JULY FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2017 - (1994 -Official Website - AUGUST PT 3-2018 )-- JULY FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2017

AUGUST-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2018          AUGUST-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2018

AUGUST-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2018        AUGUST-FREEDOM NOW-PART 5-2018

 AUGUST-FREEDOM NOW-PART 6-2018        AUGUST-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME-2018

 ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY ORG.UK.

*

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links- IMMIGRATION-

ENGLAND FILE

 'Genocide - Eliminating The English' (pdf)

BULLETIN FILE  ARCHIVE-  EU FILE   IMPORTED WAHHABISM-FOR ARMS  FOREIGN AID FILE

*  *  *

 

 

Media caption Nigel Farage: "Brexit plan a complete betrayal"

Nigel Farage has said he is going "back on the road" to campaign against the prime minister's Brexit plan.

In the Daily Telegraph, the UKIP MEP said Theresa May's Chequers agreement was a "sell-out" as it included regulatory alignment with the EU.

He wrote he would join pro-Brexit group

Leave Means Leave

at UK public events.

Meanwhile, ex-civil service head Lord Kerslake has said consequences of a no-deal Brexit would be so serious, MPs would have to reconsider it.

The announcement by former UKIP leader Mr Farage comes after a string of resignations last month over the prime minister's Brexit strategy - including those of David Davis and Boris Johnson.

Mr Davis quit as Brexit secretary saying he did not agree with Mrs May's proposals, while former foreign secretary Mr Johnson accused the prime minister of pursuing a "semi-Brexit".

Mr Farage said "scores of people" had stopped him in the street to ask when he was "coming back".

He added: "Well now you have your answer: I'm back."

The 54-year-old said a "battlebus" had already been hired.

He later told the BBC that Mrs May's proposal was "a complete betrayal of what people voted for".

His comments also come amid calls for a second referendum on the final Brexit deal.

Campaign group People's Vote has also criticised the government's handling of negotiations with the European Union.

People's Vote argues the public should be allowed a say on the final deal agreed with the EU.

Lord Kerslake told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that, if the government was unable to strike a deal with Brussels, there would have to be a "pause" in the Article 50 process. under which the UK will leave the EU on 29 March 2019.

The crossbench peer said in those circumstances, the European Commission would likely insist on some "re-examination" of the 2016 referendum decision to leave.

"The consequences of a no deal would be so serious as I think Parliament would have to seriously consider whether it could contemplate this," he said.

"The question people need ask themselves is: is this a risk that they think we should be taking?

"If the government can negotiate a good deal, then so be it.

"But if they can't and we end up in this position, then we have to reopen the question of whether we go forward with Brexit at all. It is not too late to do that."

The government is due to publish a series of technical notes on preparations for a no-deal Brexit on areas including farming and financial services. But Lord Kerslake said this was "too little, too late".

On Friday, Foreign Secretary Jeremy Hunt insisted Britain would "survive and prosper" if it left the EU without a trade deal - but added it would be a "big mistake for Europe".

 

 

comment image

See: 80 Comments

[WE were surprised a matter of some months ago when we saw the close warm greeting between Mrs May and Angela Merkel when they met to discuss BREXIT. WE expected that they would have kept at arms length ,at the time, that  a distance between them would have given more confidence to Brexiteers that the negotiations would not be a 'SELL OUT' which in some areas such as our Fishing Fields and the sovereignty of our sea lanes... we now have our suspicions. ]

APRIL 9,2018

As the picture above clearly shows it has been decades of association between Theresa May and  Frau Merkel who was a civil servant under the  Communist East German Government.  May's treasonous Cabinet plan appears to have all the hallmarks of the mindset of the German Chancellor.  May has admitted that she is in close contact with her once teen age friend so we should'nt be surprised if more bad news follows?

AUGUST 7,2018

 

H.F.1525/1

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

AUGUST 23 -2018

 

H F 644

 

 

 

 

*  *  *

Weekly Geo-Political News and Analysis

by Benjamin Fulford

Questions from a military man

 

Benjamin:

I’ve been a follower for a while, and I’m a retired military with a high clearance.  I have a couple of questions.

First, what part of DoD are these folks working in who are discussing the cabal?  I worked in both the agencies and the DoD and never saw any of the things you mention.  I’m curious how they can keep things a secret within the ranks.  Bear in mind that I was privy to a lot of information and had a need to know with some of it but never saw any of this information.

Second, how do we win?  How do we out the MSM and get this information out to the public?

Best,
SM


Hi SM:

First of all, there is a lot of confusion with terminology, with people meaning different things.  For example, when they use the word “Illuminati,” for many it is a general catch-all phrase for the tip-top of the elite.  In the real world, there are two groups who call themselves “Illuminati.”  One is the descendants of the Caesars and the ruling bloodlines of Europe.  The other is opposed to bloodline rule and claims to have started the American, French, and Russian Revolutions.  In my work I refer to the latter as Gnostic Illuminati, and the former as P2 Freemasons or British Royal family, depending on which faction of the bloodlines I refer to.  Remember that as a reporter I got this information first-hand by meeting representatives of these groups.

The trick is to follow the money to understand what is going on.  What we are dealing with is a faction among the families that control the privately owned central banks.

For convenience and ease of understanding, I use “Khazarian mafia” as a catch-all phrase for the ruling factions engaged in high-level criminal activity.  You would probably have used phrases like Israel, the Israeli lobby, neo-cons, and oligarchs to describe the same groups.

In any case, the key to removing their power is to remove their control of the Western central banks and the Fortune 500 companies.  These are all controlled by about 700 people.

Concerning the media, the trick is to occupy the corporate headquarters of the six conglomerates who control 90% of the media and arrest their top management and controlling shareholders.  A lot could be accomplished by arresting the Sulzberger family who own The New York Times.  They could and should be charged as being criminally complicit, for example, in the crimes of 9/11.

What you also need to understand is that Donald Trump is controlled opposition who was bailed out by the Rothschild family each time he went bankrupt.  That is why he has failed so far to round up the people involved in 9/11.  This can be confirmed through open sources.

—BF

Guam citizens should have the right to vote in U.S. elections

I am writing on behalf of the governor of Guam, Eddie Baza Calvo, to ask you to consider publishing his recent letter to President Trump.

Governor Calvo Letter to President Trump-A Veteran A Vote

Guam is a tiny western Pacific U.S. territory, one-third of it occupied by two U.S. military bases, taken as spoils of war in 1898 and 1944.  Its indigenous people (the Chamorros) have long struggled for civil rights as well as political self-determination.  No one resident on Guam can vote for president or vice president of the U.S., although they are U.S. citizens by birth.

The governor is attempting to draw attention to the injustice of this issue with his initiative “A Veteran, A Vote,” because Guam has the highest military enlistment in the States or territories (one out of every eight adults), while being dead last in veterans funding.  We have highly decorated service members, such as former Congressman and Brigadier General Ben Blaz, USMC (Ret.), and Command Sgt. Maj. Martin Manglona, U.S. Army (Ret.).

Our non-voting delegate to the U.S. House of Representatives, Madeleine Bordallo, is preparing a House resolution on the issue as well.

We believe that at a time when the country is debating the rights of immigrants, this is a good time to remind the conscience of our nation of the rights of our veterans, and the rights of those who are already U.S. citizens.

On a personal note, I was born in Michigan to descendants of Irish and German immigrants and, when I moved to Guam in 2012, I too lost my right to vote.  As a longtime admirer of the suffragettes who won women the right to vote, I often wondered if I would have the courage they did.  Now I am finding out just how hard it can be to win attention even for a good cause.

Please consider helping our cause for civil rights by publishing the letter below.  I am also attaching a copy of the governor’s letter to the White House, some members of Congress, governors of other U.S. territories, and some members of the Cabinet.

Thank you for your time and attention.

Elizabeth (Isa) Bowman, Ph.D.
Special Assistant
Ufisian i Maga’lahin Guahan
(Office of the Governor of Guam)


AN OPEN LETTER TO THE NATION
From Gov. Eddie Baza Calvo

My Fellow Americans:

As another Fourth of July passes, in which our nation celebrates our independence from colonial Britain, and as debates over illegal immigrants continue to rend at the fabric of our unity, I ask you to join me in considering the rights of our own U.S. citizens in our island territories.

As the governor of the U.S. territory of Guam, I bring to your attention a matter of great importance to our nation—the plight of the U.S. veteran.

Our island of Guam is an American stronghold in the western Pacific and the “tip of the spear” in safeguarding our national security.  Our people are among the most patriotic of Americans:

  • One-third of prime land is occupied by U.S. naval and air force bases.
  • Guam has the highest per-capita enlistment in the U.S. military.
  • One out of every eight Guamanians has served in the U.S. Armed Forces.
  • The casualty rate for Guam service members in Iraq and Afghanistan is 450% higher than the national average.
  • Four thousand U.S. patriots are buried at the Guam U.S. Veterans Cemetery.

So many of Guam’s veterans laid down their lives, and thousands more fought and bled on foreign shores in the service of America’s noblest ideal—the defense of democracy.  Today, sons and daughters of Guam continue that legacy of service.  Yet, despite this, not one of these U.S. citizens can participate in the democratic process with a vote for their Commander-in-Chief, the American president.

This tragic irony affects thousands of our American citizens and military veterans living across the U.S. territories:  “Equal in war, unequal in peace,” as our late delegate from Guam, Brigadier General Ben Blaz, USMC (Ret.), told Congress.  Would we permit this to happen anywhere else—on the streets of Brooklyn, or in the small towns of Illinois—for those who gave their very lives to our nation?

“America, My Irony” is a memorial poem about the Guam U.S. Veterans Cemetery.  The Guamanian-American author, Joseph W. Duenas, is the son of a 27-year veteran of the U.S. Army.  His message resonates with our veterans, our military families, the U.S. citizens of Guam, and all brothers-and sisters-in-arms across the United States:  “And stacked four-high in concrete crypts, the U.S. soldiers lie;  no voice or vote for president;  democracy denied.”

American veterans residing in Guam and other U.S. territories have served our nation tirelessly for generations now, advocating with force of arms to protect our rights.  At a time of heated national debate, when voices are raised high for the rights of non-citizens and immigrants, whose voices are raised for their rights?

My fellow Americans, we have fallen short in advocating for the rights of our most honored citizens—our veterans.  It is time to right this wrong.  Where there is a veteran, there must be a vote.

EDDIE BAZA CALVO is the governor of Guam and a U.S. citizen who cannot vote for president.

 

America, My Irony
On this month of Independence & Liberation, we reflect on Guam’s greatest generation.  We honor those Guamanians, past and present, who have served the USA.

Watch the Video: “America, My Irony” (2 min):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sflb1VGnzR4

Issues simmering over the summer may lead to war in the autumn

Several issues could trigger a brief, sharp war inside the U.S., in the Middle East, and possibly even in Japan this autumn, multiple sources agree.  The key issue remains 9/11, a mass-murder event that remains unpunished and officially unacknowledged to this day.  The 9/11 war crime was used as an excuse for the mass murder of Iraqi, Syrian, Afghan, and other peoples.  Furthermore, if you dig deeper, it ties into the Kennedy assassinations of the 1960’s, the murder of Martin Luther King, as well as the December 26, 2004 and March 11, 2011 human-induced tsunami mass-murder attacks among many other crimes against humanity.

It is interesting to note, by the way, that the 350 or so corporate publications that last week simultaneously put out editorials calling for freedom of the press have not dared to write the truth about any of these crimes against humanity.  That’s because they are mostly owned by the people who carried out these crimes—the Khazarian mafia.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/08/16/politics/newspaper-editorials-trump-list/index.html

When is The New York Times and the rest of the corporate propaganda media going to write that it was the Zionist neo-cons who planned and carried out the 9/11 attacks?  When are they going to write about what was in all the Kennedy assassination documents that were recently released?  Why don’t they write that it was Israeli Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion, working under orders from his Khazarian Rothschild masters etc., who ordered the Kennedy assassinations?  Why don’t they report the truth like they are supposed to?

The complicity in crimes against humanity by these media outlets, controlled by six Khazarian conglomerates, means they are enemies of the people and need to be occupied by military police and forced to write the truth.

https://www.businessinsider.com/these-6-corporations-control-90-of-the-media-in-america-2012-6

The truth, as readers of this newsletter know, is that the Khazarian faction of the Western establishment carried out these and countless other war crimes to remain in control of the world’s financial system and thus true world power.  As a member of the British royal family once told me, “They are not going to go quietly into the night.”  In other words, it is going to take all-out war to remove these criminals.

A lot of people think U.S. President Donald Trump is going to be the man to end Khazarian rule and tell people the truth.  Well, so far, since being elected, he has not said anything about 9/11, Fukushima, or other war crimes.  You can also confirm through open source news articles that, as a businessman, he was bailed out by the Rothschilds each time he went bankrupt.

Of course, Trump would never have been allowed to run for President if he was not controlled through the usual combination of bribery and blackmail.  However, even then Trump was scripted to lose the election.  It was patriots in the military and the ABC agencies who decided he was the lesser of two evils and used Special Forces to break into the computer centers (like the one under Denver Airport) that were being used to steal the election for Hillary Clinton (Rockefeller).

Also, thanks to the military backers of the Trump regime, enough U.S. officials involved in crimes against humanity have now been removed from power for the next phase of the revolution to begin, Pentagon sources say.  The sources say that starting this autumn…
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

China’s AI “Goddess” and the East/West AI competition


Notice to readers:  This is the last of our three pre-written reports.  We will return to our usual weekly news format next week.  Your patience and understanding have been appreciated.

Last year, Russian President Vladimir Putin said whoever leads in AI (Artificial Intelligence) “will control the world.”  The Chinese took these words seriously and are investing huge sums of money in an effort to create an AI “Goddess.”  They hope it will give them unprecedented powers and help them in their bid to form a world government, according to members of Asian secret societies.

The West, for its part, is building a quantum-based financial system they hope will allow them to continue to control the main source of world power—the international financial system.

This battle is serious, and it even led to the Chinese supercomputer Tainhe-1—at one point the world’s fastest—to be blown up by unknown parties on August 12, 2015.  The fact that this explosion came immediately after a sudden unannounced 4% devaluation in the Chinese yuan was almost certainly no coincidence.  The fact that the European-headed IMF supported this move shows that the European faction of the Khazarian mafia was in on the plot.

Clearly, some sort of Chinese and European Khazarian attempt to use the devaluation and the supercomputer to destabilize U.S. dollar-based Western financial system did take place and was met with a kinetic response.

Now fast-forward to the third-year anniversary of this explosion.  As of June 2018, the U.S. Department of Energy surpassed the Chinese with the world’s fastest publicly acknowledged computer.  The system—called Summit—can process 200,000 trillion calculations per second, or 200 petaflops.  That’s eight times faster than America’s former top supercomputer, the Titan, and it maintains a big lead over China’s 93-petaflop TaihuLight, which had been the world’s fastest supercomputer since 2016.
https://www.energy.gov/articles/oak-ridge-national-laboratory-launches-america-s-new-top-supercomputer-science

http://fortune.com/2018/06/09/america-makes-worlds-fasts-supercomputer-title/

No doubt the Chinese will soon announce something even faster than that as the AI “arms race” continues.  These days, though, the Chinese, instead of concentrating on finance, are taking a different tack with a “Goddess” project.

Representatives of an Asian secret society explained the goals of the new Goddess project to this writer earlier this summer.  As it now exists, the Goddess can identify anybody’s face and within 7 seconds pull up all the data available on that person “such as their blood type.”  The data also almost certainly includes (to those who are authorized access) the person’s educational records, medical records, criminal records (if any), their address, family members, close friends, insurance, private messages, financial situation, gaming duration, smart-home statistics, preferred newspapers, shopping history, dating behavior, their “social credit score,” etc.  All of this within 7 seconds.  They can also follow a person “anywhere on earth,” the sources say.

The real aim of this Goddess project, though, is to…
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Secret societies, secret services and religions: The current balance of power


Notice to readers:  This is the second of three pre-written reports as we continue our summer “digital detox.”

The secret war for the planet earth has been intensifying and is headed for some sort of climax.  For that reason, before the autumn battles begin, it’s a good time to look at some of the world’s most important secret societies and the governments, religions, and agendas they are associated with.

The first thing people must understand when looking at this issue is that in the real world, spy agencies, secret societies, and armies are subservient to religions.  The reason for this is that even though Mao Tse-Tung said, “Power grows from the barrel of a gun,” it really grows from the mind of the person holding the gun.  So the battle for the planet earth is really a battle for the hearts and minds of the people who really count during a power struggle—the warriors.

Let’s start with the Asian secret societies.  Overall, their view right now is that the West has ruled the planet for long enough and now it’s their turn.  However, the Asian secret societies, just like their Western counterparts, are divided into several competing groups.

The biggest is probably the Hongmen, with 55 million members, mostly located in China and in Asian communities around the world.  Chinese President Xi Jinping is a member of this group.  It can be seen as a sort of combination between a chamber of commerce and a gangster group.  This sort of thing, by the way, is true of Western secret societies, too, because wielding big money and big power requires protection.  The Hongmen are closely linked to, but not the same as, the Chinese Communist Party.  Their hierarchy is based on meritocracy and not bloodlines.  There is a Taiwan-based splinter group as well, but they are losing influence and power due to poor leadership and the betrayal of their March 19th secret pledge.

The Hongmen say they want a world government so that humanity can live in peace and prosperity.  However, based on my personal experience with them, they need to become more multicultural if they are to succeed.

The second major Asian group is the Dragon family.  This is a grouping of old royal bloodlines with their networks of retainers and their stashes of historical gold.  They are strongest in Taiwan, Northern China, and Southeast Asia.  North Korea is one of their main strongholds, since that country is the real heir to the Manchu Dynasty which ruled China during the Qing Dynasty (1644-1912).  They are also strong in Northern China, Japan, and Mongolia.  They are the heirs of the Mongol warriors, and any country whose name ends in “-stan,” such as Pakistan or Afghanistan, has a strong Mongol heritage.  The Dragon family has close links to European royal families and also believes in a world government, but they think hereditary bloodlines and constitutional monarchies are needed to provide such a government with stability and continuity.

Another grouping that used to be very powerful was the Black Dragon Society (BDS).  They were behind the World War 2 Imperial Japanese push for a greater East-Asian Co-prosperity sphere.  This group thought the Nazis would win World War 2 and would proceed to try to enslave and then eliminate the Asian and non-white races, as Hitler indicated in Mein Kampf.  The BDS was very successful in recruiting non-European people around the world in their bid to end European/Western rule.  However, as an African-American activist explained to this writer, “We were all in favour of their aims, except that they told us we all had to become Japanese and obey the Japanese.”  There are several organizations that claim to be heirs of the Black Dragon Society, but none of them have any real power.

The other big Asian secret society is the Blue Dragon, and they are the heirs of the Assassins.  They are strong in Persia (Iran) and the Muslim world, especially the Muslims of India.  They believe a great leader called the Mahdi will emerge and rid the world of evil before the End Times.  This group, though lacking a clear leader, is working towards the common goal of liberating the Muslim world, especially the Middle East, of neo-colonialist rulers.

There are other Asian groups and subdivisions such as the Shinto-connected Three Legged Crow, but they are not major players in the current battle for the planet Earth and will align themselves with whomever emerges victorious.

Now let us look at Western secret societies….

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

H.F.1662

*  *  *

Yes it's scorching, but claims heatwave is climate change...[IS BONKERS!] - Daily Mail

www.dailymail.co.uk/.../Yes-scorching-claims-heatwave-climate-change-just-hot-air-says-CHRISTOPHER-BOOKER.html
July 25, 2018 .
 

Yes it's scorching, but claims that the heatwave is down to climate change are just hot air: June was even hotter when Victoria was on the throne, writes CHRISTOPHER BOOKER

450

View
comments

There is at least one thing about this summer of 2018 on which we can all agree: the past months have unquestionably been swelteringly, abnormally hot.

And not just here in Britain, but in many other countries right across the northern hemisphere.

In the UK, our own heatwave began in May and has continued relentlessly ever since. In Japan, where one city claimed the highest temperature ever recorded in that country, topping 106 degrees Fahrenheit (41 degrees Centigrade), the heatwave has been declared ‘a natural disaster’.

 

Parched grass on Primrose Hill, London, as Britain endures the driest summer for years but some experts are questioning the thermometers

Meanwhile, wildfires in Greece have killed at least 80 people, leading to claims that this has been the worst disaster of its kind seen in Europe since World War II.

There have been numerous other claims of temperature records being broken, all the way from California to Armenia and Azerbaijan (although here in Britain we have not so far seen anything to equal the 101.3f — 38.5c — that was recorded near Faversham, Kent, on August 10, 2003).

Distorted 

But more sober experts have raised question marks over the reliability of these temperature measurements, because of the siting of the thermometers which recorded them.

In every case, it turned out, they broke the golden rule that such thermometers must not be placed near heat-retaining structures or surfaces, such as in the centre of large cities, near airport runways or on Tarmac car parks.

This is because their readings are then distorted by the so-called ‘urban heat island effect’, which can exaggerate temperatures by up to 2 degrees Celsius or more.

One comical example of this was on June 28, when the UK Met Office rushed to announce that the 91.7f (33.2c) reached at Motherwell made it the hottest temperature recorded in Scotland.

 

A businessman in Tokyo feels the heatwave smacking Japan

Only when it was pointed out that its thermometer was in the middle of a Tarmac car park did the Met Office hastily withdraw its claim, with the rather sad explanation that the reading had been distorted by a ‘car left nearby with its engine running’.

But all these excitable little mishaps notwithstanding, it has certainly been abnormally hot. Above all, this raises the question: how unprecedented has this summer’s heat really been? And, secondly, how long was it going to be before certain climate scientists came round to telling us that this was unquestionably proof the world is in the grip of man-made global warming?

At last this week they have come in on cue, with Peter Stott, head of climate change predictions at the Met Office, and Rowan Sutton, head of atmospheric science at Reading University, both making that point loud and clear.

As Professor Sutton told us on yesterday’s BBC Radio 4 Today programme, thanks to climate change we can expect summers like this one to become more frequent. And even if we curb our carbon dioxide emissions in accord with the famous Paris climate agreement of 2015, this will continue for decades to come.

 

Elephants at Whipsnade Zoo are able to keep cool in the water

Perhaps it is time, therefore, to start looking at some proper historical evidence in order to gain a more balanced perspective on what is really going on.

For a start, here in the UK we have the longest-running set of temperature data in the world, the Central England Temperature Record (CET), which goes back to 1659. And this shows that June of this year was only the 18th warmest June in more than 350 years — the hottest being as long ago as 1846.

So this kind of summer heat is far from unprecedented. In fact, as people have begun to observe, the nearest parallel to what has been happening this year was the celebrated ‘drought summer’ of 1976.

That was the year when, as older folk vividly recall, the heatwave lasted virtually unbroken for three months, until rain finally came at the end of August. And, according to the CET, those daily temperatures 42 years ago frequently beat this summer’s figures hands down,

 

A lack of rainfall weeks combined with soaring temperatures is having a dramatic effect on water levels the Llwyn-on Reservoir, Merthyr Tydfil, Wales has had hardly any

But there is another striking parallel between this year and 1976 — as there also is with that other heatwave summer of 2003 when the highest single temperature ever recorded in Britain was set.

In each case the cause of the prolonged heat has been a large area of high pressure that has sucked in hot air from the Sahara (when my next-door neighbour returned to Heathrow this week, she found her car covered in this desert sand).

This in turn has been caused and prolonged by a movement of the jet stream (which dictates much of the northern hemisphere’s weather conditions) because of cooler ocean temperatures in the Atlantic. This movement has kept lower-pressure weather formations containing moister and cooler air parked further out in the Atlantic to the north-west of Britain and Europe. 

Sweltering

Although the causes of this cooler Atlantic are an entirely natural cyclical shift, the global warming-obsessed Met Office became so excited by that heatwave in 2003 that the following year it produced a report based on computer models, called Uncertainty, Risk And Climate Change.

This predicted that baking summers would soon be so frequent that by 2040 more than half of Europe’s summers would be hotter than 2003.

But the same 2004 report predicted that by 2014, global temperatures would have risen by 0.3c. In fact, during those ten years, temperatures recorded by weather satellites did not rise at all. Neither, until the past few weeks, have we seen a single summer to compete with the sweltering 2003.

We need to recall such facts, if only to remind ourselves that there are those so convinced of their particular theory of how climate works that they will leap on any evidence which seems to confirm that they and their computer models are correct.

Although there have recently been claims in the U.S. that America is getting hotter than ever before, more than half the temperature records for the 50 U.S. states were set in the baking ‘dustbowl years’ of the Thirties. Another 13 state records are even older. Indeed, only two state records were set in the 21st century, at a time when — we are constantly told — increases in industrial emissions are causing dangerous warming of the planet.

Drastic 

On yesterday’s Today programme, Professor Sutton of Reading University and his BBC interviewer agreed on how important it is that the world should follow the Paris climate agreement by making very drastic reductions in its emissions of CO2.

What neither of them seemed to realise was that the much-touted Paris Accord was no more than a wholly non-binding Western wish list. Even at the time, the rest of the world — led by China and India, respectively the world’s largest and third-largest CO2 emitters — made no secret of the fact that it had no intention of reducing its CO2 emissions.

In fact, buried away in the small print of the documents every country had to supply before Paris, it was clear the rest of the world would continue to build coal-fired power stations. China planned by 2030 to double its emissions and India to treble them, to keep their economies growing.

Despite all pretences to the contrary, Paris was little more than an empty charade. But the good news is that this may well have not the slightest effect on the world’s climate.

We shall continue to have abnormally hot summers from time to time, just as we did in 1976 and 1846, way back before global warming was invented. Meanwhile, we can only keep praying for rain.

 

Yes it's scorching, but claims that the heatwave is down to climate change are just hot air: June was even hotter when Victoria was on the throne, writes CHRISTOPHER BOOKER

Scientists Getting Filthy Rich On Climate Change? Here Are The Facts

*

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

July 25, 2018 .
 

H.F.1658

 

*  *  *

 

DOES this Government actually have a strategy on housebuilding.

the mail asks this question because every time a minister opens his or her mouth on the subject, something different comes out.

IT's less than two years since the then communities  secretary sajid javid promised the biggest state-backed houseing programme since the 1970s.

big developers would be forced to stop sitting on huge 'land banks' and 'get building' an accelerated construction scheme would open up 'brownfield ' sites in our towns and cities and unused publicly-owned land would also be made available.

There was certainly no mention in this great revolution of large-scale building over the

GREEN BELT

yet since then there appears to have  been a gradual but distinct policy shift. the green belt, designed to prevent urban sprawl and beautify our great conurbations, has become expendable.

UP TO 460,000 have already been pencilled in for green belt land. now chief treasury secretary liz truss has signalled there may be many more to come.

asked if she approved of 'paving over our green and pleasant land', she said: people recognise the choice is building on more greenfield sites...or losing the next election and ending up with jeremy corbyn.'

THIS IS OF COURSE A FALLAC. Y.

most peopledo not recognise that choice. they believe concreting over this land is an offence against their children and grandchildren, depriving them of green spaces.

this newspaper fully understands that we need more houses for our rapidly growing population. but enough brownfield sites have been identified for 720,000 new homes.

surly they should be built on first.

and what about the 400,000 homes that have already been granted planning permission

BUT REMAIN UNBUILT

because big construction companies prefer to sit on the land-allegedly

to keep prices high

why are they not being forced-in mr javid's words-

to

get building?

Yes, they prefer to build on the green belt because it is easier to clear. but this is land we hold in trust for future generations.

it should not be sacrificed for a

quick profit.

*  *  *

AUGUST 7,2018

[comments in brackets are ours!]

H.F.1654

*  *  *

 

 

*  *  *

A MAN of VISION-A LEARNED PATRIOT for whom LONDON DOCKERS MARCHED on WESTMINSTER in his SUPPORT-HISTORY has VALIDATED his FEARS.

*

 

Words

Enoch would never have uttered

 

by

Andrew Alexander

COLUMN

[Daily Mail- Friday, November 9, 2007]

 

 

THERE is a long standing form of moral evasion popular among politicians - and some journalists too - which has always intrigued me , if only for its

IMPUDENCE

It involves Enoch Powell's so called 'river of blood' speech in 1968, whose recollection has forced the resignation of the Tory candidate for Halesowen and Rowley Regis. The speech itself, incidentally, was notable for understating the prospective immigrant population.

 

'Ah, yes, you see,' the cry of the political elite has long run (I read it again last week),

'It was that speech , that phrase, which made rational discussion of immigration impossible.'

Note the implication that these people had been indulging in a rational debate on immigration only to be thrown off course by Powell's hand-grenade.

Let me assure you with every fibre of my being that a rational discussion was just what leading politicians were avoiding.

THERE WAS A CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE

by both front benches

-which drove Powell to fury.

Far from making thoughtful debate impossible, his speech and reaction made it

VERY URGENT

As an admirer and friend of Powell I was myself dismayed by that sanguinary phrase. But the real shock lay in the public reaction.

Dockers from the East End marched on Westminster demanding  to protest at

TED HEATH

sacking Powell from the Shadow Cabinet.

Opinion polls showed massive backing for Powell, to say nothing of the largest politician's postbag on record, in which the overwhelming majority supported him.

THE CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE

sprang from the fact that the problem had become so daunting. Effective action would have to be on a major scale , admit to previous failures and would risk, indeed ensure, denunciation from every pulpit in the land (lay and clerical)

It was easier for politicians and commentators, all secure in their leafy suburbs, to assure the public that the problem would be solved by

INTEGRATION

NOW, however, the genie was out of the bottle. So in the 1970 Tory manifesto Heath promised

'No further large scale permanent immigration'.

BUT

of course, there was.

 

The 1962 Commonwealth Immigrants Act

 

TOO LITTLE and TOO LATE

had allowed those already here or able to secure work vouchers to bring in their families and 'dependant relatives'.

THEY CAME IN SWARMS

 

PARENTS

GRANDPARENTS

UNCLES

and

SISTERS

and their

COUSINS

and their AUNTS.

They came from the sub-continent where birth certificates were far form common and anyone could claim a blood relationship. Money readily changed hands. So that Tories changed the law to say that only

Spouses

Fiances

and

Fiancees

would be allowed.

 

But by 1976, the level of intercontinental match-making had reached such a level the Foreign Office dispatched a senior official to the sub-continent to assess the

PROBLEM.

He observed that allowing in married and affianced partners would open up a whole new group of applicants -'subsequently entitling

PARENTS

GRANDPARENTS

and allegedly distressed

RELATIVES

to seek entry.

IT WOULD BE LIKE BAILING OUT THE OCEAN.

 

SO AN EFFORT was made to tighten up the rules but it was -how did you guess?

TOO LITTLE-TOO LATE

Since Heath's promise

TO CLOSE THE DOOR

more than

3,000,000

non-British immigrants have arrived

IN THIS COUNTRY

And traffic in spouses between such places such as

BRADFORD and BANGALORE

HAS CONTINUED APACE

 

Two other factors have long overhung any rational debate on

IMMIGRATION

Most obvious, in an echo of the Salem witchcraft trials, has been the tactic of pointing at someone and shrieking

'RACIST'

-the sin against the Holy Ghost - and even calling for

POLICE ACTION

Believe me , this accusation has long scared the wits out of

FLEET STREET EDITORS

-their legal departments

media commentators generally and politicians of every shade.

IT HAS BEEN CENSORSHIP BY ANOTHER NAME

-the public has been duly cowed.

A technical problem has added to this because the word

RACE

is SHORT -and EASY to FIT into a HEADLINE -while IMMIGRATION isn't. So arguments about IMMIGRATION were labelled in innumerable headlines as being about

'RACE'

The other problem which hindered meaningful debate was that immigrants had come to form a grouping of such

SIZE and IDENTITY

that politicians on all sides thought well worth wooing, indeed crawling to.

NOW

David Cameron has woken up, in intervals between sacking Tory front benchers and Tory candidates for 'racism' to the Government's vulnerability on

IMMIGRATION.

Ministers have trebled the number of work vouchers available to foreign workers over ten years to a level running at

150,000 a year

 

Cameron has no serious solution to

IMMIGRATION

but as the saying is, every bit helps.

 

The supreme irony of this week's fuss around Powell's 1968 speech is that recently had our supposedly internationalist Prime Minister promising

'BRITISH JOBS for BRITISH WORKERS.

Enoch would not have touched such a phrase with a bargepole.

*

 

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underling Used-Comments in Brackets]

*

[Under PR- Proportional Representation the Immigration levels would have been curtailed because the Government of the Day would feel obliged to take a stronger line in order to gather up the votes and back to power. But as we all know it has been this single-minded attitude of the tripartite in your

HOUSE OF COMMONS

to keep power within their grasp and to hell to any outsiders.

Most of the problems in our society over the past 40 years have occurred because of the determination of the party in power to take what they consider a more lenient line on policy whether it is

CAPITAL PUNISHMENT

ABORTION

IMMIGRATION

and no doubt dozens of other matters which has resulted in absolute chaos in the above areas.

If they are able to claw in another small section of the community which will be ready voters they will change anything what ever the consequences to the people and the country.

We have been calling for the introduction of

PR in our PARLIAMENT

for many years as a number of bulletins on our website can testify but the very organisations that could achieve this necessary alteration -the numerous political organisations in our country appear not to be interested. And that is the PROBLEM

and until we change the system we shall see the constant over-regulation by the Government and the hair-brained schemes adopted by the so-called OPPOSITION which lays a path of problems in the future.

Of course if PR had been in place over the last four decades there would not have been the

WAR in IRAQ

or even

Mission Impossible in Afghanistan.

 

The Abortion Bill would only have passed if much greater safeguards had been put in place.

 

Immigration would have been freely discussed and sensible measures adopted to allow controlled entry ONLY and those who were prepared to INTEGRATE and NOT THREATEN the very existence of the COUNTRY that they were adopting.

 

Abolition of Capital Punishment Bill failed to honour the feelings in the country that if the Death Sentence was abolished that MURDER would mean a LIFE SENTENCE where the circumstances warrant it. Even before the abolition of the penalty over 50 per cent of murderers had their sentence commuted to life imprisonment and that didn't mean twelve or even three years or less today. The liberal establishment have much to answer for ,whether in believing that prisons should be five star hotels or that a fine that is never paid is the answer to the increased

MURDERS- GUN /KNIFE CRIME- BURGLARY- ROBBERY-THEFT-ASSAULT and whatever.

 

 

Our so-called Criminal Justice system would have been unable to treat prisoners as visitors and victims as criminals and there would have been Bobbies of the Beat- more prisons, and punishment to fit the crime.

Over the past 40 years the majority of your politicians in

YOUR HOUSE of COMMONS

 have been feathering their own nests to the point today in November 2007 there are many of them on a comfortable

£250,000 [at least] a year.

They fiddle their expenses-They lie about their expenditure-They lie about the true facts of the EU. In fact many of them lie about almost everything. They only work for a little over half a year .They have gold-plated pensions and they will be comfortable for the rest of their lives. As for what happens to their country as far as many of them are concerned our country had never existed.

Of course in such a bedlam there are a small group of men and women of

Honour and Integrity

who alas are ignored by their colleagues -some say they even detest them. Guilty secrets no doubt.

 

As for Europe the lies could not have been hidden if there had been eurosceptic parties at Westminster.  And the CONSPIRACY that has taken place since 1972 would not have been in place and our NATIONHOOD and COUNTRY threatened with extinction as will be the case in your Parliament in the early months of 2008.

*

THE ENEMY WITHIN IS YOUR OWN GOVERNMENT WHICH INTENDS TO SELL YOUR COUNTRY TO FOREIGN POWERS.

November-2007.

