VOTE UKIP!-ON MAY 7-2015

&

AT THE REFERENDUM

WHICH MUST BE HELD IN THE FOUR NATION STATES

VOTE TO LEAVE THE UNDEMOCRATIC

NAZI-PLANNED EU.

 

 
 
 
MAJOR ISSUES BULLETIN

 

 

 

 
 

 

 

*HOME-PT 2

 

PREVIOUS:

PAGE ONE/ PAGE TWO/PAGE THREE/ PAGE FOUR/PAGE FIVE/

OCTOBER-PT2-2012/

NOVEMBER-PT2-2012

JANUARY-PT2 -2013

 

A PEACEFUL ENGLISH REVOLUTION IS ON THE WAY-ALERT-1

 
RON PAUL 9-11+(1) GLOBALWARMING SCAM USA IRAQ/AFGHAN LONDON BOMBINGS COMMON PURPOSE CONSPIRACY CENTRAL BANKS  +(1)
HOME ARCHIVE  MAIN BULLETINS E U  ENGLAND +(1) BILDERBERGERS+(1)

(+1)

ILLUMINATI +(1) NEW WORLD ORDER +(1)
1)U.S. Concentration Camps

2)DEC-2011- MADE-READY

3) PLANS

1)

FEMA

2)

1)Protocols

of

ZION

2) (3)

ZIONISM

4) (5)

CITY

OF

LONDON

 

 A STATE WITHIN ENGLAND

+(2)

 Dr.

John

Coleman

WHO OWNS

THE FED

 

POWER

OF 1)HAARP FOR GOOD   2)EVIL

Mind Control INTERNET

CENSOR

SHIP

1)Chem

trails

2)CREATED

C3)

1)

PRIVATE CENTRAL BANKS

2)

(1)

War is a Racket

(2)

(3)

(4)

HOW WARS ARE MADE

(5)

A MEETING PLACE  - THERE ARE HUNDREDS  OF ALTERNATIVE WEBSITES ON OUR wEBSITE- SINCE 2003
realzionistnews. TruetorahJews CONSPIRACYPLANET

.COM/

Fagan-Sounded-Alarm-of -the ILLUMINATI-in-1967   DAVID ICKE BRITISH CONSTITUTION GROUP

 

YOU CAN HANDLE

THE TRUTH

BENJAMIN FULFORD.NET

 

THE WORLD OF TRUTH NEWWORLDORDER

INFO.COM

 

NADER LIBRARY.COM-

TERRORISM-ILLUMINATI

 

LANDDESTROYER.

BLOGSPOT

.COM

HENRY MAKOW  CORBETTREPORT) LIFE IN THE MIX 2

 

UK COLUMN.ORG. JEW WATCH

ACTIVISTPOST.

COM

TARPLEY.NET

 

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS almost BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/ ****    REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****    THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****       FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/  ****   A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?     **** GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER/  ****    A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES? ****   THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/   WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/  ****   GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND****   50 YEARS OF SURRENDER***AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED.

DAVID CAMERON'S PLAN TO CLAW BACK POWERS FROM EU ARE DOOMED SAYS EU CHIEF IN OCTOBER-2013

 

 
     
 

MAJOR ISSUES BULLETIN

 
 

HOME

 

 

THE ROAD TO SERFDOM is a REALITY in the UNITED STATES OF EUROPE -A COLLECTIVIST SYSTEM which STALIN-HITLER and MUSSOLINI brought the WORLD TO WAR.

WE ARE ALL HEADED FOR AN ADMINISTRATIVE NIGHTMARE WHERE THE OFFICIAL RULES WITHIN A POLICE STATE AND

NO RULE OF LAW .

If you want some very interesting reading from a book which will no doubt be BANNED by BRUSSELS now is the TIME to find out what was known over 60 years ago. Hitler came to POWER because he already found a PEOPLE and COUNTRY which had already abandoned the RULE OF LAW in line with the socialistic doctrine. They need us in EUROPE to PAY THE BILLS but ON THEIR TERMS.

Unless your POLITICIANS and /or MONARCH veto the New EU TREATY you might as well learn what is in store FOR YOU

F. A. Hayek -The Road to Serfdom

(1944 & 1971)

Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd

[It is most unlikely that you will find such a POLITICALLY INCORRECT

publication in your local library]

The Road to Serfdom is probably Professor Hayek's best known work. First published in 1944, it has been translated into twelve languages and has made its author world -famous. Economic planning is still a topic of academic as well as governmental interest and study. The Road to Serfdom, therefore, continues to form a basis for critical discussion of planned economies.

 

 

'This book should be read by everybody. It is no use saying that there are a great many people who are not interested in politics [particularly in 2008]  ; the political issue discussed by Dr Hayek concerns every single member of the community: it is a problem of

FREEDOM in a PLANNED SOCIETY

According to Dr Hayek, the moment we pass arrangements to ensure

"security against severe physical privation"

and the provision of those services which cannot be provided by competition, to any attempt to establish [as in 2008] a

"central direction of all economic activity according to a

SINGLE PLAN

laying down how the

RESOURCES of SOCIETY

should be consciously directed to serve particular ends in a definite way"

OUR LIBERTY IS GONE

[Each underlined word has a separate bulletin]

(Listener)

[The works above were among the first bulletins  put on our EDP website- by  one who struggled  to master a keyboard let alone type and not the best in the spelling stakes in the world  but had to get into it, whatever the difficulties. After now in 2008 having accumulated millions of words we have improved a little-we hope?]

*

 

We have on our website a few years ago mentioned the works of Dr Hayek because of the relevance of his work to the explanation of how easy it has been over the past sixty years for the collectivist  message to be driven by our membership of the European Union.

It is as was said by the Scottish philosopher David Hume:

'It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once.'

How true that has been over the past six decades and more importantly in the year 2008 when the final nail will be hammered into the coffin containing our

Rights and Liberties

of Englishman

of over 1400 years in the making.

There will be in fact three nails to secure closed the lost LIBERTIES of a once Parliamentary democracy unique in the world.

THE HOUSE OF COMMONS

THE HOUSE OF LORDS

and

THE QUEEN

[Of course there is the Parliament Bill of 1911 and 1949 for the Executive to push through the traitorous design. ONLY the QUEEN can VETO the TREATY and ensure the RIGHTS and LIBERTIES of HER subjects are SECURE.]

*

 

THE TOTALITARIANS IN OUR MIDST

 

A quote by The Times was very apt 60 years ago and a stern warning to those who find politics a bore, as it is for many in January, 2008.

 

When authority presents itself in the guise of organisation it develops charms fascinating enough to convert communities of FREE PEOPLE into TOTALITARIAN STATE

PROBABLY it is true that the very magnitude of the outrages committee by the totalitarian governments, instead of increasing the fear that such a system might one day arise in this country , has rather strengthened the assurance that

IT CANNOT HAPPEN HERE!

[IT HAS!]

 

When we look to Nazi Germany [1944] the gulf which separates us seems so immense that nothing that happens there can possess relevance for any development in this country.  And the fact that the difference has steadily become greater seems to refute any suggestion that we may be moving in a similar direction.

BUT

let us not forget that fifteen years ago [1929] the possibility of such a thing happening in Germany would have appeared fantastic, not only to nine-tenths of the Germans themselves, but also to the most hostile foreign observers (however wise they may now pretend to have been [as we today in January 2008 who see how far over the past six decades the dream of a totalitarian United States of Europe is only months away and our once FREE country could end up part of such a collectivist empire]

As suggested earlier in these pages, however, it is not the present Germany [1944] but the Germany of twenty or thirty years ago to which conditions in this country show an ever-increasing resemblance. There are many features which were then regarded as "typically German" and which are now equally familiar in this country, and many systems that point to a further development in the same direction.

We have already mentioned the most significant , the increasing similarity between the economic views of the Right and left [as in 2008] and their common opposition to the

LIBERALISM

that used to be the common basis of most English politics.

 

We have the authority of Mr Harold Nicolson for the statement that during the last Conservative government, among back-benchers of the Conservative party

 "the most gifted... were all socialists at heart"

(Spectator, April 12, 1940, p.523)

[Is that not true in 2008]

and there can be little question that, as in the days of the Fabians, many socialists have more sympathy with the Conservatives than with the Liberals.

