JAN FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2018 - (1994 -Official Website -JAN-PT4 -2018 )--JANFREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2018

JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2018 _  JAN FREEDOM NOW HOME 2018

ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY. ORG.UK.

FREEDOM-UNITY.

*

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links- IMMIGRATION-

ENGLAND FILE

 'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE-  EU FILE   IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID FILE

BULLETINS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links- IMMIGRATION-ARCHIVE- EU FILE

JANUARY 23-BREXIT NOW-2017--       - (1994 -Official Website-JAN-PT 4- 2018 ) -   JANUARY 23-BREXIT NOW-2017-PT1 -

JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2018

JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2018

JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2018

JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART1-2018

 JANUARY -FREEDOM NOW-NEW HOME- 2018

 
 

 

Lets return to our old values, says, Rees-Mogg.

BY Jason Groves-Political Editor-Daily Mail -Monday, January 8,2018

 

 

THERESA May must return to Tory values of individual choice and free trade, Jacob Rees-Mogg has warned.

He fears the Conservatives will lose further ground to Jeremy Corbyn unless the Prime Minister goes back to

'First Principles'.

The prominent Brexiteer is tipped by some as a future Tory leader, although he is not expected to be given a ministerial position in Mrs May's reshuffle.

Mr Rees-Mogg also warned that the poor relationship between Mrs May and Chancellor Philip Hammond is hampering government.

And he encouraged ministers to embrace

BREXIT,

saying that the government had been 'too timid'. Writing in the Sun, Rees Mogg urged the PM to put clear blue water between the Tories and Labour by highlighting the fundamental 'dividing lines' between the two parties.

'Tories want to help people to ,lead lives they want and to remove as many obstacies as possible,' he said.

'The socialist aims to cajole people into leading lives that are "good" for them. Tories are more realistic about human nature and generally more pragmatic.

Some Eurosceptics have privately urged Mrs May to sack her Chancellor into today's reshuffle to prevent him watering down Brexit.

Mr Rees-Mogg said: 'The whole government machine ought to be directed towards the benefit of Brexit and not the timorous efforts of managing decline, a recipe for failure popular with too many post-war British politicians.'

'In this regard, it is essential that the PM and Chancellor improve their working relationship and advocate the same policies. No government works when these two figures are not united.'

Mr Ress-Mogg said Brexit could bring huge benefits, including cheaper prices and real control over Britain's future. But he added: 'Here the Government has been too timid. It is as if it were carrying out a policy reluctantly- one foist upon it by the electorate, not one it really and enthusiastically wants.'

[And the past events or more precisely non-events since the referendum have confirmed this analysis.]

 

 

 

This isn't the Britain we fought for,' say the 'unknown warriors' of WWII
 


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1229643/This-isnt-Britain-fought-say-unknown-warriors-WWII.html#ixzz53txyBNPw
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

January 8,2018

H.F.1435

Brexit

– Britain Challenges Covert Fourth Reich & its Secret Space Program

Britain Challenges Covert Fourth ReichFrom June 17, 1940 to June 22, 1941, Great Britain stood alone against the Nazi Third Reich which had blitzed mainland Europe and forged an alliance of convenience with the Soviet Union in splitting Poland asunder. Now, 75 years later, with the June 23 decision to leave the European Union, Great Britain has issued a clear challenge to a secret ‘Fourth Reich”, covertly established by breakaway Nazi groups in South America and Antarctica, who during WWII had established an advanced space program, and later exerted an increasingly powerful hidden influence over the European Union.

The roots of the infiltration of the European Union and its predecessors by breakaway Nazi groups after WWII can be traced to a decision taken by Deputy Fuhrer Martin Bormann on August 10, 1944 soon after the Allied armies landed on the beaches of Normandy. Bormann had secretly brought together leading German industrialists and told them the war was lost.

A U.S. Military Intelligence document called the “Red House Report,” dated November 7, 1944, describes how German industrialists were told to evacuate all available assets to neutral countries using thousands of shell companies designed to hide the massive out-flow of Nazi capital and industrial resources.

Red House Report

The source of the secret orders, according Paul Manning, author of the book Martin Bormann: Nazi in Exile, was Bormann whose influence over the Nazi Party increasingly grew as Hitler became increasingly despondent over impending defeat.

Bormann was explicit that the financial assets sent out of Germany would be subsequently used to establish a Fourth Reich by covert economic means as relayed through his emissary Dr. Scheid:

From now on also German industry must realize that the war cannot be won and that it must take steps in preparation for a post-war commercial campaign. Each industrialist must make contacts and alliances with foreign firms, but this must be done individually and without attracting any suspicion. Moreover, the ground would have to be laid on the financial level for borrowing considerable sums from foreign countries after the war.
 

The report went on to describe Bormann’s plan for the emergence of a new German Empire, a Fourth Reich:

[I]t was stated that the Nazi Party had informed the industrialists that the war was practically lost but that it would continue until a guarantee of the unity of Germany could be obtained. German industrialists must, it was said, through their exports increase the strength of Germany. They must also prepare themselves to finance the Nazi Party which would be forced to go underground as Maquis (in Gebirgaverteidigungastellen gehen). From now on the government would allocate large sums to industrialists so that each could establish a secure post-war foundation in foreign countries. Existing financial reserves in foreign countries must be placed at the disposal of the Party so that a strong German Empire can be created after the defeat.
 

What gave significant muscle to the covert project to establish a Fourth Reich by economic means was a secret space program established in Antarctica during World War II.

A number of credible whistleblowers have come forward to describe the building of a Nazi secret space program in Antarctica, which achieved incredible success in launching missions to the moon, Mars and elsewhere in deep space even while hostilities were occurring in mainland Europe.
 

Dark Fleet Base on Moon

Alleged Moon Base built by Nazi Germany and now belonging to a secret “Fourth Reich” space program called the “Dark Fleet”. Graphic: Sphere Being Alliance

Many of these whistleblower testimonies are described at length in the book, Insiders Reveal Secret Space Programs and Extraterrestrial Alliances (2015). Since its publication, another witness, William Tompkins, has come forward to describe his participation in a covert US Navy program to penetrate the Nazi’s top secret aerospace programs during WWII, discover what they were doing in Antarctica, and to disseminate this information to U.S. think tanks and industry.

Tompkins has supplied documents to confirm his incredible testimony. Furthermore, two retired U.S. Navy officers have come forward to validate his expertise regarding “special projects,” which Tompkins ran from 1985 to 1999, involving advanced aerospace technologies related to to both Nazi and U.S. secret space programs that he had acquired during his career in the aerospace industry and covert Navy service.

Tompkins’ testimony confirms that the Nazi’s secret space program hidden in Antarctica beat back successive attempts by the British and the U.S. to eradicate the Nazi’s subterranean bases in both Antarctic and South America. Admiral Byrd’s Operation Highjump 1946/47 was the most publicized effort, but the British had also staged their own unsuccessful attempts using special forces in the Antarctic summer of 1945/46.
 

By 1952, the Nazi secret space program based in Antarctica had developed to the extent that they could now conduct overflights of major U.S. cities, including Washington DC., to pressure the Truman and Eisenhower administrations to negotiate a treaty.

The principal figure in the secret treaty negotiations was the then chief of CIA covert operations, Allen Dulles. In 1950, he was recruited by the CIA Director at the time, General Walter Bedell Smith, to become Deputy Director of Plans and Deputy Director of Central Intelligence – second only to Smith. Dulles was promoted to CIA Director in February 1953 upon Smith’s retirement.

During WWII, Dulles was the head of the Office of Strategic Services based in Bern, Switzerland, and specialized in forming secret deals with Nazi German officials for a negotiated end to military hostilities. “Operation Sunrise”, where Dulles negotiated with Waffen SS General Karl Wolf over the surrender of German troops in Italy, is the most well known of these secret negotiations.

What is not well known is Dulles’ involvement in a number of secret deals, with the approval of British Military Intelligence (MI6), which allowed prominent Nazi officials such as Adolf Hitler, Martin Borman, etc., to leave Europe for refuge in South America. Harry Cooper’s, Hitler in Argentina, provides extensive evidence that both Hitler and Bormann had indeed escaped to Argentina. In exchange, the Nazis facilitated the process by which some of their scientific expertise and technologies in Europe would be handed over to the Americans and British.

Surprisingly, Dulles himself hinted at the truth of such claims to Paul Manning regarding his research for Martin Bormann: Nazi in Exile. In his acknowledgements, Manning wrote about his personal meetings with Dulles prior to his death in 1969:

To Allen W. Dulles, for his encouragement and assurance that I was “on the right track and should keep going” after reading my German research notes in preparation for this book, during the afternoons we talked in his house on Q Street in Washington, D.C.

The extraction of 1500 Nazi scientists to the USA after WWII in Project Paperclip, and a similar removal of Nazi scientists to Britain, was merely one aspect of the secret agreements negotiated with the Nazis by Dulles and others.

Project_Paperclip_Team_at_Fort_Bliss

Project Paperclip Nazi Scientists at Fort Bliss, Texas in 1946

What the U.S. and British intelligence communities were aware of, however, was that the Nazi’s most advanced weapons, scientific expertise and aerospace projects were hidden in Antarctica, and outside the scope of the secret agreements forged by Dulles and British Intelligence with Nazi officials in Europe.

In 1951, six European nations established the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), aimed to foster free trade and to prevent a future European war. The ECSC would provide an ideal platform for the Nazis to covertly begin establishing a Fourth Reich through economic means, as Bormann had planned back in 1944.

Nazi capital could now be strategically moved to take over companies both in the U.S. and Europe that would covertly re-establish Nazi influence. According to Tompkins, this was especially the case in the U.S. aerospace industry where Nazi scientific expertise was highly valued by the Military Industrial Complex.

Tompkins has privately confirmed to me that some Project Paperclip scientists were allowed to secretly travel to Antarctica to learn about the latest technologies in the breakaway German space program. He said that the U.S. intelligence community hoped the Project Paperclip scientists would learn things that would help the emerging U.S. space program. Instead, the Project Paperclip scientists helped the breakaway Nazi groups sabotage and slow down U.S. efforts which began in the late 1940’s.

In the early 1950’s while employed with Douglas Aircraft Company, Tompkins began designing kilometer long spacecraft for a future U.S. Navy space program.

Tompkins-Spacecraft Carrier

Dulles and the CIA were instrumental in creating the Bilderberg Group, which held its first meeting in May 1954. It would be an important tool for encouraging the development of a European super state, which would be gradually infiltrated and eventually taken over by a covert Fourth Reich.

The European Union was designed to accumulate power behind faceless bureaucrats, who would follow the dictates of leading European industrialists, who were increasingly being influenced by Nazi interests associated with the Fourth Reich. This concentration of power was achieved through the European Commission, which comprises a single representative from each member state – currently 28.

The European Commission website describes the Commission as the “EU’s executive body” whose main role is to “propose legislation,” and “enforce European law.” The European Union Parliament, the only truly democratic institution in the European Union, is described as a “co-legislator” with the authority to adopt or reject proposed laws.

Who then proposes ideas to EU Commissioners for new laws? Robito Chapwin, writing for the popular website Collective Evolution, provides a startling answer:

They come from the The European Round Table of Industrialists. The ERT consists of “around 50 Chief Executives and Chairmen of major multinational companies” and the ERT was formed with the express intention of shaping and furthering EU integration.
 

Chapwin’s answer is supported by what we know about the Red House Report where Bormann explicitly referred to German industrialists as the mechanism by which a covert Fourth Reich would be established after WWII.

Significantly, in 1983, the CEO of Volvo, Pehr Gyllenhammar, initiated the creation of the European Round Table of Industrialists. Volvo and its controllers, were identified by Dr. Steven Greer, head of the UFO Disclosure Project, as part of a shady international system managing advanced technology issues involving extraterrestrial life and secret space programs.

Here is the welcome message to the The European Round Table of Industrialists by its current chairman, Benoît Potier:

The European Round Table of Industrialists (ERT) is a forum bringing together around 50 Chief Executives and Chairmen of major multinational companies of European parentage covering a wide range of industrial and technological sectors.  Companies of ERT Members are widely situated across Europe, with combined revenues exceeding € 2,135 billion, sustaining around 6.8 million jobs in the region. They invest more than € 55 billion annually in R&D, largely in Europe.
 

Thus the European Union was designed to concentrate power in arcane bureaucracies, rather than the parliamentary institutions created to represent the will of the European population.

Consequently, the European Parliament became at best a rubber stamp that approved decisions taken by European Union bureaucrats placed in power by behind the scenes deal making. The European Parliament became a charade for representing the will of Europeans, but was nevertheless lauded as a model for regional integration in other areas of the world.
 

Eventually a future World Union, featuring a Parliament and governing institutions modelled on the EU, would have been introduced, heralding the final stage in the covert plan for a ‘global’ Fourth Reich.  

The decision by Britain to end its participation in the European Union puts an end to the fiction that the EU genuinely represents the will of the European populace. Brexit, furthermore, represents a major setback to the covert plan to establish a global Fourth Reich where the European Union would have been offered as a viable model for a “World Union”.

There should be no confusion that Brexit represents a major challenge to a covert Fourth Reich with its own secret space program, significant industrial assets spread around the world, and its long term plans for global dominance through covert economic means.

It does not appear coincidental that the year-long political process leading to the Brexit vote, occurred at roughly the same time a space war is reportedly being waged against the Fourth Reich and its allies, in Antarctica and Deep Space. If such reports are correct, as a May 26 letter by President Barack Obama to the U.S. Congress suggests, then Britain may once again, as it did 75 years ago, be leading the way in confronting a resurgent Nazi Reich as a global threat. 

© Michael E. Salla, Ph.D. Copyright Notice

[Update: 6/28. An earlier version of this article mistakenly identified Volkswagen and Volvo as the same company. The article has been revised to remove the error.]

Further Reading

 

(Visited 13,281 times, 4 visits today)

Comments

Tags: Adolph Hitler, Allen Dulles, Brexit, European Commission, European Round Table of Industrialists, European Union, Great Britain, Martin Bormann, Nazi Germany, Red House Report, Volvo

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.

 

H.F.1239

H

 
 

September 2015.

Thousands of Syrian migrants crossing the Balkan route were heading toward Germany. Chancellor Angela Merkel was on the phone with Interior Minister Thomas de Maizière, talking about a number of measures to protect the borders, where thousands of policemen were secretly located along with buses and helicopters. De Maizière turned for advice to Dieter Romann, then head of the police. "Can we live with the images that will come out?" de Mazière asked. "What happens if 500 refugees with children in their arms run toward the border guards?"

De Maiziére was told that the appropriate use of the measures to be taken would have be decided by the police on the field. When de Maizière relayed Romann's response to the Chancellor, Merkel reversed her original commitment. And the borders were opened for 180 days.

"For historical reasons, the Chancellor feared images of armed German police confronting civilians on our borders," writes Robin Alexander, Die Welt's leading journalist, who revealed these details in a new book, Die Getriebenen ("The Driven Ones"). Alexander reveals the real reason that pushed Merkel to open the door to a million and a half migrants in a few weeks: "In the end, Merkel refused to take responsibility, governing through the polls." This is how the famous Merkel's motto "Wir schaffen das" was born:

"We can do it."

According to Die Zeit:

"Merkel and her people are convinced that the marchers could only be stopped with the help of violence: with water cannons, truncheons and pepper spray. It would be chaotic and the images would be horrific. Merkel is extremely wary of such images and of their political impact, and she is convinced that Germany wouldn't tolerate them. Merkel once said that Germany wouldn't be able to stand the images from the dismal conditions in the refugee camp at Calais for more than three days. But how much more devastating would images be of refugees being beaten as they try to get to Austria or Germany?"

Merkel's refugee policy was not a masterpiece of humanitarian politics; it was dictated by the fear of television images spread all over the world. In so many key moments, it is the photograph that dictates our behavior: the image that dishonors us, that makes us cringe in horror.

Now, the main German sentiment that seems to be driving public opinion and politics is a dramatic sense of guilt. It is a "secular sin", according to a new book by German sociologist Rolf Peter Sieferle that is topping the German bestseller list, "Finis Germania".

The behavior of Germans during the current migrant crisis, however, is symbolic of a more general Western condition. On April 30, 1975, the fall of Saigon was part of a war fought and lost by the United States as much on television as in the Vietnamese forests and rice paddies. It ended with the the escape of helicopters from the rooftop of the US embassy.

In 1991, the imagery of the "highway of death" of Saddam Hussein's bombed army of thugs fleeing a plundered Kuwait also shocked the public in the West, and led to calls for an immediate cessation of the fighting in Iraq and Kuwait. The result was that Saddam Hussein's air force and Republican Guard divisions were spared; during the "peace" that followed, it was these troops who butchered Kurds and Shiites.

The photograph of a dead American soldier dragged through the streets of Mogadishu after the "Black Hawk Down" incident pushed President Bill Clinton to order a shameful retreat from Somalia. That photograph also led the US Administration to rethink and cancel plans to use US troops for United Nations peace operations in Bosnia, Haiti and other strategic points. General David Petraeus would describe America's engagement in Afghanistan as a "war of perception".

Even the suffering of our enemies disturbs us, in the humanitarian culture of the West. We are therefore increasingly amenable to policies of appeasement, censorship and retreat, in order not to have to face the possibility of such horribleness and actually having to fight it.

That is why radical Islam has been able to horrify the West into submission. We have paralysed ourselves. We censor the cartoons, the graphic photos of the terrorists' victims and even the faces and names of the jihadists. The Islamic terrorists, on the other hand, are not publicity-seekers; they are soldiers ready to die and kill in the name of what they care about.

This week, the German media was shocked by the revelation that the German air force will probably come under fire during its Syrian mission. "Endangering German soldiers!" -- with an exclamation point -- wrote Bild, the largest-selling newspaper in Germany. The statement exposed the anxiety of what John Vinocur of the Wall Street Journal called a "country where the army and air force basically do not fight". A pacifist Germany is now a source of trouble also for its own neighbors, such as Poland. "For centuries, our main worry in Poland was a very strong German army", said former Polish Defense Minister Janusz Onyszkiewicz. "Today, we're seriously worried about German armed forces that are too weak."

The Western establishment censors images of our enemies' crimes while giving prominence to our "guilt". The French government censored the "gruesome torture" of the victims at the Bataclan Theater, who were castrated, disemboweled and had their eyes gouged out by the Islamist terrorists. It was a mistake: it was in the public interest to know exactly what enemy we are facing.

The FBI and Department of Justice released a transcript of the Orlando jihadist's 911 call, but omitted all reference to the terror group ISIS and to Islam. These authorities did not want the public to know that Omar Mateen identified himself as an "Islamic soldier".

The European Commission against Racism and Intolerance then told the British press it should not report when terrorists are Muslim.

The CEO of Twitter, Dick Costolo, suspended accounts that showed photographs of the beheading of John Foley, along with other Islamist beheadings and savagery. But Twitter did not mind being flooded by images of a little dead boy, Alan (Aylan) Kurdi on a beach.

The mainstream media in the US fought hard to lift the photo ban on military coffins during the war in Iraq. Its goal, apparently, was to humiliate and intimidate the public, to lower the support for the war.

Images, as in Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib, are published only if they amplify the West's sense of guilt and turn the "war on terror" into something more even more dangerous than the jihad causing the war.

Amnesty International's Secretary General, Irene Khan -- referring to concentration camps in the Soviet Union, where millions of people perished -- infamously called Guantanamo "the Gulag of our time". The result is to erase our enemy from our imagination. This is how the "war on terror" has become synonymous with lawlessness throughout the West.

Ten years ago, after the brave surge in Iraq, US soldiers discovered Al Qaeda's torture chambers. No one -- not ABC, not CBS, not the New York Times -- published one photo of them; they just filled our eyes with naked bodies at Abu Ghraib.

We are utopian technophiles and, contrary to the traditional Western view that we are flawed human beings in a tragic world. We now believe in Mark Zuckerberg's brave new world where no one should ever suffer and everyone should be happy and peaceful all the time. That is an exorbitant dream. For a short time we can afford it, as with Angela Merkel and Europe's migrant crisis. Unfortunately, that fantasy will not last. The conflicts at our gates, together with our aversion to making hard choices, will exact a far higher price.

Giulio Meotti, Cultural Editor for Il Foglio, is an Italian journalist and author.

*

    Is Radical Islam Horrifying the West into Paralysis?

    https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10603/radical-islam-west
    5 days ago ... That is why radical Islam has been able to horrify the West into submission. We
    have paralyzed ourselves. We censor the cartoons, the graphic ...

     

    Is Radical Islam Horrifying The West Into Paralysis? | Zero Hedge

    www.zerohedge.com/.../radical-islam-horrifying-west-paralysis
    3 days ago ... That is why radical Islam has been able to horrify the West into submission. We
    have paralyzed ourselves. We censor the cartoons, the graphic ...

     

    Is Radical Islam Horrifying The West Into Paralysis? | Net News

    world.news.sorozatwiki.hu/.../is-radical-islam-horrifying-the-west-into-paralysis
    2 days ago ... Authored by Giulio Meottie via The Gatestone Institute,German Chancellor
    Angela Merkel's refugee policy was not a masterpiece of ...

     

    Is Radical Islam Horrifying The West Into Paralysis? | Latest News ...

    todaynewsheadlines.444.hu/.../is-radical-islam-horrifying-the-west-into-paralysis
    2 days ago ... Authored by Giulio Meottie via The Gatestone Institute,German Chancellor
    Angela Merkel's refugee policy was not a masterpiece of ...

     

    Is Radical Islam Horrifying the West into Paralysis? | Elite Trader

    https://www.elitetrader.com/.../is-radical-islam-horrifying-the-west-into-paralysis.311003/
    1 day ago ... https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/10603/radical-islam-west.
     

    Is Radical Islam Horrifying The West Into Paralysis? - Long Room

    https://www.longroom.com/.../is-radical-islam-horrifying-the-west-into-paralysis
    3 days ago ... That is why radical Islam has been able to horrify the West into submission. We
    have paralyzed ourselves. We censor the cartoons, the graphic ...

