- (1994 -Official Website -NOV-PT1-2018 )--

NOVEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2018          NOVEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2018

NOVEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2018          NOVEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 5-2018

NOVEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 6-2018          NOVEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME--2018

 ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY. ORG.UK .

*
 

Don't Give In To The E U

 

WHY A UK COMPROMISE WITH BRUSSELS WILL CONFINE THEIR CAPTIVE NATION STATES EVEN TIGHTER TO ENSURE THERE CAN BE NO MORE DEFECTORS. WHILE A FIRM RESPONSE FOR A JUST SETTLEMENT FROM THE UK WILL GIVE HEART AND ASSISTANCE TO THOSE FREEDOM LOVING PATRIOTS PRISONERS OF HITLER'S PLANNED EU TO BAND TOGETHER TO FIGHT FOR THE RETURN OF THEIR ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATES.

WE SAY NO! TO COMPROMISE.

It is forgotten that an individual country which makes a decision affecting itself or others has the opportunity to remedy the situation. Whereas, in the EU this is not possible, unless ALL or the permitted number agree to the change and knowing the belligerence of Hitler's brainchild this could have serious and dangerous consequences.

Remember, the responsibility of the UK to assist those captive people's who wish to be

FREE

because it was the blood of British troops in the past that assisted the birth of many of the

FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATES in EUROPE.

BY STANDING FIRM FOR AN ORDERLY AND JUST EXIT FROM HITLER'S EU WE WILL RECOVER THAT RESPECT THAT OUR BROTHER NATIONS WHO SAW BRITAIN IN 1973 NEGLECT THEIR KIN AROUND THE WORLD FOR AN UNHOLY ALLIANCE WITH A COUNTRY

GERMANY

WHICH IN

TWO WORLD WARS

WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEATHS  AND INJURIES OF MILLIONS AND VAST DESTRUCTION OF PROPERTY...FOR WHICH THE LIKE THE WORLD WOULD NOT HAVE  PREVIOUSLY SEEN.

A FREE INDEPENDENT EUROPEAN UNION OF FREE PEOPLE'S WITHIN THEIR OWN INDEPENDENT NATION STATES.

YES!

THE PRESENT UNDEMOCRATIC-UNREPRESENTATIVE-BULLYING EU.

NO!

The fault of our present situation is because of TREASON within the Tory Government of

Edward Heath

 A Nazi spy since 1938 reported to MI5 in 1938 by the Master of Balliol College, Oxford.

 Who in the 70's  and with previous administrations secretly conspired to lead the British people blindfolded into the Nazi-planned EU . It is therefore incumbent on the present Tory Government of Mrs May to bring the situation back to what it was before January 1973. The evidence of Tory wrong-doing has been on our website since 2005.

*

Compromise.

Compromise is but the sacrifice of one right or good in the hope of retaining another,-too often ending in the loss of both,

- Tryon Edwards

*

From the beginning of our history the country has been afflicted with compromise. It is by compromise that human rights have been abandoned. I insist that this shall cease. The country needs repose after all its trials; it deserves repose. And repose can only be found in everlasting principles.-

Charles Sumner

*

A surrender to the Nazi-planned EU would not bring repose to the millions of patriots who wanted their country back. An unjust settlement instead of a Churchillian response will see the battle continue until victory is secured.

Victory

You ask, What is our aim?  I can answer in one word: Victory - victory at all costs, victory in spite of all the terror; victory, however long and hard the road may be; for without victory there is no survival.

- Winston Churchill.

FOR THE MILLIONS WHO HAVE DIED IN THE PAST FOR THEIR FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND THEIR CAN BE NO SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED UNDEMOCRATIC CAPTIVE SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

*  *  *
THE END OF THE ENGLISH

INTRODUCTION

HOW IT ALL BEGAN 

 HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER

THE RESULTANT LUNACIES

HOW WE ARE CONTROLLED

 WHERE FREEDOM IS VANISHING

*

[THE MAJORITY OF YOU DID

NOTHING!]

 

 

 

 

The European Union Collective: Enemy of Its Member States

OCTOBER-2005

 
 

 LIFE AND TIMES

OF

Christopher Story

 PATRIOT AND TRUTHSEEKER

2010

THIS COULD BE THE TIME FOR THOSE    MP'S in the SO-CALLED CONSERVATIVE PARTY  OR OTHERS TO FORM THEIR OWN PATRIOTIC PARTY OF THE CENTRE. TO ATTRACT ALL VOTERS WHO LOVE  THEIR COUNTRY AND UNIQUE -PRIZED CONSTITUTION. WHO WANT IT BACK AS IT STOOD BEFORE JANUARY,1973.

Rees-Mogg-Borris Johnson... TO LEAD THE WAY!

THE EDP WOULD OFFER ITS NAME AND WITHDRAW FROM THE POLITICAL SCENE TO SUCH PATRIOTIC INDIVIDUALS AND AT THE LEAST WOULD SUPPORT SUCH A PARTY.

IN PARLIAMENT WE FIND THERE ARE LOBBY GROUPS SUCH AS FRIENDS OF WHO EVER BUT THERE ARE NO FRIENDS OF ENGLAND .IT IS ABOUT TIME THERE IS A PATRIOTIC BLOCK TO STAND UP FOR ENGLAND AND ITS PAST AND FUTURE. WE HAVE BEEN WAITING TOO LONG FOR A RETURN OF OUR ENGLISH PARLIAMENT - IS LONG OVERDUE.

LETS DO IT!

*  *  *

NOVEMBER 14, 2018

H.F.1627

*  *  *

Theresa May should abandon Brexit trade deal talks

 if Brussels remains stubborn, say top Leave campaigners including Lord Lawson

  • Theresa May has been encouraged to walk away if EU won't discuss a trade deal 
  • Leading Leavers including former Tory Chancellor Lord Lawson made the calls
  • They say delaying trade talks is causing ‘a highly damaging level of uncertainty’  

By Jack Doyle and Claire Ellicott for the Daily Mail

Published: 23:19, 18 October 2017 | Updated: 08:42, 19 October 2017

Brexiteers including former Tory Chancellor Lord Lawson  (pictured) urged Mrs May to abandon the negotiations if there is no progress towards a deal

Theresa May should walk away from Brexit talks tomorrow if EU leaders refuse to discuss trade with Britain, leading Leave campaigners say today.

Brexiteers including former Tory Chancellor Lord Lawson urged Mrs May to abandon the negotiations if there is no progress towards a deal.

In a letter released today they say the EU’s deliberate policy of delaying trade talks is causing ‘a highly damaging level of uncertainty’ for British business.

As such, the Prime Minister must issue an ultimatum at this week’s meeting of the European Council, which begins today.

If talks do not move on to trade, Mrs May should announce that Britain will move to World Trade Organisation (WTO) terms after March 30, 2019, and begin intense preparations for the ‘no deal’ Brexit.

The letter, organised by the Leave Means Leave pressure group, is signed by senior figures from politics, business, law and the military.

As well as Lord Lawson, who chaired the official Leave campaign, signatories include former Tory cabinet ministers Peter Lilley, John Redwood and Owen Paterson, Labour MPs Kate Hoey and Graham Stringer, economist Professor Patrick Minford, and JD Wetherspoon chairman Tim Martin. 

It came as former Tory leader Iain Duncan Smith called on Mrs May to make preparations for leaving without a deal.

It came as former Tory leader Iain Duncan Smith called on Mrs May to make preparations for leaving without a deal

He urged her to order Government departments to ‘make all arrangements’ for moving to WTO terms.

In an article for the Brexit Central news website, Mr Duncan Smith said the EU was dragging its feet to try and extract as much money as it can out of the UK. 

And in a clear swipe at Chancellor Philip Hammond, he said Britain’s planning for a ‘no deal’ scenario must include spending money.

The letter to Mrs May, published as she travels to Brussels, says: ‘Following your ...speech in Florence, it has become increasingly clear that the European Commission is deliberately deferring discussions on the UK’s future trading relationship with the EU27 post-Brexit. 

This is causing a highly damaging level of uncertainty for businesses.

‘The EU is taking this approach because they do not believe that the UK would be prepared to go to WTO rules for our trading relationship with them.

The letter, organised by the Leave Means Leave pressure group, is signed by senior figures from politics, business, law and the military

‘If at the European Council this week, the EU continues to refuse to discuss the future framework for a trade relationship, we should formally declare that we are assuming that we will be subject to WTO rules from March 30, 2019.’

Such an announcement would provide business with ‘absolute certainty about the future’ – and if the EU then wanted to return to the negotiating table, that would be a ‘bonus’. 

The letter adds that the public would welcome ‘such decisive action’ and ministers would be better focusing their efforts on ‘minimising disruptions’ from Brexit and seizing the economic opportunities.

 
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4994864/Theresa-urged-abandon-Brexit-trade-deal-talks.html#ixzz4w8OVhIJj
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

OCTOBER 19-2017

*  *  *

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H.F.1353 [BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED EU FOR GERMANY TO DOMINATE EUROPE IN THE PEACE AND TO ENTRAP ENGLAND TO PAY ITS MAJOR SHARE FOR THE

SATANIC BEAST'

VERY SURVIVAL, AS REVENGE FOR ENGLAND...WINNING TWO WORLD WARS AGAINST THE HUN!

H.F.1353

*
MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18
NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

ENGLAND FILE

 'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

Multiculturalism As A Tool To Divide And Conquer: The Layman's ...-

Multiculturalism and the Ruling Elite

IMMIGRATION-BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE- EU FILE  IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS-_FOREIGN AID

 

BULLETINS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD

 

[THE

CON PARTY

GOT US IN THE EU IN 1973

BY

STEALTH-LIES-DECEIT

AND

IN NOVEMBER 2019

THE SIGNS ARE THAT THEY ARE UP TO THEIR OLD TRICKS ONCE MORE.

This situation has easily happened because of the failure of a robust UKIP to keep the pressure on the Government up the March 29-2019 deadline.

There has been suspicions for decades that UKIP was the brainchild of the Conservative Party and as a close observer of the political scene and having attended a number of their events we have commented  on this fact on many occasions.

 

TREASON

 

'Fellowship in treason is a bad ground of confidence'

EDMUND BURKE
comment image

See: 80 Comments

[WE were surprised a matter of some months ago when we saw the close warm greeting between Mrs May and Angela Merkel when they met to discuss BREXIT. WE expected that they would have kept at arms length ,at the time, that  a distance between them would have given more confidence to Brexiteers that the negotiations would not be a 'SELL OUT' which in some areas such as our Fishing Fields and the sovereignty of our sea lanes... we now have our suspicions. ]

APRIL 9,2018

As the picture above clearly shows it has been decades of association between Theresa May and  Frau Merkel who was a civil servant under the  Communist East German Government.  May's treasonous Cabinet plan appears to have all the hallmarks of the mindset of the German Chancellor.  May has admitted that she is in close contact with her once teen age friend so we should'nt be surprised if more bad news follows?

AUGUST 7,2018

HOW CAN YOU TRUST THEM

ONLY A CHANGE OF LEADERSHIP TO A TRUE BREXIT BELIEVER CAN ENSURE A CLEAN BREAK

FROM

HITLER'S

 PLANNED SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

OUR FUTURE PROSPERITY MUST BE IN OUR HANDS AS A FAMILY OF NATION STATES IN OUR OWN ISLAND HOME. IT IS A LEGACY FROM THE PAST THAT MUST BE HANDED INTACT TO FUTURE GENERATIONS-IT IS NOT OURS TO DISREGARD AS TRAITORS WITHIN IN OUR GOVERNMENT  AND CIVIL SERVICS DID SO IN 1970's . 

NEVILLE CHAMBERLAIN HANDED THE LEADERSHIP TO WINSTON CHURCHILL in 1940. SO LIKEWISE THERESA MAY SHOULD HAND THE LEADERSHIP IN 2018 TO A TRUE BREXITEER TO ENSURE THAT

JUSTICE IS DONE!

SEPTEMBER 6,2018

H.F.1525/1

 

As we mentioned a few months ago when we showed the above photograph of the teenage Theresa May with the future Chancellor of Germany Frau Merkel that such a long acquaintance spells trouble for

 BREXIT

and with information now at hand we know it does.

Compromise can be a a useful attribute in some matters but when it is the very FREEDOM-IDENTITY-CUSTOM-CONSTITUTION of a long established -unique PARLIAMENTARY DEMOCRACY-then there can be NO COMPROMISE.

To think that it was possible for someone with strong counter view such as an acknowledged REMAINER to fight for the return of our and our children's INHERITANCE was a wish too far.

The coming revelation of the terms of our escape from Hitler's planned EU over the coming weeks will no doubt confirm our fears of BETRAYAL.

 

NOVEMBER 10,2018

 

* * *

30th November, [1970]

 

LETTER from Lord Kilmuir, the Lord Chancellor, to Edward Heath, prior to the acceptance by Parliament of the “Treaty of Rome”

 

My dear Ted,

 

You wrote to me on 30th November, [1970] - about the constitutional implications of our [The UK] becoming a party to the “Treaty of Rome”. I have now had an opportunity of considering what you say in your letter and have studied the memoranda you sent me I agree with you that there are IMPORTANT CONSTITUTIONAL ISSUES INVOLVED.

 

I have no doubt that if we do sign the TREATY, we shall suffer some LOSS of SOVEREIGNTY, but before attempting to define or evaluate the loss I wish to make one general observation.

 

 At the end of the day, the ISSUE is

Whether or NOT to join the [So-called]

 EUROPEAN ECONOMIC COMMUNITY

 

- must be decided on broad political grounds and if it appears from what follows in

this letter that I find the constitutional objections serious that does mean that I consider them conclusive [final!]

 

I do however, think it important that we should appreciate clearly from the outset exactly WHAT, from the CONSTITUTIONAL point of view, is involved if we sign the treaty, and it is with that consideration in mind that I have addressed myself to the questions you have raised.

 

Adherence to the Treaty of Rome would in my opinion, would AFFECT our SOVEREIGNTY in three ways:-

 

PARLIAMENT would be required to surrender some of its functions to the ORGANS of the COMMUNITY.

 

The CROWN would be called ON to TRANSFER part of its TREATY-MAKING power to those ORGANS of the COMMUNITY.

 

OUR COURTS OF LAW would sacrifice some degree of INDEPENDENCE by becoming subordinate in certain respects to the EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE.

 

The POSITION of PARLIAMENT.

 

It is clear that the memorandum prepared by your Legal advisers that the Council of Ministers could eventually (after the system of qualified majority voting had come into force) make regulations which would be binding on us even against our wishes, and would in fact become for us part of the LAW of the LAND.

 

THERE ARE TWO WAYS IN WHICH THIS REQUIREMENT OF THE TREATY COULD IN PRACTICE BE IMPLEMENTED.

 

Parliament could legislate ad hoc on each occasion that the Council make regulations requiring action by us. The difficulty would be that, since Parliament can bind neither bind itself nor its successors, we could only comply with the obligations under the TREATY if PARLIAMENT abandoned its RIGHT of passing independent judgment on the legislative proposals put before it.

 

A parallel is the CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION whereby PARLIAMENT passes the British North American Bills without question at the request of the PARLIAMENT of CANADA; in this respect PARLIAMENT here has substance if not in form, abdicated its SOVEREIGN position, and it would have pro tanto [for so much] , to do the same for the [EUROPEAN] COMMUNITY.

 

 It would in theory be possible for parliament to enact at the outset legislation which would give automatic force of law to any existing or future [EU] regulations made by the appropriate organs of the Community.  For Parliament to do this would go far beyond the most extensive delegation of -----

I do not think there is any likelihood of this being acceptable to the House of Commons. Which ever course were adopted, Parliament would retain in theory the liberty to repeal the relevant Act or Acts [Of the EU Treaty] but I would agree with you that we must act on the assumption that entry into the [EU] Community would be irrevocable; we should therefore to accept a position where Parliament had no more power to repeal its own enactments than it has in practice to abrogate the Statute of Westminster. 

 

In short, Parliament would have to transfer to the [EU] Council, or other appropriate organ of the [EU] Community, its substantive powers of legislating over a whole of a very important field.

 

Treaty –Making POWERS.

 

The proposition that every treaty entered into by the United Kingdom does to some extent fetter our freedom of action is plainly TRUE.  Some treaties such as GATT and O.E.E.C restrict severely our liberty to make agreements with third parties and I should not regard it as detrimental to our sovereign that, by signing the TREATY of ROME, we undertook not to make tariff or trade agreements without the Council’s approval.

 

BUT to transfer to the Council or the [EU] Commission the power to make such treaties on our behalf, and even against our will, is an entirely different proposition.

 

There seems to me to be a clear distinction between the exercise of sovereignty involved in the conscious acceptance by us of obligations under treaty-making powers and the total or partial surrender of sovereignty involved in our cession of these powers to some other body.

 

To confer a sovereign state’s treaty-making powers on an international organisation is the first step on the road which leads by way of confederation to the fully FEDERAL STATE.

 

I do not suggest that what is involved would necessarily carry us very far in this direction, but it would be a most significant step and one for which there is no precedent in our case.  Moreover, a further surrender of sovereignty of parliamentary supremacy would necessarily be involved as you know, although the treaty-making power is vested in the CROWN.

 

 

Parliamentary sanction is required for any treaty which involves a change in the law or the imposition of taxation (to take two examples), and we cannot ratify such a treaty unless Parliament consents. But if binding treaties are to be entered into on our behalf, Parliament must surrender this function and either resign itself to becoming a rubber stamp or give the Community, in effect, the power to amend our domestic laws.

 

Independence of the Courts.

 

There is no precedent for our final appellate tribunal being required to refer questions of law (even in a limited field) to another Court and as I assume to be the implication of “refer” to accept that Court’s decision.

 

You will remember that when a similar proposal was considered in connection with the Council of Europe we felt strong objection to it. I have no doubt that the whole of the legal profession in this country would share my dislike for such a proposal which must inevitably detract from the INDEPENDENCE and AUTHORITY of OUR COURTS.

 

 

Of these three objections, the first two are by far the more important.  I must emphasise that in my view the SURRENDERS of SOVEREIGNTY involved are SERIOUS ONES, and I think that as a matter of practical politics, it will not be easy to persuade PARLIAMENT or the PUBLIC to accept them.

 

I am sure that it would be a great mistake to under-estimate the force of objections to them.  But these objections ought to be brought out into the open now because, if we attempt to gloss over them at this stage, those who are opposed to the whole idea of our joining the [EU] Community will certainly seize on them with more damaging effect later on.  Having said this, I would emphasis once again that, although these CONSTITUTIONAL considerations must be given their full weight when we come to balance the arguments on either side, I do not for one moment wish to convey the impression that they must necessarily tip the scale.  In the long run we shall have to decide whether economic factors require us to make

SACRIFICES of SOVEREIGNTY:

My concern is to ensure that we should see exactly what it is that we are called on to sacrifice, and how serious our loss would be.

 

Yours ever,      David.

 

*          *

 

[There are many hundreds of essays on the subject of constitutional  matters on our bulletin board which give the background to the CONSPIRACY of the pro-European lobby at the time and since who felt no compunction in telling LIES-LIES and more LIES.  Some of those politicians who concealed and the TRUTH and fostered the DECEIT are still with us today in 2006. –Though some have now realised how wrong they were to turn a blind eye to the blatant half-truths and downright lies in order to get the Bill through Parliament by only 8 votes. – to remind you again that many more details by INDEPENDENT sources on our bulletin board].

 

*          *          *

 

 [Font altered-bolding & underlining used-comments in brackets.]

SEPTEMBER/06

 

*  *  *

 

NON-DISCLOSURE OF LEGAL ADVICE FROM THE  ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE DAY

 FIFTEEN years ago, as war with IraQ loomed, Tony Blair notoriously declined to publish the full legal advice [as Edward Heath in 1970] of his Attorney General Lord Goldsmith. To day history repeats itself. Theresa May is holding back from the public view the opinions of her Attorney General Geoffrey Cox on the legal issues surrounding Brexit.

This is outrageous, and shows how Britain still cannot learn from the mistakes of the Iraq War

 [ and from the non-disclosure of legal advice prior to our entry into the EU in 1973.]

DAILY MAIL-PETER OBORNE-SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 10,2018

 

[COMMENTS WITHIN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

 
 

 

    News for DAILY MAIL-PETER OBORNE-

     

    WHY THIS DEAL

     

     

    COULD SPARK AN ERUPTION

     

     

     

    THAT BLOWS THE TORIES APART.

     

     

     


     Daily Mail
    PETER OBORNE: Mrs May's deal could spark a Tory eruption
    Daily Mail - 18 hours ago
    For the past two years, Brexit has advanced at a snail's pace. There have been
    frequent reports that negotiations had broken down, and that negotiations had broken down, and that Theresa May was finished. ...

LAST PARAGRAPH OF MR OBORNE' S ARTICLE

... MANY voters would wonder how the Conservatives dared to change leader at such a pivotal moment for the nation. In such circumstances, I believe an event which happens only very rarely in modern politics will take place. The monarch will be forced, however  reluctantly to intervene. Fulfilling her constitutional role means the Queen-who is far more respected than any living British politician -will invite Jeremy Corbyn to try  his hand at forming a government.

I doubt he will be able to do so. at which point a number of different options will be considered.

One will be another general election. It's also likely that calls for a second referendum on Brexit would then gain strength.

It's less than eight weeks until Christmas Day, and I'm not going too far to say the destiny of Britain for the next half-century could be determined amid the carol services and sparkling trees of the festive season.

If I were a betting man, I would guess Mrs May will get her way and , for all the travails she has faced in recent months, she will yet lead Britain out of the European Union on March 29,2019.

PETER OBORNE

*  *  *

[WE find it most surprising if Theresa May is able to satisfy Brexiteers in their determination to:

LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION TO REGAIN OUR ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE AS IT WAS BEFORE ANOTHER CONSERVATIVE PARTY LEADER EDWARD HEATH IN 1973 BETRAYED THE PEOPLE WITH GROSS LIES AND DECEIT.

AS WE STATED ON A NUMBER OF OCCASIONS OVER THE YEARS OUR POLITICAL SYSTEM IS BROKEN AND ONLY PR-PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION WILL MEND IT. A GLANCE AT THE POLITICAL SCENE IN GERMANY HAS SHOWN THAT UNDER SUCH AN ARRANGEMENT EVEN A GERMAN IRON CHANCELLOR SUCH AS FRAU MERKEL IS NOT SECURE.

IN BRITAIN IT IS A MUSICAL CHAIR ARRANGEMENT SHARED BY JUST TWO MAIN PARTIES AND ALL THEY HAVE TO DO IS WAIT BEFORE THEIR RIVAL IS BROKEN.

DEMOCRACY IS ONLY SERVED WHEN THE VOICE OF ALL THE PEOPLE IS HEARD!

AND ONLY PR CAN GIVE US TRUE REPRESENTATION IN OUR ONCE FREE HALLOWED ENGLISH PARLIAMENT IN WESTMINSTER.]

NOVEMBER 10,2018

 

MORE!

 

H.F.1746

*  *  *
 

Weekly Geo-Political News and Analysis

by Benjamin Fulford
2018-11-05

Saudi Arabia to be broken up; Israel must choose between Netanyahu and Tel Aviv

By  Weekly Reports  41 Comments
The dismantling of the Khazarian mafia control grid continues with ongoing takedown of the leadership of Saudi Israelia, say Pentagon, CIA, and other sources.  In particular, negotiations are now taking place between Russia and the U.S. to divide Saudi Arabia into a Sunni zone controlled by Iran and a Shia zone controlled by Turkey, according to CIA and FSB sources.

Here is what the Pentagon had to say on this:  “Karma’s a bitch, as Saudi Arabia may be dismembered for what it did to Jamal Khashoggi, and Mohammed bone Sawman (MBS) may be forced to end the Yemen war and lift the Qatar blockade, while the U.S. may find new partners in Turkey and Iran after the Global Currency Reset.”

The other thing going on is that the long-awaited arrests of cabalists in the U.S. have already begun, the sources say.  The highest-profile of these are senior Goldman Sachs bankers arrested along with former Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak for looting money from that country.  One of the uses for the stolen money was to finance the Rothschild-glorifying film “The Wolf of Wall Street.”
 https://www.npr.org/2018/11/01/663197943/2-goldman-sachs-bankers-charged-in-malaysian-financial-scandal

More of the over 61,000 sealed indictments will be unsealed after the U.S. midterm elections, but already, “Gitmo Air is wheels up,” the Pentagon sources say.

Another visible aspect of this is the cabal (Rockefeller faction) General Electric Corporation’s ongoing bankruptcy, the sources say.  This writer’s great-grandfather George Taylor Fulford was the largest single shareholder in GE before he died in a mysterious car crash in 1905.  All newspaper archives related to this crash have vanished, but his GE shares all went to the Rockefeller family via a corrupt trust fund, according to my grandmother.  So for me, this is poetic justice more than a century after the fact.  It is also important to remember that GE was intimately involved in the March 11, 2011 nuclear and tsunami mass-murder attack on Japan, since it was their nuclear generators that were supposedly at the heart of this crime.

In any case, the ongoing slow-motion stock market collapse will continue to claim corporate victims as the new Quantum Financial System goes online, the Pentagon sources say.

The sources also say,“ The migrant caravan [in Mexico] may have been neutralized with 15,000 U.S. troops to the border, as ISIS [Daesh], MS13, and other criminal elements were arrested by Special Forces, while Mexico has induced many to seek asylum.”  In other words, attempts to use this caravan to disrupt the U.S. midterm elections have been neutralized.

There is also high-level intrigue going on in East Asia with the remote-controlled hijacking and crashing of Indonesian Lion Air Flight JT610, CIA sources say.  This plane crash was part of a proxy battle for control of the …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

 
2018-11-03

Request for assistance: SEAN-DAVID MORTON and MELISSA MORTON

By  Letters to the Editor  4 Comments
This is war, folks.  They are jailing alternative media personalities on trumped-up charges.  We need to hunt down and bring to justice all those who participated in this frame-up operation.  –BF

Hello Ben,

My friend Sean-David Morton has asked me to forward his letter.  I recall hearing your interview on his Internet broadcast, “Strange Universe Radio.”  Sean is at the nexus of having the IRS Targeting of Conservatives case re-opened and also revoking the Chevron ruling allowing Administrative Law to supersede Constitutional Law.

We would ask to enlist your support if you would be able to assist Sean in getting this letter to the attention of President Trump, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, Members of Congress, or the media.

Sincerely,

Ken McCoy

Letter as follows (also attached):  Letter_SDM_20181101

Donald J. Trump
President of these united States of America
1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20500

RE:  Pardon request for DR. SEAN-DAVID MORTON and MELISSA MORTON, both vindictively prosecuted by IRS/DOJ CONSPIRACY and wrongfully convicted by elements of the DEEP STATE to ALTER 2012 and 2016 ELECTION OUTCOMES.

RESPONSE TO Presidential request to be informed of horrendous administrative abuses by the IRS and DOJ against supporters of the President for political purposes.

Dear Mr. President,

My name is Dr. Sean-David Morton.  We met, sir, when I appeared ON STAGE with you at your presidential campaign rally in ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA in 2016.  I’m a lifelong friend of Congressman Dana Rohrbacher (R) Orange County.  From the very beginning, starting in 2015, I PREDICTED ON MY TOP TEN RADIO SHOW THAT YOU WOULD WIN IN A LANDSLIDE AND BECOME PRESIDENT, although I was roundly mocked by everyone else in the media.

My INTERNET radio program was in the top TEN of over 10,000 stations worldwide, second only to ALEX JONES, with a global audience going out to millions.  I’m a writer/producer/director and investigative reporter for programs like HARD COPY, UNSOLVED MYSTERIES, SIGHTINGS, STRANGE UNIVERSE, Geraldo Rivera, and dozens more, with HUNDREDS of radio and TV appearances and speaking engagements all over the world, supporting YOU and your agenda to make America great again.

I had the Nevada rancher BUNDY FAMILY, whom you pardoned, on my radio show from the beginning and supported them in their fight against the lies of the DOJ.

Please help us now, as you helped them, so we can be out of here to HELP YOU!

YOU specifically asked for any of your political supporters to come forward that were TARGETED DURING THE CAMPAIGN.  When the IRS Lois Lerner emails came to light, the U.S. Congress asked if political foes could be prosecuted for “FALSE” statements (LERNER put the quotes around the “FALSE”), which Lerner SAID was a way to target Democratic opponents and “THOSE CRAZY RIGHT-WING RADIO TALK SHOW HOSTS.”  (Lerner emails, Congressional Record.)

We were criminally prosecuted less than 2 weeks AFTER the Congressional investigation closed and the Congressional subpoenas were ignored and expired, and the PLOT TO JAIL CONSERVATIVES or DEMOCRATIC OPPONENTS COMMENCED.

WE are the ONLY ONES who have a link to the specific IRS POLITICAL TARGETING and to their nefarious PLOT TO JAIL CONSERVATIVES TO STIFLE FREE SPEECH AND FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION.  This is also a TEST of the infamous CHEVRON CASE, which challenges near-unlimited ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY POWER, which is why I believe you nominated Brett Kavanaugh for the Supreme Court.

WE are the only ones whose cases infer they did NOT stop targeting political foes after the Congressional IRS investigation ended–could it be closed so abruptly to ensure the long-term political plot in 2011/2012 was continued?

WE WERE INDICTED and TARGETED in a VINDICTIVE PROSECUTION as a political tactic hatched earlier as known in the LOIS LERNER emails describing the [election campaign] as an OBAMA/HOLDER plot to jail vocal conservative leaders and to silence certain movements who claim FEDERALISM and want to make America a better place.

It is because of my investigative journalism, my lectures, and my work in RADIO and TELEVISION and books that DEEP STATE forces within the DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and the OBAMA ADMINISTRATION have put my sick wife Melissa and me in prison for YEARS!  Literally, as it states in my sentencing document, as a “DETERRENT AND EXAMPLE TO ANYONE THAT WOULD QUESTION THE VOLUNTARY INCOME SYSTEM OF THE UNITED STATES,” which I have NEVER DONE!

In fact, Obama appointees DOJ prosecutors VALERIE MAKAWITZ and JAMES C. HUGHES prosecutions were SO HATEFUL and it shows on its face prima facie evidence of VINDICTIVE PROSECUTION.  I did a GOFUNDME.com site and conducted lectures and webinars to ask my friends and supporters for donations to help pay for my appeal.  ON THE RECORD, these prosecutors CONTACTED the GOFUNDME.COM WEBSITE and demanded that the site SEND THE DONORS’ MONEY BACK, along with a LETTER intended to STOP and DETOUR any help and to CHILL my relationships and DEFAME me with all of my friends, family, and associates trying to HELP US, stating that I was attempting to, and I quote Valerie Makawitz and the DOJ here, “THWART THE WILL OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE.”

Not in the long HISTORY of the DOJ have I ever heard of these dark, evil, dastardly, and scandalous tactics being used.  This has GOT to be the MOST VINDICTIVE PROSECUTION THAT HAS EVER BEEN!  It just shows the sheer psychopathic nature of Valerie Makawitz and her accomplices.  They did not want us to win or be able to fight them AT ALL COSTS, or even to raise the funds to allow us DUE PROCESS and further access to the legal system.  THEY WANTED US TO BE USED AS EXAMPLES of what they would DO to your supporters and makes it obvious that Valerie Makawitz and the DOJ would stop at NOTHING, including violating all ethical rules and EVEN BREAK THE LAW TO DO IT!

I BEG YOU for a pardon for my sick wife Melissa and myself!  We were unjustly and illegally prosecuted and now are both rotting in federal prisons for “CRIMES” in which the DOJ said there were “NO VICTIMS AND NO MONETARY LOSS TO THE GOVERNMENT.”

This was all a SET-UP and a vendetta carried out for publicity against your supporters by DEEP STATE ACTORS of the Obama Administration, such as LOIS LERNER, ERIC HOLDER, MARK EVERSON, the IRS, and the DOJ to try to ALTER THE OUTCOME OF THE 2016 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION.

POINT BY POINT:

THE PROSECUTORS

Lead DOJ prosecutor is Valerie Makawitz, under Sandra Bowen, who both worked on Obama’s campaign in Los Angeles and were both appointed by Obama.  Makawitz’s husband, Mark Makawitz, is another Obama appointee as a Military Tribunal judge, the first to be appointed with NO EXPERIENCE WHATSOEVER.  They all KNEW we were supporters of you, and that we were selectively and vindictively prosecuted, or HEAD-HUNTED, as being in the freedom movement who spoke out against government conspiracies and oppression.  Co-Prosecutor James Hughes, also an Obama appointee, also worked for the GSO.

They specifically tampered with the jury pool by using a DOJ database to choose a jury pool of only those who would be most likely to convict us.

In fact, Melissa and I were NAMED AS VICTIMS in three other IRS targeting cases of ALEXANDER ADAMS, BRANDON ADAMS, GARRET ADAMS, and GORDON HALL.  Then, suddenly the DOJ decided to persecuted US, WHO WERE THE VICTIMS, and now the “main architects and perpetrators” of THEIR 1099-OID tax process, which consisted of filing the IRS’s OWN documents and returns, available in programs like TURBO TAX.

THE IRS AGENTS

The IRS TARGETING for political purposes BEGAN in EL MONTE and LAGUNA, both Southern California cities.  The PROGENITOR of these investigations and prosecution were IRS AGENTS PETER LU and JOHN SMITH.  Turns out “JOHN SMITH” was an alias for Agent JOHN LUCERO, who was the main player in the vindictive and selective prosecutions of those in the TEA PARTY and SUPER-PACS that opposed Obama in 2012, and then were pro-Trump in 2015-2016.  So it all stared with “JOHN SMITH.”

THE JURY

Judge Stephen V. Wilson illegally denied a VOID DIRE vetting of the jury or the opportunity to QUESTION potential jurors on their experience and prejudices.  We found out WHY.

The LEAD JUROR, JUROR #1, Leticia Sanchez, turns out has a long criminal record, was operating under an alias, and has been associated with VIOLENT PRO-IMMIGRATION GROUPS, LA RAZA, and even has connections with MS-13.