There are many other features closely related to this. The increasing veneration for

THE STATE

-the admiration of

POWER

and of bigness for bigness' sake, the enthusiasm for

"organisation"

OF

EVERYTHING

 

(we now call it planning),

and that

"inability to leave anything to the simple power of organic growth"

which even H. v. Treitschke deplored of in Germany sixty years ago (1884), are all scarcely less marked in this country now ,than they were in Germany.

How far in the last twenty years England has travelled on the German path is brought home to one with extraordinary vividness if one reads some of the serious discussions of the differences between British and German views on political and moral issues which appeared in this country during the last war [1914-18]

It is probably true to say that then the British public had in general a truer appreciation of these differences than it has now [1944]; but while the people of this country were then proud of

THEIR DISTINCTIVE TRADITION

there are few of the political views then regarded as characteristically English of which the majority of people in this country do not now seem half-ashamed, if they do not positively repudiate them.

It is scarcely an exaggeration to say that the more typically English a writer on political or social problems then appeared in the world, the more is he today forgotten in his own country. Men like

 

LORD MORLEY

or

HENRY SIDGWICK

LORD ACTON

A. V. DICEY

 

who were then admired in the world at large as outstanding examples of the political wisdom of liberal England, are to the present generation [1944 and again in 2008-more so] largely obsolete Victorians.

Perhaps, nothing shows this change more clearly than that, while there is no lack of sympathetic treatment of Bismarck in contemporary English literature, the name of Gladstone is rarely mentioned by the younger generation without a sneer over the Victorian morality and naive utopianism.

I wish I could in a few paragraphs adequately convey the alarming impression gained from the perusal of a few of the English works on the ideas dominating the Germany of the last war [1914-18] where almost every word could be applied to the views most conspicuous in current English literature. I shall merely quote one brief passage by Lord Keyes, describing in 1915 the "nightmare" which he found expounded in a typical German work of that period: he describes how according to a German author

even in peace industrial life must remain mobilised. This is what he means by speaking of the "militarisation of our industrial life" [the title of the work reviewed] Individualism must come to an end absolutely. A system of regulations must be set up, the object of which is not greater happiness of the individual (Professor Jaffe is not ashamed to say this in so many words), but the strengthening of the organised unity of the state for the object of attaining the maximum degree of efficiency (Leistungsfahigkeit), the influence of which on individual advantage is only indirect. - This hideous doctrine is enshrined in a sort of idealism.  The nation will grow into a "closed unity" and will become, in fact, what Plato declared it should be -

"Der mensch im Grossen".

In particular, the coming peace will bring with it a strengthening of the idea of State action in industry....Foreign investment, emigration, the industrial policy which in recent years had regarded the whole world as a market, are too dangerous. The old order of industry, which is dying to-day, is based on Profit; and the new Germany of the twentieth-century Power without consideration of Profit is to make an end of that system of Capitalism, which came over from England one hundred years ago.

[ Economic journal, 1915, p.450]

[Is this not still the policy of the original six founders of the EU particularly France in 2008]

Except that no English author [up to 1944] has yet to my knowledge dared openly to disparage individual happiness, is there a passage in this which is not mirrored in much contemporary English literature

And, undoubtedly, not merely the ideas which in Germany and elsewhere prepared totalitarianism, but also many principles of totalitarianism itself are what exercises an increasing fascination in many other countries?

Although few people , if anybody, in this country [1944] would probably be ready to swallow totalitarianism whole, there are few single features which we have not yet advised by somebody or other to imitate.   Indeed, there is scarcely a leaf out of Hitler's book which somebody or other in this country [England] has not recommended us to take and use for our own purposes. [which is of course what many Nazi traitors such as Edward Heath Geoffrey Ribbon and Roy Jenkins and a great deal of others, even to this day in January 9, 2008 when we have a prime minister who shows he has learnt a great deal from Hitler in refusing the

PEOPLE a REFERENDUM.]

[Each underlined word has a separate bulletin]

 

This applies [particularly to many people who are undoubtedly Hitler's mortal enemies because of one special feature in his system. We should never forget that the anti-semitism of Hitler has driven from his country, or turned into enemies, many people who in every respect are confirmed totalitarians of the German type.

[At the end of the 1939-45 European War the Americans were conned by the German academics that their real enemy was Russia and as a result the Americans stopped their De -Nazification programme shortly after the Surrender. At least 77O top Nazis of particular interests were allowed to settle in the US. One noted individual was Von Braun the rocket expert who later helped the American Space success. There were some with knowledge in the 'Black Arts' and other subversive activities.  Regrettably over the decades the Nazi influence had grown and it has only been in the last few years that American Intelligence has realised that their intelligence services were supporting future German expansion. The United States of Europe has been not only a brainchild of the Nazis but also supported by the Americans  for over four decades.   Much of this information is included in the underlined words above from information received by the

INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW

 

 

 

 

www.worldreports.org

 from certain members of the Intelligence Services and included in their  Summer-Autumn 2005 journal which we were to receive on or about October 10-2005 and was promptly placed on our EDP website. As we have explained on a number of occasions the so-called FREE PRESS in our country has been reluctant to give the TRUTH to the PUBLIC no doubt because of the great harm it will do to our now so-called DEMOCRACY?]

*

MATERIAL CONDITIONS AND IDEAL ENDS

(1944)

There is one aspect of the change in moral values brought about by the advance of collectivism which at present time provides special food for thought.  It is that virtues which are held less and less in esteem and which consequently become rarer are precisely those on which the British people justly prided themselves and in which they are generally recognised to excel. The  virtues possessed by the British people possessed in a higher degree than most other people, excepting only a few of the smaller nations , like the Swiss and the Dutch [It was no coincidence that the Dutch voted against the New EU Treaty in 2005.], where independence and self-reliance, individual initiative and local responsibility, the successful reliance on voluntary activity, non-interference with one's neighbour and toleration ,and suspicion of power and authority.   British strength, British character, and British achievement are to a great extent the result of a cultivation of the spontaneous.

But almost all the traditions and institutions in which British moral genius has found its most characteristic expression, and which in turn have moulded the national characteristic and the whole moral climate of England, are those which the progress of collectivism and its inherently centralistic tendencies are progressively destroying...

... The Left intelligentsia, indeed have so long worshipped foreign gods that they seem to have become almost incapable of seeing any good in the characteristic English institutions and traditions.

[IS THAT NOT SO IN 2008 AND FOR SOME YEARS PAST]

That the moral values on which most of them pride themselves are largely the product of the institutions they are out to destroy, these socialists cannot , of course, admit.

That this attitude is unfortunately not confined to avowed socialists. Though one must hope that this is not true of the less vocal but more numerous cultivated Englishmen, if one were to judge by the ideas which find expression in current political discussion and propaganda [as in 2008] the Englishmen who not only

"the language speak that Shakespeare spake",

but also

"the faith and morals hold that Milton held"

seem to have almost vanished.

Though the subject of this chapter has already invited more than one reference to Milton, it is difficult to resist the temptation to add here one more quotation, a very familiar one, though one, it seems, which nowadays nobody but a foreigner would dare cite:

"Let not England forget her precedence of teaching nations how to live."

It is perhaps, significant that our generation has seen a host of American and English detractors of Milton - and that the first of them, Mr. Ezra Pound, was during the war broadcasting from Italy!

To believe, however, that the kind of propaganda produced by this attitude can have the desired effect on our enemies [1944]  and particularly the Germans, is a fatal blunder [as we see in 2008] The Germans know their country, not well, perhaps, yet sufficiently to know what are the characteristic traditional values of British life, [but particularly English life] and what for the past two or three generations has increasingly separated the minds of the two countries. [over the past two generations we have seen the result of the failure of the English people to apprehend what was happening to their country until recently when they now know they are only months from losing

THEIR FREE CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY.]

If we wish to convince them, not only the country of our sincerity, but also that we have to offer a real alternative to the way they have gone, it will not be by concessions to their system of thought. [Regrettably that is exactly what has happened over the past sixty years by our traitorous prime ministers who have been financially rewarded from a Nazi slush fund.]

We shall not persuade them  with a stale reproduction of the ideas of their fathers which we have borrowed from them - be it

STATE-SOCIALISM

"Realpolitik"

"scientific"

planning, or corporativism.

We shall not persuade them by following them half the way which leads to

TOTALITARIANISM.

 

[THEY HAVE ALMOST DONE SO IN 2008]

 

If the English themselves abandon the supreme ideal of

FREEDOM and HAPPINESS

of the individual, if they implicitly admit that their civilisation is not worth preserving, and that they know nothing better than to follow the path along which the Germans have led, they have indeed nothing to offer.

