THE GREATEST EU DECEPTION OF THEM ALL-
EU SUMMIT-JUNE 2007
*
What happened at the June2007 summit
was that Britain's partners agreed to become willing accomplices in the
attempt to deceive the British electorate in return for Blair's support
for an
ALMOST UNCHANGED NEW EU CONSTITUTION
*
Eurofacts-6th July 2007
Vol 12 No 18
The June EU summit - the latest phrase
in what Christopher Booker and Richard North have aptly termed the
Great Deception
-exceeded in
DISHONESTY
-anything that has gone before.
In the weeks running up to it we were
told over and over again that there would be a
REFERENDUM
-if powers were to be transferred from
member -states to
BRUSSELS
-and that is precisely
WHAT WILL NOW HAPPEN.
BUT
THERE WILL BE NO REFERENDUM
[Though the
FREEDOM ASSOCIATION
www.tfa.net
and no doubt others have other ideas.]
We are told that an agreement
would not lead to a
CONSTITUTIONAL TREATY
-merely [as usual] an
AMENDING TREATY
BUT
-if the
"Reform Treaty"
-to which the forthcoming IGC is
intended to lead does not merit the description of a
CONSTITUTIONAL TREATY
WHAT DOES?
Its impact will be to create
NEW EU INSTITUTIONS
To redefine the relations between EU
institutions and member states.
To abolish QMV-qualified majority
voting in more than
50 AREAS
TO change voting procedures and to
give the EU
LEGAL PERSONALITY
[In other words to create a STATE
and once this has been done we have lost out our Independent Nation
State of over 1400 years-in the making -IT MUST NEVER HAPPEN and we for
a start would NEVER relinquish our Inherited Rights whatever a so-called
British Government decided. Our call for ALL eurosceptic organisations
and parties to unite under
ONE UMBRELLA ORGANISATION
UNDER ONE LEADER
-would be the most effective way to
show any so -called British Government that they
CANNOT GIVE AWAY
-that which belongs to the
PEOPLE
-and
NOT TO GOVERNMENTS.
WHAT A WAY TO WIN A WAR
UNITY IS THE ONLY WAY TO VICTORY]
Only those who wish to be deceived or
wish to deceive others can seriously question that the
NEW EU TREATY
to which the
JUNE 2007 SUMMIT
-will lead
WILL HAVE HUGE, PROFOUND AND
FAR-REACHING
CONSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS
*
Those Red Lines
WE were told -and continue to be told
-that British interests could and would be protected by
OPT-OUTS
-that Mr Blair's
"Red Lines"
-would not be violated.
In fact Mr Blair defined his
"Red Lines"
-so loosely that a half plausible case
that
'VICTORY'
-had bee secured could be made; but as
is becoming increasingly obvious the
'OPT-OUTS'
which he negotiated are likely
[WE WOULD SAY DEFINITELY]
TO PROVE WORTHLESS.
We were told that the exercise was
necessary in order to avoid a legislative log-jam and as a spur to
efficiency.
[Our opinion is that the German
Chancellery was getting very concerned that the usual slumbering and
some would say docile British Lion and England's John Bull were awaking
with a vengeance and were threatening the very future of the
German/French euro-engine which must have John Bull on board but nowhere
near the engine -but paying the heaviest fare possible for they realise
that a withdrawal of England as a high fare-paying passenger would put
the wasteful and corrupt cesspool of the EU into immediate
receivership.
Gordon Brown is on his own - with the
other 26 countries and their paid-for adherents of the insatiable
creature which chews up once independent nation-states which England
standing alone had been their greatest supporter and even creator of the
desire for FREEDOM.
As we and we are sure the majority of
people agree Gordon Brown needs to have the FULL SUPPORT of the
People in our Island home. His task is that of ONE MAN and HIS
DETERMINATION to do that which the majority of the people of this island
wish for and that is
TO RETAIN THEIR INDEPENDENT NATION
STATE AND ANCIENT CONSTITUTION.
We are not privy to the most inner
thoughts of our new Prime Minister and one thing that he could do
without delay to prove his intentions to protect that which many hold
more dear than any other consideration
OUR FREEDOM
AND
NATIONHOOD
THEN
A REFERENDUM
-would signal that he is a man of his
word and not a servant of the closed shop of the totalitarian
UNITED STATES OF EUROPE.]
