JAN FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2018 - (1994 -Official Website -JAN-PT2 -2018 )--JANFREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2018

JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2018    JAN FREEDOM NOW - NEW -HOME- 2018

ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY. ORG.UK.

FREEDOM-UNITY.

*

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links- IMMIGRATION-ARCHIVE- EU FILE

BULLETINS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD

 

JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2018

 

 

 

Lets return to our old values, says, Rees-Mogg.

BY Jason Groves-Political Editor-Daily Mail -Monday, January 8,2018

 

 

THERESA May must return to Tory values of individual choice and free trade, Jacob Rees-Mogg has warned.

He fears the Conservatives will lose further ground to Jeremy Corbyn unless the Prime Minister goes back to

'First Principles'.

The prominent Brexiteer is tipped by some as a future Tory leader, although he is not expected to be given a ministerial position in Mrs May's reshuffle.

Mr Rees-Mogg also warned that the poor relationship between Mrs May and Chancellor Philip Hammond is hampering government.

And he encouraged ministers to embrace

BREXIT,

saying that the government had been 'too timid'. Writing in the Sun, Rees Mogg urged the PM to put clear blue water between the Tories and Labour by highlighting the fundamental 'dividing lines' between the two parties.

'Tories want to help people to ,lead lives they want and to remove as many obstacies as possible,' he said.

'The socialist aims to cajole people into leading lives that are "good" for them. Tories are more realistic about human nature and generally more pragmatic.

Some Eurosceptics have privately urged Mrs May to sack her Chancellor into today's reshuffle to prevent him watering down Brexit.

Mr Rees-Mogg said: 'The whole government machine ought to be directed towards the benefit of Brexit and not the timorous efforts of managing decline, a recipe for failure popular with too many post-war British politicians.'

'In this regard, it is essential that the PM and Chancellor improve their working relationship and advocate the same policies. No government works when these two figures are not united.'

Mr Ress-Mogg said Brexit could bring huge benefits, including cheaper prices and real control over Britain's future. But he added: 'Here the Government has been too timid. It is as if it were carrying out a policy reluctantly- one foist upon it by the electorate, not one it really and enthusiastically wants.'

[And the past events or more precisely non-events since the referendum have confirmed this analysis.]

 

 

 

This isn't the Britain we fought for,' say the 'unknown warriors' of WWII
 


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1229643/This-isnt-Britain-fought-say-unknown-warriors-WWII.html#ixzz53txyBNPw
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

January 8,2018

H.F.1435

[URGENT NOTICE!]

Energy giants 'bully their customers into getting smart meters': Firms accused of flouting trading laws by telling families devices are a legal requirement

[AND SAVING IS EXPECTED TO BE ONLY  £11 A YEAR

  • Households have been bombarded with texts, emails, letters and phone calls 
  • Citizens Advice reports a stream of complaints from harassed customers 
  • Letter from one supplier said: ‘We have legal requirement to change your meter’

[BUT THEY DON'T]

Energy giants were last night accused of flouting trading laws by pressuring homeowners into getting smart meters.

Families are being told the digital devices are a legal requirement when they are not. Trading standards chiefs have told power firms that misleading customers in this way is a breach of consumer laws.

Households have been bombarded with texts, emails, letters and phone calls telling them they need a smart meter.

 

Families are being told the digital devices are a legal requirement when they are not

Citizens Advice reports a stream of complaints from harassed customers. One said: ‘These are obviously bullying tactics. You’d think you have no choice.’

A letter sent out by one supplier said: ‘We have a legal requirement to change your meter.’ In other cases engineers are dispatched even when the householder has repeatedly declined.

The £11billion cost for the roll-out is being passed on to customers through bills – at a cost of around £300 for every UK household. Yet those who have them installed are expected to save only £11 a year.

They're not telling families the truth 

Alfred Kaelin says he was bullied for months to get a smart meter. 

The 79-year-old retired chemist said he received three or four letters – two of them just days apart – prompting him to have one installed.

One letter to him was titled: ‘Reminder: we need to change your meter.’

It then read: ‘Your electricity meter is an old model that we need to replace with our free self-reading smart meter.’ 

Another said: ‘Reminder: your meter is being phased out.’

None of the letters explained that customers did not have to agree. 

Mr Kaelin, who lives with his wife Patricia in Pinner, north-west London, said: ‘I’m just ignoring the letters as I don’t want a smart meter.

‘But these are obviously bullying tactics. They are not letting customers have the true facts by failing to make it clear you don’t have to have one. 

If you didn’t know they were optional you’d think you have no choice.’

Michael Coote, from Norfolk, said he received a similar letter last year, even though his meter was only four months old. 

‘The letter was frightening and bullying,’ said the 74-year-old retired electrical engineer.

 

The Chartered Trading Standards Institute has written to Energy UK, which represents big suppliers, to raise concerns about the way firms are marketing the meters.

It warns they may be breaking regulations drawn up in 2008 to protect consumers from unfair trading if they create the false impression that customers have no choice but to switch.

‘Firms are getting more and more aggressive in the way they are marketing smart meters to customers,’ said the institute’s Steve Playle. ‘This letter is a shot across the bows. We will take further action if complaints continue to come in.’

 

Alfred Kaelin who lives with his wife Patricia in Pinner, north-west London, says he was bullied for months to get a smart meter

Baroness Altmann, former pensions minister, said it was unacceptable for energy firms to mislead people and inflict ‘unnecessary hassle’. She added: ‘There should be proper penalties in place for firms which behave aggressively and break the rules.’

Victoria MacGregor, director of energy at Citizens Advice, said: ‘Smart meters are not compulsory and customers shouldn’t feel pressured to have one installed.

‘We appreciate suppliers are under pressure to install more meters but they have a responsibility to act reasonably toward their customers and not to use misleading or aggressive sales practices.’

Smart meters are controversial because their internet connectivity may make them vulnerable to being hacked by criminals or even foreign powers. There have also been reports that they interfere with other household devices such as baby monitors, while some studies suggest they make little difference to energy efficiency.

Why gadgets' critics aren't convinced 

  • Privacy campaigners warn smart meters give firms access to a ‘honeypot’ of data that tells them when customers are at home and where and how they use power.
  • Experts fear suppliers could use this information to introduce surge pricing at peak times, hiking bills for families and making it harder to shop around.
  • Others fear the meter data could be used by hackers, burglars and even marketing companies.
  • Nearly a third of householders may not be able get a smart meter because they live in a rural area with poor mobile phone signal or have the wrong type of property.
  • There are also claims that the meters are a fire hazard when they have been poorly fitted by engineers.

Power firms said the devices would help customers cut bills by showing them how much they were using – in terms of pounds and pence. They were supposed to reduce the average household’s gas and electricity costs by £26 a year.

But the Government has revised that down to just £11 because the cost of the nationwide installation of the devices has accelerated past £11billion. Eight million have been installed in homes and firms – under pressure from the Government. One in five homes has one fitted.

Mark Todd of the comparison site Energyhelpline said the Government had bungled the roll-out by doing it too quickly.

A spokesman for the energy watchdog Ofgem said: ‘It is not compulsory to have a smart meter installed – consumers have a right to decline them and suppliers must not mislead consumers.

‘Ofgem is working with suppliers offering smart meter installations to make sure their communications are transparent and accurate. They are allowed to use pre-booked appointments to install a meter, however customers can cancel or re-arrange these appointments.’ A spokesman for Energy UK said the body was in contact with trading standards chiefs.

He added: ‘Energy companies will be adopting various methods of communication with their customers to increase engagement and enable as many people as possible to experience the benefits smart meters bring.’

Robert Cheesewright, of Smart Energy GB, the independent group set up to oversee the smart meter programme, said: ‘The roll-out will benefit everyone by bringing down energy bills, upgrading our national grid and delivering savings of £6billion to the British economy by 2030.’ 

 


Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5323315/Energy-giants-bully-customers-getting-smart-meters.html#ixzz55aVSLId9
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

JANUARY 29,2018

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!

 

H.F.1459

 

GREED THAT SHAMES BRITAIN

ALEX BRUMMER: Boardroom greed shames Britain and insults a generation of young people

Efforts to curb pay in Britain’s boardrooms and outsize rewards in the City are still failing. 

In spite of the resignations of the senior independent directors at housebuilder Persimmon there is no public sign so far of chief executive Jeff Fairburn giving up any of his total pay, bonuses and incentive package of £110million.

The scale of his award is an insult to a generation of young people in Britain who now need an £80,000 deposit to get on the housing ladder.

Moreover, the £400million to be shared among the next layer of Persimmon bosses does not sit well in a country grotesquely short of social housing, where private sector builders seek to minimise the amount of land and resources devoted to the less well-off. 

 

Grotesque: There is no public sign so far of Persimmon chief executive Jeff Fairburn giving up any of his total pay, bonuses and incentive package of £110m

Persimmon may appear to represent the worst of the bitter divisions in our society. But who could not feel queasy at the sight of one of the plumpest panjandrums of investment banking, Sir Simon Robey, collecting £37million for advising on a series of deals which weakened the fabric of Britain.

Robey and colleagues at Robey Warshaw should be in the stocks for advising Japanese titan Softbank on the purchase of UK smart chipmaker ARM, and promoting the hugely misjudged, aborted London Stock Exchange deal with Deutsche Boerse.

The collapsed merger saw executives at both exchanges thrown to the wolves, and the LSE destabilised, while the bosses of Robey Warshaw split £63.3million.

It would be nice to think of Robey rolling up his sleeves at a charity like Toynbee Hall or the local homeless shelter rather than lording it up as he once did as chairman of the Royal Opera House.

The public owes a debt of gratitude this week to the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development and the High Pay Centre for shining a brilliant light on the gross inequalities that exist within Britain’s FTSE 100 companies. 

Together, they calculate that in the last year the average pay of bosses was 120 times that of a full-time employee on the median wage.

A week earlier, Vlerick Business School in Belgium found that of 861 public companies in Europe the pay gulf between those at the top and employees was greatest in Britain.

What is most startling about this is that executives have been allowed to help themselves by compliant boards at a moment in history when the incomes of ordinary Britons have been squeezed by the financial crisis and the fall in the pound.

The sacrifices have been made by staff while business leaders enjoy the good life, in some cases irrespective of performance.

There are some signs attitudes are changing. The Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association has called on boards to ‘be more sceptical about the need for vast executive pay awards’.

It noted that big pay gaps show that too many companies fail to appreciate the value of their workers.

Worse than that, companies in trouble such as Bernard Matthews, Toys R Us and Palmer & Harvey have tried to escape pension obligations built up over a lifetime to loyal workforces. 

The need for boardroom pay to be approved by investors in non-binding votes at annual meetings has helped, with the bosses of the UK’s top companies earning 17 per cent less on average in 2016 than a year earlier.

The added requirement by the Government that annual reports will have to show the pay ratio between chief executives and the average worker should also ramp up the public outrage.

Whether that will make much difference in the most extreme cases such as Sir Martin Sorrell at WPP, who earned £48million in 2017 (down from £70million the year before), is hard to tell.

What is certain is that pension funds and big investors like BlackRock, with £5.7trillion under management, need to keep up the pressure by opposing fat cat deals.

As we have seen time and time again a company’s investors cannot count on supine pay committees, often headed by the weakest link among the directors, to take on the bosses.

Bringing real discipline to pay in the boardroom may require the Government to turn non-binding votes into law, with dissent of 20 per cent of investors requiring action.

If the Tories don’t do it we can be sure that Jeremy Corbyn and his frightening Marxist sidekick, John McDonnell, won’t hesitate to act.

[The unacceptable face of capitalism is still in evidence with the Conservative Party membership reflecting the inability of the party to control the City and its impenetrable defences against CHANGE from fornicator to friend of the PEOPLE.]

The CITY MILE is a financial loose cannon instead of a DUAL- controlled economic force for the benefit of all the PEOPLE and COUNTRY.

 

*

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

JANUARY 6,2018

H.F.1434

News for DAILY MAIL

 

-NO-NAME-CALLING CAN QUITE DESCRIBE THE STUPIDITY OF TORY MPs so desperate to foil

BREXIT

 they'll risk making Corbyn PM

 

 

 by Quentin Letts

NOVEMBER 16-2017

 

No name-calling can quite describe the stupidity of Tory MPs so desperate to foil Brexit they'll risk making Corbyn PM, says QUENTIN LETTS

What should we call those Conservative MPs (maybe 20 in number) who are so pro-Brussels that they may vote against, and possibly defeat, the Government in the Commons?

This is a question that touches the very roots of our freedoms as a nation, as individuals and as a democracy.