*

H.F.1594

*  *  *

UK

[ENGLAND]

    THE MOST CROWDED COUNTRY IN EUROPE FOR DECADES

 
 

    News for DAILY MAIL-

     

     

     

     

     

    3.8million EU migrants

     

     

     

     

     

    allowed to STAY HERE

     

     

     

     

     

    That's 600,000 more than previously expected ..It is

     

    because officials

     

     

     DO NOT KNOW HOW MANY EU MIGRANTS

     

     

    are

     

     

     

    LIVING HERE

     

     

     (

     

     

    EU migrants and their relatives

     

     

     

    are allowed to stay here after

     

     

     

     Brexit

     

     

    Nearly 4 million EU migrants

     

     

     

    will be allowed to

     

     

    live permanently in Britain ...

     

     

    They will be given the automatic right to settle here

     

     

    as long as they pay £65-about £10 less than the

     

     

     minimum cost of a

     

     

     UK passport...

     

     

    FULL ARTICLE

    by Ian Drury

    Home Affairs Editor

    About 52,300,000 results

     

      Fact Check: is the UK the most crowded country in Europe?

      theconversation.com/fact-check-is-the-uk-the-most-crowded-country-in-europe-38468
      9 Mar 2015 ... The UK is one of the most densely populated countries in Europe, but ... strong
      earnings growth in London and the south east over decades.

       

      UK to be EU's most populous country in just three decades, due to ...

      https://www.rt.com/uk/313929-uk-immigration-eurostat-germany/
      31 Aug 2015 ... If current immigration and birth rate patterns continue, the United Kingdom will
      overtake Germany to accommodate a population of over 75 ...

       

      England to be most crowded in Europe - Telegraph

      https://www.telegraph.co.uk/.../England-to-be-most-crowded-in-Europe.html
      5 May 2008 ... England to be most crowded country in Europe ... About 1.3 million immigrants
      have arrived in the past decade and ministers say the record ...

       

      Britain set to 'have the LARGEST population in Europe within ...

      https://www.express.co.uk/.../uk/.../uk-population-britain-largest-europe-germany-france-migration-poland-czech-republic
      11 Jul 2017 ... Projections suggest the UK could become the most populous in Europe by ... The
      ONS report revealed that eight east European countries had ...

       

      Fact Check: is the UK the most crowded country in Europe?

      https://www.sheffield.ac.uk/.../uk-immigration-crowded-ukip-1.447474
      9 Mar 2015 ... The UK is one of the most densely populated countries in Europe, but ... strong
      earnings growth in London and the south east over decades.

       

      England is officially Europe's most densely packed major country ...

      www.dailymail.co.uk/.../This-worryingly-crowded-isle-England-officially-Europes-densely-packed-country.html
      27 Dec 2013 ... England has become the most overcrowded major country in Europe. .... Only
      three decades from now, unless there is a significant tightening in ...

       

      UK population to hit 70 million in less than a decade | UK news | The ...

      https://www.theguardian.com/uk.../uk-population-to-hit-70-million-ons-in-less-than-a-decade
      3 Mar 2017 ... Country to become Europe's most populous nation by 2050 but Brexit could
      change projections, says ONS.

       

      UK population to overtake France's in a decade | News | The Times

      https://www.thetimes.co.uk/.../uk-population-to-overtake-france-in-a-decade-tgxjfnrw0
      9 Jul 2016 ... The UK is on course to overtake France to become the second most populous
      country in Europe within a decade, as migration drives ...

       

      UK population will surpass that of France in a decade, according to ...

      https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/uk-population-will-surpass-that-france-decade-according-eurostat-1569790
      11 Jul 2016 ... Britain's population could overtake France's, making it the second most populous
      country amongst European Union states within a decade, ...

       

      You'll never guess which is the most densely populated country in ...

      https://unherd.com/.../youll-never-guess-densely-populated-country-europe/
      19 Mar 2018 ... ... Luxembourg, what is the most densely populated nation in Europe? ... with 505
      people per square kilometre, followed by England on 426. ... with density, they're
      a time-tested way of sustaining it over decades and centuries.

       

     

     

H.F.1578

*  *  *

NHS

NATIONA yL HAPHAZARD SERVICE

Have you had occasion to visit your A&E department in your home town with an urgent letter from your GP requesting that an urgent blood test was required with  immediate results because the patient only month's away from her 90th birthday, had a suspected blood clot in her lower leg, which needed to be investigated without delay. Obviously, one would have considered such an occurrence as dangerous to the person concerned-therefore the urgent need for immediate confirmation of the patients condition.

The patient arrived at the hospital at 8pm and had still not been seen by a doctor or any of the nursing staff at 10pm whereas the couple were under the impression that a system was introduced a few years ago in order that an assessment could be made as to the urgency of treatment in individual cases but it soon became obvious that no such system was in place so that after 2 hours the husband of the patient asked the counter staff when his wife would be attended to and with no confirmation that his wife of 89 would be able to see any nursing staff informed them that he would take his wife home. This prompted the reply that they would get someone to attend to his wife immediately. But it was after midnight before the couple could leave the hospital because of further delays until the examination and treatment was finally completed.

The impression that was gained was that even with a letter from the GP there was no assurance as to the time as to when the first assessment is made by the nursing staff. In fact the husband was told that the requests from GPs was looked on as wasting the time of hospital staff because it was mentioned that Surgery's had the capability to do blood testing in house rather than bother the overburdened A&E. But obviously if the facilities meant a delay in obtaining the necessary information then A& E would be the obvious place to send patients with a letter stating the reasons for urgent assistance.

The husband lost his cool when he realised that his 89 year old-old-frail and underweight wife with pain and discomfort in her lower leg and tired because of a number of unsettling nights with the husband also experiencing the concern of his wife's condition -was in the middle of an vendetta between the SURGERY and A&E and was most vocivorous  about the delay in investigation and  treatment for his wife , being placed in the middle of the dispute.

One thing was most obvious that without foreign doctors the NHS would collapse over night but there is also the question that the patients concerns are not understood and as a result this adds to that difficulties experienced by the lack of financial resources for the NHS whereas at the same time people in other countries have the use of cash machines and whatever enjoying the 'goodlife' from our  BLOATED FOREIGN AID while patients receive a

THIRD WORLD HOSPITAL SERVICE at HOME!

NHS is 'worse than healthcare in Ireland, Spain and Slovenia' in ...

*  *  *

AUGUST 23-2018

WARWICK-ENGLAND

 

H.F.1671

*  *  *

 

Boris Johnson sparks fury by saying the burqa makes women look like 'bank robbers' and 'letter boxes'

  • Ex Foreign Secretary mocked the full face veils
  •  in his weekly newspaper column 
  • The intervention comes after a woman was fined in Denmark
  •  for wearing a
  • niqab 
  • Labour MP David Lammy said Mr Johnson was a 'pound-shop Donald Trump' 
 
 

*  *  *

 

 

Boris Johnson sparks fury by saying the burqa makes women look like 'bank robbers' and 'letter boxes'

  • Ex Foreign Secretary mocked the full face veils
  •  in his weekly newspaper column 
  • The intervention comes after a woman was fined in Denmark
  •  for wearing a
  • niqab 
  • Labour MP David Lammy said Mr Johnson was a 'pound-shop Donald Trump' 

*  *  *

 

TOLERATION

'Toleration is a giood thing in its place; but you cannot tolerate what will not tolerate you, and is trying to cut your throat.'

Froude

[Mrs May will not take advice from a senior Muslim Cleric who has urged for many years to successive governments to ban the  Niqab and Burka which are not mentioned in the Koran. With over 3,000,000 Muslims in our country with an estimated 60% unwilling to INTEGRATE   Mrs Mays dilatory and dangerous message must be received with huge delight.   Just as with BREXIT Theresa May can't avoid

 

BUT SEND THE WRONG MESSAGE.]

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS]

 

H.F.1647

 

*  *  *

 

 

RUTH DUDLEY EDWARDS: Angry at Boris? I just feel rage for the women forced to hide away behind the burka

 
 
 

103

View
comments

 

Boris Johnsons joke about burka-wearing women looking like ‘letter boxes’ made me wince – not least because I know there are so many women forced to dress that way at the behest of their menfolk and who hate how it makes them look.

There are many worse things than giving offence, and one of them is to cordon off contentious topics and designate them no-go areas, while demanding punitive attitudes to people who make inappropriate jokes.

So full marks to the former Foreign Secretary for getting this desperately needed public debate going.

 

'Full marks to the former Foreign Secretary for getting this desperately needed public debate going,' writes Ruth Dudley Edwards

If he’d tackled the subject by writing something that wouldn’t upset even the most sensitive imam, then we might not now be having frank discussions in pubs, on phone-in programmes and on social media about two issues we need to speak truthfully about.

First, are we entitled to outlaw cultural practices that come from abroad that, for whatever reason, a majority of people feel uncomfortable with?

And secondly, in the interests of showing sensitivity towards those who feel slighted, should we curtail free speech?

Taking the first point, I agree with Boris that the burka shouldn’t be banned as it has been in France, Belgium, Chad, Cameroon and Denmark.

 

'So many women forced to dress that way at the behest of their menfolk and who hate how it makes them look,' writes Ruth Dudley Edwards 

Stopping people wearing what they like is an interference with the individual liberty we prize in this country, so we shouldn’t do it.

Yes, the language he used gave offence to the kind of people who like to take offence, particularly extreme liberal cheerleaders who think it unforgiveable ever to criticise minorities.

He has also, of course, given the Left a golden opportunity to distract attention from the anti-Semitism that is poisoning the once great Labour Party by alleging that the Conservative party is Islamophobic.

But it cannot be denied that many of us talk in private about how we are troubled by the burka and the niqab, though few of us will say so in public for fear of being accused of being Islamophobic or racist.

I come to the subject as someone who has studied Islam. When Islamist acts of terror emerged as a potential threat here, I wanted to learn more about the dangers posed by extreme Islam and began reading extensively, writing and debating about it.

The climate for debate, however, has deteriorated because of restrictive laws about so-called hate-speech passed by a pusillanimous liberal elite, officiously policed, and supported by teachers and academics who tell their students they can’t challenge liberal pieties until they end up too terrified to question anything.

Added to that are sanctimonious media and Twitter mobs that can destroy people’s careers with screeching accusations of racism or sexism over a clumsy word. As a result, free speech is becoming gradually stifled.

This in turn spreads resentment and can fuel the far-Right, as we are seeing in Britain. So I feel that those of us who are battle-hardened should tell the truth bluntly, even if it’s impossible to open your mouth without offending somebody. 

 

Maajid Nawaz (pictured) says the burka is 'the uniform of medieval patriarchal tyranny'

Personally, I feel that wearing the burka and the niqab implies a rejection of our society, yet I have no doubt that some women are permitted no choice but to cover up by fathers, husbands or brothers.

I also believe strongly that we should stand up to self-appointed spokespeople like Baroness Warsi (she has accused Boris Johnson of encouraging hate crime), and Lord Sheikh (he wants him thrown out of the Tory party) who try to shame us out of being frank.

I have read the Koran twice, and know there is no requirement in it for women to cover their faces or even their hair. So any time you hear anyone claiming otherwise, know they are either ignorant or lying, and feel free to tell them it’s an Arab cultural practice that is out of place in the West.

My position was neatly summed up on Twitter by Maajid Nawaz, a one-time Islamist who co-founded Quilliam, the think tank which challenges extremism. Through his LBC radio show he debates with everyone and is cheered on by many Muslim listeners who hate what is being said in their name by fundamentalists.

The burka ‘is the uniform of medieval patriarchal tyranny,’ he wrote. ‘It victim-blames women for their beauty. Where this is enforced it symbolises violent misogyny. I’m not advocating banning this monstrosity but I refuse to defend it. It deserves to be ridiculed. Not the women inside it.’

Neither the law nor misguided sensitivity should prevent women being required to show their faces at passport control or to police or security personnel at the point of entrance to any building, public or private.

Shops should have the right to refuse service to anyone with a covered face. No child should have a schoolteacher nor any patient a nurse whose face they can’t see, and any judge and jury are entitled to watch the expressions on the faces of participants in a court case.

Much as I dislike the veil, though, I do sometimes smile at someone wearing one if we are in close proximity, not least because it’s all too possible they are unwilling victims of a tyrannical relative, and I want to reassure them that they are not in a hostile world.

I have nothing but contempt, however, for non-Muslims who defend a uniform that isolates women from normal life and makes it almost impossible to make cross-community friendships.

I hope the hysteria over what was a perfectly rational and liberal article – with just one or two elements that might have been better expressed – will encourage us all to stand up for our right to say what we think, however unfashionable.

 

H.F.1650

*  *  *

 

 

 

 

*  *  *

 

 

 

Patriotic, optimistic and a world expert on trade deals: Why Theresa May must listen to top aide Crawford Falcone on Brexit (and not the rest of the defeatist civil service)

 

For those in despair over the lack of progress on Brexit, as our political class trade blows and the entire process becomes bogged down in a quagmire of their making, there is a small corner of a government department that they can turn to for cheer.

It is the office of Crawford Falconer, Chief Trade Negotiation Adviser at the Department of International Trade, a man of immense experience in such matters. And, in contrast to the doomsayers, his message about Brexit is one of almost unbounded optimism.

Rather than get het up about every scintilla of the negotiating process, he insists on looking at the bigger picture, saying: ‘Keep your eye on the end game.’

 

It is the office of Crawford Falconer, Chief Trade Negotiation Adviser at the Department of International Trade, a man of immense experience in such matters. And, in contrast to the doomsayers, his message about Brexit is one of almost unbounded optimism

Thrive

He is convinced that after a period of psychological and economic adjustment to being outside the EU, Britain’s fortunes will thrive. He cannot understand why people are ‘so negative about our future’, and says the world is ‘begging’ to do trade deals with us.

Some will scoff, of course, saying his upbeat comments are simply the pipedream of a pro-Brexit ideologue.

But that could not be further from the truth. For Falconer is a man with 25 years of experience in international trade negotiations. He was New Zealand’s ambassador in Britain (although born in Scotland, he was brought up a Kiwi), as well as his adopted country’s permanent representative to the World Trade Organisation (WTO).

His knowledge of the working of the Geneva-based organisation is crucial, considering its role trying to tear down trade barriers, lower tariffs and resolve commercial disputes between nations. Indeed, the fact is that if Britain leaves the EU without a deal, all our world trade relationships will be in the hands of the WTO.

Yet his verdict on a post-Brexit Britain could not be more upbeat.

‘The opportunities are enormous,’ he told the Sunday Times. ‘There are so many, where do I start? In ten years, maybe even quicker, people will look back and say: “Oh, why were we so negative about our future?” ’

Nor is his optimism dimmed by Mrs May’s Chequers deal. He believes that once outside the EU, whether after a soft or a hard Brexit, the Government will be much better placed than the doom-mongers behind Project Fear claim.

He says we’ll benefit from a ‘change of direction’ — not least because Brexit has forced businesses to focus on the potential of selling services and goods outside the EU.

Indeed, his enthusiasm is so infectious it makes you think that if he was in charge of Brexit, the whole thing would be wrapped up by now.

And far from being pie-in-the-sky, his reasoning is based on solid evidence.

The Washington-based International Monetary Fund forecasts that over the next ten to 15 years almost all significant global growth will originate outside Europe.

By 2020, China’s middle class — who are powerful engines of economic growth — will have expanded to 600 million people. India’s already numbers up to 300 million. It is estimated there will be 1.1 billion African middle classes by 2060.

Envied

Those populations, Falconer explains, will be desperate for British services and goods.

‘The world is the UK’s oyster,’ he says. ‘We produce the best professional services in the world. Our banks are the best in the world. Our insurance companies the most reliable. Our architects, our designers, our lawyers, our accountants: they are world-class.

‘We have intellectual property rights to die for. It is these services that the fastest-growing economies in Asia and Africa crave. The world is begging for the UK to be able to trade with it. We’ll be pushing on an open door.’

He sees huge export opportunities in goods from cars to aircraft wings and foodstuffs. ‘The world is crying out for protein and safe food generally. In East Asia, that’s what they want. They don’t trust their domestic production, with good reason. The UK makes world-class produce. We can now negotiate with countries in a way that’s specifically tailored to getting our salmon and our venison on tables.’

 

For those in despair over the lack of progress on Brexit, as our political class trade blows and the entire process becomes bogged down in a quagmire of their making, there is a small corner of a government department that they can turn to for cheer

He’s right. Even amid the present political stalemate, Britain’s exports of professional and financial services to the rest of the world (including the EU) climbed from £36.9 bn in the first quarter of 2017 to £37.8 bn in the same three months of this year.

As well as a being a powerhouse for financial services, Britain is home to Europe’s top four research universities and dominates in sectors such as popular music, computer gaming, video and publishing.

We’re world-beaters in pharmaceutical and aerospace research. Our technology know-how is envied across the globe, with Chinese, Japanese and American digital firms constantly on the prowl to buy our leading innovative firms.

In the past six months, Chinese firms have invested £1.7 bn in UK technology.

Every businessman or woman worth their salt is fully aware of the opportunities available by exploiting this huge competitive advantage.

And Dr Liam Fox and his Department of International Trade colleagues are determined to do so. Post-Brexit, they argue, Britain can take advantage of all this.

Of course, following two world wars, Britain has benefited hugely in economic terms by sharing trade interests with other members of the EU.

But the fact is that, despite Brussels bravado about the efficacy of a Single Market, EU member states have suffered over recent years because their Brussels rule-setters have been too inward-looking. They are obsessed by trade within the EU — to the detriment of the potential of wider possibilities across the whole world.

In contrast, the Department of International Trade looks outwards. In pursuit of the deals Britain must strike post-Brexit, Fox has travelled more than 300,000 miles. He may be mocked for trying to woo trade partners by giving them Union Jack cufflinks, but this ignores the hard work that his senior officials such as Crawford Falconer have been doing.

Bluster

 

Freed at last from the shackles of Brussels, what Dr Liam Fox and Crawford Falconer want is for Britain to seize the ‘enormous opportunities’ ahead. And for our political leaders to stop all their squabbling

Their outward-looking drive is vital at a time when Donald Trump has launched an international trade war by imposing tariffs on Chinese goods and taxes on imports such as steel and aluminium from EU countries. Indeed, the fear is that we are heading for trade wars on a scale not seen since the Thirties.

I am not so pessimistic. Too few people realise that behind all his bluster, Trump’s goal is not to sabotage the world’s trading system but to spark a new round of negotiations which will lead to tariffs being reduced in the long run.

Indeed, his policy is already having success. China and India have lowered tariff barriers in response to his threats.

Meanwhile, German car manufacturers have made it clear they want to negotiate tariff-free trade between the U.S. and Europe for motor vehicles.

The shape of global trade is changing before our eyes — and it is trade outside Europe that we must encourage.

Anyone who listens to those who want the UK to stay in the EU would think that Brexit was a crazy act of self-harm.

The truth is otherwise. Ever since the Brexit vote, our economy has prospered. Unemployment is at its lowest level since the Seventies.

Freed at last from the shackles of Brussels, what Dr Liam Fox and Crawford Falconer want is for Britain to seize the ‘enormous opportunities’ ahead. And for our political leaders to stop all their squabbling.

*

Patriotic, optimistic and a world expert on trade deals: Why Theresa May must listen to top aide Crawford Falcone on Brexit (and not the rest of the defeatist civil service)

THE HONOURABLE COURSE AT THIS CRUCIAL HOUR IN THE LIFE OF OUR NATION WOULD BE FOR THERESA MAY TO RESIGN  TO ALLOW A BREXITEER TO FINISH THE JOB- WITHOUT FURTHER DELAY .]

No legacy is so rich as honesty.-

Shakespeare

*

Honesty is the best policy.-

Franklin

*

Do not consider anything for your interest which makes you break your word, quit your modesty, or inclines you to any practice which will not bear the light, or look the world in the face.-

Marcus Antoninus.

*

 

ENGLAND DESERVES BETTER.

*

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

 

H.F.1640

BULLETINS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD

JANUARY 23-BREXIT NOW-2017--       - (1994 -Official Website-AUGUST-2018 ) -   JANUARY 23-BREXIT NOW-2017-PT1 -

AFTER 46 YEARS WITHIN THE CONTROL OF BRUSSELS AND BERLIN .

OUR HISTORIC  ENGLISH SEA HIGHWAYS GIVEN AWAY BY THE TRAITOROUS EDWARD HEATH WILL BE RETURNED IN MARCH 2019.

'Ye mariners of England/that guard our native seas/Whose flag has braved a thousand years/The battle and the breeze'.

Thomas Campbell.(1777-1844) Ye Mariners of England

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

293

In 1962,

Field Marshall Montgomery

 found Sir Winston Churchill sitting up in bed smoking a cigar. Churchill shouted for more brandy and protested against Britain's proposed entry into the Common Market which as we soon found out was in reality  HITLER'S plan for Europe under GERMAN Control.

 


    Winston Churchill, Myth and Reality: What He Actually Did and Said - Google Books Result

     

    Britain's attitude, Churchill explained, resembles that which we adopt about the
    European Army. We help, we dedicate, we play a part, but we are not merged
    with and do not forfeit our
    insular or commonwealth character. Our first object is
    the unity and consolidation of the British Commonwealth. Our second, “the
    fraternal ...

 

*  *  *

www.eutruth.org.uk

['A MATTER OF FACT!'. 

A REMINDER TO REMAINERS WHO IN THEIR MILLIONS REFUSED TO PUT FREEDOM AND COUNTRY-CULTURE AND CONSTITUTION

FIRST!]

H.F.1585/1

*  *  *

Nazi Spy Ring revealed by the Master of Balliol College in 1938. It included the late ex prime minister Edward Heath and Ministers Geoffrey Ribbon and Roy Jenkins.

The above information is after two years now well known to the tens of thousands of viewers of our

TOP BULLETIN

EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED AS ILLEGAL

 

A criminalized organisation

 

Monday 10th October, 2005- London.

 

the most popular of all our Bulletins of each day and each week since it was put on our website in October 2005, immediately it  had been received. The explosive material which we felt required the greatest coverage possible even though the source of the information had been bullied and exposed to persistent interference from our Security Services.

 

'The signatories, both - of The British treaty of Accession whom received substantial financial rewards for their ‘co-operation’, were Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon. Together with the late Roy Jenkins, they were recruited by the German Abwehr while studying at Balliol College, Oxford in 1938. The Nazi ring of spies was reported to MI5 in 1938 by the then MASTER of Balliol  A.D.Lindsay.

What we were unaware of at the time was that we had already read back in 2000 a book

A.D.LINDSAY

A Biography

by

DRUSILLA SCOTT

[1971

Basil Blackwell

When we received the information from

International Currency Review

we had not connected the information in the publication above with the matter in hand. It is only recently that we have again read the material to find much that puts the exposure in an even firmer basis as the following extract outlines:

'It was with William Temple that Lindsay planned the series of conferences with German statesmen and academics which were held in Balliol [College-Oxford] from 1928 till 1935.  In these small groups the problems of Europe were discussed between the German guests and the English counterparts who were invited to meet them; many of the Germans stayed in the Master's Lodgings, and in the informal setting both sides were able to talk freely, and say what they really felt about war guilt and other emotive subjects.

Among the Germans were professor von Weizsacker, Professor Mendelssohn Bartholdy, a former [German] Minister of Defence, and a former Secretary of State in the German Foreign Office. And among the British guests were Ernest Barker, Stafford Cripps, Gilbert Murray, Arnold Toynbee. William Paton and A.E. Zimmern.

As the years passed , and the menace of Hitler became more apparent such contacts were more difficult, and at the Church, Community and State conference the German delegates were not permitted by their  [German] Government to attend. Lindsay, who was deeply concerned about Germany, used every opportunity of meeting Germans who could throw light on what was happening. Through the Student Christian Movement and in particular through Amy Buller, who knew German students well, he met many groups who came to England, including one party of which some members were NAZIS.

These meetings brought home to him the intolerable pressures which could make reasonable men accept what HITLER was DOING.'

 

*

 

[We have included the above extract to add to the credibility of the information received from

INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW

cstory@worldreports.org

 

which two years later NO NEWSPAPER HAS PRINTED or even tinkered around the edges of the traitorous events.

 

It is no surprise that we now learn that a number of Nazi inspired members of Balliol College ,Oxford were able to cover their tracks for over 60 years most certainly with the connivance of German appeasers in our Government and our Security Services.'

There is the case of Edward Heath being given a job in a top security planning department in Aircraft design during the Second World War. It transpired that a brilliant inventor in that department was assassinated by someone sabotaging the controls of the new airplane. But Edward Heath was not suspected? WE wonder WHY?

As we have mentioned recently members of the Establishment including a member of the Royal Family such as Edward VIII was Nazi sympathiser and possibly a spy. No doubt others in Government would have done their worst if Winston Churchill had not become Prime Minister in the nick of time to stop the appeasers from having their Nazis running our Country. In 2008 the same kinds of people wish to ensnare our people into a Nazi inspired dream of the 30,s of a UNITED STATES OF EUROPE.  If the at present idle masses do not come to their senses over the next few months then HITLER and his friends  would  have achieved what two WORLD WARS with over 1,750,000 of our servicemen and women who lost their lives with over 50 million deaths in Europe in the World War II alone and which were fought to prevent a WORLD DICTATORSHIP and the destruction of our Way-of -Life , Common Law of England and all which makes us English and a

FREE and DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE.

Many people must wonder WHY this matter has NOT been exposed by our so-called FREE PRESS. Just after the last war Anthony Sampson in his ANATOMY OF BRITAIN showed the TRUE situation in our country as to who RULES in REALITY at that time which was a few hundred people had the POWER to determine the FUTURE. So it is today on the 31st December ,2007 when the numbers are possibly around 300 who CONTROL the PRESS-INDUSTRY-BANKING SYSTEM-GOVERNMENT and MUCH ELSE . That is WHY the PEOPLE have heard NOTHING. about the NAZI TRAITORS who have undermined our country for over 62 years and are still in place in 2007. The PEOPLE have underestimated what certain people will do to CONTROL THEM and they are now seeing before their eyes the mirage of their once FREEDOM which they will surely LOSE because they left their RIGHTS and LIBERTIES to those they elected who were only concerned with gaining POWER which has been TRUE throughout HISTORY. And instead of protecting their LIBERTIES as they have been constantly warned in the past they decided that others can do it for them because they no longer had any interest in what may happen.

AND NOW THEY WILL PAY THE PRICE!

THE BILDERBERGERS

*

To show the DEVOTION and STEADFASTNESS of A.D.LINDSAY to his FELLOW MEN and for MANKIND in GENERAL and the ARDENT DEFENDER of our UNIQUE CONSTITUTION we reproduce the FOREWORD to the above work.

 

'This is the life (written with rare distinction by his daughter) of Lord Lindsay of Birker, Master of Balliol 1924 -49 and founder of the first of Britain's post - war Universities.

A man in whom thought and action, based on the Christian faith, were exceptionally united, he not only made the theories of democracy vivid to his pupils but played a full part in its practice: working on the human problems of unemployment in the twenties and thirties, standing against the

APPEASEMENT OF HITLER

and fighting with skill and determination for the many causes into which his imaginative sympathy led him.

he believed in education as passionate and as critically as in democracy, and worked all his life to make it relevant to modern needs and to open doors to the excluded - working men, women, and the 'non-bookish majority' whose needs he came to think no less important than those of the academic student.

The understanding of a university's purpose and function which he gathered through his life in Scotland, in Oxford, and from his contacts with universities in India, Germany and America - all this finally brought to bear on the pioneering venture of the new University College at Keele which opened the way for experiment and change in higher education in post-war Britain.

Lindsay's work as a philosopher is also discussed in a chapter by professor Dorothy Emmet.

A. D. LINDSAY'S other book THE ESSENTIALS OF DEMOCRACY by Oxford University press  (1930) contains many lectures which were given in America on the Foundation at Swarthmore College , Pennsylvania in January of the above year. The subject matter touches on the 17th century when the Puritans and Levellers in Cromwell's Army were discussing the idealism behind the then well known phrase

 

' I think the poorest he that is in England hath a life to live as the richest he'

 

Now it is clear that if this common life is to be the standard of legislation we need in the legislator and the government an understanding of it, and that understanding can only be obtained if that common life finds explicit expression in discussion in which all concerned in that common life -individuals and voluntary associations -take part. Without that the most expert legislator cannot know where the adjustment and regulation of government is necessary ('only the wearer knows where the shoe pinches'), and he cannot know what effect his legislation and enactments will have.

 'A second class law obeyed is better than a first class law disobeyed.'

What is needed, and what most difficult is to combine technical knowledge of the expert with the practical experience and understanding of the common life of the ordinary public. The expert has to be sensitive to public opinion; the ordinary man has somehow to discuss with some understanding of what the experts' proposals amount to. Democracy assumes for its success an educated public: but if all the voluntary associations are centres of education in thinking publicly the task of public education is not quite so hopeless as it would otherwise be.

It follows from this view of the function of the STATE that POLITICS are a secondary matter. Plato said long ago that the STATE would be well ruled only when its rulers had a life BETTER than the POLITICAL ONE. If the purpose of the state's force is to guard and maintain and harmonise a common life, the greater the strength and spontaneity of that common life the more necessary but the easier will be the task of the state -the more necessary because vigorous and spontaneous life produces clashes of interests, new disharmonies, all kinds of possibilities of conflict; the easier because the more real and active the common life, the more real will public opinion be, and the easier the expression of the general will.

We can perhaps now see at least the beginning of an answer to the most serious of the objections raised in the last lecture -the objection that the ordinary voter regards politics with indifference, and is only whipped up to vote by forms of collective excitement such as nationalism or party enthusiasm. These artificial and irrational forms of uniting men are necessary just as so far they are not naturally united in sharing in a wide common culture and participating in a common life where there are no cultural enclaves [as in England in 2007/8] where there is real spiritual communication among groups [providing it does not include the CHRISTIAN RELIGION as in 2007/8] where in fact the smaller groupings unite and do not divide [ In 2007/8 the now abandoned Leftist dogma of  Multiculturalism has already done irreparable damage to community relations] Where that is not the case, in a community with cultural or religious barriers [As again in 2007/8] only some cause which enlists strong irrational excitement -[As Fundamentalist Islam in 2007/8]   can force men together to the necessary degree to get the work of government done.

In that sense it is true that nationalism is as it were the measles of nationality. nations are made nations usually by strong external forces...

For nationalism, one of the most powerful religions in the world today [January,1930 as in 2007/8]...

[A selection of our bulletins follows]

 

Almost everything that is precious in our civilisation has come from small states.

*

A Fabian Europhile of 1947 supported Independent Nation States.

*

Empires have gone and most people in the world live in Nation States.

*

[The last few paragraphs of the book]

...We cannot I think, ever make our political government, considered in itself, really representative. The scale on which it has to operate is too vast -its units, the constituencies, are , if taken  in themselves, too big and far too little informed by any public spirit to be really democratic. But if a vigorous non -political democratic life exists, the political machinery may harmonise and co-ordinate all that partial focussing of public opinion which non-political associations perform. There can be ,and there is increasingly coming to be a vast deal of public discussion and political education focussed by universities, by churches, and by all kinds of cultural associations.

This may all seem a far cry from what happens today. Politics is still largely a scene of conflicts for power and of irrational enthusiasms. No democratic political machinery, however well devised, can in itself make it different. Against the perversion and abuse of political power by powerful interests the individual is singularly helpless. Improvised and ad hoc reform associations are not much more effective.  Only associations which exist for their own purposes and are yet concerned for the public welfare as a whole (such as churches and universities to create a DISINTERESTED and REAL PUBLIC OPINION.

 

[As the EDP has found in its almost 13 years on the political scene -endeavouring to obtain the reform of our representative system by PR and a fixed term time limit on MPs to give them more freedom to put their COUNTRY FIRST instead of having their eyes on their next election and the gold-plated pension.]

Complacent optimism about democracy has done much harm in the past, but the disillusioned scepticism which has taken its place is worse [As in 2007/8] There are all kinds of grounds for  alarm, but there are as many grounds for rational hope [1930]. We have suffered in the past from making democracy into a dogma, in the sense of thinking of it as something magical, except from the ordinary laws which govern human nature. the con version of principles into magical dogmas has the effect in politics as it has in religion. the magic that cannot be believed is accepted till it is found out, [In 2007/8] and then the true principle on which it is based is abandoned along with it.

DEMOCRACY IMPLIES FAITH-BUT A REASONED FAITH.

In the INTRODUCTION of A. D. Lindsay -A Biography following view was stated by Dr Christopher Hill a tutor at Balliol College, Oxford and a member of the Communist party who advised A. D. Lindsay who was a man to look into different political systems with an open mind as he felt it was important to give the other view  in order to arrive at a fair conclusion.

'I have never been able to distinguish completely in my own mind between

A. D. LINDSAY and OLIVER CROMWELL

'they were great men of the Calvinist type. Each of them had a sense of being the elect; for each the consequence was less a smug self-satisfaction than a strong sense of

DUTY TO OTHERS

Each found it difficult to define in a series of slogans exactly what he wanted to bring about, and in consequence was accused of opportunism and inconsistency.

Each won the loyalty of those close to him, and the execution of those who failed to sympathise. Each discovered, rather late in life, a great talent for political manoeuvre, and a

TREMENDOUS MORAL POWER

Each has a vivid sense of the politically  possible, and each was capable of persuading himself that the possible was desirable. Each combined

REAL TRUST

in God with great care for the dryness of his powder, to such an extent that each was accused  of hypocrisy....

Each was generously and perceptively tolerant of those with the root of the matter in them; each could be

HARSH

 and unsympathetic to those outside the pale.

CROMWELL never believed in DEMOCRACY

as LINDSAY did, but he wanted to believe in parliamentary government; each of them, once he realised his power as a politician, sometimes found it irresistible to give

"what's for their good, not what pleases them"

Each was a great man whose achievement, at first sight, seems incommensurable with the effort put into it. yet it was not long after Oliver's death that worldly -wise men like Samuel Pepys looked back to his time as one when other considerations

THAN SELF-INTEREST RULED...'

[Oxford Magazine, Feb. 23rd, 1961.]

On 31st December, 2007 we have a prime minister who with his family history of Presbyteries and the government of the most democratic of religious societies - the Society of Friends-a pure example of representative democracy. He is aware of the 'sense of the meeting' he knows of the history of the FREE CHURCH of SCOTLAND he knows of the 'Claim of Right'. Gordon Brown more than anyone else knows why a PEOPLE and NATION must be FREE and that an UNDEMOCRATIC MAMMOTH is not for any in our once RULE BRITANNIA.  As we have said before he has an opportunity which comes to a politician only once in a lifetime if he would only stand by his INHERITANCE and ignore the present  poisoness ACCOLADES offered , and use his considerable influence by CHANGING EUROPE to a community of independent Nation States and  by strengthening and revitalising the unique Parliamentary democracy of England to face the great issues which now appear in the 21st century. He can be a

MAN of DESTINY

or remembered as a man who sold his country and that of England and our western neighbour which were placed in his hands and sworn to 

PROTECT .

A REFERENDUM held within the next few months will confirm our good opinion of the MAN but a denial will further emphasis that He can no longer be TRUSTED as a politician or a MAN.

 

*

Added December, 2007

*

This intelligence has emerged since the recent death of Sir Edward Heath [Another Traitor amongst many who have been honoured by the Queen with a title]

EXPOSURES TRIGGERED BY THE DEATH OF

SIR EDWARD HEATH

 

These revelations have become possible following the death of Sir Edward Heath, who was a German agent and asset for six decades - the longest known foreign intelligence penetration in modern history.

 

It is significant that the extensive Obituary of Heath published in the Guardian on 18th July 2005, closed with the cryptic sentence:

 

‘He [Heath] remained determined that he would be vindicated, until close to the end.

 

This referred to the fact that when Heath visited Salzburg in 2003, ostensibly to attend the Music Festival there, the real reason for his visit was that he had been summoned to Dachau, where DVD officers warned him that

British intelligence were intending to confront him with his treachery.