To the Germans all these are merely belated admissions that the British have been wrong all the way through, and that they themselves are leading the way to a better and new world, however, appalling the period of transition may be.

The Germans know that what they still regard as the

BRITISH TRADITION

and their own new ideals are fundamentally opposed and irreconcilable views of life. They might be convinced that the way they have chosen was wrong -but nothing will ever encourage them that the British will be better guides on the German path.

Least of all will that type of propaganda appeal to those Germans on whose help we must ultimately count in rebuilding Europe because their values are nearest our own.  For experience has made them wiser and sadder men: they have learnt that neither good intentions nor efficiency of organisation can preserve decency in a system in which personal freedom and individual responsibility are destroyed.

What the German and Italian who have learnt the lesson above all want is protection against a monster state - not grandiose schemes for organisation on a colossal scale, [as we have seen in the case of the expansion of the EU over the past three decades] but opportunity peacefully and in freedom to build up once more his own little world....

If we are to succeed in the war of ideologies and to win over the decent elements in the enemy countries, we must first of all regain the belief in the

TRADITIONAL VALUES

 for which this country stood in the past, and must have the moral courage stoutly to defend the

IDEALS

which our enemies attack.

Not by shamefaced apologies and by assurances that we are rapidly reforming, NOT by explaining that we are seeking some compromise between

TRADITIONAL ENGLISH VALUES

and the

NEW TOTALITARIAN IDEAS

shall we win confidence and support.

 

Not the latest improvements we have effected in our social institutions, which count but little compared with the basic differences of two opposed ways of life.

[Each underlined word has a separate bulletin]

BUT OUR UNWAVERING FAITH IN THOSE TRADITION WHICH HAVE MADE THIS COUNTRY A COUNTRY OF FREE UPRIGHT, TOLERANT AND INDEPENDENT PEOPLE -IS THE THING THAT COUNTS.

 

*

 

 

This was so in 1944 and should be so in 2008 if the people wake up to the con-trick which is being played on them by the majority of their politicians who can only at present imagine the  power they will assume who toe the line of the

NEW EU TREATY.

   *

[As we have said a number of times over the past years the traitor Tony Blair will be offered the position of the first President of the E U Council as a reward for his vital signature on the Treaty. Our only hope of remaining a

FREE NATION STATE

will be if

 THE QUEEN

refuses to ratify the Treaty.]

*

 

THE GREAT UTOPIA

[1944]

THAT socialism has displaced liberalism as the doctrine held by the great majority of progressives does not simply mean that people have forgotten the warnings of the great liberal thinkers of the past about the

CONSEQUENCES

 OF

COLLECTIVISM.

because they were persuaded of the very opposite of what these men had predicted. the extraordinary thing is that the same socialism that was not only early recognised as the

GRAVEST THREAT TO FREEDOM

but quite openly began as a reaction against the liberalism of the French revolution, gained general acceptance under the

FLAG OF LIBERTY

 

It is rarely remembered now that under socialism in its beginnings was frankly

AUTHORITARIAN.

The French writers who laid the foundations of modern socialism had no doubt that their ideas could be put into practice only by a

DICTATORIAL GOVERNMENT.

To them socialism meant an attempt to

"terminate the revolution"

by a deliberate reorganisation of society on hierarchical lines, and the imposition of a  coercive

"spiritual power".

Where freedom was concerned, the founders of socialism made no bones about their intentions.

FREEDOM OF THOUGHT

they regarded as the root-evil of nineteenth-century society, and the first of modern planners, Saint Simon, even predicted that those who did not obey his proposed planning boards would be

"treated as cattle".

Only under the influence of a strong democratic currents preceding the revolution of 1848 did socialism begin to ally itself with forces of freedom.  But it took the new

"democratic socialism"

a long time to live down the suspicions aroused by its antecedents.  Nobody saw more clearly than  [Alexis] de Tocqueville (1805-59) that democracy as an essentially individualistic institution stood in an

IRRECONCILABLE CONFLICT WITH SOCIALISM:

 

'Democracy extends the sphere of individual freedom [he said in 1848], socialism restricts it.

'Democracy attaches all possible value to each man; socialism makes each man a mere agent, a mere number.

'Democracy and socialism have nothing in common but one word: equality

BUT NOTE THE DIFFERENCE:

while

DEMOCRACY seeks EQUALITY

in

 LIBERTY

 

SOCIALISM seeks EQUALITY

 in

RESTRAINT and SERVITUDE.

[These words were right in 1844 and they are right in 2008 and it is what you will get more of in the future United States of Europe.]

Dr Walter Lippmann (1889) comments:

the generation to which we belong is now learning from experience what happens when men retreat from freedom to a coercive organisation of their affairs.  Though they promise themselves a more abundant life , they must in practice renounce it ; as the organised direction increases, the variety of ends must give way to uniformity. That is the nemesis of the planned society and the authoritarian principle in human affairs.

[This is as true today in 2008 as we have seen particularly over the past ten years when almost every part of our lives are under close scrutiny and where the legislation particularly from Brussels has turned into a flood.  The more laws that are put on the STATUTE BOOK the more there will be great injustices because as the saying goes the

'best government is one that governs the least."]

 

In the early passages of Professor Hayek's best known works he said in 1943:

....For at least Twenty -five years before the spectre of

TOTALITARIANISM

became a real threat, we had progressively been moving away from the basic ideas on which European civilisation has been built.  That this movement on which we have entered with such high hopes and ambitions should have brought us face to face with the

TOTALITARIAN HORROR

has come as a profound shock to this generation [19 14-1944] , which still refuses to connect the two facts. Yet this development merely confirms the warnings of the liberal philosophy which we still profess.  We have progressively abandoned that

FREEDOM

in

ECONOMIC AFFAIRS

without which

PERSONAL AND POLITICAL FREEDOM

has never existed

IN THE PAST.

 

Although we had been warned by some of the greatest political thinkers of the nineteenth century, by

Alexis de Tocqueville and Lord Action

that

SOCIALISM MEANS SLAVERY

we have steadily moved in the direction of

SOCIALISM

[As has been the case since that time in 1944 when the evidence became clear that the path to socialism was indeed the path to

SLAVERY

as we shall all witness in 2008.]

And now we have seen a new form of slavery arise before our eyes, we have so completely forgotten the warning, that it scarcely occurs to us that the two things may be connected .[as shown over the past six decades of which the results will be seen in all their true colours in 2008]

 

HOW SHARP A BREAK not only with the recent past but with the whole evolution of Western civilisation the modern trend towards socialism means, becomes clear if we consider it nor merely against a background of the nineteenth century, but in a longer historical perspective.

We are rapidly abandoning not the views merely of

COBDEN and BRIGHT

of

ADAM SMITH and DAVID HUME

or even of

LOCKE and MILTON

but one of the salient characteristics of

WESTERN CIVILISATION

 

as it has grown from the

FOUNDATION of CHRISTIANITY

and the

GREEKS and ROMANS.

 

Not merely nineteenth-and eighteenth-century liberalism, but the basic

INDIVIDUALISM

inherited by us from

ERASMUS and MONTAIGNE

from

CICERO and TACITUS

and

PERICLES and THUCYDIDES

is progressive  relinquished

 

The Nazi leader who described the National-Socialist revolution as a counter -Renissance spoke more truly than he probably knew.  It was a decisive step in the destruction of that civilisation which modern man had built up from the age of the Renaissance and which was above all an individualist civilisation.

INDIVIDUALISM

 has a bad day today [1944]

[IS NOT THAT TRUE IN 2008]

and the term has come to be connected with egotism and selfishness.   But the individualism of which we speak in contrast to socialism and all other forms of

COLLECTIVISM

has no necessary connection with these.

 

....But the essential features of that individualism which, from elements provided by

CHRISTIANITY

and the philosophy of classical antiquity, was first fully developed during the

RENAISSANCE

and has since grown and spread into what we know as

WESTERN EUROPEAN CIVILISATION

-the respect for the

INDIVIDUAL MAN

qua man, that is the recognition of his own views and tastes as supreme in his own sphere, however narrowly that may be circumscribed, and the belief that it is desirable that men should develop their own individual gifts and bents.

"FREEDOM" and "LIBERTY"

are now [1944 and in 2008] words so warn with use and abuse that one must hesitate to employ them to express ideals for which they stand during that period.