Turns out KATIE INGEBRETSON, JUROR #6, worked on the Obama Presidential campaign with DOJ PROSECUTOR VALERIE MAKAWITZ in 2012.  Ingebretson described herself as a harmless “green consultant.”  She in fact RAN BARACK OBAMA’S CAMPAIGN OPERATIONS in what were described as “BATTLEGROUND STATES.”  She used what she learned about using the INTERNET for political gain and opened a communications and government relations firm in Los Angeles.  As a POLITICAL CONSULTANT for Obama, she was the lead manager of the re-election campaign that was known to be WHY the IRS TARGETING began to sway the 2012 election campaign WHICH SHE RAN… and SHE was chosen to be IMPARTIAL on our jury?  NOT SO MUCH!  She has in fact given TED TALKS on “INFILTRATION OF ENEMY POLITICAL CAMPAIGNS!”

More specifically, as an investigative journalist and in my best-selling “SANDS OF TIME: 40 YEARS IN THE SHADOW GOVERNMENT” book series, I exposed and blew the lid off the top-secret base called AREA 51.  KATIE INGEGRETSON was the ASSISTANT TO THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE.  So do you think SHE had an agenda in convicting us?

THE WITNESSES:

MARK EVERSON

Witness #1 against us was one MARK W. EVERSON, who was the 18th Republican candidate in a field of 17 THAT RAN AGAINST YOU for PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.  He was the 46th COMMISSIONER OF THE IRS beginning in 2003.  Everson stated, “Trump’s policies are reckless, be they stripping trillion in revenues from the Treasury and bankrupting the country, or countenancing nuclear proliferation, to name two of the worst.”  The Obama targeting of conservative groups BEGAN UNDER HIS WATCH!  Everson also was put in charge of reorganizing and “updating” ALL government databases.  HIS WORK resulted in the hacking and loss of HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS of taxpayer Social Security numbers and the financial records of all these U.S. citizens.

He also testified that it was Alexander Adams, CPA and his sons BRANDON and GARRET ADAMS, licensed tax preparers, who filed ALL of our IRS tax documents, that THEY were the “Architects and perpetrators of the scheme,” and that they had the licenses of the IRS FIRE SYSTEM NUMBERS allowing them to file the 1099-OID’s… meaning that WE COULD NOT have done the actual filing, as claimed by the DOJ.

JOHN KIRSLING

Presented himself as an IRS “computer expert,” yet he was apparently ON THE STAND UNDER OATH operating under an alias, because we can find NO INFORMATION about this “expert” ANYWHERE on the INTERNET.  He testified that he went through “hundreds of thousands of records” in our computers and could find “no evidence whatsoever that the Morton’s defrauded anyone.”

WILLIAM KERR

A paid DOJ “Expert Witness” on banking and bonds who claimed that he had testified in some 76 cases on bonds and banking.  Yet Mr. Kerr did not know even the basic fundamentals of what he claimed to be an expert in.  He knew nothing of the United States bankruptcy of 1933, did not know that the Federal Reserve was a PRIVATE ENTITY, and did not KNOW what a W-4 employment form EVEN WAS.

KRISTY MORGAN

Claiming to be an IRS TAX EXPERT, did not know the FIRST THING about 1099-OID returns, what they were for, or how they were even processed.  And she claimed to NOT KNOW what a 1099-A was or an “Abandonment and Acquisitions” form, which lets banks know that you want funds returned that were ORIGINALLY GENERATED by the taxpayer, that were used by the bank to fractionalize funds they loan out.

So this is the ROGUES GALLERY that were used to target and vindictively persecute us.

The Los Angeles DOJ originally offered us both MISDEMEANOR CHARGES of less than a year, then told us, “That offer is RESCINDED because we have been told that DONALD TRUMP and JEFF SESSIONS want to be TOUGH ON CRIME!” knowing that we were supporters of you in your efforts to defeat the DEEP STATE and SAVE AMERICA, as this WAS the DEEP STATE in a massively publicized case fighting back against a very PUBLIC SUPPORTER of you and what you are doing!

Then I got 71 MONTHS, nearly 7 YEARS, and my poor wife, who had a debilitating STROKE when they read the verdict where she was DEAD FOR FOUR MINUTES, got TWO YEARS in prison!  Our family was torn apart, our possessions were looted, and we have been left with nothing.

WE BEG YOU FOR A PARDON!  IF ANYONE DESERVED ON IT IS US!  I got MORE THAT THE MAXIMUM sentence because the DOJ claimed I “WAS TO BE MADE AN EXAMPLE OF,” as one of your supporters, and that my sentence was to be an example and a deterrent to others.

This was NOT a “TAX EVASION” case.  It was literally IRS paperwork, filed by a CPA and LICENSED TAX PREPARERS, and paperwork with which we assisted other people to send to banks to help them with crushing debt.

THE CASE IS CURRENTLY UNDER APPEAL, AND I STILL FEEL THAT YOU ARE OUR LAST HOPE!  What was DONE to us was all part of an insidious plot to ALTER THE OUTCOME OF THE 2016 ELECTION, using publicity by targeting your supporters.

MR. PRESIDENT, I believe you have the responsibility to support and defend the people that supported you and to save them from this GOVERNMENT TYRANNY AND INJUSTICE!

HELP US DEFEAT THE DEEP STATE THAT DID THIS TO US SO UNJUSTLY.

Your devoted supporter,

Dr. Sean-David Morton
 #730-55-112
SPC-USP
PO BOX 74549
Tucson, AZ 85734

 
2018-11-01

White Dragons Wearing Red Shirts?

By  Letters to the Editor  1 Comment
Hi Benjamin,

Your “CIA source” appears to be feeding you more drivel this week, similar to last week.  To review, last week your source appeared be very confused about whether MBS is dead or is living on a different planet.
 https://benjaminfulford.net/2018/10/24/whats-become-of-mohammad-bin-salman/

The confusion/disinformation is perhaps not surprising, considering that the CIA is well known to have been against the crowning of MBS from the beginning and more in favor of another, more pliable, crown prince.
 https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-10-28/regime-change-riyadh-cia-has-just-publicly-dumped-mbs

In any case, this week we have another dead or alive caper.  This time it involves Thai billionaire Vichai Srivaddhanaprabha, whose helicopter apparently crashed after a football match in Leicester City, England.
 https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-10-28/billionaire-clan-in-focus-after-leicester-owner-s-chopper-crash

Your CIA source reports that the death was faked in the context that “the elite are faking their own deaths in the hopes of evading justice or revenge.”

So according to your source, Vichai was one of the “bad guys.”  In making this claim, your source is essentially taking a position in Thailand’s ongoing political struggle against the King of Thailand and more in favor of deposed prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra’s faction.

“The family name Srivaddhanaprabha was bestowed upon [Vichai’s family] by Thailand’s late King Bhumibol Adulyadej and loosely translates as “light of progressive glory.”  That came after the monarch gave the rare honor of a royal warrant to Vichai.”

Vichai’s company is called “King Power” and holds the concession for duty-free shopping in Thailand, meaning lots of access to airports and import/export facilities.

“[Vichai’s] sudden death comes as state-run Airports of Thailand prepares a tender to award the next concession for the sprawling duty-free stores at Suvarnabhumi, Thailand’s main international airport in the capital Bangkok.  The current concession is due to expire in 2020, and foreign companies such as South Korea’s Lotte Corp. have shown interest in the business.”

Vichai was also engaged in a legal struggle:  “Most recently, a Thai court dismissed a case alleging the Thai government hadn’t received all the fees due from the operation of duty-free concessions.”

The circumstances seem quite suspicious.  Did Vichai really fake his own death, as your CIA source says, or was he assassinated?

Interestingly, both Vichai and Thaksin were owners of football teams in the English Premier League.  Vichai bought underdog team Leicester City and led it to a miraculous league championship in 2016, a feat which has already become one of the greatest upset stories in sports history.  Vichai was well-liked by fans and gave out free beer on his birthday.

Thaksin, on the other hand, bought perennial favorite Manchester City.  But nobody really liked him and the club manager said he “didn’t have a clue” about football.  The team was quickly sold to Abu Dhabi.

Ben, all we can say your “CIA source” once again appears to be playing for the wrong team.

 
2018-10-31

Naiem Giladi

By  Letters to the Editor  0 Comments
Dear Ben,

There is a great article online (nigh on 10 years) by Naiem Giladi entitled “The Jews of Iraq.”  Giladi (now deceased) was a former Zionist.  In that article he testifies in his own hand to having thrown grenades at innocent Jews in Iraq in order to convince them that the state was out to get them.

Note:  We located the article here:
 http://www.inminds.com/jews-of-iraq.html

I highly recommend the article and I was intending to clip out relevant paragraphs and send them to you apropos of the incident in Pittsburgh.  Unfortunately I am traveling now and cannot clip the paragraphs for you as hoped.

As you may remember, I also live in Pittsburgh and I consider you to be my friend as well.  Although in fact people may have actually been murdered, having traveled close to the area and having been alerted via phone, I felt it had the ring of a well-practiced drill.

Irrespective, I wasn’t in the synagogue, so I can’t provide you with better info.  Obviously the event was the only conversation on the street.  As I had lunch with friends in a local restaurant during the alert, I can only say that many people were scared out of their wits and huddling indoors.  That said, the orthodox community seemed largely unfazed (good for them), strolling casually to and from their services.

—Anonymous

 
2018-10-29

Message to the banking elite: Trick or treat

By  Weekly Reports  400 Comments
It is going to be an especially haunting Halloween for the Khazarian mafia banking elite, because they have been given an October 31 deadline to return the gold they stole or face being systematically hunted down and exterminated, say Asian secret society, CIA, and White Dragon Society sources.  After that deadline, bounties of gold will be placed on senior bankers starting with the heads of the EU Central Bank, the Bank of Japan, the Federal Reserve Board, and the BIS, the sources say.

The White Dragon Society (WDS) has offered the Khazarian mafia a way out of this situation.  All they have to do is monetize, in a constructive and reality-based manner, $40 trillion worth of 1934 Henry Morgenthau Bonds to finance the establishment of a meritocratic future planning agency.  This would be enough to end poverty, stop environmental destruction, and finance human expansion into the universe.  The alternative is death for all the Khazarian gangsters involved in central bank fraud and Babylonian debt slavery.

In the U.S., meanwhile, Pentagon sources say U.S. President Donald “Trump had a briefing and dinner with top military brass at the White House on October 23 in a blunt message to Israel, the Democrats, the deep state, and its invading army from Mexico not to steal the midterm elections.”  The photo below shows clearly where the U.S. military stands.
 There is also a major push going on to take down the rogue regime of Saudi Israelia, multiple sources agree.  The murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi is, despite attempts by the Khazarians to distract us with false flags etc., turning out to have been a fatal mistake.

The heads of state of Russia, Germany, and France were in Istanbul last week to meet with Turkish President Recep Erdogan to discuss this murder and the future of the rogue Zionist Saudi Israelia regime, according Russian sources.

CIA sources tried to convince this writer that the murder never actually took place by sending the following statement about the summit, to which the U.S., Israel, and China were not invited:

“They are there to discuss the Khashoggi matter.  They are trying to figure out how to release the truth about Khashoggi.  He is NOT dead.  He is also not available for anyone to meet.  The heads of the special powers that be, U.S., Russia, China, Turkey, France, Germany, Saudi Arabia, and Israel, know exactly where he is.  Let’s just say Khashoggi fucked them all.  He turned their own unacknowledged special-application-program weapon against them.  He had the access codes.”

The Russians responded by sending the horrific photographs below of Khashoggi’s dismembered body with his face peeled off.  Warning:  The photographs in these links are extremely gruesome.

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

H.F.1743

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

PETER OBORNE

 

 
News for DAILY MAIL-PETER OBORNE:

 Why does Britain cosy up to

 Saudi Arabia.

[WEALTH-OIL-JOBS]

WHY DO WE COSY UP TO  A STATE THAT SILENCES ITS CRITICS?

OCTOBER 10, 2018

SIX months ago, Britain rolled out the red carpet in fine style for Crown Prince Mohammed Bin Salman, the man who is the heir apparent in Saudi Arabia.

He was given lunch with the Queen, enjoyed an earnest discussion about interfaith relations at Lambeth Palace and was hosted for dinner by the Prince of Wales.

There were also long detailed-and doubtless talks with Theresa May about British trade with Saudi Arabia, which reportedly established a 65billion trade and investment target, some of which would involve lucritive arms sales to the desert kingdom.

Earlier, the PM had said in the Commons that

 'the link that we have with Saudi Arabia is historic, it is an important one, and it has saved the lives of potentially hundreds of people in this country'.

People who should have known much better hailed Bin Salman, who is only 33, as a great reformer whose mission is to drag his country into the 21st century. A hugely expensive PR campaign highlighted the fact that, thanks to him, Saudi cinemas are opening after decades of closure, while women are at last being allowed-heresy of heresies - to drive a car.

But there has always been a dark side to this Saudi Crown Prince, and his Western admirers had absolutely no excuse not to know this.

 AS he sat down with Mrs May hundreds of political opponents-some of whom had been tortured in gruesome ways-languished in Saudi jails

 Meanwhile, the Saudi bombing campaign in neighbouring Yemen-as part of a war against rebel forces seeking to overthrow the Yemeni Government to which it is allied-continued to claim thousands of innocent lives in what the United Nations has called

THE WORLD'S WORST HUMANITARIAN CRISIS

Meanwhile, many very troubling question marks continue to surround the long Saudi relationship with the Al Qaeda terror group.

But it has taken the disappearance of the exiled journalist Jamal Khashoggi to bring home the moral bankruptcy of the Bin Salman regime.

This is because Mr Khashoggi, who is feared to have been murdered in gruesome circumstances by thugs employed by the Saudi monarchy, is known to many in the West.

Indeed, he was here in Britain only a fortnight ago for a public meeting in which he criticised Saudi plans for a so-called 'deal of the century' to undertake massive new construction programmes.

Jamal Khashoggi, a gentle bear of a man, was a journalist of untold integrity who illuminated any conversation he took part in. He was no deranged revolutionary. He was not even against the House of Saud, the dynasty which British agents put on the throne almost 100 years ago.

He supported gradual reform. For example he supported capital punishment and in its early stages at least, the Saudi offensive in Yemen.

Though he lived in exile, he had a close connections with the Saudi royal family. He used to be an adviser to Prince Turki al-Faisal, ex-director of Saudi intelligence.

It may be, says one source quietly, that he knew too much.

The facts, according to Turkish police are grim. Mr Khashoggi was planning to marry  his Turkish fiancee Hatice Cengiz. However, Turkish law does not allow polygamy. So he needed to get papers from Saudi Arabia proving he was divorced from his first wife. Hence his visit last Tuesday to the Saudi Arabian consulate in Instanbul.

Much! Muc! More! To Follow Here!

 

OCTOBER 10, 2018

 

H.F.1727

*  *  *
 UNDERSTANDING ISLAM

PART 16

AUGUST 2005

ISLAMIC AMBITION

In his 1934 book 'Sex and Culture the anthropologist J.D.Unwin studied 86 different cultures from a period of 5,000 years and concluded that chastity and fidelity in "strict marital monogamy" were central to any strong, healthy society. Indeed, no society flourished for more than three generations without it. Britain is now nearing the end of the second generation. Once the third generation was out, the society died, usually by being taken over by another, monogamous people. "I know of no exceptions to this rule.

Could the fiercely monogamous Islam be the culture that takes over from the secular humanist culture of the Western world? Will we see  the establishment of an Islamic State in Britain and the imposition of Sha'ria. This author believes the British Establishment would not  allow such a thing to happen, jealous  as its leaders are of their grip on power.  However, events have a habit  of taking politicians by surprise, and there is no lack  of ambition amongst Muslims.  It is only necessary to look at tower hamlets  to see what happens when 'ordinary Muslims' take power.

Tower Hamlets [in 2005] is 36% Muslim, and yet Muslims are in a majority in the ruling Labour group and on the Council as a whole, and the Mayor is Muslim.  Presumably the Muslim councillors can be regarded as 'ordinary Muslims.' Once in power, they attempted to have  wards renamed to eliminate references to Christianity (Trinity ward disappeared ), and a proposal to twin the London Borough with Jenin, a Palestinian hot-bed of terrorism, was narrowly averted.

The Borough is able to use the funding it allocates to advance Islamic programmes and cultural societies, force the closure of Christian schools and ensure that Muslims control everything for which the local authority has responsibility.

There are 14 Muslim community organisations in partnership with Tower Hamlets Borough Council. In addition to the 2 mosques, the Ahmadiya Muslim Association has as its purpose:

Practising Islamic knowledge... to upkeep a moral society', the junior Muslim Circle provided' religious education' to 8-14 year olds, a Madrassah has 'mother tongue [Arabic?] and study support classes', and the Shahjalal Centre is there  to 'meet the needs of the Muslim community' with 'prayer space' and 'education for children'

Couple Islamic ambition for a Khilafah with a decadent British society whose leaders dare not speak out against Islam or oppose 'multiculturalism', and Islamic advances can be made.  Mosques can be built and expanded, Islamic schools established, cultural centres set up, and large amounts of public money can fund studies which do not benefit the United Kingdom..

*  *  *

Christian Voice, PO Box 739A, Surbiton, KT6 5YA -

AUGUST 2005

Searches related to pew research muslim population

sweden muslim population 2050

islam in germany 2050

islam in europe 2050

muslim population in france 2017

muslim population in europe 2018

belgium muslim population

islam in europe today

muslim population

 

More!

IMMIGRATION FILE

 

 

H.F.1711/16

*  *  *
 UNDERSTANDING ISLAM

PART 8

AUGUST 2005

TAKEYYA-DECEPTION

The principle of Al Takeyya-literally 'to prevent' or guard against something - conveys the understanding that Muslims are permitted to lie as a preventative measure against anticipated harm to one's self or fellow Muslims.  This principle gives Muslims the liberty to lie under circumstances that they perceive as life threatening. Mohammed said they can even deny the faith, if they do not mean it in their hearts. Falsehoods told to prevent denigration of Islam, to protect one;lf, or to promote the cause of Islam are sanctioned by the Qur'an, which says:" Allah will not call you to account for what is futile in your oaths, but he will call you to account for your deliberate oaths" (Sura 5:89). What is important is what is in your heart (Sura 2:225) and to deny Islam " under compulsion, his heart remaining firm in faith" is acceptable to Allah (Sura 16:106). It is also in order to pretend to befriend infidels as a preventative measure (Sura 3:28).

The most authoritive Hadith confirms the point: "Allah's Apostle said, Who is willing to kill Ka'b bin Al-Ashraf who has hurt Allah and his Apostle? "Thereupon Muhammed bin Maslama got up saying, "O Allah's Apostle!" Would you like that I kill him?" The Prophet said ," Yes," Muhammed bin Maslama said "Then allow me to say a (false) thing (i.e. to deceive Kab).  "The Prophet said, " You may say it," (Bukhari vol 4:271p168.

The principle has become codified in Islam to suggest that a Muslim may lie to reconcile mfellow Muslims, in time of war, which many believe they are in, and a Muslim may lie to his wife. Defending Islam itself is an obvious reason for Takeyya, and that can mean defending oneself including lying under penalty of perjury in testimony, lying or making distorted statements to the media (such as claiming Islam is a religion of peace, knowing it is not) and deceiving fellow Muslims when the one lying has deemed to be apostates.

Naturally, once the principle of lying is accepted, the practice can extend to virtually any circumstance. It is a very uncomfortable felling that Muslims may not be trusted, for the majority seem such decent  and honourable people.  Equally, it is a sad fact that all recent cases of postal ballot-rigging have involved Muslims, and in the Birmingham case, Election Commissioner Richard Mawrey QC said that in the evidence of one of the councillors concerned, Mohammed Afzal, 'obvious lie followed obvious lie.' This is written with a heavy heart, but especially in the present context Muslims feel Islam itself is under threat, we should expect the principle of deception to come heavily into play.

 

Christian Voice, PO Box 739A, Surbiton, KT6 5YA -

AUGUST 2005

Searches related to pew research muslim population

sweden muslim population 2050

islam in germany 2050

islam in europe 2050

muslim population in france 2017

muslim population in europe 2018

belgium muslim population

islam in europe today

muslim population

 

More!

IMMIGRATION FILE

 

 

H.F.1711/8

*  *  *
 UNDERSTANDING ISLAM

PART 17

AUGUST-2005

RESPONDING TO ISLAM

The long-term danger of an Islamic state in Britain may be far off as not to be significant, but the short-term threat of terrorism and the medium-term threat of Islamicisation in Muslim enclaves both demand a response. The Government has already announced a number of measures which it is actively considering [They are still doing so in 2018] Among these are proscribing organisations, naming Hizb-ut-Tahir and successor organisations of al-Muhajiroun.  What more should our Government do? What should we as Christians pray for, apart from the salvation of Muslim souls?

It is important to recognise that nothing can be achieved by multiculturalism. The insistence that all cultures are equally valid is part of the problem. Even Trevor Phillips, head of the Commission for Racial Equality, said in 2004 that multiculturalism was dead and integration based on shared values and loyalties was the only way to avoid friction. His call to accept "common values... the common currency of the English language, honouring the culture of these islands, like Shakespeare and Dickens," led to the claim from Asian MP Keith Vas MP that imposing British values would be like "the work of Christian missionaries." Yet the one 'common value' and essential part of the 'culture of these islands' Phillips ignored was Christianity and the Bible.

The single most important thing our Government should do is to emphasis, not a nebulous 'Britishness', but Britain's Christian heritage and Constitution.  As a small step, the Queen should announce a day of prayer to Almighty God for protection and guidance in the glorious name of Lord Jesus Christ. The God who brought this nation victorious through two world wars in answer to prayer made in that mighty Name is still strong as powerful and as able to save today.  He can frustrate the plans of bombers and reveal their hiding places if we acknowledge Him as Sovereign of the universe and  turn to him with all our hearts.

Secondly, the Government must recognise that the United Kingdom has sinned by diluting our Christian heritage with secularism to the point where there is scarcely any Christianity left.  Muslim activists use the immorality and injustice of our land to prove that Islam is superior to Christianity, and to claim that Sha'ria would bring peace and tranquillity.  They fail to understand that Christianity has not failed in these islands, it has been cast away in favour of a law-system dreamt up by sinful men. It would not be enough to pray to God for protection and then refuse to listen to Him when he commands us to repent.  The Government should must begin to rely again on the wisdom of the Bible in framing law, and reverse current trends which encourage wickedness.

Thirdly, the Government should say frankly and unapologetically that this was, is and is going to be a Christian nation, and that anyone who does not like it that state of affairs is free to leave. They have announced quicker deportation of foreign nationals and widened the grounds, and in the case of to who encourage terrorism, will strip the British element of citizenship from those with dual citizenship or those who are naturalised.  They plan to refuse asylum to terrorists. However, they have little idea of how to deal with British-born jihadists, beside control orders, and one idea they should consider is how they might assist those second-generation British followers of other religions who wish to find a more agreeable place to live..

Closure of places of worship which are used as centres of extremism would be useful, but the Government should know that much indoctrination of Muslim youth is done outside the mosques. A more practical measure would be to remove public money from British madrassahs, Islamic centres and Muslim associations and scrutnise them and Muslim charities for any signs of jihadist teaching or overseas funding.  Planning permission for Islamic centres and mosques should be put on hold.  Foreign policy-including trade policy-should also be much more assertive against those regimes where Christians are under threat either from government action or from Muslim mobs.  Our foreign policy should be righteous rather than 'ethical'. Britain should pull our soldiers out of Iraq and not engage in further excursions in sovereign Muslim lands where no British interest is served. We should also be more supportive of the modern state of Israel, flawed as it is, recognising the unification of Jerusalem, and the rightful place of Judea and Samaria in Israel as a whole.

It could be  objected that one effect of such measures, and even those which the Government is proposing at the time of writing, is that Muslim youth will be even more disaffected with Britain than they are at the moment and more inclined to terrorism. However, Britain is now Dar-al-Harb in any case and reliance on Almighty God is the key element in any successful programme of surveillance and intelligence-gathering.  he 7/7 bombers were unknown to the security forces.  Many praying Christians will have a strong sense that the failure of 21/7 was by the grace of God alone, and He was demonstrating His power as the One who brings wicked schemes to light.  He was also saying that He has given us a window to repent and turn to Him, who alone can save.

Christian Voice, PO Box 739A, Surbiton, KT6 5YA -

AUGUST 2005

Searches related to pew research muslim population

sweden muslim population 2050

islam in germany 2050

islam in europe 2050

muslim population in france 2017

muslim population in europe 2018

belgium muslim population

islam in europe today

muslim population

 

More!

IMMIGRATION FILE

 

 

H.F.1711/17

 
 

News for DAILY MAIL-UK pays worst state pension in the developed world

Britain pays retirees the worst state pension in the developed world with a basic payout of £122.30 a week
  • The basic payout of £122.30 a week is the least generous in the West 
  • Former pensions minister Ros Altmann warned the situation could get worse 
  • Government projections suggest that for those now under 30 the age when they can claim a state pension will have to be raised to 70 

By Daniel Martin, Policy Editor For The Daily Mail

February 12, 2018

Britain pays retirees the worst state pension of any country in the developed world, analysis has found.

The basic payout of £122.30 a week is the least generous in the West – worth just 29 per cent of average earnings – and last night former pensions minister Ros Altmann warned the situation could get even worse.

Government projections suggest that for those now under 30 the age when they can claim a state pension will have to be raised to 70, while future payments could be cut even further to avoid needing massive hikes in national insurance, Baroness Altmann said.
 

Britain pays retirees the worst state pension of any country in the developed world, analysis has found

The league table revealing Britain's pension shame was compiled by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), which analyses the world's industrialised nations. 

Out of all the countries compared, Britain comes bottom – even behind poorer nations such as Chile, Poland and Mexico.

While the UK's state pension is worth just 29 per cent of average earnings, in France the equivalent figure is 74.5 per cent. 

Germany's state pension is worth 50.5 per cent of average earnings, while in the USA it is 49.1 per cent. 

The most generous state pension in the world is in the Netherlands, where the payments are slightly higher than average earnings.
 

The basic payout of £122.30 a week is the least generous in the West – worth just 29 per cent of average earnings. File photo

Baroness Altmann warned that despite a recent overhaul to the pension system, payments will need to be cut further to avoid massive tax rises in future to pay for it. 

She said: 'We are one of the world's leading economies, but our support for the oldest in society is not fit for purpose.

'In April 2016, major reforms to the UK state pension were supposed to have made the system affordable for the future, reducing its generosity. Beyond the 2030s, the new state pension will be lower than the old system for most people and the lowest paid, predominantly women, will lose significantly from the new system.

'Despite this, the Government has been advised that the costs of paying state pensions will soar so much over the next 20 years and beyond that further cuts could be required.'

From later this year the state pension age for women will rise from 63 to match men at 65, and will reach 66 for both by 2020.

Baroness Ros Altmann (pictured) warned that despite a recent overhaul to the pension system, payments will need to be cut further to avoid massive tax rises in future to pay for it

The Government's economic forecasters, the Actuary's Department, believes it will become 70 in the 2050s and 71 in the 2060s.

This would mean that anyone aged 30 or below now will not get their state pension until they are 70, while those under 20 will have to wait until they are 71.

Baroness Altmann added: 'The Government actuary believes that just funding the UK's exceptionally low state pension will require reducing payments in future or dramatic tax rises. Policymakers face difficult decisions and are also likely to need to increase the state pension age further.'

The former pensions minister called on the Government to do more to address the crisis, including making private pensions more attractive so that more people are willing to pay a portion of their wages into their own fund.

'To avoid burdening younger generations with significant tax rises, it is vital that more is done to boost private pension saving,' she added. 'Auto-enrolment is a good start, but the pensions industry needs to attract more customers to pay more into their pensions.' 
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5379521/Britain-pays-retirees-worst-state-pension.html#ixzz56thYQdgc
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

February 12, 2018

[IT IS IRONIC THAT IT WAS THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY WHICH INTRODUCED THE STATE PENSION  OVER A HUNDRED YEARS AGO BY WINSTON CHURCHILL YET AS SHOWN ABOVE IT HAS BEEN ALLOWED BY BOTH THE MAIN POLITICAL PARTIES TO THE PRESENT LEVEL AS THE POOREST PENSIONERS OF THE 24 DEVELOPED NATIONS WITH A PERCENTAGE OF THE AVERAGE WAGE OF 29PER CENT-WHEREAS THE TOP NATION NETHERLANDS PAYS 100.6 %. WITH THE CITY MILE BEING BAILED OUT WITH 45 BILLION OF THE TAXPAYERS MONEY.]

-A GREEDY SQUARE MILE AND PARSIMONIOUS STATE PENSION YET OUR OVERSEAS AID IS SQUANDERED AND WASTED WITH THE CHARITIES IN THE MAIN GAUGING THEMSELVES WITH HIGH LIVING-AND NOW WE HEAR EVEN PROSTITUTION IS CONSIDERED A PERK OF THE JOB.  THERE APPEARS NO ADEQUATE OVERSIGHT OF CHARITIES TO ENSURE THAT CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS ARE FOR THE TRUE NEEDY NOT FOR FUN AND GAMES AND TERRORISTS OR HIGH LIVING OF THOSE RECEIVING THE TAXPAYERS HARD EARNED REMUNERATION WHILE MANY OF THE CONTRIBUTORS ARE IN GREAT PAIN AND MANY DYING WHICH COULD BE GREATLY REDUCED IF CHARITY BEGAN AT HOME.  TO BOAST OF BEING THE LARGEST CONTRIBUTOR TO OVERSEAS AID WHILE A GREAT NUMBER OF OUR CITIZENS PARTICULARLY THE POOR AND A NUMBER OF THE ELDERLY  ARE SUFFERING IN ORDER THAT THE TOP OF THE FOREIGN AID LIST IS MAINTAINED.

HOW IS IT THAT THE OTHER 23 NATIONS CAN PROVIDE A HIGHER STATE PENSION? WHAT IS PREVENTING WESTMINSTER FROM BRINGING OUR STATE PENSION UP TO AT LEAST THE AVERAGE OF THOSE ON THE LIST BELOW WHICH CONTAINS MANY NATIONS WHICH CAN HARDLY BE  CONSIDERED RICH COMPARED TO THE UK. IS IT THAT IN THOSE COUNTRIES THE PEOPLE ARE

 PUT FIRST! - NOT LAST?

THERE ARE TOO MANY PEOPLE FEEDING OFF THE PUBLIC PURSE WITH THEIR OBSCENE RATES OF SALARY AND GOLDEN PENSION-POSSIBLY SO LONG AS THEY ARE COMFORTABLE THEY HAVE NO THOUGHT FOR THOSE WHO PAID FOR THEIR LAVISH LIFESTYLE?

PAYOUT AS PERCENTAGE OF AVERAGE WAGE
Netherlands   -  100.6%

Portugal        -   94.9%

Italy             -  93.2%

Austria         -  91.8%

Spain             -  81.8%

Denmark        -  80.2%

France            -  74.5%

Belgium          -  66.1%

Finland         -  65%

Czech Republic-60%

Sweden         -  54.9%

Canada          -  53.4%

OECD average=62.9

 

 Germany    -    50.5%

USA            -    49.1%

Norway      -    48.8%

 Switzerland    -    44.9%

New Zealand   -  43.2%

Australia     -    42.6%

Ireland        -   42.3%

Chile         -     40.1%

Japan           -  40%

Poland       -      38.6%

Mexico         -     29.6%

UK  -  29%

Source-OECD

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

February 12, 2018

*

LATEST!

ON THE CONTINUING GROWTH OF THE VANITY PROJECT

FOREIGN AID BUDGET

DAILY MAIL

OCTOBER 30, 2018

Foreign Aid will top £14bn a year
 

Britain's foreign Aid budget will soar by £230million next year, taking it above£14billion for the first time

The UK is committed to spend 0.7per cent of its national income on aid.

Britain is one of only seven countries in the world to meet the target.

The foreign aid budget soared by £555million to a record £13.9billion last year. Our aid budget has more than doubled from the £6.4billion spent in 2008 and more than quadrupled from the £3.3billion doled out in 2002.

[Why with such vast sums to alleviate the distress around the world are we still seeing adverts on our television screens for such a basic-common and vital need as drinking water?]

 

With billions spread abroad like confetti why are UK state pensions not up with the best in Europe. With a strongly extreme Left Labour Party we would have expected them to have this at the top of their agenda-If it is-they are keeping it a SECRET!]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

OCTOBER 30, 2018

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

H.F.1716

QUENTIN LETTS on Labour's Barry Sheerman Brexit bashing | Daily ...

 

Just when you thought Remainers couldn't get more patronising, up pops this snooty ninny! QUENTIN LETTS on Labour backbencher Barry Sheerman

By Quentin Letts for the Daily Mail

 October 31,2017

At the age of 77, Huddersfield’s Labour MP Barry Sheerman may not plan to stand again for re-election to the House of Commons.

We must certainly assume so given that the old booby just let slip he thinks his constituents in West Yorkshire are ill-educated. As election-winning strategies go, it is at least novel. Vote for me, thickos!

Mr Sheerman, a blowy Europhile, made his outburst during a television discussion at the weekend. Maybe the heat of the studio got to him, or over-excitement at being asked to take part in a live discussion on BBC TV’s Sunday Politics (backbencher Barry is rarely considered important enough for such invitations these days).

Talk turned to our EU referendum and Mr Sheerman closed his eyes, tilted his head and said: ‘The truth is that when you look at who voted to remain, most of them were the better educated people in our country.’ 

Disdain

If that was not la-di-dah enough for an MP whose own constituency is in an area (Kirklees) that voted by 54 per cent to leave the EU, Mr Sheerman also took a swipe at people who were educated at polytechnics.

He was cross that Conservative MP Chris Heaton-Harris has written to universities trying to find out what is being taught about Brexit.