Are these rebels ‘mutineers’ or figures of pious principle? They have been called ‘collaborators’ by one senior Tory. Is it improper to regard them as such? Or are these times so unusual that normal rules of engagement do not apply?

Brexit, though it has yet to happen, was precipitated by a mighty plebiscite in June 2016. The electorate came out in unprecedented numbers. The result was close but clear and cannot be questioned.

Rebellious

As the BBC’s David Dimbleby said in the early hours of June 24 last year: ‘We’re out!’

I don’t know about you, but when Dimbleby uttered those words, I sat on the edge of my bed and came over all weepy, I was so proud and happy. Some members of my family wept for the opposite reason.

Ahead of the vote, David Cameron had said the result would be a conclusive, once-in-a-lifetime decision. It would, he said, be a clear instruction to our political class and could not be overturned. Yet many members of that class and of the wider elite now wish to ignore that instruction.

 

Ahead of the vote, David Cameron had said the result would be a conclusive, once-in-a-lifetime decision

Basically, the British Establishment has gone on dirty protest. It hopes that if it refuses to acknowledge the referendum result, Brexit will somehow go away.

Senior public figures, from Tony Blair to Kenneth Clarke to a former head of MI6 to the leaders of the CBI to ex-MP Nick Clegg (who has even written a book demanding that Brexit be blocked), have placed themselves in direct antagonism to the electorate.

These are so-called leaders of our society. They pocket the perks and the pay privileges of leadership. Yet now they are setting themselves in open conflict with the people they rule. Were there ever a recipe for revolution, this may be it.

Which brings us to our rebellious MPs.

On Tuesday, as MPs began another long debate about Brexit, a succession of backbenchers stood on their hind legs and, even while saying that they ‘respect the result of the referendum’, made plain that they hated the prospect of Brexit very, very much.

Tory MP Dominic Grieve, an archetypal lawyer, called the result an act of ‘national self-mutilation’.

 

Tony Blair has been among those to have placed themselves in direct antagonism to the electorate

Mr Grieve (a member of the Legion d’Honneur, entre nous) is a reserved, eloquent man. He speaks with the arid authority of a legal textbook. He is no tub-thumper. His lurid expression ‘national self-mutilation’ therefore jarred. It was not the natural language of so punctilious a scrivener. Maybe that rare departure from legalistic writ told us something.

Anyone who watches parliamentary proceedings will know that Brexit is being vigorously opposed by the likes of Labour’s Ben Bradshaw, Hilary Benn, Chris Bryant and Sir Keir Starmer. On the Lib Dem benches, there is Sir Vince Cable and Sir Ed Davey (how they love knighthoods in the Europhile camp!).

The Scots Nationalist clan is agin Brexit, while on the Conservative benches the most prominent Remainers, apart from Mr Grieve, include Anna Soubry, Kenneth Clarke, Nicky Morgan, and one Antoinette Sandbach. Oh yes, and a chap called Bob Neill, Muttley to Mr Grieve’s Dick Dastardly.

I have known some of them for years and, despite my rule about keeping a social distance from politicians, have a soft spot for at least five of those just mentioned.

I was therefore appalled to hear Miss Soubry state in the Commons that she had allegedly received death threats after a newspaper front page yesterday printed photographs of Tory ‘Brexit mutineers’.

 

Tory MP Dominic Grieve, an archetypal lawyer, called the result an act of ‘national self-mutilation’

No one, no matter how strongly he or she feels about the EU, should replace disagreement with violence. That goes for those who threaten Miss Soubry just as much as it does for those who have tried to intimidate Nigel Farage.

Westminster would be intolerable if MPs always obeyed their party whips. Indeed, any demand that Tory MPs support Mrs May in each and every vote is to be resisted.

The 18th century’s Edmund Burke established the principle that MPs may follow their consciences rather than being merely servants of their constituents. They are representatives, not delegates.

Yet that Burkean idea does not quite apply in the case of Brexit, for the EU referendum was not a parliamentary election. It was extra-parliamentary, ultra-parliamentary, in that it went beyond and above the Commons.

 

Anna Soubry has been one of the loudest anti-Brexit voices in the Commons, despite her constituents voting for it

It was set up to be just that — with the referendum having been established by Parliament. This was a rare, direct democratic instruction to our MPs from the populace.

Indignation

Europhile Tory rebels will argue — and they have the right to do so — that they simply want stronger economic ties with the EU after Brexit. But is that their only motive?

This week’s debate suggested other forces — vanity and personal pique, and mulishness and hunger for attention — may also have been in play. I sensed some MPs were driven as much by indignation as patriotism.

After the Government made concessions the Europhiles turned round and suddenly said those measures were unimportant and further concessions were needed.

Oh, come off it, guys. Were you serious in the first place or are you merely determined to be difficult?

Miss Soubry, in some ways admirably feisty, said she deplored the lack of ‘tolerance’ in the Brexit squabbles. Yet 24 hours earlier she kept heckling pro-Leave MPs. When Tory Brexiteer Bernard Jenkin was speaking, she hissed: ‘Oh move on, for God’s sake!’ at him.

By reporting that, am I whipping up mob violence against my friend Anna? No. I’m afraid to some extent she must reap as she sows.

Mr Grieve said Brexiteers were being ‘disingenuous’ (a posh word for ‘lying’) and should demonstrate ‘a bit more honesty and clarity’. But is that not also true of the Remainers? Is it not the case that some (or many) of them want Brexit to fail because that will be the only way, after so many wild warnings of pending apocalypse, that Remainers could save face?

 

Nick Clegg was among a select group of Europhiles who went to Brussels for talks with the European Commission

Peril

They are terrified that their caterwauling will be found out and that they are losing their grip on the Establishment.

Last month, Mr Clegg, with Ken Clarke and Labour’s Lord Adonis, went to Brussels for talks with the European Commission. To some of us, I regret to say, that looked very rum. Here were three Remainers trotting off to our ‘enemy’ (as Chancellor Philip Hammond has called the EC).

Were Clegg and Co giving intelligence to our country’s opponents at a time of national peril? In previous centuries, such behaviour might have led to accusations of treason.

This brings us back to the question: what should we call the more militant Remainers on the Tory side?

 

Their actions weaken Theresa May. Some faint-hearts even think Mrs May could be toppled by their manoeuvrings. That could lead to a Jeremy Corbyn Government

Their actions weaken Theresa May. Some faint-hearts even think Mrs May could be toppled by their manoeuvrings. That could lead to a Jeremy Corbyn Government.

At what point do these alleged Conservatives pause to wonder if Europhilia might not be the most important thing in politics? For, to usher in the hard socialism of Mr Corbyn would be an act of madness. It would be an act of fanaticism.

You could even call it an act of ‘self-mutilation’, done less out of high-minded internationalism than petty-minded vanity. No name-calling can quite describe the stupidity of that.

 

Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5087523/QUENTIN-LETTS-calling-not-bad-Corbyn-No-10.html#ixzz4ygTDoWQZ
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

 

 

H.F.1383

Previous Speaker of the House of Commons-1976-83

 supports our Ancient Constitution

  

The following letter was sent to This England by the late Viscount Tonypandy (Mr George Thomas) Speaker of the House of Commons

 

Sir: Since I retired from the Speaker’s chair in the House of Commons in 1983, I have strictly adhered to our parliamentary tradition, which prevents former Speakers from being embroiled in party political controversies.

 

It is because I am convinced that the question of our national sovereignty towers above all that I feel free to submit this address to the electors of Britain.

 

Our Westminster Parliament is in danger of being denuded of its responsibilities, and of being supplanted by European assembly controlled by a hotchpotch of European politicians and bureaucrats, who have no love for this country. Our national destiny will be subject to foreign control.

 

In our British heritage a special place of honour is reserved for Pym and Hampden, who so courageously fought for the rights of our Parliament against the claims of absolutism by the Crown. Their portraits hang in pride in Speaker’s House, along with that of Speaker Lenthall who defended Parliament’s independence when it was challenged by Charles 1

 

Other parliamentary giants have followed in their wake. Names such as Palmerston and Pitt, Gladstone, Disraeli, Asquith, Lloyd George, Churchill, Attlee, and the like, shine in our history as fierce defenders of self-government by the British people.

 

They should be living in this hour, for we need support to protect our national interests from being subject to foreign control.

 

 No political party in Britain has a mandate from the electorate to surrender our national sovereignty to foreign hands.

 

The current slide towards a single European currency threatens both our economic and our political independence, and thus our sovereignty. Subterfuge and half-truths have been used to persuade the nation that neither our sovereignty nor our relationship with the Commonwealth is endangered.

 

There appears to be a conspiracy of silence about the fact that the United Kingdom’s trade and oversees investments are still much greater with countries outside the European Union than they are with those within the Union, which is itself increasingly a puppet of a French and German alliance.

 

It is not too late for us to save our sovereignty

 

For more than 600 years Speakers of the House of Commons have fiercely defended the supremacy of the Westminster Parliament. As one whose privilege it was to follow humbly in the steps of the mighty Speakers of the past, I call upon our nation to awake, and to demand that the voice of all our people shall be heard before the next inter-governmental conference takes irrevocable decisions affecting our sovereignty.

 

A national Referendum conducted before, and not after, further decisions are taken is our democratic right.

 

This is the only sure way to prevent our parliamentary sovereignty, our judicial system and our Commonwealth relationships from being grievously undermined.

 

*          *          *

 

We believe that Lord Tonypandy would support our cause at this momentous time for our nation when the people will at last have their say after they have been honestly given the true facts of the dangers to the Constitution, Freedom and Independence of our Country.

2004

*

AFTER 46 YEARS WITHIN THE CONTROL OF THE BEAST IN BRUSSELS AND BERLIN .

OUR HISTORIC  ENGLISH SEA HIGHWAYS GIVEN AWAY BY THE TRAITOROUS EDWARD HEATH WILL BE RETURNED IN MARCH 2019.

'Ye mariners of England/that guard our native seas/Whose flag has braved a thousand years/The battle and the breeze'.

Thomas Campbell.(1777-1844) Ye Mariners of England

In September 1654 Cromwell summoned his first Parliament. The Speaker was  William Lenthall the greatest and most respected holder of that HIGH OFFICE during the English Civil War.

The Lord Protector said

"the main object in calling Parliament was that

"the ship of the commonwealth may be brought into a safe harbour."

 [Is not this our aim in our day?]

 
 [LETTER]

For the Honourable William Lenthall, Speaker of the Commons

House of Parliament: these,

Sir                                      Harborough, 14th June, 1645           

Being commanded by you to this service, I think myself bound to acquaint you with the good hand of God towards you and us.

We marched yesterday after the King, who went before us from Daventry to Harborough; and quartered about six miles from him.  This day we marched before him.  He drew out to meet us; both Armies engaged.  We, after three hours fight very doubtful, at last routed his Army; killed and took about 5000,-very many officers, but of what quality we yet know not.   We took also about 200 carriages, all he had; and all his guns, being 12 in number, whereof two were demi-cannon, two demi-culverins, and I think the rest sackers.  We pursued the Enemy from three miles short of Harborough to nine beyond, even to the sight of Leicester, whither the King fled.

Sir, this is none other but the hand of God; and to Him alone belongs the glory, wherein none are to share with Him.  The General served you with all faithfulness and honour: and the best commendation I can give him is, That I daresay he attributed all to God, and would rather perish than assume to himself. Which is an honest and a thriving way:-and yet as much for bravery may be given to him, in this action.  Sir, they are trusty; I beseech you, in the name of God, not to discourage them. I wish this action may beget thankfulness and humility in all that are concerned in it.  He that ventures his life for liberty of his country, I wish he trust God for the liberty of his conscience, and you for the liberty he fights for.  In this he rests, who is

Your most humble servant,

OLIVER CROMWELL

*

[Page 171-PART II FIRST CIVIL WAR-14th June 1645-LETTERSXXiX., NASEBY-OLIVER CROMWELL'S LETTERS AND SPEECHES by THOMAS CARLYLE-1888 ]

 

Is not this the wish of the majority in England in our day with regard to

BREXIT?

The dangerous and ironical situation we have faced in our day could have been avoided if Cromwell's "Fundamentals of the Constitution" -had been protected in law after the Civil War. There  are certain protected articles within

 Magna Carta.

What a previous Speaker of the House of Commons stated about the PROTECTION of the CONSTITUTION in the 1980's

 

The English People

 were betrayed by

 Parliament and the Monarchy.

TREASON

 

*

AND

ENGLAND'S

GREAT ESCAPE

 FROM

HITLER'S  FOURTH REICH

See also: eutruth.org.uk-Why we are leaving!-if you need a reminder?

*

AUGUST 21-2017

H.F.1285/1-BREXIT MEANS BREXIT!

 

[AT LONG! LONG! LAST!