     

    Is Radical Islam Horrifying the West into Paralysis? - Sharia Watch UK

    www.shariawatch.org.uk/?q.../radical-islam-horrifying-west-paralysis
    4 days ago ... German Chancellor Angela Merkel's refugee policy was not a masterpiece of
    humanitarian politics; it was dictated by the fear of television ...

     

    Richard Falknor on Twitter: ""Is Radical Islam Horrifying the West ...

    https://twitter.com/i/web/status/884146467518246913
    13 hours ago ... "Is Radical Islam Horrifying the West into Paralysis?" Lost Our Will To Survive?
    http://tinyurl.com/ya3hatga We can't even fight the corrupt ...

     

    Is Radical Islam Horrifying The West Into Paralysis? | State of Globe

    stateofglobe.com/.../is-radical-islam-horrifying-the-west-into-paralysis/
    3 days ago ... Source: Zero Hedge Authored by Giulio Meottie via The Gatestone Institute,
    German Chancellor Angela Merkel's refugee policy was not a ...

     

    Is Radical Islam Horrifying The West Into Paralysis? | NewZSentinel

    newzsentinel.com/is-radical-islam-horrifying-the-west-into-paralysis/
    3 days ago ... That is why radical Islam has been able to horrify the West into submission. We
    have paralyzed ourselves. We censor the cartoons, the graphic ...

     
  1. What Is Radicalisation? - Childline Is Here To Help

    Ad                   www.childline.org.uk/

*  *  *

FOREIGN  AID

[IF ALL THE RESOURCES OF FOREIGN AID FROM GERMANY-BRITAIN-USA AND FROM OTHER COUNTRIES HAD BEEN UTILIZED EARLY TO DEAL WITH POSSIBLE ONE OF THE WORST EXAMPLES OF THE  AFFECTS OF GREED ON THE POLICIES OF WHAT ARE CONSIDERED MORAL NATIONS AT THE OUTSET OF THIS DEMOGRAPHIC DISASTER WE WOULD NOT BE IN THE DISASTROUS SITUATION THAT THE PEOPLE OF EUROPE AND BRITAIN [ENGLAND] NOW FIND THEMSELVES.

WE ARE NOW INFORMED THAT 7 OUT OF 10 OF THOSE SEEKING A HOME IN EUROPE ARE NOT REFUGEES - BUT ECONOMIC MIGRANTS. WHICH CONFIRMS THAT AN EARLY RECOGNITION OF THIS FACT WOULD SHOW IN WHICH DIRECTION THE WEST'S OBJECTIVE SHOULD PROCEEED. 

THE FAULT FOR THIS MASSIVE EXODUS FROM THE MIDDLE EAST RESTS WITH THE POLITICIANS OF THE USA AND BRITAIN AND OTHER HISTORICAL OIL DISTRIBUTION NATIONS MANY STILL CAPTIVE WHO ARE WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE UK WITH BREXIT TO HAND ARE BUT REGIONS WITHIN A NAZI-PLANNED EUROPEAN UNION WHICH NOW FINDS ITSELF THE VICTIM OF ITS OWN MAKING.  INDIVIDUAL NATION STATES WOULD HAVE SEEN CLEARLY THE RISKS BUT AS SHOWN BY THE ARTICLE ABOVE THEY DID NOT SEE THE DEMOGRAPHIC DISASTER UNTIL IT WAS UPON THEM.]

*

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

JULY 10-2017

H F 1250BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER.

 

BROUGHT FORWARD FROM 2009

[WHAT PROGRESS HAS BEEN MADE]

SHOULD GOVERNMENT COLLECT TAXES IN ORDER TO WASTE MONEY

 

The sole legitimate function of Government- is to Protect The Rights of its Citizens

 

By

 

Vernon Coleman
 

www.vernoncoleman.com

 

That is why governments were created. It is why they exist. There is no other reason. A government only has the right to tax people in order to pursue that simple aim. It does not have the right to raise taxes if it intends to waste that money or, worse still, to use the money to oppress the citizens. It does not have the right to raise money through taxation when that money will be used to push through legislation, which takes away the citizen’s Freedom.

But how many of the things our Government- and the EU- do, are done to protect the right to Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness?

 [FROM 2002]

Just look at what citizens everywhere have a right to expect from their Government – and how our Government is failing in its duty.

1.            Citizens have a right to be able to walk the streets safely – day or night. But there are very few towns in England today where it is safe for a law-abiding citizen to walk after 10pm.

2.            Citizens have a right to know that their politicians will keep their promises. If politicians don’t their electoral promises what is the point in voting for them? Blair & Co. have lied [and still lying in 2004]

3.            Citizens have a right to live their lives freely and in privacy. But Blair & Co. has steadily removed freedoms and the right of privacy. English citizens are losing their status as citizens and rapidly becoming serfs in Blairdom.

4.            Citizens have a right to know that their Government will protect them when on foreign soil. But evidence shows that our Government will not protect English citizens when they are abroad. The elected Prime Minister is more concerned with helping the Americans than looking after the people who pay his wages.

5.            Citizens have a right to know that our taxes are used only for essential and approved public services – and that our money is not wasted. Blair’s Government has wasted billions of pounds of taxpayers’ hard earned money. Vast quantities of cash have been frittered away on absurdly expensive wallpaper, (parts of which now need to be replaced in 2004) the pointless Dome, (still costing £250,000 per month in 2004) personal servants and vast numbers of spin-doctors.

6.            Citizens have a right to be able to travel around the country freely and safely. The English now have a transport system, which is the worst in the world. Train travel has become an expensive lottery with no prizes. Road travel is slow and hazardous. The police are more concerned with collecting speeding fines than keeping traffic moving safely. (Certainly no improvement since 2002)

7. Citizens have a right to know that they will be able to find good health care when and where they need it. But health care in England is a constantly deteriorating shambles. The Government has given up and is now paying to send a few selected patients abroad for treatment.

8.            Citizens have a right to know that their Government will protect their savings and investments. But the Government itself stole billions from small savers by stealing Railtrack from its shareholders.

9.            Citizens have a right to know that their Government will provide decent education for their children. But the level of illiteracy in England is rising dramatically. Schools are dismal. Teachers are demoralised. There is little discipline or learning.

10.    Citizens have a right to clean drinking water and to be able to buy good quality food at reasonable prices.

11.    Citizens have a right to know that the taxes they are charged will be fair and that the money raised will be used for the benefit of the community.

12.    Citizens have a right to know that their security and freedom will be protected by a fair system of justice- with honest policemen and courts administering justice fairly. This we do not have.

 

Citizens everywhere have a right to expect their Government to set an example: to be honest, honourable and fair in their dealings. But the English have a Government, which is dishonest, dishonourable and unfair.

 

Any government exists to make its citizens’ lives better and freer. That is what it is there for. Politicians are paid well, and given numerous perks, in order to provide their employers (the electorate) with good government.

 

But in a what way has the Blair government (now well into its second term and therefore no longer able to blame the previous government for everything that goes wrong) contributed to the freedom and well being of English citizens?

 

If a company fails to fulfil its promises to its customers it will be hauled into court. Why are Blair and his wretched companions immune to the law?

 

It is the duty of those in government to behave responsibly and in the public interest. But most of those in government now are too conceited, too arrogant and too concerned with their own personal futures to put the public interest anywhere near the top of their personal agenda.

 

It is hardly surprising that the exodus of English citizens, leaving to live abroad, now exceeds the number of alleged asylum seekers arriving in England to take advantage of the free benefits system. (Although, for the record, most asylum seekers don’t use the English health service- they go home when they need medical treatment).

 

We have accepted all this because we do not see an alternative.

 

Blair’s Government is the most uncaring, irresponsible and dishonest of my lifetime, though I doubt if the Conservative or Liberals would do a better job. That is the shame of modern politicians.

 

It is our silent acquiescence, which enables Blair to cheat us in this way. That is our shame

 

The easiest thing is to do nothing

 [to leave it to others to fight your battle to reclaim your ‘rights and liberties’]

 

The easy way out is to turn our backs; to console ourselves with the thought that we can do nothing to change the way things are.

 

And if we choose to do that then we can hardly complain if things continue to get worse: if our freedoms and privacy and rights continue to disappear and our leaders continue to treat us without respect.

 

But should we really allow them to continue to get away with their arrogance and their deceit?

 

We have been betrayed by a bunch of greedy, uncaring, deceitful men and women who are concerned only with their careers.

 

Blair has cheated the public. New Labour has put up taxes dramatically but has invested far too little in new hospitals, schools and roads.

Where did all the money go?

 

Blair and his wastrel chums [ and later Cameron] spent it on spin doctors, parties and fancy wallpaper. But most of all it gave it away to EU bureaucrats.

 

As a result we now live in the worst and feeblest ‘developed’ country in the world.

 

If we do nothing England under Blair will soon become a Third World country. We need to act together. We need to take back our country from the no-hopers who are running it into the ground.

 

Look up the word ‘kakistocracy’ in the dictionary. It means’ the government of a state by the worst citizens. And that is what we’ve got. We are living in a kakistocracy

 

We do not have to give in and let our world be ruined by unimaginative, second rate citizens.

Together we can do anything we want to do.

 

How many marks out of ten would you give your Government for honesty, decency, caring, and efficiency?

 2002

 

*          *

 

Words of a great Prime Minister, William Ewart Gladstone, are much to the point:

 

‘’The finance of any country is ultimately associated with the liberties of the country. It is a powerful leverage by which English liberty has been gradually acquired. If the House of Commons by any possibility loses the control of the grants of public money, depend upon it, your very liberty will be worth very little in comparison. That powerful leverage has been what is commonly known as the power of the purse – the control of the House of Commons over public expenditure’’ (1891)

*

[This article was written in 2002 and in the space of 15 years has there been any improvement in a government's handling of the tax-payers contribution. The answer is NO! The greatest waste of money apart from the inflated salaries and pensions of  many civil servants is that of the infamous FOREIGN AID BUDGET which makes a mockery of any pretence of public accountability of the PUBLIC PURSE.]

AUGUST 3-2017

More!

H.F.1271 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

 
 

Islamic State in Asia: Saudi-Funding and Naive Policymakers Endanger Region

 
June 1, 2017 (Joseph Thomas - NEO) - Recently, terrorist attacks have unfolded across Indonesia, a militant network disrupted along the Thai-Malaysian border and full-scale military operations including aerial bombing deployed as Philippine troops fought to take back Marawi City on the southern island of Mindanao, all linked or affiliated with the Islamic State.

 

A dangerously deceptive narrative is being crafted by US and European media organisations, the same sort of narrative that was used to conceal the true source of the Islamic State's fighting capacity across the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region beginning as early as 2011.

The New York Times, for example, in an article titled, "
In Indonesia and Philippines, Militants Find a Common Bond: ISIS," claims:
 
An eruption of violence in the southern Philippines and suicide bombings in Indonesia this week highlight the growing threat posed by militant backers of the Islamic State in Southeast Asia. 

While the timing of the Jakarta bombings and the fighting on the southern Philippine island of Mindanao appears to be coincidental, experts on terrorism have been warning for months that the Islamic State, also known as ISIS, has provided a new basis for cooperation among extremists in the region.
However, back in reality, the Islamic State is no different than any other military force. Its members require food, water and shelter daily. They require weapons and ammunition. They require uniforms. They need transportation, which in turn requires fuel, maintenance personnel and spare parts. And most important of all, the Islamic State requires a steady stream of recruits made possible only through organised education and indoctrination.

For the scale the Islamic State is doing this on, stretching across MENA and now reaching into Southeast Asia, confounding the response of not just individual nation-states but entire blocs of nations attempting to confront this growing threat, it is abundantly clear the Islamic State is not fulfilling these prerequisites on its own.

Its doing this all through state sponsorship, a reality rarely mentioned by the New York Times,  Agence France-Presse, Associated Press, CNN, the BBC and others. Those acquiring their worldview through these media organisations are setting themselves up and those depending on their analysis for tragic failure.

Education and Indoctrination: Who is Feeding the Fire?  

The ranks of the Islamic State in Southeast Asia are being filled by a regional network of extremist indoctrination conducted in institutions posing as Islamic boarding schools known as madrasas. Those institutions indoctrinating local populations with notions of extremism and inspiring them to take up violence and terrorism share a common denominator; Saudi funding.


 

Visiting Senior Research Fellow at the Center for Technology and National Security Policy at the National Defense University, Yousaf Butt, in a Huffington Post article titled, "How Saudi Wahhabism Is the Fountainhead of Islamist Terrorism," would put Saudi funding of such extremist networks into perspective, stating:
 
It would be troublesome but perhaps acceptable for the House of Saud to promote the intolerant and extremist Wahhabi creed just domestically. But, unfortunately, for decades the Saudis have also lavishly financed its propagation abroad. Exact numbers are not known, but it is thought that more than $100 billion have been spent on exporting fanatical Wahhabism to various much poorer Muslim nations worldwide over the past three decades. It might well be twice that number. By comparison, the Soviets spent about $7 billion spreading communism worldwide in the 70 years from 1921 and 1991.
The article also lays out the cause and effect between Saudi funding and the predictable terrorism, violence and instability that follows. Yousaf Butt concludes by aptly stating:
 
The House of Saud works against the best interests of the West and the Muslim world. Muslim communities worldwide certainly need to eradicate fanatical Wahhabism from their midst, but this will be difficult, if not impossible, to accomplish if the West continues its support of the House of Saud. The monarchy must be modernized and modified — or simply uprooted and replaced. The House of Saud needs a thorough house cleaning.
The United States under the administration of President Donald Trump just sealed a $110 billion arms deal with Saudi Arabia, following tens of billions of dollars of weapon deals under the previous administration of President Barack Obama, and in turn following a pattern of decades of military, political and economic support for the Persian Gulf state. Western support for the House of Saud appears to be fully intact and in no danger of changing any time soon.


 

The direct connection between terrorism ranging from Al Qaeda to the Islamic State and Saudi-funded indoctrination is clear. Yet US and European media organisations attempt to muddle the issue with unwarranted ambiguity.

New York Times articles like, "
Saudis and Extremism: ‘Both the Arsonists and the Firefighters’," go as far as stating:
 
Over the next four decades, in non-Muslim-majority countries alone, Saudi Arabia would build 1,359 mosques, 210 Islamic centers, 202 colleges and 2,000 schools. Saudi money helped finance 16 American mosques; four in Canada; and others in London, Madrid, Brussels and Geneva, according to a report in an official Saudi weekly, Ain al-Yaqeen. The total spending, including supplying or training imams and teachers, was “many billions” of Saudi riyals (at a rate of about four to a dollar), the report said.

And continues by stating:
 
That is the disputed question, of course: how the world would be different without decades of Saudi-funded shaping of Islam. Though there is a widespread belief that Saudi influence has contributed to the growth of terrorism, it is rare to find a direct case of cause and effect. For example, in Brussels, the Grand Mosque was built with Saudi money and staffed with Saudi imams. In 2012, according to Saudi diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks, one Saudi preacher was removed after Belgian complaints that he was a “true Salafi” who did not accept other schools of Islam. And Brussels’ immigrant neighborhoods, notably Molenbeek, have long been the home of storefront mosques teaching hard-line Salafi views. 

After the terrorist attacks in Paris in November and in Brussels in March were tied to an Islamic State cell in Belgium, the Saudi history was the subject of several news media reports. Yet it was difficult to find any direct link between the bombers and the Saudi legacy in the Belgian capital.
Yet commonsense, when applied, takes into consideration the substantial intelligence networks and police states that exist across the European Union's various members and the fact that in the aftermath of most recent terrorist attacks it is revealed that security services across Europe often had foreknowledge of suspects, their criminal backgrounds and activities as well as their ties to extremism both within their own communities in Europe and abroad upon battlefields in Syria, Iraq, Yemen and Libya.

It is well within the means of US and European intelligence and security agencies to establish a direct link between terrorism and Saudi funding. What is lacking is the political will to do so.


A Global Expeditionary Force That Goes Where Western Troops Cannot

It is clear that despite the New York Times attempting to make a connection between Saudi-funded indoctrination at mosques and madrasas and terrorism as ambiguous as possible, Saudi funding is the primary factor driving extremism and filling the ranks of terrorist organisations like Al Qaeda and the Islamic State.

Coupled with covert, indirect and direct military support when these extremists reach various battlefields around the world, Saudi-funded extremism represents what is essentially a mercenary expeditionary force, auxiliaries used in pursuit of modern day empire.

As witnessed in Libya and Syria, the purpose behind the United States and Europe supporting Saudi Arabia and turning an intentional blind-eye to its global network of extremist indoctrination and the terrorist organisations these networks feed into, is targeting and overthrowing governments the United States and Europe are incapable of overthrowing directly with military force.

Saudi-funded indoctrination filling the ranks of this virtual global mercenary force, can be used as a tool for regime change. Saudi-funded extremists were instrumental in overthrowing the Libyan government in 2011, and have led the fight to oust the Syrian government.

Saudi-funded indoctrination can also be a useful tool of geopolitical coercion, opening up opportunities for the US to sell a greater military presence in any given country targeted by Saudi-funded extremism.

In fact, the New York Times' recent article, "
In Indonesia and Philippines, Militants Find a Common Bond: ISIS," hints as just such a motive in the Philippines, claiming:
 
Since the early 2000s, the United States has stationed military advisers in the southern Philippines to aid in the fight against Abu Sayyaf and other Islamic extremists. 

Richard Javad Heydarian, a political science professor at De La Salle University in Manila, said that Mr. Duterte was under mounting pressure to address the crisis in his home island, Mindanao, and that he may need further assistance from Washington.
During a period when the Philippines finds itself pivoting away from the United States and toward Beijing and other regional allies, needing "further assistance from Washington" is a circumstance too convenient to be coincidental.

Considering how the US has used Saudi-funded extremism it has enabled elsewhere, there is need for concern not only in the Philippines, but across all of Asia regarding the Islamic State's "sudden interest" in the region.

Asian Policymakers Only As Good As Their Sources 

As obvious as the truth behind the Islamic State's presence and perpetuation in Asia seems to be, many policymakers, politicians and people in the media across Asia appear to be mesmerised by US and European headlines and intentionally misleading analysis.

Eagerly republishing and repeating these headlines and analysis, policy and media circles find themselves mired in a deepening swamp of delusion. Within this swamp of delusion they are exposing Asia to the same threat the MENA region is now facing.

For a variety of reasons, extremism was allowed to take root and spread in nations like Libya and Syria, where political deals and cooperation with the US and Europe led toward greater violence and destabilisation, not toward resolving the issue of extremism
, terrorism and national or regional security.

 
 

Likewise in Asia, should the root of extremism and terrorism not be addressed, namely Saudi-funding and America's and Europe's aiding and abetting of the House of Saud, this threat will continue to be cultivated and leveraged by its creators at the cost of its Asian hosts.

While it may not be politically popular to openly expose, condemn and otherwise confront US-Saudi sponsored terrorism in fear of being ostracised from US-European media and policy circles, Asian policymakers, politicians and media should consider the fate of their MENA counterparts and the state of Libya and Syria now versus pre-2011 when there was still a chance to head off a regional humanitarian catastrophe.

The inability of Asian policymakers to clearly single out and deal with Saudi-funded, US-backed terrorism in the region allows political demagogues to play entire ethnic and religious groups off against one another, further compounding factors that fuel instability and even war. Coupled with socioeconomic factors, foreign interests seeking vectors into Asia to coerce, control or even overthrow regional governments have a wide variety of options to pick from.

Eliminating these options and closing the door to outside interference means that the Asian public must be fully and properly informed, and all forms of foreign funding and support, whether it be "schools" or nongovernmental organisations, should be called into question. It is clear that part of this process should include national and regional calls and mechanisms to end Saudi funding to organisations posing as charities, educational institutions and other fronts propagating divisive extremism.

Considering the fate of the MENA region, Asia may have only one chance to get this right. Those policymakers who prove themselves incapable of objective, truthful analysis and who find themselves simply helping along foreign interference should no longer be deferred to as policymakers, and perhaps take up a more appropriate title; lobbyists.


Joseph Thomas is chief editor of Thailand-based geopolitical journal, The New Atlas and contributor to the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”.

 
 

 

JUNE 27 -2016

H.F.1237

 
 THE CHOICE IS YOURS!

 

CHRISTIANITY IS MORE THAN A RELIGION-IT IS THE MAIN CULTURAL FORCE-WHICH MAKES US WHAT WE ARE.

 

 CHRISTIANITY AND MARRIAGE AND THE STATE**** GAMBLING AND ETHICS****CHRISTIANITY,THE PEOPLE, AND ETHICS****IMMIGRATION POLICY**** CHRISTIANITY IS MORE THAN A RELIGION-IT IS THE MAIN CULTURAL FORCE_WHICH MAKES US WHAT WE ARE****CHRISTIAN BELIEFS UNDER ATTACK BY EU'S PARLIAMENT IS INTELLECTUAL NAZISM**** A DEFENCE OF CHRISTIANITY BY A ONCE AGNOSTIC****WHO CARES ABOUT MORALITY****DEMOCRACY WITHOUT MORALITY AND RESPECT FOR INDIVIDUALITY IS DESPOTISM****THE WORLD IS DIVIDED INTO MANY RELIGIOUS CIRCLES OF INFLUENCE****THE INDIVIDUAL IS THE BACKBONE OF CHRISTIANITY****CHRISTIAN PARLIAMENTARIAN SPEAKS ON TAX BILLS-FOREIGN POLICY-PEACE-AND THE POWER OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS****OURS MIGHT BE A STRONGER AND HAPPIER SOCIETY IF CHRISTIANS WERE READIER TO DEFEND THEIR VALUES****SUNDAY SCHOOL CAN SAVE CHILDREN FROM DELINQUENCY-SAYS BISHOP****OUR CHRISTIAN FESTIVAL OF EASTER WHICH MANY KNOW SO LITTLE AND SOME NONE****

AN AGE WHEN ALL FAITHS ARE EQUAL-EXCEPT CHRISTIANITY****

LET the CHRISTMAS MESSAGE ring out WHILE you still CAN-by -MICHAEL NAZIR ALI-BISHOP OF ROCHESTER-DEC-2006****

 

WHY WE MUST REMAIN A CHRISTIAN COUNTRY

 

O COME ALL YE FAITHFUL…

EXCEPT CHRISTIANS.

