PART 1    -PART 2     (1994 -Official Website-JANUARY  -NEW- HOME PAGE - 2018)     PART 3-PART 4

 

 ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY. ORG.UK.

FREEDOM-UNITY.

*

 

Weekly Geo-Political News and Analysis

by Benjamin Fulford

 

Happy New Year: Hundreds of top Khazarian mobsters, including the Bush family, renditioned to Gitmo

 

In a historic moment of poetic justice, most of the U.S.-based top perpetrators of the fake “war on terror” have now themselves been renditioned to the U.S. Navy camp in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, Pentagon sources say.  “The Rothschild assets George Soros, Peter Munk, Peter Sutherland, the Bushes, the Podestas, and many others may have been airlifted to Gitmo for military tribunals, as the Department of Defense spends $500M to upgrade the prison and send more military police and Marines,” the sources say.

In one of many signs of just how historic the new American revolution is, “30 congressmen will not be returning in the new year,” the Pentagon sources say.  CIA sources also confirm that former U.S. President Bill Clinton, hoping for a plea bargain, is spilling the beans on people like former CIA head John Brennan, top U.S. Mossad agent Rahm Emmanuel, former Vice President Dick Cheney, and many others.

Furthemore, as U.S. President Donald Trump proclaims Janaury 2018 to be “Anti-Slavery Month,”
 

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/president-donald-j-trump-proclaims-january-2018-national-slavery-human-trafficking-prevention-month/

… human trafficking centers around the world are being raided and shut down.  In Saudi Arabia, 3,000 child sex slaves have been freed, according to Russian FSB sources.  In the U.S., “there was a power outage on December 27th at the “pedo heaven Disneyland,” as the place was raided by special forces fighting human slavers, the Pentagon sources say.  In apparently connected events, Washington Post heir Bill Graham and Jordan Feldstein, the brother of the actor Jonah Hill, died last week, the sources point out.

Another move was that Julian Assange “was extracted from the Ecuadorian Embassy to take down the cabal, and he may be pardoned along with Mike Flynn,” the sources add.

Also, “On Christmas day, Delta Force raided a mansion owned by former President Barack Obama in …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Merry Christmas:  The 13 “Illuminati” bloodline families sue for peace

Peace on earth and goodwill to all (and not just men, but all life forms) is looking like a realistic goal for 2018 now that the 13 “Illuminati” * bloodline families, seeing their ancient rule of planet Earth collapsing, are suing for peace.  Last week a representative of the G7 (Germany, the U.K., the corporate U.S., Japan, Italy, France, and Canada) met with a representative of the White Dragon Society (WDS) to discuss peace terms, according to a WDS member who was present at the meeting.  The G7, of course, is the political front for the 13 bloodline families.  There can be no doubt that this meeting was made possible by people inside the military-industrial complex acting in the spirit of Jesus Christ, and for this we wish them all “a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.”

The bloodline offer to negotiate peace is directly connected to the state of emergency that was declared last week by USA President Donald Trump.  If you have not seen it yet, please read the historic document in the link below.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/text-letter-president-congress-united-states-6/

“After Hanukkah, Trump declared a state of emergency and signed an executive order on December 20th freezing the assets of those accused of human rights abuses and corruption, a catch-all to bankrupt the Bushes, Clintons, Soros, Obama, the Cabal, and the global Jewish mafia,” was how a Pentagon source summed up the situation.

“The national emergency allows Trump to seize assets and unleash the military to carry out mass arrests and adjudicate via military tribunals, effectively imposing martial law,” the source continues.

The Pentagon source also sent a copy of this photograph with the explanation, “Trump wears purple when unveiling his national security strategy on December 18th in a victory lap over the Soros/Hillary purple revolution, and drinks water with both hands to simulate handcuffs.”

Clearly reacting to this situation, the representative of the bloodlines set the meeting for December 23rd, the birthday of the Japanese Emperor, and claimed to be a representative of the Imperial family as well as the G7.  The representative, who acted as if he was negotiating a surrender, said the bloodlines want to keep existing nation-states and institutions as they are, but…
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Letter to the Editor – Experimental Quantum Anti-Gravity Successfully Replicated

 

I would like to let you know that my anti-gravity experiments have been successfully replicated by the Aerospace Engineering Department at the New Sciences & Technologies Faculty of the University of Tehran in the Islamic Republic of Iran. I have developed complete quantum anti-gravity hypothesis with direct testable predictions that are simple, clear, easy, and inexpensive.

As you know, present-day quantum gravity theories suffer from too many mathematical space dimensions, and from too few conclusive experimental results.

My hypothesis is simple, clear, and subject to easy empirical verification.  I offer clear explanation of the principles of quantum gravity, and also precisely describe how to perform simple and inexpensive experiments to verify it.

In order to clearly understand quantum anti-gravity, please follow these 8 steps:

  1. Start from this brief overview — Quantum Gravity in a Nutshell
  2. The theoretical basis for quantum gravity are the Abraham’s equations of the Abraham-Minkowski controversy, and their empirical counterpart — the Abraham force
  3. To understand how the Biefeld-Brown effect works, you need to be clear where B-B vectors point — “up” or “down”
  4. The Biefeld-Brown effect is an instance of the Abraham force.
  5. Study the section about gyroscope’s anomalous effect.
  6. Please, study all the material on THE BOYD BUSHMAN EFFECT page in order to appreciate the potential complex magnetic fields have for shaping quantum gravity interactions.
  7. Now, you are ready to read the short introduction to quantum gravity.
  8. Perform two simple experiments for empirical verification.

The following are the 10 “mysteries” that my hypothesis sheds new light upon:

  1. The main prediction of my hypothesis (2016) is that anti-hydrogen will anti-gravitate.
  2. Gravitational waves mystery.
  3. EmDrive mystery.
  4. Solar mystery.
  5. Mass mystery.
  6. Bicycle mystery.
  7. Propeller  mystery.
  8. Cloud mystery.
  9. Pioneer mystery.
  10. Missing mystery.

I have designed 4 progressively more complex experiments, and we have successfully performed one of them, the one of medium difficulty, which constitutes:

The empirical discovery of hitherto unknown physical interaction between angular momentum of a spinning gyroscope and Earth’s magnetic and electric fields.

To perform this experiment, we need a gyroscope with a vertical support, and magnetic and electric shielding cages.

According to my hypothesis, there will be a measurable time difference between a freely spinning gyroscope inside, and outside the cages.  A gyroscope freely spinning inside both cages will come to rest in less time than when spinning outside them.

The experiment was performed successfully and was recorded in the following two videos:

To have a clear idea what is involved in the experiment, please take a closer look at the above two videos first.

For the experiment, we used the following small and light gyroscope at 10,000 rpm:

It would be much better to use a heavier gyro, because the heavier the gyro, the stronger the effect, at the same rate of rpm.

The value of angular velocity (rpm) is important only insofar as to generate sufficient angular momentum to allow the gyro to spin freely for a longer time before it comes to rest.

The objective of the experiment was to obtain two values of the gyro’s run time:

  • Outside the shielding;
  • Inside the shielding.

In my experiment, the two sample values are, respectively:

  • 55.54 seconds
  • 51.87 seconds

There was a 3.67 second difference, which amounts to 6.6%.  The time difference is directly proportional to the quality and quantity of electrostatic shielding of the Faraday cage. Applying the magnetic shielding in addition to the electric one would further increase the time difference.

As you can see in the video, it is important that the gyro is elevated by means of a vertical support.  Ideally, gyro should start spinning as close to a vertical position as possible, and also be able to pass lower, while still spinning, than its horizontal position.

The reason for this effect is that the gyroscope inside the cages will be spinning in reduced strength of Earth’s magnetic and electric fields, which in turn reduces the strength of the Biefeld-Brown effect acting upon it.

The gyroscope outside the cages, spinning in the undiminished strength of Earth’s magnetic and electric fields, is subject to the full influence of the Biefeld-Brown effect that causes the gyroscope to resist Earth’s gravity pull, which happens to be none other than pure natural antigravity effect.

OBJECTIONS

  • All conductors, like the brass gyro, exhibit an effective diamagnetism when they experience a changing magnetic field.  The Lorentz force on electrons causes them to circulate around forming eddy currents.  The eddy currents then produce an induced magnetic field that opposes the applied field and resist the conductor’s motion.

—  That is true for both, the gyro spinning inside and outside the Faraday cage in Earth’s magnetic field.  It does not make any difference.

  • But the gyro’s induced magnetic field will generate eddy currents in the Faraday cage and the resultant magnetic field will slow down gyro’s spin (magnetic breaking), and hence the whole effect.  It is like dropping a magnet down a copper pipe: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8dFFL8TDt2Q

—   The analogy in the video applies, but only in principle.  Spinning brass gyro is not a strong neodymium magnet, and if, in principle, it generates any magnetic field, it is so weak that it will not even affect a needle of a compass.  As opposed to the copper pipe in the video, the enamel-coated copper mesh Faraday cage has much larger diameter (the inverse-square law), so it is enough to drop a strong neodymium magnet down the Faraday cage to see how much it would slow down, if at all.  As you can see in the above video, even few empty slits in the copper pipe greatly weaken the eddy currents, this being the reason for using enamel-coated copper mesh.  Diamagnetic materials, like brass, or copper, have a relative magnetic permeability that is less than or equal to 1, and therefore a magnetic susceptibility less than or equal to 0, since susceptibility is defined as χv=μv−1.  This means that diamagnetic materials, in principle, are repelled by magnetic fields.  However, since diamagnetism is such a weak property, its effects are not observable in everyday life.  Moreover, there is a big difference between Faraday cage made of solid copper, and one made of enamel-coated copper mesh.  The magnetic field induced in the gyro is weak, because Earth’s magnetic field is weak, so whatever little eddy currents could be induced by the gyro in solid copper Faraday cage will become irrelevant in the enamel-coated copper mesh Faraday cage, as you can see in the following two videos:

Even though it is true that the experiment, in principle, is open to influences from various phenomena, including the Carnegie curve, the overall result is clearly well beyond being attributed exclusively to these other phenomena.

To completely eliminate above objections, magnetic shielding needs to be applied in addition to the Faraday cage, and the gyro should be custom-made from a material which does not allow for eddy currents to flow in it.

Naturally,  I will be happy to answer any questions that you may have for me regarding the theoretical foundations as well as replication of the experiment.

With respect and much gratitude,  I am
Sincerely yours,

U.S. troops deploy worldwide with 10,000 sealed indictments to take down Khazarian mob

U.S. President Donald Trump spent the weekend at Camp David with his top generals to map out the exact strategy for decapitating the Khazarian mafia worldwide, say Pentagon sources.  “The Atlanta airport was shut down, while the Department of Defense refused to disclose the locations of 44,000 U.S. troops who may be involved in terminating the cabal worldwide,” a senior Pentagon source said.  There are now close to 10,000 sealed indictments as more and more of the Khazarian criminals give up evidence on their colleagues, the sources say.

There are also many extra-judicial killings going on.  “The liberal sanctuary city mayor of San Francisco, Edwin Lee, dropped dead after an illegal alien was found not guilty in the murder of Kate Steinle even after his confession,” one source notes.  “Lee’s death is a message to the Democrats and sanctuary city mayors like Rahm Emmanuel of Chicago and Bill De Blasio of New York City,” the source warns.

The Khazarian mob is also killing off lots of people.  In Japan, two former executives of Toshiba, Atsutoshi Nishida and Taizo Nishimura, suddenly died in the past two months because they were about to provide evidence about the March 11, 2011 Fukushima tsunami and nuclear terror attack against Japan, according to sources close to the royal family.

This attack was carried out by henchmen of the Rockefeller family, whose members include Hillary and Bill Clinton, the sources say.  The Rockellers, in turn, were taking orders from the fascist P2 Freemason lodge, they say.  The Rockefeller family, by the way, has elected Mel Rockefeller, the son of Nelson Rockefeller, as the new family head, these sources added.

In Canada, Barry Sherman, owner of the Canadian pharmaceutical giant Apotex, was found hanging dead alongside his wife Honey by the family’s indoor pool.  According to CIA sources, Sherman was …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

 

H.F.1430

 

 

 

 
 

DISCONNECTION OF OUR INTERNET IN 24 HOURS

We have received a garbled telephone message this morning informing us that our INTERNET CONNECTION will be CLOSED DOWN in 24 hours. After 23 years expecting this to happen we are not surprised but at least it will be an enforced REST after such a long campaign to see the return of OUR COUNTRY OF ENGLAND from the strangling suffocating tentacles of Hitler's planned  so called EUROPEAN UNION-a NATION STATE DESTROYER and CURSE on the EUROPEAN PEOPLES who are now up in arms of sorts for the RETURN of THEIR FREE COUNTRY - CUSTOM and LAWS.

 

8.30 AM-TUESDAY, DECEMBER 11 ,2017

 

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 Home &

DEC-17

JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links- IMMIGRATION-ARCHIVE- EU FILE

 

 

 

NOTICE!

 

We show content from other websites which is of GENERAL INTEREST and  of OTHERS we SUPPORT to ensure that should THEIR WEBSITE be GROUNDED we have at least some of THEIR CONTENT to  FILL THE GAP on THEIR BEHALF.  It takes up much TIME to offer THIS SERVICE  away from our own CAUSE ,but WHAT IS TIME! if the CONTENT is VITAL for immediate CIRCULATION?

 

DECEMBER 1-2017

 

 

[ A BETRAYAL AND  A

SURRENDER!

TO A

EUROPEAN COURT

AND PRINCIPLE.

 

 

'No deal is better than a bad deal.' ]

 

PM will confront Boris over Brexit before Christmas: Theresa May prepares for Cabinet showdown as Gove warns her hard won deal could be ripped up at the next election

  • Theresa May has overcome a Brexit obstacle - but must now deal with Brexiteers
  • She has arranged a Cabinet meeting for December 19 to discuss BREXIT outcome
  • PM now keen to challenge Boris 'with realities of the next stage of negotiations'
  • Michael Gove, meanwhile, has said the British people will have their say on deal 

Prime Minister Theresa May has overcome her biggest Brexit obstacle so far by winning a deal with Brussels on future trade negotiations - but now she must face the Brexiteers.

She has arranged a Cabinet meeting for December 19 so her ministers can discuss what Britain's final relationship with the EU will look like. 

Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson and Environment Secretary Michael Gove are among the leading Brexiteers she is now expected to confront. 

 
 

The PM and Jean-Claude Juncker were smiling as they shook hands for the cameras on the day the deal was agreed

 
 

Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson (pictured left) and Environment Secretary Michael Gove (right) are among the leading Brexiteers she is now expected to confront

According to The Times, the prime minister has been 'buoyed' by her victory in securing a preliminary deal and is now keen to challenge Boris 'with the realities of the next stage of negotiations'.

The key concessions 

  • Britain must pay a 'divorce bill' of up to £39 billion under the terms of the withdrawal package
  • The European Court of Justice will oversee EU citizens' rights in the UK for eight years after Brexit
  • Three million EU citizens will be permitted to remain in the UK - and bring their families 
  • There will be no hard border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland
  • The UK will stay in the single market and customs union until 2021 

It comes as Mr Gove explained yesterday that the public will have their say on the EU deal at the next general election - and stressed that Mrs May's deal might be changed by future governments. 

The Times also reports that the exact form of Britain's post-Brexit relationship with the EU will not be determined in the showdown Cabinet meeting, and that ministers will be permitted to put forward their own plans.

[BLACKMAIL!]

Mrs May, however, is said to believe that the reality of needing to gain access to EU markets will force hardline Brexiteers to soften their stance on regulatory compliance.

The environment secretary, one of the leaders of the Leave campaign, explained in The Telegraph that the UK will have 'full freedom to diverge' from the EU on the single market and customs union following the two-year post-Brexit transition. 

He also stressed that 'the British people will be in control' and, if they did not approve of a final Brexit deal, a future government will be allowed to 'diverge'.  

 

Prime Minister Theresa May and Brexit Secretary David Davis smiled alongside EU officials after securing a last-minute Brexit deal

 

Mrs May was pictured greeting EU President Jean-Claude Juncker after she arrived in Brussels just before 6am. Talks started almost immediately after

 

Brexit Secretary David Davis embraced EU President Juncker early on Friday just hours before the deal was struck

But Mr Gove - who alongside Boris has espoused a Brexit featuring freedom from EU regulation - also praised Mrs May's 'tenacity and skill' in the negotiation. 

 

Mrs May shook hands with the president of the European Council Donald Tusk before the meeting in Brussels yesterday

A senior official told The Telegraph that the 'real battle begins now' and that the 'heart and soul of Brexit is now at stake'.

Mr Gove added in his article that Britain will be free to spend more cash on the NHS and housing once the country has left the EU, as well as being at liberty to make trade deals abroad.

Mrs May celebrated yesterday after the European Commission cleared the way for negotiations on the future relationship after the UK's withdrawal from the EU.

Britain will pay a 'divorce bill' of up to £39 billion under the terms of a withdrawal package agreed with Brussels.

The breakthrough was hailed by Mrs May as 'a hard-won agreement in all our interests'.

Commission president Jean-Claude Juncker said it represented 'sufficient progress' for negotiations to move on to their second phase, subject to approval by leaders of the remaining 27 EU states at a summit on December 14-15.

In dramatic pre-dawn scenes, Mrs May and Brexit Secretary David Davis flew to Brussels to confirm with Mr Juncker over breakfast the text of a joint document setting out proposals on the key withdrawal issues of citizens' rights, the Irish border and Britain's exit bill.

But the scene was set for further wrangling, as European Council president Donald Tusk set out guidelines for the next phase of talks, covering the transition to a post-Brexit relationship, which envisage the UK staying in the single market and customs union and observing all EU laws for around two years after the official withdrawal date in March 2019.

He said only 'exploratory talks' on a free trade agreement could begin at this stage, with the EU's chief Brexit negotiator Michel Barnier suggesting that 'real negotiations' on trade would get under way once a withdrawal treaty is finalised in October.

Mr Barnier also threw cold water on Mrs May's hopes for a 'deep and special' trading relationship with the EU.

He warned that her 'red lines' of taking the UK out of the single market, the customs union and the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice left a free trade deal similar to Canada's as the only option open to Britain.

There was consternation among some Brexit-backers over provisions allowing the European Court of Justice a role in overseeing EU citizens' rights in the UK for eight years after Brexit.

However, Downing Street said they only expected around two or three cases a year to be referred voluntarily by UK judges to the Luxembourg court.

And a compromise on the Irish border - forged in intensive talks late on Thursday night after the Democratic Unionist Party blocked an earlier deal on Monday - states that if no trade deal is reached, the UK as a whole will maintain 'full alignment' with elements of the EU single market and customs union which support the economy of the island of Ireland and the Good Friday Agreement.

 

Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson insisted the PM was determined to ensure the measure's 'compatibility with taking back control of our money, laws and borders'

 

Tory chief whip Julian Smith tweeted a photgraph of Mrs May apparently briefing Mr Johnson on the developments last night 

Tory former Brexit minister David Jones warned this could 'severely handicap' Britain's ability to enter free trade agreements covering areas like agriculture with countries outside the EU, like the US.

But Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson insisted the PM was determined to ensure the measure's 'compatibility with taking back control of our money, laws and borders'.

Mr Johnson and fellow Cabinet Brexiteer Michael Gove gave their public blessing to the deal, with the Environment Secretary describing it as a 'significant personal political achievement for the Prime Minister' which would make more money available for the NHS.

The development was also welcomed by business leaders, who had warned that companies would begin activating plans to move staff and activities abroad if no progress was made by Christmas. The pound rose on the announcement.

In a Brussels press conference, Mrs May said the process of arriving at a withdrawal deal 'hasn't been easy for either side', but the agreement represented a 'significant improvement' on the text she was preparing to sign off on Monday.

Provisions on citizens' rights would allow EU nationals in the UK 'to go on living their lives as before'.

 

Mr Johnson, another senior Brexiteer who has been trying to toughen the government's stance, tweeted his support but made clear the process has only just started

Meanwhile, the financial settlement would be 'fair to the British taxpayer' and the agreement on Ireland would guarantee there would be 'no hard border' between Northern Ireland and the Republic.

'I very much welcome the prospect of moving ahead to the next phase, to talk about trade and security and to discuss the positive and ambitious future relationship that is in all of our interests,' said Mrs May.

Mr Juncker said Brexit was a 'sad' development, but added: 'Now we must start looking to the future, a future in which the UK will remain a close friend and ally.'

Friday's announcement came after late-night telephone conversations with DUP leader Arlene Foster, as the Prime Minister sought a formula which would resolve the party's concerns about Northern Ireland being treated differently from the rest of the UK.

As Number 10's staff Christmas party took place elsewhere in the building, Mrs May finalised a text shortly before midnight.

It specified that 'no new regulatory barriers' will be allowed between Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK, and that the province's businesses will continue to have 'unfettered access' to the UK internal market.

Mrs Foster said 'substantial changes' to the text ensured there was 'no red line down the Irish Sea' and no 'special status' for Northern Ireland, but added that there was still further work to be done.

Irish premier Leo Varadkar, who held telephone talks with Mrs May on Thursday as the details of the deal were hammered out, said it was a 'significant day' for Ireland, which 'achieved all that we set out to achieve in phase one of these negotiations'.

The estimated Brexit bill - significantly lower than the £50 billion or more suggested by previous leaks - covers Britain's share of the EU's budget up to the end of 2020, as well as outstanding debts and liabilities for items such as the pensions of staff at European institutions.

It will be paid over several years and the exact figure is unlikely to be known for some time.

The financial settlement 'will be drawn up and paid in euro'.

Jeremy Corbyn said Mrs May had only managed to 'scrape through' the first phase of Brexit negotiations some 18 months after the referendum.

'Tory chaos and posturing has caused damaging delay and risked serious harm to our economy,' said the Labour leader.

'We need a much stronger and more constructive approach in crucial phase two.'

What has been agreed today?

Citizens' rights

The three million EU citizens in the UK and the one million UK citizens living in the EU can stay for their lifetime.

British courts will be able to refer issues about the rights of EU nationals to the European Court of Justice and have 'due regard' for the court's judgement in its decisions for eight years.

This means EU judges will still have some power over the UK after Brexit, but No10 believes this will only relate to 'two or three' cases a year. 

EU citizens in Britain and Northern Ireland will continue to have access to free healthcare and the benefits system after the UK cuts its ties with Brussels.

EU citizens with family outside the UK will also be able to bring them to the UK after Brexit. No 10 said there are no estimates for how many Europeans are expected to move to Britain under this bit of the deal.

Irish border

This was the main thorny issue which threatened to derail the talks after the DUP pulled the plug on initial plans for a deal amid fears it would break up the UK.

But six 'substantial changes' have been made to the deal which ensure Northern Ireland will keep the same rules as the rest of the UK and the border will not be pushed out to the Irish Sea.

It also rules out calls by Sinn Fein to give Northern Ireland 'special status' which would have seen it have different rules to the rest of the UK. 

And it spelled out in black and white that Northern Ireland will not be separated 'constitutionally, politically, economically or regulatory' from the rest of the UK.

And that the UK is committed to retaining its own internal market. 

The document also pledges to keep soft Irish border and to maintain the good Friday Agreement - ensuring Dublin's support for it.

But in a major concession which could spark opposition from Brexiteers, the UK said if it leaves the EU without a deal and does not come up with a plan to keep the border open then it 'will maintain full alignment' with the EU as a full back position.

Brexit bill

Britain has agreed to pay the EU between £35billion and £39billion as part of the divorce package.

Britain will pay the amount over many years to come - meaning Theresa May will not have to hand over a single fat cheque to foot the bill.

The document says: 'The UK will contribute its share of the financing of the budgetary commitments outstanding at 31 December 2020'.

Britain will get around 12 installments of 300m euros back from the European Investment Bank from 2020. 

Despite Philip Hammond insisting this week that the UK should pay whether or not there is a trade deal, the document makes clear the cash is contingent on a final agreement being reached. 

And Ukip's former leader Nigel Farage said the 17.4 million people who backed Leave last year 'did not vote for a large exit fee, the ECJ continuing to have a say over our country or a two-year transition', adding: 'This is not a deal, it's a capitulation.'

Arron Banks, the millionaire founder of the Leave.EU campaign, said the agreement amounted to a 'betrayal' of the country by a 'traitorous, lily-livered embarrassment of a prime minister'.

Mr Tusk warned that 'the most difficult challenge is still ahead'.

'We all know that breaking up is hard, but breaking up and building a new relation is much harder,' said the European Council president.

'Since the Brexit referendum, a year and a half has passed.

'So much time has been devoted to the easier part of the task, and now to negotiate the transition agreement and the framework for our future relationship we have de facto less than a year.'           

 

Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5161623/May-needs-convince-Brexiteer-ministers-EU-deal.html#ixzz50lcOyJKj
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter |
DailyMail on Facebook

*  *  *

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

-A BETRAYAL AND SURRENDER TO A EUROPEAN COURT AND PRINCIPLE.-

'NO Deal Is Better Than A Bad Deal'

 

H.F.1410DECEMBER 9-2017

 

*

 

 

Lets return to our old values, says, Rees-Mogg.

BY Jason Groves-Political Editor-Daily Mail -Monday, January 8,2018

 

 

THERESA May must return to Tory values of individual choice and free trade, Jacob Rees-Mogg has warned.

He fears the Conservatives will lose further ground to Jeremy Corbyn unless the Prime Minister goes back to

'First Principles'.

The prominent Brexiteer is tipped by some as a future Tory leader, although he is not expected to be given a ministerial position in Mrs May's reshuffle.

Mr Rees-Mogg also warned that the poor relationship between Mrs May and Chancellor Philip Hammond is hampering government.

And he encouraged ministers to embrace

BREXIT,

saying that the government had been 'too timid'. Writing in the Sun, Rees Mogg urged the PM to put clear blue water between the Tories and Labour by highlighting the fundamental 'dividing lines' between the two parties.

'Tories want to help people to ,lead lives they want and to remove as many obstacies as possible,' he said.

'The socialist aims to cajole people into leading lives that are "good" for them. Tories are more realistic about human nature and generally more pragmatic.

Some Eurosceptics have privately urged Mrs May to sack her Chancellor into today's reshuffle to prevent him watering down Brexit.

Mr Rees-Mogg said: 'The whole government machine ought to be directed towards the benefit of Brexit and not the timorous efforts of managing decline, a recipe for failure popular with too many post-war British politicians.'

'In this regard, it is essential that the PM and Chancellor improve their working relationship and advocate the same policies. No government works when these two figures are not united.'

Mr Ress-Mogg said Brexit could bring huge benefits, including cheaper prices and real control over Britain's future. But he added: 'Here the Government has been too timid. It is as if it were carrying out a policy reluctantly- one foist upon it by the electorate, not one it really and enthusiastically wants.'

[And the past events or more precisely non-events since the referendum have confirmed this analysis.]

 

 

This isn't the Britain we fought for,' say the 'unknown warriors' of WWII
 


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1229643/This-isnt-Britain-fought-say-unknown-warriors-WWII.html#ixzz53txyBNPw
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

January 8,2018

H.F.1435

 

 

 

 

 

 

*

Tories truce over Brexit cracks over May's compromise | Daily Mail ...

Tory Brexit truce cracks: PM told to walk away from talks by her own Eurosceptic MPs over 'intolerable' demands as she cancels trip to Brussels today after failing to do deal with DUP leader

  • David Davis confirmed some UK economy sectors may have to align with the EU 
  • Eurosceptic ex-leader Iain Duncan Smith suggested it was time to walk away 
  • Cabinet ministers feel they are being kept in the dark about the compromises
  • The DUP have made it clear it would not accept the PM's current proposals

The Tory truce on Brexit was fracturing last night as MPs warned Theresa May they would not accept further compromises with Brussels.

The Prime Minister faced a backlash after David Davis confirmed some sectors of the UK economy could have to align with the EU after Brexit to resolve the Irish border issue.

Former leader Iain Duncan Smith – who has acted as a bridge between No 10 and Eurosceptic MPs until now – described the proposal as 'intolerable' and suggested it was time to walk away from the talks.

 

The Prime Minister had planned to return to Brussels today to try to complete a divorce deal with the EU, but this has been cancelled

Eurosceptic Cabinet ministers also complained they were being kept in the dark about the extent of the compromises, both on the Irish border and the European Court of Justice.

Boris Johnson and Michael Gove are said to be leading a revolt of Brexiteers who have a 'genuine fear' that Mrs May is going to push through a soft option.

The Foreign Secretary reportedly confronted the Prime Minister in a dramatic clash during Cabinet yesterday over her negotiating strategy.

A senior insider told The Sun: 'Cabinet is in the dark about what the PM is doing, which is a very strange state of affairs to be in.' 

 

Michael Gove and Boris Johnson are said to be leading a revolt of Brexiteers who have a 'genuine fear' that Mrs May is going to push through a soft option

Meanwhile the DUP, whose ten MPs prop up the Government, made it clear it would not accept the plans put forward by the Prime Minister on Monday to secure a breakthrough on a post-Brexit trade deal.

Talks with European Commission chief Jean-Claude Juncker stalled on Monday after DUP leader Arlene Foster vetoed plans for a compromise on the status of the Irish border.

The Prime Minister had planned to return to Brussels today to try to complete a divorce deal with the EU.

But the trip was cancelled last night after Mrs Foster said she would not accept plans to retain 'regulatory alignment' between Northern Ireland and the Republic after Brexit.

Government sources insisted that the proposal on the Irish border was only a 'backstop' designed to open the door to trade talks this month.

 

David Davis confirmed some sectors of the UK economy could have to align with the EU after Brexit to resolve the Irish border issue

A source said the proposal was limited to a few areas linked to the Good Friday Agreement, such as agriculture and energy.

But Mr Duncan Smith warned it could 'box in' the UK, making it a 'supplicant' to Brussels even after Brexit, and preventing the Government striking trade deals.

Mrs May began the day by telling the Cabinet she was 'very close to getting agreement' with the EU on a divorce deal, which she hopes could unlock the door to the start of trade talks. The PM told ministers there were 'only a small number of issues outstanding'.

But a Cabinet source said the detail of the plans had barely been discussed by Mrs May at a meeting of the Cabinet yesterday.

'There is not a lot of clarity here,' the source said. 'People want to be helpful to the PM in this, but they are befuddled by the approach she has taken. People want to see the detail and it is not forthcoming – that is a worry.' Whitehall sources last night revealed that even Mr Davis did not learn that the phrase 'regulatory alignment' had been inserted into a proposed agreement with Brussels until Sunday.

One former minister last night warned the crisis could shorten Mrs May's tenure in No 10, saying: 'The PM is in a very weak position and she needs to wake up to the fact. She is making her position less and less tenable.' One EU ambassador said: 'We cannot go on like this, with no idea what the UK wants. She just has to have the conversation with her own cabinet, and if that upsets someone, or someone resigns, so be it.'

 

Iain Duncan Smith – who has acted as a bridge between No 10 and Eurosceptic MPs until now – described the proposal as 'intolerable'

Tory Sir Bill Cash said any commitment to align all or part of the UK's laws with the EU would be 'massively difficult' to accept.

Former Brexit minister David Jones said the move would make it difficult to strike free trade deals with countries outside the EU. He called the idea 'dangerous', adding: 'If we are aligned with the EU on agriculture, for example, it would be impossible to conclude any meaningful free trade agreements with third countries.'

Jacob Rees-Mogg described the issue as an 'indelible red line' and voiced 'gratitude' to the DUP for vetoing the deal.

What's the truth about trade across the Irish border? 

Analysis by Jack Doyle 

Northern Ireland to Ireland

It might be assumed that trade between Northern Ireland and the Republic formed a very significant part of the province's economy.

But official data shows its economic relationship with the rest of the UK is much more significant. 

Around two thirds of Northern Ireland's turnover involves sales within the province. 

Exports to Great Britain make up 21 per cent, while those to the Republic are just five per cent and to the rest of the EU just three per cent.