*
But the Economist was first to point
out this [legislative log-jam] is
NONSENSE!
-there is
NO LOG-JAM.
More recently, Renaud Dehousse,
professor at Paris -based University Sciences Po has shown that before
enlargement in May 2004, it took on average 18 months between the
deposit of a Commission proposal and its adoption by the EU Commission
and the EU Parliament. Since the entry of the 10 new member states, this
has gone down to less than 12 months.
The fears of a blockage, were therefore
unfounded: the EU regulatory machine is running at a faster pace than
ever.
*
The British Way
Mrs B [Our once 'FOREIGN' Minister]
insistence that having referendums was not
"THE BRITISH WAY"
-was similarly
DISHONEST:
-the GOVERNMENT of which she was a
member has held more referendums than any in history.
Mr Barroso, [Mr EU] who made the point of
making himself available to the
BRITISH MEDIA
-assured the British radio listeners
that no referendum was necessary because British interests would be
protected during ratification by
"THE greatest Parliament in the
world"
[What Mr EU fails to realise is that
the People are their Parliament
something that Mr EU fails to grasp and
that is WHY there
MUST BE A REFERENDUM.]
-and that the deal would in any case be
put to an Inter-governmental conference (IGC). he did mention that a way
had been devised to ensure the
MANDATE approved in BRUSSELS
-would provide the exclusive basis for
discussion so that no other matters might be raised.
*
Tedious Necessity
Opinion surveys in each of the
EU's 27 member states demonstrated overwhelming support for a
REFERENDUM
But Mrs Merkel [Mrs EU] surprised many
by achieving exactly
WHAT SHE HAD SET OUT TO DO
-which was to preserve the existing
constitutional text while tweaking a little of the terminology and, as
far as possible, avoiding the tedious necessity of consulting the
electorate.
AND SHE DID SO RUTHLESSLY.
German influence and her reputation has
grown significantly, even if her attachment to democracy is looking
increasingly flimsy.
The outcome of the SUMMIT has also
strengthened the reputation of Nicolas Sarkozy [who is not so dozy as
some may have believed] who has finally demolished the view that the EU
might have something to do with
COMPETITION?
[Thanks to the Pro-EU MEPs from our
once UK who have been in a dream of reforming the EU for over 35 years.
You will read about in books in the press and media and even from the EU
doctrinaires themselves. It has been one of the greatest deceptions for
the past 50 years.]
The Franco-German relationship is
stronger than for several years. British influence over political
developments in
EUROPE
-already
FEEBLE
-has been diminished still further.
Last week French newspapers talk of
Sarkozy's 'triumph' while reporting that Britain's influence had been
marginalised. What in effect happened in
BRUSSELS
-was that
Britain's partners agreed to being
willing accomplices in the attempt to deceive
THE BRITISH ELECTORATE
-in return for real concessions - while
Gordon Brown in his now familiar role of Macavity
demonstrated that in his view
ABSENCE is the BETTER part of VALOUR.
[In the past two hundred years our
small island home has spent much of its precious blood to destroy the
numerous dictatorships in Europe and to be the saviour of many people's
who wished to gain
THEIR FREEDOM.
We looked for no reward because what we
freely offered was of our inheritance and we therefore expected that
those nations would cherish the
THE FREEDOM and NATIONHOOD
We have been mistaken as the events in
Europe over the past 50 years have well demonstrated. To blame the
people is possibly harsh as many countries and their governments if not ALL
- have deceived
their populations as to the
TRUE NATURE OF THEIR SLAVERY.
ONLY
In ENGLAND the home of the origination
of the NATION STATE and birth of Western parliamentary democracy has
there been such
STUBBORN RESISTANCE TO DESPOTISM.
IT IS THE NATURE OF OUR PEOPLE
[YES!-THAT IS POSSIBLY YOU ALSO WHO
HAVE NO DOUBT HAVE JUST AWAKENED TO THE THREAT
TO
YOUR FREEDOM
YOUR CONSTITUTION
AND
YOUR COUNTRY.]