 *

Multicultural polices have effectively divided the population into ethnic and faith communities.

 More!

ALFRED CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH

 

[WITHOUT A MORAL PERSPECTIVE IN POLITICS THE PEOPLE ARE TREATED NO BETTER THAN SLAVES. THE MAIN POLITICAL PARTIES ARE SUPPORTED BY THE SAME CORRUPT FINANCIAL INTERESTS-WHETHER IT IS

LEFT-RIGHT-CENTRE. . .

MOB RULE HAS EXISTED FOR WELL OVER 2000 YEARS-IT IS NOTHING NEW AND LOOKING A THE STATE OF OUR NOW RETURNED NATION STATE OF ENGLAND IN JUNE 2017 WE APPEAR TO HAVE LEARN'T NOTHING IN THAT TIME.

WE HAVE FOREIGN INTERESTS EMBEDDED IN OUR COMPLETE POLITICAL SYSTEM WHICH PREVENT THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY FROM PURSUING VITAL REFORM. WHETHER IT IS ISRAEL OR SAUDI ARABIA...WE ARE TOLD THE WORLD IS CHANGING AS THE BLOOD THIRSTY FINANCIAL JACKALS WHO HAVE BEEN IN PLACE FOR CENTURIES ARE NOW GETTING THEIR COMEUPPANCE FOR A CHANGE. IT WAS STATED NOT SO LONG AGO THAT EXTREME

VIGILANCE!

OF OUR

CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY

WAS ESSENTIAL.

UNFORTUNATELY THE GREATER NUMBER OF THE PEOPLE HAD OTHER MATTERS ON THEIR MIND AND AS A RESULT WE HAVE SPENT OVER 45 YEARS IN HITLER'S PLANNED COLLECTIVIST UNDEMOCRATIC-UNACCOUNTABLE-GODLESS EU.

 

IMMIGRATION FILE

 

 

 

H.F.1238 A CHRISTIAN CULTURE COUNTRY EMBEDDED OVER 1500 YEARS

 
 

BROUGHT FORWARD- FROM 2008 ON  JUNE 30-2017- FROM 2008-

A REMINDER OF WHO WE ARE AS A PEOPLE

 

A Commonwealth of Nations

*

On 15th May 1917 General Jan Christian Smuts of South Africa gave a Speech at Banquet in his honour by members of both Houses of Parliament.

The purpose for returning to the days of the British "Empire" is to grasp the significance of the background of the time and keep before us as we are at an epoch in 2008 in which England  will soon  be  a matter of past English history as it is now close to being annihilated as a once free and unique parliamentary democracy  and to  reappear in history as PROVINCES of a so-called UNITED STATES OF EUROPE.

*

15th May 1917

 I think we are inclined to make mistakes in thinking about this group of nations to which we belong, because too often we think of it as one State.  The British Empire is much more than a State.  I think the very impression "Empire" is misleading, because it makes people think as if we are one single entity, one unity, to which the term "Empire" can be applied.

WE ARE NOT AN EMPIRE

Germany is an Empire, so was Rome, and so is India, but we are a system of nations, a community of states, and of nations far greater than any empire which has ever existed; and by using this ancient expression we really obscure the real fact that we are larger and our whole position is different, and that

WE ARE NOT ONE NATION ,OR STATE, OR EMPIRE

but we are a whole world by ourselves, consisting of many nations and states, and all sorts of communities

UNDER ONE FLAG.

We are a system of states, not only a static system, a stationary system, but a dynamic system, growing, evolving all the time towards new destinies.

Here you have a kingdom with a number of Crown colonies: besides that you have large protectorates like Egypt, which is an Empire in itself, which was one of the greatest empires in the world.  Besides that you have great dependences like India  -an empire in itself, one of the oldest civilisations in the world, and we are busy there trying to see how East and West can work together, how the forces that has kept the East going can be worked in conjunction with the ideas we have evolved in Western civilization for enormous problems with that State.

*

[Today in 2008]

[After almost a century the caste system of serfs is still in being and a constant issue in India to this day in April 2008.  The religious question which divided the population of India which resulted on independence in the creation of the Muslim State of Pakistan after the Second World War and still results in killings and hostile action between the two in the 21st century.   In England there appears apparent calm between the two faiths of Hindu and Muslim with the former finding integration slow but possible but with the greater number of the latter wishing to remain aloof from their neighbours hopeful that they will eventually turn the host country into a Islamic State with its SHARIA Law which contrary to the "Rule of Law" has now been established in their enclaves with the apparent connivance of the police and the authorities.   If  a million UK Christians where to find themselves resettled  in Pakistan - build their churches and take to the streets and demand their right of worship and existence in a Muslim State it would be but a short interval before they were-those that were lucky to remain alive - would be hurried to make their homes elsewhere.  That is the reality of the situation.  With the Muslim population in our country enabled to settle here in such large numbers by successive governments we can hardly blame the newcomers for their energetic attempts to

MAKE THEMSELVES TRULY AT HOME 

and demand they receive preferential treatment along the way.

Of course. it will no doubt be demonstrated that a number of Muslims have integrated, possibly those who came here over the past decades. But since the explosion of immigration over the past decade it is now admitted that the chances of integration of the majority are almost zero.  And we now hear that 50,000 dependents a year will join the million plus who are already here.  THE ENEMY within is RESOURCEFUL-RELENTLESS-REVENGEFUL-REPRESSIVE and REDOUBTABLE and deserves the RESPECT by all who have no  love for THEIR OWN RELIGION -THEIR OWN CUSTOMS -THEIR OWN VALUES -THEIR OWN COUNTRY.   Only a worthy opponent with clean hands in its dealings with the ISLAMIC WORLD and the strength of RELIGIOUS purpose and confident of VICTORY knowing that their CAUSE is JUST has any possibility at all of gaining the respect of their enemy.  It is the legend of King Richard of England and Saladin rising again  in the 21st century.

 HAVE WE A CHAMPION OF OUR CAUSE? ]

*

General Smuts further commented:

But beyond that we come to the so-called Dominions, a number of nations and states almost sovereign, almost independent, who govern themselves, who have been evolved on the principles of your constitutional system, now almost independent states, and who all belong to this group, to this community of nations, which I prefer to call the British Commonwealth of nations.   Now , you see that no political ideas that we have evolved in the past, no nomenclature will apply to this world which is comprised in the British Empire; any expression,, any name which we have found so far for this group has been insufficient, and I think the man who would discover the real appropriate name for this vast system of entities would be doing a great service not only to the country, but to constitutional theory.

I think that this is the fundamental fact, whish we have to bear in mind - that the British Empire, or this British Commonwealth of nations, does not stand for

UNITY

STANDARDISATION

OR

ASSIMILATION

OR

DENATIONALISM;

But it stands for a fuller, a richer, and a more various life among all the nations that compose it.  And even nations who have fought against you, like my own, must feel that they and their interests, their language, their religions, and all their cultural interests are safe and secure under the British flag as those of the children of your household and your blood.

*

[Back in 2008]

[How ironic that the very aspirations of a one time enemy of the Crown  should in 1917 speak so strongly on the very matters which are now denied by a British Government to its own population.  We have our service personnel being injured some most severely and others  losing their lives  in an illegal war in Iraq and a MISSION IMPOSSIBLE in Afghanistan while their GOVERNMENT has signed a TREATY of TREASON which takes away our once FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE in order to be PROVINCES in a centralized collectivist sovietised NEW ORDER the dream and ambition of ADOLF HITLER and before him BISMARCK and NAPOLEON.]

 

15 May 1917

It is only in proportion as that is realised that you will fulfil the true mission which you have undertaken.   Therefore, it seems, speaking my own individual opinion, that there is only one solution, that is the solution supplied by

OUR PAST TRADITIONS OF FREEDOM

SELF-GOVERNMENT,

and the fullest development.   We are not going to force common Government, federal or otherwise, but we are going to extend

LIBERTY

FREEDOM

 and

NATIONHOOD

more and more in every part of the Empire.

The question arises, how are you going to keep the world together if there is going to be all this enormous development towards a more varied and richer life among its parts?   It seems to me that you have two potent factors that you must rely on for the future.   The first is your

HEREDITARY KINGSHIP

I have seen some speculations recently in the papers in this country upon the position of the kingship of this country; speculations by people who, I am sure have never thought of the wider issues at stake.

YOU CANNOT HAVE A REPUBLIC IN THIS COUNTRY

You cannot make a Republic of the British Commonwealth of nations, because if you have to elect a President not only in these islands but all over the British Empire, who will be the

RULER and REPRESENTATIVE

of all these peoples, you are facing an absolutely insoluble problem.   Now, you know the theory of our

CONSTITUTION

is that the King is not merely

YOUR KING

but he is KING of all of US.

He represents every part of the of the whole Commonwealth of nations.  If his place is to be taken by anyone else, then that somebody will have to be elected by a process which I think, will pass the wit of man to devise.  Therefore let us be thankful for the mercies we have.  We have a kingship here which is really not very different from a hereditary Republic, and I am sure that more and more in the future the trend will be in that direction, and I shall not be surprised to see the time when our Royal princes, instead of getting their Consorts among the  princelings of Central Europe, will go to the Dominions and the outlying portions of the Empire.

I think that in the theory of the future of this great Empire it is impossible to attach too much importance to this institution which we have existing, and which can be developed, in my opinion, to the greatest uses possible for its future development.  It will, of course, be necessary to go further than that.   It is not only a symbol of unity which you have in a Royal ruler, but you will have to develop further common institutions.  .   .

 

Far too much stress is laid upon the instruments of government.  People are inclined to forget that the world is getting more democratic, and that forces which find expression in public opinion are going to be far more powerful in the future than they have been in the past  You will find that you have built up a

SPIRIT OF COMRADESHIP

and a

COMMON FEELING OF PATRIOTISM

 and that the instrument of government will not be the thing that matters so much as

THE SPIRIT

that actuates the whole system of parts.  That seems to be your mission.  You talk about an Imperial mission.  It seems to me this British Empire has only one mission, and that is a mission for

GREATER LIBERTY and FREEDOM and SELF-DEVELOPMENT

Yours is the only system that has ever worked in history where a large number of nations have been living in unity.   Talk about the League of Nations - you are the ONLY league of nations that has ever existed; and if you are true to your

OLD TRADITIONS

of

SELF-GOVERNMENT and FREEDOM

and to this vision of your future and your mission, who knows that you may not exercise far greater and more beneficent influence on the history of mankind than you have ever done before?

*

[Today in 2008]

 We find almost a century later that our country of England has been taken from us by a traitorous and misguided House of Commons on 5th March 2008 by their ratifying the

TREATY OF TREASON the LISBON TREATY

which destroys a once

FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE

of

ENGLAND

of over 1400 years in the making and

  exchanged for PROVINCES in a corrupt, collectivist,  sovietised  creature calling itself the

UNITED STATES OF EUROPE.

*

 

[15th May 1917]

In the welter of confusion which is probably going to follow the war in Europe you will stand as the one system where liberty to work successfully has kept together divers communities. You may be sure the world such as will be surrounding you in the times that are coming be likely to follow your example.  .  .

[Today in 2008]

A unique system of democracy of a family of Independent Nation States has been shelved and replaced by an artificial UTOPIA

in which there is no place for complete self-government within a system of confederation typical of the Zollverrein adapted by our enemy in two world wars GERMANY

How ironic that what the Germans had failed to obtain in two World Wars a Europe dominated by their ambition of a GERMANY at the head of a European Union has now been successfully achieved and the losers have been the real nucleus of  FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

with a unity of purpose and principle so greatly missing in our World TODAY.

 

*

 

The Commonwealth Realms V The Constitution of Europe

*

THE BRITISH LEGACY-AUSTRALIA-CANADA-NEW ZEALAND-WHY THEY MATTER?

*

Message from Australia-Support the Crown

*

The Act of Settlement of 1701-Why it should concern you now.

*

The Common Law of England is the LAW of the Commonwealth and America.

*

 

 

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comment in Brackets]

 

APRIL-2008

*  *  *

 

 

IN JUNE 2017 NINE YEARS LATER THE MUSLIM POPULATION HAS INCREASED FROM JUST OVER A MILLION TO OVER 3MILLION TODAY WITH THE NUMBER INCREASING SIGNIFICANTLY DUE TO THEIR 4-1 BIRTH RATE AND MANY BRIDES ARE FROM MUSLIM COUNTRIES-THERE ARE ALSO DEPENDENTS TO CONSIDER. IN THE LAST FEW DAYS WE ARE TOLD THAT BY 2050 THE POPULATION OF OUR SMALL ISLAND HOME WILL REACH 80 + MILLION ALMOST EQUAL TO GERMANY IN 2005-THEN 82 MILLION- A COUNTRY WITH FOUR TIMES OUR LANDMASS.  AS WE HAVE CONSTANTLY STATED OVER THE YEARS THE MAJORITY OF MUSLIMS HAVE NO INTENTION OF INTEGRATING AND WHY SHOULD THEY WHEN THEY KNOW THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY-OF WHATEVER IDEOLOGY  PREFER TO ENCOURAGE THEIR NEW VOTES RATHER THAN BRING IN LEGISLATION TO SEND BACK ALL IMMIGRANTS THAT WILL NOT INTEGRATE AND THOSE WHO COMMIT SERIOUS CRIMES WHICH FORTUNATELY A BREXIT SETTLEMENT SHOULD INCLUDE OUR EXIT FROM THE SO-CALLED EU  HUMAN RIGHTS LEGISLATION AND WHATEVER! 

THERE IS MUCH TALK ABOUT THE STATE OF OUR POLITICS WITH THE EXTREME LEFT ACTING LIKE A MOB AS THEY HAVE ALWAYS DONE. IT IS SAID POLITICS IS A GAME AND WHAT WE HAVE WITNESSED OVER THE PAST YEAR EMPHASISES THIS CRUDE FACT!   SINCE THE ENGLISH REVOLUTION OF 1668 AND  THE RAVING MOB HAS ALWAYS BEEN IN EXISTENCE-EVEN IN THE DAYS OF THE GREEK AND ROMAN EMPIRE-THEN IT WAS A MATTER OF FREE BREAD AND THE CIRCUS-NOTHING HAS CHANGED - WE HAVE FOOD BANKS AND GLASTONBURY. AND WE NOW ARE TOLD THAT THERE ARE 900,000 PEOPLE OBESE.  WE KEEP ON ASKING THE SAME QUESTION WHEN WILL THE VOTER USE THEIR ADULT MINDS INSTEAD OF THEIR VICIOUS TONGUE AND BRUTAL MAD ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR?

IT HAS BEEN STATED THAT A NEW WORLD IS ABOUT TO EMERGE WHICH WILL POSSIBLY IMPROVE OUR MINDS AND HEALTH AND OUR HAPPINESS-WE HOPE THIS IS SO, BECAUSE THE WORLD WE HAVE AT THE MOMENT HAS NOT MOVED AWAY FROM BARBAROUS TREATMENT AND MANY PEOPLE WORLDWIDE-EXPERIENCE

HELL! ON EARTH.]

JUNE 30-2017

 

 H.F.1240 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER

 

Friday, June 23, 2017

WATCH: Lord Rothschild Explains How His Family Embraced Zionism, Created Israel

 

(
Jay Syrmopoulos) The head of the Rothschild banking empire, and staunch supporter of Israel, Lord Jacob Rothschild, recently revealed the critical role of his family in the securing the Balfour Declaration, which “helped pave the way for the creation of Israel.”

Related
The Sabbatean-Frankist Cult -- The Satanic Infiltration of the Western World
 
Source - The Free Thought Project

by
Jay Syrmopoulos, June 21st, 2017

The Balfour Declaration, written in 1917, was an official document from the British Foreign Minister, Lord Balfour, addressed to Lord Rothschild, a leader of the Zionist movement in Britain at the time – and Lord Jacob Rothschild’s uncle.

During the television interview with Rothschild, he revealed new details about the extremely pivotal role his cousin Dorothea de Rothschild played. Rothschild described Dorothea, who was in her teens at the time, as “devoted to Israel,” and said: ‘What she did was crucially important.’”

Rothschild went on to say that Dorothy acted as a conduit between Zionist leader Chaim Weizmann and the British political establishment. Dorothy “told Weizmann how to integrate, how to insert himself into British establishment life, which he learned very quickly,” according to Rothschild.

Rothschild explained that the manner in which the declaration was procured was extraordinary.


“It was the most incredible piece of opportunism,” he reasoned.

“[Weizmann] gets to Balfour,” Rothschild described, “and unbelievably, he persuades Lord Balfour, and Lloyd George, the prime minister, and most of the ministers, that this idea of a national home for Jews should be allowed to take place. I mean it’s so, so unlikely.”

This extremely revealing interview with Lord Rothschild was conducted by former Israeli ambassador Daniel Taub as part of the Balfour 100 project, commemorating the 100-year anniversary of the Balfour Declaration. The interviewed took place at Waddesdon Manor in Buckinghamshire, a manor bequeathed to the nation by the Rothschild family in 1957, where the Declaration is stored.

According to Ambassador Taub, the Balfour Declaration “changed the course of history for the Middle East.”

Rothschild said his family at the time was divided on the idea of Israel, noting that some members “didn’t think it was a good thing that this national home be established there.”

Dorothea’s letters are also stored at Waddesdon, and describe her subsequent dealings with a variety of Zionist leaders, as well as her advice on the organization of the Zionist Conference, according to the Times.

othschild said that the Declaration went through five separate drafts before finally being formally issued on November 2, 1917.

In her book, Against Our Better Judgment: The Hidden History of How the U.S. Was Used to Create Israel, Alison Weir exposed the fact that numerous drafts of the declaration were presented to Zionists in the United States prior to the document being finalized.

Weir’s book notes that one of the primary inducements offered to British leaders to issue the Balfour Declaration was the Zionist claim that they would bring the U.S. into world war I on Britain’s side if the British would promise to enable the Zionist colonization of Palestine.

Balfour Declaration Text:
 
Foreign Office
November 2nd, 1917
Dear Lord Rothschild,

I have much pleasure in conveying to you. on behalf of His Majesty’s Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet.

His Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.

I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.
Yours,

Arthur James Balfour

The deeply intertwined relationship between modern Zionism and the Rothschild banking empire cannot be overstated. Without the Rothschild family’s vast influence and direct assistance, Israel very well may have never been created.

About The Author

Jay Syrmopoulos


Jay Syrmopoulos is an geopolitical analyst, freethinker, and ardent opponent of authoritarianism. He is currently a graduate student at the University of Denver pursuing a masters in Global Affairs and holds a BA in International Relations. Jay's writing has been featured on both mainstream and independent media - and has been viewed tens of millions of times. You can follow him on Twitter @SirMetropolis and on Facebook at SirMetropolis. You can support his work at Patreon.

_________________________
Stillness in the Storm Editor's note: Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake? Do you think this article needs a correction or update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at sitsshow@gmail.com with the error, headline and url. Thank you for reading.
 
________________________________________________________________
Question -- What is the goal of this website? Why do we share different sources of information that sometimes conflicts or might even be considered disinformation? 
Answer -- The primary goal of Stillness in the Storm is to help all people become better truth-seekers in a real-time boots-on-the-ground fashion. This is for the purpose of learning to think critically, discovering the truth from within—not just believing things blindly because it came from an "authority" or credible source. Instead of telling you what the truth is, we share information from many sources so that you can discern it for yourself. We focus on teaching you the tools to become your own authority on the truth, gaining self-mastery, sovereignty, and freedom in the process. We want each of you to become your own leaders and masters of personal discernment, and as such, all information should be vetted, analyzed and discerned at a personal level. We also encourage you to discuss your thoughts in the comments section of this site to engage in a group discernment process. 

 
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." – Aristotle
 

 
The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Stillness in the Storm, the authors who contribute to it, or those who follow it. 

 
View and Share our Images
Curious about Stillness in the Storm? 
See our About this blog - Contact Us page.

If it was not for the gallant support of readers, we could not devote so much energy into continuing this blog. We greatly appreciate any support you provide!

 
We hope you benefit from this not-for-profit site 

 
It takes hours of work every day to maintain, write, edit, research, illustrate and publish this blog. We have been greatly empowered by our search for the truth, and the work of other researchers. We hope our efforts 
to give back, with this website, helps others in gaining 
knowledge, liberation and empowerment.

 
"There are only two mistakes one can make along the road to truth; 
not going all the way, and not starting." — Buddha

 
If you find our work of value, consider making a Contribution.
This website is supported by readers like you. 

 
[Click on Image below to Contribute]

 

*  *  *

[This information has been known almost from the day of its implementation-WE understand that the bribe was the urgent supply of scarce explosive material-needed for the guns on the WESTERN FRONT in 1916- WORLD WAR 1-WE mentioned this fact on our website decades ago.]

Sayings of the Rothschild family in the 19th and 20th century
 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H.F.1232

 

Friday, June 23, 2017

WATCH: Lord Rothschild Explains How His Family Embraced Zionism, Created Israel

 

(
Jay Syrmopoulos) The head of the Rothschild banking empire, and staunch supporter of Israel, Lord Jacob Rothschild, recently revealed the critical role of his family in the securing the Balfour Declaration, which “helped pave the way for the creation of Israel.”

Related
The Sabbatean-Frankist Cult -- The Satanic Infiltration of the Western World
 
Source - The Free Thought Project

by
Jay Syrmopoulos, June 21st, 2017

The Balfour Declaration, written in 1917, was an official document from the British Foreign Minister, Lord Balfour, addressed to Lord Rothschild, a leader of the Zionist movement in Britain at the time – and Lord Jacob Rothschild’s uncle.