 

DUP Sammy Wilson said Northern Irish trade with the UK is more important than with the Republic of Ireland and the rest of Europe

According to the Legatum Institute think tank, trade patterns from before the UK joined the EU in 1973 have proved 'remarkably resilient'.

DUP MP Sammy Wilson has said: 'Our main market is not the Irish Republic. It is not even the whole of the EU. Our main market is the UK, and the integrity of the single UK market is far more important to us, to people who work in Northern Ireland, than having some kind of regulatory convergence or continuance with the rest of Europe.'

Ireland to Great Britain

By contrast to the relatively small scale of its trade with Northern Ireland, the Republic has very significant trade links with Great Britain, its second biggest trading partner. More than 12 per cent of Irish exports go to Great Britain, and 18 per cent of services (compared to 1.6 per cent to Northern Ireland).

It also imports a huge amount from Great Britain, which accounts for 25 per cent of its imports. But because of the size of the two economies, the Republic has a lot more to lose in relative terms from the talks collapsing and no agreement being made on trade.

Estimates of the damage to Irish GDP from a collapse in talks suggest it could fall by up to 3 per cent. Henry Newman, of the Open Europe think tank, warns the Irish have the most to lose of any EU state from no trade deal, and are 'playing with fire'.

 

Walk away from Brexit talks unless the EU drops 'intolerable' demands, Iain Duncan Smith tells Theresa May 

Iain Duncan Smith last night urged Theresa May to abandon Brexit talks unless the EU agrees to back away from its 'intolerable' demands.

In an ominous move, the former Conservative leader went public about his growing concerns with the direction of the negotiations on a potential divorce deal.

Mr Duncan Smith said accepting the EU's demands would leave the UK a 'supplicant' nation after Brexit.

 

Iain Duncan Smith last night urged Theresa May to abandon Brexit talks unless the EU agrees to back away from its 'intolerable' demands

He said he had told the PM: 'We have reached the point where really these sets of demands are demands too far.'

He added that it was time to tell the EU: 'We're not prepared to go down this road any longer, this is not working, we will not box ourselves in.'

Mr Duncan Smith has acted as a bridge between No 10 and the Eurosceptic wing of the Tory Party, helping to persuade MPs to back Mrs May and avoid rocking the boat. His decision to speak out underlines the difficulty Mrs May now faces in persuading the Right of the party to back her approach to Brexit.

But last night Mr Duncan Smith said he could not accept plans to resolve the Irish border issue by signing up to a system of 'regulatory alignment' that could tie sectors of the whole UK economy to Brussels rules after Brexit.

He said it was 'not just the DUP' who were unhappy about a plan that would 'give away our status before we even get to the trade arrangements'. He said agreeing to the demand from Dublin and Brussels would 'box in' the UK's future options and limit our ability to negotiate future trade deals with other countries.

Mr Duncan Smith also voiced grave reservations about allowing any future role for the European Court of Justice, which Brussels is saying should continue to have jurisdiction over EU citizens' rights in Britain.

He told the BBC: 'We are beginning to stare at the edge of what is a price that we simply cannot afford to pay.' Mr Duncan Smith said the EU 'needs to budge'. He said the UK was 'reaching the point fairly fast' where it should just walk away and prepare to leave the EU without a trade deal.

He suggested no deal would be better than a 'wholly intolerable one that leaves us boxed in and unable to make the kind of arrangements with the US, Australia, India and all these other countries that we want to make arrangements with'.

 

Mr Duncan Smith's decision to speak out underlines the difficulty Mrs May now faces in persuading the Right of the party to back her approach to Brexit

And he warned there was a danger that 'we will end up being supplicants in this process rather than being equal partners.'

He added: 'I think the PM is recognising that. It's just becoming very clear that no matter what we say that we will help them with, there is another demand placed there and that stands in the way of trade.'

Signalling the tensions fracturing the Tory Party, former education secretary Nicky Morgan last night rounded on Mr Duncan Smith, saying: 'This is madness. Walking away when the Brexiteers encounter difficulties they never bothered to anticipate is not in the national interest.'



Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5149619/Tories-truce-Brexit-cracks-Mays-compromise.html#ixzz50yAGpK8j
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

DECEMBER 6,2017

*  *  *

H.F.1413 -[THERE MUST BE NO SURRENDER TO EU DEMANDS-ENGLAND MUST BE  FREE AS BEFORE TRAITORS WITHIN SOLD US TO HITLER'S PLANNED EU IN 1972 TO ENABLE GERMANY TO DOMINATE EUROPE IN THE PEACE. BRUSSELS IS A POODLE OF THE FOURTH REICH-THE REAL POWER IS IN BERLIN.]

 

*

 

Brought forward from 2009

Revealed: The secret report that shows how the Nazis planned a Fourth Reich ...in the EU

The paper is aged and fragile, the typewritten letters slowly fading. But US Military Intelligence report EW-Pa 128 is as chilling now as the day it was written in November 1944.

The document, also known as the Red House Report, is a detailed account of a secret meeting at the Maison Rouge Hotel in Strasbourg on August 10, 1944. There, Nazi officials ordered an elite group of German industrialists to plan for Germany's post-war recovery, prepare for the Nazis' return to power and work for a 'strong German empire'. In other words: the Fourth Reich.

 
Heinrich Himmler with Max Faust, engineer with I. G. Farben

Plotters: SS chief Heinrich Himmler with Max Faust, engineer with Nazi-backed company I. G. Farben

The three-page, closely typed report, marked 'Secret', copied to British officials and sent by air pouch to Cordell Hull, the US Secretary of State, detailed how the industrialists were to work with the Nazi Party to rebuild Germany's economy by sending money through Switzerland.

They would set up a network of secret front companies abroad. They would wait until conditions were right. And then they would take over Germany again.

The industrialists included representatives of Volkswagen, Krupp and Messerschmitt. Officials from the Navy and Ministry of Armaments were also at the meeting and, with incredible foresight, they decided together that the Fourth German Reich, unlike its predecessor, would be an economic rather than a military empire - but not just German.

The Red House Report, which was unearthed from US intelligence files, was the inspiration for my thriller The Budapest Protocol.

The book opens in 1944 as the Red Army advances on the besieged city, then jumps to the present day, during the election campaign for the first president of Europe. The European Union superstate is revealed as a front for a sinister conspiracy, one rooted in the last days of the Second World War.

But as I researched and wrote the novel, I realised that some of the Red House Report had become fact.

Nazi Germany did export massive amounts of capital through neutral countries. German businesses did set up a network of front companies abroad. The German economy did soon recover after 1945.

The Third Reich was defeated militarily, but powerful Nazi-era bankers, industrialists and civil servants, reborn as democrats, soon prospered in the new West Germany. There they worked for a new cause: European economic and political integration.

Is it possible that the Fourth Reich those Nazi industrialists foresaw has, in some part at least, come to pass?

The Red House Report was written by a French spy who was at the meeting in Strasbourg in 1944 - and it paints an extraordinary picture.

The industrialists gathered at the Maison Rouge Hotel waited expectantly as SS Obergruppenfuhrer Dr Scheid began the meeting. Scheid held one of the highest ranks in the SS, equivalent to Lieutenant General. He cut an imposing figure in his tailored grey-green uniform and high, peaked cap with silver braiding. Guards were posted outside and the room had been searched for microphones.

 
Auschwitz

Death camp: Auschwitz, where tens of thousands of slave labourers died working in a factory run by German firm I. G. Farben

There was a sharp intake of breath as he began to speak. German industry must realise that the war cannot be won, he declared. 'It must take steps in preparation for a post-war commercial campaign.' Such defeatist talk was treasonous - enough to earn a visit to the Gestapo's cellars, followed by a one-way trip to a concentration camp.

But Scheid had been given special licence to speak the truth – the future of the Reich was at stake. He ordered the industrialists to 'make contacts and alliances with foreign firms, but this must be done individually and without attracting any suspicion'.

The industrialists were to borrow substantial sums from foreign countries after the war.

They were especially to exploit the finances of those German firms that had already been used as fronts for economic penetration abroad, said Scheid, citing the American partners of the steel giant Krupp as well as Zeiss, Leica and the Hamburg-America Line shipping company.

But as most of the industrialists left the meeting, a handful were beckoned into another smaller gathering, presided over by Dr Bosse of the Armaments Ministry. There were secrets to be shared with the elite of the elite.

Bosse explained how, even though the Nazi Party had informed the industrialists that the war was lost, resistance against the Allies would continue until a guarantee of German unity could be obtained. He then laid out the secret three-stage strategy for the Fourth Reich.

In stage one, the industrialists were to 'prepare themselves to finance the Nazi Party, which would be forced to go underground as a Maquis', using the term for the French resistance.

Stage two would see the government allocating large sums to German industrialists to establish a 'secure post-war foundation in foreign countries', while 'existing financial reserves must be placed at the disposal of the party so that a strong German empire can be created after the defeat'.

In stage three, German businesses would set up a 'sleeper' network of agents abroad through front companies, which were to be covers for military research and intelligence, until the Nazis returned to power.

'The existence of these is to be known only by very few people in each industry and by chiefs of the Nazi Party,' Bosse announced.

'Each office will have a liaison agent with the party. As soon as the party becomes strong enough to re-establish its control over Germany, the industrialists will be paid for their effort and co-operation by concessions and orders.'

 
Enlarge   The 1944 Red House Report

Extraordinary revelations: The 1944 Red House Report, detailing 'plans of German industrialists to engage in underground activity'

The exported funds were to be channelled through two banks in Zurich, or via agencies in Switzerland which bought property in Switzerland for German concerns, for a five per cent commission.

The Nazis had been covertly sending funds through neutral countries for years.

Swiss banks, in particular the Swiss National Bank, accepted gold looted from the treasuries of Nazi-occupied countries. They accepted assets and property titles taken from Jewish businessmen in Germany and occupied countries, and supplied the foreign currency that the Nazis needed to buy vital war materials.

Swiss economic collaboration with the Nazis had been closely monitored by Allied intelligence.

The Red House Report's author notes: 'Previously, exports of capital by German industrialists to neutral countries had to be accomplished rather surreptitiously and by means of special influence.

'Now the Nazi Party stands behind the industrialists and urges them to save themselves by getting funds outside Germany and at the same time advance the party's plans for its post-war operations.'

The order to export foreign capital was technically illegal in Nazi Germany, but by the summer of 1944 the law did not matter.

More than two months after D-Day, the Nazis were being squeezed by the Allies from the west and the Soviets from the east. Hitler had been badly wounded in an assassination attempt. The Nazi leadership was nervous, fractious and quarrelling.

During the war years the SS had built up a gigantic economic empire, based on plunder and murder, and they planned to keep it.

A meeting such as that at the Maison Rouge would need the protection of the SS, according to Dr Adam Tooze of Cambridge University, author of Wages of Destruction: The Making And Breaking Of The Nazi Economy.

He says: 'By 1944 any discussion of post-war planning was banned. It was extremely dangerous to do that in public. But the SS was thinking in the long-term. If you are trying to establish a workable coalition after the war, the only safe place to do it is under the auspices of the apparatus of terror.'

Shrewd SS leaders such as Otto Ohlendorf were already thinking ahead.

As commander of Einsatzgruppe D, which operated on the Eastern Front between 1941 and 1942, Ohlendorf was responsible for the murder of 90,000 men, women and children.

A highly educated, intelligent lawyer and economist, Ohlendorf showed great concern for the psychological welfare of his extermination squad's gunmen: he ordered that several of them should fire simultaneously at their victims, so as to avoid any feelings of personal responsibility.

By the winter of 1943 he was transferred to the Ministry of Economics. Ohlendorf's ostensible job was focusing on export trade, but his real priority was preserving the SS's massive pan-European economic empire after Germany's defeat.

Ohlendorf, who was later hanged at Nuremberg, took particular interest in the work of a German economist called Ludwig Erhard. Erhard had written a lengthy manuscript on the transition to a post-war economy after Germany's defeat. This was dangerous, especially as his name had been mentioned in connection with resistance groups.

But Ohlendorf, who was also chief of the SD, the Nazi domestic security service, protected Erhard as he agreed with his views on stabilising the post-war German economy. Ohlendorf himself was protected by Heinrich Himmler, the chief of the SS.

Ohlendorf and Erhard feared a bout of hyper-inflation, such as the one that had destroyed the German economy in the Twenties. Such a catastrophe would render the SS's economic empire almost worthless.

The two men agreed that the post-war priority was rapid monetary stabilisation through a stable currency unit, but they realised this would have to be enforced by a friendly occupying power, as no post-war German state would have enough legitimacy to introduce a currency that would have any value.

That unit would become the Deutschmark, which was introduced in 1948. It was an astonishing success and it kick-started the German economy. With a stable currency, Germany was once again an attractive trading partner.

The German industrial conglomerates could rapidly rebuild their economic empires across Europe.

War had been extraordinarily profitable for the German economy. By 1948 - despite six years of conflict, Allied bombing and post-war reparations payments - the capital stock of assets such as equipment and buildings was larger than in 1936, thanks mainly to the armaments boom.

Erhard pondered how German industry could expand its reach across the shattered European continent. The answer was through supranationalism - the voluntary surrender of national sovereignty to an international body.

Germany and France were the drivers behind the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), the precursor to the European Union. The ECSC was the first supranational organisation, established in April 1951 by six European states. It created a common market for coal and steel which it regulated. This set a vital precedent for the steady erosion of national sovereignty, a process that continues today.

But before the common market could be set up, the Nazi industrialists had to be pardoned, and Nazi bankers and officials reintegrated. In 1957, John J. McCloy, the American High Commissioner for Germany, issued an amnesty for industrialists convicted of war crimes.

The two most powerful Nazi industrialists, Alfried Krupp of Krupp Industries and Friedrich Flick, whose Flick Group eventually owned a 40 per cent stake in Daimler-Benz, were released from prison after serving barely three years.

Krupp and Flick had been central figures in the Nazi economy. Their companies used slave labourers like cattle, to be worked to death.

The Krupp company soon became one of Europe's leading industrial combines.

The Flick Group also quickly built up a new pan-European business empire. Friedrich Flick remained unrepentant about his wartime record and refused to pay a single Deutschmark in compensation until his death in July 1972 at the age of 90, when he left a fortune of more than $1billion, the equivalent of £400million at the time.

'For many leading industrial figures close to the Nazi regime, Europe became a cover for pursuing German national interests after the defeat of Hitler,' says historian Dr Michael Pinto-Duschinsky, an adviser to Jewish former slave labourers.

'The continuity of the economy of Germany and the economies of post-war Europe is striking. Some of the leading figures in the Nazi economy became leading builders of the European Union.'

Numerous household names had exploited slave and forced labourers including BMW, Siemens and Volkswagen, which produced munitions and the V1 rocket.

Slave labour was an integral part of the Nazi war machine. Many concentration camps were attached to dedicated factories where company officials worked hand-in-hand with the SS officers overseeing the camps.

Like Krupp and Flick, Hermann Abs, post-war Germany's most powerful banker, had prospered in the Third Reich. Dapper, elegant and diplomatic, Abs joined the board of Deutsche Bank, Germany's biggest bank, in 1937. As the Nazi empire expanded, Deutsche Bank enthusiastically 'Aryanised' Austrian and Czechoslovak banks that were owned by Jews.

By 1942, Abs held 40 directorships, a quarter of which were in countries occupied by the Nazis. Many of these Aryanised companies used slave labour and by 1943 Deutsche Bank's wealth had quadrupled.

Abs also sat on the supervisory board of I.G. Farben, as Deutsche Bank's representative. I.G. Farben was one of Nazi Germany's most powerful companies, formed out of a union of BASF, Bayer, Hoechst and subsidiaries in the Twenties.

It was so deeply entwined with the SS and the Nazis that it ran its own slave labour camp at Auschwitz, known as Auschwitz III, where tens of thousands of Jews and other prisoners died producing artificial rubber.

When they could work no longer, or were verbraucht (used up) in the Nazis' chilling term, they were moved to Birkenau. There they were gassed using Zyklon B, the patent for which was owned by I.G. Farben.

But like all good businessmen, I.G. Farben's bosses hedged their bets.

During the war the company had financed Ludwig Erhard's research. After the war, 24 I.G. Farben executives were indicted for war crimes over Auschwitz III - but only twelve of the 24 were found guilty and sentenced to prison terms ranging from one-and-a-half to eight years. I.G. Farben got away with mass murder.

Abs was one of the most important figures in Germany's post-war reconstruction. It was largely thanks to him that, just as the Red House Report exhorted, a 'strong German empire' was indeed rebuilt, one which formed the basis of today's European Union.

Abs was put in charge of allocating Marshall Aid - reconstruction funds - to German industry. By 1948 he was effectively managing Germany's economic recovery.

Crucially, Abs was also a member of the European League for Economic Co-operation, an elite intellectual pressure group set up in 1946. The league was dedicated to the establishment of a common market, the precursor of the European Union.

Its members included industrialists and financiers and it developed policies that are strikingly familiar today - on monetary integration and common transport, energy and welfare systems.

When Konrad Adenauer, the first Chancellor of West Germany, took power in 1949, Abs was his most important financial adviser.

Behind the scenes Abs was working hard for Deutsche Bank to be allowed to reconstitute itself after decentralisation. In 1957 he succeeded and he returned to his former employer.

That same year the six members of the ECSC signed the Treaty of Rome, which set up the European Economic Community. The treaty further liberalised trade and established increasingly powerful supranational institutions including the European Parliament and European Commission.

Like Abs, Ludwig Erhard flourished in post-war Germany. Adenauer made Erhard Germany's first post-war economics minister. In 1963 Erhard succeeded Adenauer as Chancellor for three years.

But the German economic miracle – so vital to the idea of a new Europe - was built on mass murder. The number of slave and forced labourers who died while employed by German companies in the Nazi era was 2,700,000.

Some sporadic compensation payments were made but German industry agreed a conclusive, global settlement only in 2000, with a £3billion compensation fund. There was no admission of legal liability and the individual compensation was paltry.

A slave labourer would receive 15,000 Deutschmarks (about £5,000), a forced labourer 5,000 (about £1,600). Any claimant accepting the deal had to undertake not to launch any further legal action.

To put this sum of money into perspective, in 2001 Volkswagen alone made profits of £1.8billion.

Next month, 27 European Union member states vote in the biggest transnational election in history. Europe now enjoys peace and stability. Germany is a democracy, once again home to a substantial Jewish community. The Holocaust is seared into national memory.

But the Red House Report is a bridge from a sunny present to a dark past. Joseph Goebbels, Hitler's propaganda chief, once said: 'In 50 years' time nobody will think of nation states.

  '[ Is this not the essence of the EU and  the encouragement of mass immigration particularly from the Muslim World?- Added:-Dec-2017]

For now, the nation state endures. But these three typewritten pages are a reminder that today's drive towards a European federal state is inexorably tangled up with the plans of the SS and German industrialists for a Fourth Reich - an economic rather than military imperium.

• The Budapest Protocol, Adam LeBor's thriller inspired by the Red House Report, is published by Reportage Press.

Full ARTICLE

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1179902/Revealed-The-secret-report-shows-Nazis-planned-Fourth-Reich--EU.html#ixzz4oiNwdrtt
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

2009

 

H.F.1270 -BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER

 

OUR KB'S (**** ****) DROPPED OVER NIGHT (DECEMBER 10-2017) FROM A REGULAR 95-103 KB's TO JUST 25-35 KB'S

WE ASK! HAVE WE OFFENDED SOMEONE?

 

BULLETINS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD

 

PART 1-PART 2(1994 -Official Website-DECEMBER- HOME- 2017)- PART 3-PART 4 

 

TOM UTLEY: To the young (like my sons) who think we baby boomers are pampered, selfish, racists, here's why

YOUR ALL SO WRONG

Are you a baby boomer like me, born in the post-war breeding period from 1946 to 1964? If so, you stand accused by increasing numbers of millennials of being a pampered, selfish racist, incapable of coherent thought and not to be trusted with the vote.

Don’t take my word for it. This is the finding of charity workers concerned with the welfare of the elderly.

At a conference in London this week, they warned that, since last year’s EU referendum, there has been an upsurge of ageist prejudice among the resentful young, who feel hard done by and betrayed by their parents’ generation.

 

Millennials, according to a new survey feel betrayed by Baby Boomers over Brexit

 

, I must admit that I was one of the lucky ten per cent or so of baby boomers who went to university in the Sixties and Seventies, with our tuition fees paid by the state

Said Kate Jopling, the former head of public affairs at Help the Aged: ‘[After Brexit], there was a casual use of demonising and divisive language, the bandying around of stereotypes about who older people are, about their economic circumstances, their motivations and even their ability to form rational judgments.

‘Baby boomers used to be talked about as the generation that would change everything. Now it is almost a term of abuse.’

As a 64-year-old father of four — and a Brexiteer to boot — I feel I’ve been on the receiving end of more than my fair share of such demonisation from my own Remainer sons. So on behalf of my fellow baby boomers, I’d like to take this opportunity of entering a plea of Not Guilty to every charge on their generation’s indictment. 

I am also tempted to lay counter-charges against my sons’ own age group, which strikes me in general as being more pampered and selfish than mine, less capable of independent thought — and, yes, less to be trusted with the vote.

According to speakers at The Future of Ageing Conference, millennials’ resentment of baby boomers focuses on three main areas: tuition fees, housing and, of course, the Brexit result. The idea is that we had everything handed to us on a plate — free higher education and affordable homes — and are too selfish to care a damn about how much they suffer.

To rub salt into the wounds of the young, surveys suggest some 60 per cent of us 50 to 65-year-olds voted Leave, while almost three-quarters of 18 to 24-year-olds voted Remain. Thus, we stand accused of wilfully ‘stealing the future’ from our children, who ascribe our decision purely to stupidity and racism. Many add that since they are the ones who will have to live with the long-term consequences of Brexit, they alone should have decided the matter.

Let’s take tuition fees first. Before I go any further, I must admit that I was one of the lucky ten per cent or so of baby boomers who went to university in the Sixties and Seventies, with our tuition fees paid by the state and — in many cases, including mine — a generous maintenance allowance thrown in by our local councils. Indeed, all my life I’ve felt grateful to the miners, welders, street-cleaners and check-out girls who made my higher education possible through their taxes (though, in my defence, I must say I’ve repaid the state many times over since).

But the point is that 90 per cent of my generation didn’t share my good fortune. For when universities depended overwhelmingly on the Treasury for their running costs, places were restricted. Most of my fellow students came from comfortable, middle-class backgrounds, while a hugely disproportionate number of them had been privately educated, as I was.

Contrast this with the position today, after the introduction of tuition fees made possible a rapid expansion in the number of places available, with the proportion of school-leavers going into higher education more than trebling since my day.

What’s more, the student loan system — under which repayments begin only when graduates earn a decent income, and debts are written off after 30 years — has had a dramatic effect on the social composition of the university population.

Though the Left warned it would deter poorer teenagers from applying for places, the opposite has proved true. Indeed, a report this week from the Centre for Global Higher Education finds the proportion of students from families in the bottom fifth of income groups has doubled since fees were introduced in 1998.

Are resentful young graduates really saying the system was fairer all those decades ago, when universities had to compete for funding with every other Whitehall department — forcing them to turn 90 per cent of baby boomers away?

Or do they simply believe in Jeremy Corbyn’s magic money tree, whose fruits will somehow fund free higher education for all — on top of free everything else — while relieving them of all their debts? If so, who’s being stupid and selfish now?

On housing, I have to admit our young antagonists are on firmer ground. Undeniably, it is much harder for them to get on to the ladder after years of mass immigration and marital breakdown, in which supply has failed to keep up with demand.

 

Somehow or other, three-quarters of millennials appear to have run away with the idea that the EU is an earthly paradise of free trade, prosperity, democracy and brotherly love. In their view, it seems, anyone who thinks otherwise must be a thick, pig-headed racist

But to the charge that ‘I’m all right Jack’ baby boomers don’t care about this crisis, I plead an emphatic Not Guilty. We feel the pain acutely — not least, those of us stuck with twentysomething offspring on the premises, treating us to lectures on our selfishness as they tuck into free grub earned by the sweat of our brows.

Indeed, politicians need have no fear of losing older voters’ support if they embark on a mass programme of house building. For most of us, it can’t come too soon.

Then there’s Brexit, the biggest bone of contention of them all. Somehow or other, three-quarters of millennials appear to have run away with the idea that the EU is an earthly paradise of free trade, prosperity, democracy and brotherly love. In their view, it seems, anyone who thinks otherwise must be a thick, pig-headed racist.

I ask them only to consider the facts. How can they think Brussels a guarantor of prosperity, when they see the rampant youth unemployment imposed on southern Europe by the eurocrats’ politically inspired folly of the one-size-fits-all euro?

How can they think the EU stands for free trade and friendship between nations, when, in fact, it erects savage tariff barriers against some of the world’s poorest countries, preventing them from developing in order to protect its own inefficient farmers and industries? 

Take African cocoa. The EU is happy to exempt imports of raw beans from all charges. But in a relic of colonialism, it imposes import tariffs of 30-60 per cent on finished products such as chocolate bars to protect European processors. No wonder the shops are full of overpriced Belgian chocolates, while Africa suffers.

 

How can they think Brussels a guarantor of prosperity, when they see the rampant youth unemployment imposed on southern Europe by the eurocrats’ politically inspired folly of the one-size-fits-all euro?

There’s nothing touchy-feely about this aspect of the monstrous, protectionist cartel that is Brussels.

Yet despite its efforts to protect its own, the EU’s share of world trade has shrunk every year since we joined. Indeed, it’s bewildering how milliennials can think Brussels represents the future.

As for democracy, it doesn’t get a look-in, as unelected officials blithely impose laws on 500 million citizens who have no power to get rid of them. No wonder neo-Nazis and Communists are rearing their ugly heads again, on a continent falling apart at the seams.

Meanwhile what, pray, is racist about demanding an end to the free movement of unskilled, mostly white Europeans, so that we can welcome the skilled workers we need from the rest of the world?

No, you millennials. We baby boomers voted Brexit because we have your interests at heart, to save you from sinking aboard the bureaucratic Titanic.

As for the claim that we were pampered in our youth, millennials are the healthiest, most widely travelled generation in history — with more holidays, clothes, sources of entertainment and an infinitely more exciting diet than most of us could dream of, in the days when roast chicken was the height of luxury.

So why don’t the young lift their eyes from their smartphones, pull those earphones from their lugs, stop whingeing — and start thinking before they vote?



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5134843/TOM-UTLEY-millennials-like-sons-wrong.html#ixzz5067WXQ4b
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter |
DailyMail on Facebook

*  *  *

'Of the whole sum of human life no small part is that which consists of a man's relations to his country, and his feelings concerning it.-

Gladstone

*

'The love of country produces good manners; and good manners, love of country.- The less we satisfy our individual passions, the more we leave to the general.'-

Montesquieu

*

Be just and fear not; let all the ends thou aimest at, be thy country's, thy God's, and truth's.

Shakespeare

 

*

 

 

DECEMBER-2017

H.F.1401-

Brought forward from 2009

Revealed: The secret report that shows how the Nazis planned a Fourth Reich ...in the EU

The paper is aged and fragile, the typewritten letters slowly fading. But US Military Intelligence report EW-Pa 128 is as chilling now as the day it was written in November 1944.

The document, also known as the Red House Report, is a detailed account of a secret meeting at the Maison Rouge Hotel in Strasbourg on August 10, 1944. There, Nazi officials ordered an elite group of German industrialists to plan for Germany's post-war recovery, prepare for the Nazis' return to power and work for a 'strong German empire'. In other words: the Fourth Reich.

 
Heinrich Himmler with Max Faust, engineer with I. G. Farben

Plotters: SS chief Heinrich Himmler with Max Faust, engineer with Nazi-backed company I. G. Farben

The three-page, closely typed report, marked 'Secret', copied to British officials and sent by air pouch to Cordell Hull, the US Secretary of State, detailed how the industrialists were to work with the Nazi Party to rebuild Germany's economy by sending money through Switzerland.

They would set up a network of secret front companies abroad. They would wait until conditions were right. And then they would take over Germany again.

The industrialists included representatives of Volkswagen, Krupp and Messerschmitt. Officials from the Navy and Ministry of Armaments were also at the meeting and, with incredible foresight, they decided together that the Fourth German Reich, unlike its predecessor, would be an economic rather than a military empire - but not just German.

The Red House Report, which was unearthed from US intelligence files, was the inspiration for my thriller The Budapest Protocol.

The book opens in 1944 as the Red Army advances on the besieged city, then jumps to the present day, during the election campaign for the first president of Europe. The European Union superstate is revealed as a front for a sinister conspiracy, one rooted in the last days of the Second World War.

But as I researched and wrote the novel, I realised that some of the Red House Report had become fact.

Nazi Germany did export massive amounts of capital through neutral countries. German businesses did set up a network of front companies abroad. The German economy did soon recover after 1945.

The Third Reich was defeated militarily, but powerful Nazi-era bankers, industrialists and civil servants, reborn as democrats, soon prospered in the new West Germany. There they worked for a new cause: European economic and political integration.

Is it possible that the Fourth Reich those Nazi industrialists foresaw has, in some part at least, come to pass?

The Red House Report was written by a French spy who was at the meeting in Strasbourg in 1944 - and it paints an extraordinary picture.

The industrialists gathered at the Maison Rouge Hotel waited expectantly as SS Obergruppenfuhrer Dr Scheid began the meeting. Scheid held one of the highest ranks in the SS, equivalent to Lieutenant General. He cut an imposing figure in his tailored grey-green uniform and high, peaked cap with silver braiding. Guards were posted outside and the room had been searched for microphones.

 
Auschwitz

Death camp: Auschwitz, where tens of thousands of slave labourers died working in a factory run by German firm I. G. Farben

There was a sharp intake of breath as he began to speak. German industry must realise that the war cannot be won, he declared. 'It must take steps in preparation for a post-war commercial campaign.' Such defeatist talk was treasonous - enough to earn a visit to the Gestapo's cellars, followed by a one-way trip to a concentration camp.

But Scheid had been given special licence to speak the truth – the future of the Reich was at stake. He ordered the industrialists to 'make contacts and alliances with foreign firms, but this must be done individually and without attracting any suspicion'.

The industrialists were to borrow substantial sums from foreign countries after the war.

They were especially to exploit the finances of those German firms that had already been used as fronts for economic penetration abroad, said Scheid, citing the American partners of the steel giant Krupp as well as Zeiss, Leica and the Hamburg-America Line shipping company.

But as most of the industrialists left the meeting, a handful were beckoned into another smaller gathering, presided over by Dr Bosse of the Armaments Ministry. There were secrets to be shared with the elite of the elite.

Bosse explained how, even though the Nazi Party had informed the industrialists that the war was lost, resistance against the Allies would continue until a guarantee of German unity could be obtained. He then laid out the secret three-stage strategy for the Fourth Reich.

In stage one, the industrialists were to 'prepare themselves to finance the Nazi Party, which would be forced to go underground as a Maquis', using the term for the French resistance.

Stage two would see the government allocating large sums to German industrialists to establish a 'secure post-war foundation in foreign countries', while 'existing financial reserves must be placed at the disposal of the party so that a strong German empire can be created after the defeat'.

In stage three, German businesses would set up a 'sleeper' network of agents abroad through front companies, which were to be covers for military research and intelligence, until the Nazis returned to power.

'The existence of these is to be known only by very few people in each industry and by chiefs of the Nazi Party,' Bosse announced.

'Each office will have a liaison agent with the party. As soon as the party becomes strong enough to re-establish its control over Germany, the industrialists will be paid for their effort and co-operation by concessions and orders.'

 
Enlarge   The 1944 Red House Report

Extraordinary revelations: The 1944 Red House Report, detailing 'plans of German industrialists to engage in underground activity'

The exported funds were to be channelled through two banks in Zurich, or via agencies in Switzerland which bought property in Switzerland for German concerns, for a five per cent commission.

The Nazis had been covertly sending funds through neutral countries for years.

