EUROPEAN
UNION
EXPOSED AS
ILLEGAL
A
criminalized
organisation
Monday 10th
October,
2005-
London.
BRITAIN
CAN LEAVE
THIS ILLEGAL
‘FESTERING
DUSTBIN OF
CORRUPTION’
TOMORROW
The European
Union
Collective
is
illegal
and so
extensively
criminalized
that it has
become all
but
indistinguishable
from
a criminal
organization.
It is
illegal
because key
EU treaties
were
procured
by means of
slush fund
payments.
It is
criminal
because,
being born
in
corruption,
its
procedures
are designed
to mask the
corrupt
activities
of many of
its
officials,
while it
publishes
false
accounts.
Britain is
free to
leave
immediately,
as explained
below.
These
findings are
published
today the 10th
October,
2005 in the
latest issue
of
International
Currency
Review,
the London
-based
Journal of
the
International
Financial
Community.
·
The
fraudulence
of the
European
Commission’s
accounts
necessitates
urgent
consideration
of its
Triple-A
Credit
Rating by
the leading
Rating
Agencies.
Precise
evidence of
the
fraudulence
of the EC’s
accounts is
presented in
the issue. (Normally
this
scandalous
state of
affairs is
‘successfully’
shoved under
the carpet).
·
International
Currency
Review has
advised the
agencies
accordingly,
and
anticipates
that they
will carry
out the
necessary
overdue
reassessment
of the EU’s
‘integrity’.
In the event
that zero
action is
taken, given
the extreme
gravity of
the evidence
of
institutionalised
accounting
fraud
presented in
the journal,
the
integrity of
the Credit
Rating
Agencies
themselves
may be
called into
question -
not
least by
International
Currency
Review.
This may
have
repercussions
for the
International
Financial
Community
generally.
*
WHY THE
EUROPEAN
UNION IS
ILLEGAL AND
ILLEGITIMATE
But first
things
first.
The
illegitimacy
and
illegality
of the
European
Union-and
thus of
ALL
its
constituent
structures,
including
the European
Central Bank
- arises
from the
following
facts:
The British
Treaty of
Accession
was signed
by two
agents of
the German
‘Black’ Nazi
intelligence
continuum,
DVD
-This
is the
ultra-secret
German Nazi
continuing
‘Black
Operations’
intelligence
organisation
based,
appropriately
enough, in
Dachau,
near Munich.
Intelligence
concerning
the
existence
was passed
to the
Editor
of
International
Currency
Review:
Christopher Story FRSA - Veteran UK financial and intelligence analyst
E-mail:
cstory@
worldreports.org
Telephone
+44-(0)
20-7222 3836
by
British
intelligence
sources
The
Editor
then had its
contents
checked out
by high
-level US
intelligence
contacts,
who
confirmed
the entity’s
existence
and
importance.
There
remains some
uncertainty
about what
the initials
DVD
stand for-
alternatively
Deutsche
Versicherungs
Dienst
[German
Insurance
Agency] or
else
Deutsche
Verteidigungs
Dienst [German
Defence
Agency]
- the
context here
being that
DVD is the
intelligence
[Abwehr]
continuum of
the
NAZI
INTERNATIONAL
Originally
established
by the Nazi
Abwehr
as the
German
Geopolitical
Centre in
Madrid in
1942.
Therefore,
in this
context,
‘insurance’
would mean
‘insurance’
would mean ‘insuring
the
continuity
of Nazi
global
hegemony
strategy for
the
controlling
a
Thousand-Year
Reich.’
While
‘defence’ in
this same
context
would mean
‘defending’
the
continuing
covert Nazi
global
hegemony
strategy.
DVD
is not
funded by
the German
Government
and
Taxpayer,
since it
operates its
own covert
sources of
giga-finance;
but its
primary
operations
and strategy
are
routinely
approved by
the
German
Chancellery.
Any official
denial of
this fact is
a lie
To continue:
The
signatories,
both - of
The British
treaty of
Accession
whom
received
substantial
financial
rewards
for their
‘co-operation’,
were
Edward Heath
and
Geoffrey
Rippon.
Together
with the
late Roy
Jenkins,
they were
recruited by
the German
Abwehr
while
studying at
Balliol
College,
Oxford.