During the television interview with Rothschild, he revealed new details about the extremely pivotal role his cousin Dorothea de Rothschild played. Rothschild described Dorothea, who was in her teens at the time, as “devoted to Israel,” and said: ‘What she did was crucially important.’”

Rothschild went on to say that Dorothy acted as a conduit between Zionist leader Chaim Weizmann and the British political establishment. Dorothy “told Weizmann how to integrate, how to insert himself into British establishment life, which he learned very quickly,” according to Rothschild.

Rothschild explained that the manner in which the declaration was procured was extraordinary.


“It was the most incredible piece of opportunism,” he reasoned.

“[Weizmann] gets to Balfour,” Rothschild described, “and unbelievably, he persuades Lord Balfour, and Lloyd George, the prime minister, and most of the ministers, that this idea of a national home for Jews should be allowed to take place. I mean it’s so, so unlikely.”

This extremely revealing interview with Lord Rothschild was conducted by former Israeli ambassador Daniel Taub as part of the Balfour 100 project, commemorating the 100-year anniversary of the Balfour Declaration. The interviewed took place at Waddesdon Manor in Buckinghamshire, a manor bequeathed to the nation by the Rothschild family in 1957, where the Declaration is stored.

According to Ambassador Taub, the Balfour Declaration “changed the course of history for the Middle East.”

Rothschild said his family at the time was divided on the idea of Israel, noting that some members “didn’t think it was a good thing that this national home be established there.”

Dorothea’s letters are also stored at Waddesdon, and describe her subsequent dealings with a variety of Zionist leaders, as well as her advice on the organization of the Zionist Conference, according to the Times.

othschild said that the Declaration went through five separate drafts before finally being formally issued on November 2, 1917.

In her book, Against Our Better Judgment: The Hidden History of How the U.S. Was Used to Create Israel, Alison Weir exposed the fact that numerous drafts of the declaration were presented to Zionists in the United States prior to the document being finalized.

Weir’s book notes that one of the primary inducements offered to British leaders to issue the Balfour Declaration was the Zionist claim that they would bring the U.S. into world war I on Britain’s side if the British would promise to enable the Zionist colonization of Palestine.

Balfour Declaration Text:
 
Foreign Office
November 2nd, 1917
Dear Lord Rothschild,

I have much pleasure in conveying to you. on behalf of His Majesty’s Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet.

His Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.

I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.
Yours,

Arthur James Balfour

The deeply intertwined relationship between modern Zionism and the Rothschild banking empire cannot be overstated. Without the Rothschild family’s vast influence and direct assistance, Israel very well may have never been created.

About The Author

Jay Syrmopoulos


Jay Syrmopoulos is an geopolitical analyst, freethinker, and ardent opponent of authoritarianism. He is currently a graduate student at the University of Denver pursuing a masters in Global Affairs and holds a BA in International Relations. Jay's writing has been featured on both mainstream and independent media - and has been viewed tens of millions of times. You can follow him on Twitter @SirMetropolis and on Facebook at SirMetropolis. You can support his work at Patreon.

_________________________
Stillness in the Storm Editor's note: Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake? Do you think this article needs a correction or update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at sitsshow@gmail.com with the error, headline and url. Thank you for reading.
 
________________________________________________________________
Question -- What is the goal of this website? Why do we share different sources of information that sometimes conflicts or might even be considered disinformation? 
Answer -- The primary goal of Stillness in the Storm is to help all people become better truth-seekers in a real-time boots-on-the-ground fashion. This is for the purpose of learning to think critically, discovering the truth from within—not just believing things blindly because it came from an "authority" or credible source. Instead of telling you what the truth is, we share information from many sources so that you can discern it for yourself. We focus on teaching you the tools to become your own authority on the truth, gaining self-mastery, sovereignty, and freedom in the process. We want each of you to become your own leaders and masters of personal discernment, and as such, all information should be vetted, analyzed and discerned at a personal level. We also encourage you to discuss your thoughts in the comments section of this site to engage in a group discernment process. 

 
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." – Aristotle
 

 
The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Stillness in the Storm, the authors who contribute to it, or those who follow it. 

 
View and Share our Images
Curious about Stillness in the Storm? 
See our About this blog - Contact Us page.

If it was not for the gallant support of readers, we could not devote so much energy into continuing this blog. We greatly appreciate any support you provide!

 
We hope you benefit from this not-for-profit site 

 
It takes hours of work every day to maintain, write, edit, research, illustrate and publish this blog. We have been greatly empowered by our search for the truth, and the work of other researchers. We hope our efforts 
to give back, with this website, helps others in gaining 
knowledge, liberation and empowerment.

 
"There are only two mistakes one can make along the road to truth; 
not going all the way, and not starting." — Buddha

 
If you find our work of value, consider making a Contribution.
This website is supported by readers like you. 

 
[Click on Image below to Contribute]

 

*  *  *

[This information has been known almost from the day of its implementation-WE understand that the bribe was the urgent supply of scarce explosive material-needed for the guns on the WESTERN FRONT in 1916- WORLD WAR 1-WE mentioned this fact on our website decades ago.]

Sayings of the Rothschild family in the 19th and 20th century
 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H.F.1232

 

The Balfour Declaration [1916] : Time to say sorry. Time we made amends.

by Stuart Littlewood

 

In a letter to a local newspaper about Brexit and the way prime minister Theresa May is handling it, I happened to mention in passing the Balfour Declaration, criticising her plans to celebrate the centenary “with pride” and invite Israel’s PM Netanyahu to the fun. This drew a sharp response from someone spouting the usual Israeli propaganda ‘facts’ and saying my attitude harmed the Jewish community worldwide.

The Balfour Declaration is a deadly serious subject. It is a cause of great horror and grief, of justifiable international anger, and a matter for profound regret. This is a right time and proper time for debate. Let’s focus on it for the next few months because justice groups are urging the British Government to mark the Balfour Declaration centenary by saying sorry.

Mrs May could do some real good here. She could, at a stroke, help quell the destructive turmoil in the Middle East and begin repair to Britain’s tattered prestige. She could even open new trade routes into Islamic markets, vitally important as we leave the EU.

By eating a little humble pie and apologising on our behalf for 100 years of agony inflicted on lovely people in a lovely part of the world Mrs May could take a giant step for mankind on the world stage. She has between now and November to do it. Will she?

No, she’ll be celebrating Balfour in style with the Israeli prime minister and not giving a toss about the people Britain wronged.

Which is shocking when a UN report recently branded Israel an apartheid regime. It’s even more regrettable considering the desperate cry for help from the National Coalition of Christian Organizations in Palestine in an open letter to the World Council of Churches and the ecumenical movement, signed by over 30 organisations in Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza.

Here’s an extract: “We are still suffering from 100 years of injustice and oppression that were inflicted on the Palestinian people beginning with the unlawful Balfour declaration… followed by the Israeli occupation of the West Bank including East Jerusalem and Gaza and the fragmentation of our people and our land through policies of isolation and confiscation, and the building of Jewish-only settlements and the Apartheid Wall…”

Mrs May needs a jolt.

When I enquired whether the Balfour Declaration is taught in our schools I was told ‘no’. So what exactly is it?

Arthur Balfour, British foreign secretary in 1917, penned a letter to the most senior Jew in England, Lord Rothschild – pledging the Government’s “best endeavours” to facilitate the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people. Balfour also wrote: “We do not propose even to go through the form of consulting the wishes of the present inhabitants of the country.”

It amounted to a betrayal of our Arab allies in WW1. Many in Parliament objected, including Lord Sydenham who remarked: “What we have done, by concessions not to the Jewish people but to a Zionist extreme section, is to start a running sore in the East, and no-one can tell how far that sore will extend.”

At the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 when the Great Powers carved up the territorial spoils of war a Zionist delegation produced Balfour’s promissory note. It planted a powder-keg in the Middle East and the fuse was now lit. Britain accepted the mandate responsibility for Palestine and eventually in 1947 the Great Powers pushed the United Nations into partitioning the territory, again without consulting those who lived there.

So what made Balfour do it? The more you delve, the more incredible the answers to those unaware of the growing influence of worldwide Zionism. Support for the movement and its ambition to create a New Israel was quite fashionable in the corridors of power around the time of WW1. The story I find compelling is that, while Britain struggled desperately against German U-boat successes and ammunition shortages, the Zionist power-brokers of Germany and Eastern Europe consulted with their opposite numbers in America and decided, given their grip on money and media, they could bring the US into the war against Germany and its Ottoman ally if Britain were to promise them Palestine for a Jewish homeland afterwards.

Balfour was a Zionist convert (as were many others including prime minister David Lloyd-George) and in the right position. The proposition was put to Britain in 1916. The Zionists delivered. The US entered the war. In the meantime immigrant Polish-Zionist chemist Chaim Weizmann offered a solution to the production of enough acetone, a critical ingredient in cordite for artillery shells, to satisfy the war effort. He demanded the same promise. Balfour handed them their ‘receipt’ in November 1917 even though Palestine was not, and never could be, Britain’s to give away.

‘Name of the game: erasing Palestine’

Balfour had inserted into his ‘declaration’ that “nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing and non-Jewish communities….” on the insistence of the only Jew in the British Cabinet, Lord Montague, who was anti-Zionist and opposed the deal. But this safeguard was jettisoned as soon as Britain lost control of events.

Not content with the territory allocated to them under the UN Partition Plan the Israelis declared statehood ignoring all boundaries. Their ‘Plan Dalet’ offensive, begun beforehand, had seized much Arab-designated land at gunpoint.  Jewish militia – the Irgun, Haganah, Palmach and Lehi – raided towns and villages forcing inhabitants to flee. Numerous attrocities were committed including the bombing of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem (headquarters of the British administration) in 1946 murdering 91, and the massacres at Deir Yassin and Lydda in 1948.

Today Israel illegally occupies the West Bank and East Jerusalem, including the Old City, and has Gaza in a stranglehold so pitiless as to have caused a long-term humanitarian crisis and irreparable environmental damage. For nearly 70 years millions of dispossessed Palestinians and their families have languished in refugee camps, and those who remain in their homeland – Christian and Muslim alike – live a miserable life under brutal military occupation.

The situation stands as a monumental stain on the flag of the United Nations, which hasn’t the backbone to take action. And the continuing repercussions throughout the Holy Land should concern all true Christians and Muslims especially regular churchgoers like Mrs May.

Miko Peled, the son of an Israeli general and a former soldier in the Israeli army – and now an important figure in the struggle for justice – confirms what many have been saying for years: “The name of the game: erasing Palestine, getting rid of the people and de-Arabizing the country… By 1993 the Israelis had achieved their mission to make the conquest of the West Bank irreversible…. That is when Israel said, OK, we’ll begin negotiations…”

My critic in the local newspaper called Hamas terrorists. Peled describes the Israeli army, in which he served, as “one of the best trained and best equipped and best fed terrorist organisations in the world.” Take your pick. But Hamas’ political wing is not proscribed as a terrorist organisation in the UK.

The accusation that criticising the Israeli regime harms Jewish communities is unacceptable. There are many admirable Jewish groups vehemently campaigning against Israel’s crimes. One-time Israeli Military Intelligence chief Yehoshafat Harkabi warned that Jews throughout the world would pay the price of Israel’s misconduct. So the problem appears to be ‘family’ matter between Jews everywhere.

Related Posts:



 
The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

 
Posted by on July 22, 2017, With 1416 Reads Filed under Government & Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

JULY 22-2017

FaceBook Comments

H.F.1261.-JULY 22,2017

 

[There is a well-known phrase:

'People's are not evil ONLY individuals are evil.'

We have no hatred for the Israeli people  of whom many of them at home and abroad in the USA and around the world hate ZIONISM and its brutal and destructive agenda. It thrives on WAR and EXPLOITATION and they are pushing ahead for a WAR against IRAN.

Unfortunately for the English people their traitorous PRIME MINISTER DAVID CAMERON and many others in WESTMINSTER and in the country are the very SERVANTS of that hateful dogma which is leading towards a ONE-WORLD CORPORATISM/GOVERNMENT which apart from an ELITE and SLAVES there will be no place on PLANET EARTH for the majority of MANKIND.   As we have already mentioned about the SURPRISE ATTACK by ATTACK HELICOPTERS accompanied by a POLICE HELICOPTER on our property during the recent  PARLIAMENTARY RECESS.   WE understand that the FOREIGN Minister and BILDERBERGER William Hague is responsible for the Security Service MI6 and GCHQ -  possibly he could explain why the intrusive and noisy operation took place above a quiet country village at NOON on a Sunday.    Now we know why we received those visitors possibly from a USA BASE in the UK.  The WAR in LIBYA was but a stepping stone to the remaining non-ROTHCHILD CENTRAL BANKS countries who will fall in the very near future.       We have been WARNING for a few years for you to NOT!  vote for  the BILDERBERGERS the SERVANTS of the ILLUMINATI/ZIONISM who CONTROL the GOVERNMENT and so-called OPPOSITION parties at WESTMINSTER and  have no love for NATION STATES particularly those such as ENGLAND who still has some FREEDOM but that is now under THREAT as witnessed by the introduction of the CONTINENTAL SYSTEM of Corpus Juris into our

JewsnotZionists

*

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-/

David-Cameron-doesnt-understand-Conservative-party.

[Well we are sure the majority of the population must feel the same way.  NO SUBSTANCE!-NO CONSERVATIVE and certainly NO STATESMAN but PR THROUGH AND THROUGH, and apart from a few politicians deserving such a term over the past 100 years the pick since the Second World War brings us but a few which are too obvious for us to note . We have to look to the Victorian Age to compare how so much that is now wrong with our society:

'Between 1871 and 1875 our birth-rate reached its highest point, round about 35 per thousand, and the United Kingdom population, which had been 27 million in 1851, rose in the next thirty years to nearly 35 millions.   In much the same period they invested over £1000 million overseas, while 2.[5] million British subjects migrated to the British Colonies and the United States.   The tonnage cleared in our ports grew from less than 15 millions to nearly 60 , almost one-third of the world's sea-going ships were British.   In 1850 exports were valued at £197millions but at £297 millions in 1874, imports rising even more from £100 millions to £370 millions , while at the last date the total foreign trade of Britain and her Colonies equalled that of France, Germany, Italy, and the United States all rolled together.   Except for the Crimea, ,the country was engaged in no major war .  Much that had been tentative  in the Empire of 1850 was made solid; Canada was confederated, Australian self-government determined, in India the mutiny was suppressed and government transferred to the Crown.   Memorable things were done for the life  of the mother State.   Universities were opened and reformed, the modern civil service created, education made universal, the parliamentary electorate doubled, the courts of law modenized, trade unions given their full status, and the position of women revolutionized.  As for the achievements of the spirit, in the years between Wordsworth death in 1850 and Carlyle's in 1881, a  great body of immortal British literature and thought was made:  by Tennyson, Browning, and Ruskin; Dickens, Thackery , and George Elliot; Newman and Mathew Arnold;  Macauly,  Mill, and T. H .Green, Darwin, Huxley , and Tyndall; Bagehot, Henry Maine, and Herbert Spencer; J. R .Green, [Lord} Acton and Froude; Meridith, Thomas Hardy, and William Morris; Westcott, Lightfoot, and Martineau; Clerk Maxwell and F.H.Bradley.'

-A HISTORY OF ENGLAND-by Keith Feiling-1948

[As many more people are now aware that since the 50's secret meetings of the BILDERBERGERS in the BILDERBERGER HOTEL in the Netherlands began with the aim of the destruction of the nation state to be replaced by a ONE-WORLD/CORPORATION/GOVERNMENT. It is no coincidence that the main-players on the political scene in England are these same traitors who meet in secret to discuss their satanic plans while attempting to be representatives of the people . As we have mentioned so many times how can these same individuals serve two masters-either the PEOPLE or the ILLUMINATI not BOTH.  But as shown above the PRESS and MEDIA in the main refuse to highlight this destructive subversive and traitorous element in our PARLIAMENT and the population at large appears not to be interested that their country is now ruled SERVANTS of a FOREIGN POWER.]

CLICKStartpage

http://www.prisonplanet.com/

real-tough-men-in-america-and-israel-are-against

-an-attack-on-iran.

H.F.1233

 

 

 

MAX HASTINGS says latest estimates suggest more than 65 million migrants are roaming the world in search of safe or rich havens. He says we need more than the lifejackets stunt.

 

SEPTEMBER 21,2016

H.F978 BREXIT NOW

 

 
WHERE'S THEIR SENSE OF DUTY?

 

NNot since WW2 has there been a greater need for politicians to pull together. Fat chance when they're so lacking in PUBLIC SPIRIT says

Daily Mail: 2017-07-11 - WHERE'S THEIR SENSE OF DUTY?

 

 

WHATEVER you think of our vote to leave the EU there is no doubt that we face some of the most critical months in our nation's modern history.

Most observers, whether Leavers or Remainers, agree that extricating ourselves from

BRUSSELS

and charting a newly

INDEPENDENT COURSE

will be

A COLOSSAL CHALLENGE,

YOU MAY HAVE  HOPED, THEREFORE , THAT OUR NATION'S POLITICIANS WOULD HAVE RISEN TO THE MOMENT, PUTTING ASIDE PETTY DIFFERENCES AND COMING TOGETHER IN THE

NATIONAL INTEREST.

What better sign that we are all

PATRIOTS.

and that, like our forefathers,

WE STAND OR FALL AS ONE

UNITED KINGDOM?...

 

 

The tragedy is that never in living memory have they fallen so depressingly short of the standards we deserve.

[COUNTRY BEFORE PARTY

UNITY INSTEAD OF CHAOS]

DECISION

Once in every man and nation comes the moment to decide'

In the strife of Truth with Falsehood for the good or evil side.

J. R. LOWELL, The present crisis.

*

 

OPPORTUNITY

There is a tide in the affairs of men

Which, taken at the flood, leads on to fortune;

Omitted, all the voyage of their life

Is bound in shallows and in miseries.

SHAKESPEARE.

*

FREEDOM

All we have of freedom-all we use and know-

This our fathers bought for us, long long ago.

KIPLING

*

ENGLAND

All our past proclaims our future; Shakespeare's voice and Nelson's hand

Milton's faith and Wordsworth's trust in this our chosen and [soon] chainless land.

Bear us witness; come the world against her,

England yet shall stand.

SWINBURNE . England.

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

 

 

[TO BE CONTINUED]

JULY 11-2017

 

 

 

H.F.1252 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

 
 
 
 
 

ENGLAND MATTERS

  ENGLAND'S DAY-23RD APRIL-ENGLAND'S DAY
  Understanding Easter- a part of our Christian cultural force which has made us what we are.
   Our Christian Festival of Easter which many know so little and some none.
  CHRISTIANITY IS MORE THAN A RELIGION
  THE INDIVIDUAL IS THE BACKBONE OF CHRISTIANITY
  WHY WE MUST REMAIN A CHRISTIAN COUNTRY
 

English Constitution, by it they lived, for it they died

 

How Two Patriots died while in the service of their country - Part 1

 

 How Two Patriots died while in the service of their country - Part 2

 

 How Two Patriots died while in the service of their country - Part 3

 

How Two Patriots died while in the service of their country - Part 4

 

 How Two Patriots died while in the service of their country - Part 5

 

The Lives and Reputation of our Ancient Island’s Defenders of Freedom now at greater Risk - Part 1

 

The Lives and Reputation of our Ancient Island’s Defenders of Freedom now at greater Risk - Part 2

 

The Lives and Reputation of our Ancient Island’s Defenders of Freedom now at greater Risk - Part 3

 

Christianity, The People, and Ethics - Part 1

 

Christianity, The People, and Ethics - Part 2

 

Alfred –Christian King of the English - Part 1

 

Alfred -Christian King of the English - Part 2

 

 Our way forward to Kinship in Liberty

 

A Defence of Christianity by a once militant agnostic - Part 1.

 

 Dangers of a supreme parliament.

 

 Who CARES about MORALITY?

 

A Christian Parliamentarian speaks on a range of issues - Part 1.

 

A Christian Parliamentarian speaks on a range of issues - Part 2.

 

 A Christian Parliamentarian speaks on a range of issues - Part 3.

 

A Christian Parliamentarian speaks on a range of issues - Part 4.

 

 A Christian Parliamentarian speaks on a range of issues - Part 5.

 

Freedom of Speech-A Freedom, which cannot be abused - is not worth having.

 

Our Past is embedded in our national consciousness-It asks were we came from and who we are.

 

An Englishman’s checklist to how Pro-EU faction in ALL Parties is overturning our Ancient Constitution.

 

Blairland has almost destroyed the Family Values in its quest for supposed Equality.

 

Two loving parents are more important than good teachers.

 

Celebrate 700 years of Constitutional Development in 2007- from Edward 1 the English Justinian.

 

IMMIGRATION-THE BETRAYAL OF BRICK LANE BY MULTICULTURALISM INSTEAD OF INTEGRATION

 

 The Common Law Of England -Its Heritage and Importance to Parliamentary Democracy Today.

 

Home Rule For Scotland WHY NOT Home Rule For ENGLAND

 

NOR SHALL MY SWORD - THE REINVENTION OF ENGLAND

 

Robocop or Dixon of Dock Green -Millions of Pensioners will choose the latter. The true eyes and ears and friend of the Community.

 

THOUGHTS ON ST. GEORGE's DAY-FREEDOM

 

THE ENEMY EVERYWHERE

 

THOUSANDS OF ENGLISH/BRITISH CITIZENS
REJECTING EU CITIZENSHIP-
WHY DON'T YOU?

 

Free trade agreement.s are the future of world trade

 

THE VEIL – THE CROSS –A VITAL DEBATE over the HEART and SOUL of OUR NATION.

 

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

INTRODUCTION

HOW IT ALL BEGAN 

HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER

THE RESULTANT LUNACIES

HOW WE ARE CONTROLLED

WHERE FREEDOM IS VANISHING

 

ENGLAND'S PLACE IN THE UNION

 

THE MAKING OF LONDONISTAN

 
 

ENGLAND A MONOCULTURE - TOLERANT-A CLEAR IDENTITY-A OLD COUNTRY-A SENSE OF CONTINUITY- -NOT MULTICULTURAL.

