- (1994 -Official Website - OCTOBER-NEW-HOME-2018 )-- 

OCTOBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2018              O CTOBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2018

OCTOBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2018          OCTOBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2018

OCTOBER-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 5-2018          OCTOBER-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 6-2018

  ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY. ORG.UK.

 

 

BROUGHT FORWARD FROM 2003

OUR LOYALTY TO OUR INSTITUTIONS AND COUNTRY?

 

Over the forthcoming months the People of this Island and those of our kin in lands beyond these shores will be asked to sign a Petition to the Queen. This historic action by a number of concerned citizens about the future (if any) of our Country who have courageously decided to fight to protect what is left at present and to reclaim back on the success of their action, our True Constitution.

 

Whatever one’s political leanings (if any) or our views of the Monarchy – there is one Virtue I’m sure most people would agree and that is what we owe to our Country and Institutions for which many millions of our people here and overseas have given their lives, particularly during the last hundred years and whom we all remember especially at this time of the year.

 

One’s Allegiance is in the words of a great ecclesiastical constitutional historian of the 19th centuryis a legal duty to the King, the State, or the Nation, whether it is embodied in an Oath or not’.

 

Because of an apparent blind spot (to put it mildly) in the thinking of many politicians over the last 40 years – the above expression of Loyalty- to King, the State, and Country has been misinterpreted or for those who should have known better another word comes to mind and that is Traitor.  The law of High Treason covers a number of points but the intent ‘to compass the kings death, or disinherit him of his Realm’ are the most heinous. The courses of events over the past seven years have reached a point today were we could no longer ignore the dangers to our Constitution of the possible implementation of the New European Constitution.

 Returning to the words of the same Bishop Stubbs of yester- year. Who emphasized that?-

 

‘Loyalty is a virtuous habit or sentiment of a very composite character; a habit of strong and faithful attachment to a person, not so much by reason of his personal character as of his official position.’

 

‘There is a love which the good son feels for the most brutal or indifferent father; National loyalty has an analogous feeling for a bad or indifferent king; it is not the same feeling, but somewhat parallel. Such loyalty gives far more than it receives the root of the good is in the Loyal People not in the Sovereign, who may or may not deserve it; there is a feeling too of proprietorship; ‘he is a great hero but he is our King.’

Some historical training must have prepared a Nation to conceive such an idea.

 

The name King cannot have been synonymous with oppression; Loyalty itself, in its very name, recalls the notion of Trust in Law and Observance of Law; and the race and Nation

 which calls it forth, as well as the Nation that feels it, must have been on the whole a Law -abiding race and Nation.

It gathers into itself all that is admirable and loveable in the character of the ruler, and the virtues of a good king unquestionably contribute to strengthen the habit of loyalty to all kings.

 

A continental observer of the Peasants’ Revolt  of 1381 commentated on the condition of the downtrodden English labourers ,artisans, rural clergy, confirmed that this was not against their King, but his advisers who introduced the Poll Tax at such a difficult time after the plague and the People wishing to obtain a higher standard of living. It was further said that’ England was full of inflammable material at the mercy of a spark’ which the introduction of Poll Tax finally ignited. Might the millions of our citizens to the prospect of our integration into a New European Constitution light a fuse under Parliament, which will only be defused by honest and open debate, and the introduction of safeguards for our Constitution?

 

A Chancellor of England in the 15th century expressed his feelings when he said ‘ that the true safety of the Realm is to have the entire and cordial Love of the People, and to guard for them their Laws and Rights’.

 

Hence the need for the Petition to the Queen by the Defenders of the Realm’ who will look to the help of the majority of the People, and in the words of our greatest naval Commander Horatio Nelson who gave his life for his Country at the battle of Trafalgar on 21stOctober, 1805;

against the combined fleets of France and Spain.

 

‘England expects every man to do his Duty’

 

( For Details of how to help Petition Contact No. Tel. O207 793 4049 Fax. 0207 463 2008 )  

 

  6/10/03

 

BROUGHT FORWARD FROM 2003

H.F.1698

*

No 10 will be relieved it has an early opportunity to cultivate relations given that May’s leadership rival Boris Johnson is now signed up to the Daily Telegraph, where his last column on fully veiled Muslim women was so controversial that it dominated the political conversation for a week. While it was criticised by high-profile party liberals, it was popular with many members, already unhappy with May’s Chequers Brexit compromise.

Part of Greig’s initial thinking is that, by next March, when Britain is due to leave the European Union, some of the heat will have come out of the leave/remain debate – or at least it will become less binary and more complex, a discussion about where the country should head next.

But it is also influenced by a desire not to give Dacre any satisfaction that his approach accurately reflected the mood of a large section of the nation. The tabloid campaigned relentlessly for leave during the referendum, characterising the opposing campaign as “Project Fear” and attacking anybody it perceived as frustrating Brexit, branding three high court judges “enemies of the people” after they ruled that parliament had to vote to trigger article 50.

A week after Dacre’s departure was announced, he fired a warning shot to Greig in the Spectator, writing: “Support for Brexit is in the DNA of both the Daily Mail and, more pertinently, its readers. Any move to reverse this would be editorial and commercial suicide.”

The tabloid sold 1.26 million copies a day in June and while sales in recent years have fallen in line with all printed newspapers, it remains Britain’s second-bestselling title after the Sun and is arguably its most politically influential. Greig knows that Dacre, who will be based on the sixth floor, where Rothermere has his office, will be studying the sales figures closely.

Greig has assembled a small group of loyalists to help him to assert his grip on a paper where almost everybody owes their career to Dacre. Gerard Greaves and Tobyn Andreae, who have previously worked on the Mail on Sunday, will be his deputies, while the City editor, Ruth Sunderland, is also being brought over.

The most significant appointment, however, is that of the Mail on Sunday’s political editor, Simon Walters, as assistant editor. He moves after 19 years in Westminster to the paper’s Derry Street headquarters, where he will become Greig’s chief political commentator and adviser. Walters, a seasoned story chaser who is well known across all wings of the Tory party, is not regarded as an ideologue in the Brexit debate. But he has long been carefully attuned to Greig’s thinking and will be used by the new editor to help assert the emerging editorial line.

Greig’s editorship ended on a melancholy note, however. He rushed off early as he finished his final edition of the Mail on Sunday to be at the bedside of his friend, writer VS Naipaul, who died shortly after he visited him yesterday.
 

*

[THE ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY. ORG UK  IS INDEBTED TO MR DACRE AND THE DAILY MAIL WITHOUT WHICH THE EDP WOULD HAVE FOUND ITS TASK TO SEE THE RETURN OF ENGLAND AS AN INDEPENDENT NATION STATE EVEN MORE TOILSOME THAN IT HAS BEEN OVER THE PAST 15 YEARS.  WE THANK HIM FOR HIS HISTORIC DECISION TO SUPPORT THE BREXIT CAUSE AT SUCH A CRUCIAL MOMENT IN THE HISTORY OF OUR COUNTRY.

 WE WISH HIM EVERY SUCCESS IN HIS NEW ROLE.]

*  *  *

THE   ENGLISH CONSTITUTION HAS MANY ADHERENTS COVERING MUCH OF THE WORLD AND THE DECISION BY TRAITORS WITHIN IN 1973 MUST HAVE BEEN RECEIVED WITH DISBELIEF KNOWING THE UNIQUENESS OF THAT SACRED INHERITANCE PASSED BY ITS FOREBEARS TO THE PRESENT GENERATION IN KEEPING FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS TO COME.  WE CAN UNDERSTAND OUR COUNTRY BEING WITHIN AN ASSOCIATION OF FREE FRIENDLY STATES

BUT

BEING A CAPTIVE STATE WITHIN A FOREIGN CONSTITUTION DEVISED BY THE LEADER OF NAZI GERMANY ADOLF HITLER IS NOT ACCEPTABLE BY ANY TRUE ENGLISHMAN.

WE FIND IT MYSTERIOUS THAT ANY INDIVIDUAL COULD GIVE UP THEIR COUNTRY IN SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES. AFTER ALL, AS WE NOW OBSERVE IN MANY OF THE CAPTIVE ONCE FREE NATION STATES IN EUROPE THE EMERGENCE OF A CRY FOR LIBERTY WHICH MANY NATIONS HAD RECEIVED ASSISTANCE AT OUR HANDS OVER THE PAST 300 YEARS.

More!

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

H.F.1688

*

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links-

ENGLAND FILE

 'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

IMMIGRATION-BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE-  EU FILE   IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID FILE

*  *  *

Weekly Geo-Political News and Analysis

by Benjamin Fulford

 

Saudi-Israeli “axis of evil” being taken down by international alliance

The battle raging at the highest levels of world power is reaching a climax of sorts, with an ongoing operation to take down the governments of Israel and Saudi Arabia and end their control of the petrodollar system, multiple sources agree.  The so-called murder of Nazi Muslim Brotherhood agent and Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi at the Saudi Arabian consulate in Turkey was staged to provide cover for this ongoing operation, the sources add.

“This is all about the financial survival of certain countries (Israel, Saudi Arabia, and the bankrupt U.S. Corporation),” a CIA source explained.

The overall story as told by CIA, Mossad, Japanese intelligence, and Pentagon sources is as follows:  Saudi Crown Prince and de facto head of state Mohammad bin Salman (MBS) was shot and killed in April and replaced with a body double.  The people controlling the body double then had their funds frozen in retaliation, with the Khashoggi incident as cover.  Now, the satanic Khazarian governments of Israel and Saudi Arabia are fighting for their lives.

So the real reason all the big corporations and government ministers cancelled their planned visits to this week’s “Saudi Arabian Davos” investment forum is because the flow of money they were hoping would be poured in their direction has been cut off.

“The global boycott of Saudi Arabia escalates, as Goldman Sachs is forced to stop sending Dina Powell and Germany’s Deutsche Bank, and Japanese banks MUFG and Mizuho join the party,” was how Pentagon sources described the situation.

“This appears to be a plan to end the petrodollar, the Israeli-Saudi axis of evil, and the fountainhead of terrorism, as many things converge to collapse the old financial system so the new Quantum Financial System and Global Currency Reset can be launched,” the sources add.

Confirmation of this can be found in reports that U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin cancelled his planned visit to the Saudi investment forum and will now instead visit Saudi Arabia to attend a “terrorist financing” meeting.

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/21/us/politics/steven-mnuchin-saudi-arabia-khashoggi.html

CIA sources also say “Khazarian war criminal Netanyahu is about to take the fall for something big that he is involved with.  The U.S. is pulling the plug.  Too much pressure is being put on Trump and others very close to him.”  We assume this will be Netanyahu’s involvement with the 9/11 and Fukushima mass murder terror attacks.

We will get back to the Saudi Arabian troubles later in this report, but first we need to explain why the situation in Japan, North Korea, and China is the ultimate reason for the chaos in the Middle East.  Members of the cabinet of Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and Manchu royals both contacted the White Dragon Society (WDS) last week to explain what was really going on.  In essence, the Bank of International Settlements (BIS), the central bank for central banks, was given strong warnings to cut off the Zionist/Satanic Rothschild family “or else,” the sources say.

As a result, the control of the existing global financial system has changed hands.  The Manchu royals say the Rothschilds never controlled more than 8% of the world’s gold.  Now the Asian secret societies and the U.S. military-industrial complex have agreed to …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Is Putin dead?

Hi Benjamin,
Re:
https://operationdisclosure.blogspot.com/2018/10/benjamin-fulford-report-fall-of-zionist.html

Putin is already dead.  They have taken one of his two cousins and did surgery.  Kent Dünn, Drake Bailey in Quantum Shift.  Not the actual, but the one before.

It is clearly to be seen that the actual Putin is not the real Putin.  Glasses 😉

Furthermore, there’s a YouTube Video pretending that the actual Putin is Michael Helfiger, supported by Zionists from UBS, Nestle, and others from Switzerland.  There’s a YouTube Video of Putin as Satan 2.  When I find it I will send you the link.

Please find out yourself if true.

Kind regards,
S.

Are these people really dead?

On 2018/10/19, Robert David Steele wrote:

I have gotten several messages like this:

WARNING:  While RDS reports (being quoted widely) of “received information” that both the King of SA and MBS are dead and represented by impostors, the giver of said information, Benjamin Fulford, is notorious for reporting people dead who are still walking around, as with HRC, G. Soros, and John Kerry, who Fulford has said was represented by an impostor when urging Iran to stay in a nuclear deal that 45 invalidated.  Upon Kerry’s notorious reappearances after being “really dead,” Fulford tried to CYA in saying that after being hidden in Antarctica, he looks “10-20 years younger” and thus “renewed.”

The warning is that you should do an update of either outing Fulford as the source of a dead king and prince (as Fulford’s “imposters” news is public) with some language distancing yourself and your reputation from such wild and publicly incredulous fates of SA rulers.  While it’s not too damaging for the faithful to think of multiple possibilities in light of the blackout of truth in J. Khashoggi’s disappearance, imagine what a hit your brand’s reputation will take when these two are walking and meeting with world leaders and officials.


Benjamin Fulford replies:

First of all, for a long time Khazarian agents have been using a tactic against people like me and my murdered colleague Christopher Story.  It involves informing us that people are dead, only to have them appear after we report it.  For example, Christopher Story and I were both repeatedly told that Henry Kissinger was dead or arrested, only to have him appear at a major public event shortly after we reported on this.

For that reason, when I report that a senior CIA source told me John Kerry was dead, I am reporting what the source says.  I was told John Kerry was dead by such a source and after I was informed of that, he vanished from public view for about a year.  The John Kerry we are recently seeing on TV looks a lot younger than the John Kerry we saw in the run-up to the 2016 presidential election.  However, it may well be I was told a lie by the CIA source, since these people specialize in deceit.

It is well known that body doubles are a common tactic used at the highest levels of power since time immemorial.  It is also well known now that the technology exists to make realistic videos of people using computer graphics.

For all the above reasons, it is a tricky business to report people as dead.

In the case of Mohammad bin Salman (MBS), what we know is as follows:  There was a shooting incident reported at his palace in April.  Shortly afterward, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo went to visit him.  The dinner meeting with MBS was delayed and no photograph of the two meeting was issued, even though it is normal protocol for such a picture to be issued or taken by the press.

Since then, MBS vanished from public view for a long time.  Recently a man claimed to be MBS has been appearing, but he definitely looks different.  My best guess is that a body double was created and we had to wait for the plastic surgery to heal before he could be trotted out in public.

Finally, last week a senior Japanese intelligence official told me he personally called MBS’s lawyer, a man always seen with him.  The lawyer told him MBS was shot twice in the head in April and was dead.

Since the death or life of MBS involves the control over trillions of petrodollars, creating the appearance that he is still alive is clearly very important for the petrodollar people.

Time will tell the truth, as it always does.

The fall of the Zionist house of Saud plus possible coup attempt in Russia

World events are quickly coming to a head, with a major move against the house of Saud and a possible coup attempt this weekend against Russian President Vladimir Putin, say Pentagon, CIA, and FSB sources.

First, the murder (or psy-ops staged murder) of Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi is part of a move to remove the Zionist/Satanic house of Saud from control of Saudi Arabia and Middle Eastern oil, according to Pentagon and CIA sources.  The operation is also aimed at grabbing funds to keep the bankrupt U.S. afloat, CIA sources say.

This is how the CIA summed up the situation:

“The U.S. Treasury is holding between $3-5 TRILLION of Saudi Arabia’s petrodollars, which have been accumulating since the 70’s when this whole petrodollar sleight of hand began (around the same time that Nixon closed the gold window).  These trillions have been confiscated and will not be returned.  The same for the thousands of tons of gold stored in Credit Suisse and UBS banks in Switzerland, which was owned by Saudi Arabia (the House of Saud).  It has been confiscated as well.  It is game over financially for the Zionist Khazarian House of Saud.  This really is Game-Set-Match.”

It is also no coincidence the Khashoggi incident happened just as the head of the CIA in Turkey, “Pastor” Andrew Brunson, was released from Turkish prison.  The longer-term scenario will be for Turkey to resume control of its former holdings in Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States, while Israel becomes a Jewish autonomous zone under Turkish protection, the sources say.

As a preliminary step, “Saudi clown prince Mohammad bin Salman (MBS) may be purged, as Saudi Arabia is facing Western sanctions and boycotts in a dry run for an attack on Israel when 9/11 documents are declassified,” Pentagon sources add.

We will discuss this further below, but as this newsletter was about to be published we got urgent communications from FSB sources about an attempted coup this weekend against Russian President Vladimir Putin.  According to the sources, a big move against the autonomous Donbass region of the Ukraine by “Rothschild forces” led to a “huge dispute inside the Russian general staff with Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu …

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

Interview with Red Dragon Ambassador & White Dragon Benjamin Fulford

On the GoldFish Report No. 281, Louisa and Co-host Steve interview the spokesperson for the Red Dragon Family, The Ambassador, and the White Dragon Society spokesperson Benjamin Fulford for a discussion about the present economy, financial system, geopolitics, and what some of the obstacles have been to fulfilling the 555 Mission for Humanity that the Ambassador introduced over four years ago.

Benjamin explains a new system is possible and one that can operate parallel to the Belt and Road Initiative.  The Ambassador discusses the remit and surrender progress of the Old Guard and how it has been underway to make way for global economic prosperity and egalitarianism.

Benjamin agrees that the draining of the D.C swamp is where change has to happen first to trickle to other regions in the world.  This interview is packed with wisdom and perspective from behind-the-scenes, insider perspectives who want a better world for all people.  It gives you an insight as to how the real decision-makers of the world think and where they may need to rethink playing God.

 

H.F.1678

 

 

 

 

*  *  *

 

News for DAILY MAIL-RETALIATE? NOT WHILE WE'RE ADDICTED TO THEIR BILLIONS -COMMENTARY by John R Bradley

From an author who spent years in Saudi working with murdered writer Jamal Khashoggi.

 

On a typically sunny Friday morning in Jeddah, I found myself driving past the city's biggest mosque, the vast  car park of which doubled as the city's 'chop-chop square' where executions were a frequent occurrence.

Friday prayers had just ended, and the crowd gathering outside was surrounded by police cars with lights flashing. It could mean only one thing, I joined the throng just in time to see two Bangladeshi men -blindfolded and with hands tied behind their backs-being forced to kneel on the ground. Amid cries of Allahu akbar-'God is greatest'-they were decapitated by a burly executioner wielding a huge sword, who held their heads aloft. Welcome, I said to myself with a shudder of horror, to Saudi Arabia.

Just a couple of of hours later, I was sitting in a Starbucks cafe inside a glitzy mall surrounded  by families strolling with their children, mostly dressed in Western clothes and eating ice cream. It struck me that it could have been Knightsbridge in London.

[Well! in a generation or so this scene could indeed happen in London-Birmingham... At present with a crime-rate at an all time high a sterner  imprisonment punishment regime would no doubt be welcomed and which only additional prisons will oblige.]

In a single day I witnessed the deep contradictions that lie at the heart of Saudi society: a country with ultra-modern infrastructure and astonishing wealth created by vast oil reserves, but whose people are repressed by a justice system that is almost incomprehensibly medieval.

For all of the Western trappings, the absolute monarchy that rules there will brook no opposition. As I discovered during three years working on a newspaper in Jeddah, all local papers and TV stations are government controlled.

Meanwhile, the adamantine rule of the courts means Saudis are unlikely to be mugged as they carry bagfuls of designer shopping back to their cars. Indeed, you probably won't even see a uniformed police officer. But  small wonder given the severity of the punishments, even for petty crimes.

In 2015, a British grandfather faced 350 lashes for possessing bottles of home-made alcohol, a sentence which was suspended only after an outcry in the British Press. Others were not so fortunate. A blogger was sentenced to 1,000 lashes for insulting Islam. A Saudi airline employee was jailed for five years and sentenced to 1,000 lashes because he discussed his sex life on TV

 God help those who refuse to toe the line politically: the secret police will swoop on you in an instant. There are at least 30,000 political prisoners in Saudi prisons, where the conditions are appalling, and torture chambers abound.

