HAS YOUR MP REPLIED TO YOUR CONCERNS OF THE NEW TREATY
AND THE LOSS OF YOUR COUNTRY?
Many of you will no longer be surprised about the content
of any reply from the majority of
At a time when a growing number of Members of Parliament
are joining the No Lobby in respect of the supposed
NEW EU TREATY
it is not surprising that the replies that members of the
public are receiving from a number of MPs are completely at odds to many
of their colleagues in the House who view both the rejected EU TREATY
thrown our by the French and Dutch voters in 2005 as identical (except
for 10 out of 250 proposals -a 'tidying -up exercise as they would say)
and the so-called
We give a reply by an MP obviously in the YES! lobby.
'Thank you very much for your post card received 11th
September 2007 urging the Government to hold a referendum on the
proposed revisions to the EU Treaty.
The commitment to hold a referendum was
made specifically in relation to a proposal to introduce a European
Union Constitutional Treaty. As you know, that treaty was
concluded last year and was subject to referendum ratification in a
number of EU countries. However, once the treaty failed to secure
ratification following referendum defeats in France and the Netherlands,
it was abandoned. At a subsequent meeting of Heads of Government of the
EU, there was a formal declaration that that treaty is no longer being
proceeded with. There is no longer any proposal to install a EU
The Governments of the European Union are now proceeding
with negotiations on further revisions to the existing EU treaties. This
process is likely to be concluded at the next EU Summit. However
this programme of revision to the existing treaties is a standard way of
revising the EU operational rules. There have been several major
revisions to the treaties over recent years and in no previous case did
any British Government put those treaty revisions to a national
referendum. Given that this current process is now just a further
revision exercise, there is, as before no requirement to put these
changes to a national referendum.
To contest the
above half-truths would be a waste of our valuable time as there are a
number of bulletins on our EU File to refute the muddled explanation
We only need to point to other members of the House who
are convinced that the New TREATY is in substance the same TREATY that
was rejected by the French and Dutch voters.
HOW CAN IT BE
that there are even now two sides to this question.
THE TRUTH AND THE OTHER IS A
DOWN RIGHT LIE.
The Irish-The German-The Spanish and many other Foreign Ministers say
THIS IS THE SAME TREATY IN SUBSTANCE.
The above and their heads of government are proud to
declare to their people's that it is a
NEW EUROPEAN CONSTITUTION
and that if the British don't like it they can get out.
SO WHY ARE OUR MPs IN THE MAIN STILL UNABLE TO COME CLEAN
AS TO THE TRUE NATURE OF THE NEW TREATY?
Surely if it is such a wonderful opportunity for the
people of our island home why aren't they spending more time telling us
the TRUTH about this wonderful UTOPIA for us
UNITED STATES OF EUROPE.
We observed in the Eurofacts journal of 21st
the following article written by
Stuart, Labour MP for Birmingham, Edgbaston and a member of the
Convention of the Future for Europe writing in the Sunday Times on 9th
We include this article to show the divergence of opinion
amongst MPs of all parties about the crucial matter of a REFERENDUM on
the NEW EU TREATY.
'has rigged decision on Constitution'
" In practice this is the last time for a referendum.
The notion that a decision on this treaty should be by parliament rather
than by a referendum is like telling someone to trust a court when
the jury is rigged.
The Government should stick to labour's manifesto promise on the
referendum and this should be reaffirmed in any future manifesto for a
'snap' election. To do otherwise would either break a commitment to
the electorate or be based on a deception: the notion that a new treaty
is in any meaningful way different from the previous constitution.
As illustrated above the
difference of interpretation of the New Treaty by the two parties above
supports our contention that there is TRUTH on one side with the call
for a REFERENDUM and misinformation to downright LIES on the other which
puts up a confused written smokescreen to baffle the electorate.
YOU CAN CHOOSE WHO YOU BELIEVE?
We would be pleased to have copies of any other replies
from MPs on the above matter so that we can see what variety of fancy
there is from the brain cells of many of our so-called representatives.
Please send to:
6, Field Barn Road,
CV 35 RT
On a lighter vein but of much interest to anyone who
employees any firm which uses ladders or ropes or needing roofing or
other work undertaken the following
EU DIRECTIVE 2001/45/EC
Working at Height
be of interest.
How the EU smears
our view of reality
Eurofacts of the same above date.
Our normally laser-like take on reality may possibly be
obscured at present. Its not that eurofacts' perception of the
external world has been skewed by europhile propaganda, only that our
view from our first floor office window is hindered by a large smear.
This was caused by the window cleaner.
Aren't window cleaners supposed to remove stains rather
than cause them? we hear you ask. Indeed they are, but our new high-tech
window cleaner doesn't quite seem to grasp this.
The old cleaner, who did understand this, has gone out of
business because he could not afford to meet the costs of the provisions
EU Working at Height Directive
which restricts the use of ladders and consequently
requires the purchase of expensive modern cleaning equipment.
The new cleaner arrived with extendable high pressure
hoses and his own supplies of purified water. However, he explained that
he could not reach two windows because of their inaccessibility.
When he declared the job done we
pointed out that several windows appeared to be dirtier than when he
He instructed his
assistant to climb on to the adjacent roof in order to remove the smears
with a rag. explaining that there were special provisions in the
Directive which allowed him to do this.
The smears stubbornly remain, but he assured us that
these will disappear after only three or four visits.
The origins of our problem lie in
EU DIRECTIVE 2001/45/EC
which lays down safety rules for working with ladders and
ropes. This was subsequently gold-plated
[In Whitehall- where that have a
wonderful time in making simple instructions of say 4 pages blossom into
40 or even 400 pages or even higher.]
when it is incorporated into British law by means of an
excessive instrument laid before Parliament.