TOLERATION

is, perhaps, the only word which still preserves the full meaning of the principle which during the whole of this period was in ascendant and which only in recent times has again been in decline, to disappear completely with the rise of the

TOTALITARIAN STATE

[Has not this been the picture over the past six decades with  the decadent fruits of that creation coming into full bloom over the next six months in 2008 in

ENGLAND -WALES and SCOTLAND.]

 

*

Even much more recent warnings which have proved dreadfully true have almost entirely forgotten.  it is not yet thirty years since Mr Hilaire Belloc, in a book which explains more of what has happened since in Germany than most works written after the event, explained that

"the effect of Socialist doctrine on Capitalist society is to produce a third thing different from either of its two begetters - to wit, the

"SERVILE STATE"

(The Servile State, 1913, 3rd edition 1927, p. XIV)

 

IS THIS NOT WHAT WE NOW HAVE IN ENGLAND AND A GREAT DEAL MORE SO IF THE NEW EU TREATY IS RATIFIED IN 2008?

*

 

SECURITY and FREEDOM

 

The general endeavour to achieve security by restrictive measures, tolerated or supported by the

STATE

has in the course of time produced a progressive transformation of society -[as we have found to our cost in 2008] -a transformation in which, as in so many other ways, Germany has led and other countries have followed.

This development has been hastened by another effect of socialist teaching, the deliberate disparagement of all activities involving economic risk and the moral opprobrium cast on the gains which makes risks worth taking but which few can win.

We cannot blame our young men when they prefer the safe , salaried position to the risk of

ENTERPRISE

after they have heard from their earliest youth the former described as the superior, more unselfish and disinterested occupation.  the younger generation of today in 1944 [as in 2008] has grown up in a world in which in school and press the spirit of commercial enterprise has been represented as disreputable and the making of profit as immoral, where to employ a hundred people is represented  as exploitation but to command [i.e. centralised control] the same number is honourable.

Older people may regard this as an exaggeration of the present state of affairs [not in 2008] but the daily experience of the University teacher leaves little doubt that as a result of anti-capitalist propaganda  values have already altered far in advance of the change in institutions which has already taken place in this country.  The question is whether by changing our institutions to satisfy the new demands, we shall not unwittingly

DESTROY VALUES WHICH WE STILL RATE HIGHER

[As we are set to do in 2008]

The change in the structure of society involved in the victory of the

IDEAL of SECURITY

over that of

INDEPENDENCE

cannot be better illustrated than by a comparison of what ten or twenty years ago could still be regarded as the

English

 and the

German

type of society.

 

However  great the influence of the army may have been in the latter country, it is a grave mistake to ascribe what the Englishman regarded as the "military" character of German society mainly to that influence.   The difference went much deeper than could be explained on that ground, and the peculiar attributes of German society existed no less in circles in which the properly military influence was negligible than in those in which is strong.

It was not so much that at almost all times a larger part of the German people was organised for war than was true in other countries, but that the same type of organisation was employed for so many other purposes, which gave German society its peculiar character.  It was that a larger part of the civil life of Germany than any other country was deliberately organised from the top, that so large a proportion of her people did not regard themselves as independent but as appointed functionaries , which gave her social structure its peculiar character.    Germany had, as the Germans themselves boasted, for long been a Beamtenstaat in which not only in the Civil Service proper but in almost all spheres of life income and status were assigned and guaranteed by some AUTHORITY.

[As we find in England in 2008 -with enormous finance sucking QUANGOS -and a growing multitude of non-jobs of a host of  other privileged GOVERNMENT bodies at LOCAL and CENTRAL level.

With over 6.000,000 employees of the GOVERNMENT and growing every day. We now have a country of

TWO NATIONS

Those under the control of centralised authority with their special privileges and those who though also under growing control from the CENTRE are considered second class subjects. Of course , as soon as the GOVERNMENT can squeeze more from them it will then offer another bribe to some section of the remaining tax-paying outcasts.  All will become clear as the

TREASURY

finds that it has not been

PRUDENT ENOUGH

with nothing put by for a

RAINY DAY.

THE BRIBERY OF THE PEOPLE HAS BEEN TO THE FOREFRONT OF NEW LABOUR POLICY FOR VOTES.]

 

As we have said on countless occasions in the words of Lord Acton (1834-1902]:

'Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. great men are almost always bad men.'

The problem we have in our present supposed but almost destroyed constitution is that with the checks and balances ignored it is a case of as the Protector Oliver Cromwell said so aptly to Members of Parliament:

'It is not fit that you sit here any longer!...you shall now give place to better men.'

[Speech to the Rump parliament, 22 Jan. (1654)

*

To continue with the issue of

SECURITY and FREEDOM

While it is doubtful whether the spirit of

FREEDOM

can anywhere be extirpated by force

[They certainly tried in Blairdom and now Gordonvill as  they have the

Terrorism Bill

to arrest anyone who should speak our at a Labour Conference or remember the dead of the IRAQ at the Cenotaph and no doubt hundreds of other law-abiding subjects who once believed they lived in a

FREE COUNTRY.]

It is nor certain that any people would successfully withstand the process by which it was slowly smothered in Germany.   Where distinction and rank is achieved almost exclusively by coming salaried

SERVANT of the STATE

where to do one's assigned duty is regarded more laudable than to choose one's own assigned field of usefulness, where all pursuits that do not give a recognised place as inferior and even somewhat disreputable, it is too much to expect that many will long prefer

FREEDOM to SECURITY

[which is exactly what the BUSH with his Patriot Bill/BLAIR with his Terrorism Bill obtained with an illegal war in IRAQ so desperately needed in the early years of the 21st century and in evidence today in January, 2008.]

 

And where the alternative  to security in a dependent position is a most precarious position, in which one is despised alike for

SUCCESS and for  FAILURE

only few will resist the temptation of safety at the

PRICE of FREEDOM.

Once things have gone so far,

LIBERTY

indeed becomes almost a mockery, since it can be purchased only by sacrifice of most good things of this earth. In this state it is little surprising that more and more people should come to feel that without economic security liberty is

"not worth having"

and that they are willing to

SACRIFICE THEIR LIBERTY FOR SECURITY

[As many have done over the past decades but particularly over the past ten years prior to 2008]

There can be no question that adequate security against severe privation , and the reduction of the avoidable causes of misdirected effort and consequent disappointment  will have to be one of the main goals of policy.

But if these endeavours are to be successful and

NOT DESTROY INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM

security must be provided outside the market and

COMPETITION

be left to function unobstructed.

Some security is essential if

FREEDOM

is to be preserved, because most men are willing to bear a risk which

FREEDOM

inevitably involves only so long as that risk is not too great.

But while this is a TRUTH of which we must never lose sight, nothing is more fatal than the present fashion among intellectual leaders of extolling SECURITY at the expense of FREEDOM.

It is essential that we should re-learn frankly to face the fact that

FREEDOM CAN ONLY BE HAD AT A PRICE

and that as

INDIVIDUALS

we must be prepared to make severe material sacrifices

TO PRESERVE OUR LIBERTY.

If we want to retain this we must regain the conviction onwhich the

RULE of LIBERTY

in the Anglo-Saxon countries has been based and which

BENJAMIN FRANKLIN

expressed in a phrase applicable to us in our lives as individuals no less than of NATIONS:

 

 

"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty or safety."

 

THE END

[possibly?- in more ways than one!]

 

 

 

*          *          *

[We have advocated that members of PARLIAMENT should ONLY serve ONE TERM. This will enable more suitable individuals in the community to give some time for

THEIR COUNTRY

This will enable the members to express their true views knowing that they cannot be blackmailed to toe the line particularly if the EXECUTIVE wish to sell THEIR COUNTRY to a FOREIGN POWER.

 

*

 

*

 

[Font altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets]

 

 

THE ENEMY WITHIN

 

[We have recently heard that the police now have great numbers of criminals in their cells because there is no room in prison. At the same time we are told that the sentences have to be such as not to incur a prison sentence. The victims have been ignored and in some cases themselves thrown in a cell. A driver who kills someone on the road will now not go to jail. We now hear that a whistle-blower in the so-called Heath Service had to take her case to the  High Court and though she has been proved innocent of the charges and received an apology after 5 years she will lose her occupation even though the GOVERNMENT has said that this should not be so. We now have the usually endlessly happy suntanned cavalier attitude of Peter Hain who thinks it is a big laugh to hide 100,000 of his 200,000 donations for his deputy prime minister contest from the appropriate authority.  As is usual with New Labour Mr Hain can look forward to being promoted for his waywardness.  The list is endless of the incompetence of members of the GOVERNMENT but they are still in place because we no longer live in a TRUE DEMOCRACY.