‘This man who went to Wolverhampton Polytechnic,’ shuddered Mr Sheerman. ‘Who does he think he is? Trying to frighten my university in Huddersfield!’ The thrust of this was clear: poly-educated oiks such as Heaton-Harris have no place offering their opinion to us Varsity types.

That’s the Brexit vote and the Polytechnic vote slagged off in seconds. Good work, Barry. At this rate Theresa May will give you a knighthood for services to the Tory party.

Let us begin by trying to understand Mr Sheerman’s ‘snobbery’ — as one fellow guest in the studio put it. There is certainly data to show university graduates voted two to one in June 2016 to stay in the European Union.

Cambridge and Oxford, our best-known university strongholds, were hot for Remain. The British political, legal, media and academic elites were, and still are, markedly anti-Brexit. They clutch their necks with condescending disdain at those lower orders who voted for British independence.

It may seem unfair to pick on so slight a political figure as Barry Sheerman, a spongy middler who in the Blair years won the ‘Golden Pager Award’ for asking the most obsequious questions in Parliameny 

Mr Sheerman, it could be said, was merely stating facts when he hailed the intellectualism of the Remain camp. But it brings us up against the old truism that the longer someone has studied at university, the less clued up he or she may be. I say that as someone who attended three universities and who has often felt a hamfisted nincompoop alongside non-university friends.

Some of the quickest wits I know never went near a college campus, and many of our biggest idiots are those with fancy letters after their names.

It may seem unfair to pick on so slight a political figure as Barry Sheerman, a spongy middler who in the Blair years won the ‘Golden Pager Award’ for asking the most obsequious questions in Parliament.

In the past he has called for Buckingham Palace to be torn down (because it is one of Britain’s ugliest buildings), demanded that Britain join the Euro, and described a £7,000 pay rise for MPs as ‘pathetic’.

It probably tells you all you need to know about this sorry little man, but he’s again placed his head above the parapet, so here goes with the polemical mallet. His attitude stinks of entitlement, of patronising disdain, of a self-righteous sense of superiority over ‘the little people’. For a Labour MP — a Labour MP! — to express such views is dreadful; yet hardly surprising.

Mr Sheerman is typical of the illiberal Centre-Left which has done so much damage to this country in recent decades.

Labour sloganeering about ‘the many not the few’ is tommy-rot. They are vicious snobs and regard ‘the many’ as a herd of dumb cattle. There sits Mr Sheerman in the House of Commons, supposedly representing his constituents, yet plainly regards the majority of them as educationally inferior.

He studied at the London School of Economics, long a seed-bed of the worst sort of anti-popular, neo-elitist, pocket-filling Leftism. He has both a BSc and MSc in economics to his name. Bow down, ye voters of Huddersfield, to your twice mortar-boarded Member of Parliament.

Hail to your intellectual master, the chin-stroker, the brow-clutcher, that Erasmus de nos jours, Barry ‘the Brainbox’ Sheerman! You won’t be surprised to hear he opposes grammar schools (even though he went to one).

We don’t want the working-classes getting ideas above their stations, do we, Barry? This ninny, this snoot, this velvet-lined codpiece, Sheerman is typical of a Parliament which, with its allies in the Establishment, has gone on dirty protest about Brexit.

They kick, stamp, pout and blow bubbles about last year’s stonking, revolutionary referendum result. The Leave vote was a close but clear rejection not just of the European Union but also of the stooges and suck-ups who for years anti-democratically pushed Brussels down our throats.

Crucial

The Sheermans of this world argue that MPs are chosen by constituents to act and vote on various matters as they personally see fit. That an MP is entitled to take his or her view on, say, capital punishment, even though it may clash with majority opinion in the constituency. This, Burkean view of democracy — as argued by philosopher Edmund Burke — raises parliamentarians to the level of autonomous trustees, sent to the Commons to do as they see fit for the nation. Except, except, except . . . it is more complicated than that.

The EU referendum was not a parliamentary vote. The crucial thing was that it was beyond and above the House of Commons, and it was established as such by Parliament.

It trumped the Burkean ideal. If there was an element of trusteeship, it was that the Parliamentary class would obey the referendum’s verdict.

From Labour’s Sir Keir Starmer and Tory Dominic Grieve, to dimmer bulbs such as Mr Sheerman, Westminster’s Remainers put themselves above the majority — and pooh-pooh them as morons who ‘didn’t vote to become poorer’ or ‘didn’t vote to leave the Single Market’.

In his TV appearance, Mr Sheerman derided Conservatives for agreeing to respect the EU referendum result.
 

Theresa May will give Sheerman a knighthood for services to the Tory party if he keeps on offending voters at his current rate

Exquisite

The Tories were now ‘no longer the nasty party’ but ‘the stupid party’, he tweeted later.

Yes, how stupid of politicians to respect the will of the majority of voters in the biggest plebiscite held in our country.

The arrogance of these Remain extremists is sometimes matched only by the over-ripeness of their claims.

I recently heard Mr Sheerman claim, in the Commons, that he had met ‘not one person’ in the manufacturing or business sectors of Huddersfield or Leeds who wanted to leave the EU. He was either lying or picks acquaintances in pro-Brexit Yorkshire with exquisite hygiene.

Let us close by returning to the polling data from pro-EU areas. What exactly do those statistics from university towns tell us? Do they prove the intellectual superiority of the Remain case? Even if they did, the democratic will would surely have to prevail — unless you want riots on the street.

But might the statistics not just tell us our college populations like the world the way it is? University types, who tend to do better financially than non-degree holders, may not have wished their elitist privileges to be imperilled by change. Voting patterns may just be down to all-too human greed and protectionism.

Only a very stupid politician — such as Barry Sheerman — would fail to admit the possibility of that.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5033921/QUENTIN-LETTS-Labour-s-Barry-Sheerman-Brexit-bashing.html#ixzz4xSPznd8g
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*

OCTOBER 31-2017

H.F.1365-BREXIT MEANS BREXIT- NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'SPLANNED EUDOMINATION OF EUROPE

*  *  *

THE TRUTH that BRUSSELS cannot BEAR:

PEOPLE CRAVE NATIONAL IDENTITY.

By Stephen Glover for the Daily Mail

 3 October 2017

What happened in Catalonia on Sunday was shaming and shocking in a modern European state. Spanish police bludgeoned and assaulted defenceless civilians who were simply trying to exercise their democratic right.

First and foremost, this is a terrible crisis for the wrong-headed, bully-boy government in Madrid. After the unedifying spectacle of police attacking blameless voters, the chances must surely have increased of Catalonia – Spain’s most prosperous region with some 7.5million inhabitants – seceding.

But it is also an enormous crisis for the European Union, which in recent weeks has said almost nothing as the Spanish authorities arrested officials arranging an independence referendum on behalf of the devolved Catalan government.

 

 

RELATED ARTICLES


 

One reason he did not do so in the case of Spain is that it is one of the most obedient pro-EU countries in Europe, which seldom defies the will of Brussels, or causes trouble for Juncker and his ilk.

But there is an even deeper reason for the Commission’s silence. The events in Catalonia challenge at a deep level its project for ever closer union, about which both Juncker and President Emmanuel Macron of France have ventilated in recent weeks.

For how can there be an amicable union between the EU’s nation states if some of those nations are themselves deeply divided and fractious, as is plainly the case with Catalonia and Spain?

Here is a region of largely Catalan-speaking people who regard themselves as culturally distinct. A sizeable proportion of them yearn to break free from Spain, even though Catalonia has been part of the country for hundreds of years.

Sunday’s vote illuminates a truth which Brussels cannot bear. There are many people in Europe for whom the atavistic call of identity counts far more than any exhortation about forging a European superstate

That, after all, was one of the main messages of Brexit – that the majority of voters in our own ancient nation resent the undemocratic control of Brussels, and have no wish to be sucked into a united Europe.

For Brussels, the example of Britain was bad enough, and it has set about trying to punish us for having had the effrontery to want to leave. In a sense, the demonstration of Catalan nationalism is even more alarming to the federalists because this show of independence is happening inside one of the EU’s nation states.

How is it possible, they wonder, for the pan-European project to proceed if some EU countries are in danger of fracturing? The terror in Brussels is that if Catalonia were allowed to break away, regions in other member states could follow suit. Instead of coalescing into an amorphous whole, some EU nations might fall apart.

Belgium, whose capital, Brussels, is the seat of EU expansionism, is divided. The Flemish-speaking region of Flanders, which constitutes about 60 per cent of the country’s population, is at daggers drawn with the French-speaking minority.

Many people in northern Italy long to be rid of the impoverished south, which is relatively unproductive and, in the view of northerners, consumes more than its fair share of government spending. The Right-wing Northern League has campaigned with some success for independence for the north, and imagines a separate country called Padania.

France faces an independence movement in the island of Corsica. Meanwhile the cohesion of Spain is threatened not just by free-spirited Catalans but also by militant Basques, part of whose territory lies in France.

Romania and Slovakia both have unhappy Hungarian minorities. Even in Poland’s region of Silesia, much of which used to be ruled by Germany until 1945, there are stirrings of an independence movement.

All over Europe apparently unified countries are harried by breakaway groups which have a strong sense of separate identity. If Catalonia were allowed to go it alone, who knows what might come next?
 

The problem for Brussels is that it is used to dealing with individual nation states but is powerless to intervene in unruly regions. That is why the Commission has remained so quiet in the case of Catalonia apart from expressing a few words of solidarity with Spain.

By the way, the British response has been regrettably supine. Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson stressed his support for the Spanish government in a tweet. As the leading Brexiteer he should surely have been more critical of Madrid’s use of violence.

The Spanish government, it must be said, has behaved rashly and brutishly. Arguably some Catalan separatist political parties have been unwise in deliberately engineering a confrontation.

But given that the Catalan government had made numerous requests to hold a referendum on independence – after Spain’s constitutional court had controversially declared in 2010 that Catalonia was not a nation – what was it to do having been rebuffed time and time again? If it had possessed a modicum of good sense, the Spanish government would have allowed the referendum to go ahead. Had the vote been in favour of independence, it could have then questioned its legal status.

But to arrest Catalan officials, to close a large number of polling stations, and then to clobber innocent voters were acts of unbelievable stupidity as well as nastiness.

It passes understanding how the prime minister of Spain, Mariano Rajoy, can say that democracy has prevailed. The opposite is true.

Imagine if two or three years hence the Scottish National Party’s Nicola Sturgeon were to hold a referendum without the approval of Westminster – by no means an unthinkable eventuality.

In fact, her case would be much weaker than that of the Catalan government since there has already been one legal referendum in Scotland in 2014, which was said by the SNP leader Alex Salmond at the time to be the last for a generation.

Even so, it is inconceivable that a new unofficial referendum in Scotland would be met by the authorities in Westminster with police wielding batons and firing rubber bullets. Such a wild over-reaction would inevitably give a boost to Scottish nationalism – as, I have no doubt, the cause of Catalan nationalism will have benefited from Sunday’s onslaught.

The truth is that the Spanish state has a very restricted conception of democracy. We should know that already from its desire to shoehorn Gibraltar into Spain despite 99 per cent of its citizens having voted in a 2002 referendum to remain British.

God alone knows what will happen now in Catalonia. Unless the Spanish government agrees to an official referendum – an unlikely prospect – there will probably be deadlock. I am afraid there is also the possibility of more violence on both sides.

Justifying and supporting the Madrid government is the European Commission in all its absurdity, dreaming dreams of a union which the people of Europe do not want. It will do its utmost to ensure that Catalonia doesn’t interfere with its grandiose scheme.

Will Remainers look at Catalonia and reflect that we have a quieter and more civilised way of dealing with our differences in this country? I don’t know. What I do know is that every day I am ever more relieved that we are leaving this misguided club.
Full article
 


 Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4942684/STEPHEN-GLOVER-truth-national-identity.html#ixzz4uYWX4q7V
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on

 

92

View
comments

 

H.F.1332 BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED EU

*  *  *
 UNDERSTANDING ISLAM

PART 16

AUGUST 2005

ISLAMIC AMBITION

TheIn his 1934 book 'Sex and Culture the anthropologist J.D.Unwin studied 86 different cultures from a period of 5,000 years and concluded that chastity and fidelity in "strict marital monogamy" were central to any strong, healthy society. Indeed, no society flourished for more than three generations without it. Britain is now nearing the end of the second generation. Once the third generation was out, the society died, usually by being taken over by another, monogamous people. "I know of no exceptions to this rule.

Could the fiercely monogamous Islam be the culture that takes over from the secular humanist culture of the Western world? Will we see  the establishment of an Islamic State in Britain and the imposition of Sha'ria. This author believes the British Establishment would not  allow such a thing to happen, jealous  as its leaders are of their grip on power.  However, events have a habit  of taking politicians by surprise, and there is no lack  of ambition amongst Muslims.  It is only necessary to look at tower hamlets  to see what happens when 'ordinary Muslims' take power.

Tower Hamlets [in 2005] is 36% Muslim, and yet Muslims are in a majority in the ruling Labour group and on the Council as a whole, and the Mayor is Muslim.  Presumably the Muslim councillors can be regarded as 'ordinary Muslims.' Once in power, they attempted to have  wards renamed to eliminate references to Christianity (Trinity ward disappeared ), and a proposal to twin the London Borough with Jenin, a Palestinian hot-bed of terrorism, was narrowly averted.

The Borough is able to use the funding it allocates to advance Islamic programmes and cultural societies, force the closure of Christian schools and ensure that Muslims control everything for which the local authority has responsibility.

There are 14 Muslim community organisations in partnership with Tower Hamlets Borough Council. In addition to the 2 mosques, the Ahmadiya Muslim Association has as its purpose:

Practising Islamic knowledge... to upkeep a moral society', the junior Muslim Circle provided' religious education' to 8-14 year olds, a Madrassah has 'mother tongue [Arabic?] and study support classes', and the Shahjalal Centre is there  to 'meet the needs of the Muslim community' with 'prayer space' and 'education for children'

Couple Islamic ambition for a Khilafah with a decadent British society whose leaders dare not speak out against Islam or oppose 'multiculturalism', and Islamic advances can be made.  Mosques can be built and expanded, Islamic schools established, cultural centres set up, and large amounts of public money can fund studies which do not benefit the United Kingdom..

*  *  *

Christian Voice, PO Box 739A, Surbiton, KT6 5YA -

AUGUST 2005

Searches related to pew research muslim population

sweden muslim population 2050

islam in germany 2050

islam in europe 2050

muslim population in france 2017

muslim population in europe 2018

belgium muslim population

islam in europe today

muslim population

 

More!

IMMIGRATION FILE

 

 

H.F.1711/16

*  *  *

("IN MY VIEW BOTH THE BURKA AND NIQAB SHOULD BE

 

BANNED

 

 AS THEY HAVE BEEN IN FRANCE AND BELGIUM AND ELSEWHERE."

by

Dr Taj Hargey-

Director of the Muslim Educational Centre of Oxford, and Imam of the Oxford Islamic Congregation)

Diversity should not trump right to a happy foster home | Daily Mail ...

 

...

Tuesday, August 29,2017

An

An obsession with diversity should NEVER trump a child's right to a happy foster home

The social services industry prides itself on its cultural sensitivity, especially when it comes to fostering and adoption.

Respect for background and identity is meant to be central to the process of finding a home for a vulnerable child.

But that ideal has utterly broken down in the case that emerged yesterday, in which it was reported that a five-year-old girl from a white Christian family was placed by Tower Hamlets council in London in two successive Muslim households.

Much to the child’s distress — as logged in confidential local authority reports seen by The Times — neither family seems to have shown much respect or understanding for her upbringing or faith.

One supervisor is reported to have described her sobbing as she begged not to go back to the carer’s home because

‘they don’t speak English’.

A necklace with a crucifix was apparently taken from her and she was told to learn Arabic. She was also told that ‘Christmas and Easter are stupid’ and ‘European women are stupid and alcoholic’. 

When, on a visit to her birth mother, she was given her favourite dish of spaghetti carbonara to take back to her foster home, she was banned from eating it because it contained bacon.

Compounding what must have been this child’s sense of alienation, her first carer, with whom she spent four months, is said to have worn the niqab — a face veil — when outside the family home.

In the second and current placement, her carer wore the all-enveloping burka and fully concealed her face in public.

(In my view, this is a garment that should have no place in British society. Both the burka and niqab should be banned, as they have been in France, Belgium and elsewhere.)

It is absolutely right that MPs demand an inquiry into this appalling example of forced cultural convergence.

Social services bosses love to prattle about human rights, but the treatment of this little girl represents a denial of her most basic rights.

If the reports are correct, she has been plunged into an unfamiliar environment of language, creed and dress code, where her carers make plain they have little time for her family or heritage.

To a young child, of course, such words mean little — but we can imagine her confusion and anxiety at the apparent hostility towards her background, the dismissive description of its women and its ancient festivals.

And let’s not forget that she is likely to have been traumatised already by difficult family circumstances.

This is yet another case in which the dogma of liberal political correctness appears to have triumphed over common sense. How else could one even begin to rationalise placing this child in strict Muslim households?

Here is what should happen now. The girl should be removed immediately from her current foster parents to a more appropriate placement. Then the social workers and their line managers who made this insensitive decision should be named, shamed and dismissed.

Alienation...

*

Poisonous...

*

Tolerance...

*

Full article

 

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4831638/Diversity-not-trump-right-happy-foster-home.html#ixzz4r8xRffzN
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*

 

 

IMMIGRATION FILE

*

ENGLAND A MONOCULTURE-TOLERANT -NOT MULTICULTURE

*

THE MAKING OF LONDONISTAN

*

THE VEIL-THE CROSS-A VITAL DEBATE over the HEART and SOUL of OUR NATION.

*

WHY WE MUST BE FIRM WITH MUSLIM EXTREMISTS AND WHY CITIZENSHIP MEANS FULL INTEGRATION.

*

TONY BLAIR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND

WHY WE MUST BE FIRM WITH MUSLIM EXTREMISTS AND WHY CITIZENSHIP MEANS FULL INTEGRATION.

 

Tuesday, August 29,2017

 

H.F.1289

*  *  *

 UNDERSTANDING ISLAM

PART 8

AUGUST 2005

TAKEYYA-DECEPTION

The principle of Al Takeyya-literally 'to prevent' or guard against something - conveys the understanding that Muslims are permitted to lie as a preventative measure against anticipated harm to one's self or fellow Muslims.  This principle gives Muslims the liberty to lie under circumstances that they perceive as life threatening. Mohammed said they can even deny the faith, if they do not mean it in their hearts. Falsehoods told to prevent denigration of Islam, to protect one;lf, or to promote the cause of Islam are sanctioned by the Qur'an, which says:" Allah will not call you to account for what is futile in your oaths, but he will call you to account for your deliberate oaths" (Sura 5:89). What is important is what is in your heart (Sura 2:225) and to deny Islam " under compulsion, his heart remaining firm in faith" is acceptable to Allah (Sura 16:106). It is also in order to pretend to befriend infidels as a preventative measure (Sura 3:28).

The most authoritive Hadith confirms the point: "Allah's Apostle said, Who is willing to kill Ka'b bin Al-Ashraf who has hurt Allah and his Apostle? "Thereupon Muhammed bin Maslama got up saying, "O Allah's Apostle!" Would you like that I kill him?" The Prophet said ," Yes," Muhammed bin Maslama said "Then allow me to say a (false) thing (i.e. to deceive Kab).  "The Prophet said, " You may say it," (Bukhari vol 4:271p168.

The principle has become codified in Islam to suggest that a Muslim may lie to reconcile mfellow Muslims, in time of war, which many believe they are in, and a Muslim may lie to his wife. Defending Islam itself is an obvious reason for Takeyya, and that can mean defending oneself including lying under penalty of perjury in testimony, lying or making distorted statements to the media (such as claiming Islam is a religion of peace, knowing it is not) and deceiving fellow Muslims when the one lying has deemed to be apostates.

Naturally, once the principle of lying is accepted, the practice can extend to virtually any circumstance. It is a very uncomfortable felling that Muslims may not be trusted, for the majority seem such decent  and honourable people.  Equally, it is a sad fact that all recent cases of postal ballot-rigging have involved Muslims, and in the Birmingham case, Election Commissioner Richard Mawrey QC said that in the evidence of one of the councillors concerned, Mohammed Afzal, 'obvious lie followed obvious lie.' This is written with a heavy heart, but especially in the present context Muslims feel Islam itself is under threat, we should expect the principle of deception to come heavily into play.

 

Christian Voice, PO Box 739A, Surbiton, KT6 5YA -

AUGUST 2005

Searches related to pew research muslim population

sweden muslim population 2050

islam in germany 2050

islam in europe 2050

muslim population in france 2017

muslim population in europe 2018

belgium muslim population

islam in europe today

muslim population

 

More!

IMMIGRATION FILE

 

 

H.F.1711/8

 

 

*  *  *
 

SHADOW OF A BLOODY PAST

SATURDAY

ESSAY

by

Tom Holland

For centuries, Islam and Christianity were locked in a brutal conflict most have forgotten. The horror, a top historian argues, is that for jihadis it's as real today as it was in the Middle Ages.

 

EXTRACT

...year after year, Turkish forces probed Christian defences, crossing the plains of Hungary or churning the waters off Malta with their warships. In 1529 and again in 1683, an Ottoman army almost took Vienna.

Yet that was to be the last great attempt to extend the Caliphate across Europe. The global balance of power was shifting, and nearly a millennium of Muslim preponderance was drawing to a close.

It was the Christians who colonised America, established trading empires that spanned the globe and started the process of industrialisation.  By the 19th century with India ruled by the British Raj and the Islamic Ottoman Empire scorned in Western capitals as 'the sick man of Europe', Muslims could no longer close their eyes to the sheer scale of their decline.

It was they who were now the imperial subjects, and Islam the civilisation looked down on by its adversaries as backward, as Christendom had once been.

Ever since the first days of their faith, Muslims had tended to take for granted that its truth was manifest in its worldly success.

As a result, subordinated to the infidel British or French there were many in the Muslim world who looked to the golden age of the Caliphate for their  inspiration.

The age of Muhammad and his successors, which had seen Islam emerge from desert obscurity tom global empire, was enshrined as the model to follow. Over recent decades resentment at continued Western interventions in Muslin countries such as Afghanistan and Iraq have only burnished the appeal of the glorious past.

Today, according to a poll some two-thirds of Muslims worldwide want to see the

RESTORATION of a CALIPHATE

It is not empires per se they are apposed to -just

NON-ISLAMIC EMPIRES

Hardly surprising then that al-Qaeda and ISIS should be so obsessed by periods of history that to most Westerners are thoroughly obscure.

That Constantinople

has been a Muslim city for almost 600 years, that the Crusades are done and dusted and that Europe no longer defines itself as Christendom, barely intrudes on the consciousness of many jihadis.

They inhabit a mental landscape in which the Middle Ages never went away. The menace of this way of thinking is brutally evident-a world in which young people murdered a rock concert, can be cursed as 'Crusaders' is a world on the verge of going mad.

It is not just non-Muslims who are threatened by this imperialist nostalgia.

 'Either you are with the Crusade, 'ISIS has warned European Muslims,' or you are with ISLAM

...

More!

 

 

 

*  *  *

 

[WHAT WE HAVE IS A NIGHTMARE SITUATION OF A GUERRILLA WAR UNFOLDING SUPPORTED BY THOSE HARD-LINE FUNDAMENTALISTS  AND THEIR SUPPORTERS WITHIN THE 3,000,000 MUSLIM COMMUNITY AND WITH THEIR ADDITIONAL ADVANTAGE OF FULL COVER FROM THE ACCEPTED DRESS  OF THE VEIL AND BURKA-SYMBOLS OF EXTREME ISLAM. IT IS MOST UNLIKELY THAT A MUSLIM WILL BETRAY A FELLOW MUSLIM AS MUCH AS THEY MIGHT DISAGREE WITH THEIR MESSAGE AND INTENDED ACTION.  AS MANY OF OUR TOWNS AND CITIES HAVE ALMOST A PREPONDERANCE OF THOSE OF THE MUSLIM FAITH IT WILL BE ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE IF NOT IMPOSSIBLE TO PROTECT THE OTHER MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNITY. THE ONE VITAL ADVANTAGE WE HAD MANY YEARS AGO -THE BOBBIE-ON-THE -BEAT IS NO LONGER THERE-THE VITAL LINK OF TRUST WITH THE LOCAL COMMUNITY SO VERY IMPORTANT IN THE EVENT OF A CRISIS WE SEE BEFORE US TODAY.  WE MENTIONED THIS VERY MATTER MANY YEARS AGO KNOWING HOW IMPORTANT THE LINK WOULD BE IN A NATIONAL EMERGENCY.  AS WE NOW HEAR ISIS HAS ASKED ITS SUPPORTERS IN OUR COMMUNITIES TO STAY PUT-NOT TO JOIN THEM AS THEY THEMSELVES WILL BE ON THEIR WAY TO JOIN THE FIGHT!.]

 

THE GREAT ERROR FROM THE BEGINNING WAS TO ALLOW THE THE LARGE SCALE IMMIGRATION OF THOSE FROM A HISTORICALLY OPPOSING CULTURE  TO SETTLE IN ENGLAND.  THE JEWS NUMBER 300,000 WHEREAS THE MUSLIMS ARE NO DOUBT OVER 3,000,000 WITH A AN ADVANTAGEOUS

 BIRTH-RATE OF 4-1.  MAKE NO MISTAKE THERE ARE MANY OF THE ISLAMIC FAITH WHO LONG TO BELONG TO AN ISLAMIC STATE  .WE HAVE ALREADY GIVEN THEM SHARIA LAW OF PARTS!

 

 IT WAS AND STILL IS OUR STUPID POLITICIANS WHO HAVE PUT AT RISK THE LIVES OF THE INDIGENOUS POPULATION IN THE VERY NEAR FUTURE. IN WARTIME ONE HAS INTERNMENT CAMPS BUT IN THE PRESENT SITUATION THIS WOULD BE MOST DIFFICULT OR IMPOSSIBLE TO CONSIDER BUT IF THE CARNAGE BECOMES UNCHECKED THEN WHO KNOWS WHAT MEASURES WILL BE NEEDED IN ORDER TO STILL THE VIOLENCE. OVER THE PAST DECADE THERE HAVE BEEN MANY WARNINGS FROM EMINENT AUTHORITY OF THE DANGERS WHICH WOULD ARISE BUT THEY WERE ALL IGNORED BECAUSE OF THE PREVAILING ATTITUDE OF POLITICAL CORRECTNESS-THE DETAILS ARE SHOWN IN OUR

 

 IMMIGRATION FILE

 

 

 

  Daily Mail-

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

NOVEMBER 21,2015

H F 621/1

 

*  *  *
 

SO WILL BRITAIN ONE DAY BE  MUSLIM?

by

Ruth Dudley Edwards

SATURDAY ESSAY

 

[Daily Mail-May 5-2007]

 

*

Our failure to have children.

Welfarism.

Political Correctness.

And a

LACK of WILL

 to fight Islamic extremism

 

 

 

THIS WEEK has been another terrible one for those of us who want a society in which all races, religions and cultures mix to their mutual advantage and

ENRICHMENT.

On Tuesday, five men were sentenced to life in prison for plotting to use a huge fertiliser bomb in what would have been the UK's largest mass murder.

Omar Khyam, Salahuddin Amin, Anthony Garciaand Jawa Akbar -first and second generation immigrants - responded to the tolerance of the British people

BY TRYING TO KILL AS MANY OF THEM AS POSSIBLE.

It is absurd to hope that the exposure of their evil after a 13-month trial which cost an estimated

£50,000,000

-has finally provided the wake-up call that this slumbering country so badly needs?

I'm one of those old-fashioned immigrants to this country who feels passionately grateful, is proudly British (as well as Irish -having been born in Dublin) and believes that immigrants have more duties than rights. And further, that one of those is to adjust to British society rather than expecting it to adjust to them. [ has been the practice for some decades but more so during the Blair years.]

However, one aspect of contemporary British society which I refuse to adjust to is its weakness in the face of the

ENEMY WITHIN

In my many conversations with like-minded people about the threat that radical Islam poses to the

 BRITISH WAY OF LIFE

-And indeed, to European civilisation -we frequently end by despairingly agreeing that the

WEST

-seems intention committing

POLITICAL and CULTURAL

SUICIDE.

When we look starkly at the demographic statistics, the wimpishness of our

ESTABLISHMENT

-in the face of the

THREAT

-the perversions perpetuated by

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

-and our passivity, it's hard to avoid the

CONCLUSION

-that within a couple of generations

ISLAM

-will be in

CONTROL of EUROPE

And before anyone says that there nothing wrong if this happened, since the vast majority of

MUSLIMS

are tolerant people who would not dream of interfering with

OUR WAY OF LIFE

-it's necessary  to point out that in

MUSLIM COUNTRIES

, it's usually the radicals and extremists

MULLAHS

-who regard

TOLERANCE

AS A VICE

-WHO MAKE THE RUNNING.

This occurs too in microcosm in

MUSLIM GHETTOS

around

EUROPE

We saw the frightening fundamentalist fringe of

ISLAM

-marching, threatening and perpetuating violence over the cartoons depicting

MOHAMMAD

IN

DENMARK

while the majority of Muslims - who, yes, of course are tolerant and decent - kept their mouths shut and stayed at

HOME

YES, Islam may be a great religion. BUT

-in its fundamentalist version, some of its values are antipathetic to ours, and if they triumph in

EUROPE 

-they will

THREATEN OUR VALUES

such as

FREEDOM OF THOUGHT

and

SPEECH

and the spirit of intellectual inquiry that made

EUROPEAN CIVILISATION

Great and Prosperous

 

The danger of ending up like these poor, despotic and medieval

Islamic States

-in which millions live miserably is the prospect that

CHRISTIANS

HINDUS

MODERATE MUSLIMS and NON-BELIEVERS -should be uniting

TO PREVENT

 

BUT THE TRUTH IS WE ARE DOING LITTLE TO STOP IT.

Consider first a few chilling statistics.

EUROPEANS ARE FAILING TO REPRODUCE

[Yet in our own island millions of potential citizens have been 

SLAUGHTERED AT BIRTH

thanks to David Steels -Abortion Bill of 1965?

It is still taking place in 2007 though there is NOW an  growing awareness of the tragedy to the potential mother and to society in general that many more doctors today are refusing to condone the

MURDER.

Recently the sight of full grown foetuses being deprived of their lives has now brought the horror and injustice of the action to destroy life.

In an age of contraception of many devices and anti-life pills it is unbelievable that any potential mother was unable to take the necessary steps to prevent conception.

David Steels Bill was to prevent back-street abortions and he himself a few ears ago voiced his concern as to what has happened over the years since.]

*

Consider  first a few chilling statistics.

Europeans are failing to reproduce. Just to keep the population steady, you need 2.1 births per women

[This is a case for Government action by offering cash and other vital services to enable the reluctant mother to do her best for her community and country.]

However in 2005, the European average was 1.38.

In Ireland it was 1.9

France it was 1.89

Germany 1.35

Italy 1.23

Britain scored in the middle of this range with 1.6

BUT

That was because - like France - we have a large

MUSLIM POPULATION

with a high birth rate. Indeed,

MUSLIMS

are out breeding

 non-Muslims

through out

 EUROPE

 

 

[Many of whom have absolutely no intention of integrating -

Thank you very much Mr Blair -we don't think so.]

'Just look at the development within Europe.'

said a triumphant Norwegian Imam a few months ago

'where the number of

MUSLIMS

is expanding like mosquitoes.

Every Western women in the EU is producing an average of 1.4 children. Every Muslim women in the same countries is producing an average of 3.5 children.

'OUR WAY OF THINKING WILL PROVE MORE POWERFUL THAN YOURS' he said.

The big question this poses is:

WHY ARE WE NOT REPRODUCING?

There are many reasons, but probably the most important are the decline of religion and the liberation of women.

[The populations which have the stronger religious stance will be the eventual rulers of Europe. It can be a Christian Europe or a Muslim Europe. The Governments of Europe and the shrinking United Kingdom have to decide.]

In Ireland, when the Roman Catholic Church effectively ran society, sex for procreation, contraceptives were banned, the normal size for a family was around five or six children, bur 12 or 13 were not uncommon.

As the country embraced secularism in the 1980s, birth rates plummeted, exacerbated by the new -found confidence of women that made them choose careers rather than domesticity.

WHEREAS in the 1970s, I was regarded in both the UK and Ireland as odd for being married but voluntarily childless, these days, childlessness |

IS A COMMON CHOICE

It is a world where one-child families abound and to have more than two children is to be regarded as eccentric and probably environmentally irresponsible.

Moreover, the erosion of family life and the long - hours culture place a heavy burden on those prepared to rear the next generation.

Despite these social forces, even in the UK, devote Muslims and Orthodox Jews obey instructions to have large families.

Confronted with this demographic revolution and official statistics which showed there were too few young people to support an ageing population, European governments decided to embrace

IMMIGRATION

-as an inherent good without any thought for the consequences.

As a result, politicians and businessmen assured us that we had to have economic growth in n order to prop up ever greater public spending and that it could be provided only by importing large numbers of workers from abroad

BUT WHY WASN'T THERE A NATIONAL DEBATE

ABOUT

Whether it was wise to mortgage our cultural future for the sake of a mess of financial pottage?

[A recent report on the cost  and benefit of large scale

IMMIGRATION

estimated that the country benefited by

ONLY - 50p

 for each migrant]

Where were the politicians arguing against the doctrine of

MULTICULTURALISM

-which holds that upholding majority values is somehow

ILLEGITIMATE

Who among the liberal elite's commentariat were challenging the moral relativism that flew in the face of

SENSE and SENSIBILITY

-by insisting that the culture of

Shakespeare

The King James Bible

Keats's poetry

Turner's paintings

and

Elgar's music

-was no more important than - the cultures of other

IMPORTED MINORITIES?

 

We know the answer all too well.

Cries of racism drowned out rational argument - not just here but throughout

OLD EUROPE

As one gloomster put it:

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

which is thought what

SENTIMENTALITY is to COMPASSION

-means that the intelligentsia of the

WEST

-has disarmed itself in advance of any possible struggle.