- WE LEAVE

THE

CORRUPT-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC-GODLESS EU

 IN MARCH 2019.]

*

DAILY MAIL

-At last, Hammond's on board with

BREXIT

and the

REMOANERS are DEAD and BURIED

LEAVING THE EU

 IN

MARCH,2019

 

 

THE

DOMINIC

LAWSON

Column

 

 

Full article


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4787508/At-Hammond-s-board-Brexit.html#ixzz4pkbL1fqi
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*

[15 MONTHS

TO REGAIN OUR ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND.]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

AUGUST 14, 2017

H.F.1281 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

 
 

 

[IT HAD TO HAPPEN!

-'WE ARE AFTER ALL AN INSULAR  ISLAND PEOPLE']

 

*

 

Even Remainers now back a

'hard' Brexit:

 Most Brits ... - Daily Mail

 

. Even Remainers now back a 'hard' Brexit: Most Brits want to regain full control ...
By Claire Ellicott for the Daily Mail and Kate Ferguson For Mailonline ... a straight
choice between that and no deal, with 58 per cent backing it.

 

Most Brits want to regain full control of our borders and to become free of meddling EU judges, survey reveals

  • Most polled want the UK to become free of EU judges and full border control 

  • Two thirds said they would prefer 'no deal' rather than a soft Brexit, poll found

  • Findings boost for Theresa May who says no deal is better than a bad deal

Most Remain voters now back a Brexit that gives Britain a clean break from the EU and control back of our borders, a major study has found.

Many of those who voted to stay in the European Union also now believe the country should only pay a small ‘divorce bill’ and stop EU judges ruling over the UK.

The results are a major boost for Theresa May’s Brexit stategy - and suggest diehard Remainers, such as Liberal Democrat leader Sir Vince Cable and former prime minister Tony Blair, have overestimated support for backtracking on Brexit. 

Full artical


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4782712/Most-Brits-hard-Brexit-new-survey-finds.html#ixzz4pXWhGZDU
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*

 

 FREEDOM!

 

.'..We cannot, I fear, falsify the pedigree of the fierce people, and persuade them that they are not sprung from a nation in whose veins the blood of freedom circulates.  The language in which they would hear you tell them this tale would detect the imposition; your speech would betray you

'An Englishman is the unfittest person on earth, to argue another Englishman into slavery'.

*

EDMUND BURKE

 

Conciliation with America-speech House of Commons

March 22,1775

 

*

1+2+3

+4+5+6+7+8+9+10

Soul of England

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

AUGUST 12-2017

H.F.1277 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

 
 
WHERE'S THEIR SENSE OF DUTY?

 

NNot since WW2 has there been a greater need for politicians to pull together. Fat chance when they're so lacking in PUBLIC SPIRIT says

Daily Mail: 2017-07-11 - WHERE'S THEIR SENSE OF DUTY?

 

 

WHATEVER you think of our vote to leave the EU there is no doubt that we face some of the most critical months in our nation's modern history.

Most observers, whether Leavers or Remainers, agree that extricating ourselves from

BRUSSELS

and charting a newly

INDEPENDENT COURSE

will be

A COLOSSAL CHALLENGE,

YOU MAY HAVE  HOPED, THEREFORE , THAT OUR NATION'S POLITICIANS WOULD HAVE RISEN TO THE MOMENT, PUTTING ASIDE PETTY DIFFERENCES AND COMING TOGETHER IN THE

NATIONAL INTEREST.

What better sign that we are all

PATRIOTS.

and that, like our forefathers,

WE STAND OR FALL AS ONE

UNITED KINGDOM?...

[TO BE CONTINUED]

JULY 11-2017

 

 

 

H.F.1252 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

 
 

[There is a well-known phrase:

'People's are not evil ONLY individuals are evil.'

We have no hatred for the Israeli people  of whom many of them at home and abroad in the USA and around the world hate ZIONISM and its brutal and destructive agenda. It thrives on WAR and EXPLOITATION and they are pushing ahead for a WAR against IRAN.

Unfortunately for the English people their traitorous PRIME MINISTER DAVID CAMERON and many others in WESTMINSTER and in the country are the very SERVANTS of that hateful dogma which is leading towards a ONE-WORLD CORPORATISM/GOVERNMENT which apart from an ELITE and SLAVES there will be no place on PLANET EARTH for the majority of MANKIND.   As we have already mentioned about the SURPRISE ATTACK by ATTACK HELICOPTERS accompanied by a POLICE HELICOPTER on our property during the recent  PARLIAMENTARY RECESS.   WE understand that the FOREIGN Minister and BILDERBERGER William Hague is responsible for the Security Service MI6 and GCHQ -  possibly he could explain why the intrusive and noisy operation took place above a quiet country village at NOON on a Sunday.    Now we know why we received those visitors possibly from a USA BASE in the UK.  The WAR in LIBYA was but a stepping stone to the remaining non-ROTHCHILD CENTRAL BANKS countries who will fall in the very near future.       We have been WARNING for a few years for you to NOT!  vote for  the BILDERBERGERS the SERVANTS of the ILLUMINATI/ZIONISM who CONTROL the GOVERNMENT and so-called OPPOSITION parties at WESTMINSTER and  have no love for NATION STATES particularly those such as ENGLAND who still has some FREEDOM but that is now under THREAT as witnessed by the introduction of the CONTINENTAL SYSTEM of Corpus Juris into our

JewsnotZionists

*

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-/

David-Cameron-doesnt-understand-Conservative-party.

[Well we are sure the majority of the population must feel the same way.  NO SUBSTANCE!-NO CONSERVATIVE and certainly NO STATESMAN but PR THROUGH AND THROUGH, and apart from a few politicians deserving such a term over the past 100 years the pick since the Second World War brings us but a few which are too obvious for us to note . We have to look to the Victorian Age to compare how so much that is now wrong with our society:

'Between 1871 and 1875 our birth-rate reached its highest point, round about 35 per thousand, and the United Kingdom population, which had been 27 million in 1851, rose in the next thirty years to nearly 35 millions.   In much the same period they invested over £1000 million overseas, while 2.[5] million British subjects migrated to the British Colonies and the United States.   The tonnage cleared in our ports grew from less than 15 millions to nearly 60 , almost one-third of the world's sea-going ships were British.   In 1850 exports were valued at £197millions but at £297 millions in 1874, imports rising even more from £100 millions to £370 millions , while at the last date the total foreign trade of Britain and her Colonies equalled that of France, Germany, Italy, and the United States all rolled together.   Except for the Crimea, ,the country was engaged in no major war .  Much that had been tentative  in the Empire of 1850 was made solid; Canada was confederated, Australian self-government determined, in India the mutiny was suppressed and government transferred to the Crown.   Memorable things were done for the life  of the mother State.   Universities were opened and reformed, the modern civil service created, education made universal, the parliamentary electorate doubled, the courts of law modenized, trade unions given their full status, and the position of women revolutionized.  As for the achievements of the spirit, in the years between Wordsworth death in 1850 and Carlyle's in 1881, a  great body of immortal British literature and thought was made:  by Tennyson, Browning, and Ruskin; Dickens, Thackery , and George Elliot; Newman and Mathew Arnold;  Macauly,  Mill, and T. H .Green, Darwin, Huxley , and Tyndall; Bagehot, Henry Maine, and Herbert Spencer; J. R .Green, [Lord} Acton and Froude; Meridith, Thomas Hardy, and William Morris; Westcott, Lightfoot, and Martineau; Clerk Maxwell and F.H.Bradley.'

-A HISTORY OF ENGLAND-by Keith Feiling-1948

[As many more people are now aware that since the 50's secret meetings of the BILDERBERGERS in the BILDERBERGER HOTEL in the Netherlands began with the aim of the destruction of the nation state to be replaced by a ONE-WORLD/CORPORATION/GOVERNMENT. It is no coincidence that the main-players on the political scene in England are these same traitors who meet in secret to discuss their satanic plans while attempting to be representatives of the people . As we have mentioned so many times how can these same individuals serve two masters-either the PEOPLE or the ILLUMINATI not BOTH.  But as shown above the PRESS and MEDIA in the main refuse to highlight this destructive subversive and traitorous element in our PARLIAMENT and the population at large appears not to be interested that their country is now ruled SERVANTS of a FOREIGN POWER.]

CLICKStartpage

http://www.prisonplanet.com/

real-tough-men-in-america-and-israel-are-against

-an-attack-on-iran.

2011

H.F1233

JEWS  AGAINST ZIONISM -WHAT IS ZIONISM ?

 -THE GREATEST THREAT TO WORLD PEACE  

 

http://search.news.yahoo.com/search/news?p=Zionist&n=50

ZIONISM VERSUS BOLSHEVISM

-A struggle for the soul of the Jewish People by the Rt.Hon. Winston S. Churchill-written in 1920

*

"There is no need to exaggerate the part played in the creation of Bolshevism and in the actual bringing about of the Russian Revolution by these international and for the most part atheistical Jews."

( Winston Churchill, Illustrated Sunday Herald, Feb. 8, 1920)+(1)

FIND OUT WHAT IS IN STORE FOR THE FREEDOM - LOVING PEOPLE OF AMERICA

http://www.martiallawsurvival.com/

IT COULD HAPPEN TO

YOU

 

WIKILEAKS IS PROPAGANDA - ZIONIST CONSPIRACY/

 
Startpage

WHY ISRAEL IS MOST IMPORTANT TO THE RULERS OF THE USA

 

 

Israelis Largely Support Calls

for Palestinian State, Say Protesters

'On the day before Mahmoud Abbas was expected to launch his bid for a Palestinian state, guide Amir Rimon 28, was lecturing a group of young soldiers under one of Rothschild's broad ficus trees.

"We come [here] to remind ourselves of the values on which our state was founded," he said. The Declaration of Independence, read by David Ben-Gurion 63 years ago, said Palestinians would be equals in the fledgling country.

"I think we need to recognise a Palestinian state. Many of the soldiers agree with me – it's 50-50," Rimon added. A recent poll conducted by the Hebrew University found that 70% of Israelis believe that if the UN votes in favour of a Palestinian state, Israel should accept the decision. This is not the position of the Israeli government.'

Read more: Israelis Largely Support Calls for Palestinian State, Say Protesters

 

 

SHOULD+THE+POLITICAL+TERM

+ZION

+ HAVE +BEEN+USED+AS+AN

+EMBLEM

+IN+THE

+2012

+OLYMPIC+GAMES?

*

David Icke - The Zion MainFrame

 *

5-facts-that-prove-radical-islam-is-a-child-of-american-british-israeli-intelligence.html

JEWISH CONSPIRACY IS BRITISH IMPERIALISM

*

Click here for the Neturei Karta official website.

A ZIONIST PLOT

http://www.zimoz.co.uk/

news/headlines/atlantic-bridge-liam-fox-adam-werritty-israel/

A SO-CALLED CHARITY FOUNDATION SHOWN TO BE BOGUS.

The Illustrated Protocols Of Zion  81

More!

*

Wandering Who

 

     

Endorsements:

Gilad Atzmon has written an absorbing and moving account of his journey from hard core Israeli nationalist to a de-Zionized patriot of humanity and passionate advocate of justice for the Palestinian people. It is a transformative story told with unflinching integrity that all (especially Jews) who care about real peace, as well as their own identity, should not only read, but reflect upon and discuss widely.’

Professor Richard Falk, Albert G. Milbank Professor of International Law Emeritus, Princeton University, author of over 20 books, and UN Special Rapporteur for Occupied Palestinian Territories.

***
 

Gilad Atzmon has written a fascinating and provocative book on Jewish identity in the modern world. He shows how assimilation and liberalism are making it increasingly difficult for Jews in the Diaspora to maintain a powerful sense of their 'Jewishness.' Panicked Jewish leaders, he argues, have turned to Zionism (blind loyalty to Israel) and scaremongering (the threat of another Holocaust) to keep the tribe united and distinct from the surrounding goyim. As Atzmon’s own case demonstrates, this strategy is not working and is causing many Jews great anguish. The Wandering Who? should be widely read by Jews and non-Jews alike.’

John J. Mearsheimer is the R. Wendell Harrison Distinguished Service Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago

OCTOBER-2011

*

 

PATRIOTIC JEW

 EXPOSES

THE TREACHERY

OF

WORLD ZIONISM

2011

 

H F 167

Brexit and Jewish Oligarchy

Goldman Sachs, George Soros are not part of the Brussels Government

 
 

By Gilad Atzmon

Yesterday Britain voted to leave the EU. The causes of this result have been known for a while. More than half of the Brits are dismayed by the level of immigration, multiculturalism, lack of job opportunities, global capitalism, evaporation of manufacturing and a housing bubble that leaves most young Brits without the prospect of a decent future.