 

Commonwealth Realms v The Constitution for Europe-PT 1- 4

 

DECLARATION OF RESISTANCE

 

 Free Speech - Religious Opinion

 

NO WHERE ELSE flies the White Ensign on top of its tower but the village with the Nelson Touch - As we would EXPECT.

   
   
   
   

 

H.F.1244/2 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

 

The number of Muslims in Europe reaches

44 MILLION

 

 

[MUSLIM POPULATION

 WITHIN EACH PARTICULAR

ONCE FREE NATION STATE

 WITHIN THE EU]

 

WHERE THEY LIVE
 

 Germany---       4,760,000--------------5.8per cent

 France--------     4,710,000-------------7.5 per cent

 Britain--------      2,960,000-------------4.6per cent

Italy--------------2,220,000-------------7per cent   

 Bulgaria-----------1,020,000-----------13.7per cent

 Netherlands------1,000,000-------------6.0percent

 Spain--------------980,000--------------2.3percent

 Belgium-----------630,000-------------5.9 percent

 Greece-------------610,000--------------5.3percent

 Austria------------450,000--------------5.4percent

by

Ian Drury- 

Daily Mail

Home Affairs Correspondent

*  *  *

 

   [ The above figures are no doubt an estimate of each nation 's Muslim population therefore there could be millions more at any one time. Our own government has admitted it does not know the full number, as  those who should have left the country are still here, and others over the years have melted into the population. We also know from experience over the years from those at No 10 are not very good at simple Arithmetic!- when it suits them!]

[WITH THE BIRTH-RATE OF 4-1 THE MUSLIM POPULATION IN ENGLAND WILL GROW TO SURPASS THE INDIGENOUS POPULATION IN A MATTER OF A FEW GENERATIONS AND THEN THEY WILL HAVE THEIR ISLAMIC STATE WITH ITS STRICT SHARIA LAW AND SEEING HOW THE MAJORITY OF THE MUSLIMS IN OUR COUNTRY HAVE REACTED TO THE MASSACRE IN FRANCE THERE WILL BE NO TOLERANCE OF RELIGIOUS FREEDOM WHICH WE HAVE GIVEN THEM. OF COURSE THERE ARE MANY MUSLIMS WHO DECRY THE SILENCE OF THE MAJORITY OF MUSLIMS BUT UNTIL THE GREATER MAJORITY BECOME THE NORM THERE WILL BE NO LIKELIHOOD OF THEIR INTEGRATION INTO OUR SOCIETY.

THE MAJOR FAULT FOR THE SITUATION WE SEE BEFORE US IN THE MIDDLE EAST IS BECAUSE OF THE WEST'S-[USA-UK-FRANCE] HISTORY OF EXPLOITATION IN MUSLIM COUNTRIES IN REGARD TO OIL SUPPLIES OVER THE PAST 97 YEARS AND INTERFERENCE IN THE AFFAIRS OF MUSLIM COUNTRIES WHICH HAS BROUGHT MANY ILLEGAL WARS WITH GREAT SLAUGHTER AND DEVASTATION TO THEIR POPULATIONS.

THE IRISH QUESTION IS A YARD STICK TO SEE HOW LONG INJUSTICE TO A PEOPLE CAN HAVE DIRE CONSEQUENCES EVEN TODAY IN NOVEMBER 2015. IRONICALLY IT WAS THE WAR MONGER TONY BLAIR WHO FOUND THE SOLUTION WHICH BROUGHT PEACE HOWEVER FRAGILE.  BUT HE FAILED TO LEARN FROM HISTORY ABOUT THE INTERFERENCE IN THE MATTERS OF OTHER NATION STATES -PARTICULARLY MUSLIM-A PEOPLE DEDICATED TO THEIR RELIGION ISLAM-THOUGH THEY HAVE DIFFERENT SECTS OF FOLLOWERS ,WHO HAVE YEARNED TO BE THEMSELVES!

WE BELIEVE THAT THE ANSWER TO THE FLOOD OF REFUGEES  FROM ITS OUTSET SHOULD HAVE BEEN TO KEEP THE REFUGEES IN THE MIDDLE EAST -SAUDI ARABIA-HAS TENTED AREA TO ACCEPT 3,000,000 -EGYPT-JORDON...WITH MASSIVE FINANCIAL  HELP AND SHELTER ETC OFFERED TO THOSE COUNTRIES UNSTINTINGLY BUT ALLOW A CONTROLLED FLOW OF WAR REFUGEES TO THOSE COUNTRIES WILLING TO TAKE THEM-_BUT NO COMPULSION SHOULD BE MADE. IN THIS WAY THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN AVOIDED THE CATASTROPHE WE SEE BEFORE US IN EUROPE.

 

*

 

  1. The number of Muslims in Europe reaches

     

    44million -

     

     

    Daily Mail

    13 hours ago ... The number of Muslims in Europe reaches 44m: Serious concerns raised about
    the ... By Ian Drury Home Affairs Correspondent For The Daily Mail ... By contrast,
    the UK has about 2.9million Muslims – the third largest number.

     

     

     
     

     

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS.]

NOVEMBER 16-2015

 

 

H F 550

 

 DAILY MAIL

-MARIO LEDWITH-

Brussels Correspondent

-EU PARLIAMENT

 'RIDICULOUS'...and proves why so many Britons were right to vote BREXIT.

JULY 5-2017

 

NOW

HE GETS IT!

Exasperated: Jean-Claude Juncker has the floor but only 30  out of 720 MEPS are there to hear him address EU parliament.

Mr Juncker continued: I will never again, I will never again attend a meeting of this kind.'

The remarks will once again draw attebntion to the generous perks enjoyed by the parliaments 720 MEP's including a tax-free $306 (£269) 'daily allowance' just for turning up...

To claim the fee MEPs only have to turn up for more than half the debates in a day

MEP's also earn a range of other benefits, including a £46,ooo 'general expenditure allowance' on top of their generous £89,000 annual salaries.

The monthly journey by MEPs and their huge entourages to Strasbourg from Brussels for a four-day sitting has been described as a 'travelling circus' and costs European taxpayers around £175million every year.

 

*

[Either GERMANY or BRITAIN [ENGLAND]

 are the top annual contributors to the EU BUDGET.

They will sorely miss us when we finally

 LEAVE.]

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

JULY 5-2017

H. F.1242 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

 PETER OBORNE

        ON POLITICS AND POWER

 Corbyn could be the surprise savior of

 BREXIT

News for Daily Mail-PETER  OBORNE-Corbyn could be surprise savior of

BREXIT

Although many Tory Brexiteers detect a conspiracy between Corbyn and
Brussels bigwigs to undermine Mrs May, PETER OBORNE believes... 

JULY 8-2017

Brexiteers are incandescent that Jeremy Corbyn is due to hold talks next week in Brussels with the EU’s trade negotiator Michel Barnier.

They are convinced that despite voting in the Commons to trigger Article 50 to begin Britain’s withdrawal from the EU, the Labour leader secretly wishes to sabotage Brexit.

The argument runs that, by following this course, he hopes to destroy Theresa May’s government and move into No 10 himself.

It’s Monsieur Barnier, of course, a former French government minister, who is a thorn in Mrs May’s side, having preposterously proclaimed that Britain will have to pay a £50billion divorce settlement...

Jeremy Corbyn voted for Britain to leave what was then the Common Market in 1975. He then opposed the Maastricht Treaty that, 25 years ago, significantly extended the power of Brussels and laid the foundations for the EU becoming a superstate as it removed sovereign powers from individual member governments

Although many Tory Brexiteers detect a conspiracy between Corbyn and Brussels bigwigs to undermine Mrs May, I believe they have badly misread the intentions of the Labour leader.

But, as some in the Tory party traitorously plot against a gravely weakened PM amid irresponsible talk of possible successors and stalking-horses, the truth is that Corbyn could well make a vital contribution to the Brexit negotiations...

He is on record in recent months as having said the referendum result was ‘a clear vote’ and has stressed his determination to get a ‘good deal with Europe’.

Indeed, currently the most popular politician in Britain — with a YouGov/Times poll yesterday giving Labour an eight-point lead over the Conservatives — he feels he has an increasing amount of authority to ensure Brexit happens.

There is a bigger irony here. In last month’s General Election, thousands of Remainers voted for Labour in the hope that if elected PM, Corbyn might overturn the referendum result or instigate a second vote.

The fact is that, at heart, Corbyn is much more critical of the EU than Theresa May — or many other members of the Cabinet...

 

Full article



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4676706/Peter-Oborne-Jeremy-Corbyn-Brexit-saviour.html#ixzz4mEzRCUS5
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

JULY 8-2017

 

H.F.1247 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

 

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-June-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

 

 

BREXIT

BUT NOT OUT OF THE EU FOR 2/3 YEARS. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. ALL EU TREATIES WERE OBTAINED BY BRIBERY AND TREASON  AND FRAUD WHICH

UNDER THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES MAKES THEM.

NULL AND VOID.

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

JULY 23 FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2016

*

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW PART 1-2016SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW-2016

OCTOBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

NOVEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

DECEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

*

H.F.200A-FREEDOM NOW

 

PLEASE  NOTE: WE HAVE IN ADVANCE GIVEN BELOW THE BULLETIN FOR EACH MONTH FOR THE NEXT 30 MONTHS WHICH YOU CAN ENTER-IT WILL CONTAIN INFORMATION FROM OTHER MONTHS FROM THE PAST AND THAT AVAILABLE AT THE SPECIFIED TIME.  WE ARE MAKING THIS ARRANGEMENT AS WE ARE UNABLE TO GIVE AN EXIT DATE FROM THE EU. AS YOU ARE AWARE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE IN OCTOBER 2003 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING AVAILABLE INFORMATION WHICH WOULD BRING THE EXIT FROM THE EU AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. BUT NOW THAT BREXIT IS SOON TO BE ENACTED BY PARLIAMENT THE DAY OF OUR DELIVERANCE WILL SOON BE AT HAND AND THE RETURN OF OUR INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND TOGETHER WITH OUR NEIGHBOURING NATION STATES OF WALES-SCOTLAND AND NORTHERN ISLAND.

MAY GOD GRANT US A SPEEDY EXIT FROM THE SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC -MAMMOTH MONSTROSITY OF THE SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

 

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

 

 

 

The English People's

VoicE

WELCOME!

IMMIGRATION FILE

E U FILE

IRAQ/AFGHAN WAR

     9/11 AN INSIDE JOB

MAGNA CARTA

LONDON 7/7-AN INSIDE JOB

NAZI DVD

ENGLAND FILE

CRIMINAL EU

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

SAY NO TO EU

UNDERSTANDING EASTER

EURO MUST FAIL

ROTTEN HEART OF EU

SOUL OF ENGLAND

100 REASONS TO LEAVE EU

TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

MOST EVERYTHING WHICH IS PRECIOUS IN OUR CIVILISATION HAS COME FROM SMALL INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

 by LORD PETER SHORE.

 

A NATION STATE HAS BEEN REBORN

 

ON the momentous day Theresa May said Britain WILL quit the single market, she put Cameron's feeble negotiations to shame with an ultimatum to Brussels that the UK will 'walk away from a bad deal-and make the EU pay' 

  • STEEL OF THE NEW
  • IRON LADY
  • The PM is hopeful of an EU-UK trade deal because of mutual economic interests 
  • She said Europe not making a deal with Britian would be 'calamitous self-harm'
  • It was confirmed that we will be leaving the single market and customs union
  • But the EU's chief negotiator called her show of defiance counter-productive
  • Her speech was criticised by the Lib Dems as Labour fought on how to respond 
  • Sterling rose 2.8 per cent against the Dollar and 1.8 per cent against the Euro


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4130034/Theresa-s-Brexit-speech-puts-Cameron-shame.html#ixzz4W7pxZPm9
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Europe split over May's ...

https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-mail/20170118/281625305003771
Europe split over May's vision – but even Tusk calls it 'realistic'. Daily ... News -
From Mario Ledwith in Brussels and John Stevens in London.

 

*

POINT BY POINT, HER BLUEPRINT TO FREE BRITAIN FROM BRUSSELS
THERESA May delighted Eurosceptics yesterday with an ambitious road map for BREXIT. The PM extended the hand of friendship to the EU but threatened to walk away if BRUSSELS tried to impose a punitive deal. Jack DOYLE sets out her 12 objectives and analyses her chances of success.

1. CERTAINTY

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will provide certainty where we can. The same rules and laws will apply on the day after BREXIT, as they did before. And the Government will put the final deal to a vote in both houses of Parliament.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By keeping in place-at least initially-all EU laws, Mrs May will provide a degree of continuity and confidence for business. However, as she freely admits she cannot control the outcome of the negotiations. Parliament is highly likely to approve any deal because the alternative will be a chaotic BREXIT.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

2. OUR OWN LAWS

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will take back control of our laws and bring an end to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in Britain. Because we will not truly left the EU if we are not in control of our own laws

CAN SHE DELIVER

 Adopting the 'take back control' slogan of the Leave campaign, Mrs May repeated her promise to end rule by EU rule and judges in Luxembourg and restore power to Parliament and domestic courts. Without this there is no Brexit. A firm red line

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

3 A UNITED KINGDOM

 WHAT SHE SAID

A stronger Britain demands that we strengthen the precious union between the four nations of the UK.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By consulting devolved administrations, Mrs May is seeking to reassure voters in the nations of the UK which didn't vote for Brexit that she is listening to their concerns, and avoid Nicola Sturgeon calling for a second independence vote.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

4. THE IRISH BORDER

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE will work to deliver a practical solution that allows the maintenance of the Common Travel Area with the Republic, while protecting the integrity of the United Kingdom's immigration system.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Both countries want to maintain the open border between Northern Ireland and the Republic without opening a back door into Britain. Likely to mean UK border checks at Irish ports and airports.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

5. CONTROL OF IMMIGRATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

The message from the public before and during the referendum campaign was clear: BREXIT must mean control of the number of people who come to Britain from Europe. And that is what we will deliver

CAN SHE DELIVER

Ending free movement is a  RED LINE, but Mrs May left open when it will end, what system will replace it and details of any transition deal. The PM wants highly skilled EU migrants, doctors and nurses, but will she compromise on unskilled migrants to get a better trade deal

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

 6.  EU NATIONALS AND BRITISH EXPATS

 

WHAT SHE SAID

We  want to guarantee the right of EU citizens who are already living here in Britain, and the rights of British nationals in other member states, as early as we can.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Likely to agreed early on, as long as the EU doesn't want to haggle. Last year Mrs May offered to settle on the rights of three million EU nationals in the UK, and 1.2million Brits on the continent in advance of formals talks- but Angela Merkel refused.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*
7.WORKER'S RIGHTS

 WHAT SHE SAID

Not only will the government protect the rights of workers' set out in European legislation, we will build on them.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May is determined to at least preserve protections for workers on low and middle incomes-many of whom voted for BREXIT. Could come under threat if there is no deal., and Britain slashes taxes and regulation to attract business.

DEAL OR NO DEAL? 3/5

*

8. TRADE WITH EUROPE

WHAT SHE SAID

As a priority, we will pursue a bold and ambitious free trade agreement with the EU. This should allow for the freest possible trade in goods and services. But I want to make it clear. It cannot mean membership of the single market

CAN SHE DELIVER

The crux of the negotiation. Britain will leave the single market, and with it EU laws and free movement. Instead Mrs May wants a tariff-free trade and customs agreement to stop goods being held up at ports. She ruled out ' vast contributions' to the EU budget, and the only money going to Brussels will be for particular programmes and agencies like Europol. Her huge gamble is to threaten to walk away if the EU attempts to punish Britain

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

9. GLOBAL TRADE

 WHAT SHE SAID

A global Britain must be free to strike trade agreements with countries outside the EU too. But I also want tariff-free trade with Europe and cross-border trade there to be as frictionless as possible.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants deals with non-EU countries including the US. That would be impossible from inside the customs union, which imposes a uniform tariff on all non-EU countries. It would also make trade Secretary Liam Fox's job redundant.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 4/5

*

10. SCIENCE AND INNOVATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE have a proud history of leading and supporting cutting -edge research and innovation. So we will also welcome agreement to continue to collaborate with our European partners on major science, research, and technology initiatives.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Unlikely to be an obstacle to any deal. Much collaboration between academics takes place outside formal EU structures and will continue unimpeded.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

11. CRIME AND TERRORISM

 WHAT SHE SAID

All of us in Europe face the challenge of cross-border crime, a deadly terrorist threat, and the dangers presented by hostile states.  All of us share interests and values in common, values we want to see projected around the world.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Security and intelligence cooperation and defence cooperation cannot be a formal bargaining chip, but without making it one, Mrs May reminds EU allies of Britain's importance as an ally in fighting terrorism and important status as a military power.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

12.  A SMOOTH EXIT

 WHAT SHE SAID

It is in no one's interests for there to be a cliff-edge for business or a threat to stability as we change from our existing relationship to a new partnership with the European Union.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants tranitional arrangements to smooth the process of leaving the EU with specific deals on budget contributions, immigration, trade and customs lasting different periods of time. Securing this as well as securing a final deal within two years is a huge task.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

[THERE IS EVERY LIKELIHOOD THAT OTHER EU MEMBER STATES WILL BE GREATLY ENCOURAGED BY BREXIT TO LEAVE THAT SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION IN THE NEXT FEW YEARS WHICH SHOULD MAKE A NUMBER OF EU STATES TO CO-OPERATE FULLY WITH THE UK OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR UNFRIENDLY ATTITUDE AT A LATER DATE.

AS THE GREAT PRIME MINISTER - WILLIAM PITT -  (1759-1806) ANNOUNCED IN NOVEMBER 9-1805 SHORTLY AFTER  NELSON'S VICTORY OVER THE FRENCH AND SPANISH FLEETS AT TRAFALGAR.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

The blueprint of a Free and Prosperous United Kingdom should be the blueprint of a future Free Europe and the world at large. Our past still lives in the hearts of FREE PEOPLES everywhere and soon we will rejoin that sacred past which we left over 43 years ago because of traitorous politicians and others who couldn't see the dangers ,for the gross lies and deceit in their path.

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 18-2017

H.F.1092 BREXIT NOW

Brought-forward from August 2003

[THE WAY AHEAD TO RECLAIM OUR SACRED INHERITANCE.]

Faced with the possible imposition (illegally) of a E. U. Constitution this  article contemplating our own U.K. Constitution (English Constitution), is especially topical.

J. Bingley

Constitutional Principles of Power and Remedy.

The Constitution is specifically intended, indeed designed to limit the powers of the state with respect to the people. The Constitution sets a standard upon which the performance of governance may be measured and contested and to provide remedy if abused.

The whole constitution originates its authority from

COMMON LAW

Supremacy resides in the

LAW and PEOPLE

NOT THE

CROWN or PARLIAMENT.

It is a matter of constitutional principle and legal fact that,

THE LAW IS SUPREME

The rule of law is the antithesis of arbitrary power. Integral with this, is the system of jury trial. It places the power of law enforcement in the

HANDS of the PEOPLE.

This the most vital safeguard against DESPOTISM.

The English Constitution's function is to

PROTECT the

"RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

 of ENGLISHMEN".

These are the 'BIRTHRIGHT' of the PEOPLE'

[In 2016 one can see how successive governments have by gradualism watered down these rights with even attempts to replace jury trial by trial by judge only on the grounds of speed and saving resources. The people in the main have been, amiss in not being vigilant to the protection of THEIR CONSTITUTION. In just a few weeks on the 23 June,2016 they have a choice whether to vote to leave the EU and regain THEIR LAW-THEIR CONSTITUTION-THEIR FREE COUNTRY. or REMAIN in an ALIEN COLLECTIVIST AND CORRUPT UNDEMOCRATIC EU with NO PROTECTION of MAGNA CARTA of 1215 and BILL OF RIGHTS of 1688 and NO ENGLISHMAN'S ' RIGHTS and LIBERTIES' to be passed on to FUTURE GENERATIONS.]

The fundamental rights and liberties are listed in the preamble of the Coronation Oath Act of 1688 which declares that  the oath is taken for the purpose of

" Maintaining our spiritual and civil rights and properties"

It is a contract with the people which makes it the permanent duty of the CROWN, and the CROWN in both GOVERNMENT and PARLIAMENT.

This contracts the Monarch to govern only according to the STATUTE, COMMON LAW, and the CUSTOM and to 'CAUSE LAW and JUSTICE with MERCY to be used in all JUDGEMENTS'.

All power of governance is vested in the CROWN.

The two Houses of Parliament may upon their concurrence offer bills for ROYAL ASSENT.

A BILL is not ENACTED until it has been authorised by the SOVEREIGN POWER.

Whilst the enacting power (a royal prerogative) of Royal Assent is entirely vested with the monarch it is contracted ONLY TO BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.  This is a limitation and essential safeguard to protect the people from any over mighty governance  [such as Tony Blair's and Gordon Brown's NEW LABOUR and since DAVE'S PARTY]

 It was used  to defeat the Divine Right of Kings; a claim of absolute power by the Stuart monarchs.  The OATH ascertains the SUPREMACY of the LAW, not the supremacy of CROWN or of PARLIAMENT.

There is certainly no Divine Right of Politicians.

The Coronation contract is of the Crown owing allegiance to the Constitution. The PEOPLE give ALLEGIANCE to the CROWN.

Here is a system of mutual protection for there is a constitutional interdependence.

The MAGNA CARTA

made provision for the PEOPLE to use ANY MEANS including FORCE if the CROWN is found to be in BREACH.

[THE CROWN IS IN BREACH!]

THE RIGHT OF RESISTANCE IS THE ULTIMATE REMEDY...

That which constitutionally binds the Monarch is a restriction upon Her Majesty, Her Government and all Parliamentary power.  The Monarch may do no wrong, but should she refuse by her negative power( the right to withhold assent) to

'LET WRONG BE DONE.'