 

It is reported that, on hearing this, Heath literally ‘blew a fuse’: he suffered a pulmonary embolism.

 

A similar fate attended the demise of the late Roy (Lord) Jenkins who suffered a severe heart attack when confronted by intelligence officials with the fact that he was about to be exposed for his long-term treachery against the United Kingdom.

 

Roy Jenkins [Later Lord Jenkins] was one of the most lethal of all long-term German agents operating at the highest levels of the British Government.

 

-the present allegedly deeply compromised Tony Blair is the late Lord Jenkins’ protégé.

 

Heath, Rippon and Jenkins were far from being the only long-term. High-level foreign penetrations by the DVD-the successor ‘Black’ (continuing Nazi) intelligence organisation to the Abwehr.

 *

Is it not strange that the Security Services have been very active in revealing Communist traitors over the last 62 years and there is the case of HER MAJESTY the QUEEN finding a Communist traitor Blunt who was in her service at the time.

What is so strange is that the Nazi spies seemed to have been given immunity over the same period as no case of a Nazi spy has been revealed until

 

INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW

after much harassment by the Security Services decide to print THE TRUTH

 

 

The above information received from:

International Currency Review

, VOL. 30 NO 4 [extracts from 153 pages -shown above], available by subscription from www.worldreports.org. was mailed to paying subscribers worldwide on

 

10th October 2005

 

Banks, Corporations and other entities that use subscription agencies may subscribe to World Reports Ltd serials (complete) through their usual channels, or else direct from our website, or from the London or New York addresses shown in the lower red panel on the

 

www.worldreports.org Home Page. The website has a secure and reliable subscription ordering system.

 

ABOUT INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW

 

International Currency Review is the only INDEPENDENT global journal specialising in international currency, financial and economic issues with a geopolitical and intelligence dimension.

 

Published since 1969, it specialises today in exposing corruption in governance structures, since the corruption of governance and of the capitalist system is swamping all other considerations.

 

The Journal is one of a series of intelligence sources published by World Reports, details of which will be found on our website:

 

www.worldreports.org

 

International Currency Review has recently exposed the basis of the ‘Upper Echelon’ global financial structure, which sustains the ‘Lower Echelon’ structure with which we are all familiar.

 

The ‘Upper Echelon’ is a ‘closed’ intergovernmental and intelligence financial environment characterised by high -yield investment programmes, scamming operations and colossal stored fiat wealth running into trillions of dollars

 

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used-comments in brackets]

 

* * *

OCTOBER 10-2005

*

FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS

*

A TRAITOR-FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?

*

The term DVD stands for Deutsche Verteidigungs Dienst or German Defence Agency or Secret Service.

*

European Union exposed as illegal -A criminalised organisation

 

*

Revealed after his death that Edward Heath: An agent of Nazi International and traitor to his country since 1938.

*

A plague of treachery-corruption and skulduggery has taken over once proud democracies.

*

GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 by HEINRICH HIMMLER

*

Democracy is a dialectual farce because intelligence agencies call the shots -not so-called democracies.

*

What are the dark actors playing games, which Dr David Kelly referred?

*

Britain can leave the EU unilaterally and cease payment says Queen's Counsel.

*

EU whistleblowers expose billions of EU fraud but nothing is done.

 

*

Nazi traitor Edward heath left 5 million to his own charity-his home opposite Salisbury Cathedral.

*

THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE

*

DECEMBER-2007

 

*

[On the 4th August 2018 amongst the many we came across the following bulletin-one out of over 4,000 over the past 15 years and decided to give it light of day because unless the citizens of a country hold to account those traitors then

WHAT IS PATRIOTISM ALL ABOUT ?

 
 

 LIFE AND TIMES

OF

Christopher Story

 PATRIOT AND TRUTHSEEKER

2010

 

MORE INFORMATION ALSO AVAILABLE FOOT OF PAGE.

 
comment image

See: 80 Comments

[WE were surprised a matter of some months ago when we saw the close warm greeting between Mrs May and Angela Merkel when they met to discuss BREXIT. WE expected that they would have kept at arms length ,at the time, that  a distance between them would have given more confidence to Brexiteers that the negotiations would not be a 'SELL OUT' which in some areas such as our Fishing Fields and the sovereignty of our sea lanes... we now have our suspicions. ]

APRIL 9,2018

AS they say a picture is worth a thousand words and at least a number thoughts  with one knowing how long Mrs May has known Frau Merkel which by the above images must be decades which leads one to suspect that Theresa May must have divided loyalties .It brings to mind the close relationship between Neville Chamberlain and Adolf Hitler (1937-1940) and many of us today know the result of that appeasement.   ONLY when we had the right leader Winston Churchill did the people 

UNITE ! and VICTORY was WON.

The past 24 months has  shown  how not to  engage with Hitler's brainchild the so-called EU and to a great number of people the word

TREASON

 

comes to mind.

H.F.1525/1

H.F.1443

 

*  *  *

 [THEY NEVER LEARN.]

The reason we have a shortage of homes is that too many of them are lived in by foreigners (like me)

by Lional Shriver

SINCE Theresa May's clarion call to address the UK's housing shortage (and how many successive prime ministers have embarked on the same heave-ho?) countless comment pieces have addressed the 'real' problems that drive the disjunction between

SUPPLY and DEMAND.

Nimbyism. Complex. protracted planning permission. Developer land banking (when companies own vast plots of land but do not build on them). Rich Chinese and Russians investing in unoccupied properties as three-dimensional bank accounts. Excessive protection of green belts. Second homeowners. The catastrophic sell-off of social housing.

[In the main: One word sums this up

GREED]

Awkward

Yet, when two statistics are out of whack-in this case the number of homes available, and the number needed-it behoves us to look at them both.  All the above dysfunctions regard

SUPPLY.

Which suggests there's something awkward about looking instead at

DEMAND

At Radio 3 Free Thinking Festival event last weekend, I all but came to blows with the 'rational optimist' on my panel who believes continued human population growth will be modest and benign.

The moment I mentioned the inevitable pressures on Europe of

MASS IMMIGRATION

the poor gentleman exploded, as if i'd tripped the pin on a hand grenade. He railed about how we screwed up in Libya, and the need for more overseas staff.

Give this guy this, he did rouse righteous applause from the great and the good progressives in the audience

But let's look at this housing business. It took half a century for the UK population

to rise from 50.3 million in 1950

TO

59.1 million in 2000

[And we know that governments have admitted on a number of occasions over the years that they don't know the true figure of the foreign population at any one time with no doubt a million or two having submerged into the general population at large.]

In that period, the foreign-born population rose from 4.3 per cent to 8.8 per cent -so a measure of that increase was already accounted for by

 NEWCOMERS

After an inflow historically unprecedented for this country, this brief century alone has seen the

UK POPULATION

 shoot up to

65.6 MILLION

( As of JANUARY 2017

14per cent of whom were

FOREIGN BORN

as of 2016

We're adding another half million every year.

According to the Office of National Statistics, the UK population is set to cross

70 MILLION by 2029;

MIGRATION WATCH

places it even sooner in 2026.

Demographic predictions are notoriously undependable, but near-term projections tend to be more reliable.

Oxford demographer David Coleman estimates 85 per cent of the UK's population increase from 2000 to 2015 is explained by

MIGRANTS and their CHILDREN

These new people have to live somewhere.

The pressure on housing among many other social provisions, is intensified by the

FACT

that, on average,foriegn-born mothers have more children

(2.06 in 2016)

than women born in Britain

(1,75)

[It is established that with Muslim women it is

4-1]

Fertility among foreign-born mothers has certainly dropped. YET the high proportion of incomers who are in their reproductive years means the absolute number of babies with foreign mothers continues to rise.

Thus the ONS asserts that in ENGLAND and WALES in 2016 a staggering 28.2 per cent of births were to foreign-born women, 'the highest level on record'.

In 1970, it was 12 per cent.

We've heard about Britain's recent' mini-baby boom', but its primary cause issn't native -born women using the NHS to have IVF in their 40's and bearing triplets. It's not appreciably caused by immigrants from Eastern Europe, either

AS of 2011, Mothers born in Poland averaged 2.1 children-while mothers born in Pakistan had 3.8, and mothers from Somalia had 4.2

So even BREXIT-assuming it actually happens, and actually curtails freedom of movement (ha! on both counts)-may not appreciably constrain foreign increase.

THE DEMOGRAPHIC DAMAGE HAS ALREADY OCCURRED.]

The housing crunch is further complicated by the fact many immigrants settle in the South East, where residential shortages are keenest. The population of Greater London in 2017 was

 8.8 MILLION

a rise of

400,000

on the previous five years.

Greater London housed only 7.1 MILLION people in 1997

when Tony Blair opened the gates to permanent visitors.

That's 1.7 million more residents in two decades-an increase of over a quarter, two-thirds of which occurred in the last

10 YEARS

AS of 2016, only 45 per cent of the capital was

WHITE BRITISH

An astonishing 58.2per cent of births in London were to foreign-born mothers. (IN the north-west London borough of Brent, 76 per cent were to non-UK-born women.)

While over a third of the babies born in England and Wales had at least one parent born outside the UK, in London that figure was 66.6 per cent: two thirds

To Follow

DEMAND

Look, I know all about the fact that immigrants to the UK take up

SPACE

because I am an immigrant to the UK.

Both Americans, my husband and I occupy a three-bedroom Georgian House -thus removed from the stock available to folks

BORN HERE.

In a 2012  speech. Theresa My said:

'One area in which we  can be certain mass immigration has an effect is housing. More than one-third of all new housing demand in Britain is caused by

IMMIGRATION.

And there is evidence that without the demand caused by

MASS IMMIGRATION

house prices could be ten per cent lower over a 20-year period

Last year, Lord Green, Chairman of

MIGRATION WATCH

told the House of Lords at least 300 houses would have to be built every day to accommodate new migrants. And using projections published by the Department of Communities and Local Government, a Migration Watch study concluded half of Britain's homes built in the next 21 years will be needed to house

MIGRANT POPULATION

None 0f these, if anything understated statistics takes into account how many recent immigrants already occupy existing properties, whose removal from the market helps drive the need for so much additional housing in future. After all, if you took immigration out of the equation, the UK population would level off, before going down.

 

CRISIS

Indeed, most immigration statistics are untrustworthy - because they're

TOO LOW.

London Councils chairman Merrick Cockell told the BBC back in 2008:

'London's population is growing at an even faster rate than these figures suggest, because official data has failed to properly account for the complexities of migration and population churn.'

A Westminster City Council spokeswomen chimed in: 'The statistics leave out a massive

HIDDEN POPULATION

and mean that local authorities are constantly short-changed by

GOVERNMENT

as they still provide vital services to these people, but receive no government funding for them'

Government has

a) - no idea how to track people with every motivation  to keep off the radar, and

b ) every motivation itself to under estimate an unpopular social phenomenon, with a range of consequences

IT CANNOT SEEM TO CONTROL.

Do I sound bigoted?

People can be bigoted, but facts can't be.

The UK's housing crisis rests hand -in-glove with

MASS IMMIGRATION

Without a doubt nimbyism, arcane planning permission rules, Russian oligarchs-all that-make the situation worse.

But effectively, even if Theresa May improbably abracadabra-ed

1.5 MILLION HOMES

into this country by 2020, as pledged in the Tory manifesto?

THEY'D BE BUILT FOR FOREIGNERS

LIKE ME.

 

*  *  *

A VERSION of this article appears in this week's Spectator magazine

 

To be continued.

[We were unable to obtain a link to this article in the Dail Mail at the present time.]

MARCH 16,2018

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

H.F.1504

*  *  *

 

LITTLEJOHN

 

 

Forget Davis, Forget Boris-Why hasn't Mother Theresa QUIT?

1.3k

View
comments

Never mind Boris, never mind David Davis. Why the hell hasn’t Theresa May resigned? She has repeatedly misled the British people and forfeited the privilege of being our Prime Minister.

We now know her oft-parroted ‘Brexit means Brexit’ was a sham, a meaningless soundbite calculated to deceive. Her vision of Brexit is Remain by any other name. Always was.

She has sold out the 17.4 million people who voted Leave in the referendum. She has betrayed the 80 per cent of the electorate who voted at the last General Election for parties committed to carrying out Brexit as advertised.

Almost 20 years ago, after Labour’s landslide victory, the odious federast Peter Mandelson, addressing a German audience, remarked smugly: ‘The era of pure representative democracy is coming to an end.’ For once Mandelson spoke the truth. But it has taken a Conservative PM to ignore the result of the biggest single vote for anything in our history.

 

Theresa May has sold out the 17.4 million people who voted Leave in the referendum 

If May gets away with this constitutional outrage, Britain will cease to be a proper democracy. She has signalled that the vested interests of big business, the Civil Service and the political class count for more than the views of voters expressed at the ballot box.

One hundred years exactly after the extension of the franchise, and 90 years after women over 21 were finally given the vote, our second female Prime Minister has decided that your vote isn’t worth the ballot paper it’s scribbled on.

The men, and women, in Whitehall, in Brussels, in the boardrooms, in the think-tanks, in the courtrooms, really do know best. So shut up and concentrate on the World Cup.

Watching wall-to-wall football was certainly my intention up until last Friday. I had planned to take an extended break, to forget all about the Brexit debacle for a few weeks. Then the news from Chequers filtered through to my sun lounger and stirred me from my stupor.

How could I relax while Britain was being sold down the Swanee? Which is why I am back in the paper sooner than I expected.

It was clear that May had called the Cabinet together to bury Brexit while the rest of the country was distracted by the exploits of Harry Kane and company in Russia.

What we saw on Friday was a revolution in reverse — the Government overthrowing the people. In this Looking Glass world, the so-called ‘rebels’ are the handful of principled politicians who are actually prepared to stand up for the electorate.

So desperate was May to force her capitulation through Cabinet that she even threatened to strip dissenters of their ministerial cars on the spot.

 

No wonder David Davis finally summoned up the spine to resign. He should have walked away months ago when it became glaringly apparent he was being undermined by Mrs May

How unbelievably petty. This wasn’t strong leadership, it was the worst kind of weakness.

Whatever happened to ‘no deal is better than a bad deal’?

More hollow rhetoric.

Then again, May is terminally weak. Regular readers will be aware that from day one I’ve never thought she was up to the job.

From the off, her heart hasn’t been in leaving the EU, in any shape or form, despite her fatuous ‘Brexit means Brexit’ mantra.

She’s bungled the negotiations, caved in to Brussels at every turn and gone out of her way to appease both the Civil Service and the Remain headbangers in her own party.

What else should we have expected from a woman who spent the entire referendum campaign hiding behind the sofa?

Her career has been characterised by indecision. She got the job by default, only because Boris was shafted by his ex-lieutenant Michael Gove. Over the weekend, Gove was at it again, siding with May’s sell-out against his fellow Leavers. So the man who said famously that the public was sick of ‘experts’ has decided to support the ‘experts’ after all.

 

She’s wasted two vital years. As I wrote a couple of months ago, it’s been two years of vacillation, obfuscation, cowardice and downright sabotage

Perhaps Gove still thinks he has a shot at becoming Prime Minister himself. Frankly, who cares?

This isn’t about individual ambition, much as the political class always manage to make everything about them. It’s about the fundamental principle of who determines our destiny — the British people or those we elect to represent us?

And ever since the result of the EU referendum was announced, the majority of the political class have worked cynically to derail our departure, to keep us in perpetuity as prisoners of an anti-democratic, sclerotic European superstate.

That’s exactly what the decisions taken at Chequers on Friday would do, even though we voted unequivocally to take back control of our laws, our money and our borders.

Independent sovereign nations do not collect taxes on behalf of foreign governments. Independent sovereign nations do not accept the jurisdiction of unelected foreign judges. Independent sovereign nations do not swallow wholesale rules made by unaccountable foreign bureaucrats. Independent sovereign nations are at liberty to conclude free trade deals with any country in the world.

But if May gets her way, none of that will apply. Britain will still be subject to European directives and the rulings of European judges. That’s not Brexit by any stretch of the imagination.

No wonder David Davis finally summoned up the spine to resign. He should have walked away months ago when it became glaringly apparent that although he was nominally in charge of negotiating Brexit, he was being undermined by the Prime Minister and her Remainiac placemen in the Civil Service.

Davis has gone about his business with optimism and good humour, despite being faced with an obdurate Michel Barnier, the EU’s Monsieur Non. He has until now remained loyal to May and has been repaid with a stiletto between the shoulder blades. After Friday, his position was untenable.

 

As for Boris, at least he’s done the decent thing and not left Davis swinging in the wind. How could he possibly remain part of Government hell-bent on destroying his vision of an independent, freebooting, global Britain?

It was Bojo’s optimism, his enthusiasm, his can-do attitude which helped convince so many people to cast off the shackles of the EU and take a leap into the future. My view was that he had earned the right to have his shot at the top job. He’s far from the bumbling imbecile his enemies like to pretend he is.

After all, he ran London for eight years — far better than the present incumbent. And if he’d screwed up spectacularly, then we still wouldn’t be any worse off than we are today. We needed a swashbuckling, strong, confident Prime Minister, who actually believed in Brexit, to lead us forward.

We got Mrs May. She’s wasted two vital years. As I wrote a couple of months ago, it’s been two years of vacillation, obfuscation, cowardice and downright sabotage.

Now her ‘vision’ of Brexit is no Brexit at all, a wish-list so watered down some people might conclude it’s not worth leaving the EU. Either that, or it is designed deliberately to make it easier for us to rejoin a few years down the line.

Which was probably her intention all along. But this wasn’t what we were promised and it isn’t what we voted for. May has turned Britain, one of the world’s great economies and military powers, into an international laughing stock, a pushover, incapable of surviving independently.

How does she square that with her Christian conscience? How can she live with the knowledge that she has betrayed the British people? Every week this vicar’s daughter parades her piety, pictured leaving the Sunday service at her local church in Berkshire.

Who knew her role model here on earth was Judas Iscariot?

Forget Boris, forget Davis. If Mother Theresa had a shred of decency, she would be the one resigning. 

1.3k

View
comments

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CHANGES IN TEXT...ARE OURS!]

 

H.F.1612

*  *  *

Hot July has been the month our political class finally went the full lemming. Actually, that may be a little unkind to the Arctic ‘Lemmus lemmus’, whose tendency to leap suicidally off cliffs en masse has been exaggerated by Hollywood and cartoonists.

But this has been a month our administrative elite, driven round the twist by the heat, Brexit and general, gibbering fears of its impending demise, has behaved in a manner so hyperbolic and self-damaging that those stubby-snouted, northern hemisphere rodents might justifiably feel aggrieved at comparisons. ‘Excuse me,’ coughs Larry the Lemming, ‘but we small, furry chaps look fairly sane compared with your doom- spreading public servants.’

In a collective attack of the screaming abdabs, our functionaries have been forecasting calamity.

 

Hot July has been the month our political class finally went the full lemming. Actually, that may be a little unkind to the Arctic ‘Lemmus lemmus’, whose tendency to leap suicidally off cliffs en masse has been exaggerated by Hollywood and cartoonists

This week, they claimed thousands of us will shrivel and die in future British summers and that our motorways will melt, railways will buckle and sunscreen should be provided free to all outdoor workers.

Brexit is so going to isolate our kingdom from the rest of the planet that we need to start stockpiling food and drugs, and the road to Dover will become a permanent lorry park, amid fears about imports and exports.

The BBC’s (markedly Europhile) business editor, Simon Jack, said a no-deal Brexit would cause a national shortage of sandwiches. And The Guardian reported that we were likely to start killing ourselves in greater numbers. It was not clear if that would be a result of the maddening heat or because we were all so demoralised after reading the latest column by the paper’s resident shroud-waver, Polly Toynbee.

The Met Office, once a level-headed analyst of barographs and incoming weather fronts, issued bubonic plague-style warnings that we should not step outside in this heat and should not open our windows.

Public Health England enthusiastically joined in the ‘amber warnings’ and the NHS issued a ‘level four alert’ on ‘severe heatwaves’. One of the symptoms it listed was ‘confusion’. There’s certainly plenty of that around in our supposedly great institutions at present.

Even if we somehow avoided being banjaxed by heatstroke and dehydration and cramps and ‘intense thirst’ (a reference to the European Commission’s Jean-Claude Juncker?), Brexit was going to do for us all. We were firmly told that leaving the EU without agreement from Brussels would create ‘riots’, ‘horrendous consequences’ and ‘a state of emergency’.

 

The Met Office, once a level-headed analyst of barographs and incoming weather fronts, issued bubonic plague-style warnings that we should not step outside in this heat and should not open our windows

At this point, a theatre director might ask his backstage staff to provide some dark chords and a rattle of King Lear-style thunder and lightning.

Those melodramatic warnings, in fact, came from the British head of the multi-national Amazon shopping website Doug Gurr, from the chief executive of our Civil Service John Manzoni, and from Tory MP Dominic Grieve, who chairs Parliament’s intelligence and security committee. These are three of our supposedly most mature figures, the sort of wise men who habitually assert the importance of proceeding on the basis of rational evidence.

Yet they were hopping up and down with all the sang froid of daft old Corporal Jones shouting ‘don’t panic, don’t panic!’ in Dad’s Army.

Let it be stressed that it is members of Britain’s ruling class who are the leading hysterics, predicting the imminent end of the world as we know it.

Apocalypse soon, folks!

 

At this point, a theatre director might ask his backstage staff to provide some dark chords and a rattle of King Lear-style thunder and lightning

We are not talking here about a grassroots insurrection based on half-heard rumour. It is not the under-educated peasants who are marching on the Citadel of Reason, proclaiming the end is nigh.

It is the opposite: this doom-mongering has its origins among the bosscats, the Sir Humphrys, those ‘top people’ who ‘take The Times’ (as that choicely patronising advertising slogan once put it).

It is they and their allies at the BBC and in the broadsheet (i.e. expensive) Press who are trying to excite a sense of national disaster.

Members of the ruling class once saw it as their duty to try to pacify the populus. Remember those wartime ‘Keep calm and carry on’ posters? That was the attitude officialdom used to take.

Pathe cinema newsreels, narrated by manly voices, would assure everyone that the state had matters under control.

To reinforce the idea of competence at the helm, cinema audiences were shown footage of white-coated scientists nodding in an avuncular way from high-tech laboratories as they calmly planned the protection and promotion of Good Old Blighty.

 

The Commons environmental audit committee predicted that heatwave-related deaths will more than triple to 7,000 a year according to Labour MP Mary Creagh

Laughably paternalistic? Maybe. But quite responsible. It burnished the notion of a secure nation state, and that created confidence which can attract investment and build civic and national pride.

How different things are today.

Any modern Pathe newsreel would need to be narrated by a voice of high-pitched terror.

Those scientists today would have their neckties askew, the buttons of their white coats half-torn from their moorings.

They would be biting their fingernails and staring wildly at the sky to see if it was about to collapse.

A secure and strong nation state? Forget it. It’s almost as if our Euro-federalising elite wants us to think nation states are an absurd aberration. Hot weather, of course, can always turn people a little peculiar. Heat, shimmering off baked country roads, creates corrugations on fervid brows.

And inevitably, the freak summer has been seized on by some in authority as proof of a permanent change towards a tropical climate. They seem to forget that only four months ago much of Britain was under snow and that the rainfall in past summers has been much higher than this year.

The Commons environmental audit committee predicted that heatwave-related deaths will more than triple to 7,000 a year.

These lurid claims secured plenty of airtime for the committee’s chairman, Labour MP Mary Creagh. She relished the attention and did much doleful shaking of her head about man-made climate change. But how accurate are her committee’s claims likely to be?

I attended one of the Creagh committee’s evidence sessions. At that hearing it was stated that there is currently no official definition of ‘heatwave’.

An expert admitted that, under current data, two unseasonably warm nights in succession could represent a heatwave.

Furthermore, although at present 2,000 deaths a year are attributed to warm weather, 40,000 are caused by cold weather.

The committee also heard that hot summers could bring benefits in agriculture and from tourism. More positive angles such as those do not sit comfortably with officialdom’s quasi-religious belief in the alleged disaster of man-made global warming.

And so the Mary Creaghs of this world seize on a few exceptionally hot weeks — we have not had a summmer like this since 1976, though that was so dry that great cracks appeared in the ground — and start issuing all sorts of blood-curdling edicts.

 

Londoners get caught in torrential downpours in London's West End

It was claimed this week that British house-builders had failed to design homes capable of withstanding hot weather. Ms Creagh wailed that ministers had ‘ignored’ warnings about man-made climate change and had left Britain ‘woefully unprepared’ for hot spells.

She demanded that houses, offices and public buildings such as hospitals should have ‘resilience’ to heatwaves. Fancy that: a politician demanding more regulations. It’s what they do.

But up pipes a still, small voice of calm, once more to whisper some scepticism. Is it not possible that there are too many regulations? The worst types of building for shade and cool were found to be those designed since the 1960s. If you want a cool hospital, visit an Edwardian or Victorian one with its thicker walls, loftier ceilings and draughtier doorways and windows (much disapproved of by eco-nannies such as Mary Creagh because they are not insulated and therefore ‘leak’ energy).

Alas, older hospitals have often been razed to make way for new buildings which comply with all those blessed regulations which are now found wanting. Such is the mad vortex of modern politics.

How often do the clipboard classes — the don’t-do-that, we-know-best brigade — overstate or invent rules? How often are alleged risks genuine?

Pregnant women are firmly instructed to avoid alcohol. Yet plenty find that a bottle of stout every day or two in pregnancy is a nourishing boost to morale. My wife certainly did.

Doctors admit that it is impossible to lay down hard rules and that alcohol unit guidelines are pretty random. But officialdom goes ahead all the same, wagging fingers and saying we must obey this and that, maybe simply because it can and because it enjoys lecturing us.

We are told at petrol stations and on aeroplanes that we must on no account use a mobile phone because the radio transmitter or battery could ignite a fire or interfere with the plane’s controls.

A book by science writers Michael Hanlon and Tracey Brown noted that no such disaster has ever ensued.

Safety professionals insist that helmets should be worn by cyclists, but when Australia made such helmets compulsory, serious cycling injuries increased.

The ‘man from the ministry’ long stated, with gruesome posters, that importing animals to Britain from the Continent without placing them in quarantine would create a risk of rabies.

Over decades, perfectly harmless pets were forced to spend miserable months in kennels. Not a single quarantined animal was found to be infected with rabies. The bossy rules were eventually dropped 18 years ago.

Perhaps the most notorious of all false alarms was the Millennium Bug scare, whipped up in 1999 by unscrupulous IT consultants, grandstanding parliamentarians and credulous civil servants who claimed that the date change to 2000 was going to cause computer malfunctions.

Aircraft were going to plummet earthwards. Life-support machines would conk out and domestic appliances go haywire. A fortune was spent preparing us for that ‘Y2K’ threat.

 

A woman relaxes in the sun in London, as the heatwave continues in parts of the UK, with forecasted highs of 37C

It was a mirage. Life just sailed on.

Something similar happened recently with the data protection rules, when companies and charities were encouraged by legal advisers to secure written authorisations from anyone on their databases. This cost millions — and it was quite unnecessary.

But it all made the bureaucracy feel important and it created plenty of work for legal advisers.

When the boss of multinational Amazon predicts ‘civil unrest within two weeks’ of Brexit unless he can have frictionless customs arrangements, is it because he has a unique understanding of the British political temperament or because tax-avoiding corporations like his prefer weak national governments?

When civil service chief Manzoni wails about the ‘disaster’ of a no-deal Brexit, is it because he has truly balanced the long-term consequences of a global free-trading Britain or because staying in the protectionist EU suits his career plans?

When Mr Grieve prophesies plague and damnation from our leaving the EU, is he thinking clearly or is he succumbing to an hysteria driven by personal pique at being sacked as a minister?

These mandarins and magnificoes spurring on the notion of social breakdown clearly believe they are the only ones clever enough to see catastrophes that await us. But sceptics (and when official advice is so palpably over-hyped, scepticism only multiplies) might say it is because they want to boost their own importance and power and keep the rest of us in our places.

And anyway, how much easier to deal with fellow quangocrats here and faceless bureaucrats in Brussels than awkward, irrational, ordinary people in sovereign democracies.

I don’t know but my bet is that if there is a no-deal Brexit, life will just toddle along pretty much as before. I also predict future British summers could be wash-outs.

 

Brexit is so going to isolate our kingdom from the rest of the planet that we need to start stockpiling food and drugs, and the road to Dover will become a permanent lorry park, amid fears about imports and exports

It is almost as if our political class would love something terrible indeed to occur, so that they could say ‘we told you so’.

Imagine if there is a no-deal Brexit and nothing particularly bad happens. How foolish they would all look.

Imagine if future summers prove to be damp. What idiots all those climate catastrophists would be shown to be.

We will have to wait and see.

Meanwhile, most Britons seem to be coping remarkably well despite this barrage of woes.

The public has this week chewed on its cud and gone about its daily business, rather enjoying the sunny weather.

British stoicism? Or just a shrewd understanding of the neck-clutching neurosis of our ruling class?

Our lemming-like leaders can run towards the abyss if they wish, but we’ll just watch them and quietly laugh.

*  *  *

Why are today's leaders hysterical doom merchants? QUENTIN LETTS asks whatever happened to

 Keep Calm and Carry On

View
comments

H.F.1634

*  *  *

 

 

H.F.730

 

*  *  *

Weekly Geo-Political News and Analysis

by Benjamin Fulford

 

Secret societies, secret services and religions: The current balance of power


Notice to readers:  This is the second of three pre-written reports as we continue our summer “digital detox.”

The secret war for the planet earth has been intensifying and is headed for some sort of climax.  For that reason, before the autumn battles begin, it’s a good time to look at some of the world’s most important secret societies and the governments, religions, and agendas they are associated with.

The first thing people must understand when looking at this issue is that in the real world, spy agencies, secret societies, and armies are subservient to religions.  The reason for this is that even though Mao Tse-Tung said, “Power grows from the barrel of a gun,” it really grows from the mind of the person holding the gun.  So the battle for the planet earth is really a battle for the hearts and minds of the people who really count during a power struggle—the warriors.

Let’s start with the Asian secret societies.  Overall, their view right now is that the West has ruled the planet for long enough and now it’s their turn.  However, the Asian secret societies, just like their Western counterparts, are divided into several competing groups.

The biggest is probably the Hongmen, with 55 million members, mostly located in China and in Asian communities around the world.  Chinese President Xi Jinping is a member of this group.  It can be seen as a sort of combination between a chamber of commerce and a gangster group.  This sort of thing, by the way, is true of Western secret societies, too, because wielding big money and big power requires protection.  The Hongmen are closely linked to, but not the same as, the Chinese Communist Party.  Their hierarchy is based on meritocracy and not bloodlines.  There is a Taiwan-based splinter group as well, but they are losing influence and power due to poor leadership and the betrayal of their March 19th secret pledge.

The Hongmen say they want a world government so that humanity can live in peace and prosperity.  However, based on my personal experience with them, they need to become more multicultural if they are to succeed.

The second major Asian group is the Dragon family.  This is a grouping of old royal bloodlines with their networks of retainers and their stashes of historical gold.  They are strongest in Taiwan, Northern China, and Southeast Asia.  North Korea is one of their main strongholds, since that country is the real heir to the Manchu Dynasty which ruled China during the Qing Dynasty (1644-1912).  They are also strong in Northern China, Japan, and Mongolia.  They are the heirs of the Mongol warriors, and any country whose name ends in “-stan,” such as Pakistan or Afghanistan, has a strong Mongol heritage.  The Dragon family has close links to European royal families and also believes in a world government, but they think hereditary bloodlines and constitutional monarchies are needed to provide such a government with stability and continuity.

Another grouping that used to be very powerful was the Black Dragon Society (BDS).  They were behind the World War 2 Imperial Japanese push for a greater East-Asian Co-prosperity sphere.  This group thought the Nazis would win World War 2 and would proceed to try to enslave and then eliminate the Asian and non-white races, as Hitler indicated in Mein Kampf.  The BDS was very successful in recruiting non-European people around the world in their bid to end European/Western rule.  However, as an African-American activist explained to this writer, “We were all in favour of their aims, except that they told us we all had to become Japanese and obey the Japanese.”  There are several organizations that claim to be heirs of the Black Dragon Society, but none of them have any real power.

The other big Asian secret society is the Blue Dragon, and they are the heirs of the Assassins.  They are strong in Persia (Iran) and the Muslim world, especially the Muslims of India.  They believe a great leader called the Mahdi will emerge and rid the world of evil before the End Times.  This group, though lacking a clear leader, is working towards the common goal of liberating the Muslim world, especially the Middle East, of neo-colonialist rulers.

There are other Asian groups and subdivisions such as the Shinto-connected Three Legged Crow, but they are not major players in the current battle for the planet Earth and will align themselves with whomever emerges victorious.

Now let us look at Western secret societies….

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

Benjamin Fulford Talks: Interview July 19, 2018 with Prepare for Change

Our July 19 interview went up a few days ago and now the transcript is there too:

https://prepareforchange.net/2018/07/23/benjamin-fulford-talks-helsinki-india-and-africa-interview-july-19-2018-with-prepareforchange-net

This link with its associated article contains links to all six interviews by Benjamin Fulford on Prepare For Change in May-June-July 2018, as well as the July 19, 2018 full transcript.

Are you pushing the Cabal agents as good guys?

Hi Ben:

I have followed you for some years now, but have often felt that you are promoting the pinnacle and chief architects of the Cabal as good guys.  Yes, I know you say that you print what you hear and let the reader decide.  But what really concerns me is that you are pushing the Cabal agents as good guys.  I cannot sit back any longer.

You seem to think the satan-worshiping paedophiles known as the British Royal family are working for the side of humanity?  Since when?  They have been at the helm of the cabal since way back.  How many times do “friends of Charles” get outed as rampant paedophiles?  Jimmy Savile being his best friend, then he gets the police to quash investigations into his archbishop paedophile friend.  He was named in the Elm guest house paedophile ring, which was buried by the UK police and hidden under both Nazi Google and EU right-to-be-forgotten laws.  As well as Prince Philip.  Not forgetting Prince Andrew’s close friendship with Jeffrey Epstein getting mentioned in the press here, only for the false flag attack at Charlie Hebdo to happen the next day.  So how are these evil people good, Ben?  The royals seem to get a biannual pay increase which they squander but never help the people.

Now, let’s look at the Vatican and the Pope you love so much.  Francis was involved in child abuse and subsequent coverups in South America.  He personally swore in Lucifer as the God of Christianity in the Vatican’s Serpent Temple.  You keep telling us Francis will eradicate global poverty.  He has been sitting on Satan’s throne for how long now?  Five plus years, and he hasn’t done a thing to end poverty.  Just swear in Lucifer and continue to rape children.

So tell me, Ben, whose side are you on here, as you are championing the evil that’s murdering and raping its way through to the total demise of Gaia and all her inhabitants?

I hope I’m wrong about you, Ben.  But please explain why you promote the vile and despicable as the good guys.

I won’t even mention the P2 Lodge, let alone how you conflict in which side they are on.  As one month you tell it how it is with the P2—they are evil satan-worshipers.  The week after, they are the good guys.

I’m sure many who follow your blog feel the same.  But others blindly accept.

I do not accept the paedophile satan-worshiping royals, Vatican, and whoever else you promote as the good guys, as this is promoting these child-raping, torturing, murdering, and eating parasites as our “liberators.”  To me this is a promotion of the Cabal 2.0 with a reboot, and they can carry on as normal.  Does this not seem the way?

In love and light against the dark,
CD


Hello.

Years of first-hand reporting have shown me that many people in the secret cabals actually mean well but are locked inside a bad system.  Our goal has always been to save the planet—not to “get the bad guys.”

Of course, some of the satanists are so evil that only the total destruction of their souls is possible.  However, there are many talented and basically good people locked in the system who can be put to work saving the planet after they have appeared in front of a truth and reconciliation committee.

