New Page 1

Lord McIntosh says of EU-There is no doubt that there are both irregularities and FRAUD as of all Systems.

[Before we proceed with the expose of CORRUPTION it is as well to remind everyone that the EU Accounts have NOT been passed for over 11 years which a clear sign of the inveterate corrupt monster we are dealing with.]

International Currency Review

www,worldreports.org

www.c/storyworldreports.org

BRITISH AUTHORITIES’

FECKLESS ATTITUDE.

What, then, is the British Government’s attitude to Euro-fraud?

When asked in the House of Lords to defend the British Government’s position on

EU FRAUD and CORRUPTION,

Lord McIntosh of Haringey said:

‘There is no doubt that there are both irregularities and FRAUD. Of course there are. There are in all systems’.

Including no doubt, the Government of which he is a member, we suppose?

So that’s all right, then. But of course it isn’t:

Clearly, Lord McIntosh comes from a background in which fraudulent practice is the norm, or else he thinks that all businesses, trade unions and official organisations, including UK Government agencies and quangos, are riddled with gross misappropriation, malfeasance, theft and fraud -so that (by implication) it is naïve for a stupid MEP to complain about FRAUD in the EU.

What do you expect, appears the attitude

[of Lord McIntosh of Haringey]

Which, of course, plays like sweet music in the ears of the serial fraudsters of

BRUSSELS

-since the main objective of their ‘anti-fraud’ measures is to deflect criticism against them back to the constituent satrap

‘MEMBER STATES’

What will the EU criminalists do when the ‘Member States’ no longer operate ‘separate’ jurisdictions?

Beyond that, Lord McIntosh’s answer confirms that the UK Government constructively and knowingly connives at the widespread, institutionalised fraud in the EU structures.

Ministers have decadently permitted a form of institutionalised corruption to supplant their fiduciary duties to the BRITISH people, a corrupt state of affairs that has continued for many years.

Through their connivance at the EU’s dishonest methods of handling public money, British Ministers have deceived and defrauded the taxpayers who entrusted them with the levers of national power, with disastrous consequences.

The prevailing state of affairs appears to represent institutionalised illegality on the EU’s own terms.

FOR UNDER THE ORIGINAL TREATY OF ROME

(1956)

-the fraudulent state of affairs which prevail today (and has prevailed for decades) is itself unlawful.

This, not least, is because

Article 209a

proclaims:

‘Member States shall take the same measures to counter fraud affecting the financial interests of the Community as they take to counter fraud affecting their own financial interests’.

HAVE YOU SPOTTED THE DECEPTION HERE?

At a superficial level, the key word here is shall (not ‘may’ or ‘can’, but ‘shall’). But a moment’s thought reveals the deception contained within this typically weasel Euro-sentence. For clearly, if ‘Member States’ FAIL to take appropriate measures against domestic fraud, they are only ‘bound’ under this Paragraph to apply the same inadequate measures against EU fraud, if any, they are accustomed to do (or not to do) against fraud at home.

It was not for nothing, then, that the Treaty of Rome’s words were reiterated, unchanged, at Section 5, Article III- 321, clause 2 of the failed [NEW] EU Constitution.’

This Editors’s [Christopher Story of International Currency Review -www.c/storyworldreports.org own experience of analysing and opposing the

[1992]

Maastricht Treaty

[Mr Graham Brady- The CONservative - Shadow Europe minister -Please note the following:]

-in the early 1990’s taught him that every paragraph, sub-paragraph and clause of EU language has to be treated with suspicion, because it usually harbours a dimension of double-talk, lies or deception, or else is, like successive Soviet constitutions, contradicted elsewhere in the same document

[So Mr Brady you should in fact be the OUT of Europe Minister if you have in fact read the EU Constitution and NOT like a CONservative minister by the name of Douglas Hurd who had the true thought in his mind when after signing the Maastricht Treaty in February 1992 said:

[As the then British Foreign Secretary was notoriously overheard commenting, having signed it, that]

‘We’d better find out what we’ve just signed’.

NEED WE SAY MORE!

-Mr BRADY?

In the Daily Mail of Wednesday February 1-2006 an article by Graeme Wilson -Political Correspondent

leads us to believe that Lord McIntosh comment that there is corruption everywhere and that one should not be unduly concerned is shown by the slovenly way a major Department of Government handles its accounts

Shambles of £13billion Home Office Accounts.

WHITEHALL’S spending watchdog has taken the historic step of refusing to approve the Home Office’s

£13 billion accounts.

[Well! the EU have got away with it for over 11 years so our Government Departments are only getting into line with their colleagues in Europe]

Home Secretary Charles Clarke was rocked as the National Audit Office concluded the situation was so bad it

‘Could not reach an opinion on the TRUTH and FAIRNESS of the ACCOUNTS’

[Well! they seem to be good Europeans don’t you think?]

They had been adjusted by £946 million

to make them add up and a corner shop keeps better books, said the National Audit Office.

Whitehall insiders said it was the first time in living memory that the watchdog had produced such a damning judgment on one of the leading Department of State.

Last night furious opposition politicians asked how the Home Office could hope to run a National ID card system when it could not even keep on top of its own finances.