The result of all this, as recent events have made tragically clear, was that

BRITISH CULTURE

-was

UNDERMINED and SOCIAL COHESION

DAMAGED.

Separated from mainstream society by geographical and cultural apartheid, which has been fostered by

MULTICULTURALISM

-many immigrants were denied the chance to

INTEGRATE.

 

AND, INSTEAD OF BEING TOLD BY THE HOST COMMUNITY

THAT IF THEY DIDN'T WANT TO ADHERE

-to the values of a liberal, pluralist democracy, they should

RETURN HOME

They were asked how they would like

BRITAIN

-to conform to

THEIR VALUES.

THE STORY WAS VERY MUCH THE SAME THROUGHOUT EUROPE

The robust American political commentator Mark Steyn, a disillusioned Anglophile has already written us off. The thesis of his Blackly comic book,

*

America Alone:

The End Of The World As We Know It

*

-is that the U.S. will survive because the

RELIGIOUS RIGHT ARE CONFIDENT

 AND

 REPRODUCE

BUT

 THAT EUROPE IS FINISHED

Its not just demographic decline, he says, it's also the unsustainability of the

MODERN WELFARE STATE

-in which we depend so much on our own individual resources.

We are also, he believes, suffering from 'civilisational exhaustion':

CULTURAL DISINTEGRATION

-brought about by

BIG GOVERNMENT

[Or if you prefer BIG BROTHER]

-which has fatally

DESTROYED OUR SENSE OF SELF-RELIANCE.

 

MEANWHILE, we are importing large numbers of unemployed youths from abroad in order to maintain

OUR

STANDARD OF LIVING

Yet many of these newcomers have nothing

BUT

CONTEMPT

 FOR OUR

WAY OF LIFE

-and some even wish

TO DESTROY IT

Steyn sees this as a

CIVIL WAR

which

EUROPE

-is too timid even to acknowledge - let alone

LET ALONE WIN

[This is something the Tory Mr Oliver Letwin or as we have said on a number of occasions Mr Let-them-win -and they will, who appears to be out of touch with the real issues that matter to our country in the early years of the 21st century.]

Mr Steyn says:

'Islam has youth and WILL

Europe has age and WELFARE.'

It's hard not to agree with Mark Steyn, especially as every day seems to bring more evidence

THAT AS A SOCIETY

WE ARE TERMINALLY

MAD

For example, this week's fertiliser bomb trial had heard that the key plotters had been radicalised by the hate preacher Omar Bakri Mohammed whom the judge condemned as

'a master of cowardice -who works in the shadows.'

This was the same firebrand who as an asylum -seeker here, had pocketed

£275,000

-in Welfare benefits.

[It is the same mentality shown by

Lord Chief Justice Phillips and Lord Falconer and many others

-who instead of spending the £32 million allocated for building prisons a few years ago are now doing almost anything in order to keep thousands of criminals many repeat offenders and dangerous, out of prison and giving many early release so they can go back to torment their victims and as has happened in a number of occasions returned to have another go at their robbery or other offence knowing that the worst that might happen is either a holiday or community service or whatever  and as many prisons these days are very much like 5star hotels there will be no hardship encountered if they are so lucky to win the prison admission lottery -then it will be a nice break to see old friends and anyway they will be out before they have completed their degree in political science or whatever.

The victims of crime, many of them elderly - poor and lonely won't as a rule be free of fear of their tormentor returning for a second or even third try to rob them of the little they have  and as has happened even assault and kill the defenceless pensioner - but some victims even lose heart and end their own lives by depriving themselves of food because they have lost hope that they can be safe again and we have their so-called protectors such as The Lord Chief Justice Phillips and Lord Falconer the new 'Justice' Minister ? who says 'Jail's the wrong place for burglars' and others who are doing whatever they can to keep the criminals out of jail. If the Army can put up a temporary  barracks in double quick time then there would be spaces for all the thousands of criminals who should be

OUT OF THE COMMUNITY.

Of course there would be complaints that the conditions are not up to the standards of the 5star prisons that they have 'visited' over the years and anyway there is

Tony Blair's

1998 HUMAN RIGHTS ACT

to keep them out of such uncomfortable surroundings which would not provide the 'key' service which has been introduced with their friendly solicitor providing a drugs service as an extra comfort.

THERE IS NO LONGER JUSTICE AS THE SENTENCE DOES NOT FIT THE CRIME

ANYMORE]

*

To continue:

Despite all this, I still believe there are grounds for hope - largely because Muslim hotheads have overplayed their hand by blowing people up, rioting in their neighbourhoods or broadcasting hate -filled speeches which alienate them from the host community.

*

 

[Well we are of the opinion that until the Government shows to the Muslim population that they will not give way on insisting that ALL newcomers and those already with us conform to

OUR RULE OF LAW

 

-and punish without hesitation any breaches of the Law and make it plain that anyone who is a threat to our country WILL BE extradited. BUT of course we have Tony Blair's 1998 Human Rights Act and articles within the 1951 British led Convention of Human Rights which will need amending.

It should be made quite clear that those who have no intention to

INTEGRATE

-should be reminded of their commitment which they gave when they where granted immigration or asylum status (which should be a legal requirement in the future)

Unless drastic action is taken by the next Prime Minister as a priority , future generations of the indigenous population will find themselves foreigners in their own country with their religion and culture under growing  threat. The evidence is before our eyes it is a warning of what the future will bring if action is not taken

QUICKLY AND DECISIVELY

Those moderate Muslims will at last feel secure in the knowledge that they are safe from the extremist influence which up to now they have had it all their own way. By our commitment

IT WILL BE SECURITY THROUGH STRENGTH OF PURPOSE AND THE MUSLIMS WILL BE WITH US

Continue as NOW and they will have nothing but contempt for our indecision and inadequate moral integrity.]

*

To continue:

The sharp-suited, soft spoken undercover agents of the

MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD

-the banned Egyptian group whose former members include Osma Bin Laden -understand that power is best secured by

STEALTH

by infiltrating institutions and seducing the

MEDIA

Libya's Colonel Gaddafi once exemplified this policy

He said:

'There are signs that Allah will grant Islam victory in Europe -without swords, without guns-without conquests. The 50 million Muslims in Europe will turn it into a Muslim continent within a few decades.'

 

[AND THEY SURE MEAN IT]

 

 

[Our survival as a Christian nation can only be achieved by the Government reversing it's abhorrent legislation as to Religious freedom of speech and action because not to do so further emphasises to the extremist elements in our country that we are WEAK and AMORAL nation and therefore ready for conversion by stealth as their numbers obtain the victory while we ignore our Christian past at our peril.

Our close relations to America must be strengthened particularly in the moral arena so that our nations will gain the grudging respect of those who have a desire to replace our Christian heritage with their own.

There will be many who will say that we live in a secular environment and that the Government of the day should not concern itself but we have no choice we either support our Institutions and that includes our Christian inheritance which is ingrained into the very fabric of our nation or  lose that priceless heirloom the foundation of our IDENTITY and accept another more fanatical regime who do not believe in toleration but only in the observance of their one and only deliverer who will have no other faiths before it.

WE HAVE TO MAKE A CHOICE

-because a vacuum must be filled and it is better that we know what contain.

The Choice Is Yours!

-but better it will be to retain our own heritage than be converted to another.]

*

But the violent extremists have provoked some signs of a backlash, not just among indigenous populations of Europe but among those tolerant immigrants who value the countries

THAT TOOK THEM IN

The Swedes, of all people, whom liberals claimed had produced a perfect society, are trying to row back on the

WELFARE STATE

-to encourage the

WORK ETHIC

and are demanding

THAT IMMIGRANTS INTEGRATE

 

Nyamko Sabuni a female, Muslim, African immigrant who is now the country's

INTEGRATION and EQUALITY

MINISTER

-insists that

ALL IMMIGRANTS

-should learn Swedish and find a job.

 

She is also intent on criminalising

FORCED MARRIAGES

CHECKING GIRLS FOR EVIDENCE OF FEMALE CIRCUMCISION

and

BANNING THE VEIL

as well as

STATE FUNDING

for RELIGIOUS SCHOOLS.

[This is an area that needs the new Premier Gordon Brown to put his attention as to make it plain that their is one

RULE OF LAW

in

ENGLAND

[NO EXCEPTIONS FOR MUSLIMS OR ANYONE ELSE IN OUR COUNTRY]

 

 

*          *          *

 

[Daily Mail-May 5-2007]

 

H.F.1294

*  *  *

 UNDERSTANDING ISLAM

PART 9

AUGUST 2005

FIVE PILLARS OF ISLAM

Allah requires a complex system of observance to please Allah and gain admission to paradise. This observance is divided into five categories, which are said by Sunni Muslims to be the 'Five Pillars' of Islam. Muslims perform them faithfully. They are:

1. Shahadah, the acknowledgement of Allah. A Muslim is one who can say the Kalima: "There is no deity worthy of worship but Allah, and Mohammed is his prophet."

2. Salah, prayer. Muslims are obliged to perform a prayer ritual five times a day. It is the same every time, except that an additional optional passage of the Quran may be included by choice. Salah is expressed  in Arabic, even if the person does not speak or understand Arabic.

3. Zakah, the paying of alms.  A tax at the rate of 2.5% of one's excess wealth. Muslims believe that paying the Zakah is a form of purification.

4. Sawm or Siyam, fasting. Ordained in the Quran and carried out during daylight hours of the lunar month Ramadan.

5. Hajj, pilgrimage to Mecca. Must be carried out at least once in a lifetime.

Critics of Islam-www.MuslimHope.com in particular-have traced aspects of the Pillars of Islam back to the erley pagan rites of the people of Mecca.  In particular, the month-long fast and five-times-a-day prayer are pre-Islam practices.  The Hajj, with its perambulation of the Ka'aba, kissing the black stone, running up between the hills of the male and female deities, animal sacrifice and throwing pebbles at the standing stones of demons, is pure paganism.  Of course, from a practical point of view, the Hajj preserved the economy of Mecca,which was dependent on pilgrimage.

Shi-ites omit Shahadah asa pillar of Islam, as they consider it to be the foundation of all, and they call the pillars 'principles', adding 'Khums,' another tax, to bring the total back to five. For both Sunni and Shi-ite Muslims, Jihad is the sixth pillar (or principle) of Islam,

*  *  *

Christian Voice, PO Box 739A, Surbiton, KT6 5YA -

AUGUST 2005

Searches related to pew research muslim population

sweden muslim population 2050

islam in germany 2050

islam in europe 2050

muslim population in france 2017

muslim population in europe 2018

belgium muslim population

islam in europe today

muslim population

 

More!

IMMIGRATION FILE

 

 

H.F.1711/9

 

*  *  *

 

 

KILLERS
 BETRAY ISLAM AND ALL MUSLIMS

COMMENTARY by Dr Taj Hargey

DIRECTOR OF THE MUSLIM EDUCATIONAL CENTRE OF OXFORD

*

DAILY MAIL, Friday, January 9, 2015

 
 

THERE has understandably been revulsion and outrage across the world at the massacre in Paris, one of the darkest atrocities perpetuated in France for decades. All right-minded people will join  unequivocally in condemnation of this barbarous pitiless act

Our response must be one of resolution in defence of liberty and freedom of expression, two of the central foundations of our democratic society. There can be no compromise with the twisted extremist ideology that inspired this slaughter.

LikLike all Islamic fanatics, the perpetrators of the Charlie Hebdo killings loathe the liberal values of open ,pluralistic societies.  Driven by their wilfully perverted misinterpretation of the MUSLIM FAITH, they want to establish theocratic, authoritarian rule across WESTERN EUROPE, complete with all the instruments of dogmatic oppression, including the compulsory wearing of the face veil for Muslin women.

European authorities must not give in to this blackmail, imposed through the barrel of a Kalashnikov or the shell of a suicide bomb. The principles of freedom must be upheld for all citizens including Muslims.

For the truth is that there is nothing remotely Islamic about all this murderous fundermentalism. The true tradition of the Muslim religion is one of

TOLERANCE and RESPECT for OTHERS.

 When the Prophet Mohammed moved from Mecca in 622AD to establish the first Islamic State, he did not set up a sectarian Caliphate like today's violent thugs in Al Qaeda and ISIS demand. On the contrary, in the Charter of Medina he created a multicultural, multifaith society where the rights of everyone, Muslims , Jews, Christians or pagans were upheld.

So the idea, so popular among the zealots, of Islamic supremacy under

SHARIA LAW

has absolutely no basis in either the Koran or the earliest biography of the Prophet.

Just as false is the belief that the Koran provides some sort of justification for the Charlie Hebdo murders, on the grounds that the satiracal magazine has consistently published derogatory images about Islam.

THIS IS DANGEROUS NONSENSE

As a devote Muslim, I have been deeply offended by some of the vulgar material in Charlie Hebdo. Indeed, it has often seemed the magazine went bout of its way to be gratuitously childishly provocative. But I would defend without reservation the magazine's right to publish such stuff.

THAT IS THE ESSENCE OF FREEDOM OF SPEECH.

MUSLIMS who want to avoid being offended don't have to buy the magazine or read it. In our open society, we cannot allow one group to impose censorship in the name of protecting

THEIR FAITH

from any ridicule, mockery or even criticism.

As they left the scene of the massacre at the Charlie Hebdo office on Wednesday, the assailants shouted

'Allahu Akabar'

(God is the greatest.)

and 'the Prophet Mohammed has been avenged'. But this is another warping of theology.

NOWHERE does the KORAN sanction taking any human life in the name of defending the Prophet's reputation.  A host of verses, like Chapter 109, verse 6, or chapter 10, verse 99, actually set out the need to defend

FREEDOM of RELIGION.

According to the Muslim scripture, no one has the right to deny other people-whether they are Christian, humani9st or even atheist-their beliefs. Similarly, the

CHARTER of MEDINA

lays down the right of all citizens to be

FREE and EQUAL.

So, contrary to all the vicious despotic propaganda from ISIS and Al Qaeda, respect for essential liberties is at the crux of

ISLAM.

The supposed 'crimes' of blasphemy and apostasy have  been invented by the

RELIGIOUS ZEALOTS

to justify their jihadism and have no basis in

TRUE ISLAM.

That is highlighted by two key incidents in the life of the Prophet, who called on his followers to ignore the ridicule and contempt on him.  In Chapter 74, verse 11, responding to complaints that he had been labelled 'crazy' and 'a sorcerer' the Koran reveals that God will ultimately deal with all those who mock him. It is not for us on Earth to decide their fate.

In the same vein , when Mohammed first put forward the revelations he received from God that would constitute the

KORAN

one of the renowned poets of the time, Musaylimah, became vexed at Mohammed's growing power.  He therefore claimed that his own poems had been inspired by divine revelations and that he and Mohammed should work together to rule the nascent Muslim community.

Mohammed's followers were appalled at this effrontery and urged the Prophet to take action.  But Mohammed merely said:

'Let him be. He is just a liar. Ignore him.'

So,' Musaylimah, the Liar'  is the name history remembers him by -profound theological proof that the Prophet felt distain, not blood-soaked vengeance, was the correct response to mockery.

 That should have been the reaction of all Muslims to even the most provocative Charlie Hebdo cartoons.  The Prophet does not need to be protected by self-proclaimed zealots.

 God will protect his reputation.

Indeed, it is an offence against Islam to assume the role of religious defender, with the arbitrary power of life and death against declared enemies of the faith.

 

FREEDOM of RELIGION.

According to the Muslim scripture, no one has the right to deny other people-whether they are Christian, humani9st or even atheist-their beliefs. Similarly, the

CHARTER of MEDINA

lays down the right of all citizens to be

FREE and EQUAL.

So, contrary to all the vicious despotic propaganda from ISIS and Al Qaeda, respect for essential liberties is at the crux of

ISLAM.

The supposed 'crimes' of blasphemy and apostasy have  been invented by the

RELIGIOUS ZEALOTS

to justify their jihadism and have no basis in

TRUE ISLAM.

That is highlighted by two key incidents in the life of the Prophet, who called on his followers to ignore the ridicule and contempt on him.  In Chapter 74, verse 11, responding to complaints that he had been labelled 'crazy' and 'a sorcerer' the Koran reveals that God will ultimately deal with all those who mock him. It is not for us on Earth to decide their fate.

In the same vein , when Mohammed first put forward the revelations he received from God that would constitute the

KORAN

one of the renowned poets of the time, Musaylimah, became vexed at Mohammed's growing power.  He therefore claimed that his own poems had been inspired by divine revelations and that he and Mohammed should work together to rule the nascent Muslim community.

Mohammed's followers were appalled at this effrontery and urged the Prophet to take action.  But Mohammed merely said:

'Let him be. He is just a liar. Ignore him.'

So,' Musaylimah, the Liar'  is the name history remembers him by -profound theological proof that the Prophet felt distain, not blood-soaked vengeance, was the correct response to mockery.

 That should have been the reaction of all Muslims to even the most provocative Charlie Hebdo cartoons.  The Prophet does not need to be protected by self-proclaimed zealots.

 God will protect his reputation.

Indeed, it is an offence against Islam to assume the role of religious defender, with the arbitrary power of life and death against declared enemies of the faith.

There is not the slightest theological vindication for that kind of savagely arrogant conduct in Islam, all life is sacred and no one has the right to end it in the name of the deity or to take the

LAW INTO THEIR OWN HANDS.

 Filled with HATRED, the Charlie Hebdo KILLERS took it on themselves to act as

JUDGE, JURY AND EXECUTIONERS.

IN doing so, they were real heretics . They not only betrayed Islam but also shamed Muslims...

  When Muslims are finally able to move away from clerically-manipulated theocracy and return to the uncorrupted divine text of the religion, they will clearly see through all the horrific posturing of the jihadi militants

Muslims will then be able  to embrace the Koran's pristine vision, with its emphasis on

INCLUSIVENESS -PLURALISM- PEACEFUL

co-existence and mutual respect.

This  is the message that will be preached at our mosque in Oxford. And it presents a far more appealing world that the terrifying, macho sectarianism the crazed zealots want to inflict upon us all,

*  *  *

[TO BE CONTINUED.]

 

 

[WE ARE TOLD THAT ONLY A SMALL NUMBER OF PROFESSED MUSLIMS ARE UNTRUE TO THE TEACHING OF THE PROPHET SO WHY HAVEN'T THE GREATER NUMBER OF  TRUE MUSLIMS NOT TAKEN EFFECTIVE ACTION TO DESTROY THE IMPOSTORS OF THE MUSLIM FAITH. 

 AS GHANDI SHOWED MOST EFFECTIVELY THAT NON-VIOLENT ACTION CAN BE MOST SUCCESSFUL IN OBTAINING AN OBJECTIVE SUCH AS FREEDOM>  SO WHY DO TRUE MUSLIMS NOT ARISE AND COVER THE COMMUNITIES THEY LIVE IN FROM THE ACTIONS OF THE IMPOSTORS OF THEIR TRUE RELIGION>

OVER THE YEARS MANY CLERICS SUCH AS DR TAJ HARGEY HAVE VOICED THEIR CONCERNS AT THE LACK OF ACTION BY TRUE MUSLIMS AND IT IS THAT VERY FAILURE WHICH IS BAFFLING THE ONCE SETTLED PEOPLES OF THOSE COUNTRIES WHO HAVE RECEIVED MILLIONS OF MUSLIMS WITHIN THEIR COMMUNITIES>

TO MANY PEOPLE IT IS AS IF THEY ARE MORE INTERESTED TO ACHIEVE AN ISLAMIC STATE RATHER THAN INTEGRATE INTO THEIR NEW ONCE SETTLED LANDS.

TO STAND BY AND ALLOW  THE  NAME OF ISLAM TO BE USED IN THE SLAUGHTER OF INNOCENTS  MUST SURELY BE UNWORTHY OF ANY TRUE RELIGION .]

JANUARY  20-2018

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS-CAPS ARE OURS!]

DAILY MAIL, Friday, January 9, 2015

H.F.1445

*  *  *
 UNDERSTANDING ISLAM

PART 17/1

AUGUST 2005

THE 'COVENANT OF SECURITY'

The Islamic concept of a 'Covenant of Security' means two things. Firstly, unbelievers who pay the Jizyah are entitled to the provision of security from the Khilafah, and secondly, a non-Islamic nation which provides shelter to Muslims is not regarded as Dar-al-Harb. It is the second meaning which is relevant to Britain today.

In practice, as long as Britain sheltered Islamic terrorists planning strikes against their own governments, and did not make war against islamic lands, Britian was safe from attack.  The turning of London into Londonistan, a haven for foreign jihadists, made Britain, in a perverse kind of way, a safer place.

Chief among advocates of the 'Covenant of Security' was Skeikh Omar Bakri, leader of al-Muhajiroun. The head of its Luton branch, Sayful Islam, said in April 2004 that he supported Osama Bin Laden "100 per cent" in the quest to achieve

"the worldwide domination of Islam"

but he would not engage in terror attacks in Britain

"as long as they allow us Muslims to live here in peace."

All that changed as events unfolded in 2004 as a result of 9/11.

The British Government arrested certain foreign nationals on suspicion of inciting terrorism, and, unable for human rights reasons to deport them, kept them interned without trial.

The second factor was Britain's active support in the American invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq.

In January 2005 Bakri determined that the covenant of security had ended and "the whole of Britain had become Dar-al-Harb."

British Muslims were obliged "to join the global Islamic camp against the global crusader camp" the latter of which included Britain. Six months later, the bombing campaign in London began.

Other British jihadists took a different line. Hassan Butt left al Muhajiroun because he disagreed that British-born Muslims were bound by the same covenant of security felt by foreigners, such as Bakri himself.  In an interview, Butt said British-born Muslim youth have no allegiance to this country: " Islamically, I agree that someone who runs from the Middle East-where people like me are persecuted-and says, 'Britain, I want you to protect me' has entered a covenant of security. They  say, 'look protect my life and as a result I won't do any harm to you.' That  I agree with 100 per cent, but most of our people, especially the youth are British citizens... They did not ask to be born here; neither did they ask to be protected by Britain....They  have no covenant. As far as I'm concerned, the Islamic hukum (order) that I follow, says that a person has no covenant whatsoever with the country in which they are born." (Prospect Magazine August 2005)

*  *  *

Christian Voice, PO Box 739A, Surbiton, KT6 5YA -

AUGUST 2005

Searches related to pew research muslim population

sweden muslim population 2050

islam in germany 2050

islam in europe 2050

muslim population in france 2017

muslim population in europe 2018

belgium muslim population

islam in europe today

muslim population

 

More!

IMMIGRATION FILE

 

 

H.F.1711/14/1

*  *  *

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Britain's State  Pension

'POOREST IN THE WEST'

 

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-12-06 - Britain's state pension ...

https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-mail/20171206/281883003672171
 Britain's state pension 'poorest in West'. Daily Mail - 2017-12-06 - News - By
Hugo Duncan Deputy Finance Editor. BRITAIN'S pensioners face the biggest
drop in living standards of any major developed nation when they retire, a
damning report said yesterday. Workers on an average wage who rely on the
state pension ...

 

 
 
     

    Parts of Britain are now poorer than POLAND | Daily Mail Online

    www.dailymail.co.uk/.../Revealed-How-parts-Britain-poorer-POLAND-families-Wales-Cornwall-Europes-worst-off.html
    ‎
     May 2014 ... EXCLUSIVE By Tom Mctague, Mail online Deputy Political Editor ... The region of
    “West Wales and the Valleys” is now in the top five poorest areas in Western
    Europe - with families HALF as wealthy as their German ..... Huh the British
    pensioner on state pension has to do with £7,000 a year to live on. 17.
     

    Britons have worst state pension in EU | Daily Mail Online
    www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article.../Britons-worst-state-pension-EU.html
    ‎
    12 Nov 2007 ... The average age of retirement in Britain - 62.6 - is also above the EU average of
    61. Some 57 per cent of Britons aged between 55 and 64 are in paid employment
    . Aon found the value of Britain's state pension for a single person is 30.8 per cent
    of the average wage. This figure is 32.5 per cent in Ireland, ...
     

    Fifth of UK's poorest men 'die before they qualify for state ... - Daily Mail
    www.dailymail.co.uk/.../Fifth-UKs-poorest-men-die-qualify-state-pension.html
    ‎
    0 Apr 2011 ... Around 19 per cent of men from the lowest social classes die before they reach
    65, Labour's former pensions minister Malcolm Wicks said (pictured).
     

    Pensions crisis: 96% of final salary schemes are ... - Daily Mail
    www.dailymail.co.uk/.../Pensions-crisis-96-final-salary-schemes-doomed--OAPs-worst-Britain--state-funds-withering-vine.html
    24 Jun 2009 ... The extent of the pensions crisis has been laid bare by a 'triple whammy' of
    worrying reports.
     

    Retire at 60... if you take cut in state pension - Daily Mail
    www.dailymail.co.uk/news/.../UK-workers-retire-early-cut-state-pension.html
    ‎
    13 Oct 2016 ... The review also raises the prospect of blue collar workers in poor areas retiring
    earlier than office workers in wealthier parts of the country. ... To limit the costs of
    the payouts, which have soared due to Britain's ageing population, the
    Government also proposes to review the state pension age every five ...
     

    British state pension 'one of the least generous in ... - Daily Mail
    www.dailymail.co.uk/.../British-state-pension-one-generous-Europe-giving-UK-workers-bigger-financial-shock-retire.html
    ‎
    6 Oct 2014 ... British state pension 'one of the least generous in Europe' giving UK workers a
    bigger financial shock when they retire ... By Sean Poulter for the Daily Mail .....
    they will expect us to work till we drop, thus saving any pension payment, old
    people dont work for fun, its because they are so poor they have too. 1.
     

    OECD report puts Britain bottom of pension league table | This is ...
    www.thisismoney.co.uk/.../pensions/.../OECD-report-puts-Britain-bottom-pension-league-table.html
    ‎
    1 day ago ... Britons thinking about retirement should not rely on their state pension or face up
    to a huge fall in earnings, a report from the influential OECD shows.
     

    UK middle class one of the smallest and poorest in Europe | This is ...
    www.thisismoney.co.uk/.../UK-middle-class-one-smallest-poorest-Europe.html
    ‎
    25 Apr 2017 ... The UK's middle class remains one of the smallest and poorest in Europe despite
    having expanded the most over two decades. Middle class British family of four
    had a minimum disposable income of between £19,000 - £57,350 in 2010; Italy,
    Spain, UK and Ireland have smallest middle classes in Western ...
     

*  *  *

 
 

 

PENSIONER POVERTY

IN

BRITAIN

*

Energy firms shamed over worst tariffs

by Sean Poulter

Daily Mail -Consumer Affairs Editor

DECEMBER 21-2017

BRITAIN'S two biggest energy firms have been shamed by a watchdog for having the most customers on rip-off tariffs.

Some 67 per cent of British Gas non-prepayment meter customers are on its EXPENSIVE STANDARD VARIABLE TARIFF (SVT) which is some £284 a year more than the cheapest deal from a rival.

SSE  has 71 per cent on its SVT , paying £315 a year more than the cheapest deal.

Details revealed by energy watchdog Ofgem which said some firms are not doing enough to encourage customers on the SVT to move to a BETTER TARIFF. The findings provide powerful evidence to support the Governments proposal to increase a CAP on the SVT.

The 'big six firms-British Gas, SSE, E. ON, EDF.  Npower and Scottish Power-say there is need for one because competition is increasing and more families are shopping around.

The figures from Ofgem paint a very different  picture. Of the rest of the big six,

 E.ON has 61 per cent of non-prepayment meter customers on the SVT,

EDF has 52 per cent,

Npower has 48 per cent and

Scottish Power has 41 per cent

 

[The unacceptable face of capitalism-Basic usage of water and power should be

FREE

TO ALL

BUT AT THE VERY LEAST PARTICULARLY

FOR ELDERLY PENSIONERS

Excess usage chargeable.]

There's plenty of spare cash in the Foreign Aid Budget which at present is wasted on foreign dancing groups and even handouts to terrorists -as Richard Littlejohn so often remarks 'mind how you go'...'

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

*

DAILY MAIL

DECEMBER 21,2017
About 1,610,000 results

  1. What are Smart Meters? - Smart Energy GB - smartenergygb.org

    Adwww.smartenergygb.org/Smart-Meters/Energy-Bills‎

    Smart meters show how much gas and electricity you’re using, in pounds & pence

    Save energy & cut costs · See what you’re spending · Clear & fair bills

    Smart Meter Benefits - The National Rollout - What Are Smart Meters?

    Are smart meters safe? Yes. ... This means that, as with traditional meters, smart meters have undergone rigorous tests during the manufacturing process to ensure gas and electricity consumption is being measured accurately. Just like with mobile phones and baby monitors, smart meters emit low radio frequency emissions.

    Are smart meters safe? Smart Meter Help and advice from British Gas

    www.britishgas.co.uk/.../Meters-meter.../Smart-Meters/...smart-meters/Are-smart-meters-safe.html


     

    Watchdog exposes smart meter safety concerns - Utility Week

    https://utilityweek.co.uk/watchdog-exposes-smart-meter-safety-concerns/

    ‎

    9 Jun 2017 ... BBC Watchdog featured smart meter safety concerns in the first programme of its
    new series last night. The show, which champions consumer interests, identified
    three case studies in which consumers' homes had been left unsafe due to “
    negligent” installation or faulty meters being fitted. In one instance, a ...
     

    Six reasons to say no to a smart meter - The

     

    Telegraph

    www.telegraph.co.uk/money/.../six-reasons-say-no-smart-meter/

    ‎

     Aug 2017 ... The authorities consistently reassured the public that the devices were secure and safe. An investigation by BBC Watchdog, which aired in late July, also raised questions about the links between smart meters and fires. It was not clear whether the meters themselves, or their installation, was at fault.
     

    Are smart meters safe? Smart Meter Help and advice from British Gas

    www.britishgas.co.uk/.../Meters-meter.../Smart-Meters/...smart-meters/Are-smart-meters-safe.html

    ‎

    re smart meters safe? Yes. ... This means that, as with traditional meters, smart meters have undergone rigorous tests during the manufacturing process to ensure gas and electricity consumption is being measured accurately. Just like with mobile phones and baby monitors, smart meters emit low radio frequency emissions.
     

    What are 'Smart' Meters? « Stop Smart Meters!

     

     

    (UK)

    stopsmartmeters.org.uk/resources/what-are-smart-meters/

    ‎

    any appliances and consumer goods coming to market today feature tiny RFID
    chips which are capable of communicating with a 'Smart' Meter so that the system
    .... (If you have been led to believe that WiFi is safe, there are many studies
    suggesting otherwise – and even telecoms industry patents (click here) claiming
    it ...
     

    THE CHOOSE IS YOURS!

 

H.F.1406

 
 

News for DAILY MAIL-UK pays worst state pension in the developed world

Britain pays retirees the worst state pension in the developed world with a basic payout of £122.30 a week
  • The basic payout of £122.30 a week is the least generous in the West 
  • Former pensions minister Ros Altmann warned the situation could get worse 
  • Government projections suggest that for those now under 30 the age when they can claim a state pension will have to be raised to 70 

By Daniel Martin, Policy Editor For The Daily Mail

February 12, 2018

Britain pays retirees the worst state pension of any country in the developed world, analysis has found.

The basic payout of £122.30 a week is the least generous in the West – worth just 29 per cent of average earnings – and last night former pensions minister Ros Altmann warned the situation could get even worse.

Government projections suggest that for those now under 30 the age when they can claim a state pension will have to be raised to 70, while future payments could be cut even further to avoid needing massive hikes in national insurance, Baroness Altmann said.
 

Britain pays retirees the worst state pension of any country in the developed world, analysis has found

The league table revealing Britain's pension shame was compiled by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), which analyses the world's industrialised nations. 

Out of all the countries compared, Britain comes bottom – even behind poorer nations such as Chile, Poland and Mexico.

While the UK's state pension is worth just 29 per cent of average earnings, in France the equivalent figure is 74.5 per cent. 

Germany's state pension is worth 50.5 per cent of average earnings, while in the USA it is 49.1 per cent. 

The most generous state pension in the world is in the Netherlands, where the payments are slightly higher than average earnings.
 

The basic payout of £122.30 a week is the least generous in the West – worth just 29 per cent of average earnings. File photo

Baroness Altmann warned that despite a recent overhaul to the pension system, payments will need to be cut further to avoid massive tax rises in future to pay for it. 

She said: 'We are one of the world's leading economies, but our support for the oldest in society is not fit for purpose.

'In April 2016, major reforms to the UK state pension were supposed to have made the system affordable for the future, reducing its generosity. Beyond the 2030s, the new state pension will be lower than the old system for most people and the lowest paid, predominantly women, will lose significantly from the new system.

'Despite this, the Government has been advised that the costs of paying state pensions will soar so much over the next 20 years and beyond that further cuts could be required.'

From later this year the state pension age for women will rise from 63 to match men at 65, and will reach 66 for both by 2020.

Baroness Ros Altmann (pictured) warned that despite a recent overhaul to the pension system, payments will need to be cut further to avoid massive tax rises in future to pay for it

The Government's economic forecasters, the Actuary's Department, believes it will become 70 in the 2050s and 71 in the 2060s.

This would mean that anyone aged 30 or below now will not get their state pension until they are 70, while those under 20 will have to wait until they are 71.

Baroness Altmann added: 'The Government actuary believes that just funding the UK's exceptionally low state pension will require reducing payments in future or dramatic tax rises. Policymakers face difficult decisions and are also likely to need to increase the state pension age further.'

The former pensions minister called on the Government to do more to address the crisis, including making private pensions more attractive so that more people are willing to pay a portion of their wages into their own fund.