We have for years now asked for a debate about PR Proportional Representation which is the only way to clear most of the deadheads out of our House of Commons. But though we have constantly pushed this vital issue nobody seems to be listening particularly the dozens of smaller political parties in the country who would benefit from the change.

We know the tripartite twisters in the House which are in the majority do not wish to share their power with anyone except BRUSSELS.

We believe that under PR we will have representatives to represent all kinds of opinion in the country including our new comers, which will give them a stake in the country, and as a consequence they are more likely to integrate fully into

THEIR COUNTRY.

We believe that the Sentences Guidelines Committee  under the Lord Chief Justice (?) is  an affront to TRUE JUSTICE behind which the GOVERNMENT of the Day can hide from its FAILURES and PROMISES.

The new Lord Chancellor a lawyer by going along with the measures which have nothing to do with justice but are in the main a matter suited to an accountant has undermined our once respected JUSTICE SYSTEM.

  If the victims see that they are denied justice under these circumstances then they may take the matters into their own hands and the responsibility will be on the shoulders of the  Lord Chancellor. Of course his  reply will be as is usual

"NONSENSE"

*

A Champion of Individualism from the late 19th century exposes the fallacies in collectivism and central planning.

 

 

 

*          *          *

 

THE QUEEN'S SPEECH ON THE EVE OF THE DESTRUCTION OF OUR UNIQUE NATION STATE URGES EVERYONE TO BE KIND TO EACH OTHER - ON SEPTEMBER 3,1939 ENGLAND DECLARED WAR ON GERMANY-WHATEVER FOR?---Most looked at bulletin since  placed on our website Jan.5 again on 6 and 7-and 8 and 9... We know we have touched a nerve so keep  coming and pass on the message. We want a REFERENDUM not a fait accompli in your traitorous House of Commons.

At this most momentous and dangerous hour in our long history in our Island Home the following expressions comes to mind:

fortes Fortuna adjuvat -  Fortune helps the brave.

fori et fideli nihil difficile  -to the brave and faithful nothing is difficult.

fortis cadere,cendere, cedare non potest -  the brave man may fall - he cannot yield.

*

In 1773 the Boston Tea Party led to American Freedom - In 2008 the EU TREATY will lead to English Slavery-and the People -DO NOTHING?

*

WHY is a BRITISH GOVERNMENT NOT PLAYING FAIR as they in the PAST TREATED their NEW SUBJECTS in allowing them THEIR CUSTOMARY LAW in our once EMPIRE -  to be denied to US in the UNITED STATES of EUROPE?  "Red Lines" are "Red Herrings"

*

 

 

*

 

THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN-IS THE EU COMMISSION LISTENING?

*

Ditch the EU TREATY after IRISH REJECTION

SAY VOTERS

by

Daniel Martin

Political Reporter

[Daily Mail-Wednesday, June 18,2008]

MORE THAN HALF of voters believe Britain should drop the controversial European Treaty in the wake of its rejection in last week's

IRISH REFERENDUM'

The poll comes as the Tories launch a last-ditch bid in the

HOUSE of LORDS

today to delay the

RATIFICATION OF THE TREATY.

And

10,000 people

have signed a

PETITION

on the

DOWNING STREET- WEBSITE

within the past few days

JUNE16-2008

, calling on the

GOVERNMENT

NOT TO RATIFY THE BILL

[WHY DON'T YOU?]

 

Downing Street website is

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Abandon-Lisbon/

*

JUNE 18-2008

 

 

*

 

*

The abolition of Britain
by The Reform Treaty
- Second Reading-Passed by majority of 138

*

Veteran parliamentarian TONY BENN speaks of the absolute necessity of a

REFERENDUM

HEAR HIM ON

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I-ZdvQz1o

*

 

JANUARY, 2008

 

 

 

 

*

67% want powers back from EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95% of British people want a REFERENDUM

*

'The Spirit of England'

by

Winston Churchill

In London on St.George's Day -1953

*

 

 

VOTE

 -2014

 

TO LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION

WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE

TO SET YOU

 FREE

 

THE

UK INDEPENDENCE PARTY

www.ukip.org

THE QUESTION THAT THE VOTER MUST ANSWER

 

DO YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE CORRUPT ,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND CORRUPT ALIEN BUSYBODY BRUSSELS’

 

-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?

 

TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER

BUT

SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.

*

 

ONLY

PRO-PORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

*

 

SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?

 

*

 

Home Rule for Scotland

WHY NOT

HOME RULE for ENGLAND

 

*

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin]

 

 

 

Elections in the British One Party State

If you vote Conservative, Labour, Lib-Dem, UKIP or the BNP, you'll be voting for the EU dictatorship. All five party leaderships are EU controlled. That's why your vote doesn't make a difference - all these five parties have the same policies: the EU's policies.

The 17 most senior politicians in the Conservative, Lib Dem and Labour parties, including Ken Clarke, Francis Maude, Cameron, William Hague, George Osborne, Nick Clegg, Brown, David and Ed Milliband, Ed Balls, Peter Mandleson are Bilderbergers, the 140 strong band of ultra senior Freemasons who are bribed by the EU to build the EU dictatorship.

No Bilderberger, Freemason or Common Purpose graduate should ever be allowed to hold public office.

UKIP and the BNP are honey traps to neutralise activists: UKIP is riddled with Freemasons and Common Purpose like a cancer, and the BNP controlled by the Edgar Griffin (father) and son Nick Freemasonry family. The 350,000 freemasons and the 40,000 strong Common Purpose Organisation are the (mostly unknowing) foot soldiers of the EU in Britain. (Which makes the BNP the easiest party to clean up - get rid of the Griffins, and put in a real anti-EU leadership.)

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF

UKIP

 OR

 INTEND TO JOIN THEM TAKE NOTE OF THE MESSAGE ABOVE

 

 

THE EDP HAS BEEN CRITICAL OF THE MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP OF THE UKIP FOR SOME TIME NOW AS IS SHOWN IN A NUMBER OF BULLETINS  OVER THE PAST FEW YEARS WHERE WE HAVE CRITICISED THEIR LACK LUSTRE PERFORMANCE AS THEY FAILED TO MOTIVATE THEIR MEMBERSHIP TO A MORE DETERMINED CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE CAMPAIGN WHICH WOULD HAVE MADE THE GOVERNMENTS TREMBLE BUT THEY HAD NO WORRY BECAUSE THEY HAD THEIR OWN PERSONS IN CHARGE AT THE TOP OF THE ORGANISATION.  THIS FIGHTING SPIRIT HAS BEEN LACKING AND WE CAN CONFIRM THIS OURSELVES BECAUSE WE HAVE BEEN OUTSIDE PARLIAMENT WHEN A MARCH WAS CANCELLED - AND WATCH THE FARCE WHEN CANDLES WERE HELD AND THOUSANDS OF LETTERS SENT TO MPS WHO KNEW WHERE TO DISPOSES OF THEM -AND ALL TO NO AVAIL.  IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF UKIP YOU HAVE BEEN BETRAYED BY YOUR OWN LEADERSHIP SOME APPEAR ON THE ALEX JONES SHOW WHICH HAS BEEN UNDER CLOSE SPOTLIGHT RECENTLY AS BEING CLOSE TO AN ISRAELI SECURITY FIRM DETAILS ON OUR WEBSITE .    IRONICALLY IT WAS A CHANCE LOOK ON THE INTERNET A FEW YEARS AGO  TO COME UPON THAT SITE WHICH OPENED OUR MIND TO THE ILLUMINATI.   THOUGH WE HAVE SOME DETAILS OF THE BILDERBERGERS ON OUR SITE  A NUMBER OF YEARS AGO WE FAILED TO DO MORE RESEARCH- WE ALL HAVE TO LEARN.  THE FAILURE OF UKIP WE HAVE SUSPECTED  FOR MANY YEARS   THAT MANY AT THE TOP OF THEIR ORGANISATION MIGHT BE UNDERCOVER MEMBERS OF THE ILLUMINATI.  IT IS A FAVOURITE TRICK OF THEIRS TO SUPPORT ANY PARTY OR ORGANISATION AT THE OUTSET WHATEVER ITS POLICY AS IT ALLOWS THEM TO PUT THEIR OWN PEOPLE IN TO CONTROL ITS POLICES AS THEY BEHIND THE SCENES SUPPLY THE VITAL FINANCIAL SUPPORT.