*
However, the deception about which we
complain was almost entirely
BRITISH MADE
Once the deal was struck only British
ministers denied that the SUMMIT outcome represented a major step in the
political development of the
[UNITED STATES OF EUROPE]
European Prime Ministers and the
European Media agreed with British eurosceptics about the
[TRUE]
-impact of the
DRAFT IGC MANDATE
[In simple language our
MINISTERS OF THE CROWN
HAVE COMMITTED
TREASON.]
-it will result in a deal that will
preserve [as the Irish Premier Bertie Ahern said:
" I think all the changes that we
have made are for the worse. Thankfully, they haven't changed any of the
substance, so I will be talking about the 90 % [of the
TREATY that if LEFT
THEREFORE]
90%
-of the original constitutional text
and its effect will be almost identical.
In the words of a leader in Le Monde
on 23rd June 2007:
"...all the institutional advances
brought in by the [New] Constitution have been maintained. While the
symbols-anthem, flag etc -have officially disappeared [just for now] the
permanent presidency remains; and while the Minister of Foreign Affairs
has gone back to High Representative, he keeps all the new powers that
Valery Giscard d'Estaing's text gave him."
Two aspects of the document, however,
exceed the worst fears of British eurosceptics. The relegation of the
commitment to
FREE MARKETS
-will assist French governments to pour
taxpayers' subsidies into French 'national champions' to the
detriment of British companies and will encourage protectionism more
widely.
Second, the clause that insists that
the mandate will provide
"The exclusive basis and framework
for the work of the IGC"
represents an unprecedented
attempt to control not only the ratification process but also the debate
which will take place in member states.
*
It is difficult to be clear about the
long run consequences of what happened on
BRUSSELS
However, it is likely that in British
eurosceptic opinion will harden and that those moderate eurosceptics who
continue to believe in
"REFORM"
will conclude that their position
has become
UNTENABLE.
Many of those who have been happy about
the political aspects of
EUROPEAN INTEGRATION
have lent their somewhat reluctant
support because of
THEIR OF THEIR COMMITMENT TO A COMMON
MARKET IN GOODS AND SERVICES.
Now that the [new French
president] Sarkozy has weakened [THAT] commitment that was already
SUSPECT
-an increasing number may conclude that
there is
NO POINT TO THE EUROPEAN UNION AT
ALL
-and that
BRITISH WITHDRAWAL
-is the
ONLY OPTION
-a view expressed incidentally by
Valery d'Escard [Mr X]
-on French radio on 27th June -2007
As Lord Owen has recently argued,
unless Gordon Brown is prepared to rethink the matter the refusal to
hold a
REFERENDUM
-could poison his
PRIME MINISTERSHIP
-from the very START.
There is also the possibility that the
HOUSE OF LORDS
would seek to assert its constitutional
right against a measure that runs counter to the
MANIFESTOS
-of ALL main political parties.
A referendum has been viewed by many as
a democratic safeguard. If the electorate is to be denied this safeguard
the sense of anger and frustration among eurosceptics of all stripes is
likely to grow.
[What we cannot understand is that
whether there is a REFERENDUM OR NOT
-loyal subjects will on no account
accept any adverse conclusion which jeopardised our traditional
'RIGHTS and LIBERTIES'
OF
ENGLISHMEN
The only option open to those loyalists
would be
OPEN CIVIL WAR
-and this and
previous governments have already seen examples in our own
British Isles
in
Northern Ireland
The victors were told on numerous
occasions that there would be no negotiations with -
you guessed it'
-with terrorists.
But in the case of
Northern Ireland it
is surprising what some people who proclaimed their determination to
fight for as long as it takes for their glorious heritage will give up
for
POWER in HIGH PLACES.
OR IN
ENGLAND TODAY
FOR THEIR ELITE PATRONAGE
IN A
UNITED STATES OF EUROPE.]
*
[Lord Owen] -And, as the scale of the
deception which made British support for Europe's
NEW EU CONSTITUTION
-possible becomes more widely
recognised, so will the clamour
FOR WITHDRAWAL
*
* *
*
Tradition | |
Custom |
What an enormous magnifier is tradition!