The Brexit was an outlet for these legitimate frustrations. Yet the problematic symptoms listed above have little to do with the EU or Brussels. Their root cause lies elsewhere.

Immigration and multiculturalism (that is; the ideology designed to suppress expression of chauvinism) are integral to cultural Marxist ideology. Britain, like the rest of the West, has been subject to an invasive and brutal paradigm designed to vitiate the working class.

Flooding Britain with immigration was a conscious political act pushed by the Jewish left and the Jewish lobby. This is explainable. Jews have good reason to be fearful of the working classes. Historically, it has been the working classes that turned against the Jews. Breaking society into fragmented and diverse segments is transparently a Jewish left interest. When a society is broken into a manifold of tribes and identities, the Jews become merely one tribe amongst many.

I am an immigrant myself and not an anti immigration campaigner. However, at a certain stage in the early 2000s my eight piece Orient House Ensemble consisted of seven immigrants and one native Brit. We were Israelis, a Palestinian, a Romanian and a Moldovan. At the time our ensemble won every British musical award. We were a favourite of the BBC and the Guardian’s album of the year. We were heroes of multiculturalism and the symbol of a new ‘tolerant’ British society. The British Council sent us around the globe to promote those ideals. This didn’t last long. I quickly grasped the underlying agenda. As those who know me may expect, I didn’t keep my mouth shut.

Yesterday the Brits voted against immigration. But leaving the EU may not be the answer for their plight. Looking into the elements and ideologies that planted pro-immigration policies and multiculturalism may be the ultimate way forward.

brexit

 

The demography of the referendum suggests that it is primarily the British working people who want to leave the EU. In the last four decades they have watched manufacturing dying out. They saw an economic bubble that left many of them impoverished and off the property ladder. But it wasn’t really the EU that caused all of it and leaving the EU may not improve things. Milton Friedman, who taught ‘free market’ philosophy to Margaret Thatcher, never lived in Brussels. Friedman believed in the service economy. He also believed that capitalism wasn’t just a great idea, it was also

very good for the Jews.  Goldman Sachs, George Soros and others who fecklessly destroy one country after another are also not part of the Brussels Government. The British vote was actually a vote against Goldman Sachs, Soros, Friedman and cultural Marxism, but most of them do not know it yet.

Yesterday the Brits proved, once again, that they are a brave people. They made a decision that they understood could inflict some serious difficulties on their society. Knowing that, they marched into the Brexit with pride and I admire their courage.  The Brits voted against immigration, banksters, the global economy, the City and the two parties that have facilitated this disaster for decades.  However, the Brits failed to attack the root cause of the problem.  Leaving the EU is not going to emancipate them. For Jewish oligarchy, the Brexit is a red alert. ‘Hands off’ would be the most clever strategy. Can they follow this humble advice? I doubt it.

Most British Jews have little to do with it. Liam Fox and Michael Gove who were amongst the leaders of the call to leave, are notorious for being dedicated servants of the Jewish lobbies. The Jewish press was pretty quiet on the Brexit.

And

crucially, if British Jews had identified that the call to leave the EU was somehow related to Jewish power, Jewish Banking or Jewish Left pro immigration we would have seen the rapid formation of a

“Jews for Brexit campaign.”

This is what Jews do when they detect dissent to their political power, they immediately form the bodies that control the opposition.

 

#Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedinmail

 

Related Posts:

*

[HIGHLIGHTING-CAPS ETC- ARE OURS]

JULY 23-2016

 

H.F.932 FREEDOM NOW

 

ENGLAND MATTERS

  ENGLAND'S DAY-23RD APRIL-ENGLAND'S DAY
  Understanding Easter- a part of our Christian cultural force which has made us what we are.
   Our Christian Festival of Easter which many know so little and some none.
  CHRISTIANITY IS MORE THAN A RELIGION
  THE INDIVIDUAL IS THE BACKBONE OF CHRISTIANITY
  WHY WE MUST REMAIN A CHRISTIAN COUNTRY
 

English Constitution, by it they lived, for it they died

 

How Two Patriots died while in the service of their country - Part 1

 

 How Two Patriots died while in the service of their country - Part 2

 

 How Two Patriots died while in the service of their country - Part 3

 

How Two Patriots died while in the service of their country - Part 4

 

 How Two Patriots died while in the service of their country - Part 5

 

The Lives and Reputation of our Ancient Island’s Defenders of Freedom now at greater Risk - Part 1

 

The Lives and Reputation of our Ancient Island’s Defenders of Freedom now at greater Risk - Part 2

 

The Lives and Reputation of our Ancient Island’s Defenders of Freedom now at greater Risk - Part 3

 

Christianity, The People, and Ethics - Part 1

 

Christianity, The People, and Ethics - Part 2

 

Alfred –Christian King of the English - Part 1

 

Alfred -Christian King of the English - Part 2

 

 Our way forward to Kinship in Liberty

 

A Defence of Christianity by a once militant agnostic - Part 1.

 

 Dangers of a supreme parliament.

 

 Who CARES about MORALITY?

 

A Christian Parliamentarian speaks on a range of issues - Part 1.

 

A Christian Parliamentarian speaks on a range of issues - Part 2.

 

 A Christian Parliamentarian speaks on a range of issues - Part 3.

 

A Christian Parliamentarian speaks on a range of issues - Part 4.

 

 A Christian Parliamentarian speaks on a range of issues - Part 5.

 

Freedom of Speech-A Freedom, which cannot be abused - is not worth having.

 

Our Past is embedded in our national consciousness-It asks were we came from and who we are.

 

An Englishman’s checklist to how Pro-EU faction in ALL Parties is overturning our Ancient Constitution.

 

Blairland has almost destroyed the Family Values in its quest for supposed Equality.

 

Two loving parents are more important than good teachers.

 

Celebrate 700 years of Constitutional Development in 2007- from Edward 1 the English Justinian.

 

IMMIGRATION-THE BETRAYAL OF BRICK LANE BY MULTICULTURALISM INSTEAD OF INTEGRATION

 

 The Common Law Of England -Its Heritage and Importance to Parliamentary Democracy Today.

 

Home Rule For Scotland WHY NOT Home Rule For ENGLAND

 

NOR SHALL MY SWORD - THE REINVENTION OF ENGLAND

 

Robocop or Dixon of Dock Green -Millions of Pensioners will choose the latter. The true eyes and ears and friend of the Community.

 

THOUGHTS ON ST. GEORGE's DAY-FREEDOM

 

THE ENEMY EVERYWHERE

 

THOUSANDS OF ENGLISH/BRITISH CITIZENS
REJECTING EU CITIZENSHIP-
WHY DON'T YOU?

 

Free trade agreement.s are the future of world trade

 

THE VEIL – THE CROSS –A VITAL DEBATE over the HEART and SOUL of OUR NATION.

 

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

INTRODUCTION

HOW IT ALL BEGAN 

HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER

THE RESULTANT LUNACIES

HOW WE ARE CONTROLLED

WHERE FREEDOM IS VANISHING

 

ENGLAND'S PLACE IN THE UNION

 

THE MAKING OF LONDONISTAN

 
 

ENGLAND A MONOCULTURE - TOLERANT-A CLEAR IDENTITY-A OLD COUNTRY-A SENSE OF CONTINUITY- -NOT MULTICULTURAL.

 

Commonwealth Realms v The Constitution for Europe-PT 1- 4

 

DECLARATION OF RESISTANCE

 

 Free Speech - Religious Opinion

 

NO WHERE ELSE flies the White Ensign on top of its tower but the village with the Nelson Touch - As we would EXPECT.

   
   
   
   

 

H.F.1244/2 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

 
 

 DAILY MAIL

-MARIO LEDWITH-

Brussels Correspondent

-EU PARLIAMENT

 'RIDICULOUS'...and proves why so many Britons were right to vote BREXIT.

JULY 5-2017

 

NOW

HE GETS IT!

Exasperated: Jean-Claude Juncker has the floor but only 30  out of 720 MEPS are there to hear him address EU parliament.

Mr Juncker continued: I will never again, I will never again attend a meeting of this kind.'

The remarks will once again draw attebntion to the generous perks enjoyed by the parliaments 720 MEP's including a tax-free $306 (£269) 'daily allowance' just for turning up...

To claim the fee MEPs only have to turn up for more than half the debates in a day

MEP's also earn a range of other benefits, including a £46,ooo 'general expenditure allowance' on top of their generous £89,000 annual salaries.

The monthly journey by MEPs and their huge entourages to Strasbourg from Brussels for a four-day sitting has been described as a 'travelling circus' and costs European taxpayers around £175million every year.

 

*

[Either GERMANY or BRITAIN [ENGLAND]

 are the top annual contributors to the EU BUDGET.

They will sorely miss us when we finally

 LEAVE.]

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

JULY 5-2017

H. F.1242 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

 PETER OBORNE

        ON POLITICS AND POWER

 Corbyn could be the surprise savior of

 BREXIT

News for Daily Mail-PETER  OBORNE-Corbyn could be surprise savior of

BREXIT

Although many Tory Brexiteers detect a conspiracy between Corbyn and
Brussels bigwigs to undermine Mrs May, PETER OBORNE believes... 

JULY 8-2017

Brexiteers are incandescent that Jeremy Corbyn is due to hold talks next week in Brussels with the EU’s trade negotiator Michel Barnier.

They are convinced that despite voting in the Commons to trigger Article 50 to begin Britain’s withdrawal from the EU, the Labour leader secretly wishes to sabotage Brexit.

The argument runs that, by following this course, he hopes to destroy Theresa May’s government and move into No 10 himself.

It’s Monsieur Barnier, of course, a former French government minister, who is a thorn in Mrs May’s side, having preposterously proclaimed that Britain will have to pay a £50billion divorce settlement...

Jeremy Corbyn voted for Britain to leave what was then the Common Market in 1975. He then opposed the Maastricht Treaty that, 25 years ago, significantly extended the power of Brussels and laid the foundations for the EU becoming a superstate as it removed sovereign powers from individual member governments

Although many Tory Brexiteers detect a conspiracy between Corbyn and Brussels bigwigs to undermine Mrs May, I believe they have badly misread the intentions of the Labour leader.

But, as some in the Tory party traitorously plot against a gravely weakened PM amid irresponsible talk of possible successors and stalking-horses, the truth is that Corbyn could well make a vital contribution to the Brexit negotiations...

He is on record in recent months as having said the referendum result was ‘a clear vote’ and has stressed his determination to get a ‘good deal with Europe’.

Indeed, currently the most popular politician in Britain — with a YouGov/Times poll yesterday giving Labour an eight-point lead over the Conservatives — he feels he has an increasing amount of authority to ensure Brexit happens.

There is a bigger irony here. In last month’s General Election, thousands of Remainers voted for Labour in the hope that if elected PM, Corbyn might overturn the referendum result or instigate a second vote.

The fact is that, at heart, Corbyn is much more critical of the EU than Theresa May — or many other members of the Cabinet...

 

Full article



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4676706/Peter-Oborne-Jeremy-Corbyn-Brexit-saviour.html#ixzz4mEzRCUS5
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

JULY 8-2017

 

H.F.1247 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

 

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-June-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

BREXIT

BUT NOT OUT OF THE EU FOR 2/3 YEARS. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. ALL EU TREATIES WERE OBTAINED BY BRIBERY AND TREASON  AND FRAUD WHICH

UNDER THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES MAKES THEM.

NULL AND VOID.

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

JULY 23 FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2016

*

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW PART 1-2016SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW-2016

OCTOBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

NOVEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

DECEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

*

H.F.200A-FREEDOM NOW

 

PLEASE  NOTE: WE HAVE IN ADVANCE GIVEN BELOW THE BULLETIN FOR EACH MONTH FOR THE NEXT 30 MONTHS WHICH YOU CAN ENTER-IT WILL CONTAIN INFORMATION FROM OTHER MONTHS FROM THE PAST AND THAT AVAILABLE AT THE SPECIFIED TIME.  WE ARE MAKING THIS ARRANGEMENT AS WE ARE UNABLE TO GIVE AN EXIT DATE FROM THE EU. AS YOU ARE AWARE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE IN OCTOBER 2003 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING AVAILABLE INFORMATION WHICH WOULD BRING THE EXIT FROM THE EU AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. BUT NOW THAT BREXIT IS SOON TO BE ENACTED BY PARLIAMENT THE DAY OF OUR DELIVERANCE WILL SOON BE AT HAND AND THE RETURN OF OUR INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND TOGETHER WITH OUR NEIGHBOURING NATION STATES OF WALES-SCOTLAND AND NORTHERN ISLAND.