In a further twist, the top civil servant who presided over the financial shambles-former Home Office permanent secretary Sir John Gieve-was recently appointed as a deputy governor of the Bank of England.

He is also a member of the banks monetary policy committee, which sets Britain’s interest rates.

In a devastating report, the NAO criticised the Department for producing accounts, which contained

‘numerous errors and internal inconsistencies’.

Even these were delivered ten weeks after the deadline for submission.

[Obviously the departmental head had not seen the Government’s advertisement on TV exclaiming how easy it is to complete their accounts on time]

When a second set of figures was demanded, the spending watchdog discovered that virtually all the key financial figures were markedly different from the first accounts.

The NAO was also alarmed that the Home office was unable to match the cash it spent and receipts with the figures shown on its bank statements.

The report stressed that this was a:

‘key control for the prevention and detection of fraud’.

Following further inquires by external consultants; the Home Office was forced to adjust its figures by

NOT

£946

NOT

£946,000

BUT

£946million

[£946.000.000]

in order to balance the books.

The failing in this area stunned the NAO staff. One insider said:

‘This is the sort of basic accounting practice that even your local corner shop would carry out routinely.’

Another key weakness was that a new accounting system [some would say it was certainly very-very new system which many busy businessmen would like to get their hands on] had been introduced by the Home Office but the staff had not been properly trained to use it.

The Report said the lack of proper training led to numerous

‘problems and delays’

and meant that the Department was unable to produce figures in time for the deadlines.

On top of that, it found that the computer system used by the Department could be accessed by

‘unauthorised staff…exposing the Home Office to a greater risk of fraud and error.’

The Department’s £13 billion outgoings include:

£5.1billion on police

£2.4 billion on prisons.

£1.9billion on Immigration

£659million on Administration

including £400million in wages

Its failings were attacked last night by Edward Leigh, the Tory chairman of the Commons Public Accounts Committee.

‘It is extraordinary that one of the Principle Departments of State should fail so spectacularly to met its accounting obligations to Parliament.’ He said.

Today’s report is a serious criticism of the department’s internal financial administration and of the leadership of its senior management.’

A spokesman last night said the Home Office had ‘taken steps to tackle the problems’

[That they have sacked all those incompetents concerned with the SHAMBLES-we don’t think so!]

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used -comments in brackets]

* * *

JAN/06

THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN-IS THE EU COMMISSION LISTENING?

*

Ditch the EU TREATY after IRISH REJECTION

SAY VOTERS

by

Daniel Martin

Political Reporter

[Daily Mail-Wednesday, June 18,2008]

MORE THAN HALF of voters believe Britain should drop the controversial European Treaty in the wake of its rejection in last week's

IRISH REFERENDUM'

The poll comes as the Tories launch a last-ditch bid in the

HOUSE of LORDS

today to delay the

RATIFICATION OF THE TREATY.

And

10,000 people

have signed a

PETITION

on the

DOWNING STREET- WEBSITE

within the past few days

JUNE16-2008

, calling on the

GOVERNMENT

NOT TO RATIFY THE BILL

[WHY DON'T YOU?]

Downing Street website is

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Abandon-Lisbon/

*

JUNE 18-2008

IF YOU CAN SAY

'WE WANT OUT-WITHOUT A DOUBT'

THEN

[Only an ultimatum by millions of subjects that the new EU TREATY can never be accepted such as signing the

RENUNCIATION of EU CITIZENSHIP

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Optout

Details from petition creator

With the signing of the Maastricht Treaty the people of Britain were given

DUAL CITIZENSHIP

-both

EUROPEAN and BRITISH

The extra tier of citizenship was thrust upon the people without their consent -and in many cases knowledge.

The PEOPLE of GREAT BRITAIN should be allowed the option of opting out of the EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP if they so wish. The GOVERNMENT will then be able to provide those who have opted out with

BRITISH DOCUMENTATION

-only such as British (not EU) passports, driving licences and other national documents.

EU laws will also NOT APPLY to those who

HAVE OPTED OUT OF EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP

*

Let the people speak!

www.makeitanissue.org.uk

www.noliberties.com

[Latest Addition - June07]

www.eutruth.org.uk

www.thewestminsternews.co.uk

www.speakout.co.uk

Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU

www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs

GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY WON'T HE TRUST YOU?

HELL ON EARTH IN IRAQ

67% want powers back from EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95% of British people want a REFERENDUM

PETITION

FOR A

REFERENDUM

SIGN TODAY ON LINE

telegraph.co.uk/eureferendum

* July 18-2007

ALSO

JOIN THE 10 DOWNING STREET PROTEST

Readers can add their support to the growing clamour for a REFERENDUM on the '"REFORM TREATY" by signing up to a 10 Downing Street 0n-line petition

(http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/EU-treaty-NON/)

The Petition reads as follows:

"We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to guarantee that the British people will be permitted a binding REFERENDUM on any and all attempts to resurrect the EU " CONSTITUTION" (and any or all of its content) regardless of nomenclature."

Deadline for the PETITION is 31st January,2008

Eurofacts 27th July 2007.

'The Spirit of England'

Winston Churchill

In London on St.George's Day -1953

VOTE

-2007

TO LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION

WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE

TO SET YOU

FREE

THE