Swiss banks, in particular the Swiss National Bank, accepted gold looted from the treasuries of Nazi-occupied countries. They accepted assets and property titles taken from Jewish businessmen in Germany and occupied countries, and supplied the foreign currency that the Nazis needed to buy vital war materials.

Swiss economic collaboration with the Nazis had been closely monitored by Allied intelligence.

The Red House Report's author notes: 'Previously, exports of capital by German industrialists to neutral countries had to be accomplished rather surreptitiously and by means of special influence.

'Now the Nazi Party stands behind the industrialists and urges them to save themselves by getting funds outside Germany and at the same time advance the party's plans for its post-war operations.'

The order to export foreign capital was technically illegal in Nazi Germany, but by the summer of 1944 the law did not matter.

More than two months after D-Day, the Nazis were being squeezed by the Allies from the west and the Soviets from the east. Hitler had been badly wounded in an assassination attempt. The Nazi leadership was nervous, fractious and quarrelling.

During the war years the SS had built up a gigantic economic empire, based on plunder and murder, and they planned to keep it.

A meeting such as that at the Maison Rouge would need the protection of the SS, according to Dr Adam Tooze of Cambridge University, author of Wages of Destruction: The Making And Breaking Of The Nazi Economy.

He says: 'By 1944 any discussion of post-war planning was banned. It was extremely dangerous to do that in public. But the SS was thinking in the long-term. If you are trying to establish a workable coalition after the war, the only safe place to do it is under the auspices of the apparatus of terror.'

Shrewd SS leaders such as Otto Ohlendorf were already thinking ahead.

As commander of Einsatzgruppe D, which operated on the Eastern Front between 1941 and 1942, Ohlendorf was responsible for the murder of 90,000 men, women and children.

A highly educated, intelligent lawyer and economist, Ohlendorf showed great concern for the psychological welfare of his extermination squad's gunmen: he ordered that several of them should fire simultaneously at their victims, so as to avoid any feelings of personal responsibility.

By the winter of 1943 he was transferred to the Ministry of Economics. Ohlendorf's ostensible job was focusing on export trade, but his real priority was preserving the SS's massive pan-European economic empire after Germany's defeat.

Ohlendorf, who was later hanged at Nuremberg, took particular interest in the work of a German economist called Ludwig Erhard. Erhard had written a lengthy manuscript on the transition to a post-war economy after Germany's defeat. This was dangerous, especially as his name had been mentioned in connection with resistance groups.

But Ohlendorf, who was also chief of the SD, the Nazi domestic security service, protected Erhard as he agreed with his views on stabilising the post-war German economy. Ohlendorf himself was protected by Heinrich Himmler, the chief of the SS.

Ohlendorf and Erhard feared a bout of hyper-inflation, such as the one that had destroyed the German economy in the Twenties. Such a catastrophe would render the SS's economic empire almost worthless.

The two men agreed that the post-war priority was rapid monetary stabilisation through a stable currency unit, but they realised this would have to be enforced by a friendly occupying power, as no post-war German state would have enough legitimacy to introduce a currency that would have any value.

That unit would become the Deutschmark, which was introduced in 1948. It was an astonishing success and it kick-started the German economy. With a stable currency, Germany was once again an attractive trading partner.

The German industrial conglomerates could rapidly rebuild their economic empires across Europe.

War had been extraordinarily profitable for the German economy. By 1948 - despite six years of conflict, Allied bombing and post-war reparations payments - the capital stock of assets such as equipment and buildings was larger than in 1936, thanks mainly to the armaments boom.

Erhard pondered how German industry could expand its reach across the shattered European continent. The answer was through supranationalism - the voluntary surrender of national sovereignty to an international body.

Germany and France were the drivers behind the European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), the precursor to the European Union. The ECSC was the first supranational organisation, established in April 1951 by six European states. It created a common market for coal and steel which it regulated. This set a vital precedent for the steady erosion of national sovereignty, a process that continues today.

But before the common market could be set up, the Nazi industrialists had to be pardoned, and Nazi bankers and officials reintegrated. In 1957, John J. McCloy, the American High Commissioner for Germany, issued an amnesty for industrialists convicted of war crimes.

The two most powerful Nazi industrialists, Alfried Krupp of Krupp Industries and Friedrich Flick, whose Flick Group eventually owned a 40 per cent stake in Daimler-Benz, were released from prison after serving barely three years.

Krupp and Flick had been central figures in the Nazi economy. Their companies used slave labourers like cattle, to be worked to death.

The Krupp company soon became one of Europe's leading industrial combines.

The Flick Group also quickly built up a new pan-European business empire. Friedrich Flick remained unrepentant about his wartime record and refused to pay a single Deutschmark in compensation until his death in July 1972 at the age of 90, when he left a fortune of more than $1billion, the equivalent of £400million at the time.

'For many leading industrial figures close to the Nazi regime, Europe became a cover for pursuing German national interests after the defeat of Hitler,' says historian Dr Michael Pinto-Duschinsky, an adviser to Jewish former slave labourers.

'The continuity of the economy of Germany and the economies of post-war Europe is striking. Some of the leading figures in the Nazi economy became leading builders of the European Union.'

Numerous household names had exploited slave and forced labourers including BMW, Siemens and Volkswagen, which produced munitions and the V1 rocket.

Slave labour was an integral part of the Nazi war machine. Many concentration camps were attached to dedicated factories where company officials worked hand-in-hand with the SS officers overseeing the camps.

Like Krupp and Flick, Hermann Abs, post-war Germany's most powerful banker, had prospered in the Third Reich. Dapper, elegant and diplomatic, Abs joined the board of Deutsche Bank, Germany's biggest bank, in 1937. As the Nazi empire expanded, Deutsche Bank enthusiastically 'Aryanised' Austrian and Czechoslovak banks that were owned by Jews.

By 1942, Abs held 40 directorships, a quarter of which were in countries occupied by the Nazis. Many of these Aryanised companies used slave labour and by 1943 Deutsche Bank's wealth had quadrupled.

Abs also sat on the supervisory board of I.G. Farben, as Deutsche Bank's representative. I.G. Farben was one of Nazi Germany's most powerful companies, formed out of a union of BASF, Bayer, Hoechst and subsidiaries in the Twenties.

It was so deeply entwined with the SS and the Nazis that it ran its own slave labour camp at Auschwitz, known as Auschwitz III, where tens of thousands of Jews and other prisoners died producing artificial rubber.

When they could work no longer, or were verbraucht (used up) in the Nazis' chilling term, they were moved to Birkenau. There they were gassed using Zyklon B, the patent for which was owned by I.G. Farben.

But like all good businessmen, I.G. Farben's bosses hedged their bets.

During the war the company had financed Ludwig Erhard's research. After the war, 24 I.G. Farben executives were indicted for war crimes over Auschwitz III - but only twelve of the 24 were found guilty and sentenced to prison terms ranging from one-and-a-half to eight years. I.G. Farben got away with mass murder.

Abs was one of the most important figures in Germany's post-war reconstruction. It was largely thanks to him that, just as the Red House Report exhorted, a 'strong German empire' was indeed rebuilt, one which formed the basis of today's European Union.

Abs was put in charge of allocating Marshall Aid - reconstruction funds - to German industry. By 1948 he was effectively managing Germany's economic recovery.

Crucially, Abs was also a member of the European League for Economic Co-operation, an elite intellectual pressure group set up in 1946. The league was dedicated to the establishment of a common market, the precursor of the European Union.

Its members included industrialists and financiers and it developed policies that are strikingly familiar today - on monetary integration and common transport, energy and welfare systems.

When Konrad Adenauer, the first Chancellor of West Germany, took power in 1949, Abs was his most important financial adviser.

Behind the scenes Abs was working hard for Deutsche Bank to be allowed to reconstitute itself after decentralisation. In 1957 he succeeded and he returned to his former employer.

That same year the six members of the ECSC signed the Treaty of Rome, which set up the European Economic Community. The treaty further liberalised trade and established increasingly powerful supranational institutions including the European Parliament and European Commission.

Like Abs, Ludwig Erhard flourished in post-war Germany. Adenauer made Erhard Germany's first post-war economics minister. In 1963 Erhard succeeded Adenauer as Chancellor for three years.

But the German economic miracle – so vital to the idea of a new Europe - was built on mass murder. The number of slave and forced labourers who died while employed by German companies in the Nazi era was 2,700,000.

Some sporadic compensation payments were made but German industry agreed a conclusive, global settlement only in 2000, with a £3billion compensation fund. There was no admission of legal liability and the individual compensation was paltry.

A slave labourer would receive 15,000 Deutschmarks (about £5,000), a forced labourer 5,000 (about £1,600). Any claimant accepting the deal had to undertake not to launch any further legal action.

To put this sum of money into perspective, in 2001 Volkswagen alone made profits of £1.8billion.

Next month, 27 European Union member states vote in the biggest transnational election in history. Europe now enjoys peace and stability. Germany is a democracy, once again home to a substantial Jewish community. The Holocaust is seared into national memory.

But the Red House Report is a bridge from a sunny present to a dark past. Joseph Goebbels, Hitler's propaganda chief, once said: 'In 50 years' time nobody will think of nation states.

  '[ Is this not the essence of the EU and  the encouragement of mass immigration particularly from the Muslim World?- Added:-Dec-2017]

For now, the nation state endures. But these three typewritten pages are a reminder that today's drive towards a European federal state is inexorably tangled up with the plans of the SS and German industrialists for a Fourth Reich - an economic rather than military imperium.

• The Budapest Protocol, Adam LeBor's thriller inspired by the Red House Report, is published by Reportage Press.

Full ARTICLE

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1179902/Revealed-The-secret-report-shows-Nazis-planned-Fourth-Reich--EU.html#ixzz4oiNwdrtt
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

2009

 

H.F.1270 -BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER

 
 
 

 

 

 

North Korea has blinked FIRST.

So is Trump's crazy war mongering paying off?

 

North Korea has blinked first. So is Trump's crazy war mongering paying off

, asks JUSTIN WEBB

The stakes could not be higher. The North Koreans will soon have the capacity to attack the U.S. with a missile tipped with a nuclear warhead.

America needs to stop that happening. But any military exchange involving North Korea could kill millions and threaten a world war.

Surely this is a moment for steady, wise, clear-headed leadership. Fine. Except that the leaders in question are, on the one side, a narcissistic and power-crazed fantasist. And on the other, North Korea's President Kim Jong-un.

For better or worse, the biggest nuclear standoff since the Cuba missile crisis has come to a head on Donald Trump and Kim's watch. And neither man appears to be endowed with the wisdom of Solomon.

 

Donald Trump and Kim Jong Un are involved in the biggest nuclear standoff since the Cuba missile crisis. But could the President's unpredictability be key to unlocking the crisis?

So how frightened should we be? More pertinently, is the more powerful of the two men, Donald Trump, the right person for this job?

On the face of it the answer is pretty obvious. The 45th President is incapable of the tact required and the kind of high-pressure decisions he has to make.

An explosive new book about Trump's White House by journalist Michael Wolff has suggested his own staff think he is incompetent and possibly mad.

His foreign policy views are described as 'random, uninformed, and seemingly capricious'. He does not read. He knows no history. His tweet last week boasting that his nuclear button is 'much bigger and more powerful' than Kim's apparently sums up the depths of the man.

And yet another view is emerging. A view that doesn't seek to invest the President with hidden powers but simply suggests his unpredictability, recklessness and yes, even madness, could actually be the key to unlocking this crisis. A view that says perhaps, just perhaps, the maelstrom presidency of Donald J. Trump is going to save the world from nuclear disaster.

News this week that the North Koreans are sending athletes to the winter Olympics in South Korea next month could be a sign Donald Trump is winning his bizarre and scary war of words with Kim Jong-un.

The decision by the North Koreans to meet officials from the South, pictured, and send athletes to next month's winter Olympics could be a sign Trump is winning his war of words

The North Koreans, in other words, have blinked.

Yesterday the two countries held their first formal talks for more than two years and agreed to military talks in the future as well as the restoration of a 'military hotline' that's been closed since 2016. It is a dramatic and sudden change of tone from Pyongyang.

Power

Trump has been quick to take credit, of course. He tweeted that it would not have happened without him being 'firm, strong and willing to commit our total 'might' against the North'.

But the interesting thing is that it is not just Trump saying this. A calmer, more thoughtful voice is also suggesting it.

 

 The North and South have restored their 'military hotline' in a dramatic change of tone from Pyongyang. Pictured is the Demilitarized Zone

John Everard, a former British Ambassador to North Korea, told CNN President Trump's unpredictability may have contributed to Pyongyang's decision to resume relations with the South.

'When United Nations Under-Secretary-General Jeffrey Feltman visited Pyongyang last month,' he explained, 'the North Koreans asked him repeatedly how decisions were made in Washington.

'They are nervous that the United States is now behaving in ways that they cannot predict and are probably anxious at President Trump's talk of military action.'

 

Moderate speech: Kim Jong-un made a statement that was shorter than usual recently, prompting questions that an attack on United States was cut at the last minute

Michael Wolff's book, with its title Fire And Fury reminding the North Koreans of the threat Trump made months ago to unleash America's military power on their heads, will only have compounded the sense of unease.

Everything in it suggests Donald Trump is deeply unpredictable. Capable of doing anything.

Former ambassador Everard makes the point that North Korea's economy is tottering and is affected by U.S- inspired sanctions.

He believes this, combined with Trump's bellicosity, might be getting to Kim Jong-un, who made a speech recently about the crisis that was more moderate and much shorter than usual, prompting Everard to wonder: 'were condemnations of the United States cut at the last minute?'

Having spent time in South Korea last year I am very aware this might be wishful thinking. The wonderful, vibrant South Korean capital of Seoul is a 40- minute drive from the border with North Korea. Pyongyang's field guns are pointed at its heart and ready to fire in minutes. On the Seoul tube there are emergency bunkers and first aid kits.

Impulsive

And since everyone knows war with the North would cause tens of thousands of deaths, it feels as if a threat from the U.S. to unleash that war could only be a bluff. The grim reality of mass casualties (including many Americans who live in Seoul) would surely stay the hand of any American president.

But in President Trump's case, maybe it wouldn't. And it's the 'maybe' that counts. For years America's North Korea policy — under Obama and under George Bush — was serious and stable. When I was based in Washington for the BBC I remember being lectured by the highly educated Obama state department team about how delicate a matter North Korea was. They would proceed with great caution, they said. At the time it felt impressive. But let's be honest, it was a disastrous failure.

 

North Korea developed its nuclear weapons programme while Barack Obama was the US President, not Donald Trump, suggesting a calm guy doesn't always get things right. Pictured are test lauches of the Hwasong-12, left, and Hwasong-14 missiles

Like so much of Obama's foreign policy it looked sophisticated and wise but fell apart in the real world.

It was under Obama, not Trump, that North Korea developed its weapons technology. Just as Syria went to hell under Obama. And relations with Russia collapsed. And Libya was ripped apart.

The calm guy doesn't always get things right. Rashness is not always the enemy of foreign policy success. When President Assad of Syria used chemical weapons against civilians Obama threatened action, then thought about it, then did nothing.

Trump — faced with the same thing last year — blasted an airfield with cruise missiles. People were terrified. What would happen next? What would Syria's allies, the Russians, do?

It turns out the Russians did nothing and the Assad government has made no further large-scale chemical weapons attack.

Trump gets no credit for this but if you were his enemy, you would feel discomfited by his impulsive behaviour. Which is no bad thing.

The British historian Niall Ferguson points out that Donald Trump is oddly like a president the liberal Left have long believed to be a demi-god, an icon of fine judgment and decency — John F. Kennedy.

Seriously? Wasn't Kennedy brilliant and handsome? Well, yes. But he was also a serial abuser of women, a man with connections to organised crime, a man who hid his medical problems even when they affected his mental state.

 

A British historian has said that Donald Trump's foreign policy is similar to that of John F Kennedy

And in foreign policy, Ferguson points out, 'Kennedy combined callousness with recklessness. His questionable interventions ranged from an abortive invasion of Cuba to a bloody coup d'état in South Vietnam. On his watch, the Central Intelligence Agency sought to assassinate Fidel Castro using Mafia hit-men'.

It makes Trump look almost tame.

Missiles

Of course the Cuba missile crisis — when U.S. ships blockaded Soviet-occupied Cuba to stop the Soviets' plan to place nuclear missiles there — ended with the world still in one piece. But only after risks were taken and war narrowly averted.

I accept that just because brinkmanship worked then, does not mean it will work now. It could have gone wrong under Kennedy and let's be blunt, it could go wrong under Trump.

But what if it goes right? If there are talks between North and South Korea that eventually broaden out to include China, the U.S. and Russia, and reach some kind of arrangement that buys off the North Koreans and reduces the threat to America?

What if Trump and Kim Jong-un sit down together to see who really is crazier. What if they actually got along?

A joint Nobel peace prize: Kim Jong-un and Donald Trump. Don't rule it out. The modern world is a strange and unpredictable place. And the alternatives to a peaceful outcome are too terrible to think about.

 

Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5252795/Is-Donald-Trumps-crazy-war-mongering-paying-off.html#ixzz53nSg7sR0
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

JANUARY 10,2018

H.F.1431

 

LITTLEJOHN

 

 

 

 

 

To hell with these traitor's human rites

 

 

 

 

 

To hell with these traitors' yuman rites: RICHARD LITTLEJOHN says it's good to finally have a Defence Secretary who speaks in plain English

Defence Secretary, Gavin Williamson, arrives for the weekly Cabinet meeting last month

This column has long maintained that those who travelled abroad to join Izal should be stripped of both their passports and their citizenship and denied re-entry to this country.

Ideally, they should be put up against a wall and shot through the head in whichever disgusting desert hell-hole they have chosen to make their home.

Failing that they should be blown to Kingdom Come by a drone strike or Hellfire missile.

That’s what I wrote back in October, after the Tory MP Rory Stewart said the only way to deal with home-grown terrorists was to kill them.

It was refreshing to hear a mainstream politician, even if he is only a junior minister, agreeing with me. I’ve been advocating the same hardline approach ever since hundreds of young British citizens flocked to the Middle East to wage holy war.

Fortunately, our new Defence Secretary Gavin Williamson feels the same way. ‘A dead terrorist can’t cause any harm to Britain,’ he told the Mail this week.

Williamson has given his full support to the RAF and special forces who are believed to be working their way through a ‘kill list’ of jihadis before they can bring murder and mayhem back to the streets of Britain.

Reassuringly, he promised: ‘Our job in terms of eliminating them will not stop this year, will not stop next year, it is something we have got to continue to pursue. This is about keeping Britain safe.’

Any who escape with their lives will have their passports taken away to stop them crossing international borders and re-entering this country.

Hallelujah!

At last we’ve got a Defence Secretary who speaks in plain English not just for the Armed Forces, but also for the British people.

Oh, how the old sweats mocked when 41-year-old Williamson, then Chief Whip, was appointed to head the MoD just over a month ago. He’s a wet-behind-the-ears whippersnapper, who knows nothing about defence, they grizzled. Now, though, they can choke on their disdain.

 

In Gavin Williamson, we’ve got a Defence Secretary who speaks in plain English not just for the Armed Forces, but also for the British people, writes Richard Littlejohn

Williamson has already promised a showdown over funding with the Treasury, which would be happy to see the strength of the British Army cut to the bone until it could fit into the back of an armoured personnel carrier — if we’ve got any left.

Spreadsheet Phil, who was Defence Secretary before he became Chancellor, is willing to hand over at least £40 billion (more than Britain’s entire defence budget) to his beloved EU as part of a blackmail — sorry, divorce — payment, while at the same time slashing a further £2 billion from spending on the Armed Forces.

Williamson retaliated by banning Hammond from using the RAF as his own private jet fleet, because the Treasury hasn’t paid the bills.

It might seem petty, but it’s a significant statement of intent. Nothing, repeat nothing, is more vital than the defence of the realm.

Naturally, the hand-wringing yuman rites brigade begs to differ.

 

Some people will try anything to lose weight. A dinner lady from Ipswich has just been nicked for drink-driving after being caught three times over the limit.

In mitigation she said she had been drinking vodka because she heard the property TV presenter Kirstie Allsopp say it had helped her shed a bit of timber.

Some years ago, I had dinner with the late Jeremy Beadle who was on a crash diet before an upcoming series.

It involved eating a plain baked potato three times a day, washed down with a bottle of vodka.

He lost four days.

Max Hill, a liberal QC from central casting, who was hired to review our anti-terror laws, bleats that home-grown jihadis are guilty of nothing more than ‘naivety’ and should be allowed to come home and be ‘reintegrated’ into society. Hundreds have been able to drift back to Britain already.

It emerged yesterday that MI5 only has the capacity to monitor round the clock 50 or 60 of those considered the greatest threat.

Yet how much safer this country would be if they could all have been killed before they had the chance to ‘reintegrate’ themselves by blowing up a Tube train, mowing down pedestrians in a stolen van or stabbing to death late-night revellers.

The Left are predictably squealing with outrage over Williamson’s remarks. Labour claims that ‘eliminating’ these terrorists is extra-judicial murder and in breach of the Geneva Convention.

But the Geneva Convention was designed for conventional warfare. It should apply only to those who agree to abide by the Geneva Convention. Izal may call itself a ‘state’ and rally behind a fancy flag, but it is little more than a gang of bloodthirsty desperados who get high on torture, rape and mass murder.

Calling them ‘combatants’ is too polite. I don’t even accept they’re ‘British’, even if they were born here and carry British passports.

They could not be further removed from the vast majority of loyal and law-abiding British Muslims living here.

These jihadis are not our ‘fellow citizens’; they’re traitors — our sworn enemies.

Their allegiance is to an international terrorist organisation and their own warped interpretation of a global religion.

As Gavin Williamson says: ‘They hate everything that Britain stands for, hate our values, hate that Britain is a beacon to the world of democracy and tolerance.’

The sooner they are all wiped off the face of the earth, the better.

Orchestral manoeuvres

Having exposed so much ‘inappropriate’ behaviour in politics, entertainment and the media, the torchlit ‘historic’ sex crimes posse have turned their attention to the world of classical music.

James Levine, conductor of the Metropolitan Opera in New York, has been suspended following a complaint that he had sexual contact with a teenager in 1986. 

Given that where America leads, Britain follows, it can only be a matter of time before the Jimmy Savile squad gets in on the act.

 

James Levine, conductor of the Metropolitan Opera in New York, has been suspended following a complaint that he had sexual contact with a teenager in 1986

How long until we see a senior police officer standing outside the Albert Hall, appealing for ‘victims’ of Sir Henry Wood to come forward?

Soon they’ll be rounding up dozens of violinists, oboe and piccolo players, accused of ‘historic’ offences in the orchestra pit. We’ll have to learn a whole new meaning for the expression ‘fiddler’s elbow’.

An African migrant jailed twice for sex attacks in Britain has been awarded £110,000 compensation after his own country refused to take him back.

Eh? Just run that by me again. In what parallel universe are British taxpayers forced to give a small fortune to a foreign criminal we are trying to kick out of the country? How did that happen?

Aliou Bah, 28, came here from Guinea in 2007 to join his father. He was subsequently convicted of two sexual assaults, for which he was sentenced to 18 months and two years respectively.

Since the end of the second sentence he has been held for 21 months in an immigration detention centre while the authorities tried to deport him. But Guinea said they didn’t want him and simply refused to process his travel documents. It turns out we haven’t been able to deport anyone to Guinea since 2006.

And because he had previously been granted asylum, a court has ruled that he was detained unlawfully. Even the judge thought it was insane, but rules is rules.

I’m assuming that Bah has also received tens of thousands of pounds in legal aid, not just for defending him in the two sex cases, but also to bring his claim for compensation.

Meanwhile, neither of his victims has received a penny and yet he has been released back on to the streets, where he could strike again, with a cheque for 110 grand in his back pocket.

Apparently, there are almost 6,000 convicted foreign criminals free in this country, all of whom have been released despite being candidates for deportation.

We don’t even know where some of them have come from. Hundreds have simply vanished.

Soft-touch Britain? You couldn’t make it up.

One of the unalloyed joys of the freedom of movement has been the way our city centres have been transformed by colourful newcomers, who make such a valuable contribution to our society.

Where would we be without the gangs of exotic Eastern European gypsies who have set up camp here?

Only this week, Roma beggars surrounded Prince and Princess Michael of Kent as they left a Mayfair nightclub. The Prince gave them a tenner, but they kept pestering him.

Mayfair is a popular pitch, where beggars believe there are rich pickings. And it’s not just foreigners, either. My wife and a friend were walking through the area last week, not far from Claridge’s hotel, when they were accosted by a vagrant with a broad Glaswegian accent.

‘Hey, missus. Can ya spare twenty-five thousand pound?’

When they stopped laughing, they gave him a quid.


Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5158115/To-hell-traitors-yuman-rites.html#ixzz50fwiEAxn
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

 

firmness

 

 

'

'THE GREATEST FIRMNESS IS THE GREATEST MERCY.'

 

 

Longfellow, Henry Wadsworth (1807-32) Am.Poet

 

*

 

 

'Firmness, both  in suffering and exertion, is a character which I would wish to possess - I have always despised the whining yelp of complaint, and the cowardly feeble resolve.'-

 

BURNS,Robert(1759-96) Scot poet

 

 

[THERESA May - must NOT Kow-Tow to the present advocates of Hitler's plan for German domination of EUROPE. Our country has not fought two WORLD WARS with that FOE not to understand that FIRMNESS she can UNDERSTAND.  Other once FREE NATION STATES in EUROPE are watching a once WORLD POWER and may in the not to distant future require our HELP and SUPPORT to

LEAVE

the

BEAST of BERLIN

 which we can best offer

 if

BREXIT means BREXIT

 

AS

 

 

THERESA MAY- SINCERELY  PROMISED.]

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

DECEMBER 9-2014

H .F .1409

 
 

 

Why standing up for Christmas 'will help defeat extremism

by Steve Doughty-

Daily Mail-Social Affairs Correspondent

September 9-2016

' Miss Casey finally said in the article above: '

I have become convinced that it is only the upholding of our core British [English] laws, cultures, values and traditions that will offer us the route through the different and complex challenge of creating a

 COHESIVE SOCIETY.

Full article

 

 

*  *  *

 

 

 CHRISTIANITY AND MARRIAGE AND THE STATE**** GAMBLING AND ETHICS****CHRISTIANITY,THE PEOPLE, AND ETHICS****IMMIGRATION POLICY**** CHRISTIANITY IS MORE THAN A RELIGION_IT IS THE MAIN CULTURAL FORCE_WHICH MAKES US WHAT WE ARE****CHRISTIAN BELIEFS UNDER ATTACK BY EU'S PARLIAMENT IS INTELLECTUAL NAZISM**** A DEFENCE OF CHRISTIANITY BY A ONCE AGNOSTIC****WHO CARES ABOUT MORALITY****DEMOCRACY WITHOUT MORALITY AND RESPECT FOR INDIVIDUALITY IS DESPOTISM****THE WORLD IS DIVIDED INTO MANY RELIGIOUS CIRCLES OF INFLUENCE****THE INDIVIDUAL IS THE BACKBONE OF CHRISTIANITY****CHRISTIAN PARLIAMENTARIAN SPEAKS ON TAX BILLS-FOREIGN POLICY-PEACE-AND THE POWER OF THE HOUSE OF LORDS****OURS MIGHT BE A STRONGER AND HAPPIER SOCIETY IF CHRISTIANS WERE READIER TO DEFEND THEIR VALUES****SUNDAY SCHOOL CAN SAVE CHILDREN FROM DELINQUENCY-SAYS BISHOP****OUR CHRISTIAN FESTIVAL OF EASTER WHICH MANY KNOW SO LITTLE AND SOME NONE****

AN AGE WHEN ALL FAITHS ARE EQUAL-EXCEPT CHRISTIANITY****

LET the CHRISTMAS MESSAGE ring out WHILE you still CAN-by -MICHAEL NAZIR ALI-BISHOP OF ROCHESTER-DEC-2006****

 

WHY WE MUST REMAIN A CHRISTIAN COUNTRY

 

 

O COME ALL YE FAITHFUL…

EXCEPT CHRISTIANS.

 

 

 

*   *   *

 

FREEDOM

 

 

[At the REFERENDUM  the greater number of REMAINERS  in WALES and SCOTLAND... voted in effect to LOSE THEIR IDENTITY because being within the nation state destroyer  -

Hitler's planned EU

 - would see eventually by the devious art of gradualism, the lose of much they hold dear. If there was one nation which should have stood against the EU then Scotland gave its answer in the year 1320 in their:-

Arbroath Manifesto sent by the nobles and Commons of Scotland to the Pope in Rome.

 

'We fight not for glory nor for wealth nor for honour but for that freedom which no good man will surrender but with his life.'

Even in 1707 many Scotsmen were against losing their heritage but they retained their LAWS and KIRK and greater possibilities for TRADE  the TREATY was signed.

In JUNE 2016  the majority in Scotland voted to stay within the

CORRUPT-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC EU

and the attitude no doubt was simply

WHAT CAN I GET OUT OF IT?

We have always stated in our

 EDP policy

'That all the NATION STATES within the BRITISH ISLES should be FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATES with FOREIGN POLICY and DEFENCE the matter for a SUPREME ISLAND COUNCIL...']

ALFRED CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-

*

Why can’t we have the right to be

English?

 

by

 

Paul Johnson

 

 

ST GEORGE'S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ON SHAKESPEARE'S' BIRTHDAY

 

Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND? ****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH****NEW LABOUR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND****UNLESS WE TAKE CONTROL OF OUR LIVES WE WILL LOSE OUR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY****OUR PAST IS EMBEDDED IN OUR NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS -IT ASKS WHERE WE CAME FROM AND WHO WE ARE .****.THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/ ****  THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/ ****    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/****  DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/ ****   NOR SHALL MY SWORD/****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/ ****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/****   ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY -CORRECT BROWNDOM/****    ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1- /****   ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/****    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./****    ENGLAND ARISE! - TODAY WE CLAIM OUR RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION/ ****  KISS GOOD BYE TO YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY****    ST GEORGE'S DAY-ENGLAND'S DAY/****ST GEORGE'S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ON SHAKESPEARE'S' BIRTHDAY****EU WIPES ENGLAND OFF THE MAP**** AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED****THE ENGLISH DID NOT MOVE THEMSELVES SO ARE NOW SLAVES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE****"...What kind of people do they think we are?" by WINSTON CHURCHILL****  THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

 

 

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

 

 

SEPTEMBER 9,2016

H.F.971 BREXIT NOW

 

LITTLEJOHN

 

 

 

 

It is not Alan Partridge who's the EU dinosaur: RICHARD LITTLEJOHN on why he is no fan of self-regarding celebs who sneer at the masses

 

The other night I was invited to a gala Christmas dinner in London. At the next table was St

The grand finale featured a band of guardsmen playing a Last Night of the Proms medley — Rule Britannia!, Land Of Hope And Glory, you know the drill.

Everyone stood up, linking arms, singing along, waving napkins. Everyone, that is, except Coogan and his acolytes. He looked as if the cat had done a whoopsie in his walnut brownie and Guinness ice cream. 

Given that Coogan is a socialist who supports Jeremy Corbyn, I’m assuming he’s read George Orwell’s 1941 essay The Lion And The Unicorn.

‘England is perhaps the only great country whose intellectuals are ashamed of their own nationality. 

In Left-wing circles it is always felt that there is something slightly disgraceful in being an Englishman and that it is a duty to snigger at every English institution, from horse racing to suet puddings.

‘It is a strange fact, but it is unquestionably true that almost any English intellectual would feel more ashamed of standing to attention during God Save The King than of stealing from a poor box.’

I’ve quoted those passages before, because so much wisdom in Orwell’s essay still applies to the modern Guardian-reading classes.

What has any of this got to do with Coogan? Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I refer you to his remarks in the Radio Times, comparing the 17.4 million people who voted Leave in the EU referendum to ‘dinosaurs’ like Alan Partridge.

