ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY. ORG UK. FREEDOM-UNITY.

BULLETINS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD

Est.1994-POLICY-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links- IMMIGRATION-ARCHIVE- EU FILE

JANUARY 23-BREXIT NOW-2017--       - (1994 -Official Website-January-2017 ) -   JANUARY 23-BREXIT NOW-2017-PT1 -

LATEST INFORMATION IN PART1 

HOME -FEBRUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2017

WHY I WANT

OUT OF THE EU

 

I want out because I fear that our

NATIONAL IDENTITY

OUR WAY OF LIFE

and tradition of liberal democracy are under

THREAT

from the EU's rules on the

FREE MOVEMENT of PEOPLE

and its

INSANE

HUMAN RIGHTS REGIME

I WANT OUT

because I believe that

BRUSSEL'S

attempts to impose

UNIFORMITY

on hugely diverse peoples are holding economies back, destroying livelihoods and breeding dangerous ill-feelings between

NATIONS.

I WANT OUT

so that we can regain the right to elect those who make our laws-and to

DISMISS THEM IF THEY FAIL US

I'm sick of seeing my country infantilised by an

UNSACKABLE NANNY STATE.

IN A WORD

I WANT OUT BECAUSE I WANT

BRITAIN

[ENGLAND]

TO BE FREE

*

Tom Utley for the Daily Mail

[We couldn't have put it better-Thank you!- Tom Utley.

TOM UTLEY: Oh dear. Is the fact my wife was a bus ... - Daily Mail-Friday, June 3,2016l

 

H.F.805

 

 UK voting system' ignores will of millions'

by

Daniel Martin for the Daily Mail -Chief Political Correspondent-JUNE 2-2015.

 

BRITAIN'S voting system is 'archaic' and divisive' and does not represent the will of millions, a pressure group has argued. The Electoral Reform Society, which has campaigned for proportional representation for 130 years, claimed last month's General Election was the most disproportionate ever.  It said UKIP would have WON up to 80 seats using the type of PR used in many European nations, while the GREENS would have got 20.  UKIP and the GREENS received 5MILLION VOTES, but under the FIRST-PAST-THE-POST system ended up with ONE MP each.  An E R S-commissioned survey said under PR the TORIES would have seen their tally of MPs fall  by almost 100 while  LABOUR would have gone down 24...

[MONTHLY BULLETIN CHART UNTIL REFERENDUM ON EU -LATEST MAY 2017 -AT FOOT OF PAGE!    ASAP!  

SEE HERE!   ]

 

JUNE 2-2015

H.F.1388

 

How middle classes won the Brexit vote... along with EVERY social group group (except for the Rich)...

 

by James Slack, political Editor for the Daily  Mail...

 

THE csj'S ,Philippa and James O'Shaughnessy of the Institute say the vote was a heartfelt cry from millions who feel WESTMINSTER no longer knows or even cares how it feels to walk in their shoes...

 

This was what we anticipated would happen-self interest -not love of ENGLISH CUSTOM-ENGLISH LAW and THEIR COUNTRY  OF MAGNA CARTA FAME WHICH MILLIONS OF OUR COUNTRYMEN AND FROM THE COMMONWEALTH GAVE THEIR LIVES IN TWO WORLD WARS FOR FREEDOM FROM BERLIN THE HEART OF THE NAZI-PLANNED EU. OUR WAR DEAD MUST WONDER WHY THEY SACRIFICED THEIR LIVES WHEN SO MANY OF THEIR COUNTRYMEN IN JUNE 2006 DECIDED TO LET BERLIN THINK FOR THEM RATHER THAN DEFEND THEIR CUSTOM AND COUNTRY FOR WHICH MANY MILLIONS DIED FOR OR WHO BORE THEIR INJURIES FOR THE REST OF THEIR LIVES. THEY DID WHAT THEY WERE ASKED TO DO WITHOUT COMPLAINT BECAUSE THEIR CUSTOM THEIR LAW-THEIR COUNTRY WAS WORTH SACRIFICING THEIR LIVES FOR. IN JUNE 2016 MILLIONS OF THE ENGLISH DECIDED TO LOOK TO THEIR OWN ADVANTAGE AND THEIR CUSTOM THEIR LAW AND COUNTRY  MEANT

 NOTHING!

 

SEPTEMBER 30,2016

H.F.987 BREXIT NOW

Sunday, November 26, 2017

David Wilcock Explains The Rules Of The Illuminati & How They Operate


(Joe Martino) At times it’s laughed at, at times it’s taken very seriously and now, the term “Illuminati” has gained such a large amount of attention and popularity that it begs a deeper exploration by those not even in the ‘conspiracy realm’ but who are simply curious and seeking truth.
 


Related 
David Wilcock Update: Something Very Big, Part III: Saudi Mass Arrests Sign of Impending Cabal Defeat?

Source - Collective Evolution

by 
Joe Martino, November 25th, 2017

There is certainly a great deal of disinformation, propaganda and distraction when it comes to the Illuminati and other ‘conspiracy theories.’ With certain alternative news websites out there continuously publishing fake or misleading stories, it can sometimes take away from the truth other outlets are working to bring forth credibly. Thus, making sense of what’s actually going on can be difficult at times, especially when the mainstream tosses those who ask these questions in the category of “looney’s.”

In reality, fingers are often pointed towards Hollywood movie stars, music artists and entertainers who are seen throwing up specific hand signs or music videos constantly containing significant ancient art/symbolism. And although these stars are not the Illuminati themselves, they are tools for them, and their use of the cabals symbolism is to popularize or normalize the religion that this group follows.

 


And while some feel this is simply a joke being passed around to get people on the internet talking, others have explored, researched and heard directly from the horse’s mouth what the truth really is. I believe it’s time we pull our heads out of the sand and have the courage to truly look at this, what it means, how it impacts our lives and what we can do to move on from it, because it is very real. In today’s terms, it’s often referred to as the Deep State, Shadow Government or Elite.
 

If we want to know where we can go, we first have to identify the experience we are facing and how it functions. Sure, there is no denying the fact that corporations dictate major government policy,and that a handful of corporations and the people who run them seem to have control over major resources and industries that currently govern our world, but without us they are powerless.

This is no conspiracy. Within the past couple of years multiple studies have examined the allocation of global resources and wealth. They’ve found that the richest 1 percent on the planet own the majority of global wealth. On top of this, our health care industry, food industry, energy industry, entertainment industry, education and the world of finance are all owned and operated by a handful of corporations and the people that run them. (
source
) You might be saying “yeah, so what?” The point is, all of these industries continue to participate in activities that destroy the planet, our health and overall well-being. Meanwhile, we all go to school, work and live our lives while continuing to remain blind to what is happening in the world.

 

“I want a nation of workers, not thinkers.” – John

D. Rockefeller

Separating Fact From Fiction

People have sometimes asked me, why talk about such negative things? If we talk about the Illuminati we’re giving power to them and focusing our attention on them. This is an understandable first reaction when you consider what has happened in the New Age movement with disinformation about how our reality is formed. Although our thoughts and beliefs do help co-create our reality, our purpose is not to avoid the truth. We must awaken to what’s going on, snap out of our global sleep and begin to create real change. Putting a ‘negative’ or ‘positive’ connotation on talking about the Illuminati comes down to how much power you choose to give that yourself.

If we want to know where we can go, we first have to identify the experience we are facing and how it functions. Sure, there is no denying the fact that
corporations dictate major government policy, and that a handful of corporations and the people who run them seem to have control over major resources and industries that currently govern our world, but without us they are powerless.

 

Find Out More >

94,400

 

Why This Symbolism Is Used
 


While at an event in California called Contact In The Desert, we interviewed David Wilcock, a longtime occult researcher. During the interview, he mentioned that the Elite/Illuminati believe they must convey their intentions to humanity in order to, in essence, get permission from us to have them enslave us. This manifests as rituals during mass sports events, symbolism found around society and in various popular industries like film and music.

The rules and symbols this group follows is very similar to that of many religions we know of today like Christianity, Judaism, Islam etc. To them, it’s their strong belief, and their goal is to popularize their religion and symbolism so they can gain as much power from it as possible.

Check out the clip below to hear what this symbolism is about. You can watch the full interview with
David Wilcock here.

 

________________________________________________________________
Question -- What is the goal of this website? Why do we share different sources of information that...

 

November 25th, 2017
 

H.F.1396

 

 

Is Donald Trump too scared to name George Bush Sr. and P2 Freemasons as Kennedy assassins?

U.S. Corporation President Donald Trump last week announced he would release all records related to the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, “other than the names and addresses of any mentioned person who is still living.”  In other words, it appears he is too scared to mention the involvement of George Bush (Scherf, Pecce) Sr. and the Vatican P2 Freemason lodge fascist New World Order faction.

Pentagon officials, however, say, “Trump muscled the CIA, Mossad, the FBI, and the Bush cabal to release ALL JFK files, since [then Israeli Prime Minister] Ben Gurion wanted JFK dead, and the same perps also did 9/11.”

These are the people who aim to create a world fascist government controlled by members of European royal families who claim descent from the Caesars and from King David, as revealed by forensic research over a period of many years.  This research, including meetings with many members of this family group, has led us to the conclusion that these are the real “elders of Zion.”

Thanks to the confessions of Benjamin Freedman…
http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/israel/freedman.htm

and others, John F. Kennedy became aware of a plot to start World War III, wipe out 90% of humanity, and turn the rest into slaves.  The Zionists very nearly succeeded in accomplishing this by triggering all-out nuclear war during the Cuban missile crisis.  That is why Kennedy decided to take away their main source of power—the ability to create money out of thin air.

George Bush Sr. (whose real family name goes back through Sherf and Pearce to the Roman aristocratic Pecce name) and the Zionists had Kennedy assassinated in order to prevent the nationalization of the Federal Reserve Board.

These people are still in control of the creation of U.S. dollars, Euros, and Japanese yen out of thin air.  Their main instrument of power in the U.S. these days is still the Bush/Clinton/Rockefeller Zionist Federal Reserve Board, truth researchers agree.

A very interesting example of how these gangsters distribute their fiat money can be seen in the article at the link below that shows how the rise in Amazon share prices matches the rise in central bank money printing and moves in the opposite direction of actual Amazon results.  There can be little doubt that Jeff Bezos is now “the world’s richest man,” because he has been selected as a premier distributor of fiat money.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-10-27/amazon

Forensic research has shown that most (if not all) major listed corporations are controlled, via hedge funds like Vanguard, BlackRock, State Street, Fidelity, etc., by this family group, known now to many as the Khazarian mafia.

In Japan, this writer has identified the quislings used by the Khazarian mafia, thanks to testimony by assassins formerly in their employ here.  These people are now vanishing one by one as their former hitmen turn on them, the assassins say.

The quisling politician Seiji Maehara played a key role in the recent theft of the Japanese election by Khazarian mobsters led by Rothschild agent Michael Greenberg and Barbara Bush cousin Richard Armitage.  Maehara is the son of the North Korean agent Son Tae Chuk, also known as Daisaku Ikeda.  Ikeda for years was the absolute ruler of the Soka Gakkai Buddhist lay group and controller of the Komeito political party, whose duped members are crucial to maintaining Khazarian control of Japan.  Ikeda has been in a vegetative state (probably dead) for several years, so Maehara is effectively in charge now, even though he ostensibly belongs to a different political grouping.  White Dragon Society (WDS) sources in Japan say Maehara regularly walks into the U.S. embassy in Tokyo and is never asked to show any ID.

The Khazarians stole the Japanese election because the Party of Hope led by Koike Yuriko was planning to nationalize the Bank of Japan, say sources close to the Japanese emperor.

With U.S. President Donald Trump scheduled to visit Japan November 5-7, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS, the employer of Greenberg and Armitage) had big meetings this past weekend in Tokyo to discuss what agenda they were going to present to Trump.

Prior to this gathering, the CSIS sent a top agent to meet with a representative of the White Dragon Society.  At this meeting, the CSIS official, who personally does not approve of Armitage, said that he was sent by Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte to…
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Emergency Alert

Murderer and drug dealer Richard Armitage and criminal Michael Green (berg) will be at the Teikoku Hotel in Tokyo, Japan between 8:30 and 13:15 on Friday, October 27th, 2017.
http://www.nikkei-events.jp/csis/

Richard Armitage has been responsible for the murder and torture of Japanese prime ministers, according to my sources.  He has also been named by CIA and other sources as a drug dealer and a traitor who contributed greatly to the U.S. loss in the Vietnam War.  He will be wearing a bulletproof vest at the event because he has created many enemies with his crimes.

Michael Green told Japanese gangsters that I was a woman-beating amphetamine addict and paid them to kill me, according to these gangsters.  He employs Japanese gangsters to terrorize the Japanese political and financial establishment.

These men engineered the theft of the Japanese election that took place on October 22, 2017, and now their puppets like Shinzo Abe are calling for war with North Korea according to the agenda of their Zionist masters.

Message to Admiral Harry Harris:  If you do not order military police to arrest these traitors and criminals, you yourself will ultimately face court martial and imprisonment for neglect of duty.

These men must be arrested, and if they resist arrest, all necessary force must be used.  Arresting these men could be the game-changer that finally liberates humanity from Khazarian mob terror.

We will offer a bounty of 1 ton of gold deliverable in Hong Kong for the arrest of these criminals.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

緊急報告:
リチャード・アーミタジとミカエル・グリーンは2017年10月27日の8時30分から13時15分の間に帝国ホテルで登場する予定です。
多くの情報源によるとアーミタジは殺人犯や麻薬犯である。またアーミタジは多くの日本の総理大臣の殺戮に加担したと情報源らが言う。彼の逮捕は急務である。
ミカエル・グリーンは日本の多くの暴力団と関係を持っている。彼が日本のとても危険な連中に僕は女に暴力を振るう覚せい剤中毒者だと言う嘘を付いて僕の殺人を依頼した。彼の逮捕も急務である。
彼らが10月22日の総選挙泥簿をして、今家来安部政権に北朝鮮との戦争を始めさせようとしている。この二人を束縛すれば日本は再び独立国家になれる。
皆さん27日に帝国ホテルで集合してください。勝負をつけましょう。

Another Letter to the Editor About the Jews

Hello, Benjamin,

It is funny reading how the JEWS do not like being criticized for being JEWS.

No, it’s not the Khazarians, it’s the F-ing JEWS that are destroying the world.

I don’t buy into the “good Jews” and “bad Jews” argument.  Those that do not wish to go along with the JEWISH SH#T SCUM in the world should act accordingly and stop calling themselves JEWISH.

Of course you will not have the guts to print this because you are part of the system.

JEWS are a cancer upon this world.  Any group that has been shunned from every country on Earth for over 2,000 years should by now realise that they are doing something wrong.

We need to call it like it is:  IT IS THE JEWS THAT ARE HELL-BENT ON DESTROYING THE WORLD.  HELL-BENT IS A VERY GOOD PHRASE TO USE BECAUSE IT IS SATAN WHO IS THEIR GOD AND IS WHO THEY SERVE. That is the truth.  The JEWS do not want the truth to be known.

What are you going to do, Benjamin?  Are you going to tell the truth, or are you going to continue to hide behind this Khazarian lie?

Even if you do not print this, I would like you to reply.  What I have said is the truth!  Are you going to run and hide, or are you going to tell the truth?

Regards

 

Hello,

First of all, I do not consider myself to be Jewish.  I am a human being from the planet earth—that is all.  I simply point out that according to their definition, I am one of them.

I think the Jews are like the matador’s red cape used in bullfights.  They distract us from the real enemy who is, as you point out, the Satanists.  A lot of Satanists pretend to be Jews, but most Jews are not Satanists.

I have and continue to risk my life to fight against the Satanists, but at the same time, so as not to become like them, I refuse to attack innocent people, whatever ethnic group they identify with.

However, the Jews do need to join the fight against the Satanists.  They also need to renounce many of the horrific things written in the Talmud such as this:  “Even the best of the ‘goyim’ should all be killed.”  (Soferim 15)

Benjamin Fulford

Past Presidents of Bankrupt U.S. Corporation Go on “Beg-athon” for Godfather Bush

The dragnet is slowly but inexorably closing in on the Bush/Clinton (Scherf/ Rockefeller) Khazarian mafia clan and their Federal Reserve Board printing press.  Multiple legal investigations, mass arrests of junior Khazarian mobsters, and public disclosure are now part of regular public discourse, and not just on blogs formerly maligned as “conspiracy” sites.

An interesting sign of the Khazarians’ desperation was the spectacle of George Bush Senior posing with four other former presidents (minus Donald Trump) of the United States Corporation as part of a “beg-athon.”
http://thehill.com/blogs/in-the-know/in-the-know/356605-photo-of-lady-gaga-and-five-former-presidents-goes-viral

First, we must note that with computer graphics and body doubles it is hard to know if this event really took place.  For example, multiple sources have told this writer that Bill Clinton (Rockefeller) died of AIDS early this year.

Nonetheless, assuming this event did really take place, this is what a senior CIA source in Texas had to say about it:

“The ‘beg-athon’ in Texas is pure BS.  Notice that the money goes through the George H.W. Bush (Scherf) Foundation.  They are scamming money any way they can get it.  The Khazarian mafia cabal must be really desperate.”

The causes of their desperation have been snowballing in recent weeks.  Perhaps most deadly have been the ongoing disclosures about Khazarian genocides.  This has started with the release of documents showing that the U.S. government was involved in the murder of over 500,000 Indonesians in the mid-1960s.
https://www.commondreams.org/news/2017/10/18/documents-reveal-active-us-support-indonesian-mass-killings-1960s

The Texas-based CIA source admits, “We removed [Indonesian President] Soekarno from power, and we put Soeharto into power.”  He regrets that he was a part of the operation back them.  His excuse:  just doing what he was ordered to do by his boss at Langley.

President Donald Trump promised more disclosure in the following tweet, saying, “Subject to the receipt of further information, I will be allowing, as President, the long blocked and classified JFK files to be opened.”

Three separate sources—one NSA, one Pentagon, and one CIA—all said they did not believe Trump would release the real truth about the Kennedy assassination.

However, one senior Pentagon source who has been consistently reliable in the past said that “The Trump release of JFK files may implicate Bush Senior, Mossad, the CIA, and the deep state, and may be a prelude to an intel dump on 9/11, suppressed technology, the secret space program, and other disclosures prior to mass arrests.”

Long-term readers of this blog already know that JFK was assassinated because he was trying, using gold provided by Soekarno, to take control of the issuance of U.S. dollars away from the privately-owned Federal Reserve Board (FRB).

Pentagon sources are saying that in any case, “Khazarian control of the FRB is kaput, as Fed Governor Jerome (Jay) Powell may be chosen as the next FRB, beating the three Jews Gary Cohn, Janet Yellen, and Kevin Warsh, who is son-in-law of billionaire 9/11 conspirator and Israeli asset Ron Lauder….  Stanford PhD economist John Taylor may also be named to the FRB as Vice Chairman or Governor.”

The source continues by noting, “When the global currency reset happens, the FRB may be folded into [the U.S.] Treasury [Department] and issue gold-backed United States Notes (USN).

The Texas CIA source, who claims to hate Bush Senior but appears to be closely connected to him, says the Khazarian mafia was ready to retaliate by taking drastic action, warning that “The entire Internet has a back door installed and the Khazarian mafia can and will
 

The remainder of this article is only available to members of BenjaminFulford.net
Please Log In or Register to create an account.

 

Letter to the Editor – A Note on “Jewishness” and Zionism

Hello Ben,

I read the complaint of the individual objecting to your use of the term “Jewish” in your description of events last week.  There is, I think, reason to differentiate carefully between the term “Jewish mafia” and the Italian Mafia.  They are not necessarily correct analogs.

In the case of Jewish people, one awful risk they face, which apparently is largely unseen by many of them, is the Zionists.  The Zionists are the Jewish mafia, and it is apparent to me that they are hiding behind the Jewish religion as a front for their activities.