'To avoid burdening younger generations with significant tax rises, it is vital that more is done to boost private pension saving,' she added. 'Auto-enrolment is a good start, but the pensions industry needs to attract more customers to pay more into their pensions.' 
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5379521/Britain-pays-retirees-worst-state-pension.html#ixzz56thYQdgc
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

February 12, 2018

[IT IS IRONIC THAT IT WAS THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY WHICH INTRODUCED THE STATE PENSION  OVER A HUNDRED YEARS AGO BY WINSTON CHURCHILL YET AS SHOWN ABOVE IT HAS BEEN ALLOWED BY BOTH THE MAIN POLITICAL PARTIES TO THE PRESENT LEVEL AS THE POOREST PENSIONERS OF THE 24 DEVELOPED NATIONS WITH A PERCENTAGE OF THE AVERAGE WAGE OF 29PER CENT-WHEREAS THE TOP NATION NETHERLANDS PAYS 100.6 %. WITH THE CITY MILE BEING BAILED OUT WITH 45 BILLION OF THE TAXPAYERS MONEY.]

-A GREEDY SQUARE MILE AND PARSIMONIOUS STATE PENSION YET OUR OVERSEAS AID IS SQUANDERED AND WASTED WITH THE CHARITIES IN THE MAIN GAUGING THEMSELVES WITH HIGH LIVING-AND NOW WE HEAR EVEN PROSTITUTION IS CONSIDERED A PERK OF THE JOB.  THERE APPEARS NO ADEQUATE OVERSIGHT OF CHARITIES TO ENSURE THAT CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS ARE FOR THE TRUE NEEDY NOT FOR FUN AND GAMES AND TERRORISTS OR HIGH LIVING OF THOSE RECEIVING THE TAXPAYERS HARD EARNED REMUNERATION WHILE MANY OF THE CONTRIBUTORS ARE IN GREAT PAIN AND MANY DYING WHICH COULD BE GREATLY REDUCED IF CHARITY BEGAN AT HOME.  TO BOAST OF BEING THE LARGEST CONTRIBUTOR TO OVERSEAS AID WHILE A GREAT NUMBER OF OUR CITIZENS PARTICULARLY THE POOR AND A NUMBER OF THE ELDERLY  ARE SUFFERING IN ORDER THAT THE TOP OF THE FOREIGN AID LIST IS MAINTAINED.

HOW IS IT THAT THE OTHER 23 NATIONS CAN PROVIDE A HIGHER STATE PENSION? WHAT IS PREVENTING WESTMINSTER FROM BRINGING OUR STATE PENSION UP TO AT LEAST THE AVERAGE OF THOSE ON THE LIST BELOW WHICH CONTAINS MANY NATIONS WHICH CAN HARDLY BE  CONSIDERED RICH COMPARED TO THE UK. IS IT THAT IN THOSE COUNTRIES THE PEOPLE ARE

 PUT FIRST! - NOT LAST?

THERE ARE TOO MANY PEOPLE FEEDING OFF THE PUBLIC PURSE WITH THEIR OBSCENE RATES OF SALARY AND GOLDEN PENSION-POSSIBLY SO LONG AS THEY ARE COMFORTABLE THEY HAVE NO THOUGHT FOR THOSE WHO PAID FOR THEIR LAVISH LIFESTYLE?

PAYOUT AS PERCENTAGE OF AVERAGE WAGE
Netherlands   -  100.6%

Portugal        -   94.9%

Italy             -  93.2%

Austria         -  91.8%

Spain             -  81.8%

Denmark        -  80.2%

France            -  74.5%

Belgium          -  66.1%

Finland         -  65%

Czech Republic-60%

Sweden         -  54.9%

Canada          -  53.4%

OECD average=62.9%

 

 Germany    -    50.5%

USA            -    49.1%

Norway      -    48.8%

 Switzerland    -    44.9%

New Zealand   -  43.2%

Australia     -    42.6%

Ireland        -   42.3%

Chile         -     40.1%

Japan           -  40%

Poland       -      38.6%

Mexico         -     29.6%

UK  -  29%

Source-OECD

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

February 12, 2018

[WITH A BLOATED -  WASTEFUL -  FOREIGN AID BUDGET NOW £14 BILLION THERE IS  MONEY ENOUGH TO INCREASE UK STATE PENSIONS TO THE AVERAGE OF THE RICHEST NATIONS IN THE G7.- November 5,2018]

H.F.1478

*  *  *

BRITISH PENSIONS THE WORST IN G7

WHY?

BROUGHT FORWARD FROM NOVEMBER 13,2007

AS YOU WILL SEE ABOVE THE SITUATION HAS NOT IMPROVED IN 2018 AS REGARDS AN IMPROVED STATE PENSION-IN FACT IT HAS BECOME MUCH WORSE.  POLITICIANS FEATHER THEIR OWN NESTS WITH THEIR GENEROUS SALARIES-PENSIONS AND PERKS BUT DO ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO GIVE US PENSIONS TO MATCH THE GERMAN AND FRENCH . WE ARE TOLD WE LIVE IN A DEMOCRACY BUT AS YOU WILL SEE BELOW THAT THEY TREAT THEIR PENSIONERS WITH GROSS CONTEMPT!. WITH A MATTER OF MONTHS UNTIL THE WINTER COLD CLAIMS MORE VICTIMS IT IS ABOUT TIME THERESA MAY DECIDED TO REDUCE THE WASTEFUL FOREIGN AID BUDGET AND GIVE PENSIONERS A LIFE SAVING STATE PENSION.-ADDED MAY 19,2018

 

A HAPPY and PROSPEROUS CHRISTMAS for SOME

 

While millions of our pensioners in poverty are ignored by this GOVERNMENT which pays millions in bonus's for FAILURE and this in one of the richest countries in the world.

*

The 2.5 million pensioners battling to stay warm

by

Steve Doughty

[Daily Mail - Social Affairs Correspondent-Tuesday, November 13,2007]

A FIFTH OF THE OVER -60's spend their winter living in a single room because they cannot afford to keep their whole house warm, it was revealed yesterday.

The shocking figure means that 2.5 million older people limit their heating costs in this way.

A survey also revealed  that one million have to cut back on food to enable them to pay their

HEATING BILLS.

The study for the charity

HELP THE AGED

highlighted the scale of deprivation among the elderly and the reasons

WHY SO MANY OF THEM DIE OVER THE WINTER.

It says that the complexity of many

STATE BENEFITS

 makes it hard for them to claim the cash, compounding

THEIR POVERTY

Help the Aged said

£4.5 billion

worth of pension credit, housing benefit and council tax benefit

GOES UNCLAIMED

It is also estimated that 25,000 die in winter because of illnesses linked to cold and hypothermia. According to the charity's research. Large numbers of the over 60's resort to wearing gloves, overcoats while indoors to avoid having to pay

HEATING BILLS.

A million go to public libraries, coffee shops or malls just to find somewhere warm and more than a million and a half go to bed in the daytime to find warmth under blankets, it said.

Older people have been the poorest section of society for nearly a

DECADE

[Thanks a lot! -New Labour -

WE DON'T THINK SO]

Single mothers who used to be the poorest group, have shot up the income scale thanks to Labour's tax credits and other benefits.

BUT THE ELDERLY - who are supposed to be  buoyed up by GORDON BROWN'S pension credit system -  OFTEN FAIL TO CLAIM OR ARE MISSED OUT OF THE SYSTEM.

The Daily Mail's

DIGNITY for the ELDERLY

CAMPAIGN

has highlighted the way many are

CHEATED

by the means  when they need a place in a care home and how vital home help that allows them to stay in their own property is being cut back by councils.

[Of course those who have already secured their gold-plated pensions by working for the GOVERNMENT and who have themselves an opportunity of obtaining special bonus's are unforgiving about those unfortunate beings THE ELDERLY who are looked on as an unnecessary expenditure which they could do without whereas any politically correct hair-brained schemes always seem to attract the necessary funds without restriction. We have members of parliament on upwards of  £250,000 with their upper limit always rising but the pensioners who have given good service to their country having at their time of lives to pass the pension credit hurdle which was so designed that any self-respecting

LEGISLATIVE CHAMBER

WOULD HAVE BEEN DONE AWAY WITH ON ITS FAILURE TO DO THE JOB OF REDUCING POVERTY IN THE ELDERLY]

The complexity of making a claim for pension credit and other benefits is often cited as one reason why they are not taken up. Another is that the elderly are reluctant to claim means-tested benefits, seen by many as demeaning handouts.

The charity which conducted its survey with British Gas, called for greater state efforts

TO REACH THOSE WHO NEED HELP.

(11.4 million pensioners in Britain)

'Each year over 25,000 older people lose their lives to a preventable cold-related illness,' said Anne Pearson of

HELP the AGED.

'The GOVERNMENT IS NOT DOING NEARLY ENOUGH TO END FUEL POVERTY.

It has a potential jack-pot of

£4.5 billion

waiting for older people, but it dangles this vital cash behind a complex maze of means-tested benefits and, as a result, money continually

FAILS TO REACH THOSE WHO NEED IT TO SURVIVE.

The survey, taken by ICM among 1,171 over 60's last month, indicated that more than

2.5 million

of the country's 11 million elderly live in one room because of the

COST OF HEATING THEIR HOMES.

Almost as many -2.2 million -turn off their heating entirely at some times because of the cost. Around two million wear out-door clothing indoors.

The charity said benefit advice services were unhelpful, with one in three older people left with no idea how they can claim state aid.

Pension credit tops up the income of a single person to

£119.05 a week

and a couple to

£181 a week

Most pensioners are also entitled to winter fuel payments. Those under 79 get between £100 and £200, depending on their circumstances, while those over 80 or over get up to

£300

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comments in brackets]

 

 

*

Britons have the worst state pensions in the EU

by

 Sean Poulter

 

[Daily Mail-Consumer Affairs Editor-Tuesday, November 13, 2007]

 

 

 

PENSION MISERS

 

State pension as proportion of average working pay

Greece ---------    95.7%

          Luxembourg  ---------   88.3%                      

         Netherlands ----------    81.9%                    

         Spain     ---------  81.2%          

       Denmark   ------------ 79.8%             

         Italy  ------------    67.9%       

      Sweden  ------------      62.1%           

      EU average ------------ 60%               

         France------------   51.2%       

          Germany -----------  39.9%          

            Estonia -----------   32.9%          

      Ireland ----------      32.5%    

              UK -----------  30.8%

 

MILLIONS of Britons are being condemned to POVERTY in OLD AGE

by the worst state pension in the EU, a study shows.

TO BE CONTINUED

*        *         *

[The early signs are are that the coming months will be decidedly colder so that the conditions outlined above will be much deadlier to the pensioner living alone. There are many organisations who have contact with the elderly who by their observations and action could well reduce those who will die of the cold this

SEASON of CHRISTMAS of GOOD WILL to ALL. 

*

 

[Daily Mail - Social Affairs Correspondent-Tuesday, November 13,2007]

 

H.F.1478/ NOVEMBER-2007

*  *  *
 
 

[AT LONG! LONG! LAST!

- WE LEAVE

THE

CORRUPT-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC-GODLESS EU

 IN MARCH 2019.]

*

DAILY MAIL

-At last, Hammond's on board with

BREXIT

and the

REMOANERS are DEAD and BURIED

LEAVING THE EU

 IN

MARCH,2019

 

 

THE

DOMINIC

LAWSON

Column

 

By DOMINIC LAWSON

 

Finally, it’s sorted. Until yesterday, the anti-Brexiteers known as Remoaners had high hopes of Philip Hammond, the Chancellor.

But yesterday he appeared as joint author of a newspaper article with the most adamantine Brexiteer in the Cabinet, the International Trade Secretary Dr Liam Fox. The two supposed foes declared that in March 2019, Britain would not just be leaving the EU but also ‘we will leave the Customs Union and be free to negotiate the best trade deals around the world as an independent, open, trading nation’.

Although the Cabinet Brexiteers were content with Hammond’s proposal that there should be a transition period after March 2019, pending a final settlement of the country’s arrangements with the EU, the Chancellor had given the impression he was bending to the demands of the CBI that Britain remain within the Customs Union during that unspecified period.

Blunder

This they regarded as a fatal blunder — and not just because they suspected the CBI (which had campaigned for Britain to give up sterling for the euro) of seeking to keep the UK in the EU ‘by the back door’.

As Shanker Singham, chairman of the special trade commission of the Legatum Institute (a group consulted regularly by the Government), warned last week: ‘The UK must be able to provide the clarity of being outside the Customs Union on Day 1 of Brexit.

If such clarity does not exist, then other countries will not think the UK is serious about executing an independent trade policy and they will quickly lose patience and move on.’...

...In any case, the nation has not changed its collective mind since the referendum in June 2016. If anything, views have hardened in the direction set by the result. A survey of 3,293 people published on Friday by the London School of Economics showed that even those who had voted ‘Remain’ would prefer the sort of Brexit deal the LSE’s team described as ‘hard’.

A total of 51.3 per cent of Remain voters backed a Brexit deal which delivered ‘full control’ over immigration and led to lower numbers of migrants from the EU. No fewer than 54.7 per cent of Remainers said that the UK should ‘pay nothing’ to the EU by means of a ‘divorce bill’.

And 52.2 per cent of Remainers told the LSE researchers that we should entirely free British law from the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice. Unsurprisingly, a still higher proportion of self-identifying ‘Leave’ voters supported what the LSE termed

His statement on The Andrew Marr Show last month that failure to reach an amicable deal with the EU ‘would be a very, very bad outcome for Britain’ was seen as an attack on his Brexiteer colleagues in the Cabinet (and, indeed, on the Prime Minister).

‘hard Brexit’.

Monstrous

This clearly disappointed the most voluble critic of the Brexiteers on the Tory parliamentary benches, Anna Soubry. In her own newspaper article yesterday, she lamented ‘a sense of resignation among most people who voted Remain that we have to “man up” and make the most of what we know will be a rotten Brexit’...

Full article


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4787508/At-Hammond-s-board-Brexit.html#ixzz4pkbL1fqi
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*

[7 MONTHS

TO REGAIN OUR ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND.]

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

AUGUST 14, 2017

H.F.1281 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!
 
 

 

[IT HAD TO HAPPEN!

-'WE ARE AFTER ALL AN INSULAR  ISLAND PEOPLE']

 

*

 

Even Remainers now back a

'hard' Brexit:

 Most Brits ... - Daily Mail

 

. Even Remainers now back a 'hard' Brexit: Most Brits want to regain full control ...
By Claire Ellicott for the Daily Mail and Kate Ferguson For Mailonline ... a straight
choice between that and no deal, with 58 per cent backing it.
 

Most Brits want to regain full control of our borders and to become free of meddling EU judges, survey reveals

  • Most polled want the UK to become free of EU judges and full border control 

  • Two thirds said they would prefer 'no deal' rather than a soft Brexit, poll found

  • Findings boost for Theresa May who says no deal is better than a bad deal

Most Remain voters now back a Brexit that gives Britain a clean break from the EU and control back of our borders, a major study has found.

Many of those who voted to stay in the European Union also now believe the country should only pay a small ‘divorce bill’ and stop EU judges ruling over the UK.

The results are a major boost for Theresa May’s Brexit stategy - and suggest diehard Remainers, such as Liberal Democrat leader Sir Vince Cable and former prime minister Tony Blair, have overestimated support for backtracking on Brexit. 

Full artical


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4782712/Most-Brits-hard-Brexit-new-survey-finds.html#ixzz4pXWhGZDU
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*

 

 FREEDOM!

 

.'..We cannot, I fear, falsify the pedigree of the fierce people, and persuade them that they are not sprung from a nation in whose veins the blood of freedom circulates.  The language in which they would hear you tell them this tale would detect the imposition; your speech would betray you

'An Englishman is the unfittest person on earth, to argue another Englishman into slavery'.

*

EDMUND BURKE

 

Conciliation with America-speech House of Commons

March 22,1775

 

*

1+2+3

+4+5+6+7+8+9+10

Soul of England

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

AUGUST 12-2017

H.F.1277 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!
 

A Fabian Europhile of 1947 supported Independent Nation-States and the Rule of Law.

 

We have had the privilege to read the work of a Fabian Europhile of 1947 who was a Socialist, a University Professor and though never elected or having become a delegate or aspired to the position within the Socialist Movement.

 

He believed to teach what he believed to be TRUE whether other people believed or not- but with the proviso that, if he set out to teach never to conceal a weakness in his case. [Tony Blair please note!]

 

The purpose in introducing this erudite and talented human being is that for 32 years or even longer Governments have never been frank about the aims of the European Union, which is what it was from the beginning.

 

In order to put the other view which the majority voted for in 1972 and particularly in 1975 it is refreshing to hear the words of one who was in most respects in tune with the people of Britain and as you will hear in the way the EEC was as portrayed in the 1975 election which in reality turned out to be the biggest deception of the British people for all time.

 

The Government will not be truthful to the people of our country on the issues involved in considering the New EU Constitution but by unveiling the thoughts of a Fabian - an Oracle of a man that loved his country and his fellow beings we are prepared to hear his words.

 

WE obviously differ in certain aspects of his views but this is not to say that our view is safe from further dialogue.

 

Before we get to the matters under consideration we will explore the man and his aspirations. The following extracts are from:

 

‘The Intelligent Man’s Guide to the Post-War World,

By

 

G D.H.Cole

London

VICTOR GOLLANCZ LTD

1947

 

What I take for Granted

 

1)         Standards of Living. I assume that the most universally important of all objects of political and social activity is to raise standards of living of ordinary people in our own country and throughout the world. (We have a special responsibility for our own country, but an only less immediate responsibility for others), in such a way as to put an end to malnutrition, preventable disease and mortality, illiteracy and ignorance, and sub-human living and working conditions wherever they exist. I assume that no other object can claim any allegiance when it conflicts seriously with the primary object.

2)    Personal and Political Freedom. I assume that freedom and self- government are good things, for both individuals and societies, and that it is the business of all good men to oppose tyranny, either of man over man, or of ruling State [Brussels] over subject people.

 

 

But I cannot state this second assumption in as unequivocal terms as the first, because obviously neither individuals nor societies can be left entirely uncontrolled. There must be a Rule of Law, for both man and peoples; and all that can be sought is that this rule shall be such as to provide within the social environment the largest amounts of liberty for all men and for all peoples that are consistent with the equal claims of other men and of other men and peoples.

 

This, however, includes the assumption that the self-government is good in it, and that the good constitution is that which gives all the inhabitants of a country (or of the world) the best chance they are capable of taking to play a real and effective part in government.

 

3)         Canons of Social Conduct. I assume that, whenever a man or government, or any group of man or governments, acts in a way that can be defended only on the ground that the action is necessary because of the imperfections of individual, group, or government behaviour, the necessity for so acting is to be regarded as a challenge to use all possible efforts to raise the standards of such behaviour, and that no one is ever justified in invoking this defence unless he is using his best endeavours to that end.

4)         The Duty of Service. I assume that every person is under an obligation to use his powers, whatever they are, in such a way as not merely to avoid being a burden on society, if he or she can help it, [How things have changed over the last few decades] but positively to contribute to social well-being.

5)          

This applies, for all normal persons, an obligation to do fair day’s work and not to be unduly exacting about the reward, an obligation to develop valuable talents and not fritter them away, and an obligation to be a good colleague, so as to help instead of hindering the work of others.

6)    The Right to go One’s Own Way. I assume that every person has a right, within wide limits, to go his own way and not to be interfered with or badgered about on grounds of nonconformity, as long as he his tolerably fulfilling his obligations as set out in the previous clause. I assume that it takes many sorts (not all) to make a good world, and that the only sorts it does not take are those who are either deliberately trying to make a bad one or unprepared to recognise any code of social behaviour resting on the notion of moral rights and duties.

7)         Morality [According to Tony Blair does not exist] I assume that the simple rules of common morality are valid, and that no one is ever entitled to override a moral rule except in the pursuit of a higher moral end falling within (and not beyond) the ambit of common morality. I define these moral rules, for working purposes, as

(a)    A duty to be kind.

8)         (b) A duty to be tolerant of differences within the limits of morality as here defined, a duty to regard every human being as an end and not a means,

(d) A duty to deny the validity of and to resist all claims that are contrary to fundamental human equality of rights, a duty to be active, up to the limit of one’s powers, in standing up for the observance of these principles.

7) The Brotherhood of Man. I assume that all men are brothers, and that the only valid reason for hating one’s brother

Is that he is acting against good and right, in denial of our fundamental common morality

9)         Truth I assume that TRUTH is preferable to falsehood, and it is good to enlarge the realm of TRUTH both by new discovery and by the spreading of existing knowledge. I assume that men are better for being educated in the TRUTH, whether they are happier or not.

10)Freedom of Speech. It follows that I assume the freedom of speech and publication to be good, with the sole restriction that they cannot legitimately be used either (a) to deny fundamental common morality or (b) to attack toleration and freedom of speech and publication within this sole limit.

11) Freedom of Association I assume that freedom of association is good, because men cannot enjoy full opportunities of self-government or of discovery of TRUTH unless they are free to join together for common group purposes. I assume that the only limitations on the freedom of association should be identical with those limiting freedom of speech and publication.

12) Freedom of Will. I assume that men enjoy free will, in the sense that their history is not predestined, but made by their own ways of handling the opportunities presented to them in each generation by (a) their physical and traditional environments, and (b) their knowledge and abilities. Accordingly, I assume that the world may get better or worse, as men by their wisdom or stupidity make it better or worse. [Don’t we know that in 2005]

13)   Right and Wrong Vision. I assume that everyone who acts against these principles is either a scoundrel, or blind. But believing real scoundrels to be rare, I assume most of those who offend to be suffering from defective vision [Is that right Tony Blair; Edward Heath; Kenneth Clarke and hundreds of cronies -in 2005]

 

By vision I here mean imagination, especially power to put oneself in the places of others, and to think objectively, setting self-interest apart. No one can do these things wholly; but everyone can try to achieve them if he is given a chance.

 

To give all men the best possible chance is one of the three great purposes of education. The other two are (a) to teach TRUTH, (b) to teach citizenship.

Taking Sides

I have written all this down at the beginning of the book because I want there to be no mistake about the side I am on. I am on the side of the common people, in the sense that I want all men to have a chance of the good life and of living it in the ways that suit them best.

 

[Just a reminder that these words were written in 1947 but I’m sure many will agree that they are as important (if not more important) today in February 2005]

 

This does not mean that I want all men to have everything the majority of them would vote for now, if they asked. I don’t stand for that kind of democracy.

 

I want people to have good nutrition, good housing, good education, good working conditions, freedom of speech, writing and association, self-government, peaceful relations with our neighbours, sound moral notions, whether they would vote for having them or not. To this extent, but no further, I am prepared to assert that I know better [Mr G.D.H.Cole] what is good for people than many of them can know themselves, being less well informed and more held in mental subjection.

 

By the democracy I stand for I mean making people really free and self-governing, not the votes they record when they are neither. Voting is merely a handy device: It is not to be identified with democracy, which is a mental and moral relation of man to man. …

 

[The literary output from this respected human being has been prodigious on so many worthy subjects and we are going to touch the very question, which is so important at the present time in March 2005 -the question of self-government and the brotherhood of mankind.]

 

* *

The Political Structure of Western Unity

[1946]

 

This is the economic aspect of Western Unity, which is indispensable in order to give the political aspect a real and substantial content. Politically, the structure need not be at all elaborate, if only the right economic links can be successfully made.

 

I see no necessity for a common Constitution or for a common Parliament, even of a federal type. [Neither do millions of voters in 2005]

 

The whole thing should be done by treaties, filled out by agreements for close economic collaboration; and the political machinery could be no more than a periodically-meeting West European Congress, which could be created as a ‘regional group’ within the framework of the United Nations Organization, and on lines parallel to those of the existing Pan-American Union. [To remind you this was written in 1946]

 

Such a Congress would debate policies and set up Commissions to draft agreements for ratification by the national Parliaments, and to supervise their execution when they had been duly ratified.

 

There would be no need to supersede, or to interfere with the separate forms and methods of government in the different countries - only persuade them to shape the policies in common on a number of questions which call imperatively for supra-national action.

 

[As a realistic visionist of the future Mr Cole went on to say] There are, indeed, certain terms of unity, which I should like to see written into the common agreement of the West European States. I should like complete freedom of movement, without passports or visa, to be established over the entire area. I should like any citizen of any country within the group to be recognised, on the basis of a simple residence qualification, as a citizen of any other, to the extent of acquiring full legal and voting rights.

 

I should like to see conventions agreed on by all countries in the group on such matters as patents, company laws, Trade Union rights, libel law, double taxation, and, as far as possible, social insurance and minimum conditions of employment. And I should hope, as soon as possible, for a truly common currency, resting on the foundation of an agreed policy for the maintenance of full employment over the entire area.

 

[Much of the above we have no quarrel with and as Mr Cole had said much could have been achieved without the absolute loss of Sovereignty. Whether Britain needed to be a part is an entirely different question on which we would give a firm ‘No’ to any areas, which threatened our borders and security and the means to act independently of the countries beyond our moat, when the need would arise.

 

Nevertheless, Mr Cole showed the way in 1946 to European co-operation, which if followed instead of the Heath to Blair scenario may have brought some benefit without the threat to the independent Nation-States in Europe.]

 

Western Unity is not Military Alliance

 

Mr Cole continued- As for military affairs, I do not want Western unity to be involved in them in any way. It would be a great mistake to create in Western Europe any sort of bloc of armed force, even if it were organised only as a common contribution to U.N.O. Any proposal to make a military, as well as an economico-political, group in Western Europe would inevitably arouse, as matters stand [1946], all the worst suspicions in the Soviet Union; and, even apart from this, it could be represented as implying an abandonment of U.N.O.’s position, or turn any line that would further weaken U.N.O.’s position, or turn the West into an additional (and certainly ineffective) power bloc to match its strength against the Soviet Union or the United States [of America], instead of standing as the champion of world order and a representative of the smaller countries in the endeavour to make an end of military power-politics as the determinant of world affairs….

[It is ironic that the problems of 1946 have reared their heads again over 59 years later- and we can now all see what mistakes have been made. There is the anti-American attitude in parts of Europe which even without the Iraq War have always been in existence-hence the call for their own EU Military Command-ignoring NATO which in reality brought Peace to Europe and not the formation of the EU which will lead to its own disintegration]

 

…Our differences from the Americans in values and way of life are based mainly on this-we in Western Europe are old, settled peoples, with long, continuous national traditions, living thick on the ground, and long accustomed to the husbanding of scarce resources. The Americans are a new people, of very mixed racial composition, still imperfectly fused into an American nation [1946], and living scattered over a vast continent, whose resources they have been accustomed, until quite recently, to regard as boundless….

 

Western European Unity and World Unity

 

[Mr Cole has already expressed his belief of the existence of Independent Nation -States co-operating together-not the total immersion of the States into a Totalitarian nightmare.]

 

There is no reason why we should not achieve this accommodation-we West Europeans, the Russians, and the Americans -to say nothing of the Indians, the Chinese and the other great groups [Arab nations] of the human family.

 

[We would not include Britain in Western Europe but with the English -speaking nations -of the Dominions and other areas of our influence in the world with our closest link with the USA. -Our long history has been as a world trading power]

 

…We can divide the world between us, into several spheres within which we can practice our several ways of life; and indeed, we must do just this, if we are not to tear the whole world to pieces, and leave but a desert-if even that-behind.

My plea for Western unity is part of a wider plea for the zoning of world affairs….

* * *

[Fonts altered-bolding & underlining used-comments in brackets.]

 

To conclude we have shown how vital it is that those who have close links in their way of life and values with a particular sphere of influence should not be expected to give up their values in order to become a part of another mixed culture.

 

The Middle East and the Balkans and many other parts of the world have shown the foolishness of forcing different cultures into opposition.

 

The Term:

 

‘When in Rome do as the Romans do’

 

Is as true today as it has been throughout history. Even in our Island home there has always been an earned respect for the other peoples that have been our warring neighbours in our Island home over 1400 years.

 

It seems with Tony Blair and his cronies throughout the country have no respect for England or for ‘Englishness’ but always have time for our close island neighbours or those who will not integrate having been encouraged not to do so by the misplaced policies of New Labour. But then as we all know they are only interested in being in their words ‘Good Europeans’?]

 

The ironical twist to all that Blair and

Co wish to achieve if they were successful would be the ONLY nation-state with the unique democratic credentials and English sense of ‘Fair-play and Justice’ with its subjects and kin in all quarters of the world and with the ability of independent action even against great odds as we have demonstrated many times in our history- would be negated.

 

All this would be thrown away into a mixing machine out of which all its ingredients would look alike. -We are NOT that kind of People as our Past has shown and why the majority of the people will and must be FREE.

* * *

 

Notes on Fabian Doctrine

 

Fabians advocated Socialism, not as the logical outcome of an historical process of class-struggles, but as a practical need of the time, on the essentially ethical ground that in no other way could the happiness of the common people be secured.

 

Fabion Socialism, reinterpreted by Keir Hardie and the other young working -class leaders who in 1893 founded the Independent Labour Party.

 

Great Britain was governed between 1918-1939 almost continuously by the Tories and it was the electorate in 1945, which chose the Labour Party to bring change to a war weary people.

 

* * *

MARCH/05

 

 

 

H.F.1708/A0195
 

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-June-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-July-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-July-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

BREXIT

BUT NOT OUT OF THE EU FOR 2/3 YEARS. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. ALL EU TREATIES WERE OBTAINED BY BRIBERY AND TREASON  AND FRAUD WHICH

UNDER THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES MAKES THEM.

NULL AND VOID.

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

JULY 23 FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2016

*

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW PART 1-2016SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW-2016

OCTOBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

NOVEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

DECEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

*

H.F.200A-FREEDOM NOW
 

PLEASE  NOTE: WE HAVE IN ADVANCE GIVEN BELOW THE BULLETIN FOR EACH MONTH FOR THE NEXT 30 MONTHS WHICH YOU CAN ENTER-IT WILL CONTAIN INFORMATION FROM OTHER MONTHS FROM THE PAST AND THAT AVAILABLE AT THE SPECIFIED TIME.  WE ARE MAKING THIS ARRANGEMENT AS WE ARE UNABLE TO GIVE AN EXIT DATE FROM THE EU. AS YOU ARE AWARE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE IN OCTOBER 2003 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING AVAILABLE INFORMATION WHICH WOULD BRING THE EXIT FROM THE EU AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. BUT NOW THAT BREXIT IS SOON TO BE ENACTED BY PARLIAMENT THE DAY OF OUR DELIVERANCE WILL SOON BE AT HAND AND THE RETURN OF OUR INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND TOGETHER WITH OUR NEIGHBOURING NATION STATES OF WALES-SCOTLAND AND NORTHERN ISLAND.

MAY GOD GRANT US A SPEEDY EXIT FROM THE SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC -MAMMOTH MONSTROSITY OF THE SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

]

 
MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18
NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

 
 

The English People's

VoicE

WELCOME!

IMMIGRATION FILE

E U FILE

IRAQ/AFGHAN WAR

      9/11 AN INSIDE JOB

MAGNA CARTA
LONDON 7/7-AN INSIDE JOB

NAZI DVD

ENGLAND FILE

CRIMINAL EU

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND
SAY NO TO EU

UNDERSTANDING EASTER

EURO MUST FAIL

ROTTEN HEART OF EU

SOUL OF ENGLAND
100 REASONS TO LEAVE EU

TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

 THE END OF THE ENGLISH

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

MOST EVERYTHING WHICH IS PRECIOUS IN OUR CIVILISATION HAS COME FROM SMALL INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

 by LORD PETER SHORE.

 

A NATION STATE HAS BEEN REBORN

 

ON the momentous day Theresa May said Britain WILL quit the single market, she put Cameron's feeble negotiations to shame with an ultimatum to Brussels that the UK will 'walk away from a bad deal-and make the EU pay' 
  • STEEL OF THE NEW
  • IRON LADY
    •
  • The PM is hopeful of an EU-UK trade deal because of mutual economic interests 
  • She said Europe not making a deal with Britian would be 'calamitous self-harm'
  • It was confirmed that we will be leaving the single market and customs union
  • But the EU's chief negotiator called her show of defiance counter-productive
  • Her speech was criticised by the Lib Dems as Labour fought on how to respond 
  • Sterling rose 2.8 per cent against the Dollar and 1.8 per cent against the Euro

By James Slack Political Editor For The Daily Mail



Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4130034/Theresa-s-Brexit-speech-puts-Cameron-shame.html#ixzz4W7pxZPm9
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

*

Brexit will let us rediscover role as trading power | Daily Mail Online

Theresa May's Brexit speech puts Cameron to shame | Daily Mail ...

 

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Commons and Lords get ...

 

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Full reports and analysis

 

A great nation is reborn: Quitting will let us rediscover our role as a ...

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Europe split over May's ...

https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-mail/20170118/281625305003771
Europe split over May's vision – but even Tusk calls it 'realistic'. Daily ... News -
From Mario Ledwith in Brussels and John Stevens in London.
 

*

POINT BY POINT, HER BLUEPRINT TO FREE BRITAIN FROM BRUSSELS
THERESA May delighted Eurosceptics yesterday with an ambitious road map for BREXIT. The PM extended the hand of friendship to the EU but threatened to walk away if BRUSSELS tried to impose a punitive deal. Jack DOYLE sets out her 12 objectives and analyses her chances of success.