As for executions, sometime those who are beheaded are also crucified. Even stoning and eye-gouging aren't unheard of. It is literally Biblical. Which is why events of recent days in Istanbul should come as no surprise to those who have lived in this wrathful Arab Kingdom, whose royal house never hesitates to seek vengence against its enemies.

The killing of Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi has dragged Saudi Arabia and its leaders into a global furore that may have profound repercussions for the West's influence in the Middle East.

What is particularly troubling about the terrible story is that Saudi Arabia's powerful crown prince and de-facto leader Mohammed bin Salman, 333,personally stands accused of sending those 15 assassins to murder his most feared political opponent. They allegedly include a number of his bodyguards.

Khashoggi was targeted because he had moved to America, was the most prominent critic of bun Salman, and was about to launch a political party with the goal of overthrowing the Saudi monarchy.

Few had heard of him before he disappeared, but his name was all too familiar to me.

In the 2000s,I was a correspondent in Saudi Arabia for a number of Western media outlets, while working as the managing editor of the Jeddah-based daily Arab News. Khashoggi was the deputy editor, and we worked side by side in the office for the best part of three years.  Back then, I could never have imagined that one I would end up covering his atrocious slaying. At the same time the news from Instanbul was not entirely surprising.

Let's face it , we have been sickeningly aware for as long  as we can remember that Saudi Arabia is capable of the worst kinds of crimes against humanity. Even Saudi royalty deemed beyond the pale by the upper echelons have  found themselves drugged while living abroad, then whisked back to the kingdom in a private jet-sometimes never to be heard from again.

This kind of reckless behaviour happens so frequently because the ruling family are convinced their vast oil wealth means they can do whatever they damn well please.

Until now, that has invariably been the outcome. Even back in the mid-80s Margaret Thatcher personally lobbied the Saudi royal family, flattering them to secure major arms deals for Britain.. Ever since, the West has been caught in this Gordian knot of having to turn a blind eye to terrible human rights abuses in the name of

PROFIT and JOBS

Only last year, Donald Trump signed  $110billion in proposed deals with the Saudis, while the UK issued126 licences relating to military goods the value of

£1.129billion

There is also Saudi Arabia's key role in supporting US foreign policy objectives in the region, which are centred on containing Iran. Saudi Arabia has formed an unofficial alliance with Israel with that aim, since both the Sunni Muslim kingdom and the Jewish state share a fear of the expansioonism and nuclear ambitions of Iran, which follows the rival Shia Muslim faith. Washington worries that a weakened Saudi Arabia will embolden Iran.

This is also why the West has been so reluctant to criticise the Saudi-led war in neighbouring Yemen, where a Saudi bombardment has destroyed the country, leaving 10,000 civilians dead and 15 million facing what the UN says could be the worst  famine the world has known in 100 years.

This is the backdrop to the diplomatic crisis which has enveloped Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman who, let us remember, had tea  with the Queen during a state visit in March 2018 when the Government rolled out the red carpet for him.

it's true he has initiated social reforms in the desert kingdom which are welcome, if long overdue. He has sought to curtail the religious police, allowed women to drive, given permission for cinemas and other entertainment venues to open and relaxed rules restricting how men and women can socialise in public. All of that, though, has come at a massive cost, and it is one which Khashoggi's murder has finally brought to the world's attention.

In recent months Saudi Arabia has entered a downward spiral and is now more tyrannical than ever. In fact, it is no exaggeration to say that bin Salman  has emerged as the most paranoid, ruthless and brutal Arab leader since Saddam Hussein.

Apart from arbitrarily imprisoning and allegedly torturing leading  princes and businessmen during a corruption crackdown, he had detained the families of overseas activists to pressure them into silence.

He has overseen the cruel destruction of entire Shia Muslim villages in response to mostly peaceful protests.

The question now is whether, in the wake of the Khashoggi affair, the West has finally had enough, if not of bin Salman, then of his excesses.  Mr Trump says  he is 'not satisfied' with Saudi Arabia's account of Khashoggi's death - that he died after a fist fight-and has repeated his threat of imposing some sort of sanctions against the kingdom.

 But the danger is that in the end, all this posturing may amount to very little in terms of concrete measures.

Those decades of arms deals have tied the UK and the US to Saudi in a way that is impossible to untangle, and they have skilfully positioned themselves as a bulwark against America's enemies.

HIS TASK of dragging Saudi Arabia into the 21st century is Herculean, and he is still the kingdom's best bet in the coming years. Even so, we should put him on notice: our patience is not limitless. The hope must be that he will think twice before pulling a similar stunt in the future.

That is if he has a future. On Thursday, the French daily paper Le Figaro published a  bombshell story which reports the Saudi royal family is actively considering a replacement-his less ambitious and more predictable brother , Prince Khalid bin Salman.

Whatever unfolds in the corridors of power in Riyadh, our own politicians, too, deserve a warning about their closeness to the Saudi regime. As this paper reported on Friday Saudi Arabia has tripled  spending on British MPs this year to £100,000 in the form of junkets, gifts and other benefits.

With so many on the gravy train, it's hardly surprising that when an outrage like Instanbul occurs, there seems so little will to bring anyone to account in this baleful desert kingdom .

*  *  *

[What appears to be forgotten is that not only are the Saudis buying arms from us but they are also guiding the growing number of mosques in our country in their own brand of Islamisation. AS our great war leader stated-

["They are getting stronger -We are getting weaker"]

At a time when our country is in peril from an audacious fearless enemy within  moderate Muslim clerics such as Dr Taj. HARGEY of OXFORD have for years been asking the Government of the day to take tougher action against their hard-line colleagues - which has not been forthcoming-now we know WHY!]

 

 IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS

MAMMON RULES-ENGLAND IS ITS SPOILS.]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

OCTOBER 22,2018

 

H.F.1735

*  *  *

 

LITTLEJOHN

 

    News for daily mail richard littlejohn

     

     

    RICHARD LITTLEJOHN:

    Come on Theresa, its time for the Reverse Ferret!

     

     

    THE latest scare story surrounding the prospect of a NO-

     

    DEAL BREXIT is the collapse of the pet passport scheme.

     

    According to papers drawn up by the Government, owners may have to plan

    three months ahead if they intend to take their pets abroad.

    Given that Britain is a nation of animal lovers, ministers fear that this will

    alarm the public and could swing sentiment in favour of staying in the EU.

    As the rules now stand, it is relatively easy to obtain a pet passport for travel

    within Europe. Provided the animal has been vaccinated and either micro-

    chipped or tattooed, one  can be issued at fairly short notice.  But if a deal is

    not reached, owners could face a mountain of extra bureaucracy.

    The particular aspect of this story which caught my eye is that passports are

    currently only available for dogs, cats and ferrets.

    Eh?

    Just run that by me again. Doggies and moggies I can understand.

     

    But ferrets?

     

    Who takes a ferret on holiday with them? and where do

    they talk them - Cape Ferret, on the French Riviera?

     

    I have visions of ferrets in fashionable Vilebrequin swimwear, sinking Pina

    Coladas down by the swimming pool - like those meerkats in the television

    adverts.

    Whoever heard of anyone microchipping a ferret?

    Perhaps they get them tattooed instead, so that your average ferret now

    resembles a typical Premier League footballer.

    To be honest, I had absolutely no idea that people kept ferrets as domestic

    pets, although I am familiar with an ancient sport of 'ferret legging' which

    remains popular in the North of England-especially in those constituencies

    where support for Brexit was stronger...

    The 'ferret down the trousers' treatment could be meted out for a variety of

    reasons, from advancing an unpopular policy to indulging in a little extra-

    curricular rumpy-pumpy.

    Occasionally, following a shift in public opinion - or, more likely a phone call

    from the Sun's proprietor-it was necessary to perform a 180-degree turn.

    In which event, Kelvin would issue the instructions: Reverse Ferret!

    No further explanation was necessary. The expression has since entered the

    language. Thus, any newspaper which has a sudden change in its editorial

    stance [Such as Brexit!] is said to have executed a

     

    REVERSE FERRET

     

    [Many Brexiteers would no doubt have a much harsher expression in mind.]

    The same goes for any organisation which turns a previous policy on its head.  In recent years, everyone from Call Me Dave to the Republican Party in America and the Church of England has been accused of resorting out of expediency to the old

    Reverse Ferret.

     

    It's the only sensible course of action when there is nowhere else to go. Mother Theresa would do well to NOTE.

    THERE IS A MORAL IN ALL THIS.

    Even she must finally realise that her stubborn 'my deal or no

    deal' is

    DEAD IN THE WATER

    following her humiliation in Salzburg.

    The EU won't swallow her Chequers car crash, nor will the country, nor will Parliament, nor will

    HER OWN CABINET.

     

    Instead of sticking a pair of ferrets down the front of her

     

    designer leather trousers

     

    and hoping for the best, she should face up to the reality

     

     and

     

    perform a swift handbrake turn,

     

    before the animal lovers of Britain rise up and bring

     

     

     

    Brexit

     

     

     

    crashing down to earth.

     

     

    As Albert Einstein said: 'doing the same thing over and over

     

     

    again and expecting different results is

     

     

    the  definition of INSANITY'

     

     

    She's already been badly bitten. It's

     

     

    time for a full

     

     

    Reverse Ferret.

     

    Daily Mail-FULL ARTICLE.

    SEPTEMBER 25,2018

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CHANGES OF FORM ARE OURS!]

     

    H.F.1706

 

*  *  *

 

News for DAILY MAIL- BBC WRONG ON MIGRANTS AND BREXIT says Robert Peston

Robert Peston: BBC 'patronising' and 'got it wrong on immigration'

THE BBC ignored how migration was affecting millions of viewers, Robert Peston has admitted.

ITV's political Editor who spent nine years at the corporation. accused the BBC of not being impartial and said it had neglected the effect' the EU was having on British families.

'I love the BBC but I did feel that during the Brexit campaign they slightly got confused about

 what impartial journalism meant,'

said Peston, who left the BBC in 2015.

'For too long, people like me had a particular view of the benefits of globalisation and we simply neglected the effect it was  having on millions of our citizens.'

He said that journalists including himself had

'PATRINISED' VEIWERS

by failing to listen to

THEIR WORRIES ABOUT MIGRATION.

When we have all that migration from eastern Europe, people like me focused too much on the economic benefits in terms of the rates we were growing, and not enough on the experience of communities who were changing rapidly as a result', he told the Cheltenham Literature Festival.

'In a way we were slightly patronising. People like me were basicly saying "don't you know this is making your country richer?"

In fact, it was also dislocating hundreds of thousands to millions of lives, and these people's lives had been radically  changed by immigration. It is not in my view, racist to be concerned if the composition of you community changes by something like  10 0or 15 per cent over a small number of years.

*  *  *

 

[It is good to hear from Mr Peston - it took courage even though rather late in the day admitting to grave mistakes made on encouraging migration but he must surely realise that the damage has been done and is irrevocable that many communities will never return to their original character and custom as the creed of another way of living will spread throughout the land. The loss is a catastrophe which will completely change much of ENGLAND to the appearance of a FOREIGN LAND in the coming years. The BBC and its blinded staff have a great deal to answer for their short-sighted and politically -correct agenda. As we have stated over the years they are as  a long propaganda contractor for the Brussels Broadcasting Corporation the 'useful idiots' of a foreign power .

THE MAKING OF LONDONISTAN

TONY BLAIR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND

QUIT BRITAIN IF YOU WANT SHARIA LAW SAYS TREVOR PHILLIPS.

IMMIGRATION FILE

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H.F.1725

*  *  *

 

DAILY MAIL

COMMENT

Tuesday, September 11,2018

THERE was a time when MPs of all parties embraced periodic changes to constituency boundaries as a fundamental part of the

DEMOCRATIC PROCESS

Set by the independent Boundary Commission , they ensure that constituencies remain roughly equal in size in the face of our ever-growing and shifting population.

Most importantly, they guarantee that everyone's vote carries the

SAME WEIGHT.

But in recent years, the process has become sodeeply politicised and the source of such bitterness thast there has been no boundary reform since 2000. Since then the populaytion has risen by

8 MILLION.

The last time a review came before Parliament, in 2011, Nick Clegg's Lib Dems conspired with Labour to defeat it, cynically reneging on a

COALITION PROMISE.

Now an updated review is coming back to

PARLIAMENT

And it's favourable to the Tories-giving them up to 29 more seats in a House of Commons reduced in size from 650 to 600 members.

OPPOSITION PARTIES

are in an uproar. Rather than accepting these changes as

FAIR and DEMOCRATIC

they are concerned only with narrow

PARTY INTERESTS.

Labour accuses the Government of gerrymandering-even though the Boundary Commission is totally

 NEUTRAL

And some Tory MPs who stand to lose their seats are threatening to vote with the

OPPOSITION

TO

SABOTAGE THE CHANGES

 

Theresa May is said to be ready to

 BUY OFF REBELS

WITH

PEERAGES

or the promise of a future seat.

BUT

How sad that they should need to be

BRIBED

to do what is so clearly the

RIGHT and HONOURABLE THING

-both for their

PARTY

and the

HEALTH OF OUR DEMOCRACY

Is it any wonder the public has become so profoundly disenchanted with politicians, when they are so shamelessly

SELF SERVING.

*  *  *

[Not a bit of it! after 46 years in

Hitler's EU

we are not at all surprised. Their sheer arrogance is true to form.  We advocated some years ago a ONE TERM parliamentary TERM to ensure that they remembered that the job is not for life. It will allow those who wish to truly SERVE THEIR COUNTRY an opportunity to do so . The the arrogance we are witnessing now will become a strident reminder how a once DEMOCRACY can turn into a DESPOTISM.

*

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CHANGES OF FORM ARE OURS!]

Tuesday, September 11,2018

 

 

H.F.1695

*  *  *

Weekly Geo-Political News and Analysis

by Benjamin Fulford

 

Desperate Khazarian mafia is plotting fake alien invasion as Trump assassination fails

The Khazarian mafia is planning a fake alien invasion after their most recent attempt to assassinate U.S. President Donald Trump failed, say Pentagon and CIA sources.  The assassination attempt came in the form of a missile that was shot at Air Force One by an Israeli submarine, Pentagon sources say.  “Life imitates art, as the hunt for red October may mean Israeli and cabal submarines are sunk.  The October surprise may be bloody,” the sources add.

It is now apparent that the Khazarian mafia pulled out all the stops to delay the Supreme Court confirmation of Brett Kavanaugh in order to buy time for their assassination attempt.  Instead, their move is backfiring big time, as the Senate prepares to take legal action against the people making false accusations against Kavanaugh—something you can confirm from the Senate Judiciary Committee’s own home page.
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/press/rep/releases/judiciary-committee-refers-potential-false-statements-for-criminal-investigation

Pentagon sources explain that “the FBI probe into Kavanaugh will not only clear his name, but will morph into an attack on his paid accusers, the Democrats, and the deep state.”  Furthermore, “Kavanaugh has 53 votes and may be confirmed on October 3, when Trump will send text alerts to all cellphones,” the sources add.

It is interesting in this context that the Swiss, French, and British branches of the Rothschild family have opened lines of communication with the White Dragon Society to inquire if it is not too late to surrender and accept South African-style truth and reconciliation hearings.  Clearly, the very real prospect of military tribunals and firing squads has made them realize it really is going to be game over unless they do something.

We also got the following communication from “the head of the CIA’s clandestine services in xxx [redacted to protect source] working out of the U.S. Embassy from xxx-xxx.

“It regards the Rothschilds.  My buddy is personal friends with Nathaniel de Rothschild, who lives a very quiet and discreet life in NYC.  (They went to Harvard Business School together back in the day).

“It concerns Antarctica, where …
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Benjamin Fulford Talks: Interview Sept. 27, 2018 with Prepare for Change

Check out Benjamin Fulford’s September 27, 2018 interview with PrepareforChange.net at the link below.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PphG9PU0qOMhttps://prepareforchange.net/2018/09/29/prepare-for-change-benjamin-fulford-kavanaugh-military-tribunals-sept-27-2018

Looks like an interesting bait and switch from the Republicans to the Democrats on the FBI investigation into Kavanaugh;  white hats trolling them hard.  He has all the votes he needs.

Khazarian mafia seeks Chinese protection as military tribunals loom

The satan-worshipping Khazarian mafia is in a frenzy of fear as military tribunals loom.  As a result, they are offering the world (as if it were theirs to give) to China in exchange for protection, according to Gnostic Illuminati and Asian secret society sources.  In addition to this, they are threatening to unleash pandemics, blow up the Yellowstone Caldera, set off a massive EMP attack, and cause other mayhem in a futile effort (as these attempts will be neutralized) to blackmail themselves out of the reach of long-delayed justice.  Also, they are carrying out a foolish and widely derided smear campaign to derail the appointment of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court.

Pentagon sources say they used “the threat of 9/11 declassification, which may soon happen, to force George Bush Jr. to publicly back Kavanaugh, whose confirmation would unleash military tribunals.”  Remember, Kavanaugh said during his confirmation hearings that the U.S. has been under martial law since shortly after 9/11 and as a result, military tribunals could try, and even sentence to death, civilians guilty of treason.

In addition to this, the sources say that “because of the interference in the 2016 U.S. election by the Jewish mafia, which supported Hillary Clinton, Trump may use FISA declassification leverage to force the UK and Australia to purge Zionists and Israeli dual-citizens from positions of influence.”

The rogue state of Israel, for its part, has been trying to seek Russian and Chinese protection as it loses control of the United States.  However, this is backfiring, big time.  Here is the U.S. military’s analysis of where these efforts are leading.

First, in reaction to the recent Israeli stunt to fool Syria into shooting down a Russian plane in yet another desperate attempt to start World War 3, “An angry [Russian President Vladimir] Putin and the Russian Orthodox Church may have declared holy war on the anti-goy Jewish faction, and may impose a no-fly zone on Israel until it returns the Golan to Syria, lifts the siege of Gaza, denuclearizes, and returns the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and all stolen lands to Palestine and Lebanon.”

Second, “With China in control of the Haifa Port and infrastructure projects in Israel, the BRICS nations may ban this rogue state from the quantum financial system, and [U.S. President Donald] Trump may just agree to a UN arms embargo and air-sea blockade.”

With all this and more going on, it is no surprise that the Swiss branch of the Rothschild family, the BIS, and the Elders of Zion sent a representative last week to Japan to negotiate surrender with the White Dragon Society (WDS).  The negotiator (whom we will call the BIS man) said the banking families were worried about …

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

A Deep Dive into the Petro

General Milan writes about financial technology and cryptocurrency for the Earth Alliance, a loose-knit global alliance working for the benefit of humanity.  The battle over the future of Planet Earth has in many ways always been a financial battle.  As time passes and technology advances, that financial battle is increasingly being fought out in the cryptocurrency arena.
Follow General Milan on Twitter: 
@generalmilan

In early December of 2017, just before cryptocurrency markets started to crater, President Nicolás Maduro of Venezuela announced the creation of the Petro cryptocurrency backed by Venezuela’s oil and gas reserves.  This was both an attempt to both circumvent the financial sanctions placed on the Maduro regime and a desperate effort to patch up the Venezuelan economy, the complete collapse of which was an entirely predictable outcome of Venezuela’s decades-long experiment with authoritarian socialism.

In this article we trace the development of the Petro from Maduro, to his Russian cryptocurrency consultants, to the Japanese/Malaysian blockchain technology upon which the Petro is based, all the way back to the Esalen Institute of California—the heart and center of socialist ideology.

Venezuela has quickly gone from being one of the richest countries in South America with the largest proven oil reserves in the world, to having a humanitarian refugee crisis on par with the war in Syria.  As in almost all cases of mass human suffering, very dark forces are behind it, and indeed the oil industry itself is obviously at the heart and center of many wars and global environmental problems.

The story of the Petro is far from over, however, and the real battle over the financial future of Planet Earth is probably still just beginning.  In this, the happenings in Venezuela have major geopolitical implications.

On August 5th, 2018 President Maduro was the target of of an apparent assassination attempt by drone, a bizarre false flag-ish event that was seemingly produced on a very modest budget.

Then, on September 8th, 2018 The New York Times ran an exposé describing how officials from the Trump administration had met with opposition forces in Venezuela to plan a potential coup against Maduro.  The article can be seen as both a critique of the Trump administration’s tactics and as a form of support for Maduro’s claim that he a “good guy” battling against imperial American forces.