‘The world has coalesced into a situation that is sympathetic to Alan, which for me is quite depressing. Sometimes I agree with Alan but on Brexit I’m a Remainer, and I feel quite conflicted about it. But the fact is having a fool praise something is a far more powerful indictment than just criticising it.

‘He’s definitely a bit of a dinosaur. Unbelievably, you look around at the world now and see that there are still broadcasters with full-on, red-blooded Alan-like attitudes.

‘We thought we had thoroughly debunked that. It just shows how little influence you actually have on the national culture.’

Before I tip the statutory silver-handled bucketload of ordure over Coogan, let me emphasise that it’s nothing personal. I loved Alan Partridge and admire anyone with Coogan’s talent.

 

Before I tip the statutory silver-handled bucketload of ordure over Coogan, let me emphasise that it’s nothing personal. I loved Alan Partridge and admire anyone with Coogan’s talent

Nor would I dream of defending those journalists who hacked his mobile phone and turned him so fervently against the popular Press.

But, equally, I abhor self-regarding celebs who set themselves up as our moral arbiters and sneer at the masses who pay their wages.

The default position of gobby Remoaners is that everyone who voted Leave is either a gullible, brain-dead moron or a dyed-in-the-wool racist, who’d be better off dead — sooner rather than later.

Who are the real ‘dinosaurs’ — the majority who voted for Britain to become once-again a free-booting, sovereign nation, fully engaged with the rest of the world and equipped to respond to the fast-moving challenges of the 21st century?

Or those wedded to the idea of this great country as a supplicant of a stifling, sclerotic, anti-democratic European superstate, designed in the immediate aftermath of World War II, 70-odd years ago?

What really rankles about the likes of Coogan is not so much their imagined intellectual superiority but the fact that somehow they all still think they’re daring, anti-Establishment warriors.

Like New Labour in its arrogant pomp, they refuse to acknowledge that they are the Establishment today — just as the Red Nose ‘alternative’ comics of the Eighties turned into a Leftish version of the pro-celebrity golf crowd they always professed to despise.

Does Coogan really believe that he’d be invited by the BBC to bring back Alan Partridge from satellite television obscurity if he intended to mock the Remain cause?

What do you think?

The only reason Partridge is being revived is to add to the torrent of anti-Leave abuse on mainstream television.

‘Unbelievably, you look around at the world now and see that there are still broadcasters with full-on, red-blooded Alan-like attitudes.’

 

One of the most depressing things I read recently was the admirable Matt Lucas saying he wouldn’t make Little Britain today because it would offend too many people

Eh? Where are all these ‘Alan-like’ pro-Brexit broadcasters, then? Certainly not on the BBC, which packs every news bulletin and quiz show with smug, self-regarding, pro-Remain conformists.

If Coogan really wanted to stand out from the herd, he’d create a character who ridiculed the Left-wing consensus, not reinforced it.

One of the most depressing things I read recently was the admirable Matt Lucas saying he wouldn’t make Little Britain today because it would offend too many people.

But what was so fabulous about that show was the way in which it slaughtered so many sacred cows — and made fun of every protected species from social workers to transsexuals.

Can you imagine how refreshing such a series would be today?

Where are the comedians who are prepared to send up the preposterous Chuka Umunnas and Anna Soubrys of this world? How about Chuka as Chucky, the deranged Remainer? Or Soubry as a drunken Edna-The-Inebriate-Woman bag lady, pining Shirley Valentine-style for her lost European gigolo?

Who is ‘brave’ enough to poke fun at the ridiculous Bob Geldof or satirise the intolerant ‘diversity’ fascists?

Coogan used to do some of the voices for Spitting Image, including Jimmy Savile. Would he reprise that role today — or depict Labour’s John McDonnell as a dead-eyed IRA godfather? That would be properly edgy and innovative.

Then again, he might surprise us all by reinventing Alan Partridge as a multi-millionaire Left-wing comedian who projectile vomits every time he hears the National Anthem. But I wouldn’t hold your breath. A-Ha!

 

 

Over the weekend, police treated us to photographs of the security measures to prevent a Berlin-style terror attack at Lincoln Christmas market.

Precautions included concrete barriers, overhead drones and armed officers on the streets.

In the first three days, 180,000 people attended without incident. Yet on Sunday, the market was cancelled when snow was forecast.

Simon Walters, ‘event commander’ — they do love their fancy titles, don’t they? — said the decision had been taken to ensure public safety.

Seventy coaches were turned away. Stall-holders lost money and caterer Tom Wilkinson said he had to throw away thousands of sausage rolls.

Inevitably, Lincoln only got a light dusting of snow on Sunday. So elf’n’safety succeeded where the terrorists failed.

Makes you proud to be British.

 

 

What if the boot was on the other foot?

 

Tory councillor Keith Prince

The Tory councillor who oversees London’s transport network has apologised for a heated dispute he had with a woman passenger on a commuter train.

Why? The row, on the 8.50 from Dartford, Kent, was caught on video by another passenger, after Keith Prince told the woman to take her feet off his seat.

It escalated quickly and the woman subjected him to a torrent of foul-mouthed abuse and threatened to kick him in the groin. She took out her mobile phone, presumably to post the confrontation on social media, and said: ‘So I get on the train and this white idiot . . .’

When Mr Prince told her his wife was Nigerian, she replied: ‘Trust me, she doesn’t love you. I’m Nigerian, I know what women want.’

Fortunately, they cooled off and were laughing together by the time the train reached London. So what was Mr Prince apologising for? OK, so it was simply good manners. But he was in the right.

If anyone was owed an apology, he was.

I’m not suggesting this should have been taken any further — far from it.

But just imagine if the boot had been on the other foot, so to speak. What if he’d put his feet on the woman’s seat, threatened to assault her and called her a ‘black idiot’?

If she, or any other passenger, had claimed this was a ‘racist’ incident, you can bet your life the police would have become involved and Mr Prince would have found himself up in court charged with a ‘hate crime’.

His feet wouldn’t have touched . . .

  • Fair enough, I know I’m getting old and should probably pay more attention, but who — or what — is Georgia Toffolo? It sounds like something from the dessert menu in a trendy American barbecue joint. She’s as sweet as Toffolo honey . . . 

 

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5169575/It-not-Alan-Partridge-whos-EU-dinosaur.html#ixzz513ItLpl9
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter |

*  *  *

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

DECEMBER 11, 2014

H .F.1415

 
 

 

PENSIONER POVERTY

IN

BRITAIN

*

Energy firms shamed over worst tariffs

by Sean Poulter

Daily Mail -Consumer Affairs Editor

DECEMBER 21-2017

BRITAIN'S two biggest energy firms have been shamed by a watchdog for having the most customers on rip-off tariffs.

Some 67 per cent of British Gas non-prepayment meter customers are on its EXPENSIVE STANDARD VARIABLE TARIFF (SVT) which is some £284 a year more than the cheapest deal from a rival.

SSE  has 71 per cent on its SVT , paying £315 a year more than the cheapest deal.

Details revealed by energy watchdog Ofgem which said some firms are not doing enough to encourage customers on the SVT to move to a BETTER TARIFF. The findings provide powerful evidence to support the Governments proposal to increase a CAP on the SVT.

The 'big six firms-British Gas, SSE, E. ON, EDF.  Npower and Scottish Power-say there is need for one because competition is increasing and more families are shopping around.

The figures from Ofgem paint a very different  picture. Of the rest of the big six,

 E.ON has 61 per cent of non-prepayment meter customers on the SVT,

EDF has 52 per cent,

Npower has 48 per cent and

Scottish Power has 41 per cent

 

[The unacceptable face of capitalism-Basic usage of water and power should be

FREE

TO ALL

BUT AT THE VERY LEAST PARTICULARLY

FOR ELDERLY PENSIONERS

Excess usage chargeable.]

There's plenty of spare cash in the Foreign Aid Budget which at present is wasted on foreign dancing groups and even handouts to terrorists -as Richard Littlejohn so often remarks 'mind how you go'...']

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

*

DAILY MAIL

DECEMBER 21,2017

 

About 1,610,000 results
  1. What are Smart Meters? - Smart Energy GB - smartenergygb.org

    Adwww.smartenergygb.org/Smart-Meters/Energy-Bills

    Smart meters show how much gas and electricity you’re using, in pounds & pence

    Save energy & cut costs · See what you’re spending · Clear & fair bills

    Are smart meters safe? Yes. ... This means that, as with traditional meters, smart meters have undergone rigorous tests during the manufacturing process to ensure gas and electricity consumption is being measured accurately. Just like with mobile phones and baby monitors, smart meters emit low radio frequency emissions.

    Are smart meters safe? Smart Meter Help and advice from British Gas

    www.britishgas.co.uk/.../Meters-meter.../Smart-Meters/...smart-meters/Are-smart-meters-safe.html


     

    Watchdog exposes smart meter safety concerns - Utility

     

    Week

    https://utilityweek.co.uk/watchdog-exposes-smart-meter-safety-concerns/

    9 Jun 2017 ... BBC Watchdog featured smart meter safety concerns in the first programme of its
    new series last night. The show, which champions consumer interests, identified
    three case studies in which consumers' homes had been left unsafe due to “
    negligent” installation or faulty meters being fitted. In one instance, a ...

     

    Six reasons to say no to a smart meter - The Telegraph

    www.telegraph.co.uk/money/.../six-reasons-say-no-smart-meter/

     Aug 2017 ... The authorities consistently reassured the public that the devices were secure and safe. An investigation by BBC Watchdog, which aired in late July, also raised questions about the links between smart meters and fires. It was not clear whether the meters themselves, or their installation, was at fault.
     

    Are smart meters safe? Smart Meter Help and advice from British Gas

    www.britishgas.co.uk/.../Meters-meter.../Smart-Meters/...smart-meters/Are-smart-meters-safe.html

    re smart meters safe? Yes. ... This means that, as with traditional meters, smart meters have undergone rigorous tests during the manufacturing process to ensure gas and electricity consumption is being measured accurately. Just like with mobile phones and baby monitors, smart meters emit low radio frequency emissions.
     

    What are 'Smart' Meters? « Stop Smart Meters! (UK)

    stopsmartmeters.org.uk/resources/what-are-smart-meters/

    any appliances and consumer goods coming to market today feature tiny RFID
    chips which are capable of communicating with a 'Smart' Meter so that the system
    .... (If you have been led to believe that WiFi is safe, there are many studies
    suggesting otherwise – and even telecoms industry patents (click here) claiming
    it ...

     

     

    THE CHOOSE IS YOURS!

 

 

 

Weekly Geo-Political News and Analysis

by Benjamin Fulford

 

 

Merry Christmas:  The 13 “Illuminati” bloodline families sue for peace

Peace on earth and goodwill to all (and not just men, but all life forms) is looking like a realistic goal for 2018 now that the 13 “Illuminati” * bloodline families, seeing their ancient rule of planet Earth collapsing, are suing for peace.  Last week a representative of the G7 (Germany, the U.K., the corporate U.S., Japan, Italy, France, and Canada) met with a representative of the White Dragon Society (WDS) to discuss peace terms, according to a WDS member who was present at the meeting.  The G7, of course, is the political front for the 13 bloodline families.  There can be no doubt that this meeting was made possible by people inside the military-industrial complex acting in the spirit of Jesus Christ, and for this we wish them all “a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year.”

The bloodline offer to negotiate peace is directly connected to the state of emergency that was declared last week by USA President Donald Trump.  If you have not seen it yet, please read the historic document in the link below.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/text-letter-president-congress-united-states-6/

“After Hanukkah, Trump declared a state of emergency and signed an executive order on December 20th freezing the assets of those accused of human rights abuses and corruption, a catch-all to bankrupt the Bushes, Clintons, Soros, Obama, the Cabal, and the global Jewish mafia,” was how a Pentagon source summed up the situation.

“The national emergency allows Trump to seize assets and unleash the military to carry out mass arrests and adjudicate via military tribunals, effectively imposing martial law,” the source continues.

The Pentagon source also sent a copy of this photograph with the explanation, “Trump wears purple when unveiling his national security strategy on December 18th in a victory lap over the Soros/Hillary purple revolution, and drinks water with both hands to simulate handcuffs.”

Clearly reacting to this situation, the representative of the bloodlines set the meeting for December 23rd, the birthday of the Japanese Emperor, and claimed to be a representative of the Imperial family as well as the G7.  The representative, who acted as if he was negotiating a surrender, said the bloodlines want to keep existing nation-states and institutions as they are, but…
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Letter to the Editor – Experimental Quantum Anti-Gravity Successfully Replicated

I would like to let you know that my anti-gravity experiments have been successfully replicated by the Aerospace Engineering Department at the New Sciences & Technologies Faculty of the University of Tehran in the Islamic Republic of Iran. I have developed complete quantum anti-gravity hypothesis with direct testable predictions that are simple, clear, easy, and inexpensive.

As you know, present-day quantum gravity theories suffer from too many mathematical space dimensions, and from too few conclusive experimental results.

My hypothesis is simple, clear, and subject to easy empirical verification.  I offer clear explanation of the principles of quantum gravity, and also precisely describe how to perform simple and inexpensive experiments to verify it.

In order to clearly understand quantum anti-gravity, please follow these 8 steps:

  1. Start from this brief overview — Quantum Gravity in a Nutshell
  2. The theoretical basis for quantum gravity are the Abraham’s equations of the Abraham-Minkowski controversy, and their empirical counterpart — the Abraham force
  3. To understand how the Biefeld-Brown effect works, you need to be clear where B-B vectors point — “up” or “down”
  4. The Biefeld-Brown effect is an instance of the Abraham force.
  5. Study the section about gyroscope’s anomalous effect.
  6. Please, study all the material on THE BOYD BUSHMAN EFFECT page in order to appreciate the potential complex magnetic fields have for shaping quantum gravity interactions.
  7. Now, you are ready to read the short introduction to quantum gravity.
  8. Perform two simple experiments for empirical verification.

The following are the 10 “mysteries” that my hypothesis sheds new light upon:

  1. The main prediction of my hypothesis (2016) is that anti-hydrogen will anti-gravitate.
  2. Gravitational waves mystery.
  3. EmDrive mystery.
  4. Solar mystery.
  5. Mass mystery.
  6. Bicycle mystery.
  7. Propeller  mystery.
  8. Cloud mystery.
  9. Pioneer mystery.
  10. Missing mystery.

I have designed 4 progressively more complex experiments, and we have successfully performed one of them, the one of medium difficulty, which constitutes:

The empirical discovery of hitherto unknown physical interaction between angular momentum of a spinning gyroscope and Earth’s magnetic and electric fields.

To perform this experiment, we need a gyroscope with a vertical support, and magnetic and electric shielding cages.

According to my hypothesis, there will be a measurable time difference between a freely spinning gyroscope inside, and outside the cages.  A gyroscope freely spinning inside both cages will come to rest in less time than when spinning outside them.

The experiment was performed successfully and was recorded in the following two videos:

To have a clear idea what is involved in the experiment, please take a closer look at the above two videos first.

For the experiment, we used the following small and light gyroscope at 10,000 rpm:

It would be much better to use a heavier gyro, because the heavier the gyro, the stronger the effect, at the same rate of rpm.

The value of angular velocity (rpm) is important only insofar as to generate sufficient angular momentum to allow the gyro to spin freely for a longer time before it comes to rest.

The objective of the experiment was to obtain two values of the gyro’s run time:

  • Outside the shielding;
  • Inside the shielding.

In my experiment, the two sample values are, respectively:

  • 55.54 seconds
  • 51.87 seconds

There was a 3.67 second difference, which amounts to 6.6%.  The time difference is directly proportional to the quality and quantity of electrostatic shielding of the Faraday cage. Applying the magnetic shielding in addition to the electric one would further increase the time difference.

As you can see in the video, it is important that the gyro is elevated by means of a vertical support.  Ideally, gyro should start spinning as close to a vertical position as possible, and also be able to pass lower, while still spinning, than its horizontal position.

The reason for this effect is that the gyroscope inside the cages will be spinning in reduced strength of Earth’s magnetic and electric fields, which in turn reduces the strength of the Biefeld-Brown effect acting upon it.

The gyroscope outside the cages, spinning in the undiminished strength of Earth’s magnetic and electric fields, is subject to the full influence of the Biefeld-Brown effect that causes the gyroscope to resist Earth’s gravity pull, which happens to be none other than pure natural antigravity effect.

OBJECTIONS

  • All conductors, like the brass gyro, exhibit an effective diamagnetism when they experience a changing magnetic field.  The Lorentz force on electrons causes them to circulate around forming eddy currents.  The eddy currents then produce an induced magnetic field that opposes the applied field and resist the conductor’s motion.

—  That is true for both, the gyro spinning inside and outside the Faraday cage in Earth’s magnetic field.  It does not make any difference.

  • But the gyro’s induced magnetic field will generate eddy currents in the Faraday cage and the resultant magnetic field will slow down gyro’s spin (magnetic breaking), and hence the whole effect.  It is like dropping a magnet down a copper pipe: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8dFFL8TDt2Q

—   The analogy in the video applies, but only in principle.  Spinning brass gyro is not a strong neodymium magnet, and if, in principle, it generates any magnetic field, it is so weak that it will not even affect a needle of a compass.  As opposed to the copper pipe in the video, the enamel-coated copper mesh Faraday cage has much larger diameter (the inverse-square law), so it is enough to drop a strong neodymium magnet down the Faraday cage to see how much it would slow down, if at all.  As you can see in the above video, even few empty slits in the copper pipe greatly weaken the eddy currents, this being the reason for using enamel-coated copper mesh.  Diamagnetic materials, like brass, or copper, have a relative magnetic permeability that is less than or equal to 1, and therefore a magnetic susceptibility less than or equal to 0, since susceptibility is defined as χv=μv−1.  This means that diamagnetic materials, in principle, are repelled by magnetic fields.  However, since diamagnetism is such a weak property, its effects are not observable in everyday life.  Moreover, there is a big difference between Faraday cage made of solid copper, and one made of enamel-coated copper mesh.  The magnetic field induced in the gyro is weak, because Earth’s magnetic field is weak, so whatever little eddy currents could be induced by the gyro in solid copper Faraday cage will become irrelevant in the enamel-coated copper mesh Faraday cage, as you can see in the following two videos:

Even though it is true that the experiment, in principle, is open to influences from various phenomena, including the Carnegie curve, the overall result is clearly well beyond being attributed exclusively to these other phenomena.

To completely eliminate above objections, magnetic shielding needs to be applied in addition to the Faraday cage, and the gyro should be custom-made from a material which does not allow for eddy currents to flow in it.

Naturally,  I will be happy to answer any questions that you may have for me regarding the theoretical foundations as well as replication of the experiment.

With respect and much gratitude,  I am
Sincerely yours,

U.S. troops deploy worldwide with 10,000 sealed indictments to take down Khazarian mob

U.S. President Donald Trump spent the weekend at Camp David with his top generals to map out the exact strategy for decapitating the Khazarian mafia worldwide, say Pentagon sources.  “The Atlanta airport was shut down, while the Department of Defense refused to disclose the locations of 44,000 U.S. troops who may be involved in terminating the cabal worldwide,” a senior Pentagon source said.  There are now close to 10,000 sealed indictments as more and more of the Khazarian criminals give up evidence on their colleagues, the sources say.

There are also many extra-judicial killings going on.  “The liberal sanctuary city mayor of San Francisco, Edwin Lee, dropped dead after an illegal alien was found not guilty in the murder of Kate Steinle even after his confession,” one source notes.  “Lee’s death is a message to the Democrats and sanctuary city mayors like Rahm Emmanuel of Chicago and Bill De Blasio of New York City,” the source warns.

The Khazarian mob is also killing off lots of people.  In Japan, two former executives of Toshiba, Atsutoshi Nishida and Taizo Nishimura, suddenly died in the past two months because they were about to provide evidence about the March 11, 2011 Fukushima tsunami and nuclear terror attack against Japan, according to sources close to the royal family.

This attack was carried out by henchmen of the Rockefeller family, whose members include Hillary and Bill Clinton, the sources say.  The Rockellers, in turn, were taking orders from the fascist P2 Freemason lodge, they say.  The Rockefeller family, by the way, has elected Mel Rockefeller, the son of Nelson Rockefeller, as the new family head, these sources added.

In Canada, Barry Sherman, owner of the Canadian pharmaceutical giant Apotex, was found hanging dead alongside his wife Honey by the family’s indoor pool.  According to CIA sources, Sherman was …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Message to the People Who Censor My Hotmail Account

I saw the one about people being used as collateral for financial instruments around the world before you deleted it. To the person who sent it, please phone me at +81-90-3439-5558 so that we can talk without the idiots (who will soon be in jail) censoring us. FYI a friend of mine has also seen bonds in Singapore that were backed by US prison slave labour. We will not be free until we end the system of Babylonian debt slavery run by the privately owned central banks.
 

2017-12-25

 

H.F.1427

 

 
[PC THREAT

TO

LEARNING]]

 

If our ignorant academics really understood history they'd be proud of the British Empire writes Indian historian DR KARTAR LALVANI

He is justifiably revered as the spiritual father of Indian independence, the man who helped end British rule through his moral leadership, yet Mahatma Gandhi’s attitude towards the Empire was complex. He once said that:

 ‘India would be nothing without Englishmen.’

*

Those words are far removed from the current historical orthodoxy, which holds that the British Empire in India was nothing more than a vehicle for ruthless oppression and commercial exploitation.

Recent events have exposed how prevalent this version of history has become. As the Mail reported last week, the eminent Oxford theologian Professor Nigel Biggar has come under ferocious assault from academics for the thought-crime of daring to argue we should take a more balanced, less negative view about the legacy of Empire.

At the weekend, Balliol College, Oxford, confirmed it had removed from its magnificent hall a portrait of the great Viceroy of India Lord Curzon, because undergraduates had branded him ‘a colonialist’.

 

We should be proud of the British Empire writes Dr Kartar Lalvani, the businessman and Indian historian

 

Legacy

 

Meanwhile, historian Tony Adler has revealed how even the National Archives has fallen prey to insidious political correctness. It was forced to admit that in some of its displays it had ignored Britain’s role in the abolition of slavery, and in a blog to mark the 70th anniversary of the partition of India, blamed this nation for the bloodshed that followed.

As a scientist of Indian origin myself, who has spent decades researching colonial history, I am only too familiar with the climate of post-imperial guilt.

I came to England in 1956 to study pharmacy at King’s College, London. After gaining a doctorate from Bonn University, I chose to settle here and founded my vitamins business in 1971. In all my 60 happy years in this country, I’ve rarely heard any Briton utter a positive word about the British in India. And yet there is so much to be positive about.

The Empire brought not only wise civic administration but also an advanced physical infrastructure that fuelled both economic progress and a sense of national unity in the vast sub-continent.

Far from looting India, British governance promoted education, fostered enterprise, revolutionised transport, created an impartial judicial system, nurtured intellectual debate and tackled barbarism. It would be no exaggeration to say that the two centuries of British rule were the most progressive 200 years in the last 1,000 years of the sub-continent’s history.

And with India poised to become the world’s fifth largest economy in 2018, it is fair to say it would not have been possible without the legacy of Empire.

British rule did, of course, have its darker aspects, particularly under the East India Company, a private monopoly occasionally characterised by corruption. However, the company’s influence effectively came to an end after the Indian Mutiny of 1857 when the British Government took over direct control of the Raj.

But too much emphasis on these failures ignores the far more beneficent side of the ledger, in which the British brought India a unique mix of liberalism and innovation.

To restore some balance to the debate, last year I wrote a book, The Making Of India, that highlighted the untold achievements of the Raj. I wrote that the ‘sheer audacity and scale’ of the endeavour ‘have no parallel in human history’. I pointed to the incredible efficiency of the Indian Civil Service (ICS) which with fewer than 1,000 officials governed effectively a vast land of 500 million people spread over 1.27 million square miles.

 

He is justifiably revered as the spiritual father of Indian independence, the man who helped end British rule through his moral leadership, yet Mahatma Gandhi’s attitude towards the Empire was complex. He once said that: ‘India would be nothing without Englishmen’

No authoritarian regime would have been able to establish that kind of legitimacy, but the ICS did so through its reputation for incorruptibility and its willingness to recruit from the indigenous population.

By 1922, 15 per cent of civil servants were Indian and by 1941 that figure had climbed to over 50 per cent. When the British handed over power, they did so to a highly qualified, well-trained bureaucracy.

Imperial rule also built an Indian army, in which high standards and respect for ethnic identities cultivated a profound sense of pride among recruits, as shown by the heroic service of Indian soldiers in both world wars.

The same sense of respect shone through the courts system. In keeping with the tradition of British liberty stretching back to Magna Carta, the Empire ensured justice was available to every inhabitant of the multi-lingual, multi-faith sub-continent.

In 1880 the Marquess of Ripon, the Liberal Viceroy, abolished a rule that Indian judges could not conduct the trials of white defendants in criminal cases. Denouncing opposition to his measure, he asked: ‘Is India to be ruled for the benefit of the Indian people of all races, classes and creeds, or in the sole interest of a small body of Europeans?’

The Empire’s fine administration was matched by a huge infrastructure programme — the founding of great cities like Madras, Calcutta and Bombay, the establishment of India’s universities, technical colleges, hospitals, libraries, museums and public buildings, as well as the development of industry, canals, roads, dockyards, telegraph and postal services.

 

At the weekend, Balliol College, Oxford, confirmed it had removed from its magnificent hall a portrait of the great Viceroy of India Lord Curzon, because undergraduates had branded him ‘a colonialist.’ (Pictured: Oxford students call for a statue of Rhodes to be pulled down)

 

Benefits

 

London was connected telegraphically to India in 1852, even before New York, while, by the end of the Raj, a quarter of land in the subcontinent was irrigated. Perhaps most impressive was the construction of the huge railway network — 10,000 miles of track in 25 years.

The benefits of Empire could be seen in a host of other ways: a smallpox vaccination programme and the improvement in water supplies dramatically improved life expectancy.

Yes, of course, the Empire enhanced Britain’s wealth, but India also gained enormously. Under British rule, Indian entrepreneurs had the full freedom to engage in commerce, imports, exports and other business opportunities.

Thanks to British belief in free trade and the open market, some of the Raj’s most successful enterprises were started by Indians, such as the Bombay Spinning Mill, while the Tata family — now owners of Jaguar Land Rover — were involved in a whole range of industries during the Empire.

Contrary to the misguided modern narrative of oppression, British rule encouraged freedom of speech, a free Press, and political association. India’s first nationwide political party, the National Congress, was founded in 1885 by a British liberal civil servant, Allan Octavian Hume.

 

British rule had its darker aspects but too much emphasis on these failures ignores that the British brought India a unique mix of liberalism and innovation. (Pictured: Professor Nigel Biggar came under assault from academics for daring to take a more balanced of colonialism)

Vigilant

The Empire also led to vital social reforms that protected human rights, including the prohibition on female infanticide and the ban on the savage practice known as suttee —burning alive widows on their husbands’ funeral pyres.

Furthermore, British administrators and scholars were vigilant in the restoration of India’s heritage, especially its ancient temples, languages, records and artefacts.

If the self-righteous and ignorant Balliol undergraduates understood any real history, they would have known that Lord Curzon devoted much of his energy as Viceroy to remedying the neglect of many of India’s historic monuments — he more than anyone helped save the Taj Mahal. He was the Viceroy most admired by Nehru, the first leader of independent India.

In 2007, the prominent Indian entrepreneur, Jaithirth Rao said: ‘The British gave us a sense of our past, they gave us our feel for the land in real material terms … They mapped our country, analysed and described it.’

In fact, without the British, it is unlikely that India, as a nation, would exist at all.

Before the Empire, the sub-continent was divided into numerous kingdoms and principalities, more than 500 in all. When the Raj ended in 1947, Britain left behind the largest democracy in the world.

That should be a source of pride, not shame, for Britain for centuries to come.


Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5214071/DR-KARTAR-LALVANI-proud-British-Empire.html#ixzz52TrR0kgX
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail onFacebook

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H.F.1428

 
 

 

THE HISTORY OF ENGLAND

A STUDY IN POLITICAL EVOLUTION

CHAPTER VII

A CENTURY OF EMPIRE

1815-1911

(Printed in 1912)

The British realms beyond the seas have little history before the battle of Waterloo, a date at which the Englishman's historical education has commonly come to an end; and if by chance it has gone ay further, it has probably been confined to purely domestic events or to foreign episodes of such ephemeral interest as the Crimean War.  It may be well, therefore, to pass lightly over these matters in order to sketch in brief outline the developments of the empire and the problems which it involves. European affairs, in fact, played a very subordinate part in English history after 1815; so far as England was concerned, it was a period of excursions and alarms rather than actual hostilities; and the fortunes of English-speaking communities were not greatly affected by the revolutions and wars which made and marred continental nations, a circumstance which explains, if it does not excuse, the almost total ignorance of European history displayed in British colonies.

The interventions of Britain in continental politics were generally on behalf of the principles of nationality and self government.  Under the influence of Castlereagh and Canning the British government gradually broke away from the Holy a Alliance formed to suppress all protests against the settlement reached after Napoleon's fall; and Britain interposed with decisive effect at the battle of Navarino in 1827, which secured the independence of Greece from Turkey.  More diplomatic intervention assisted the South American colonies to assert their independence of the Spanish mother-country;  and British volunteers helped the Liberal cause in Spain and Portugal against reactionary monarchs.   Belgium was countenanced in its successful revolution against the House of Orange, and the Italian states in their revolts against native and foreign despots; the expulsion of the Hapsburgs and Bourbons from Italy, and its unification on a nationalist basis, owed something to British diplomacy, which supported Cavour, and to British volunteers who fought for Garibaldi.  The attitude of Britain  towards the Balkan nationalities, which were endeavouring to throw off the Turkish yoke, was more dubious, while Gladstone denounced Turkish atrocities, Disraeli strengthened Turkey's hands.  Yet England would have been as enthusiastic for a liberated and united Balkan power as it had been for  a united Italy but for the claims of a rival liberator, Russia'

Russia was the bugbear of two generations of Englishmen; and classical scholars, who interpreted modern politics by the light of ancient Greece, saw in the absorption of Athens by Macedon a convincing demonstration of the fate which the modern barbarian of the north was to inflict upon the British heirs of Hellas.   India was the real source of the nervousness. British domination, after further wars with the Mahrattas, the Sikhs, and the Gurkhas, had extended up to the frontiers of Afghanistan; but there was always the fear lest another sword should take away dominion won by the British, and in British eyes it was an offence that any other power should expand in Asia.  The Russian and British spheres of influence advanced till they met in Kaba; and for fifty years the two powers contested, by more of less diplomatic methods, the control of the Amir of Afghanistan.  Turkey flanked the overland route to India; and hence the protection of Turkey against Russia became a cardinal point in British foreign policy.   On behalf of Turkey's integrity Great Britain fought, in alliance with France and Sardinia, the futile Crimean War of 1854-1856, and nearly went to war in 1877.

The opening of the Suez Canal in 1869 introduced a fresh complication.  Relations between England and France had since Waterloo been friendly, on the whole; but France had traditional interests in Egypt, which were strengthened by the fact that a French engineer had constructed the Suez Canal, and by French colonies in the Far East, to which the canal was the shortest route.  Rivalry with England for the control of Egypt followed.  The Dual Control, which was established in 1876, was terminated by the refusal of France  to assist in the suppression of Egyptian revolts in 1882; and Great Britain was left in sole but informal possession of power in Egypt, with responsibility for its defence against the Mahdi (1896-1885) and the re-conquest of the Sudan (1896-1898), which is now under joint Egyptian and British flags. (1912)

Meanwhile, British expansion to the east of India, the Burmese wars, and annexation of Burma (1885) brought the empire into contact with French influence in Siam similar to its contact with Russia in Afghanistan.  Community of interests in the Far East, as well as the need of protection against the Triple Alliance of Germany, Austria, and Italy produced the entente cordiale between France and Russia in 1890.  Fortunately, the dangerous questions between them and Great Britain were settled by diplomacy, assisted by the alliance between Great Britain and Japan.  The British and Russian spheres of action on the north-west, and the British and French  spheres to the east, of India were delimited; southern Persia, and the Persian Gulf, and the Malay Peninsula were left to British vigilance and penetration, northern Persia to Russia, and eastern Siam to French.  Freed from these causes of friction, Great Britain, Russia and France exert a restraining influence on the predominant partner of the Triple Alliance.