This places Jewish people in a terrible position of “shield.”  And in order for an entire people to serve as that shield, they often express strong belief in support of the Zionists, apparently not understanding that in no way does Zionism serve the Jewish religion.  I don’t think Italians have anywhere near this level of identification with their captors.

Just a thought.  As a friend to all people, I find this situation very aggravating, as any negative criticism of Zionism very often incites attacks decrying “anti-Semitism.”  (As you pointed out, a misnomer.)  Actually, most people identifying with Judaism today have nothing to do with Semites.  They’re effectively Khazarians filtered through European bloodlines.

 

H.F.1364741

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-June-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-July-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-July-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

BREXIT

BUT NOT OUT OF THE EU FOR 2/3 YEARS. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. ALL EU TREATIES WERE OBTAINED BY BRIBERY AND TREASON  AND FRAUD WHICH

UNDER THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES MAKES THEM.

NULL AND VOID.

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

JULY 23 FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2016

JULY 30-2016

*

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

AUGUST 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW PART 1-2016

SEPTEMBER 23 FREEDOM NOW-2016

SEPTEMBER 28-2016

 

H.F.200A-FREEDOM NOW

 

PLEASE  NOTE: WE HAVE IN ADVANCE GIVEN BELOW THE BULLETIN FOR EACH MONTH FOR THE NEXT 30 MONTHS WHICH YOU CAN ENTER-IT WILL CONTAIN INFORMATION FROM OTHER MONTHS FROM THE PAST AND THAT AVAILABLE AT THE SPECIFIED TIME.  WE ARE MAKING THIS ARRANGEMENT AS WE ARE UNABLE TO GIVE AN EXIT DATE FROM THE EU. AS YOU ARE AWARE WE COMMENCED OUR BULLETIN FILE IN OCTOBER 2003 FOR THE PURPOSE OF MAKING AVAILABLE INFORMATION WHICH WOULD BRING THE EXIT FROM THE EU AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. BUT NOW THAT BREXIT IS SOON TO BE ENACTED BY PARLIAMENT THE DAY OF OUR DELIVERANCE WILL SOON BE AT HAND AND THE RETURN OF OUR INDEPENDENT NATION STATE OF ENGLAND TOGETHER WITH OUR NEIGHBOURING NATION STATES OF WALES-SCOTLAND AND NORTHERN ISLAND.

MAY GOD GRANT US A SPEEDY EXIT FROM THE SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST- CORRUPT - UNDEMOCRATIC -MAMMOTH MONSTROSITY OF THE SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION.

 

MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19

 

 

 

The English People's

VoicE

WELCOME!

 

IMMIGRATION FILE

E U FILE

IRAQ/AFGHAN WAR

     9/11 AN INSIDE JOB

MAGNA CARTA

LONDON 7/7-AN INSIDE JOB

NAZI DVD

ENGLAND FILE

CRIMINAL EU

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

SAY NO TO EU

UNDERSTANDING EASTER

EURO MUST FAIL

ROTTEN HEART OF EU

SOUL OF ENGLAND

100 REASONS TO LEAVE EU

TREASON A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS

ALFRED - KING OF THE ENGLISH

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

ENGLAND OUR ENGLAND

MOST EVERYTHING WHICH IS PRECIOUS IN OUR CIVILISATION HAS COME FROM SMALL INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

 by LORD PETER SHORE.

 

A NATION STATE HAS BEEN REBORN

 

ON the momentous day Theresa May said Britain WILL quit the single market, she put Cameron's feeble negotiations to shame with an ultimatum to Brussels that the UK will 'walk away from a bad deal-and make the EU pay' 

  • STEEL OF THE NEW
  • IRON LADY
  • The PM is hopeful of an EU-UK trade deal because of mutual economic interests 
  • She said Europe not making a deal with BritAIN would be 'calamitous self-harm'
  • It was confirmed that we will be leaving the single market and customs union
  • But the EU's chief negotiator called her show of defiance counter-productive
  • Her speech was criticised by the Lib Dems as Labour fought on how to respond 
  • Sterling rose 2.8 per cent against the Dollar and 1.8 per cent against the Euro


Read more:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4130034/Theresa-s-Brexit-speech-puts-Cameron-shame.html#ixzz4W7pxZPm9
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

PressReader - Daily Mail: 2017-01-18 - Europe split over May's ...

https://www.pressreader.com/uk/daily-mail/20170118/281625305003771
Europe split over May's vision – but even Tusk calls it 'realistic'. Daily ... News -
From Mario Ledwith in Brussels and John Stevens in London.

 

*

POINT BY POINT, HER BLUEPRINT TO FREE BRITAIN FROM BRUSSELS
THERESA May delighted Eurosceptics yesterday with an ambitious road map for BREXIT. The PM extended the hand of friendship to the EU but threatened to walk away if BRUSSELS tried to impose a punitive deal. Jack DOYLE sets out her 12 objectives and analyses her chances of success.

1. CERTAINTY

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will provide certainty where we can. The same rules and laws will apply on the day after BREXIT, as they did before. And the Government will put the final deal to a vote in both houses of Parliament.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By keeping in place-at least initially-all EU laws, Mrs May will provide a degree of continuity and confidence for business. However, as she freely admits she cannot control the outcome of the negotiations. Parliament is highly likely to approve any deal because the alternative will be a chaotic BREXIT.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

2. OUR OWN LAWS

 WHAT SHE SAID

We will take back control of our laws and bring an end to the jurisdiction of the European Court of Justice in Britain. Because we will not truly left the EU if we are not in control of our own laws

CAN SHE DELIVER

 Adopting the 'take back control' slogan of the Leave campaign, Mrs May repeated her promise to end rule by EU rule and judges in Luxembourg and restore power to Parliament and domestic courts. Without this there is no Brexit. A firm red line

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

3 A UNITED KINGDOM

 WHAT SHE SAID

A stronger Britain demands that we strengthen the precious union between the four nations of the UK.

CAN SHE DELIVER

By consulting devolved administrations, Mrs May is seeking to reassure voters in the nations of the UK which didn't vote for Brexit that she is listening to their concerns, and avoid Nicola Sturgeon calling for a second independence vote.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

4. THE IRISH BORDER

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE will work to deliver a practical solution that allows the maintenance of the Common Travel Area with the Republic, while protecting the integrity of the United Kingdom's immigration system.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Both countries want to maintain the open border between Northern Ireland and the Republic without opening a back door into Britain. Likely to mean UK border checks at Irish ports and airports.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

5. CONTROL OF IMMIGRATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

The message from the public before and during the referendum campaign was clear: BREXIT must mean control of the number of people who come to Britain from Europe. And that is what we will deliver

CAN SHE DELIVER

Ending free movement is a  RED LINE, but Mrs May left open when it will end, what system will replace it and details of any transition deal. The PM wants highly skilled EU migrants, doctors and nurses, but will she compromise on unskilled migrants to get a better trade deal

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

 6.  EU NATIONALS AND BRITISH EXPATS

 

WHAT SHE SAID

We  want to guarantee the right of EU citizens who are already living here in Britain, and the rights of British nationals in other member states, as early as we can.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Likely to agreed early on, as long as the EU doesn't want to haggle. Last year Mrs May offered to settle on the rights of three million EU nationals in the UK, and 1.2million Brits on the continent in advance of formals talks- but Angela Merkel refused.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*
7.WORKER'S RIGHTS

 WHAT SHE SAID

Not only will the government protect the rights of workers' set out in European legislation, we will build on them.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May is determined to at least preserve protections for workers on low and middle incomes-many of whom voted for BREXIT. Could come under threat if there is no deal., and Britain slashes taxes and regulation to attract business.

DEAL OR NO DEAL? 3/5

*

8. TRADE WITH EUROPE

WHAT SHE SAID

As a priority, we will pursue a bold and ambitious free trade agreement with the EU. This should allow for the freest possible trade in goods and services. But I want to make it clear. It cannot mean membership of the single market

CAN SHE DELIVER

The crux of the negotiation. Britain will leave the single market, and with it EU laws and free movement. Instead Mrs May wants a tariff-free trade and customs agreement to stop goods being held up at ports. She ruled out ' vast contributions' to the EU budget, and the only money going to Brussels will be for particular programmes and agencies like Europol. Her huge gamble is to threaten to walk away if the EU attempts to punish Britain

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

9. GLOBAL TRADE

 WHAT SHE SAID

A global Britain must be free to strike trade agreements with countries outside the EU too. But I also want tariff-free trade with Europe and cross-border trade there to be as frictionless as possible.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants deals with non-EU countries including the US. That would be impossible from inside the customs union, which imposes a uniform tariff on all non-EU countries. It would also make trade Secretary Liam Fox's job redundant.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 4/5

*

10. SCIENCE AND INNOVATION

 WHAT SHE SAID

WE have a proud history of leading and supporting cutting -edge research and innovation. So we will also welcome agreement to continue to collaborate with our European partners on major science, research, and technology initiatives.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Unlikely to be an obstacle to any deal. Much collaboration between academics takes place outside formal EU structures and will continue unimpeded.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

11. CRIME AND TERRORISM

 WHAT SHE SAID

All of us in Europe face the challenge of cross-border crime, a deadly terrorist threat, and the dangers presented by hostile states.  All of us share interests and values in common, values we want to see projected around the world.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Security and intelligence cooperation and defence cooperation cannot be a formal bargaining chip, but without making it one, Mrs May reminds EU allies of Britain's importance as an ally in fighting terrorism and important status as a military power.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 5/5

*

12.  A SMOOTH EXIT

 WHAT SHE SAID

It is in no one's interests for there to be a cliff-edge for business or a threat to stability as we change from our existing relationship to a new partnership with the European Union.

CAN SHE DELIVER

Mrs May wants tranitional arrangements to smooth the process of leaving the EU with specific deals on budget contributions, immigration, trade and customs lasting different periods of time. Securing this as well as securing a final deal within two years is a huge task.

DEAL OR NO DEAL 3/5

*

[THERE IS EVERY LIKELIHOOD THAT OTHER EU MEMBER STATES WILL BE GREATLY ENCOURAGED BY BREXIT TO LEAVE THAT SOVIETISED-COLLECTIVIST-UNDEMOCRATIC SO-CALLED EUROPEAN UNION IN THE NEXT FEW YEARS WHICH SHOULD MAKE A NUMBER OF EU STATES TO CO-OPERATE FULLY WITH THE UK OR FACE THE CONSEQUENCES OF THEIR UNFRIENDLY ATTITUDE AT A LATER DATE.

AS THE GREAT PRIME MINISTER - WILLIAM PITT -  (1759-1806) ANNOUNCED IN NOVEMBER 9-1805 SHORTLY AFTER  NELSON'S VICTORY OVER THE FRENCH AND SPANISH FLEETS AT TRAFALGAR.

'England has saved herself by her exertions; and will, as I trust, save Europe by her example.'

The blueprint of a Free and Prosperous United Kingdom should be the blueprint of a future Free Europe and the world at large. Our past still lives in the hearts of FREE PEOPLES everywhere and soon we will rejoin that sacred past which we left over 43 years ago because of traitorous politicians and others who couldn't see the dangers ,for the gross lies and deceit in their path.

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 18-2017

H.F.1092 BREXIT NOW

 

 DAILY MAIL

COMMENT

FEBRUARY 2, 2017

 

AT LAST, IT IS ALL CLEAR FOR

 BREXIT'S

LIFT-OFF

 

YESTERDAY  was a HISTORIC DAY for OUR COUNTRY. BY a RESOUNDING MAJORITY of 384, the COMMONS swept away [our  past 45 years of tutelage within an undemocratic-unaccountable-unbearable-corrupt-expensive- strait-jacket Europe.]

 

THIS was a historic day for our country. At 7.30pm yesterday by a resounding majority of 384, the Commons swept away the last serious obstacle to freeing Britain from the chains that have bound us to an unelected, unaccountable Brussels for 45 YEARS.

True, we can still expect dirty tricks from the 114 who, to their shame, voted  against implementing the

PEOPLE'S WILL.

Of these , this newspaper will not waste ink on cursing SNP members, whose fantasies of SCOTLAND as an independent EU nation state gave them a spurious excuse for defying the UK majority.

AS for the rest, no criticism is too harsh for those Labour MPs who represent solidly Brexiteer constituencies, but voted to

REMAIN.

They deserve everything coming to them at the next election.

So, too, do the creeps who in 2015 backed the call for a binding referendum, but voted last night against implementing its result.

Among these, none can beat the monstrous hypocrisy of

NICK CLEGG

-that flip-flopping representative of the moneyed elite, suckled on the [thirsty] breast of Brussels.

IN 2008, it was he who led demands for an in/out referendum on Europe (as we demonstrate on the opposite page-

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

H F 1101-AT LONG LAST-FREEDOM AWAITS! 

 

 

DAILY MAIL

 

 

 

Leaving EU customs union could create 400,000 jobs in UK Pro ...

by James Slack

 

Tuesday, January 3,2017

BRITAIN will create almost 400,000 jobs if it

LEAVES THE EU's CUSTOM UNION,

pro-BREXIT

campaigners claimed last night.

Theresa May and senior ministers have hinted that some sectors of the BRITISH ECONOMY could look to STAY in the CUSTOMS UNION once the UK LEAVES...

 

 

[FOR THIS TO HAPPEN WOULD BE A BETRAYAL OF THE PRIME MINISTER'S FIRM UNEQUIVACAL STATEMENT THAT

 BREXIT

MEANS

BREXIT

 

 

Full article

 

JANUARY 3,2017

 

H.F.1118 FREEDOM AWAITS

 

DAILY MAIL

I fought heart and soul for

REMAIN.

by

 David Blunkett.

TUESDAY,FEBRUARY 21,2017

 

 

 

I fought heart and soul for Remain. But we Lords must NOT defy the PEOPLE'S WILL.

 

 

 

 

EXTRACT

Let us be clear. The debate which opened yesterday in the House of Lords is bigger simply that the issue of triggering Article 50 and beginning the arduous process of negotiating

BRITAIN'S WAY

 OUT OF THE

 EUROPEAN UNION

It is about understanding the mood of ordinary people towards political elites-not just in Britain but across

 EUROPE and AMERICA

*

Elites

The same trend is clear in America, where the election of Donald Trump as President was a resounding expression of dissatisfaction with the political status quo. Opinion polls in the run-up to elections across Europe this year show a similar pattern, with far-Right candidates leading in both Holland and France.

Last Friday, Tony Blair made a passionate and well-argued case for those who lost the referendum not to give up. He argued that Brexit was not 'inevitable', and called for pro-Europeans to 'rise up in defence of what we believe'.

His views were repeated in speeches yesterday in the House of Lords by some who felt that the referendum result was the wrong one.

But people have have had enough of

ELITES

telling them

WHAT TO DO...

 

*

 

Challenge
 

Given the expertise in the Lords, it is reasonable for the Upper House to consider or suggest amendments to the Bill before them.

It makes sense, foe example to reinforce the commitments in the Bill that have already been made in Parliament. Not least the right of Parliament to have a vote on the final

BREXIT PACKAGE

after it has negotiated with

EUROPEAN UNION.

 

It is not in any sense acceptable, however , to use the

DEBATE

to block

ARTICLE 50...

*

 

Ignored

I am sure common sense will prevail. Most members of the House of Lords recognise their delicate constitutional situation and even more delicate position

DEMOCRACY

faces in light of the alienation from the political process felt by so many.

As I said four weeks ago in the Lords, these wider considerations cannot and must not be ignored...

In other words, the issue of our place in Europe

HAS BEEN DECIDED

There is not going to be a second referendum...

But, if we believe

in

DEMOCRACY

It is the will of the People

and not

the predilections of those in positions of authority which must prevail.

*

 

 

Full article

 

 

FEBRUARY 21-2017

 

TUESDAY,FEBRUARY 21,2017

H.F1119 FREEDOM AWAITS

 
 
 

DAILY MAIL

 COMMENT:

SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 18,2017

 

Messianic Mr Blair is away with fairies

 

*

Messianic Mr Blair is

 

 

away with the fairies.

After a speech from a man who seems to have absolutely no self -knowledge, and which was dripping with messianic madness, the Mail had just one question to ask Tony Blair:

HAVE YOU TOTALLY AND UTTERLY

LOST THE PLOT.

Indeed, what other explanation is there for his frankly incendiary demand for Britons to 'rise up' after just eight months and reverse

THE GREATEST DEMOCRATIC EXERCISE IN THIS COUNTRY'S HISTORY.

What else but a descent into la-la-land explains our former prime minister's contemptible suggestion that voters had 'imperfect knowledge' about the true dangers of

BREXIT

when they choose

LEAVE?

Was he so busy hoovering up money from

DESPOTS

that he missed

PROJECT FEAR

Or does he simply believe voters are complete idiots?

Where was Mr Blair when, day by day, we were bombarded with doomsday predictions about

ECONOMIC COLLAPSE

SOARING INTEREST RATES...

SLUMPING HOUSE PRICES...

'an immediate shock' to the economy so dire it would require an

EMERGENCY BUDGET

All of it, we now know, was

FICTION

from

GEORGE OSBORNE

and his willing acolyte

MARK CARNEY

at the

BANK OF ENGLAND.

What else but delusion explains Mr Blair's demand that ministers now consider staying in a 'reformed' EU?

Has he forgotten how, after a whistle-stop tour to renegotiate our relationship-ended in

MISERABLE FAILURE?

Or that, in every crisis from

GREEK DEBT

to

REFUGEES,

the

EU-CORRUPT, UNACCOUNTABLE AND UNDEMOCRATIC

has proved itself impervious to

REFORM

*

Blair's speech reeked of contempt for ordinary voters. What he really means when he says Brexit 'isn't smart' is that anyone who voted that way-including intellectual giants such as the former Bank of England governor

MERVYN KING

-is utterly stupid.

He accuses LEAVE supporters of being 'ideologues', when he is an unrepentant

EUROFANATIC

who has never recanted his support for Britain joining the

EURO

But perhaps Mr Blair's greatest delusion is that he seems utterly unaware he is personally responsible for the disillusionment which drove great swathes of the public to vote

BREXIT.

With the help of his venal sidekick Alastair Campbell, he turned political lying into an art form and used it to take Britain  into a bloody and disastrous war that has cost

THOUSANDS OF LIVES.

Without a shred of democratic legitimacy, he threw open the doors to mass migration, placing huge strain on our

HOSPITALS

SCHOOLS

and

SOCIAL STRUCTURE.

This arch hypocrite twice promised a referendum on the EU and reneged both times.

Now he has the gall to demand the wishes of

17.4 MILLION VOTERS

BE REVERSED.

To the great credit of those on both sides of the debate, his arguments are falling entirely on deaf ears.  Polls show the vast majority of the public accepts the

REFERENDUM RESULT

and now wants ministers to get on with implementing it.

They also show just how spectacularly unpopular Mr Blair is, with fewer that one in five Remain voters viewing him in a positive light. And yet he persists with the notion that he could lead a new popular political movement against

BREXIT.

Thus messianic delusion morphs into megalomania.

The Mail confidently believes he won't succeed and that Britain has an exciting future outside the EU. As for Mr Blair, as much as this newspaper criticised him for it, perhaps he should go back to filling his boots by serving some of the world's nastiest autocrats.

Full article

 

*  *  *

SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 18, 2017

*

 

TONY BLAIR-THE HEIGHT OF HYPOCRISY ENLARGED

Brought forward from EDP FILE -2005/6

THE DEATH OF POLITICS

A TIME TO MAKE A STAND IS HERE

BLAIR'S THREE WARS DOOMED TO FAILURE

HOW President Blair CORRUPTS EVERYTHING HE TOUCHES

TRAITOR BLAIR PUTS UP TWO FINGERS TO THE BRITISH PEOPLE

BLAIR- GOLDSMITH -SCARLETT AND OTHERS-A CABAL OF TREASON

WARNING OF OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON IN 1996-EURO DOOMED TO FAILURE

IMPEACH BLAIR FOR MISLEADING US OVER IRAQ WAR-SAYS GENERAL SIR MICHAEL ROSE [2006]

BUSH AND BLAIR START A WAR FOR POWER AND OIL AND TO RESTRICT THE FREEDOM OF THE PEOPLE [2006]

ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY- CORRECT BLAIRDOM

[A VIEW OF A FEW BULLETINS OUT OF OVER 2,000 SINCE 2003 WITH THE GREATER MAJORITY FROM WRITERS OF THE DAILY MAIL.]

