Why ratification of the new European Constitution would lead to Civil War.

 

All subjects of a state are expected to obey the laws of that state unless they are repugnant to the customary habits of the People and are a threat to their ‘Rights and Liberties’.

 

But should there be a ratification of the New European Constitution the country will divide into two camps:

 

a) Those who accept the Treaty and the consequent loss of the sovereignty of the People

 

b) And those who wish their country to run its own affairs with the protection for the sovereignty of the People.

The divide will be between those who will submit to Slavery and those who wish to remain Free.

 

There is always the probability that Her Majesty The Queen will withhold her consent in order to protect our Ancient Constitution and therefore our way-of –life.  But if not it will be expected that many of those who opposed the Treaty would combine to pursue their ‘Petition of Right’ or ‘Declaration of Right ‘ or any other legal means to have the Treaty repealed as unlawful under the Common Law of England, Magna Carta etc.

 

It would be expected that the ‘Independence Party’ would place a time limit on negotiations with the courts in order to ensure that the matter is not taken out of the hands of those who wish for a lawful settlement. But in the event of failure to obtain justice for the Cause within the limits set then the only alternative will be insurrection in order to obtain their just results.

 

In similar cases from the past a dispute does not necessarily receive its quietus because a Court of law may have pronounced upon it.  There are historical instances in which decisions of Courts have had exactly the reverse effect [As it would with the European Constitution today] and have been contributory causes of the outbreak of Civil War.

 

This is true of Hampden’s case in 1637 in which the Court declared the law on the question of ship-money, and the Dred Scot case in 1857, in which the American Supreme Court declared the law on the question of Slavery; [Does this not remind you of our efforts today to prevent Slavery ever again existing on our soil – Have you wondered why Tony Blair wants to tighten –up security –it is not only for Terrorists but primarily to prevent an uprising in this country?]

 

Each of the cases had its sequel in a Civil War which was fought in the part to determine afresh the very issues which the Courts had decided.”

 

So take head Mr Blair!

 

We would expect that the forthcoming referendum on the New European Constitution will result in a resounding ‘No’ but there is always the possibility that with many voter’s minds occupied by ‘bread and butter issues ‘ will have overlooked and not grasped the full impact of what the new Treaty would mean to their lives-their ‘Rights and Liberties’ and not appreciate that by voting for the Treaty they have agreed to their own Slavery –within their once Free Country. [Details of why not to vote for the new on our Bulletin Board]

 

AS we have said on so many occasions over the past ten years we maintain that should a majority vote in favour of the Treaty they would consign themselves and worst of all the minority to Slavery.  It is an established fact that Slavery is unlawful in England and that no Englishman man put another into Slavery.

 

The choice you have to make will like that made on the Island in Runnymede in 1215 will be the most important decision any subject in a Democracy has to make.  It is so far-reaching that many other Democracies in the world particularly the USA have a written Constitution to avoid the great danger which each of us in this country now stands in having to decide if your country’s affairs-economic; political; military; foreign etc should be decided by 24 other Slave States –for that is what they will be.

 

The final move to a Continental law System in which the State is your Master and the subject (sorry! –citizen) is Servant.  To remind you all that in our system the State is (should) be our Servant- We are the Master.

There is also the question of the workings of the law the other side of the English Channel where the citizen is guilty until proved innocent and many other differences, which we have outlined on our Bulletin Board.

 

The Choice is Yours! But it affects every subject of the Queen and it will be a decision which would decide whether we are taken back to defending our ‘Rights and Liberties, as our forebears in the 17^th century Civil War.   

 

The question isn’t whether such a political party will give you more goodies-they all will- but the overriding Good for your Country and its inherited Constitution and the protection of our Way-of-Life.

*          *          *

 

Vote

 

 

UKIP

www.ukip.org

 

 

 

 

THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE TO WITHDRAW FROM THE EU

*

 

www.eutruth.org.uk

*

www.thewestminsternews.co.uk

*

 

www.speakout.co.uk

*

 

Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU

www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs

 

*

 

 

VOTE

MAY -2007

 

TO LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION

WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE

TO SET YOU

 FREE

 

THE

UK INDEPENDENCE PARTY

www.ukip.org

 

TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER

BUT

SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.

*

 

ONLY

PRO-PORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

*

Home Rule for Scotland

WHY NOT

HOME RULE for ENGLAND

[EACH WORD HAS A DIFFERENT BULLETIN]

 

*

MAY/07

 

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin

THE QUESTION THAT THE VOTER MUST ANSWER

 

‘DO YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE CORRUPT ,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND ALIEN BUSYBODY BRUSSELS’

 

-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?