This
intelligence
has emerged
since the
recent death
of Sir
Edward Heath
[Another
Traitor
amongst many
who have
been
honoured by
the Queen
with a
title]
*
THE E.U.
TREATIES ARE
ROUTINELY
PROCURED BY
FRAUDULENT
MEANS:
That is to
say,
official
signatories
and senior
policymakers/operatives
have
received
substantial
corrupt
payments,
remitted to
their secret
offshore
bank
accounts, in
exchange for
their
‘co-operation’
in pushing
through
successive
E.U.
Treaties.
The bribery
funds are
derived from
a colossal
secret ‘Black
Operations’
slush fund
account
located in
Switzerland
-the
title and
size of
which is
divulged in
the REPORT.
For instance:
$5.0 billion
was
allocated in
2004 from
the secret
Swiss slush
fund to
‘procure’
the
European
Constitution
Treaty,
divided into
two
branches:
1)
$2.5
billion was
allocated
(and paid
out) on
completion
of the
Inter
Governmental
Conference
[IGC],
in
July/August
of 2004,
with
$100 million
allocated
for each of
the
25 EU’Member
States’.
The corrupt
bribery
funds were
remitted to
the National
officials
concerned in
Euros.
2)
A further
$2.5 billion
($100
million for
each ‘Member
State’) was
payable on
ratification
of the
Collective
Treaty.
Given the
negative
referendum
results
delivered by
the French
and Dutch
electorates,
payment of
the second
branch has
been a
matter of
understandable
tension and
contention
ever since,
not least
since such
‘Black’
remittances,
which are
common place
at the
intergovernmental
level are
illegal -and
therefore
‘never
happened’.
Intelligence
sources have
provided
International
Currency
Review with
the NAME of
the secret
Swiss bank
account, the
vast amount
of ‘Black’
money it
holds, the
amounts
allocated
for each
corrupted EU
‘Member
State’, plus
the names of
three of the
most
prominent
alleged
recipients
of ‘Black’
payments,
together
with details
of the
alleged
transactions
concerned.
[WE DON’T
KNOW WHAT
YOU THINK
BUT THIS
REPORT MUST
PUT THE
PRO-EUROPE
FACTION
LITERALLY IN
A SPIN AND
FEAR OF THE
OUTCOME WHEN
THE
CONSPIRACY
IS
FULLY
REVEALED]
We have more
to follow
*
EXPOSURES
TRIGGERED BY
THE DEATH OF
SIR EDWARD
HEATH
These
revelations
have become
possible
following
the death of
Sir
Edward Heath,
who was a
German agent
and asset
for six
decades -
the longest
known
foreign
intelligence
penetration
in modern
history.
It is
significant
that the
extensive
Obituary of
Heath
published in
the
Guardian
on 18th
July 2005,
closed with
the cryptic
sentence:
‘He [Heath]
remained
determined
that he
would be
vindicated,
until
close to the
end.
This
referred to
the fact
that when
Heath
visited
Salzburg in
2003,
ostensibly
to attend
the Music
Festival
there, the
real reason
for his
visit was
that he had
been
summoned to
Dachau,
where DVD
officers
warned him
that
British
intelligence
were
intending to
confront him
with his
treachery.
It is
reported
that, on
hearing
this, Heath
literally
‘blew a
fuse’:
he suffered
a pulmonary
embolism.
A similar
fate
attended the
demise of
the late
Roy (Lord)
Jenkins
who suffered
a severe
heart attack
when
confronted
by
intelligence
officials
with the
fact that he
was about to
be exposed
for his
long-term
treachery
against the
United
Kingdom.
Roy
Jenkins
was one of
the most
lethal of
all
long-term
German
agents
operating at
the highest
levels of
the British
Government.
And
-the present
allegedly
deeply
compromised
Tony Blair
is the late
Lord
Jenkins’
protégé.
Heath,
Rippon
and
Jenkins
were far
from being
the only
long-term.
High-level
foreign
penetrations
by the
DVD-the
successor
‘Black’
(continuing
Nazi)
intelligence
organisation
to the
Abwehr.
In the
United
States, the
Dulles
brothers
were German
agents to
this day.
Substantial
transfers of
‘Black’
Operations’
funds
originally
controlled
by the
United
States
authorities
are known to
have been
transferred
into the
hands of the
German
‘Black’
covert
intelligence
community.