1. CERTAINTY

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will provide certainty where we can. The same rules and laws will apply on the day after BREXIT, as they did before. And the Government will put the final deal to a vote in both houses of Parliament.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By keeping in place-at least initially-all EU laws, Mrs May will provide a degree of continuity and confidence for business. However, as she freely admits she cannot control the outcome of the negotiations. Parliament is highly likely to approve any deal because the alternative will be a chaotic BREXIT.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

2. OUR OWN LAWS

  WHAT SHE SAID

We will take back control of our laws and bring an end to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in Britain. Because we will not truly left the EU if we are not in control of our own laws

CAN SHE DELIVER

 Adopting the 'take back control' slogan of the Leave campaign, Mrs May repeated her promise to end rule by EU rule and judges in Luxembourg and restore power to Parliament and domestic courts. Without this there is no Brexit. A firm red line

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

3 A UNITED KINGDOM

  WHAT SHE SAID

A stronger Britain demands that we strengthen the precious union between the four nations of the UK.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By consulting devolved administrations, Mrs May is seeking to reassure voters in the nations of the UK which didn't vote for Brexit that she is listening to their concerns, and avoid Nicola Sturgeon calling for a second independence vote.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

4. THE IRISH BORDER

  WHAT SHE SAID

WE will work to deliver a practical solution that allows the maintenance of the Common Travel Area with the Republic, while protecting the integrity of the United Kingdom's immigration system.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Both countries want to maintain the open border between Northern Ireland and the Republic without opening a back door into Britain. Likely to mean UK border checks at Irish ports and airports.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

5. CONTROL OF IMMIGRATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

The message from the public before and during the referendum campaign was clear: BREXIT must mean control of the number of people who come to Britain from Europe. And that is what we will deliver

CAN SHE DELIVER

Ending free movement is a  RED LINE, but Mrs May left open when it will end, what system will replace it and details of any transition deal. The PM wants highly skilled EU migrants, doctors and nurses, but will she compromise on unskilled migrants to get a better trade deal

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

 6.  EU NATIONALS AND BRITISH EXPATS

  

WHAT SHE SAID

We  want to guarantee the right of EU citizens who are already living here in Britain, and the rights of British nationals in other member states, as early as we can.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Likely to agreed early on, as long as the EU doesn't want to haggle. Last year Mrs May offered to settle on the rights of three million EU nationals in the UK, and 1.2million Brits on the continent in advance of formals talks- but Angela Merkel refused.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

 *		 7.WORKER'S RIGHTS

 WHAT SHE SAID

Not only will the government protect the rights of workers' set out in European legislation, we will build on them.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May is determined to at least preserve protections for workers on low and middle incomes-many of whom voted for BREXIT. Could come under threat if there is no deal., and Britain slashes taxes and regulation to attract business.

DEAL OR NO DEAL? 3/5

*

8. TRADE WITH EUROPE

WHAT SHE SAID

As a priority, we will pursue a bold and ambitious free trade agreement with the EU. This should allow for the freest possible trade in goods and services. But I want to make it clear. It cannot mean membership of the single market

CAN SHE DELIVER

The crux of the negotiation. Britain will leave the single market, and with it EU laws and free movement. Instead Mrs May wants a tariff-free trade and customs agreement to stop goods being held up at ports. She ruled out ' vast contributions' to the EU budget, and the only money going to Brussels will be for particular programmes and agencies like Europol. Her huge gamble is to threaten to walk away if the EU attempts to punish Britain

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

9. GLOBAL TRADE

 WHAT SHE SAID

A global Britain must be free to strike trade agreements with countries outside the EU too. But I also want tariff-free trade with Europe and cross-border trade there to be as frictionless as possible.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants deals with non-EU countries including the US. That would be impossible from inside the customs union, which imposes a uniform tariff on all non-EU countries. It would also make trade Secretary Liam Fox's job redundant.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 4/5

*

10. SCIENCE AND INNOVATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE have a proud history of leading and supporting cutting -edge research and innovation. So we will also welcome agreement to continue to collaborate with our European partners on major science, research, and technology initiatives.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Unlikely to be an obstacle to any deal. Much collaboration between academics takes place outside formal EU structures and will continue unimpeded.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

11. CRIME AND TERRORISM

  WHAT SHE SAID

All of us in Europe face the challenge of cross-border crime, a deadly terrorist threat, and the dangers presented by hostile states.  All of us share interests and values in common, values we want to see projected around the world.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Security and intelligence cooperation and defence cooperation cannot be a formal bargaining chip, but without making it one, Mrs May reminds EU allies of Britain's importance as an ally in fighting terrorism and important status as a military power.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

12.  A SMOOTH EXIT

  WHAT SHE SAID

It is in no one's interests for there to be a cliff-edge for business or a threat to stability as we change from our existing relationship to a new partnership with the European Union.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants tranitional arrangements to smooth the process of leaving the EU with specific deals on budget contributions, immigration, trade and customs lasting different periods of time. Securing this as well as securing a final deal within two years is a huge task.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

[THERE IS EVERY LIKELIHOOD THAT OTHER EU MEMBER STATES WILL BE GREATLY ENCOURAGED BY BREXIT TO LEAVE THAT SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION IN THE NEXT FEW YEARS WHICH SHOULD MAKE A NUMBER OF EU STATES TO CO-OPERATE FULLY WITH THE UK OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR UNFRIENDLY ATTITUDE AT A LATER DATE.

AS THE GREAT PRIME MINISTER - WILLIAM PITT -  (1759-1806) ANNOUNCED IN NOVEMBER 9-1805 SHORTLY AFTER  NELSON'S VICTORY OVER THE FRENCH AND SPANISH FLEETS AT TRAFALGAR.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

The blueprint of a Free and Prosperous United Kingdom should be the blueprint of a future Free Europe and the world at large. Our past still lives in the hearts of FREE PEOPLES everywhere and soon we will rejoin that sacred past which we left over 43 years ago because of traitorous politicians and others who couldn't see the dangers ,for the gross lies and deceit in their path.

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 18-2017

H.F.1092 BREXIT NOW
 

 

 

 DAILY MAIL

COMMENT

FEBRUARY 2, 2017

 

AT LAST, IT IS ALL CLEAR FOR

 BREXIT'S

LIFT-OFF

 

YESTERDAY  was a HISTORIC DAY for OUR COUNTRY. BY a RESOUNDING MAJORITY of 384, the COMMONS swept away [our  past 45 years of tutelage within an undemocratic-unaccountable-unbearable-corrupt-expensive- strait-jacket Europe.]

 

THIS was a historic day for our country. At 7.30pm yesterday by a resounding majority of 384, the Commons swept away the last serious obstacle to freeing Britain from the chains that have bound us to an unelected, unaccountable Brussels for 45 YEARS.

True, we can still expect dirty tricks from the 114 who, to their shame, voted  against implementing the

PEOPLE'S WILL.

Of these , this newspaper will not waste ink on cursing SNP members, whose fantasies of SCOTLAND as an independent EU nation state gave them a spurious excuse for defying the UK majority.

AS for the rest, no criticism is too harsh for those Labour MPs who represent solidly Brexiteer constituencies, but voted to

REMAIN.

They deserve everything coming to them at the next election.

So, too, do the creeps who in 2015 backed the call for a binding referendum, but voted last night against implementing its result.

Among these, none can beat the monstrous hypocrisy of

NICK CLEGG

-that flip-flopping representative of the moneyed elite, suckled on the [thirsty] breast of Brussels.

IN 2008, it was he who led demands for an in/out referendum on Europe (as we demonstrate on the opposite page-

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H F 1101-AT LONG LAST-FREEDOM AWAITS! 

 
Brought-forward from August 2003

[THE WAY AHEAD TO RECLAIM OUR SACRED INHERITANCE.]

Faced with the possible imposition (illegally) of a E. U. Constitution this  article contemplating our own U.K. Constitution (English Constitution), is especially topical.

J. Bingley

Constitutional Principles of Power and Remedy.

The Constitution is specifically intended, indeed designed to limit the powers of the state with respect to the people. The Constitution sets a standard upon which the performance of governance may be measured and contested and to provide remedy if abused.

The whole constitution originates its authority from

COMMON LAW

Supremacy resides in the

LAW and PEOPLE

NOT THE

CROWN or PARLIAMENT.

It is a matter of constitutional principle and legal fact that,

THE LAW IS SUPREME

The rule of law is the antithesis of arbitrary power. Integral with this, is the system of jury trial. It places the power of law enforcement in the

HANDS of the PEOPLE.

This the most vital safeguard against DESPOTISM.

The English Constitution's function is to

PROTECT the

"RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

 of ENGLISHMEN".

These are the 'BIRTHRIGHT' of the PEOPLE'

[In 2016 one can see how successive governments have by gradualism watered down these rights with even attempts to replace jury trial by trial by judge only on the grounds of speed and saving resources. The people in the main have been, amiss in not being vigilant to the protection of THEIR CONSTITUTION. In just a few weeks on the 23 June,2016 they have a choice whether to vote to leave the EU and regain THEIR LAW-THEIR CONSTITUTION-THEIR FREE COUNTRY. or REMAIN in an ALIEN COLLECTIVIST AND CORRUPT UNDEMOCRATIC EU with NO PROTECTION of MAGNA CARTA of 1215 and BILL OF RIGHTS of 1688 and NO ENGLISHMAN'S ' RIGHTS and LIBERTIES' to be passed on to FUTURE GENERATIONS.]

The fundamental rights and liberties are listed in the preamble of the Coronation Oath Act of 1688 which declares that  the oath is taken for the purpose of

" Maintaining our spiritual and civil rights and properties"

It is a contract with the people which makes it the permanent duty of the CROWN, and the CROWN in both GOVERNMENT and PARLIAMENT.

This contracts the Monarch to govern only according to the STATUTE, COMMON LAW, and the CUSTOM and to 'CAUSE LAW and JUSTICE with MERCY to be used in all JUDGEMENTS'.

All power of governance is vested in the CROWN.

The two Houses of Parliament may upon their concurrence offer bills for ROYAL ASSENT.

A BILL is not ENACTED until it has been authorised by the SOVEREIGN POWER.

Whilst the enacting power (a royal prerogative) of Royal Assent is entirely vested with the monarch it is contracted ONLY TO BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.  This is a limitation and essential safeguard to protect the people from any over mighty governance  [such as Tony Blair's and Gordon Brown's NEW LABOUR and since DAVE'S PARTY]

 It was used  to defeat the Divine Right of Kings; a claim of absolute power by the Stuart monarchs.  The OATH ascertains the SUPREMACY of the LAW, not the supremacy of CROWN or of PARLIAMENT.

There is certainly no Divine Right of Politicians.

The Coronation contract is of the Crown owing allegiance to the Constitution. The PEOPLE give ALLEGIANCE to the CROWN.

Here is a system of mutual protection for there is a constitutional interdependence.

The MAGNA CARTA

made provision for the PEOPLE to use ANY MEANS including FORCE if the CROWN is found to be in BREACH.

[THE CROWN IS IN BREACH!]

THE RIGHT OF RESISTANCE IS THE ULTIMATE REMEDY...

That which constitutionally binds the Monarch is a restriction upon Her Majesty, Her Government and all Parliamentary power.  The Monarch may do no wrong, but should she refuse by her negative power( the right to withhold assent) to

'LET WRONG BE DONE.'

[Millions of patriots have been waiting over four decades for:-

'Right to be Done!']

Sir William Blackstone confirms this. Whilst the monarch accepts the advice of ministers, they must only advise to do that which COMPLIES with the CONSTITUTION.  Plainly NO MONARCH is FREE to ASSENT to ADVICE that CONFLICTS with the CONSTITUTION in FORCE.

There is no authority in Parliament to pass any power of governance in England to those who hold or owe no allegiance. [such as the EU]

 There is no constitutional authority for Parliament to deliberately breach the constitutional laws by new   conflicting enactment.

 There is a natural duty resulting from the logic of our constitutional law to debate and resolve conflicts, if necessary by prior repeal.

 We must put an end to this form of 'legal' abuse, particularly through the misapplication of party politics.

 Most but not all of our constitution is written:- the Magna Carta, the Petition of Rights, the Declaration of Rights, the Bill of Rights, the Act of Settlement and the Acts of Union etc. It has evolved over centuries with the expenditure of much blood. It has been abused and corrected many times. It was finally settled by the Glorious Revolution of 1688/9.

The Judicial function is to be the independent arbiter between party and party or party and government under the terms of our constitutional law.  The courts are bound to declare upon the constitutionality of an Act where it may prove to be an action of unconstitutional governance. The great examples of the Magna Carta, the Petition 1628, the Declaration & the Bill of Rights 1688/9 make this duty of the court utterly plain.

Judgement may only be given in accordance with the constraints of constitutional laws in force.  At all times the presumption of law and justice in mercy be upheld and used  in all judgements. This is the trust sand the pre-eminent public policy reposed in the judiciary.

The right of petition to the Monarch is an appeal direct to the source of power, the Monarch is under OATH and at LAW, bound to provide REMEDY. Where there are RIGHTS there are REMEDIES. Politicians and Parliament must abide by the terms of reference and DUTY to the CONSTITUTION.

A fixed and certain standard with protection and remedy are the true purpose of the Constitution.

WE MUST RECLAIM OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE RULE OF LAW FROM THE SUPPOSED DIVINE RIGHT OF OUR POLITICIANS.

John Bingley-AUGUST 2003

*

[We ask how did it come to pass that the JUDICIARY did not PROTECT the CONSTITUTION from the illegal actions of PARLIAMENT and the Crown with the disclosures in 2001 under the 30 year rule from the Public Record Office at

 KEW-LONDON

 which revealed the CONSPIRACY of the FOREIGN OFFICE to prevent the PEOPLE from hearing the TRUTH of their TREACHERY and BETRAYAL. Under the 1969 THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION on the  LAW of TREATIES  there are two key provisions which authorise a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice.

1. Where corruption has been demonstrated in respect of pro curing the treaty in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

". Where there has been a material change of circumstances. A material change of circumstances has surfaced into the daylight (September 2005), to begin with, following the death of

Edward Heath.

. It has been revealed that he was an agent of a foreign power (NAZI-GERMANY-since 1938), accepted corrupt payment for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them-and that he did all this on behalf of a foreign power which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation.

[Massive payouts were given to the signatories of the  EEC which in reality was in effect the road to the corrupt-collectivist-undemocratic

FEDERAL STATE of the EUROPEAN UNION.]

*

[THE QUEEN FAILED IN HER SOLEMN DUTY TO PROTECT HER PEOPLE AND THEIR UNIQUE WORLD RENOWNED FREE PARLIAMENTARY INHERITANCE

AND APART FROM SIGNING ILLEGALLY 6 EU TREATIES CONTRARY TO HER CORONATION OATH-IN 1998 SIGNED TONY BLAIR'S SECRET AMENDMENT BILL  FOR TREASON FROM THE DEATH PENALTY TO IMPRISONMENT FOR LIFE-OBVIOUSLY THEY BOTH HAD REASONS  FOR FEARING A FUTURE IMPEACHMENT BY PARLIAMENT.

 

More!

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS}

MAY 30-2016

H.F.800

 

 

How and Why Was WWI Planned and Prolonged

Mujahid Kamran

August 1, 2017

The history of the First World War is a deliberately concocted lie. Not the sacrifice, the heroism, the horrendous waste of life or the misery that followed. No, these were very real but the truth of how it all began and how it was unnecessarily and deliberately prolonged beyond 1915 has been successfully covered up for a century. A carefully falsified history was created to conceal the fact that Britain, not Germany, was responsible for the war. Had the truth become known after 1918, the consequences for the British Establishment would have been cataclysmic.”

Gerry Docherty and Jim Macgregor

The Planners and the Plan

The First World War did not just happen. There is undeniable evidence that the war was planned by the international-banker controlled British oligarchy almost two decades before it broke out (see e.g. [1-3]). In their outstanding book Gerry Docherty and Jim Macgregor have established beyond reasonable doubt that indeed the First World War was planned by a tiny group of members of the British oligarchy including Nathaniel Rothschild [1].

King Edward VII

While building upon what was first revealed by the late Professor Carrol Quigley, they have not only provided detailed evidence in favor of this thesis, but have also revealed the astonishing role of the British monarch, King Edward VII, in secretly building alliances against Germany. They have provided ample evidence that the playboy King, much disliked by his mother Queen Victoria, went along with the secret group that had, in the first place, planned this horrific war.

The secret group of people, whose existence was first revealed by Professor Carrol Quigley, thus putting his own life in danger, decided to work behind the scenes with the utmost secrecy. The revelations of Professor Quigley were based on documents provided by the Secret Elite, as they are referred to sometimes. The documents were provided for the purpose of writing a sanitized history.

The goal of the Secret Elite was the expansion of the British empire to the total exclusion of other powers.

This cabal was extremely wealthy. Cecil Rhodes, who, with Rothschild help, had amassed a huge fortune in South Africa, first discussed his plans with Nathaniel Rothschild in February 1890 in the presence of a few members of the British oligarchy.

In 1891 a five-member secret group comprising Cecil Rhodes, Nathaniel Rothschild, William Stead, Lord Esher and Alfred Milner became, unknown to anyone else, the core group that decided to steer the world towards a war aimed at the destruction of Germany. They called themselves the Society of the Elect. Around themselves they built, as if in a concentric circle, The Association of Helpers, eminent men, who did not know of the Society of the Elect. Other men were gradually involved in the plan but they were not aware of the separate existence of the five-member core. Together, these men steered and controlled the course of British foreign policy, unknown to the Parliament, the people, the Cabinet, and others who were constitutionally relevant.

These men represented a new phenomenon on the world stage – the money kings, who held no office and yet had real power to decide the fate of nations. When Rhodes died at age 48, he left all his money to these men for the sole purpose of extending the British empire over the entire globe. Secrecy was of utmost importance to this group.

The destruction of Germany, the Secret Elite knew, would entail enormous bloodshed. They also knew that Britain could not do it alone. It needed the strength of the Russian and French armies to achieve that end.

Russian soldiers WW1

And maybe the Secret Elite wanted Russia and France to shed their own and German blood for them. But France had been a traditional enemy of the British and vice versa whereas Russia and Britain had vied for the control of the Black Sea and the annexation of Constantinople i.e. Istanbul. There was rivalry between Russia and Britain regarding the Russian urge southwards and eastwards to warm waters, seaports that could function round the year. In the south lay the “jewel” of the British empire – India.

Despite these rivalries the Secret Elite was determined to befriend and woo both France and Russia because it considered Germany the most potent threat to the existence of the British empire. Germany was not fully aware of this heinous plan aimed at its utter destruction. And Russia and France, both were trapped by the Secret Elite. In fact, the Secret Elite succeeded not only in destroying Germany, they also destroyed Russia, and by prolonging the war, destroyed the Ottoman as well as the Austro-Hungarian empires. Britain, in the end, did not really benefit. The Zionists did – the Illuminati Zionist bankers emerged as the real force on the world stage. The Milners and the Eshers and Balfours, and all others became powerless eventually and faded away.

The Rothschilds have continued into the 21st century enhancing their power and wealth with every major bloodshed. They and their illuminati banking brethren were the real beneficiaries. The Christian West was the real loser. And so were the Muslims.

It is well known among historians that Queen Victoria disapproved of her son’s womanizing and kept his royal stipend at a minimum while she was in power. The expenses of the womanizing of King Edward VII, when he was a playboy Prince of Wales, were borne by the Rothschilds and by Sir Ernest Cassel, both bankers of German-Jewish extraction. When he came to power Edward VII was keen to oblige his patrons who, apparently, wanted to destroy the emerging German nation. And, in any case he was under the impression that the destruction of Germany would pave the way for a global British Empire – it was to be his empire.

The Zionist/Illuminati international bankers had other plans. King Edward VII was the architect of the Entente Cordiale of 1904. His image as a playboy concealed the fact that he was traveling all over Europe to build alliances against Germany, while Germany never suspected that traditional enemies like England and France could or would become friends.

Docherty and Macgregor also describe the infiltration of the Foreign Office and the Colonial Office of Great Britain by agents of the group that had planned the First World War. They were able to control the officers of both government departments. They also controlled the War Office as well as the highly important and secret Committee of Imperial Defense. The Group had influence in both parties. Their policy of destroying Germany not only transcended party politics, it also went beyond which party was in power – it transcended governments.

The Parliaments and the prime ministers came and went without knowing that a tiny cabal was planning and relentlessly driving Britain to total war with Germany.

*

Cover up and Fabricated History

Docherty and Macgregor have further revealed that (p 5, ref. [1]):

The Secret Elite dictated the writing and teaching of history, from the ivory towers of the academia down to the smallest of schools. They carefully controlled the publication of official government papers, the selection of documents for inclusion in the official version of the history of the First World War, and refused access to any evidence that might betray their covert existence. Incriminating documents were burned, removed from official records, shredded, falsified, or deliberately rewritten, so that what remained for historians was carefully selected material.”

Docherty and Macgregor point out (their book was published in 2013) that even “To this day researchers are denied access to certain First World War documents because the Secret Elite had much to fear from the truth, as do those who have succeeded them.” Why such a vehement cover up that even a century later the British authorities do not grant access to certain documents pertaining to the first World War? They want to maintain the myth of German culpability and their innocence, whereas the reality is the reverse of what establishment history portrays. The truth will shift the onus of responsibility to the shoulders of the Secret Elite and of every other consequence that followed: the Second World War, Bank of International Settlements, IMF, World Bank, the U.N., Israel, the Korean and Vietnam wars, continuing wars in the Middle East, right up to the dangerous situation today. They have lied to generations and rather than let the truth be known they have chosen and attempted to perpetuate the lie worldwide and for all times.

They can do so because the international illuminati-Zionist bankers are all powerful and control the American and British governments. Israel is a Rothschild fiefdom, a source of perpetual war and a possible eventual Armageddon. The academia is, by and large, part of this cover up and that is very sad, to say the least. Any historian in a university who challenges the establishment version will be ostracized, if not thrown out of his job. Nick Kollerstrom had to lose his job despite the fact that he is an outstanding academic. One of his colleagues, whom he had known for years, was so angry that he told Kollerstrom that he wanted to hit him with his racket!

Guido Preparata was ostracized for his outstanding book Conjuring Hitler: How Britain and America Built the Third Reich, and had to quit his job, leave the U.S., and even give up his research career for some time. It is therefore significant that Docherty and Macgregor, though British (both are Scottish) do not work for any British university. They, therefore, cannot be thrown out of their jobs.

On the surface of it, the strategic aim behind the instigated and covertly planned World War I was to destroy both Germany and Russia and thereby kill the possibility of emergence of a dominant Eurasian power, or a powerful coalition of Eurasian countries, that could threaten the British Empire. The initial group, the Circle of the Elect, appeared to have, as its aim, the establishment of a worldwide British Empire. It only included one banker, Nathaniel Rothschild. With hindsight, the evolution of global affairs indicates without any doubt that the Zionists (Communism and Zionism sprouted from the same Illuminati “tribe” and had a common origin) were the real beneficiaries and the deeper instigators of this war.

The world today is headed towards a global slave state controlled by the Illuminati cum Zionist international bankers. The Bolshevik Revolution was led and controlled by “atheistic Jews” (to use Churchill’s phrase) most of whom came from outside Russia and both Lloyd David George and President Wilson were stooges of the Zionists. Today both, the U.S. and the U.K., are completely controlled by the Zionist cum Illuminati international bankers.

However, other deeper aims of the international bankers were to weaken Christianity through widespread death and destruction of Christian life and property, to weaken European governments by exhaustively bleeding them and bringing them under deep debt bondage, to instigate the Bolshevik Revolution, to facilitate the creation of Israel and the establishment of a supra-national organization through which to set up a One World Government under their ruthless and absolute control (The New World Order). The international bankers were simultaneously Zionists and Freemasons/Illuminati.

A photo of the 1914 Christmas Truce illustrates how the British and Germans had no antipathy until it was created by propaganda and the war itself

*

Building Japan, Bruising and then Wooing Russia after Sabotaging a Russo German Treaty

It was the Secret Elite that was behind the strategy to build Japan’s navy that was then used to destroy the Russian fleet that traveled around the world to confront the Japanese navy. The Russian fleet was utterly destroyed in the Russo-Japanese war of 1904-1905 and the small island nation managed to inflict a humiliating defeat on a giant. This was part of the strategy of the Secret Elite to curtail Russia’s ambitions in the Far East and to bruise and weaken her. Ships for the Japanese navy were quietly built in the shipyards of Britain. On the one hand, the Rothschilds in London secretly provided loans to Japan, while on the other the Rothschilds in France provided loans worth 400 million francs to the Russian government to build the 6365 miles long trans-Siberian railway (p 86, ref. [1]). The Russians had expressed their gratitude to the Rothschilds when the czar decorated Alfonso de Rothschild of Paris with Grand Cross. The London Rothschilds made double profits because the armament industry which manufactured battleships for the Japanese navy were partly owned by the Rothschilds. The Rothschilds had the greatest shares in Vickers armament. Docherty and Macgregor write (pp 92, 93 ref [1]):

Manipulators at the heart of the Secret Elite, like Esher, facilitated meetings held on Rothschild premises to help the Japanese financial envoy, Takahashi Korekiyo, raise their war chest. While banks with strong links to the Rothschilds were prepared to raise funds for Japan quite openly, the Rothschilds had to tread carefully because of their immense Russian investments, not least in the Baku oilfields. They were also very aware of the political repercussions that might ensue for Russian Jews who bore the harsh brunt of czarist anti-Semitism. That changed once the war was over. The London and Paris Rothschilds negotiated a further £48 million issue to help Japanese recovery. At every turn the war profits flowed back to the Secret Elite.”

It was Japan that attacked the Russian fleet in Port Arthur, a Chinese port that was functional all year round and had been leased to Russia. Although Japan issued a declaration of war on Feb 8, 1904, its navy attacked the Russian fleet three hours before the ultimatum was delivered to the Russian government.

In order to go to war with Germany the Secret Elite took four decisions. These are summarized by Docherty and Macgregor in the following words (pp 73,74, ref. [1]):

“Foreign policy had to be sustained no matter what political party was in office; the British Army needed a complete overhaul to make it fit for the purpose; the Royal Navy had to maintain all its historic advantages; the general public had to be turned against Germany.”

The British public did not want to go to war with Germany and therefore a secretly driven but powerful propaganda campaign against Germany was launched in order to poison the minds of the public. The Belgian ambassador apparently noticed by 1903 that jingoism was on the rise in Britain and people were turning against Germany. He wrote to his government that this was merely because of jealousy. Docherty and Macgregor point out that the ambassador did not know that secret manipulation behind the scenes had resulted in this attitude.

The Secret Elite worked relentlessly using the vast Rhodes fortune at its disposal to buy politicians and men of influence in all countries that were relevant. One of the men in their pocket was Alexander Islovsky, who served them loyally to the immense detriment of Russia, Europe and the Christian West. Kaiser Wilhelm had made a brilliant move in 1905 – he wanted to have an agreement between Russia and Germany that would have averted the war by forming a defensive alliance.

The Kaiser and the Czar secretly met and signed an agreement on July 24, 1905 at Bjorko Finland, whereby if any one of the countries was attacked by a European power the other shall come to its aid. However, when the czar returned to Russia the agents of the Secret Elite as well as a bribed press opposed the ratification of the treaty. Actually no one knew of the contents of the treaty until the Czar confided in is his foreign minister Count Lansdorff who betrayed the secret to King Edward VII.

The Czar was in need of money after the Russo-Japanese war in which Russia suffered heavy material and human losses. He therefore needed loans and the Rothschilds in Paris were far richer than any Berlin banks. The Secret Elite threatened to block the much needed loans. This was crucial and the Czar backed off despite having signed the proposed treaty. This treaty, had it gone through, would have averted the planned world war. This caused the Kaiser immense pain and he wrote to the Czar (p 95 ref. [1]): “We joined hands and signed before God who heard our vows.” This mistake by the Czar was to cost Russia and Germany dearly during World War I.

Having sabotaged the Russo-German alliance the Secret Elite then used King Edward VII to woo Russia. The King invited the Russian navy to Britain and the British public was softened towards Russia through a media campaign. The Secret Elite managed to lure and trap Russia by a false promise of allowing Russia to control Constantinople (Istanbul) and the Black Sea Straits. A Russia that had been mauled militarily, that was in dire financial straits, and that was presented with a dangling Constantinople carrot succumbed and fell in the trap. An Anglo-Russian Convention was signed on 31 August 1907. Docherty and Macgregor write (pp 95,96 ref. [1]):

The Secret Elite was prepared to use any nation as cat’s-paw and Russia became the victim of British trickery, manipulated into a different treaty that was designed not to protect her or the peace of Europe but to enable the Secret Elite to destroy Germany. . . It was yet another secret deal hidden from Parliament and the people. . .”

By such deceptions, lies, bribery and manipulations, the brutal and absolutely ruthless and utterly shameless Secret Elite proceeded to steer and goad nations to a path of unprecedented bloodshed in which Christian, and to a lesser extent Muslim blood was shed. The beneficiaries were the satanic illuminati international bankers and their brethren. Their determination to destroy Germany masked a deep and malevolent desire for a conflagration that would burn Christian Europe to ashes with tens of millions of casualties. That was their goal and they drew the deepest delight and satisfaction by turning men into savage animals.

The Myth of Belgian Neutrality

When World War I began the British public had been exposed to false propaganda for a long time. Two issues on which their mind had been falsely influenced were Belgian neutrality and German militarism. Facts were the opposite of what people were led to believe. As for Belgian neutrality, it was utterly untrue. Belgium was not only not neutral it had had close military links with Britain since 1905 when Britain offered to send “4 cavalry brigades, 2 armored corps, and a division of mounted infantry” to Belgium (p 106, ref. [1]). At that time nobody outside the close knit Secret Elite know of, or suspected, possible war with Germany.

Docherty and Macgregor write (pp 106, 107ref. [1]): “Britain’s military link with Belgium was one of the closes guarded secrets, even within privileged circles.” General Grierson, who was director of military operations was present at a secret 1905 meeting along with Lord Roberts, PM Balfour, Admiral Fisher and the head of naval intelligence, where a decision to take forward joint military planning with France and Belgium was taken. This was so secret that it was agreed that “the minutes would not be printed or circulated without special permission from the prime minister.” Docherty and MacGregor write further (p 107, ref. [1]):

Documents found in the Belgian secret archives by the Germans after they had occupied Brussels disclosed that the chief of the Belgian general staff, Major General Ducarne, held a series of meetings with the British military attache’ over action to be taken by British, French and Belgian armies against Germany in event of war. A fully elaborated plan detailed the landing and transportation of British forces, which were actually called ‘allied armies’, and in a series of meetings they discussed the allocation of Belgian officers and interpreters to the British Army and crucial details on the care and ‘accommodation of the wounded of the allied armies.’”

The British allowed Belgium to annex Congo Free State in return for a “secret agreement that was in everything but name an alliance. King Leopold II sold Belgian neutrality for African rubber and minerals.” Thus Belgium bargained away her neutral status and in return entered into a deep and hidden relationship with Britain against Germany. Docherty and Macgregor point out that here too King Edward VII played a hidden but important role because the King of Belgium was a cousin of Queen Victoria and was very fond of her. So much for Belgian neutrality that became a rallying cry to war for the misled and deliberately misinformed British public. The technique of using the media to control the public mindset continues to date and entails an incredible cost in terms of loss of human life and property.

The Myth of German Militarism

As for German militarism, Docherty and Macgregor have provided irrefutable data that clearly establishes that Britain was spending far more secretly on arming itself compared to Germany. In reality it was British militarism but the cunning and, in a sense, deep characterlessness of the Secret Elite, which hoodwinked everyone and which worked outside and in contradiction with the constitution, and which lied to and shamelessly deceived everyone, created the opposite impression. When the Liberal leader Campbell-Bannerman won a landslide victory in 1906, the Liberals were committed to peace.

Edward Grey and Haldane were committed to war and along with other members of the Secret Elite, steering the country towards war. Cabinet was never informed of this, nor was the prime minister. The crafted biographies of men like Haldane contain lies and are unreliable. And if one reads Docherty and Macgregor they have exposed the lies in Haldane’s biography and private notes. In fact, there is evidence that Campbell-Bannerman was kept in the dark about the military contacts with other countries. His untimely death in 1908 relieved the Secret Elite of the pressure for a peaceful world! In fact, the Secret Elite were very worried soon afterwards, because in 1910, their key patron King Edward VII died at age 68, while the Liberals were still in power.

False propaganda about German military preparations was carried out at the behest of the Secret Elite in the British media. As Docherty and Macgregor put it (pp 134, 135, ref. [1])

From the beginning of the twentieth century, the Secret Elite indulged in a frenzy of rumor and half-truths, of raw propaganda and lies, to create the myth of a great naval race. The story widely accepted, even by many anti-war Liberals, was that Germany was preparing a massive fleet of warships to attack and destroy the British navy before unleashing a military invasion on the east coast of England or the Firth of Forth in Scotland. It was the stuff of conspiracy novels. But it worked. The British people swallowed the lie that militarism had run amok in Germany and the ‘fact’ that it was seeking world domination through military superiority. Militarism in the United Kingdom was of God, but in Germany of the Devil, and had to be crushed before it crushed them.”

These authors are quick to point out that when Germany was defeated and all their prewar records became available to the Allies, not a shred of evidence in favor of such secret plans to invade Britain were discovered. They point out that the statistics were thoroughly abused by an “almighty alliance of armaments manufacturers, political rhetoric, and newspaper propaganda” that conjured a frightening image of a German naval armada and the German will to dominate the world.

Rothschild and Ernest Cassel, who paid for the lechery of King Edward VII when he was a playboy Prince of Wales, were major owners of the largest armament factory Vickers. They point out that in the decade prior to war the British naval expenditure was £351.9 million whereas the German naval expenditure was £185.2 million, i.e. almost half of the British expenditure. Similarly, the Allies, i.e., the Triple Entente spent £675.88 million on warships in that same decade whereas Germany and Austro-Hungary spent £235.9 million, almost a third of what the Entente had spent, on their navies in the same period.

Generals Hindenburg and Ludendorff (R) lead Germany as virtual military dictators from mid-1916 to the end of the war

The German army was 7,61000 strong, the French and Russian armies had, respectively, 794,000 and 1.845 million personnel. So, where is the evidence of German militarism running amok? Who was running amok? Who was spending far more than the Germans? This lie of German military buildup has been perpetuated by establishment historians when the numbers speak out for themselves. The establishment historians should be ashamed at propagating lies and holding the so-called nonexistent German militarism responsible for the war. They have lied to, and continue to lie to their own people as well as the whole world. What a shame! The Germans should stand up with their heads high. They did not lie or deceive.

The sanitized history taught worldwide seems to hold Germany as the aggressor. This is utterly untrue as established by Docherty and Macgregor. Preparata also states in his fascinating book (published 2005) (p 14 of ref [3]):

“From the beginning Britain was the aggressor, not Germany.”