The development of a vast dominion in India has created for the British government problems, of which the great Indian mutiny of 1857 was merely one illustration.  No power has succeeded in permanently governing subject races by despotic authority; in North and South America the natives have so dwindled in numbers as to leave the conquerors indisputably supreme; in Europe and elsewhere in former times the subject races fitted themselves for self-government, and then absorbed their conquerors.  The racial and religious gulf forbids a similar solution of the Indian question, while the abandonment of her task by Great Britain would leave India a prey to anarchy...(1912)

 

(TO BE CONTINUED.)

A STUDY IN POLITICAL EVOLUTION

CHAPTER VII

A CENTURY OF EMPIRE

1815-1911

(Printed in 1912)

A. F. POLLARD D. Litt., F.B.A.

FELLOW OF ALL SOULS COLLEGE, OXFORD

*

JANUARY 4-2018

H.F.1429

 

Library books saying it's OK to beat your wife if she refuses sex are among misogynistic material found in Islamic schools across Britain

  • Ofsted has put together a file of the worst examples of discrimination and sexism its inspectors found in schools

  • Among the books they found was one titled 'women who deserve to go hell'

  • One school Ofsted visited encouraged children to read a text that contrasted the 'noble women of the East' with the 'internally torn woman of the West'

  • The findings comes as Muslims girls wearing the hijab in primary schools will be quizzed as to why by inspectors 

 

Amanda Spielman, the chief inspector, has said she wants to ensure that children at religious schools are prepared for 'life in modern Britain'

Library books claiming hell is mostly full of women because they are 'ungrateful to their husbands' have been found in Islamic schools, it has emerged.

Ofsted has put together a file of the worst examples of discrimination and sexism its inspectors found in schools.

Among the library books they found was one titled 'women who deserve to go hell' which claimed it was wrong for wives to show 'ingratitude to their husband' or have 'tall ambitions'. 

And it advises pupils: 'In the beginning of the 20th century, a movement for the freedom of women was launched with the basic objective of driving women towards aberrant ways.'

The book was written by Egyptian preacher Mansoor Abdul Hakim.  

Other books said in a Muslim marriage 'the wife is not allowed to refuse sex to her husband' or 'leave the house where she lives without his permission' while boys and girls were taught the 'man by way of correction can also beat her'. 

One school Ofsted visited encouraged children to read a text that contrasted the 'noble women of the East' with the 'internally torn woman of the West'.

It claimed western women attract men and hang around aimlessly in cinemas and cafés. 

The materials came from state-funded schools as well as private faith schools and those running illegally as under-the-radar madrassas without registering with the government.

Inspectors also claimed teachers said that women had a responsibility 'only to bear children and bring them up as Muslims', The Times reported. 

In a box entitled 'daily life and relationships', a pupil had written that men are 'physically stronger' and women are 'emotionally weaker'.

The worksheet was covered in approving red ticks from the teacher. 

Ofsted insiders said the discovery of the books made for 'uncomfortable reading'.  

There are 177 Muslim schools in England, of which 148 are independent, and the rest state-funded.

The Department for Education has been contacted for comment. 

The findings comes as Muslims girls wearing the hijab in primary schools will be quizzed as to why by inspectors.

 
 

The findings by Ofsted comes as Muslims girls wearing the hijab in primary schools will be quizzed as to why by inspectors (file picture)

Head of Ofsted Amanda Spielman said creating an environment where Muslim children are expected to wear the headscarf 'could be interpreted as sexualisation of young girls'.   

It comes after it was revealed a fifth of 800 primary schools now list the headscarf in their uniform policy.

This is despite the fact a hijab is usually only worn by young women after puberty and in front of men for modesty reasons - not by primary school children.

Campaigners have said it should be 'fiercely resisted' and claimed it could 'sexualise' young children. 

Aisha Ali-Khan, a Muslim feminist campaigner and a teacher for 13 years, told MailOnline: 'The hijab should be banned from primary schools but local authorities are afraid of causing offence to the Muslim community and afraid of being branded as racist.

'A headscarf or hijab, is usually worn by girls who have reached puberty, to prevent unwanted sexual advances from men.

'How can a four or five year old child make an informed choice? It's not allowed in Islam so why is it being allowed in schools? You should only do something if you want to and understand the concept behind it.

'But the local authorities are too scared to go back and our government has allowed this to be part of the school policy and that's wrong. They are allowing decisions to be made by schools and local authorities which is worrying and they are trying to wash their hands of all responsibility.'

Gina Khan, a children's rights campaigner in Birmingham, added: 'Schools are allowing it because they are afraid of being called Islamophobic and they have been told that this is a religious garment - but they need to support Muslim girls to have free choices, not to be set apart from other children.' 

But the Muslim Council of Britain said Ofsted's policy was 'deeply worrying'.

Secretary general Harun Khan said: 'It is deeply worrying that Ofsted has announced it will be specifically targeting and quizzing young Muslim girls who choose to wear the headscarf.

'It sends a clear message to all British women who adopt this that they are second-class citizens, that while they are free to wear the headscarf, the establishment would prefer that they do not.'

He added that many British Muslims who wear the headscarf have done 'extremely well' in education.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5125623/Books-saying-OK-beat-wife-Islamic-schools.html#ixzz500TscQny
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
 

NOVEMBER 28,2016

 

H.F.1398

 
Top World News Now

November 28, 2017

 

 

United States

Trump jokes about Sen. Warren as ‘Pocahontas’ with Native American code-talkers

Warren says Trump’s use of ‘Pocahontas’ is a ‘racist slur’

Flashback: Here's the deal with Elizabeth Warren's Native American heritage

White House Weighs Personal Mobile Phone Ban for Staff

Former Intelligence Community Inspector General Charles McCullough III - Clinton campaign planned to fire me over email probe

Tillerson Drains the Swamp - Diplomats Sound the Alarm as They Are Pushed Out in Droves

MSNBC’s Joy Reid calls rural voters ‘core threat to our democracy’

John McCain Tells Clinton to 'Shut Up' and 'Get Over' Loss to Trump

Supreme Court Guts Second Amendment By Refusing To Hear Semi-Auto Ban Case

More Guns! US Army Plans to Sell Civilians 8,000 Surplus M1911 Pistols in 2018

Federal court rules military must accept transgender recruits by Jan. 1

 

 

Russia

Putin vows to defend rights of Russian Paralympic athletes at highest level

Putin urges countries to eliminate chemical weapons

Kremlin comments on Kadyrov’s remark on his ‘dream to step down’

Pentagon: 'Unprovoked' Russian fighter makes ‘dangerous’ intercept of US aircraft over Black Sea

Foreign Ministry - Moscow to continue efforts to promote national dialogue in Libya

Russia toppled from Sochi 2014 medals first place but final count unknown

About 300 Russian tourists to be evacuated from Bali volcano zone

Cameraman deported by Ukraine: "They kidnapped me and violated every conceivable standards of treatment"

Nothing personal - just business: US already supplies arms to Ukraine

‘Death to the kikes’ painted on Jewish charity office in Ukraine

Saakashvili's extradition not 'subject of discussion' between Kyiv, Tbilisi – Ukrainian ambassador in Georgia

 

 

China

Xi Jinping to skip Fortune world business leaders’ forum in Guangzhou

Premier Li proposes five initiatives to advance cooperation with CEE countries

Disgraced Chinese general Zhang Yang commits suicide

Chinese border troops hold drills in sub-zero temperatures amid tensions on Korean peninsula

Japan Warns That North Korea Set For Missile Launch In Next Few Days

North Korea Is Fortifying the Spot Where a Solider Made a Dramatic Dash to the South

Former US defence official says US could launch a trade war with China within months

China jails Taiwan activist Lee Ming-che for 'subversion'

Blogger Sentenced to 7 Years in Prison For Reporting on Toxic Spill in Vietnam

Pope’s Visit Brings to Fore Concerns of Christians in Myanmar

Number of Rohingya refugees fleeing to Bangladesh reaches 624,000: UN

 

 

United Kingdom‎           

May faces fresh accusations of 'rigging Parliament' over controversial move to block Budget amendments

Deputy PM Damian Green ‘offered Tory cash to DUP’ in bid to keep May in power after election

UK and Ireland at loggerheads over post-Brexit border and trade

UK Teenager Found Guilty of Plotting Terror Attack at Justin Bieber Concert

Saudis woo Tory MPs with lavish dinners & hotels as 20 million Yemenis starve

Donald Tusk gives UK ‘absolute deadline’ to make Brexit offer

Brexit: May to assure EU that UK will continue playing a key role in its security and warns about "destabilization" attempts coming from powers like Russia

Alex Salmond Dubbed Kremlin Agent Even Before His RT Show Launched

Secret document on realities of EU membership kept locked away from public for 30 years

 

 

European Union

Catalan politicians struggle with Spanish prison regime

Monsanto wins: Germany swings EU vote in favor of weed-killer glyphosate

Hungary’s ruling party to distribute book targeting George Soros

Seven arrested for selling bogus olive oil in Greece and abroad

Italy prepares to introduce ‘web tax’ worth €114 million a year

Fear of Flying Prevents Russian Mob Boss Extradition from Austria

Nationalist politician in Sweden forced to resign after declaring that Muslims are the opposite of humans

Surge in Migrants Creates Abysmal Conditions on Greek Islands

Thousands protest Romania's tax, justice laws

 

 

Germany

Merkel speaks out against new election

Merkel presses cautious SPD over joining new German coalition

Germany's Christmas markets open under tight security a year after attack

Germany grapples with integration after opening its borders

More than 100 reindeer dead in Norway after getting hit by freight train

Dig We Must: German Court Says OK for Coal Mine to Destroy Last Ancient Forest

It flies, and it snoops: Norway’s pricey F-35s caught sending ‘sensitive data’ to US

Merkel Offered Path to Fourth Term as Main Rivals Debate Backing

Merkel - and Davos - Rebuked in Germany

 

                    

France

Macron says glyphosate to be banned in France within three years

Porn star vs Macron: Х-rated actor lashes out at French leader for ‘demonizing’ adult films

'Bad news for Theresa May!' Macron scores new victory as Banking Authority moves to Paris

After lapses at renowned security fair, Amnesty says France provides a 'marketplace for torturers'

France to take refugees rescued from Libya who ‘need protection’

Macron tones down criticism of Poland, but concerned by its judicial reform plans

France’s ban on gender-neutral language sets off national debate

Netanyahu to Meet Macron on Lebanon Crisis

Macron says not offering Lebanon's Hariri exile

 

 

War For Global Energy Supremacy-World War III

Syria Kurds say US to ‘adjust’ weapons deliveries

Over 50,000 people isolated as US closes area around its base in Syria

Russian Defense Ministry denies air raid on Al Shafah village in Syria

Saudi-led ‘Arab NATO’ declares total war on terrorism, not particular ‘country or sect’

Mother of 3 Afghans killed by SAS paid $4,800 in ‘compensation’

Humanitarian Aid Lands In Yemen After Three-Week Saudi Blockade

Six Russian Tu-22M3 bombers hit Islamic State facilities in northeast Syria

ISIS retreating ‘deep into desert’ as Iraqi forces continue final offensive

US carries out sixth straight day of airstrikes in Somalia

 

 

Interesting Developments

Facebook to expand suicide prevention AI following successful US tests

Lockheed Martin’s Electronic Exoskeleton Enters Active Military Testing

Ex-Clinton Foundation Official Tied To Chinese Kindergarten Embroiled In Bizarre Sexual Abuse Scandal

Bali issues red alert fearing ‘imminent’ larger eruption of Mount Agung volcano

Badass NZ police recruitment video features helicopter, bagpipes & cop cat (VIDEO)

Bitcoin Tops $9,000 to Fresh Record High Amid Mainstream Investor Demand

Lockstep Nation: Facebook Alerts Users to Ideological Threat

MIT Admits: Electric Cars Are NOT Green, Pollute MORE Than Petrol Cars

Opposite Day: Study Says Outdoor LEDs Make More Light Pollution, Save No Energy

 

 

Israel

Israel vows to destroy Iranian positions within 40 km of Syrian border

Netanyahu: Those who seek to annihilate us place themselves in an existential threat

U.S. backtracks on decision to close Palestinian office in D.C.

Israel arrests Palestinians over population count

Netanyahu bashes deputy FM for saying US Jews have it easy

Abbas Orders to Freeze Contacts With Washington Over Threat to Close Palestinians' D.C. Office

Israel Gives Official Confirmation Of Covert Ties With Saudi Arabia

IDF chief - Israel ready to share intelligence on Iran with Saudi Arabia

Netanyahu’s Office: Iran, Iraq Turned Down Israel’s Aid Offer After Earthquake Devastated Border Region

New-look Labor leader vows to unseat Netanyahu in Israel

 

 

Turkey

Erdogan Does Not Rule Out Future Contacts With Assad on Syrian Kurds

Turkey builds third ‘observation spot’ inside Idlib

Erdogan says Syrian Kurdish Afrin must be cleared of ‘terrorists’

Erdogan’s chief adviser calls for Turkey’s NATO membership to be reconsidered

NATO Soldiers Could Be Invisible With New Turkish Fabric

Opposition accuses government of intention to spoil ties with NATO

NATO Drill Incident: Norway Puts Turkish Leaders On "Enemy Chart" - Hopes Turkey Will Accept Apology

Turkey may remove US radar if F-35s not delivered on schedule

Ambassador to NATO unsure if US will impose sanctions on Turkey for S-400 buy

Ankara says US case against Turkish businessman 'clear plot against Turkey'

 

 

Egypt

Egypt mosque attackers wore military uniforms and arrived in SUVs

Saudi Arabia to host first meeting of Islamic coalition against terrorism

Alwaleed Bin Talal Reportedly Hung Upside Down And Beaten By US Mercenaries

Hariri's "Unresignation" As Seen In A Bizarre Photo With The Iranian Ambassador

South Africa

Mugabe’s birthday declared a holiday in Zimbabwe

Golden handshake: Mugabe family reportedly offered $10 million payoff & legal immunity

Zimbabwe's new president Mnangagwa vows to 're-engage' with world

Mugabe’s out, Mnangagwa’s in. Is South Africa’s Zuma next?

 

Iran

Revolutionary Guard: If Europe wants to turn into a threat, we will increase the range of our missiles

Iran hits back over Saudi's prince's 'Hitler' insult to Supreme Leader

Supreme Leader Hails End of Islamic State ‘Tumor’

Supreme Leader: Iran to Help Fight against Arrogant Powers Whenever Necessary

Iran Guards ready to help rebuild Syria, Hezbollah will not disarm

New Cold War? Iran Sends Warships to Gulf of Mexico

Rouhani believes Syrian National Dialogue Congress to help draft new constitution

Foreign Minister Zarif - Riyadh 'fuels terrorists, wages war' while Tehran works on regional peace process

Death toll from earthquake in western Iran climbs to 440, over 7,000 injured

 

 

Venezuela

Maduro Regime Corruption on Display as Malaria Ravages Venezuela

Maduro: Detained Venezuelan-U.S. Citgo executives to be tried as 'traitors'

Planned Talks Between Venezuelan Opposition, Government Will Not Take Place

S&P Downgrades Venezuela To "Selective Default" After Bondholder Meeting Devolves Into Total Chaos

Maduro says Venezuela will 'never' default on its massive debt

Maduro Urges to Strengthen Political Revolutionary Organization

Evo Morales Denounces US Sanctions to Venezuelan Authorities

EU to impose arms embargo on Venezuela, lays basis for sanctions

 

 

Brazil

Argentine navy says water got in missing submarine’s snorkel and caused short circuit

Families grieve as Argentina says sound detected in search for missing submarine is consistent with non-nuclear explosion

Search For Missing Argentine Sub Continues, Navy Spokesman Not Ruling Out Survival Of Crew

A New Hope: Russia Offers Assistance in Search for Missing Argentinian Submarine

Missing Argentine Navy sub may have sent distress signals, US Navy sends help

Argentine Navy loses communication with submarine carrying crew of 44

Chile, UK, US Offer Argentina Help in Hunt for Missing Submarine

Brazil: Far-Right Presidential Hopeful Bolsonaro Outlines Platform

 

 

Mexico

Top U.S.-Backed Honduran Security Minister is Running Drugs, According to Court Testimony

Mexico Ruling Party Leans to Outside Candidate to Save Presidency

Human rights official, son killed in northern Mexico

'Abuse of Power' Found in Mexico's Mega-Projects

3 explosions rattle Popocatepetl volcano sending column of ash and gas 3 km high

Mexico Discovers Its Richest Oil Field in 15 Years

Spooked by a wave of violence from Cancun to Los Cabos, tourists scared off Mexico's beaches

Mexico loses tuna trade battle to Trump administration

 

 

Cuba

Russia's Avtovaz resumes car deliveries to Cuba after 12-year hiatus

Castro meets North Korea minister amid hope Cuba can defuse tensions

Russia delivers 280 tonnes of humanitarian aid to hurricane-hit Cuba

EU-Cuba Agreement Signals New Era in Bilateral Relations In Spite Of US Blockade

Cuba Says Cicadas Are Behind the 'Sonic Attacks' That Injured U.S. Diplomats in Havana

Cuban Officials: Alleged Sonic Attacks on US Diplomats Are 'Science Fiction'

Miguel Diaz-Canel - Next Cuban Leader - Rejects US ‘Imperialism’

Hurricane Ravaged Dominica: "It's All Gone" And Fighting For Survival

 

 

United Nations

United Nations Plan to Push Sex on Young Children is Defeated as African Nations Fight Back

At U.N., North Korea says U.S. to blame for 'worst ever situation'

Guterres - UN ready to assist response efforts following quake in Iran and Iraq

Madagascar plague outbreak - Families are refusing to hand over infectious bodies and victims are avoiding doctors

Rich Nations' Failure To Honor Pledge Scuttles Paris Agreement

UN General Assembly urges US for 26th time to end Cuba embargo

‘Sickening’: Rights groups slam WHO for appointing Zimbabwe’s Mugabe a goodwill ambassador

The U.S. Owes UNESCO Half A Billion Dollars

 

 

Japan

A 'Ghost Ship' Found in Japan May Have Been Carrying North Korean Defectors

Japan Wants To Push A Million Tons Of Radioactive Water Into The Pacific Ocean

Japan protests San Francisco's 'sex slave' statue decision

Eight Men Found Washed Ashore in Japan Say They Are North Korean

Just a Pause: Abe Says North Korea ‘Continues to Develop Its Weapons'

Japan, ASEAN leaders to discuss 'free and open' order in Manila

Just roll with it! Abe ‘falls into sand bunker’ while golfing with Trump (VIDEO)

Abe says he and Trump had good talk during golf

Trump, Abe meet amid heightened tensions with North Korea

Donald Trump greets Japan’s emperor with a nod and a handshake – but no bow

 

 

 

India

India Holds Massive Military Exercise Near Chinese Trade Chokepoint

Modi’s ruling party accused of stoking India’s culture war after man found hanged

Female Motorbike Squad To Protect Women In India’s ‘Rape Capital’

Moody's Boosts Modi: India Gets First Sovereign Credit Upgrade Since 2004

Pakistan

Law minister Zahid Hamid resigns amid deadly clashes between police, protesters

Suicide Bomber Hits Pakistan Security Convoy, Kills 5

US Says Pakistan Must Arrest Terrorist Hafiz Saeed, Freed Yesterday

Islamic schools in Pakistan plagued by sex abuse of children

 

 

Australia

Refugees Who Refused to Leave Manus Island Detention Camp Have Been Forcibly Removed

Sri Lanka arrests 22 trying to go to Australia by boat

Small tsunamis detected in New Caledonia and Vanuatu after magnitude 7 undersea quake

Indonesian Parliament Speaker Detained in Probe Into $170 Million Theft

Turnbull says government aims to legalize same-sex marriage by year-end

A giant Australian publisher scrapped a book on China's influence out of fear for Beijing's wrath

Duterte Serenades Trump: ‘You Are the Light of My World’

Turnbull meeting Trump on Asia summit sidelines

Australian activists vow to press on with pro-refugee Manus protests

‘We can’t afford war’: Duterte recommends leaving South China Sea alone, Trump offers mediation

 

 

 

 

 

 

WhatDoesItMean.Com Is One Of The Top Ranked Websites In The World For New World Order, Conspiracy Theories And Alternative News

WhatDoesItMean.Com Privacy Policy And About Information   

Join Sorcha Faal’s Mailing List

 

 

 

  

 

Conspiracy: Comes from Latin word 'conspirare' meaning to breathe together; conspiracy theories emphasize the invisible forces and actions (of selfish harmful intent by special interests) behind the visible historical events.

 

NOVEMBER 28, 2017

 

H.F.1400

 
 

A RETURN OF A MUSLIM EXODUS TO  EUROPE AND BEYOND-A CHRISTIAN FAITH VOID IN THE WESTERN WORLD IS NOW BEING FILLED BY MECCA, AND THAT POWER COULD RULE THE EARTH?]

 

 

 

 

Muslim population in parts of Europe could TRIPLE by 2050: New study predicts migration and birth rates will lead to dramatic rise in numbers across continent

  • Muslims making up total population of Britain could rise from 6.3 to 17.2 per cent
  • As of 2016, the UK's share of Muslims was recorded at 6.3 per cent of the country
  • Muslims average 13 years younger than other Europeans and have high birth rate

THE Muslim population in parts of Europe - including Britain - could triple by 2050, researchers say.

Figures in a new report suggest a stark east-west divide, with the Muslim share of the UK's population rising from 6.3 per cent in 2016 to 16.7 per cent in one scenario.

The study by the Pew Research Centre concludes that Europe's Muslim population would continue to grow over the next several decades even if immigration to the continent were halted.

Under the 'zero migration' scenario, Muslims would make up 7.4 per cent of Europe's population by 2050 compared to the 4.9 per cent they comprised last year. 

Researchers say that's mostly because the birthrate for Muslims is generally higher than for other Europeans. 

Countries including Belgium, France and Italy will see the biggest change in the 'zero migration' scenario because they have young Muslim populations. 

As of 2016, the UK's share of Muslims was recorded as 6.3 per cent, around 4.1 million people. In Europe, the total was 4.9 per cent, around 24.9 million.

In the medium migration scenario - perhaps the most likely - the UK's Muslim population would rise from 6.3 per cent to 16.7 per cent - around 13 million. 

 

The Muslim population could triple in some European countries by 2050, with the UK projected to see one of the most rapid rises throughout the continent

 

Under the 'zero migration' scenario, an estimated 30 million Muslims would make up 7.4 per cent of Europe's population by 2050 

The lowest estimate has the share rising to 9.7 per cent, and the highest 17.2 per cent. 

Experts at Pew Research Centre, in Washington, USA, modeled three scenarios for estimating the number of Muslims who would be living in Europe by 2050.

All three used a mid-2016 estimate of 25.8 million as a baseline, but assumed different future migration rates.

Under the 'zero migration' scenario, an estimated 30 million Muslims would make up 7.4 per cent of Europe's population by 2050 compared to the 4.9 percent they comprised last year.

The researchers said that is mostly because Muslims are on average 13 years younger than other Europeans and also have a higher birthrate.

The study estimates 58.8 million Muslims would account for 11.2 per cent of the population in a 'medium migration' scenario that has migration maintaining a 'regular speed'.

In the 'high migration' scenario, the study projects that the record flow of migrants who came to Europe between 2015 and 2016 would continue indefinitely, resulting in 75 million Muslims in Europe, a 14 per cent increase, by the middle of the century.

 

Muslims are seen offering Eid al-Adha prayers in a convention centre in Marseille, southern France

 

Demonstrators display signs with crossed mosques during a protest in front of a mosque in Berlin, Germany

EU pledges £39bn to limit mass migration from Africa to Europe 

 

Jean-Claude Juncker (pictured), the European Commission president

The European Union has pledged £39billion to Africa by 2022 amid reports of slave trading in Libya.

Jean-Claude Juncker, the European Commission president, said the best way to tackle mass migration out of Africa was to rebuild the continent's economy. 

Libya agreed with key EU and African leaders to allow up to 20,000 migrants facing abuse in detention camps to be evacuated within days or weeks.

The decision was taken after Ivory Coast President Alassane Ouattara called for 'all urgent measures' to end slave trading and other migrant abuses in Libya at an EU-Africa summit in Abidjan, the capital city of the Ivory Coast. 

The summit comes just two weeks after US network CNN aired footage of black Africans sold as slaves in Libya, sparking outrage from political leaders and street protests in African and European capitals. 

African Union, European Union and United Nations officials at the meeting offered increased support for the International Organisation of Migration 'to help with the return of the Africans who want it to their home countries'.

Even with the most immigration, Muslims would 'still be considerably smaller than the populations of both Christians and people with no religion in Europe,' the researchers concluded.

Muslim immigrants have been a politically sensitive topic in Europe following the influx of newcomers in 2015 and 2016.

Some countries have seen backlashes that have included populist parties campaigning on anti-Islam messages.

The study was based on census and survey data, population registers, immigration data and other sources.

The 30 countries it covered include the 28 European Union members, plus Norway and Switzerland.

Not all countries would be affected evenly by future immigration, according to the Pew report.

In the high migration scenario, Germany and Sweden would have the biggest increases because both countries took in the most asylum-seekers during the height of the refugee crisis two years ago.

While Muslims made up six per cent of Germany's population last year, their proportion would go up to 20 percent by 2050.

Sweden's Muslims, who were at eight per cent in 2016, would account for 31 per cent of the population in that same scenario.

Meanwhile, some countries that had comparatively few Muslim residents in 2016 would continue to have few by 2050 in all three scenarios.

 

Muslims pray in the street for Friday prayer in Paris. Thousands of faithful pray each Friday in the Paris streets due to the lack of mosques



Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5130617/Study-Europes-Muslim-population-grow-migration-not.html#ixzz50O5eWcEO

Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

 

H.F.1403

 

 
'WE MUST PUT GUILTY [BANKSTERS]

IN THE DOCK.'

 

[THE TRUTH IS AS AN INDEPENDENT STATE

THE CITY MILE APPEARS UNTOUCHABLE.]

 

He has chronicled every financial crisis to hit the UK: Now the most respected historian in the City says...‘We must put guilty bankers in the dock’

Storm brewing: Even from the home counties David Kynaston's anxiety about the lack of accountability in British banking looks highly relevant

Storm brewing: Even from the home counties David Kynaston's anxiety about the lack of accountability in British banking looks highly relevant

Sitting at his kitchen table, sipping from a mug of instant coffee, author David Kynaston has something on his mind.

Why is it, some ten years after the leak in the financial system sprung at Northern Rock, that the taxpayer never had a proper account of what went wrong?

‘It’s not too late for a judge-led tribunal of inquiry,’ Kynaston says.

‘We’ve got the Bloody Sunday inquiry as a precedent. The financial crisis was something so major and a continues to have such consequences. Rather like South Africa after apartheid, there is a case for knowing who the guilty men are and getting some kind of closure and learning some lessons.’

It’s a strong view from a man who comes across as mild-mannered. But he knows, almost better than anyone else, how crucial getting answers should be.

When former governor Lord King wanted to commission a popular history of the Bank of England, he turned to Kynaston. The 66-year-old historian has written several painstaking volumes on the City’s history, as well as books on the London Stock Exchange and HSBC, and he has also won enormous plaudits for his unsurpassed three-volume (so far) social history of modern Britain.

Unlike many great historians, Kynaston has not buried himself in an ivory tower at one of the top universities but beavers away from his modest suburban home in Surrey.

But even from the home counties his anxiety about the lack of accountability in British banking looks highly relevant, as a group of shareholders battles in the High Court with Lloyds Bank over compensation for the shotgun marriage with HBOS at the height of the crisis. The Government has been making it as hard as possible for the Court to access official witnesses and documents on the grounds that it might compromise the civil service.

Meanwhile, businesses which were damaged by Royal Bank of Scotland in the aftermath of the crisis, and by Lloyds as a result of fraud at HBOS’s Reading branch, are also fighting for redress.

Kynaston had hoped that after the crisis there would be some kind of ‘audit of the financial system’. That would have allowed policymakers to understand better which parts added economic value and which didn’t.

‘It would have been helpful, because it’s my impression that it’s still a somewhat unreformed system,’ he says.

During the course of writing his mammoth 879-page history of the Old Lady of Threadneedle Street, covering a period from its foundation in 1694 until 2013, Kynaston was granted full access to its sometimes patchy and unhelpful archives. But when it came to the financial crisis, many of the documents remained sealed because of a 20-year secrecy rule, although he did have access to many of the main players, including Lord King.

As we already know, Lord King’s version of the crisis and that of then prime minister Gordon Brown, delivered at a recent conference to commemorate two decades of the Bank’s independence, are sharply different.

Kynaston’s cynical view of the failure to dig into the origins of the crisis is that it is about politics, and the Tories have been reluctant to take on its own supporters in the financial community who, incidentally, are big contributors to the nation’s tax base.

But as a historian he believes longer-term forces are in play.

The 1970s saw the Bretton Woods system of fixed exchange rates break down, and for Britain this culminated in Black Wednesday a quarter of a century ago when the UK was ejected from the Exchange Rate Mechanism.

The Bank of England also has changed dramatically with the times. Kynaston says: ‘The intellectual calibre of the Bank is way ahead of what it was 30 or 40 years ago. It went up to another level under Mervyn King. It’s become a place where very bright young people are happy to spend time.’

The heart of the narrative of the modern Bank uncovered by Kynaston deals with the lead up to independence in 1997.

The pressure for cutting the Old Lady free from the Government began with Lord Lawson’s resignation speech in 1989, he says.

Documents seen by Kynaston suggest Eddie George, the then governor, had ‘long been wanting monetary policy independence and it was a great prize. But once he knew supervision was going, he wasn’t sure he was happy with the bargain’.

The most influential governor before the Bank won independence was Montague Norman, whose portrait still hangs in the governor’s office today. ‘He was governor for 24 years which is twice as long as anyone else. He had a strong sense of public duty.’ In Kynaston’s view, Norman’s greatest moment – and also his undoing – was the financial reconstruction after the First World War.

He wanted the City and Britain to restore the hegemony it had enjoyed up to 1914.

This led him to embrace the gold standard and he persuaded then-chancellor Winston Churchill that it was the right thing to do.

It proved disastrous for the British economy – a prelude to union strife, economic stagnation and job losses which fed into the narrative of the Great Depression.

When Norman was finally ‘torn away from the job’ in 1944, the favourite to take charge was the governor of Canadian Central Bank Graham Towers – but his candidacy fell by the wayside because of establishment objections.

Britain would have to wait until 2013 to finally hand control of that British institution to a Canadian – Mark Carney, a former Goldman Sachs banker armed with an Oxford PhD, who was seen as the right candidate to repair Britain’s contaminated financial system.

  • Till Time’s Last Stand. A History of the Bank of England 1694-2013, by David Kynaston.


Read more: http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/markets/article-5133683/Historian-David-Kynaston-wants-guilty-bankers-dock.html#ixzz50PNQNGv2
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on

The Crown Corporation Controls Inner City London | Independence

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H.F.1404

 
 

 

Why pompous Milburn is so wrong about Britain's haves and have nots.... - Daily Mail

 

DECEMBER 4,2017

 

DOMINIC LAWSON: Why pompous Milburn is so wrong about Britain's haves and have nots

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5142221/Why-Milburn-wrong-Britains-haves-nots.html#ixzz50TZeZZNP
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

 

 

Jumped before he was pushed: Alan Milburn presented his departure as 'social mobility tsar' as a resignation on a matter of principle despite the fact his term had come to an end

How strange it is that Alan Milburn should routinely have been described as the Government's 'social mobility tsar', a grandiose title to which he never objected.