The CIA
is belatedly
being to
some extent
purged of
operators
with ethnic
and other
loyalties
and ties to
Germany.
TENSIONS
EXIST WITHIN
INTELLIGENCE
COMMUNITIES
BECAUSE OF
THIS
PENETRATION
*
THE 1969
VIENNA
CONVENTION
ON TREATIES.
Given that
(a)
The United
Kingdom’s
EEC
Accession
Treaty,
(b)
The
Maastricht
Treaty
of 1992 and
(c)
The
(aborted)
European
Constitution
Treaty
were among
E.U.
bilateral
and
collective
Treaties
that were
procured by
corrupt and
fraudulent
means,
THE
EUROPEAN
UNION IS AN
ILLEGAL
ORGANISATION.
This is
because
Article 49
of the 1969
Vienna
Convention
on Treaties,
to which
Britain and
the other EU
‘Member
States’ are
parties,
provides as
follows:
‘If a State
has been
induced to
conclude a
Treaty by
the
fraudulent
conduct of
another
negotiating
State, that
State may
invoke the
fraud as
invalidating
its consent
to be bound
by the
Treaty.
[* The first
tranche of
corrupt
payments for
the European
Constitution
Treaty was
paid out,
but the fate
of the
second
tranche,
given the
negative
French and
Dutch
referenda
outcomes, is
uncertain -
as well as
being the
subject of
vicious
secret
controversy]
According to
intelligence
sources,
earlier EU
Collective
treaties
were
likewise
procured by
fraudulent
means.
In the
British case,
UK
Membership
of the
European
Union
Collective
-an illegal
organisation
which exists
to subsume,
usurp and
collectivise
national
sovereignty
under the
enticing
cover of
‘co-operation’
(code for
collectivisation)-contravenes
the
1689 Bill of
Rights
which
remains the
LAW of
the United
Kingdom
to this day
and which
incorporates
the
following
Oath:
‘I do
declare that
no foreign
prince,
person,
prelate,
state or
potentate
hath or
ought to
have
jurisdiction,
power,
superiority,
pre-eminence
or authority
with this
Realm’
*
WHY THE
EUROPEAN
UNION IS A
CRIMINAL
ORGANISATION
In addition
to exposing
the
illegality
and
illegitimacy
of the
European
Union as a
whole,
International
Currency
Review
[Volume 30,
Number 4]
demonstrates,
with
extensive
analysis and
documentation,
that
the European
Commission
is a
criminal
organisation.
The issue
has been
prepared in
close
collaboration
with Ashley
Mote,
-Independent
MEP for
Southeast
England, [www.ashleymote.co.uk]
and
Continental
MEP
colleagues.
In October
2004, Mr
Mote and
Marta
Andreason,
the former
Chief
Accountant
of the
European
Commission,
presented
the UK
Serious
Fraud Office
with two
large
lever-arch
files
containing
voluminous
damning
information
about
institutionalised
corruption
in the EU
Commission
and related
EU
structures.
NO ACTION
WAS TAKEN
[Does the
stink of
corruption
in high
places
prevent the
Rule of Law
from taking
place?]
Among the
reasons for
concluding
that the
European
Union is a
criminal
organisation,
are the
following:
1)
Because
successive
Presidents
of the
European
Union
preside over
the
disbursement
of the
corrupt
‘Black’
‘facilitation
fees’
identified,
each
successive
(six-monthly)
President is
and has been
aware of the
corrupt
mechanism
used to
procure the
EU’s
successive
collective
Treaties.
2)
The
incidence of
fraud
committed
within the
EU’s
structures
is so
extensive
and routine,
that the
European
Commission
has been
condemned as
openly
condoning a
‘culture
of
corruption’,
and
presiding
over a
system of
‘institutional
looting’.
Scandalised
EC whistle
blowing
officials
refer to the
European
Commission
as a
‘festering
dustbin of
corruption’.
In
2004, there
were nearly
3,500 cases
of EC fraud.
3)
When
informed in
2004 that
the EC Vice
-
President-designate,
Jacques
Barrot,
had been
convicted
for
embezzlement
of funds,
and had
withheld
this
information
from the
European
Commission’s
President-designate,
Sr.
Jose-Manuel
Barroso,
the new
President
denied any
prior
knowledge of
this fact,
and left
Barrot
in place.