We expect the geopolitical battle to continue in the weeks and months ahead, but for now our focus is on the Petro cryptocurrency.  In fact it remains to be seen whether or not the Petro is successful in any way.  On August 30th, 2018, Reuters ran a special investigative report entitled “In Venezuela, new cryptocurrency is nowhere to be found.”  The report describes the fact that the Petro is based on oil reserves located underneath a barren patch of land that would require an investment of at least $20 billion to retrieve, money that the bankrupt Venezuelan government does not have.

Thus, in many ways the Petro is nothing but a pipe dream.  The article quotes the exiled former Venezuelan Oil Minister Rafael Ramirez as saying, “The Petro is being set at an arbitrary value which exists only in the government’s imagination.”

The Petro is based on the NEM blockchain.  The idea for NEM originally came from a Bitcointalk user named UtopianFuture, but NEM was developed by an Osaka company called Tech Bureau, led by a character named Takao Asayama.  The NEM Foundation is domiciled in Singapore and physically located in the oil-rich nation of Malaysia.

Takao Asayama is said to be closely connected to Takafumi Horie, a notorious character in Japan who is deeply connected into the Asian underworld.  Horie is a kind of a Japanese Elon Musk—an aggressive technology businessman who was criticized for his M&A practices and actually went to jail for market manipulation tactics.  It’s said that when Horie went into jail he may have been “grey,” but when he came out he was fully “black” and 60 pounds lighter.  Horie is the founder of a rocket company called Interstellar Technologies which has unfortunately experienced two failed launches.

The logo for NEM is a combination of counterclockwise-rotating Japanese mitsudomoe symbol and a shield representing the Reuleaux triangle shape used inside of the internal combustion engine.  NEM stands for New Economy Movement, not to be confused with the New Economic Model (NEM), an affirmative action plan developed by the former Malaysian prime minister and the Malaysian Chinese Association.

The NEM cryptocurrency is based on a consensus algorithm called Proof-of-Importance, which is an attempt to improve upon the rich-get-richer characteristics of Proof-of-Stake algorithms.  In Proof-of-Importance, accounts are assigned a “reputation” or “importance” score, such that accounts that are deemed to be more important to the NEM ecosystem are awarded with more new currency units.  We fear that over time NEM’s consensus algorithm may need to be renamed Proof-of-Maduro’s-Importance.

NEM was at the center of the Coincheck hack of January 2018.  In that event, hackers broke into a Japanese cryptocurrency exchange called Coincheck and stole over $500 million dollars worth of NEM, making it one of the largest thefts in the history of the world.  The hack cast a pall over the cryptocurrency market in Japan and contributed to the global sell-off that became the cryptocurrency bear market of 2018.  The hack also reduced the number of exchanges trading NEM in Japan to only one—the Zaif exchange owned by Tech Bureau itself.

In March 2018, the Japanese FSA issued a business improvement order to Zaif and several other exchanges over their security and anti-money-laundering practices.  This put Zaif and NEM in the awkward position of being close to complete shutdown in Japan.

Then on September 20th 2018, Zaif announced that it had been hacked to the tune of $60 million, but also announced that a bailout loan was being arranged through a Horie-connected Japanese investment advisory firm called FISCO.  As part of the deal, FISCO would take a majority share ownership in Zaif.  Since FISCO already operates its own cryptocurrency exchange in Japan and is already partnered with Zaif, the bailout could be seen as a way for FISCO to subsume Zaif and start fresh with a clean regulatory record.

Just one day after the Zaif hack was announced, cryptocurrency investors were left scratching their heads as the price of the Ripple cryptocurrency surged by more than 60%.  But as one Twitter user keenly noted, “Anyone attempting to explain this Ripple move should also explain why Monacoin is up roughly the same amount.”  In fact, Monacoin, billed as “the first Japanese cryptocurrency,” was among the cryptocurrencies stolen in the Zaif hack.  If the hackers of the Zaif exchange wanted to unload their stolen Monacoin, it would make a lot of sense to pump up the price first.

But back to the topic of the Petro, how and why did Maduro decide to base the Petro on the NEM blockchain?  After all, Venezuela is a world away from Japan.  To answer that question, we need to look at some of Maduro’s cryptocurrency advisors.

The first character of interest is the 27-year-old Venezuelan Gabriel Jimenez.  After Jimenez’s father was charged for defrauding investors in the collapse of a Dominican bank, Jimenez went to work in Washington, D.C. as a congressional intern for one of Maduro’s strongest critics.  In that role he was a “spirited anti-government crusader who helped organize a caravan … in which thousands of Venezuelan exiles traveled by bus to Washington to pressure the Obama administration to slap sanctions on Maduro’s government.”  But soon after, he returned to Venezuela and quickly rose to become one of the top strategists behind the Petro.  We can only assume that he is either a spy or a complete sell-out.  In any case, to find the real masterminds behind the Petro we need to look farther afield, to Maduro’s Russian consultants.

In March 2018 after President Trump issued an Executive Order banning Americans from transacting in the Petro, Time Magazine published an exclusive article entitled “Russia Secretly Helped Venezuela Launch a Cryptocurrency to Evade U.S. Sanctions.”  Of course, as with all mainstream media articles about Russia, it is mostly an attempt to demonize Russia and link everything back to Putin, which is a little bit like saying that Trump controls everything that happens in the United States.  The author’s other Time articles include “To Understand Russia, Read A Terrible Country” and “How I Learned to Love the German Nanny State After Leaving Putin’s Russia.”

In any case, the Time article does a good job of detailing the Russian consultants behind the Petro.  It’s worth noting here that the symbol for the Petro, ₽, is exactly the same as the symbol for the Russian Ruble that was newly chosen in 2013 via a process organized by the Central Bank of Russia.

The main two Russian consultants behind the Petro are Fyodor Bogorodsky and Denis Druzhkov.  According to the Time article, “Bogorodsky moved to Uruguay around 2009 and became an informal ambassador of Russian culture across Latin America.”  Bogorodsky’s personal website details his family’s long history in Russia from its beginnings among “eminent Tatars,” to “military service in the Crimea campaign,” to the development of banking in Kazan province.  Bogorodsky’s contributions to Maduro were apparently run out of a shell company called Aerotrading, which is only really notable for using the Illuminati left-facing OK sign as its logo.

Denis Druzhkov is the co-founder of a Russian cryptocurrency exchange called the Zeus Exchange.  We note here that Zeus was not known to be a kind god.  The Zeus Exchange is based on the NEM blockchain and is partnered with the NEM Foundation.

Druzhkov’s Twitter account is enlightening.  He is a follower of the Latvia-based anti-Kremlin news agency Meduza, named after the snake-headed monster from Greek mythology.  He is also a follower of “the Kremlin’s leading critic-in-exile” Mikhail Khodorkovsky, the oligarch who looted Russia’s oil industry after the fall of the Soviet Union and a close colleague of Henry Kissinger and Jacob Rothschild.  Druzhkov also follows Shaltai Boltai, an anonymous hacking group that targets the Kremlin.  Needless to say, Time appears to have been completely wrong in portraying Druzhkov and Bogorodsky as puppets of the Kremlin.

Druzhkov is also a Twitter follower of the Esalen Institute in Big Sur, California.  It is worth digging into this relationship a little bit, because readers may not be aware of the Esalen Institute’s prominent position in the global Satanic hierarchy.  But remember that while the 60’s produced a lot of love, freedom, and liberation, it also produced horrible events such as the Manson family’s murder of Luciferian movie stars, all of whom hung out around Esalen.

According to The Magic of Esalen:  “At its essence, Esalen culture is organized almost like a Masonic Lodge or Secret Society, with concentric orders of initiation and status.”  In fact, Esalen was influential enough during the Cold War to have arranged United States visits via its Soviet-American exchange program for several prominent Russians just before the collapse of the Soviet Union.  This included a visit for one of Mikhail Gorbachev’s chief economic advisors, and also included Boris Yeltsin’s first trip to the United States to meet with George H.W. Bush and other political leaders.  We wonder if the Esalen Institute would be as welcoming to Vladamir Putin today;  somehow we doubt it.  Those interested in reading more about the history of Esalen are encouraged to take a look at “How Darwin, Huxley, and the Esalen Institute Launched the Psychedelic Revolutions” or the associated map.

Following President Trump’s executive order banning the Petro, the Zeus Exchange appears to have cut ties with Druzkov, at least nominally.  But having structured at least two major projects around NEM (the Zeus Exchange and the Petro), it is a safe bet that Druzkov and colleagues still are heavily invested in NEM and perhaps even actively promoting it.

Indeed, NEM has been making headway among some interesting groups.  In August, at the 100th Annual Crow Fair for the Crow Nation of Montana, NEM systems were demonstrated to tribal leaders: “Good Guy NEM? – Helping Native Americans Get into Crypto! – Great Idea!”  The Crow Nation—or the Black Lodges, as one of its subgroups is called—is located in a major oil-producing region, but NEM’s interest in collaborating with the Crow likely also extends to the tribal casino business.

Historically, the Crow tribe worked together with the U.S. Army against their enemies the Lakota Sioux.  This is notable in the sense that the Lakota Standing Rock reservation was major news in recent years due to protests over the Dakota Access oil pipeline.  We have a feeling that the Lakota would not be as eager as the Crow to embrace using a cryptocurrency with deep ties to the oil industry.

Further south in Las Vegas, NEM recently signed an informal agreement with Kind Heaven, a new multimedia theatrical experience created by Peretz Bernstein, a.k.a. Perry Farrell, the frontman of the rock bands Porno for Pyros and Jane’s Addiction.  Taking a page from The Hangover film series or even the Vietnam War, the event will be Southeast Asia-themed, complete with betting on virtual monkey wrestling:  Inside Perry Farrell’s Wild Vegas EDM Musical: Sex, Drugs and War.  It will also run exclusively on cryptocurrency.

Another project building on NEM is Eterly, the “artificial intelligence platform for life extension.”  The logo for Eterly looks like the symbol for a biohazard.  We could go on, but you get the idea….

To summarize, while the Venezuelan Petro may collapse into a failed experiment, the cryptocurrency upon which it is based, NEM, is slowly seething its way into the oil and gambling industries and beyond.  The two most important commodities in the world are gold and oil.

Money has historically been backed by gold, but that ended in 1971 when Kissinger and Nixon detached the U.S. dollar from gold, and attached it instead to an oil and military agreement involving Saudi Arabia and Israel–the origin of the petrodollar.  The result has been the greatest debt bubble in human history, a global environmental catastrophe, and non-stop war in the Middle East.  Clearly, the days of the petrodollar are numbered, but nefarious forces are already experimenting with creating new forms of petro-currency.

Gold is created through the super-energetic collapse and collision of stars.  Oil, known as black gold, comes from deep within the Earth.  While gold has been very useful as the basis of money throughout human history, and while a return to the gold standard would go a long way toward preventing bankers and politicians from printing too much money and giving it to themselves to wage endless warfare, the real problem with the financial system is the centralization of control over the creation and distribution of money.  To put it another way, even under the gold standard, the central banks are still in control of the creation and distribution of money and generally have the power to debase their currencies when it suits them to do so.

What is really needed is a new economic system where the power to create and distribute money is truly decentralized, or in other words, put back into the hands of the people.  Bitcoin was a major innovation, but it replaces control by banks with a strange new system where all new money is rewarded to those with access to cheap computers and electricity, which happens to be a few people in China.

To understand the real potential for cryptocurrency as a new method of currency creation and distribution, we recommend the excellent article “Why Everyone Missed the Most Mind-Blowing Feature of Cryptocurrency.”  NEM was an attempt to create this kind of next-generation cryptocurrency, but it is flawed and is completely controlled by nefarious forces in any case.

Rest assured, alternatives are being created.  For now, we can only advise the citizens of Venezuela as well as the rest of the world to avoid both the Petro and NEM like the Black Plague.

 

H.F.1720

*  *  *

[A MIND OF HIS OWN]

 

 

 

 

News for DAILY MAIL-Schoolboy 'given detention for backing Ukip'

 

A  15-YEAR OLD BOY was given detention after voicing his support for Ukip during a classroom debate, his father has claimed.

 

During a phone-in on radio station LBC yesterday a caller named Paul told host Nick Ferrari his son had been punished after declaring he would vote for the Right-wing party-but shouldn't be called racist.

 

 

 The caller said:'One boy said he'd vote for Ukip and the teacher said

all Ukip voters are racist", so my boy came in and said. 'I'd vote for Ukip and I'm not a racist."

 

He was given a detention, [with] the three boys that had said it, and when he came home and told me I didn't believe him.

 

 

It came after it was reported Alissa Cook-Gray,17, quit her college course after her tutor warned her she was 'Right-wing for supporting former EDL leader Tommy Robinson.

 

She claimed a teacher told her 'Get out, we don't want people of your views' during a political debate in Crewe.

 

 A Ukip spokesman said 'There is an increasing number of reports across the country of this behaviour

 by teachers against pupils who say they support Ukip.

 

 

*

 

 

[Since 1973 the young have been brainwashed by the BBC  the Brussels Broadcasting Contractor  but with Brexit now with us there is now at last steadfast resistance beginning to appear among the young -a sign of freeminds are beginning to appear. Any level-headed teacher would have welcomed an inquisitive mind  -not punish it. This tyranny is worthy of the name of the communist STASI not of the FREE WORLD.  But after over 45 years in the EU we should not be surprised that many teachers were themselves brainwashed in their early years in order to indoctrinate future generations.]

 

 

 

 

*

 

Individuality is everywhere to be spared and respected as the root of everything good.-

 

 Richter

 

*

'Don't despair of a student if he has one clear idea.'

Emmons

*

'Even a STUDENT will turn.'

Anon

*

Freedom 

 http://FreedomKeys.com


Keys
a collection of amusing, 
fascinating, insightful, or 
maybe even useful information

   

Professor R. J. Rummel, who keeps track of such things, now estimates that in the 20th century

262,000,000

people were murdered by their own governments.  And all these horrors were perpetrated by collectivist governments for the alleged sake of "the proletariat," the "master race," and especially, "the greater good."

None were done by countries based

on

individualism

 

See:  http://tinyurl.com/RJRummel

{COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS.]

 

OCTOBER 6,2018

 

H.F 1723

 

*  *  *

 

It's the hubris of Europe's liberal politicians that has fuelled this chilling rise of the far-Right.

 

 

News for daily mail dominic sandbrook

 

DOMINIC SANDBROOK: Chilling rise of the Far Right in Sweden

...It's their naivety, their hubris, their indifference tio voter'concerns, that has fuelled the rise of such parties as the Sweden Democrats...

Read More!

 

H.F.1695/1

*  *  *

 

 

Media caption Nigel Farage: "Brexit plan a complete betrayal"

Nigel Farage has said he is going "back on the road" to campaign against the prime minister's Brexit plan.

In the Daily Telegraph, the UKIP MEP said Theresa May's Chequers agreement was a "sell-out" as it included regulatory alignment with the EU.

He wrote he would join pro-Brexit group

Leave Means Leave

at UK public events.

Meanwhile, ex-civil service head Lord Kerslake has said consequences of a no-deal Brexit would be so serious, MPs would have to reconsider it.

The announcement by former UKIP leader Mr Farage comes after a string of resignations last month over the prime minister's Brexit strategy - including those of David Davis and Boris Johnson.

Mr Davis quit as Brexit secretary saying he did not agree with Mrs May's proposals, while former foreign secretary Mr Johnson accused the prime minister of pursuing a "semi-Brexit".

Mr Farage said "scores of people" had stopped him in the street to ask when he was "coming back".

He added: "Well now you have your answer: I'm back."

The 54-year-old said a "battlebus" had already been hired.

He later told the BBC that Mrs May's proposal was "a complete betrayal of what people voted for".

His comments also come amid calls for a second referendum on the final Brexit deal.

Campaign group People's Vote has also criticised the government's handling of negotiations with the European Union.

People's Vote argues the public should be allowed a say on the final deal agreed with the EU.

Lord Kerslake told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that, if the government was unable to strike a deal with Brussels, there would have to be a "pause" in the Article 50 process. under which the UK will leave the EU on 29 March 2019.

The crossbench peer said in those circumstances, the European Commission would likely insist on some "re-examination" of the 2016 referendum decision to leave.

"The consequences of a no deal would be so serious as I think Parliament would have to seriously consider whether it could contemplate this," he said.

"The question people need ask themselves is: is this a risk that they think we should be taking?

"If the government can negotiate a good deal, then so be it.

"But if they can't and we end up in this position, then we have to reopen the question of whether we go forward with Brexit at all. It is not too late to do that."

The government is due to publish a series of technical notes on preparations for a no-deal Brexit on areas including farming and financial services. But Lord Kerslake said this was "too little, too late".

On Friday, Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt insisted Britain would "survive and prosper" if it left the EU without a trade deal - but added it would be a "big mistake for Europe".

 

comment image

See: 80 Comments

[WE were surprised a matter of some months ago when we saw the close warm greeting between Mrs May and Angela Merkel when they met to discuss BREXIT. WE expected that they would have kept at arms length ,at the time, that  a distance between them would have given more confidence to Brexiteers that the negotiations would not be a 'SELL OUT' which in some areas such as our Fishing Fields and the sovereignty of our sea lanes... we now have our suspicions. ]

APRIL 9,2018

As the picture above clearly shows it has been decades of association between Theresa May and  Frau Merkel who was a civil servant under the  Communist East German Government.  May's treasonous Cabinet plan appears to have all the hallmarks of the mindset of the German Chancellor.  May has admitted that she is in close contact with her once teen age friend so we should'nt be surprised if more bad news follows?

AUGUST 7,2018

 

H.F.1525/1

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

AUGUST 23 -2018

 

H F 1670

*  *  *

 

 

www.eutruth.org.uk

['A MATTER OF FACT!'.  A REMINDER TO REMAINERS WHO IN THEIR MILLIONS REFUSED TO PUT FREEDOM AND COUNTRY-CULTURE AND CONSTITUTION

FIRST!]

 

*  *  *

How immigration killed off Sweden’s liberal dream as violence and uncertainty replace tolerance and stability

Mark Almond — Daily Mail Sept 9, 2018

Migrant no-go zones have become a fact of life in Malmo, Sweden. A problem that local politicians seem unable to acknowledge. Click to enlarge

Migrant no-go zones have become a fact of life in Malmo, Sweden. A problem that local politicians seem unable to acknowledge. Click to enlarge

Whatever the eventual outcome of the election, Sweden’s image as an ultra-liberal and stable democracy that’s only too happy to welcome new arrivals from around the globe has been irreparably damaged.

The fiercely anti-immigrant, blatantly nationalistic Sweden Democrat party – which has only recently abandoned its neo-Nazi roots – has sharply increased its share of the vote since the last election and possibly become the country’s second largest.

And while the left-of-centre Social Democrats which have dominated Swedish politics for decades remain the largest party, they will now find it very difficult to form a majority coalition that supports their liberal agenda on welfare and immigration.

It is the Social Democrats who were behind Sweden’s cradle-to-grave welfare policies where high taxes paid for a very high standard of services. The liberal Social Democrats ushered in unprecedented mass immigration. There could be no more dramatic evidence that this election result to demonstrate how the public mood has soured as a result of those policies.

The open-door policy for refugees – with as many as 165,000 immigrants arriving in 2015 alone in a country of fewer than ten million – has radically changed the composition of big cities like Stockholm or Malmo. A survey by the respected Pew Research Centre predicts that if the high migration rates continue, 30.6 per cent of the Swedish population will be Muslim by 2050. Its researchers estimated the proportion in 2016 at 8.1 per cent.

The influx has strained welfare budgets and caused resentment just as global economic challenges smashed Sweden’s previous blue chip companies like Saab, causing job insecurity and static pay.

Tolerance and stability have been replaced by violence and uncertainty, and across Swedish cities such as Gothenburg and Stockholm, cars have been set ablaze. All this played into the hands of the Sweden Democrats who blamed everything from welfare waiting lists to crimes like rape and arson on the migrants. All highly emotive and often unproven – but the nationalists played the message dramatically to their advantage.