After all, the Russian tsar was the apex of a system of absolute social hierarchy. Now our social mobility 'tsar' has abdicated, protesting that the Government is doing nothing to bring about the more equal country that the Social Mobility Commission was designed to support.

In fact Milburn's abdication is no more voluntary than that of Tsar Nicholas II, 100 years ago. As Justine Greening, the Education Secretary, pointed out yesterday, he'd been doing the job for five years 'and his term had come to an end'.

In other words, Milburn jumped before he was pushed, and presented it as a resignation on a matter of principle.

In one respect, Milburn really did enjoy the status of a tsar: his pronouncements as chairman of the Social Mobility Commission were always accorded complete reverence — not least on the BBC — and were never subjected to any sort of critical review.

When this quango was launched in 2012 by the then coalition top team of David Cameron and Nick Clegg (largely, I suspect, because both men were embarrassed by their own exclusively private education and wealthy backgrounds), Milburn declared: 'We live in a country, where, invariably, if you're born poor, you die poor.'

He repeated this on many occasions — and was never challenged on it by his many TV and radio interviewers.

But it is — and was — completely untrue. Even the Sutton Trust, an organisation dedicated to the cause of increasing the life-chances of the less well-off, has produced research completely refuting Milburn's central proposition.

Feared

Its most recent analysis, dividing society into quartiles by income, revealed that 62 per cent of sons born to fathers in the bottom income quartile, themselves escaped into the higher three quartiles.

 

Education Secretary Justine Greening pointed out on the Andrew Marr show that Alan Milburn jumped before he was pushed from the role

Moreover, as you would expect, there was social movement (as defined by income) in the opposite direction.

Only 42 per cent of sons born to fathers from the top income bracket managed to retain that position in the highest income quartile — and 16 per cent of those born in the top income category slid all the way to the bottom.

So why did Milburn get away with it? Well, the Conservatives didn't dare criticise him because they feared — especially under David Cameron — that they would be seen as defending 'elitism'. And for Labour, Milburn's position was pleasantly in accord with their own claim that only a Labour government would represent 'the many, not the few'.

Funnily enough, it is within the Labour party — of which the former Cabinet minister Milburn is still a member — that there has been an actual retreat in working-class success.

In 1964, 37 per cent of Labour MPs were from a family background of manual work; by 2015 that figure had plunged to just 7 per cent.

 

David Cameron's government dare not criticise Milburn because they feared that they would be seen as defending 'elitism'

This process is even accentuated by its current leader, Jeremy Corbyn, as the resoundingly middle-class socialist pressure group Momentum tightens its hold on the selection process.

Ludicrous

On Saturday, the Mail reported 'Labour insiders' as saying that the son of a miner, Kieran Harpham, had been de-selected as a Sheffield councillor because he was 'too authentically working-class' and 'not Left-wing enough': he has been replaced by Janet Ridler, a historian from Sheffield's wealthiest suburb, Dore.

To be fair to Alan Milburn, he is far from a Corbyn fan. He is, to the contrary, a Blairite. And, echoing his former boss, Milburn presented Brexit as a curse on British society, which must somehow be lifted. 'Tough on Brexit, tough on the causes of Brexit,' was Milburn's ludicrous slogan yesterday — which is as much as to say that he thinks the British people's decision to leave the EU was nothing less than a crime.

He went on to argue, confusingly, that if Theresa May didn't do what he said about social mobility, she would be 'betraying the families who voted for Brexit'.

His claim, such as it is, seems to be that those who voted to leave the EU did so as a protest against the nation's lack of social mobility, and its alleged adverse effect on their living standards.

It is an assertion both presumptuous and pompous, based on no evidence. If anything, the pro-Brexit vote in the Labour heartlands was one in favour of greater social cohesion, and against the form of mobility defined by the EU's absolute guarantee of freedom of movement.

 

Milburn's ludicrous 'tough on Brexit, tough on the causes of Brexit,' slogan suggests that he thinks the British people's decision to leave the EU is nothing less than a crime

The consequent unchecked level of immigration into the UK had many benefits, but the influx of millions of Europeans to work in this country also had a depressing effect on the wages of the unskilled. Such voters would, more likely, argue that the only way Mrs May could 'betray' them over Brexit would be to do what Mr Milburn wants and keep Britain inside the Single Market (which mandates freedom of movement).

But what is it, above anything else, which enables those from less well-off homes to have a chance of prosperity? A first-class quality of free education and the prospect of regular employment at the end of it. By both these measures, Britain has actually been upping its game — and it has nothing to do with Mr Milburn's Social Mobility Commission.

Employment rates have been rising, for year after year, and the proportion of families without anyone in paid work has (thankfully) gone in the opposite direction — down. The latter has much to do with the benefit reforms pioneered by Iain Duncan Smith.

His colleague, Michael Gove, was also instrumental, as Education Secretary, in driving up standards in state schools by demanding a greater level of rigour in both teaching and examinations.

The result of this has been a narrowing of the quality gap — and public exam outcomes — between state schools and private schools.

Again, this was no thanks to the Social Mobility Commission. It had nothing useful to say about improving the standards of teaching, and instead advocated lowering standards of entry at our top universities to those from the poorest homes. What a counsel of despair.

Of course we are an unequal society. As are all societies in all nations, always. But despite the self-serving cliches of the Left, last year in the UK income inequality — defined as the gap between the earnings of the richest and the poorest — fell to its lowest level since 1986.

Benefit reforms pioneered by Iain Duncan Smith, left, and the drive to improve standards in state schools by his colleague Michael Gove had nothing to do with Mr Milburn's Social Mobility Commission

And, as the Chancellor Philip Hammond pointed out in his Budget speech a fortnight ago, since 2010 the incomes of the poorest 10 per cent have grown faster, proportionately, than the richest 10 per cent.

Obsessed

It's true that we are in a long period of earnings stagnation: but this applies across the developed world. And it is simply not the case that Britain is at the bottom of the international league table in terms of social mobility.

We are probably more obsessed with class than any other nation, and accent still plays too much of a role in the way we treat each other.

But as Peter Saunders, emeritus professor of sociology at Sussex University explained in his recent Civitas pamphlet, Social Mobility Delusions: 'Social mobility is the norm in Britain, not the exception, and it covers the range from top to bottom. Politicians say our social mobility rate is one of the lowest in the Western world, but studies of class mobility put Britain around the middle of the international rankings.

'The chances of moving into a different class than the one you were born into are less than in Sweden, the U.S. and Australia, but better than in Germany, France or Italy.'

So do we actually need a quango called the Social Mobility Commission?

We can certainly do without another social mobility 'tsar'.

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

DECEMBER 4-2017

H .F. 1405

 
 
 
 
 

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-June-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

BREXIT

BUT NOT OUT OF THE EU FOR 2/3 YEARS. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. ALL EU TREATIES WERE OBTAINED BY BRIBERY AND TREASON  AND FRAUD WHICH

UNDER THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES MAKES THEM.

NULL AND VOID.

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

JULY 23 FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2016

*

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW PART 1-2016SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW-2016

OCTOBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

NOVEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

DECEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

*

H.F.200A-FREEDOM NOW

 
 

The number of Muslims in Europe reaches

44 MILLION

 

 

[MUSLIM POPULATION

 WITHIN EACH PARTICULAR

ONCE FREE NATION STATE

 WITHIN THE EU]

 

WHERE THEY LIVE
 

 Germany---       4,760,000--------------5.8per cent

 France--------     4,710,000-------------7.5 per cent

 Britain--------      2,960,000-------------4.6per cent

Italy--------------2,220,000-------------7per cent   

 Bulgaria-----------1,020,000-----------13.7per cent

 Netherlands------1,000,000-------------6.0percent

 Spain--------------980,000--------------2.3percent

 Belgium-----------630,000-------------5.9 percent

 Greece-------------610,000--------------5.3percent

 Austria------------450,000--------------5.4percent

by

Ian Drury- 

Daily Mail

Home Affairs Correspondent

*  *  *

 

   [ The above figures are no doubt an estimate of each nation 's Muslim population therefore there could be millions more at any one time. Our own government has admitted it does not know the full number, as  those who should have left the country are still here, and others over the years have melted into the population. We also know from experience over the years from those at No 10 are not very good at simple Arithmetic!- when it suits them!]

[WITH THE BIRTH-RATE OF 4-1 THE MUSLIM POPULATION IN ENGLAND WILL GROW TO SURPASS THE INDIGENOUS POPULATION IN A MATTER OF A FEW GENERATIONS AND THEN THEY WILL HAVE THEIR ISLAMIC STATE WITH ITS STRICT SHARIA LAW AND SEEING HOW THE MAJORITY OF THE MUSLIMS IN OUR COUNTRY HAVE REACTED TO THE MASSACRE IN FRANCE THERE WILL BE NO TOLERANCE OF RELIGIOUS FREEDOM WHICH WE HAVE GIVEN THEM. OF COURSE THERE ARE MANY MUSLIMS WHO DECRY THE SILENCE OF THE MAJORITY OF MUSLIMS BUT UNTIL THE GREATER MAJORITY BECOME THE NORM THERE WILL BE NO LIKELIHOOD OF THEIR INTEGRATION INTO OUR SOCIETY.

THE MAJOR FAULT FOR THE SITUATION WE SEE BEFORE US IN THE MIDDLE EAST IS BECAUSE OF THE WEST'S-[USA-UK-FRANCE] HISTORY OF EXPLOITATION IN MUSLIM COUNTRIES IN REGARD TO OIL SUPPLIES OVER THE PAST 97 YEARS AND INTERFERENCE IN THE AFFAIRS OF MUSLIM COUNTRIES WHICH HAS BROUGHT MANY ILLEGAL WARS WITH GREAT SLAUGHTER AND DEVASTATION TO THEIR POPULATIONS.

THE IRISH QUESTION IS A YARD STICK TO SEE HOW LONG INJUSTICE TO A PEOPLE CAN HAVE DIRE CONSEQUENCES EVEN TODAY IN NOVEMBER 2015. IRONICALLY IT WAS THE WAR MONGER TONY BLAIR WHO FOUND THE SOLUTION WHICH BROUGHT PEACE HOWEVER FRAGILE.  BUT HE FAILED TO LEARN FROM HISTORY ABOUT THE INTERFERENCE IN THE MATTERS OF OTHER NATION STATES -PARTICULARLY MUSLIM-A PEOPLE DEDICATED TO THEIR RELIGION ISLAM-THOUGH THEY HAVE DIFFERENT SECTS OF FOLLOWERS ,WHO HAVE YEARNED TO BE THEMSELVES!

WE BELIEVE THAT THE ANSWER TO THE FLOOD OF REFUGEES  FROM ITS OUTSET SHOULD HAVE BEEN TO KEEP THE REFUGEES IN THE MIDDLE EAST -SAUDI ARABIA-HAS TENTED AREA TO ACCEPT 3,000,000 -EGYPT-JORDON...WITH MASSIVE FINANCIAL  HELP AND SHELTER ETC OFFERED TO THOSE COUNTRIES UNSTINTINGLY BUT ALLOW A CONTROLLED FLOW OF WAR REFUGEES TO THOSE COUNTRIES WILLING TO TAKE THEM-_BUT NO COMPULSION SHOULD BE MADE. IN THIS WAY THERE WOULD HAVE BEEN AVOIDED THE CATASTROPHE WE SEE BEFORE US IN EUROPE.

 

*

 

  1. The number of Muslims in Europe reaches

     

    44million -

     

     

    Daily Mail

    13 hours ago ... The number of Muslims in Europe reaches 44m: Serious concerns raised about
    the ... By Ian Drury Home Affairs Correspondent For The Daily Mail ... By contrast,
    the UK has about 2.9million Muslims – the third largest number.

     

     

     
     

     

 

 

IT IS SAID THAT A PICTURE IS WORTH A THOUSAND WORDS. THE ABOVE MUST SURELY BE WORTH A BILLION?

 

 

 

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS.]

NOVEMBER 16-2015

 

 

H F 550

 
 
 
 
 

SO WILL BRITAIN ONE DAY BE  MUSLIM?

by

Ruth Dudley Edwards

SATURDAY ESSAY

 

[Daily Mail-May 5-2007]

 

*

Our failure to have children.

Welfarism.

Political Correctness.

And a

LACK of WILL

 to fight Islamic extremism

 

 

 

THIS WEEK has been another terrible one for those of us who want a society in which all races, religions and cultures mix to their mutual advantage and

ENRICHMENT.

On Tuesday, five men were sentenced to life in prison for plotting to use a huge fertiliser bomb in what would have been the UK's largest mass murder.

Omar Khyam, Salahuddin Amin, Anthony Garciaand Jawa Akbar -first and second generation immigrants - responded to the tolerance of the British people

BY TRYING TO KILL AS MANY OF THEM AS POSSIBLE.

It is absurd to hope that the exposure of their evil after a 13-month trial which cost an estimated

£50,000,000

-has finally provided the wake-up call that this slumbering country so badly needs?

I'm one of those old-fashioned immigrants to this country who feels passionately grateful, is proudly British (as well as Irish -having been born in Dublin) and believes that immigrants have more duties than rights. And further, that one of those is to adjust to British society rather than expecting it to adjust to them. [ has been the practice for some decades but more so during the Blair years.]

However, one aspect of contemporary British society which I refuse to adjust to is its weakness in the face of the

ENEMY WITHIN

In my many conversations with like-minded people about the threat that radical Islam poses to the

 BRITISH WAY OF LIFE

-And indeed, to European civilisation -we frequently end by despairingly agreeing that the

WEST

-seems intention committing

POLITICAL and CULTURAL

SUICIDE.

When we look starkly at the demographic statistics, the wimpishness of our

ESTABLISHMENT

-in the face of the

THREAT

-the perversions perpetuated by

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

-and our passivity, it's hard to avoid the

CONCLUSION

-that within a couple of generations

ISLAM

-will be in

CONTROL of EUROPE

And before anyone says that there nothing wrong if this happened, since the vast majority of

MUSLIMS

are tolerant people who would not dream of interfering with

OUR WAY OF LIFE

-it's necessary  to point out that in

MUSLIM COUNTRIES

, it's usually the radicals and extremists

MULLAHS

-who regard

TOLERANCE

AS A VICE

-WHO MAKE THE RUNNING.

This occurs too in microcosm in

MUSLIM GHETTOS

around

EUROPE

We saw the frightening fundamentalist fringe of

ISLAM

-marching, threatening and perpetuating violence over the cartoons depicting

MOHAMMAD

IN

DENMARK

while the majority of Muslims - who, yes, of course are tolerant and decent - kept their mouths shut and stayed at

HOME

YES, Islam may be a great religion. BUT

-in its fundamentalist version, some of its values are antipathetic to ours, and if they triumph in

EUROPE 

-they will

THREATEN OUR VALUES

such as

FREEDOM OF THOUGHT

and

SPEECH

and the spirit of intellectual inquiry that made

EUROPEAN CIVILISATION

Great and Prosperous

 

The danger of ending up like these poor, despotic and medieval

Islamic States

-in which millions live miserably is the prospect that

CHRISTIANS

HINDUS

MODERATE MUSLIMS and NON-BELIEVERS -should be uniting

TO PREVENT

 

BUT THE TRUTH IS WE ARE DOING LITTLE TO STOP IT.

Consider first a few chilling statistics.

EUROPEANS ARE FAILING TO REPRODUCE

[Yet in our own island millions of potential citizens have been 

SLAUGHTERED AT BIRTH

thanks to David Steels -Abortion Bill of 1965?

It is still taking place in 2007 though there is NOW an  growing awareness of the tragedy to the potential mother and to society in general that many more doctors today are refusing to condone the

MURDER.

Recently the sight of full grown foetuses being deprived of their lives has now brought the horror and injustice of the action to destroy life.

In an age of contraception of many devices and anti-life pills it is unbelievable that any potential mother was unable to take the necessary steps to prevent conception.

David Steels Bill was to prevent back-street abortions and he himself a few ears ago voiced his concern as to what has happened over the years since.]

*

Consider  first a few chilling statistics.

Europeans are failing to reproduce. Just to keep the population steady, you need 2.1 births per women

[This is a case for Government action by offering cash and other vital services to enable the reluctant mother to do her best for her community and country.]

However in 2005, the European average was 1.38.

In Ireland it was 1.9

France it was 1.89

Germany 1.35

Italy 1.23

Britain scored in the middle of this range with 1.6

BUT

That was because - like France - we have a large

MUSLIM POPULATION

with a high birth rate. Indeed,

MUSLIMS

are out breeding

 non-Muslims

through out

 EUROPE

 

 

[Many of whom have absolutely no intention of integrating -

Thank you very much Mr Blair -we don't think so.]

'Just look at the development within Europe.'

said a triumphant Norwegian Imam a few months ago

'where the number of

MUSLIMS

is expanding like mosquitoes.

Every Western women in the EU is producing an average of 1.4 children. Every Muslim women in the same countries is producing an average of 3.5 children.

'OUR WAY OF THINKING WILL PROVE MORE POWERFUL THAN YOURS' he said.

The big question this poses is:

WHY ARE WE NOT REPRODUCING?

There are many reasons, but probably the most important are the decline of religion and the liberation of women.

[The populations which have the stronger religious stance will be the eventual rulers of Europe. It can be a Christian Europe or a Muslim Europe. The Governments of Europe and the shrinking United Kingdom have to decide.]

In Ireland, when the Roman Catholic Church effectively ran society, sex for procreation, contraceptives were banned, the normal size for a family was around five or six children, bur 12 or 13 were not uncommon.

As the country embraced secularism in the 1980s, birth rates plummeted, exacerbated by the new -found confidence of women that made them choose careers rather than domesticity.

WHEREAS in the 1970s, I was regarded in both the UK and Ireland as odd for being married but voluntarily childless, these days, childlessness |

IS A COMMON CHOICE

It is a world where one-child families abound and to have more than two children is to be regarded as eccentric and probably environmentally irresponsible.

Moreover, the erosion of family life and the long - hours culture place a heavy burden on those prepared to rear the next generation.

Despite these social forces, even in the UK, devote Muslims and Orthodox Jews obey instructions to have large families.

Confronted with this demographic revolution and official statistics which showed there were too few young people to support an ageing population, European governments decided to embrace

IMMIGRATION

-as an inherent good without any thought for the consequences.

As a result, politicians and businessmen assured us that we had to have economic growth in n order to prop up ever greater public spending and that it could be provided only by importing large numbers of workers from abroad

BUT WHY WASN'T THERE A NATIONAL DEBATE

ABOUT

Whether it was wise to mortgage our cultural future for the sake of a mess of financial pottage?

[A recent report on the cost  and benefit of large scale

IMMIGRATION

estimated that the country benefited by

ONLY - 50p

 for each migrant]

Where were the politicians arguing against the doctrine of

MULTICULTURALISM

-which holds that upholding majority values is somehow

ILLEGITIMATE

Who among the liberal elite's commentariat were challenging the moral relativism that flew in the face of

SENSE and SENSIBILITY

-by insisting that the culture of

Shakespeare

The King James Bible

Keats's poetry

Turner's paintings

and

Elgar's music

-was no more important than - the cultures of other

IMPORTED MINORITIES?

 

We know the answer all too well.

Cries of racism drowned out rational argument - not just here but throughout

OLD EUROPE

As one gloomster put it:

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

which is thought what

SENTIMENTALITY is to COMPASSION

-means that the intelligentsia of the

WEST

-has disarmed itself in advance of any possible struggle.

The result of all this, as recent events have made tragically clear, was that

BRITISH CULTURE

-was

UNDERMINED and SOCIAL COHESION

DAMAGED.

Separated from mainstream society by geographical and cultural apartheid, which has been fostered by

MULTICULTURALISM

-many immigrants were denied the chance to

INTEGRATE.

 

AND, INSTEAD OF BEING TOLD BY THE HOST COMMUNITY

THAT IF THEY DIDN'T WANT TO ADHERE

-to the values of a liberal, pluralist democracy, they should

RETURN HOME

They were asked how they would like

BRITAIN

-to conform to

THEIR VALUES.

THE STORY WAS VERY MUCH THE SAME THROUGHOUT EUROPE

The robust American political commentator Mark Steyn, a disillusioned Anglophile has already written us off. The thesis of his Blackly comic book,

*

America Alone:

The End Of The World As We Know It

*

-is that the U.S. will survive because the

RELIGIOUS RIGHT ARE CONFIDENT

 AND

 REPRODUCE

BUT

 THAT EUROPE IS FINISHED

Its not just demographic decline, he says, it's also the unsustainability of the

MODERN WELFARE STATE

-in which we depend so much on our own individual resources.

We are also, he believes, suffering from 'civilisational exhaustion':

CULTURAL DISINTEGRATION

-brought about by

BIG GOVERNMENT

[Or if you prefer BIG BROTHER]

-which has fatally

DESTROYED OUR SENSE OF SELF-RELIANCE.

 

MEANWHILE, we are importing large numbers of unemployed youths from abroad in order to maintain

OUR

STANDARD OF LIVING

Yet many of these newcomers have nothing

BUT

CONTEMPT

 FOR OUR

WAY OF LIFE

-and some even wish

TO DESTROY IT

Steyn sees this as a

CIVIL WAR

which

EUROPE

-is too timid even to acknowledge - let alone

LET ALONE WIN

[This is something the Tory Mr Oliver Letwin or as we have said on a number of occasions Mr Let-them-win -and they will, who appears to be out of touch with the real issues that matter to our country in the early years of the 21st century.]

Mr Steyn says:

'Islam has youth and WILL

Europe has age and WELFARE.'

It's hard not to agree with Mark Steyn, especially as every day seems to bring more evidence

THAT AS A SOCIETY

WE ARE TERMINALLY

MAD

For example, this week's fertiliser bomb trial had heard that the key plotters had been radicalised by the hate preacher Omar Bakri Mohammed whom the judge condemned as

'a master of cowardice -who works in the shadows.'

This was the same firebrand who as an asylum -seeker here, had pocketed

£275,000

-in Welfare benefits.

[It is the same mentality shown by

Lord Chief Justice Phillips and Lord Falconer and many others

-who instead of spending the £32 million allocated for building prisons a few years ago are now doing almost anything in order to keep thousands of criminals many repeat offenders and dangerous, out of prison and giving many early release so they can go back to torment their victims and as has happened in a number of occasions returned to have another go at their robbery or other offence knowing that the worst that might happen is either a holiday or community service or whatever  and as many prisons these days are very much like 5star hotels there will be no hardship encountered if they are so lucky to win the prison admission lottery -then it will be a nice break to see old friends and anyway they will be out before they have completed their degree in political science or whatever.

The victims of crime, many of them elderly - poor and lonely won't as a rule be free of fear of their tormentor returning for a second or even third try to rob them of the little they have  and as has happened even assault and kill the defenceless pensioner - but some victims even lose heart and end their own lives by depriving themselves of food because they have lost hope that they can be safe again and we have their so-called protectors such as The Lord Chief Justice Phillips and Lord Falconer the new 'Justice' Minister ? who says 'Jail's the wrong place for burglars' and others who are doing whatever they can to keep the criminals out of jail. If the Army can put up a temporary  barracks in double quick time then there would be spaces for all the thousands of criminals who should be

OUT OF THE COMMUNITY.

Of course there would be complaints that the conditions are not up to the standards of the 5star prisons that they have 'visited' over the years and anyway there is

Tony Blair's

1998 HUMAN RIGHTS ACT

to keep them out of such uncomfortable surroundings which would not provide the 'key' service which has been introduced with their friendly solicitor providing a drugs service as an extra comfort.

THERE IS NO LONGER JUSTICE AS THE SENTENCE DOES NOT FIT THE CRIME

ANYMORE]

*

To continue:

Despite all this, I still believe there are grounds for hope - largely because Muslim hotheads have overplayed their hand by blowing people up, rioting in their neighbourhoods or broadcasting hate -filled speeches which alienate them from the host community.

*

 

[Well we are of the opinion that until the Government shows to the Muslim population that they will not give way on insisting that ALL newcomers and those already with us conform to

OUR RULE OF LAW

 

-and punish without hesitation any breaches of the Law and make it plain that anyone who is a threat to our country WILL BE extradited. BUT of course we have Tony Blair's 1998 Human Rights Act and articles within the 1951 British led Convention of Human Rights which will need amending.

It should be made quite clear that those who have no intention to

INTEGRATE

-should be reminded of their commitment which they gave when they where granted immigration or asylum status (which should be a legal requirement in the future)

Unless drastic action is taken by the next Prime Minister as a priority , future generations of the indigenous population will find themselves foreigners in their own country with their religion and culture under growing  threat. The evidence is before our eyes it is a warning of what the future will bring if action is not taken

QUICKLY AND DECISIVELY

Those moderate Muslims will at last feel secure in the knowledge that they are safe from the extremist influence which up to now they have had it all their own way. By our commitment

IT WILL BE SECURITY THROUGH STRENGTH OF PURPOSE AND THE MUSLIMS WILL BE WITH US

Continue as NOW and they will have nothing but contempt for our indecision and inadequate moral integrity.]

*

To continue:

The sharp-suited, soft spoken undercover agents of the

MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD

-the banned Egyptian group whose former members include Osma Bin Laden -understand that power is best secured by

STEALTH

by infiltrating institutions and seducing the

MEDIA

Libya's Colonel Gaddafi once exemplified this policy

He said:

'There are signs that Allah will grant Islam victory in Europe -without swords, without guns-without conquests. The 50 million Muslims in Europe will turn it into a Muslim continent within a few decades.'

 

[AND THEY SURE MEAN IT]

 

 

[Our survival as a Christian nation can only be achieved by the Government reversing it's abhorrent legislation as to Religious freedom of speech and action because not to do so further emphasises to the extremist elements in our country that we are WEAK and AMORAL nation and therefore ready for conversion by stealth as their numbers obtain the victory while we ignore our Christian past at our peril.

Our close relations to America must be strengthened particularly in the moral arena so that our nations will gain the grudging respect of those who have a desire to replace our Christian heritage with their own.

There will be many who will say that we live in a secular environment and that the Government of the day should not concern itself but we have no choice we either support our Institutions and that includes our Christian inheritance which is ingrained into the very fabric of our nation or  lose that priceless heirloom the foundation of our IDENTITY and accept another more fanatical regime who do not believe in toleration but only in the observance of their one and only deliverer who will have no other faiths before it.

WE HAVE TO MAKE A CHOICE

-because a vacuum must be filled and it is better that we know what contain.

The Choice Is Yours!

-but better it will be to retain our own heritage than be converted to another.]

*

But the violent extremists have provoked some signs of a backlash, not just among indigenous populations of Europe but among those tolerant immigrants who value the countries

THAT TOOK THEM IN

The Swedes, of all people, whom liberals claimed had produced a perfect society, are trying to row back on the

WELFARE STATE

-to encourage the

WORK ETHIC

and are demanding

THAT IMMIGRANTS INTEGRATE

 

Nyamko Sabuni a female, Muslim, African immigrant who is now the country's

INTEGRATION and EQUALITY

MINISTER

-insists that

ALL IMMIGRANTS

-should learn Swedish and find a job.

 

She is also intent on criminalising

FORCED MARRIAGES

CHECKING GIRLS FOR EVIDENCE OF FEMALE CIRCUMCISION

and

BANNING THE VEIL

as well as

STATE FUNDING

for RELIGIOUS SCHOOLS.

[This is an area that needs the new Premier Gordon Brown to put his attention as to make it plain that their is one

RULE OF LAW

in

ENGLAND

[NO EXCEPTIONS FOR MUSLIMS OR ANYONE ELSE IN OUR COUNTRY]

 

 

*          *          *

 

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

[Daily Mail-May 5-2007]

 

H.F.1294

 
 
 

If this article makes you angry how can you argue that Multiculturalism is not designed to polarize society?

E Pluribus Unum?

 

This is banned but separation is not

Multiculturalism is the policy of encouraging the separate development of several cultures within a nation state. It is not about having Curry Houses and Balti restaurants, these just make for a varied national culture, it is not about hip hop or the Chinese New Year, multiculturalism is about encouraging people from different backgrounds to develop separately from the rest of society. Multiculturalism is not about diversity, it is a political movement with a clear and deliberate policy of deconstructing national cultures in favour of many separate cultures. It is a sad truth that 90% of those who say they support multiculturalism are actually anti-racist and pro-diversity: they have got no idea that when they say they support "multiculturalism" they are supporting a subversive political and philosophical movement within Western countries. It is probably the support of this ignorant faction that has allowed Multiculturalism, which is another word for "separate development" (in Afrikaans 'apartheid'), to become so embedded in Britain.

 

 

Multiculturalism in Britain was a policy implemented by New Labour with the intention of creating a revolutionary tension and change in society. It was a Soviet policy that was released in instruction packs distributed to the various, subversive, university "socialist societies" in the nineteen seventies, at the height of the Cold War. The policy was intended to destabilise the West. (See The Roots of New Labour). It failed in its primary objective because the British are a tolerant culture. It is amazing that British journalists, especially in the television media and BBC, have supported this policy with such zeal although this is probably due to the fact that many of these individuals also have roots in the British left wing movements of the 1970s and that multiculturalism is now seen as an 'answer' to how to accommodate nationalities within political unions such as the EU, Russian Empire and Chinese Empire.

Multiculturalism was more fully characterised in the work of the philosopher Jacques Derrida who proposed that the polarization of society should be an objective of social policy. Derrida was a malevolent force in modern philosophy whose ideas were largely designed to damage social structures. Curiously governments have permitted the appointment of post Marxist post modernists who support the ideas of Derrida to chairs in sociology and education in western universities so that social policy is now being guided by many people who believe that the objective of social policy should be the destruction of a structured society.  Political commentators have not realised that socialism now relies on racial tension, not class war, to exacerbate political difference and create conflict (see Postmodernism-poststructuralism-postmarxism).

Apart from the obvious ill-effects of polarising people into ghettoes and opposing groups Multiculturalism also has some serious adverse effects that result from the fact that almost all non-western cultures have not undergone the changes that result from exposure to the Enlightenment and the Age of Reason. Examples of the adverse effects of multiculturalism are: failure to identify with society at large, socialising solely with your co-religionists so depriving others in the neighbourhood of society, supporting the caste system and caste attitudes so that the poor are kept poor, excluding people from outside your culture from work, girls wearing restrictive clothing in school so that they cannot participate in the full range of lessons, forced marriage, setting up schools to teach Intelligent Design or Koranic ideas on biology so depriving children of a truthful education, supporting foreign powers against your own country so endangering our security etc. All of these adverse effects of multiculturalism and many, many more are evident in British life. The socialist elite argues that separate cultures within the UK should be encouraged to exercise these "freedoms" but each freedom that is encouraged within a separate culture deprives the whole of British society of other freedoms. Those who support multiculturalism generally just deny that these adverse effects will occur but some, such as the effects of restrictive clothing in young girls and the effects of a caste system etc. are simply inevitable because they are in the nature of those "freedoms".

Multicultural policies are apparent in a variety of institutions and exist wherever the intention is to increase the polarization and separation of people rather than to reduce it. The teaching of history in British schools has been heavily infiltrated and oriented towards polarization, for instance British children are taught about slavery and colonisation rather than about emancipation and the explosive development of European states in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. They are taught about the US Civil Rights movement, which has nothing to do with the British but upsets black people, rather than the peaceful decolonisation of much of the British Empire. They are taught about the persecution of the Jews rather than the heroic struggle of the British and the global British cultural zone against the Germans, Russians and their allies that saved the Jews. Some of the legislation that treats groups of people as minorities and victims also polarizes society. The recent extensions to Equalities legislation in the Equalities Act that outlaw political discussion about belief are also designed to polarize society.