4)
It is
nothing
unusual for
European
Commission
officials
to be
associated
with
lucrative
corrupt
‘side
businesses’-often
using
offshore
accounts-from
which they
benefit
financially,
consequent
upon
contracts
being
awarded to
the
businesses
in which
they
themselves
have a
secret
pecuniary
interest.
For
instance:
5)
The Sunday
Telegraph
reported on
25th
September
-2005 that
two EC
employees
own a
Brussels sex
hotel,
Studio
Europe,
which rents
out rooms
for 13 euros
an hour. No
doubt this
location is
used for
blackmail
purposes.
The EC
officials in
question
were named
as
Carmela lo
Guidance,
an assistant
in the EC
Budget
Directorate-General
and
George
Tizzies
a porter in
the
Directorate-General
responsible
for
employment.
This is the
latest of
innumerable
EC scandals
to have
erupted into
the public
domain, some
of which are
examined in
the Special
Issue [out
on Monday 10th
October
2005.]
6)
Unhealthy
and
evidently
pervasive
masonic
links exist
between
European
Commission
officials
and
contractors,
resulting in
corrupt and
unhealthy
‘business
relationships’.
7)
The European
Commission’s
accounting
is NOT only
shambolic,
but also
fraudulent.
Evidence to
this effect
is
presented,
inter alia,
by the
well-known
British
forensic
accountant
Christopher
Arkell,
FTCA,
and by
former
Chief
Accountant
of the
European
Commission,
Marta
Andreason.
She was
‘suspended’
after five
months en
poste,
and then
fired, after
she
questioned
the
legitimacy
of payments
that
Directorates-General
required
her to
authorise.
She asked
awkward
questions,
and was
effectively
told to
‘shut up and
just sign’.
8)
The EC’s
accounting
irregularities,
which are
glaring,
include the
following
abuses:
When certain
accounting
modifications
were
implemented
at the end
of 2004, the
closing
balances in
2004 and the
opening
balances in
2005 were
not
reconciled-
thereby
permanently
embedding
false
accounting
data for the
future.
This means
that
henceforth
no European
Commission
accounts can
ever be
accurate
(not that
this has
ever been
the case).
en though EU
‘Member
States’ have
been making
payments to
the
Commission
for decades
to cover the
costs of
pension
liabilities
for
approximately
39,000 EC
employees
(as of 2005),
the EU
‘Member
States’ have
simultaneously
been charged
with the
liability of
making/guaranteeing
the
resulting
pension
payments.
Thus pension
liabilities
appear on
both sides
of the
balance
sheet.
Proper
accounting
practice
would
require a
charge to
the Income
and
Expenditure
Account of
EUR 19.5
billion
And a
consequent
reduction in
reserves.
The European
Commission
should have
been
acquiring a
liability
for pensions
throughout
its
existence
instead of
fudging the
accounts in
this
fraudulent
and
irregular
manner.
The European
Commission
‘makes’
massive
surpluses
out of the
‘Member
States’
annually,
which it
covers up
Surpluses
are supposed
according to
the EU’s own
regulations,
to be
returned to
the ‘Member
States’.
What happens
in practice
is that the
EC surpluses
that have
arisen after
all accruals
have been
accounted
for, are
eliminated
by the
simple
manipulative
expedient of
providing
for
potential
expenditures
not openly
through the
Income
and
Expenditure
Account,
but by means
of corrupt
adjustments
to the
Balance
Sheet (‘Provisions’).
This method
of
accounting
is
prohibited
by all
recognised
accounting
standards
around the
world as
DISHONEST.
Its use by
the European
Commission
represents a
clear fraud
perpetuated
upon ‘Member
States’
and their
troubled and
exploited
peoples.
EC
accounting
records can
be changed
two or more
years in
arrears.
The amount
and the
payee, but
not the
unique
identifying
number, can
be altered,
and no
record
whatsoever
of such
changes
is/has been
maintained
in the
records.
This
represents
an
open-ended
invitation
to scam the
system,
especially
as it is
routine for
the EC’s
Annual
Accounts to
be adjusted
retrospectively.
The huge
Eurocracy
(or
self-interested
EU
nomenklatura)
has
perfected
subtle
mechanisms
for ensuring
that hardly
anything is
ever done to
stamp out
the
corruption
over which
it has
presided for
decades.