The death of Sweden’s liberal dream has seen young professionals leave the country for well-paid but lower-taxed jobs elsewhere in the EU. Instability in Northern Europe worries NATO just as it looks just across the Baltic Sea towards an increasingly belligerent Russia. Sweden may be officially neutral but everyone knows its neutrality tilts towards the West.

Its recent drift towards joining NATO now looks likely to run aground. This is because populist parties in Sweden – whether on the Right or Left – admire Putin as a strong man who, in contrast to the ‘wishy-washy’ West, stands firm against immigration and the perceived dilution of national cultures.

Putin’s Russia will be watching gleefully as Sweden’s politics frays at both edges. Ordinary Russians have traditionally viewed Sweden’s social democracy as an ideal alternative to the Soviet model with its bountiful welfare provisions plus freedom and prosperity.

The fact that this once model Western democracy is now floundering can only help boost Putin’s image domestically as the leader upholding a stable Russian regime.

The Sweden Democrats’ triumph will also trouble Brussels and the EU. The party has called for a referendum on membership of the union. After the general election, Sweden’s conventional parties will try to return to politics as usual and form a coalition government.

But if they exclude the Sweden Democrats from government, they will have to cobble together their coalition from parties which have long been political enemies – which will infuriate those parties’ natural supporters and encourage the drift towards the populist Right and Left.

The problems of Sweden’s welfare state, its migration woes plus the general downward pressure on ordinary living standards show no sign of disappearing in the country – or, for that matter, anywhere else in Europe.

Failure to come first will not worry the nationalist Sweden Democrats who have massively increased their vote in this election. They fully expect to celebrate victory after the next.

Source

*  *  *

[ IT WAS BOUND TO HAPPEN BECAUSE AS SHOWN IN OTHER ONCE FREE NATION STATES WITHIN

 THE SETTLED PEOPLES FINALLY UNDERSTOOD THE MEANING OF NATIONALITY ONLY WHEN THEIR VERY OWN CULTURE WAS UNDER THREAT.]

HITLER'S EU

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!.]

Daily Mail Sept 9, 2018

H.F.1692

*  *  *

Why NO Treaty LIMITING EU powers CAN EVER be RELIED ON.

 

On the 50th anniversary of the treaty of Rome a leading barrister describes the role of the European Court of Justice in expanding the powers of the EU

 

by

Martin Howe QC

 

[Eurofacts 6th April, 2007]

Vol 12 No 13

 

What is the key feature that makes the Treaty of Rome different in kind from every other international Treat to which this country belongs, and quite possibly makes it unique in the world?

To this question, a lawyer can give only one answer:

the key feature is Community Law -a system of law that penetrates inside the member states and takes precedence over national laws in the domestic courts of member states.

Many treaties bind states with rules at the international or external level - but it is this internal penetration which marks out the

TREATY OF ROME

-as different from other treaties.

In fact this internal penetration is a classic characteristic, not of international treaties, but of the internal constitutional arrangements of

FEDERAL STATES.

And like a federal state, the

EUROPEAN UNION

-has its own

SUPREME COURT

the

EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE

-which has the

ULTIMATE POWER

-of decision over both

CONTENT and the SCOPE of COMMUNITY LAW.

 

Profound Changes

This court is not neutral or impartial interpreter of the rules.

The perspective of looking back over 50 years allows us to see clearly how profoundly the

TREATY of ROME

-has been changed from what it was in 1957.

I am not speaking here of the many changes of text which have been made by successive amending treaties such as the

Single European Act

Maastricht

or

Nice.

I am talking of the profound changes in the effective content of the Treaty which have occurred as a result of a process of so-called

"INTERPRETATION"

-of the

Treaty by the Court.

The key point that Treaty articles have direct effect inside the member states is nowhere stated in the

TREATY

-but was decided by the

EUROPEAN COURT

in the

Van Gend en Loos case in 1963.

It said:

"The treaty is more than an agreement which merely creates mutual obligations between the contracting states. This view is confirmed by the preamble to the Treaty which refers not only to governments but to peoples....the Community constitutes a new legal order in international law for whose benefit the states have limited their sovereign rights, albeit within limited fields, and the subjects of which comprise not only the Member States but also their nationals".

 

Sovereign Rights

 

Shortly afterwards in 1964 in the Costa v. ENEL case, the Court ruled that

COMMUNITY LAW

-over-rides conflicting national laws:

 

" The transfer by the States from their domestic legal system to the Community system of rights and obligations arising under the Treaty carries with it a permanent limitation of their sovereign rights..."

[So since 1963 politicians who later claimed that there would be

NO LOSS OF SOVEREIGNTY

-were lying and are still lying to the

BRITISH PEOPLE

We have only days ago put on our bulletin board some comments from Lord Carrington about the interference of the European Union in matters which should be none of their concern.

From the early days of the Treaty of Rome thousands of politicians have lied -From Macmillan-Edward Heath-Kenneth Clarke and every prime minister and government -with the only objections raised by Margaret Thatcher who only later realised the danger which she disregarded decades before and even Conservative MEPs today in 2007 still hold onto the hope that they can change the EU when the only thing worth having was given up over 40 years ago.

A dagger was derisively thrust into the heart of nation -state sovereign power by the European Court  in 1963/1964 and Britain alone of all States with its long history of over a thousand years of freedom should have kept faith with those who won that freedom so long ago.]

 

By 1970, in Internationale Handelgesellschaft, the European Court had declared its view that Community LAW should take precedence even over the constitutional laws of Member States -including basic entrenched laws guaranteeing

FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS.

In the  1987 Foto-Frost case, the European Court ruled that national courts had no power to question the validity of Community measures and reserved that power exclusively to

ITSELF

-even though there is nothing in the Treaty or in general principles of

INTERNATIONAL LAW

-which would require

 STATES

-to recognise the

VALIDITY OF ACTS

-which are

OUTSIDE THE POWERS

conferred by the

TREATY

*

During the early period of the [so-called] Common Market, free market economists would have approved of the Court's activism in the field of free movement of goods.

BUT

-this activism became a

Poisoned Chalice

-since the Court made clear that it regarded a

 

EUROPEAN FREE MARKET

-not as an END in ITSELF , but simply a MEANS to a GREATER END.

Concrete Progress

The Court spelled out its thinking in 1992 in the

European Economic Area Agreement Case:

" An international treaty is to be interpreted not only on the basis of its wording, but in the light of its objectives. ...The Rome Treaty aims to achieve economic integration leading to the establishment of an internal market and economic and monetary union.

Article 1 of the Single European Act makes it clear that the objective of all the Community treaties is to contribute together to making concrete progress towards European unity.

It follows from the foregoing that the provisions of the Rome treaty on free movement and competition, far from being an END in THEMSELVES, are only means for obtaining those objectives.

... As the Court of Justice has consistently held, the COMMUNITY TREATIES ESTABLISHED A NEW LEGAL ORDER for the benefit of which the States have limited their

SOVEREIGN RIGHTS

-in ever wider fields,

-and the subjects of which comprise not only the member States but also their nationals. [emphasis added]".

In the last sentence, the important change in wording from 1963 Van Gend case - should be noted. By 1992,

"limited fields"

 become

"ever wider fields"

-reflecting the Court's endorsement of the doctrine that there can only ever be a one-way transfer of powers from member states to the centre.

[Do you now understand Mr Nice Guy Dave and many of your MEPs who are always harping about retrieving

 POWER back from BRUSSELS]

The Court has also expanded powers of the Community over the external relations of the member states. It developed a doctrine of implied external competence - that the Community has power to make external agreements relating to fields over which it has acquired internal competence. Furthermore, under this doctrine, the member states lose their own powers to conclude international agreements relating to areas of policy over which the

COMMUNITY

-has attained an internal competence.

Under this doctrine, in 2002 the Bermuda Agreement between the UK and the US relating to trans-Atlantic air transport was struck down. British Airways at the time welcomed the fact that such arrangements would in future be negotiated by the EU rather than bilaterally. I must confess to a slight sensation of schadenfreude at British Airways' present reaction to what the EU has apparently succeeded in negotiating on our behalf.

Whilst the Court has liberalised the internal market, it has often used its growing powers over the external trade of member states in a way which inhibits the liberalisation across the external borders of the EU.

In the 1998 Silhouette case, it interpreted the

Trade Marks Directive

-as requiring member states to prohibit so-called

"parallel imports"

-of genuine trade marked goods from non-member states when the proprietor of the mark has not consented to the marketing of his goods into the Community. This enables trade mark proprietors to prevent the importation of their own genuine goods into the EC from other countries where they have placed them on the market (e.g. the USA), so enabling them to charge consumers within the EC a higher price than in other markets.

Similarly, in the field of regulations and technical standards, the Court has ruled in the 1999 Agrochemicals case that the UK is prohibited by Community Law from licensing

"parallel imports"

-from non-EC countries, even though the products are identical to agrochemicals licensed inside the EC and made by the same manufacture.

The economic rationale of this

"fortress Europe"

-mentally is baffling, and it cuts against

OUR

-global trade obligations under the

World Trade Organisation

on

Technical Barriers to Trade.

*

Onward Progress

Where the onward progress of European integration has been blocked by national vetoes, the Court has been willing to reinterpret the Treaty to make up for the lack of progress on the legislative front.

In a whole series of recent tax cases, the Court has invoked the general clauses of the treaty on non-discrimination to strike down national tax legislation. An important example is the 2002 Lankhorst-Hohorst case on tax credits on payments by a subsidiary to its parent in another member state. What is significant is that the Court departed from its earlier cases which had decided that such arrangements were compatible with the Treaty.

The Treaty had not been changed, but its meaning, according to the Court, had. Thus , the effective harmonisation of direct taxes proceeds step by step at the hands of the Court despite the UK's theoretical veto on this area under the Treaty.

More recently in the 2005 environmental protection case, the Court decided that the EC can, under its first-pillar supranational law-making powers, specify and impose criminal offences and penalties in the very wide fields where the EC has an existing competence. The remarkable thing about this decision is that, if it is right, the EEC had these powers over criminal law from the day the

TREATY of ROME

-was signed on 25th March 1957.

Yet if this had been suggested to those who signed the Treaty in 1957, or to those who signed Britain's

 Accession Treaty

-in 1972, they would have laughed

 

We see, with the perspective of 50 years, how powerful has been the effect of the rolling process of reinterpretation of the

TREATY of ROME

-carried out by the Court over that period.

WHAT CONCLUSION SHOULD WE DRAW FROM THIS?

If we believe that it is right to halt or reverse the ongoing process of the transfer of powers from the UK to the European institutions, then we should recognise a simple point.

We saw how the so-called Social chapter opt-out negotiated at Maastricht was rapidly undermined by the abuse of

HEALTH and SAFETY POWERS

-under the treaty to by-pass the UK's veto on the

Working Time Directive.

 

THIS ABUSE OF THE TREATY WAS OF COURSE SANCTIONED BY THE

 

EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE.

 

If we remain subject to Community law, and to the European Court's interpretation of the Treaties, no agreement or treaty defining or limiting the powers of Europe can be relied upon -simply because it will be reinterpreted by the Court, over time, to expand those powers again.

[Conservative MPs and MEPs please note the above and adjust your records accordingly and remember that the ECoJ has you all by the nose -though many of you are still unaware of how little you can do as you put it- with your supposed influence inside the EU.

As to the excuses of the Pro-EU Conservative MP' and MEPs that they were misled from the beginning we know that this was a lie  as shown from publication of details of that era. and the following view of:

 Jean Monnet document on the European Coal and Steel Community, June 1950, quoted in Memoirs, 1978 confirms that statement.

"The withdrawal of a State which has committed itself to the Community should be possible only if all the others agree to such withdrawal and to the conditions in which it takes place. The rule in itself sums up the fundamental transformation which the French proposal seek to achieve. Over and above coal and steel it is laying the foundations of a European federation. In a federation no Stat can secede by its own unilateral decision. Similarly, there can be no Community except among nations which commit themselves to it with no limit and no looking back'

*

Why NO Treaty LIMITING EU powers CAN EVER be RELIED ON.

 

On the 50th anniversary of the treaty of Rome a leading barrister describes the role of the European Court of Justice in expanding the powers of the EU

 

by

Martin Howe QC

 

[Eurofacts 6th April, 2007]

Vol 12 No 13

 

 

 

 

www.eutruth.org.uk

[' A MATTER OF FACT!

 A REMINDER TO REMAINERS WHO IN THEIR MILLIONS REFUSED TO PUT FREEDOM AND COUNTRY-CULTURE AND CONSTITUTION

FIRST!]

H.F.1424

H.F.1651

 

*  *  *

*  *  *

AFTER 46 YEARS WITHIN THE CONTROL OF

THE BEAST!

IN

BRUSSELS AND BERLIN .

OUR HISTORIC  ENGLISH SEA HIGHWAYS GIVEN AWAY BY THE

TRAITOROUS

 EDWARD HEATH

 TO BE RETURNED IN

MARCH 2019.

'Ye mariners of England/that guard our native seas/Whose flag has braved a thousand years/The battle and the breeze'.

Thomas Campbell.(1777-1844) Ye Mariners of England

*

ENGLAND'S

GREAT ESCAPE

 FROM

HITLER'S  FOURTH REICH

See also: eutruth.org.uk-Why we are leaving!-if you need a reminder?

*

IN MARCH 2018 WE HEAR THAT   ANOTHER CONSERVATIVE PRIME MINISTER IS GOING TO SELL OUT OUR FISHING RIGHTS AND  ISLAND FISHING FIELDS.

 THERE MUST BE NO SURRENDER OF ENGLISH

AND OTHER  ISLAND NATIONS SOVEREIGNTY OF THEIR HISTORIC WATERS.

This has been brought about because as we  suspected  to expect a

 REMAIN Prime Minister and her fellow closet traitors

 to put her country FIRST! and give the PEOPLE their

 BREXIT which means BREXIT

now looks like an imp

- (1994 -Official Website - OCTOB-

ossible

 

 

 

 dream.

ENGLAND IS NOT ENGLAND S.

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

293

In 1962,

Field Marshall Montgomery

 found Sir Winston Churchill sitting up in bed smoking a cigar. Churchill shouted for more brandy and protested against Britain's proposed entry into the Common Market which as we soon found out was in reality  HITLER'S plan for Europe under GERMAN Control.

 


    Winston Churchill, Myth and Reality: What He Actually Did and Said - Google Books Result
     

    Britain's attitude, Churchill explained, resembles that which we adopt about the
    European Army. We help, we dedicate, we play a part,
    but we are not merged
    with and do not forfeit our insular or commonwealth character. Our first object is
    the unity and consolidation of the British Commonwealth.
    Our second, “the
    fraternal ...

SCOTLAND AND WALES HAVE THEIR PARLIAMENT

 - HOW LONG MUST

 ENGLAND

WAIT FOR HER'S?

 Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND?**** BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH.

*

THE TRAITOROUS PEERS

ARE THE

'USEFULL IDIOTS'

OF THE

 HITLERITE EUROPEAN UNION

*

We're sure that Mrs May is aware of the biblical psalm

'Righteousness exalteth a nation' [14:34]

17.4 million people voted in June 2016 to regain their once FREE -INDEPENDENT NATION STATE and since that time many others are joining the BREXIT BANNER by the DAY.

 

'LET RIGHT BE DONE!'

*

On the facts before us as to the closet EU retainers advising the PM at the highest level in Government it can only be construed as an example  of duplicity - hardly likely to give confidence to Brexit voters at this time?

We can see little difference between the actions of  the arch traitor Edward Heath  with his top civil servants in the 1970's and the actions of Theresa May  with hers in 2018. WE ask where is the English attribute of 'Fair- play' in this matter?

Brexiteers,for sure, dont want any 'dreamed up

'CRETINOUS'

plan from Europhiles.

*

'Nothing is ever settled until it is settled right'.

Rudyard Kipling.

*

WE NOW MUST DEPEND ON THE

 BREXIT FOUR-

FOX-DAVIS-JOHNSON-GOVE

'Statesman, yet friend to truth! of soul sincere / in action faithful, and in honour clear,/ Who broke no promise, served no private end,/ Who gained no title, and lost no friend. '[Ib.V.67] - Pope

*

MRS MAY HAS GONE WELL ASTRAY BECAUSE THE EU CUSTOM UNION IS STILL IN PLAY AND THAT TELLS US THAT MRS MAY WAS NOT AN IDEAL POLITICIAN

TO SEE

ENGLAND AND FREEDOM - AGAIN HERE TO STAY.

*

MAY 2,2018

 

*  *  *

 

LATEST NEWS!

 

[ IN JUNE 2018-DID YOU KNOW THAT

YOU HAVE BEEN TRICKED BY

MAY AND DAVIS?]

 

 

Brexit must reverse all the damage done by the EU; that’s obvious. But with the EU Withdrawal Bill, Theresa May

and Labour aren’t planning to reverse any of it. This is what

 they should be doing:

 

By David Noakes

 

www.thewestminsternews.co.uk

 

 

Britain was an independent nation for 3,500 years; we must get back to being one again. “No Deal” is the way to achieve that, by saving £10 billion a year in EU tariffs on the rest of the world by dropping out of the EU’s single market and customs union, Its costs us an additional £70 billion a year just to trade with the EU, so the sooner we leave the better.

 

 

The EU's Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) puts up our food prices by 17% according to the Institute of Economic Affairs, and they recommend leaving it.

 

With “No Deal” we can have free trade with the rest of the world, the 93% that is outside the EU. All these negotiations will trap us into a damaging, continuing, costly relationship with the EU.

 

Repeal VAT: VAT is an EU tax, the most complicated to administer in all history. It costs both government and business billions to collect. It raises £100 billion in a £2,000 billion economy. The inland Revenue raises £550 billion in taxes, but that isn’t all of them. If the government is too lazy to cut out some of its vast waste to pay for VAT, it can offset it against the £300 billion we save below.

 

Repeal the disastrous 120,000 EU regulations. When we went into the EU in 1973, in 3,500 years Britain had accumulated just 2,000 regulations. You see all those old in-town deserted petrol stations? They were killed by just one EU regulation.

 

Regulation EU 9767 has closed over 10,000 British post offices. EU Taxation on drinks, ie, no tax in the supermarkets and huge tax in the pubs, has closed tens of thousands of pubs, as Wetherspoons Chairman Tim Martin points out. These regulations cost £100 billion a year to implement, according to the Better Regulation Commission, and that doesn’t count the damage they do to industry.

 

Repeal the over 3,000 EU laws on our statute books.

 

These 120,000 regulations and 3,000 laws have put hundreds of thousands of British businesses out of business.

 

Its frightening that David Davis and Theresa May have done the opposite, and think passing the EU Withdrawal Bill with a majority of 36, keeping the EU’s 120,000 regulations and 3,000 laws is a success. Its taking the majority of EU disasters with us.

 

Scores of Tory MP’s over the last 43 years have said how damaging these regulations are. But meekly they all voted for them.

 

Jeremy Corbyn failed to see the point, as usual. Labour voted against because the bill; like most bills these days, it has been drafted to be an affront to democracy. They didn’t even notice the 120,000 regulations.

 

Abolish the 8,500 EU mandated quangos, which cost us £210 billion a year, according to the Cabinet office. There's £310 billion a year saved, and we haven't mentioned the £11 billion annual fee for being in the EU.

 

Restrict immigration to thirty thousand a year as Britain did in the 1950’s. Australia, ten times our size, and a hundred other nations, still do today. Only the British Civil Service and government is incapable of keeping them out. The DWP deliberately encourages them to come here by being the only nation that gives even better benefits than the local British immediately on their arrival. And they have the advantage that Britain is an Island. The government still has their own, anti British agenda.

 

Theresa May is as big a disappointment as Tony Blair and David Cameron. She also still issues 800,000 social security numbers to immigrants to Britain every year. Perhaps that is why she did so badly in the election; immigration was why many voted for Brexit.