 *  *  *

 

H.F.1115 FREEDOM AWAITS.

 

 

 

 

 

 

he was accused of being 'stupid or racist' for even considering a vote to leave the
EU. ... have lost touch', adding: 'Why they were created in the first place no longer
seems relevant, and it's more difficult to see what each party stands for.'.

 

 

 

From grammar boy to grandee

Mervyn King served as the Governor of the Bank of England from 2003 to 2013. The 68-year-old attended Wolverhampton Grammar school before going on to study economics at Cambridge and Harvard. He became a professor at the London School of Economics in 1984.

In1990 he joined the Bank of England as a non-executive director and was appointed Governor in 2003.

He married his wife Barbara Melander, a Finnish interior-designer, in 2007 at a private ceremony in Helsinki.

In July 2013 he was made a life peer for contributions to public service.

 

Full article

 

 

DEMOCRACY AND REPRESENTATION

'... The people  must recognize that, even when they do not know what it is, there is a community of effort and satisfaction which binds them together, whether it is embodied in a language or in a common love of the land or even in a fiction or a mythology.   It must be something which if threatened will enable them to close ranks against a common enemy and to postpone domestic differences until the national menace has been defeated or removed.

i.e. LEAVE THE EU

This  idea of unity is that which makes a people, and without which a State is merely artificial and represents no permanent element in human history. It is this idea of unity which the statesman must interpret, leading the people to recognize themselves as

ONE PEOPLE

and to subordinate their differences to their

UNITY.

So only can they govern themselves. Otherwise there will be a section of governors and a section - or many sections-of subjects and no true State.. Historically, this position is illustrated by all the nationalisms of the nineteenth century. They represent a spirit of unity brought to self-consciousness by the intrusion of a foreign body.  They are not always rational. Sometimes they occur in what might almost be called the unemployables amongst nations, the nations who cannot preserve their self-respect without keeping others at a distance, who cannot work with others, and are in some instances unable to maintain their own unity except in active opposition to their neighbours. But sometimes they represent a genuine popular reaction and, as in the case of Italy [Again in 2017] substitute their claim to independent national Sovereignty.  But these are always questions of historical fact.  Their interest for us is principally that they illustrate the community of will and purpose which the representative must interpret, and which really constitute a

PEOPLE

*

Pages181 & 182 CH. vi

DEMOCRACY AND REPRESENTATION

THE PRINCIPLES OF POLITICS

By

A. R. LORD, M.A.

1926

*

'Public opinion is the proper protection of public liberties.'

EDMUND BURKE

Those who look to their own selfish needs instead of supporting the freedom from slavery of the common wealm deserve outlawry from the soon free Kingdom of England.

H.F.1111 FREEDOM AWAITS

 

DAILY MAIL

COMMENT:

Wednesday, February 15,2017

Keep trendy politics away

from

 pulpit ...

HOW DEEPLY depressing that the Archbishop of Canterbury has added his voice to the chorus of luvvies wailing against

BREXIT and Donald Trump

We have grown used to such posturing from millionaires at the Baftas and Oscars parading

LEFT-WING

consciences before sweeping off in limousines, clutching

£160.000 goodie bags.

But why does the chief clergyman of the

CHURCH OF ENGLAND

feel impelled to join them in the political arena, bandying about words such as

'POPULIST'

and even

'FASCIST'

to insult anyone who challenges the

LIBERAL ORTHODOXY.

For Justin Welby's information, millions voted

LEAVE

without a trace of racism or ill-feeling towards fellow men.  They included churchgoing Anglicans-and many who fought fascism in the war.

Yes, they wanted stronger border controls to ease the strain on public services and protect

NATIONAL SECURITY. BUT WHAT'S SO WRONG ABOUT THAT?

They were motivated, too, by a belief in Britain's ability to prosper in the world beyond the EU.

And every man and women among them believed in

VOTER'S DEMOCRATIC RIGHT

denied by

BRUSSELS

to elect and sack their rulers (an option unavailable under fascist regimes!)

Indeed, this paper sees nothing in the

BREXIT AGENDA

to warrant such crass and offensive condemnation from the pulpit.

As for Mr Trump, true, he is deeply flawed-though you might think a

CHURCHMAN

would at least approve of his crackdown on

MASS ABORTION

and support for

CHRISTIANS

in the

MIDDLE EAST.

But what business is it of the Archbishop to condemn the choice of

63,000,000

AMERICANS

or bracket them with supporters of

EUROPEAN NEO FASCISTS?

In an increasingly Godless Britain of emptying pews, family breakdown, selfishness, greed and shallow celebrity you might think Mr Welby had enough to concern him without dabbling in fashionable politics-thus further dividing a CHURCH already torn apart by its obsession with gay rights.

If he wanted to PREACH right-on LIBERALISM, he should have stood alongside NICK CLEGG for PARLIAMENT.

*

Full article

*

[It is often stated that the job maketh the man which could very well be true with Donald Trump but alas in the case of Mr Welby as they say you can't fit a square hole into a circle.]

[COMMENT IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

Wednesday, February 15,2017

 

H.F.1116 FREEDOM AWAITS

 
 

 

 DAILY MAIL

 

-To link those who voted Brexit to fascism is appalling (and historically illiterate ) ARCHBISHOP WELBY by Christopher Hart

FEBRUARY 15,2017

 

 

To link those who voted Brexit to fascism is appalling (and historically illiterate),ARCHBISHOP WELBY.

 

 

EXTRACT

The Archbishop of Canterbury has once again raised eyebrows with his political opinions. Addressing the General Synod- the Church of England's annual talking shop-he crassly linked

BREXIT

 with what he calls 'the fascist tradition'.

The most Reverend Justin Welby observed: 'There care a thousand ways to explain the Brexit vote or the election of President Trump or the strength in the polls in Holland of Geert Wilders or in France of Madame Le Pen (popular far right leaders in each country) and many other leaders in nationalist, populist or even fascist traditions of politics.'

Implying in this roundabout way that the ordinary decent people who voted for Brexit are somehow marked or tainted by traces of 'fascism' is an appalling ill considered move.

The Archbishop is reckoned an intelligent and well-meaning man, but here, he has revealed something alarming about the way in which he sees the world. Indeed, in their contempt for a

DEMOCRATIC RESULT

and their attempts to do everything to

THWART IT,

it's the

REMOANERS

who might be said to share the

'FASCIST TRADITION'

And, of course, I accept that Remainers are not closet fascist or Nazis-and neither are Brexit voters.

In the same speech in which he made this silly assertion, the Archbishop also lamented:

'The language of public life at present is deeply, savagely divided and may become worse.'

[Well! Archbishop - you have not shown Christian example by entering the debate at this same level?]

 

Divisive

  He's right about this. The language of public life has, particularly from the

REMAINERS

become more aggressive, less civil-although this is arguably because there are suddenly such huge issues at stake, after decades of rather sleepy consensus and drift.

But isn't casually describing

BREXIT VOTERS

as being in the same bracket as

'FASCISM'

in itself deeply savagely divisive, not to mention

TOTALLY UNTRUE?

Indeed, it is an historically absurd contention. Many of those who voted

BREXIT

were voting for

BRITISH SELF-DETERMINATION

and

DEMOCRACY,

thus upholding the principles so dear to those who fought

AGAINST FASCISM

in

WORLD WAR II

What is more, our parents' and grandparents' 'traditional' views to borrow Welby's language, left them instinctively suspicious of government by diktat from

UNELECTED APPARATCHIKS

such as the

EUROPEAN COMMISSION

in

BRUSSELS.

Now for the Archbishop, rejecting these unelected apparatchiks makes 

BREXIT SUPPORTERS

guilty of a complicity with a

'FASCIST TRADITION'

NOTHING COULD BE FURTHER FROM THE TRUTH

The writer George Orwell was a committed socialist who, unlike so many on theLEFT today, really did understand and love his fellow countrymen.

In 1941, at close to the darkest hour in the war, he wrote bluntly:

What has kept England on its feet during the past year?

In part, no doubt, some vague idea about a

BETTER FUTURE

but chiefly the atavistic emotion of

PATRIOTISM

'For the last 20 years, the main object of the English Left-wing intellectuals has been to break this feeling

DOWN

and if they had succeeded, we might be watching the SS men patrolling the London streets at this moment.

Orwell, in other words, understood that

PATRIOTISM and NATIONAL PRIDE

-the very qualities that underpinned

BREXIT

were also the principle bulwarks against fascism during WORLD WAR II...

*

Oblivious

 

...In marked contrast to Archbishop Welby , his predecessor, Archbishop George Carey has spoken perceptively about how the current resurgence of

NATIONAL FEELING

IN THE

WEST

might be viewed.

Crucially, perhaps, Carey's own origins are more humble than Welby's.  He was born in the East End of London, went to a secondary modern in Barking and started work for the London Electricity Board.

Is this why he shows a better understanding of the British people and

THEIR BREXIT VOTE?

Welby, on the other  hand, was educated at Eton and Cambridge and has any number of grand family connections, including the

DUKES of RICHMOND.

As Mervyn King, the former governor of the Bank of England, observed last week, the distain the

ESTABLISHMENT

 showed for those worried about the

[UNDEMOCRATIC-UNACCOUNTABLE-CORRUPT-GODLESS]

EU

encouraged many

TO VOTE TO LEAVE.

...

 

[TO BE CONTINUED]

 

*

Sneering

Instead of standing out as a leader willing to question the status quo, Welby's views chime perfectly with those of the Liberal establishment in

Academia, the BBC and Whitehall

Yet as

 Archbishop of Canterbury

rather than sneering and making offensive comparisons with fascists, should he not be making a more considered attempt to understand what motivates

BREXIT VOTERS?

The intense levels of disillusionment with the

POLITICAL CLASS

the longing for a sense of

IDENTITY

in a world that is changing too rapidly for

SOCIAL COHESION

the mass movement of peoples to our country that doesn't seem so exciting and diverse (as some bill it) as

DESTABILISING AND DIVERSE.

To suggest that these views are of a 'fascist tradition' is to grasp for the hysterical  terminology of the keyboard zealots of Facebook and Twitter, their shallow language of labelling and insult.

It is frankly, profoundly unworthy of the leader of the

CHURCH OF ENGLAND.

*  *  *

 

Full article

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

H.F.1097 FREEDOM NOW

 

 

Understanding Easter- a part of our Christian cultural force which has made us what we are.

*

Christianity is more than a Religion it is the main cultural force, which makes us what we are.

 *

The Individual is the backbone of Christianity

*

Christianity, The People, and Ethics.

The Importance of the Christian Faith, which is written into the Constitutions of a number of European Nations.

*

A Defence of Christianity by a once militant agnostic who became a champion of the Parish Churches of England.

 

*

Who CARES about MORALITY?

*

Our Christian Festival of Easter which many know so little and some none.

 *

 

 ALFRED CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH

 

MARCH 21 -2008

 

*          *          *

 

AND

FOR FURTHER STUDIES

 

 

 

Daily MaiL on SUNDAY

 

Why don't we teach migrants we are a

CHRISTIAN COUNTRY.

by LORD CAREY

 FORMER ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY.. -

 

...I believe we should include Christianity in citizen tests for all those who want to come to this country. There are many questions aked of migrants about the Royal Family and Parliament, but little about the Church of England or Britain's Christian history.

And it is vital that the Government itself does its homework better. Politicians and advisers would do well to remember the contribution of Christianity to our life, and not just our 'holy-days' and celebrations.

In coordination with religious leaders, some thought should be given to special training in religious literacy for at least some judges, Ministers and senior servants who deal directly with religious communities-their freedom and equalities.

It is preposterous yet dangerous state of affairs when Christmas cards are considered offensive, or the Cross is banned because it is thought divisive. Yet this is the world we live in.

We should rejoice in our Christian identity as a nation and celebrate it. Ordinary British people are not drifting away from the Christian Faith- look at the packed church carol services up and down the country.

'Peace on earth and goodwill towards men'

 may be the song of angels, but it should also be the aim of all of us to build a nation where we are secure in our own faith and welcome others.

 

Full article

 

 

 

 

H.F.1073BREXIT NOW

 

 

 

Why I as a Christian believe we Must-

banish evil British jihadis from these shores-

Says former-Archbishop-Canterbury.

1. Lord Carey wants those involved in terrorism to lose their passports

[2.WE have not included item 2 as it is strongly contradicted (*) below]

 3.Muslim communities are being pressured to discipline their young

by Lord Carey forMAIL ON SUNDAY

EXTRACT

(*)...By embracing multiculturalism and the idea that every culture and belief is of equal value

WE HAVE BETRAYED OUR OWN TRADITIONS

of welcoming strangers to

OUR SHORE..

The strangers we welcome were attracted to

OUR WAY OF LIFE

and

DEMOCRATIC TRADITIONS.

They were escaping

TOTALITARIANISM

and

RELIGIOUS PERSECUTION

and  wanted to come to a country where there was

FREEDOM OF RELIGION

and separation of the power of

CHURCH

STATE

and

JUDICIARY

They also came to one of the only countries in Europe where there was an

ESTABLISHED CHURCH.

The establishment of the Church didn't mean other

BELIEFS

were not welcome but it did offer hospitality for a range of diverse beliefs...

This year we are reminded by the commemoration of

TWO WORLD WARS

that the

VALUES

of our

DEMOCRATIC TRADITIONS

are

PRECIOUS

Our fathers and grandfathers-including many thousands of Muslims from around the

Commonwealth

Fought against

TOTALITARISM

for the survival of DEMOCRATIC VIRTUES.

The bloody advance of IS is a reminder that

TOTALITARISM

 Is far from

DEAD

OUR FIGHT CONTINUES.

 

More!

 

 

Multiculuralism is no longer right for Britain by CRE Head Trevor Phillips [IT NEVER WAS.]

Christianity is more than a Religion it is the main cultural force which makes us what we are.

immigration flood'fuelling more hostility

Muliticulturalism: not only a fraud-but also DANGEROUS!

OUR PAST is embedded in our NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS-It asks-WERE WE CAME FROM and WHO WE ARE.

.

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

AUGUST 24 19-2014

H F 228

 

 
 

Why I as a Christian believe we Must-

banish evil British jihadis from these shores-

Says former-Archbishop-Canterbury.

1. Lord Carey wants those involved in terrorism to lose their passports

[2.WE have not included item 2 as it is strongly contradicted (*) below]

 3.Muslim communities are being pressured to discipline their young

by Lord Carey forMAIL ON SUNDAY

EXTRACT

(*)...By embracing multiculturalism and the idea that every culture and belief is of equal value

WE HAVE BETRAYED OUR OWN TRADITIONS

of welcoming strangers to

OUR SHORE..

The strangers we welcome were attracted to

OUR WAY OF LIFE

and

DEMOCRATIC TRADITIONS.

They were escaping

TOTALITARIANISM

and

RELIGIOUS PERSECUTION

and  wanted to come to a country where there was

FREEDOM OF RELIGION

and separation of the power of

CHURCH

STATE

and

JUDICIARY

They also came to one of the only countries in Europe where there was an

ESTABLISHED CHURCH.

The establishment of the Church didn't mean other

BELIEFS

were not welcome but it did offer hospitality for a range of diverse beliefs...

This year we are reminded by the commemoration of

TWO WORLD WARS

that the

VALUES

of our

DEMOCRATIC TRADITIONS

are

PRECIOUS

Our fathers and grandfathers-including many thousands of Muslims from around the

Commonwealth

Fought against

TOTALITARISM

for the survival of DEMOCRATIC VIRTUES.

The bloody advance of IS is a reminder that

TOTALITARISM

 Is far from

DEAD

OUR FIGHT CONTINUES.

 

More!

 

 

Multiculuralism is no longer right for Britain by CRE Head Trevor Phillips [IT NEVER WAS.]

Christianity is more than a Religion it is the main cultural force which makes us what we are.

immigration flood'fuelling more hostility

Muliticulturalism: not only a fraud-but also DANGEROUS!

OUR PAST is embedded in our NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS-It asks-WERE WE CAME FROM and WHO WE ARE.

.

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

AUGUST 24 -2014

H F 228

 

 

 

     

    Spare a thought for our poor

     

     

     

     judges!

     

     

     

     

    They

     

     

    moan they're ...

     

     

     

     

    By

     

     

    Steve Doughty

    They moan they're underpaid and unappreciated (despite enjoying

    six-figure salaries)

    THE majority of judges think they are unappreciated and underpaid, an official report

     said yesterday...

     

    The survey was carried out in June and July last year, four months before the

    decision of Lord Thomas and High Court colleagues to disrupt the BREXIT process

    by ordering that  Parliament must vote on Article 50-an intervention that provoked

    widespread controversy.

    The survey followed growing political acrimony over

    apparent willingness of the

    [mainly EU minded and controlled judges]

     

    courts routinely to overturn ministerial

    decisions, especially in cases involving

    IMMIGRATION

    ASYLUM

    the detention of terror suspects and the deportation of

    criminals.

    [Well! ,we have the Human Rights Act of 1998 courtesy

    of

    war-monger Tony Blair to blame for this stupid and

     dangerous situation.]

    ...Dr David Green, a criminologist who is director of the Civitas think-tank, compared

     the judges to the Aslef train drivers union. 'there is a blend of victim-hood and

    aggression on display,' he said

    'They may feel underpaid by comparison with what lawyers exploiting no-win no fee

     and conditional fee arrangements can get. They should be comparing themselves

     with a typical salary for someone in a responsible job.

    'We have seen in the

    SUPREME COURT

    ruling on

    BREXIT

    that

     

    MOST OF THE JUSTICES

     

     

    were acting as

     

    POLITICAL USURPERS

     

     

    For judges now to act in a way to increase their pay is not

     

     

    compatible with being seen as acting in the

     

     

    SPIRIT OF JUSTICE

     

     

    IF THEY THINK THIS IS GOING TO IMPROVE

     

     

    THE WAY THEY ARE REGARDED BY THE

     

    PUBLIC

     

     

    THEY ARE MAKING A

     

     

    [ BIG ]

     

     

    MISTAKE.

     

    Full article

     

    *

    Is the EU undemocratic? | World news | The Guardian

    *

    The Undemocratic EU Explained - It Will Never Change | The ...

    *

    Alfred Denning, Baron Denning - Wikiquote

    *

    [PDF] 

    The United Kingdom and Human Rights - College of

     

    Social ...

      PROFESSOR Lord McGregor of Durris. 1980 Constitutional ..... delivered at
     

    London University by Lord Denning and in a sense set the ... it—human

    rights
     

    discourse arose in a Western European context. .... godless gatherings of
     

    philosophers for the next two hundred ...... that the judiciary is

    undemocratic,
     

    unaccountable and.

    *

    [PDF] 

    Untitled - UCL

    (and the European Court of Human Rights) give effect to civil
     

    and political ...... that it is undemocratic for these unelected and

    unrepresentative
     

    individuals to ... determined by a democratically unaccountable panel of

    foreign


    judges, ..... Lord Denning once drew a distinction between two judicial

    extremes:.
    *

    july 23 freedom now-part 2-2016 - English Democratic Party

    Tory MPs yesterday hit out at plans for Britain to keep access to the EU ...

    OF THE
     

    CORRUPT-COLLECTIVIST- UNDEMOCRATIC EU WHICH DEVOURS ...... OF
     

    THE COLLECTIVIST-CORRUPT-UNACCOUNTABLE MAMMOTH BEAST IN ......
     

    and whose legislation, according to the late Lord Denning, a former Master

    of the...
     