We all want justice, of course, but ending poverty and stopping environmental destruction should be our first priority.

BF

The secret history of the planet Earth from 2000 to 2018


Notice to readers:  For the next three weeks, barring some unprecedented news event, the reports will be pre-written as I take my annual sabbatical off the grid and off the Internet.  Your understanding is appreciated.

As we prepare for what may be the final autumn offensive that finally overthrows the Khazarian mafia cabal, it’s a good time to look at the big picture to understand why a secret battle for the planet Earth has been raging all these years.

The best place to start is still the U.S. election of the year 2000, which was a coup d’état against American democracy that started the Nazi Fourth Reich headed by Fuhrer George Bush, Sr.  That election was between two Western secret government factions:  Faction 1—the Nazis, who wanted to kill 90% of humanity in order to “save the environment”;  and Faction 2—the Global Warming faction, who said this could be accomplished by using “global warming” as an excuse to impose a carbon tax and a world government.

The Nazis won by using fraud, murders, and death threats to terrorize the U.S. establishment into handing over power.  This was followed by very real attempts to murder 90% of humanity.  The Nazi regime of George Bush, Jr. began spreading bioweapons like SARS, weaponized bird flu, Ebola, etc. to wipe out most of humanity.  At the same time, they created starvation crises in 33 countries by paying farmers money to grow “biofuel” instead of food.  They also tried multiple times to start a nuclear world war using Iran, Syria, North Korea, and other hotspots.  This is important to remember and cannot be repeated often enough:  these people tried to kill you and your family, and are still trying to do so.

Enter the Asian secret societies.  They learned of the Nazi plans to murder 90% of humanity by successfully eavesdropping on their secret meetings, notably the Bohemian Grove gatherings.  In 2003, the spreading of SARS—a bioweapon designed specifically to target only Asians—was their real call to arms.

This led to a rupture between heroin- and amphetamine-dealing East Asian underworld groups and their cocaine- and marijuana-dealing former Nazi allies.  The Nazis, however, anticipated this break by moving their heroin operations from East Asia to Afghanistan during 2001–2002.

The Nazis, as they described in their report “Project for a New American Century,” also tried to cement their control of the world by seizing the oil fields of Iraq and Central Asia.  They use the threat of cutting off oil to keep Asia under control.

The Asians responded by threatening to assassinate the top leadership of the Western secret government.  In particular, they targeted the individuals who were members of all three of the following groups:  the Bilderbergers (European cabalists), the Council on Foreign Relations (American cabalists), and the Trilateral Commission (Japanese quislings and their masters).

The Asians also looked for Western allies against the Nazis.  They noted that a Western faction had been fighting desperately to expose and derail the genocidal plans of the Nazis.  This can be seen, for example, in a 1997 episode of “The Simpsons” showing a book entitled Curious George and the Ebola Virus.  “Curious George,” of course, refers to George Bush, Sr.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2786966/How-The-Simpsons-predicted-U.S.-Ebola-outbreak-1997-Episode-shows-Marge-offering-sick-Bart-children-s-book-Curious-George-Ebola-Virus.html

There was also the BBC reporter standing in front of the still-intact World Trade Center Building 7, saying it had collapsed.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=677i43QfYpQ

The Asians founded a group of Western allies who became what is known as the White Dragon Society (WDS).  This group includes senior people in the Pentagon, the CIA, the Russian FSB, the British Royal Family, Freemasonry, the Vatican P2 Lodge, etc.

This group attempted to bankrupt the U.S. in 2008 with the engineered Lehman shock as a way to bankrupt the U.S. Deep State—the Khazarian mafia in the U.S.  The Americans were told at the time they were no longer able to buy goods from the rest of the world on credit.  That is why the U.S. trade deficit went from over U.S. $696 billion in 2008 to $381 billion in 2009 after the Lehman shock.
https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/balance-of-trade

The attempt to bankrupt the U.S. Deep State would have succeeded, too, except for the fact that the U.S. forced Middle Eastern client states to cut the price of oil they sold to the U.S., and the Chinese were fooled into supporting Communist agent Barack Obama and financing his regime.  Only later did they realize he was just a Bush/Clinton/Rockefeller slave.

Also around that time, in a series of episodes never before revealed to the public, handwritten letters were sent by the WDS to the Chinese Politburo, the Vatican, and the British monarchy that…
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Earth Alliance Cryptocurrency Report, Q3 2018

Follow us on Twitter:  @generalmilan

It has been some time since our last reports (Q1-2018 and Q4-2017).  That’s okay—we are strong believers in taking a long-term approach to investing.  It’s well documented that overactive trading is detrimental to investors’ financial health, let alone their mental health.  The best thing to do is often… nothing.  Patience is a virtue.

Tech entrepreneur Naval Ravikant has said that 99% of all effort is wasted.”  This principle applies doubly in the world of investing, where over-trading can result in real financial losses stemming not only from bad trading decisions, but also from trading fees.  Just as it is in the best interest of the news media to stir people into a frenzy, so is it in the interest of the financial establishment, including the growing cryptocurrency establishment, to encourage investors to over-trade their accounts.  The real beneficiaries of all that trading are the exchanges, brokerages, and market makers who collectively skim fees and take a percentage of every trade, in the same way that casinos take a percentage of all gamblers’ bets.

In fact, the main organizations making money from the cryptocurrency markets so far are those which are facilitating trading.  We are reminded of a conversation with a top trader at a global investment bank in which he attempted to explain what it is exactly that investment banks do.  “We are the casino,” he said.  “Our clients are the gamblers.”

Make no mistake, the world is a giant casino.  People are human and are strongly attracted to things with addictive power.  We wonder what the world would look like without any businesses based on alcohol, caffeine, sex, or gambling.  It would surely be a very different place.

Where we have advocated trading before is in the rebalancing of a carefully constructed portfolio.  Rebalancing—or constantly buying low and selling high—is a way to harvest volatility.  The burgeoning cryptocurrency markets are extraordinarily volatile, so there is an extraordinary opportunity to harvest volatility, which is a kind of wealth transfer from short-term trend-followers and day traders to rebalancers.

However, there are two issues with this approach.  The first issue is taxation, because from a tax perspective, constantly selling winners and reinvesting the proceeds into losers is exactly the wrong thing to do because it maximizes realized gains.  Thus, the effectiveness of rebalancing depends a lot on one’s tax jurisdiction.  There is no point in rebalancing if the gains harvested must be paid to national governments and used to help them delay their inevitable bankruptcies.

In fact, simply spending the cryptocurrency itself is a taxable event in most jurisdictions.  Germany is the exception, and that country has moved to recognize Bitcoin at least as legal tender.  But in most other jurisdictions, buying a cup of coffee with Bitcoin would technically trigger a capital gain or loss.  This is obviously an untenable situation, and very few investors would even have the ability to keep track of all such dispersals to comply with the tax reporting requirement.

The situation is even worse if you imagine a future world of micro-transactions where cryptocurrency users are spending the equivalent of one cent here and there to pay for various services like data storage.  We joked that cryptocurrency investors should start dumping million-page Schedule D forms onto the front lawn of the IRS.  If spending cryptocurrency triggers capital gains, then it is much better to just HODL and never spend it, but that would kind of defeat the purpose of it—cryptocurrency was originally envisioned to be a medium of exchange and not simply a store of value.  This is just one of many ways in which cryptocurrency is pitted in a battle against governments, and in which government regulation is, as always, lagging far behind technological innovation.

On the topic of tax, we will mention here that the large capital gains realized by active cryptocurrency traders in 2017 are one possible explanation for the brutal cryptocurrency market sell-off that began in December 2018 and accelerated into the first quarter of 2018.  Anyone wanting to take some profits out of the market at that time would probably not have wanted to sell until the new year so as to delay owing taxes by at least one more year.  But knowing that many investors might sell out in January could in theory cause a sell-off in December, as investors willing to foot the tax bill sooner tried to get out before more widespread systematic selling began—and a sell-off starting in December is exactly what we saw.

The market peak also coincided with the launch of the Bitcoin futures trading that many market participants feared that would allow large-money interests to systematically short the market, thus driving it down.  In reality, initial futures volumes were very low, but remember that markets are often driven more by fear and expectation than by actual events.

In any case, speculating on the causes of the sell-off is beside the point.  Markets have a mind of their own (are they sentient?) and our job as long-term investors is to ignore the short-term fluctuations, however painful they may be.  The history of cryptocurrency is fraught with huge sell-offs, so it is really par for the course.

We need to examine the market with a wider lens.  The always-entertaining John McAfee put it succinctly: “Okay, people:  Can we please get real?  One year ago to the day, Bitcoin was at $2,560.  Today it is over $6,000.  That is a 140% increase.  This year-to-year increase has been accelerating significantly.  Stop the short-term thinking.  Get real.”

Back to the topic of portfolio rebalancing, there is also an argument that rebalancing a portfolio of small tech startups is not a correct approach, given that tech startups tend to follow a power law distribution, meaning that a few companies (or coins in this case) come to dominate and the rest fail miserably.  In such a market, the best approach is to diversify but to let the winners ride, instead of rebalancing out of them and into the losers.  Of course, there are those “Bitcoin maximalists” who feel that Bitcoin itself is the only real long-term winner and that the ICO market is a land of empty promises.

The Bitcoin maximalists were not right in 2017, as the price-performance of Ethereum trounced that of Bitcoin itself and Bitcoin market dominance declined dramatically, but it remains to be seen if this trend eventually reverses.  Bitcoin maximalist (and voracious carnivore) Saifedean Ammous published a book called The Bitcoin Standard, which makes a strong argument that Bitcoin improves upon the central banking gold standard, or in other words, that it is like Gold 2.0.  The book was well summarized by a former advisor to the French prime minister.

However, gold bugs like Jim Rickards often point out that Bitcoin is not backed by anything real and is a far cry from gold.  Gold is a very special element of the universe that is probably only produced in massively energetic neutron star collisions.  We have a feeling that this debate will not be resolved anytime soon, which is probably a boon for Bitcoin, given that it is still just a small fraction of the size of the gold market.

Somehow we are reminded of the recent film Ready Player One.  While the virtual world is certainly not a nirvana, it is pretty obvious at this point that it is ever-increasing in size and importance.  This probably bodes well for virtual currency.  But zooko from the Zcash project put it well when he said, “I’m a maximalism minimalist.  The universe is always at least an order of magnitude bigger than what you can see.”

Of course, establishment economists such as The Financial Times Izabella Kaminska have long argued that, as a currency, Bitcoin is even more untenable than gold.  The argument is based around the idea that money supply should expand and contract fluidly as needed to maintain price stability and avoid dreaded deflation.  In fact, Bitcoin could be even more deflationary than anticipated, given that approximately 5% of cryptocurrencies are irretrievably lost annually according to one estimate.  That is a lot of forever-sunken gold.  In any case, readers of The Financial Times might now be kicking themselves for having missed out on the entire blockchain revolution so far.

Keynesians aside, if gold and cryptocurrency are the two main contenders for a global store of value, then what about gold-backed cryptocurrency?  There is an argument to be made that it would be the best of both worlds, but it’s not that clear.  For one thing, gold-backed cryptocurrency reintroduces the need for trust.  Bitcoin maximalists love the fact that Bitcoin is fully decentralized and trust-less (putting aside the fact that most mining is controlled by a couple of people in China).  With gold-backed cryptocurrency, there is obviously a need to believe, or trust, that there is actually some amount of gold located somewhere and allocated to every unit of the cryptocurrency.

Moreover, while we have argued for real asset-backed cryptocurrencies in the past, it is far from clear how some of them would function practically.  One major issue was well summarized in a recent tweet:  “If I buy a tokenized house and lose my private key, have I lost ownership of my house?  Can I never sell it again since I can’t technically transfer the key?  Who can issue me a new key?  Where is the real ownership ledger?  What is the use of the token?  Honestly wondering.”

We recently mused that the ideal global currency might simply be micro-shares of the global all-asset portfolio.  One unit of the currency would represent a small ownership stake in every publicly tradeable asset in the world in proportion to the asset’s size.  Thus it would be a recursive system where the currency itself would have an earnings yield, as opposed to cash or gold which naturally yield nothing, or which often actually have a negative yield in the form of inflation or storage costs.

Anthony Pompliano, or Pomp, is a big proponent of the idea of “tokenizing the world,” and is one of the most incessantly positive cryptocurrency commentators.  But he recently decided to take a break from the negativity of the online world following a thread for which he was criticized for being over-enthusiastic about the potential of tokenized securities.

Many people pointed out that re-implementing existing securities in the form of tokens will not necessarily be as large of a wealth transfer event as the invention of a new gold-like asset (Bitcoin).  But it remains to be seen how it all plays out.  It is quite possible that the very concept of equity, or of shared corporate ventures, will be transformed by the advent of cryptocurrency.

Indeed, ICOs have recently overtaken other forms of fundraising even though they do not convey typical equity rights to investors.  So it remains to be seen how ventures are funded and earnings shared with investors in the future.  Remember that we are already living in a world where many of the leading tech stocks do not own much in the way of hard assets and do not typically pay out dividends to investors.  Tech stocks are already quite “virtual” in a sense, and have already evolved a long way away from the more traditional idea of what a stock should be.  This process is bound to continue as cryptocurrency continues to revolutionize Silicon Valley.

We take Pomp’s temporary departure from online commentary—just before the summer solstice—to have coincided with a low point for the market.  Cryptocurrency’s most enthusiastic and incessantly positive commentator could not withstand the negativity and he surrendered.  And while we generally shy away from all forms of market timing, as described above, our sources indicated that this year’s summer solstice marked a turning point not only for the crypto markets but also for the more general ongoing battle for control of planet Earth.  We shall see.

We were very happy to see Pomp return to active commentary—on the Friday, July 13th new moon.  The numerology of this date is a bit counterintuitive, since we are taught by Hollywood that only bad things happen on this date.  But remember that Hollywood is well known to be chock-full of disinformation anyway, and the interpretation of dates and numerologies is much more complex subject than one might expect.

In other esoteric crypto news, John McAfee spent the summer solstice in a coma induced by apparent poisoning, but awoke thereafter in good spirits.  Shortly thereafter, he was forced to avoid a live speaking appearance due to “credible death threats.”  McAfee is planning to run again for U.S. president in 2020, this time on a cryptocurrency-based platform.

On the topic of security-like tokens or security tokenization, we will mention here that we are generally dividend lovers, and this is reflected in our affinity for proof-of-stake cryptocurrency systems.  One view is that proof-of-work is an “absurdly inefficient version of proof-of-stake, given that in either system those with a lot of money are capable of coming to dominate through investment—the only difference being that proof-of-work requires much more energy expenditure and the setup of warehouses, etc.

While we concede that Bitcoin may remain on top indefinitely, our general view that cryptocurrency will continue its evolution towards proof-of-stake platforms that offer tokenization and programmability, a process exemplified by Ethereum’s great success in 2017.  In light of that, our favorite investment at the moment is Waves, a fully-functioning proof-of-stake system that is already technologically more advanced than Ethereum in many ways but which stills trades for a fraction of Ethereum’s price.  In addition, the Waves platform already includes a fully-functional decentralized exchange allowing for the secure trading of arbitrary crypto-assets without restriction.

We list our portfolio of recommendations below in rank order of our preference for each investment at the current time.  The order represents conviction, pricing/risk, and also a time preference, in the sense of some investments being more likely to mature sooner than others.  While we have advocated for an equal-weight portfolio in the past, the rank ordering information below could, for example, be used to overweight higher-conviction positions.

Note that our first three positions are all blockchains which either already are, or have some plan to become, some version of proof-of-stake chains.  Of further note is the fact that the top two positions are both using the Bitcoin Next Generation (Bitcoin-NG) consensus algorithm from Professor Emin Gün Sirer.  As one of the world’s foremost blockchain academics, Emin’s new Avalanche consensus algorithm is also one to keep an eye on.

  1. Waves
  2. Aeternity
  3. Quantum Resistant Ledger
  4. Ethos
  5. Stellar
  6. 0x Protocol
  7. Basic Attention Token
  8. Edgeless
  9. Substratum
  10. Maecenas
  11. Swarm City

As a reminder, we are providing information to the public simply out of a desire share our views and the results of our research. The battle for control of planet Earth has always been a financial battle, and within the realm of finance, cryptocurrency is the latest battleground for control of the future.

There are actually some strange theories that Satoshi Nakamoto was a time traveler. We don’t put much stock into such ideas;  however, there are many bizarre occurrences in the world of cryptocurrency that can perhaps only be explained as manifestations of the greater ongoing battle.  These apparent attacks and counterattacks can give us some insight into the future, as they give us a glimpse of some of the possible futures that certain forces are attempting to either prevent or facilitate.

Of course, we take a position alongside the forces that we feel to be benevolent.  This is our somewhat more esoteric idea of “socially responsible investing,” which is a topic of growing importance even on Wall Street.  The only problem with social responsibility is that it is a very subjective concept.  We are speaking here from the perspective of the Earth Alliance, a loose-knit collective of global organizations working for the benefit of humanity that includes the Asia-based White Dragon Society.

 

2018-08-06

 

H.F.1657

 

*  *  *

 

[SMART METERS ARE NOT SO SMART WHEN YOU CHANGE SUPPLIER.]

 

Not so smart meters: How energy readers cut bills by just £11-a-year and half of those already in UK homes don't work when customers switch supplier

  • Half of the devices broke and tenth went 'dumb' to
  • signal issues,
  • report found 
  • MPs: £11bn project to install meters in every home by 2020 should be
  • reviewed
  • Tory MP Grant Shapps, who is chairman of the group, last night called on
  • the Government to launch an immediate investigation

 

Smart meters are expected to cut energy bills by just £11-a-year, much less than

originally hoped. 

Half of energy readers also stop working when customers switch energy suppliers and a

tenth go ‘dumb’ due to poor signal, MPs and peers said yesterday.

A cross-party committee warned the £11billion project to install the meters in every home by 2020 should be urgently reviewed.

They said consumers are ‘picking up the tab’ for the ‘over time, over budget and mismanaged scheme’.

Smart meters show exactly how much energy households are using minute-by-minute in pounds and pence and send this data to suppliers.

 

Smart meters show how much power and gas you're using minute by minute and send that data to your supplier

The gadgets are supposed to help customers save money as they can track how much energy they are using. It also makes bills more accurate as they are no longer based on estimates.

Yet an analysis of Government figures found that projected savings for customers have been slashed dramatically.

The average annual saving on a duel fuel bill by 2020 was estimated in 2014 to be £26, but this has now been reduced to just £11.

The report by the British Infrastructure Group (BIG) of MPs and Lords warned many smart meters have stopped working because of bad mobile phone signal or after switching supplier. 

Tory MP Grant Shapps, who is chairman of the group, last night called on the Government to launch an immediate review.

He said: ‘Over 90 parliamentarians are stepping in to ask ministers to ensure the smart meter roll-out acts in the interests of consumers. Smart meter technology, which promised to help consumers, looks in severe danger of predominantly benefiting electricity suppliers instead.

‘Currently the smart meter roll-out is going to be delivered over time, over budget and with consumers quite literally picking up the tab for supplier mismanagement.’ The report found more than half of the one million customers with a smart meter who annually switch provider are left with a gadget which has lost its smart features.

 

The meters are reliant on existing mobile networks to send data accordingly so do not work in areas with poor signals

This includes automatically sending data to suppliers and displaying energy use in pounds and pence. And as many as a tenth of meters are not fully functioning because of bad mobile phone signal, the group found.

The meters are reliant on existing mobile networks to send data accordingly so do not work in areas with poor signals. 

The report also warned about suppliers also using ‘scare tactics’ in order to meet the target of getting meters installed in all homes by 2020.

They highlighted tactics including stating that ‘bills would otherwise go up, smart meters are compulsory, current meters are unsafe, and booking installations without a customer’s consent’.

The report said: ‘The roll-out of 53million energy smart meters, far from being a programme which would provide benefits to all, has been one which continues to raise significant concerns.

‘Customers have firstly been left paying over £11billion for outdated and obsolete smart meters, up to 10 per cent of which have gone “dumb”, and which have actually made switching harder.’

e-mail

 

 

 

[SMART METERS NOT SO SMART WHEN YOU CHANGE SUPPLIER.]

 

H.F.1631

*  *  *

  

ROBERT HARDMAN: The Brussels bully hailed as a scheming blend of Star Wars baddie Darth Vader, Rasputin and Blackadder

This has been a difficult month for Jean- Claude Juncker. Film footage of the European Commission president staggering around the Nato summit was followed by an excoriating personal attack on him by a doyen of the Brussels Press corps, amid claims of morning gin sessions, befuddled judgment and rampant cronyism.

This week, Juncker managed to get through a White House session with Donald Trump without any embarrassing incidents — apart from kissing the President — and emerged with a temporary ceasefire in the latest transatlantic trade war.

Yet, as he heads off on holiday ahead of his final months in the job, there is already an inescapable sense of power draining away from the man in charge of 32,000 of Europe's highest-paid bureaucrats.

 

Martin Selmayr, a 47-year-old lawyer and right hand man to Jean-Claude Juncker, arrives for a Eurogroup meeting

This month's savaging by a highly respected French veteran of Brussels politics in the pages of The Spectator and elsewhere has only added to the impression that wobbly-on-his-pins Juncker is already yesterday's man.

The real power in Brussels is now wielded by his secretary-general Martin Selmayr, a 47-year-old German lawyer and fanatical Euro-federalist hailed as a scheming blend of Star Wars baddie Darth Vader, Rasputin and Blackadder.

These may be colourful comparisons for a detail-obsessed functionary, but they are ones he seems to rather enjoy. And when it comes to Brexit, his view is pretty clear: no mercy for the perfidious Brits.

Thus far, Selmayr is perhaps best known in Britain for reportedly leaking the details of a key Brexit dinner at Downing Street between Theresa May and Juncker last year (a charge he has denied), and for mocking the England football team for crashing out of the World Cup. But expect to hear a lot more about Europe's top civil servant in the coming months.

 

President of the European Commission Jean-Claude Juncker (left ) is talking with his cabinet chief Martin Selmayr (right) at the EU Council headquarters

The EU is gearing up for an autumn showdown with the UK ahead of the fast-approaching Brexit deadline. This week, Europe's Brexit negotiator, Michel Barnier, rejected the central plank of Theresa May's latest Brexit proposals — her so-called Chequers plan — just as she was packing her bags for a European road trip to promote them.

Standing alongside Barnier at the Commission rostrum was Britain's new Brexit secretary, Dominic Raab, who last weekend warned that Britain would remove its offer of a £40 billion severance payment from the Brexit table without a satisfactory deal.

'Oh no you won't,' M Barnier told him very publicly this week — no doubt egged on by Selmayr.

For here in Brussels, it is not Juncker or Barnier, and certainly not Theresa May, who is deemed to hold the key to what happens next. People are no longer so impressed with fast-declining German Chancellor Angela Merkel, either. The big question is: what does Martin think?

Nothing, it seems, happens here without a nod from Martin Selmayr, the man who has gone from being 'the most powerful man in Brussels' to 'by far the most powerful man in Brussels', having recently orchestrated a brazen takeover of the top slot in this temple of bureaucracy.

That a group of 28 (for now) democracies should be quite so in thrall to an unelected German academic-turned-lawyer- turned-spin doctor-turned-civil servant might serve as a pretty plausible argument for leaving. Yet everyone at the Berlaymont, the vast headquarters of the European Commission, seems in awe of the man they call 'the Berlaymonster' or 'the Beast of Brussels'.

Unsurprisingly, it turns out that Selmayr was the real architect of this week's EU/US truce, at a meeting with Trump's economic adviser, Larry Kudlow. And he will certainly play a key role in determining the sort of Brexit we are offered. As one Brussels insider put it to me: 'If Martin has his way, it will be not so much a deal as a punishment beating.'

So who is the formidable operator running this gargantuan bureaucracy as well as the thirsty ex-politician nominally in charge of the place?

Born in 1970 to an academic family, Selmayr is your quintessential member of the European elite. Having acquired a fistful of law degrees at universities in Germany, Switzerland, Britain (King's College London) and the University of California, he speaks three languages (German, French and English) fluently plus enough Russian, Spanish, Polish and Italian to get by.

When not running the EU's civil service, he has three honorary academic positions (two in Germany, one in Austria) and has written or contributed to more than 70 legal publications. Ambitious civil servants know not to forget his full title — 'Professor Doctor Selmayr' — when addressing the master.

After youthful stints at both the European Central Bank and the International Monetary Fund in Washington, he arrived in Brussels in his early 30s as a legal adviser to the media conglomerate Bertelsmann.

Talent-spotted by a powerful German MEP, he soon transferred to a job in the Commission as a spokesman for the commissioner in charge of media and telecoms, then rose to be 'head of cabinet' in the justice section.

As the race began to appoint a new president of the European Commission — effectively the executive boss of the whole European project —Selmayr took unpaid leave to run the campaign of the former prime minister of Luxembourg, Jean-Claude Juncker, then still something of a smalltown outsider.

When Juncker triumphed in 2014, Selmayr was rewarded with the top slot of chief of staff, and his grip on the Berlaymont — and Juncker —seemed unassailable. But with Juncker due to step down in 2019, Selmayr needed a new power base.

Four months ago, in a lightning coup that appalled even his own supporters, he was appointed to the post of secretary-general of the entire Commission. The previous incumbent had stood down and Selmayr was magically installed before anyone even had a chance to discuss it. Those who say Europe is run by powerful, unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats could simply cross their arms and say: 'I told you so.'

Even Guy Verhofstadt, the Belgian arch-federalist MEP who leads the European Parliament's Brexit team, was angry, calling the power-grab a 'misstep'. But Juncker had blessed the promotion of his former protege and that was that.

Since then, British bureaucrats and MEPs have noticed a marked ratcheting up of the anti-Brexit tone at the Commission. The very day Dominic Raab made his first appearance in Brussels was the day the Commission produced a fresh report warning of Britain being 'disconnected' from the Continent after Brexit.

Cue the usual stuff about queues at Calais, medicines drying up, plagues of locusts, etc. The Commission says it was merely a report that had been in hand for some months. Selmayr-watchers, however, say it was a classic Selmayr ploy.

'I used to be amazed that we could be in a meeting and everything would be agreed and then, within hours, there were reports that it had all gone wrong,' says a former Commission colleague of Selmayr. 'If he didn't like a plan, he would just destroy it.'

Married to a fellow lawyer, with whom he shares a modern but unostentatious flat in an up-and-coming part of Brussels — he commutes by Metro while lesser mortals travel by chauffeur-driven Mercedes — Selmayr seems as wedded to his work as his colleague, Jean-Claude Juncker, is to his wine list. It is said that the Selmayrs even cut short their honeymoon to Ireland when an office problem required his urgent attention.

His staff are said to be devoted to him, while those who have been cast aside talk of a bully who never stops looking three steps ahead.

'Martin is ruthless, incredibly hard-working and takes a long-term strategic view about everything,' says a former colleague. 'And if you are not useful to him, then he is not interested.'

Another calls him a 'brilliant disruptor' who is hell-bent on shaking up the smug, sluggish, hierarchical culture for which the Commission is renowned. 'You could tell he was going to be trouble,' says one. 'There is a pecking order at the Commission, a certain way of doing things. On day one, he was asking difficult questions and picking fights.'

To which one might say: Hallelujah. In many ways, he is exactly the sort of electric shock the bloated Commission needs. But the main problem, as far as Britain is concerned, is that Selmayr is determined Brexit shall offer no temptations to any other members of the EU's awkward squad, such as Italy and Greece. Brexit must fail, pour encourager les autres.

'Martin is a doctrinal purist on European integration,' says one who knows him. 'Perhaps there is even a sense of atonement.'

Both grandfathers were highly decorated top officers in World War II, and he has spoken of visits to the World War I battlefields with his mother's father. He is of that EU mindset that the only palatable nationalism is European nationalism.

Perhaps this explains reports that he was actually thrilled when Britain voted to leave the EU. He is said to regard us as troublesome near-neighbours and bad Europeans with 'a foot on the brake of history'. It is a view that allegedly dates from his student days in London, when he attended a speech given by Margaret Thatcher, then promoting her memoirs. He bought a signed copy, but was said to be dismayed by her anti-Europeanism.

Brexiteers were quick to pounce on Selmayr's response on Twitter after England's World Cup defeat by Croatia, when he tweeted a string of EU flags. Surely this was an example of his Anglophobia? His staff say he was simply rooting for any and every EU member state in the competition and had been equally supportive of England when they beat Colombia.

'He finds Britain frustrating, but he is much too clever to say so,' says one who has watched him closely for years.

He remains a mystery, and that is how he likes it. Before his latest promotion, Selmayr could often be found enjoying a beer (though not to the same extent as his boss) at a pub next to the Berlaymont.

His favourite table at the Old Hack — founded by a former Fleet Street journalist — was below a 1947 photograph of Daily Mail sub-editors at work. But since his elevation, he has stopped coming.

Given all that lies ahead — running Europe, seeing off the pesky Brits, lecturing on EU law and plotting Juncker's successor as president of the European Commission — it is hardly surprising.

As a result of Selmayr's seemingly unstoppable rise, we are now witnessing an interesting change of heart among hardcore Brexiteers. Those who once demonised Juncker are suddenly growing rather fond of the old soak.

'I always get on well with him,' says former UKIP leader Nigel Farage, adding that he has just bought a pair of Union Jack socks to give Juncker the next time they meet. 'He is a very personable individual as a human being.

'He is also a lot less dangerous than Selmayr — and Selmayr is now more powerful than ever.'

 

ROBERT HARDMAN: The Brussels bully hailed as a scheming blend of Star Wars baddie Darth Vader, Rasputin and Blackadder

 

H.F.1636

 

*  *  * 

How and Why Was WWI Planned and Prolonged

Mujahid Kamran

August 1, 2017

The history of the First World War is a deliberately concocted lie. Not the sacrifice, the heroism, the horrendous waste of life or the misery that followed. No, these were very real but the truth of how it all began and how it was unnecessarily and deliberately prolonged beyond 1915 has been successfully covered up for a century. A carefully falsified history was created to conceal the fact that Britain, not Germany, was responsible for the war. Had the truth become known after 1918, the consequences for the British Establishment would have been cataclysmic.”

Gerry Docherty and Jim Macgregor

The Planners and the Plan

The First World War did not just happen. There is undeniable evidence that the war was planned by the international-banker controlled British oligarchy almost two decades before it broke out (see e.g. [1-3]). In their outstanding book Gerry Docherty and Jim Macgregor have established beyond reasonable doubt that indeed the First World War was planned by a tiny group of members of the British oligarchy including Nathaniel Rothschild [1].

King Edward VII

While building upon what was first revealed by the late Professor Carrol Quigley, they have not only provided detailed evidence in favor of this thesis, but have also revealed the astonishing role of the British monarch, King Edward VII, in secretly building alliances against Germany. They have provided ample evidence that the playboy King, much disliked by his mother Queen Victoria, went along with the secret group that had, in the first place, planned this horrific war.

The secret group of people, whose existence was first revealed by Professor Carrol Quigley, thus putting his own life in danger, decided to work behind the scenes with the utmost secrecy. The revelations of Professor Quigley were based on documents provided by the Secret Elite, as they are referred to sometimes. The documents were provided for the purpose of writing a sanitized history.

The goal of the Secret Elite was the expansion of the British empire to the total exclusion of other powers.

This cabal was extremely wealthy. Cecil Rhodes, who, with Rothschild help, had amassed a huge fortune in South Africa, first discussed his plans with Nathaniel Rothschild in February 1890 in the presence of a few members of the British oligarchy.

In 1891 a five-member secret group comprising Cecil Rhodes, Nathaniel Rothschild, William Stead, Lord Esher and Alfred Milner became, unknown to anyone else, the core group that decided to steer the world towards a war aimed at the destruction of Germany. They called themselves the Society of the Elect. Around themselves they built, as if in a concentric circle, The Association of Helpers, eminent men, who did not know of the Society of the Elect. Other men were gradually involved in the plan but they were not aware of the separate existence of the five-member core. Together, these men steered and controlled the course of British foreign policy, unknown to the Parliament, the people, the Cabinet, and others who were constitutionally relevant.

These men represented a new phenomenon on the world stage – the money kings, who held no office and yet had real power to decide the fate of nations. When Rhodes died at age 48, he left all his money to these men for the sole purpose of extending the British empire over the entire globe. Secrecy was of utmost importance to this group.

The destruction of Germany, the Secret Elite knew, would entail enormous bloodshed. They also knew that Britain could not do it alone. It needed the strength of the Russian and French armies to achieve that end.

Russian soldiers WW1

And maybe the Secret Elite wanted Russia and France to shed their own and German blood for them. But France had been a traditional enemy of the British and vice versa whereas Russia and Britain had vied for the control of the Black Sea and the annexation of Constantinople i.e. Istanbul. There was rivalry between Russia and Britain regarding the Russian urge southwards and eastwards to warm waters, seaports that could function round the year. In the south lay the “jewel” of the British empire – India.

Despite these rivalries the Secret Elite was determined to befriend and woo both France and Russia because it considered Germany the most potent threat to the existence of the British empire. Germany was not fully aware of this heinous plan aimed at its utter destruction. And Russia and France, both were trapped by the Secret Elite. In fact, the Secret Elite succeeded not only in destroying Germany, they also destroyed Russia, and by prolonging the war, destroyed the Ottoman as well as the Austro-Hungarian empires. Britain, in the end, did not really benefit. The Zionists did – the Illuminati Zionist bankers emerged as the real force on the world stage. The Milners and the Eshers and Balfours, and all others became powerless eventually and faded away.

The Rothschilds have continued into the 21st century enhancing their power and wealth with every major bloodshed. They and their illuminati banking brethren were the real beneficiaries. The Christian West was the real loser. And so were the Muslims.

It is well known among historians that Queen Victoria disapproved of her son’s womanizing and kept his royal stipend at a minimum while she was in power. The expenses of the womanizing of King Edward VII, when he was a playboy Prince of Wales, were borne by the Rothschilds and by Sir Ernest Cassel, both bankers of German-Jewish extraction. When he came to power Edward VII was keen to oblige his patrons who, apparently, wanted to destroy the emerging German nation. And, in any case he was under the impression that the destruction of Germany would pave the way for a global British Empire – it was to be his empire.

The Zionist/Illuminati international bankers had other plans. King Edward VII was the architect of the Entente Cordiale of 1904. His image as a playboy concealed the fact that he was traveling all over Europe to build alliances against Germany, while Germany never suspected that traditional enemies like England and France could or would become friends.

Docherty and Macgregor also describe the infiltration of the Foreign Office and the Colonial Office of Great Britain by agents of the group that had planned the First World War. They were able to control the officers of both government departments. They also controlled the War Office as well as the highly important and secret Committee of Imperial Defense. The Group had influence in both parties. Their policy of destroying Germany not only transcended party politics, it also went beyond which party was in power – it transcended governments.

The Parliaments and the prime ministers came and went without knowing that a tiny cabal was planning and relentlessly driving Britain to total war with Germany.

*

Cover up and Fabricated History

Docherty and Macgregor have further revealed that (p 5, ref. [1]):

The Secret Elite dictated the writing and teaching of history, from the ivory towers of the academia down to the smallest of schools. They carefully controlled the publication of official government papers, the selection of documents for inclusion in the official version of the history of the First World War, and refused access to any evidence that might betray their covert existence. Incriminating documents were burned, removed from official records, shredded, falsified, or deliberately rewritten, so that what remained for historians was carefully selected material.”