[Millions of patriots have been waiting over four decades for:-

'Right to be Done!']

Sir William Blackstone confirms this. Whilst the monarch accepts the advice of ministers, they must only advise to do that which COMPLIES with the CONSTITUTION.  Plainly NO MONARCH is FREE to ASSENT to ADVICE that CONFLICTS with the CONSTITUTION in FORCE.

There is no authority in Parliament to pass any power of governance in England to those who hold or owe no allegiance. [such as the EU]

 There is no constitutional authority for Parliament to deliberately breach the constitutional laws by new   conflicting enactment.

 There is a natural duty resulting from the logic of our constitutional law to debate and resolve conflicts, if necessary by prior repeal.

 We must put an end to this form of 'legal' abuse, particularly through the misapplication of party politics.

 Most but not all of our constitution is written:- the Magna Carta, the Petition of Rights, the Declaration of Rights, the Bill of Rights, the Act of Settlement and the Acts of Union etc. It has evolved over centuries with the expenditure of much blood. It has been abused and corrected many times. It was finally settled by the Glorious Revolution of 1688/9.

The Judicial function is to be the independent arbiter between party and party or party and government under the terms of our constitutional law.  The courts are bound to declare upon the constitutionality of an Act where it may prove to be an action of unconstitutional governance. The great examples of the Magna Carta, the Petition 1628, the Declaration & the Bill of Rights 1688/9 make this duty of the court utterly plain.

Judgement may only be given in accordance with the constraints of constitutional laws in force.  At all times the presumption of law and justice in mercy be upheld and used  in all judgements. This is the trust sand the pre-eminent public policy reposed in the judiciary.

The right of petition to the Monarch is an appeal direct to the source of power, the Monarch is under OATH and at LAW, bound to provide REMEDY. Where there are RIGHTS there are REMEDIES. Politicians and Parliament must abide by the terms of reference and DUTY to the CONSTITUTION.

A fixed and certain standard with protection and remedy are the true purpose of the Constitution.

WE MUST RECLAIM OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE RULE OF LAW FROM THE SUPPOSED DIVINE RIGHT OF OUR POLITICIANS.

John Bingley-AUGUST 2003

*

[We ask how did it come to pass that the JUDICIARY did not PROTECT the CONSTITUTION from the illegal actions of PARLIAMENT and the Crown with the disclosures in 2001 under the 30 year rule from the Public Record Office at

 KEW-LONDON

 which revealed the CONSPIRACY of the FOREIGN OFFICE to prevent the PEOPLE from hearing the TRUTH of their TREACHERY and BETRAYAL. Under the 1969 THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION on the  LAW of TREATIES  there are two key provisions which authorise a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice.

1. Where corruption has been demonstrated in respect of pro curing the treaty in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

". Where there has been a material change of circumstances. A material change of circumstances has surfaced into the daylight (September 2005), to begin with, following the death of

Edward Heath.

. It has been revealed that he was an agent of a foreign power (NAZI-GERMANY-since 1938), accepted corrupt payment for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them-and that he did all this on behalf of a foreign power which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation.

[Massive payouts were given to the signatories of the  EEC which in reality was in effect the road to the corrupt-collectivist-undemocratic

FEDERAL STATE of the EUROPEAN UNION.]

*

[THE QUEEN FAILED IN HER SOLEMN DUTY TO PROTECT HER PEOPLE AND THEIR UNIQUE WORLD RENOWNED FREE PARLIAMENTARY INHERITANCE

AND APART FROM SIGNING ILLEGALLY 6 EU TREATIES CONTRARY TO HER CORONATION OATH-IN 1998 SIGNED TONY BLAIR'S SECRET AMENDMENT BILL  FOR TREASON FROM THE DEATH PENALTY TO IMPRISONMENT FOR LIFE-OBVIOUSLY THEY BOTH HAD REASONS  FOR FEARING A FUTURE IMPEACHMENT BY PARLIAMENT.

 

More!

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS}

MAY 30-2016

H.F.800

 

 

 

IIMIGRATION- THE ENEMY WITHIN!

WHY SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS HAVE IGNORED GRASS ROOTS CALL FOR A HALT TO IMMIGRATION SINCE ENOCH POWELL SPOKE FOR THE PEOPLE OF OUR SMALL ISLAND THOSE MANY DECADES AGO. THAT IS WHY THERE ISN'T SUFFICIENT HOUSING AVAILABLE AS LOCAL PEOPLE WON'T A STOP TO CONCRETING ANY MORE OF THEIR BEAUTIFUL COUNTRYSIDE.

 We hear that millions of robots will soon be a part of our life. Hasn't anyone thought about the consequences of this on our everyday life. Our transport system already overloaded will have to accommodate those extra bottoms. Millions of people will lose their jobs and become the responsibility of the general taxpayer.

As a small island a quarter the size of Germany it was stated many decades ago that the population of between 20 to 30 million would be a comfortable number to match the energy and other resources necessary for a comfortable existence. We have been recently informed that by 2050 we will have an island population of 80 million. Germany which is four times our landmass had 82 million not so long in the past and has accepted over a million immigrants in the last year alone.

It is the political parties, particularly the GANG OF THREE who over the past decades have looked on increased immigration as their source of future voters and as has been demonstrated they decided to ignore local objections to more housing and put pressure on local councils to build to accommodate the millions of immigrants in their back yard.

We mentioned a number of years ago that governments should not put the cart before the horse by allowing millions of immigrants to settle in our once settled and comfortable island home. As we all know there isn't sufficient housing for those many elderly who wish to downside which has been ignored for decades.

It is time for the politicians of all parties to face reality and immediately embark on a programme of an immediate block on future immigration except for the need for particular needs of the moment and the encouragement of immigrants to return to their own back yard .

We have over 3 million of the Islamic faith of which we are told over 60 per cent have NO INTENTION OF INTEGRATING INTO OUR SOCIETY-their own CLERICS who have integrated have criticized  successive governments for their failure in not bringing in strict measures-

EITHER INTEGRATE-OR GO!

Instead, with successive governments looking to  Saudi Arabian Government investment and ARMS CONTRACTS they have chosen to ignore the repeated calls for ACTION! and simply leave the matter for a future government which means

THAT NOTHING IS DONE!

DEMOCRATIC GOVERNMENTS ARE IN POWER TO CARRY OUT THE WISHES OF THE ELECTORATE

NOT

THE SELFISH WISH

OF

UNPATRIOTIC POLITICIANS.

This is a matter that UKIP should have been covering but their internal bickering and unpatriotic mischief's have proved that they have been a tool of successive governments since its formation decades ago. We in fact were invited to the House of Lords at its inauguration and have not been impressed by their usual lack lustre performance over the years.]

ROYAL SOCIETY OF ST GEORGE

 by ENOCK POWELL. - [23rd April]

*

www.eutruth.org.uk

 Find out the TRUTH

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS!]

 

JULY 6-2017

H. F.1243 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

 

BROUGHT FORWARD FROM APRIL-2007

 

WHEN WILL WE LEARN TO STOP APPEASING TERROR

*

COMMENTARY

by

Melanie Phillips

[Daily Mail -April-2007]

 

The ending of the Al Qaeda fertiliser bomb plot trial has posed crucial questions about the competence of

MI5

In particular, the assurances we were given after the 7/7 bombings, that the perpetrators had been unknown to the

SECURITY SERVICE

-have been shown to be utterly false.

 

Disturbingly as that is by itself, the case also raises yet more pressing questions about whether Britain is even now acting effectively enough against the threat to this country from

ISLAMIST TERRORISM.

The fact is that Al Qaeda now sees Britain as both its principal target and its principal recruiting ground. By its own admission, MI5 is monitoring no fewer than 200 terrorist networks, 1,600 identified individual terrorists and 30 known terrorist plots. It says British Muslims are being indoctrinated with horrifying speed, and more terrorists are being recruited every day.

IN TRUTH, as our leading counter-terrorist police officer, Peter Clarke, said last night, this country is facing  a terrorist threat of a nature and scale it has simply

NEVER SEEN BEFORE.

This terrorism is part of a

GLOBAL HOLY WAR

-and the dreadful thing is that it is recruiting British -born boys as its foot-soldiers against their own fellow citizens.

 

When my book

LONDONISTAN

was published a year ago, my claim that we were in a state of denial about the unprecedented emergency we were facing from home-grown terrorism and extremism was dismissed in some quarters as unwarranted alarmism.

SINCE THEN

-public opinion has shifted. Many have realized that what I wrote was if anything, an understatement of the

TRUE POSITION.

BUT

-our official class is still failing to

TAKE ACTION

-that was necessary to

DEFEAT THIS THREAT

to our

WHOLE WAY OF LIFE

Certainly, it is now aware of the enormous scale of the

TERROR THREAT

But it is still fighting with

BOTH HANDS

tied behind its back. In particular, the

HUMAN RIGHTS ACT

-continues to make effective anti-terror policy almost

IMPOSSIBLE.

 

ONLY last week , the Government was prevented from deporting two Libyan terrorist suspects, even though they came here illegally are deemed to pose a serious threat to our lives, because our judges have said no one can be sent anywhere that might not uphold their

HUMAN RIGHTS.

The Government was originally begged by our

SECURITY SERVICES

-not to pass the 1998 Human Rights Act precisely because of the danger it would pose to

NATIONAL SECURITY

-by tying us in such knots. Ministers merely dismissed their concerns.

NOW

-the same

SECURITY SERVICES

-face the nightmare that Islamist terrorists will obtain a nuclear or other dirty bomb to use against

BRITAIN

-with a

HUNAN RIGHTS LAW

-that makes it more difficult to thwart such a terrible

OUTCOME

*

 

[The solution lies with the Government who must repeal the

1998 HUMAN RIGHTS ACT

and articles in the British led -

1951 Human Convention of Human Rights

they will of course prevaricate and laud the advantages of the

HUMAN RIGHTS ACT

-until they were under attack for their illegal war in Iraq.

Any articles which a Government wished to retain could be legislated for in Parliament.]

 

Even worse than this, ministers seem to have no idea about the need to attack the ideology driving all this.

It is simply not enough to flush out the terrorist cells, vital though that clearly is. We have to defeat the ideas driving some British Muslims to commit these acts in the first place.

The Government has started paying lip-service to this. It has spoken against extremism of the

Muslim Council of  Britain

-and is encouraging a wider range of truly moderate Muslims to speak up. And a few more extremists are being arrested.

BUT AT THE SAME TIME IT IS STILL APPEASING RADICALISM.

*

[It reminds one of the typical duo police investigators of the past where one was the softy and the other the hard man. So long as they achieved their objective it had a purpose. The moderate Muslims of course as their more militant brothers and sisters provided they balance their approach will achieve their aim of a future

MUSLIM STATE RELIGION

in

ENGLAND

And their greatest helper is the Blair Government with their illegal war in Iraq which has allowed the discontented Muslim youth who have enjoyed the benefits of the diversity and human rights agenda to put their faith to the test in combating the invaders of a Muslim State.]

 It has become a cliché to say that  most British Muslims are

MODERATE

-Certainly, most of them undoubtedly would have no truck with terrorism or violence and encouragingly a growing number are speaking out against

ISLAMIST EXTREMISM.

But extremist views are not confined to a few rogue elements. Opinion polls suggest that more than

 100,000

-of our Muslim citizens think the July 2005 attacks in London were justified.

A report by the Policy Exchange think-tank revealed that around one third of British Muslims thought that if Muslims left the FAITH, they should be killed; and 37 per cent of 16-to-24-year olds wanted to live in

BRITAIN

UNDER

SHARIA rather than ENGLISH LAW

[Well as we have explained before the fault is down to those who allowed the immigration in such large numbers from Muslim countries. Were they so naive not to realise that Muslims take their FAITH most seriously and they do not compromise -why should they. They were accepted into Britain and that included their right to worship in their own way.  A knowledge of the history of the Islamic World should have given governments caution about extending citizenship to their peoples in such large numbers. But they are here and we can only hope that a firm but just policy will lead to integration and tolerance of the faiths of all who share our island home. BUT it should be understood that our past and future are coupled with our

CHRISTIAN HERITAGE.

THOSE WHO ARE UNABLE TO ACCEPT THIS MUST FIND THEIR HOME ELSEWHERE. ]

 

*

These numbers subscribing to such extremist views are deeply disturbing. They swell the sea in which terrorism swims.

If this tide is to be held back Islamist extremism in Britain must be stopped and British values reasserted and stoutly upheld. To defeat such extremism, we have to make it abundantly clear that we will not give an inch to those who want to

DESTROY OUR VALUES.

But we appear instead to be doing nothing to stop the spread of radical Islamism. Indeed, in a myriad different ways we are giving out the lethal message that we have nether the will nor the courage to

DEFEND OUR WAY OF LIFE.

British Muslims are being recruited in large numbers to terror because next to nothing is being done

TO STOP IT

[Well!- an immediate pullout of Iraq and Afghanistan may stem the flow because that is why the recruiting sergeants are so successful but unless this happens immediately then the flow becomes a flood.]

Last January, a Channel Four television Dispatches programme revealed that at certain mosques which were assumed to be more

moderate and which were even prominent in talking to other faiths, material was being preached and disseminated advocating such horrors as the murder of homosexuals, the beating of women and hatred of

CHRISTIANS and JEWS.

Despite the Prime Minister's promise to outlaw the radical group Hizb ut Tahrir (which believes Britain should be an Islamic State), the Government refuses to do so.

YET, Ed Husain, an extremely brave former radical who has recanted, chillingly documents in his new book

THE ISLAMIST

-the enormous influence of this group in telling countless British Muslims its duty to wage holy war, and that Muslims have a corresponding duty

TO BE PREPARED.

-to launch attacks on Britain

FROM WITHIN

 

Not only are we failing to halt the spread of such lethal extremist views, we are also failing to hold the line for

OUR OWN VALUES.

Above all else, we should absolutely refuse to countenance the spread of

SHARIA LAW

-which is not only inimical to our own deepest principles but aims to

SUPPLANT OUR OWN LAWS.

Yet we are turning a blind-eye to the steady Sharia-isation

SHARIA-ISATION

OF

OUR COUNTRY.

We have ignored the development of informal parallel SHARIA jurisdictions, enforced by SHARIA courts, in areas heavily populated by Muslims.

We have turned a blind eye to the polygamous marriages they sanction in Britain but now give extra welfare benefits to husbands settling here with

MULTIPLE WIVES

-even though bigamy is a

CRIME

Despite the fact that thousands of Muslim women are terrorised by the threat of

'Honour killings'

only a few of these horrific cases result in prosecutions - because our police are terrified of being accused of

'racism'

IF THEY PURSUE THEM.

 

Now Gordon Brown has said Britain should become the centre of global Islamic banking. But this is heavily backed by Saudi Arabia which will use it to further its objective of Islamising

THE WEST.

- and may even provide a cover for the financing of further terror.

This craven appeasement of extremism gives Islamists the unmistakable message

THAT BRITAIN IS THEIRS

-for the taking.

Thus truly moderate Muslims

ARE BETRAYED

-and all of us are put in infinitely

GREATER DANGER

-not just from

TERRORISM

-but from a

CULTURE

that still seems to be

SLEEPWALKING TO OBLIVION.

*          *          *

 

[As we have intimated in the past the mistakes were made from the very beginning by our politicians not noting the  different religious  customs which would make full

INTEGRATION IMPOSSIBLE

As a nation which had one of the largest

EMPIRES

-the world has ever seen - with a population of a quarter of the globe under our guidance.

HOW IS IT POSSIBLE

that such ignorance could have been shown to the difficulties in which large scale immigration from certain places would bring us to our present day problems and dangers.

IMMIGRATION

should be controlled with the realisation that certain immigrants are by their inability to

INTEGRATE and comply with our LAWS

-be asked to accept their responsibility of citizenship before being allowed to settle here.

For the people who from all corners of the world who have decided to make our country their home and integrate and obey our laws it is imperative that those who have no intention to comply should be refused citizenship -there can be no exceptions as in our country everyone who ever they are under the same

RULE OF LAW

to have it any other way lies the path to disorder and anarchy.]

*

LONDONISTAN

published by

Gibson Square

£8.99

 

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets]

 

*

IMMIGRATION FILE

 

All underlined words have a separate bulletin]

[Daily Mail -April-2007]

 

 

LETTER from Lord Kilmuir, the Lord Chancellor, to Edward Heath, prior to the acceptance by Parliament of the

“Treaty of Rome

 

My dear Ted,

 

You wrote to me on 30th November, [1970] - about the constitutional implications of our [The UK] becoming a party to the “Treaty of Rome”. I have now had an opportunity of considering what you say in your letter and have studied the memoranda you sent me I agree with you that there are IMPORTANT CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES INVOLVED.

 

I have no doubt that if we do sign the TREATY, we shall suffer some LOSS of SOVEREIGNTY, but before attempting to define or evaluate the loss I wish to make one general observation.

 

 At the end of the day, the ISSUE is

Whether or NOT to join the [So-called]

 EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY

 

- must be decided on broad political grounds and if it appears from what follows in

this letter that I find the constitutional objections serious that does mean that I consider them conclusive [final!]

 

I do however, think it important that we should appreciate clearly from the outset exactly WHAT, from the CONSTITUTIONAL point of view, is involved if we sign the treaty, and it is with that consideration in mind that I have addressed myself to the questions you have raised.

 

Adherence to the Treaty of Rome would in my opinion, would AFFECT our SOVEREIGNTY in three ways:-

 

PARLIAMENT would be required to surrender some of its functions to the ORGANS of the COMMUNITY.

 

The CROWN would be called ON to TRANSFER part of its TREATY-MAKING power to those ORGANS of the COMMUNITY.

 

OUR COURTS OF LAW would sacrifice some degree of INDEPENDENCE by becoming subordinate in certain respects to the EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE.

 

The POSITION of PARLIAMENT.

 

It is clear that the memorandum prepared by your Legal advisers that the Council of Ministers could eventually (after the system of qualified majority voting had come into force) make regulations which would be binding on us even against our wishes, and would in fact become for us part of the LAW of the LAND.

 

THERE ARE TWO WAYS IN WHICH THIS REQUIREMENT OF THE TREATY COULD IN PRACTICE BE IMPLEMENTED.

 

Parliament could legislate ad hoc on each occasion that the Council make regulations requiring action by us. The difficulty would be that, since Parliament can bind neither bind itself nor its successors, we could only comply with the obligations under the TREATY if PARLIAMENT abandoned its RIGHT of passing independent judgment on the legislative proposals put before it.

 

A parallel is the CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION whereby PARLIAMENT passes the British North American Bills without question at the request of the PARLIAMENT of CANADA; in this respect PARLIAMENT here has substance if not in form, abdicated its SOVEREIGN position, and it would have pro tanto [for so much] , to do the same for the [EUROPEAN] COMMUNITY.

 

 It would in theory be possible for parliament to enact at the outset legislation which would give automatic force of law to any existing or future [EU] regulations made by the appropriate organs of the Community.  For Parliament to do this would go far beyond the most extensive delegation of -----

I do not think there is any likelihood of this being acceptable to the House of Commons. Which ever course were adopted, Parliament would retain in theory the liberty to repeal the relevant Act or Acts [Of the EU Treaty] but I would agree with you that we must act on the assumption that entry into the [EU] Community would be irrevocable; we should therefore to accept a position where Parliament had no more power to repeal its own enactments than it has in practice to abrogate the Statute of Westminster. 

 

In short, Parliament would have to transfer to the [EU] Council, or other appropriate organ of the [EU] Community, its substantive powers of legislating over a whole of a very important field.

 

Treaty –Making POWERS.

 

The proposition that every treaty entered into by the United Kingdom does to some extent fetter our freedom of action is plainly TRUE.  Some treaties such as GATT and O.E.E.C restrict severely our liberty to make agreements with third parties and I should not regard it as detrimental to our sovereign that, by signing the TREATY of ROME, we undertook not to make tariff or trade agreements without the Council’s approval.

 

BUT to transfer to the Council or the [EU] Commission the power to make such treaties on our behalf, and even against our will, is an entirely different proposition.

 

There seems to me to be a clear distinction between the exercise of sovereignty involved in the conscious acceptance by us of obligations under treaty-making powers and the total or partial surrender of sovereignty involved in our cession of these powers to some other body.

 

To confer a sovereign state’s treaty-making powers on an international organisation is the first step on the road which leads by way of confederation to the fully FEDERAL STATE.

 

I do not suggest that what is involved would necessarily carry us very far in this direction, but it would be a most significant step and one for which there is no precedent in our case.  Moreover, a further surrender of sovereignty of parliamentary supremacy would necessarily be involved as you know, although the treaty-making power is vested in the CROWN.

 

 

Parliamentary sanction is required for any treaty which involves a change in the law or the imposition of taxation (to take two examples), and we cannot ratify such a treaty unless Parliament consents. But if binding treaties are to be entered into on our behalf, Parliament must surrender this function and either resign itself to becoming a rubber stamp or give the Community, in effect, the power to amend our domestic laws.

 

Independence of the Courts.

 

There is no precedent for our final appellate tribunal being required to refer questions of law (even in a limited field) to another Court and as I assume to be the implication of “refer” to accept that Court’s decision.

 

You will remember that when a similar proposal was considered in connection with the Council of Europe we felt strong objection to it. I have no doubt that the whole of the legal profession in this country would share my dislike for such a proposal which must inevitably detract from the INDEPENDENCE and AUTHORITY of OUR COURTS.

 

 

Of these three objections, the first two are by far the more important.  I must emphasise that in my view the SURRENDERS of SOVEREIGNTY involved are SERIOUS ONES, and I think that as a matter of practical politics, it will not be easy to persuade PARLIAMENT or the PUBLIC to accept them.