    *

     

    *july 23-freedom now-2016 - English Democratic Party

    And the first British President of the European Commission in Brussels

    (Lord ......
     

    if they were in charge instead of the EU's unaccountable individuals who

    number
     

    in ..... and whose legislation, according to the late Lord Denning, a former

    Master
     

    ..... the Captive-Collectivist-Corrupt -Wasteful- Godless Undemocratic

    European
     

    *

    Major Issues Bulletin 30 - EDP English Democratic Party.

    1 Jan 2016 ... Albania is in course to join the European Union-alongside four

    other countries .....
     

    were in charge instead of the EU's unaccountable individuals who number

    in the
     

    .... as a COLLECTIVIST-CORRUPT -GODLESS-UNDEMOCRATIC ..... law'',

    and
     

    whose legislation, according to the late Lord Denning, a former ...
     

    Searches related to LORD DENNING AND THE UNDEMOCRATIC-UNACCOUNTABLE-GODLESS EU

    eu undemocratic examples

    eu unelected bureaucrats

    the eu is not democratic

    does the eu suffer from a democratic deficit

    undemocratic nature of the eu

    is the eu democratic essay

    european commission unelected

    eu undemocratic myth

    *

    [WE thank the unseen hands which have assisted the CAUSE for a

     

     FREE

     

    ENGLAND,

     

    since we commenced our bulletin file in 2003.]

     

    [COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

    FEBRUARY 10-2017

 

H.F.1112 FREEDOM AWAITS!

 

 

 

 

TREASON - A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS
  
 
By

PATRIOT and TRUTH SEEKER
  
 
NORRIS McWHIRTER

 

2003

 

[This was our No 15 bulletin in 2003-It clearly stated the case to be answered but it was ignored by the Courts.]

...Of all the magical and mysterious processes involved in Britain’s political integration with Europe, initiated by Macmillan and engineered by

HEATH

 from 31 July 1961 to17 October 1972, none is more remarkable than the absence of a single measure repealing any part of any of the four great Constitutional Statutes –

 MAGNA CARTA

of Edward 1, the Petition of Right (1627), the Bill of Rights (1688 ) and the Act of Settlement (1700). Perhaps Sir John Fiennes relied upon the doctrine of implied repeal, but certainly the electorate would have regarded express repeal as offending against the principle that nothing but their own demerit can deprive natural born subjects of their peculiar privileges, called their birthright, as enshrined in these hitherto durable constitutional bulwarks. 

  

 In Vauxhall Estates v. Liverpool Corporation 1932, it was established in law that “no Parliament may bind its successors” However, Article Q  of the timeless Maastricht Treaty said that the Treaty “is concluded for an unlimited period” and it conveyed no right or mechanism for secession. It is nonetheless arguable that what one Parliament has done , that same or some succeeding Parliament can undo. In Blackburn v.Attorney General 1983, Lord Justice Megarry, in his judgement declared:

   

“As a matter of  law, the Courts of England recognize Parliament as being omnipotent in all save the power to destroy its omnipotence.”  

   

From the European Court of Luxembourg in 1972, the very year in which Parliament, at least temporarily, voted away its sovereignty in such large measure, came an unappealable judgement on the Treaty of Rome:

   

“The treaty entails a definitive limitation of the sovereign rights of member states against which no provisions of municipal law whatever their nature can be involved.”

    It was in reference to this Court that Sir Patrick Neill QC, former Warden of All Souls College, Oxford, coined the maxim;

 

“ A court with a mission is a menace; a supreme Court with a mission is a tyranny.”

 [THOSE JUDGES WHO PERMITTED THE EU TREATIES TO PASS THOUGH KNOWING THAT LIES AND DECEIT WERE USED BY THE GOVERNMENT OF THE DAY WHICH MADE THE TREATIES

NULL AND VOID

UNDER THE 1996 VIENNA CONVENTION ON  THE LAW OF TREATIES  SHOULD BE TRIED FOR TREASON. FORTUNATELY FOR THEM WE HAD A REFERENDUM INSTEAD OF A CIVIL WAR  AS IN CROMWELL'S DAY  WOULD KNOW HOW TO DEAL WITH TRAITORS. IN THAT CONFLICT THE COUNTRY WAS DIVIDED AS IN JUNE 23-2016.]

The phrase was incorporated into the recent Euro-sceptic speech by the Home Secretary. (1996)

   Those who see th erosion of British self –government (in defence of the 1,250,000 Britons died in the first half of this century) as emanating from the single Oxford college of Balliol, will be dubbed ‘ conspiracy theorists’. But the precise legal definition of a conspiracy is that it is an agreement between

 

 

 unrelated in marriage, to behave in a manner that will automatically constitute an offence by at least one of them, though mens rea (guilty mind) is required by at least two co-conspirators. There is nothing theoretical about the way in which the Privy Counsellor’s oath, which enjoined two Balliol educated Prime Ministers,

Macmillan and Heath.

And the first British President of the European Commission in Brussels (Lord Jenkins of Hillhead, also a  Balliol man!):

    “To bear and allegiance to the Crown and to defend its jurisdiction and powers against all foreign .   .   . persons .   .   . or states.”

  

 has been breached by these men.

 

  What is further demoralizing is that no less than six subsequent Privy Counsellor’s, following the precedent of Lord Jenkins in 1975, have each made a solemn declaration before the Luxembourg Court as European Commissioners:

   

“To perform my duties in complete independence in the general interest of the communities; in carrying out my duties”.

  

This conflict of solemn undertaking can only mildly be described as duplicitous.

    Unconstitutionality in the headlong dash to create the new European Superstate is hardly confined to Britain. The Dutch draftsmen of the Maastricht Treaty included a stipulation in Article R that each and every country must ratify it “according

to its own constitution requirements”.  Having got it ` wrong’ the first time, Denmark`s second referendum raised several studiously unanswered constitutional questions . No case was , however, more stark than the case of Germany herself. She has a unique Federal Constitutional Court, the Bundesverfassungsgericht, with nine judges sitting in Karksruhe to guard their Constitution.

   

The creation of the European Union and Britain`s continued self-governance was dependent on the verdict of this Court for , on 11 October 1993 , Germany`s instrument of ratification was still undeposited in Rome. Without this twelfth and last document (the other 11 EU countries having ratified the Maastricht Treaty) the EU could not come into being. It transpired however that the terms approved by this supreme German national Court to permit ratification, were miles wide of the terms of the Treaty already signed by the German Government and the eleven other nations.

    For instance, the Court declared:

   

“Article F does not empower the (European) Union to procure the financial means or other means it deems necessary to fulfil its purposes.”

   

Yet that is precisely what Article F does say in the following words:

  

 “ The Union shall provide itself with the resources necessary to attain its objectives and carry out its policies.”

    Following a question in the House of Lords, Baroness Chalker, Minister of State in the Foreign Office, confirmed that indeed the European Union “can obtain financial resources to attain the Union`s  objectives.”        

 

  In another area the Karksruhe Court calmly took for Germany an unnegotiated opt-out from the European Monetary Union (EMU) -  something for which both Denmark and the United Kingdom had to negotiate by special protocol prior to signing. Both the Governors of the Bank of England and the Danish Central Bank have confirmed that there was and is no opt-out provision for Germany in the Treaty. The fact that the terms and conditions of the Maastricht Treaty, as approved by their Constitutional Court, simply do not exist. Hence Germany`s rapid ratification was in clear breach of Article R of the Treaty itself. Since its ratification was invalid, the Maastricht Treaty itself has no proper legal standing.

   

Though earlier this year (1996) our Foreign Office made a legal assessment of the Treaty, it has not publicly disclosed the obvious and only conclusion. Perhaps we are waiting either until the going gets rougher or some wealthy corporation litigates to prove that some swingeing Brussels penalty is in fact unenforceable.

  

 No sovereign state can survive without the concepts of allegiance and of breaches of allegiance being treasonable.

   

Can a European Superstate survive without such internal defences? The answer must assuredly be that where solidarity is more, rather than less, fragile and tenuous, the as yet unfamiliar concept of Euro-treason will eventually be vigorously advanced. There does not appear to be any ready instrument for enforcement at the moment (1996) it is not however hard to predict that the draconian powers of the Luxembourg Court will soon bring the concept of Euro-treason into focus. We are told that the Europol is intended for apprehending cross-border criminals within the Union. But the beef crisis, the United Kingdom was about to acquiesce in its creation. Perhaps a fortuitous blow for freedom has been struck and magazine articles such as this will be safe from a Europol for a little longer.

    Bully for beef.

 FULL ARTICLE

 

 

UNDER

MAGNA CARTA

 IT IS LAWFUL FOR ENGLISHMEN TO TAKE UP ARMS TO FIGHT FOR THE PROTECTION OF THEIR INHERITED

"Rights and Liberties

of

Englishmen"

*          *          *

 

[IT APPEARS WE NO LESS NEED NEW CITIZENS TO SIGN A DECLARATION OF INTENT TO INTEGRATE  - WE IT SEEMS ALSO NEED EVERYONE WHO VOTED TO STAY IN THE UNDEMOCRATIC-UNACCOUNTABLE- CORRUPT-WASTEFUL-GODLESS EU TO PROTECT IN FUTURE THEIR AND THEIR FELLOW CITIZENS PRICELESS ENGLISH CONSTITUTION.

ENGLISH FREEDOM CANNOT  EVER AGAIN BE DISCARDED AS IT IS INCUMBENT ON ENGLISHMEN TO RETAIN THEIR INHERITED RIGHTS AS NOT TO DO SO PLACES THE SECURITY OF THE RIGHTS OF OTHER PATRIOTIC ENGLISHMEN AT RISK, AS HAPPENED IN 1972 AND ALMOST AGAIN IN 2016. THERE IS ALSO THE MATTER OF PASSING ON TO FUTURE GENERATIONS THAT WHICH WE HOLD DEAR TO OUR HEARTS.

FORTUNATELY,IT WAS THE

 SHIRES OF ENGLAND

 WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE CENTRAL BLOT ON THE LANDSCAPE

 WARWICK

WHICH DEFIED ITS HISTORICAL PLACE IN HISTORY AND BY A MAJORITY WISHED TO REMAIN IN THE UNDEMOCRATIC-UNACCOUNTABLE-CORRUPT-GODLESS EU. THERE WAS ALSO LONDON WITH ITS MANY MILLIONS OF NEWCOMERS FROM AROUND THE WORLD WHO IN THE MAIN HAVE NO RESPECT OR LOYALTY TO ENGLISH TRADITIONS.

WE ALSO HAVE MILLIONS OF THOSE OF ANOTHER CULTURE OF WHICH IT IS ESTIMATED ALMOST

2,000,000

WILL NEVER INTEGRATE

AS WE HAVE SAID SO MANY TIMES , WE ARE AT A LOSS TO UNDERSTAND HOW ANY CITIZEN OF OUR COUNTRY OF ENGLAND COULD GIVE AWAY THOSE IMMEMORIAL RIGHTS WHICH BELONG TO EVERYONE IN OUR ISLAND HOME WHICH ARE SO RESPECTED AND PROTECTED IN MORE THAN HALF THE WORLD.]

'Slavery they can have anywhere. It is a weed that grows in every soil.'

EDMUND BURKE

(As we already know over the past 44 years)

 

...We cannot, I fear, falsify the pedigree of the fierce people, and persuade them that they are not sprung from a nation in whose veins the blood of freedom circulates.  The language in which they would hear you tell them this tale would detect the imposition; your speech would betray you

'An Englishman is the unfittest person on earth, to argue another Englishman into slavery'.

*

 

EDMUND BURKE

 

Conciliation with America-speech House of Commons

March 22,1775

 

*

1+2

 

A REMINDER FROM 2003

 

BRITAIN AND EUROPE

 

We are still finding 8 months after BREXIT that those who voted to remain in the EU are still complaining about the affect it will have on them rather than accept the result  of the REFERENDUM and the majority decision to reclaim their over 800 year inherited English Constitution and all that it since entails for

 THEIR FREEDOM-THEIR LAW and THEIR CUSTOM

 for  which millions of subjects have given their lives since - particularly in the TWO WORLD WARS.  The EU did not keep the PEACE in captive EUROPE-it was NATO. In fact is was

GERMANY

 itself which created tension in Croatia and elsewhere. And as we have all seen since

BREXIT

 the patriotic people across the soon reclaimed English Channel are in REVOLT against the monstrous Orwellian EU elite and their close friends the  GLOBALISTS and we now see a rapidly

GATHERING STORM

of protest and demand to reclaim their own once

 FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATES

accountable to the

PEOPLE.

 AS we have previously stated when a country is at war to defend its

 COUNTRY-CONSTITUTION-CUSTOM

the PEOPLE suffer HARDSHIP as many still with us today experienced in the SECOND WORLD WAR and one would have expected that those

 REMAINERS

 would have understood and accepted the situation instead of continuing complaining of their PERSONAL LOSS of WHATEVER KIND.

As has been stated over the years

 

'The World is our Oyster.'

This England never did, nor never shall,/Lie at the proud foot of a conqueror,/ But when it first did help to wound itself:/ Now these her princes are come home again,/ Come the three corners of the world in arms,/ And we shall shock them, Nought shall make us rue/ If ENGLAND to itself do rest but true. [vv.vii.112]

Shakespeare

 

.F. 1113 FREEDOM AWAITS!

 

 

Daily Mail

 

 

- OUT OF ORDER, MR SPEAKER! -

 by

Daniel Martin-Chief Political Correspondent

 

 

 

 

 

 

OUT OF ORDER-MR SPEAKER!

 

 

 

 

QUENTIN LETTS -YESTERDAY IN PARLIAMENT

 

 

Ka-bound Bercow boils over with self important outburst

 

DAILY MAIL-QUENTIN LETTS-YESTERDAY IN PARLIAMENT-Ka-boom! Bercow boils over with self important outburst when he attacked Donald Trump-strongley opposed to Trump's address to Parliament.

 

JOHN Bercow, who has been in a particular mood since early January, exploded messily all over the Commons yesterday when he attacked Donald Trump.

As so often with Bercow, the red mist came down and he let loose a volley of self-important rudeness about how he wouldn't dream of inviting that Trump man to Westminster because (in so many words) heawas a racist, sexist and didn't believe in equality and an independent judiciary. That last bit was aimed at the Tory benches with a glower.

The outburst so delighted the Opposition benches that the Scots Nats starting clapping. Conservative Members looked daggers. Mr Bercow, who had plainly enjoyed his sally greatly quickly swept out of the Chamber, librarian-style robes swirling in his wake. Nurse! A cold compress for his boiling brow!

Some context. Moments earlier the Speaker had been challenged by a couple of Tory buffers about an edict at the start of the day when he announced that Commons clerks would no longer have to wear wigs and court dress. This being done to make the house less stuffy and forbidding'.

Given this assault on fripperies, we must hope the Speaker will immediately surrender his ornate grace-and-favour house on the parliamentary estate, as that is also plainly a ridiculous throwback to a twirlier age.

Will the Speaker' pretty-calved young page-his trainbearer, I believe-also be removed from his old-fashioned knickerbockers and ruff collar? Will the mace be flogged off on eBay? Will Members be told they no longer need to bow to the chair?

Let moderation sweep through the place like a dose of gyppy, says I...

...

Full article

[... Unlike the Speaker of the Lords the Speaker of the Lower House ( House of Commons), who holds rank as the first commoner of the realm, can take no part in debates, and has no vote unless the numbers are equal, when he has a casting vote. The office, which is filled by a vote of the Commons subject to royal approbation, is of very ancient origin. That some spokesman was necessary from the first institution of Parliament is sufficiently obvious, but the position and title; of Speaker were only settled in 1377. But Henry of Keighley, who in 1301 bore the petition of the Lincoln Parliament to the royal presence; Sir William Trussell, who answered for the Commons in 1343, though not a member of the House itself; Sir Peter de la Mare, famous leader of the Good Parliament in 1376, who discharged the functions without the title, must all practically have been in much the same position as the later speaker,  But in 1376 the title is definitely given to Sir Thomas Hungerford, and from that date the list is complete.

SPEAKERS OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS

Sir Thomas Hungerford-1376

Sir Peter de la Mare-1377

Sir James Pekeryug - 1378

Sir John Gildersburgh -1380

Sir Richard de Waldsgrave - 1381

Sir John Pickering -1383

Sir John Bussy -1384

Sir John Cheyne -1399...

[The Speaker of the House of Commons at any one time is no doubt a window into the composition of that House and its true persona in the country. With much more care in its selection of such an important individual  needs a reserve in line with the reverence and great importance of the revered historic institution as the position must enhance the image and efficiency of that unique and long established democratic parliamentary body, without the office itself being a competitor of that COMMONS of ENGLAND ,so respected in the world at large, since its beginning on November 27, 1295 (apart from its earlier origin). ]

DICTIONARY OF ENGLISH HISTORY

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

 

 

 

 

 

Full article

 

H.F.1096 FREEDOM-AWAITS

 

 
 

DAILY MAIL

COMMENT

 

-PIPSQUEAK BERCOW IS AN EMBARRASSMENT

THIS time he has gone too far. Out of respect for his office, this column has long observed restraint in its criticism of the Commons Speaker. But by insulting the newly elected

PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

John Bercow has made it impossible to

MAINTAIN OUR SILENCE.

Indeed, this egotistical publicity -seeker has broken the most sacred rule of his job-that he should be scrupulously

NEUTRAL AND AT ALL TIMES SERVE THE HOUSE.

In banning Donald Trump from addressing

PARLIAMENT

without any authority from MPs or consultation with the LORDS, the exhibitionist Mr Bercow has set himself up as the

MASTER OF THE COMMONS

NOT ITS

SERVANT.

Eaten up by self-regard - and a lust for headlines, shared with his wife Sally- he has single-handedly created an ugly diplomatic incident, which threatens to undermine the work of the

 Prime Minister- Theresa May

in promoting

BRITAIN'S INTERESTS

and bringing the maverick President into line.

Leave aside Mr Bercow's hypocrisy in welcoming visitors from

TOTALITARIAN

North Korea and China while snubbing the elected representative of our

FREEDOM-LOVING ALLY

THE USA

Forget his lavish expenses claims and persistent bias against the Conservatives, whose far-Right he supported before his

CONVERSION TO POLITICAL CORRECTNESS.

It is time for the Speaker to accept that his love of the sound of his own voice is not shared by the House he purports to represent-or a public to whom he is frankly an

 EMBARRASSMENT.

By jeopardising the

SPECIAL RELATIONSHIP

in this way, this arrogant, self-promoting pipsqueak of a man has done a massive disservice to

HIS OFFICE AND HIS COUNTRY.

 

Full article

FEBRUARY 8-2017

 

 

A MAN CALLED PETER-THE STORY Of PETER MARSHALL

*

A SCOTSMAN WHO FILLED THE  CHAPLAINCY OF THE SENATE OF  THE USA.

 

We intend to show excepts from the book 'Compellingly told by much loved author Catherine Marshal -this is the story of her first husband Peter Marshall. It is an irresistible account of the love between a dynamic man and his GOD and the tender love between a husband and wife.

The life of Peter Marshall -'the story that had to be told'-recounts the triumph of a young Scottish immigrant who made his way from his homeland to the chaplaincy of the United States Senate.

Catherine's and Peter's life together in the hall's of highest human happiness', as Peter often referred to marriage, is related with love humour and immense wisdom.

'The best stories are those that really happen. None of the novels...written during the last few years touches the heart and appeals to the mind in the way that Catherine Marshall does in telling the story of her husbands life.'

Catherine Marshall was the author of numerous bestselling books, including Christy, Julie. The Helper, Beyond Our Selves and A Closer Walk.

The book A Man Called PETER has sold 2,000,000 copies

Hodder and Stoughton Ltd

338 Euston Road

London NWI 3 BH

1951

*

 

 

We commence our brief search of the life of a 

 A MAN CALLED PETER

with the Preface of the Book

Since Peter Marshall left us to be at home in our Father's house, I have often dreamed of him. But one dream was different from all the rest. It had the feel of reality about it

I dreamed that I was allowed to visit Peter briefly, to see him in his new setting. I found him working in a rose garden, surrounded by those perfect hybrid tea roses he always wanted to grow

.After a while, he said playfully, "I know perfectly well what you've been doing, Catherine. You're writing a book. Now, now  -no exposes! What you're doing to me shouldn't happen to a dog!"