Docherty and Macgregor point out (their book was published in 2013) that even “To this day researchers are denied access to certain First World War documents because the Secret Elite had much to fear from the truth, as do those who have succeeded them.” Why such a vehement cover up that even a century later the British authorities do not grant access to certain documents pertaining to the first World War? They want to maintain the myth of German culpability and their innocence, whereas the reality is the reverse of what establishment history portrays. The truth will shift the onus of responsibility to the shoulders of the Secret Elite and of every other consequence that followed: the Second World War, Bank of International Settlements, IMF, World Bank, the U.N., Israel, the Korean and Vietnam wars, continuing wars in the Middle East, right up to the dangerous situation today. They have lied to generations and rather than let the truth be known they have chosen and attempted to perpetuate the lie worldwide and for all times.

They can do so because the international illuminati-Zionist bankers are all powerful and control the American and British governments. Israel is a Rothschild fiefdom, a source of perpetual war and a possible eventual Armageddon. The academia is, by and large, part of this cover up and that is very sad, to say the least. Any historian in a university who challenges the establishment version will be ostracized, if not thrown out of his job. Nick Kollerstrom had to lose his job despite the fact that he is an outstanding academic. One of his colleagues, whom he had known for years, was so angry that he told Kollerstrom that he wanted to hit him with his racket!

Guido Preparata was ostracized for his outstanding book Conjuring Hitler: How Britain and America Built the Third Reich, and had to quit his job, leave the U.S., and even give up his research career for some time. It is therefore significant that Docherty and Macgregor, though British (both are Scottish) do not work for any British university. They, therefore, cannot be thrown out of their jobs.

On the surface of it, the strategic aim behind the instigated and covertly planned World War I was to destroy both Germany and Russia and thereby kill the possibility of emergence of a dominant Eurasian power, or a powerful coalition of Eurasian countries, that could threaten the British Empire. The initial group, the Circle of the Elect, appeared to have, as its aim, the establishment of a worldwide British Empire. It only included one banker, Nathaniel Rothschild. With hindsight, the evolution of global affairs indicates without any doubt that the Zionists (Communism and Zionism sprouted from the same Illuminati “tribe” and had a common origin) were the real beneficiaries and the deeper instigators of this war.

The world today is headed towards a global slave state controlled by the Illuminati cum Zionist international bankers. The Bolshevik Revolution was led and controlled by “atheistic Jews” (to use Churchill’s phrase) most of whom came from outside Russia and both Lloyd David George and President Wilson were stooges of the Zionists. Today both, the U.S. and the U.K., are completely controlled by the Zionist cum Illuminati international bankers.

However, other deeper aims of the international bankers were to weaken Christianity through widespread death and destruction of Christian life and property, to weaken European governments by exhaustively bleeding them and bringing them under deep debt bondage, to instigate the Bolshevik Revolution, to facilitate the creation of Israel and the establishment of a supra-national organization through which to set up a One World Government under their ruthless and absolute control (The New World Order). The international bankers were simultaneously Zionists and Freemasons/Illuminati.

A photo of the 1914 Christmas Truce illustrates how the British and Germans had no antipathy until it was created by propaganda and the war itself

*

Building Japan, Bruising and then Wooing Russia after Sabotaging a Russo German Treaty

It was the Secret Elite that was behind the strategy to build Japan’s navy that was then used to destroy the Russian fleet that traveled around the world to confront the Japanese navy. The Russian fleet was utterly destroyed in the Russo-Japanese war of 1904-1905 and the small island nation managed to inflict a humiliating defeat on a giant. This was part of the strategy of the Secret Elite to curtail Russia’s ambitions in the Far East and to bruise and weaken her. Ships for the Japanese navy were quietly built in the shipyards of Britain. On the one hand, the Rothschilds in London secretly provided loans to Japan, while on the other the Rothschilds in France provided loans worth 400 million francs to the Russian government to build the 6365 miles long trans-Siberian railway (p 86, ref. [1]). The Russians had expressed their gratitude to the Rothschilds when the czar decorated Alfonso de Rothschild of Paris with Grand Cross. The London Rothschilds made double profits because the armament industry which manufactured battleships for the Japanese navy were partly owned by the Rothschilds. The Rothschilds had the greatest shares in Vickers armament. Docherty and Macgregor write (pp 92, 93 ref [1]):

Manipulators at the heart of the Secret Elite, like Esher, facilitated meetings held on Rothschild premises to help the Japanese financial envoy, Takahashi Korekiyo, raise their war chest. While banks with strong links to the Rothschilds were prepared to raise funds for Japan quite openly, the Rothschilds had to tread carefully because of their immense Russian investments, not least in the Baku oilfields. They were also very aware of the political repercussions that might ensue for Russian Jews who bore the harsh brunt of czarist anti-Semitism. That changed once the war was over. The London and Paris Rothschilds negotiated a further £48 million issue to help Japanese recovery. At every turn the war profits flowed back to the Secret Elite.”

It was Japan that attacked the Russian fleet in Port Arthur, a Chinese port that was functional all year round and had been leased to Russia. Although Japan issued a declaration of war on Feb 8, 1904, its navy attacked the Russian fleet three hours before the ultimatum was delivered to the Russian government.

In order to go to war with Germany the Secret Elite took four decisions. These are summarized by Docherty and Macgregor in the following words (pp 73,74, ref. [1]):

Foreign policy had to be sustained no matter what political party was in office; the British Army needed a complete overhaul to make it fit for the purpose; the Royal Navy had to maintain all its historic advantages; the general public had to be turned against Germany.”

The British public did not want to go to war with Germany and therefore a secretly driven but powerful propaganda campaign against Germany was launched in order to poison the minds of the public. The Belgian ambassador apparently noticed by 1903 that jingoism was on the rise in Britain and people were turning against Germany. He wrote to his government that this was merely because of jealousy. Docherty and Macgregor point out that the ambassador did not know that secret manipulation behind the scenes had resulted in this attitude.

The Secret Elite worked relentlessly using the vast Rhodes fortune at its disposal to buy politicians and men of influence in all countries that were relevant. One of the men in their pocket was Alexander Islovsky, who served them loyally to the immense detriment of Russia, Europe and the Christian West. Kaiser Wilhelm had made a brilliant move in 1905 – he wanted to have an agreement between Russia and Germany that would have averted the war by forming a defensive alliance.

The Kaiser and the Czar secretly met and signed an agreement on July 24, 1905 at Bjorko Finland, whereby if any one of the countries was attacked by a European power the other shall come to its aid. However, when the czar returned to Russia the agents of the Secret Elite as well as a bribed press opposed the ratification of the treaty. Actually no one knew of the contents of the treaty until the Czar confided in is his foreign minister Count Lansdorff who betrayed the secret to King Edward VII.

The Czar was in need of money after the Russo-Japanese war in which Russia suffered heavy material and human losses. He therefore needed loans and the Rothschilds in Paris were far richer than any Berlin banks. The Secret Elite threatened to block the much needed loans. This was crucial and the Czar backed off despite having signed the proposed treaty. This treaty, had it gone through, would have averted the planned world war. This caused the Kaiser immense pain and he wrote to the Czar (p 95 ref. [1]): “We joined hands and signed before God who heard our vows.” This mistake by the Czar was to cost Russia and Germany dearly during World War I.

Having sabotaged the Russo-German alliance the Secret Elite then used King Edward VII to woo Russia. The King invited the Russian navy to Britain and the British public was softened towards Russia through a media campaign. The Secret Elite managed to lure and trap Russia by a false promise of allowing Russia to control Constantinople (Istanbul) and the Black Sea Straits. A Russia that had been mauled militarily, that was in dire financial straits, and that was presented with a dangling Constantinople carrot succumbed and fell in the trap. An Anglo-Russian Convention was signed on 31 August 1907. Docherty and Macgregor write (pp 95,96 ref. [1]):

The Secret Elite was prepared to use any nation as cat’s-paw and Russia became the victim of British trickery, manipulated into a different treaty that was designed not to protect her or the peace of Europe but to enable the Secret Elite to destroy Germany. . . It was yet another secret deal hidden from Parliament and the people. . .

By such deceptions, lies, bribery and manipulations, the brutal and absolutely ruthless and utterly shameless Secret Elite proceeded to steer and goad nations to a path of unprecedented bloodshed in which Christian, and to a lesser extent Muslim blood was shed. The beneficiaries were the satanic illuminati international bankers and their brethren. Their determination to destroy Germany masked a deep and malevolent desire for a conflagration that would burn Christian Europe to ashes with tens of millions of casualties. That was their goal and they drew the deepest delight and satisfaction by turning men into savage animals.

The Myth of Belgian Neutrality

When World War I began the British public had been exposed to false propaganda for a long time. Two issues on which their mind had been falsely influenced were Belgian neutrality and German militarism. Facts were the opposite of what people were led to believe. As for Belgian neutrality, it was utterly untrue. Belgium was not only not neutral it had had close military links with Britain since 1905 when Britain offered to send “4 cavalry brigades, 2 armored corps, and a division of mounted infantry” to Belgium (p 106, ref. [1]). At that time nobody outside the close knit Secret Elite know of, or suspected, possible war with Germany.

Docherty and Macgregor write (pp 106, 107ref. [1]): “Britain’s military link with Belgium was one of the closes guarded secrets, even within privileged circles.” General Grierson, who was director of military operations was present at a secret 1905 meeting along with Lord Roberts, PM Balfour, Admiral Fisher and the head of naval intelligence, where a decision to take forward joint military planning with France and Belgium was taken. This was so secret that it was agreed that “the minutes would not be printed or circulated without special permission from the prime minister.” Docherty and MacGregor write further (p 107, ref. [1]):

Documents found in the Belgian secret archives by the Germans after they had occupied Brussels disclosed that the chief of the Belgian general staff, Major General Ducarne, held a series of meetings with the British military attache’ over action to be taken by British, French and Belgian armies against Germany in event of war. A fully elaborated plan detailed the landing and transportation of British forces, which were actually called ‘allied armies’, and in a series of meetings they discussed the allocation of Belgian officers and interpreters to the British Army and crucial details on the care and ‘accommodation of the wounded of the allied armies.’”

The British allowed Belgium to annex Congo Free State in return for a “secret agreement that was in everything but name an alliance. King Leopold II sold Belgian neutrality for African rubber and minerals.” Thus Belgium bargained away her neutral status and in return entered into a deep and hidden relationship with Britain against Germany. Docherty and Macgregor point out that here too King Edward VII played a hidden but important role because the King of Belgium was a cousin of Queen Victoria and was very fond of her. So much for Belgian neutrality that became a rallying cry to war for the misled and deliberately misinformed British public. The technique of using the media to control the public mindset continues to date and entails an incredible cost in terms of loss of human life and property.

The Myth of German Militarism

As for German militarism, Docherty and Macgregor have provided irrefutable data that clearly establishes that Britain was spending far more secretly on arming itself compared to Germany. In reality it was British militarism but the cunning and, in a sense, deep characterlessness of the Secret Elite, which hoodwinked everyone and which worked outside and in contradiction with the constitution, and which lied to and shamelessly deceived everyone, created the opposite impression. When the Liberal leader Campbell-Bannerman won a landslide victory in 1906, the Liberals were committed to peace.

Edward Grey and Haldane were committed to war and along with other members of the Secret Elite, steering the country towards war. Cabinet was never informed of this, nor was the prime minister. The crafted biographies of men like Haldane contain lies and are unreliable. And if one reads Docherty and Macgregor they have exposed the lies in Haldane’s biography and private notes. In fact, there is evidence that Campbell-Bannerman was kept in the dark about the military contacts with other countries. His untimely death in 1908 relieved the Secret Elite of the pressure for a peaceful world! In fact, the Secret Elite were very worried soon afterwards, because in 1910, their key patron King Edward VII died at age 68, while the Liberals were still in power.

False propaganda about German military preparations was carried out at the behest of the Secret Elite in the British media. As Docherty and Macgregor put it (pp 134, 135, ref. [1])

From the beginning of the twentieth century, the Secret Elite indulged in a frenzy of rumor and half-truths, of raw propaganda and lies, to create the myth of a great naval race. The story widely accepted, even by many anti-war Liberals, was that Germany was preparing a massive fleet of warships to attack and destroy the British navy before unleashing a military invasion on the east coast of England or the Firth of Forth in Scotland. It was the stuff of conspiracy novels. But it worked. The British people swallowed the lie that militarism had run amok in Germany and the ‘fact’ that it was seeking world domination through military superiority. Militarism in the United Kingdom was of God, but in Germany of the Devil, and had to be crushed before it crushed them.”

These authors are quick to point out that when Germany was defeated and all their prewar records became available to the Allies, not a shred of evidence in favor of such secret plans to invade Britain were discovered. They point out that the statistics were thoroughly abused by an “almighty alliance of armaments manufacturers, political rhetoric, and newspaper propaganda” that conjured a frightening image of a German naval armada and the German will to dominate the world.

Rothschild and Ernest Cassel, who paid for the lechery of King Edward VII when he was a playboy Prince of Wales, were major owners of the largest armament factory Vickers. They point out that in the decade prior to war the British naval expenditure was £351.9 million whereas the German naval expenditure was £185.2 million, i.e. almost half of the British expenditure. Similarly, the Allies, i.e., the Triple Entente spent £675.88 million on warships in that same decade whereas Germany and Austro-Hungary spent £235.9 million, almost a third of what the Entente had spent, on their navies in the same period.

Generals Hindenburg and Ludendorff (R) lead Germany as virtual military dictators from mid-1916 to the end of the war

The German army was 7,61000 strong, the French and Russian armies had, respectively, 794,000 and 1.845 million personnel. So, where is the evidence of German militarism running amok? Who was running amok? Who was spending far more than the Germans? This lie of German military buildup has been perpetuated by establishment historians when the numbers speak out for themselves. The establishment historians should be ashamed at propagating lies and holding the so-called nonexistent German militarism responsible for the war. They have lied to, and continue to lie to their own people as well as the whole world. What a shame! The Germans should stand up with their heads high. They did not lie or deceive.

The sanitized history taught worldwide seems to hold Germany as the aggressor. This is utterly untrue as established by Docherty and Macgregor. Preparata also states in his fascinating book (published 2005) (p 14 of ref [3]):

“From the beginning Britain was the aggressor, not Germany.”

The Russian ambassador to France Isvolsky, who was an agent of the Secret Elite, sent a telegram to Moscow on August 1, 1914 (p 320, ref. [1]):

The French War Minister informed me, in hearty high spirits, that the Government have firmly decided on war, and begged me to endorse the hope of the French General Staff that all efforts will be directed against Germany…”

Germany did not order mobilization until 24 hours later! The Kaiser had sent a message to the Russian czar asking that Russia stop her military movements on her borders. The Kaiser waited for 24 hours without any reply before ordering mobilization. Docherty and Macgregor correctly observe that Germany was the last of the European powers to order mobilization. Does that indicate that Germany wanted war? It only indicates that Germany did her best to avoid war.

A detailed study of the interactions between the British leaders and the Germans and others during July and the first days of August reveals clearly that the British leaders were shamelessly lying to the Germans and deceiving them. Their conduct had descended to the level of common criminals and crooks.

The Germans conducted themselves with integrity and a degree of innocence. The Secret Elite had also advised the Russians and the French to mobilize to attack, but not actually attack Germany, because the British public would never support the aggressor in a European war. They wanted Germany, as Docherty and Macgregor put it, to “swallow the bait.” Britain had trapped Germany into a war, in collusion with Russia and France. Docherty and Macgregor write (p 321, ref. [1]):

What else could Germany have done? She was provoked into a struggle for life and death. It was a stark choice: await certain destruction or strike out to defend herself. Kaiser Wilhelm had exposed his country to grave danger and almost lost one precious advantage Germany had by delaying countermeasures to Russian mobilization in the forlorn hope of peace.”

When Germany declared war against France on August 3, 1914, the French Under-Secretary of State, Abel Ferry, noted in his diary (ref. [3], p 24):

The web was spun and Germany entered it like a great buzzing fly.”

The Illuminati international bankers and other secret society members of the British oligarchy had colluded together for a destruction of Christian Europe. Only the Zionist international bankers and their fellow “tribesmen” saw this outcome clearly – they had planned for it and the non-banking oligarchy was used. The lie parroted in standard history books that Germany bore the responsibility of the war is an utter and shameful lie. The responsibility of the war rested with the Secret Elite controlled British leadership.

Western Front WW1 British soldier

Zionism and the American Involvement

Almost two months before war broke out, on May 29, 1914, the Rothschild agent Col. House, who handled and controlled President Wilson, had written to him:

Whenever England consents, France and Russia will close in on Germany.”

It is well known that Col. Edward Mandel House was a Rothschild agent as was his father. Col. House played a diabolical role in prolonging World War I, and in dragging the U.S. into the World War. It is important to understand how influential he was with President Wilson. President Wilson had once referred to him as his alter ego. In his seminal book, that has sold over five million copies since it was first published, Gary Allen states [4]:

“Colonel” House was front man for the international banking fraternity. He manipulated President Wilson like a puppet. Wilson called him “my alter ego.” House played a major role in creating the Federal Reserve System, passing the graduated income tax and getting America into WWI. House’s influence over Wilson is an example that in the world of super-politics the real rulers are not always the ones the public sees.

Col. House represents a new phenomenon – the emergence of “advisors” to the U.S. President who do not hold any formal office, are unelected, and are intimately tied to the international banking families, apart from being members of secret societies. These advisors hold the president of the United States “captive.” In his profound book The Controversy of Zion, Douglas Reed, a Times (London) correspondent in Central Europe right up to the beginning of WW II, mentions that four men held President Wilson captive – Col. House, Rabi Stephen Wise, Justice Brandeis and Bernard Baruch. Reed states [5]:

Thus three out of the four men around President Wilson were Jews and all three, at one time or the other, played leading parts in the re-segregation of the Jews through Zionism and its Palestinian ambition ….

Such was the grouping around a captive president as the American Republic moved towards involvement in the First World War, and such was the cause which was to be pursued through him and his country’s involvement. After his election Mr. House took over his correspondence, arranged whom he should see or not receive, told cabinet officers what they were to say or not to say, and so on.

In order to understand how and why the preplanned WWI was prolonged it is important to know who influenced or controlled the elected leadership of the U.K. and the U.S. and what were the aims of these controllers. It is also important to know that Justice Louis Brandeis had founded a secret society by the name Parushim, for promoting Zionism in U.S.A. The initiate was asked to accept the following oath at a secret initiation ceremony [6] :

You are about to take a step which will bind you to a single cause for all your life. You will for one year be subject to an absolute duty whose call you will be impelled to heed at any time, in any place, and at any cost. And ever after, until our purpose shall be accomplished, you will be fellow of a brotherhood whose bond you will regard as greater than any other in your life – dearer than that of family, of school, of nation. By entering this brotherhood, you become a self-dedicated soldier in the army of Zion. Your obligation to Zion becomes your paramount obligation… It is the wish of your heart and of your own free will to join our fellowship, to share its duties, its tasks, and its necessary sacrifices.

Rabi Stephen Wise was on board regarding Parushim and, almost certainly, Bernard Baruch was also on board. Bernard Baruch’s connection with the international bankers is well known. It is also important to point out that the international bankers had planned World War I to, among other things, promote the Zionist cause. As Douglas Reed, using information provided in Chaim Weizmann’s book Trial and Error, stated in his book Far and Wide [7]:

The First World War began in 1914; long-memoried readers may recall that it appeared to be concerned with such matters as the rape of Belgium, ending Prussian militarism, and making the world safe for democracy. At its start Baron Edmond de Rothschild told Dr. Weizmann that it would spread to the Middle East, where things of great significance to Political Zionism would occur.

How did Edmond de Rothschild know right at the beginning of the war that the war would spread to the Middle East where things will work out to the great advantage of Political Zionism? He could only know this if it was planned that way and if he was one of the planners. And, as we will see, this was one of the reasons why World War I was deliberately prolonged.

Prolonging the War

The war was prolonged through several tactics. Firstly, all overtures of peace from the side of the Germans, and later the Ottomans, were defeated by agents of the international bankers. Secondly when Germans ran short of food, the deception named Belgian Relief Commission was set up by the international bankers through their front men, by which food was supplied to Germany and the German army, under guise of food supplies to Belgium, so that the German army could keep on fighting. Thirdly Germans were supplied with vital chemicals, metals, and other war materials by Allied Big Business, to enable them to keep fighting. Finally, wherever the Allied rulers seemed to resist the expansion of the war into the Middle East, they were eliminated politically, and if need be physically. They were then replaced by agents of the international banking cabal.

Sabotage of German Peace Offers of February 1915 and December 1916

A lone French soldier in a wet trench

Early in the war, on November 3, 1914, Britain declared the North Sea a theater of war. It blockaded ports of neutral countries illegally. On February 3, 1915, i.e. three months later, the Germans announced a counter blockade. They announced that with effect from February 18, 1915, the entire English channel along with territorial waters of Britain and Ireland would be considered a war zone. One must appreciate the fact that the Germans waited for three months before announcing a counter blockade. They were within their rights to do so.

However simultaneously, in February 1915, the Germans approached James W. Gerard, the U.S. ambassador in Germany, and expressed their desire to end the war. The German authorities wanted the ambassador to convey their desire for peace to President Wilson. They were however utterly unaware that President Wilson was a captive of the “advisors” installed around him by the international bankers. This German overture for peace is not something that is mentioned in textbooks but it has been mentioned by James W. Gerard in autobiography My First Eighty Three Years in America.

The response from Washington was most astonishing. Instead of commenting on the German proposal for peace, the White House directed the ambassador to communicate with Col. House instead of the President of U.S.A.! Dr. Stanley Montieth quotes from ambassador Gerard’s biography [8]:

In addition to the cable which I had already received informing me that Colonel House was “fully commissioned to act” he himself reminded me of my duty in his February 16 postscript. In his own handwriting these were the words from House. “The President has just repeated to me your cablegram to him and says he has asked you to communicate directly with me in future . . .” All authority, therefore had been vested in Colonel House direct, the President ceased to be even a conduit of communications. . . . He, who had never been appointed to any position, and who had never been passed by the Senate, was “fully instructed and commissioned” to act in the most grave situation. I have never ceased to wonder how he had managed to attain such power and influence.

One may notice that the German counter blockade was to begin on February 18, and the Germans communicated their desire for peace before that date as Colonel House’s handwritten postscript was dated February 16th. So it appears that the Germans expected that since the counter blockade represented an increased and new level of hostility, the Americans would be concerned to defuse the situation. They had no idea that Wilson was a stooge, a puppet in the hands of those who had planned a long war.

And one may recall that although the Archduke Ferdinand was assassinated as late as June 28, 1914, Col. House had, a month earlier, on May 29th, communicated to Wilson the arrangement that as soon as England indicated, France and Russia would pounce on Germany. So Colonel House wanted a long war, and destruction of both Germany and Russia, in accordance with the desire of the Zionist international bankers. Therefore, the ambassador never heard anything from Col. House about the peace proposal of February 1915. The peace proposal was sabotaged by Col. House.

Realizing that Col. House was in control of Wilson the Germans made another overture of peace in December 1916. This has been revealed by historian Leon Degrelle [9]. He mentions that on December 12, 1916, German officials expressed a desire for peace and talks with their adversaries. He also writes that Germans expressed the hope that Col. House would persuade the Allies. The freemason Col. House ruled out peace and thus helped sabotage the second peace initiative within the same year. The Germans did not know that Col. House had played an important role in precipitating the First World War by secretly entering into a secret agreement with Britain, well before Wilson’s re-election, that the U.S. would join the war, on the side of the Allies. Degrelle further writes [9]:

On December 18, 1916, U.S. ambassador to Britain, Walter H. Page, relayed a peace offer to the Allies from Germany, the Austro-Hungarian Empire, the Ottoman Empire, and Bulgaria. On January 9, 1917, Prime Minister Lloyd George quickly repudiated the offering and declared that Britain would fight to the victory, which possibly prompted the Germans to re-initiate submarine warfare. Ambassador Page, in touch with President Wilson and Secretary of State Robert Lansing, defended British policies. This was William Jenning Bryan’s resignation, after he described Britain’s collapsing financial situation and the need for America’s neutrality.

If the war had ended in 1916 million of lives could have been saved and destruction and devastation of numerous cities avoided. But the international bankers had planned a long war. It is important to note that, according to writer Juri Lina, who had access to records of numerous important Masonic lodges, Lloyd George was a Freemason, a Masonic Grand Master, and a Jew, whose real name was David Levi-Lowitt [10]. His connections with international bankers are very well known and he was installed in power as a result of an intrigue with the object of promoting the Zionist cause, as will be described later.

The picture of dead men among trees is a censored photo that was banned from publication by the French government. Those are dead Frenchmen mowed down by German guns during the Battle of the Frontiers in August/September 1914.

*

“Belgian Relief”

The next betrayal perpetrated by the international bankers took place in the form of the deception called Belgian Relief Commission. One finds many eulogized discussions about the work of this Commission. On the face of it this Commission was set up to supply food to the Belgian population. We quote below the typical version of the Belgian Relief Commission. It has been taken from an article by Elena S. Danielson that appeared in The United States in the First World War: An Encyclopedia, (edited by Anne Cipriano Venzon) [11]:

Herbert Hoover founded the Commission for Relief in Belgium (CRB) in London in October 1914 as a private organization to provide food for German-occupied Belgium. Belgium’s attempts at resistance to German military demands at the outbreak of the Great War had aroused much popular sympathy in England and the United States. A densely populated, industrialized country, Belgium depended on imports for three-quarters of its normal food supply. When the German Army began to requisition local foodstuffs and the British blockade cut off imported sources, 7 million Belgians faced severe hunger as the winter of 1914-1915 approached. When the American ambassador in London, Walter Hines Page, met with Belgian representatives, they concluded that Herbert Hoover was the best choice to administer some emergency relief action. The comprehensiveness of the program, however, was the result of Hoover’s personal determination to feed the entire nation.

But the real function, to which the Belgian Relief Commission was diverted, was hideous. Once Britain blockaded Germany, and the Germans were starved for food, the Belgian Relief Commission became a cover for sending food supplies to the German Army so that the German Army could keep on fighting. It may be useful to remember that Walter Hines Page was in the pay of Rothschilds. In his book The Secrets of the Federal Reserve Eustace Mullins writes [12]:

The U.S. Ambassador to Britain, Walter Hines Page, complained that he could not afford the position, and was given twenty-five thousand dollars a year spending money by Cleveland H. Dodge, president of the National City Bank. H.L. Mencken openly accused Page in 1916 of being a British agent, which was unfair. Page was merely a bankers’ agent.

The “City” banks were always owned by the Rothschilds. Mullins writes [13]:

The Belgian Relief Commission was organized by Emile Francqui, director of a large Belgian bank, Societe Generale, and a London mining promoter, an American named Herbert Hoover, who had been associated with Francqui in a number of scandals which had become celebrated court cases, notably the Kaiping Coal Company scandal in China, said to have set off the Boxer Rebellion, which had as its goal the expulsion of all foreign businessmen from China. Hoover had been barred from dealing on the London Stock Exchange because of one judgment against him, and his associate, Stanley Rowe, had been sent to prison for ten years. With this background, Hoover was called an ideal choice for a career in humanitarian work.

Further the truth about Hoover is given in the following words [14]:

Hoover had also carried out a number of mining operations in various parts of the world as a secret agent for the Rothschilds, and had been rewarded with a directorship on one of the principal Rothschild enterprises, the Rio Tinto Mines in Spain and Bolivia.

It may also be useful to remember that [15]:

Wilson’s academic career was financed by gifts from Cleveland H. Dodge, director of National City bank and Moses Taylor Payne, grandson and heir of the founder of the National City Bank. Wilson then signed an agreement not to go to any other college.

Please note that the same Cleveland Dodge was the financier of both, Ambassador Walter Hines Page, and President Wilson. Dodge was working for the Rothschilds. The first person to expose the hideous reality about the Belgian Relief Commission was a British nurse named Edith Cavell who was running a hospital in Belgium at the time. In his book Secrets of the Federal Reserve, first published in 1951, Eustace Mullins wrote about this [16]:

Franqui and Hoover threw themselves into the seemingly impossible task of provisioning Germany during World War I. Their success was noted in Nordeutsche Allegmeine Zeitung, March 13, 1915, which noted that large quantities of food were now arriving from Belgium by rail. Schmoller’s Yearbook for Legislation, Administration and Political Economy for 1916 shows that one billion pounds of meat, one and a half billion pounds of bread, and one hundred and twenty one million pounds of butter had been shipped from Belgium to Germany in that year.

Mullins then narrates the story of Edith Cavell (Ibid pp 72, 73):

A patriotic British woman who had operated a small hospital in Belgium for several years, Edith Cavell, wrote to Nursing Mirror in London, April 15, 1915, complaining that “Belgian Relief” supplies were being shipped to Germany to feed the German army. The Germans considered Miss Cavell to be of no importance, and paid no attention to her, but the British intelligence service in London was appalled by Miss Cavell’s discovery, and demanded that the Germans arrest her as a spy. Sir William Wiseman, head of British Intelligence, and partner of Kuhn Loeb Company, feared that the continuance of war was at stake, and secretly notified the Germans that Miss Cavell must be executed. The Germans reluctantly arrested her and charged her with aiding prisoners of war to escape. The usual penalty for this offence was three months imprisonment, but the Germans bowed to Sir William Wiseman’s demands, and shot Edith Cavell, thus creating one of the principal martyrs of the First World War.

It is to be noted that after the war Sir William Wiseman settled in the United States and became one of the directors of the Kuhn Loeb & Co. This was his reward for having helped prolong the war. It may be noted that the head of the German secret service was Max Warburg, another international banker, whose brother Paul Warburg had emigrated to the U.S. in 1902 and was instrumental, in 1913, in having the Federal Reserve Act passed. Paul Warburg was a partner in Kuhn Loeb & Co. The deeply hidden international banking connections are fairly obvious to anyone who cares to find out.

Thus the “Belgian Relief” was used to prolong the war. Had the war ended in February 1915 there would have been no Bolshevik Revolution (instigated and bankrolled by the international bankers) and the war would not have been extended to the Middle East. But the plan of the bankers who instigated the war was to prolong the war as long as possible and to fulfill, as far as possible, their targets (as revealed at the outset of the war by Edmond de Rothschild to Weizmann).

Zionists Sabotage a Separate Peace Possibility with the Ottomans

The Zionists defeated another opportunity of securing peace with the Ottoman Empire in May 1917. It was in May 1917 that the U.S. Secretary of State Robert Lansing received a report that the Ottomans were tired of war and a separate peace with Britain could be secured thereby isolating Germany. But the Zionists did not want to keep the Ottoman Empire intact – they wanted its complete destruction so that they could secure a Jewish homeland in Palestine from the rubble of the Ottoman Empire. The Zionists got wind of the plan when President Wilson assigned Henry J. Morgenthau the duty of contacting the Ottomans. Henry J. Morgenthau had once been the U.S. ambassador in Turkey. Morgenthau was himself Jewish and he therefore decided to take Felix Frankfurter with him.

As Alison Weir writes in her book [17], Felix Frankfurter was a “paid political lobbyist and lieutenant” of Justice Louis Brandeis. Now Justice Brandeis was a highly unscrupulous individual when it came to his political purposes – he could go to any length to achieve these. It is the same Justice Brandeis who had set up the secret society Parushim for promoting Zionism in U.S. clandestinely, as mentioned previously. He was also one of the four men who held President Wilson captive.

If the Ottomans had made a separate peace with Britain, the Ottoman Empire would have survived intact and there would be no room for Israel. Alison Weir states [18]:

Felix Frankfurter became part of the delegation and ultimately persuaded the delegation’s leader, former Ambassador Henry J. Morgenthau, to abandon the effort. U.S. State Department officials considered that Zionists had worked to scuttle this potentially peace-making mission and were unhappy about it. Zionists often construed such displeasure at their actions as evidence of American diplomats’ ‘anti-Semitism’.

Thus the Zionists, controlled by the international bankers, “killed” still another opportunity for peace which could have saved millions of lives.

Two Russian soldiers stand in front of a ruined building in NE Turkey and look at the remains of Armenians killed by the Turks, part of the 1.5 million Armenians killed during WW1 by the Turks.

*

Intrigue in Britain to Open Up a Front in Palestine

In his deep book, Douglas Reed, narrates [19]:

Opposition to Zionism developed from another source. In the highest places still stood men who thought only of national duty and winning the war. They would not condone “hatred” of a military ally or espouse a wasteful “sideshow” in Palestine. These men were Mr. Herbert Asquith (Prime Minister), Lord Kitchener (Secretary for War), Sir Douglas Haig (who became Commander-in-Chief in France), and Sir William Robertson (Chief-of-Staff in France, later of Chief of the Imperial Staff).

How did the Zionists get rid of this highest level opposition to opening up a front in Palestine? They decided to get rid of the Prime Minister and Lord Kitchener. It is almost unknown to the world that the Bolshevik Revolution was actually a Zionist coup in which the funding and support came from international bankers. The Zionist international bankers were mortal enemies of Russia because of the allegiance of the royal family to Christianity. Researchers have dug out this little known aspect of World War I. This aspect reveals the profound, utterly ruthless and absolutely single-minded pursuit of the goal of world domination by the international bankers. Reed describes how the Zionists were able to eliminate Lord Kitchener. He writes [20]:

Lord Kitchener was sent to Russia by Mr. Asquith in June 1916. The cruiser Hampshire, and Lord Kitchener in it, vanished. Good authorities concur that he was one man who might have sustained Russia. A formidable obstacle, both to the world-revolution there and to the Zionist enterprise, disappeared. Probably Zionism could not have been foisted upon the West, had he lived.

The silent and sinister physical elimination of Lord Kitchener has also been consigned to oblivion through controlled history writing. Had Kitchener managed to salvage Russia the Zionist enterprise would have been almost permanently thwarted. That is why he had to be eliminated. In an overall view of things the elimination of Lord Kitchener was vital for the survival of the Zionist enterprise and fits a pattern of intrigue in which assassinations and installation of puppet politicians was crucial. World War I was triggered by an assassination and prolonged by various tactics including the elimination of Lord Kitchener.

The elimination of Prime Minister Asquith has been looked into by Cornelius. He writes [21]:

Herbert Asquith, who had been prime minister since 1908, had begun, reluctantly, to consider a negotiated peace, but negotiations with the Zionists, through Weizmann and Balfour, provided another option for Britain, although not for Asquith. That option was the possibility of a formal, but secret, alliance between the Zionists and the Monarchy, whereby the British Monarchy would undertake to facilitate the establishment of a Jewish state in Palestine and the Zionists would undertake to help bring America into the war on the side of the Allies, this assuring an Allied victory. An agreement with a British government would certainly be necessary, but British governments come and go, and a commitment from something less ephemeral than a British government would have been required by the Zionists. It is proposed that such an agreement took place. There seems to be no way to date it accurately but it seems likely to have occurred sometime around in October 1916.

Cornelius writes further:

In early December 1916, a political crisis, probably engineered, occurred in Britain, and Herbert Asquith, was forced to resign. The denouement came on Dec. 6, 1916. That afternoon King George V summoned several prominent political figures, including Balfour and Lloyd David, to a conference at Buckingham Palace. Later that same evening, Balfour received a small political delegation, which proposed that the difficult situation could be resolved with Lloyd George as prime minister, provided Balfour would agree to accept the position of foreign minister, which he did.

The Zionists thus eliminated Asquith, who did not wish to open a front in the Middle East for furtherance of the Zionist ambitions there. In his place they installed Lloyd David George, a Zionist, a Freemason and a man who worked for the international bankers. This was an odd situation – Balfour, who had been a Prime Minister from 1902 – 1905, had agreed to work as Foreign Minister of a far junior politician.

What concerns were so pressing that made Lord Balfour accept a junior position? Lord Balfour had long been inducted in the larger Secret Elite circle and was simply carrying out what the Secret Elite wanted him to do as part of their plans. It could only be the pressure of the Zionist international bankers with reference to the opening up of a military front in the Middle East and establishing a Jewish homeland in Palestine.