 

I am sure that it would be a great mistake to under-estimate the force of objections to them.  But these objections ought to be brought out into the open now because, if we attempt to gloss over them at this stage, those who are opposed to the whole idea of our joining the [EU] Community will certainly seize on them with more damaging effect later on.  Having said this, I would emphasis once again that, although these CONSTITUTIONAL considerations must be given their full weight when we come to balance the arguments on either side, I do not for one moment wish to convey the impression that they must necessarily tip the scale.  In the long run we shall have to decide whether economic factors require us to make

SACRIFICES of SOVEREIGNTY:

My concern is to ensure that we should see exactly what it is that we are called on to sacrifice, and how serious our loss would be.

 

Yours ever,      David.

 

*          *

 

[There are many hundreds of essays on the subject of constitutional  matters on our bulletin board which give the background to the CONSPIRACY of the pro-European lobby at the time and since who felt no compunction in telling LIES-LIES and more LIES.  Some of those politicians who concealed and the TRUTH and fostered the DECEIT are still with us today in 2006. –Though some have now realised how wrong they were to turn a blind eye to the blatant half-truths and downright lies in order to get the Bill through Parliament by only 8 votes. – to remind you again that many more details by INDEPENDENT sources on our bulletin board].

 

*          *          *

 

 [Font altered-bolding & underlining used-comments in brackets.]

SEPTEMBER/06

 

*

H.F.766

 

 

 

Fake Terrorism: The Road to Dictatorship

Michael Rivero – What Really Happened.com

It’s the oldest trick in the book, dating back to Roman times; creating the enemies you need.

In 70 BC, an ambitious minor politician and extremely wealthy man, Marcus Licineus Crassus, wanted to rule Rome. Just to give you an idea of what sort of man Crassus really was, he is credited with invention of the fire brigade. But in Crassus’ version, his fire-fighting slaves would race to the scene of a burning building whereupon Crassus would offer to buy it on the spot for a tiny fraction of it’s worth. If the owner sold, Crassus’ slaves would put out the fire. If the owner refused to sell, Crassus allowed the building to burn to the ground. By means of this device, Crassus eventually came to be the largest single private landholder in Rome, and used some of his wealth to help back Julius Caesar against Cicero.

In 70 BC Rome was still a Republic, which placed very strict limits on what Rulers could do, and more importantly NOT do. But Crassus had no intentions of enduring such limits to his personal power, and contrived a plan.

Crassus seized upon the slave revolt led by Sparticus in order to strike terror into the hearts of Rome, whose garrison Sparticus had already defeated in battle. But Sparticus had no intention of marching on Rome itself, a move he knew to be suicidal. Sparticus and his band wanted nothing to do with the Roman empire and had planned from the start merely to loot enough money from their former owners in the Italian countryside to hire a mercenary fleet in which to sail to freedom.

Sailing away was the last thing Crassus wanted Sparticus to do. He needed a convenient enemy with which to terrorize Rome itself for his personal political gain. So Crassus bribed the mercenary fleet to sail without Sparticus, then positioned two Roman legions in such a way that Sparticus had no choice but to march on Rome.

Terrified of the impending arrival of the much-feared army of gladiators, Rome declared Crassus Praetor. Crassus then crushed Sparticus’ army and even though Pompeii took the credit, Crassus was elected Consul of Rome the following year.

With this maneuver, the Romans surrendered their Republican form of government. Soon would follow the first Triumvirate, consisting of Crassus, Pompeii, and Julius Caesar, followed by the reign of the god-like Emperors of Rome.

The Romans were hoaxed into surrendering their Republic, and accepting the rule of Emperors.

Julius Caesar’s political opponent, Cicero, for all his literary accomplishments, played the same games in his campaign against Julius Caesar, claiming that Rome was falling victim to an internal “vast right wing” conspiracy in which any expressed desire for legislative limits on government was treated as suspicious behavior. Cicero, in order to demonstrate to the Romans just how unsafe Rome has become hired thugs to cause as much disturbance as possible, and campaigned on a promise to end the internal strife if elected and granted extraordinary powers.

What Cicero only dreamed of, Adolph Hitler succeeded in doing. Elected Chancellor of Germany, Hitler, like Crassus, had no intention of living with the strict limits to his power imposed by German law. Unlike Cicero, Hitler’s thugs were easy to recognize; they all wore the same brown shirts. But their actions were no different than those of their Roman predecessors. They staged beatings, set fires, caused as much trouble as they could, while Hitler made speeches promising that he could end the crime wave of subversives and terrorism if he was granted extraordinary powers.

The Germans were hoaxed into surrendering their Republic, and accepting the rule of Der Fuhrer. The state-sponsored schools will never tell you this, but governments routinely rely on hoaxes to sell their agendas to an otherwise reluctant public. The Romans accepted the Emperors and the Germans accepted Hitler not because they wanted to, but because the carefully crafted illusions of threat appeared to leave no other choice.

Our government too uses hoaxes to create the illusion that We The People have no choice but the direction the government wishes us to go in.

In 1898, Joseph Pulitzer’s New York World and William Randolph Hearst’s New York Journal were arguing for American intervention in Cuba. Hearst is reported to have dispatched a photographer to Cuba to photograph the coming war with Spain. When the photographer asked just what war that might be, Hearst is reported to have replied, “You take the photographs, and I will provide the war”. Hearst was true to his word, as his newspaper published stories of great atrocities being committed against the Cuban people, most of which turned out to be complete fabrications.

On the night of February 15, 1898, the USS Maine, lying in Havana harbor in a show of US resolve to protect her interests, exploded violently. Captain Sigsbee, the commander of the Maine, urged that no assumptions of enemy attack be made until there was a full investigation of the cause of the explosion. For this, Captain Sigsbee was excoriated in the press for “refusing to see the obvious”. The Atlantic Monthly declared flat out that to suppose the explosion to be anything other than a deliberate act by Spain was “completely at defiance of the laws of probability.”

Under the slogan “Remember the Maine”, Americans went to war with Spain, eventually winning the Phillipines (and annexing Hawaii along the way).

In 1975, an investigation led by Admiral Hyman Rickover examined the data recovered from a 1911 examination of the wreck and concluded that there had been no evidence of an external explosion. The most likely cause of the sinking was a coal dust explosion in a coal bunker imprudently located next to the ship’s magazines. Captain Sigsbee’s caution had been well founded.

President Franklin Delano Roosevelt needed a war. He needed the fever of a major war to mask the symptoms of a still deathly ill economy struggling back from the Great Depression (and mutating towards Socialism at the same time). Roosevelt wanted a war with Germany to stop Hitler, but despite several provocations in the Atlantic, the American people, still struggling with that troublesome economy, were opposed to any wars. Roosevelt violated neutrality with lend lease, and even ordered the sinking of several German ships in the Atlantic, but HItler refused to be provoked.

Roosevelt needed an enemy, and if America would not willingly attack that enemy, then one would have to be maneuvered into attacking America, much as Marcus Licinius Crassus has maneuvered Sparticus into attacking Rome.

The way open to war was created when Japan signed the tripartite agreement with Italy and Germany, with all parties pledging mutual defense to each other. Whereas Hitler would never declare war on the United States no matter the provocation, the means to force Japan to do so were readily at hand.

The first step was to place oil and steel embargoes on Japan, using Japan’s wars on the Asian mainland as a reason. This forced Japan to consider seizing the oil and mineral rich regions in Indonesia. With the European powers militarily exhausted by the war in Europe, the United States was the only power in the Pacific able to stop Japan from invading the Dutch East Indies, and by moving the Pacific fleet from San Diego to Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, Roosevelt made a pre-emptive strike on that fleet the mandatory first step in any Japanese plan to extend it’s empire into the “southern resource area.”

Roosevelt boxed in Japan just as completely as Crassus had boxed in Sparticus. Japan needed oil. They had to invade Indonesia to get it, and to do that they first had to remove the threat of the American fleet at Pearl Harbor. There never really was any other course open to them.

To enrage the American people as much as possible, Roosevelt needed the first overt attack by Japan to be as bloody as possible, appearing as a sneak attack much as the Japanese had done to the Russians. From that moment up until the attack on Pearl Harbor itself, Roosevelt and his associates made sure that the commanders in Hawaii, General Short and Admiral Kimmel, were kept in the dark as much as possible about the location of the Japanese fleet and it’s intentions, then later scapegoated for the attack. (Congress recently exonerated both Short and Kimmel, posthumously restoring them to their former ranks).

But as the Army board had concluded at the time, and subsequent de-classified documents confirmed, Washington knew the attack was coming, knew exactly where the Japanese fleet was, and where it was headed.

On November 29th, Secretary of State Hull showed United Press reporter Joe Leib a message with the time and place of the attack, and the New York Times in it’s special 12/8/41 Pearl Harbor edition, on page 13, reported that the time and place of the attack had been known in advance!

The much repeated claim that the Japanese fleet maintained radio silence on it’s way to Hawaii was a lie. Among other intercepts still held in the Archives of the NSA is the UNCODED message sent by the Japanese tanker Shirya stating, “proceeding to a position 30.00 N, 154.20 E. Expect to arrive at that point on 3 December.” (near HI)

President Lyndon Johnson wanted a war in Vietnam. He wanted it to help his friends who owned defense companies to do a little business. He needed it to get the Pentagon and CIA to quit trying to invade Cuba. And most of all, he needed a provocation to convince the American people that there was really “no other choice”.

On August 5, 1964, newspapers across America reported “renewed attacks” against American destroyers operating in Vietnamese waters, specifically the Gulf of Tonkin. The official story was that North Vietnamese torpedo boats launched an “unprovoked attack” on the USS Maddox while it was on “routine patrol.”

The truth is that USS Maddox was involved in aggressive intelligence gathering in coordination with actual attacks by South Vietnam and the Laotian Air Force against targets in North Vietnam. The truth is also that there was no attack by torpedo boats against the USS Maddox. Captain John J. Herrick, the task force commander in the Gulf, cabled Washington DC that the report was the result of an “over-eager” sonarman who had picked up the sounds of his own ship’s screws and panicked. But even with this knowledge that the report was false, Lyndon Johnson went on national TV that night to announce the commencement of air strikes against North Vietnam, “retaliation” for an attack that had never occurred.

President George Bush wanted a war in Iraq. Like Crassus, George Bush is motivated by money. Specifically oil money. But with the OPEC alliance failing to keep limits on oil production in the Mideast, the market was being glutted with oil pumped from underneath Iraq, which sat over roughly 1/3 of the oil reserves of the entire region.

George wanted a war to stop that flow of oil, to keep prices (and profits) from falling any further than they already had. But like Roosevelt, he needed the “other side” to make the first move.

Iraq had long been trying to acquire greater access to the Persian Gulf, and felt limited, confined to a narrow strip of land along Kuwait’s northern border, which placed Iraqi interests in close proximity with hostile Iran. George Bush, who had been covertly arming Iraq during its war with Iran, sent word via April Glaspie (1) that the United States would not intervene if Saddam Hussein grabbed a larger part of Kuwait. Saddam fell for the bait and invaded.

Of course, Americans were not about to send their sons and daughters to risk their lives for petroleum products. So George Bush arranged a hoax, using public relations firm Hill & Knowlton, which has grown rich on taxpayer money by being most industrious and creative liars! Hill & Knowlton concocted a monumental fraud in which the daughter of the Kuwaiti Ambassador to the United States, went on TV pretending to be a nurse, and related a horror story in which Iraqi troops looted the incubators from a Kuwaiti hospital, leaving the premature babies on the cold floor to die. The media, part of the swindle from the start, never bothered asking why the “nurse” didn’t just pick the babies up and wrap them in blankets or something.

Enraged by the incubator story, Americans supported operation Desert Storm, which never removed Saddam Hussein from power but which did take Kuwait’s oil off of the market for almost 2 years and limited Iraq’s oil exports to this very day. That our sons and daughters came home with serious and lingering medical illnesses was apparently not too great a price to pay for increased oil profits.

Following the victory in Iraq, yet another war appeared to be in the offing in the mineral rich regions of Bosnia. Yet again, a hoax was used to create support for military action.

The photo of Fikret Alic, a Muslim, staring through a barbed wire fence, was used to “prove” that the Bosnians were running modern day “Concentration Camps”. As the headline of “Belsen 92” indicates, all possible associations with the Nazi horrors were made to sell the necessity of sending yet more American troops into someone else’s nation.

But when German Journalists went to Trnopolje, the site of the supposed Bosnian Concentration Camp. to film a documentary, they discovered that the photo was a fake! The camp at Trnopolje was not a concentration camp but a refugee center. Nor was it surrounded by barbed wire. Careful examination of the original photo revealed that the photographer had shot the photo through a broken section of fence surrounding a tool shed. It was the photographer who was on the inside, shooting out at the refugees.

Once again, Americans had been hoaxed into support of actions they might otherwise not have agreed with (2).

While several American Presidents have willingly started wars for personal purposes, perhaps no President has ever carried it to the extreme that Bill Clinton has.

Coincident with the expected public statement of Monica Lewinsky following her testimony, Bill Clinton ordered a cruise missile attack on Sudan and Afghanistan, claiming to have had irrefutable proof that bogeyman extraordinaire (and former Afghani ally) Osama Bin Ladin was creating terrorist chemical weapons there.

Examination of the photos of the debris revealed none of the expected structures one would find in a laboratory that handled lethal weapons-grade materials. Assurances from the CIA that they had a positive soil test for biological weapons fell on their face when it was revealed that there had been no open soil anywhere near the pre-bombed facility. Sudan requested that international observers come test the remains of the factory for any signs of the nerve gas Clinton had insisted was there. None was found. The Sudanese plant was a harmless aspirin factory, and the owner has sued for damages. Later examination of the site hit in Afghanistan revealed it to be a mosque.

Meanwhile, back in Kosovo, stories about genocide and atrocities were flooding the media (in time to distract from the Sudanese embarrassments), just as lurid and sensational and as it turns out often just as fictional as most of William Randolph Hearst’s stories of atrocities against the Cubans.

Again, the government and the media were hoaxing Americans. The above photo was shown on all the American networks, claiming to be one of Slobodan Milosovic’s Migs, shot down while attacking civilians. Closer examination shows it to be stenciled in English!

Like Germany under Chancellor Hitler, there have been events in our nation which strike fear into the hearts of the citizens, such as the New York World Trade Tower bombing, the OK City Federal Building, and the Olympic Park bomb (nicely timed to divert the media from witnesses to the TWA 800 shoot down). The media has been very quick to blame such events on “radicals”, “subversives”, “vast right wing conspiracies”, and other “enemies in our midst”, no different than the lies used by Cicero and Hitler.

But on closer examination, such “domestic terrorist” events do not appear to be what they are made out to be. The FBI had an informant inside the World Trade Tower bombers, Emad Salam, who offered to sabotage the bomb. The FBI told him “no”. The so-called “hot bed” of white separatism at Elohim City, occasional home to Tim McVeigh in the weeks prior to the OK City bombing, was founded and is being run by an FBI informant!

And nobody has ever really explained what this second Ryder truck was doing in a secret camp half way from Elohim City to Oklahoma City two weeks before the bombing. (See photo below)

So, here we are today. Like the Romans of Crassus’ and Cicero’s time, or the Germans under a newly elected Hitler, we are being warned that a dangerous enemy threatens us, implacable, invisible, omnipresent, and invulnerable as long as our government is hamstrung by that silly old Bill of Rights. Already there have appeared articles debating whether or not “extraordinary measures” (i.e. torture) are not fully justified under certain circumstances such as those we are purported to face.

As was the case in Rome and Germany, the government continues to plead with the public for an expansion of its power and authority, to “deal with the crisis”.

However, as Casio watch timers are paraded before the cameras, to the stentorian tones of the talking heads’ constant dire warnings, it is legitimate to question just how real the crises is, and how much is the result of political machinations by our own leaders.

Are the terrorists really a threat, or just hired actors with bombs and Casio watches, paid for by Cicero and given brown shirts to wear by Hitler?

Is terrorism inside the United States really from outside, or is it a stage managed production, designed to cause Americans to believe they have no choice but to surrender the Republic and accept the totalitarian rule of a new emperor, or a new Fuhrer?

Once lost, the Romans never got their Republic back. Once lost, the Germans never got their Republic back. In both cases, the nation had to totally collapse before freedom was restored to the people.

Remember that when Crassus tells you that Sparticus approaches.
Remember that when thugs in the streets act in a manner clearly designed to provoke the public fear. Remember that when the Reichstagg burns down.

(1) See Prologue to a Crisis: a transcript of a meeting between Saddam Hussein and US Ambassador Glaspie shortly before Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait:
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/oldsite/article.asp?ID=51

(2) See Tears of the Mighty by Jared Israel.
http://www.emperors-clothes.com/news/film.htm

JUNE 3-2017

H.F.1212 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

 

The Rotten Heart of Europe -

 by Bernard Connolly

-Part 1

 

For a list of the latest publications contact:

 

Faber and Faber Ltd., 3 Queen Square, London WC1N3AU

 

The following extracts are from the 400page 1996 publication above which when read again almost eight years later deserve the well-known expression ‘I told you so’ as the future events expressed in the popular and erudite truth busting expose of the ‘Rotten Heart of Europe’ had in fact been anticipated.

 

To repeat the views of the ‘ TheTimes’at the review of the book in 1995:

 

The Rotten Heart of Europe must surely now be on the reading list of any politician who wishes to argue about Britain’s European future…The days when Europe’s statesmen could build currency grids and integration treaties over the heads of voters have gone for good. Mr Connolly has given vivid expression to an unease previously voiced by only a few others but widely felt by many…The more people like Mr Connolly who speak that plain truth the better it will be for the Europe of the next century.’

 

Before we can elucidate on the above it will be necessary to outline for you the background of the author:

 

Bernard Connolly was born in Manchester in 1949, and studied at Oxford. He has worked on Wall Street, and for six years from 19989 were head of the European Commission responsible for analysis of the European Monetary System and national and Community money policies. On publication of the hardback edition of this book he was suspended from his job and subsequently sacked. He is widely regarded by academics and bankers as the foremost practical expert on the interaction of politics and economics in European monetary affairs. Now an economic consultant influential in both London and New York, he is in constant demand for articles, press, TV and radio interviews and speeches throughout Europe and North America (written in 1995).

 

One Nation, one money

 

The central aspiration of the treaty of Rome was ‘an ever closer union’, ECU, is also that of the European currency unit, destined by Maastricht to become the single currency of the European Union Would the adoption of the ECU single currency lead to the ECU of friendship, trust and fellow-feeling among the citizens of the neighbouring countries of Europe?

 

The ERM was always intended as the locomotive that would carry Europe to one ECU or the other. Sadly, the history of the ERM suggests that, far from being two sides of the same ECU coin, monetary union and harmonious relations in Europe are as far apart as dross and gold. The true story of the ERM has been one of duplicity, skulduggery, conflict; of economic harm done to every country in the caste interests of he elite; of the distortion of economic logic and the dilution of economic logic and the dilution of political accountability.

 

The contrast between ERM reality and the ERM myth should of itself be warning enough against accepting the even more dangerous myths of the EMU and ‘European’ union’. But just as, in Britain, Lawson saw the failure of his ERM-shadowing policy as a reason for embracing the Erm itself, so now the propagandists portray the failures of the ERM as the cost of ‘non Europe’. This book has already pointed to the economic harm that would be done by monetary union - it would work only if it were not necessary, as the example of monetary relations between Germany and the Netherlands shows (1995) This final chapter will look closely at the politics of European monetary and political union - The two go together - and argue that ‘Europe’ is a dangerous fantasy.

 

The true lesson of the ERM story is that a Europe, even a Rhenish Europe, built on its money would be a Europe sitting atop the fault lines of an earthquake zone. Those fault lines correspond with the borders of nation-states, for the Commission slogan’ One Market, One Money’ is no more than a prediction of discredited’ neo-functionist’ theory. In contrast, the counter-cry of ‘One Nation, One Money’ is the product of psychological, political and historical reality. Could ‘Europe’.

 

Death of the nation- state

 

The obituary of the nation-state has been written many times in recent years, most recently and most aggressively in the Lamers report from the CDU parliamentary group dealing with European affairs. Whether one likes it or not, the argument often goes, increasing globalization of economic activity and the mobility of factors of production have already destroyed the nation-state as a meaningful entity in economic terms.

 

What does it mean to say that the nation-state is no longer an economically viable unit? What implications might there be for ‘Europe’? The most careful historical research into the development of the EC shows that the Community has, up to now, been a mechanism for preserving those features of regulatory state power that liberals find objectionable. It is this feature of Europe that has made it attractive to Socialists and corporatists in national governments. And the Commission. Only their insistent propaganda has created the myth that ‘Europe’ is about ‘an ever closer union of peoples’.

 

The French elite has very distinctive views on these questions. They certainly do not believe the nation is dead, at least not the French nation. Their fear is that the nation is no longer so clearly identifiable as an economic unit as to provide a basis of for the power of a regulatory, interventionist, technocratic state. Liberals will rejoice that the globalization of the world economy, combined with the technological revolution, is making many aspects of the state redundant and enhancing individual freedom. French technocrats are appalled at the inroads into their power being made by the world (that is,’ Anglo-Saxon’) market. A choice has to be made, in their minds, between’ le disorder anglo-saxon et l’etat republicain’.

 

Only by extending the border of the state from the French nation to’ Europe’ can that state hope to retain its domestic power. And only through such an extension can France’ stand up’ to the American and Japanese ogres. One of the most lasting images of the Maastricht referendum campaign in France is that of the posters and press adverts put out by the ‘Yes’ side (that is, in effect, the government) of a paunchy cowboy and a gross sumo wrestler sitting astride the globe. Only through ‘Europe’ the posters screamed, could the French soul escape the domination of the barbarians.

 

Yet this rout of ‘escape’ poses a problem for France: escaping the yoke of Anglo-Saxon and Japanese barbarians must involve embracing German demons. The solution, seen from Paris, is the European Union, in which the enarques, the true inheritors in Europe of the Prussian state tradition, would ‘tie down’ and tame Germany. The ‘Yes’ campaign in France thus developed a double theme: confront the outside world via the creation of a European economic, political and military mammoth; and within this new’ Europe’, ensure French control over Germany by the extension of the French technocracy.