MAY GOD GRANT US A SPEEDY EXIT FROM THE SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC -MAMMOTH MONSTROSITY OF THE SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

 

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

 

 

 

The English People's

VoicE

WELCOME!

IMMIGRATION FILE

E U FILE

IRAQ/AFGHAN WAR

     9/11 AN INSIDE JOB

MAGNA CARTA

LONDON 7/7-AN INSIDE JOB

NAZI DVD

ENGLAND FILE

CRIMINAL EU

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

SAY NO TO EU

UNDERSTANDING EASTER

EURO MUST FAIL

ROTTEN HEART OF EU

SOUL OF ENGLAND

100 REASONS TO LEAVE EU

TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

MOST EVERYTHING WHICH IS PRECIOUS IN OUR CIVILISATION HAS COME FROM SMALL INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

 by LORD PETER SHORE.

 

A NATION STATE HAS BEEN REBORN

 

ON the momentous day Theresa May said Britain WILL quit the single market, she put Cameron's feeble negotiations to shame with an ultimatum to Brussels that the UK will 'walk away from a bad deal-and make the EU pay' 

  • STEEL OF THE NEW
  • IRON LADY
  • The PM is hopeful of an EU-UK trade deal because of mutual economic interests 
  • She said Europe not making a deal with Britian would be 'calamitous self-harm'
  • It was confirmed that we will be leaving the single market and customs union
  • But the EU's chief negotiator called her show of defiance counter-productive
  • Her speech was criticised by the Lib Dems as Labour fought on how to respond 
  • Sterling rose 2.8 per cent against the Dollar and 1.8 per cent against the Euro


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4130034/Theresa-s-Brexit-speech-puts-Cameron-shame.html#ixzz4W7pxZPm9
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Europe split over May's ...

https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-mail/20170118/281625305003771
Europe split over May's vision – but even Tusk calls it 'realistic'. Daily ... News -
From Mario Ledwith in Brussels and John Stevens in London.

 

*

POINT BY POINT, HER BLUEPRINT TO FREE BRITAIN FROM BRUSSELS
THERESA May delighted Eurosceptics yesterday with an ambitious road map for BREXIT. The PM extended the hand of friendship to the EU but threatened to walk away if BRUSSELS tried to impose a punitive deal. Jack DOYLE sets out her 12 objectives and analyses her chances of success.

1. CERTAINTY

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will provide certainty where we can. The same rules and laws will apply on the day after BREXIT, as they did before. And the Government will put the final deal to a vote in both houses of Parliament.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By keeping in place-at least initially-all EU laws, Mrs May will provide a degree of continuity and confidence for business. However, as she freely admits she cannot control the outcome of the negotiations. Parliament is highly likely to approve any deal because the alternative will be a chaotic BREXIT.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

2. OUR OWN LAWS

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will take back control of our laws and bring an end to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in Britain. Because we will not truly left the EU if we are not in control of our own laws

CAN SHE DELIVER

 Adopting the 'take back control' slogan of the Leave campaign, Mrs May repeated her promise to end rule by EU rule and judges in Luxembourg and restore power to Parliament and domestic courts. Without this there is no Brexit. A firm red line

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

3 A UNITED KINGDOM

 WHAT SHE SAID

A stronger Britain demands that we strengthen the precious union between the four nations of the UK.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By consulting devolved administrations, Mrs May is seeking to reassure voters in the nations of the UK which didn't vote for Brexit that she is listening to their concerns, and avoid Nicola Sturgeon calling for a second independence vote.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

4. THE IRISH BORDER

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE will work to deliver a practical solution that allows the maintenance of the Common Travel Area with the Republic, while protecting the integrity of the United Kingdom's immigration system.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Both countries want to maintain the open border between Northern Ireland and the Republic without opening a back door into Britain. Likely to mean UK border checks at Irish ports and airports.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

5. CONTROL OF IMMIGRATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

The message from the public before and during the referendum campaign was clear: BREXIT must mean control of the number of people who come to Britain from Europe. And that is what we will deliver

CAN SHE DELIVER

Ending free movement is a  RED LINE, but Mrs May left open when it will end, what system will replace it and details of any transition deal. The PM wants highly skilled EU migrants, doctors and nurses, but will she compromise on unskilled migrants to get a better trade deal

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

 6.  EU NATIONALS AND BRITISH EXPATS

 

WHAT SHE SAID

We  want to guarantee the right of EU citizens who are already living here in Britain, and the rights of British nationals in other member states, as early as we can.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Likely to agreed early on, as long as the EU doesn't want to haggle. Last year Mrs May offered to settle on the rights of three million EU nationals in the UK, and 1.2million Brits on the continent in advance of formals talks- but Angela Merkel refused.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*
7.WORKER'S RIGHTS

 WHAT SHE SAID

Not only will the government protect the rights of workers' set out in European legislation, we will build on them.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May is determined to at least preserve protections for workers on low and middle incomes-many of whom voted for BREXIT. Could come under threat if there is no deal., and Britain slashes taxes and regulation to attract business.

DEAL OR NO DEAL? 3/5

*

8. TRADE WITH EUROPE

WHAT SHE SAID

As a priority, we will pursue a bold and ambitious free trade agreement with the EU. This should allow for the freest possible trade in goods and services. But I want to make it clear. It cannot mean membership of the single market

CAN SHE DELIVER

The crux of the negotiation. Britain will leave the single market, and with it EU laws and free movement. Instead Mrs May wants a tariff-free trade and customs agreement to stop goods being held up at ports. She ruled out ' vast contributions' to the EU budget, and the only money going to Brussels will be for particular programmes and agencies like Europol. Her huge gamble is to threaten to walk away if the EU attempts to punish Britain

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

9. GLOBAL TRADE

 WHAT SHE SAID

A global Britain must be free to strike trade agreements with countries outside the EU too. But I also want tariff-free trade with Europe and cross-border trade there to be as frictionless as possible.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants deals with non-EU countries including the US. That would be impossible from inside the customs union, which imposes a uniform tariff on all non-EU countries. It would also make trade Secretary Liam Fox's job redundant.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 4/5

*

10. SCIENCE AND INNOVATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE have a proud history of leading and supporting cutting -edge research and innovation. So we will also welcome agreement to continue to collaborate with our European partners on major science, research, and technology initiatives.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Unlikely to be an obstacle to any deal. Much collaboration between academics takes place outside formal EU structures and will continue unimpeded.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

11. CRIME AND TERRORISM

 WHAT SHE SAID

All of us in Europe face the challenge of cross-border crime, a deadly terrorist threat, and the dangers presented by hostile states.  All of us share interests and values in common, values we want to see projected around the world.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Security and intelligence cooperation and defence cooperation cannot be a formal bargaining chip, but without making it one, Mrs May reminds EU allies of Britain's importance as an ally in fighting terrorism and important status as a military power.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

12.  A SMOOTH EXIT

 WHAT SHE SAID

It is in no one's interests for there to be a cliff-edge for business or a threat to stability as we change from our existing relationship to a new partnership with the European Union.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants tranitional arrangements to smooth the process of leaving the EU with specific deals on budget contributions, immigration, trade and customs lasting different periods of time. Securing this as well as securing a final deal within two years is a huge task.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

[THERE IS EVERY LIKELIHOOD THAT OTHER EU MEMBER STATES WILL BE GREATLY ENCOURAGED BY BREXIT TO LEAVE THAT SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION IN THE NEXT FEW YEARS WHICH SHOULD MAKE A NUMBER OF EU STATES TO CO-OPERATE FULLY WITH THE UK OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR UNFRIENDLY ATTITUDE AT A LATER DATE.

AS THE GREAT PRIME MINISTER - WILLIAM PITT -  (1759-1806) ANNOUNCED IN NOVEMBER 9-1805 SHORTLY AFTER  NELSON'S VICTORY OVER THE FRENCH AND SPANISH FLEETS AT TRAFALGAR.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

The blueprint of a Free and Prosperous United Kingdom should be the blueprint of a future Free Europe and the world at large. Our past still lives in the hearts of FREE PEOPLES everywhere and soon we will rejoin that sacred past which we left over 43 years ago because of traitorous politicians and others who couldn't see the dangers ,for the gross lies and deceit in their path.

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 18-2017

H.F.1092 BREXIT NOW

Brought-forward from August 2003

[THE WAY AHEAD TO RECLAIM OUR SACRED INHERITANCE.]

Faced with the possible imposition (illegally) of a E. U. Constitution this  article contemplating our own U.K. Constitution (English Constitution), is especially topical.

J. Bingley

Constitutional Principles of Power and Remedy.

The Constitution is specifically intended, indeed designed to limit the powers of the state with respect to the people. The Constitution sets a standard upon which the performance of governance may be measured and contested and to provide remedy if abused.

The whole constitution originates its authority from

COMMON LAW

Supremacy resides in the

LAW and PEOPLE

NOT THE

CROWN or PARLIAMENT.

It is a matter of constitutional principle and legal fact that,

THE LAW IS SUPREME

The rule of law is the antithesis of arbitrary power. Integral with this, is the system of jury trial. It places the power of law enforcement in the

HANDS of the PEOPLE.

This the most vital safeguard against DESPOTISM.

The English Constitution's function is to

PROTECT the

"RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

 of ENGLISHMEN".

These are the 'BIRTHRIGHT' of the PEOPLE'

[In 2016 one can see how successive governments have by gradualism watered down these rights with even attempts to replace jury trial by trial by judge only on the grounds of speed and saving resources. The people in the main have been, amiss in not being vigilant to the protection of THEIR CONSTITUTION. In just a few weeks on the 23 June,2016 they have a choice whether to vote to leave the EU and regain THEIR LAW-THEIR CONSTITUTION-THEIR FREE COUNTRY. or REMAIN in an ALIEN COLLECTIVIST AND CORRUPT UNDEMOCRATIC EU with NO PROTECTION of MAGNA CARTA of 1215 and BILL OF RIGHTS of 1688 and NO ENGLISHMAN'S ' RIGHTS and LIBERTIES' to be passed on to FUTURE GENERATIONS.]

The fundamental rights and liberties are listed in the preamble of the Coronation Oath Act of 1688 which declares that  the oath is taken for the purpose of

" Maintaining our spiritual and civil rights and properties"

It is a contract with the people which makes it the permanent duty of the CROWN, and the CROWN in both GOVERNMENT and PARLIAMENT.

This contracts the Monarch to govern only according to the STATUTE, COMMON LAW, and the CUSTOM and to 'CAUSE LAW and JUSTICE with MERCY to be used in all JUDGEMENTS'.

All power of governance is vested in the CROWN.

The two Houses of Parliament may upon their concurrence offer bills for ROYAL ASSENT.

A BILL is not ENACTED until it has been authorised by the SOVEREIGN POWER.

Whilst the enacting power (a royal prerogative) of Royal Assent is entirely vested with the monarch it is contracted ONLY TO BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.  This is a limitation and essential safeguard to protect the people from any over mighty governance  [such as Tony Blair's and Gordon Brown's NEW LABOUR and since DAVE'S PARTY]

 It was used  to defeat the Divine Right of Kings; a claim of absolute power by the Stuart monarchs.  The OATH ascertains the SUPREMACY of the LAW, not the supremacy of CROWN or of PARLIAMENT.

There is certainly no Divine Right of Politicians.

The Coronation contract is of the Crown owing allegiance to the Constitution. The PEOPLE give ALLEGIANCE to the CROWN.

Here is a system of mutual protection for there is a constitutional interdependence.

The MAGNA CARTA

made provision for the PEOPLE to use ANY MEANS including FORCE if the CROWN is found to be in BREACH.

[THE CROWN IS IN BREACH!]

THE RIGHT OF RESISTANCE IS THE ULTIMATE REMEDY...

That which constitutionally binds the Monarch is a restriction upon Her Majesty, Her Government and all Parliamentary power.  The Monarch may do no wrong, but should she refuse by her negative power( the right to withhold assent) to

'LET WRONG BE DONE.'

[Millions of patriots have been waiting over four decades for:-

'Right to be Done!']

Sir William Blackstone confirms this. Whilst the monarch accepts the advice of ministers, they must only advise to do that which COMPLIES with the CONSTITUTION.  Plainly NO MONARCH is FREE to ASSENT to ADVICE that CONFLICTS with the CONSTITUTION in FORCE.

There is no authority in Parliament to pass any power of governance in England to those who hold or owe no allegiance. [such as the EU]

 There is no constitutional authority for Parliament to deliberately breach the constitutional laws by new   conflicting enactment.

 There is a natural duty resulting from the logic of our constitutional law to debate and resolve conflicts, if necessary by prior repeal.

 We must put an end to this form of 'legal' abuse, particularly through the misapplication of party politics.