The social tension caused by multiculturalism must now be repaired and wholesale immigration into the UK, which is already overcrowded, must be stopped (See The benefits of immigration to the UK economy). Multiculturalism has already caused the outbreaks of terrorism associated with Londonistan (many of the 9/11 terrorists stayed in the UK and the 7/7 terrorists were British) and will lead to worse problems as time goes on.

The coalition government has taken a sensible stand against multiculturalism (see State multiculturalism has failed, says David Cameron). The government should be supported in this stand and the New Labour appointed BBC governors and current affairs staff should be quietly removed to prevent the distorted coverage of the issue. Governments should oppose both institutional multiculturalism and institutional racism because apartheid is both a cause and a symptom of racism.

Many races in one culture is workable and may be desirable but separating the races into cultural ghettos will polarise society and cause perpetual strife, though not a full blown revolution and totalitarian government, as the originators of multiculturalism once hoped. It is time to finally cauterise the damage done to the social fabric of Britain by the Cold War and to move on to realist, liberal politics.

Multiculturalism has recently been adopted by those who are in favour of large scale political unions such as the EU as a desperate approach to the problem of the free movement of labour and how to contain multiple nationalities within a single state. This problem could be resolved by simply unwinding the EU back to the EEC without the destructive effects of multiculturalism.

If we continue with Multiculturalism we will end up with tribalism with all that that entails from corruption to nepotism to gangs, riots and terrorism.

The whole point of a modern nation with one culture was to stop these evils. Nations are the unit of cultural diversity and this must be respected.

See also:

The Roots of New Labour

Labour confirms that multiculturalism is bad

Diversity in the UK

A ranking of social evils 

Multiculturalism and truth

Nations are the unit of cultural diversity  

The Benefits of Immigration to the UK Economy

Against racism

The aims of Localism

 

 

 

 

*  *  *

LONDONISTAN

 

*

THE VEIL-THE CROSS-A VITAL DEBATE over THE HEART AND SOUL OF OUR NATION.

 

*

 

 

TONY BLAIR'S LEGACY- THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND.

 

 

*

 

 H.F.718/MULTICULTURALISM

 

 

 
 

 

 

Britain's State  Pension

'POOREST IN THE WEST'

 

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-12-06 - Britain's state pension ...

 

 
 
     

    Parts of Britain are now poorer than

     

     

    POLAND

     

     

     

     | Daily

     

    Mail Online

     

     

     

    Wales-Cornwall-Europes-worst-off.html

     

     

     May 2014 ... EXCLUSIVE By Tom Mctague, Mail online Deputy Political Editor ... The region of
    “West Wales and the Valleys” is now in the top five poorest areas in Western
    Europe - with families HALF as wealthy as their German ..... Huh the British
    pensioner on state pension has to do with £7,000 a year to live on. 17.

     

    Britons have worst state pension in EU | Daily Mail Online

    www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article.../Britons-worst-state-pension-EU.html
    12 Nov 2007 ... The average age of retirement in Britain - 62.6 - is also above the EU average of
    61. Some 57 per cent of Britons aged between 55 and 64 are in paid employment
    . Aon found the value of Britain's state pension for a single person is 30.8 per cent
    of the average wage. This figure is 32.5 per cent in Ireland, ...

     

    Fifth of UK's poorest men 'die before they qualify for state ... - Daily Mail

    www.dailymail.co.uk/.../Fifth-UKs-poorest-men-die-qualify-state-pension.html
    0 Apr 2011 ... Around 19 per cent of men from the lowest social classes die before they reach
    65, Labour's former pensions minister Malcolm Wicks said (pictured).

     

    Pensions crisis: 96% of final salary schemes are ... - Daily Mail

    www.dailymail.co.uk/.../Pensions-crisis-96-final-salary-schemes-doomed--OAPs-worst-Britain--state-funds-withering-vine.html
    24 Jun 2009 ... The extent of the pensions crisis has been laid bare by a 'triple whammy' of
    worrying reports.

     

    Retire at 60... if you take cut in state pension - Daily Mail

    www.dailymail.co.uk/news/.../UK-workers-retire-early-cut-state-pension.html
    13 Oct 2016 ... The review also raises the prospect of blue collar workers in poor areas retiring
    earlier than office workers in wealthier parts of the country. ... To limit the costs of
    the payouts, which have soared due to Britain's ageing population, the
    Government also proposes to review the state pension age every five ...

     

    British state pension 'one of the least generous in ... - Daily Mail

    www.dailymail.co.uk/.../British-state-pension-one-generous-Europe-giving-UK-workers-bigger-financial-shock-retire.html
    6 Oct 2014 ... British state pension 'one of the least generous in Europe' giving UK workers a
    bigger financial shock when they retire ... By Sean Poulter for the Daily Mail .....
    they will expect us to work till we drop, thus saving any pension payment, old
    people dont work for fun, its because they are so poor they have too. 1.

     

    OECD report puts Britain bottom of pension league table | This is ...

    www.thisismoney.co.uk/.../pensions/.../OECD-report-puts-Britain-bottom-pension-league-table.html
    1 day ago ... Britons thinking about retirement should not rely on their state pension or face up
    to a huge fall in earnings, a report from the influential OECD shows.

     

    UK middle class one of the smallest and poorest in Europe | This is ...

    www.thisismoney.co.uk/.../UK-middle-class-one-smallest-poorest-Europe.html
    25 Apr 2017 ... The UK's middle class remains one of the smallest and poorest in Europe despite
    having expanded the most over two decades. Middle class British family of four
    had a minimum disposable income of between £19,000 - £57,350 in 2010; Italy,
    Spain, UK and Ireland have smallest middle classes in Western ...

     

*  *  *

 

 

 

PENSIONER POVERTY

IN

BRITAIN

A pensioner couple aged 85 and 88 with built - up life savings of £8,300 have seen their hard accumulated savings over a number of years reduced by over half this year with repairs to their old boiler and the installation of a new boiler at a cost of £2875 with an additional electricity bill of over £1200 on top of the usual monthly payment. The  cold weather FUEL ALLOWANCE of £300 will help but is an insult knowing how those in Britain are sorely treated when compared to the generous payments made in many counties across the soon to be returned ENGLISH CHANNEL.  The spend-thrift FOREIGN AID payments to  RICH COUNTRIES and TERRORISTS is an a ABOMINATION when we still see APPEALS on our screens daily to supply WATER and FOOD for CHILDREN across the WORLD.

DECEMBER 6,2017

H.F.1406

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
 

[ A TRIUMPH OF HUMAN ENDEAVOUR]

 

How loving parents helped boy into £38,000-a-year ... - Daily Mail

 

From council house to Eton: How loving parents and an inspirational teacher helped this boy from one of Britain's poorest areas into the £38,000-a-year college

  • Stephen Geddes, 16, has won place to study at elite £38,700-a-year Eton College
  • David Crosby, a teacher at Liverpool’s King’s Leadership Academy, tutored him
  • He turned down the chance of a lucrative career in the City to go into teaching 
 

Mr Crosby (right with Stephen), 32, is a bright, likeable man who could have chosen any career he wanted after gaining four A-levels at one of the top-achieving state schools in the country, St Olave’s Grammar School in Orpington, Kent

When maths teacher David Crosby was told his 16-year-old protege Stephen Geddes, raised in one of the poorest areas in Britain, had won a scholarship to study at £38,700-a-year Eton College, he took his glasses off and wept.

‘It was probably the proudest moment of my teaching career,’ says Crosby. ‘To see the look on the faces of his mother and father, to see the look of shock and disbelief on Stephen’s face — to have the knowledge that this was really going to change his life and change this community’s life...’

Mr Crosby, a teacher at Liverpool’s King’s Leadership Academy — a school which was in special measures until just over two years ago — struggles to find the words to describe that overwhelming moment.

‘Teaching can sometimes be a thankless task. When you get moments like that you think, Yes, I am doing the right thing. The early starts and late finishes are worth it. It validates my life decisions.’

Mr Crosby, 32, is a bright, likeable man who could have chosen any career he wanted after gaining four A-levels at one of the top-achieving state schools in the country, St Olave’s Grammar School in Orpington, Kent.

Like most of his classmates, he was destined for a lucrative career in the City after studying history at York University. Until he decided to teach.

‘Most of my friends are investment bankers or consultants in the City. My dad worked in banking too.

‘But I wanted to be able to give students from areas like this the opportunities I was able to have. For me it’s more rewarding than earning a fortune — knowing you’ve made a difference to a young person’s life.

‘Stephen, though, must take 99 per cent of the credit himself for what he’s achieved. This has not been gifted to him. He’s worked hard.

 

Stephen (pictured with his parents) lives in a council-owned property in Dingle, which is in the top 10 per cent of the most deprived areas in England, according to the Department for Communities and Local Government

‘If I’ve done anything to help Stephen, it’s been to raise his aspirations — to shift his perceptions of where in life he might get to. Before now, he’d never considered the prospect of Oxbridge or an American university. All I’ve done is open his eyes.’

Stephen is the youngest of four children of loving parents Brenda, 54, a carer and Stephen, 50, who works in the frozen food department at Tesco.

He lives in a council-owned property in Dingle, which is in the top 10 per cent of the most deprived areas in England, according to the Department for Communities and Local Government.

The area’s terraced streets served as the backdrop to Alan Bleasdale’s gritty drama, Boys From The Blackstuff.

Stephen says: ‘My road is sort of OK. As you go to the main road it can be a bit more dodgy.’

Whatever the road in this neighbourhood, it’s a different world to the green playing fields and privilege of Eton.

‘Before I went to Eton for my interviews (Stephen sat through no fewer than eight academic interviews to secure his scholarship) there were fears about fitting in and being from a different background. I was a bit scared, but I met some of the boys and they were so welcoming.

‘You have the impression they’re going to be posh and stuck-up, but when I went down there and talked to them they were a normal bunch of lads.

‘The school was overwhelming — unreal. People talk about the facilities, but when you see it with your own eyes, it’s just ridiculous.

‘It’s more like a town than a school. There are fields and fields of sport, theatres and 25 boarding houses. It’s absolutely massive.’ Stephen’s eyes are round as saucers when he describes the public school.

 

The academy’s enrolment in the scholarship programme that will see Stephen pack his long black tailcoat for Eton (pictured) next year — run by the SpringBoard Bursary Foundation and Hope Opportunity Trust — is part of head teacher Mark O’Hagan’s plan to give his 455 pupils the best start in life he can

To date, his secondary education has been at the red-brick academy building behind an iron security fence in Dingle.

Just two months ago the school was put in lockdown when a man made racially aggravated threats to the pupils, who are made up of 30 different nationalities.

Stephen wears his maroon uniform with pride, as well he might. Step into the school and while the polished corridors do not exude the privilege of Eton, there is an atmosphere of aspiration and hope.

The academy’s enrolment in the scholarship programme that will see Stephen pack his long black tailcoat for Eton next year — run by the SpringBoard Bursary Foundation and Hope Opportunity Trust — is part of head teacher Mark O’Hagan’s plan to give his 455 pupils the best start in life he can.

Little more than two years ago, this school, formerly known as Shorefields School, was in special measures with many teachers leaving amid worryingly poor academic results.

 

Stephen Geddes gets a hug and kiss from his mother after winning a scholarship to Eton

The academy’s success since it was taken over by the Great Schools Trust, which seeks to emulate the teaching methods of leading independent schools, is dizzying.

Stephen will not be the only pupil heading off to board in a public school next year. He will be joined by four of his classmates, who have also been told they will receive scholarships but have yet to learn which school they will attend.

‘The year tens were playing football when we heard about our successes,’ says Mr O’Hagan. ‘Mr Crosby, who’s been fantastic at raising attainment levels, got the text. Stephen was standing with his best friend Rhys who was also in the scholarship scheme.

‘We’d put in five applications — last year we got one boy a scholarship to Merchiston in Edinburgh. So the best I was hoping for was three. To find out all five were successful, well...’ His face lights up. ‘Can you imagine being able to give five young people that chance? I went up to Stephen and Rhys and shook their hands.’

Things like a firm handshake are, you see, central to the changes made at the academy, which have seen it rise through the league table of schools in Liverpool from 31st — at the bottom — to 12th; the most improved school in the city.

Having adopted a ‘private school’ philosophy, Mr O’Hagan insists his pupils arrive on time with their ties properly done up. The use of mobile phones is not tolerated on school premises. Nor is rudeness to members of staff.

 

Stephen Geddes, 16, from Dingle, in Liverpool, has won a scholarship to Eton

Before each lesson, the children line up to shake a teacher’s hand before entering the classroom.

The school has introduced a house system to encourage competition and colour-coded ties as rewards, both borrowed from the independent sector.

Teachers are never called by their first names either — something which has become increasingly common in state schools up and down the country.

We meet in Mr O’Hagan’s office, which is labelled ‘Oxford’; each of the doors at this school bears the name of a prestigious UK or international university to inspire the children to dream big.

‘As the head of the trust, Sir Iain Hall, puts it, “Your IQ isn’t set by your postcode”. It’s about bringing out the potential in the kids,’ he says. ‘I’ve been to schools like Harrow, and one of the most impressive things is the confidence the kids have.

‘It’s not arrogance. They’re really, really self-aware. We’re trying to give our children that swagger.’

The word ‘our’ is spoken with huge fondness. For, make no mistake, the success of King’s Leadership Academy is about the selfless commitment of each of its 36 members of staff. Take Mr Crosby. His working day begins at 7.45 am. He’ll often still be in his office at 5pm helping one pupil or another with their work and he also gives extra tuition on a Saturday.

‘I wasn’t the first in this morning,’ he says. ‘The head of science was running revision classes at 7am. Teachers stay late. We do Saturday school.

‘This is what is expected when you come to work at King’s. We want to create a school this community can be proud of.’

In its previous incarnation, the school was anything but a source of pride. It was a downright shambles. While students like Stephen, who has been supported throughout his life by caring parents, did their best to work hard, that was nigh-on impossible.

 
 

Left, Prince William during his time at Eton in 2000 and right, Prince William at the prestigious college in 2003

‘The school collapsed when the old head left at the end of my year seven,’ says Stephen, who would then have been just 12.

‘It got to the point where you’d come into school to sit and do nothing because the teachers were never in so we had supply teachers. There was hardly any discipline. The school didn’t care. That’s how I felt — none of the teachers cared. Low-level disruption in class — talking, throwing things at friends — was expected.

‘Most of the teachers just turned a blind eye. There were loads of fights every day — that was normal — and the fire alarm used to go off a lot.

‘I remember months at a time when it went off every day. You’d have to leave your lesson and stand outside for 20 minutes.

‘The change in management has been fantastic,’ he beams. ‘And Mr Crosby has been amazing. He’s my mentor and is always there for me. Even when I was going to Eton for the interviews he said, “If you go and don’t enjoy it, you say”.’

Stephen is a lovely, well-mannered young man who is a credit to his parents as much as the school. His dad, who left school at 15, taught him maths from an early age and nurtured his love of football. Last year he was diagnosed with cancer from which he is, thankfully, recovering. Stephen was distraught but such is his strength of character he did not give up on his studies.

‘It was obviously tough at the start,’ he says. ‘That word cancer is terrifying, particularly when you’ve never experienced it before. I kept going because I knew at the end of the day it would be OK.

‘Me being on a down in the house wouldn’t have helped. I took it upon myself to lift my mum and dad when they were down.

‘I thought: “In six months’ time we won’t be in this situation” — and that’s exactly what it was like. The school obviously knew but I think they also knew what I was like. As soon as I left my front door I left my home problems there. I went into school to do what I was there for: study.’

Mr Crosby smiles fondly when I repeat Stephen’s words to him.

‘His parents have given him an unbelievable set of values,’ he says. ‘We have a moral code at the school called the ASPIRE code. A is for aspiration and achievement, S is for self-awareness, P is for professionalism, I is for integrity, R is for respect and E is for endeavour. The name of the school is King’s Leadership Academy because we’re trying to train them to be the leaders of the future and we believe those characteristics are the qualities of a good leader.

‘Stephen has those qualities written through him like words through a stick of rock and that’s down to his parents as much as us. They’ve been so supportive and never tried to hold him back.

‘They tell him: “This is your dream. Follow it.” I imagine it’s daunting sending your child across the country to a whole new world at the age of 16.’

Indeed, as Stephen says in his native Liverpool vernacular, his parents ‘weren’t fond on’ his going away to board to start with. ‘Obviously, they didn’t want to see me go. But the more we looked into it and saw the opportunities — the facilities, the things you’d be able to do to build yourself up as a person — they could see it could set me up for life.

‘I know they’re scared about letting me go, but they’re just so happy I’ve got an opportunity like this. My mum has hardly stopped crying since she heard. They’ve always provided me with the best they can, but this is huge.

‘I made it clear when I came back from going there that that’s where I wanted to be and they’ve just supported me.

Before all of this, I never really had an idea of what job I wanted.’ He stops to correct himself. ‘Sorry, I mean career. Mr Crosby, when he was helping me with what to do in an interview, said I wasn’t to call it a job, I had to say career or profession.

‘He also taught me to shake hands properly, answer questions in the right way and to keep eye contact.

‘Anyway, before all of this I just took it step by step. I wanted to go to university but mostly I wanted to follow in my dad’s footsteps. I still do. Maybe I’d like to be in a better career but the values he’s got with family, I’d like to have those.’

Stephen’s sheer decency is overwhelming. Yesterday, he visited his primary school St Cleopas to thank them for ‘setting me up with my manners and work ethic’. When he entered the staff room the teachers stood to applaud.

‘See what I mean when I say this is nothing to do with luck?’ says Mr O’Hagan. ‘He’s achieved this through hard work and a good set of values.’

Indeed, you can’t help but feel if anyone is lucky, it will be those at Eton College who rub shoulders with this thoroughly admirable young man. 

 
Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5161013/How-loving-parents-helped-boy-38-000-year-college.html#ixzz50rMSMDsd
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*  *  *

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

 

H.F.1411

 
 
 
 
 
 

PLEASE  NOTE: WE HAVE IN ADVANCE GIVEN BELOW THE BULLETIN FOR EACH MONTH FOR THE NEXT 30 MONTHS WHICH YOU CAN ENTER-IT WILL CONTAIN INFORMATION FROM OTHER MONTHS FROM THE PAST AND THAT AVAILABLE AT THE SPECIFIED TIME.  WE ARE MAKING THIS ARRANGEMENT AS WE ARE UNABLE TO GIVE AN EXIT DATE FROM THE EU. AS YOU ARE AWARE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE IN OCTOBER 2003 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING AVAILABLE INFORMATION WHICH WOULD BRING THE EXIT FROM THE EU AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. BUT NOW THAT BREXIT IS SOON TO BE ENACTED BY PARLIAMENT THE DAY OF OUR DELIVERANCE WILL SOON BE AT HAND AND THE RETURN OF OUR INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND TOGETHER WITH OUR NEIGHBOURING NATION STATES OF WALES-SCOTLAND AND NORTHERN ISLAND.

MAY GOD GRANT US A SPEEDY EXIT FROM THE SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC -MAMMOTH MONSTROSITY OF THE SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

 

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

 

 

The English People's

VoicE

WELCOME!

IMMIGRATION FILE

E U FILE

IRAQ/AFGHAN WAR

     9/11 AN INSIDE JOB

MAGNA CARTA

LONDON 7/7-AN INSIDE JOB

NAZI DVD

ENGLAND FILE

CRIMINAL EU

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

SAY NO TO EU

UNDERSTANDING EASTER

EURO MUST FAIL

ROTTEN HEART OF EU

SOUL OF ENGLAND

100 REASONS TO LEAVE EU

TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

MOST EVERYTHING WHICH IS PRECIOUS IN OUR CIVILISATION HAS COME FROM SMALL INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

 by LORD PETER SHORE.

 

A NATION STATE HAS BEEN REBORN

 

ON the momentous day Theresa May said Britain WILL quit the single market, she put Cameron's feeble negotiations to shame with an ultimatum to Brussels that the UK will 'walk away from a bad deal-and make the EU pay' 

  • STEEL OF THE NEW
  • IRON LADY
  • The PM is hopeful of an EU-UK trade deal because of mutual economic interests 
  • She said Europe not making a deal with BRITAIN would be 'calamitous self-harm'
  • It was confirmed that we will be leaving the single market and customs union
  • But the EU's chief negotiator called her show of defiance counter-productive
  • Her speech was criticised by the Lib Dems as Labour fought on how to respond 
  • Sterling rose 2.8 per cent against the Dollar and 1.8 per cent against the Euro


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4130034/Theresa-s-Brexit-speech-puts-Cameron-shame.html#ixzz4W7pxZPm9
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Europe split over May's ...

https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-mail/20170118/281625305003771
Europe split over May's vision – but even Tusk calls it 'realistic'. Daily ... News -
From Mario Ledwith in Brussels and John Stevens in London.

 

*

POINT BY POINT, HER BLUEPRINT TO FREE BRITAIN FROM BRUSSELS
THERESA May delighted Eurosceptics yesterday with an ambitious road map for BREXIT. The PM extended the hand of friendship to the EU but threatened to walk away if BRUSSELS tried to impose a punitive deal. Jack DOYLE sets out her 12 objectives and analyses her chances of success.

1. CERTAINTY

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will provide certainty where we can. The same rules and laws will apply on the day after BREXIT, as they did before. And the Government will put the final deal to a vote in both houses of Parliament.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By keeping in place-at least initially-all EU laws, Mrs May will provide a degree of continuity and confidence for business. However, as she freely admits she cannot control the outcome of the negotiations. Parliament is highly likely to approve any deal because the alternative will be a chaotic BREXIT.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

2. OUR OWN LAWS

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will take back control of our laws and bring an end to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in Britain. Because we will not truly left the EU if we are not in control of our own laws

CAN SHE DELIVER

 Adopting the 'take back control' slogan of the Leave campaign, Mrs May repeated her promise to end rule by EU rule and judges in Luxembourg and restore power to Parliament and domestic courts. Without this there is no Brexit. A firm red line

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

3 A UNITED KINGDOM

 WHAT SHE SAID

A stronger Britain demands that we strengthen the precious union between the four nations of the UK.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By consulting devolved administrations, Mrs May is seeking to reassure voters in the nations of the UK which didn't vote for Brexit that she is listening to their concerns, and avoid Nicola Sturgeon calling for a second independence vote.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

4. THE IRISH BORDER

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE will work to deliver a practical solution that allows the maintenance of the Common Travel Area with the Republic, while protecting the integrity of the United Kingdom's immigration system.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Both countries want to maintain the open border between Northern Ireland and the Republic without opening a back door into Britain. Likely to mean UK border checks at Irish ports and airports.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

5. CONTROL OF IMMIGRATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

The message from the public before and during the referendum campaign was clear: BREXIT must mean control of the number of people who come to Britain from Europe. And that is what we will deliver

CAN SHE DELIVER

Ending free movement is a  RED LINE, but Mrs May left open when it will end, what system will replace it and details of any transition deal. The PM wants highly skilled EU migrants, doctors and nurses, but will she compromise on unskilled migrants to get a better trade deal

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

 6.  EU NATIONALS AND BRITISH EXPATS

 

WHAT SHE SAID

We  want to guarantee the right of EU citizens who are already living here in Britain, and the rights of British nationals in other member states, as early as we can.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Likely to agreed early on, as long as the EU doesn't want to haggle. Last year Mrs May offered to settle on the rights of three million EU nationals in the UK, and 1.2million Brits on the continent in advance of formals talks- but Angela Merkel refused.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*
7.WORKER'S RIGHTS

 WHAT SHE SAID

Not only will the government protect the rights of workers' set out in European legislation, we will build on them.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May is determined to at least preserve protections for workers on low and middle incomes-many of whom voted for BREXIT. Could come under threat if there is no deal., and Britain slashes taxes and regulation to attract business.

DEAL OR NO DEAL? 3/5

*

8. TRADE WITH EUROPE

WHAT SHE SAID

As a priority, we will pursue a bold and ambitious free trade agreement with the EU. This should allow for the freest possible trade in goods and services. But I want to make it clear. It cannot mean membership of the single market

CAN SHE DELIVER

The crux of the negotiation. Britain will leave the single market, and with it EU laws and free movement. Instead Mrs May wants a tariff-free trade and customs agreement to stop goods being held up at ports. She ruled out ' vast contributions' to the EU budget, and the only money going to Brussels will be for particular programmes and agencies like Europol. Her huge gamble is to threaten to walk away if the EU attempts to punish Britain

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

9. GLOBAL TRADE

 WHAT SHE SAID

A global Britain must be free to strike trade agreements with countries outside the EU too. But I also want tariff-free trade with Europe and cross-border trade there to be as frictionless as possible.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants deals with non-EU countries including the US. That would be impossible from inside the customs union, which imposes a uniform tariff on all non-EU countries. It would also make trade Secretary Liam Fox's job redundant.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 4/5

*

10. SCIENCE AND INNOVATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE have a proud history of leading and supporting cutting -edge research and innovation. So we will also welcome agreement to continue to collaborate with our European partners on major science, research, and technology initiatives.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Unlikely to be an obstacle to any deal. Much collaboration between academics takes place outside formal EU structures and will continue unimpeded.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

11. CRIME AND TERRORISM

 WHAT SHE SAID

All of us in Europe face the challenge of cross-border crime, a deadly terrorist threat, and the dangers presented by hostile states.  All of us share interests and values in common, values we want to see projected around the world.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Security and intelligence cooperation and defence cooperation cannot be a formal bargaining chip, but without making it one, Mrs May reminds EU allies of Britain's importance as an ally in fighting terrorism and important status as a military power.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

12.  A SMOOTH EXIT

 WHAT SHE SAID

It is in no one's interests for there to be a cliff-edge for business or a threat to stability as we change from our existing relationship to a new partnership with the European Union.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants tranitional arrangements to smooth the process of leaving the EU with specific deals on budget contributions, immigration, trade and customs lasting different periods of time. Securing this as well as securing a final deal within two years is a huge task.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

[THERE IS EVERY LIKELIHOOD THAT OTHER EU MEMBER STATES WILL BE GREATLY ENCOURAGED BY BREXIT TO LEAVE THAT SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION IN THE NEXT FEW YEARS WHICH SHOULD MAKE A NUMBER OF EU STATES TO CO-OPERATE FULLY WITH THE UK OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR UNFRIENDLY ATTITUDE AT A LATER DATE.

AS THE GREAT PRIME MINISTER - WILLIAM PITT -  (1759-1806) ANNOUNCED IN NOVEMBER 9-1805 SHORTLY AFTER  NELSON'S VICTORY OVER THE FRENCH AND SPANISH FLEETS AT TRAFALGAR.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

The blueprint of a Free and Prosperous United Kingdom should be the blueprint of a future Free Europe and the world at large. Our past still lives in the hearts of FREE PEOPLES everywhere and soon we will rejoin that sacred past which we left over 43 years ago because of traitorous politicians and others who couldn't see the dangers ,for the gross lies and deceit in their path.

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 18-2017

H.F.1092 BREXIT NOW

Brought-forward from August 2003

[THE WAY AHEAD TO RECLAIM OUR SACRED INHERITANCE.]

Faced with the possible imposition (illegally) of a E. U. Constitution this  article contemplating our own U.K. Constitution (English Constitution), is especially topical.

J. Bingley

Constitutional Principles of Power and Remedy.

The Constitution is specifically intended, indeed designed to limit the powers of the state with respect to the people. The Constitution sets a standard upon which the performance of governance may be measured and contested and to provide remedy if abused.

The whole constitution originates its authority from

COMMON LAW

Supremacy resides in the

LAW and PEOPLE

NOT THE

CROWN or PARLIAMENT.

It is a matter of constitutional principle and legal fact that,

THE LAW IS SUPREME

The rule of law is the antithesis of arbitrary power. Integral with this, is the system of jury trial. It places the power of law enforcement in the

HANDS of the PEOPLE.

This the most vital safeguard against DESPOTISM.

The English Constitution's function is to

PROTECT the

"RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

 of ENGLISHMEN".

These are the 'BIRTHRIGHT' of the PEOPLE'

[In 2016 one can see how successive governments have by gradualism watered down these rights with even attempts to replace jury trial by trial by judge only on the grounds of speed and saving resources. The people in the main have been, amiss in not being vigilant to the protection of THEIR CONSTITUTION. In just a few weeks on the 23 June,2016 they have a choice whether to vote to leave the EU and regain THEIR LAW-THEIR CONSTITUTION-THEIR FREE COUNTRY. or REMAIN in an ALIEN COLLECTIVIST AND CORRUPT UNDEMOCRATIC EU with NO PROTECTION of MAGNA CARTA of 1215 and BILL OF RIGHTS of 1688 and NO ENGLISHMAN'S ' RIGHTS and LIBERTIES' to be passed on to FUTURE GENERATIONS.]

The fundamental rights and liberties are listed in the preamble of the Coronation Oath Act of 1688 which declares that  the oath is taken for the purpose of

" Maintaining our spiritual and civil rights and properties"

It is a contract with the people which makes it the permanent duty of the CROWN, and the CROWN in both GOVERNMENT and PARLIAMENT.

This contracts the Monarch to govern only according to the STATUTE, COMMON LAW, and the CUSTOM and to 'CAUSE LAW and JUSTICE with MERCY to be used in all JUDGEMENTS'.

All power of governance is vested in the CROWN.

The two Houses of Parliament may upon their concurrence offer bills for ROYAL ASSENT.

A BILL is not ENACTED until it has been authorised by the SOVEREIGN POWER.

Whilst the enacting power (a royal prerogative) of Royal Assent is entirely vested with the monarch it is contracted ONLY TO BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.  This is a limitation and essential safeguard to protect the people from any over mighty governance  [such as Tony Blair's and Gordon Brown's NEW LABOUR and since DAVE'S PARTY]

 It was used  to defeat the Divine Right of Kings; a claim of absolute power by the Stuart monarchs.  The OATH ascertains the SUPREMACY of the LAW, not the supremacy of CROWN or of PARLIAMENT.

There is certainly no Divine Right of Politicians.

The Coronation contract is of the Crown owing allegiance to the Constitution. The PEOPLE give ALLEGIANCE to the CROWN.

Here is a system of mutual protection for there is a constitutional interdependence.

The MAGNA CARTA

made provision for the PEOPLE to use ANY MEANS including FORCE if the CROWN is found to be in BREACH.

[THE CROWN IS IN BREACH!]

THE RIGHT OF RESISTANCE IS THE ULTIMATE REMEDY...

That which constitutionally binds the Monarch is a restriction upon Her Majesty, Her Government and all Parliamentary power.  The Monarch may do no wrong, but should she refuse by her negative power( the right to withhold assent) to

'LET WRONG BE DONE.'

[Millions of patriots have been waiting over four decades for:-

'Right to be Done!']

Sir William Blackstone confirms this. Whilst the monarch accepts the advice of ministers, they must only advise to do that which COMPLIES with the CONSTITUTION.  Plainly NO MONARCH is FREE to ASSENT to ADVICE that CONFLICTS with the CONSTITUTION in FORCE.

There is no authority in Parliament to pass any power of governance in England to those who hold or owe no allegiance. [such as the EU]

 There is no constitutional authority for Parliament to deliberately breach the constitutional laws by new   conflicting enactment.

 There is a natural duty resulting from the logic of our constitutional law to debate and resolve conflicts, if necessary by prior repeal.

 We must put an end to this form of 'legal' abuse, particularly through the misapplication of party politics.

 Most but not all of our constitution is written:- the Magna Carta, the Petition of Rights, the Declaration of Rights, the Bill of Rights, the Act of Settlement and the Acts of Union etc. It has evolved over centuries with the expenditure of much blood. It has been abused and corrected many times. It was finally settled by the Glorious Revolution of 1688/9.

The Judicial function is to be the independent arbiter between party and party or party and government under the terms of our constitutional law.  The courts are bound to declare upon the constitutionality of an Act where it may prove to be an action of unconstitutional governance. The great examples of the Magna Carta, the Petition 1628, the Declaration & the Bill of Rights 1688/9 make this duty of the court utterly plain.