 

In essence, the French technocratic dream was to be able to present European union as a move from the nation-state to the state-nation. The nation-state (identified by many French political theorists with the concept, which they attribute to Germany, of jus sanguinis- (‘where there are Germans, there German soil is’) can be represented as a destructive, selfish and dangerous excrescence of tribalism.

 

The state-nation, on the other hand (identified with the French concept of jus solis- (‘where there is French soil, there Frenchman are’), is depicted as the creation of feelings of unity among different ‘tribes’ through common fealty to a state whose principles and functions offer material, social and even spiritual advantages to all those who choose to accept them.

 

* * *

 

‘One of the most important books ever written about Europe’ Knack

 

CLICK HERE FOR PART 2

 

 

 

The number of Muslims in Europe reaches

44 MILLION

 

 

[MUSLIM POPULATION

 WITHIN EACH PARTICULAR

ONCE FREE NATION STATE

 WITHIN THE EU]

 

WHERE THEY LIVE
 

 Germany---       4,760,000--------------5.8per cent

 France--------     4,710,000-------------7.5 per cent

 Britain--------      2,960,000-------------4.6per cent

Italy--------------2,220,000-------------7per cent   

 Bulgaria-----------1,020,000-----------13.7per cent

 Netherlands------1,000,000-------------6.0percent

 Spain--------------980,000--------------2.3percent

 Belgium-----------630,000-------------5.9 percent

 Greece-------------610,000--------------5.3percent

 Austria------------450,000--------------5.4percent

by

Ian Drury- 

Daily Mail

Home Affairs Correspondent

*  *  *

 

   [ The above figures are no doubt an estimate of each nation 's Muslim population therefore there could be millions more at any one time. Our own government has admitted it does not know the full number, as  those who should have left the country are still here, and others over the years have melted into the population. We also know from experience over the years from those at No 10 are not very good at simple Arithmetic!- when it suits them!]

[WITH THE BIRTH-RATE OF 4-1 THE MUSLIM POPULATION IN ENGLAND WILL GROW TO SURPASS THE INDIGENOUS POPULATION IN A MATTER OF A FEW GENERATIONS AND THEN THEY WILL HAVE THEIR ISLAMIC STATE WITH ITS STRICT SHARIA LAW AND SEEING HOW THE MAJORITY OF THE MUSLIMS IN OUR COUNTRY HAVE REACTED TO THE MASSACRE IN FRANCE THERE WILL BE NO TOLERANCE OF RELIGIOUS FREEDOM WHICH WE HAVE GIVEN THEM. OF COURSE THERE ARE MANY MUSLIMS WHO DECRY THE SILENCE OF THE MAJORITY OF MUSLIMS BUT UNTIL THE GREATER MAJORITY BECOME THE NORM THERE WILL BE NO LIKELIHOOD OF THEIR INTEGRATION INTO OUR SOCIETY.

THE MAJOR FAULT FOR THE SITUATION WE SEE BEFORE US IN THE MIDDLE EAST IS BECAUSE OF THE WEST'S-[USA-UK-FRANCE] HISTORY OF EXPLOITATION IN MUSLIM COUNTRIES IN REGARD TO OIL SUPPLIES OVER THE PAST 97 YEARS AND INTERFERENCE IN THE AFFAIRS OF MUSLIM COUNTRIES WHICH HAS BROUGHT MANY ILLEGAL WARS WITH GREAT SLAUGHTER AND DEVASTATION TO THEIR POPULATIONS.

THE IRISH QUESTION IS A YARD STICK TO SEE HOW LONG INJUSTICE TO A PEOPLE CAN HAVE DIRE CONSEQUENCES EVEN TODAY IN NOVEMBER 2015. IRONICALLY IT WAS THE WAR MONGER TONY BLAIR WHO FOUND THE SOLUTION WHICH BROUGHT PEACE HOWEVER FRAGILE.  BUT HE FAILED TO LEARN FROM HISTORY ABOUT THE INTERFERENCE IN THE MATTERS OF OTHER NATION STATES -PARTICULARLY MUSLIM-A PEOPLE DEDICATED TO THEIR RELIGION ISLAM-THOUGH THEY HAVE DIFFERENT SECTS OF FOLLOWERS ,WHO HAVE YEARNED TO BE THEMSELVES!

WE BELIEVE THAT THE ANSWER TO THE FLOOD OF REFUGEES  FROM ITS OUTSET SHOULD HAVE BEEN TO KEEP THE REFUGEES IN THE MIDDLE EAST -SAUDI ARABIA-HAS TENTED AREA TO ACCEPT 3,000,000 -EGYPT-JORDON...WITH MASSIVE FINANCIAL  HELP AND SHELTER ETC OFFERED TO THOSE COUNTRIES UNSTINTINGLY BUT ALLOW A CONTROLLED FLOW OF WAR REFUGEES TO THOSE COUNTRIES WILLING TO TAKE THEM-_BUT NO COMPULSION SHOULD BE MADE. IN THIS WAY THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN AVOIDED THE CATASTROPHE WE SEE BEFORE US IN EUROPE.

 

*

 

  1. The number of Muslims in Europe reaches

     

    44million -

     

     

    Daily Mail

    13 hours ago ... The number of Muslims in Europe reaches 44m: Serious concerns raised about
    the ... By Ian Drury Home Affairs Correspondent For The Daily Mail ... By contrast,
    the UK has about 2.9million Muslims – the third largest number.

     

     

     
     

     

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS.]

NOVEMBER 16-2015

 

 

H F 550

BROUGHT FORWARD FROM APRIL 2008

New Mosques should not be built in this country while Islamic States

persecuted Christians.

*

No more mosques says Synod member

by

Jonathan Petre

Religious Correspondent

[Daily Telegraph-April 2-2008]

" You build a mosque and then what happens? You have Muslim people moving into that area, all the shops will become Islamic, all the housing will then become Islamic and as the Bishop of Rochester has so wisely pointed out that will be a no-go area for anyone else'...

. .  .According to premier Radio, there are 47,000 Christian Churches in the UK and about 1,600 mosques. . .

[The reality is that large numbers of those of the Muslim faith should never have been allowed to settle in the country in the first place because as we have always suspected the majority do not wish to integrate into our community. The premier fault is with the GOVERNMENT which still today allows 50,000 dependents a year to increase the number of Muslims and consequently the number of MOSQUES.] 

A SENIOR lay member of the Church of England's "Parliament" has called for  a ban on the building of more mosques in Britain.

Alisopn Ruoff, a long-standing member of the General Synod, said that new mosques should not be built in this country while Islamic states continued to persecute Christians.

The former magistrate, who was one of the strongest  critics of the

ARCHBISHOP of CANTERBURY'S

SPEECH on ISLAMIC LAW

earlier this year, added that

SHARIA LAW

would be introduced into

BRITAIN

" If we don't watch out"

[Well! as far as we are aware it is already here with the full support of the

GOVERNMENT.]

Apart from being a Synod member, Mrs Ruoff, a

CONSERVATIVE EVANGELICAL

also sits on the

BISHOPS COUNCIL

which advises the

BISHOP of LONDON

the Rt Rev Richard Chartres.

 

*

 

[Each word underlined has a separate bulletin]

JUNE-2008

HOME

 
A FREE PRESS!

It's finest expression had already been given in

MILTON'S

AREOPAGITICA.

Milton boldly proclaimed two principles of profound importance.

One was the immunity of the religious life from political regulation. The other was that doctrine which has been the strength of the best thought of individualism from his day to the present, to wit that the well-being of society requires the natural diversity of its members, and that coercive uniformity of morals and manners would spell the ruin and degradation of any people.

*

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

More!

 

 

 

 

 
THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR PAST OVER 50 YEARS

 (1959-2016)

 

 

 

THE SPIRIT OF A PEOPLE

THE FIRST TASK of any politics that could be really scientific was to relate authority to its principle source, to show its dependence on the whole social fabric, the customs and traditions, the modes of thought and the standards of life that prevail among a people.  ...the work of Montesquieu.   He really sought to understand society, to show the influence of underlying  conditions ,climatic, geographical, economic, to show that custom and institutions neither are made nor can be changed by fiat, to show that there is in every people a spirit of character which their law must reveal

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

 

 
 

A REMINDER!

WHAT YOU ARE ESCAPING FROM SINCE TRAITORS IN YOUR PARLIAMENT SIGNED YOUR COUNTRY OF

ENGLAND

 AWAY IN

1972

AND IN LATER TREATIES UNTIL YOU SPOKE YOUR MIND ON

 JUNE 23-2016

 A DATE IN HISTORY WHICH WILL BE ALWAYS REMEMBERED

BY ALL TRUE ENGLISHMEN.

 

*  *  *

HOW IT CAME ABOUT!

Mr Macmillan and 1961

Mr Heath and 1970

Mrs Thatcher and 1985

From Major to Blair, Maastricht to Nice

The Price We Have PAid

 

*  *  *

 

H.F.1100 FREEDOM AWAITS

 
NEW SERIES

*

WHY WE VOTED TO LEAVE

THE

UNDEMOCRATIC-UNACCOUNTABLE-COLLECTIVIST-CORRUPT-WASTEFUL-GODLESS

SO-CALLED

EUROPEAN UNION

[WE WILL SELECT INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM AUTHORITIVE SOURCES CONCERNING THE ILLEGALITY OF THE EU TREATIES AND THOSE WHO LIED FOR PERSONAL GAIN AND POWER AND OTHER SUBSTANTIATED INFORMATION COLLECTED OVER THE 20 YEARS SINCE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE AFTER STANDING FOR ELECTION IN THE 1997 GENERAL ELECTION AND THE 1999 EUROPEAN ELECTION. MANY WHO VOTED TO REMAIN IN THE EU WOULD SURELY HAVE RECONSIDERED IF THEY HAD BEEN DISINTERESTED OBSERVERS-DECIDING ON THE FACTS AND PUTTING NATIONAL INTERESTS  OF FREEDOM  and NATIONHOOD OUTLINED IN MAGNA CARTA AND OTHER PRIZED DOCUMENTS HELD IN TRUST-SACRED HEIRLOOMS - FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS, BEFORE THEIR OWN COMFORT ZONE.  FORTUNATELY, THE GODS, WERE WITH ENGLAND-AND THE SOON RETURN OF

 A FREE LAND AND FREE PEOPLE.

OUR ENSLAVEMENT IN 1972 INTO HITLER'S PLAN FOR GERMAN EXPANSION AND POWER IN PEACE-TIME EUROPE WILL SOON BE AT AN END. AS A UNITED PEOPLE IT WILL BE SOONER THAN LATER. LET US WORK TOGETHER AS  AN EXAMPLE TO OTHER ONCE FREE PEOPLES WITHIN THE CAPTIVE EU WHO WILL SURELY FOLLOW. IF THE SHIP IS NOT ON AN EVEN KEEL IT CANNOT HELP OTHERS WHO WILL NEED OUR STURDY STEADY HAND.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

William Pitt.

 [Speech, 9th Nov, after Nelson's VICTORY at THE Battle of Trafalgar-with the destruction of the French and Spanish Fleets-Oct 21-1805]

MARCH 1-2017

 
A FAMILIAR WARNING FROM HISTORY - WE MUST NOT IGNORE!

'It is quite true that, in my opinion the waters which we have to navigate are likely to be stormy, and that the anti-social ferments within the nation are unusually malignant. But just a a healthy body generates anti-toxins to combat any virulent infection, so our nation

ENGLAND

 may be vigorous enough to neutralize the poisons which now threaten our civilization with death. Nothing but good can be done by calling attention to perils which really exist, and which may easily escape due attention amid the bottomless insincerity of modern politics and political journalism.

DANGERS OF PREDICTION

However , the dangers of prediction have been so often illustrated that those who are naturally disposed to optimism may be excused for rejecting the anticipations of coming CALAMITY, which  are now  [as in 2016/7] widely felt, though not so often expressed.

In the Victorian age we had  our profits of woe [and doom], who vociferated warnings about "shooting Niagara" when the country was more prosperous than it had ever been before. [As yet again in 2016/7].

Even on the morrow of our victory in 1815, " as soon as Waterloo was fought," says Sir Walter Besant, "the continental professors, historians, and others began with one accord to prophesy the approaching downfall of Great Britain," which they liked to compare with Carthage.

They emphasised the condition of Ireland, the decay of trade, our huge debt, our wasteful expenditure, our corrupting poor laws, the ignorance and drunkenness of the masses. Nor was this pessimistic forecast confined to our jealous neighbours.  In December 1816, the Common Council of the City of London addressed the Prince Regent as follows:

" Distress and misery are no longer limited to one portion of the Empire, and under their irresistible pressure the commercial, agricultural, and manufacturing interests are rapidly sinking.   We can ,Sir no longer support out of our dilapidated resources the overwhelming load of taxation.  Our grievances are the natural result of rash and ruinous wars, unjustly commenced and pertinaciously persisted in, where no rational object was to be attained; of immense subsidies to foreign Powers to defend their own territories  or to commit aggressions on those of our neighbours;  of a delusive paper currency; of an unconstitutional and unprecedented military force in time of peace;   of the unexampled and increasing magnitude of the Civil List ;  of the enormous sums paid for unmerited pensions and sinecures;   and of a long course of the most lavish and improvident expenditure of the public money throughout every branch of Government."

In December 1816, the Common Council of the City of London addressed the Prince Regent with the above statement.

Sounds familiar in 2017-Don't you think?

 

[EPILOGUE-William Ralph Inge -Dean of St Pauls ENGLAND-1938] -(1860-1954)

 

We endorse the final paragraph which states:

 

" I have laid bare my hopes and fears for the country I love.  This much I can avow, that never, even when the storm clouds appear blackest, have I been tempted to wish that I was other than an Englishman."

*

[We appear to have learned NOTHING! since this speech  in 1816 as the multiple evils are still with us today August 6, 2011. The reason is OBVIOUS! because the SAME! once invisible GLOBAL CONSPIRATORS are  STILL in CHARGE! and  are now in the OPEN!

If the ECONOMY has a DISEASE and FAILS to take the CORRECT MEDICINE then the END RESULT is OBVIOUS.

TOTAL CHAOS!

*

WHY DO WE TRUST THESES DISCREDITED DOOM-MONGERS?

By Alex Brummer - City Editor-Daily Mail-Monday, August 8,2011

 

 [EXTRACT]

...and the answer is that the CREDIT RATING AGENCIES are now seen as the ONLY arbiters prepared to spell out just how SERIOUS the GLOBAL DEBT CRISIS really IS.... After all, the very same AGENCIES were still providing the US. energy company ENRON with TOP RATING up to THREE DAYS before IT COLLAPSED in the world's BIGGEST INDUSTRIAL BANKRUPTCY...  They also gave a CLEAN BILL of HEALTH to FANNIE MAE and FREDDIE MAC -semi-official, but privately owned U. S bodies set up to expand the HOME OWNERSHIP and the availability of MORTGAGES-despite WARNINGS from the LEGENDARY American investor -WARREN BUFFETT -THAT they were BROKE... S&P's downgrade may look like a poke in the eye for the UNITED STATES. But with luck, it could in the end DAMAGE the FUTURE CREDIBILITY of the CREDIT-RATING AGENCIES - they are in MORE URGENT NEED of REFORM than AMERICA.

 

 

THE AMERICAN DREAM IS OVER!

 

h

 

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS almost BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/ ****    REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****    THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****       FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/  ****   A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?     **** GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/  ****    A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES? ****   THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/   WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/  ****   GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND****   50 YEARS OF SURRENDER***AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED.

DAVID CAMERON'S PLAN TO CLAW BACK POWERS FROM EU ARE DOOMED SAYS EU CHIEF IN OCTOBER-2013

*

THE HISTORY OF THE SATANIC COLLECTIVIST EUROPEAN UNION

***

HITLER'S+PLAN+FOR+A+

GERMAN+CONTROLLED

+EUROPEAN+UNION

***

TREASON

***

 

 

 

ENGLAND

 

 Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND?**** BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH****NEW LABOUR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND****UNLESS WE TAKE CONTROL OF OUR LIVES WE WILL LOSE OUR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY****.OUR PAST IS EMBEDDED IN OUR NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS -IT ASKS WERE WE CAME FROM AND WHO WE ARE .****.THE ENGLISH WITH OTHER GERMANIC TRIBES CAME TO BRITAIN OVER YEARS AGO - THE STREAM OF TEUTONIC INFLUENCE  HAS DECIDED THE FUTURE OF EUROPE****THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/ ****  THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/ ****    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/****  DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/ ****   NOR SHALL MY SWORD/****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/ ****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/****   ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY -CORRECT BROWNDOM/****    ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1- /****   ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/****    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./****   WHY OUR ENGLISH SELF-GOVERNMENT IS UNIQUE IN EUROPE AND THE WORLD****.ENGLAND ARISE! - TODAY WE CLAIM OUR RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION/ ****  KISS GOOD BYE TO YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY****  THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED? **** ST GEORGE'S DAY-ENGLAND'S DAY/**** ST GEORGE'S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ONSHAKESPEARE'S' BIRTHDAY****NAZI SPY RING REVEALED BY THE MASTER OF BALLIOL COLLEGE IN 1938 . IT INCLUDED THE LATE EX PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH AND MINISTERS GEOFFREY RIPPON AND ROY JENKINS.* * * *AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED****   EU WIPES ENGLAND OFF THE MAP**** THE ENGLISH DID NOT MOVE THEMSELVES SO ARE NOW SLAVES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE****"...What kind of people do they think we are?" by WINSTON CHURCHILL****THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

 

‘THE MAKING OF THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION’****

OUR CONSTITUTION OF OVER A THOUSAND YEARS – WHY DOES BLAIR MEAN TO DESTROY IT?****

OUR DISCREDITED DEMOCRACY OR IRAQ DICTATORSHIP****OUR LOYALTY TO OUR INSTITUTIONS AND COUNTRY?****Liberties of Parliament- Birthright of Subjects of England.****LOSS of TRUST in NEW LABOUR****New England’s Tears for Old England’s fears?****The House of Commons has a need of members dedicated to their Country-not time wasters.****English Constitution, by it they lived, for it they died****CABINET GOVERNMENT IS NOW A DICTATORSHIP****MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA SUPPORTS THE CROWN****THE FINAL BETRAYAL - Part 1-5****House of Lords legal Whistleblower – Speaks Out in Defence of OUR  Law & Constitution****SAY ‘NO’ TO EUROPE! – SAYS RODNEY ATKINSON****The Rotten Heart of Europe - by Bernard Connolly-Part 1-5****THE CLUB IS MIGHTIER THAN THE HANDBAG****WHY you should Vote at Elections to protect YOUR Democracy****The sole legitimate function of Government- is to Protect The Rights of its Citizens****So You Thought You Were Free****A DREAM TO REMEMBER- NEW LABOUR POLICY -2004?****NO SUPPORT IN HOUSE OF LORDS FOR INQUIRY INTO EU BY TORY WHIP**** Could England Survive Outside The EU?  -YES!****COST OF DEVOLUTION –N’IRELAND, SCOTLAND AND WALES LONDON +BRUSSELS****European Arrest Warrant – What Price Our Freedom Now?****Government Obsession With Spending Itself out of Trouble**** Bill of Rights of 1688 –Outlaws European Constitution****OUR UNREPRESENTATIVE VOTING SYSTEM= BREEDS TREASON -
BETRAYAL OF COUNTRY
****Impeachment of Ministers of the Crown – Why Now?****New European Constitution – Concessions Fudge.****The Judiciary – A Defence of English Freedom?****
New European Constitution – A ‘Bridge’ Too Far?**** Our way forward to Kinship in Liberty****OUR HISTORIC HOUSE OF LORDS MUST REMAIN – TO PREVENT TYRANNY****  Scottish Independence – Have No need of Union flag and Anthem****Misuse of Prerogative Powers by Tony Blair****A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION –CONSPIRATORS NAME  PARTS 1-5****

 

 

H.F.1099 FREEDOM AWAITS

 
A MEETING PLACE  - THERE ARE HUNDREDS  OF ALTERNATIVE WEBSITES ON OUR wEBSITE- SINCE 2003CLICK HERE
realzionistnews. TruetorahJews CONSPIRACYPLANET

.COM/

Fagan-Sounded-Alarm-of -the ILLUMINATI-in-1967  DAVID ICKE BRITISH CONSTITUTION GROUP

 

YOU CAN HANDLE THE TRUTH
BENJAMIN FULFORD.NET

 

THE WORLD OF TRUTH NEWWORLDORDER

INFO.COM

 

SITSSHOW.BLOGSPOT.COM
LANDDESTROYER.

BLOGSPOT

.COM

HENRY MAKOW  CORBETTREPORT) LIFE IN THE MIX 2

 

UK COLUMN.ORG. JEW WATCH

ACTIVISTPOST.

COM

TARPLEY.NET

 

HOW+THEY+WASTE+

YOUR+MONEY+

by+Margaret+Hodge

EXTRACTED from Called to Account: How Corporate Bad Behaviour And Government Waste Combine To Cost Us Millions by Margaret Hodge, published by Little Brown tomorrow at £18.99.

To order a copy for £15.19 (P&Pfree, offer valid to September 23), visit mailbookshop.co.uk or call

0844 571 0640.

Margaret Hodge will be speaking at the Henley Literary Festival on OCTOBER 1,#

http://henleyliteraryfestival.co.uk

[WE FULLY SUPPORT MARGARET HODGE IN HER EXEMPLARY WORK OVER MANY YEARS ON BEHALF OFF THE TAX PAYERS OF BRITAIN]

Wednesday, September 14,2016

H.F.973 BREXIT NOW

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

 

THANK YOU FOR CALLING!

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

CLICK HERE FOR PREVIOUS FRONT PAGE-2012

JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2018

JAN FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2018

JANFREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2018

JANFREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2018

 JAN FREEDOM NOW HOME 2018

THIS IS:

 

JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2018