 Most but not all of our constitution is written:- the Magna Carta, the Petition of Rights, the Declaration of Rights, the Bill of Rights, the Act of Settlement and the Acts of Union etc. It has evolved over centuries with the expenditure of much blood. It has been abused and corrected many times. It was finally settled by the Glorious Revolution of 1688/9.

The Judicial function is to be the independent arbiter between party and party or party and government under the terms of our constitutional law.  The courts are bound to declare upon the constitutionality of an Act where it may prove to be an action of unconstitutional governance. The great examples of the Magna Carta, the Petition 1628, the Declaration & the Bill of Rights 1688/9 make this duty of the court utterly plain.

Judgement may only be given in accordance with the constraints of constitutional laws in force.  At all times the presumption of law and justice in mercy be upheld and used  in all judgements. This is the trust sand the pre-eminent public policy reposed in the judiciary.

The right of petition to the Monarch is an appeal direct to the source of power, the Monarch is under OATH and at LAW, bound to provide REMEDY. Where there are RIGHTS there are REMEDIES. Politicians and Parliament must abide by the terms of reference and DUTY to the CONSTITUTION.

A fixed and certain standard with protection and remedy are the true purpose of the Constitution.

WE MUST RECLAIM OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE RULE OF LAW FROM THE SUPPOSED DIVINE RIGHT OF OUR POLITICIANS.

John Bingley-AUGUST 2003

*

[We ask how did it come to pass that the JUDICIARY did not PROTECT the CONSTITUTION from the illegal actions of PARLIAMENT and the Crown with the disclosures in 2001 under the 30 year rule from the Public Record Office at

 KEW-LONDON

 which revealed the CONSPIRACY of the FOREIGN OFFICE to prevent the PEOPLE from hearing the TRUTH of their TREACHERY and BETRAYAL. Under the 1969 THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION on the  LAW of TREATIES  there are two key provisions which authorise a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice.

1. Where corruption has been demonstrated in respect of pro curing the treaty in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

". Where there has been a material change of circumstances. A material change of circumstances has surfaced into the daylight (September 2005), to begin with, following the death of

Edward Heath.

. It has been revealed that he was an agent of a foreign power (NAZI-GERMANY-since 1938), accepted corrupt payment for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them-and that he did all this on behalf of a foreign power which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation.

[Massive payouts were given to the signatories of the  EEC which in reality was in effect the road to the corrupt-collectivist-undemocratic

FEDERAL STATE of the EUROPEAN UNION.]

*

[THE QUEEN FAILED IN HER SOLEMN DUTY TO PROTECT HER PEOPLE AND THEIR UNIQUE WORLD RENOWNED FREE PARLIAMENTARY INHERITANCE

AND APART FROM SIGNING ILLEGALLY 6 EU TREATIES CONTRARY TO HER CORONATION OATH-IN 1998 SIGNED TONY BLAIR'S SECRET AMENDMENT BILL  FOR TREASON FROM THE DEATH PENALTY TO IMPRISONMENT FOR LIFE-OBVIOUSLY THEY BOTH HAD REASONS  FOR FEARING A FUTURE IMPEACHMENT BY PARLIAMENT.

 

More!

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS}

MAY 30-2016

H.F.800

 

 

 

 Daily Mail:

Jack Doyle-Executive Political Editor

2017-07-13

 - Islamist fund-raisers posing as charities.

MINISTERS were accused last night of suppressing details of how Saudi Arabia funds extremism in Britain.

Before the election, reports suggested that the Home Office review of funding for Islamist activity in the UK had been delayed to avoid embarrassing the Middle Eastern kingdom, a key strategic and economic ally.

Yesterday, s decision to publish only a brief summary of the report without naming any country sparked fury among opposition parties.

 [AND SO IT SHOULD, BECAUSE UNLESS THEY DEMAND THAT THE GOVERNMENT MUST REVEAL THE NAMES OF ALL CONCERNED AND THE AUTHORITIES TAKE IMMEDIATE ACTION TO ENSURE THAT THERE CAN BE NO FAVOURITES IN MATTERS OF THIS TYPE ,WHICH TO PUT IT BLUNTLY - IS A MATTER OF

TREASON!

IT APPEARS THAT BECAUSE SAUDI ARABIA IS A VALUED CUSTOMER THAT ITS SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITY IN OUR COUNTRY IS TOLERATED AND ITS INFLUENCE ENCOURAGED.

 KNOWINGLY. BEING AWARE OF THE DANGEROUS INFILTRATION OF OUR SOCIETY OF A FOREIGN  POWER AN ISLAMIC STATE WHO UNDER MIND THE LOYALTY AND  PREVENTS INTEGRATION OF MANY OF THOSE OF THE ISLAMIC FAITH IN ENGLAND.

 OVER THE PAST DECADES, MANY INTEGRATED AND INFORMED MUSLIM CLERICS  HAVE REQUESTED THE GOVERNMENT  TO TAKE A FIRM LINE  AND  THOSE THAT REFUSE TO INTEGRATE -

 MUST RETURN TO THEIR ISLAMIC HOMELAND. ]

 

Continued:  Liberal Democrat leader Tim Farron said: 'It seems like the Government, yet again, is putting our-so-called friendship with Saudi Arabia above our values.  This  shoddy decision is the latest in a long line where we have put

 PROFIT over PRINCIPLE

Shadow home secretary Diane Abbott said there was a 'strong suspicion' the report is being suppressed to protecttrade and diplomatic priorities, including in relation to

 SAUDI ARABIA'.

Saudi cash has been linked to

EXTREMIST MOSQUES AND ISLAMIC SCHOOLS AND MADRASSAS.

.*  *  *

See also:

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-07-13 - Islamist fund-raisers posing as charities...

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS OUR OURS!]

JULY 13-2017

 

H.F.1254 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER

 

 

REFERENCE ONLY

 

 

  • German Chancellor Angela Merkel's refugee policy was not a masterpiece of humanitarian politics; it was dictated by the fear of television images spread all over the world.

  • Even the suffering of our enemies disturbs us, in the humanitarian culture of the West. We are therefore increasingly amenable to policies of appeasement, censorship and retreat in order not to have to face the possibility of such horribleness and actually having to fight it. That is why radical Islam has been able to horrify the West into submission. We have paralyzed ourselves. We censor the cartoons, the graphic photos of the terrorists' victims and even the faces and names of the jihadists. The Islamic terrorists, on the other hand, are not publicity-seekers; they are soldiers ready to kill and die in the name of what they care about.

  • Images, as in Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib, are published only if they amplify the West's sense of guilt and turn the "war on terror" into something more even more dangerous than the jihad causing the war. The result is to erase our enemy from our imagination. This is how the "war on terror" has become synonymous with lawlessness throughout the West.

September 2015. Thousands of Syrian migrants crossing the Balkan route were heading toward Germany. Chancellor Angela Merkel was on the phone with Interior Minister Thomas de Maizière, talking about a number of measures to protect the borders, where thousands of policemen were secretly located along with buses and helicopters. De Maizière turned for advice to Dieter Romann, then head of the police. "Can we live with the images that will come out?" de Mazière asked. "What happens if 500 refugees with children in their arms run toward the border guards?"

De Maiziére was told that the appropriate use of the measures to be taken would have be decided by the police on the field. When de Maizière relayed Romann's response to the Chancellor, Merkel reversed her original commitment. And the borders were opened for 180 days.

"For historical reasons, the Chancellor feared images of armed German police confronting civilians on our borders," writes Robin Alexander, Die Welt's leading journalist, who revealed these details in a new book, Die Getriebenen ("The Driven Ones"). Alexander reveals the real reason that pushed Merkel to open the door to a million and a half migrants in a few weeks: "In the end, Merkel refused to take responsibility, governing through the polls." This is how the famous Merkel's motto "Wir schaffen das" was born: "We can do it."

According to Die Zeit:

"Merkel and her people are convinced that the marchers could only be stopped with the help of violence: with water cannons, truncheons and pepper spray. It would be chaotic and the images would be horrific. Merkel is extremely wary of such images and of their political impact, and she is convinced that Germany wouldn't tolerate them. Merkel once said that Germany wouldn't be able to stand the images from the dismal conditions in the refugee camp at Calais for more than three days. But how much more devastating would images be of refugees being beaten as they try to get to Austria or Germany?"

Merkel's refugee policy was not a masterpiece of humanitarian politics; it was dictated by the fear of television images spread all over the world. In so many key moments, it is the photograph that dictates our behavior: the image that dishonors us, that makes us cringe in horror.

 

German Chancellor Angela Merkel's refugee policy was not a masterpiece of humanitarian politics; it was dictated by the fear of television images spread all over the world. In so many key moments, it is the photograph that dictates our behavior: the image that dishonors us, that makes us cringe in horror. (Photo by Adam Berry/Getty Images)

 

Now, the main German sentiment that seems to be driving public opinion and politics is a dramatic sense of guilt. It is a "secular sin", according to a new book by German sociologist Rolf Peter Sieferle that is topping the German bestseller list, "Finis Germania".

The behavior of Germans during the current migrant crisis, however, is symbolic of a more general Western condition. On April 30, 1975, the fall of Saigon was part of a war fought and lost by the United States as much on television as in the Vietnamese forests and rice paddies. It ended with the the escape of helicopters from the rooftop of the US embassy.

In 1991, the imagery of the "highway of death" of Saddam Hussein's bombed army of thugs fleeing a plundered Kuwait also shocked the public in the West, and led to calls for an immediate cessation of the fighting in Iraq and Kuwait. The result was that Saddam Hussein's air force and Republican Guard divisions were spared; during the "peace" that followed, it was these troops who butchered Kurds and Shiites.

The photograph of a dead American soldier dragged through the streets of Mogadishu after the "Black Hawk Down" incident pushed President Bill Clinton to order a shameful retreat from Somalia. That photograph also led the US Administration to rethink and cancel plans to use US troops for United Nations peace operations in Bosnia, Haiti and other strategic points. General David Petraeus would describe America's engagement in Afghanistan as a "war of perception".

Even the suffering of our enemies disturbs us, in the humanitarian culture of the West. We are therefore increasingly amenable to policies of appeasement, censorship and retreat, in order not to have to face the possibility of such horribleness and actually having to fight it.

That is why radical Islam has been able to horrify the West into submission. We have paralysed ourselves. We censor the cartoons, the graphic photos of the terrorists' victims and even the faces and names of the jihadists. The Islamic terrorists, on the other hand, are not publicity-seekers; they are soldiers ready to die and kill in the name of what they care about.

This week, the German media was shocked by the revelation that the German air force will probably come under fire during its Syrian mission. "Endangering German soldiers!" -- with an exclamation point -- wrote Bild, the largest-selling newspaper in Germany. The statement exposed the anxiety of what John Vinocur of the Wall Street Journal called a "country where the army and air force basically do not fight". A pacifist Germany is now a source of trouble also for its own neighbors, such as Poland. "For centuries, our main worry in Poland was a very strong German army", said former Polish Defense Minister Janusz Onyszkiewicz. "Today, we're seriously worried about German armed forces that are too weak."

The Western establishment censors images of our enemies' crimes while giving prominence to our "guilt". The French government censored the "gruesome torture" of the victims at the Bataclan Theater, who were castrated, disemboweled and had their eyes gouged out by the Islamist terrorists. It was a mistake: it was in the public interest to know exactly what enemy we are facing.

The FBI and Department of Justice released a transcript of the Orlando jihadist's 911 call, but omitted all reference to the terror group ISIS and to Islam. These authorities did not want the public to know that Omar Mateen identified himself as an "Islamic soldier".

The European Commission against Racism and Intolerance then told the British press it should not report when terrorists are Muslim.

The CEO of Twitter, Dick Costolo, suspended accounts that showed photographs of the beheading of John Foley, along with other Islamist beheadings and savagery. But Twitter did not mind being flooded by images of a little dead boy, Alan (Aylan) Kurdi on a beach.

The mainstream media in the US fought hard to lift the photo ban on military coffins during the war in Iraq. Its goal, apparently, was to humiliate and intimidate the public, to lower the support for the war.

Images, as in Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib, are published only if they amplify the West's sense of guilt and turn the "war on terror" into something more even more dangerous than the jihad causing the war.

Amnesty International's Secretary General, Irene Khan -- referring to concentration camps in the Soviet Union, where millions of people perished -- infamously called Guantanamo "the Gulag of our time". The result is to erase our enemy from our imagination. This is how the "war on terror" has become synonymous with lawlessness throughout the West.

Ten years ago, after the brave surge in Iraq, US soldiers discovered Al Qaeda's torture chambers. No one -- not ABC, not CBS, not the New York Times -- published one photo of them; they just filled our eyes with naked bodies at Abu Ghraib.