The Russian ambassador to France Isvolsky, who was an agent of the Secret Elite, sent a telegram to Moscow on August 1, 1914 (p 320, ref. [1]):

“The French War Minister informed me, in hearty high spirits, that the Government have firmly decided on war, and begged me to endorse the hope of the French General Staff that all efforts will be directed against Germany…”

Germany did not order mobilization until 24 hours later! The Kaiser had sent a message to the Russian czar asking that Russia stop her military movements on her borders. The Kaiser waited for 24 hours without any reply before ordering mobilization. Docherty and Macgregor correctly observe that Germany was the last of the European powers to order mobilization. Does that indicate that Germany wanted war? It only indicates that Germany did her best to avoid war.

A detailed study of the interactions between the British leaders and the Germans and others during July and the first days of August reveals clearly that the British leaders were shamelessly lying to the Germans and deceiving them. Their conduct had descended to the level of common criminals and crooks.

The Germans conducted themselves with integrity and a degree of innocence. The Secret Elite had also advised the Russians and the French to mobilize to attack, but not actually attack Germany, because the British public would never support the aggressor in a European war. They wanted Germany, as Docherty and Macgregor put it, to “swallow the bait.” Britain had trapped Germany into a war, in collusion with Russia and France. Docherty and Macgregor write (p 321, ref. [1]):

“What else could Germany have done? She was provoked into a struggle for life and death. It was a stark choice: await certain destruction or strike out to defend herself. Kaiser Wilhelm had exposed his country to grave danger and almost lost one precious advantage Germany had by delaying countermeasures to Russian mobilization in the forlorn hope of peace.”

When Germany declared war against France on August 3, 1914, the French Under-Secretary of State, Abel Ferry, noted in his diary (ref. [3], p 24):

The web was spun and Germany entered it like a great buzzing fly.”

The Illuminati international bankers and other secret society members of the British oligarchy had colluded together for a destruction of Christian Europe. Only the Zionist international bankers and their fellow “tribesmen” saw this outcome clearly – they had planned for it and the non-banking oligarchy was used. The lie parroted in standard history books that Germany bore the responsibility of the war is an utter and shameful lie. The responsibility of the war rested with the Secret Elite controlled British leadership.

Western Front WW1 British soldier

Zionism and the American Involvement

Almost two months before war broke out, on May 29, 1914, the Rothschild agent Col. House, who handled and controlled President Wilson, had written to him:

“Whenever England consents, France and Russia will close in on Germany.”

It is well known that Col. Edward Mandel House was a Rothschild agent as was his father. Col. House played a diabolical role in prolonging World War I, and in dragging the U.S. into the World War. It is important to understand how influential he was with President Wilson. President Wilson had once referred to him as his alter ego. In his seminal book, that has sold over five million copies since it was first published, Gary Allen states [4]:

“Colonel” House was front man for the international banking fraternity. He manipulated President Wilson like a puppet. Wilson called him “my alter ego.” House played a major role in creating the Federal Reserve System, passing the graduated income tax and getting America into WWI. House’s influence over Wilson is an example that in the world of super-politics the real rulers are not always the ones the public sees.

Col. House represents a new phenomenon – the emergence of “advisors” to the U.S. President who do not hold any formal office, are unelected, and are intimately tied to the international banking families, apart from being members of secret societies. These advisors hold the president of the United States “captive.” In his profound book The Controversy of Zion, Douglas Reed, a Times (London) correspondent in Central Europe right up to the beginning of WW II, mentions that four men held President Wilson captive – Col. House, Rabi Stephen Wise, Justice Brandeis and Bernard Baruch. Reed states [5]:

Thus three out of the four men around President Wilson were Jews and all three, at one time or the other, played leading parts in the re-segregation of the Jews through Zionism and its Palestinian ambition ….

Such was the grouping around a captive president as the American Republic moved towards involvement in the First World War, and such was the cause which was to be pursued through him and his country’s involvement. After his election Mr. House took over his correspondence, arranged whom he should see or not receive, told cabinet officers what they were to say or not to say, and so on.

In order to understand how and why the preplanned WWI was prolonged it is important to know who influenced or controlled the elected leadership of the U.K. and the U.S. and what were the aims of these controllers. It is also important to know that Justice Louis Brandeis had founded a secret society by the name Parushim, for promoting Zionism in U.S.A. The initiate was asked to accept the following oath at a secret initiation ceremony [6] :

You are about to take a step which will bind you to a single cause for all your life. You will for one year be subject to an absolute duty whose call you will be impelled to heed at any time, in any place, and at any cost. And ever after, until our purpose shall be accomplished, you will be fellow of a brotherhood whose bond you will regard as greater than any other in your life – dearer than that of family, of school, of nation. By entering this brotherhood, you become a self-dedicated soldier in the army of Zion. Your obligation to Zion becomes your paramount obligation… It is the wish of your heart and of your own free will to join our fellowship, to share its duties, its tasks, and its necessary sacrifices.

Rabi Stephen Wise was on board regarding Parushim and, almost certainly, Bernard Baruch was also on board. Bernard Baruch’s connection with the international bankers is well known. It is also important to point out that the international bankers had planned World War I to, among other things, promote the Zionist cause. As Douglas Reed, using information provided in Chaim Weizmann’s book Trial and Error, stated in his book Far and Wide [7]:

The First World War began in 1914; long-memoried readers may recall that it appeared to be concerned with such matters as the rape of Belgium, ending Prussian militarism, and making the world safe for democracy. At its start Baron Edmond de Rothschild told Dr. Weizmann that it would spread to the Middle East, where things of great significance to Political Zionism would occur.

How did Edmond de Rothschild know right at the beginning of the war that the war would spread to the Middle East where things will work out to the great advantage of Political Zionism? He could only know this if it was planned that way and if he was one of the planners. And, as we will see, this was one of the reasons why World War I was deliberately prolonged.

Prolonging the War

The war was prolonged through several tactics. Firstly, all overtures of peace from the side of the Germans, and later the Ottomans, were defeated by agents of the international bankers. Secondly when Germans ran short of food, the deception named Belgian Relief Commission was set up by the international bankers through their front men, by which food was supplied to Germany and the German army, under guise of food supplies to Belgium, so that the German army could keep on fighting. Thirdly Germans were supplied with vital chemicals, metals, and other war materials by Allied Big Business, to enable them to keep fighting. Finally, wherever the Allied rulers seemed to resist the expansion of the war into the Middle East, they were eliminated politically, and if need be physically. They were then replaced by agents of the international banking cabal.

Sabotage of German Peace Offers of February 1915 and December 1916

A lone French soldier in a wet trench

Early in the war, on November 3, 1914, Britain declared the North Sea a theater of war. It blockaded ports of neutral countries illegally. On February 3, 1915, i.e. three months later, the Germans announced a counter blockade. They announced that with effect from February 18, 1915, the entire English channel along with territorial waters of Britain and Ireland would be considered a war zone. One must appreciate the fact that the Germans waited for three months before announcing a counter blockade. They were within their rights to do so.

However simultaneously, in February 1915, the Germans approached James W. Gerard, the U.S. ambassador in Germany, and expressed their desire to end the war. The German authorities wanted the ambassador to convey their desire for peace to President Wilson. They were however utterly unaware that President Wilson was a captive of the “advisors” installed around him by the international bankers. This German overture for peace is not something that is mentioned in textbooks but it has been mentioned by James W. Gerard in autobiography My First Eighty Three Years in America.

The response from Washington was most astonishing. Instead of commenting on the German proposal for peace, the White House directed the ambassador to communicate with Col. House instead of the President of U.S.A.! Dr. Stanley Montieth quotes from ambassador Gerard’s biography [8]:

In addition to the cable which I had already received informing me that Colonel House was “fully commissioned to act” he himself reminded me of my duty in his February 16 postscript. In his own handwriting these were the words from House. “The President has just repeated to me your cablegram to him and says he has asked you to communicate directly with me in future . . .” All authority, therefore had been vested in Colonel House direct, the President ceased to be even a conduit of communications. . . . He, who had never been appointed to any position, and who had never been passed by the Senate, was “fully instructed and commissioned” to act in the most grave situation. I have never ceased to wonder how he had managed to attain such power and influence.

One may notice that the German counter blockade was to begin on February 18, and the Germans communicated their desire for peace before that date as Colonel House’s handwritten postscript was dated February 16th. So it appears that the Germans expected that since the counter blockade represented an increased and new level of hostility, the Americans would be concerned to defuse the situation. They had no idea that Wilson was a stooge, a puppet in the hands of those who had planned a long war.

And one may recall that although the Archduke Ferdinand was assassinated as late as June 28, 1914, Col. House had, a month earlier, on May 29th, communicated to Wilson the arrangement that as soon as England indicated, France and Russia would pounce on Germany. So Colonel House wanted a long war, and destruction of both Germany and Russia, in accordance with the desire of the Zionist international bankers. Therefore, the ambassador never heard anything from Col. House about the peace proposal of February 1915. The peace proposal was sabotaged by Col. House.

Realizing that Col. House was in control of Wilson the Germans made another overture of peace in December 1916. This has been revealed by historian Leon Degrelle [9]. He mentions that on December 12, 1916, German officials expressed a desire for peace and talks with their adversaries. He also writes that Germans expressed the hope that Col. House would persuade the Allies. The freemason Col. House ruled out peace and thus helped sabotage the second peace initiative within the same year. The Germans did not know that Col. House had played an important role in precipitating the First World War by secretly entering into a secret agreement with Britain, well before Wilson’s re-election, that the U.S. would join the war, on the side of the Allies. Degrelle further writes [9]:

“On December 18, 1916, U.S. ambassador to Britain, Walter H. Page, relayed a peace offer to the Allies from Germany, the Austro-Hungarian Empire, the Ottoman Empire, and Bulgaria. On January 9, 1917, Prime Minister Lloyd George quickly repudiated the offering and declared that Britain would fight to the victory, which possibly prompted the Germans to re-initiate submarine warfare. Ambassador Page, in touch with President Wilson and Secretary of State Robert Lansing, defended British policies. This was William Jenning Bryan’s resignation, after he described Britain’s collapsing financial situation and the need for America’s neutrality.”

If the war had ended in 1916 million of lives could have been saved and destruction and devastation of numerous cities avoided. But the international bankers had planned a long war. It is important to note that, according to writer Juri Lina, who had access to records of numerous important Masonic lodges, Lloyd George was a Freemason, a Masonic Grand Master, and a Jew, whose real name was David Levi-Lowitt [10]. His connections with international bankers are very well known and he was installed in power as a result of an intrigue with the object of promoting the Zionist cause, as will be described later.

The picture of dead men among trees is a censored photo that was banned from publication by the French government. Those are dead Frenchmen mowed down by German guns during the Battle of the Frontiers in August/September 1914.

*

“Belgian Relief”

The next betrayal perpetrated by the international bankers took place in the form of the deception called Belgian Relief Commission. One finds many eulogized discussions about the work of this Commission. On the face of it this Commission was set up to supply food to the Belgian population. We quote below the typical version of the Belgian Relief Commission. It has been taken from an article by Elena S. Danielson that appeared in The United States in the First World War: An Encyclopedia, (edited by Anne Cipriano Venzon) [11]:

Herbert Hoover founded the Commission for Relief in Belgium (CRB) in London in October 1914 as a private organization to provide food for German-occupied Belgium. Belgium’s attempts at resistance to German military demands at the outbreak of the Great War had aroused much popular sympathy in England and the United States. A densely populated, industrialized country, Belgium depended on imports for three-quarters of its normal food supply. When the German Army began to requisition local foodstuffs and the British blockade cut off imported sources, 7 million Belgians faced severe hunger as the winter of 1914-1915 approached. When the American ambassador in London, Walter Hines Page, met with Belgian representatives, they concluded that Herbert Hoover was the best choice to administer some emergency relief action. The comprehensiveness of the program, however, was the result of Hoover’s personal determination to feed the entire nation.

But the real function, to which the Belgian Relief Commission was diverted, was hideous. Once Britain blockaded Germany, and the Germans were starved for food, the Belgian Relief Commission became a cover for sending food supplies to the German Army so that the German Army could keep on fighting. It may be useful to remember that Walter Hines Page was in the pay of Rothschilds. In his book The Secrets of the Federal Reserve Eustace Mullins writes [12]:

The U.S. Ambassador to Britain, Walter Hines Page, complained that he could not afford the position, and was given twenty-five thousand dollars a year spending money by Cleveland H. Dodge, president of the National City Bank. H.L. Mencken openly accused Page in 1916 of being a British agent, which was unfair. Page was merely a bankers’ agent.

The “City” banks were always owned by the Rothschilds. Mullins writes [13]:

The Belgian Relief Commission was organized by Emile Francqui, director of a large Belgian bank, Societe Generale, and a London mining promoter, an American named Herbert Hoover, who had been associated with Francqui in a number of scandals which had become celebrated court cases, notably the Kaiping Coal Company scandal in China, said to have set off the Boxer Rebellion, which had as its goal the expulsion of all foreign businessmen from China. Hoover had been barred from dealing on the London Stock Exchange because of one judgment against him, and his associate, Stanley Rowe, had been sent to prison for ten years. With this background, Hoover was called an ideal choice for a career in humanitarian work.

Further the truth about Hoover is given in the following words [14]:

Hoover had also carried out a number of mining operations in various parts of the world as a secret agent for the Rothschilds, and had been rewarded with a directorship on one of the principal Rothschild enterprises, the Rio Tinto Mines in Spain and Bolivia.

It may also be useful to remember that [15]:

Wilson’s academic career was financed by gifts from Cleveland H. Dodge, director of National City bank and Moses Taylor Payne, grandson and heir of the founder of the National City Bank. Wilson then signed an agreement not to go to any other college.

Please note that the same Cleveland Dodge was the financier of both, Ambassador Walter Hines Page, and President Wilson. Dodge was working for the Rothschilds. The first person to expose the hideous reality about the Belgian Relief Commission was a British nurse named Edith Cavell who was running a hospital in Belgium at the time. In his book Secrets of the Federal Reserve, first published in 1951, Eustace Mullins wrote about this [16]:

Franqui and Hoover threw themselves into the seemingly impossible task of provisioning Germany during World War I. Their success was noted in Nordeutsche Allegmeine Zeitung, March 13, 1915, which noted that large quantities of food were now arriving from Belgium by rail. Schmoller’s Yearbook for Legislation, Administration and Political Economy for 1916 shows that one billion pounds of meat, one and a half billion pounds of bread, and one hundred and twenty one million pounds of butter had been shipped from Belgium to Germany in that year.

Mullins then narrates the story of Edith Cavell (Ibid pp 72, 73):

A patriotic British woman who had operated a small hospital in Belgium for several years, Edith Cavell, wrote to Nursing Mirror in London, April 15, 1915, complaining that “Belgian Relief” supplies were being shipped to Germany to feed the German army. The Germans considered Miss Cavell to be of no importance, and paid no attention to her, but the British intelligence service in London was appalled by Miss Cavell’s discovery, and demanded that the Germans arrest her as a spy. Sir William Wiseman, head of British Intelligence, and partner of Kuhn Loeb Company, feared that the continuance of war was at stake, and secretly notified the Germans that Miss Cavell must be executed. The Germans reluctantly arrested her and charged her with aiding prisoners of war to escape. The usual penalty for this offence was three months imprisonment, but the Germans bowed to Sir William Wiseman’s demands, and shot Edith Cavell, thus creating one of the principal martyrs of the First World War.

It is to be noted that after the war Sir William Wiseman settled in the United States and became one of the directors of the Kuhn Loeb & Co. This was his reward for having helped prolong the war. It may be noted that the head of the German secret service was Max Warburg, another international banker, whose brother Paul Warburg had emigrated to the U.S. in 1902 and was instrumental, in 1913, in having the Federal Reserve Act passed. Paul Warburg was a partner in Kuhn Loeb & Co. The deeply hidden international banking connections are fairly obvious to anyone who cares to find out.

Thus the “Belgian Relief” was used to prolong the war. Had the war ended in February 1915 there would have been no Bolshevik Revolution (instigated and bankrolled by the international bankers) and the war would not have been extended to the Middle East. But the plan of the bankers who instigated the war was to prolong the war as long as possible and to fulfill, as far as possible, their targets (as revealed at the outset of the war by Edmond de Rothschild to Weizmann).

Zionists Sabotage a Separate Peace Possibility with the Ottomans

The Zionists defeated another opportunity of securing peace with the Ottoman Empire in May 1917. It was in May 1917 that the U.S. Secretary of State Robert Lansing received a report that the Ottomans were tired of war and a separate peace with Britain could be secured thereby isolating Germany. But the Zionists did not want to keep the Ottoman Empire intact – they wanted its complete destruction so that they could secure a Jewish homeland in Palestine from the rubble of the Ottoman Empire. The Zionists got wind of the plan when President Wilson assigned Henry J. Morgenthau the duty of contacting the Ottomans. Henry J. Morgenthau had once been the U.S. ambassador in Turkey. Morgenthau was himself Jewish and he therefore decided to take Felix Frankfurter with him.

As Alison Weir writes in her book [17], Felix Frankfurter was a “paid political lobbyist and lieutenant” of Justice Louis Brandeis. Now Justice Brandeis was a highly unscrupulous individual when it came to his political purposes – he could go to any length to achieve these. It is the same Justice Brandeis who had set up the secret society Parushim for promoting Zionism in U.S. clandestinely, as mentioned previously. He was also one of the four men who held President Wilson captive.

If the Ottomans had made a separate peace with Britain, the Ottoman Empire would have survived intact and there would be no room for Israel. Alison Weir states [18]:

“Felix Frankfurter became part of the delegation and ultimately persuaded the delegation’s leader, former Ambassador Henry J. Morgenthau, to abandon the effort. U.S. State Department officials considered that Zionists had worked to scuttle this potentially peace-making mission and were unhappy about it. Zionists often construed such displeasure at their actions as evidence of American diplomats’ ‘anti-Semitism’.”

Thus the Zionists, controlled by the international bankers, “killed” still another opportunity for peace which could have saved millions of lives.

Two Russian soldiers stand in front of a ruined building in NE Turkey and look at the remains of Armenians killed by the Turks, part of the 1.5 million Armenians killed during WW1 by the Turks.

*

Intrigue in Britain to Open Up a Front in Palestine

In his deep book, Douglas Reed, narrates [19]:

Opposition to Zionism developed from another source. In the highest places still stood men who thought only of national duty and winning the war. They would not condone “hatred” of a military ally or espouse a wasteful “sideshow” in Palestine. These men were Mr. Herbert Asquith (Prime Minister), Lord Kitchener (Secretary for War), Sir Douglas Haig (who became Commander-in-Chief in France), and Sir William Robertson (Chief-of-Staff in France, later of Chief of the Imperial Staff).

How did the Zionists get rid of this highest level opposition to opening up a front in Palestine? They decided to get rid of the Prime Minister and Lord Kitchener. It is almost unknown to the world that the Bolshevik Revolution was actually a Zionist coup in which the funding and support came from international bankers. The Zionist international bankers were mortal enemies of Russia because of the allegiance of the royal family to Christianity. Researchers have dug out this little known aspect of World War I. This aspect reveals the profound, utterly ruthless and absolutely single-minded pursuit of the goal of world domination by the international bankers. Reed describes how the Zionists were able to eliminate Lord Kitchener. He writes [20]:

“Lord Kitchener was sent to Russia by Mr. Asquith in June 1916. The cruiser Hampshire, and Lord Kitchener in it, vanished. Good authorities concur that he was one man who might have sustained Russia. A formidable obstacle, both to the world-revolution there and to the Zionist enterprise, disappeared. Probably Zionism could not have been foisted upon the West, had he lived.”

The silent and sinister physical elimination of Lord Kitchener has also been consigned to oblivion through controlled history writing. Had Kitchener managed to salvage Russia the Zionist enterprise would have been almost permanently thwarted. That is why he had to be eliminated. In an overall view of things the elimination of Lord Kitchener was vital for the survival of the Zionist enterprise and fits a pattern of intrigue in which assassinations and installation of puppet politicians was crucial. World War I was triggered by an assassination and prolonged by various tactics including the elimination of Lord Kitchener.

The elimination of Prime Minister Asquith has been looked into by Cornelius. He writes [21]:

“Herbert Asquith, who had been prime minister since 1908, had begun, reluctantly, to consider a negotiated peace, but negotiations with the Zionists, through Weizmann and Balfour, provided another option for Britain, although not for Asquith. That option was the possibility of a formal, but secret, alliance between the Zionists and the Monarchy, whereby the British Monarchy would undertake to facilitate the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine and the Zionists would undertake to help bring America into the war on the side of the Allies, this assuring an Allied victory. An agreement with a British government would certainly be necessary, but British governments come and go, and a commitment from something less ephemeral than a British government would have been required by the Zionists. It is proposed that such an agreement took place. There seems to be no way to date it accurately but it seems likely to have occurred sometime around in October 1916.”

Cornelius writes further:

In early December 1916, a political crisis, probably engineered, occurred in Britain, and Herbert Asquith, was forced to resign. The denouement came on Dec. 6, 1916. That afternoon King George V summoned several prominent political figures, including Balfour and Lloyd David, to a conference at Buckingham Palace. Later that same evening, Balfour received a small political delegation, which proposed that the difficult situation could be resolved with Lloyd George as prime minister, provided Balfour would agree to accept the position of foreign minister, which he did.”

The Zionists thus eliminated Asquith, who did not wish to open a front in the Middle East for furtherance of the Zionist ambitions there. In his place they installed Lloyd David George, a Zionist, a Freemason and a man who worked for the international bankers. This was an odd situation – Balfour, who had been a Prime Minister from 1902 – 1905, had agreed to work as Foreign Minister of a far junior politician.

What concerns were so pressing that made Lord Balfour accept a junior position? Lord Balfour had long been inducted in the larger Secret Elite circle and was simply carrying out what the Secret Elite wanted him to do as part of their plans. It could only be the pressure of the Zionist international bankers with reference to the opening up of a military front in the Middle East and establishing a Jewish homeland in Palestine.

Lest anyone has any doubts about who steered the policy when Lloyd David George became Prime Minister, it would be sufficient to look at the following statement in A.N. Field’s 1936 book, All These Things, in which he quotes a passage from the French book La Mystification des Peuples Allies authored by Andre Cheradame [22]:

For some years a group of financiers whose families, for the most part, are of German-Jewish origin, has assumed control of political power and exerts a predominant influence over Mr. Lloyd George. The Monds, the Sassoons, Rufus Isaacs those known as the representatives of the international banking interests, dominate Old England, own its newspapers, and control its elections. The close solidarity existing between Mr. Lloyd George and Jewish high finance is easily shown by the brief biographical sketches of some of the influential personages by whom he is surrounded . . . Each of the names represents not only an individual, but also a veritable tribe and head of immense financial interests.”

So the international bankers assumed control of the British government at the highest level by eliminating Prime Minister Asquith and Lord Kitchener, the former politically and the latter physically. Docherty and Macgregor have pointed out that the Secret Elite “identified and nurtured malleable politicians” across Europe and at home. They write (p 170, ref. [1]):

“Lloyd George’s love of good life and his insatiable sexual appetite rendered him vulnerable. His career could have ended several times over had the Secret Elite chosen to destroy him. Instead, they protected his reputation, defending him against damaging allegations and saved his career.”

Since 1910 Lloyd George had been in the “pocket of the Secret Elite.” What happened when Lloyd George became Prime Minister? This is best described by Douglas Reed who has rendered an invaluable service to mankind by writing his last book. He writes [23]:

The simultaneous triumph of Bolshevism in Moscow and Zionism in London in the same week of 1917 were only in appearance distinct events. The identity of the original source has been shown in an earlier chapter, and the hidden men who promoted Zionism through the Western governments also supported the world-revolution. The two forces fulfilled correlative tenets of the ancient Law: “Pull down and destroy . . . rule over all nations”; the one destroyed in the East and the other secretly ruled in the West.”

Reed further narrates that after the assumption of power by Lloyd David George the cabinet began pressing the army for opening up a front in the Middle East. The armed forces resisted this strategically senseless pressure. But the change of government had been wrought by the international bankers, the Rothschilds, only for one purpose, the purpose of promoting the cause of political Zionism, as revealed at the outset of war by Edmond de Rothschild to Weizmann. John Reed quotes Sir William Robertson (emphasis in original) [24]:

“Up to December 1916, operations beyond the Suez Canal were purely defensive in principle, the government and General Staff alike . . . recognizing the paramount importance of the struggle in Europe in need of give the armies there the utmost support. This unanimity between ministers and the soldiers did not obtain after the premiership changed hands . . . The fundamental difference of opinion was particularly obtrusive in the case of Palestine . . . The General Staff put the requirements at three additional divisions and these could only be obtained from the armies on the Western Front . . . The General Staff said the project would prove a great source of embarrassment and injure our prospects of success in France . . . These conclusions were disappointing to Ministers, who wished to see Palestine occupied at once, but they could not be refuted . . .”

This clearly shows that there was a difference of opinion between the government and the General Staff regarding the issue of sending British troops to occupy Palestine. Sir William Robertson was one of the four men, mentioned previously by Reed, who held British interests supreme and stood in the way of the expansion of war into Palestine.

Shipment of War- and Food-materials to Germany Despite Blockade

The international bankers, who also controlled Big Business, were able to prolong the war by supplying much needed materials, such as chemicals, copper, zinc, etc., as well as food to Germany through neutral countries, thereby helping Germany to fight longer. The major neutral countries were Denmark, Norway Sweden, and Netherlands. Finland was also part of the chain of nations supplying materials to the Germans. This is another little known aspect of World War I (and also World War II). This policy of trading with the enemy to make profits and to prolong the war was also utilized in the Second World War.

It is not that sentient and patriotic journalists and analysts were unable to fathom the international-bankers’ intrigue at that time – rather it was the overall control of media, and of book publishing, that has made it possible for the international bankers to deceive generations with controlled information and sanitized history which omits their hideous role. The story was brought out by journalists and analysts in England during the course of World War I, and subsequently by Admiral M.W.W.P. Consett, who was posted as naval attaché in Denmark during the war. Scandinavia was, of course, a traditional “listening post for warring nations.” In the year 1923 Consett wrote a book with a very interesting title, The Triumph of Unarmed Forces (1914-1918). Consett writes [25]:

“Our trade with Scandinavia was conducted and justified on the accepted security of guarantees that Germany should not benefit by it: here it is sufficient to say that the security was worthless.”

As he writes in a previous paragraph (p x):

“But from the very beginning goods poured into Germany from Scandinavia, and for over two years Scandinavia received from the British Empire and the Allied countries, stocks which, together with those from neutral countries, exceeded all previous quantities and literally saved Germany from starvation.”

Consett has given several tables that indicate that the amount of various items that were imported into Germany during the period 1913-1917. Please note that war broke out in August 1914. The total food imported into Germany from Sweden in the years 1913, 1914, 1915, 1916, 1917 was, respectively (in metric tons): 252 128, 262376, 561,234, 620,756, and 315,205 (Appendix VI, p 298). Please note that food imports from Sweden in 1917 were more than food imports from that country in 1913. The food items covered in these figures are “meat of all sorts, fish, dairy produce, eggs, lard, margarine.” The food items do not include “vegetable oils, beer, fish, oil, bone fat, coffee, tea, cocoa, horses, syrup and glucose, fruit, vegetables.” This was despite the naval blockade imposed by Britain. The corresponding figures for Denmark follow a similar pattern. No wonder a Danish naval officer wrote (p 295 of Consett’s book) to his British counterparts:

“I cannot help saying to you how much we Danish naval officers sympathize with you in having to live as you do amongst these people who are making fortunes in supplying your enemies with food when the officers and men of the Navy to which you belong are risking their lives in trying to blockade your enemies.”

The story of Germany acquiring other items – much needed coal, vital lubricants, metals such as zinc, copper, nickel, etc. arrived at German ports through Scandinavian countries. The details have been provided by Consett in various chapters of his book. For instance on p 180 of his book, Consett quotes the U.S. ambassador James W. Gerard as having recorded the following his diary [26]:

“Probably the greatest need of Germany is lubricating oil for machines.”

And yet lubricating oil did reach Germany from Scandinavian countries, as described by Consett. In fact Consett mentions that Ludendorff admitted:

“Lubricants provided us with some of our greatest problems . . .”

Similarly, other materials needed for explosives also arrived in Germany from Denmark and Holland despite the blockade. That the laxity in the blockade was intentional will become evident shortly. Consett states [27]:

“These oils and fats, both vegetable and animal, are used in normal times principally for food, soap, candles, lubricants and fuel; but in war time their importance is much enhanced on account of the glycerin which they contain.”

Glycerin is used in explosives and in 1915 Germany had discovered a process for extracting glycerin from sugar. This secret process was revealed only after the war. So important is glycerin that during the war the British Army collected all scraps of meat carefully in the British war zone, so that the fat could be used for extraction of glycerin.

That the British government was complicit in allowing vital materials to be shipped to Germany is evident from the following, which was revealed by Arnold White, a British journalist. In a packed meeting held at the Queen’s Hall London on March 4, 1917, Arnold White was speaker. According to A.N. Field, Arnold White [28]:

“. . . referred at length to the mysterious way in which Britain had allowed an extension of Norwegian territorial waters from the customary three miles accepted internationally to a four-mile limit. This extra mile allowed great American ships to slip through immune Norwegian waters with 10,000-ton cargoes of ore to Germany. He had enquired into this matter and he found that the political heads understood nothing of significance of the extension of Norwegian territorial waters to which Britain had consented. Those who instigated it, in Mr. White’s opinion, knew exactly what it meant. But for that extension he added, “it would have been impossible for the great American ships to have carried 100,000 tons of ores last year into Germany.”

What is difficult to understand about such matters that the politicians could not understand? One is reminded of the famous line by Upton Sinclair:

It is difficult to make a man understand when his salary depends upon not understanding it.”

It is quite clear that the British government allowed the extension of Norwegian territorial waters deliberately. The politicians were working for the international bankers, led by the Rothschilds. The government of David Lloyd George had been installed in power by them through intrigue, and possibly murder of Lord Kitchener that may have been made to look like drowning or disappearance of the cruiser Hampshire, to further their own Zionist interests. According to A.N. Field:

. . . Mr. Lloyd George had been among other things solicitor to the Zionist organization in England. In December 1916, Mr. Lloyd George succeeded Mr. Asquith as Prime Minister, holding office until October 1922. Throughout the greater part of his career Mr. Lloyd George had close Jewish associations, and the pronounced Jewish complexion of the Lloyd George Ministries was more than once subject of Press comment in Britain.”

Nine days later, on March 13, 1917, questions were asked in the House of Commons regarding the extension of territorial waters of Norway. The answer was that the government would do nothing about it.

The March 4, 1917 meeting had been organized by Dr. Ellis Powell, editor of the London Financial News. In this meeting Dr. Powell pointed out to the mysterious continuation of the activities of international bankers in Britain. This meeting was one of a series of meetings addressed by Dr. Powell and others, who had been agitating for exposing the “Hidden Hand” that was in control of Britain, and was betraying British interests. In fact, in 1917, Arnold White had written a book with title The Hidden Hand. The “Hidden Hand” was none other than the international bankers. The banks being run by bankers of German-Jewish origin in Britain were involved in activities that needed investigation. A resolution was passed at the March 4, 1917 meeting by all those present, numbering several thousand. They unanimously demanded closure of German banks in London. Field writes further [29]:

In seconding the resolution Dr. Ellis Powell, while seconding the resolution declared that German banks in the city were part of a vast organization of betrayal. The great outstanding fact of the war-time Hidden Hand agitation is that whenever it came to mention names and specific instances the names were mainly Jewish.”

The Russian revolution is relevant to WW1 – this 1919 poster was printed by the White Russians and depicts Trotsky as an evil Jew. Bottom right are Asiatic soldiers of the Red army executing a European Russian

In his speeches Dr. Powell had attacked Jacob Schiff by name as being behind activities that went against British interests. Schiff was the owner of the Kuhn Loeb & Co, who had also bankrolled the Bolshevik movement. Jacob Schiff was born in the same house where the founder of the Rothschild family was born. Dr. Powell also mentioned Schroder, a naturalized British citizen, a banker of German-Jewish extraction, as well as others.

It is therefore quite clear that the international bankers were behind all major attempts at prolonging the war. They not only surrounded the British Prime Minister and the U.S. President, but all surrounded the German Chancellor. They were all Zionists and Freemasons.

It is important to keep track of the dates because this enables a better overall comprehension of what was going on. The German peace proposals of February 1915 and December 1916 were sabotaged.

It was in December 1916 that Asquith was toppled, it was in February 1917 that the Russian Czar abdicated, it was in April 1917 that the U.S.A. entered the war, it was during, and soon after May 1917, that the Ottoman peace possibility was destroyed by the Zionists, it was in October 1917, that the agents of the international bankers, the Bolsheviks, took over Russia and it was in November 1917, that the Balfour Declaration, addressed to Baron Rothschild, was formally issued.

All these events were manipulated by Zionist international bankers and their Illuminati controlled freemasonic brethren who had planned and intrigued on a global scale for a very long time. These epochal victories of the Illuminati Zionist international bankers have since dictated the course of history right up to today.

The global turmoil is a continuation of the Zionist thrust for seizing world power and they have come very close to their target with the destruction of U.S.S.R., Yugoslavia, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan and the ongoing destruction of Syria, and with clouds over Saudi Arabia, Yemen, and Pakistan. “Pull down and destroy . . . rule over all nations”! The United States of America and the United Kingdom are the biggest tools in the hands of international bankers. Despite their profound strengths these two countries have, on account of their control by Zionist and Illuminati international bankers, become the greatest threat to the very survival of the human species at this point in time.