Lest anyone has any doubts about who steered the policy when Lloyd David George became Prime Minister, it would be sufficient to look at the following statement in A.N. Field’s 1936 book, All These Things, in which he quotes a passage from the French book La Mystification des Peuples Allies authored by Andre Cheradame [22]:

For some years a group of financiers whose families, for the most part, are of German-Jewish origin, has assumed control of political power and exerts a predominant influence over Mr. Lloyd George. The Monds, the Sassoons, Rufus Isaacs those known as the representatives of the international banking interests, dominate Old England, own its newspapers, and control its elections. The close solidarity existing between Mr. Lloyd George and Jewish high finance is easily shown by the brief biographical sketches of some of the influential personages by whom he is surrounded . . . Each of the names represents not only an individual, but also a veritable tribe and head of immense financial interests.

So the international bankers assumed control of the British government at the highest level by eliminating Prime Minister Asquith and Lord Kitchener, the former politically and the latter physically. Docherty and Macgregor have pointed out that the Secret Elite “identified and nurtured malleable politicians” across Europe and at home. They write (p 170, ref. [1]):

Lloyd George’s love of good life and his insatiable sexual appetite rendered him vulnerable. His career could have ended several times over had the Secret Elite chosen to destroy him. Instead, they protected his reputation, defending him against damaging allegations and saved his career.”

Since 1910 Lloyd George had been in the “pocket of the Secret Elite.” What happened when Lloyd George became Prime Minister? This is best described by Douglas Reed who has rendered an invaluable service to mankind by writing his last book. He writes [23]:

The simultaneous triumph of Bolshevism in Moscow and Zionism in London in the same week of 1917 were only in appearance distinct events. The identity of the original source has been shown in an earlier chapter, and the hidden men who promoted Zionism through the Western governments also supported the world-revolution. The two forces fulfilled correlative tenets of the ancient Law: “Pull down and destroy . . . rule over all nations”; the one destroyed in the East and the other secretly ruled in the West.

Reed further narrates that after the assumption of power by Lloyd David George the cabinet began pressing the army for opening up a front in the Middle East. The armed forces resisted this strategically senseless pressure. But the change of government had been wrought by the international bankers, the Rothschilds, only for one purpose, the purpose of promoting the cause of political Zionism, as revealed at the outset of war by Edmond de Rothschild to Weizmann. John Reed quotes Sir William Robertson (emphasis in original) [24]:

Up to December 1916, operations beyond the Suez Canal were purely defensive in principle, the government and General Staff alike . . . recognizing the paramount importance of the struggle in Europe in need of give the armies there the utmost support. This unanimity between ministers and the soldiers did not obtain after the premiership changed hands . . . The fundamental difference of opinion was particularly obtrusive in the case of Palestine . . . The General Staff put the requirements at three additional divisions and these could only be obtained from the armies on the Western Front . . . The General Staff said the project would prove a great source of embarrassment and injure our prospects of success in France . . . These conclusions were disappointing to Ministers, who wished to see Palestine occupied at once, but they could not be refuted . . .

This clearly shows that there was a difference of opinion between the government and the General Staff regarding the issue of sending British troops to occupy Palestine. Sir William Robertson was one of the four men, mentioned previously by Reed, who held British interests supreme and stood in the way of the expansion of war into Palestine.

Shipment of War- and Food-materials to Germany Despite Blockade

The international bankers, who also controlled Big Business, were able to prolong the war by supplying much needed materials, such as chemicals, copper, zinc, etc., as well as food to Germany through neutral countries, thereby helping Germany to fight longer. The major neutral countries were Denmark, Norway Sweden, and Netherlands. Finland was also part of the chain of nations supplying materials to the Germans. This is another little known aspect of World War I (and also World War II). This policy of trading with the enemy to make profits and to prolong the war was also utilized in the Second World War.

It is not that sentient and patriotic journalists and analysts were unable to fathom the international-bankers’ intrigue at that time – rather it was the overall control of media, and of book publishing, that has made it possible for the international bankers to deceive generations with controlled information and sanitized history which omits their hideous role. The story was brought out by journalists and analysts in England during the course of World War I, and subsequently by Admiral M.W.W.P. Consett, who was posted as naval attaché in Denmark during the war. Scandinavia was, of course, a traditional “listening post for warring nations.” In the year 1923 Consett wrote a book with a very interesting title, The Triumph of Unarmed Forces (1914-1918). Consett writes [25]:

Our trade with Scandinavia was conducted and justified on the accepted security of guarantees that Germany should not benefit by it: here it is sufficient to say that the security was worthless.

As he writes in a previous paragraph (p x):

But from the very beginning goods poured into Germany from Scandinavia, and for over two years Scandinavia received from the British Empire and the Allied countries, stocks which, together with those from neutral countries, exceeded all previous quantities and literally saved Germany from starvation.

Consett has given several tables that indicate that the amount of various items that were imported into Germany during the period 1913-1917. Please note that war broke out in August 1914. The total food imported into Germany from Sweden in the years 1913, 1914, 1915, 1916, 1917 was, respectively (in metric tons): 252 128, 262376, 561,234, 620,756, and 315,205 (Appendix VI, p 298). Please note that food imports from Sweden in 1917 were more than food imports from that country in 1913. The food items covered in these figures are “meat of all sorts, fish, dairy produce, eggs, lard, margarine.” The food items do not include “vegetable oils, beer, fish, oil, bone fat, coffee, tea, cocoa, horses, syrup and glucose, fruit, vegetables.” This was despite the naval blockade imposed by Britain. The corresponding figures for Denmark follow a similar pattern. No wonder a Danish naval officer wrote (p 295 of Consett’s book) to his British counterparts:

I cannot help saying to you how much we Danish naval officers sympathize with you in having to live as you do amongst these people who are making fortunes in supplying your enemies with food when the officers and men of the Navy to which you belong are risking their lives in trying to blockade your enemies.

The story of Germany acquiring other items – much needed coal, vital lubricants, metals such as zinc, copper, nickel, etc. arrived at German ports through Scandinavian countries. The details have been provided by Consett in various chapters of his book. For instance on p 180 of his book, Consett quotes the U.S. ambassador James W. Gerard as having recorded the following his diary [26]:

Probably the greatest need of Germany is lubricating oil for machines.”

And yet lubricating oil did reach Germany from Scandinavian countries, as described by Consett. In fact Consett mentions that Ludendorff admitted:

Lubricants provided us with some of our greatest problems . . .

Similarly, other materials needed for explosives also arrived in Germany from Denmark and Holland despite the blockade. That the laxity in the blockade was intentional will become evident shortly. Consett states [27]:

These oils and fats, both vegetable and animal, are used in normal times principally for food, soap, candles, lubricants and fuel; but in war time their importance is much enhanced on account of the glycerin which they contain.

Glycerin is used in explosives and in 1915 Germany had discovered a process for extracting glycerin from sugar. This secret process was revealed only after the war. So important is glycerin that during the war the British Army collected all scraps of meat carefully in the British war zone, so that the fat could be used for extraction of glycerin.

That the British government was complicit in allowing vital materials to be shipped to Germany is evident from the following, which was revealed by Arnold White, a British journalist. In a packed meeting held at the Queen’s Hall London on March 4, 1917, Arnold White was speaker. According to A.N. Field, Arnold White [28]:

. . . referred at length to the mysterious way in which Britain had allowed an extension of Norwegian territorial waters from the customary three miles accepted internationally to a four-mile limit. This extra mile allowed great American ships to slip through immune Norwegian waters with 10,000-ton cargoes of ore to Germany. He had enquired into this matter and he found that the political heads understood nothing of significance of the extension of Norwegian territorial waters to which Britain had consented. Those who instigated it, in Mr. White’s opinion, knew exactly what it meant. But for that extension he added, “it would have been impossible for the great American ships to have carried 100,000 tons of ores last year into Germany.

What is difficult to understand about such matters that the politicians could not understand? One is reminded of the famous line by Upton Sinclair:

It is difficult to make a man understand when his salary depends upon not understanding it.

It is quite clear that the British government allowed the extension of Norwegian territorial waters deliberately. The politicians were working for the international bankers, led by the Rothschilds. The government of David Lloyd George had been installed in power by them through intrigue, and possibly murder of Lord Kitchener that may have been made to look like drowning or disappearance of the cruiser Hampshire, to further their own Zionist interests. According to A.N. Field:

. . . Mr. Lloyd George had been among other things solicitor to the Zionist organization in England. In December 1916, Mr. Lloyd George succeeded Mr. Asquith as Prime Minister, holding office until October 1922. Throughout the greater part of his career Mr. Lloyd George had close Jewish associations, and the pronounced Jewish complexion of the Lloyd George Ministries was more than once subject of Press comment in Britain.

Nine days later, on March 13, 1917, questions were asked in the House of Commons regarding the extension of territorial waters of Norway. The answer was that the government would do nothing about it.

The March 4, 1917 meeting had been organized by Dr. Ellis Powell, editor of the London Financial News. In this meeting Dr. Powell pointed out to the mysterious continuation of the activities of international bankers in Britain. This meeting was one of a series of meetings addressed by Dr. Powell and others, who had been agitating for exposing the “Hidden Hand” that was in control of Britain, and was betraying British interests. In fact, in 1917, Arnold White had written a book with title The Hidden Hand. The “Hidden Hand” was none other than the international bankers. The banks being run by bankers of German-Jewish origin in Britain were involved in activities that needed investigation. A resolution was passed at the March 4, 1917 meeting by all those present, numbering several thousand. They unanimously demanded closure of German banks in London. Field writes further [29]:

In seconding the resolution Dr. Ellis Powell, while seconding the resolution declared that German banks in the city were part of a vast organization of betrayal. The great outstanding fact of the war-time Hidden Hand agitation is that whenever it came to mention names and specific instances the names were mainly Jewish.

The Russian revolution is relevant to WW1 – this 1919 poster was printed by the White Russians and depicts Trotsky as an evil Jew. Bottom right are Asiatic soldiers of the Red army executing a European Russian

In his speeches Dr. Powell had attacked Jacob Schiff by name as being behind activities that went against British interests. Schiff was the owner of the Kuhn Loeb & Co, who had also bankrolled the Bolshevik movement. Jacob Schiff was born in the same house where the founder of the Rothschild family was born. Dr. Powell also mentioned Schroder, a naturalized British citizen, a banker of German-Jewish extraction, as well as others.

It is therefore quite clear that the international bankers were behind all major attempts at prolonging the war. They not only surrounded the British Prime Minister and the U.S. President, but all surrounded the German Chancellor. They were all Zionists and Freemasons.

It is important to keep track of the dates because this enables a better overall comprehension of what was going on. The German peace proposals of February 1915 and December 1916 were sabotaged.

It was in December 1916 that Asquith was toppled, it was in February 1917 that the Russian Czar abdicated, it was in April 1917 that the U.S.A. entered the war, it was during, and soon after May 1917, that the Ottoman peace possibility was destroyed by the Zionists, it was in October 1917, that the agents of the international bankers, the Bolsheviks, took over Russia and it was in November 1917, that the Balfour Declaration, addressed to Baron Rothschild, was formally issued.

All these events were manipulated by Zionist international bankers and their Illuminati controlled freemasonic brethren who had planned and intrigued on a global scale for a very long time. These epochal victories of the Illuminati Zionist international bankers have since dictated the course of history right up to today.

The global turmoil is a continuation of the Zionist thrust for seizing world power and they have come very close to their target with the destruction of U.S.S.R., Yugoslavia, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan and the ongoing destruction of Syria, and with clouds over Saudi Arabia, Yemen, and Pakistan. “Pull down and destroy . . . rule over all nations”! The United States of America and the United Kingdom are the biggest tools in the hands of international bankers. Despite their profound strengths these two countries have, on account of their control by Zionist and Illuminati international bankers, become the greatest threat to the very survival of the human species at this point in time.

Henry Makow Ph.D., himself Jewish, and full of anger at the anti-mankind policies of the Zionist international bankers, sums up World War I [30]:

As mysteriously as it began, the war ended. In Dec. 1918, the German Empire suddenly “collapsed.” You can guess what happened. The banksters had achieved their aims and shut off the spigot. (Hence, the natural sense of betrayal felt in Germany, exacerbated by the onerous reparations dictated by the banksters at Versailles.)

What were the banksters’ aims? The Old Order was destroyed. Four empires (Russian, German, Austro-Hungarian and Ottoman) lay in ruins.

The banksters had set up their Bolshevik go-fers in Russia. (They sponsor many “revolutionary” movements as a way to eventually control all property themselves.) They ensured that Palestine would become a “Jewish” state under their control. Israel would be a perennial source of new conflict.

But more important, thanks to bloodbaths such as Verdun (800,000 dead), the optimistic spirit of Christian Western Civilization, Faith in Man and God, were dealt a mortal blow. The flower of the new generation was slaughtered. (See “The Testament of Youth” by Vera Brittain for a moving first-hand account.)”

Almost forty million humans died in World War I [31].

REFERENCES and NOTES

[1] Gerry Docherty and Jim Macgregor: Hidden History: The Secret Origins of the First World War; Mainstream Publishers, 2013

[2] Carol White: The New Dark Ages Conspiracy: Britain’s Plot to Destroy Civilization; The New Benjamin Franklin House Publishing Co, 1980

[3] Guido G. Preparata: Conjuring Hitler: How Britain and America Made the Third Reich, Pluto Press 2005, p 24.

[4] Gary Allen: None Dare Call It Conspiracy, first published 1971; 2013 edition published by Dauphin Publications Inc., p 52.

[5] Douglas Reed: The Controversy of Zion, Bridger House Publishers Inc. 2012, p 242; emphasis added.

The story of Douglas Reed illustrates how the international bankers and their agents suppress truth and promote a sanitized history. In a book Far and Wide, Douglas Reed had dared to put the American History in its true European context. Ivor Benson writes in the Preface to The Controversy of Zion:

In Europe during the war years immediately before and after World War II the name of Douglas Reed was on everyone’s lips; his books were being sold by scores of thousand, and he was known with intimate familiarity throughout the English-speaking world by a vast army of readers and admirers. Former London Times correspondent in Central Europe, he won great fame with books like Insanity Fair, Disgrace Abounding, Lest We Regret, Somewhere South of Suez, Far and Wide, and several others, each amplifying a hundredfold the scope available to him as one of the world’s leading foreign correspondents.

The disappearance into almost total oblivion of Douglas Reed and all his works was a change that could not have been wrought by time alone; indeed the correctness of his interpretation of the unfolding history of the times found some confirmation after what happened to him at the height of his powers.

After 1951, with the publication of Far and Wide, in which he set the history of the United States of America into the context of all he had learned in Europe of the politics of the world, Reed found himself banished from the bookstands, all publishers’ doors closed to him, and those books already published liable to be withdrawn from library shelves and “lost”, never to be replaced.”

This is how knowledge of history is controlled, distorted and even fabricated by the One World cabal of international bankers.

[6] Sarah SchmidtThe Parushim: A Secret Episode in American Zionist History;

American Jewish Historical Quarterly, Sep 1975-Jun 1976; 65. l – 4; AJHS Journal pg. 121.

[7] Douglas Reed: Far and Wide; first printed 1951; Angriff Pr June 1, 1981; part 2, chapter 2.

[8] Dr. Stanley Montieth: Brotherhood of Darkness, Bible Belt Publishing, Oklahoma City, U.S.A., 2000, p 65.

[9] Leon Degrelle: Hitler: Born at Versailles, Vol I, Institute for Historical Review, Torrance, California, 1992, p 255 – 259; cited by Deanna Spingola: The Ruling Elite: The Zionist Seizure of World Power, Trafford Publishing 2012, pp 622, 923

[10] Juri Lina: Architects of Deception, Referent Publishing 2004, chapter 7.

[11] See http://socialarchive.iath.virginia.edu/xtf/view?docId=commission-for-relief-in-belgium-1914-1930-cr.xml

[12] Eustace Mullins: The Secrets of the Federal Reserve: The London Connection; first published 1951; the 1991 edition by Bridger House publishing, p 83.

[13] Ibid, pp 69, 70.

[14] Ibid p 72.

[15] Eustace Mullins: The World Order: A Study in the Hegemony of Parasitism, published by Ezra Pound Institute of Civilization, 1985

[16] Ref 11, p 72

[17] Alison Weir: Against Our Better Judgment: the hidden history of how the U.S. was used to create Israel; 2014, p 9.

[18] Ibid p 22.

[19] Ref. 5, p 247.

[20] Ibid p 248.

[21] John Cornelius: The Hidden History of the Balfour Declaration; Washington Report on Middle East Affairs;

http://www.wrmea.org/2005-november/special-report-the-hidden-history-of-the-balfour-declaration.html

[22] A.N. Field: All These Things, 1936, p 82.

[23] Ref 5, p 272

[24] Ref 5, p 252

[25] M.W.W.P. Consett: Triumph of Unarmed Forces (1914-1918), Williams and Norgate, London, 1923; p xi.

[26] Ibid p 180.

[27] Ibid p 167.

[28] Ref. 22, p 42.

[29] Ref. 22, p 42.

[30] Henry Makow : Bankers Extended WWI By Three Years; revised and reposted December 1, 2007, http://www.henrymakow.com/001583.html

[31] Ref. 15.

*

Related Posts:



 
The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

 
Posted by on August 1, 2017, With 1863 Reads Filed under Of Interest, World War I (1914-1918). You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
 

 
 

FaceBook Comments

8 Responses to "How and Why WWI Was Planned and Prolonged

AUGUST 1-2017

H.F.1269

*  *  *

The Balfour Declaration [1916] : Time to say sorry. Time we made amends.

 

In a letter to a local newspaper about Brexit and the way prime minister Theresa May is handling it, I happened to mention in passing the Balfour Declaration, criticising her plans to celebrate the centenary “with pride” and invite Israel’s PM Netanyahu to the fun. This drew a sharp response from someone spouting the usual Israeli propaganda ‘facts’ and saying my attitude harmed the Jewish community worldwide.

The Balfour Declaration is a deadly serious subject. It is a cause of great horror and grief, of justifiable international anger, and a matter for profound regret. This is a right time and proper time for debate. Let’s focus on it for the next few months because justice groups are urging the British Government to mark the Balfour Declaration centenary by saying sorry.

Mrs May could do some real good here. She could, at a stroke, help quell the destructive turmoil in the Middle East and begin repair to Britain’s tattered prestige. She could even open new trade routes into Islamic markets, vitally important as we leave the EU.

By eating a little humble pie and apologising on our behalf for 100 years of agony inflicted on lovely people in a lovely part of the world Mrs May could take a giant step for mankind on the world stage. She has between now and November to do it. Will she?

No, she’ll be celebrating Balfour in style with the Israeli prime minister and not giving a toss about the people Britain wronged.

Which is shocking when a UN report recently branded Israel an apartheid regime. It’s even more regrettable considering the desperate cry for help from the National Coalition of Christian Organizations in Palestine in an open letter to the World Council of Churches and the ecumenical movement, signed by over 30 organisations in Jerusalem, the West Bank and Gaza.

Here’s an extract: “We are still suffering from 100 years of injustice and oppression that were inflicted on the Palestinian people beginning with the unlawful Balfour declaration… followed by the Israeli occupation of the West Bank including East Jerusalem and Gaza and the fragmentation of our people and our land through policies of isolation and confiscation, and the building of Jewish-only settlements and the Apartheid Wall…”

Mrs May needs a jolt.

When I enquired whether the Balfour Declaration is taught in our schools I was told ‘no’. So what exactly is it?

Arthur Balfour, British foreign secretary in 1917, penned a letter to the most senior Jew in England, Lord Rothschild – pledging the Government’s “best endeavours” to facilitate the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people. Balfour also wrote: “We do not propose even to go through the form of consulting the wishes of the present inhabitants of the country.”

It amounted to a betrayal of our Arab allies in WW1. Many in Parliament objected, including Lord Sydenham who remarked: “What we have done, by concessions not to the Jewish people but to a Zionist extreme section, is to start a running sore in the East, and no-one can tell how far that sore will extend.”

At the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 when the Great Powers carved up the territorial spoils of war a Zionist delegation produced Balfour’s promissory note. It planted a powder-keg in the Middle East and the fuse was now lit. Britain accepted the mandate responsibility for Palestine and eventually in 1947 the Great Powers pushed the United Nations into partitioning the territory, again without consulting those who lived there.

So what made Balfour do it? The more you delve, the more incredible the answers to those unaware of the growing influence of worldwide Zionism. Support for the movement and its ambition to create a New Israel was quite fashionable in the corridors of power around the time of WW1. The story I find compelling is that, while Britain struggled desperately against German U-boat successes and ammunition shortages, the Zionist power-brokers of Germany and Eastern Europe consulted with their opposite numbers in America and decided, given their grip on money and media, they could bring the US into the war against Germany and its Ottoman ally if Britain were to promise them Palestine for a Jewish homeland afterwards.

Balfour was a Zionist convert (as were many others including prime minister David Lloyd-George) and in the right position. The proposition was put to Britain in 1916. The Zionists delivered. The US entered the war. In the meantime immigrant Polish-Zionist chemist Chaim Weizmann offered a solution to the production of enough acetone, a critical ingredient in cordite for artillery shells, to satisfy the war effort. He demanded the same promise. Balfour handed them their ‘receipt’ in November 1917 even though Palestine was not, and never could be, Britain’s to give away.

‘Name of the game: erasing Palestine’

Balfour had inserted into his ‘declaration’ that “nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of existing and non-Jewish communities….” on the insistence of the only Jew in the British Cabinet, Lord Montague, who was anti-Zionist and opposed the deal. But this safeguard was jettisoned as soon as Britain lost control of events.

Not content with the territory allocated to them under the UN Partition Plan the Israelis declared statehood ignoring all boundaries. Their ‘Plan Dalet’ offensive, begun beforehand, had seized much Arab-designated land at gunpoint.  Jewish militia – the Irgun, Haganah, Palmach and Lehi – raided towns and villages forcing inhabitants to flee. Numerous attrocities were committed including the bombing of the King David Hotel in Jerusalem (headquarters of the British administration) in 1946 murdering 91, and the massacres at Deir Yassin and Lydda in 1948.

Today Israel illegally occupies the West Bank and East Jerusalem, including the Old City, and has Gaza in a stranglehold so pitiless as to have caused a long-term humanitarian crisis and irreparable environmental damage. For nearly 70 years millions of dispossessed Palestinians and their families have languished in refugee camps, and those who remain in their homeland – Christian and Muslim alike – live a miserable life under brutal military occupation.

The situation stands as a monumental stain on the flag of the United Nations, which hasn’t the backbone to take action. And the continuing repercussions throughout the Holy Land should concern all true Christians and Muslims especially regular churchgoers like Mrs May.

Miko Peled, the son of an Israeli general and a former soldier in the Israeli army – and now an important figure in the struggle for justice – confirms what many have been saying for years: “The name of the game: erasing Palestine, getting rid of the people and de-Arabizing the country… By 1993 the Israelis had achieved their mission to make the conquest of the West Bank irreversible…. That is when Israel said, OK, we’ll begin negotiations…”

My critic in the local newspaper called Hamas terrorists. Peled describes the Israeli army, in which he served, as “one of the best trained and best equipped and best fed terrorist organisations in the world.” Take your pick. But Hamas’ political wing is not proscribed as a terrorist organisation in the UK.

The accusation that criticising the Israeli regime harms Jewish communities is unacceptable. There are many admirable Jewish groups vehemently campaigning against Israel’s crimes. One-time Israeli Military Intelligence chief Yehoshafat Harkabi warned that Jews throughout the world would pay the price of Israel’s misconduct. So the problem appears to be ‘family’ matter between Jews everywhere.

Related Posts:



 
The views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not necessarily the views of VT, VT authors, affiliates, advertisers, sponsors, partners, technicians, or the Veterans Today Network and its assigns. LEGAL NOTICE - COMMENT POLICY

 
Posted by on July 22, 2017, With 1416 Reads Filed under Government & Politics. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

JULY 22-2017

FaceBook Comments

H.F.1261.-JULY 22,2017

*  *  *

BROUGHT FORWARD FROM NOVEMBER-2017

The EU's imploding as nation after nation turns to the ugly Far Right. But Brussels and Remainers just won't talk about it.

 

News for DAILY MAIL-The EU's imploding as nation after nation turns to the ugly far Right. But Brussels and Remainers just won't talk about it.

 

The three young men waiting for a bus outside the Hungarian town of Perbal a few days ago so alarmed one local resident that he called the police.

Surely these were illegal migrants. However, they were anything but. They were students from Sri Lanka, working as volunteers at a home for the mentally disabled.

A minor misunderstanding, perhaps. Except that it is part of a familiar pattern. 

 

Viktor Orban, Hungary's Right-wing leader who has been accused of xenophobia and anti-anti-semitism over  his country's fight against EU migrant quotas

A few weeks earlier, death threats were sent to a man and his car tyres slashed after villagers complained that he was offering a family of migrants a free break at his motel.

International condemnation of this incident in Ocseny in southern Hungary was swift but the country’s Prime Minister, Viktor Orban, assured the villagers that they had his sympathy. 

But then, the Right-wing leader himself has been accused of xenophobia — and even anti-semitism — as a result of his government’s campaign against EU-imposed migrant quotas.

Such is the reality of life on the other side of the EU.

The EU leadership and the European Commission are far too preoccupied with political chaos in Germany and with Brexit to deal with a much greater threat to their grand European dream.

In Britain, bitter Remoaners are fighting a forlorn rearguard battle to try to stop Brexit and sneer at Leavers for their stupidity, seemingly oblivious to the convulsions in the east of the EU. 

Instead of a serene and harmonious Europe of Tuscan villas, Provencal markets, German opera and Bavarian beer halls, we are witnessing rancorous divisions over migration, economic stagnation and incipient independence movements.

And the bitter truth is that in Hungary, the Czech Republic and Poland, there is now a stridently anti-Brussels, anti-migrant and anti-Establishment movement with the increasingly angry peoples of these nations convinced they are being treated as second-class citizens. 

   

More from Robert Hardman for the Daily Mail...

This is a different Europe, too, which has never known multiculturalism and is in no mood to start embracing it now. 

Hence this month’s Independence Day celebrations in Warsaw featured a torch-lit procession by tens of thousands celebrating their ancient Christian heritage. They chanted ‘We want God’ and waved banners with messages such as ‘White Europe’.

Commentators less attuned to Polish traditions and history were quick to accuse these protesters of ‘fascism’. Here in Central Europe, though, the response has been different. According to Poland’s robustly nationalist government, it was ‘a great celebration of Poles’.

The same mood was reflected in the recent elections in Austria and the Czech Republic. Both countries have elected Right-wing Eurosceptic governments — in the wake of the sudden rise of the hard-Right Alternative fur Deutschland (AfD) in Germany.

Indeed, AfD emerged as the third-largest party in September’s elections — meaning Angela Merkel has been unable to form a government and is fighting for her political life.

Even in France, where this summer’s shock election victory by Emmanuel Macron’s centre-Left En Marche movement grabbed the headlines, the fact that the far-Right National Front gained ground while the grand old political party machines collapsed was all but ignored.

The ineluctable fact is that Europe is shifting to the Right. Which is why I am in Hungary, because it is the next EU nation to go to the polls and is emblematic of the new anti-Brussels mood in Central and Eastern Europe.

There is no chance of a lurch to the Right here, come April’s vote, because Hungary lurched that way long ago. Its leader is hated by liberal commentators — not least for the Trump-style border fence he has built to keep out migrants. 

But Orban, like Trump, couldn’t care less. He has no problem with being called ‘populist’, though he prefers the term ‘plebeian’. Even his friends call him ‘The Viktator’.

And he is well on course for victory in next spring’s election which will carry profound implications for Brussels.

Few doubt that Orban will be returned to power with anything less than an overall majority. Indeed, he is fast becoming the de facto leader of the alternative EU.

Predictably, just as the Brussels establishment belittled Brexiteers ahead of last summer’s EU referendum, it is now dismissing the Hungarian leader as an authoritarian Right-wing fruitcake. 

Jean-Claude Juncker, president of the European Commission, has called him a ‘dictator’ and gave him a half-joking slap on the cheek at an EU summit in 2015. 

The thirsty arch-Eurocrat has never forgotten that it was Orban and David Cameron who were the only EU leaders who dared to oppose his appointment.

 

Polish independence day celebrations were marred after far-Right supporters turned out in their hundreds in the capital Warsaw

 

While many in western Europe denounced the marchers as Fascists, at home the event was praised as 'a great celebration of Poles'

But you do not last as long as Orban (he’s already been PM for a total of 11 years) without shrewd political instincts. This former professional footballer — a God-fearing father of five who makes sausages by slaughtering his own pigs — had his first stint as prime minister as long ago as 1998.

He made his name as a young firebrand bravely demanding multi-party elections in Hungary while the Iron Curtain was still standing. Those who like to paint Central Europe’s dramatic turn to the Right as a dark reprise of Germany in the Thirties are missing the point.

No, what goes to the core of Orban’s political DNA — and the current shift across the whole East European region — is a hatred of communism. These are people who remember living under a totalitarian empire less than 30 years ago. Many now regard Brussels and its unelected Commission and unaccountable courts as the new Moscow.

John O’Sullivan, former speechwriter for Margaret Thatcher and now president of the Budapest-based think tank the Danube Institute, says that outsiders fail to understand how deep the scars of communism go.

His biography of Orban recounts how, significantly, the politician was arrested in 1988 as he tried to create his movement. He says Orban’s experience of life under Communist rule has made him ‘much more critical of elites the higher he has risen.’

Indeed, Orban’s great modern heroes are those who brought about the pulling down of the Berlin Wall in 1989 — notably German chancellor Helmut Kohl, US president Ronald Reagan and Thatcher. It is a popular sentiment around here, as I discover in Budapest’s Liberty Square where Orban has erected a bronze statue of Reagan.

Looking closely, I see it is in need of repair. A crack has now turned into a hole in Reagan’s outstretched hand — because so many people come here to shake it. 

If Orban and his Fidesz party win a fourth term, as everyone expects, the old European elite can no longer dismiss what is happening here as mere ‘populism’. A clear dividing line now runs from the Baltic to the Danube and the Black Sea.

On one side are the EU’s wealthier, liberal, multicultural nations such as France and Germany (where, in 2015, Merkel controversially — and to her bitter cost — invited more than a million refugees).

On the other are those whose democracies are, in most cases, virtually brand new — the so-called Borscht Belt, the Goulash Gang, call them what you will — whose social outlook on everything from gay rights to immigration is very different.

In last month’s Czech elections, an Islamophobic party which urged voters to walk pigs past a mosque to protect what it called the country’s ‘democratic way of life and the heritage of our ancestors from Islam’ won 10.7 per cent of the vote. (That is a great deal more than the 7.4 per cent achieved by the Lib Dems in Britain four months earlier.)

The default response in the Western half of Europe is to demand that these ghastly people become better Europeans. But the fact is that these ghastly people are no longer afraid of squaring up to Brussels.

Barely noticed, thanks to the general obsession with Brexit and Catalonia’s bid for independence, has been a recent summit of Central European leaders in the Slovakian capital, Bratislava. 

 

Germany's Angela Merkel is on the brink after coalition talks stalled following a general election which saw her party lose vote share

 

Merkel is being hounded by the AfD, a party founded by neo-Nazis which returned an historic share of the vote amid concerns over migration

It had been convened to tackle a festering cause of anger and injured pride. The specific indignity was the discovery that sub-standard foods had been exported to the former Eastern Bloc which had not been sold in Western Europe.

Orban’s government has described it as the ‘biggest scandal of the recent past’. Just imagine the protests and smashed windows in Scotland if Sainsbury’s was flogging sub-standard food north of the border but not in Surrey. The Bulgarian prime minister calls this ‘food apartheid’.

Although this controversy was about food, it symbolised to East Europeans how they were being abused by Brussels. 

Stung in to action, Brussels has promised to introduce a new food testing regime from next year. Too late. The damage has been done.

It is just yet another example of why Brussels-bashing is so prevalent to the east of the Alps, particularly here in Hungary.

For when Orban started building his razor wire fence along Hungary’s southern border during the migration crisis of 2015, he was roundly attacked.

Hundreds of thousands who had crossed from Turkey into Greece were heading West via Serbia and Hungary. Some were fleeing the Syrian civil war. But many were economic migrants.

Mrs Merkel was hailed as the ‘angel of Europe’ for saying that Germany would welcome the lot. For his part, Orban was branded the villain for closing the door. 

Today, the memory of the chaos of 2015 and subsequent terrorist incidents by Muslim extremists across Europe mean few here question Orban’s decision.

‘Migration is the big issue here, and the EU is now following Orban on migration,’ says Zsolt Jesenszky, a well-known Hungarian entrepreneur. ‘The Left were totally against the fence when it went up saying: “It won’t work”. And guess what? It works.’

Jesenszky, 45, says that the younger generations want leaders who stand up to Brussels, not people who go on bended knee.

‘Hungary likes a guy who stands up to the big bully,’ he says. ‘They’d never vote for a guy like Macron who spends a fortune on make-up.’ 

(Many here remember that the image-conscious French president, who spent £24,000 on a make-up artist in his first three months in office, has been a stern critic of Hungary and Poland.) 

But Orban is more than happy to be attacked by the ‘old’ nations of the EU because they are playing into his hands.

He has now consolidated his position by outflanking the notorious Hungarian nationalist movement Jobbik, infamous for its fascist uniforms and its anti-semitic, anti-gyspy rhetoric.

Jobbik has just performed a U-turn in search of votes from the Left. It is Orban and his Fidesz movement who are now playing the xenophobia card. 

Even some of his supporters think he has gone too far by leafletting eight million households and erecting posters as part of a campaign against Budapest-born billionaire George Soros.

They claim the 87-year-old gave Brussels a plan to flood Hungary with migrants in order to meet labour market needs and bolster the voter base of Left-wing groups.

Orban has ordered Hungary’s security services to investigate a so-called ‘Soros network’ which it is claimed is pulling strings in Brussels. As a result, Orban has been accused of anti-semitism for his demonisation of the great philanthropist.

Born into a Hungarian Jewish family shortly before the war, Soros only survived the German occupation of Budapest with the use of forged papers.

Though now based in America, Soros has been a very generous benefactor to countless Hungarians, having built the Central European University in Budapest. There, I met students and staff appalled to find themselves at the centre of political controversy.

Earlier this year, in a very disturbing development, Orban’s government introduced laws effectively forcing the university to re-apply for its licence to operate. That approval has still not been granted.

It is a bewildering situation. But the new mood in Central and East Europe has its roots in a proud nationalism that Brussels, for years, has tried to marginalise with its vision of a European super-state.

There’s a message for Britain, too. Perhaps all those Remoaners accusing the Brexiteers of being blinkered little Englanders should open their eyes and look at just how rotten much of the EU is now.

 


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5106147/EU-implodes-nation-nation-turns-far-Right.html#ixzz4zFdkhhrD
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Full article

H.F.1390ONLY A STEADFAST AND UNYIELDING APPROACH TO THE BEAST IN BRUSSELS WILL WIN OUR INDEPENDENCE DAY WITH OUR ACCUSTOMED HONOUR AND DIGNITY IN PLACE.

*  *  *

 
 
 
 

 

[IT HAD TO HAPPEN!

-'WE ARE AFTER ALL AN INSULAR  ISLAND PEOPLE']

 

*

 

Even Remainers now back a

'hard' Brexit:

 Most Brits ... - Daily Mail

 

. Even Remainers now back a 'hard' Brexit: Most Brits want to regain full control ...
By Claire Ellicott for the Daily Mail and Kate Ferguson For Mailonline ... a straight
choice between that and no deal, with 58 per cent backing it.

 

Most Brits want to regain full control of our borders and to become free of meddling EU judges, survey reveals

  • Most polled want the UK to become free of EU judges and full border control 

  • Two thirds said they would prefer 'no deal' rather than a soft Brexit, poll found

  • Findings boost for Theresa May who says no deal is better than a bad deal

Most Remain voters now back a Brexit that gives Britain a clean break from the EU and control back of our borders, a major study has found.