 

As an independent nation we must break the stranglehold big pharmaceutical corporations have on our health. 200,000 British die unnecessarily each year because big pharma control government health departments from Health Minister Jeremy Hunt MP downwards, and their own regulators like the MHRA and NICE. They license expensive drugs that kill, and deny the public inexpensive treatments that work. See www.mhracorrupt.st

 

We must abolish the prescription system, which denies thousands the treatment they need. and rely on pharmacists inside chemists to do the work. Involving a doctor is a destructive duplication. Spain and Portugal are amongst the nations that don’t have a prescription system.

 

We should close the pro-EU and anti British BBC, which is too corrupt to be reformed. It wastes £7 billion a year of our license fee, fosters paedophilia, and damages us. See www.abolishthebbc.co.uk

 

We need to pass an Act of Parliament prohibiting one person, one organisation or corporation from owning more than 10% of any large media company, or group.

 

The money laundering regulations and the Proceeds of Crime Act 2003 are a disgrace and override our human rights.  The banking compliance system should be made illegal. Each year agencies close thousands of innocent people's bank accounts, with no evidence, no judge, no jury, no justice. They never get their money back. And repeal the Restraint Order system of 2003 - where the government steals everything a person has, again with with no evidence, no judge, no jury, no justice.

 

A bill needs to be passed making it illegal for a bank to deny a person a bank account.

 

While we are about it, we should pass a law banning people who are members of secrets societies from all public offices and employment. That will get rid of the Bilderbergers, and 8 cabinet ministers, the core of freemasonry, and Common Purpose, who are in favour of the EU and do so much damage in other ways to us.

 

Abolish the EU Arrest Warrant, EAW. You can be hauled out of your British house at 3 am by British police and handed over to a prison cell in any EU nation, as is happening to me. It doesn’t matter that the intent of the the French, in my case, is utterly corrupt. There are 8 grounds for appeal, but the fact you are innocent is not one of them.

 

The French have 17,000 pre trial prisoners who they refuse to give bail to. In England they are innocent until proven guilty. In France they are guilty and incarcerated until proven innocent. The French prison system is so awful 25% of them attempt suicide every year. Hundreds of English are carted off to rot in European jails every year under the EAW.

 

We need to abolish the EU’s corpus juris, which puts government above the law; 1,500 British have died in police custody since it came into force in 1992, and the police cannot be prosecuted.

 

We need to make it illegal to put artificial intelligence into machines, or we will have an Arnold Schwarzeneggar Terminator future, as the scientist Stephen Hawking pointed out.

 

All this we can do as an independent nation.

 

The government took us in to the EU without the consent of the British people in 1972.  For 43 years we have been inside this costly, unelected, corrupt, bribing dictatorship, in breech of the British Constitution.

 

Declare that common law, and our written British Constitution remain the law of the land; they need to be amended to give them force, so politicians and the courts cannot ignore them again.

 

We should add the Swiss Referendum System to our Constitution, where all Bills Parliament passes should be voted on by the public once a year to decide if they should receive Royal Assent.

 

That will prevent Parliament ever overriding our wishes again. Its the reason Switzerland is prosperous, and isn't in the EU.

 

Just 10% of England’s economy is trade. You don’t need trade deals to trade with other nations. The EU is just 7% of the world. Its a 7% we can entirely do without.

 

The EU has organised it that Britain loses £70 billion a year trading with the EU, so we need to leave the Single Market and trade elsewhere.

 

But the Conservative and Labour parties seem to be determined for us to leave the EU with both hands tied behind our backs.

 

JUNE 24,2018

 H.F.1585

*  *  *

comment image

See: 80 Comments

[WE were surprised a matter of some months ago when we saw the close warm greeting between Mrs May and Angela Merkel when they met to discuss BREXIT. WE expected that they would have kept at arms length ,at the time, that  a distance between them would have given more confidence to Brexiteers that the negotiations would not be a 'SELL OUT' which in some areas such as our Fishing Fields and the sovereignty of our sea lanes... we now have our suspicions. ]

APRIL 9,2018

As the picture above clearly shows it has been decades of association between Theresa May and  Frau Merkel who was a civil servant under the  Communist East German Government.  May's treasonous Cabinet plan appears to have all the hallmarks of the mindset of the German Chancellor.  May has admitted that she is in close contact with her once teen age friend so we should'nt be surprised if more bad news follows?

AUGUST 7,2018

HOW CAN YOU TRUST THEM

ONLY A CHANGE OF LEADERSHIP TO A TRUE BREXIT BELIEVER CAN ENSURE A CLEAN BREAK FROM

HITLER'S PLANNED SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

OUR FUTURE PROSPERITY MUST BE IN OUR HANDS AS A FAMILY OF NATION STATES IN OUR OWN ISLAND HOME. IT IS A LEGACY FROM THE PAST THAT MUST BE HANDED INTACT TO FUTURE GENERATIONS-IT IS NOT OURS TO DISREGARD AS TRAITORS WITHIN IN OUR GOVERNMENT  AND CIVIL SERVICS DID SO IN 1970's . 

NEVILLE CHAMBERLAIN HANDED THE LEADERSHIP TO WINSTON CHURCHILL in 1940. SO LIKEWISE THERESA MAY SHOULD HAND THE LEADERSHIP IN 2018 TO A TRUE BREXITEER TO ENSURE THAT

JUSTICE IS DONE!

SEPTEMBER 6,2018

H.F.1525/1

*  *  *

Brexit hardliner Rees-Mogg calls on Theresa May to 'chuck Chequers' and tells grassroots Tories the PM must stand up to EU threats

  • Rees-Mogg last night wrote strongly-worded letter to local Tory party
  • chairmen
  • He said Theresa May should stand up to Brussels bullies and 'believe in
  • Britain'
  • Letter came ahead of Raab's paper on how UK will cope if negotiations
  • collapse

Hardliner Brexit campaigner Rees-Mogg tells grassroots Tories: Believe In Britain and stand up to the Brussels bullies.

Jacob Rees-Mogg last night called on the Prime Minister to ‘chuck Chequers’ as he told grassroots Tories the UK should not fear a no-deal Brexit.

In a strongly worded letter to the chairmen of local Conservative parties, he said Theresa May should stand up to ‘bullying’ from Brussels and ‘believe in Britain’.

Mr Rees-Mogg’s forthright message came just as Brexit Secretary Dominic Raab prepared to publish a series of papers on how Britain will cope if negotiations with the EU collapse.

 

Jacob Rees-Mogg (pictured) last night called on Theresa May to stand up to ‘bullying’ from Brussels and ‘believe in Britain’

Mr Raab will say today that he is confident a good withdrawal deal is ‘within our sights’ – while insisting ministers are ready if talks fail.

But in his letter last night, Mr Rees-Mogg, chairman of the pro-Brexit European Research Group of Tory MPs, said Britain had nothing to fear from a no deal because Brussels needs a deal more than we do.

This is because, if no deal is reached, the EU will not receive the £40billion ‘divorce settlement’ Britain has promised to pay.

Mr Rees-Mogg – seen as a Tory leadership candidate if Mrs May falters – called on her to ditch the Brexit plans agreed with her Cabinet at Chequers last month, writing: ‘It is time to face down vested interests in the establishment and put democracy first.

 

‘Yet most of all, it is time to chuck Chequers, respect the referendum, be out of Europe, take back control and believe in Britain.’

On what promises to be another dramatic day for Brexit:

 

North East Somerset MP Mr Rees-Mogg said Mrs May’s Chequers deal was the ‘wrong deal for Britain’ and does not ‘implement the will of the British people’, adding: ‘The white paper does not respect the result of the referendum and does not give us control of our borders, laws and money. Chequers will tie our economy and our future to the EU indefinitely.’

He wrote: ‘This is why the Prime Minister should “chuck Chequers” and instead seek a Canada style free trade agreement with the EU to make the most of the global opportunities that lie ahead.

‘The United Kingdom does not need to do a deal with the EU. The EU needs to do a deal with us at all costs. No deal means no divorce bill – handing a £40billion Brexit bonus to Brussels. It is time the Government realised that the EU stands to lose much from no deal being agreed and stopped being cowed by the EU’s threats.’

 

Mr Rees-Mogg’s letter came just as Brexit Secretary Dominic Raab (pictured) prepared to publish a series of papers on how Britain will cope if negotiations with the EU collapse

Mr Rees-Mogg concluded the letter to all Conservative Association chairmen by saying: ‘Please feel free to circulate this letter and briefing note to members and your constituents to assure them that the Prime Minister has alternatives, and that if the bullying stance of the EU continues we can leave on 29 March 2019 with either Canada or WTO terms. We believe in Britain.’

As part of its no-deal planning, the Treasury will today commit to guarantee EU funding promised to poorer regions such as Cornwall and parts of northern England, as well as scientific research.

The plan is one of the ‘technical notices’ published today by Mr Raab, laying out how Britain will cope if talks with the EU collapse.

Mr Raab will also accuse Brussels of being irresponsible by refusing to work with the UK to prepare for a potential no-deal.

It is understood one of the papers will guarantee funding for scientific research under the ‘Horizon 2020’ scheme. And farm payments under the Common Agricultural Policy will also be maintained.

A source said: ‘The Government will commit to the Northern Powerhouse by maintaining the structural fund.’

Mr Raab will say the series of technical briefings will ensure the ‘smooth, continued functioning’ of the UK economy in the event of a no-deal Brexit.

The Brexit Secretary will also say the Government will take ‘unilateral action’ to maintain continuity if negotiations break down.

In the event of a no-deal, the UK will ‘continue to behave as responsible European neighbours’.

In a speech, Mr Raab will state: ‘I remain confident a good deal is within our sights, and that remains our top, and overriding, priority. If the EU responds with the level of ambition and pragmatism, we will strike a strong deal that benefits both sides.

‘But, we must be ready to consider the alternative. We have a duty, as a responsible government, to plan for every eventuality.

‘These technical notices – and the ones that will follow – are a sensible, measured, and proportionate approach to minimising the impact of no-deal on British firms, citizens, charities and public bodies.’

Mr Raab will say the UK, in the event of a no-deal, would ‘diverge when we are ready, on our terms’ from the EU.

The Brexit Secretary will explain there have already been planning discussions between the Bank of England and the European Central Bank for no deal and called for talks to begin on data protection and between port authorities.

‘For our part, if the negotiations fail, we will continue to behave as responsible European neighbours, partners and allies,’ he will say.

Under current plans, the technical notices will be published in batches, starting today and running through September.

But Labour’s Brexit spokesman Sir Keir Starmer dismissed the documents as a distraction, saying a no-deal would be ‘catastrophic’. 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!

 

H.F.1678

*  *  *

BULLETINS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD

*  *  *

How immigration killed off Sweden’s liberal dream as violence and uncertainty replace tolerance and stability

Mark Almond — Daily Mail Sept 9, 2018

Migrant no-go zones have become a fact of life in Malmo, Sweden. A problem that local politicians seem unable to acknowledge. Click to enlarge

Migrant no-go zones have become a fact of life in Malmo, Sweden. A problem that local politicians seem unable to acknowledge. Click to enlarge

Whatever the eventual outcome of the election, Sweden’s image as an ultra-liberal and stable democracy that’s only too happy to welcome new arrivals from around the globe has been irreparably damaged.

The fiercely anti-immigrant, blatantly nationalistic Sweden Democrat party – which has only recently abandoned its neo-Nazi roots – has sharply increased its share of the vote since the last election and possibly become the country’s second largest.

And while the left-of-centre Social Democrats which have dominated Swedish politics for decades remain the largest party, they will now find it very difficult to form a majority coalition that supports their liberal agenda on welfare and immigration.

It is the Social Democrats who were behind Sweden’s cradle-to-grave welfare policies where high taxes paid for a very high standard of services. The liberal Social Democrats ushered in unprecedented mass immigration. There could be no more dramatic evidence that this election result to demonstrate how the public mood has soured as a result of those policies.

The open-door policy for refugees – with as many as 165,000 immigrants arriving in 2015 alone in a country of fewer than ten million – has radically changed the composition of big cities like Stockholm or Malmo. A survey by the respected Pew Research Centre predicts that if the high migration rates continue, 30.6 per cent of the Swedish population will be Muslim by 2050. Its researchers estimated the proportion in 2016 at 8.1 per cent.

The influx has strained welfare budgets and caused resentment just as global economic challenges smashed Sweden’s previous blue chip companies like Saab, causing job insecurity and static pay.

Tolerance and stability have been replaced by violence and uncertainty, and across Swedish cities such as Gothenburg and Stockholm, cars have been set ablaze. All this played into the hands of the Sweden Democrats who blamed everything from welfare waiting lists to crimes like rape and arson on the migrants. All highly emotive and often unproven – but the nationalists played the message dramatically to their advantage.

The death of Sweden’s liberal dream has seen young professionals leave the country for well-paid but lower-taxed jobs elsewhere in the EU. Instability in Northern Europe worries NATO just as it looks just across the Baltic Sea towards an increasingly belligerent Russia. Sweden may be officially neutral but everyone knows its neutrality tilts towards the West.

Its recent drift towards joining NATO now looks likely to run aground. This is because populist parties in Sweden – whether on the Right or Left – admire Putin as a strong man who, in contrast to the ‘wishy-washy’ West, stands firm against immigration and the perceived dilution of national cultures.

Putin’s Russia will be watching gleefully as Sweden’s politics frays at both edges. Ordinary Russians have traditionally viewed Sweden’s social democracy as an ideal alternative to the Soviet model with its bountiful welfare provisions plus freedom and prosperity.

The fact that this once model Western democracy is now floundering can only help boost Putin’s image domestically as the leader upholding a stable Russian regime.

The Sweden Democrats’ triumph will also trouble Brussels and the EU. The party has called for a referendum on membership of the union. After the general election, Sweden’s conventional parties will try to return to politics as usual and form a coalition government.

But if they exclude the Sweden Democrats from government, they will have to cobble together their coalition from parties which have long been political enemies – which will infuriate those parties’ natural supporters and encourage the drift towards the populist Right and Left.

The problems of Sweden’s welfare state, its migration woes plus the general downward pressure on ordinary living standards show no sign of disappearing in the country – or, for that matter, anywhere else in Europe.

Failure to come first will not worry the nationalist Sweden Democrats who have massively increased their vote in this election. They fully expect to celebrate victory after the next.

Source

*  *  *

[ IT WAS BOUND TO HAPPEN BECAUSE AS SHOWN IN OTHER ONCE FREE NATION STATES WITHIN

HITLER'S EU

 THE SETTLED PEOPLES FINALLY UNDERSTOOD THE MEANING OF NATIONALITY ONLY WHEN THEIR VERY OWN CULTURE WAS UNDER THREAT.]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!.]

Daily Mail Sept 9, 2018

H.F.1692

*  *  *

 

 

Proof the Remainer row over EU Customs Union is claptrap: There's barely a customs officer in sight at Felixstowe which handles £80bn of goods a year... so why all the hysteria about the Irish border with its £3bn trade?

  • Ten months from now, according to doom-mongers, we could be back on rations
  • With lines of lorries backing up more than 30 miles from the Channel ports
  • To which I can only say: don't forget to include the flying pigs — and the plague of frogs, too. For this is claptrap 

comments

 

Ten months from now, according to the doom-mongers, we could be back on rations for the first time since the Fifties. With lines of lorries backing up more than 30 miles from the Channel ports, Britain will face gridlock and food shortages.

For a hellish mess of endless paperwork and bureaucracy lies in wait if we leave the European customs union and the frictionless trade which comes with it. Things will be even worse on the island of Ireland as the terrorists disinter their hidden stashes of Kalashnikovs and Semtex to wage war on any British attempts to reimpose a post Brexit border between North and South.

This, then, is the Project Fear vision of Britain in March 2019. There is only one way to avert this catastrophe, according to the more hysterical members of the House of Lords: we must cave in on all this Brexit nonsense, forget about silly free-trade agreements and remain locked into the customs union. Otherwise our entire haulage industry will seize up while the bullets fly in Crossmaglen.

 

This, then, is the Project Fear vision of Britain in March 2019

To which I can only say: don't forget to include the flying pigs — and the plague of frogs, too. For this is claptrap.

The vexed question of the Irish border is back with a vengeance these days. What should be a footnote to the Brexit negotiations is being elevated to an existential crisis by Brussels and Westminster's energetic gang of Brexit-wreckers.

The EU has warned that Brexit talks could collapse entirely if agreement cannot be reached on a way to handle £3 billion of annual North/South trade — between Northern Ireland, which will be outside the EU after Brexit, and the Republic, which will still be inside it.

 

RELATED ARTICLES-See -hERE

Arch-Remainer Lord Patten has likened any attempt to create a border between the two countries as 'a can of petrol and a box of matches'.

Quite apart from the deplorable tactic of absolving the terrorist and blaming the Government for violence, Patten neglects the fact that a border already exists for different excise duties levied on fuel, alcohol and tobacco products; that a border already exists in terms of currency (Ireland has the Euro, Ulster has the Pound); and the world has moved on from old-fashioned barriers and checkpoints anyway.

Of course, it suits the Project Fear brigade to paint the Irish border as Armageddon if it keeps us in the customs union because that, in turn, prevents us conducting any free trade deals with the rest of the world. Whereupon Brexit is scuppered.

 

Right now, I am surrounded by 50,000 containers stacked across an 835-acre site. Things are busy as you would expect, but certainly not hectic

But those peddling this alarmist nonsense should take a trip, as I did this week, to the end of the A14 — and then apologise.

For here on the quayside at Felixstowe — Britain's largest container port by a very large margin — they deal with 25 times more trade than the entire North/South Irish border every year.

Before my eyes, scanners and barcodes are speeding containers on their way. If they can do so here, they could surely help find a way to break the deadlock over tariffs?

And remember, there is not a customs officer in sight. One Suffolk quayside handles £80 billion of trade a year — that is £77 billion more than the entire Irish border — without a glitch.

Right now, I am surrounded by 50,000 containers stacked across an 835-acre site. Things are busy as you would expect, but certainly not hectic.

The atmosphere is calm. Some of these huge metal boxes are on the way into Britain fully loaded, some on the way out. But all will move one way or the other as soon as the owners want them.

 

Here in Felixstowe, things are much slicker these days. The various agencies use intelligence-gathering and data analysis, not Jobsworths

Urgent or dangerous goods — fireworks for example — will be off the premises in no time. Containers with frozen goods inside are stacked on special electrified cold storage racks. Those which are part of a particular supply chain, for a car plant or supermarket group, will wait for their slot in the customer's schedule.

In effect, I am looking at Britain's biggest warehouse. And I can find no one here who is unduly worried about the 'hardness' or 'softness' of Brexit, for the simple reason they will cope with whatever the system asks of them — just as they do already. And this place is still expanding.

Given that the average insured value of each container is £20,000, I am actually looking at a billion pounds of trade right now. And most of it has had nothing to do with the EU customs union.

Over the course of a year, four million container units —the great majority from outside the EU — will pass through Felixstowe on some of the world's biggest ships. Because they are mainly non-EU goods, they must be declared and processed.

As it happens, many EU containers in the same ships already go through this system because it is so painless and it just would be more complicated to separate them from the non-EU stuff.

And guess what? It all works like clockwork.

A further 250,000 containers currently come and go by lorry each year on the roll-on/roll-off ferries heading to and from the Netherlands.

Because they are travelling inside the EU and thus inside the customs union, these goods do not need to be declared. Post-Brexit they may need to be. In which case, they will have to comply with the same process as the other four million. It is not rocket science. In fact, it is not even particularly difficult.

Here on the quayside, five mega-ships are all unloading and reloading at once. The one immediately in front of me is a record-breaker, the OOCL Indonesia. There is nothing bigger on the high seas.

It arrived from the Far East a few hours earlier and will disgorge its non-EU cargo of absolutely everything under the sun in just a day or so, before heading on to Rotterdam and then back to the Far East.

A North Sea ferry beetles in to an adjacent berth fresh from the Netherlands, bearing goods from inside the EU. It looks like a child's bath toy compared to the 22- storey Hong Kong-registered behemoth next to it.

The OOCL Indonesia is a quarter of a mile long. It carries the equivalent of 21,000 container units. In other words, it has a cargo worth £420 million at any given moment.

Brexit will not make the slightest difference to this astonishing operation. A ship like the OOCL Indonesia shifts goods worth billions every year. Its owners have a very simple global perspective. If Britain wants stuff, Britain will get stuff — and on time.