How a thing grows in the human memory
and in the human imagination when
love, worship, and all that lies in the
human heart is there to encourage it. - Carlyle | |
Men commonly think according to
their inclinations, speak according to
their learning and imbibed opinions
but generally act according to custom. - Bacon.
|
What others have said recently about
the New EU TREATY
Bertie Ahern, the Irish Taiseach
quoted in the Irish Times on 25th June,2007
| | Kate Hoey MP
speaking in the House of Commons on 26th June,2007 |
"I think all the
changes that we have made are for the worse. Thankfully they haven't changed any
of the substance, so I will be talking about the 90%[of the treaty that is
left]." | |
"Don't you understand that no matter what you
or anyone else says, the vast majority of the public will see that there has
simply been a tweaking of words and that this [New ] treaty is fundamentally no
different from the original [EU] constitution.
Why are you and why is our Government afraid of a REFERENDUM?"
|
Margot Wallstrom, EU Commissioner quoted in
Svenska Dagbladet, 26th June,2007 | |
Williams Rees-Mogg- writing in
The Times on 25th June,2007 |
" It's essentially the same proposal
as the old constitution"
[Rejected by the French and Dutch people's] | |
"The Franco/German alliance dominates Europe:
so far as one can tell they are ruthlessly determined to create single European
State, despite their own public opinion, let alone ours. The emerging, Super
Europe' following the political traditions of Napoleon and Bismarck [and
Hitler] , is bureaucratic by nature, rather than liberal.
"The British do not want to belong to such a single European
State; if we are forced to go in, we shall immediately look for an exit."
|
David Owen, The Sunday Times, 24th June,2007 | |
Nicolas Sarkozy, President of France-quoted by Le Monde,
25th June, 2007 |
"For those like myself who remain convinced
that Britain should stay within the European Union, the referendum is a
democratic safeguard. If that safeguard is removed, the demand for Britain to
WITHDRAW, without even a referendum, will grow. | |
" Competition is now just a means not an end
in itself. This opens the way to a different jurisprudence, one that favours
European champions and brings a true industrial policy."
|
Details from Eurofacts 6th July
,2007
*
* *
[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining
Used-Comments in Brackets]
*
*
THE PEOPLE HAVE
SPOKEN-IS THE EU COMMISSION LISTENING?
*
Ditch the EU
TREATY after IRISH REJECTION
SAY VOTERS
by
Daniel
Martin
Political
Reporter
[Daily Mail-Wednesday, June
18,2008]
MORE THAN HALF of voters believe Britain should
drop the controversial European Treaty in the wake of its
rejection in last week's
IRISH REFERENDUM'
The poll comes as the Tories launch a last-ditch
bid in the
HOUSE of LORDS
today to delay the
RATIFICATION OF
THE TREATY.
And
10,000 people
have signed a
PETITION
on the
DOWNING STREET-
WEBSITE
within the past few days
JUNE16-2008
, calling on the
GOVERNMENT
NOT TO RATIFY THE BILL
[WHY DON'T YOU?]
Downing Street
website is
http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Abandon-Lisbon/
*
JUNE 18-2008
|
*
'Taking Liberties'
is on show in cinemas across the
country.
Visit:
www.noliberties.com
*
* *
*
Let the people speak!
www.makeitanissue.org.uk
*
www.noliberties.com
[Latest Addition - June07]
*
www.eutruth.org.uk
*
www.thewestminsternews.co.uk
*
www.speakout.co.uk
*
Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION
to the EU
www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs
*
GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY WON'T
HE TRUST YOU?
HELL ON EARTH IN IRAQ
*
67% want powers back from
EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95%
of British people want a
REFERENDUM
*
PETITION
FOR A
REFERENDUM
SIGN TODAY ON LINE
telegraph.co.uk/eureferendum
*
July 18-2007
VOTE
-2007
TO
LEAVE
THE
EUROPEAN
UNION
WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE
TO SET YOU
FREE
THE
UK
INDEPENDENCE PARTY
www.ukip.org
THE QUESTION THAT THE
VOTER MUST ANSWER
‘DO
YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE
CORRUPT ,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND CORRUPT ALIEN BUSYBODY BRUSSELS’
-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?
TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE
FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER
BUT
SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS
WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.
*
ONLY
PRO-PORTIONAL
REPRESENTATION
WILL
BRING
DEMOCRACY
BACK
TO
THE
ENGLISH
PEOPLE
*
SCOTLAND
-ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS
ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL
AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?
*
Home
Rule
for
Scotland
WHY
NOT
HOME
RULE
for
ENGLAND
*
[All underlined words have a
separate bulletin]
|