Many of those who voted to stay in the European Union also now believe the country should only pay a small ‘divorce bill’ and stop EU judges ruling over the UK.

The results are a major boost for Theresa May’s Brexit stategy - and suggest diehard Remainers, such as Liberal Democrat leader Sir Vince Cable and former prime minister Tony Blair, have overestimated support for backtracking on Brexit. 

Full artical


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4782712/Most-Brits-hard-Brexit-new-survey-finds.html#ixzz4pXWhGZDU
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

*

 

 FREEDOM!

 

.'..We cannot, I fear, falsify the pedigree of the fierce people, and persuade them that they are not sprung from a nation in whose veins the blood of freedom circulates.  The language in which they would hear you tell them this tale would detect the imposition; your speech would betray you

'An Englishman is the unfittest person on earth, to argue another Englishman into slavery'.

*

EDMUND BURKE

 

Conciliation with America-speech House of Commons

March 22,1775

 

*

1+2+3

+4+5+6+7+8+9+10

Soul of England

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

AUGUST 12-2017

H.F.1277 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

 

Searches related to WHAT INFLUENCE HAS SAUDI ARABIA OVER THE 1.8 MILLION ISLAMIC FUNDAMENTALISTS IN ENGLAND-ARE THEY THE FUTURE FOOT SOLDIERS OF THE TAKE-OVER OF

 ENGLAND?

pew research islam sharia

how many christians in the world

pew poll islam apostasy

how many muslims want sharia law

how many muslims in the uk

percent of muslims who support terrorism

how many muslims are radical

how many muslims in the us

 

THEY ARE TRULY THE ENEMY WITHIN BUT THE LIKES OF MOTHER THERESA [Thanks ! Mr Littlejohn - your nickname for Mrs May could not be more appropriate . As we all know by now  her shameful untruthful statement  outside No 10 in an address to the

 NATION

that

BREXIT MEANS BREXIT

 

  shows  she is certainly no Saint!]  and has no conception of what she is encouraging with her so softly-softly approach  though she and many others in the past have been warned by moderate Muslim clerics that only a tougher stance should be taken NOW! to avoid a massive calamity in the future. It will indeed be a night of the long knives and with little police presence on our streets there will be no warning-just a massacre of the INNOCENTS! 

 

Of course there will be many who will laugh at this suggestion but for those who saw those 140,000 Muslims in a Birmingham Park in prayer as one powerful entity ,then to remember that there are Millions of Fundamentalist Muslims in our midst prepared to die for THEIR FAITH, it is so important that governments listen to those who have successfully integrated into our society. The  likes of Mrs May and others who decided to pass the buck to future PRIME MINISTERS will be held  responsible should another massacre destroy the lives of thousands of our citizens of all faiths in our island home in the coming years.

 

*  *  *

 

AUGUST 6,2018

 

H.F. 1046/1

 
 
BREXIT

ANNOUNCEMENT

ARTICLE 50 LETTER

DELIVERED BY

'HER MAJESTY'S AMBASSADOR

TO

BRUSSELS

ON

MARCH 29-2017

*

ON

THE FINAL STRETCH

 TO

 FREEDOM

OF THE

PEOPLE AND NATION STATE OF

 ENGLAND

[TIME ELAPSED SINCE REFERENDUM IN JUNE-2016

 12 MONTHS

 

JULY-2017- AUG-2019 (?)

JULY 23-2017.

*

 

[No 1]

 

    DAILY MAIL

     

    -MAY: EU MIGRANTS CAN STAY IN UK


    Daily Mail
    May says 3.2million EU citizens CAN stay in Britain after we leave
    Daily Mail - 14 hours ago
    May insists her offer to let three million EU citizens stay after Brexit is 'fair' ... All of
    the 3.2million EU nationals currently in the UK will be allowed to stay ..... in case
    there is a late surge of migrants arriving as Brexit approaches.

    JUNE 23,2017

H.F.1226 BREXIT SOONER THAN LATER!

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-June-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

BREXIT

BUT NOT OUT OF THE EU FOR 2/3 YEARS. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. ALL EU TREATIES WERE OBTAINED BY BRIBERY AND TREASON  AND FRAUD WHICH

UNDER THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES MAKES THEM.

NULL AND VOID.

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

JULY 23 FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2016

*

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW PART 1-2016SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW-2016

OCTOBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

NOVEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

DECEMBER 23-BREXIT NOW-2016

*

H.F.200A-FREEDOM NOW

 

PLEASE  NOTE: WE HAVE IN ADVANCE GIVEN BELOW THE BULLETIN FOR EACH MONTH FOR THE NEXT 30 MONTHS WHICH YOU CAN ENTER-IT WILL CONTAIN INFORMATION FROM OTHER MONTHS FROM THE PAST AND THAT AVAILABLE AT THE SPECIFIED TIME.  WE ARE MAKING THIS ARRANGEMENT AS WE ARE UNABLE TO GIVE AN EXIT DATE FROM THE EU. AS YOU ARE AWARE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE IN OCTOBER 2003 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING AVAILABLE INFORMATION WHICH WOULD BRING THE EXIT FROM THE EU AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. BUT NOW THAT BREXIT IS SOON TO BE ENACTED BY PARLIAMENT THE DAY OF OUR DELIVERANCE WILL SOON BE AT HAND AND THE RETURN OF OUR INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND TOGETHER WITH OUR NEIGHBOURING NATION STATES OF WALES-SCOTLAND AND NORTHERN ISLAND.

MAY GOD GRANT US A SPEEDY EXIT FROM THE SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC -MAMMOTH MONSTROSITY OF THE SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

 

 

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

 

 

The English People's

VoicE

WELCOME!

IMMIGRATION FILE

E U FILE

IRAQ/AFGHAN WAR

     9/11 AN INSIDE JOB

MAGNA CARTA

LONDON 7/7-AN INSIDE JOB

NAZI DVD

ENGLAND FILE

CRIMINAL EU

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

SAY NO TO EU

UNDERSTANDING EASTER

EURO MUST FAIL

ROTTEN HEART OF EU

SOUL OF ENGLAND

100 REASONS TO LEAVE EU

TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

MOST EVERYTHING WHICH IS PRECIOUS IN OUR CIVILISATION HAS COME FROM SMALL INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

 by LORD PETER SHORE.

 

A NATION STATE HAS BEEN REBORN

 

ON the momentous day Theresa May said Britain WILL quit the single market, she put Cameron's feeble negotiations to shame with an ultimatum to Brussels that the UK will 'walk away from a bad deal-and make the EU pay' 

  • STEEL OF THE NEW
  • IRON LADY
  • The PM is hopeful of an EU-UK trade deal because of mutual economic interests 
  • She said Europe not making a deal with Britian would be 'calamitous self-harm'
  • It was confirmed that we will be leaving the single market and customs union
  • But the EU's chief negotiator called her show of defiance counter-productive
  • Her speech was criticised by the Lib Dems as Labour fought on how to respond 
  • Sterling rose 2.8 per cent against the Dollar and 1.8 per cent against the Euro


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4130034/Theresa-s-Brexit-speech-puts-Cameron-shame.html#ixzz4W7pxZPm9
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Europe split over May's ...

https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-mail/20170118/281625305003771
Europe split over May's vision – but even Tusk calls it 'realistic'. Daily ... News -
From Mario Ledwith in Brussels and John Stevens in London.

 

*

POINT BY POINT, HER BLUEPRINT TO FREE BRITAIN FROM BRUSSELS
THERESA May delighted Eurosceptics yesterday with an ambitious road map for BREXIT. The PM extended the hand of friendship to the EU but threatened to walk away if BRUSSELS tried to impose a punitive deal. Jack DOYLE sets out her 12 objectives and analyses her chances of success.

1. CERTAINTY

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will provide certainty where we can. The same rules and laws will apply on the day after BREXIT, as they did before. And the Government will put the final deal to a vote in both houses of Parliament.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By keeping in place-at least initially-all EU laws, Mrs May will provide a degree of continuity and confidence for business. However, as she freely admits she cannot control the outcome of the negotiations. Parliament is highly likely to approve any deal because the alternative will be a chaotic BREXIT.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

2. OUR OWN LAWS

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will take back control of our laws and bring an end to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in Britain. Because we will not truly left the EU if we are not in control of our own laws

CAN SHE DELIVER

 Adopting the 'take back control' slogan of the Leave campaign, Mrs May repeated her promise to end rule by EU rule and judges in Luxembourg and restore power to Parliament and domestic courts. Without this there is no Brexit. A firm red line

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

3 A UNITED KINGDOM

 WHAT SHE SAID

A stronger Britain demands that we strengthen the precious union between the four nations of the UK.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By consulting devolved administrations, Mrs May is seeking to reassure voters in the nations of the UK which didn't vote for Brexit that she is listening to their concerns, and avoid Nicola Sturgeon calling for a second independence vote.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

4. THE IRISH BORDER

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE will work to deliver a practical solution that allows the maintenance of the Common Travel Area with the Republic, while protecting the integrity of the United Kingdom's immigration system.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Both countries want to maintain the open border between Northern Ireland and the Republic without opening a back door into Britain. Likely to mean UK border checks at Irish ports and airports.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

5. CONTROL OF IMMIGRATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

The message from the public before and during the referendum campaign was clear: BREXIT must mean control of the number of people who come to Britain from Europe. And that is what we will deliver

CAN SHE DELIVER

Ending free movement is a  RED LINE, but Mrs May left open when it will end, what system will replace it and details of any transition deal. The PM wants highly skilled EU migrants, doctors and nurses, but will she compromise on unskilled migrants to get a better trade deal

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

 6.  EU NATIONALS AND BRITISH EXPATS

 

WHAT SHE SAID

We  want to guarantee the right of EU citizens who are already living here in Britain, and the rights of British nationals in other member states, as early as we can.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Likely to agreed early on, as long as the EU doesn't want to haggle. Last year Mrs May offered to settle on the rights of three million EU nationals in the UK, and 1.2million Brits on the continent in advance of formals talks- but Angela Merkel refused.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*
7.WORKER'S RIGHTS

 WHAT SHE SAID

Not only will the government protect the rights of workers' set out in European legislation, we will build on them.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May is determined to at least preserve protections for workers on low and middle incomes-many of whom voted for BREXIT. Could come under threat if there is no deal., and Britain slashes taxes and regulation to attract business.

DEAL OR NO DEAL? 3/5

*

8. TRADE WITH EUROPE

WHAT SHE SAID

As a priority, we will pursue a bold and ambitious free trade agreement with the EU. This should allow for the freest possible trade in goods and services. But I want to make it clear. It cannot mean membership of the single market

CAN SHE DELIVER

The crux of the negotiation. Britain will leave the single market, and with it EU laws and free movement. Instead Mrs May wants a tariff-free trade and customs agreement to stop goods being held up at ports. She ruled out ' vast contributions' to the EU budget, and the only money going to Brussels will be for particular programmes and agencies like Europol. Her huge gamble is to threaten to walk away if the EU attempts to punish Britain

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

9. GLOBAL TRADE

 WHAT SHE SAID

A global Britain must be free to strike trade agreements with countries outside the EU too. But I also want tariff-free trade with Europe and cross-border trade there to be as frictionless as possible.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants deals with non-EU countries including the US. That would be impossible from inside the customs union, which imposes a uniform tariff on all non-EU countries. It would also make trade Secretary Liam Fox's job redundant.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 4/5

*

10. SCIENCE AND INNOVATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE have a proud history of leading and supporting cutting -edge research and innovation. So we will also welcome agreement to continue to collaborate with our European partners on major science, research, and technology initiatives.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Unlikely to be an obstacle to any deal. Much collaboration between academics takes place outside formal EU structures and will continue unimpeded.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

11. CRIME AND TERRORISM

 WHAT SHE SAID

All of us in Europe face the challenge of cross-border crime, a deadly terrorist threat, and the dangers presented by hostile states.  All of us share interests and values in common, values we want to see projected around the world.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Security and intelligence cooperation and defence cooperation cannot be a formal bargaining chip, but without making it one, Mrs May reminds EU allies of Britain's importance as an ally in fighting terrorism and important status as a military power.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

12.  A SMOOTH EXIT

 WHAT SHE SAID

It is in no one's interests for there to be a cliff-edge for business or a threat to stability as we change from our existing relationship to a new partnership with the European Union.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants tranitional arrangements to smooth the process of leaving the EU with specific deals on budget contributions, immigration, trade and customs lasting different periods of time. Securing this as well as securing a final deal within two years is a huge task.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

[THERE IS EVERY LIKELIHOOD THAT OTHER EU MEMBER STATES WILL BE GREATLY ENCOURAGED BY BREXIT TO LEAVE THAT SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION IN THE NEXT FEW YEARS WHICH SHOULD MAKE A NUMBER OF EU STATES TO CO-OPERATE FULLY WITH THE UK OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR UNFRIENDLY ATTITUDE AT A LATER DATE.

AS THE GREAT PRIME MINISTER - WILLIAM PITT -  (1759-1806) ANNOUNCED IN NOVEMBER 9-1805 SHORTLY AFTER  NELSON'S VICTORY OVER THE FRENCH AND SPANISH FLEETS AT TRAFALGAR.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

The blueprint of a Free and Prosperous United Kingdom should be the blueprint of a future Free Europe and the world at large. Our past still lives in the hearts of FREE PEOPLES everywhere and soon we will rejoin that sacred past which we left over 43 years ago because of traitorous politicians and others who couldn't see the dangers ,for the gross lies and deceit in their path.

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 18-2017

H.F.1092 BREXIT NOW

 

 DAILY MAIL

COMMENT

FEBRUARY 2, 2017

 

AT LAST, IT IS ALL CLEAR FOR

 BREXIT'S

LIFT-OFF

 

YESTERDAY  was a HISTORIC DAY for OUR COUNTRY. BY a RESOUNDING MAJORITY of 384, the COMMONS swept away [our  past 45 years of tutelage within an undemocratic-unaccountable-unbearable-corrupt-expensive- strait-jacket Europe.]

 

THIS was a historic day for our country. At 7.30pm yesterday by a resounding majority of 384, the Commons swept away the last serious obstacle to freeing Britain from the chains that have bound us to an unelected, unaccountable Brussels for 45 YEARS.

True, we can still expect dirty tricks from the 114 who, to their shame, voted  against implementing the

PEOPLE'S WILL.

Of these , this newspaper will not waste ink on cursing SNP members, whose fantasies of SCOTLAND as an independent EU nation state gave them a spurious excuse for defying the UK majority.

AS for the rest, no criticism is too harsh for those Labour MPs who represent solidly Brexiteer constituencies, but voted to

REMAIN.

They deserve everything coming to them at the next election.

So, too, do the creeps who in 2015 backed the call for a binding referendum, but voted last night against implementing its result.

Among these, none can beat the monstrous hypocrisy of

NICK CLEGG

-that flip-flopping representative of the moneyed elite, suckled on the [thirsty] breast of Brussels.

IN 2008, it was he who led demands for an in/out referendum on Europe (as we demonstrate on the opposite page-

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H F 1101-AT LONG LAST-FREEDOM AWAITS! 

 

 

Brought-forward from August 2003

[THE WAY AHEAD TO RECLAIM OUR SACRED INHERITANCE.]

Faced with the possible imposition (illegally) of a E. U. Constitution this  article contemplating our own U.K. Constitution (English Constitution), is especially topical.

J. Bingley

Constitutional Principles of Power and Remedy.

The Constitution is specifically intended, indeed designed to limit the powers of the state with respect to the people. The Constitution sets a standard upon which the performance of governance may be measured and contested and to provide remedy if abused.

The whole constitution originates its authority from

COMMON LAW

Supremacy resides in the

LAW and PEOPLE

NOT THE

CROWN or PARLIAMENT.

It is a matter of constitutional principle and legal fact that,

THE LAW IS SUPREME

The rule of law is the antithesis of arbitrary power. Integral with this, is the system of jury trial. It places the power of law enforcement in the

HANDS of the PEOPLE.

This the most vital safeguard against DESPOTISM.

The English Constitution's function is to

PROTECT the

"RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

 of ENGLISHMEN".

These are the 'BIRTHRIGHT' of the PEOPLE'

[In 2016 one can see how successive governments have by gradualism watered down these rights with even attempts to replace jury trial by trial by judge only on the grounds of speed and saving resources. The people in the main have been, amiss in not being vigilant to the protection of THEIR CONSTITUTION. In just a few weeks on the 23 June,2016 they have a choice whether to vote to leave the EU and regain THEIR LAW-THEIR CONSTITUTION-THEIR FREE COUNTRY. or REMAIN in an ALIEN COLLECTIVIST AND CORRUPT UNDEMOCRATIC EU with NO PROTECTION of MAGNA CARTA of 1215 and BILL OF RIGHTS of 1688 and NO ENGLISHMAN'S ' RIGHTS and LIBERTIES' to be passed on to FUTURE GENERATIONS.]

The fundamental rights and liberties are listed in the preamble of the Coronation Oath Act of 1688 which declares that  the oath is taken for the purpose of

" Maintaining our spiritual and civil rights and properties"

It is a contract with the people which makes it the permanent duty of the CROWN, and the CROWN in both GOVERNMENT and PARLIAMENT.

This contracts the Monarch to govern only according to the STATUTE, COMMON LAW, and the CUSTOM and to 'CAUSE LAW and JUSTICE with MERCY to be used in all JUDGEMENTS'.

All power of governance is vested in the CROWN.

The two Houses of Parliament may upon their concurrence offer bills for ROYAL ASSENT.

A BILL is not ENACTED until it has been authorised by the SOVEREIGN POWER.

Whilst the enacting power (a royal prerogative) of Royal Assent is entirely vested with the monarch it is contracted ONLY TO BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.  This is a limitation and essential safeguard to protect the people from any over mighty governance  [such as Tony Blair's and Gordon Brown's NEW LABOUR and since DAVE'S PARTY]

 It was used  to defeat the Divine Right of Kings; a claim of absolute power by the Stuart monarchs.  The OATH ascertains the SUPREMACY of the LAW, not the supremacy of CROWN or of PARLIAMENT.

There is certainly no Divine Right of Politicians.

The Coronation contract is of the Crown owing allegiance to the Constitution. The PEOPLE give ALLEGIANCE to the CROWN.

Here is a system of mutual protection for there is a constitutional interdependence.

The MAGNA CARTA

made provision for the PEOPLE to use ANY MEANS including FORCE if the CROWN is found to be in BREACH.

[THE CROWN IS IN BREACH!]

THE RIGHT OF RESISTANCE IS THE ULTIMATE REMEDY...

That which constitutionally binds the Monarch is a restriction upon Her Majesty, Her Government and all Parliamentary power.  The Monarch may do no wrong, but should she refuse by her negative power( the right to withhold assent) to

'LET WRONG BE DONE.'

[Millions of patriots have been waiting over four decades for:-

'Right to be Done!']

Sir William Blackstone confirms this. Whilst the monarch accepts the advice of ministers, they must only advise to do that which COMPLIES with the CONSTITUTION.  Plainly NO MONARCH is FREE to ASSENT to ADVICE that CONFLICTS with the CONSTITUTION in FORCE.

There is no authority in Parliament to pass any power of governance in England to those who hold or owe no allegiance. [such as the EU]

 There is no constitutional authority for Parliament to deliberately breach the constitutional laws by new   conflicting enactment.

 There is a natural duty resulting from the logic of our constitutional law to debate and resolve conflicts, if necessary by prior repeal.

 We must put an end to this form of 'legal' abuse, particularly through the misapplication of party politics.

 Most but not all of our constitution is written:- the Magna Carta, the Petition of Rights, the Declaration of Rights, the Bill of Rights, the Act of Settlement and the Acts of Union etc. It has evolved over centuries with the expenditure of much blood. It has been abused and corrected many times. It was finally settled by the Glorious Revolution of 1688/9.

The Judicial function is to be the independent arbiter between party and party or party and government under the terms of our constitutional law.  The courts are bound to declare upon the constitutionality of an Act where it may prove to be an action of unconstitutional governance. The great examples of the Magna Carta, the Petition 1628, the Declaration & the Bill of Rights 1688/9 make this duty of the court utterly plain.

Judgement may only be given in accordance with the constraints of constitutional laws in force.  At all times the presumption of law and justice in mercy be upheld and used  in all judgements. This is the trust sand the pre-eminent public policy reposed in the judiciary.

The right of petition to the Monarch is an appeal direct to the source of power, the Monarch is under OATH and at LAW, bound to provide REMEDY. Where there are RIGHTS there are REMEDIES. Politicians and Parliament must abide by the terms of reference and DUTY to the CONSTITUTION.

A fixed and certain standard with protection and remedy are the true purpose of the Constitution.

WE MUST RECLAIM OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE RULE OF LAW FROM THE SUPPOSED DIVINE RIGHT OF OUR POLITICIANS.

John Bingley-AUGUST 2003

*

[We ask how did it come to pass that the JUDICIARY did not PROTECT the CONSTITUTION from the illegal actions of PARLIAMENT and the Crown with the disclosures in 2001 under the 30 year rule from the Public Record Office at

 KEW-LONDON

 which revealed the CONSPIRACY of the FOREIGN OFFICE to prevent the PEOPLE from hearing the TRUTH of their TREACHERY and BETRAYAL. Under the 1969 THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION on the  LAW of TREATIES  there are two key provisions which authorise a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice.

1. Where corruption has been demonstrated in respect of pro curing the treaty in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

". Where there has been a material change of circumstances. A material change of circumstances has surfaced into the daylight (September 2005), to begin with, following the death of

Edward Heath.

. It has been revealed that he was an agent of a foreign power (NAZI-GERMANY-since 1938), accepted corrupt payment for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them-and that he did all this on behalf of a foreign power which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation.

[Massive payouts were given to the signatories of the  EEC which in reality was in effect the road to the corrupt-collectivist-undemocratic

FEDERAL STATE of the EUROPEAN UNION.]

*

[THE QUEEN FAILED IN HER SOLEMN DUTY TO PROTECT HER PEOPLE AND THEIR UNIQUE WORLD RENOWNED FREE PARLIAMENTARY INHERITANCE

AND APART FROM SIGNING ILLEGALLY 6 EU TREATIES CONTRARY TO HER CORONATION OATH-IN 1998 SIGNED TONY BLAIR'S SECRET AMENDMENT BILL  FOR TREASON FROM THE DEATH PENALTY TO IMPRISONMENT FOR LIFE-OBVIOUSLY THEY BOTH HAD REASONS  FOR FEARING A FUTURE IMPEACHMENT BY PARLIAMENT.

 

More!

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS}

MAY 30-2016

H.F.800

 

 

 

 

 
A FREE PRESS!

It's finest expression had already been given in

MILTON'S

AREOPAGITICA.

Milton boldly proclaimed two principles of profound importance.

One was the immunity of the religious life from political regulation. The other was that doctrine which has been the strength of the best thought of individualism from his day to the present, to wit that the well-being of society requires the natural diversity of its members, and that coercive uniformity of morals and manners would spell the ruin and degradation of any people.

*

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

More!

 

 

 

 

 
THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR PAST OVER 50 YEARS

 (1959-2016)

 

 

 

THE SPIRIT OF A PEOPLE

THE FIRST TASK of any politics that could be really scientific was to relate authority to its principle source, to show its dependence on the whole social fabric, the customs and traditions, the modes of thought and the standards of life that prevail among a people.  ...the work of Montesquieu.   He really sought to understand society, to show the influence of underlying  conditions ,climatic, geographical, economic, to show that custom and institutions neither are made nor can be changed by fiat, to show that there is in every people a spirit of character which their law must reveal

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

 

 

*  *  *

 

NEW AGE

OF

 INTOLERANCE

 

A.N. WILSON on the new dark age of intolerance: You must believe in gay marriage, you can't question abortion and as for transgender rights...

The great French writer Voltaire famously said: 'I disapprove of what you say and would defend to the death your right to say it'. In this way, he encapsulated what it meant to be an enlightened human being — someone prepared to consider all points of view.

But in recent years the principle of freedom of speech, sacred since Voltaire's 18th century, has been lost, and this is surely one of the most sinister features of our times. It is as if we are entering a new Dark Age of Intolerance.

The irony is that this intolerance has come about as a result of what were initially good intentions. One of the things which makes me happy as I grow older is the thought that during my lifetime we have all tried to become a kinder society.

When I was a boy and a young man, for example, racist jokes were the norm on radio and TV. Now they would be unthinkable. Mockery of homosexuals, and the equation of being gay with being limp-wristed and camp, were absolute norms of comedy when I was growing up. Now no longer.

Such jokes have gone the way of boarding-houses which used to put 'NO BLACKS. NO DOGS. NO IRISH in the window'. Obviously, all civilised people feel pleased by this.

But somehow those initial good intentions — to be kinder to and more tolerant of others — have morphed into a political correctness that has had the very opposite effect.

Two notorious recent examples of this concerned the treatment of a Christian baker in Northern Ireland, and some Christian bed and breakfast owners in Berkshire. The baker had not wanted to make a wedding cake for a gay couple who were getting married. The B&B owners had refused to let a gay couple share the same room in their establishment. In each case they were successfully sued for unlawful discrimination.

Now, a gay activist would no doubt say this was a good thing, arguing that the baker and bed and breakfast owners' behaviour was comparable to the racism of the past. Yet this is surely getting things wholly out of proportion.

The baker was not persecuting homosexuals, as Hitler did. He was not saying they should be put in prison, as all Home Secretaries in Britain did until the Sixties. He was merely saying that, as a Christian, he thought marriage should be between a man and a woman, and that two chaps tying the knot were doing something rather different, which is contrary to traditional Christian teaching.

Whatever you think about this matter, the Northern Irish baker and the B&B couple were merely holding on to Christian beliefs.

I don't happen to share their views myself, and think that if two people are rash enough to promise to live together for the rest of their lives, good luck to them, whether they are gay, straight, trans or anything else. But surely you can understand both sides of this dilemma, can't you?

Well, the answer, more and more in our intolerant society, is 'No'. My concern here is not about the rights and wrongs of gay marriage, transgender rights, our colonial history, or any of the other emotive issues that are subject to endless debate in the modern age.

It is about freedom of thought and speech; freedom to disagree in a liberal society; freedom to have thoughts which are different from the current orthodoxy.

What began as our very decent desire not to be nasty to those of a different ethnicity, or sexual proclivity, from ourselves, has turned into a world as intolerant as monkish Christianity in the days of the Dark Ages, when any freedom of thought is questioned.

Tim Farron, leader of the Lib Dems during the General Election, was asked repeatedly about his views on gay marriage. As a fairly old-fashioned Christian, he did not believe it was possible — marriage should be between a man and a woman.

As the leader of a modern political party, he knew that it would be political death to admit this. He was finally forced to resign.

This was a signal to the world that if you want to succeed in modern politics, it is simply not allowed to hold views which, until a very short time ago, were the consensus among the great majority of people in the Western world.

I use the words 'not allowed' advisedly. What is sinister about living in the new Dark Ages, however, is that it is by no means clear who is doing the allowing and not allowing. In Mao's China, it was obvious: thought crimes were ideas which contradicted the supreme leader.

In Britain today, however, it seems an army of self-appointed censors — from internet trolls to angry students, lobby groups, town hall officials, craven politicians and lawyers and Establishment figures, as well as a host of other sanctimonious and often bilious busy-bodies — have taken it upon themselves to police what we can and cannot think or say.

Not believing in abortion, like not believing in gay marriage, is now, unquestionably, a thought crime. It was hardly surprising that the Tory MP Jacob Rees-Mogg recently said he did not believe in abortion, because he is a man of conviction as well as a Roman Catholic, and this is the teaching of his Church. Yet his view was treated with incredulity and disdain by everyone from trolls and women's groups to the higher echelons of the political Establishment.

As in the case of abortion, debate is no longer allowed on transgender issues. There was a BBC2 Horizon Programme last Tuesday night called Being Transgender. The close-up shots of transgender surgery in a Californian hospital will not easily leave the mind.

We met a number of nice people who had decided for one reason or another that they were not the gender which they had once supposed. They were all undergoing some form of transformative medical treatment, either taking hormones or having surgery.

What made the programme strange as a piece of journalism was the fact that it did not contain one dissenting voice. Not one psychiatrist or doctor who said they doubted the wisdom of some of these procedures, especially in the very young.

Still less was there anyone like the redoubtable feminist and academic Dr Germaine Greer who once expressed her view that a man did not become a woman just because he had undergone transgender surgery — and was, as a result, decried from the rooftops with everything from petitions launched to stop her from speaking at university campuses to death threats.

Dr Greer had also been bold enough to say 'a great many women' shared her view, which is obviously true — a great many women do not think that transgender people have really changed sex. What has changed is that it is no longer permitted to say so.

A friend of mine who likes bathing in the women's pond on Hampstead Heath in London says that at least one person now uses the female changing rooms who is obviously in a stage of transition from man to woman, and is simply a hairy man wearing lipstick.

However uncomfortable this makes the women feel, they know that they cannot say anything.

There was an ugly incident lately at Hyde Park's Speakers' Corner, which used to be the place where anyone could go and stand on a soap-box and hold any opinion they liked.

Speakers' Corner was a symbol of British Freedom of Speech. As a schoolboy, I had a Jewish friend whose grandfather used to take us there to listen to people proclaiming that the earth was flat, preachers praising Hitler, Stalin, and others saying whatever they liked. It was the freedom to do so, said the old man who had escaped Hitler's Germany, which made the very air of Britain so refreshing to him.

What would he have thought had he witnessed the scene earlier this month at Speakers' Corner when a 60-year-old woman called Maria was smacked in the face, allegedly by a transgender fanatic, while listening to a talk on planned reforms to the Gender Recognition Act. Reforms which would allow men to 'self-identify' as female, and enter women's changing rooms or refuges unchallenged.

For Maria, as for the intimidated women of Hampstead swimming pool, and for Germaine Greer, it is by no means clear that transgender people have changed their sex.

Transgender activists have labelled women like Maria TERFS — Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminists. When news of the assault on her reached the internet — ie instantaneously — the trolls began baying, like the bloodthirsty mob during the guillotine-executions of the French Revolution. 'Burn in a fire, TERF'. 'I want to f*** some TERFS up, they are no better than fascists'.

The use of the word 'fascist' is commonplace in our new Dark Age for anyone with whom you happen to disagree. You hear it all the time in the Brexit arguments which rage all around us and which I dread. As it happens, I voted Remain. But I do not regard Brexiteers as 'fascists', and many of their arguments — wanting to reclaim the power to make our own laws and control our own borders — are evidently sensible.

Yet I have lost count of the number of times I have heard Remainers say that Brexiteers are fascists. As a matter of historical fact, many of the keenest supporters of a united European superstate were actual fascists.

The only British politician who campaigned on the ticket of Europe A Nation during the Fifties was Sir Oswald Mosley who was leader of the British Union of Fascists. But then, today's PC censors don't let facts get in their way of bigotry.

Branding anyone you disagree with a fascist; hitting people in the face; tweeting and blogging abuse behind the cowardly anonymity of the internet — these are the ugly weapons used to stifle any sort of debate. And it is often in the very places where ideas should be exchanged and examined that the bigotry is at its worst: our universities.

This week on the Radio 4's Today programme, we heard James Caspian, a quietly-spoken, kindly psychotherapist, describing what has become a cause celebre at Bath Spa University.

He has been working for some years with people who for one reason or another have begun the process of gender-transition, and then come to regret it.

Caspian is evidently not a judgmental man. He wanted to write a thesis on this subject from a sympathetic and dispassionate point of view.

What makes people feel so uncomfortable with their own apparent gender that they wish to undergo painful and invasive surgery to change it? What makes people then come to reassess their first idea? These are surely legitimate questions about a subject many of us can't quite comprehend.

I have two friends who started out as men, and decided in mid-life that they were really women, or wanted to become women, which is what they have done. I do not really understand what has happened to them, even though they have tried to explain it to me.

Surely a man like James Caspian, who has worked with transgender men and women, should be encouraged by a university to explain this area of medicine or psychology?

But no. The university, having initially approved of his idea for a thesis, then turned down his application. 'The fundamental reason given was that it might cause criticism of the research on social media, and criticism of the research would be criticism of the university,' he told Radio 4 listeners. 'They also added it's better not to offend people.'

This is all of a piece with students at Oxford wanting to pull down the statue of 19th century imperialist Cecil Rhodes from his old college, Oriel, on the grounds that he was racist.

Rather than having a reasoned debate weighing the evils of racist colonialism against Rhodes's benevolence, the student at the forefront of the movement — who had actually accepted a £40,000 Rhodes scholarship funded by the fortune the colonialist gave to Oxford — wanted to pull down the statue.

This is the same attitude of mind as that which led monks in the Dark Ages to destroy the statues of pagan gods and goddesses, or the Taliban to do the same to age-old Buddhist artefacts.

Reason, debate, seeing more than one side to an argument, surely these are the foundations of all that has fashioned the great values of the West since the Enlightenment started in the 18th century with an explosion of new ideas in science, philosophy, literature, and modern rational thought that ushered in the Age of Reason.

Realising that human actions and ideas are often mixtures of good and bad — isn't this what it means to have a grown-up mind? Surely we should be allowed to discuss matters without being accused of thought crime?

In universities, as at Speakers' Corner and in the public at large, there used to be the robust sense that sticks and stones may break our bones but words can never hurt us. Now, the 'hurt-feelings' card is regularly played to stifle any debate.

Little by little, we are allowing the Dark Ages of intolerance to come again. We should not be letting this happen.

We should be able to say: 'We disapprove of your views — on Europe, on Transgender Issues, on Islam, on absolutely anything, but we defend to the death your right to express them'.


 

Full article

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-4935418/A-N-WILSON-new-dark-age-intolerance.html#ixzz4uAFieZ6T
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

[COMMENTS-HIGHLIGHTING - ARE OURS!]

 

SEPTEMBER 30-2017

H.F.1329

 

*  *  *

HOME

DEMOCRACY or FREEDOM? THAT IS YOUR CHOICE

by

Andrew Alexander

COLUMN

[Daily Mail-June 27,2008]

DEMOCRACY and freedom. It is a fine sounding phrase-rarely off the lips of President Bush as he blunders around the Middle East.

Why do we readily accept that democracy and freedom are natural partners? There is scant historical evidence for it. Often it is a case of

DEMOCRACY or FREEDOM: even DEMOCRACY versus FREEDOM.

Consider two examples.  the United States is the only country to have banned alcohol by public demand. Contrast this with Hong Kong. Until shortly before being handed back by

BRITAIN to BEIJING

 it had

NO DEMOCRACY

at all: It was ruled by a colonial governor. Yet enjoyed enviable freedom with one of the least intrusive governments -and flourished wonderfully.

Our own experience also has much to tell us.

BEING A DEMOCRACY HAS NOT PROMOTED PERSONAL LIBERTY.

QUITE THE OPPOSITE.

More than

3000

 NEW OFFENCES

have been created since 1997, and officialdom revels in nearly

300 POWERS OF ENTRY.

Much of this is due to the

EUROPEAN UNION

whose

DIRECTIVES

are rarely scrutinised, let alone debated , by our supposedly democratic representatives.

WHAT we may SAY, WRITE or DO, or whom WE EMPLOY has been increasingly limited. The Government has passed legislation which can make assisting your son's football team

AN OFFENCE.

Another side of our

'democracy'

demonstrates painfully how the public will is constantly flouted. Take the brazen example of voters being

PROMISED REFERENDUM

on

CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGES

resulting from the

LISBON TREATY

The unscrupulous machinery of government has been deployed to

FRUSTRATE THE PUBLIC WILL.

I am not making a party point.

FOR OVER 40 YEARS, GOVERNMENTS OF BOTH PARTIES HAVE BEEN RESISTING AN OVERWHELMING PUBLIC DEMAND FOR CURBS ON

IMMIGRATION.

especially from the

NEW COMMONWEALTH.