Our old window cleaner whistled and told jokes. he
charged £15. his politically correct successor appears to know more
about the law than about cleaning windows. he charges £30. Sometimes
through a small or relatively minor matter it is possible to observe a
much larger picture. So it is with the laws which govern the working
conditions of window cleaners'
[or letters from our MPs on the subject of a referendum as many of them
appear to have many smears obscuring their vision in their attempt to
not look at the true picture but to hide the truth from view with
downright LIES and DECEIT.]
Letters to Eurofacts -21st September, 2007
How to back a Referendum
the new EU REFORM TREATY is virtually the same as the EU Constitution
rejected by the French and Dutch people there is a growing demand for a
that Gordon brown should heed.
His initial reaction is to tough it out and to pretend
that the two are entirely different - a view not taken by Valery Giscard
d'Estaing, the Constitution's chief drafter or other heads of state that
-is the same.
Bob Spink MP, the chairman of the cross-party Campaign for the
Independent Britain (CIB) has put down a Parliamentary Early Day Motion
(EDM 1780) calling for a
Your readers may wish to encourage their MPs to sign this
EDM as a matter of urgency. It has been reported that the Labour MP Ian
Davidson has told his leader that
members of the Parliamentary Labour Party are calling for
substantial amendments to the REFORM TREATY or a REFERENDUM.
We live in interesting times,
ASK US FIRST
your columns I draw attention to the setting up of a campaign to press
into holding a referendum on the Constitution?
France and Holland have already voted and rejected the
We in Britain are now faced with a treaty which is a
substitute for the [New ] Constitution.
This treaty would finally abolish any meaningful national
Our campaign is
"ASK US FIRST"
and its aim is simply to ensure that a referendum is
held, not a campaign
is already mounting on Gordon brown and the Government. At the last
election they promised the British people that no decision would be
taken without first reference to the electorate.
"ASK US FIRST"
support in both
House of Parliament.
and I have undertaken to manage the campaign organisation
across the country as a volunteer.
A national campaign needs organisers and volunteers in
all areas of the country and I appeal to any one with time and energy to
spare to contact me now. I can be contacted at e.maim:
[The EDP and friends of england have already given
our opinion about the growing campaigns and the need for
nevertheless we still give full support
to those who are fighting their own way to
SAVE OUR COUNTRY.]
THE PEOPLE HAVE
SPOKEN-IS THE EU COMMISSION LISTENING?
Ditch the EU TREATY after IRISH
[Daily Mail-Wednesday, June
MORE THAN HALF of voters believe Britain should
drop the controversial European Treaty in the wake of its
rejection in last week's
The poll comes as the Tories launch a last-ditch
bid in the
HOUSE of LORDS
today to delay the
have signed a
within the past few days
, calling on the
NOT TO RATIFY THE BILL
[WHY DON'T YOU?]
IF YOU CAN SAY
'WE WANT OUT-WITHOUT
[Only an ultimatum by millions of
subjects that the new EU TREATY can never be accepted such as signing
RENUNCIATION of EU CITIZENSHIP
Details from petition creator
With the signing of the Maastricht
Treaty the people of Britain were given
EUROPEAN and BRITISH
The extra tier of citizenship was
thrust upon the people without their consent -and in many cases
The PEOPLE of GREAT BRITAIN should be
allowed the option of opting out of the EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP if they so
wish. The GOVERNMENT will then be able to provide those who have opted
-only such as British (not EU)
passports, driving licences and other national documents.
EU laws will also NOT APPLY to those who
HAVE OPTED OUT OF EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP
"ASK US FIRST"
MARTYRS WIN VICTORY OVER EU
SOFT TALK FROM EU ON EVE OF OUR
BATTLE AGAINST NEW TREATY-THEY
NOW BACK DOWN TO ALLOW IMPERIAL
MEASURES TO REMAIN FOR EVER
[Daily Mail - Tuesday, September 11,2007]
PROOF OF WHAT WE SAY-ONLY DIRECT
ACTION CAN GET RESULTS
to Conservative West Midlands MEP Philip Bushill-Matthews-who
couldn't understand what imperial measures meant 'to the people'.
In one word 'IDENTITY' now do
Download the RENUNCIATION
OF CITIZENSHIP OF THE EUROPEAN UNION FORM.
"Right Click" on the image and select "Save As.."to
download the form in word document.
Let the people speak!
[Latest Addition - June07]
Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION
to the EU
GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY WON'T
HE TRUST YOU?
HELL ON EARTH IN IRAQ
67% want powers back from
EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95%
of British people want a
SIGN TODAY ON LINE
JOIN THE 10 DOWNING
Readers can add their support to
the growing clamour for a REFERENDUM on the '"REFORM
TREATY" by signing up to a 10 Downing Street 0n-line
reads as follows:
"We the undersigned petition the
Prime Minister to guarantee that the British people
will be permitted a binding REFERENDUM on any and
all attempts to resurrect the EU " CONSTITUTION"
(and any or all of its content) regardless of
Deadline for the
PETITION is 31st January,2008
'The Spirit of England'
In London on
St.George's Day -1953
WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE
TO SET YOU
THE QUESTION THAT THE
VOTER MUST ANSWER
YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE
CORRUPT ,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND CORRUPT ALIEN BUSYBODY BRUSSELS’
-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?
TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE
FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER
SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS
WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.
-ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS
AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?
[All underlined words have a