Just a handful of human beings are involved in this extraordinary mechanical ballet. The crane drivers work simultaneously on different bits of different ships, lifting off containers like blocks of Lego and plonking them on to trailers.

The trailer drivers then shuttle each container to the airport-sized container yard, where another crane puts them in their pre-assigned places. Most will be on a rail wagon or lorry to somewhere in Britain within hours.

This place doesn't have one rail terminal. It has three. There are two things I fail to see all day: any paperwork, and Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs. That is because this vast operation has no paperwork. And there is no customs officer either.

A container can be off the deck of the OOCL Indonesia, on a lorry and out on the road in quarter of an hour, even if it has come from that terrifying land of anarchy and strife — otherwise known as 'the world outside the EU'.

That is because of an automated customs system that works perfectly. All of which raises that same question: if Felixstowe can smoothly handle £80 billion in trade from outside the customs union each year, is it really so hard for Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland to cope with a mere £3 billion without going to war?

The fact that I cannot spot any customs checks at Felixstowe does not mean they are not going on.

HMRC monitors every single non-EU container on every ship.

They just don't happen to have a team of pen-chewing functionaries with hi-viz jackets and clipboards wandering around the dockyard kicking tyres and asking lorry drivers if they have anything to declare. That is a world that vanished years ago.

Here in Felixstowe, things are much slicker these days. The various agencies use intelligence-gathering and data analysis, not Jobsworths. Every year, 80,000 of the four million containers passing through here are cracked open and checked for any number of infringements.

I am taken inside 'Shed 70', a huge complex with a whole series of hermetically sealed testing areas, each the size of a supermarket. Some are solely for checking animal products, some for frozen food and so on.

We enter a spotless unloading bay used only for testing cargo containing nuts. The health inspectors have picked out a container full of sacks of groundnuts from Gambia.

They want a sample from every single pallet-load in order to check for a particular type of mould. In the next-door bay, trading standards officers have just confiscated a consignment of baby swings from China which are deemed to be suspect.

In other words, there are plenty of checks going on. But 98 per cent of non-EU goods will pass through here as easily as EU goods, for the simple reason that most have cleared customs before they even touch British soil.

They do so using a tried-and-tested digital cargo-tracking system developed here in Felixstowe. Known as Destin8, it has worked so well for more than a decade that it now processes most of the non-EU maritime trade coming into this country.

So how difficult would it be to adapt this acclaimed system if Britain left the customs union, so that it also had to include all the EU trade coming in to Felixstowe? Billions of pounds? Years of pain and technical heartache? Er, not exactly. It might take, ooh, a minute or so.

'It would probably involve a few extra keystrokes,' says Alan Long, chief executive of MCP, the company behind Destin8.

 

In the time it takes a post-Brexit lorryload of apples to travel by ferry from the Netherlands to Felixstowe or Harwich, all will be sorted

The system was developed years ago here in Felixstowe by a consortium of all the main players — the port people, the customs people, the shipping people and so on. It has now been adopted in 70 per cent of British ports.

Anyone trading goods from outside the EU clicks a few boxes on their computer and the software does the rest.

It will send the manifest (the description of the goods) and the customs declaration to every relevant party — including the shipping company, the port and the haulage company.

The details will also go to every border control agency from HMRC (who look for contraband), Port Health (food), DEFRA (crops), trading standards (dodgy goods), the Forestry Commission and dozens more.

The system gives every consignment a unique number known as an MRN — think of it as a barcode — which removes the need for paperwork altogether. The Destin8 system will also link in to HMRC's system, work out all the tariffs and duty, and automatically deduct whatever needs paying from the trader's account.

Every politician, on either side of the Brexit debate, should come to Suffolk and meet Alan Long and his small, motivated team in their hi-tech offices in a converted chapel on the edge of Felixstowe.

Yet few have yet to do so. Nor have the Whitehall experts charged with implementing our departure from the EU been to consult the real experts here in Felixstowe.

As far as Brexit is concerned, Mr Long says his company will just adapt their systems to suit whatever deal the Government and the EU agree. They are also exploring a specific solution to the Dover/Calais cross-Channel route and to the shorter routes across the Irish Sea, which have their own unique problems due to the brevity of the journey. A seven-hour North Sea crossing allows the current system quite enough time for any customs data to be processed.

In the time it takes a post-Brexit lorryload of apples to travel by ferry from the Netherlands to Felixstowe or Harwich, all will be sorted.

With shorter transit times, a different system will be needed to handle a similar lorryload between Calais and Dover or Fishguard and Dublin. Mr Long has no doubt a solution will be found.

'The logistics industry always finds a way to do these things,' he assures me. 'It will just be a hybrid system.' He can't be more specific for now as his company is in the midst of designing the answer.

And the Northern Irish border with Ireland? He says that the obvious common-sense solution for the moment is to ask exporters and importers to fill in self- assessment forms — much like tax returns — reinforced by rigorous spot-checks and penalties. Those do not have to take place at the border anyway.

Nearby, I meet Jason Flower, managing director of KWL Logistics and chairman of the Felixstowe Port Users Association.

He manages freight for many international exporters, and says that he has European clients who want to know how things will work after Brexit.

He himself voted against Britain leaving the EU, but says that now it is happening we need to make it work. Like everyone in Felixstowe — both Remainers and Leavers — he subscribes to the 'GOWI' philosophy: 'Get on with it'.

Is he filled with doom and gloom — or will things pan out? 'I'm an optimist,' he says. 'There may be some small extra costs to start with. It always takes a bit of time to get used to a new system. But we'll sort it out.'

He remembers the not-too-distant days of infernal paperwork — for both EU as well as non-EU goods. Things are so much better now.

Down at the cafe next to the harbour entrance, a small crowd is glued to the sight of another monster being nudged into her berth by two tug boats.

The Madison Maersk has come straight from Colombo, Sri Lanka, with 18,000 containers on top. Not one of them comes under the magic wand of the EU customs union.

Every single one needs its own 'MRN' barcode and customs declaration. Yet the first will be trundling up the A14 within the hour.

If Britain grinds to a halt next March, I will eat my hat (Remoaners insist there won't be much else on the menu). But if it does not, will those Brexit-wrecking peers be prepared to do the same? Share or comment on this article:


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5746801/Proof-Remainer-row-EU-Customs-Union-claptrap.html#ixzz5G3K72hcD
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

H.F.1553

*  *  *

 

 
 

 

 
 
 

 

[IT HAD TO HAPPEN!

-'WE ARE AFTER ALL AN INSULAR  ISLAND PEOPLE']

 

*

 

Even Remainers now back a

'hard' Brexit:

 Most Brits ... - Daily Mail

 

. Even Remainers now back a 'hard' Brexit: Most Brits want to regain full control ...
By Claire Ellicott for the Daily Mail and Kate Ferguson For Mailonline ... a straight
choice between that and no deal, with 58 per cent backing it.

 

Most Brits want to regain full control of our borders and to become free of meddling EU judges, survey reveals

  • Most polled want the UK to become free of EU judges and full border control 

  • Two thirds said they would prefer 'no deal' rather than a soft Brexit, poll found

  • Findings boost for Theresa May who says no deal is better than a bad deal

Most Remain voters now back a Brexit that gives Britain a clean break from the EU and control back of our borders, a major study has found.

Many of those who voted to stay in the European Union also now believe the country should only pay a small ‘divorce bill’ and stop EU judges ruling over the UK.

The results are a major boost for Theresa May’s Brexit stategy - and suggest diehard Remainers, such as Liberal Democrat leader Sir Vince Cable and former prime minister Tony Blair, have overestimated support for backtracking on Brexit. 

Full artical


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4782712/Most-Brits-hard-Brexit-new-survey-finds.html#ixzz4pXWhGZDU
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*

 

 FREEDOM!

 

.'..We cannot, I fear, falsify the pedigree of the fierce people, and persuade them that they are not sprung from a nation in whose veins the blood of freedom circulates.  The language in which they would hear you tell them this tale would detect the imposition; your speech would betray you

'An Englishman is the unfittest person on earth, to argue another Englishman into slavery'.

*

EDMUND BURKE

 

Conciliation with America-speech House of Commons

March 22,1775

 

*

1+2+3

+4+5+6+7+8+9+10

Soul of England

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

AUGUST 12-2017

H.F.1277 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

 
 
 
 
BREXIT

ANNOUNCEMENT

ARTICLE 50 LETTER

DELIVERED BY

'HER MAJESTY'S AMBASSADOR

TO

BRUSSELS

ON

MARCH 29-2017

*

ON

THE FINAL STRETCH

 TO

 FREEDOM

OF THE

PEOPLE AND NATION STATE OF

 ENGLAND

[TIME ELAPSED SINCE REFERENDUM IN JUNE-2016

 12 MONTHS

 

JULY-2017- AUG-2019 (?)

JULY 23-2017.

*

 

[No 1]

 

    DAILY MAIL

     

    -MAY: EU MIGRANTS CAN STAY IN UK


    Daily Mail
    May says 3.2million EU citizens CAN stay in Britain after we leave
    Daily Mail - 14 hours ago
    May insists her offer to let three million EU citizens stay after Brexit is 'fair' ... All of
    the 3.2million EU nationals currently in the UK will be allowed to stay ..... in case
    there is a late surge of migrants arriving as Brexit approaches.

    JUNE 23,2017

H.F.1226 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-June-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-July-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-July-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

BREXIT

BUT NOT OUT OF THE EU FOR 2/3 YEARS. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. ALL EU TREATIES WERE OBTAINED BY BRIBERY AND TREASON  AND FRAUD WHICH

UNDER THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES MAKES THEM.

NULL AND VOID.

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

JULY 23 FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2016

*

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW PART 1-2016SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW-2016

OCTOBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

NOVEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

DECEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

*

H.F.200A-FREEDOM NOW

 

PLEASE  NOTE: WE HAVE IN ADVANCE GIVEN BELOW THE BULLETIN FOR EACH MONTH FOR THE NEXT 30 MONTHS WHICH YOU CAN ENTER-IT WILL CONTAIN INFORMATION FROM OTHER MONTHS FROM THE PAST AND THAT AVAILABLE AT THE SPECIFIED TIME.  WE ARE MAKING THIS ARRANGEMENT AS WE ARE UNABLE TO GIVE AN EXIT DATE FROM THE EU. AS YOU ARE AWARE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE IN OCTOBER 2003 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING AVAILABLE INFORMATION WHICH WOULD BRING THE EXIT FROM THE EU AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. BUT NOW THAT BREXIT IS SOON TO BE ENACTED BY PARLIAMENT THE DAY OF OUR DELIVERANCE WILL SOON BE AT HAND AND THE RETURN OF OUR INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND TOGETHER WITH OUR NEIGHBOURING NATION STATES OF WALES-SCOTLAND AND NORTHERN ISLAND.

MAY GOD GRANT US A SPEEDY EXIT FROM THE SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC -MAMMOTH MONSTROSITY OF THE SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

 

 

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

 

 

The English People's

VoicE

WELCOME!

IMMIGRATION FILE

E U FILE

IRAQ/AFGHAN WAR

     9/11 AN INSIDE JOB

MAGNA CARTA

LONDON 7/7-AN INSIDE JOB

NAZI DVD

ENGLAND FILE

CRIMINAL EU

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

SAY NO TO EU

UNDERSTANDING EASTER

EURO MUST FAIL

ROTTEN HEART OF EU

SOUL OF ENGLAND

100 REASONS TO LEAVE EU

TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

MOST EVERYTHING WHICH IS PRECIOUS IN OUR CIVILISATION HAS COME FROM SMALL INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

 by LORD PETER SHORE.

 

A NATION STATE HAS BEEN REBORN

 

ON the momentous day Theresa May said Britain WILL quit the single market, she put Cameron's feeble negotiations to shame with an ultimatum to Brussels that the UK will 'walk away from a bad deal-and make the EU pay' 

  • STEEL OF THE NEW
  • IRON LADY
  • The PM is hopeful of an EU-UK trade deal because of mutual economic interests 
  • She said Europe not making a deal with Britian would be 'calamitous self-harm'
  • It was confirmed that we will be leaving the single market and customs union
  • But the EU's chief negotiator called her show of defiance counter-productive
  • Her speech was criticised by the Lib Dems as Labour fought on how to respond 
  • Sterling rose 2.8 per cent against the Dollar and 1.8 per cent against the Euro


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4130034/Theresa-s-Brexit-speech-puts-Cameron-shame.html#ixzz4W7pxZPm9
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Europe split over May's ...

https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-mail/20170118/281625305003771
Europe split over May's vision – but even Tusk calls it 'realistic'. Daily ... News -
From Mario Ledwith in Brussels and John Stevens in London.

 

*

POINT BY POINT, HER BLUEPRINT TO FREE BRITAIN FROM BRUSSELS
THERESA May delighted Eurosceptics yesterday with an ambitious road map for BREXIT. The PM extended the hand of friendship to the EU but threatened to walk away if BRUSSELS tried to impose a punitive deal. Jack DOYLE sets out her 12 objectives and analyses her chances of success.

1. CERTAINTY

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will provide certainty where we can. The same rules and laws will apply on the day after BREXIT, as they did before. And the Government will put the final deal to a vote in both houses of Parliament.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By keeping in place-at least initially-all EU laws, Mrs May will provide a degree of continuity and confidence for business. However, as she freely admits she cannot control the outcome of the negotiations. Parliament is highly likely to approve any deal because the alternative will be a chaotic BREXIT.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

2. OUR OWN LAWS

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will take back control of our laws and bring an end to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in Britain. Because we will not truly left the EU if we are not in control of our own laws

CAN SHE DELIVER

 Adopting the 'take back control' slogan of the Leave campaign, Mrs May repeated her promise to end rule by EU rule and judges in Luxembourg and restore power to Parliament and domestic courts. Without this there is no Brexit. A firm red line

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

3 A UNITED KINGDOM

 WHAT SHE SAID

A stronger Britain demands that we strengthen the precious union between the four nations of the UK.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By consulting devolved administrations, Mrs May is seeking to reassure voters in the nations of the UK which didn't vote for Brexit that she is listening to their concerns, and avoid Nicola Sturgeon calling for a second independence vote.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

4. THE IRISH BORDER

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE will work to deliver a practical solution that allows the maintenance of the Common Travel Area with the Republic, while protecting the integrity of the United Kingdom's immigration system.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Both countries want to maintain the open border between Northern Ireland and the Republic without opening a back door into Britain. Likely to mean UK border checks at Irish ports and airports.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

5. CONTROL OF IMMIGRATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

The message from the public before and during the referendum campaign was clear: BREXIT must mean control of the number of people who come to Britain from Europe. And that is what we will deliver

CAN SHE DELIVER

Ending free movement is a  RED LINE, but Mrs May left open when it will end, what system will replace it and details of any transition deal. The PM wants highly skilled EU migrants, doctors and nurses, but will she compromise on unskilled migrants to get a better trade deal

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

 6.  EU NATIONALS AND BRITISH EXPATS

 

WHAT SHE SAID

We  want to guarantee the right of EU citizens who are already living here in Britain, and the rights of British nationals in other member states, as early as we can.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Likely to agreed early on, as long as the EU doesn't want to haggle. Last year Mrs May offered to settle on the rights of three million EU nationals in the UK, and 1.2million Brits on the continent in advance of formals talks- but Angela Merkel refused.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*
7.WORKER'S RIGHTS

 WHAT SHE SAID

Not only will the government protect the rights of workers' set out in European legislation, we will build on them.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May is determined to at least preserve protections for workers on low and middle incomes-many of whom voted for BREXIT. Could come under threat if there is no deal., and Britain slashes taxes and regulation to attract business.

DEAL OR NO DEAL? 3/5

*

8. TRADE WITH EUROPE

WHAT SHE SAID

As a priority, we will pursue a bold and ambitious free trade agreement with the EU. This should allow for the freest possible trade in goods and services. But I want to make it clear. It cannot mean membership of the single market

CAN SHE DELIVER

The crux of the negotiation. Britain will leave the single market, and with it EU laws and free movement. Instead Mrs May wants a tariff-free trade and customs agreement to stop goods being held up at ports. She ruled out ' vast contributions' to the EU budget, and the only money going to Brussels will be for particular programmes and agencies like Europol. Her huge gamble is to threaten to walk away if the EU attempts to punish Britain

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

9. GLOBAL TRADE

 WHAT SHE SAID

A global Britain must be free to strike trade agreements with countries outside the EU too. But I also want tariff-free trade with Europe and cross-border trade there to be as frictionless as possible.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants deals with non-EU countries including the US. That would be impossible from inside the customs union, which imposes a uniform tariff on all non-EU countries. It would also make trade Secretary Liam Fox's job redundant.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 4/5

*

10. SCIENCE AND INNOVATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE have a proud history of leading and supporting cutting -edge research and innovation. So we will also welcome agreement to continue to collaborate with our European partners on major science, research, and technology initiatives.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Unlikely to be an obstacle to any deal. Much collaboration between academics takes place outside formal EU structures and will continue unimpeded.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

11. CRIME AND TERRORISM

 WHAT SHE SAID

All of us in Europe face the challenge of cross-border crime, a deadly terrorist threat, and the dangers presented by hostile states.  All of us share interests and values in common, values we want to see projected around the world.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Security and intelligence cooperation and defence cooperation cannot be a formal bargaining chip, but without making it one, Mrs May reminds EU allies of Britain's importance as an ally in fighting terrorism and important status as a military power.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

12.  A SMOOTH EXIT

 WHAT SHE SAID

It is in no one's interests for there to be a cliff-edge for business or a threat to stability as we change from our existing relationship to a new partnership with the European Union.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants tranitional arrangements to smooth the process of leaving the EU with specific deals on budget contributions, immigration, trade and customs lasting different periods of time. Securing this as well as securing a final deal within two years is a huge task.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

[THERE IS EVERY LIKELIHOOD THAT OTHER EU MEMBER STATES WILL BE GREATLY ENCOURAGED BY BREXIT TO LEAVE THAT SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION IN THE NEXT FEW YEARS WHICH SHOULD MAKE A NUMBER OF EU STATES TO CO-OPERATE FULLY WITH THE UK OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR UNFRIENDLY ATTITUDE AT A LATER DATE.

AS THE GREAT PRIME MINISTER - WILLIAM PITT -  (1759-1806) ANNOUNCED IN NOVEMBER 9-1805 SHORTLY AFTER  NELSON'S VICTORY OVER THE FRENCH AND SPANISH FLEETS AT TRAFALGAR.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

The blueprint of a Free and Prosperous United Kingdom should be the blueprint of a future Free Europe and the world at large. Our past still lives in the hearts of FREE PEOPLES everywhere and soon we will rejoin that sacred past which we left over 43 years ago because of traitorous politicians and others who couldn't see the dangers ,for the gross lies and deceit in their path.

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 18-2017

H.F.1092 BREXIT NOW

 

 DAILY MAIL

COMMENT

FEBRUARY 2, 2017

 

AT LAST, IT IS ALL CLEAR FOR

 BREXIT'S

LIFT-OFF

 

YESTERDAY  was a HISTORIC DAY for OUR COUNTRY. BY a RESOUNDING MAJORITY of 384, the COMMONS swept away [our  past 45 years of tutelage within an undemocratic-unaccountable-unbearable-corrupt-expensive- strait-jacket Europe.]

 

THIS was a historic day for our country. At 7.30pm yesterday by a resounding majority of 384, the Commons swept away the last serious obstacle to freeing Britain from the chains that have bound us to an unelected, unaccountable Brussels for 45 YEARS.

True, we can still expect dirty tricks from the 114 who, to their shame, voted  against implementing the

PEOPLE'S WILL.

Of these , this newspaper will not waste ink on cursing SNP members, whose fantasies of SCOTLAND as an independent EU nation state gave them a spurious excuse for defying the UK majority.

AS for the rest, no criticism is too harsh for those Labour MPs who represent solidly Brexiteer constituencies, but voted to

REMAIN.

They deserve everything coming to them at the next election.

So, too, do the creeps who in 2015 backed the call for a binding referendum, but voted last night against implementing its result.