These
techniques
include, but
are not
confined to
the
following:
The use of
‘candour’,
which is NOT
to be
confused
with the
truth.
‘Candour’ is
deployed in
order to
disarm,
mislead,
divert and
mollify
critics,
so that any
underlying
fraud goes
undetected.
The
‘multiple
investigations’
technique
8.2)
What happens
is that
several
investigations
are
‘opened’
separately.
Further
internal ‘investigations’
may follow.
Some are
then
‘closed’,
or
‘suspended’,
ostensibly
‘pending’
the
‘results’
of other
investigations.
The
resulting,
deliberately
contrived,
confusion,
with
successive
reports
contradicting
others,
ensures that
the
corruption
trail is
buried and
lost.
Report-writing
is used to
smother
transparency,
clarity, and
TRUTH, with
the sole
objective of
obfuscating
the
underlying
looting and
corruption.
8.3)
The EC and
its
structures
have at
least
3,094 secret
‘working
groups’
or
committees,
all of which
are
answerable
to no-one,
and the
operations
of which are
secret.
8.4)
The main
objective of
any EC fraud
investigation
is to
procure that
the case is
‘exported’
as quickly
as possible
to the
‘Member
States’
concerned,
so that any
corruption
at the EC
centre is
consequently
hidden from
scrutiny.
8.5)
Wherever
possible,
investigations
are kept
unresolved
until the
existing
Commission
is duly
replaced by
its
successor-when
the ‘that
was then,
this is now’
excuse kicks
in.
8.6)
Innumerable
other
deliberate
obstruction
methods,
identified
by
International
Currency
Review
with the
guidance of
Ashley Mote
MEP and his
colleagues,
are
routinely
employed by
the EC and
related
structures,
to maximise
the
obfuscation
of troubling
problems.
For
instance,
one external
corporation,
based in
Luxembourg,
in which EC
officials
had an
interest,
was
ostensibly
established
on
29th
February
1989-a
date
which never
even
existed,
which meant
that the
entity was
‘invisible’.
When a
sanitised
official
report on
the entity’s
fraudulent
activities
was
presented to
the former
President
of the
European
Commission,
Signor
Romano Prodi
- that
allegedly
corrupt
Italian
‘machine’
politician-
the date was
altered to
22nd
February
1989.
This further
illustrated
the devious
standard
European
Commission
technique of
promulgating
conflicting
information
in separate
contradictory
reports. By
this means,
controversy
is deflected
into sterile
arguments
over the
conflicting
information-diverting
attention
from the
institutionalised
internal
looting
itself.
8.7)
The European
Court of
Auditors has
given an
adverse
opinion for
many years,
on 95% of
all European
Commission
Expenditure.
It has
never, ever,
approved the
EC’s
accounts.
Furthermore
evidence has
surfaced of
fraud in the
Court’s own
accounts
-one of
several
indications
that the
Court itself
cannot be
trusted.
Indeed, like
the
Commission’s
own internal
Audit
Service, its
main task,
by open
official
admission,
is to
minimise
embarrassment
to the
Commission.
The damning
evidence of
institutionalised
European
Commission
looting and
serial
corruption
covered up
by the EC
authorities
contained in
the single
issue of
International
Currency
Review
is
sufficient
to induce a
terminal
crisis at
the European
Commission.
*
WHY BRITISH
PAYMENTS TO
THE EC MUST
CEASE
FORTHWITH.
Both
Ashley Mote
MEP and
the
journal’s
Editor,
Christopher
Story,
demand that
the UK
Treasury
sits up,
finally
takes
notice, and
withholds
further
contributions
to the EC
budget
pending
elimination
of
institutionalised
corruption
and looting
in the
European
Commission’s
structures -which
will never
happen.
In a letter
to Ashley
Mote
dated 22nd
October
2004,
Stephen
Timms, the
Treasury
Minister,
told the MEP
that
withholding
British
payments to
the EC would
be illegal
and would be
an
‘option’ we
would not
consider’
BUT
Continued
squandering
of UK
Taxpayers
(OUR MONEY)
represents a
dereliction
by British
Ministers
and their
officials,
of their
duty of care
towards UK
taxpayer’s
funds.