Then in a more serious vein, "It's all right, Kate. Go ahead and write it. Tell it all, if it will prove to people that a man can love the Lord and not be a sissy..."

So, in the months since then I have written it. reliving and recording parts of the life that Peter and I shared has a joyous task. The presence of Christ has shed glory on even the hard-to-bear parts of it.

I hope that you will enjoy it, and that by the time you have come to the last page [332p], you will know that if God can do so much for a man called Peter, he can do as much for YOU .

C.M

Washington, D.C.

April 29, 1951.

 

[As we have stated we shall be revealing extracts of the publication and have decided to generally restrict our recording to just three of the 20 chapters in the book which is of 332 pages.]

Before we commence our journey of the life of a Man called Peter we wish to explain that it was a recent screening of the Fact-based drama

A MAN CALLED PETER

on FILM4

which prompted  this mission into the life of a Man of God.  The distinguished actor portraying Peter Marshal is Richard Todd of The Dambusters and The Longest Day and many other fine patriotic films since the Second World War. He was himself fighting at Pegasus Bridge a vital objective on D Day June 6-1944.

 

*

 

Chapter One

 

ABOVE TIME AND CIRCUMSTANCE

 

 

For ye shall go out with joy...and it shall be to the Lord for a name, for an everlasting sign that shall not be cut off. Isaiah 55:12-13

The morning was bleak and cold. A damp penetrating wind ruffled the steel-grey waters of the Potomac, chased bits of paper and debris down the broad roped- off expanse of Pennsylvania Avenue, and whistled around the dome of the Capital.

Everywhere Washington wore an air of expectancy. The hillocks of lumber, which had been piled for weeks along the Avenue, had finally been fashioned into grandstand and bleachers.  Every street corner was garnished with a navy blue of District policemen. The gray lampposts were decorated with small American flags and pictures of Truman and Barkley. Red, white, and blue bunting was everywhere.  In a few hours, forty thousand marchers and more than forty floats would form a column seven miles long in honour of the

PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES.

It was Inauguration Day , January 20, 1949.

Before the stately Capital building with it's wide-spreading wings, I sat with 120,000 other people on crudely  built benches watching the dignitaries taking their places on the special platform before us.

Radio, television, and motion -picture technicians scurried up and down their newly built platforms, adjusting and testing equipment. At twelve noon, the eyes and ears of most Americans would be centered on this scene.

I knew that in the old Senate Chamber, with it's plum-coloured leather seats and green-carpeted aisles, Peter Marshall, the Senate Chaplain, called by many a reporter the

"Conscience of the Senate"

was at that moment praying. His simple, sincere, down- to - earth prayers had been having an increasing profound effect on the Senators. But it was an intimate thing - not the kind of thing a man talks about readily.

 

I could picture the scene, as I had often seen it -the sudden hush, the way the men reverently dropped their heads as Peter prayed:

'God of our fathers in Whom we trust and by Whose guidance and grace this nation was born, bless the Senators of these United States at this important time in our history and give all things needful to the faithful discharge of their responsibilities.

We pray especially today for our President, and also for him who will preside over this chamber.

Give to them good health for the physical strains of their office, good judgment for the decisions they must make, wisdom beyond their own, and clear understanding for the problems of this difficult hour.

We thank Thee for their humble reliance upon Thee. May they go often to the throne of grace as we commend them both to Thy loving care and Thy guiding hand.

 Through Jesus Christ our Lord. AMEN.

Soon I spied Peter marching, hat in hand, with the Senators, into the seats provided for them to the left of the Inaugural stand.  he was between Senator Lucas and Senator Vandenberg. The expression on his face suggested he was particularly pleased about something.

From where I was sitting, I could see Peter and the Senators well enough to guess that much quiet camaraderie was going on in that section of the stand.

Peter had been Chaplain of the Senate for two years. he had not sought the job, nor wanted it at first.  In the beginning he had found it hard to believe that the Senators regarded his opening prayer as more than a necessary gesture.

Time and closer acquaintance between him and the men had changed that. The Senators were men of the world, not easily impressed with preachers. Yet Peter had earned their respect and the deep affection of the members on both sides of the aisle.

Elected by a Republican majority in 1947, he had been unanimously re-elected by the Democrats on December 31, 1948. On that day, Peter had telephoned me from the church office to tell me the news.  There was exultation in his voice.

"I'm glad, Catherine. At least it shows I convinced them that I have no politics."

The affection the Senators felt for their chaplain was reflected in the way Senator Arthur Vandenberg, who presided as president pro tempore of the Senate in the absence of the vice-[president, always called Peter "Dominie," the Dutch word for "Parson."

" To know Peter is to love him,"

Senator Vandenberg said.

"My chaplain is my intimate and priceless friend."

In deed many an astute observer on Capital Hill felt Senator Vandenberg's unobtrusive spiritual partnership with Peter Marshall had under-girded the increasing stature of his statesmanship, as he rose to become the architect of the

UNITED NATIONS

-and of America's first bipartisan foreign policy in many years.

On that Inauguration Day, the vista of an ever-growing and deepening ministry among all those men opened out before Peter.  long ago he had been

"tapped on the shoulder" by "the Chief"

-as he loved to call his lord.

Twenty-two years before he had landed at Ellis Island - an immigrant boy. God sent him into strange places to preach His message

It seemed to Peter that the old Senate Chamber was almost the strangest of all. Yet , there in the highest legislative hall in the nation, the Risen Christ and the wisdom of Almighty God were surely needed.  It thrilled Peter to have the chance to be Christ's representative in that PLACE.

The uncertain Washington sun broke through the heavy clouds as Harry S. Truman took the office as president of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

His left hand was resting on two bibles, a Gutenberg Bible and the White House Bible. His outstretched fingers covered passages from the Sermon on the Mount and the Ten Commandments as he intoned the solemn words:

"I do solemnly swear that I will faithfully execute the office of the President of the United States, and will defend the Constitution...."

The sky umbrella of planes was already forming for the Inaugural parade as I made my way through the crush of people to our parked car. It was quite a while before my husband joined me. his rugged face was beaming.

 

"Guess what, Catherine ,"

he said as he opened the car door. the joy of a small boy was in his voice.

"What? What's happened?"

"Senator Vandenberg called me 'Peter' today!"

It was a small thing. But it represented the outstretched hand of friendship -the open door to a man's heart.

A long and dramatic train of events had led Peter Marshall to that memorable day. The story has about it the feel of a Biblical saga; yet, it is a story of a modern man, a warmly human man.

As I write I see a procession of vivid mental pictures: A boy walking through a Scottish lane lined with rhododendron trying to hear God's call; a ship ploughing through the cold waters of the North Atlantic; a blast furnace in New Jersey; a boy on a train going south to Birmingham.  There are traces of wistfulness in the story, and a procession of the haunted hearts of men and women. There is much laughter -and sometimes a sob.

 

The story begins some thirty years ago in a grimy industrial city in Scotland.

[We shall touch on the first steps to his ministry at a later stage]

 

*          *         *

Soon to Follow

 

Excerpt from

 Chapter Nine

 

Washington - Opportunity Unlimited.

 

1937...

 

Peter's reputation as a "thrilling evangelical preacher" soon resulted in long lines of people waiting outside New York Avenue Church [Abraham Lincoln's Church] on a Sunday morning. Often four abreast, they were patient and cheerful about the wait. They hoped to be able to get into the sanctuary and find a seat. loud-speakers had to be installed in the Lincoln Chapel and the downstairs lecture room to handle the overflow crowds. When these rooms were filled, there was nothing left to do but turn would-be worshipers away.

*

 

[Font Altered -Bolding & Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets]

 

*

 

PART 2

MARCH/07

 

 

 

H.F.1107-FREEDOM-AWAITS

 

 

 

 QUENTIN LETTS:-

 

 

Special relationship?Forget it.

This vicious, small-minded, careerist martinet of a Speaker has to get something off his preening chest

 
EXTRACT

ONE of these two men is an unstable egomaniac with smallish hands and a trophy wife. The other is Donald Trump.

One is vain, scornful of convention and reacts to criticism with an intolerance so wild you (wrongly) think he must have had one shandy too many. The other is teetotal Donald Trump,

Given how much they have in common, it may seem odd that the House of Commons  Speaker John Bercow thinks so little of the

AMERICAN PRESIDENT.

But in his basic character John Bercow is a mini Donald.

He is as greedy for attention and has the same inflated self-regard.

HE BOILS WITH IT.

Worst of all, both men appear to calculate that maximum advantage can be had in politics by creating division and hatred.

When asked about her relationship with Trump, our stolid Prime Minister, Theresa May observed that opposites can attract. By the same measure people, people with the similar characters often repel one another, as is plainly the case

HERE.

Rant...

With his red-eyed rant, Speaker Bercow has done several things. He has plunged his high office into controversy and has created an international row which has probably damaged our prospects of doing a post-BREXIT trade deal with the

TRUMP WHITE HOUSE.

He may also have irked the

 QUEEN

who invited Mr Trump in the first place

and expects people at the top of our public life to show better manners to visiting

HEADS OF STATE.

Mr Bercow delighted one side of the Commons (his remarks won a round of applause from the

SCOTS NATS

and there was similar partisanship during proceedings yesterday.

Such creation of division along party lines is unhealthy for, if not deadly to, the supposedly

IMPARTIAL POST

OF

SPEAKER.

Most of all, Mr Bercow has secured himself publicly. He has even made it onto the TV news in

AMERICA.

This, for him, will be richly satisfying, possibly in a literal sense. For, due to step down next year, he may be on the hunt for a big international post. This weeks events may in some way have been a job application.

The greatest Speaker in history was William Lenthall, who occupied the Chair during the English Civil War.

Parliament was in open conflict with the Monarchy and Lenhall was a diplomatic and level-headed presence. Had the Speaker at that time been more excitable temperament the Civil War might have been even bloodier than it was.

It was Lenthall who blocked Charles 1 as he tried to enter the Commons with some heavies, demanding to know the whereabouts of some MPs who had criticised him.

He clearly intended those men harm. Lenthall, with dignity and bravery, knelt before the furious Monarch and said:

'May it please your Majesty, I have neither eyes to see nor tongue to speAk in this place but to direct me, whose servant I am here.'

That moment encapsulated not only the independence of the Commons from the Crown, but  also the limitations of the Speakership. Parliamentarians had their own power; the Speaker, as an individual, had none.

He was merely the servant of the people's representatives and they, in theory, were the servants of the electorate. It is hard to read Mr Bercow's conduct as a continuation of that vital tradition. What we saw was a politician ambitious for attention and driven by childish anger.

He had seen Michael Gove (who he has long despised) secure a major interview with Mr Trump in New York. He had seen Mrs May (whom he little likes) then triumph in Washington.

DID HE DECIDE TO PLUNGE A STICK IN THE WHEELS?

The words he spoke were not dry, calm verdict of a semi-judicial veteran assembling the facts of the matter or seeking to reduce the public temperature.

They were markedly more personal and incendiary.

Yesterday Mr Bercow claimed he was within his rights to speak out against Mr Trump.

THAT IS QUESTIONABLE

AT THE VERY LEAST, he snubbed Buckingham Palace. More seriously, he failed to represent the settled will of the Commons.

He was off-piste, blatantly so, and it was not just Tory MPS who were appalled. Some Labour Members were queasy about his behaviour.

Perhaps Labour sensed that he has become unhealthily close to their sworn foes, the

SCOTTISH NATIONALISTS.

Of course, this is not the first scrape the Speaker has landed himself in. The surest way to ,analyse John Bercow has always been through the perism of his character.

If his Speakership is remembered chiefly for its

RANCOUR AND RUDENESS ,

that will only be a reflection of his

 

UNHAPPY, POLITICALLY ROOTLESS ,ITCHY PERSONALITY.

High-minded commentators sometimes lecture us that it is wrong to make too much of the

PERSONAL IN POLITICS,

but in nthe case of men so vivid and unpredictable as

MR BERCOW

and, for that matter, Mr Trump) ,that becomes

IMPOSSIBLE

 

This is a creature driven by molten moods and door -kicking tantrums. Philosophy really has little to do with his politics.

Having observed Mr Bercow closely since he became an MP in 1997, I was not surprised by his performance on Monday

[February 6, 2017]

 

*

Exploited...

 

Throughout his career, John Bercow has happily exploited sulphurous disagreements to buttress his personal position.

He did that in his early days as a Tory activist, when he was an objectionable oik in the racist Monday Club.

Young Bercow was a Uriah Heap-like hanger -on to Right-wing grotesques. These men taught this taxi-driver's son top speak with a plum in his mouth-something that accentuates the impression

HE IS A FAKE

It has been said that the youthful Bercow once led a

'HANG MANDELA' campaign

Having entered the Commons as an unpleasant Rightie, Bercow (whose Buckingham seat is in the Tory heartlands) saw his prospects were limited and realised he needed to change his uncouth vies to prosper.

Views yes, character no. Shedding pretty much his whole Conservative persona would certainly help him win Labour support for the Speakership.

He did this

 by mocking MPs on his own side and by sucking up to the

POLITICALLY CORRECT WING OF THE LABOUR PARTY

His postering would have put a

PEACOCK to SHAME.

Harriet Harman, Ed Balls. Ed Miliband & Co. saw what was going on and shrewdly went along with it

 as a way of destabilising the Tories.

 

Rudeness...

His chance came when Labour's Michael Martin was drummed out of the Speakership in 2009 as the highest-profile victim of the MPs' expenses scandal (thanks not least to manoeuvring by Bercow) Subsequently, Bercow swept into the job thanks to the Labour whips.

Some of us warned that he was a wrong'un, but we were ignored. Lo and behold, he was soon criticised for bias against the Tories and there were horror stories about his nastiness to his staff.

THUS HAS IT CONTINUED

Mr Bercow has been extravagant with public money, spending thousands on foreign travel and on taxis. He has inserted his little favourites on committees.

He has shown extraordinary tolerance of the disgraced Labour MP Keith Vaz and has treated less favoured MPs with lacerating rudeness.

His marital life with the lurid Sally, who is just as addicted to self-promotion as him, has also been a dreadful mess.

And with his ban on Trump, he's unprecedently involved the Speakership in foreign policy, and an area linked to the most controversial domestic policy of all,

BREXIT

Alas, this will leave White House officials seeing that their new President, already besieged by the shrieking international left, has now been insulted by the Speaker of the British House of Commons.

All the good vibes of Theresa May's Washington visit may have been forgotten.  Vital diplomatic work may have been trashed. All because this vicious, careerist, small-minded martinet felt like getting something off his preening chest.

 

*

TO BE CONTINUED

 

Full article

*

ADDED FEBRUARY 14-2017

 FROM

DAILY MAIL

Ephraim

Hardcastle

COLUMN

 SPEAKER John Bercow who controversially told Reading University students he voted REMAIN, informed scholars at BUCKINGHAM UNIVERSITY in 1998:

The people of Britain will never knowingly consent to be governed by those who do not speak their language, live in their country or depend yupon their votes. The power of self, the right to hire and fire our rulers and the capacity to chart our vown destiny are inalienable birthrights . They should not be traded in for a mess of pottage otherwise known as a back row seat at a show called

THE HEART OF EUROPE.

Our destiny is surely as a self governing nation which trades freely with the world. The future is bright; the future is global. Our success in it is dependent upon the vision, self confidence and calibre of our leaders, our bbusinesses and our workforce.'

My source there adds: His speach was such a Eurosceptic tour de force that the Bruges Group printed it as a pamphlet.' Fancy!

 

 

 

 

 
 [LETTER]

For the Honourable William Lenthall, Speaker of the Commons

House of Parliament: these,

Sir                              Harborough, 14th June, 1645           

Being commanded by you to this service, I think myself bound to acquaint you with the good hand of God towards you and us.

We marched yesterday after the King, who went before us from Daventry to Harborough; and quartered about six miles from him.  This day we marched before him.  He drew out to meet us; both Armies engaged.  We, after three hours fight very doubtful, at last routed his Army; killed and took about 5000,-very many officers, but of what quality we yet know not.   We took also about 200 carriages, all he had; and all his guns, being 12 in number, whereof two were demi-cannon, two demi-culverins, and I think the rest sackers.  We pursued the Enemy from three miles short of Harborough to nine beyond, even to the sight of Leicester, whither the King fled.

Sir, this is none other but the hand of God; and to Him alone belongs the glory, wherein none are to share with Him.  The General served you with all faithfulness and honour: and the best commendation I can give him is, That I daresay he attributed all to God, and would rather perish than assume to himself. Which is an honest and a thriving way:-and yet as much for bravery may be given to him, in this action.  Sir, they are trusty; I beseech you, in the name of God, not to discourage them. I wish this action may beget thankfulness and humility in all that are concerned in it.  He that ventures his life for liberty of his country, I wish he trust God for the liberty of his conscience, and you for the liberty he fights for.  In this he rests, who is

Your most humble servant,

OLIVER CROMWELL

*

[Page 171-PART II FIRST CIVIL WAR-14th June 1645-LETTERSXXiX., NASEBY-OLIVER CROMWELL'S LETTERS AND SPEECHES by THOMAS CARLYLE-1888 ]

*

'We have to deal with events which belong essentially to Constitutional History, and must treat them with a light touch, that we may not trespass on appropriated ground.  Our topics, how absolute monarchy, which just then succeeded so brilliantly over the Channel, was attempted in England, under conditions of no apparent danger, failed and failed at great cost. And how, in the curse of the struggle, ideas were developed which proved ultimately strong enough, as well as sufficiently lasting, to carry out an entirely new structure of constitutional government. It is the point where the history of nations turned into the modern bed. It is the point also where the Englishman became the leader of the world.'

THE PURITAN REVOLUTION

Last paragraph-Page 205

LECTURES ON MODERN HISTORY

BY

JOHN EMERICH EDWARD DALBERG-ACTON

First Baron ACTON. D.C.L  LL.D., ETC. ETC.

1926

 

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS AND CAPS ARE OURS]

 

FEBRUARY 8-2017

H. F.1108 FREEDOM-AWAITS

 

DAILY MAIL

 

 

I tremble for the Monarchy's future, says STEPHEN GLOVER   ...

 

 

Why I tremble for the Monarchy

 

We've tolerated his outspoken views on homeopathy and architecture. But suddenly, as he nears the throne, Charles is pontificating on such explosive political subjects such as immigration and populism-with allusions to Trump, Brexit and Nazism. This ,says

STEPHEN GLOVER,

 is verging on the

LUNATIC.

 

SATURDAY

 ESSAY

 by

STEPHEN GLOVER |

FEBRUARY 4, 2017

 

 EXTRACT

FOR many years, Prince Charles has unburdened himself of his views on architecture, homeopathy, organic farming, climate change and a dozen other subjects that engage his lively and fertile mind.

The heir to the throne has famously pestered government ministers with his 'black spider memos' - so described because of the spidery, handwritten notes which he attaches to these typed letters-exhorting then to action on mostly minor matters.

His public interventions can be infuriating, or somewhat cheering. Indeed, it is possible at times to find oneself on complete agreement with him, but at others to think that he is spewing out the

MOST ARRANT NONSENSE.

But whether or not one concurs with his homilies - many ogf them slightly batty, others incalculably worthy - I invariably find myself wondering whether it is wise for our future  King to expiate so freely in a way liable to cause divisions among his future subjects.

And as he has drawn ever nearer to the inevitable placing of the crown on his head, I can't have been the only supporter of the monarchy who looked forward to the time when, to put it bluntly

HE WOULD FINALLY PUT A SOCK IN IT.

...

...And though I'm concerned that he may rub up President Trump the wrong way, I am even more worried about the damage he may do to the

MONARCHY.

it has many dormant enemies, however popular the Queen may be.