We are utopian technophiles and, contrary to the traditional Western view that we are flawed human beings in a tragic world. We now believe in Mark Zuckerberg's brave new world where no one should ever suffer and everyone should be happy and peaceful all the time. That is an exorbitant dream. For a short time we can afford it, as with Angela Merkel and Europe's migrant crisis. Unfortunately, that fantasy will not last. The conflicts at our gates, together with our aversion to making hard choices, will exact a far higher price.

Giulio Meotti, Cultural Editor for Il Foglio, is an Italian journalist and author.

© 2017 Gatestone Institute. All rights reserved. The articles printed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Editors or of Gatestone Institute. No part of the Gatestone website or any of its contents may be reproduced, copied or modified, without the prior written consent of Gatestone Institute.

 

 

.H.F.700/1

 
 

 Daily Mail:

Jack Doyle-Executive Political Editor

2017-07-13

 - Islamist fund-raisers posing as charities.

MINISTERS were accused last night of suppressing details of how Saudi Arabia funds extremism in Britain.

Before the election, reports suggested that the Home Office review of funding for Islamist activity in the UK had been delayed to avoid embarrassing the Middle Eastern kingdom, a key strategic and economic ally.

Yesterday, s decision to publish only a brief summary of the report without naming any country sparked fury among opposition parties.

 [AND SO IT SHOULD, BECAUSE UNLESS THEY DEMAND THAT THE GOVERNMENT MUST REVEAL THE NAMES OF ALL CONCERNED AND THE AUTHORITIES TAKE IMMEDIATE ACTION TO ENSURE THAT THERE CAN BE NO FAVOURITES IN MATTERS OF THIS TYPE ,WHICH TO PUT IT BLUNTLY - IS A MATTER OF

TREASON!

IT APPEARS THAT BECAUSE SAUDI ARABIA IS A VALUED CUSTOMER THAT ITS SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITY IN OUR COUNTRY IS TOLERATED AND ITS INFLUENCE ENCOURAGED.

 KNOWINGLY. BEING AWARE OF THE DANGEROUS INFILTRATION OF OUR SOCIETY OF A FOREIGN  POWER AN ISLAMIC STATE WHO UNDER MIND THE LOYALTY AND  PREVENTS INTEGRATION OF MANY OF THOSE OF THE ISLAMIC FAITH IN ENGLAND.

 OVER THE PAST DECADES, MANY INTEGRATED AND INFORMED MUSLIM CLERICS  HAVE REQUESTED THE GOVERNMENT  TO TAKE A FIRM LINE  AND  THOSE THAT REFUSE TO INTEGRATE -

 MUST RETURN TO THEIR ISLAMIC HOMELAND. ]

 

Continued:  Liberal Democrat leader Tim Farron said: 'It seems like the Government, yet again, is putting our-so-called friendship with Saudi Arabia above our values.  This  shoddy decision is the latest in a long line where we have put

 PROFIT over PRINCIPLE

Shadow home secretary Diane Abbott said there was a 'strong suspicion' the report is being suppressed to protecttrade and diplomatic priorities, including in relation to

 SAUDI ARABIA'.

Saudi cash has been linked to

EXTREMIST MOSQUES AND ISLAMIC SCHOOLS AND MADRASSAS.

.*  *  *

See also:

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-07-13 - Islamist fund-raisers posing as charities...

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS OUR OURS!]

JULY 13-2017

 

H.F.1254 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER

 

Friday, June 23, 2017

WATCH: Lord Rothschild Explains How His Family Embraced Zionism, Created Israel

 

(
Jay Syrmopoulos) The head of the Rothschild banking empire, and staunch supporter of Israel, Lord Jacob Rothschild, recently revealed the critical role of his family in the securing the Balfour Declaration, which “helped pave the way for the creation of Israel.”

Related
The Sabbatean-Frankist Cult -- The Satanic Infiltration of the Western World
 
Source - The Free Thought Project

by
Jay Syrmopoulos, June 21st, 2017

The Balfour Declaration, written in 1917, was an official document from the British Foreign Minister, Lord Balfour, addressed to Lord Rothschild, a leader of the Zionist movement in Britain at the time – and Lord Jacob Rothschild’s uncle.

During the television interview with Rothschild, he revealed new details about the extremely pivotal role his cousin Dorothea de Rothschild played. Rothschild described Dorothea, who was in her teens at the time, as “devoted to Israel,” and said: ‘What she did was crucially important.’”

Rothschild went on to say that Dorothy acted as a conduit between Zionist leader Chaim Weizmann and the British political establishment. Dorothy “told Weizmann how to integrate, how to insert himself into British establishment life, which he learned very quickly,” according to Rothschild.

Rothschild explained that the manner in which the declaration was procured was extraordinary.


“It was the most incredible piece of opportunism,” he reasoned.

“[Weizmann] gets to Balfour,” Rothschild described, “and unbelievably, he persuades Lord Balfour, and Lloyd George, the prime minister, and most of the ministers, that this idea of a national home for Jews should be allowed to take place. I mean it’s so, so unlikely.”

This extremely revealing interview with Lord Rothschild was conducted by former Israeli ambassador Daniel Taub as part of the Balfour 100 project, commemorating the 100-year anniversary of the Balfour Declaration. The interviewed took place at Waddesdon Manor in Buckinghamshire, a manor bequeathed to the nation by the Rothschild family in 1957, where the Declaration is stored.

According to Ambassador Taub, the Balfour Declaration “changed the course of history for the Middle East.”

Rothschild said his family at the time was divided on the idea of Israel, noting that some members “didn’t think it was a good thing that this national home be established there.”

Dorothea’s letters are also stored at Waddesdon, and describe her subsequent dealings with a variety of Zionist leaders, as well as her advice on the organization of the Zionist Conference, according to the Times.

othschild said that the Declaration went through five separate drafts before finally being formally issued on November 2, 1917.

In her book, Against Our Better Judgment: The Hidden History of How the U.S. Was Used to Create Israel, Alison Weir exposed the fact that numerous drafts of the declaration were presented to Zionists in the United States prior to the document being finalized.

Weir’s book notes that one of the primary inducements offered to British leaders to issue the Balfour Declaration was the Zionist claim that they would bring the U.S. into world war I on Britain’s side if the British would promise to enable the Zionist colonization of Palestine.

Balfour Declaration Text:
 
Foreign Office
November 2nd, 1917
Dear Lord Rothschild,

I have much pleasure in conveying to you. on behalf of His Majesty’s Government, the following declaration of sympathy with Jewish Zionist aspirations which has been submitted to, and approved by, the Cabinet.

His Majesty’s Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavors to facilitate the achievement of this object, it being clearly understood that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing non-Jewish communities in Palestine or the rights and political status enjoyed by Jews in any other country.

I should be grateful if you would bring this declaration to the knowledge of the Zionist Federation.
Yours,

Arthur James Balfour

The deeply intertwined relationship between modern Zionism and the Rothschild banking empire cannot be overstated. Without the Rothschild family’s vast influence and direct assistance, Israel very well may have never been created.

About The Author

Jay Syrmopoulos


Jay Syrmopoulos is an geopolitical analyst, freethinker, and ardent opponent of authoritarianism. He is currently a graduate student at the University of Denver pursuing a masters in Global Affairs and holds a BA in International Relations. Jay's writing has been featured on both mainstream and independent media - and has been viewed tens of millions of times. You can follow him on Twitter @SirMetropolis and on Facebook at SirMetropolis. You can support his work at Patreon.

_________________________
Stillness in the Storm Editor's note: Did you find a spelling error or grammar mistake? Do you think this article needs a correction or update? Or do you just have some feedback? Send us an email at sitsshow@gmail.com with the error, headline and url. Thank you for reading.
 
________________________________________________________________
Question -- What is the goal of this website? Why do we share different sources of information that sometimes conflicts or might even be considered disinformation? 
Answer -- The primary goal of Stillness in the Storm is to help all people become better truth-seekers in a real-time boots-on-the-ground fashion. This is for the purpose of learning to think critically, discovering the truth from within—not just believing things blindly because it came from an "authority" or credible source. Instead of telling you what the truth is, we share information from many sources so that you can discern it for yourself. We focus on teaching you the tools to become your own authority on the truth, gaining self-mastery, sovereignty, and freedom in the process. We want each of you to become your own leaders and masters of personal discernment, and as such, all information should be vetted, analyzed and discerned at a personal level. We also encourage you to discuss your thoughts in the comments section of this site to engage in a group discernment process. 

 
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." – Aristotle
 

 
The opinions expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect the views of Stillness in the Storm, the authors who contribute to it, or those who follow it. 

 
View and Share our Images
Curious about Stillness in the Storm? 
See our About this blog - Contact Us page.

If it was not for the gallant support of readers, we could not devote so much energy into continuing this blog. We greatly appreciate any support you provide!

 
We hope you benefit from this not-for-profit site 

 
It takes hours of work every day to maintain, write, edit, research, illustrate and publish this blog. We have been greatly empowered by our search for the truth, and the work of other researchers. We hope our efforts 
to give back, with this website, helps others in gaining 
knowledge, liberation and empowerment.

 
"There are only two mistakes one can make along the road to truth; 
not going all the way, and not starting." — Buddha

 
If you find our work of value, consider making a Contribution.
This website is supported by readers like you. 

 
[Click on Image below to Contribute]

 

*  *  *

[This information has been known almost from the day of its implementation-WE understand that the bribe was the urgent supply of scarce explosive material-needed for the guns on the WESTERN FRONT in 1916- WORLD WAR 1-WE mentioned this fact on our website decades ago.]

Sayings of the Rothschild family in the 19th and 20th century
 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H.F.1232

 

 

Stop Common Purpose

The traitorous

 COMMON PURPOSE EXPOSED

 

 

 

Possibly MELANIE PHILLIPS and other Israeli sympathisers with great influence could help reduce the tension to prevent a

WORLD CATASTROPHE ?

 

What we have here is the typical Good Guy - Bad Guy scenario.  FIRST! David Cameron lets it be known that his HEAD  of MI6 has warned the ISRAELIS not to light up the world to extinction and at the very same time he is putting out a disclaimer message by stating that our country is at risk from long range missiles from IRAN - Sounds very much - don't you think -  like Tony Blair's message on IRAQ? - and we all know what tragic results were engendered from that

PACK of LIES!

 

BEWARE OF A FALSE FLAG ATTACK TO JUSTIFY WAR

 

 

ZIONIST GLOBAL  INFRASTRUCTURE AND POWER OF THE ZIONIST STATE

 

More!

 

 

 

 

 

 

LATEST!

 

 

 

 

The View From Europe: Interview with Tom Gillesberg

September 17th, 2012 • 11:09 PM
 

 

 

Tom Gillesberg is a leader in Denmark of the Danish Schiller Institute and is a former candidate for parliament. In this interview he brings to our American audience a view from Europe, and why the world depends on the United States taking the necessary step of impeaching President Obama.

 

 

*

 

'Who sees with equal eye, as Lord of all,

A hero perish, or a sparrow fall,

Atoms or systems into ruin hurled,

And now a bubble burst, and now a world.'

 

Alexander Pope

 

*

SEPTEMBER-2012

H.F.1236

 

 

 

 
A FREE PRESS!

It's finest expression had already been given in

MILTON'S

AREOPAGITICA.

Milton boldly proclaimed two principles of profound importance.

One was the immunity of the religious life from political regulation. The other was that doctrine which has been the strength of the best thought of individualism from his day to the present, to wit that the well-being of society requires the natural diversity of its members, and that coercive uniformity of morals and manners would spell the ruin and degradation of any people.

*

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

More!

 

 

 

 

 
THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR PAST OVER 50 YEARS

 (1959-2016)

 

 

 

THE SPIRIT OF A PEOPLE

THE FIRST TASK of any politics that could be really scientific was to relate authority to its principle source, to show its dependence on the whole social fabric, the customs and traditions, the modes of thought and the standards of life that prevail among a people.  ...the work of Montesquieu.   He really sought to understand society, to show the influence of underlying  conditions ,climatic, geographical, economic, to show that custom and institutions neither are made nor can be changed by fiat, to show that there is in every people a spirit of character which their law must reveal

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

 

 
 

A REMINDER!

WHAT YOU ARE ESCAPING FROM SINCE TRAITORS IN YOUR PARLIAMENT SIGNED YOUR COUNTRY OF

ENGLAND

 AWAY IN

1972

AND IN LATER TREATIES UNTIL YOU SPOKE YOUR MIND ON

 JUNE 23-2016

 A DATE IN HISTORY WHICH WILL BE ALWAYS REMEMBERED

BY ALL TRUE ENGLISHMEN.

