WE ARE YET AGAIN UNDER ATTACK WITH OUR SPEED NOW AGAIN REDUCED FROM 99 -110 KB'S
TO A STEADY 26 KB's
OBVIOUSLY! WE HAVE
OFFENDED SOMEONE AND
ORDERS ARE ORDERS! SO IT
SEEMS?
POSSIBLY
TALK TALK
MIGHT YET AGAIN HAVE A CHANGE OF MIND AND GET US BACK ON STREAM AS WE ARE NOW ON
THE HOME STRETCH AFTER 25+ YEARS AND WE HAVE MUCH MORE WORK TO DO - AS THEY SAY
HISTORY CALLS?
found Sir Winston Churchill sitting
up in bed smoking a cigar. Churchill
shouted for more brandy and
protested against Britain's proposed
entry into the Common Market which
as we soon found out was in reality
HITLER'S plan for Europe under
GERMAN
Control.
Britain's
attitude,
Churchill
explained,
resembles that
which we
adopt about the
European
Army. We
help, we
dedicate, we
play a part,
but we
are not
merged
with and
do not
forfeit our
insular
or
commonwealth
character.
Our first object
is
the
unity and
consolidation of
the British
Commonwealth.
Our second, “the
fraternal ...
The
Brexit
Secretary said he could understand why
fishermen feel ‘nervous’.
But he
promised that by the 2020s – after the
Brexit ‘transition’ period – the UK will
finally experience the benefits of
leaving the EU and having full control
of its own waters.
Mr Davis’s
comments come days after it emerged that
the quota regime will not be
specifically reformed after Brexit.
A leaked
draft of the Fisheries White Paper
suggests that large foreign firms are
set to keep their rights to fish in the
UK’s coastal waters.
Asked
whether he was selling out British
fishermen, Mr Davis told the Daily Mail:
‘No. But during the implementation
period we can’t pick and choose. We
don’t have time for that.
‘I can
understand why the fishermen are
nervous. Back in the era of Edward Heath
their interests were not served well.
'I give
them a promise: we are not going to do
that.
'After the
implementation period, we will control
our own waters. We will start that
discussion while we are still in
transition.’
Mr Heath
was the Europhile Tory prime minister
who took Britain into the Common Market
in 1973.
Last night
the Brexit Secretary said: ‘The
naysayers, those who think we should
pack up or give in, are wrong. Every
week we are negotiating in good faith to
deliver a new relationship, with Britain
outside the EU, that will stand the test
of time. Next week is no exception.
‘It’s not
about expecting the worst, or setting
our sights low, it’s about agreeing a
substantial trade deal that works for
the UK and our friends and allies in
Europe.
‘The
British public voted for this, so let’s
crack on and get it done.’
At
present, around 40 per cent of England’s
fishing quota is operated by
foreign-owned vessels.
One Dutch
firm alone controls two-thirds of the
country’s entire quota allocation for
North Sea herring.
The leaked
White Paper suggests this will not
change even after we leave the EU,
meaning smaller firms will be unable to
access a significantly larger section of
the coastal fish stock.
Responding
to the revelation, Tory MP Andrew
Rosindell said: ‘Getting back control of
our seas and fishing grounds is one of
the key reasons for voting to leave the
EU and therefore the Common Fisheries
Policy. That has to happen.
‘Our
fishermen will expect nothing less and I
trust the Prime Minister to deliver it.’
The Mail
has reported in recent weeks on cases
which appear to show that the Government
is not straining every sinew to back its
fishermen.
Earlier
this month it was revealed that the
Foreign Office has handed
£75million-worth of fishing licences
in the
South Atlantic to companies from Norway,
Chile and New Zealand.
Two firms
based in the
Falklands Islands,
a British overseas territory, had their
applications rejected, although one of
them has now been given leave to
appeal.
Britain
has to decide if it is a serious country
or a joke, the Tory MP Jacob Rees-Mogg
said yesterday in relation to the deal
we eventually strike over
Brexit.
But he
could equally have posed this question
about the state of the nation as a
whole.
To which
the answer would have to be: depends
what you mean by ‘joke’.
Not a day
goes by without lunacy hitting the
headlines
Certainly,
there’s plenty to laugh at in modern
Britain. Barely a day goes by without
another piece of lunacy hitting the
headlines.
Take the
story over the weekend about the two
women who gatecrashed a men-only
swimming session in South London, after
telling staff they ‘self-identified’ as
male.
On one
level, we all had a good chuckle. ‘I
say, Henry, that chap’s got a pretty
impressive pair of man-boobs.’
Yet, on
another, it is either complete madness
or deadly serious, according to your
point of view.
The women
were feminists, making a legitimate
protest against new gender equality laws
that would allow people to pick their
own sex, regardless of biology.