There  is a particularly moving scene in the TV series

THE CROWN

produced by Netfix

The young Queen Elisabeth is given a lesson about her exalted position by her grandmother, Queen Mary, widow of George v.

Elisabeth says it doesn't 'feel right as head of state to say and do nothing'.

Queen Mary replies:

It is exactly right. To do nothing is the hardest job of all. It will take all your energy.

'To be impartial is not natural, not human. People always want you to smile, agree or frown, but the minute you do, you will have declared a position - a point of view.

THAT IS ONE THING AS SOVEREIGN YOU ARE NOT ENTITLED TO DO.'

It is a hard lesson for any intelligent person to learn, but Queen Elisabeth adopted it at an early age. It has been an act of extraordinary sacrifice to hold her peace while all around her are giving vent to their opinions - to watch speechlessly in the public sphere, as the world around her changed.

At the age  of 68,, Prince Charles still thinks he has the right to speak his mind. In fact, he is growing more forthright. I'm afraid he does not- when it comes to

KEEPING HIS MOUTH

SHUT

begin to understand what sacrifice entails

I don't know who can save the Prince from himself. His mother? Father? Wife?

It is very late in the day. The truth is that he is a gifted man. But he is also self-indulgent one with a diminishing

SENSE OF DANGER

At the eleventh hour the Prince of Wales could still follow the noble example of his mother,

AND UNITE RATHER THAN DIVIDE THE COUNTRY

But I fear that he has no intention of doing so -which is why

I REALLY DO TREMBLE FOR THE FUTURE OF OUR GREAT MONARCHY.

 

 

Full article

FEBRUARY 4, 2017

 

H.F.1095 FREEDOM AWAITS!

 

 
 
  •  
     

    US and China are both busy

     

    with internal power struggles

     

    so the world will have to wait

    There are intense power struggles taking place in the United States and China these days meaning that big new initiatives for the planet as a whole will have to wait until the dust settles in both countries, Chinese and American sources say.

    The struggle in the United States is, to simplify things somewhat, between the deep state faction behind Trump and the remnants of the Bush/Clinton deep state apparatus. In China, three main factions are duking it out as part of an elaborate power dance that will produce a new central government line up sometime around the end of March.

    When these power struggles are over, then we can expect major reforms of the Federal Reserve Board, the United Nations, the IMF, the EU etc. to begin in earnest.

    Let us start with the US power struggle, which has intensified now that Jeff Sessions has been formally appointed Attorney General. Immediately following his appointment Trump issued an executive order that “re-focuses the Federal Government’s energy and resources on dismantling transnational criminal organizations, such as drug cartels.” As a Pentagon official described it “Trump declared war on the Bushes and Mexican drug cartels.”

    Furthermore, in a sign the anti-drug cowboys in the military and US agencies are finally getting the message that force alone will not stop illegal drug use, Pentagon officials are saying Trump may decide legalize and regulate narcotics. This would help bring the roughly $2 trillion annual illegal drug business into the tax paying mainstream and reduce drug related death. If done properly, the massive pharmaceutical industry could be brought on board as long as they were given a role. That should be easy to do since already around 30% of drugs prescribed by doctors are opium based. The drug companies could add a whole new menu of goodies doctors could offer patients if they could start making medicines based on the other major narcotics.

    Doing this would also devastate the US private prison slave industry by releasing half of the 9.5 million Americans who are either in jail or on parole.

    It would also radically lower crime rates. Ask the Swiss, who experienced an 80% drop in crimes committed by junkies immediately after they started letting doctors administer heroin to addicts. Most of the junkies were also able to eventually kick their addictions.

    http://www.citizensopposingprohibition.org/resources/swiss-heroin-assisted-treatment-1994-2009-summary/

    Since 90% of the world’s heroin is produced in Afghanistan, legalization and regulation of its opium crop would most likely lead to peace in that country.

    The Trump administration is also talking about stopping CIA drug shipments that go via US military bases. In Japan, for example, the Yokota airbase has long been a central distribution hub for North Korean amphetamines, according to senior Japanese gangsters. Shutting that trade down or else legalizing it would help clean up the Japanese political system big time. The same is true with the heroin trade going via other big US Airforce bases such as Incirlink in Turkey and Ramstein in Germany.

    With so much money and power at stake though, you can be sure though that the Bush faction is not going down without a fight. The entire ISIS/Mossad/Bush CIA/Nazi (Khazarian mafia Nazi faction) nexus is on the warpath and the fact that prominent ISIS linked criminals like Senator John McCain have not been arrested yet shows the power struggle is not nearly over. The Khazarian Nazis have been blackmailing the Pentagon White Hats with

     

    This post is only viewable for paid members please register your account to view full text.
    If you registerd,please
    login.

     

The long awaited arrests of cabalists are supposed to start this week

Multiple sources confirm that about 70 arrest warrants will be served on power brokers and politicians in Washinton DC, Virginia and New York this week shortly after Jeff Sessions is confirmed as US Attorney General. Among those to be arrested are Democratic Senators Chuck Schumer, Richard Blumenthal and Hillary Clinton’s vice-president pick Tim Kaine, Pentagon sources say. These arrests will follow 474 arrests that took place in California last week as a pedophile ring that served Hollywood and West Coast elites was taken down. It is interesting to note the California arrests were only reported by local news outlets and completely ignored by the big corporate networks.

http://abc13.com/news/474-arrested-in-california-human-trafficking-stings/1734315/

Former US President Bill Clinton is also reported to be “singing like a canary” and has provided evidence that will lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton and many others, Pentagon sources say. Here is what a Pentagon source had to say on the matter “Hillary is toast as Obama refused to pardon, Bill snitched on her, and her prosecution has been ordered by Trump.” There are credible tabloid news reports that Hillary was caught trying to flee to Bahrain and stopped.

http://www.globemagazine.com/content/clinton-stopped-her-tracks

There are also preliminary reports saying a raid was made on Jeffrey Epsteins’ Caribbean sex slave Island and that 32 kids were freed and 8 traffickers were arrested.

https://twitter.com/glennbeck/status/828344311016075264

There is also going to be a more hidden and brutal power struggle going on in the secret agencies as “CIA Deputy Director Gina Haspel was chosen to rendition to black sites and torture cabal, drug cartel and ISIS guys,” a Pentagon source says.

There is also, as is often the case, high level intrigue and skullduggery going inside the Vatican. This has been widely reported by the corporate media in the form of news that Pope Francis fired Grand Master Mathew Festing of the Knights of Malta in a “dispute over condoms.”

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/01/25/knights-malta-head-resigns-dispute-vatican-spokesperson/

If you look at the membership list of the Knights of Malta,

https://www.biblebelievers.org.au/kmlst1.htm

it reads like a who’s who of the globalist elite full of names like Rockefeller, Bush, Rothschild etc. so you can tell that this is about more than just “condoms.”
In fact, according to sources in the Vatican Secret Service, what really happened was that the Knights of Malta’s top brass were caught
(ここから有料)
 

This post is only viewable for paid members please register your account to view full text.
If you registerd,please
login
.

 

 
February 6, 2017
Posted by benjamin

 

 

H.F.1106 FREEDOM-AWAITS!

 

 

 

The MPs who snubbed Corbyn (and the voters)

 

 

LABOUR MPs WHO REBELLED

EVEN THOUGH THEIR CONSTITUENTS VOTED BREXIT

*    Graham Allen (Nottingham North)

*    Ann Clwyd   (CynonValley)  

*     Paul Farrelly (Labour, Newcastle-Under-Lyme

*     Catherine McKinnell (Labour, Newcastle upon Tyne North)  

*      Dr Alan Whitehead (Southampton,Test-also a frontbencher           

THE FRONTBENCHERS-MINISTERS  and WHIPS

*   Dr Rosena Allin-Khan (Tooting)

*   Kevin Brennan (Cardiff West)

*   Lyn Brown (West Ham)

*   Ruth Cadbury (Brentford and Isleworth)

*   Thangam Debbonaire (Bristol West)

*   Vicky Foxcroft (Lewisham)

*   Rupa Huq (Ealing Central and Acton)

*   Stephen Pound (Ealing North)

*   Andy Slaughter (Hammersmith)

*   Jeff Smith (Manchester Withington)

*   Catherine West (Hornsey and Wood Green)

*   Daniel Zeichner (Cambridge)

   OTHER LABOUR MPs WHO ALSO REBELLED.

 

*   Heildi Alexander (Lewisham East)

*   Rushanara Ali (Bethnal Green and Bow)

*   Luciana Berger (Liverpool Wavertree)

*   Ben Bradshaw (Exeter)

*   Chris Bryant (Rhondda)

*   Karen Black (Westminster North)

*   Dawn Butler (Brent Central)

*   Ann Coffey (Stockport)

*   Neil Coyle (Bermondsey and Southwark)

*   Mary Creagh (Labour, Wakefield)

*   Stella Creasy (Walthamstow)

*   Stephen Doughty (Cardiff South Penarth)

*   Jim Dowd (Lewisham West and Penge)

*   Maria Eagle (Garston and Halewood)

*   Louise Ellman (Liverpool Riverside)

*   Mick Gapes (Ilford South)

*   Lillian Greenwood (Nottingham South)

*   Helen Hayes (Dulwich and West Norwood)

*   Meg Hillier (Hackney South and Shoreditch)

*   Peter Kyle (Hove)

*   David Lammy (Tottenham)

*   Rachael Maskell (York Central)

*   Kerry McCathy (Bristol East)

*   Madeleine Moon (Bridgend)

*   Ian Murray (Edinburgh South)

*   Virendra Sharma (Ealing Southal)

*   Tulip Siddiq (Hampstead and Kilburn)

*   Owen Smith Pontypridd)

*   Jo Stevens (Cardiff Central)

*   Stephen Timms (East Ham)

     LIBDEM MPs WHO VOTED NO

*   Tom Brake (Carlshalton and Wallington)

*   Alistair Carmichael (Orkney and Shetland)

*   Nick Clegg (Sheffield Hallam)

*   Tim Farron (Westmorland and Lonsdale)

*   John Pugh (Southport

*   Mark Williams (Ceredigion)

...AND THE ONE TORY

* Kenneth Clarke (Rushcliffe)

   AND TOO POORLY TO VOTE

*   Diane Abbott (Hackney North and Stoke Newington)

 

DAILY MAIL-FEBRUARY 2, 2017

by Daniel Martin and Jason Groves

*

[REMEMBER THEIR BETRAYAL

AT THE NEXT ELECTION]

 

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

 DAILY MAIL-FEBRUARY 2, 2017

 

 

H.F.1104 FREEDOM -AWAITS!

 
 

Daily Mail

 

 

 

Police tap media phones and PM tries to get editor sacked -by Stephen Glover- Daily Mail

 

POLICE TAPPING JOURNALISTS' PHONES, A PM TRYING TO GET AN EDITOR SACKED. NO, NOT RUSSIA...BRITAIN

 

...Like most people, I suspect when I was young I used to trust in the fair-play , fundamental decency, moderation and good sense of the police and other official bodies. I no longer do.

How could one after all that has happened?

I no longer think the authorities generally believe in the

RIGHT OF THE PRESS

 to freely report without fear or favour, though of course there are exceptions. As the State ever bigger and more intrusive, its tendency to conceal acts of injustice or its own sheer ineptitude grows stronger.

Which brings me to the second instance of gross interference. On Tuesday,31st January,BBC2's Newsnight broadcast an item alleging that during the EU referendum campaign

DAVID CAMERON

tried to secure the dismissal of the Editor of this newspaper, because of his stance on

BREXIT.

According to the item, Mr Cameron fruitlessly attempted to persuade the Mail's proprietor

LORD ROTHERMERE

that its Editor should go lest this newspaper's pro-Leave sentiments de-rail the Prime Minister's  ambition for Britain to stay in the EU...

But  let us not get too tangled up with the personalities involved.  It is surely deeply troubling that any British prime minister should scheme to remove an editor with whom he disagrees. In Turkey, President Erdogan, will send his heavies to a newspaper office, or he will arrest editors and journalists he doesn't like. That's what happens in many countries we like to think of as crude or uncivilised , including

RUSSIA and CHINA.

We imagine things are done differently here, but isn't it really a question of style? David Cameron is smooth and sleek and has good manners-not a risible thug such as Erdogan or Putin who will send in the bully-boys.

Yet I know that while Opposition leader he secured his dismissal of a highly critical columnist from a national paper, and later conspired to get rid of another. Now we discover he strove unsuccessfully to

FINISH OFF AN EDITOR WHO DARED TO STAND IN HIS WAY...

Full article!

 

[Some time ago we expressed our opinion that David Cameron was a perfect example of a chameleon - an inconstant person-unpredictable...This was bound to happen in a country such as England which had forgotten its roots-its history -its culture-its priceless inheritance - until the 23rd June 2016. It's association over 44 years with the undemocratic-unaccountable-power-hungry elite of the European Union had almost destroyed its once NATIONAL SPIRIT and INTEGRITY passed on from previous ages. In the nick of time the PEOPLE awoke from their complacent slumber and asked for THEIR ONCE FREE INDEPENDENT COUNTRY-BACK!

 

 

FEBRUARY 2 - 2017

H.F.1102  AT LONG LAST-FREEDOM -AWAITS-

 

 

 
 

DAILY MAIL

 

 

I tremble for the Monarchy's future, says STEPHEN GLOVER   ...

 

 

Why I tremble for the Monarchy

 

We've tolerated his outspoken views on homeopathy and architecture. But suddenly, as he nears the throne, Charles is pontificating on such explosive political subjects such as immigration and populism-with allusions to Trump, Brexit and Nazism. This ,says

STEPHEN GLOVER,

 is verging on the

LUNATIC.

 

SATURDAY

 ESSAY

 by

STEPHEN GLOVER |

FEBRUARY 4, 2017

 

 EXTRACT

FOR many years, Prince Charles has unburdened himself of his views on architecture, homeopathy, organic farming, climate change

...And though I'm concerned that he may rub up President Trump the wrong way, I am even more worried about the damage he may do to the

MONARCHY.

it has many dormant enemies, however popular the Queen may be.

There  is a particularly moving scene in the TV series

THE CROWN

produced by Netfix

The young Queen Elisabeth is given a lesson about her exalted position by her grandmother, Queen Mary, widow of George v.

Elisabeth says it doesn't 'feel right as head of state to say and do nothing'.

Queen Mary replies:

It is exactly right. To do nothing is the hardest job of all. It will take all your energy.

'To be impartial is not natural, not human. People always want you to smile, agree or frown, but the minute you do, you will have declared a position - a point of view.

THAT IS ONE THING AS SOVEREIGN YOU ARE NOT ENTITLED TO DO.'

It is a hard lesson for any intelligent person to learn, but Queen Elisabeth adopted it at an early age. It has been an act of extraordinary sacrifice to hold her peace while all around her are giving vent to their opinions - to watch speechlessly in the public sphere, as the world around her changed.

At the age  of 68,, Prince Charles still thinks he has the right to speak his mind. In fact, he is growing more forthright. I'm afraid he does not- when it comes to

KEEPING HIS MOUTH

SHUT

begin to understand what sacrifice entails

I don't know who can save the Prince from himself. His mother? Father? Wife?

It is very late in the day. The truth is that he is a gifted man. But he is also self-indulgent one with a diminishing

SENSE OF DANGER

At the eleventh hour the Prince of Wales could still follow the noble example of his mother,

AND UNITE RATHER THAN DIVIDE THE COUNTRY

But I fear that he has no intention of doing so -which is why

I REALLY DO TREMBLE FOR THE FUTURE OF OUR GREAT MONARCHY.

*  *  *

 

Full article

FEBRUARY 4, 2017

 

H.F.1095 FREEDOM AWAITS!

 

 

 
Daily Mail

Comment

 

Geezers, pussies and a bonkers Britain

IT is a grave concern to any country when police, magistrates  and other authorities collectively lose their marbles. But if two court cases in this week's news are our guide, this is what is happening in modern Britain.

In the first, a women was hauled before a judge for nothing more serious than calling a man a 'pussy'.

To all appearances, Aga Czachowski, 31 didn't even use the word in its obscene, Trumpian sense. Rather, she employed it in its time-honoured meaning as a mild insult, suggesting timidity.

Yet extraordinary, the justice system cranked into action against her. And after she admitted sending a communication of an 'indecent or offensive nature', a judge had no choice but to sentence her-albeit to a conditional discharge.

In the second case, revealed by the Mail today, entrepreneur Vernon Mussington was convicted of a hate crime by Luton magistrates after saying 'all right geezer' to a transgender Afghanistan veteran who 'identifies as a women'.

Though he swore he was unaware former RAF reservist Joanne Gullon regarded herself as female, he was made to pay £360 and sentenced to 150 hours' of community service. ONLY when he appealed after nearly a year of anxiety, was his conviction quashed.

With genuine crime on the increase, haven't police and courts better things to do with their time - and our money-than pursuing these piffling cases?

Mr Mussington's case is only the latest example of

THE POWER THAT BE

abandoning reason in their obsession with protecting transgender feelings.

In universities, sex-specific toilet signs have been changed to avoid giving offence. Schools are allowing boys who think of themselves as girls to wear skirts. Only last weekend, the BMA even told doctors to stop calling pregnant women 'expectant mothers' for fear of upsetting any who might see themselves as fathers - to - be.

This paper has great sympathy with people who are unhappy about their sex.

BUT WHATEVER HAPPENED TO COMMON SENSE?

IS EVERYONE IN AUTHORITY GOING STARK, STARING BONKERS?

Full article

 

*  *  *

[This is the inevitable result of loss of humour and that once give - and - take attitude so reminiscent many decades ago -a  world known characteristic nature of our island people. But with the advent of the so-called European Union  and the Human Rights Act of 1998 and the following scourge of political correctness the sparkle of life has been gradually subdued by the actions of hardened individuals placing their demands for affirmative action rather than live as themselves without a special label and demand particular considerations which in the past was all about living together in society in free association and understanding and good humour.]

'Haste thee, nymph, and bring with the/Jest and youthful jollity,/Quips and cranks, and wanton wiles,/ Nods, and becks, and wreathed smiles.Ib.25.

JOHN MILTON

 

'With the fearful strain that is on me night and day, if I did not laugh I should die.'

Abraham Lincoln (1809-65)

'O. judgment, thou art fled to brutish beasts, and men have lost their reason.'

Shakespeare.

*

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

 

H.F.1094FREEDOM-AWAITS!

 

If this article makes you angry how can you argue that Multiculturalism is not designed to polarize society?

E Pluribus Unum?

 

This is banned but separation is not

Multiculturalism is the policy of encouraging the separate development of several cultures within a nation state. It is not about having Curry Houses and Balti restaurants, these just make for a varied national culture, it is not about hip hop or the Chinese New Year, multiculturalism is about encouraging people from different backgrounds to develop separately from the rest of society. Multiculturalism is not about diversity, it is a political movement with a clear and deliberate policy of deconstructing national cultures in favour of many separate cultures. It is a sad truth that 90% of those who say they support multiculturalism are actually anti-racist and pro-diversity: they have got no idea that when they say they support "multiculturalism" they are supporting a subversive political and philosophical movement within Western countries. It is probably the support of this ignorant faction that has allowed Multiculturalism, which is another word for "separate development" (in Afrikaans 'apartheid'), to become so embedded in Britain.

 

 

Multiculturalism in Britain was a policy implemented by New Labour with the intention of creating a revolutionary tension and change in society. It was a Soviet policy that was released in instruction packs distributed to the various, subversive, university "socialist societies" in the nineteen seventies, at the height of the Cold War. The policy was intended to destabilise the West. (See The Roots of New Labour). It failed in its primary objective because the British are a tolerant culture. It is amazing that British journalists, especially in the television media and BBC, have supported this policy with such zeal although this is probably due to the fact that many of these individuals also have roots in the British left wing movements of the 1970s and that multiculturalism is now seen as an 'answer' to how to accommodate nationalities within political unions such as the EU, Russian Empire and Chinese Empire.