 

*  *  *

HOW IT CAME ABOUT!

Mr Macmillan and 1961

Mr Heath and 1970

Mrs Thatcher and 1985

From Major to Blair, Maastricht to Nice

The Price We Have PAid

 

*  *  *

 

H.F.1100 FREEDOM AWAITS

 
NEW SERIES

*

WHY WE VOTED TO LEAVE

THE

UNDEMOCRATIC-UNACCOUNTABLE-COLLECTIVIST-CORRUPT-WASTEFUL-GODLESS

SO-CALLED

EUROPEAN UNION

[WE WILL SELECT INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM AUTHORITIVE SOURCES CONCERNING THE ILLEGALITY OF THE EU TREATIES AND THOSE WHO LIED FOR PERSONAL GAIN AND POWER AND OTHER SUBSTANTIATED INFORMATION COLLECTED OVER THE 20 YEARS SINCE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE AFTER STANDING FOR ELECTION IN THE 1997 GENERAL ELECTION AND THE 1999 EUROPEAN ELECTION. MANY WHO VOTED TO REMAIN IN THE EU WOULD SURELY HAVE RECONSIDERED IF THEY HAD BEEN DISINTERESTED OBSERVERS-DECIDING ON THE FACTS AND PUTTING NATIONAL INTERESTS  OF FREEDOM  and NATIONHOOD OUTLINED IN MAGNA CARTA AND OTHER PRIZED DOCUMENTS HELD IN TRUST-SACRED HEIRLOOMS - FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS, BEFORE THEIR OWN COMFORT ZONE.  FORTUNATELY, THE GODS, WERE WITH ENGLAND-AND THE SOON RETURN OF

 A FREE LAND AND FREE PEOPLE.

OUR ENSLAVEMENT IN 1972 INTO HITLER'S PLAN FOR GERMAN EXPANSION AND POWER IN PEACE-TIME EUROPE WILL SOON BE AT AN END. AS A UNITED PEOPLE IT WILL BE SOONER THAN LATER. LET US WORK TOGETHER AS  AN EXAMPLE TO OTHER ONCE FREE PEOPLES WITHIN THE CAPTIVE EU WHO WILL SURELY FOLLOW. IF THE SHIP IS NOT ON AN EVEN KEEL IT CANNOT HELP OTHERS WHO WILL NEED OUR STURDY STEADY HAND.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

William Pitt.

 [Speech, 9th Nov, after Nelson's VICTORY at THE Battle of Trafalgar-with the destruction of the French and Spanish Fleets-Oct 21-1805]

MARCH 1-2017

 
A FAMILIAR WARNING FROM HISTORY - WE MUST NOT IGNORE!

'It is quite true that, in my opinion the waters which we have to navigate are likely to be stormy, and that the anti-social ferments within the nation are unusually malignant. But just a a healthy body generates anti-toxins to combat any virulent infection, so our nation

ENGLAND

 may be vigorous enough to neutralize the poisons which now threaten our civilization with death. Nothing but good can be done by calling attention to perils which really exist, and which may easily escape due attention amid the bottomless insincerity of modern politics and political journalism.

DANGERS OF PREDICTION

However , the dangers of prediction have been so often illustrated that those who are naturally disposed to optimism may be excused for rejecting the anticipations of coming CALAMITY, which  are now  [as in 2016/7] widely felt, though not so often expressed.

In the Victorian age we had  our profits of woe [and doom], who vociferated warnings about "shooting Niagara" when the country was more prosperous than it had ever been before. [As yet again in 2016/7].

Even on the morrow of our victory in 1815, " as soon as Waterloo was fought," says Sir Walter Besant, "the continental professors, historians, and others began with one accord to prophesy the approaching downfall of Great Britain," which they liked to compare with Carthage.

They emphasised the condition of Ireland, the decay of trade, our huge debt, our wasteful expenditure, our corrupting poor laws, the ignorance and drunkenness of the masses. Nor was this pessimistic forecast confined to our jealous neighbours.  In December 1816, the Common Council of the City of London addressed the Prince Regent as follows:

" Distress and misery are no longer limited to one portion of the Empire, and under their irresistible pressure the commercial, agricultural, and manufacturing interests are rapidly sinking.   We can ,Sir no longer support out of our dilapidated resources the overwhelming load of taxation.  Our grievances are the natural result of rash and ruinous wars, unjustly commenced and pertinaciously persisted in, where no rational object was to be attained; of immense subsidies to foreign Powers to defend their own territories  or to commit aggressions on those of our neighbours;  of a delusive paper currency; of an unconstitutional and unprecedented military force in time of peace;   of the unexampled and increasing magnitude of the Civil List ;  of the enormous sums paid for unmerited pensions and sinecures;   and of a long course of the most lavish and improvident expenditure of the public money throughout every branch of Government."

In December 1816, the Common Council of the City of London addressed the Prince Regent with the above statement.

Sounds familiar in 2017-Don't you think?

 

[EPILOGUE-William Ralph Inge -Dean of St Pauls ENGLAND-1938] -(1860-1954)

 

We endorse the final paragraph which states:

 

" I have laid bare my hopes and fears for the country I love.  This much I can avow, that never, even when the storm clouds appear blackest, have I been tempted to wish that I was other than an Englishman."

*

[We appear to have learned NOTHING! since this speech  in 1816 as the multiple evils are still with us today August 6, 2011. The reason is OBVIOUS! because the SAME! once invisible GLOBAL CONSPIRATORS are  STILL in CHARGE! and  are now in the OPEN!

If the ECONOMY has a DISEASE and FAILS to take the CORRECT MEDICINE then the END RESULT is OBVIOUS.

TOTAL CHAOS!

*

WHY DO WE TRUST THESES DISCREDITED DOOM-MONGERS?

By Alex Brummer - City Editor-Daily Mail-Monday, August 8,2011

 

 [EXTRACT]

...and the answer is that the CREDIT RATING AGENCIES are now seen as the ONLY arbiters prepared to spell out just how SERIOUS the GLOBAL DEBT CRISIS really IS.... After all, the very same AGENCIES were still providing the US. energy company ENRON with TOP RATING up to THREE DAYS before IT COLLAPSED in the world's BIGGEST INDUSTRIAL BANKRUPTCY...  They also gave a CLEAN BILL of HEALTH to FANNIE MAE and FREDDIE MAC -semi-official, but privately owned U. S bodies set up to expand the HOME OWNERSHIP and the availability of MORTGAGES-despite WARNINGS from the LEGENDARY American investor -WARREN BUFFETT -THAT they were BROKE... S&P's downgrade may look like a poke in the eye for the UNITED STATES. But with luck, it could in the end DAMAGE the FUTURE CREDIBILITY of the CREDIT-RATING AGENCIES - they are in MORE URGENT NEED of REFORM than AMERICA.

 

 

THE AMERICAN DREAM IS OVER!

 

h

 

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS almost BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/ ****    REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****    THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****       FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/  ****   A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?     **** GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/  ****    A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES? ****   THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/   WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/  ****   GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND****   50 YEARS OF SURRENDER***AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED.

DAVID CAMERON'S PLAN TO CLAW BACK POWERS FROM EU ARE DOOMED SAYS EU CHIEF IN OCTOBER-2013

*

THE HISTORY OF THE SATANIC COLLECTIVIST EUROPEAN UNION

***

HITLER'S+PLAN+FOR+A+

GERMAN+CONTROLLED

+EUROPEAN+UNION

***

TREASON

***

 

 

 

ENGLAND

 

 Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND?**** BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH****NEW LABOUR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND****UNLESS WE TAKE CONTROL OF OUR LIVES WE WILL LOSE OUR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY****.OUR PAST IS EMBEDDED IN OUR NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS -IT ASKS WERE WE CAME FROM AND WHO WE ARE .****.THE ENGLISH WITH OTHER GERMANIC TRIBES CAME TO BRITAIN OVER YEARS AGO - THE STREAM OF TEUTONIC INFLUENCE  HAS DECIDED THE FUTURE OF EUROPE****THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/ ****  THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/ ****    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/****  DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/ ****   NOR SHALL MY SWORD/****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/ ****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/****   ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY -CORRECT BROWNDOM/****    ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1- /****   ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/****    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./****   WHY OUR ENGLISH SELF-GOVERNMENT IS UNIQUE IN EUROPE AND THE WORLD****.ENGLAND ARISE! - TODAY WE CLAIM OUR RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION/ ****  KISS GOOD BYE TO YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY****  THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED? **** ST GEORGE'S DAY-ENGLAND'S DAY/**** ST GEORGE'S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ONSHAKESPEARE'S' BIRTHDAY****NAZI SPY RING REVEALED BY THE MASTER OF BALLIOL COLLEGE IN 1938 . IT INCLUDED THE LATE EX PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH AND MINISTERS GEOFFREY RIPPON AND ROY JENKINS.* * * *AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED****   EU WIPES ENGLAND OFF THE MAP**** THE ENGLISH DID NOT MOVE THEMSELVES SO ARE NOW SLAVES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE****"...What kind of people do they think we are?" by WINSTON CHURCHILL****THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

 

‘THE MAKING OF THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION’****

OUR CONSTITUTION OF OVER A THOUSAND YEARS – WHY DOES BLAIR MEAN TO DESTROY IT?****

OUR DISCREDITED DEMOCRACY OR IRAQ DICTATORSHIP****OUR LOYALTY TO OUR INSTITUTIONS AND COUNTRY?****Liberties of Parliament- Birthright of Subjects of England.****LOSS of TRUST in NEW LABOUR****New England’s Tears for Old England’s fears?****The House of Commons has a need of members dedicated to their Country-not time wasters.****English Constitution, by it they lived, for it they died****CABINET GOVERNMENT IS NOW A DICTATORSHIP****MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA SUPPORTS THE CROWN****THE FINAL BETRAYAL - Part 1-5****House of Lords legal Whistleblower – Speaks Out in Defence of OUR  Law & Constitution****SAY ‘NO’ TO EUROPE! – SAYS RODNEY ATKINSON****The Rotten Heart of Europe - by Bernard Connolly-Part 1-5****THE CLUB IS MIGHTIER THAN THE HANDBAG****WHY you should Vote at Elections to protect YOUR Democracy****The sole legitimate function of Government- is to Protect The Rights of its Citizens****So You Thought You Were Free****A DREAM TO REMEMBER- NEW LABOUR POLICY -2004?****NO SUPPORT IN HOUSE OF LORDS FOR INQUIRY INTO EU BY TORY WHIP**** Could England Survive Outside The EU?  -YES!****COST OF DEVOLUTION –N’IRELAND, SCOTLAND AND WALES LONDON +BRUSSELS****European Arrest Warrant – What Price Our Freedom Now?****Government Obsession With Spending Itself out of Trouble**** Bill of Rights of 1688 –Outlaws European Constitution****OUR UNREPRESENTATIVE VOTING SYSTEM= BREEDS TREASON -
BETRAYAL OF COUNTRY
****Impeachment of Ministers of the Crown – Why Now?****New European Constitution – Concessions Fudge.****The Judiciary – A Defence of English Freedom?****
New European Constitution – A ‘Bridge’ Too Far?**** Our way forward to Kinship in Liberty****OUR HISTORIC HOUSE OF LORDS MUST REMAIN – TO PREVENT TYRANNY****  Scottish Independence – Have No need of Union flag and Anthem****Misuse of Prerogative Powers by Tony Blair****A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION –CONSPIRATORS NAME  PARTS 1-5****

 

 

H.F.1099 FREEDOM AWAITS

 
A MEETING PLACE  - THERE ARE HUNDREDS  OF ALTERNATIVE WEBSITES ON OUR wEBSITE- SINCE 2003CLICK HERE
realzionistnews. TruetorahJews CONSPIRACYPLANET

.COM/

Fagan-Sounded-Alarm-of -the ILLUMINATI-in-1967  DAVID ICKE BRITISH CONSTITUTION GROUP

 

YOU CAN HANDLE THE TRUTH
BENJAMIN FULFORD.NET

 

THE WORLD OF TRUTH NEWWORLDORDER

INFO.COM

 

SITSSHOW.BLOGSPOT.COM
LANDDESTROYER.

BLOGSPOT

.COM

HENRY MAKOW  CORBETTREPORT) LIFE IN THE MIX 2

 

UK COLUMN.ORG. JEW WATCH

ACTIVISTPOST.

COM

TARPLEY.NET

 

 
MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

 

THANK YOU FOR CALLING!

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

CLICK HERE FOR PREVIOUS FRONT PAGE-2012

JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2018

JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2018

JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2018

JANUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2018

 JAN FREEDOM NOW HOME 2018