Judgement may only be given in accordance with the constraints of constitutional laws in force.  At all times the presumption of law and justice in mercy be upheld and used  in all judgements. This is the trust sand the pre-eminent public policy reposed in the judiciary.

The right of petition to the Monarch is an appeal direct to the source of power, the Monarch is under OATH and at LAW, bound to provide REMEDY. Where there are RIGHTS there are REMEDIES. Politicians and Parliament must abide by the terms of reference and DUTY to the CONSTITUTION.

A fixed and certain standard with protection and remedy are the true purpose of the Constitution.

WE MUST RECLAIM OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE RULE OF LAW FROM THE SUPPOSED DIVINE RIGHT OF OUR POLITICIANS.

John Bingley-AUGUST 2003

*

[We ask how did it come to pass that the JUDICIARY did not PROTECT the CONSTITUTION from the illegal actions of PARLIAMENT and the Crown with the disclosures in 2001 under the 30 year rule from the Public Record Office at

 KEW-LONDON

 which revealed the CONSPIRACY of the FOREIGN OFFICE to prevent the PEOPLE from hearing the TRUTH of their TREACHERY and BETRAYAL. Under the 1969 THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION on the  LAW of TREATIES  there are two key provisions which authorise a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice.

1. Where corruption has been demonstrated in respect of pro curing the treaty in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

". Where there has been a material change of circumstances. A material change of circumstances has surfaced into the daylight (September 2005), to begin with, following the death of

Edward Heath.

. It has been revealed that he was an agent of a foreign power (NAZI-GERMANY-since 1938), accepted corrupt payment for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them-and that he did all this on behalf of a foreign power which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation.

[Massive payouts were given to the signatories of the  EEC which in reality was in effect the road to the corrupt-collectivist-undemocratic

FEDERAL STATE of the EUROPEAN UNION.]

*

[THE QUEEN FAILED IN HER SOLEMN DUTY TO PROTECT HER PEOPLE AND THEIR UNIQUE WORLD RENOWNED FREE PARLIAMENTARY INHERITANCE

AND APART FROM SIGNING ILLEGALLY 6 EU TREATIES CONTRARY TO HER CORONATION OATH-IN 1998 SIGNED TONY BLAIR'S SECRET AMENDMENT BILL  FOR TREASON FROM THE DEATH PENALTY TO IMPRISONMENT FOR LIFE-OBVIOUSLY THEY BOTH HAD REASONS  FOR FEARING A FUTURE IMPEACHMENT BY PARLIAMENT.

 

More!

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS}

MAY 30-2016

H.F.800

 

 

 

DOMINIC LAWSON: Why pompous Milburn is so wrong about Britain's haves and have nots

Jumped before he was pushed: Alan Milburn presented his departure as 'social mobility tsar' as a resignation on a matter of principle despite the fact his term had come to an end

How strange it is that Alan Milburn should routinely have been described as the Government's 'social mobility tsar', a grandiose title to which he never objected.

After all, the Russian tsar was the apex of a system of absolute social hierarchy. Now our social mobility 'tsar' has abdicated, protesting that the Government is doing nothing to bring about the more equal country that the Social Mobility Commission was designed to support.

In fact Milburn's abdication is no more voluntary than that of Tsar Nicholas II, 100 years ago. As Justine Greening, the Education Secretary, pointed out yesterday, he'd been doing the job for five years 'and his term had come to an end'.

In other words, Milburn jumped before he was pushed, and presented it as a resignation on a matter of principle.

In one respect, Milburn really did enjoy the status of a tsar: his pronouncements as chairman of the Social Mobility Commission were always accorded complete reverence — not least on the BBC — and were never subjected to any sort of critical review.

When this quango was launched in 2012 by the then coalition top team of David Cameron and Nick Clegg (largely, I suspect, because both men were embarrassed by their own exclusively private education and wealthy backgrounds), Milburn declared: 'We live in a country, where, invariably, if you're born poor, you die poor.'

He repeated this on many occasions — and was never challenged on it by his many TV and radio interviewers.

But it is — and was — completely untrue. Even the Sutton Trust, an organisation dedicated to the cause of increasing the life-chances of the less well-off, has produced research completely refuting Milburn's central proposition.

Feared

Its most recent analysis, dividing society into quartiles by income, revealed that 62 per cent of sons born to fathers in the bottom income quartile, themselves escaped into the higher three quartiles.

 

Education Secretary Justine Greening pointed out on the Andrew Marr show that Alan Milburn jumped before he was pushed from the role

Moreover, as you would expect, there was social movement (as defined by income) in the opposite direction.

Only 42 per cent of sons born to fathers from the top income bracket managed to retain that position in the highest income quartile — and 16 per cent of those born in the top income category slid all the way to the bottom.

So why did Milburn get away with it? Well, the Conservatives didn't dare criticise him because they feared — especially under David Cameron — that they would be seen as defending 'elitism'. And for Labour, Milburn's position was pleasantly in accord with their own claim that only a Labour government would represent 'the many, not the few'.

Funnily enough, it is within the Labour party — of which the former Cabinet minister Milburn is still a member — that there has been an actual retreat in working-class success.

In 1964, 37 per cent of Labour MPs were from a family background of manual work; by 2015 that figure had plunged to just 7 per cent.

 

David Cameron's government dare not criticise Milburn because they feared that they would be seen as defending 'elitism'

This process is even accentuated by its current leader, Jeremy Corbyn, as the resoundingly middle-class socialist pressure group Momentum tightens its hold on the selection process.

Ludicrous

On Saturday, the Mail reported 'Labour insiders' as saying that the son of a miner, Kieran Harpham, had been de-selected as a Sheffield councillor because he was 'too authentically working-class' and 'not Left-wing enough': he has been replaced by Janet Ridler, a historian from Sheffield's wealthiest suburb, Dore.

To be fair to Alan Milburn, he is far from a Corbyn fan. He is, to the contrary, a Blairite. And, echoing his former boss, Milburn presented Brexit as a curse on British society, which must somehow be lifted. 'Tough on Brexit, tough on the causes of Brexit,' was Milburn's ludicrous slogan yesterday — which is as much as to say that he thinks the British people's decision to leave the EU was nothing less than a crime.

He went on to argue, confusingly, that if Theresa May didn't do what he said about social mobility, she would be 'betraying the families who voted for Brexit'.

His claim, such as it is, seems to be that those who voted to leave the EU did so as a protest against the nation's lack of social mobility, and its alleged adverse effect on their living standards.

It is an assertion both presumptuous and pompous, based on no evidence. If anything, the pro-Brexit vote in the Labour heartlands was one in favour of greater social cohesion, and against the form of mobility defined by the EU's absolute guarantee of freedom of movement.

Milburn's ludicrous 'tough on Brexit, tough on the causes of Brexit,' slogan suggests that he thinks the British people's decision to leave the EU is nothing less than a crime

The consequent unchecked level of immigration into the UK had many benefits, but the influx of millions of Europeans to work in this country also had a depressing effect on the wages of the unskilled. Such voters would, more likely, argue that the only way Mrs May could 'betray' them over Brexit would be to do what Mr Milburn wants and keep Britain inside the Single Market (which mandates freedom of movement).

But what is it, above anything else, which enables those from less well-off homes to have a chance of prosperity? A first-class quality of free education and the prospect of regular employment at the end of it. By both these measures, Britain has actually been upping its game — and it has nothing to do with Mr Milburn's Social Mobility Commission.

Employment rates have been rising, for year after year, and the proportion of families without anyone in paid work has (thankfully) gone in the opposite direction — down. The latter has much to do with the benefit reforms pioneered by Iain Duncan Smith.

His colleague, Michael Gove, was also instrumental, as Education Secretary, in driving up standards in state schools by demanding a greater level of rigour in both teaching and examinations.

The result of this has been a narrowing of the quality gap — and public exam outcomes — between state schools and private schools.

Again, this was no thanks to the Social Mobility Commission. It had nothing useful to say about improving the standards of teaching, and instead advocated lowering standards of entry at our top universities to those from the poorest homes. What a counsel of despair.

Of course we are an unequal society. As are all societies in all nations, always. But despite the self-serving cliches of the Left, last year in the UK income inequality — defined as the gap between the earnings of the richest and the poorest — fell to its lowest level since 1986.

Benefit reforms pioneered by Iain Duncan Smith, left, and the drive to improve standards in state schools by his colleague Michael Gove had nothing to do with Mr Milburn's Social Mobility Commission

And, as the Chancellor Philip Hammond pointed out in his Budget speech a fortnight ago, since 2010 the incomes of the poorest 10 per cent have grown faster, proportionately, than the richest 10 per cent.

Obsessed

It's true that we are in a long period of earnings stagnation: but this applies across the developed world. And it is simply not the case that Britain is at the bottom of the international league table in terms of social mobility.

We are probably more obsessed with class than any other nation, and accent still plays too much of a role in the way we treat each other.

But as Peter Saunders, emeritus professor of sociology at Sussex University explained in his recent Civitas pamphlet, Social Mobility Delusions: 'Social mobility is the norm in Britain, not the exception, and it covers the range from top to bottom. Politicians say our social mobility rate is one of the lowest in the Western world, but studies of class mobility put Britain around the middle of the international rankings.

'The chances of moving into a different class than the one you were born into are less than in Sweden, the U.S. and Australia, but better than in Germany, France or Italy.'

So do we actually need a quango called the Social Mobility Commission?

We can certainly do without another social mobility 'tsar'. 


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5142221/Why-Milburn-wrong-Britains-haves-nots.html#ixzz50fTDt3Ba
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

 

 

H.F.1408

 

 
 
 

 

 
A FREE PRESS!

It's finest expression had already been given in

MILTON'S

AREOPAGITICA.

Milton boldly proclaimed two principles of profound importance.

One was the immunity of the religious life from political regulation. The other was that doctrine which has been the strength of the best thought of individualism from his day to the present, to wit that the well-being of society requires the natural diversity of its members, and that coercive uniformity of morals and manners would spell the ruin and degradation of any people.

*

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

More!

 

 

 

 

 

 
THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

 

 

 

 

 

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

*

 

A BETRAYAL OF OUR PAST OVER 50 YEARS

 (1959-2016)

 

 

 

THE SPIRIT OF A PEOPLE

 

THE FIRST TASK of any politics that could be really scientific was to relate authority to its principle source, to show its dependence on the whole social fabric, the customs and traditions, the modes of thought and the standards of life that prevail among a people.  ...the work of Montesquieu.   He really sought to understand society, to show the influence of underlying  conditions ,climatic, geographical, economic, to show that custom and institutions neither are made nor can be changed by fiat, to show that there is in every people a spirit of character which their law must reveal

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
A MEETING PLACE  - THERE ARE HUNDREDS  OF ALTERNATIVE WEBSITES ON OUR wEBSITE- SINCE 2003CLICK HERE
realzionistnews. TruetorahJews CONSPIRACYPLANET

.COM/

Fagan-Sounded-Alarm-of -the ILLUMINATI-in-1967  DAVID ICKE BRITISH CONSTITUTION GROUP

 

YOU CAN HANDLE THE TRUTH
BENJAMIN FULFORD.NET

 

THE WORLD OF TRUTH NEWWORLDORDER

INFO.COM

 

SITSSHOW.BLOGSPOT.COM
(Jeff )RENCE.COM  TRUTHCONTROL.COM/  

WHATDOESIT MEAN.COM

 

 

HUMANS ARE FREE

CLIMATE CHANGE A HOAX-TRUMP KNOWS IT-NOW YOU KNOW IT!

The Rothschilds.
 

LANDDESTROYER.

BLOGSPOT

.COM

HENRY MAKOW  CORBETTREPORT) LIFE IN THE MIX 2

 

UK COLUMN.ORG. JEW WATCH

ACTIVISTPOST.

COM

TARPLEY.NET

 

 A MATTER OF FACT!

On October 11-2017 15 months after the PEOPLE had voted to LEAVE the EU  the Daily Mail in its COMMENT column stated the FOLLOWING:

'YES, the Mail would have preferred a quicker and cleaner BREXIT but how foolish of Eurosceptic MPs to kick up a fuss about the planned TWO-YEAR TRANSITION PERIOD. After 45 years of subjection to EUROPEAN JUDGES, another couple will be a mere blink in HISTORY'S EYE. The great thing is that BREXIT is GOING AHEAD and barring REMOANER'S TREACHERY, SEPARATION WILL BE COMPLETE BEFORE THE NEXT ELECTION.'

STATEMENT!

[We and no doubt the majority who voted to LEAVE the EU, knowing the following true facts will no doubt NOT AGREE! with that COMMENT.

 What is FORGOTTEN is the MANNER in which the PEOPLE were DECEIVED by the TORY GOVERNMENT in 1972 and the LEGAL consequences of THEIR ILLEGAL ACTIONS as clearly indicated in numerous BULLETINS on our EDP website over the past 12 years. To call our DEPARTURE from the EU  a DIVORCE is a PERVERSION of the FACTS!  - A MARRIAGE if we are to call it THAT is INVALID if its DOCUMENTATION is  FALSE or obtained by BRIBERY and /or FRAUD.

  NO-MARRIAGE-NO CONTRACT-NO COMPENSATION

FOR THE EU TO EXPECT A GOLDEN HANDSHAKE UNDER SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES IS TO REWARD THEM FOR THE WICKED; ATROCIOUS; DREADFUL; INFAMOUS; OUTRAGEOUS; PERVERSE; SINISTER; VILLAINOUS; EVIL; AND WASTEFUL CONDUCT OF MANY POLITICIANS WITHIN THE EU, SOME AS MENTIONED BELOW.

*

 

Below we have shown details of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and other relevant information which will clearly show that the UK could EXIT THE EU in MONTHS NOT YEARS. Obviously, there has been a COVER-UP of MAJOR PROPORTIONS by the POLITICAL CLASS in GENERAL because how can one explain the SILENCE! even FROM our FREE PRESS the FOURTH ESTATE in the land which we look too to PROTECT OUR  over a thousand year ENGLISH  RIGHTS  and LIBERTIES . Possibly the reason could be that there would be a REVOLUTION if the PEOPLE knew the TRUE FACTS?

 Added OCTOBER 11-2017

IN JULY 2016 AFTER THE SUCCESSFUL BREXIT VOTE WE ARE TOLD BY OUR NEW PRIME MINISTER MRS MAY THAT IT COULD BE YEARS BEFORE WE ARE FREE OF THE CORRUPT-_COLLECTIVIST- UNDEMOCRATIC EU WHICH DEVOURS MILLIONS OF OUR NEEDED POUNDS EVERY DAY OF THE YEAR. 

OUR MESSAGE TO FRAU MERKEL AND HER ROBBER BAND

IS

'GO TO HELL'

BUT

MRS MAY APPEARS TO HAVE A DIFFERENT MESSAGE EVEN THOUGH HER OWN WORDS WERE

"BREXIT MEANS BREXIT.

The following article was put on our website in October,2005 shortly after we received this most revealing information from

CHRISTOPHER STORY

 WHO GAVE HIS LIFE

FOR

TRUTH AND PATRIOTISM

 

FROM

INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW-

SEPTEMBER-2005

*

 

EUROPEAN PAYROLA SYSTEM

 

THE BUDGET FOR THE EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION WAS $5.0 BILLION

 

An account held by Credit Suisse in Zurich, labelled the ‘SBC’ Charcol Account, held a total of some $470 billion when last reviewed by sources.  These funds were originally derived from Nazi funds and assets, are routinely used to pay top politicians and officials to sign successive European Collective treaties- the latest being the so-called ‘European Constitution’.

The budget set aside from the ‘SBC’Charcol Account and to be distributed from the Credit Suisse disbursement account for the latest ‘update’ of the ‘rolling  European Collective Treaty’ was $5.0billion- $2.5 billion being payable in Euros to the participants from the 25 EU countries.

On the finalisation of the Intergovernmental Conference (IGC), which framed the text of the Treaty, and a further $2.5 billion payable in Euros on ratification.  This tranche is currently the subject of much dissension.

For each national cadre of key negotiator, therefore, the total set aside  was $100 million per tranche.  The chief negotiators of each EU country, plus selected officials were each to be paid from the national pot of $ 100 million, whish equates to roughly $75 million per corrupted European Union country.

Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian Prime Minister, was allegedly initially offered $50 million.  being an extremely wealthy man, he departed for the weekend in question in July 2004, following conclusion of the IGC, having indicated to those concerned that he was insulted by such a figure, and that $100million would be nearer the mark.  In the event, following an allowance for his wife, he was allegedly paid $75 million, according to sources.

Tony Blair allegedly received $75 million, which was paid into an offshore bank account held in Belize, the former British Honduras.  There, official eyebrows were naturally raised at the Central bank of Belize, where we notice that all of a sudden, the official reserves of foreign exchange jumped from $49.72 million in February 2005, to $164.53 million in March [2005]

Since the corrupt payment ‘due’ at the completion of the IGC will have been remitted in or about July 2004, this may suggest that the funds have subsequently (in March 2005) been taken into the foreign exchange reserves of the local central bank, so that their actual ownership can be disguised, a ‘new form’ of money-laundering: through a central bank!

 

WE ARE RELIABLY ADVISED THAT THIS CORRUPT PAYOLA SYSTEM IS THE NORM.

 

This means that the European Union’s Treaties

 are null and void,

as they have been obtained by fraud. 

 

That applies to the original EU Accession Treaty signed on behalf of the UK Government by [Nazi] agents Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon, agents of German intelligence, who were both recruited at Balliol College Oxford as discussed in this analysis.

 

It applies also to the Maastricht Treaty, signed by

 

John Major

 

Who allegedly received at least one corrupt payment for his services.  And it applies to the latest fiasco of the EU Collective.

 

THESE CORRUPT PAYOLA PAYMENTS

ARE ‘NON-REFUNDABLE’.

 

The second tranches of  $100 Million per country for the [New European Constitution] new treaty are payable on ratification, but following their referenda, the Netherlands and France cannot ratify.

 

*          *

International Currency Review

 

(Vol 30- No 4)

*

 

 

www.worldreports.org

 

*          *          *

 

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used –comments

in brackets]

 

OCT/05

 

THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION

Under the 1969 Vienna Convention on the

Law of Treaties

there are two key provisions which authorize a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice:

WHERE corruption has been demonstrated in respect of procuring the

TREATY

in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation.

AS the next section will show, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

2. Where there has been a material change of circumstances.

 

A material change of circumstances has surfaced into daylight, to begin with, following the death of Sir Edward Heath. It has been revealed that he was an agent for a foreign power, accepted corrupt payments for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them - and that he did all this on behalf of a

FOREIGN POWER.

which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation

As even more disturbing material change of circumstances has arisen as a consequence of the bombing of the London Underground and a bus , which took place on 7th July 2005, and the attempted explosions perpetuated two weeks later. We understand that the situation is so serious that the Civil Contingencies Secretariat has been in the process of drafting, or has drafted, legislation providing for the British Government to abrogate its putative international treaty [sic] 'obligations' towards the European Union.

ARE YOU STILL THERE MR HAGUE?

This development reflects the knowledge in certain UK intelligence circles that the attacks amounted to an

ACT of WAR

against the United Kingdom, and that the foreign powers behind this activity are ultimately controlled by the DVD from Dachau -( the same area of the World War II notorious concentration camp) which is the successor organization to the Abwehr, Nazi Germany's main external intelligence administration.

It was the Abwehr that first established , as a means of undermining British influence in the Middle East, the Muslim Brotherhood, from which ALL subsequent Islamic terror groups, without exception, originate. Al Qaeda, a descendant ultimately of the German-founded

Muslim Brotherhood,

is a controlled cut-out operation of international intelligence.

The Nazi regime and its Stalinist dialectical counterpart, were both Black Illuminati regimes. The Al Qaeda operation is an extension of the Black tradition, and is ultimately controlled, like the IRA (until very recently) by the DVD out of Dachau.

near Munich

For confirmation of the above and further information consult our bulletin board or contact

E-mail: cstory@ worldreports.org

Website:

www.worldreports.org

*

The European Union Collective:
Enemy of Its Member States

EU

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****  HOW HITLER'S ENABLING ACT OF 1933 WAS PASSED THROUGH YOUR WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENT BY 8 VOTES****   REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

OCTOBER-2005

 

 

H.F.1335/1-BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED EU

Rip-off leases on new houses are banned: Law to ban 'feudal' practice that exploits buyers to be announced by Sajid Javid

  • Communities Secretary said the new law will end 'toxic' leasehold rip-off

  • Exploitation saw developers retaining ownership of land the property is built on 

  • Unwitting buyers were paying sharp increases in ground rent, devaluing home

  • Daily Mail led way in exposing the issue dubbed 'PPI of housebuilding industry'

 

Communities Secretary Sajid Javid, pictured, said a new law would end what he called a ‘feudal’ practice that exploits buyers

Developers are to be banned from selling new houses with ‘toxic’ leaseholds attached, Sajid Javid will announce today.

In a victory for the Daily Mail, the Communities Secretary said a new law would end what he called a ‘feudal’ practice that exploits buyers.

The number of houses sold as leasehold has spiralled in recent years. 

Builders used the practice to extract more money from buyers desperate to get on the ladder.

Leaseholders have a legal right to occupy the property for a set period, typically from 99 to 999 years. 

But developers retained ownership of the freehold – the land on which the property is built – as an investment.

Some unwitting buyers found yearly ground rent payable to the freeholder would increase sharply in the years after they bought, even doubling every decade and drastically reducing the value of the property. 

 

Builders used the practice to extract more money from buyers by retaining ownership of the freehold – the land on which the property is built

In one home in Bolton the charges on a £200,000 property were expected to hit £10,000 a year by 2050.

Thousands of families are thought to be trapped in homes they cannot sell because of such clauses. 

And developers often sell the contracts on to investors who can demand huge sums when families want to buy the freehold. 

 

Some unwitting buyers found yearly ground rent payable to the freeholder would increase sharply in the years after they bought, even doubling every decade and drastically reducing the value of the property

The Mail led the way in exposing an issue which has been dubbed ‘the PPI of the housebuilding industry’. 

Now Mr Javid has said that a new law will cut out ‘unfair and abusive’ practices in the leasehold system in future. It will, however, do little to help existing leaseholders.

As well as a ban on leaseholds for almost all new-build houses, ground rents on long leases will in future be fixed at zero. That includes houses and flats.

‘It’s unacceptable for home buyers to be exploited through unnecessary leaseholds, unjustifiable charges and onerous ground rent terms,’ Mr Javid said.

A law is expected to be introduced in Parliament next year. The only exceptions will be homes that have shared services.

 

Thousands of families are thought to be trapped in homes they cannot sell because of such clauses. Developers often sell the contracts on to investors who can demand huge sums when families want to buy the freehold

Separately, Mr Javid is writing to developers urging them to stop using Help to Buy loans – a subsidised government scheme – for leasehold homes before the ban comes in. 

Ministers are also looking at changing the law to make buying a freehold easier and cheaper.

The Mail can also reveal that a member of David Cameron’s family played a leading role in a campaign to stop the government crackdown on leases. 

William Waldorf Astor IV – the half-brother of the former Prime Minister’s wife Samantha – has links to firms that rake in cash by owning and managing freeholds.

The 38-year-old’s fund management company Long Harbour has the freeholds of more than 160,000 homes on its books – with its investors making money out of the ground rents paid by the leaseholders.

 

First-time buyers desperate to get on the property ladder were often the ones exploited by the scheme dubbed 'the PPI of the housebuilding industry'

The Mail understands that Long Harbour hired lobbyists at London-based PR firm Pagefield in a bid to water down the reforms.

Long Harbour director Jack Spearman also sent an email this week to property executives asking them to sign an open letter to the Government expressing their concerns about the shake-up.

A Long Harbour spokesman said: ‘Long Harbour have played a co-ordinating role over the past three months to engage with the Government constructively over leasehold reform. 

We have outlined on multiple occasions the impact on UK housing supply if all grounds were reduced to zero, and the value of an institutional freeholder.’

 



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5200525/Law-ban-practice-exploiting-home-buyers-announced.html#ixzz52Mfn11uN
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

 

 

H.F.1425

 

Remainers who mock the return of the blue British passport are showing their true colours, writes PETER OBORNE

 

How sad — and utterly predictable. News that the traditional blue UK passports will be revived after Brexit has left many Remainers fulminating with rage and rancour.

Labour MPs have been queuing to voice their displeasure at this inspired and patriotic move.

For example, Tottenham MP David Lammy says the return of the blue passport means that ‘Brexit is beginning to feel like a huge effort to turn the clock back with some misguided imperial overtones’.

And from across the political divide, Lord (Charles) Powell, who was Mrs Thatcher’s most respected private secretary when she was in Downing Street, was even more scornful.

 

The new blue passports will be phased in from October 2019, when the current supplier's contract expires and soon after the UK leaves the European Union

He sneered that the new passport was ‘part of the nostalgia on which the predominantly elderly Brexit constituency thrives’.

How typical of such people to deride something that will be a potent, everyday symbol of Britain’s independence from the EU come 2019.

Disingenuously, during the referendum campaign, Powell claimed that if she had still been alive, Mrs Thatcher would have considered the vote to be ‘anti-democratic’ and she would have campaigned to Remain.

I disagree. And I believe that no one would have been more delighted by the move back to blue passports than Mrs T.

Not because Margaret Thatcher was a hard-line anti-European or an imperialist determined to turn the clock back to the 19th century when Britain ruled the world.

No, she was always a pragmatic and sensible politician and never let such emotional factors dictate what she thought best for Britain.

Above all, she was a Conservative. And as such, she always understood the value of national symbols — be it our flag, our currency, the monarch — or the British passport. (Remember, too, how she shamed British Airways into reverting to Union flag tailfins after it experimented with ethnic ‘world art’ designs?)

The fact is that Conservatives have long realised that such symbols represent political authority and the traditions of society accumulated over centuries. They understand such traditions help to bind people and communities, providing a national rallying point and sense of identity.

The current European Union-approved burgundy document (pictured) was controversially introduced in 1988

By contrast, too many on the Left have held that national symbols are irrational, misguided and wrong. Indeed, they have been contemptuous of the nation state itself, seeing it as the source of wars and exploitation.

Karl Marx viewed belief in the nation state as a form of ‘false consciousness’ which distracted workers from pursuing their real interests, and fighting the class enemy.

So it is no surprise that Jeremy Corbyn’s neo-Marxist Labour Party should disdain the new blue passports.

For its part, it makes perfect sense that Theresa May’s government should reintroduce something that was such an important symbol of British national identity. And, indeed, from 2019, will be so again.

The burgundy EU passports — forced on us in 1988 — were a striking example of what made so many Britons dissatisfied with EU membership and how our sense of nationhood was being subsumed into a Brussels-run superstate. And thus 17 million of them voted to quit the EU.

When this country joined what was then the Common Market more than 40 years ago, Britons were told by prime minister Edward Heath that they were joining a free trade area and Britain was not giving up its ability to govern itself.

The appearance of a joint EU passport was just one of many things that showed this was a blatant lie. It came unannounced. Nobody voted for it. Nobody wanted it.

Above all, it was typical of the EU: completely undemocratic, imposed from above by a pan-national elite contemptuous of nation states.

Most shamefully, it showed that national borders were of little consequence. Whereas the old version merely entitled a citizen of another nation to cross national borders, anyone with a European passport would be instantly recognised at frontiers and receive equal treatment from the authorities.

But, of course, it offered much more than that.

EU nationals could come to Britain and stay as long as they liked. They could look for work and claim British benefits while they did so. They could, and often did, undercut British workers.

Crucially, a European passport meant they could make full use of the British welfare state — an entitlement which has been widely exploited.

In truth, many foreigners have seen that our welfare state is more generous than anything similar offered in their own countries and have come here to take advantage.

The British are a deeply tolerant and generous people, and we will remain so after Brexit. But there are limits to such generosity.

And this is why the European passport has, like the unelected, unaccountable Brussels machine, become a symbol for so much that people don’t like about the EU.

To say a return to the blue passport is ‘part of the nostalgia on which the predominantly elderly Brexit constituency thrives’, as Lord Powell does, is, frankly, an insult.

I should point out that Powell, who has sat on the board of many large international companies, will have seen those firms thrive by using cheap labour from other EU countries.

His affluent ilk, too, will have benefited from such cheap foreign labour in other ways — from domestic helpers, to builders and plumbers.

However, the experience has been very different for millions of hard-pressed British workers.

The period when the burgundy European passport has been in use has seen their pay often cut, their jobs threatened, and the public services — such as the NHS, education, housing and transport — on which they depend come under huge extra pressure from people born abroad.

And for Labour MPs to champion the European passport is to sneer at their own heartlands who have struggled to cope with the economic conditions it has helped to create.

Many of these MPs despise the concept of national citizenship and Britishness — and yearn to be

‘citizens of the world’ instead.

Could EU laws mean new British passports are made in Europe? 

The company which produces passports for British citizens is UK money and security printing firm De Le Rue in Gateshead.

But the contract for who produces them is due to expire soon and, due to EU rules, a French and a German firm have also entered tenders.

Martin Sutherland, De Le Rue's chief executive, has spoken of his hopes the documents

will be made in Britain.

He told the Telegraph: 'We have submitted our bid for the renewal, which is in 2019 and will last for 10 years.

'It would be a shame if in the year of Brexit the contract was lost and the British passport was not printed by a British company.'

To them, any passport is anachronistic. Certainly, this is the philosophy of the bureaucrats in Brussels. They seem intent on obliterating any signs of nationhood — having got a common European currency, an EU foreign policy and their ultimate goal: a United States of Europe.

While the EU referendum campaign was tainted by the lies of Remainers with Project Fear, we are now hearing similar lies about the decision to reintroduce an old-style blue British passport.

James Caan, multi-millionaire and TV personality from Dragons’ Den, said it will cost £500 million to change the colour of the passport. This was completely untrue and he was forced to retract his claim.

But the attitude of Caan — part of the country’s smug rich — demonstrates that many Remainers still don’t understand the deep-seated reasons why the majority rejected Brussels rule.

A passport is a symbol of nationhood. And the British passport is no exception — famously stating: ‘Her Britannic Majesty’s Secretary of State requests and requires in the name of Her Majesty all those whom it may concern to allow the bearer to pass freely without let or hindrance, and to afford the bearer such assistance and protection as may be necessary.’

Above all, it symbolises British common values and the way we stand together. While reminding us of our magnificent past, it is also confirmation of an independent future.

Those who sneer at the return of our blue British passport are guilty of sneering at people who want this country to take the opportunity of having a much better future outside the EU.


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5212081/Remainers-mock-blue-passport-showing-true-colours.html#ixzz52PblrJWa
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

'Of the whole sum of human life no small part is that which consists of a man's relations to his country, and his feelings concerning it.'-

GLADSTONE

'The  love of country produces good manners; and good manners, love of country.- The less we satisfy our individual passions, the more we leave to our general.-

Montesquieu.

'The patriot's boast. where'er we roam. his first country ever is at home.'-

Goldsmith

'Love of country is one of the loftiest virtues; and so treason against it has been considered the most damning sins.-

E.A.Storrs

'There  can be no affinity nearer than our country.'

Plato

*

TREASON

 'The man was noble; but with his last attempt he wiped it out; betrayed his country; and his name remains to the ensuing age abhorred.'

Shakespeare

'Where trust is greatest, there treason is in its most horrid shape.'

Dryden

 

*

 

H.F.1426

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

 

PART 1    -PART 2     (1994 -Official Website-JANUARY  -NEW-HOME PAGE  - 2018)     PART 3-PART 4

 

 

 

 

 

TO RETURN TO:

 

 

 

JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2018

JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2018

JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2018

JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2018

 

THIS IS:

JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW- -NEW- HOME PAGE-2018

 

 

THANK YOU FOR CALLING!

TOP OF PAGE

 

CLICK HERE FOR PREVIOUS FRONT PAGE-2012

-2019