Given the
conspicuous
gravity of
the
situation,
Ministers
are believed
to be
increasing
the risk of
being sued
for
negligence
as exposures
of the
European
Commission’s
‘culture of
corruption’
proliferate.
[At
this moment
in Time in
the UK
millions of
people on
tax-credits
who were
overpaid
because of
technical
problems are
being asked
to hand the
money back.
They should
ALL
insist that
the
Treasury
should try
the
European
Commission
and ask
their
employees to
point the
finger and
explain were
the billions
of pounds of
OUR money is
resting in
banks in
Switzerland.
WE should
certainly
have a great
deal of
compound
interest to
collect at
the same
time]
Moreover the
former
Chancellor
of the
Exchequer,
Lord Lawson
of Blaby,
has advised
the House of
Lords’
European
Committee
that the
British
Government
DOES
possess the
legal scope
to give
itself
powers
to
withhold
payments to
the European
Commission.
He told
the
Committee:
‘You have to
remember how
hard it was
to win the
(UK)
rebate…It
would never
have
happened if
we had not
made clear
that if we
did not get
satisfaction,
we would
withhold our
contributions.
It was never
published,
but it was
printed. It
was
discreetly
known to
those who we
negotiated
with, that
this is what
would happen
if we did
not get
satisfaction….Without
that threat
to withhold
our
contributions,
to the
extent of
having the
UK law
officers
produce a
bill, we
would have
NOT got [the
Rebate].’
[Source:
Future
Financing of
the European
Union,
House of
Lords
European
Committee,
HL Paper 62,
9th
March 2005.]
But since
Britain’s EU
membership
is illegal,
because the
UK Accession
Treaty and
successive
EU
Collective
Treaties
(notably
Maastricht)
were
procured by
fraud, it is
not even
technically
necessary
for the
Government
to extract
that draft
bill from
the official
pigeon-hole
into which
it was
shoved.
*
BRITAIN CAN
LEAVE THE
EUROPEAN
UNION
TOMORROW: NO
PROBLEM.
The
Government
can walk
away from
the European
Union
Tomorrow-
and use the
25% of gross
Domestic
Product
represented
by all
current and
future costs
of the EU
membership:
To rebuild
the Public
Transportation
system.
Build
spanking new
‘Schools and
Hospitals’
wherever
demand
exists.
And
revitalise
the BRITISH
economy
generally.
All without
suffering
any losses
since EU
membership
has brought
Britain no
clear
benefits at
all, that
could not
have been
procured
domestically.
It has
however,
meant that
billions of
UK
taxpayers’
funds that
the British
Government
should have
been
spending at
home, have
been
squandered
on this
sterile,
decaying
collectivist
project, led
by corrupted
and
blackmailed
politicians
and
operatives.
All EU
‘Member
States’,
valuing the
huge British
market for
their goods,
would be
compelled to
negotiate
arms’-length
bilateral
trade and
other
agreements
with the
United
Kingdom, or
risk losing
access to UK
markets. Any
prospective
interim
disruptions
could be
accommodated
by the
British
Government
directing
the UK
taxpayers’
funds that
it normally
squanders
with the
EC’s
‘festering
dustbin of
corruption’,
into
temporarily
vulnerable
sectors of
the UK
economy.
A Free Trade
Agreement
linking
Britain, the
United
States and
Canada has
bee readied,
for
implementation
when Britain
leaves the
European
Community.
For,
contrary to
what is in
the public
domain,
contingency
plans do
exist in the
United
Kingdom to
leave the
European
Union.
These were
recently
reviewed and
‘dusted
down’, in
the context
of key
connections
made by
certain
intelligence
circles
following
the 7/7
attacks,
which have
shown that
EU Member
States’ that
profess to
be allies of
the United
Kingdom
are anything
but.
Exposure
information
for this
special
issue of
International
Currency
Review
[Vol.30,
No4]
has
been
developed
with the
generous
practical
assistance
of Ashley
Mote MEP.
Paul van
Buitenen
MEP, Marta
Andreason,
Christopher
Arkle FTCA
and the US
and UK
intelligence
sources
special to
the
Editor,
Christopher
Story.
For further
details, see
Ashley
Mote’s
website:
www.ashleymote.co.uk.
International
Currency
Review,
VOL. 30 NO 4
[extracts
from 153
pages -shown
above],
available by
subscription
from