It may be asked:
Why does no British Government ever
take steps to have this matter
clarified?
There are two possible answers to
this question:
(1) If the matter
were to be resolved and it were to
transpire that, indeed, The Queen is
not Sovereign, then
all
legislation to which Her Majesty has
given the Royal Assent since Britain
acceded to the EEC is
NULL and VOID
because
she had no power to give the Royal
Assent,
Alternatively:
(2) Successive UK
Governments since the beginning of
the collapse in 1970 have preferred
this issue to
remain unresolved because if
it were to be concluded by 'the
appropriate courts' that The Queen
is
Sovereign, then correspondingly all
EU legislation in the UK
is
NULL and VOID
because it is presupposed that EU
law has precedence over UK law.
which cannot be the case if The
Queen is Sovereign.
By contrast, if it does transpire
the
The Queen is not Sovereign, then,
certainly all legislation passed
since Britain joined the EEC is
indeed called into question.
Either way -whether The Queen is or
is not Sovereign -the logic of the
above leads to the conclusion
that all EU law may be invalid in
the United Kingdom.
Thus the the real reason this key
issue has never been clarified is
that the British Government's
deceitful EU
'coup d' etat by installments'
policy would be exposed as illegal
if the issue were ever to be
addressed in the COURTS.
Furthermore, as reviewed on page
209, the Treaty of Rome was
reportedly
NOT SIGNED
-so the basis of all EU law
throughout the
EU COLLECTIVE
may be open to
LEGAL CHALLENGE
on that ground alone.
It is concluded that EU law may have
no standing in the United Kingdom
and that successive conniving UK
Governments have been
SHIRKING THIS CENTRAL ISSUE.
In an article published in
The Times of London on 27th
April,1996, Karl Lamers, whio was
then foreign affairs spokesman for
the Christian Democrats in the
Bundestag, condescended to recognise
that 'British doubts are deeply
rooted.
The British concern is about the
destruction of the national identity
and the nation state, which is seen
by the British as the only
legitimate expression of the popular
will. Germans, by
contrast, say that there has long
been a supranational reality created
by our European civilisation.
Common problems spawn common
interests; our vital interests are
identical
Whereupon Herr Lamers delivered a
further broadside in Germany's
psychological warfare offensive
designed to help the stupid British
to abandon their love of national
sovereignty, which it is the central
purpose of the European Union to
COLLECTIVISE:
'The Euro-optimists take as
their starting point the objective
external reality.... The
Eurosceptics (in Britain) deal with
the inner, subjective reality of the
consciousness of the British people.
It is if you like , the forces of
Logic pitied against the forces of
Psycho-logic. It must be the
task of democratic politics to help
narrow this gap. Otherwise
politics will cease to be effective.
A community makes sense if it can
begin to solve its existential
problems.
If the nation state can no longer do
that by itself, its failure
undermines its political
legitimacy'.
In other words, Britain had no right
to continue existing as a nation
state, and it must be 'brought to
reason' so that it comes to full
acceptance of German prescriptions
and intentions without further.
tedious prevarication
Note that, for Herr Lamers, the
Pan-German position was 'logical',
whereas the perceived British
tendency to 'cling' to the nation
state was 'psychological'. Once
again here, the truth was turned
upside-down.
The essence of Germany's continuing,
updated strategy to realise the
Germans, has never been in doubt -
not least, since the German
legislature adopted several
amendments to the
Basic Law (constitution) on 22nd
December, 1992, in order to
legalise' ratification of the
Maastricht Treaty. A new
Article 23 was incorporated, the
previous one having been repealed by
the Unification T of 31st August
1990. The revised Article known as
the 'ARTICLE on EUROPEAN UNION'.
contains the following:
With a view to establishing a Unite
Europe, the Federal republic of
Germany shall participate in the
development of the European Union,
which is committed to democratic[?],
rule of law, social and federative
principles as well as to the
principle of subsidiarity, and
ensures protection of basic rights
comparable in substance to that
accorded to the
Basic law
To this end
the (German)
Federation may transfer sovereign
powers by law with the consent of
the Bundesrat.
The establishment of the
European Union , as well as
amendments to its statutory
foundations and comparable
foundations which amend or
supplement the content of this Basic
Law or make such amendments and
supplements possible shall be
subject to the provisions of
paragraph (2) and (30 of Article
79.........
THIS MEANS that Germany can extend
its sovereignty into Moravia and
Bohemia, as provided for under the
secret accord reached between
President Gorbachev and Chancellor
Kohl in Geneva , in 1990
As for Dr Professor Herzog, he faced
both ways at the 1997 Konigswinter
Conference, held in Berlin. In a
welcoming speech, he suggested that
'Britons and Germans can build on
common values, convictions and
interests. the debate on
Europe can only reach a fruitful
conclusion - that is to say,
a conclusion acceptable to the
German strategy elite- if we
help gain acceptance for one idea,
namely that the 'Europe
of-Fatherlands' is possible.
The European nations can be
Fatherlands and still integrate'
[TO BE CONTINUED]
*
[More background information will be
available in the near future but why
wait - order your copy -
THE EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE
-contact the under-mentioned
website]
[This is a new series of single
statements from
THE EUROPEAN UNION
COLLECTIVE
IS THE
Enemy of its Member State
www.edwardharle.com
www.worldreports.org
*