At Dulwich
Leisure Centre, they were pushing on an
open door. The staff were too terrified
of being accused of ‘transphobia’ to
refuse them admission.
Much
excitement over the news that
scientists at the University of
Washington have developed a male
contraceptive pill, which has
been safely tested on men aged
between 18 and 50.
Apparently,
you put it in your shoe and it
makes you limp.
In any
event, I can’t think of many blokes who
would object to a couple of half-naked
women doing the back stroke, even if it
was technically a men-only night.
But the
reverse doesn’t apply. The real problem
arises when men who identify as women
demand the right to use exclusively
female facilities.
This is
where even the most rabid feminists and
fanatical ‘trans’ activists fall out.
Women don’t want to share changing
rooms, toilets and all-women swimming
sessions with someone in possession of a
five o’clock shadow and male genitalia.
In any
sane world, individuals with a full set
of wedding tackle should not be allowed
to describe themselves as ‘women’ and
claim all the privileges and protections
which go with it.
Yet the
Government is considering letting people
self-certify their gender without any
medical diagnosis — despite the
potential distress it could cause to
more than half the population.
Hospitals
have stopped calling mothers ‘mothers’
because it might upset the
trans-fascists. A couple of weeks ago,
retailers were knocking out gender-free
Mother’s Day cards.
You
couldn’t make it up.
This is
the crazy world we live in, one in which
a private girls’ school is thinking of
installing ‘gender-neutral’ toilets,
even though it has no transgender
pupils. How long before every girls’
school in the land has to be fitted with
urinals?
So you
tell me: is this a serious country, or a
joke?
In recent
years, official Britain has taken leave
of its senses, especially when it comes
to ‘diversity’.
Any old
crank or axe-grinder can get a
government grant to further their
agenda, however deranged. A pair of
Left-wing academics, given ten grand of
taxpayers’ money, has just produced a
report claiming that PE (Physical
Education) in schools is ‘racist’
because football, cricket and rugby are
all hangovers from the days when ‘white
privileged males’ ran the British
Empire.
Nurse!
These are
just a handful of stories from the past
few days. We can and do laugh them off.
I’ve made a good living over the past
30-odd years writing columns making fun
of this kind of stupidity.
A proper cold front
My
reaction to all those dopey
birds in flimsy micro-skirts and
killer heels photographed
teetering through the snow like
Bambi On Ice?
The
'Beast from the East'
returns haunt revelers
Exactly the same as that of
Winston Churchill when told that
one of his ministers had been
caught in flagrante delicto with
a guardsman in St James’s Park,
London, in sub-zero
temperatures.
Makes you proud to be British!
But
increasingly the joke has worn thin. For
instance, would any serious country give
houseroom to an alleged ‘asylum-seeker’,
who claims to have trained with Izal in
Syria, boasts about hating the West and,
after being lavished with money and
kindness, attempts to blow up hundreds
of people on the London Underground?
No serious
country would run down its Armed Forces,
as successive governments in Britain
have done, at a time of heightened
tensions in the world — and then launch
a recruitment campaign featuring a
female soldier jumping, Anneka
Rice-style, out of a helicopter to
celebrate International Women’s Day. Nor
would a serious country commission two
expensive aircraft carriers, without
bothering to provide the aircraft to use
them. A serious country wouldn’t shut
three-quarters of its police stations,
withdraw foot patrols and expect victims
to report crimes over the internet.
[Not
paying it's pensioner's at least the
average pension rather than lowest in a
list of many countries many poorer than
ourselves.
Britain
pays retirees the worst state pension of
any country in the developed world,
analysis has found.
The basic
payout of £122.30 a week is the least
generous in the West – worth just 29 per
cent of average earnings – and last
night former pensions minister Ros
Altmann warned the situation could get
even worse.
Government
projections suggest that for those now
under 30 the age when they can claim a
state pension will have to be raised to
70, while future payments could be cut
even further to avoid needing massive
hikes in national insurance, Baroness
Altmann said.
Britain pays
retirees the worst state pension of
any country in the developed world,
analysis has found
The league
table revealing Britain's pension shame
was compiled by the Organisation for
Economic Co-operation and Development
(OECD), which analyses the world's
industrialised nations.
Out of all
the countries compared, Britain comes
bottom – even behind poorer nations such
as Chile, Poland and Mexico.
While the
UK's state pension is worth just 29 per
cent of average earnings, in France the
equivalent figure is 74.5 per cent.
Germany's
state pension is worth 50.5 per cent of
average earnings, while in the USA it is
49.1 per cent.
The most
generous state pension in the world is
in the Netherlands, where the payments
are slightly higher than average
earnings.