  Our intention is not to benefit from this disaster as since the 1999 European Election we have NOT! accepted a DONATION! from ANYONE! and we closed membership also because we did not wish to split the vote for UKIP but have stated in the past that we would contest another election if it was ever necessary to enter into the affray again and with the reputation of UKIP under scrutiny we will keep our options OPEN!   As we mentioned some time ago we have been almost two decades on the campaign trail to free our once FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE of ENGLAND from the SATANIC EU and those who have for centuries have planned for an EVIL ONE-WORLD CORPORATION/GOVERNMENT and EXTERMINATE! at least 5 BILLION of the WORLD'S POPULATION and therefore if we are right about those mentioned above they are not only TRAITORS to their COUNTRY but also a THREAT to WORLD PEACE.   However, of late, matters have NOT! been going well for the ILLUMINATI as you will observe BELOW.

The Queen, Treason and the Coronation oath

Together with Churchill, King George VI saved our nation; he was a Monarch to be proud of. But his daughter the Queen is the only monarch to have broken all her coronation oaths, by signing these six treaties that abolish our common law, the British Constitution, the British and English nations, and our sovereignty. She has also committed treason, together with co-signatories Ted Heath, Margaret Thatcher, John Major, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown.

Realising that under the five Treason Acts they should already be hanging by the neck until dead, Tony Blair and the Queen signed the Crime and Disorder Act, 1998, which secretly abolished much of the crime of treason (s36.3) and reduced the penalty to life imprisonment - they didn't tell the MP's what they had just voted for.

1.4 million British Servicemen gave their lives for our independence. The Queen has thrown their sacrifices away and made them worthless.

At no physical risk to herself, she could have fulfilled her oath and duty as a constitutional check and balance, by refusing to sign the six treaties until an in/out referendum had been held. In the unlikely event the vote went against her, she was even more unlikely to lose her crown (not her life or a limb), and would keep her 9 billion plus palaces either way. Those servicemen's lives would still have meant something.

But she was always keen to sign; and said in advance she would sign the last treaty. Princes Charles, William or Harry can now never be King. You can't have a King without a Kingdom: they can only be princes of a region (principality) within Europe.

King Edward 8th was forced to abdicate because he was too overt as a German Nazi supporter. Mrs Simpson's divorce was merely the excuse. The Royal Family is a German Family - real surname Saxe-Coburg Gotha. Windsor is an adopted surname. All four of Prince Phillip's sisters married high ranking German Nazis. After they lost the war the EU was switched from a Nazi basis to a communist basis.

Between the ages of 12 and 22 Queen Elisabeth's political and constitutional tutor was Sir Henry Martin, a Fabian Communist. It seems clear she was well trained for her subversion and treason.

Because she waves and smiles at us most are fooled into thinking she's lovely; in fact the Queen is a member of the Illuminati, a Bilderberger, head of Freemasonry, is wholly pro the (German) EU, and has abolished this nation with ruthless determination. It is so obvious she cares nothing for Britain or the British.

The Queen's aspirations are not ours; she clearly serves a much darker master; the faith she defends cannot be the one we think it is. King George VI, the one recent monarch not indoctrinated with Nazi or Communist philosophy, must be turning over in his grave.

I ask that the law be enforced, and the Queen be tried for treason before 12 honest people, and not by our corrupt judges. And that the illegal section 36.3 Crime and Disorder Act be declared null and void, so that she can hang by the neck till dead.

The new EU Hitler doesn't have to get elected
Its worth noting that Adolf Hitler first had to get elected, if on a 35% minority vote, and then get his Enabling Act passed. An EU dictator has no such problems. Our EU rulers do not submit themselves for election now. And the Queen has already signed the Enabling Act (Civil Contingencies Act 2004).

The EU's Hitler will have a much easier rise to power, and will have the formerly British and French nuclear weapons from day one. Adolf Hitler killed 54 million people. The EU's dictator could kill a billion at the touch of a button, with no democratic checks and balances to answer to. How could any aspiring dictator resist the EU opportunity?

 

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

 

www.bilderbergmeetings.org/participants2012.

+THE HISTORY OF THE MONEY CHANGERS

 KNOWN GOOD GUYS UNDER SUSPICION OF BEING PROVOCATEURS ON BEHALF OF THE ILLUMINATI.

As we have explained elsewhere it is this typical situation which we must fear the most and expect this insidious practice of the satanic ILLUMINATI who wish to ensure where possible that it is THEIR STOOGE in CONTROL! within their ENEMIES camp.  We suspect that there are many more within UKIP [-possibly even MEP's-one talking about a deal with the Conservative party ] and  BNP and other declared advocates across the political spectrum pursuing  FREEDOM! and NATION STATE! who will soon share the space below.

There are always great difficulty in these matters and one can only go on the actions and contacts of the individuals involved.

There can be no greater or more heinous crime imaginable than for one to betray the TRUST of a COMRADE fighting for a JUST! and GOOD CAUSE!

'It is said: 'No man can justly censure or condemn another, because indeed no man truly knows another'

But what we are considering is at a time when those who intend to destroy the majority of mankind and make serfs of the majority allowed to live and  It is a WAR we are FIGHTING for SURVIVAL! and in such circumstances a persons ACTIONS or lack of ACTION! are the ONLY basis on which one can JUDGE! another.

Finally it is up to the membership of UKIP and BNP to purge THEIR PARTY of the TRAITORS within and look for those who have the fire in their belly to carry the party forward to VICTORY!

 

MAY-2012

HOME

DID YOU KNOW?

No 8

(Christopher Story of International Currency Review)

 

IS HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN SOVEREIGN?

Under Article 17 of the collectivist Maastricht treaty , all residents of the European Union are citizens of the EU Collective.  It follows that Presidents and Monarchs are 'citizens of the

EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE

as well

This provides the twisted rationale for President Herzog's vituperative dismissal of the relevance of the nation state, and for his insistence that it has outlived its usefulness, even though he continued to serve as President.

Dr Herzog's subversive remarks have special resonance for Britain, where

QUEEN ELIZABETH II

 is the

 SOVEREIGN AND CONSTITUTIONAL HEAD

of the

UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND.

She is the custodian, in her person, of the sovereignty of the British people which was passed to HER in February 1952 on the death of her father,  This was confirmed initially when the

QUEEN took the OATH of ACCESSION

and was finally solemnized at the QUEEN'S CORONATION in 1953 after HER MAJESTY had been recognized and universally accepted as the undoubted and rightful

 SOVEREIGN of the BRITISH PEOPLE

In November 2000 -after a correspondent who had taken care to prepare his case thoroughly, had written to the Prime Minister, Tony Blair; to the then Leader of the Opposition William Hague; to the Leader of the House of Lords, who was then Baroness Jay; and to the Lord Chief justice and other official office-holders and dignatories -asking:

Is Her Majesty the Queen Sovereign?

HE RECEIVED NO ANSWER AT ALL

or else a non-committal weak, diversionary reply.

Mr Blair being unable to answer the question himself, redirected the enquiry  to the Home office, which likewise prevaricated. Indeed, a hallmark of the

BLAIR GOVERNMENT

has been its Ministers' arrogant reluctance to answer letters and parliamentary questions.  Likewise, Mr Blair has reportedly made a point on occasion, of'

' standing the Queen up'

by failing to turn up on time., or at all, for his weekly scheduled audiences.

[Further details to follow]

*

[More background information will be available in the near future but why wait - order your copy - contact the under-mentioned website]

 

[This is a new series of single statements from

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

www.edwardharle.com

www.worldreports.org

*

AUGUST-2008

*

 

WHAT IF ALL EU LAWS PASSED BY PARLIAMENT AND APPROVED BY HER MAJESTY ARE INVALID BECAUSE AGAINST THE LAW OF THE LAND.

 

The position under English law, of course, is that Her Majesty remains Sovereign until the moment of her death, when sovereignty will pass automatically to the next rightful heir to the British Throne.  However, the Prime Minister's problem appears to be that since, under Article 17 of the Maastricht treaty, the Queen is a 'citizen' of the European Union, Her Sovereignty has been usurped.  Those UK Ministers and officials who permitted this scandalous state of affairs to develop are accordingly prima facie

TRAITORS

and ought to be indicted for

TREASON.

But so far as President Herzog of Germany has been concerned, his status as a 'citizen' of the

EU COLLECTIVE

appears to be entirely acceptable, because the EU is just a 'mask' for emerging

'GREATER GERMANY'.