Multiculturalism was more fully characterised in the work of the philosopher Jacques Derrida who proposed that the polarization of society should be an objective of social policy. Derrida was a malevolent force in modern philosophy whose ideas were largely designed to damage social structures. Curiously governments have permitted the appointment of post Marxist post modernists who support the ideas of Derrida to chairs in sociology and education in western universities so that social policy is now being guided by many people who believe that the objective of social policy should be the destruction of a structured society.  Political commentators have not realised that socialism now relies on racial tension, not class war, to exacerbate political difference and create conflict (see Postmodernism-poststructuralism-postmarxism).

Apart from the obvious ill-effects of polarising people into ghettoes and opposing groups Multiculturalism also has some serious adverse effects that result from the fact that almost all non-western cultures have not undergone the changes that result from exposure to the Enlightenment and the Age of Reason. Examples of the adverse effects of multiculturalism are: failure to identify with society at large, socialising solely with your co-religionists so depriving others in the neighbourhood of society, supporting the caste system and caste attitudes so that the poor are kept poor, excluding people from outside your culture from work, girls wearing restrictive clothing in school so that they cannot participate in the full range of lessons, forced marriage, setting up schools to teach Intelligent Design or Koranic ideas on biology so depriving children of a truthful education, supporting foreign powers against your own country so endangering our security etc. All of these adverse effects of multiculturalism and many, many more are evident in British life. The socialist elite argues that separate cultures within the UK should be encouraged to exercise these "freedoms" but each freedom that is encouraged within a separate culture deprives the whole of British society of other freedoms. Those who support multiculturalism generally just deny that these adverse effects will occur but some, such as the effects of restrictive clothing in young girls and the effects of a caste system etc. are simply inevitable because they are in the nature of those "freedoms".

Multicultural policies are apparent in a variety of institutions and exist wherever the intention is to increase the polarization and separation of people rather than to reduce it. The teaching of history in British schools has been heavily infiltrated and oriented towards polarization, for instance British children are taught about slavery and colonisation rather than about emancipation and the explosive development of European states in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. They are taught about the US Civil Rights movement, which has nothing to do with the British but upsets black people, rather than the peaceful decolonisation of much of the British Empire. They are taught about the persecution of the Jews rather than the heroic struggle of the British and the global British cultural zone against the Germans, Russians and their allies that saved the Jews. Some of the legislation that treats groups of people as minorities and victims also polarizes society. The recent extensions to Equalities legislation in the Equalities Act that outlaw political discussion about belief are also designed to polarize society.

The social tension caused by multiculturalism must now be repaired and wholesale immigration into the UK, which is already overcrowded, must be stopped (See The benefits of immigration to the UK economy). Multiculturalism has already caused the outbreaks of terrorism associated with

LONDONISTAN

 

 (many of the 9/11 terrorists stayed in the UK and the 7/7 terrorists were British) and will lead to worse problems as time goes on.

The coalition government has taken a sensible stand against multiculturalism (see State multiculturalism has failed, says David Cameron). The government should be supported in this stand and the New Labour appointed BBC governors and current affairs staff should be quietly removed to prevent the distorted coverage of the issue. Governments should oppose both institutional multiculturalism and institutional racism because apartheid is both a cause and a symptom of racism.

Many races in one culture is workable and may be desirable but separating the races into cultural ghettos will polarise society and cause perpetual strife, though not a full blown revolution and totalitarian government, as the originators of multiculturalism once hoped. It is time to finally cauterise the damage done to the social fabric of Britain by the Cold War and to move on to realist, liberal politics.

Multiculturalism has recently been adopted by those who are in favour of large scale political unions such as the EU as a desperate approach to the problem of the free movement of labour and how to contain multiple nationalities within a single state. This problem could be resolved by simply unwinding the EU back to the EEC without the destructive effects of multiculturalism.

If we continue with Multiculturalism we will end up with tribalism with all that that entails from corruption to nepotism to gangs, riots and terrorism.

The whole point of a modern nation with one culture was to stop these evils. Nations are the unit of cultural diversity and this must be respected.

See also:

The Roots of New Labour

Labour confirms that multiculturalism is bad

Diversity in the UK

A ranking of social evils 

Multiculturalism and truth

Nations are the unit of cultural diversity  

The Benefits of Immigration to the UK Economy

Against racism

The aims of Localism

 

 

 

 

 H.F.718/MULTICULTURALISM

 

 

Daily Mail:

 

Fury as Npower blames smart meters for 15% surge in prices. Scottish Daily Mail
- 2017-02-04 - Weekender - By Victoria Bischoff Money Mail Deputy Editor

 

The' spy' in your home

Smart meters monitor how much gas and electricity households use by the second and use wireless signals to communicate to the supplier.

They put an end to estimated  bills and come with a screen that shows how much energy you are using to encourage customer to switch off lights and appliances. However, the £11 billion cost of installing them in homes by 2020 will mean higher bills.

Many who already have smart meters have complained that it stops working if they try to switch supplier.

Privacy campaigners have raised concerns that the meters can reveal details of a customer's activities.

*

[There is no mention of radiation which can invade the living accommodation of the householder and affect the health of the individual.]

 

 

Full article

FEBRUARY 4-2017

 

H.F.1105 FREEDOM-AWAITS

 

Boys will be boys as the Year of the Cock starts and war looms on the horizon

The war drums are beating as the testosterone laden Year of the Cock (Rooster) begins and the boys get ready to show who is biggest and baddest. The biggest warnings are coming from China, which has seen many of its “red lines” crossed, at least verbally, by the macho-laden administration of US President Donald Trump. The fireworks could begin after February 5th as the Chinese New Year’s holidays wind down, Chinese intelligence and secret society sources say. As the Chinese have warned, if they make a move it will be “unexpected and worse than you can imagine.”

The Trump administration, meanwhile has been too preoccupied with redrawing the maps of the Middle East and dealing with ongoing power struggle in the West to fully appreciate what will happen if China makes a military move.

Before getting back to what China could do, let us take a look at the new Middle East that is being created by the Trump administration acting in unison with Russia. What we see is the region being divided into three spheres of influence. One is Turkey with expanded zones of influence penetrating Syria and Iraq. The other is the Persian (Iranian) empire now extending into Iraq, central Syria and Lebanon. The third is the Arab zone, including Egypt, the Gulf States, Sunni parts of Iraq, Jordan and Israel. Militarily the Russians and Americans have divided their spheres of influence with Russia to the East of the Euphrates and the US to the West. The map below shows the new zones of influence in Syria.
 

mapofmideast


As many seasoned observers have noted, Trump has promised to destroy ISIS within a month even as he promises undivided support to Israel, the main sponsor of ISIS. What is really happening is that the Saudi monarchy is going to take on the fundamentalist Wahab clergy (who they secretly hate) while the Israelis will deal with fundamentalist Zionist fanatics, which are two sides of the same ISIS coin. The reward for doing this will be survival for the gulf monarchies and new pipeline routes for their gas exports to Europe via Israel and Turkey.

For the Trump regime, fixing the Middle East will be the easy part. Trump has announced he also plans to take on the hard part, dealing with the Federal Reserve Board, by hanging of portrait of Rothschild (Fed) nemesis Andrew Jackson in the White House, Pentagon sources note. This is not something the US military government will be able to solve merely by marching into Fed headquarters and rounding up central bankers or even by bumping off members of the Rothschild family. It will rather involve dealing with China.

Here is how a source close to the Rothschilds described the situation. “The Rothschilds are embedded in China, and have been for many years. All of their gold and liquid assets are in China…Everything that happens is well thought out and planned long in advance.”

Chinese intelligence agency and secret society sources told representatives of the White Dragon Society last week that if China decided to move military it would...

 

This post is only viewable for paid members please register your account to view full text.
If you registerd,please
login
.

 

Now that Trump is president the real horse trading begins

Now that the Trump regime has formally been installed, the real battle over the future of the planet

 

H.F.1093 FREEDOM NOW

 

 

Brought-forward from August 2003

[THE WAY AHEAD TO RECLAIM OUR SACRED INHERITANCE.]

Faced with the possible imposition (illegally) of a E. U. Constitution this  article contemplating our own U.K. Constitution (English Constitution), is especially topical.

J. Bingley

Constitutional Principles of Power and Remedy.

The Constitution is specifically intended, indeed designed to limit the powers of the state with respect to the people. The Constitution sets a standard upon which the performance of governance may be measured and contested and to provide remedy if abused.

The whole constitution originates its authority from

COMMON LAW

Supremacy resides in the

LAW and PEOPLE

NOT THE

CROWN or PARLIAMENT.

It is a matter of constitutional principle and legal fact that,

THE LAW IS SUPREME

The rule of law is the antithesis of arbitrary power. Integral with this, is the system of jury trial. It places the power of law enforcement in the

HANDS of the PEOPLE.

This the most vital safeguard against DESPOTISM.

The English Constitution's function is to

PROTECT the

"RIGHTS and LIBERTIES

 of ENGLISHMEN".

These are the 'BIRTHRIGHT' of the PEOPLE'

[In 2016 one can see how successive governments have by gradualism watered down these rights with even attempts to replace jury trial by trial by judge only on the grounds of speed and saving resources. The people in the main have been, amiss in not being vigilant to the protection of THEIR CONSTITUTION. In just a few weeks on the 23 June,2016 they have a choice whether to vote to leave the EU and regain THEIR LAW-THEIR CONSTITUTION-THEIR FREE COUNTRY. or REMAIN in an ALIEN COLLECTIVIST AND CORRUPT UNDEMOCRATIC EU with NO PROTECTION of MAGNA CARTA of 1215 and BILL OF RIGHTS of 1688 and NO ENGLISHMAN'S ' RIGHTS and LIBERTIES' to be passed on to FUTURE GENERATIONS.]

The fundamental rights and liberties are listed in the preamble of the Coronation Oath Act of 1688 which declares that  the oath is taken for the purpose of

" Maintaining our spiritual and civil rights and properties"

It is a contract with the people which makes it the permanent duty of the CROWN, and the CROWN in both GOVERNMENT and PARLIAMENT.

This contracts the Monarch to govern only according to the STATUTE, COMMON LAW, and the CUSTOM and to 'CAUSE LAW and JUSTICE with MERCY to be used in all JUDGEMENTS'.

All power of governance is vested in the CROWN.

The two Houses of Parliament may upon their concurrence offer bills for ROYAL ASSENT.

A BILL is not ENACTED until it has been authorised by the SOVEREIGN POWER.

Whilst the enacting power (a royal prerogative) of Royal Assent is entirely vested with the monarch it is contracted ONLY TO BE USED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.  This is a limitation and essential safeguard to protect the people from any over mighty governance  [such as Tony Blair's and Gordon Brown's NEW LABOUR and since DAVE'S PARTY]

 It was used  to defeat the Divine Right of Kings; a claim of absolute power by the Stuart monarchs.  The OATH ascertains the SUPREMACY of the LAW, not the supremacy of CROWN or of PARLIAMENT.

There is certainly no Divine Right of Politicians.

The Coronation contract is of the Crown owing allegiance to the Constitution. The PEOPLE give ALLEGIANCE to the CROWN.

Here is a system of mutual protection for there is a constitutional interdependence.

 MAGNA CARTA

made provision for the PEOPLE to use ANY MEANS including FORCE if the CROWN is found to be in BREACH.

[THE CROWN IS IN BREACH!]

THE RIGHT OF RESISTANCE IS THE ULTIMATE REMEDY...

That which constitutionally binds the Monarch is a restriction upon Her Majesty, Her Government and all Parliamentary power.  The Monarch may do no wrong, but should she refuse by her negative power( the right to withhold assent) to

'LET WRONG BE DONE.'

[Millions of patriots have been waiting over four decades for:-

'Right to be Done!']

Sir William Blackstone confirms this. Whilst the monarch accepts the advice of ministers, they must only advise to do that which COMPLIES with the CONSTITUTION.  Plainly NO MONARCH is FREE to ASSENT to ADVICE that CONFLICTS with the CONSTITUTION in FORCE.

There is no authority in Parliament to pass any power of governance in England to those who hold or owe no allegiance. [such as the EU]

 There is no constitutional authority for Parliament to deliberately breach the constitutional laws by new   conflicting enactment.

 There is a natural duty resulting from the logic of our constitutional law to debate and resolve conflicts, if necessary by prior repeal.

 We must put an end to this form of 'legal' abuse, particularly through the misapplication of party politics.

 Most but not all of our constitution is written:- the Magna Carta, the Petition of Rights, the Declaration of Rights, the Bill of Rights, the Act of Settlement and the Acts of Union etc. It has evolved over centuries with the expenditure of much blood. It has been abused and corrected many times. It was finally settled by the Glorious Revolution of 1688/9.

The Judicial function is to be the independent arbiter between party and party or party and government under the terms of our constitutional law.  The courts are bound to declare upon the constitutionality of an Act where it may prove to be an action of unconstitutional governance. The great examples of the Magna Carta, the Petition 1628, the Declaration & the Bill of Rights 1688/9 make this duty of the court utterly plain.

Judgement may only be given in accordance with the constraints of constitutional laws in force.  At all times the presumption of law and justice in mercy be upheld and used  in all judgements. This is the trust sand the pre-eminent public policy reposed in the judiciary.

The right of petition to the Monarch is an appeal direct to the source of power, the Monarch is under OATH and at LAW, bound to provide REMEDY. Where there are RIGHTS there are REMEDIES. Politicians and Parliament must abide by the terms of reference and DUTY to the CONSTITUTION.

A fixed and certain standard with protection and remedy are the true purpose of the Constitution.

WE MUST RECLAIM OUR CONSTITUTION AND THE RULE OF LAW FROM THE SUPPOSED DIVINE RIGHT OF OUR POLITICIANS.

John Bingley-AUGUST 2003

*

[We ask how did it come to pass that the JUDICIARY did not PROTECT the CONSTITUTION from the illegal actions of PARLIAMENT and the Crown with the disclosures in 2001 under the 30 year rule from the Public Record Office at

 KEW-LONDON

 which revealed the CONSPIRACY of the FOREIGN OFFICE to prevent the PEOPLE from hearing the TRUTH of their TREACHERY and BETRAYAL. Under the 1969 THE VIENNA TREATY CONVENTION on the  LAW of TREATIES  there are two key provisions which authorise a signatory power to abrogate a bilateral or multilateral treaty unilaterally, without giving the stipulated notice.

1. Where corruption has been demonstrated in respect of pro curing the treaty in the first place, or in respect of any dimension of its implementation, the European Commission (EC) permits and is associated with corruption on a monumental scale, which the EU authorities have tried to cover up with declining success.

". Where there has been a material change of circumstances. A material change of circumstances has surfaced into the daylight (September 2005), to begin with, following the death of

Edward Heath.

. It has been revealed that he was an agent of a foreign power (NAZI-GERMANY-since 1938), accepted corrupt payment for his services, and lied to the British people concerning the nature of the geopolitical trap into which he had been instructed by his handlers to lead them-and that he did all this on behalf of a foreign power which has all along disguised its continuing Nazi orientation.

[Massive payouts were given to the signatories of the  EEC which in reality was in effect the road to the corrupt-collectivist-undemocratic

FEDERAL STATE of the EUROPEAN UNION.]

*

[THE QUEEN FAILED IN HER SOLEMN DUTY TO PROTECT HER PEOPLE AND THEIR UNIQUE WORLD RENOWNED FREE PARLIAMENTARY INHERITANCE

AND APART FROM SIGNING ILLEGALLY 6 EU TREATIES CONTRARY TO HER CORONATION OATH-IN 1998 SIGNED TONY BLAIR'S SECRET AMENDMENT BILL  FOR TREASON FROM THE DEATH PENALTY TO IMPRISONMENT FOR LIFE-OBVIOUSLY THEY BOTH HAD REASONS  FOR FEARING A FUTURE IMPEACHMENT BY PARLIAMENT.

 

More!

 

 

A MATTER OF TREASON

The behaviour of our politicians over the past thirty-five years has confirmed the dangers of one-party rule which was warned of over two millennium ago . The greatest danger we face is from within BY THE TREASONABLE ACTIONS of many of our politicians and judges who should know better and those close to our sovereign Queen Elizabeth II the PRIVY COUNSELLORS of the REALM.
 
Before we proceed we will state the oaths taken by our Privy Counsellors to the Queen and also to the European Union. We are at a loss to understand how it is possible to take the oath to Queen and Country and yet still take the oath to the EU.
 
CONFLICT OF DUTIES AND LOYALTIES
 
THE UNITED KINGDOM
 
THE OATH OF A PRIVY COUNSELLOR

 
'You do swear by Almighty God to be true and faithful Servant unto the Queen's Majesty's Privy Council. You will not know or understand of any manner of thing to be attempted, done, or spoken against Her Majesty's Person. Honour, Crown, or Dignity Royal, but you will let and withstand the same to the uttermost of your Power, and either cause it to be revealed to her Majesty Herself, or to such of Her Privy Council as shall advertise Her Majesty of the same. You will, in all things to be removed, treated, and debated in Council, faithly and truly declare your Mind and Opinion. According to your Heart and Conscience; and will keep secret all Matters committed and revealed unto you, or that shall be treated of secretly in Council. And if any of the said Treaties or Counsels shall touch any of the Counsellors, you will not reveal it unto him, but will keep the same until such time as, by the Consent of Her Majesty, or of the Council, Publication shall be made thereof. You will in your uttermost bear Faith and Allegiance unto the Queen's Majesty; and will assist and defend all Jurisdictions, Pre-eminence's, and Authorities, granted to her Majesty, annexed to the Crown by Acts of Parliament, or otherwise, against all Foreign Princes, Persons, Prelates, States, or Potentates. And generally in all things you will do as a faithful and true Servant ought to do to Her Majesty. SO HELP ME GOD. '
 
THE EUROPEAN UNION

 

The OATH SWORN BY COMMISSIONERS - BEFORE THE EUROPEAN COURT OF JUSTICE
 
'I solemnly undertake to perform my duties in complete independence in the general interest of the Communities in carrying out my duties neither to seek nor to take instructions from my government or body, to refrain from any action incompatible with my duties. I formally note the undertaking of each member state to respect this principle and not to seek to influence members of the Commission in the performance of their task. I further undertake to respect both during and after my term of office the obligations arising therefrom and in particular the duty to behave with integrity and discretion as regards the acceptance after I have ceased to hold office of certain appointments or benefits. '
 

Our Constitution was only safe so long as our Representatives were persons of INTEGRITY unfortunately it is clear that any person owning allegiance to Her Majesty could not in all honesty sign the oath to the European Union. We have therefore in our midst many TRAITORS to her Majesty and to the people of these Islands. We hope one day to have these Traitors tried by a SUPREME Constitutional Court when England one day will return to being a FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE of a Greater Britain. It is only a few decades ago when the last TRAITOR in England was" hanged by the neck until he was dead ". I t is our opinion that the actions of those who knowingly gave away the

 " Rights and Liberties

of the English People "

should suffer the maximum sentence prescribed by law, in memory of those millions of our people who gave their lives for their country, even in the last few weeks.
 
We will list every person that has had a hand in traitorously betraying this country in a TRAITORS GALLERY and see that these names are known by the people of this country. We ask anyone who is aware of anyone who has taken an Oath to let us know for inclusion in our list.
 
OVER TWO THOUSAND YEARS AGO THE FOLLOWING WORDS WERE SPOKEN BY A GREAT SENATOR OF ROME .
 
" A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and he carries his banners openly. But the TRAITOR moves among those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the TRAITOR appears no TRAITOR; he speaks in the accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their garments, and appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of men. He rots the soul of a nation; he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city; he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A MURDERER IS LESS TO BE FEARED".
 
CICERO ,
Marcus Tullius (106-43 B.C. ) Rom. Orator

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS}

MAY 30-2016

H.F.800

 

 

 

 
A FREE PRESS!

It's finest expression had already been given in

MILTON'S

AREOPAGITICA.

Milton boldly proclaimed two principles of profound importance.