Among these, none can beat the monstrous hypocrisy of

NICK CLEGG

-that flip-flopping representative of the moneyed elite, suckled on the [thirsty] breast of Brussels.

IN 2008, it was he who led demands for an in/out referendum on Europe (as we demonstrate on the opposite page-

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H F 1101-AT LONG LAST-FREEDOM AWAITS! 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Brought-forward from August 2003

[THE WAY AHEAD TO RECLAIM OUR SACRED INHERITANCE.]

Faced with the possible imposition (illegally) of a E. U. Constitution this  article contemplating our own U.K. Constitution (English Constitution), is especially topical.

J. Bingley

Constitutional Principles of Power and Remedy.

The Constitution is specifically intended, indeed designed to limit the powers of the state with respect to the people. The Constitution sets a standard upon which the performance of governance may be measured and contested and to provide remedy if abused.

The whole constitution originates its authority from

COMMON LAW

Supremacy resides in the

LAW and PEOPLE

NOT THE

CROWN or PARLIAMENT.

It is a matter of constitutional principle and legal fact that,

THE LAW IS SUPREME

The rule of law is the antithesis of arbitrary power. Integral with this, is the system of jury trial. It places the power of law enforcement in the

HANDS of the PEOPLE.

This the most vital safeguard against DESPOTISM.

The English Constitution's function is to

PROTECT the

"RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

 of ENGLISHMEN".

These are the 'BIRTHRIGHT' of the PEOPLE'

[In 2016 one can see how successive governments have by gradualism watered down these rights with even attempts to replace jury trial by trial by judge only on the grounds of speed and saving resources. The people in the main have been, amiss in not being vigilant to the protection of THEIR CONSTITUTION. In just a few weeks on the 23 June,2016 they have a choice whether to vote to leave the EU and regain THEIR LAW-THEIR CONSTITUTION-THEIR FREE COUNTRY. or REMAIN in an ALIEN COLLECTIVIST AND CORRUPT UNDEMOCRATIC EU with NO PROTECTION of MAGNA CARTA of 1215 and BILL OF RIGHTS of 1688 and NO ENGLISHMAN'S ' RIGHTS and LIBERTIES' to be passed on to FUTURE GENERATIONS.]

The fundamental rights and liberties are listed in the preamble of the Coronation Oath Act of 1688 which declares that  the oath is taken for the purpose of

" Maintaining our spiritual and civil rights and properties"

It is a contract with the people which makes it the permanent duty of the CROWN, and the CROWN in both GOVERNMENT and PARLIAMENT.

This contracts the Monarch to govern only according to the STATUTE, COMMON LAW, and the CUSTOM and to 'CAUSE LAW and JUSTICE with MERCY to be used in all JUDGEMENTS'.

All power of governance is vested in the CROWN.

The two Houses of Parliament may upon their concurrence offer bills for ROYAL ASSENT.

A BILL is not ENACTED until it has been authorised by the SOVEREIGN POWER.

Whilst the enacting power (a royal prerogative) of Royal Assent is entirely vested with the monarch it is contracted ONLY TO BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.  This is a limitation and essential safeguard to protect the people from any over mighty governance  [such as Tony Blair's and Gordon Brown's NEW LABOUR and since DAVE'S PARTY]

 It was used  to defeat the Divine Right of Kings; a claim of absolute power by the Stuart monarchs.  The OATH ascertains the SUPREMACY of the LAW, not the supremacy of CROWN or of PARLIAMENT.

There is certainly no Divine Right of Politicians.

The Coronation contract is of the Crown owing allegiance to the Constitution. The PEOPLE give ALLEGIANCE to the CROWN.

Here is a system of mutual protection for there is a constitutional interdependence.

The MAGNA CARTA

made provision for the PEOPLE to use ANY MEANS including FORCE if the CROWN is found to be in BREACH.

[THE CROWN IS IN BREACH!]

THE RIGHT OF RESISTANCE IS THE ULTIMATE REMEDY...

That which constitutionally binds the Monarch is a restriction upon Her Majesty, Her Government and all Parliamentary power.  The Monarch may do no wrong, but should she refuse by her negative power( the right to withhold assent) to

'LET WRONG BE DONE.'

[Millions of patriots have been waiting over four decades for:-

'Right to be Done!']

Sir William Blackstone confirms this. Whilst the monarch accepts the advice of ministers, they must only advise to do that which COMPLIES with the CONSTITUTION.  Plainly NO MONARCH is FREE to ASSENT to ADVICE that CONFLICTS with the CONSTITUTION in FORCE.

There is no authority in Parliament to pass any power of governance in England to those who hold or owe no allegiance. [such as the EU]

 There is no constitutional authority for Parliament to deliberately breach the constitutional laws by new   conflicting enactment.

 There is a natural duty resulting from the logic of our constitutional law to debate and resolve conflicts, if necessary by prior repeal.

 We must put an end to this form of 'legal' abuse, particularly through the misapplication of party politics.

 Most but not all of our constitution is written:- the Magna Carta, the Petition of Rights, the Declaration of Rights, the Bill of Rights, the Act of Settlement and the Acts of Union etc. It has evolved over centuries with the expenditure of much blood. It has been abused and corrected many times. It was finally settled by the Glorious Revolution of 1688/9.

The Judicial function is to be the independent arbiter between party and party or party and government under the terms of our constitutional law.  The courts are bound to declare upon the constitutionality of an Act where it may prove to be an action of unconstitutional governance. The great examples of the Magna Carta, the Petition 1628, the Declaration & the Bill of Rights 1688/9 make this duty of the court utterly plain.

Judgement may only be given in accordance with the constraints of constitutional laws in force.  At all times the presumption of law and justice in mercy be upheld and used  in all judgements. This is the trust sand the pre-eminent public policy reposed in the judiciary.

The right of petition to the Monarch is an appeal direct to the source of power, the Monarch is under OATH and at LAW, bound to provide REMEDY. Where there are RIGHTS there are REMEDIES. Politicians and Parliament must abide by the terms of reference and DUTY to the CONSTITUTION.

A fixed and certain standard with protection and remedy are the true purpose of the Constitution.

WE MUST RECLAIM OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE RULE OF LAW FROM THE SUPPOSED DIVINE RIGHT OF OUR POLITICIANS.

John Bingley-AUGUST 2003

*

[We ask how did it come to pass that the JUDICIARY did not PROTECT the CONSTITUTION from the illegal actions of PARLIAMENT and the Crown with the disclosures in 2001 under the 30 year rule from the Public Record Office at

 KEW-LONDON

 which revealed the CONSPIRACY of the FOREIGN OFFICE to prevent the PEOPLE from hearing the TRUTH of their TREACHERY and BETRAYAL. Under the 1969 THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION on the  LAW of TREATIES  there are two key provisions which authorise a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice.

1. Where corruption has been demonstrated in respect of pro curing the treaty in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

". Where there has been a material change of circumstances. A material change of circumstances has surfaced into the daylight (September 2005), to begin with, following the death of

Edward Heath.

. It has been revealed that he was an agent of a foreign power (NAZI-GERMANY-since 1938), accepted corrupt payment for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them-and that he did all this on behalf of a foreign power which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation.

[Massive payouts were given to the signatories of the  EEC which in reality was in effect the road to the corrupt-collectivist-undemocratic

FEDERAL STATE of the EUROPEAN UNION.]

*

[THE QUEEN FAILED IN HER SOLEMN DUTY TO PROTECT HER PEOPLE AND THEIR UNIQUE WORLD RENOWNED FREE PARLIAMENTARY INHERITANCE

AND APART FROM SIGNING ILLEGALLY 6 EU TREATIES CONTRARY TO HER CORONATION OATH-IN 1998 SIGNED TONY BLAIR'S SECRET AMENDMENT BILL  FOR TREASON FROM THE DEATH PENALTY TO IMPRISONMENT FOR LIFE-OBVIOUSLY THEY BOTH HAD REASONS  FOR FEARING A FUTURE IMPEACHMENT BY PARLIAMENT.

 

More!

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS}

MAY 30-2016

H.F.800

 

 

Dr MAX

THE MIND DOCTOR

 

NHS psychiatrist Max Pemberton may make you rethink your life.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The truth is

our jails are holiday camps...with drugs.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comments

 

When did you first start using drugs?’ I asked the man sitting in front of me.

He thought for a moment. ‘About two years ago,’ he said.

I looked down at his notes. ‘About the same time you went to prison?’ I asked. He nodded.

 
 

Drugs are now so rife in prisons that, according to a Royal College of Nursing report this week, staff have required hospital treatment for accidentally inhaling fumes from spice

‘I first tried heroin in prison,’ he said. ‘I got hooked. I started to do a lot of crack in there, too. And cocaine.’

‘But hang on,’ I interrupted. ‘You were in prison.’

The man laughed at my naivety. ‘It’s easier to score drugs in prison than it is outside, mate.’

This conversation, which took place a few years ago, was with my first patient in the drugs clinic I had started working at. The clinic was near a large prison and, on release, every convict with a history of substance abuse was sent to me. This man was the first of many I saw who not only used drugs while in prison, but became an addict there.

In fact, during the time I worked in that clinic, I saw more people who had become addicts while serving time than those who had been addicts beforehand. 

Drugs are now so rife in prisons that, according to a Royal College of Nursing report this week, staff have required hospital treatment for accidentally inhaling fumes from spice — the so-called ‘zombie drug’, a form of synthetic cannabis — while treating inmates.

Last year, 16 prison officers from Holme House prison in County Durham had to take time off after breathing in spice smoke in the cells.

 

Prison officers from Holme House prison in County Durham had to take time off after breathing in spice smoke in the cells

For today’s inmates, it seems, prison is an opportunity to sit, stoned off your face, watching TV while someone else does your cooking for you. It’s a holiday camp with drugs. And that’s not my view — but what patients have told me time and time again.

As one said, prison is not a deterrent; it’s a nice break from the realities of life.

Probably one of the most shocking things I heard was from one young man, not more than about 20, who said he’d rather be in prison because the drugs he could get inside were better quality than the stuff being sold on the streets.

I can’t be alone in thinking this is utter madness. How can it be that our prisons are now places where it’s easier to break the law than it is outside? What kind of warped message is this giving to those we lock up? Isn’t this the very antithesis of what prison should be about?

It would be easy to blame the wardens, but it’s not their fault. Many have spoken to me about their frustration at what they see. Health care staff tell of the utter futility of trying to implement change because they are not supported from above.

This is one of the reasons prison staff retention is so poor — people come with the idea that a prison is a place of rehabilitation, but soon realise it’s little more than a holding pen. Staff leave in droves, meaning that many prisons are understaffed, which further perpetuates the problem.

 

One young man said he’d rather be in prison because the drugs he could get inside were better quality than the stuff being sold on the streets

One nurse who worked in a prison told me that staff know all too well who is bringing in drugs, and how.

He said dealers would sometimes throw dead pigeons stuffed with drugs over the prison walls to be collected by inmates and their contents distributed.

Mobile phones are everywhere, he explained, so co-ordinating this kind of activity is easy. There have even been cases of drones dropping off supplies.

Wardens see it all, but are powerless — there aren’t the staff numbers to quell the aggravation caused when they try to clamp down. Nor is there the political will to stamp out the problem.

But let’s be honest — it’s not that difficult to stamp out. If airports can prevent people smuggling drugs onto flights, then surely a prison can do the same.

But in order to put in place effective mechanisms to stop the torrent of drugs flooding into prisons, the Government has to decide that this is a priority.

HM Prison and Probation service needs to make a firm commitment that it is going to clamp down on drugs in prisons and do so with immediate effect. Otherwise we are making a mockery of the justice system.

Prison shouldn’t simply be a punishment. It should provide an opportunity for people to reflect on their crimes and to make positive changes in their lives.

What it most certainly shouldn’t be is a place which turns people into drug addicts. 

 
 

A shortage of nurses, it was estimated this week, is costing the NHS £2.4 billion a year. That’s money that could be spent on patient care and treatments, rather than being poured down the drain paying exorbitant agency fees. But, for once, the solution is easy.

First, Brexit provides a wonderful opportunity to recruit nurses from outside the European Union. Once we have control of our borders again, we can decide who to allow into the country. And top of my list would be nurses.

Get them to commit to a minimum of five years’ work in the NHS in exchange for being allowed in.

Second, it’s important we nurture our own, home-grown nurses. Last year, fees were introduced for nursing degrees and grants were scrapped. This has seen a significant drop in applications.

Of course, no one becomes a nurse because of money, but it’s criminal that nursing students are graduating with vast debts. We need to send a clear message to those who want to train to be nurses that we value their vocation.

Scrap the fees and reinstate grants. Now.

 
 

Blair's to blame for hospital shop rip-offs

What a disgrace. WH Smith has been selling 80p toothpaste for £8 in a hospital shop. Although the retailer has since said it was a pricing error, and has donated the money made from the sales to a charity, exploitation of the sick is nothing new.

In a hospital where I worked that had a similarly eye-wateringly overpriced WH Smith, nursing staff would often pop out to the supermarket on their lunch break to get basic necessities, such as toiletries, for patients.

 

A £7.99 toothpaste for sale at Pinderfields General Hospital in Wakefield

Why do hospitals allow this to happen? This is a legacy of Tony Blair and — with the introduction of Foundation Hospitals in the early 2000s — the insistence that hospitals become profit-generating businesses.

There are only so many ways a hospital can actually make money and most have hit upon two things: car parking and renting out the space in the foyer to corporations.

It’s the latter that explains why the entrance to many hospitals now resemble shopping malls.

The casualty in this has been the much-loved League of Friends shops, usually staffed by volunteers, who wanted to give something back, often as a thank-you to the hospital who helped them.

Every time I pay £2.50 for a coffee in hospital, I think of the League of Friends who not only charged 20p but would throw in a biscuit, too.

 
 

The way to end abuse 

I’ve been spat at, punched, kicked, sworn at, had knives pulled on me and twice been held hostage during my career as a doctor. Sadly, my experiences are far from unique. There’s no doubt that those on the frontline of the NHS bear the brunt of some atrocious behaviour.

 

Things are so bad that this week, at the Royal College of Nursing congress, it was suggested that NHS staff should be fitted with body cameras in an attempt to keep them safe.

While attacking members of staff is unforgivable, the more pressing issue is not the staff abused by patients, but rather patients abused by staff behind closed doors.

I’m thinking of the elderly, the mentally ill or those with learning disabilities — the most vulnerable members of society — who are on the receiving end of horrific abuse and neglect, particularly in care homes.

The vast majority of abuse cases that come to light do so because families have placed a camera in their relative’s room. We should now start installing this as routine. In fact, if we could put them in every room, abuse would stop practically over night.

We’d weed out the perpetrators and allow those who really care to get on with their jobs.

Yes, it’s awful that we even need to consider action like this, but sadly, as so many scandals have shown, it’s crucial that we do.

 
 

Don't tell patients to 'fight' cancer  

Macmillan, the cancer charity, has warned against telling patients to ‘fight’ cancer, saying that talking about the disease in terms of a battle leaves sufferers feeling guilty for admitting fear and often prevents them from planning for their death.

Having worked on a cancer ward where I witnessed this for myself, I couldn’t agree more.

I saw how the idea of ‘fighting’ cancer made some people feel a failure when their condition became terminal.

It’s easy to see why. The words we use to describe cancer are the words of war. The cells ‘invade’ and we ‘fight back’. We have an ‘arsenal’ of treatments to ‘defeat’ it. Cancer is the ‘enemy’.

Why do we talk about cancer in this way? Because it offers us a false reassurance that the disease is something we can fight against. By using words such as ‘fight’ and ‘win’, we suggest the patient is responsible for their own recovery when, in reality, the success of cancer treatment relies on drugs, radiotherapy or surgery, not willpower.

It’s also a great deal down to luck — at what stage it was caught, whether it has spread, what organs are affected and so on.

And it’s this arbitrary nature of the disease that makes us profoundly scared. By using active words suggestive of a war, things seem less random. But the flip side is that it implies that, when someone doesn’t win the battle, they are to blame.

Even if we never say this outright, it’s often how those with cancer feel. You should have fought harder; you were not a good enough opponent. This isn’t true. Sometimes cancer is terminal and that’s no one’s fault, certainly not the patient’s.

 


Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-5746387/DR-MAX-MIND-DOCTOR-truth-jails-holiday-camps-drugs.html#ixzz5Fxz28b1j

Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

 

[OUR DEMOCRACY IS GOING TO POT ! BECAUSE TOO MANY SUPPOSED SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE HAVE DECIDED TO TAKE AS MUCH OUT OF THE PUBLIC PURSE TO SATISFY THEIR GREED THAT ANY TRUE DEMOCRATS THAT STILL EXIST ARE FINDING THAT ONLY A COMPLETE CHANGE OF PERSONNEL AND SHORT PARLIAMENTARY TERM OF SERVICE WILL BRING BACK TRUE SERVANTS OF THE PEOPLE.]

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

 

About 60,600,000 results
 

    News for DAILY MAIL-DR MAX


    Daily Mail
    DR MAX: I'd rather die than be put in one of our dreadful care homes
     

    Daily Mail - 1 day ago

    Dr Max says it's important young children are vaccinated as well as adults, as
    babies are twice the risk of catching flu if older siblings have not ...

 

 

H.F.1552.

 

 

 
 
A FREE PRESS!

It's finest expression had already been given in

MILTON'S

AREOPAGITICA.

Milton boldly proclaimed two principles of profound importance.

One was the immunity of the religious life from political regulation. The other was that doctrine which has been the strength of the best thought of individualism from his day to the present, to wit that the well-being of society requires the natural diversity of its members, and that coercive uniformity of morals and manners would spell the ruin and degradation of any people.

*

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

More!

 

 

 

 

 
THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR PAST OVER 50 YEARS

 (1959-2016)

 

 

 

THE SPIRIT OF A PEOPLE

THE FIRST TASK of any politics that could be really scientific was to relate authority to its principle source, to show its dependence on the whole social fabric, the customs and traditions, the modes of thought and the standards of life that prevail among a people.  ...the work of Montesquieu.   He really sought to understand society, to show the influence of underlying  conditions ,climatic, geographical, economic, to show that custom and institutions neither are made nor can be changed by fiat, to show that there is in every people a spirit of character which their law must reveal

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 A MATTER OF FACT!

On October 11-2017 15 months after the PEOPLE had voted to LEAVE the EU  the Daily Mail in its COMMENT column stated the FOLLOWING:

'YES, the Mail would have preferred a quicker and cleaner BREXIT but how foolish of Eurosceptic MPs to kick up a fuss about the planned TWO-YEAR TRANSITION PERIOD. After 45 years of subjection to EUROPEAN JUDGES, another couple will be a mere blink in HISTORY'S EYE. The great thing is that BREXIT is GOING AHEAD and barring REMOANER'S TREACHERY, SEPARATION WILL BE COMPLETE BEFORE THE NEXT ELECTION.'

STATEMENT!

[We and no doubt the majority who voted to LEAVE the EU, knowing the following true facts will no doubt NOT AGREE! with that COMMENT.

 What is FORGOTTEN is the MANNER in which the PEOPLE were DECEIVED by the TORY GOVERNMENT in 1972 and the LEGAL consequences of THEIR ILLEGAL ACTIONS as clearly indicated in numerous BULLETINS on our EDP website over the past 12 years. To call our DEPARTURE from the EU  a DIVORCE is a PERVERSION of the FACTS!  - A MARRIAGE if we are to call it THAT is INVALID if its DOCUMENTATION is  FALSE or obtained by BRIBERY and /or FRAUD.

  NO-MARRIAGE-NO CONTRACT-NO COMPENSATION

FOR THE EU TO EXPECT A GOLDEN HANDSHAKE UNDER SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES IS TO REWARD THEM FOR THE WICKED; ATROCIOUS; DREADFUL; INFAMOUS; OUTRAGEOUS; PERVERSE; SINISTER; VILLAINOUS; EVIL; CONDUCT OF MANY POLITICIANS WITHIN THE EU, SOME AS MENTIONED BELOW.