When, following the correspondent's letters to selected leaders, an attempt was made by Christopher Gill MP in January 2001 to put down a question asking the Prime Minister whether

Her Majesty is Sovereign

the Table Office at the House of Commons replied in the following astonishing language:

'Last night you sought to table a question to the Prime Minister concerning the effect of the UK's membership of the

EUROPEAN UNION

on the constitutional position of

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN.

You will recall that I explained I would need to check the admissibility of the question with other colleagues before it could be tabled.  It has been pointed out to me that the question as drafted in effect seeks the Prime Minister's view in the interpretation of the law, in this case the

Treaties of the European Communities and associated European Treaties and UK legislation.

IT IS NOT POSSIBLE

to table questions to Ministers seeking interpretation of the , as this is a matter for the appropriate courts , not Ministers.'.

It would accordingly appear unclear whether

Her Majesty the Queen is Sovereign

-and by extension, whether any legislation passed by Westminster Parliament since  Britain made the mistake of joining the

EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

in

1972

is

VALID.

For evidently  until the matter is decided by the 'appropriate courts', the question of whether

HER MAJESTY IS SOVEREIGN

and thus able to act as

HEAD OF STATE

and hence give the

ROYAL ASSENT

to

LEGISLATION

passed by the

WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENT

remains in the air.

This Kafkaesque situation reflects the fact that, as noted under the

COLLECTIVE TREATY

all residents of the

EUROPEAN UNION

 are its citizens; and the

QUEEN

is a resident of the

EUROPEAN UNION

THEREFORE

if

EU law

 

has precedence over

BRITISH LAW

the

QUEEN

 being an

EU citizen

is

NOT

SOVEREIGN.

 

*

 
EXTRACT

 

The Act of Settlement: last brick in the crumbling wall

Philip Lardner argues that the Act entrenched our national independence and freedom.

'Our Queen has been made a mere "citizen" of Europe and our Parliament and Head of State are subject to the rule of a modern" Court of Rome" based in Strasbourg and Brussels and demanding a huge part of our national income be paid over to it.

[You can understand why so many once nation states in Europe have joined the EU because for many who are recipients it is a bribe too good to miss.]

 

'...In the light of the foregoing, it is breathtaking to recognise that our political supremacy now rests unchallenged in Europe under the Treaty of Rome.  Our Queen has been made a mere "citizen" of Europe  and our Parliament and Head of State are subject to the rule of a modern "Court of Rome" based in Strasbourg and Brussels, and demanding a huge part of our national income be paid over to it.

All this eagerly ceded by politicians acting against their QUEEN and COUNTRY.  Interestingly, the Statute of Praemunire -along with several treason, Treachery and Sedition Acts-was quietly abolished in 1967, while Wilson maneuvered for entry to the EEC [but really the EU]

Rodney Atkinson and Norris McWhirter laid charges of treason against Douglas Hurd and Francis Maud in 1993 due to the constraints placed on our Sovereign by the Maastricht Treaty; effectively deposing Her Majesty as the Sovereign and placing Her "in a position of suzerainty under the power of the European Union."   Unsurprisingly, the charges were never heard before a court.  As Sir John Harrington (1561-1612) said:

"Treason doth never prosper: What's the reason? For if it prosper none dare call it treason."

FREEDOM TODAY-Winter 2008/9

To Be Continued

[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS ARE OURS!]

DECEMBER-2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It may be asked: Why does no British Government ever take steps to have this matter clarified?

There are two possible answers to this question:

(1)    If the matter were to be resolved and it were to transpire that, indeed, The Queen is not Sovereign, then all legislation to which Her Majesty has given the Royal Assent since Britain acceded to the EEC is

NULL and VOID
 

because she had no power to give the Royal Assent, Alternatively:

(2)    Successive UK Governments since the beginning of the collapse in 1970 have preferred this issue to remain unresolved because if it were to be concluded by 'the appropriate courts' that The Queen is Sovereign, then correspondingly all EU legislation in the UK

is

NULL and VOID

because it is presupposed that EU law has precedence over UK law.

which cannot be the case if The Queen is Sovereign.

By contrast, if it does transpire the

The Queen is not Sovereign, then, certainly all legislation passed since Britain joined the EEC is indeed called into question.

Either way -whether The Queen is or is not Sovereign -the logic of the above leads to the conclusion that all EU law may be invalid in the United Kingdom.

Thus the the real reason this key issue has never been clarified is that the British Government's deceitful EU 'coup d' etat by installments'  policy would be exposed as illegal if the issue were ever to be addressed in the COURTS.  Furthermore, as reviewed on page 209, the Treaty of Rome was reportedly

NOT SIGNED

-so the basis of all EU law throughout the

EU COLLECTIVE

may be open to

LEGAL CHALLENGE

on that ground alone.

It is concluded that EU law may have no standing in the United Kingdom and that successive conniving UK Governments have been

SHIRKING THIS CENTRAL ISSUE.

 

In an article published in The Times of London on 27th April,1996, Karl Lamers, whio was then foreign affairs spokesman for the Christian Democrats in the Bundestag, condescended to recognise that 'British doubts are deeply rooted.

The British concern is about the destruction of the national identity and the nation state, which is seen by the British as the only legitimate expression of the popular will.   Germans, by contrast, say that there has long been a supranational reality created by our European civilisation.  Common problems spawn common interests; our vital interests are identical

Whereupon Herr Lamers delivered a further broadside in Germany's psychological warfare offensive designed to help the stupid British to abandon their love of national sovereignty, which it is the central purpose of the European Union to

COLLECTIVISE:

'The  Euro-optimists take as their starting point the objective external reality.... The Eurosceptics (in Britain) deal with the inner, subjective reality of the consciousness of the British people.  It is if you like , the forces of Logic pitied against the forces of Psycho-logic.  It must be the task of democratic politics to help narrow this gap.  Otherwise politics will cease to be effective.  A community makes sense if it can begin to solve its existential problems.

If the nation state can no longer do that by itself, its failure undermines its political legitimacy'.

In other words, Britain had no right to continue existing as a nation state, and it must be 'brought to reason' so that it comes to full acceptance of German prescriptions and intentions without further. tedious prevarication

Note that, for Herr Lamers, the Pan-German position was 'logical', whereas the perceived British tendency to 'cling' to the nation state was 'psychological'. Once again here, the truth was turned upside-down.

The essence of Germany's continuing, updated strategy to realise the Germans, has never been in doubt - not least, since the German legislature adopted several amendments to the Basic Law (constitution) on 22nd December, 1992, in order to legalise' ratification of the Maastricht Treaty.  A new Article 23 was incorporated, the previous one having been repealed by the Unification T of 31st August 1990. The revised Article known as the 'ARTICLE on EUROPEAN UNION'. contains the following:

 

With a view to establishing a Unite Europe, the Federal republic of Germany shall participate in the development of the European Union, which is committed to democratic[?], rule of law, social and federative principles as well as to the principle of subsidiarity, and ensures protection of basic rights comparable in substance to that accorded to the Basic law

To this end the (German) Federation may transfer sovereign powers by law with the consent of the Bundesrat. The establishment of the European Union , as well as amendments to its statutory foundations and comparable foundations which amend or supplement the content of this Basic Law or make such amendments and supplements possible shall be subject to the provisions of paragraph (2) and (30 of Article 79.........

THIS MEANS that Germany can extend its sovereignty into Moravia and Bohemia, as provided for under the secret accord reached between President Gorbachev and Chancellor Kohl in Geneva , in 1990

As for Dr Professor Herzog, he faced both ways at the 1997 Konigswinter Conference, held in Berlin. In a welcoming speech, he suggested that 'Britons and Germans can build on common values, convictions and interests.  the debate on Europe can only reach a fruitful conclusion - that is to say, a conclusion acceptable to the German strategy elite- if we help gain acceptance for one idea, namely that the 'Europe of-Fatherlands' is possible.  The European nations can be Fatherlands and still integrate' 

 

 

[TO BE CONTINUED]

*

 

 

[More background information will be available in the near future but why wait - order your copy -

THE EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE

 -contact the under-mentioned website]

 

[This is a new series of single statements from

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

www.edwardharle.com

www.worldreports.org

*

 

 LIFE AND TIMES

OF

Christopher Story

 A PATRIOT AND MAN OF TRUTH

 

SEPTEMBER-2008

*

 

TO ASSIST YOUR SEARCH WE HAVE INCLUDED THE LINKS BELOW

 

EUROPEAN UNION Q & A

1 EUROFACTS -   THE REALITY BEHIND THE EU

2]   WHAT IS THE POINT OF THE EU

3]   THE TRUTH OF A FEDERAL EUROPE-PARTS1-4

4]   THE 1701 ACT OF SETTLEMENT-WHY IT SHOULD  CONCERN YOU!