One was the immunity of the religious life from political regulation. The other was that doctrine which has been the strength of the best thought of individualism from his day to the present, to wit that the well-being of society requires the natural diversity of its members, and that coercive uniformity of morals and manners would spell the ruin and degradation of any people.

*

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

More!

 

 

 

 

 
THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR PAST OVER 50 YEARS

 (1959-2016)

 

 

 

THE SPIRIT OF A PEOPLE

THE FIRST TASK of any politics that could be really scientific was to relate authority to its principle source, to show its dependence on the whole social fabric, the customs and traditions, the modes of thought and the standards of life that prevail among a people.  ...the work of Montesquieu.   He really sought to understand society, to show the influence of underlying  conditions ,climatic, geographical, economic, to show that custom and institutions neither are made nor can be changed by fiat, to show that there is in every people a spirit of character which their law must reveal

THE MODERN STATE by R. M MacIVER-1950

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

 

Brought forward from February-2005

FREEDOM of SPEECH -A FREEDOM, which cannot be abused – IS NOT WORTH HAVING.

 

[In the Daily Mail on Friday the 18th February 2005 a timely article by their columnist Andrew Alexander on the most important issue to be raised in a true democracy, which is Freedom of Speech for without it, a People are deprived of the very means to find the TRUTH.

 

Though at times the means to achieve this may lead to differences of view which after all is what it all means to speak one’s mind.  There is already protection in British law to curb those who wish to encourage violence. Affray and disorder. When others put this basic right of comment under threat then who is there to defend the Principle of Free Speech.]

*          *        *

We all have a Right

to

Freedom of Speech

 

Ken Livingstone should not apologise.  He may not be everyone’s cup of tea, certainly not mine, but the issue has now become one of freedom of speech.  The possibility that a government-appointed body could suspend him from office is one of the most outrageous things I have ever heard.

What he said to an Evening Standard reporter was something no gentleman would say.  But so what?   Politics, local or national, has never been distinguished by gentlemanly behaviour and never will be.   Newspapers can play it rough, too.  Both sides expect to give and take hard knocks.

 The real villain of the piece is an item of legislation entitled-soporifically-The Local Authorities (Model Code of Conduct)  (England) Order 2001.  Under ‘General Obligations’, we find the astonishing subsection, which says that councillors ‘must treat others with respect’.

Note the word ‘must’- not ‘should’ or ‘would be wise to’ or ‘wouldn’t be nice if all councillors were to’.  No, politeness is mandatory.

Consider also the ludicrous word  ‘others’, not voters, officials, fellow councillors or anything so narrow. ‘Others’ can mean anyone on the planet, from David Beckham to the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem.

How on earth, you may wonder, did this preposterous threat to free speech creep in?  It seems that when the legislation in question was introduced, the Conservatives concentrated their fire on the excessive regulation of parish councils, which was then being established.

The Tory promise was that, if it returned to power they would abolish the bureaucratic Standards Board for England (SBE)_ a collection of nonentities chosen by the Government-and leave sorting out of councillors’ problems about conflicts of interest and the like to the Local Government Ombudsman.

The Opposition made no move to oppose the wretched 2001 Order when it came along-no protests, not even a demand for a vote.

This sinister threat of censorship, which should be fought to the last ditch, passed on a nod, leaving the SBE [Standards Board for England] with the power to bar someone from office for up to five years for breaching the code.

The matter of Livingstone’s words has been referred to the SBE by the Board of Deputies of British Jews, a disgraceful move.  It does British Jewry’s reputation no good to have the Deputies leading a campaign against freedom of speech.

Livingstone’s remark about a reporter behaving like a concentration camp guard has, also absurdly been dubbed ‘racist’.

It may have played harshly on the target’s sensitivities, but by no stretch of the imagination did it belittle or attack a race.

The only thing this sort of exaggeration shows is how far the rot of ‘anti-racism’ has taken us.  We are becoming like the U.S. where the obsession about ‘race’ has reached the proportions of a national mania.

 

No doubt, we shall hear the commonplace retort from those accused of trying to curb free speech that of course they are all in favour of freedom, except where it is abused.  This is nonsensical view.

A Freedom, which cannot be abused, is not worth having.

The threat to Livingstone comes in the wake of another threat to free speech in the Government’s new legislation to ban remarks, which stir up religious hatred.  Freedom of speech, if it means what it says, involves the right:

To Irritate

 

Annoy

 

Dismay

 

And Shock

 

Anyone who Listens.

The only sensible limitation should be on speech designed to lead to violence, affray or disorder.  But that has always been enshrined in British law anyway.

I can’t help recalling from my youth, in relation to this whole issue, the harmless joke in one of those monologues wonderfully recited by [that great entertainer and loveable gentleman] Stanley Holloway-the Lion and Albert, and all the rest.

 As some readers may remember’ one explained how the barons of old descended on King John when he was having tea’ on Runningmede Island in t’Thames’ and made him sign the Magna Carta…’but his writing in places was sticky and thick through dipping his pen in the jam’.

 

The verse concludes:

 

‘In England today we can do what we like

So long as we do what we’re told’

 

How I laughed then, I would not have believed that this joke could one day be transmuted to:

‘And that is why we can talk as we like

So long as we talk as we’re told.’

A final touch of absurdity is added by the claim that Livingstone’s remark may jeopardise London’s attempt to host the Olympic Games.  If it did, it would be one good outcome.  The cost, the upset, the dislocation, the sheer waste of effort if London is chosen is too appalling to contemplate.

 

But if his comment really threatened London’s Olympic bid, it would show what a silly solemn people make up the International Olympic Committee.

 

It might have been a nice thing if Livingstone had originally apologised for having been gratuitously rude.  But the issue has gone beyond that now.  For him to retreat in the face of a threat to freedom of speech is in no one’s interest.

 

Andrew.Alexander@dailymail.co.uk

                         

 

THE DEATH OF ANDREW ALEXANDER WAS A GRIEVOUS LOSS FOR A TRUE DEMOCRACY-HE WILL BE MISSED AND NEVER FORGOTTEN.

R I P

 

PATRIOT AND TRUTH SEEKER

 

ON LIBERTY OF SPEECH

A Great Poet, a Puritan Parliamentarian, and Secretary to Oliver Cromwell – John Milton, during the Civil War wrote the following lines on Freedom of expression: -

 ‘ Give me liberty to know, to utter, and to argue freely according to conscience, above all liberties.  Though all the winds of doctrine were let loose to play upon the earth, so Truth be in the field, we do injuriously to misjudge her strength.

Let her and Falsehood grapple!

Who ever knew Truth put to the worse in a free and open encounter?

Who knows not that Truth is strong next to the Almighty

 

 MAGNA CARTA

 

FEBRUARY 2005

*          *          *

[Fonts altered-bolding &underlining used-comments in brackets]

 

H.F. 1325.

LITTLEJOHN

 

Don't tell 'em Pike! RICHARD LITTLEJOHN says the 2021 census will be just another excuse by the Government to invade our privacy, fine and tax us more

The justification for having a census every ten years is that it furnishes the Government with valuable information to improve public services and plan for future demand.

That's the theory, anyway. The last one was held in 2011 and was the most extensive, intrusive ever. The census form ran to 32 pages, delving into the most intimate areas of our lives.

They even had the impertinence to ask about sexual preference, as if that's any of their damn business.

Next time they are determined to find out how many transsexuals there are. Failure to comply could land you with a fine of up to £1,000. But, we're told, it's for our own good.

 

The last census in 2011 was the most extensive ever with a form that ran to 32 pages and delving into the most intimate areas of our lives

The Government insists it must know everything about us in order to provide the 'world-class' public services which politicians are always boasting about.

So how's that working out, then? They've had seven years to sift through all the data from the 2011 census and react accordingly. But can anyone, hand on heart, honestly say that things have got better?

Are the roads and trains less crowded, as a result of ministers learning that more people would be travelling?

Is it easier to see your doctor? Have hospital waiting lists been slashed as more beds have been provided to cope with our growing, ageing population?

Can you get your children into the local school of your choice? Are there more coppers on the beat? Are your dustbins emptied more frequently?

Has the third runway at Heathrow been built yet? Have we opened a few more nuclear power stations to meet our insatiable demand for electricity, to power all the fancy gizmos we rely upon today?

Er, not exactly. Road space has actually been reduced, thanks to the faddish obsession with building cycle lanes. The NHS appears to be in permanent crisis, and it can take weeks to see a GP, that's if you can find one still registering new patients.

School places are under more pressure than ever, largely as a result of uncontrolled immigration. The police have withdrawn from the streets to concentrate on scouring the internet for 'hate crime'.

In some areas, you're lucky if you see the dustmen once every three weeks. No wonder fly-tipping is endemic. We'll put a man on Mars before the third runway at Heathrow opens. And it's only a matter of time until the iPhones will be going out all over Britain, as coal-fired power stations shut arbitrarily, to meet made-up 'climate change' targets, and we are forced to rely on useless windmills.

The 2021 census, will for the first time since the Domesday Book, pictured, ask for details about all our income, investments and other assets

One area where we do now lead the world is in snooping on and gathering irrelevant information about the population.

We'd like to know a little bit about you for our files.

Plans for the 2021 census have just been released and, next time, it won't be just the now-predictable demands for ethnicity, sexual predilection and gender identity.

For the first time since William the Conqueror's Domesday Book, in 1086, the Government is planning to gather details of all our income, investments and other assets. That early census was so thorough that it was said 'there was no single hide nor yard of land, nor indeed one ox or cow nor one pig which was left out'.

In 2021, hiding a pig in your shed will be easier than concealing the contents of your piggy bank from the authorities. The Office for National Statistics (ONS) plans to use new legal powers, slipped through Parliament last year, to trawl income tax and social security records and compile profiles of everyone's worth.

   

More from Richard Littlejohn for the Daily Mail...

The ONS claims it needs to build up a database of prosperous postcodes, so that services can be concentrated on 'vulnerable' areas. Cobblers. This is the first step towards introducing a wealth tax and a local income tax, so that the 'rich' pay more.

The census is not about serving the common good. It's about divide and rule, carving up the country into different and competing victim and special interest groups. They are also planning to tap into mobile phone records to track our movements, in an outrageous expansion of state surveillance. Already, Britain has more CCTV cameras than any other country on earth.

None of this is about providing better public services, it's about control. Knowledge is power, knowledge is valuable and can be sold to the highest bidder.

The tech giants already harvest our online habits, which they can then parlay into commercial gain by bombarding us with advertising. Naturally, the Government wants a piece of the action.

Of course, they pay lip service to security. But would you trust any Government official with a shred of evidence which isn't essential?

Never mind individual civil servants and rogue coppers using sensitive information to spy on and discredit others.

Look at the way local councils misuse anti-terrorism legislation to monitor parents attempting to circumvent school catchment areas to get their kids a decent education.

How many times have we heard of Government staff downloading 'secure' records and then leaving them on a train somewhere?

We know that the DVLA sells our vehicle information to private parking companies. Only yesterday, it was revealed that the Department of Health is handing over the medical records of British cancer patients to American lawyers acting for Big Tobacco.

Always work on the basis that no information you supply to the Government — or anyone else for that matter — is confidential or secure, and you won't go far wrong.

The next census, as usual, will be produced in dozens of different languages, many of them scribble. But we still won't know how many people are living here, legal or otherwise.

MPs admitted last week that they haven't got a clue about the number of foreign nationals living under the radar in Britain, because no such information exists and there's no reliable method of measuring it.

Richard Littlejohn argues that the census is not about serving the common good or providing better public services but about control

Best guess is somewhere between two and three million. But don't expect the census to clarify that.

Illegal immigrants aren't going to fill in a census form. Nor are transients, or many of those living in overcrowded inner-cities, where English is rarely spoken.

So, once again, the law will only apply to those who agree to abide by it and the 2021 census will be just another excuse by the Government to invade our privacy, fine and tax us more.

As for all this information leading to better provision of public services, well, last time out more than 400,000 people identified their religion as 'Jedi', but I haven't noticed state-funded Jedi community centres springing up everywhere. Have you?

At least not all the information they gather is wasted, which is why they're so keen on asking about gender identity.

The good news is that, while the rest of our public services are falling apart, we now also lead the world in transgender toilet provision, and the NHS is offering free cervical smear tests to men who define as women, even though they haven't got a cervix.

Makes you proud to be British. 

 

Here's another one of those stories I don't know whether to file under Mind How You Go or You Couldn't Make It Up.

A policewoman has been awarded £15,000 compensation because she couldn't carry an Alsatian up a hill. No, I can't believe I've just written that sentence, either.

PC Kim-Louise Carter applied to join the Gloucestershire canine unit. One of the tests involves carrying a dog up a 70-yard gradient. When she failed to carry a 5½st Alsatian called Hulk up the hill, she was given another chance with a lighter dog called Fizz.

But she dropped Fizz, too, complaining that her legs had 'turned to jelly'. It didn't help that during the exam her dog got into a fight with another one and bit a police officer.

Maybe she's just not cut out to be a dog handler. Yet despite the fact that three other women candidates did pass the test, Kim-Louise cried 'sex discrimination'.

And, with depressing predictability, a tribunal agreed with her, ruling that the test must be made easier and ordering instructors to undergo 'equality training'.

Perhaps the police should get rid of all their Alsatians and in future use something smaller like a dachshund, chihuahua, or some other miniature breed that PC Carter can keep in her handbag.

 

Had to laugh at the man who blew himself up trying to rob a Glasgow ATM. Police are still looking for his accomplice. Last night they issued a photo of the two men they believe were responsible, possibly under the influence of bevvy

 
 

Nick Clegg, rejected by his former constituents in Sheffield, is claiming £115,000 a year in allowances previously only given to ex-Prime Ministers. Why should taxpayers have to subsidise Calamity Clegg, when he devotes all his time attempting to overturn the democratic decision of the 17.4 million who voted for Brexit?

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-5273227/Dont-tell-em-Pike-RICHARD-LITTLEJOHN-2021-census.html#ixzz54NH3P6Ff
Follow us:
@MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

H.F.1442

H.F.730

 
 
 
A MEETING PLACE  - THERE ARE HUNDREDS  OF ALTERNATIVE WEBSITES ON OUR wEBSITE- SINCE 2003CLICK HERE
realzionistnews. TruetorahJews CONSPIRACYPLANET

.COM/

Fagan-Sounded-Alarm-of -the ILLUMINATI-in-1967  DAVID ICKE BRITISH CONSTITUTION GROUP

 

YOU CAN HANDLE THE TRUTH
BENJAMIN FULFORD.NET

 

THE WORLD OF TRUTH NEWWORLDORDER

INFO.COM

 

 
LANDDESTROYER.

BLOGSPOT

.COM

HENRY MAKOW  CORBETTREPORT) LIFE IN THE MIX 2

 

UK COLUMN.ORG. JEW WATCH

ACTIVISTPOST.

COM

TARPLEY.NET

 

 

 

THANK YOU FOR CALLING!

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

CLICK HERE FOR PREVIOUS FRONT PAGE-2012

 
MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

WARNING of OUR MAN in WASHINGTON in 1996-EURO DOOMED TO FAILURE-

 

ONLY a GOLD STRONG GERMANY has PREVENTED the COLLAPSE of

 HITLER'S war-planned EU

 TIME IS RUNNING OUT for FRAU MERKEL as many GERMANS now say WE WANT OUR COUNTRY BACK-NOW!

 

The main purpose of the EU (Germany) was to encourage mass immigration from opposing cultures to order to destroy any remaining NATIONAL SPIRIT of the member states.

It was an arrogant and complaisent move by an out-of-touch ELITE! which decided it knew best and it is now desparate to salvage what it can in order to keep their well-paid jobs and pensions.

Over the past 44 years the EU commision has used its unlimited funds to build up its connections in the member states in order to bribe and with a policy of gradualism to sponsor all manner of developments particularly in England with (propaganda and brainwashing) in schools and colleges by the BBC-the Brussels Broadcasting Corporation-books-leaflets-talks-trips etc. Businessess  and science, trade unions and many others from other areas of society and with many politicians in local and central government looking for rapid promotion particularly in Brussels with their lucritive salary and  expences in order to obtain supporters for their Super State ambition. The close result on June 23-2016 showed how successful they were with their many enticements paid for in the main by ENGLAND and the small number of  other major contributors to the EU BUDGET and that is why so many voters in the country put their own selfish interest FIRST with no interest in reclaiming their once

FREE-INDEPENDENT NATION STATE.

*

EU expenses: MEPs claim over £1million in five years as Nigel ...

 

 

Searches related to mep salary and expenses

mep salary and expenses 2016

nigel farage mep expenses

mep pension

nigel farage mep salary

mep expenses scandal

mep expenses claims

how many meps in european parliament

mep pension rights

*

101  REASONS WE LEFT THE EU

AND THE

THE ROTTEN HEART OF EUROPE

*

LATEST!

 
DAILY MAIL

 COMMENT

February 14, 2017:

 

THE PRICE FOR STAYING IN-

[THE EU]

Here's a figure George Osborne and his Remainer chums didn't mention during the referendum campaign.

Britain's net contribution to the EU budget is to soar to almost a third by 2019-from

 £7.9 billion a year to £10.2billion.

Doesn't this revelation, slipped out by the TREASURY

show precisely why we're leaving in the nick of time?

Brussels is spending well beyond its means and increasingly expects bigger countries like Britain to foot the bill. Getting out could solve our elderly care crisis at a stroke-and still leave a few billion to spare.

*
Daily Mail

*

Empires have gone and most  people in the world now live in nation states-Lord Peter Shore

2003

*

THE ARDENT EU FANATIC JOHN BERCOW OF TODAY IN FEBRUARY 2017 HAD A CHANGE OF FACE IN 1998.

 

ADDED FEBRUARY 14-2017

 FROM

DAILY MAIL

Ephraim

Hardcastle

COLUMN

 SPEAKER John Bercow who controversially told Reading University students he voted REMAIN, informed scholars at BUCKINGHAM UNIVERSITY in 1998:

The people of Britain will never knowingly consent to be governed by those who do not speak their language, live in their country or depend yupon their votes. The power of self, the right to hire and fire our rulers and the capacity to chart our vown destiny are inalienable birthrights . They should not be traded in for a mess of pottage otherwise known as a back row seat at a show called

THE HEART OF EUROPE.

Our destiny is surely as a self governing nation which trades freely with the world. The future is bright; the future is global. Our success in it is dependent upon the vision, self confidence and calibre of our leaders, our businesses and our workforce.'

My source there adds: His speach was such a Eurosceptic tour de force that the Bruges Group printed it as a pamphlet.' Fancy!

 

*

'English Freedom is rooted in English nature.'

 

IMPEACH BLAIR FOR MISLEADING US OVER IRAQ WAR-SAYS GENERAL SIR MICHAEL ROSE [2006]

HOW President Blair CORRUPTS EVERYTHING HE TOUCHES

TRAITOR BLAIR PUTS UP TWO FINGERS TO THE BRITISH PEOPLE

WARNING OF OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON IN 1996-EURO DOOMED TO FAILURE

BUSH AND BLAIR START A WAR FOR POWER AND OIL AND TO RESTRICT THE FREEDOM OF THE PEOPLE [2006]

ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY-CORRECT BLAIRDOM

THE DEATH OF POLITICS

A TIME TO MAKE A STAND IS HERE

BLAIR'S THREE WARS DOOMED TO FAILURE

BLAIR_GOLDSMITH-SCARLETT AND OTHERS-A CABAL OF TREASON

*

 ALFRED CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH

*  *  *

HOME -FEBRUARY-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2017

POLICIES

 
MAR-17 APR-17 MAY-17 JUN-17 JUL-17 AUG-17 SEP-17 OCT-17 NOV-17 DEC-17
JAN-18 FEB-18 MAR-18

APL-18

MAY-18

JUN-18

JUL-18

AUG-18

SEP-18

OCT-18

NOV-18

DEC-18

JAN-19

FEB-19

MAR-19

APR-19

MAY-19

JUN-19

JUL-19

AUG-19