*

 

Below we have shown details of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and other relevant information which will clearly show that the UK could EXIT THE EU in MONTHS NOT YEARS. Obviously, there has been a COVER-UP of MAJOR PROPORTIONS by the POLITICAL CLASS in GENERAL because how can one explain the SILENCE! even FROM our FREE PRESS the FOURTH ESTATE in the land which we look too to PROTECT OUR  over a thousand year ENGLISH  RIGHTS  and LIBERTIES . Possibly the reason could be that there would be a REVOLUTION if the PEOPLE knew the TRUE FACTS?

 Added OCTOBER 11-2017

IN JULY 2016 AFTER THE SUCCESSFUL BREXIT VOTE WE ARE TOLD BY OUR NEW PRIME MINISTER MRS MAY THAT IT COULD BE YEARS BEFORE WE ARE FREE OF THE CORRUPT-_COLLECTIVIST- UNDEMOCRATIC EU WHICH DEVOURS MILLIONS OF OUR NEEDED POUNDS EVERY DAY OF THE YEAR. 

OUR MESSAGE TO FRAU MERKEL AND HER ROBBER BAND

IS

'GO TO HELL'

BUT

MRS MAY APPEARS TO HAVE A DIFFERENT MESSAGE EVEN THOUGH HER OWN WORDS WERE

"BREXIT MEANS BREXIT.

The following article was put on our website in October,2005 shortly after we received this most revealing information from

CHRISTOPHER STORY

 WHO GAVE HIS LIFE

FOR

TRUTH AND PATRIOTISM

 

FROM

INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW-

SEPTEMBER-2005

*

 

EUROPEAN PAYROLA SYSTEM

 

THE BUDGET FOR THE EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION WAS $5.0 BILLION

 

An account held by Credit Suisse in Zurich, labelled the ‘SBC’ Charcol Account, held a total of some $470 billion when last reviewed by sources.  These funds were originally derived from Nazi funds and assets, are routinely used to pay top politicians and officials to sign successive European Collective treaties- the latest being the so-called ‘European Constitution’.

The budget set aside from the ‘SBC’Charcol Account and to be distributed from the Credit Suisse disbursement account for the latest ‘update’ of the ‘rolling  European Collective Treaty’ was $5.0billion- $2.5 billion being payable in Euros to the participants from the 25 EU countries.

On the finalisation of the Intergovernmental Conference (IGC), which framed the text of the Treaty, and a further $2.5 billion payable in Euros on ratification.  This tranche is currently the subject of much dissension.

For each national cadre of key negotiator, therefore, the total set aside  was $100 million per tranche.  The chief negotiators of each EU country, plus selected officials were each to be paid from the national pot of $ 100 million, whish equates to roughly $75 million per corrupted European Union country.

Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian Prime Minister, was allegedly initially offered $50 million.  being an extremely wealthy man, he departed for the weekend in question in July 2004, following conclusion of the IGC, having indicated to those concerned that he was insulted by such a figure, and that $100million would be nearer the mark.  In the event, following an allowance for his wife, he was allegedly paid $75 million, according to sources.

Tony Blair allegedly received $75 million, which was paid into an offshore bank account held in Belize, the former British Honduras.  There, official eyebrows were naturally raised at the Central bank of Belize, where we notice that all of a sudden, the official reserves of foreign exchange jumped from $49.72 million in February 2005, to $164.53 million in March [2005]

Since the corrupt payment ‘due’ at the completion of the IGC will have been remitted in or about July 2004, this may suggest that the funds have subsequently (in March 2005) been taken into the foreign exchange reserves of the local central bank, so that their actual ownership can be disguised, a ‘new form’ of money-laundering: through a central bank!

 

WE ARE RELIABLY ADVISED THAT THIS CORRUPT PAYOLA SYSTEM IS THE NORM.

 

This means that the European Union’s Treaties

 are null and void,

as they have been obtained by fraud. 

 

That applies to the original EU Accession Treaty signed on behalf of the UK Government by [Nazi] agents Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon, agents of German intelligence, who were both recruited at Balliol College Oxford as discussed in this analysis.

 

It applies also to the Maastricht Treaty, signed by

 

John Major

 

Who allegedly received at least one corrupt payment for his services.  And it applies to the latest fiasco of the EU Collective.

 

THESE CORRUPT PAYOLA PAYMENTS

ARE ‘NON-REFUNDABLE’.

 

The second tranches of  $100 Million per country for the [New European Constitution] new treaty are payable on ratification, but following their referenda, the Netherlands and France cannot ratify.

 

*          *

International Currency Review

 

(Vol 30- No 4)

*

 

 

www.worldreports.org

 

*          *          *

 

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used –comments

in brackets]

 

OCT/05

 

THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION

Under the 1969 Vienna Convention on the

Law of Treaties

there are two key provisions which authorize a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice:

WHERE corruption has been demonstrated in respect of procuring the

TREATY

in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation.

AS the next section will show, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

2. Where there has been a material change of circumstances.

 

A material change of circumstances has surfaced into daylight, to begin with, following the death of Sir Edward Heath. It has been revealed that he was an agent for a foreign power, accepted corrupt payments for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them - and that he did all this on behalf of a

FOREIGN POWER.

which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation

As even more disturbing material change of circumstances has arisen as a consequence of the bombing of the London Underground and a bus , which took place on 7th July 2005, and the attempted explosions perpetuated two weeks later. We understand that the situation is so serious that the Civil Contingencies Secretariat has been in the process of drafting, or has drafted, legislation providing for the British Government to abrogate its putative international treaty [sic] 'obligations' towards the European Union.

ARE YOU STILL THERE MR HAGUE?

This development reflects the knowledge in certain UK intelligence circles that the attacks amounted to an

ACT of WAR

against the United Kingdom, and that the foreign powers behind this activity are ultimately controlled by the DVD from Dachau -( the same area of the World War II notorious concentration camp) which is the successor organization to the Abwehr, Nazi Germany's main external intelligence administration.

It was the Abwehr that first established , as a means of undermining British influence in the Middle East, the Muslim Brotherhood, from which ALL subsequent Islamic terror groups, without exception, originate. Al Qaeda, a descendant ultimately of the German-founded

Muslim Brotherhood,

is a controlled cut-out operation of international intelligence.

The Nazi regime and its Stalinist dialectical counterpart, were both Black Illuminati regimes. The Al Qaeda operation is an extension of the Black tradition, and is ultimately controlled, like the IRA (until very recently) by the DVD out of Dachau.

near Munich

For confirmation of the above and further information consult our bulletin board or contact

E-mail: cstory@ worldreports.org

Website:

www.worldreports.org

*

The European Union Collective:
Enemy of Its Member States

OCTOBER-2005

 

 

 LIFE AND TIMES

OF

Christopher Story

 PATRIOT AND TRUTHSEEKER

2010

 

H.F.1335/1-BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED EU

 

 
 

A REMINDER!

WHAT YOU ARE ESCAPING FROM SINCE TRAITORS IN YOUR PARLIAMENT SIGNED YOUR COUNTRY OF ENGLAND

AWAY IN

1972

AND IN LATER TREATIES UNTIL YOU SPOKE YOUR MIND ON

 JUNE 23-2016

 A DATE IN HISTORY WHICH WILL BE ALWAYS REMEMBERED

BY ALL TRUE ENGLISHMEN.

 

*  *  *

HOW IT CAME ABOUT!

Mr Macmillan and 1961

Mr Heath and 1970

Mrs Thatcher and 1985

From Major to Blair, Maastricht to Nice

The Price We Have PAid

 

*  *  *

 

H.F.1100 FREEDOM AWAITS

 
NEW SERIES

*

WHY WE VOTED TO LEAVE

THE

UNDEMOCRATIC-UNACCOUNTABLE-COLLECTIVIST-CORRUPT-WASTEFUL-GODLESS

SO-CALLED

EUROPEAN UNION

[WE WILL SELECT INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM AUTHORITIVE SOURCES CONCERNING THE ILLEGALITY OF THE EU TREATIES AND THOSE WHO LIED FOR PERSONAL GAIN AND POWER AND OTHER SUBSTANTIATED INFORMATION COLLECTED OVER THE 20 YEARS SINCE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE AFTER STANDING FOR ELECTION IN THE 1997 GENERAL ELECTION AND THE 1999 EUROPEAN ELECTION. MANY WHO VOTED TO REMAIN IN THE EU WOULD SURELY HAVE RECONSIDERED IF THEY HAD BEEN DISINTERESTED OBSERVERS-DECIDING ON THE FACTS AND PUTTING NATIONAL INTERESTS  OF FREEDOM  and NATIONHOOD OUTLINED IN MAGNA CARTA AND OTHER PRIZED DOCUMENTS HELD IN TRUST-SACRED HEIRLOOMS - FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS, BEFORE THEIR OWN COMFORT ZONE.  FORTUNATELY, THE GODS, WERE WITH ENGLAND-AND THE SOON RETURN OF

 A FREE LAND AND FREE PEOPLE.

OUR ENSLAVEMENT IN 1972 INTO HITLER'S PLAN FOR GERMAN EXPANSION AND POWER IN PEACE-TIME EUROPE WILL SOON BE AT AN END. AS A UNITED PEOPLE IT WILL BE SOONER THAN LATER. LET US WORK TOGETHER AS  AN EXAMPLE TO OTHER ONCE FREE PEOPLES WITHIN THE CAPTIVE EU WHO WILL SURELY FOLLOW. IF THE SHIP IS NOT ON AN EVEN KEEL IT CANNOT HELP OTHERS WHO WILL NEED OUR STURDY STEADY HAND.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

William Pitt.

 [Speech, 9th Nov, after Nelson's VICTORY at THE Battle of Trafalgar-with the destruction of the French and Spanish Fleets-Oct 21-1805]

MARCH 1-2017

 
A FAMILIAR WARNING FROM HISTORY - WE MUST NOT IGNORE!

'It is quite true that, in my opinion the waters which we have to navigate are likely to be stormy, and that the anti-social ferments within the nation are unusually malignant. But just a a healthy body generates anti-toxins to combat any virulent infection, so our nation

ENGLAND

 may be vigorous enough to neutralize the poisons which now threaten our civilization with death. Nothing but good can be done by calling attention to perils which really exist, and which may easily escape due attention amid the bottomless insincerity of modern politics and political journalism.

DANGERS OF PREDICTION

However , the dangers of prediction have been so often illustrated that those who are naturally disposed to optimism may be excused for rejecting the anticipations of coming CALAMITY, which  are now  [as in 2016/7] widely felt, though not so often expressed.

In the Victorian age we had  our profits of woe [and doom], who vociferated warnings about "shooting Niagara" when the country was more prosperous than it had ever been before. [As yet again in 2016/7].

Even on the morrow of our victory in 1815, " as soon as Waterloo was fought," says Sir Walter Besant, "the continental professors, historians, and others began with one accord to prophesy the approaching downfall of Great Britain," which they liked to compare with Carthage.

They emphasised the condition of Ireland, the decay of trade, our huge debt, our wasteful expenditure, our corrupting poor laws, the ignorance and drunkenness of the masses. Nor was this pessimistic forecast confined to our jealous neighbours.  In December 1816, the Common Council of the City of London addressed the Prince Regent as follows:

" Distress and misery are no longer limited to one portion of the Empire, and under their irresistible pressure the commercial, agricultural, and manufacturing interests are rapidly sinking.   We can ,Sir no longer support out of our dilapidated resources the overwhelming load of taxation.  Our grievances are the natural result of rash and ruinous wars, unjustly commenced and pertinaciously persisted in, where no rational object was to be attained; of immense subsidies to foreign Powers to defend their own territories  or to commit aggressions on those of our neighbours;  of a delusive paper currency; of an unconstitutional and unprecedented military force in time of peace;   of the unexampled and increasing magnitude of the Civil List ;  of the enormous sums paid for unmerited pensions and sinecures;   and of a long course of the most lavish and improvident expenditure of the public money throughout every branch of Government."

In December 1816, the Common Council of the City of London addressed the Prince Regent with the above statement.

Sounds familiar in 2017-Don't you think?

 

[EPILOGUE-William Ralph Inge -Dean of St Pauls ENGLAND-1938] -(1860-1954)

 

We endorse the final paragraph which states:

 

" I have laid bare my hopes and fears for the country I love.  This much I can avow, that never, even when the storm clouds appear blackest, have I been tempted to wish that I was other than an Englishman."

*

[We appear to have learned NOTHING! since this speech  in 1816 as the multiple evils are still with us today August 6, 2011. The reason is OBVIOUS! because the SAME! once invisible GLOBAL CONSPIRATORS are  STILL in CHARGE! and  are now in the OPEN!

If the ECONOMY has a DISEASE and FAILS to take the CORRECT MEDICINE then the END RESULT is OBVIOUS.

TOTAL CHAOS!

*

WHY DO WE TRUST THESES DISCREDITED DOOM-MONGERS?

By Alex Brummer - City Editor-Daily Mail-Monday, August 8,2011

 

 [EXTRACT]

...and the answer is that the CREDIT RATING AGENCIES are now seen as the ONLY arbiters prepared to spell out just how SERIOUS the GLOBAL DEBT CRISIS really IS.... After all, the very same AGENCIES were still providing the US. energy company ENRON with TOP RATING up to THREE DAYS before IT COLLAPSED in the world's BIGGEST INDUSTRIAL BANKRUPTCY...  They also gave a CLEAN BILL of HEALTH to FANNIE MAE and FREDDIE MAC -semi-official, but privately owned U. S bodies set up to expand the HOME OWNERSHIP and the availability of MORTGAGES-despite WARNINGS from the LEGENDARY American investor -WARREN BUFFETT -THAT they were BROKE... S&P's downgrade may look like a poke in the eye for the UNITED STATES. But with luck, it could in the end DAMAGE the FUTURE CREDIBILITY of the CREDIT-RATING AGENCIES - they are in MORE URGENT NEED of REFORM than AMERICA.

 

 

THE AMERICAN DREAM IS OVER!

 

h

 

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS almost BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/ ****    REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****    THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****       FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/  ****   A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?     **** GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/  ****    A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES? ****   THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/   WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/  ****   GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND****   50 YEARS OF SURRENDER***AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED.

DAVID CAMERON'S PLAN TO CLAW BACK POWERS FROM EU ARE DOOMED SAYS EU CHIEF IN OCTOBER-2013

*

THE HISTORY OF THE SATANIC COLLECTIVIST EUROPEAN UNION

***

HITLER'S+PLAN+FOR+A+

GERMAN+CONTROLLED

+EUROPEAN+UNION

***

TREASON

***

 

 

 

ENGLAND

 

 Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND?**** BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH****NEW LABOUR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND****UNLESS WE TAKE CONTROL OF OUR LIVES WE WILL LOSE OUR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY****.OUR PAST IS EMBEDDED IN OUR NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS -IT ASKS WERE WE CAME FROM AND WHO WE ARE .****.THE ENGLISH WITH OTHER GERMANIC TRIBES CAME TO BRITAIN OVER YEARS AGO - THE STREAM OF TEUTONIC INFLUENCE  HAS DECIDED THE FUTURE OF EUROPE****THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/ ****  THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/ ****    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/****  DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/ ****   NOR SHALL MY SWORD/****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/ ****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/****   ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY -CORRECT BROWNDOM/****    ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1- /****   ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/****    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./****   WHY OUR ENGLISH SELF-GOVERNMENT IS UNIQUE IN EUROPE AND THE WORLD****.ENGLAND ARISE! - TODAY WE CLAIM OUR RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION/ ****  KISS GOOD BYE TO YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY****  THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED? **** ST GEORGE'S DAY-ENGLAND'S DAY/**** ST GEORGE'S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ONSHAKESPEARE'S' BIRTHDAY****NAZI SPY RING REVEALED BY THE MASTER OF BALLIOL COLLEGE IN 1938 . IT INCLUDED THE LATE EX PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH AND MINISTERS GEOFFREY RIPPON AND ROY JENKINS.* * * *AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED****   EU WIPES ENGLAND OFF THE MAP**** THE ENGLISH DID NOT MOVE THEMSELVES SO ARE NOW SLAVES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE****"...What kind of people do they think we are?" by WINSTON CHURCHILL****THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

 

‘THE MAKING OF THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION’****

OUR CONSTITUTION OF OVER A THOUSAND YEARS – WHY DOES BLAIR MEAN TO DESTROY IT?****

OUR DISCREDITED DEMOCRACY OR IRAQ DICTATORSHIP****OUR LOYALTY TO OUR INSTITUTIONS AND COUNTRY?****Liberties of Parliament- Birthright of Subjects of England.****LOSS of TRUST in NEW LABOUR****New England’s Tears for Old England’s fears?****The House of Commons has a need of members dedicated to their Country-not time wasters.****English Constitution, by it they lived, for it they died****CABINET GOVERNMENT IS NOW A DICTATORSHIP****MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA SUPPORTS THE CROWN****THE FINAL BETRAYAL - Part 1-5****House of Lords legal Whistleblower – Speaks Out in Defence of OUR  Law & Constitution****SAY ‘NO’ TO EUROPE! – SAYS RODNEY ATKINSON****The Rotten Heart of Europe - by Bernard Connolly-Part 1-5****THE CLUB IS MIGHTIER THAN THE HANDBAG****WHY you should Vote at Elections to protect YOUR Democracy****The sole legitimate function of Government- is to Protect The Rights of its Citizens****So You Thought You Were Free****A DREAM TO REMEMBER- NEW LABOUR POLICY -2004?****NO SUPPORT IN HOUSE OF LORDS FOR INQUIRY INTO EU BY TORY WHIP**** Could England Survive Outside The EU?  -YES!****COST OF DEVOLUTION –N’IRELAND, SCOTLAND AND WALES LONDON +BRUSSELS****European Arrest Warrant – What Price Our Freedom Now?****Government Obsession With Spending Itself out of Trouble**** Bill of Rights of 1688 –Outlaws European Constitution****OUR UNREPRESENTATIVE VOTING SYSTEM= BREEDS TREASON -
BETRAYAL OF COUNTRY
****Impeachment of Ministers of the Crown – Why Now?****New European Constitution – Concessions Fudge.****The Judiciary – A Defence of English Freedom?****
New European Constitution – A ‘Bridge’ Too Far?**** Our way forward to Kinship in Liberty****OUR HISTORIC HOUSE OF LORDS MUST REMAIN – TO PREVENT TYRANNY****  Scottish Independence – Have No need of Union flag and Anthem****Misuse of Prerogative Powers by Tony Blair****A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION –CONSPIRATORS NAME  PARTS 1-5****

 

 

H.F.1099 FREEDOM AWAITS

 
 
 

 

 

 

OCTOBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2018

OCTOBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2018

OCTOBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2018

OCTOBER-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2018

OCTOBER-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 5-2018

OCTOBER-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-PART 6-2018

OCTOBER-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME--2018

THANK YOU FOR CALLING!

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

CLICK HERE FOR PREVIOUS FRONT PAGE-2012

JUNE-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2018

 

 

 

 

THE   ENGLISH CONSTITUTION HAS MANY ADHERANTS COVERING MUCH OF THE WORLD AND THE DECISION BY TRAITORS WITHIN IN 1973 MUST HAVE BEEN RECEIVED WITH DISBELIEF KNOWING THE UNIQUENESS OF THAT SACRED INHERITANCE PASSED BY ITS FOREBEARS TO THE PRESENT GENRATION IN KEEPING FOR FUTURE GENRATIONS TO COME.  WE CAN UNDERSTAND OUR COUNTRY BEING WITHIN AN ASSOCIATION OF FREE FREINDLY STATES

BUT

BEING A CAPTIVE STATE WITHIN A FOREIGN CONSTITUTION DEVISED BY THE LEADER OF NAZI GERMANY ADOLF HITLER IS NOT ACCEPTABLE BY ANY TRUE ENGLISHMAN.

WE FIND IT MYSTERIOUS THAT ANY INDIVIDUAL COULD GIVE UP THEIR COUNTRY IN SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES. AFTERALL, AS WE NOW OBSERVE IN MANY OF THE CAPTIVE ONCE FREE NATION STATES THE EMERGENCE OF A CRY FOR LIBERTY WHICH MANY NATIONS RECEIVED AT OUR HANDS OVER THE PAST 300 YEARS.