 While successive governments have made a show of meeting public demand, they have, quite consciously

REFUSED TO ADDRESS IT

throwing occasional tit-bits to the voters in the hope

THAT THIS WILL KEEP THEM QUIET.

Consider, also, the strong public demand for

CRIMINALS TO BE PROPERLY PUNISHED.

Successive governments, including Mrs Thatcher's have come under the sway of the

'PRISON REFORM'

people -with the result that

CRIMINALS RECEIVE VERY MODEST SENTENCES.

What is more, if they serve a sentence at all, it is in the softest conditions.

IF LYING ON YOUR BED AND WATCHING TV FOR A FEW MONTHS IS THE WORST THAT THE LAW WILL INFLICT

(and that's if you are even caught)

then

CRIME IS WORTH THE RISK

AND

PUBLIC OUTRAGE IS IGNORED.

The explanation is quite logical. Politicians are typically driven by

TWO THINGS.

THE FIRST is the PURSUIT OF POWER

the most exciting thing in the world, or even some say, the first.  If this urge is not there when they start their political careers

THEN IT SOON TAKES OVER.

THEIR SECOND MOTIVATION -to give our politicians their due - is the DESIRE FOR REFORM, IMPROVE the condition of the PEOPLE.

But the catch here is that most politicians

 THINK THEY KNOW WHAT IS GOOD FOR THE PEOPLE FAR BETTER THAN THEMSELVES.

THEY FORM AN ELITE

WHICH LISTENS TO

OTHER ELITES

Or perhaps, since the word elite sounds flattering, we should say

THEY FORM A CASTE.

 

Politicians do not wake each morning wondering whether they are meeting the public will.  They turn to the media to learn what is said about them in newspapers and on the radio by other members of the

NATIONAL ELITE

- the selectorate, the clattering classes, the scribblers, the intellectually fashionable, call them what you will.

 

For elites to be out of touch is not unusual, even inevitable. The desire to be 'in' with the 'right' people is common with politicians; their weakness is for approval (and fame).

Of course, there is one moment when public opinion cannot be ignored -and that is at an

ELECTION

As Rousseau observed, voters are truly free

ONLY

 ON

ELECTION DAY.

But , by then, all the issues are jumbled up, and the voter finds himself choosing between

TWO COMPLEX and CONFUSING MENUS.

And while it is clearly advantageous for a party to offer the public

WHAT IT WANTS, the fact that both main parties say MUCH THE SAME THING..

-and make similar insincere

PROMISES

makes a mockery of any claim to be driven by

PUBLIC WILL.

 

BUT  the ALTERNATIVE to our PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM politicians say in horror, would be GOVERNMENT by REFERENDUMS. With 'horror' because it would take power from THEM and give it to THE PEOPLE.

BUT WHY NOT?

The Swiss have made a suburb success of it. Referendums are required on national and local issues if enough voters petition for them and they often do. As a result, the Federal Government, like  the local CANTON administrations, proceeds with CAUTION in case its plans are overturned by a PUBLIC VOTE. . .

To acknowledge that our PARLIAMENTARY SYSTEM, which has developed over the centuries, NO LONGER WORKS -MAY BE PAINFUL. But if you put that to a REFERENDUM,

MOST VOTERS WOULD HEARTILY AGREE.

 

*

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comment in Brackets]

 

Ten EU truths we must tell the public
 

 *

HOME

[brought forward from June-2008

AUGUST-2008

*

[ 'IN JANUARY 2018 we can look back over 10 years and see that the situation with regard to many matters mentioned above has got progressively WORSE! Whether it is IMMIGRATION-POLICING-LAWS...The only GOOD NEWS is that we are only just over a year away from leaving the monstrous soon to be containment camp know as the EU SUPER-STATE a plan of ADOLF-HITLER in 1940 for GERMANY to dominate Europe in the PEACE .]

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

[brought forward from June-2008

 

 

 

*  *  *

A MAN of VISION-A LEARNED PATRIOT for whom LONDON DOCKERS MARCHED on WESTMINSTER in his SUPPORT-HISTORY has VALIDATED his FEARS.

*

 

Words

Enoch would never have uttered

 

by

Andrew Alexander

COLUMN

[Daily Mail- Friday, November 9, 2007]

 

 

THERE is a long standing form of moral evasion popular among politicians - and some journalists too - which has always intrigued me , if only for its

IMPUDENCE

It involves Enoch Powell's so called 'river of blood' speech in 1968, whose recollection has forced the resignation of the Tory candidate for Halesowen and Rowley Regis. The speech itself, incidentally, was notable for understating the prospective immigrant population.

 

'Ah, yes, you see,' the cry of the political elite has long run (I read it again last week),

'It was that speech , that phrase, which made rational discussion of immigration impossible.'

Note the implication that these people had been indulging in a rational debate on immigration only to be thrown off course by Powell's hand-grenade.

Let me assure you with every fibre of my being that a rational discussion was just what leading politicians were avoiding.

THERE WAS A CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE

by both front benches

-which drove Powell to fury.

Far from making thoughtful debate impossible, his speech and reaction made it

VERY URGENT

As an admirer and friend of Powell I was myself dismayed by that sanguinary phrase. But the real shock lay in the public reaction.

Dockers from the East End marched on Westminster demanding  to protest at

TED HEATH

sacking Powell from the Shadow Cabinet.

Opinion polls showed massive backing for Powell, to say nothing of the largest politician's postbag on record, in which the overwhelming majority supported him.

THE CONSPIRACY OF SILENCE

sprang from the fact that the problem had become so daunting. Effective action would have to be on a major scale , admit to previous failures and would risk, indeed ensure, denunciation from every pulpit in the land (lay and clerical)

It was easier for politicians and commentators, all secure in their leafy suburbs, to assure the public that the problem would be solved by

INTEGRATION

NOW, however, the genie was out of the bottle. So in the 1970 Tory manifesto Heath promised

'No further large scale permanent immigration'.

BUT

of course, there was.

 

The 1962 Commonwealth Immigrants Act

 

TOO LITTLE and TOO LATE

had allowed those already here or able to secure work vouchers to bring in their families and 'dependant relatives'.

THEY CAME IN SWARMS

 

PARENTS

GRANDPARENTS

UNCLES

and

SISTERS

and their

COUSINS

and their AUNTS.

They came from the sub-continent where birth certificates were far form common and anyone could claim a blood relationship. Money readily changed hands. So that Tories changed the law to say that only

Spouses

Fiances

and

Fiancees

would be allowed.

 

But by 1976, the level of intercontinental match-making had reached such a level the Foreign Office dispatched a senior official to the sub-continent to assess the

PROBLEM.

He observed that allowing in married and affianced partners would open up a whole new group of applicants -'subsequently entitling

PARENTS

GRANDPARENTS

and allegedly distressed

RELATIVES

to seek entry.

IT WOULD BE LIKE BAILING OUT THE OCEAN.

 

SO AN EFFORT was made to tighten up the rules but it was -how did you guess?

TOO LITTLE-TOO LATE

Since Heath's promise

TO CLOSE THE DOOR

more than

3,000,000

non-British immigrants have arrived

IN THIS COUNTRY

And traffic in spouses between such places such as

BRADFORD and BANGALORE

HAS CONTINUED APACE

 

Two other factors have long overhung any rational debate on

IMMIGRATION

Most obvious, in an echo of the Salem witchcraft trials, has been the tactic of pointing at someone and shrieking

'RACIST'

-the sin against the Holy Ghost - and even calling for

POLICE ACTION

Believe me , this accusation has long scared the wits out of

FLEET STREET EDITORS

-their legal departments

media commentators generally and politicians of every shade.

IT HAS BEEN CENSORSHIP BY ANOTHER NAME

-the public has been duly cowed.

A technical problem has added to this because the word

RACE

is SHORT -and EASY to FIT into a HEADLINE -while IMMIGRATION isn't. So arguments about IMMIGRATION were labelled in innumerable headlines as being about

'RACE'

The other problem which hindered meaningful debate was that immigrants had come to form a grouping of such

SIZE and IDENTITY

that politicians on all sides thought well worth wooing, indeed crawling to.

NOW

David Cameron has woken up, in intervals between sacking Tory front benchers and Tory candidates for 'racism' to the Government's vulnerability on

IMMIGRATION.

Ministers have trebled the number of work vouchers available to foreign workers over ten years to a level running at

150,000 a year

 

Cameron has no serious solution to

IMMIGRATION

but as the saying is, every bit helps.

 

The supreme irony of this week's fuss around Powell's 1968 speech is that recently had our supposedly internationalist Prime Minister promising

'BRITISH JOBS for BRITISH WORKERS.

Enoch would not have touched such a phrase with a bargepole.

*

 

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underling Used-Comments in Brackets]

*

[Under PR- Proportional Representation the Immigration levels would have been curtailed because the Government of the Day would feel obliged to take a stronger line in order to gather up the votes and back to power. But as we all know it has been this single-minded attitude of the tripartite in your

HOUSE OF COMMONS

to keep power within their grasp and to hell to any outsiders.

Most of the problems in our society over the past 40 years have occurred because of the determination of the party in power to take what they consider a more lenient line on policy whether it is

CAPITAL PUNISHMENT

ABORTION

IMMIGRATION

and no doubt dozens of other matters which has resulted in absolute chaos in the above areas.

If they are able to claw in another small section of the community which will be ready voters they will change anything what ever the consequences to the people and the country.

We have been calling for the introduction of

PR in our PARLIAMENT

for many years as a number of bulletins on our website can testify but the very organisations that could achieve this necessary alteration -the numerous political organisations in our country appear not to be interested. And that is the PROBLEM

and until we change the system we shall see the constant over-regulation by the Government and the hair-brained schemes adopted by the so-called OPPOSITION which lays a path of problems in the future.

Of course if PR had been in place over the last four decades there would not have been the

WAR in IRAQ

or even

Mission Impossible in Afghanistan.

 

The Abortion Bill would only have passed if much greater safeguards had been put in place.

 

Immigration would have been freely discussed and sensible measures adopted to allow controlled entry ONLY and those who were prepared to INTEGRATE and NOT THREATEN the very existence of the COUNTRY that they were adopting.

 

Abolition of Capital Punishment Bill failed to honour the feelings in the country that if the Death Sentence was abolished that MURDER would mean a LIFE SENTENCE where the circumstances warrant it. Even before the abolition of the penalty over 50 per cent of murderers had their sentence commuted to life imprisonment and that didn't mean twelve or even three years or less today. The liberal establishment have much to answer for ,whether in believing that prisons should be five star hotels or that a fine that is never paid is the answer to the increased

MURDERS- GUN /KNIFE CRIME- BURGLARY- ROBBERY-THEFT-ASSAULT and whatever.

 

 

Our so-called Criminal Justice system would have been unable to treat prisoners as visitors and victims as criminals and there would have been Bobbies of the Beat- more prisons, and punishment to fit the crime.

Over the past 40 years the majority of your politicians in

YOUR HOUSE of COMMONS

 have been feathering their own nests to the point today in November 2007 there are many of them on a comfortable

£250,000 [at least] a year.

They fiddle their expenses-They lie about their expenditure-They lie about the true facts of the EU. In fact many of them lie about almost everything. They only work for a little over half a year .They have gold-plated pensions and they will be comfortable for the rest of their lives. As for what happens to their country as far as many of them are concerned our country had never existed.

Of course in such a bedlam there are a small group of men and women of

Honour and Integrity

who alas are ignored by their colleagues -some say they even detest them. Guilty secrets no doubt.

 

As for Europe the lies could not have been hidden if there had been eurosceptic parties at Westminster.  And the CONSPIRACY that has taken place since 1972 would not have been in place and our NATIONHOOD and COUNTRY threatened with extinction as will be the case in your Parliament in the early months of 2008.

*

THE ENEMY WITHIN IS YOUR OWN GOVERNMENT WHICH INTENDS TO SELL YOUR COUNTRY TO FOREIGN POWERS.

November-2007.

*

H.F.1594

 

 

*  *  *

 

 

 

 

 

 
 

A REMINDER!

WHAT YOU ARE ESCAPING FROM SINCE TRAITORS IN YOUR PARLIAMENT SIGNED YOUR COUNTRY OF ENGLAND

AWAY IN

1972

AND IN LATER TREATIES UNTIL YOU SPOKE YOUR MIND ON

 JUNE 23-2016

 A DATE IN HISTORY WHICH WILL BE ALWAYS REMEMBERED

BY ALL TRUE ENGLISHMEN.

 

*  *  *

HOW IT CAME ABOUT!

Mr Macmillan and 1961

Mr Heath and 1970

Mrs Thatcher and 1985

From Major to Blair, Maastricht to Nice

The Price We Have PAid

 

*  *  *

 

H.F.1100 FREEDOM AWAITS

 
NEW SERIES

*

WHY WE VOTED TO LEAVE

THE

UNDEMOCRATIC-UNACCOUNTABLE-COLLECTIVIST-CORRUPT-WASTEFUL-GODLESS

SO-CALLED

EUROPEAN UNION

[WE WILL SELECT INFORMATION RECEIVED FROM AUTHORITIVE SOURCES CONCERNING THE ILLEGALITY OF THE EU TREATIES AND THOSE WHO LIED FOR PERSONAL GAIN AND POWER AND OTHER SUBSTANTIATED INFORMATION COLLECTED OVER THE 20 YEARS SINCE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE AFTER STANDING FOR ELECTION IN THE 1997 GENERAL ELECTION AND THE 1999 EUROPEAN ELECTION. MANY WHO VOTED TO REMAIN IN THE EU WOULD SURELY HAVE RECONSIDERED IF THEY HAD BEEN DISINTERESTED OBSERVERS-DECIDING ON THE FACTS AND PUTTING NATIONAL INTERESTS  OF FREEDOM  and NATIONHOOD OUTLINED IN MAGNA CARTA AND OTHER PRIZED DOCUMENTS HELD IN TRUST-SACRED HEIRLOOMS - FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS, BEFORE THEIR OWN COMFORT ZONE.  FORTUNATELY, THE GODS, WERE WITH ENGLAND-AND THE SOON RETURN OF

 A FREE LAND AND FREE PEOPLE.

OUR ENSLAVEMENT IN 1972 INTO HITLER'S PLAN FOR GERMAN EXPANSION AND POWER IN PEACE-TIME EUROPE WILL SOON BE AT AN END. AS A UNITED PEOPLE IT WILL BE SOONER THAN LATER. LET US WORK TOGETHER AS  AN EXAMPLE TO OTHER ONCE FREE PEOPLES WITHIN THE CAPTIVE EU WHO WILL SURELY FOLLOW. IF THE SHIP IS NOT ON AN EVEN KEEL IT CANNOT HELP OTHERS WHO WILL NEED OUR STURDY STEADY HAND.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

William Pitt.

 [Speech, 9th Nov, after Nelson's VICTORY at THE Battle of Trafalgar-with the destruction of the French and Spanish Fleets-Oct 21-1805]

MARCH 1-2017

 
A FAMILIAR WARNING FROM HISTORY - WE MUST NOT IGNORE!

'It is quite true that, in my opinion the waters which we have to navigate are likely to be stormy, and that the anti-social ferments within the nation are unusually malignant. But just a a healthy body generates anti-toxins to combat any virulent infection, so our nation

ENGLAND

 may be vigorous enough to neutralize the poisons which now threaten our civilization with death. Nothing but good can be done by calling attention to perils which really exist, and which may easily escape due attention amid the bottomless insincerity of modern politics and political journalism.

DANGERS OF PREDICTION

However , the dangers of prediction have been so often illustrated that those who are naturally disposed to optimism may be excused for rejecting the anticipations of coming CALAMITY, which  are now  [as in 2016/7] widely felt, though not so often expressed.

In the Victorian age we had  our profits of woe [and doom], who vociferated warnings about "shooting Niagara" when the country was more prosperous than it had ever been before. [As yet again in 2016/7].

Even on the morrow of our victory in 1815, " as soon as Waterloo was fought," says Sir Walter Besant, "the continental professors, historians, and others began with one accord to prophesy the approaching downfall of Great Britain," which they liked to compare with Carthage.

They emphasised the condition of Ireland, the decay of trade, our huge debt, our wasteful expenditure, our corrupting poor laws, the ignorance and drunkenness of the masses. Nor was this pessimistic forecast confined to our jealous neighbours.  In December 1816, the Common Council of the City of London addressed the Prince Regent as follows:

" Distress and misery are no longer limited to one portion of the Empire, and under their irresistible pressure the commercial, agricultural, and manufacturing interests are rapidly sinking.   We can ,Sir no longer support out of our dilapidated resources the overwhelming load of taxation.  Our grievances are the natural result of rash and ruinous wars, unjustly commenced and pertinaciously persisted in, where no rational object was to be attained; of immense subsidies to foreign Powers to defend their own territories  or to commit aggressions on those of our neighbours;  of a delusive paper currency; of an unconstitutional and unprecedented military force in time of peace;   of the unexampled and increasing magnitude of the Civil List ;  of the enormous sums paid for unmerited pensions and sinecures;   and of a long course of the most lavish and improvident expenditure of the public money throughout every branch of Government."

In December 1816, the Common Council of the City of London addressed the Prince Regent with the above statement.

Sounds familiar in 2017-Don't you think?

 

[EPILOGUE-William Ralph Inge -Dean of St Pauls ENGLAND-1938] -(1860-1954)

 

We endorse the final paragraph which states:

 

" I have laid bare my hopes and fears for the country I love.  This much I can avow, that never, even when the storm clouds appear blackest, have I been tempted to wish that I was other than an Englishman."

*

[We appear to have learned NOTHING! since this speech  in 1816 as the multiple evils are still with us today August 6, 2011. The reason is OBVIOUS! because the SAME! once invisible GLOBAL CONSPIRATORS are  STILL in CHARGE! and  are now in the OPEN!

If the ECONOMY has a DISEASE and FAILS to take the CORRECT MEDICINE then the END RESULT is OBVIOUS.

TOTAL CHAOS!

*

WHY DO WE TRUST THESES DISCREDITED DOOM-MONGERS?

By Alex Brummer - City Editor-Daily Mail-Monday, August 8,2011

 

 [EXTRACT]

...and the answer is that the CREDIT RATING AGENCIES are now seen as the ONLY arbiters prepared to spell out just how SERIOUS the GLOBAL DEBT CRISIS really IS.... After all, the very same AGENCIES were still providing the US. energy company ENRON with TOP RATING up to THREE DAYS before IT COLLAPSED in the world's BIGGEST INDUSTRIAL BANKRUPTCY...  They also gave a CLEAN BILL of HEALTH to FANNIE MAE and FREDDIE MAC -semi-official, but privately owned U. S bodies set up to expand the HOME OWNERSHIP and the availability of MORTGAGES-despite WARNINGS from the LEGENDARY American investor -WARREN BUFFETT -THAT they were BROKE... S&P's downgrade may look like a poke in the eye for the UNITED STATES. But with luck, it could in the end DAMAGE the FUTURE CREDIBILITY of the CREDIT-RATING AGENCIES - they are in MORE URGENT NEED of REFORM than AMERICA.

 

 

THE AMERICAN DREAM IS OVER!

 

h

 

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS almost BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/ ****    REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****    THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****       FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/  ****   A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?     **** GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/  ****    A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES? ****   THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/   WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/  ****   GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND****   50 YEARS OF SURRENDER***AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED.

DAVID CAMERON'S PLAN TO CLAW BACK POWERS FROM EU ARE DOOMED SAYS EU CHIEF IN OCTOBER-2013

*

THE HISTORY OF THE SATANIC COLLECTIVIST EUROPEAN UNION

***

HITLER'S+PLAN+FOR+A+

GERMAN+CONTROLLED

+EUROPEAN+UNION

***

TREASON

***

 

 

 

ENGLAND

 

 Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND?**** BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH****NEW LABOUR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND****UNLESS WE TAKE CONTROL OF OUR LIVES WE WILL LOSE OUR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY****.OUR PAST IS EMBEDDED IN OUR NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS -IT ASKS WERE WE CAME FROM AND WHO WE ARE .****.THE ENGLISH WITH OTHER GERMANIC TRIBES CAME TO BRITAIN OVER YEARS AGO - THE STREAM OF TEUTONIC INFLUENCE  HAS DECIDED THE FUTURE OF EUROPE****THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/ ****  THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/ ****    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/****  DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/ ****   NOR SHALL MY SWORD/****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/ ****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/****   ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY -CORRECT BROWNDOM/****    ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1- /****   ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/****    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./****   WHY OUR ENGLISH SELF-GOVERNMENT IS UNIQUE IN EUROPE AND THE WORLD****.ENGLAND ARISE! - TODAY WE CLAIM OUR RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION/ ****  KISS GOOD BYE TO YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY****  THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED? **** ST GEORGE'S DAY-ENGLAND'S DAY/**** ST GEORGE'S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ONSHAKESPEARE'S' BIRTHDAY****NAZI SPY RING REVEALED BY THE MASTER OF BALLIOL COLLEGE IN 1938 . IT INCLUDED THE LATE EX PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH AND MINISTERS GEOFFREY RIPPON AND ROY JENKINS.* * * *AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED****   EU WIPES ENGLAND OFF THE MAP**** THE ENGLISH DID NOT MOVE THEMSELVES SO ARE NOW SLAVES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE****"...What kind of people do they think we are?" by WINSTON CHURCHILL****THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

 

‘THE MAKING OF THE ENGLISH CONSTITUTION’****

OUR CONSTITUTION OF OVER A THOUSAND YEARS – WHY DOES BLAIR MEAN TO DESTROY IT?****

OUR DISCREDITED DEMOCRACY OR IRAQ DICTATORSHIP****OUR LOYALTY TO OUR INSTITUTIONS AND COUNTRY?****Liberties of Parliament- Birthright of Subjects of England.****LOSS of TRUST in NEW LABOUR****New England’s Tears for Old England’s fears?****The House of Commons has a need of members dedicated to their Country-not time wasters.****English Constitution, by it they lived, for it they died****CABINET GOVERNMENT IS NOW A DICTATORSHIP****MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA SUPPORTS THE CROWN****THE FINAL BETRAYAL - Part 1-5****House of Lords legal Whistleblower – Speaks Out in Defence of OUR  Law & Constitution****SAY ‘NO’ TO EUROPE! – SAYS RODNEY ATKINSON****The Rotten Heart of Europe - by Bernard Connolly-Part 1-5****THE CLUB IS MIGHTIER THAN THE HANDBAG****WHY you should Vote at Elections to protect YOUR Democracy****The sole legitimate function of Government- is to Protect The Rights of its Citizens****So You Thought You Were Free****A DREAM TO REMEMBER- NEW LABOUR POLICY -2004?****NO SUPPORT IN HOUSE OF LORDS FOR INQUIRY INTO EU BY TORY WHIP**** Could England Survive Outside The EU?  -YES!****COST OF DEVOLUTION –N’IRELAND, SCOTLAND AND WALES LONDON +BRUSSELS****European Arrest Warrant – What Price Our Freedom Now?****Government Obsession With Spending Itself out of Trouble**** Bill of Rights of 1688 –Outlaws European Constitution****OUR UNREPRESENTATIVE VOTING SYSTEM= BREEDS TREASON -
BETRAYAL OF COUNTRY
****Impeachment of Ministers of the Crown – Why Now?****New European Constitution – Concessions Fudge.****The Judiciary – A Defence of English Freedom?****
New European Constitution – A ‘Bridge’ Too Far?**** Our way forward to Kinship in Liberty****OUR HISTORIC HOUSE OF LORDS MUST REMAIN – TO PREVENT TYRANNY****  Scottish Independence – Have No need of Union flag and Anthem****Misuse of Prerogative Powers by Tony Blair****A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION –CONSPIRATORS NAME  PARTS 1-5****

 

 

H.F.1099 FREEDOM AWAITS

 

[A MATTER OF FACT!]

[A LIBERAL PEER SHOULD REMEMBER]

Did you know there is a worldwide semi-secret war against white people. It started in 1923, in every country that has mostly white people, or used to have mostly white people, they are immigrating people from other races as fast as they can get away with it. They are encouraging whites to marry someone from a different race. They are also lowering the financial conditions so that the whites that do marry and used to do well, don’t want to have children or not many, because of financial conditions.
 

The white people on Earth came from Mars and were quickly genetically changed by the 8th Density about 66,000 years ago so they can mate with any Human and Earth would have one people. This was done so we would all get along better and one race wouldn’t become dominant wipe out the other races that moved here. The black Africans started here and so far 5 other races immigrated here and the whites were 2nd last, the Oriental Asians were last about 63,000 years ago and the 8th Density treated them the same, it wasn’t the Andromeda Council, like I was told last week.
 

White people are unique, we are the only ones who commonly have different eye and hair color and on average are less evil and more spiritual than the other races, except about the same as the Oriental Asians, but this has a little bit to do with the living conditions the last 300 years, all races have good & bad people. It is commonly said in the main stream media that the whites are an evil race and want to go to war with everyone, after all they pretty much wiped out the natives in North and South America and then brought slaves here.
Well this isn’t quite right, Columbus, Cortez and Pizarro were all Illuminati and didn’t have Human souls, they had the Reptilian lower soul, with little empathy for others.

The slaves were bought here on Jewish ships, most of the Jewish ship owners were Illuminati also. There were also white slaves (mostly Irish) and about 7,000 black slave owners in the USA. Less than 1 in 1,000 white people owned slaves and were constantly programmed that blacks were inferior from authorities, so the non slave owning whites would accept it.

The non slave owning Whites hated slavery, because they were forced by law to help capture run away slaves with no compensation and it was extremely hard to get a high paying job, with slaves doing a lot of work for free.

All the wars are started by and run by the Illuminati and Elite Jews. To many Whites are brainwashed to go along with the program, by the main stream media Which is all owned by the Jews or Illuminati.
 

Are you getting the picture, stop reading for a few seconds and see if you can figure it out. If there is no spiritual revolution, the brown dwarf star doesn’t come near the sun and damage Earth and the Illuminati and Elite Jews win, everyone else will become a worker/slaves. Whites won’t be allowed to marry or if they do they won’t be allowed to have children or if they do the paedophiles will take them. The only whites will be Illuminati or Jews and they will be in the ruling class, unelected and can’t be taken out of power.

 If you don’t want this future wake people up and help the spiritual revolution happen, become more spiritual. I think it’s going to happen and it’s called the Golden Age, it’s a wake up and win situation, but I think we’re going to get some wake up help. Even if your not White don’t accept that Whites should be wiped out, I certainly wouldn’t accept that Blacks should be wiped out or any other race. The only people I would accept being wiped out is the super evil ones. There will be a delightful place for everyone of every race in the Golden Age.
http://www.icheckyoursoul.com/

H.F.1424/1

 
 
 A MATTER OF FACT!

On October 11-2017 15 months after the PEOPLE had voted to LEAVE the EU  the Daily Mail in its COMMENT column stated the FOLLOWING:

'YES, the Mail would have preferred a quicker and cleaner BREXIT but how foolish of Eurosceptic MPs to kick up a fuss about the planned TWO-YEAR TRANSITION PERIOD. After 45 years of subjection to EUROPEAN JUDGES, another couple will be a mere blink in HISTORY'S EYE. The great thing is that BREXIT is GOING AHEAD and barring REMOANER'S TREACHERY, SEPARATION WILL BE COMPLETE BEFORE THE NEXT ELECTION.'

STATEMENT!

[We and no doubt the majority who voted to LEAVE the EU, knowing the following true facts will no doubt NOT AGREE! with that COMMENT.

 What is FORGOTTEN is the MANNER in which the PEOPLE were DECEIVED by the TORY GOVERNMENT in 1972 and the LEGAL consequences of THEIR ILLEGAL ACTIONS as clearly indicated in numerous BULLETINS on our EDP website over the past 12 years. To call our DEPARTURE from the EU  a DIVORCE is a PERVERSION of the FACTS!  - A MARRIAGE if we are to call it THAT is INVALID if its DOCUMENTATION is  FALSE or obtained by BRIBERY and /or FRAUD.

  NO-MARRIAGE-NO CONTRACT-NO COMPENSATION

FOR THE EU TO EXPECT A GOLDEN HANDSHAKE UNDER SUCH CIRCUMSTANCES IS TO REWARD THEM FOR THE WICKED; ATROCIOUS; DREADFUL; INFAMOUS; OUTRAGEOUS; PERVERSE; SINISTER; VILLAINOUS; EVIL; CONDUCT OF MANY POLITICIANS WITHIN THE EU, SOME AS MENTIONED BELOW.

*

 

Below we have shown details of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and other relevant information which will clearly show that the UK could EXIT THE EU in MONTHS NOT YEARS. Obviously, there has been a COVER-UP of MAJOR PROPORTIONS by the POLITICAL CLASS in GENERAL because how can one explain the SILENCE! even FROM our FREE PRESS the FOURTH ESTATE in the land which we look too to PROTECT OUR  over a thousand year ENGLISH  RIGHTS  and LIBERTIES . Possibly the reason could be that there would be a REVOLUTION if the PEOPLE knew the TRUE FACTS?

 Added OCTOBER 11-2017

IN JULY 2016 AFTER THE SUCCESSFUL BREXIT VOTE WE ARE TOLD BY OUR NEW PRIME MINISTER MRS MAY THAT IT COULD BE YEARS BEFORE WE ARE FREE OF THE CORRUPT-_COLLECTIVIST- UNDEMOCRATIC EU WHICH DEVOURS MILLIONS OF OUR NEEDED POUNDS EVERY DAY OF THE YEAR. 

OUR MESSAGE TO FRAU MERKEL AND HER ROBBER BAND

IS

'GO TO HELL'

BUT

MRS MAY APPEARS TO HAVE A DIFFERENT MESSAGE EVEN THOUGH HER OWN WORDS WERE

"BREXIT MEANS BREXIT.

The following article was put on our website in October,2005 shortly after we received this most revealing information from

CHRISTOPHER STORY

 WHO GAVE HIS LIFE

FOR

TRUTH AND PATRIOTISM

 

FROM

INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW-

SEPTEMBER-2005

*

 

EUROPEAN PAYROLA SYSTEM

 

THE BUDGET FOR THE EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION WAS $5.0 BILLION

 

An account held by Credit Suisse in Zurich, labelled the ‘SBC’ Charcol Account, held a total of some $470 billion when last reviewed by sources.  These funds were originally derived from Nazi funds and assets, are routinely used to pay top politicians and officials to sign successive European Collective treaties- the latest being the so-called ‘European Constitution’.

The budget set aside from the ‘SBC’Charcol Account and to be distributed from the Credit Suisse disbursement account for the latest ‘update’ of the ‘rolling  European Collective Treaty’ was $5.0billion- $2.5 billion being payable in Euros to the participants from the 25 EU countries.

On the finalisation of the Intergovernmental Conference (IGC), which framed the text of the Treaty, and a further $2.5 billion payable in Euros on ratification.  This tranche is currently the subject of much dissension.

For each national cadre of key negotiator, therefore, the total set aside  was $100 million per tranche.  The chief negotiators of each EU country, plus selected officials were each to be paid from the national pot of $ 100 million, whish equates to roughly $75 million per corrupted European Union country.

Silvio Berlusconi, the Italian Prime Minister, was allegedly initially offered $50 million.  being an extremely wealthy man, he departed for the weekend in question in July 2004, following conclusion of the IGC, having indicated to those concerned that he was insulted by such a figure, and that $100million would be nearer the mark.  In the event, following an allowance for his wife, he was allegedly paid $75 million, according to sources.

Tony Blair allegedly received $75 million, which was paid into an offshore bank account held in Belize, the former British Honduras.  There, official eyebrows were naturally raised at the Central bank of Belize, where we notice that all of a sudden, the official reserves of foreign exchange jumped from $49.72 million in February 2005, to $164.53 million in March [2005]

Since the corrupt payment ‘due’ at the completion of the IGC will have been remitted in or about July 2004, this may suggest that the funds have subsequently (in March 2005) been taken into the foreign exchange reserves of the local central bank, so that their actual ownership can be disguised, a ‘new form’ of money-laundering: through a central bank!

 

WE ARE RELIABLY ADVISED THAT THIS CORRUPT PAYOLA SYSTEM IS THE NORM.

 

This means that the European Union’s Treaties

 are null and void,

as they have been obtained by fraud. 

 

That applies to the original EU Accession Treaty signed on behalf of the UK Government by [Nazi] agents Edward Heath and Geoffrey Rippon, agents of German intelligence, who were both recruited at Balliol College Oxford as discussed in this analysis.

 

It applies also to the Maastricht Treaty, signed by

 

John Major

 

Who allegedly received at least one corrupt payment for his services.  And it applies to the latest fiasco of the EU Collective.

 

THESE CORRUPT PAYOLA PAYMENTS

ARE ‘NON-REFUNDABLE’.

 

The second tranches of  $100 Million per country for the [New European Constitution] new treaty are payable on ratification, but following their referenda, the Netherlands and France cannot ratify.

 

*          *

International Currency Review

 

(Vol 30- No 4)

*

 

 

www.worldreports.org

 

*          *          *

 

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used –comments

in brackets]

 

OCT/05

 

THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION

Under the 1969 Vienna Convention on the

Law of Treaties

there are two key provisions which authorize a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice:

WHERE corruption has been demonstrated in respect of procuring the

TREATY

in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation.

AS the next section will show, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

2. Where there has been a material change of circumstances.

 

A material change of circumstances has surfaced into daylight, to begin with, following the death of Sir Edward Heath. It has been revealed that he was an agent for a foreign power, accepted corrupt payments for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them - and that he did all this on behalf of a

FOREIGN POWER.

which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation

As even more disturbing material change of circumstances has arisen as a consequence of the bombing of the London Underground and a bus , which took place on 7th July 2005, and the attempted explosions perpetuated two weeks later. We understand that the situation is so serious that the Civil Contingencies Secretariat has been in the process of drafting, or has drafted, legislation providing for the British Government to abrogate its putative international treaty [sic] 'obligations' towards the European Union.

ARE YOU STILL THERE MR HAGUE?

This development reflects the knowledge in certain UK intelligence circles that the attacks amounted to an

ACT of WAR

against the United Kingdom, and that the foreign powers behind this activity are ultimately controlled by the DVD from Dachau -( the same area of the World War II notorious concentration camp) which is the successor organization to the Abwehr, Nazi Germany's main external intelligence administration.

It was the Abwehr that first established , as a means of undermining British influence in the Middle East, the Muslim Brotherhood, from which ALL subsequent Islamic terror groups, without exception, originate. Al Qaeda, a descendant ultimately of the German-founded

Muslim Brotherhood,

is a controlled cut-out operation of international intelligence.

The Nazi regime and its Stalinist dialectical counterpart, were both Black Illuminati regimes. The Al Qaeda operation is an extension of the Black tradition, and is ultimately controlled, like the IRA (until very recently) by the DVD out of Dachau.

near Munich

For confirmation of the above and further information consult our bulletin board or contact

E-mail: cstory@ worldreports.org

Website:

www.worldreports.org

*

The European Union Collective:
Enemy of Its Member States

OCTOBER-2005

 

 

 LIFE AND TIMES

OF

Christopher Story

 PATRIOT AND TRUTHSEEKER

2010

 

H.F.1335/1-BREXIT MEANS BREXIT NOT SURRENDER TO HITLER'S PLANNED EU

 

 

AUGUST-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2018          AUGUST-FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2018

AUGUST-FREEDOM NOW-PART 3-2018          AUGUST-FREEDOM NOW-PART 4-2018

AUGUST-FREEDOM NOW-PART 5-2018          AUGUST-FREEDOM NOW-PART 6-2018

AUGUST-FREEDOM NOW-NEW-HOME-2018

THANK YOU FOR CALLING!

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

CLICK HERE FOR PREVIOUS FRONT PAGE-2012