Henry Makow Ph.D., himself Jewish, and full of anger at the anti-mankind policies of the Zionist international bankers, sums up World War I [30]:

“As mysteriously as it began, the war ended. In Dec. 1918, the German Empire suddenly “collapsed.” You can guess what happened. The banksters had achieved their aims and shut off the spigot. (Hence, the natural sense of betrayal felt in Germany, exacerbated by the onerous reparations dictated by the banksters at Versailles.)

What were the banksters’ aims? The Old Order was destroyed. Four empires (Russian, German, Austro-Hungarian and Ottoman) lay in ruins.

The banksters had set up their Bolshevik go-fers in Russia. (They sponsor many “revolutionary” movements as a way to eventually control all property themselves.) They ensured that Palestine would become a “Jewish” state under their control. Israel would be a perennial source of new conflict.

But more important, thanks to bloodbaths such as Verdun (800,000 dead), the optimistic spirit of Christian Western Civilization, Faith in Man and God, were dealt a mortal blow. The flower of the new generation was slaughtered. (See “The Testament of Youth” by Vera Brittain for a moving first-hand account.)”

Almost forty million humans died in World War I [31].

REFERENCES and NOTES

[1] Gerry Docherty and Jim Macgregor: Hidden History: The Secret Origins of the First World War; Mainstream Publishers, 2013

[2] Carol White: The New Dark Ages Conspiracy: Britain’s Plot to Destroy Civilization; The New Benjamin Franklin House Publishing Co, 1980

[3] Guido G. Preparata: Conjuring Hitler: How Britain and America Made the Third Reich, Pluto Press 2005, p 24.

[4] Gary Allen: None Dare Call It Conspiracy, first published 1971; 2013 edition published by Dauphin Publications Inc., p 52.

[5] Douglas Reed: The Controversy of Zion, Bridger House Publishers Inc. 2012, p 242; emphasis added.

The story of Douglas Reed illustrates how the international bankers and their agents suppress truth and promote a sanitized history. In a book Far and Wide, Douglas Reed had dared to put the American History in its true European context. Ivor Benson writes in the Preface to The Controversy of Zion:

“In Europe during the war years immediately before and after World War II the name of Douglas Reed was on everyone’s lips; his books were being sold by scores of thousand, and he was known with intimate familiarity throughout the English-speaking world by a vast army of readers and admirers. Former London Times correspondent in Central Europe, he won great fame with books like Insanity Fair, Disgrace Abounding, Lest We Regret, Somewhere South of Suez, Far and Wide, and several others, each amplifying a hundredfold the scope available to him as one of the world’s leading foreign correspondents.

The disappearance into almost total oblivion of Douglas Reed and all his works was a change that could not have been wrought by time alone; indeed the correctness of his interpretation of the unfolding history of the times found some confirmation after what happened to him at the height of his powers.

After 1951, with the publication of Far and Wide, in which he set the history of the United States of America into the context of all he had learned in Europe of the politics of the world, Reed found himself banished from the bookstands, all publishers’ doors closed to him, and those books already published liable to be withdrawn from library shelves and “lost”, never to be replaced.”

This is how knowledge of history is controlled, distorted and even fabricated by the One World cabal of international bankers.

[6] Sarah Schmidt: The Parushim: A Secret Episode in American Zionist History;

American Jewish Historical Quarterly, Sep 1975-Jun 1976; 65. l – 4; AJHS Journal pg. 121.

[7] Douglas Reed: Far and Wide; first printed 1951; Angriff Pr June 1, 1981; part 2, chapter 2.

[8] Dr. Stanley Montieth: Brotherhood of Darkness, Bible Belt Publishing, Oklahoma City, U.S.A., 2000, p 65.

[9] Leon Degrelle: Hitler: Born at Versailles, Vol I, Institute for Historical Review, Torrance, California, 1992, p 255 – 259; cited by Deanna Spingola: The Ruling Elite: The Zionist Seizure of World Power, Trafford Publishing 2012, pp 622, 923

[10] Juri Lina: Architects of Deception, Referent Publishing 2004, chapter 7.

[11] See http://socialarchive.iath.virginia.edu/xtf/view?docId=commission-for-relief-in-belgium-1914-1930-cr.xml

[12] Eustace Mullins: The Secrets of the Federal Reserve: The London Connection; first published 1951; the 1991 edition by Bridger House publishing, p 83.

[13] Ibid, pp 69, 70.

[14] Ibid p 72.

[15] Eustace Mullins: The World Order: A Study in the Hegemony of Parasitism, published by Ezra Pound Institute of Civilization, 1985

[16] Ref 11, p 72

[17] Alison Weir: Against Our Better Judgment: the hidden history of how the U.S. was used to create Israel; 2014, p 9.

[18] Ibid p 22.

[19] Ref. 5, p 247.

[20] Ibid p 248.

[21] John Cornelius: The Hidden History of the Balfour Declaration; Washington Report on Middle East Affairs;

http://www.wrmea.org/2005-november/special-report-the-hidden-history-of-the-balfour-declaration.html

[22] A.N. Field: All These Things, 1936, p 82.

[23] Ref 5, p 272

[24] Ref 5, p 252

[25] M.W.W.P. Consett: Triumph of Unarmed Forces (1914-1918), Williams and Norgate, London, 1923; p xi.

[26] Ibid p 180.

[27] Ibid p 167.

[28] Ref. 22, p 42.

[29] Ref. 22, p 42.

[30] Henry Makow : Bankers Extended WWI By Three Years; revised and reposted December 1, 2007, http://www.henrymakow.com/001583.html

[31] Ref. 15.

*

Related Posts:



 
The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

 
Posted by on August 1, 2017, With 1863 Reads Filed under Of Interest, World War I (1914-1918). You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
 

 
 

FaceBook Comments

8 Responses to "How and Why WWI Was Planned and Prolonged

AUGUST 1-2017

H.F.1269

 
 
 
 

 

 
 
 

 

 

 
A FREE PRESS!

It's finest expression had already been given in

MILTON'S

AREOPAGITICA.

Milton boldly proclaimed two principles of profound importance.

One was the immunity of the religious life from political regulation. The other was that doctrine which has been the strength of the best thought of individualism from his day to the present, to wit that the well-being of society requires the natural diversity of its members, and that coercive uniformity of morals and manners would spell the ruin and degradation of any people.

*

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

More!

 

 

 

 
 
THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR PAST OVER 50 YEARS

 (1959-2016)

 

 

 
THE SPIRIT OF A PEOPLE

THE FIRST TASK of any politics that could be really scientific was to relate authority to its principle source, to show its dependence on the whole social fabric, the customs and traditions, the modes of thought and the standards of life that prevail among a people.  ...the work of Montesquieu.   He really sought to understand society, to show the influence of underlying  conditions ,climatic, geographical, economic, to show that custom and institutions neither are made nor can be changed by fiat, to show that there is in every people a spirit of character which their law must reveal

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

 

*  *  *

Brought forward from February-2005

FREEDOM of SPEECH -A FREEDOM, which cannot be abused – IS NOT WORTH HAVING.

 

[In the Daily Mail on Friday the 18th February 2005 a timely article by their columnist Andrew Alexander on the most important issue to be raised in a true democracy, which is Freedom of Speech for without it, a People are deprived of the very means to find the TRUTH.

 

Though at times the means to achieve this may lead to differences of view which after all is what it all means to speak one’s mind.  There is already protection in British law to curb those who wish to encourage violence. Affray and disorder. When others put this basic right of comment under threat then who is there to defend the Principle of Free Speech.]

*          *        *

We all have a Right

to

Freedom of Speech

 

Ken Livingstone should not apologise.  He may not be everyone’s cup of tea, certainly not mine, but the issue has now become one of freedom of speech.  The possibility that a government-appointed body could suspend him from office is one of the most outrageous things I have ever heard.

What he said to an Evening Standard reporter was something no gentleman would say.  But so what?   Politics, local or national, has never been distinguished by gentlemanly behaviour and never will be.   Newspapers can play it rough, too.  Both sides expect to give and take hard knocks.

 The real villain of the piece is an item of legislation entitled-soporifically-The Local Authorities (Model Code of Conduct)  (England) Order 2001.  Under ‘General Obligations’, we find the astonishing subsection, which says that councillors ‘must treat others with respect’.

Note the word ‘must’- not ‘should’ or ‘would be wise to’ or ‘wouldn’t be nice if all councillors were to’.  No, politeness is mandatory.

Consider also the ludicrous word  ‘others’, not voters, officials, fellow councillors or anything so narrow. ‘Others’ can mean anyone on the planet, from David Beckham to the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem.

How on earth, you may wonder, did this preposterous threat to free speech creep in?  It seems that when the legislation in question was introduced, the Conservatives concentrated their fire on the excessive regulation of parish councils, which was then being established.

The Tory promise was that, if it returned to power they would abolish the bureaucratic Standards Board for England (SBE)_ a collection of nonentities chosen by the Government-and leave sorting out of councillors’ problems about conflicts of interest and the like to the Local Government Ombudsman.

The Opposition made no move to oppose the wretched 2001 Order when it came along-no protests, not even a demand for a vote.

This sinister threat of censorship, which should be fought to the last ditch, passed on a nod, leaving the SBE [Standards Board for England] with the power to bar someone from office for up to five years for breaching the code.

The matter of Livingstone’s words has been referred to the SBE by the Board of Deputies of British Jews, a disgraceful move.  It does British Jewry’s reputation no good to have the Deputies leading a campaign against freedom of speech.

Livingstone’s remark about a reporter behaving like a concentration camp guard has, also absurdly been dubbed ‘racist’.

It may have played harshly on the target’s sensitivities, but by no stretch of the imagination did it belittle or attack a race.

The only thing this sort of exaggeration shows is how far the rot of ‘anti-racism’ has taken us.  We are becoming like the U.S. where the obsession about ‘race’ has reached the proportions of a national mania.

 

No doubt, we shall hear the commonplace retort from those accused of trying to curb free speech that of course they are all in favour of freedom, except where it is abused.  This is nonsensical view.

A Freedom, which cannot be abused, is not worth having.

The threat to Livingstone comes in the wake of another threat to free speech in the Government’s new legislation to ban remarks, which stir up religious hatred.  Freedom of speech, if it means what it says, involves the right:

To Irritate

 

Annoy

 

Dismay

 

And Shock

 

Anyone who Listens.

The only sensible limitation should be on speech designed to lead to violence, affray or disorder.  But that has always been enshrined in British law anyway.

I can’t help recalling from my youth, in relation to this whole issue, the harmless joke in one of those monologues wonderfully recited by [that great entertainer and loveable gentleman] Stanley Holloway-the Lion and Albert, and all the rest.

 As some readers may remember’ one explained how the barons of old descended on King John when he was having tea’ on Runningmede Island in t’Thames’ and made him sign the Magna Carta…’but his writing in places was sticky and thick through dipping his pen in the jam’.

 

The verse concludes:

 

‘In England today we can do what we like

So long as we do what we’re told’

 

How I laughed then, I would not have believed that this joke could one day be transmuted to:

‘And that is why we can talk as we like

So long as we talk as we’re told.’

A final touch of absurdity is added by the claim that Livingstone’s remark may jeopardise London’s attempt to host the Olympic Games.  If it did, it would be one good outcome.  The cost, the upset, the dislocation, the sheer waste of effort if London is chosen is too appalling to contemplate.

 

But if his comment really threatened London’s Olympic bid, it would show what a silly solemn people make up the International Olympic Committee.

 

It might have been a nice thing if Livingstone had originally apologised for having been gratuitously rude.  But the issue has gone beyond that now.  For him to retreat in the face of a threat to freedom of speech is in no one’s interest.

 

Andrew.Alexander@dailymail.co.uk

                          

 

THE DEATH OF ANDREW ALEXANDER WAS A GRIEVOUS LOSS FOR A TRUE DEMOCRACY-HE WILL BE MISSED BUT NEVER FORGOTTEN.

R I P

 

PATRIOT AND TRUTH SEEKER

 

ON LIBERTY OF SPEECH

A Great Poet, a Puritan Parliamentarian, and Secretary to Oliver Cromwell – John Milton, during the Civil War wrote the following lines on Freedom of expression: -

 ‘ Give me liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties.  Though all the winds of doctrine were let loose to play upon the earth, so Truth be in the field, we do injuriously to misjudge her strength.

Let her and Falsehood grapple!

Who ever knew Truth put to the worse in a free and open encounter?

Who knows not that Truth is strong next to the Almighty

 

 MAGNA CARTA

 

FEBRUARY 2005

*          *          *

[Fonts altered-bolding &underlining used-comments in brackets]

 

H.F. 1325.

*  *  *

 

 

 

*  *  *
 
 

A REMINDER!

WHAT YOU ARE ESCAPING FROM SINCE TRAITORS IN YOUR PARLIAMENT SIGNED YOUR COUNTRY OF ENGLAND

AWAY IN

1972

AND IN LATER TREATIES UNTIL YOU SPOKE YOUR MIND ON

 JUNE 23-2016

 A DATE IN HISTORY WHICH WILL BE ALWAYS REMEMBERED

BY ALL TRUE ENGLISHMEN.

 

*  *  *

HOW IT CAME ABOUT!

Mr Macmillan and 1961

Mr Heath and 1970

Mrs Thatcher and 1985

From Major to Blair, Maastricht to Nice

The Price We Have PAid

 

*  *  *

 

H.F.1100 FREEDOM AWAITS
 
NEW SERIES

*

WHY WE VOTED TO LEAVE

THE

UNDEMOCRATIC-UNACCOUNTABLE-COLLECTIVIST-CORRUPT-WASTEFUL-GODLESS

SO-CALLED

EUROPEAN UNION

[WE WILL SELECT INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM AUTHORITIVE SOURCES CONCERNING THE ILLEGALITY OF THE EU TREATIES AND THOSE WHO LIED FOR PERSONAL GAIN AND POWER AND OTHER SUBSTANTIATED INFORMATION COLLECTED OVER THE 20 YEARS SINCE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE AFTER STANDING FOR ELECTION IN THE 1997 GENERAL ELECTION AND THE 1999 EUROPEAN ELECTION. MANY WHO VOTED TO REMAIN IN THE EU WOULD SURELY HAVE RECONSIDERED IF THEY HAD BEEN DISINTERESTED OBSERVERS-DECIDING ON THE FACTS AND PUTTING NATIONAL INTERESTS  OF FREEDOM  and NATIONHOOD OUTLINED IN MAGNA CARTA AND OTHER PRIZED DOCUMENTS HELD IN TRUST-SACRED HEIRLOOMS - FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS, BEFORE THEIR OWN COMFORT ZONE.  FORTUNATELY, THE GODS, WERE WITH ENGLAND-AND THE SOON RETURN OF

 A FREE LAND AND FREE PEOPLE.

OUR ENSLAVEMENT IN 1972 INTO HITLER'S PLAN FOR GERMAN EXPANSION AND POWER IN PEACE-TIME EUROPE WILL SOON BE AT AN END. AS A UNITED PEOPLE IT WILL BE SOONER THAN LATER. LET US WORK TOGETHER AS  AN EXAMPLE TO OTHER ONCE FREE PEOPLES WITHIN THE CAPTIVE EU WHO WILL SURELY FOLLOW. IF THE SHIP IS NOT ON AN EVEN KEEL IT CANNOT HELP OTHERS WHO WILL NEED OUR STURDY STEADY HAND.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

William Pitt.

 [Speech, 9th Nov, after Nelson's VICTORY at THE Battle of Trafalgar-with the destruction of the French and Spanish Fleets-Oct 21-1805]

MARCH 1-2017

 
A FAMILIAR WARNING FROM HISTORY - WE MUST NOT IGNORE!

'It is quite true that, in my opinion the waters which we have to navigate are likely to be stormy, and that the anti-social ferments within the nation are unusually malignant. But just a a healthy body generates anti-toxins to combat any virulent infection, so our nation

ENGLAND

 may be vigorous enough to neutralize the poisons which now threaten our civilization with death. Nothing but good can be done by calling attention to perils which really exist, and which may easily escape due attention amid the bottomless insincerity of modern politics and political journalism.

DANGERS OF PREDICTION

However , the dangers of prediction have been so often illustrated that those who are naturally disposed to optimism may be excused for rejecting the anticipations of coming CALAMITY, which  are now  [as in 2016/7] widely felt, though not so often expressed.

In the Victorian age we had  our profits of woe [and doom], who vociferated warnings about "shooting Niagara" when the country was more prosperous than it had ever been before. [As yet again in 2016/7].

Even on the morrow of our victory in 1815, " as soon as Waterloo was fought," says Sir Walter Besant, "the continental professors, historians, and others began with one accord to prophesy the approaching downfall of Great Britain," which they liked to compare with Carthage.

They emphasised the condition of Ireland, the decay of trade, our huge debt, our wasteful expenditure, our corrupting poor laws, the ignorance and drunkenness of the masses. Nor was this pessimistic forecast confined to our jealous neighbours.  In December 1816, the Common Council of the City of London addressed the Prince Regent as follows:

" Distress and misery are no longer limited to one portion of the Empire, and under their irresistible pressure the commercial, agricultural, and manufacturing interests are rapidly sinking.   We can ,Sir no longer support out of our dilapidated resources the overwhelming load of taxation.  Our grievances are the natural result of rash and ruinous wars, unjustly commenced and pertinaciously persisted in, where no rational object was to be attained; of immense subsidies to foreign Powers to defend their own territories  or to commit aggressions on those of our neighbours;  of a delusive paper currency; of an unconstitutional and unprecedented military force in time of peace;   of the unexampled and increasing magnitude of the Civil List ;  of the enormous sums paid for unmerited pensions and sinecures;   and of a long course of the most lavish and improvident expenditure of the public money throughout every branch of Government."

In December 1816, the Common Council of the City of London addressed the Prince Regent with the above statement.

Sounds familiar in 2017-Don't you think?

 

[EPILOGUE-William Ralph Inge -Dean of St Pauls ENGLAND-1938] -(1860-1954)

 

We endorse the final paragraph which states:

 

" I have laid bare my hopes and fears for the country I love.  This much I can avow, that never, even when the storm clouds appear blackest, have I been tempted to wish that I was other than an Englishman."

*

[We appear to have learned NOTHING! since this speech  in 1816 as the multiple evils are still with us today August 6, 2011. The reason is OBVIOUS! because the SAME! once invisible GLOBAL CONSPIRATORS are  STILL in CHARGE! and  are now in the OPEN!

If the ECONOMY has a DISEASE and FAILS to take the CORRECT MEDICINE then the END RESULT is OBVIOUS.

TOTAL CHAOS!

*

WHY DO WE TRUST THESES DISCREDITED DOOM-MONGERS?

By Alex Brummer - City Editor-Daily Mail-Monday, August 8,2011

 

 [EXTRACT]

...and the answer is that the CREDIT RATING AGENCIES are now seen as the ONLY arbiters prepared to spell out just how SERIOUS the GLOBAL DEBT CRISIS really IS.... After all, the very same AGENCIES were still providing the US. energy company ENRON with TOP RATING up to THREE DAYS before IT COLLAPSED in the world's BIGGEST INDUSTRIAL BANKRUPTCY...  They also gave a CLEAN BILL of HEALTH to FANNIE MAE and FREDDIE MAC -semi-official, but privately owned U. S bodies set up to expand the HOME OWNERSHIP and the availability of MORTGAGES-despite WARNINGS from the LEGENDARY American investor -WARREN BUFFETT -THAT they were BROKE... S&P's downgrade may look like a poke in the eye for the UNITED STATES. But with luck, it could in the end DAMAGE the FUTURE CREDIBILITY of the CREDIT-RATING AGENCIES - they are in MORE URGENT NEED of REFORM than AMERICA.

 

 

THE AMERICAN DREAM IS OVER!

 

h

 

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS almost BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/ ****    REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****    THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****       FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/  ****   A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?     **** GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/  ****    A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/  ****   THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/   WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/  ****   GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/ ****   50 YEARS OF SURRENDER***AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED.

DAVID CAMERON'S PLAN TO CLAW BACK POWERS FROM EU ARE DOOMED SAYS EU CHIEF IN OCTOBER-2013

*

THE HISTORY OF THE SATANIC COLLECTIVIST EUROPEAN UNION

***

HITLER'S+PLAN+FOR+A+

GERMAN+CONTROLLED

+EUROPEAN+UNION

***

TREASON

***

 

 

 

ENGLAND

 

 Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND?**** BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH****NEW LABOUR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND****UNLESS WE TAKE CONTROL OF OUR LIVES WE WILL LOSE OUR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY****.OUR PAST IS EMBEDDED IN OUR NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS -IT ASKS WERE WE CAME FROM AND WHO WE ARE .****.THE ENGLISH WITH OTHER GERMANIC TRIBES CAME TO BRITAIN OVER YEARS AGO - THE STREAM OF TEUTONIC INFLUENCE  HAS DECIDED THE FUTURE OF EUROPE****THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/ ****  THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/ ****    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/****  DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/ ****   NOR SHALL MY SWORD/****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/ ****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/****   ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY -CORRECT BROWNDOM/****    ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1- /****   ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/****    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./****   WHY OUR ENGLISH SELF-GOVERNMENT IS UNIQUE IN EUROPE AND THE WORLD****.ENGLAND ARISE! - TODAY WE CLAIM OUR RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION/ ****  KISS GOOD BYE TO YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY / ****  THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED? **** ST GEORGE'S DAY-ENGLAND'S DAY/**** ST GEORGE'S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ONSHAKESPEARE'S' BIRTHDAY****NAZI SPY RING REVEALED BY THE MASTER OF BALLIOL COLLEGE IN 1938 . IT INCLUDED THE LATE EX PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH AND MINISTERS GEOFFREY RIPPON AND ROY JENKINS.* * * *AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED****   EU WIPES ENGLAND OFF THE MAP**** THE ENGLISH DID NOT MOVE THEMSELVES SO ARE NOW SLAVES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE****"...What kind of people do they think we are?" by WINSTON CHURCHILL****THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

 

‘THE MAKING OF THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION’****

OUR CONSTITUTION OF OVER A THOUSAND YEARS – WHY DOES BLAIR MEAN TO DESTROY IT?****

OUR DISCREDITED DEMOCRACY OR IRAQ DICTATORSHIP****OUR LOYALTY TO OUR INSTITUTIONS AND COUNTRY?****Liberties of Parliament- Birthright of Subjects of England.****LOSS of TRUST in NEW LABOUR****New England’s Tears for Old England’s fears?****The House of Commons has a need of members dedicated to their Country-not time wasters.****English Constitution, by it they lived, for it they died****CABINET GOVERNMENT IS NOW A DICTATORSHIP****MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA SUPPORTS THE CROWN****THE FINAL BETRAYAL - Part 1-5****House of Lords legal Whistleblower – Speaks Out in Defence of OUR  Law & Constitution****SAY ‘NO’ TO EUROPE! – SAYS RODNEY ATKINSON****The Rotten Heart of Europe - by Bernard Connolly-Part 1-5****THE CLUB IS MIGHTIER THAN THE HANDBAG****WHY you should Vote at Elections to protect YOUR Democracy****The sole legitimate function of Government- is to Protect The Rights of its Citizens****So You Thought You Were Free****A DREAM TO REMEMBER- NEW LABOUR POLICY -2004?****NO SUPPORT IN HOUSE OF LORDS FOR INQUIRY INTO EU BY TORY WHIP**** Could England Survive Outside The EU?  -YES!****COST OF DEVOLUTION –N’IRELAND, SCOTLAND AND WALES LONDON +BRUSSELS****European Arrest Warrant – What Price Our Freedom Now?****Government Obsession With Spending Itself out of Trouble**** Bill of Rights of 1688 –Outlaws European Constitution****OUR UNREPRESENTATIVE VOTING SYSTEM= BREEDS TREASON -
BETRAYAL OF COUNTRY****Impeachment of Ministers of the Crown – Why Now?****New European Constitution – Concessions Fudge.****The Judiciary – A Defence of English Freedom?****New European Constitution – A ‘Bridge’ Too Far?**** Our way forward to Kinship in Liberty****OUR HISTORIC HOUSE OF LORDS MUST REMAIN – TO PREVENT TYRANNY****  Scottish Independence – Have No need of Union flag and Anthem****Misuse of Prerogative Powers by Tony Blair****A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION –CONSPIRATORS NAME  PARTS 1-5****

 

 

H.F.1099 FREEDOM AWAITS
 
 
A MEETING PLACE  - THERE ARE HUNDREDS  OF ALTERNATIVE WEBSITES ON OUR wEBSITE- SINCE 2003CLICK HERE
realzionistnews. TruetorahJews CONSPIRACYPLANET

.COM/
Fagan-Sounded-Alarm-of -the ILLUMINATI-in-1967  DAVID ICKE BRITISH CONSTITUTION GROUP

 

 YOU CAN HANDLE THE TRUTH
BENJAMIN FULFORD.NET

 

 THE WORLD OF TRUTH NEWWORLDORDER

INFO.COM

 

 SITSSHOW.BLOGSPOT.COM
(Jeff )RENCE.COM  TRUTHCONTROL.COM/  

WHATDOESIT MEAN.COM

 

 

 HUMANS ARE FREE

CLIMATE CHANGE A HOAX-TRUMP KNOWS IT-NOW YOU KNOW IT!

The Rothschilds.
 
LANDDESTROYER.

BLOGSPOT

.COM

 HENRY MAKOW  CORBETTREPORT) LIFE IN THE MIX 2

 
UK COLUMN.ORG. JEW WATCH

ACTIVISTPOST.

COM

TARPLEY.NET

 
 
[ A MATTER OF FACT!]

On October 11-2017 15 months after the PEOPLE had voted to LEAVE the EU  the Daily Mail in its COMMENT column stated the FOLLOWING:

'YES, the Mail would have preferred a quicker and cleaner BREXIT but how foolish of Eurosceptic MPs to kick up a fuss about the planned TWO-YEAR TRANSITION PERIOD. After 45 years of subjection to EUROPEAN JUDGES, another couple will be a mere blink in HISTORY'S EYE. The great thing is that BREXIT is GOING AHEAD and barring REMOANER'S TREACHERY, SEPARATION WILL BE COMPLETE BEFORE THE NEXT ELECTION.'

STATEMENT!

[We and no doubt the majority who voted to LEAVE the EU, knowing the following true facts will no doubt NOT AGREE! with that COMMENT.

 What is FORGOTTEN is the MANNER in which the PEOPLE were DECEIVED by the TORY GOVERNMENT in 1972 and the LEGAL consequences of THEIR ILLEGAL ACTIONS as clearly indicated in numerous BULLETINS on our EDP website over the past 12 years. To call our DEPARTURE from the EU  a DIVORCE is a PERVERSION of the FACTS!  - A MARRIAGE if we are to call it THAT is INVALID if its DOCUMENTATION is  FALSE or obtained by BRIBERY and /or FRAUD.

  NO-MARRIAGE-NO CONTRACT-NO COMPENSATION

FOR THE EU TO EXPECT A GOLDEN HANDSHAKE UNDER SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES IS TO REWARD THEM FOR THE WICKED; ATROCIOUS; DREADFUL; INFAMOUS; OUTRAGEOUS; PERVERSE; SINISTER; VILLAINOUS; EVIL; CONDUCT OF MANY POLITICIANS WITHIN THE EU, SOME AS MENTIONED BELOW.

*

 

Below we have shown details of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and other relevant information which will clearly show that the UK could EXIT THE EU in MONTHS NOT YEARS. Obviously, there has been a COVER-UP of MAJOR PROPORTIONS by the POLITICAL CLASS in GENERAL because how can one explain the SILENCE! even FROM our FREE PRESS the FOURTH ESTATE in the land which we look too to PROTECT OUR  over a thousand year ENGLISH  RIGHTS  and LIBERTIES . Possibly the reason could be that there would be a REVOLUTION if the PEOPLE knew the TRUE FACTS?

 Added OCTOBER 11-2017

IN JULY 2016 AFTER THE SUCCESSFUL BREXIT VOTE WE ARE TOLD BY OUR NEW PRIME MINISTER MRS MAY THAT IT COULD BE YEARS BEFORE WE ARE FREE OF THE CORRUPT-_COLLECTIVIST- UNDEMOCRATIC EU WHICH DEVOURS MILLIONS OF OUR NEEDED POUNDS EVERY DAY OF THE YEAR. 

OUR MESSAGE TO FRAU MERKEL AND HER ROBBER BAND

IS

'GO TO HELL'

BUT

MRS MAY APPEARS TO HAVE A DIFFERENT MESSAGE EVEN THOUGH HER OWN WORDS WERE

"BREXIT MEANS BREXIT.

The following article was put on our website in October,2005 shortly after we received this most revealing information from

CHRISTOPHER STORY

 WHO GAVE HIS LIFE

FOR

TRUTH AND PATRIOTISM

 

FROM

INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW-

SEPTEMBER-2005

*

 

EUROPEAN PAYROLA SYSTEM

 

THE BUDGET FOR THE EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION WAS $5.0 BILLION

 

An account held by Credit Suisse in Zurich, labelled the ‘SBC’ Charcol Account, held a total of some $470 billion when last reviewed by sources.  These funds were originally derived from Nazi funds and assets, are routinely used to pay top politicians and officials to sign successive European Collective treaties- the latest being the so-called ‘European Constitution’.

The budget set aside from the ‘SBC’Charcol Account and to be distributed from the Credit Suisse disbursement account for the latest ‘update’ of the ‘rolling  European Collective Treaty’ was $5.0billion- $2.5 billion being payable in Euros to the participants from the 25 EU countries.

On the finalisation of the Intergovernmental Conference (IGC), which framed the text of the Treaty, and a further $2.5 billion payable in Euros on ratification.  This tranche is currently the subject of much dissension.

For each national cadre of key negotiator, therefore, the total set aside  was $100 million per tranche.  The chief negotiators of each EU country, plus selected officials were each to be paid from the national pot of $ 100 million, whish equates to roughly $75 million per corrupted European Union country.

Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian Prime Minister, was allegedly initially offered $50 million.  being an extremely wealthy man, he departed for the weekend in question in July 2004, following conclusion of the IGC, having indicated to those concerned that he was insulted by such a figure, and that $100million would be nearer the mark.  In the event, following an allowance for his wife, he was allegedly paid $75 million, according to sources.

Tony Blair allegedly received $75 million, which was paid into an offshore bank account held in Belize, the former British Honduras.  There, official eyebrows were naturally raised at the Central bank of Belize, where we notice that all of a sudden, the official reserves of foreign exchange jumped from $49.72 million in February 2005, to $164.53 million in March [2005]

Since the corrupt payment ‘due’ at the completion of the IGC will have been remitted in or about July 2004, this may suggest that the funds have subsequently (in March 2005) been taken into the foreign exchange reserves of the local central bank, so that their actual ownership can be disguised, a ‘new form’ of money-laundering: through a central bank!

 

WE ARE RELIABLY ADVISED THAT THIS CORRUPT PAYOLA SYSTEM IS THE NORM.

 

This means that the European Union’s Treaties

 are null and void,

as they have been obtained by fraud. 

 

That applies to the original EU Accession Treaty signed on behalf of the UK Government by [Nazi] agents Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon, agents of German intelligence, who were both recruited at Balliol College Oxford as discussed in this analysis.

 

It applies also to the Maastricht Treaty, signed by

 

John Major

 

Who allegedly received at least one corrupt payment for his services.  And it applies to the latest fiasco of the EU Collective.

 

THESE CORRUPT PAYOLA PAYMENTS

ARE ‘NON-REFUNDABLE’.

 

The second tranches of  $100 Million per country for the [New European Constitution] new treaty are payable on ratification, but following their referenda, the Netherlands and France cannot ratify.

 

*          *

International Currency Review

 

(Vol 30- No 4)

*

 

 

www.worldreports.org

 

*          *          *

 

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used –comments

in brackets]

 

OCT/05

 

THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION

Under the 1969 Vienna Convention on the

Law of Treaties

there are two key provisions which authorize a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice:

WHERE corruption has been demonstrated in respect of procuring the

TREATY

in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation.

AS the next section will show, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

2. Where there has been a material change of circumstances.

 

A material change of circumstances has surfaced into daylight, to begin with, following the death of Sir Edward Heath. It has been revealed that he was an agent for a foreign power, accepted corrupt payments for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them - and that he did all this on behalf of a

FOREIGN POWER.

which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation

As even more disturbing material change of circumstances has arisen as a consequence of the bombing of the London Underground and a bus , which took place on 7th July 2005, and the attempted explosions perpetuated two weeks later. We understand that the situation is so serious that the Civil Contingencies Secretariat has been in the process of drafting, or has drafted, legislation providing for the British Government to abrogate its putative international treaty [sic] 'obligations' towards the European Union.

ARE YOU STILL THERE MR HAGUE?

This development reflects the knowledge in certain UK intelligence circles that the attacks amounted to an

ACT of WAR

against the United Kingdom, and that the foreign powers behind this activity are ultimately controlled by the DVD from Dachau -( the same area of the World War II notorious concentration camp) which is the successor organization to the Abwehr, Nazi Germany's main external intelligence administration.

It was the Abwehr that first established , as a means of undermining British influence in the Middle East, the Muslim Brotherhood, from which ALL subsequent Islamic terror groups, without exception, originate. Al Qaeda, a descendant ultimately of the German-founded

Muslim Brotherhood,

is a controlled cut-out operation of international intelligence.

The Nazi regime and its Stalinist dialectical counterpart, were both Black Illuminati regimes. The Al Qaeda operation is an extension of the Black tradition, and is ultimately controlled, like the IRA (until very recently) by the DVD out of Dachau.

near Munich

For confirmation of the above and further information consult our bulletin board or contact

E-mail: cstory@ worldreports.org

Website:

www.worldreports.org

*

The European Union Collective: Enemy of Its Member States

OCTOBER-2005

 
 

 LIFE AND TIMES

OF

Christopher Story

 PATRIOT AND TRUTHSEEKER

2010

 

H.F.1335/1-BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED EU

 
 
MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18
NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 
 

 

THANK YOU FOR CALLING!

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

CLICK HERE FOR PREVIOUS FRONT PAGE-2012

NOVEMBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2018