5[    THE BRITISH LEGACY -CANADA-AUSTRALIA-NEW ZEALAND

6]    COMMONWEALTH REALMS VERSUS THE NEW CONSTITUTION  OF EUROPE

7]   OUR BASIC LIBERTIES AND FREEDOMS SURRENDERED TO A FOREIGN POWER

8]   MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA-SUPPORT THE CROWN

9]   OUR QUEEN AND EU CONSTITUTION

10] VALERY GISCARD'ESTAING -WHY HE IS CALLED X

11]  THE ROTTEN HEART OF EUROPE by BERNARD CONNOLLY

12]   'I SAY WE MUST NOT JOIN EUROPE'-FIELD MARSHALL MONTGOMERY-(1962)

13]  PREVIOUS SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS SAYS WE MUST RETAIN OUR ANCIENT CONSTITUTION

14] THE COMMON LAW OF ENGLAND IS THE  LAW OF ENGLISH SPEAKING PEOPLES.

15]  A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION - CONSPIRATORS NAMED (1993)

16]   WHAT HISTORY TELLS US ABOUT OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CONTINENT

17]    COST of EU to UK-4.8billion = 40 DISTRICT HOSPITALS-EQUIPPED -_STAFFED-AND FUNDED.

18]   WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON ABOUT THE EURO.

19]     200 MORE REASONS TO WHY TO REJECT THE EURO AND THE EU

20]     100 REASONS TO LEAVE THE EU

21]    THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE

22]    UK CONTRIBUTION TO BRUSSELS: BIG INCREASE IN 2005

23]   EU WHISTLEBLOWERS EXPOSE BILLIONS OF EURO FRAUD BUT NOTHING IS DONE

24]    BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENTS SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL

25]    FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENTS BY PAYOUTS

26]    SIGNS OF AN EU POLICE STATE

27]    NINETY-NINE COUNTRIES HAVE FREE TRADE WITH THE EU-WITHOUT PAYING A CENT TO BRUSSELS.

28]    IT IS TIME TO CONSIDER OURSELVES-IN A COMMONWEALTH FREE TRADE AREA

29]   BRITAIN MUST LEAVE THE EU AS UN SHOW BEST AREA FOR EXPANSION WILL BE USA/ANGLO-SAXON SPHERE

30]    WAVE GOODBYE TO THE EU AND MAKE EUROPE A BETTER PLACE   

31]    LORD STODDART PINS DOWN BLAIR GOVERNMENT ON COST OF EU -JUNE 2007.

32]    BRITISH VOTERS MUST GET A SAY ON NEW EU TREATY-[JUNE-2007]

33]    BLAIR'S LAST TREACHEROUS ACT. THE 60,000 DOLLAR QUESTION IS WHAT WILL MR BROWN DO?-JUNE-2007]

34]   GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY WON'T HE TRUST YOU?

35]  HITLER'S PRECEDENT PROVIDED THE MODEL FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION-1930-2007

36]  SAVE YOUR ENGLAND! - SAY NO! TO REGIONS
 

37]   NAZI INTERNATIONAL IN 2007-CLOSER TO YOUR HOME THAN YOU THINK  

38]    A WARNING FROM JAN-2005-TO PRESERVE THE NATION-STATES OF EUROPE-VOTE 'NO' TO THE NEW EU CONSTITUTION (D.T.)

49]    SO WHY DON'T WE LEAVE THE EU. (D.M.)

 

[For hundreds of bulletins about the EU]

HOME

 

 

WHAT A WAY TO WIN A WAR

*

IS SENATOR RON PAUL- ILLUMINATI?

 

BENJAMIN FULFORD

 

More!

[WORKS]

*

SEEKTHETRUTHANDWISDOM

 

*

Bank Of England The Banking Swindle

 

More!

 

More!

 

PATRIOT or TRAITOR to HIS COUNTRY

+More!

 

 More!

 

+(More!

 

 

THIS YOU MUST SEE IT CONCERNS

 YOUR

PLANET!

AND

 YOU!

 

 

NO NEED TO PANIC!

 

'Others shall sing the song,

Others shall right the wrong,-

Finish what I begin,

All all I fail of win.

Hail to the coming singers!

Hail to the brave light-bringers!

Forward I reach and above

All that they sing and dare.

 

The airs of heaven blow o'er me;

A glory shines before me

Of what mankind shall be'-

Pure, generous, brave and free,

I feel the earth move sunward,

I join the great march onward,

And  take, by faith, while living,

My freehold of thanksgiving.-

 

WHITTIER

 

MAY-2012

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

 

 

ENGLAND

 

 Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND?**** BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH****NEW LABOUR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND****UNLESS WE TAKE CONTROL OF OUR LIVES WE WILL LOSE OUR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY****.OUR PAST IS EMBEDDED IN OUR NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS -IT ASKS WERE WE CAME FROM AND WHO WE ARE .****.THE ENGLISH WITH OTHER GERMANIC TRIBES CAME TO BRITAIN OVER YEARS AGO - THE STREAM OF TEUTONIC INFLUENCE  HAS DECIDED THE FUTURE OF EUROPE****THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/ ****  THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/ ****    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/****  DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/ ****   NOR SHALL MY SWORD/****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/ ****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/****   ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY -CORRECT BROWNDOM/****    ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1- /****   ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/****    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./****   WHY OUR ENGLISH SELF-GOVERNMENT IS UNIQUE IN EUROPE AND THE WORLD****.ENGLAND ARISE! - TODAY WE CLAIM OUR RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION/ ****  KISS GOOD BYE TO YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY****  THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED? **** ST GEORGE'S DAY-ENGLAND'S DAY/**** ST GEORGE'S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ONSHAKESPEARE'S' BIRTHDAY****NAZI SPY RING REVEALED BY THE MASTER OF BALLIOL COLLEGE IN 1938 . IT INCLUDED THE LATE EX PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH AND MINISTERS GEOFFREY RIPPON AND ROY JENKINS.* * * *AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED****   EU WIPES ENGLAND OFF THE MAP**** THE ENGLISH DID NOT MOVE THEMSELVES SO ARE NOW SLAVES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE****"...What kind of people do they think we are?" by WINSTON CHURCHILL****

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND

BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

 

 

ENGLAND

 

 Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND?**** BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH****NEW LABOUR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND****UNLESS WE TAKE CONTROL OF OUR LIVES WE WILL LOSE OUR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY****.OUR PAST IS EMBEDDED IN OUR NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS -IT ASKS WERE WE CAME FROM AND WHO WE ARE .****.THE ENGLISH WITH OTHER GERMANIC TRIBES CAME TO BRITAIN OVER YEARS AGO - THE STREAM OF TEUTONIC INFLUENCE  HAS DECIDED THE FUTURE OF EUROPE****THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/ ****  THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/ ****    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/****  DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/ ****   NOR SHALL MY SWORD/****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/ ****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/****   ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY -CORRECT BROWNDOM/****    ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1- /****   ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/****    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./****   WHY OUR ENGLISH SELF-GOVERNMENT IS UNIQUE IN EUROPE AND THE WORLD****.ENGLAND ARISE! - TODAY WE CLAIM OUR RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION/ ****  KISS GOOD BYE TO YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY****  THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED? **** ST GEORGE'S DAY-ENGLAND'S DAY/**** ST GEORGE'S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ONSHAKESPEARE'S' BIRTHDAY****NAZI SPY RING REVEALED BY THE MASTER OF BALLIOL COLLEGE IN 1938 . IT INCLUDED THE LATE EX PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH AND MINISTERS GEOFFREY RIPPON AND ROY JENKINS.* * * *AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED****   EU WIPES ENGLAND OFF THE MAP**** THE ENGLISH DID NOT MOVE THEMSELVES SO ARE NOW SLAVES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE****"...What kind of people do they think we are?" by WINSTON CHURCHILL****THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

MAY-2012

PAGE ONE/ PAGE TWO/PAGE THREE/ &  LATEST- PAGE FOUR