The basic
payout of £122.30 a week is the
least generous in the West – worth
just 29 per cent of average
earnings. File photo
Baroness
Altmann warned that despite a recent
overhaul to the pension system, payments
will need to be cut further to avoid
massive tax rises in future to pay for
it.
She said:
'We are one of the world's leading
economies, but our support for the
oldest in society is not fit for
purpose.
'In April
2016, major reforms to the UK state
pension were supposed to have made the
system affordable for the future,
reducing its generosity. Beyond the
2030s, the new state pension will be
lower than the old system for most
people and the lowest paid,
predominantly women, will lose
significantly from the new system.
'Despite
this, the Government has been advised
that the costs of paying state pensions
will soar so much over the next 20 years
and beyond that further cuts could be
required.'
From later
this year the state pension age for
women will rise from 63 to match men at
65, and will reach 66 for both by 2020.
Baroness Ros
Altmann (pictured) warned that
despite a recent overhaul to the
pension system, payments will need
to be cut further to avoid massive
tax rises in future to pay for it
The
Government's economic forecasters, the
Actuary's Department, believes it will
become 70 in the 2050s and 71 in the
2060s.
This would
mean that anyone aged 30 or below now
will not get their state pension until
they are 70, while those under 20 will
have to wait until they are 71.
Baroness
Altmann added: 'The Government actuary
believes that just funding the UK's
exceptionally low state pension will
require reducing payments in future or
dramatic tax rises. Policymakers face
difficult decisions and are also likely
to need to increase the state pension
age further.'
The former
pensions minister called on the
Government to do more to address the
crisis, including making private
pensions more attractive so that more
people are willing to pay a portion of
their wages into their own fund.
'To avoid
burdening younger generations with
significant tax rises, it is vital that
more is done to boost private pension
saving,' she added. 'Auto-enrolment is a
good start, but the pensions industry
needs to attract more customers to pay
more into their pensions.'
[IT IS IRONIC THAT IT WAS THE
CONSERVATIVE PARTY WHICH INTRODUCED THE
STATE PENSION OVER A HUNDRED YEARS AGO
BY WINSTON CHURCHILL YET AS SHOWN ABOVE IT
HAS BEEN ALLOWED BY BOTH THE MAIN POLITICAL
PARTIES TO THE PRESENT LEVEL AS THE POOREST
PENSIONERS OF THE 24 DEVELOPED NATIONS WITH
A PERCENTAGE OF THE AVERAGE WAGE OF 29PER
CENT-WHEREAS THE TOP NATION NETHERLANDS PAYS
100.6 %. WITH THE CITY MILE BEING BAILED OUT
WITH 45 BILLION OF THE TAXPAYERS MONEY.]
ARE
SUFFERING IN ORDER THAT THE TOP OF THE
FOREIGN AID LIST IS MAINTAINED.
HOW IS IT THAT THE OTHER 23
NATIONS CAN PROVIDE A HIGHER STATE PENSION?
WHAT IS PREVENTING WESTMINSTER FROM BRINGING
OUR STATE PENSION UP TO AT LEAST THE AVERAGE
OF THOSE ON THE LIST BELOW WHICH CONTAINS
MANY NATIONS WHICH CAN HARDLY BE
CONSIDERED RICH COMPARED TO THE UK. IS IT
THAT IN THOSE COUNTRIES THE PEOPLE ARE
TEN years ago tonight, the BBC's Robert Preston broke the news
that the Bank of England had been forced to step in to rescue
Northern Rock from collapse, prompting endless queues to withdraw
savings over the following days.
T
hough
the authorities were slow to realise it, this was the first outward
sign of
GREED-FED CANCER
i
nfecting
the entire financial system.
Indeed, it marked the start of an
epic crisis whose consequences we all suffer today.
With businesses driven to the wall and taxpayers stung for
massive bailouts, the
PUBLIC FINANCES
were laid to waste.
Borrowing soared to terrifying heights- and
DEBT
is still rising in
2017
Towards an unimaginable
£2 TRILLION
£2
TRILLION.
Meanwhile, household incomes have
been painfully squeezed, while savers and pension funds have been
hammered by a decade of historically low interest rates.
Yet ten years on, no banker has been jailed for
the sharp practice that brought this contry to the brink of ruin.
Extraordinary, nor has there been a
FULL ENQUIRY.
to establish
the lessons of the
CRISIS.
(though after the comparatively footling scandal of voicemail
hacking by rogue redtops, the Coalition had no hesitation in
ordering one into the conduct sand ethics of the newspaper industry.
What is so deeply worrying is that, even now, none of those
lessons appears to have been learned. Indeed, there are abundant
signs that the cancer is back.
As greedily as ever , bankers are
inflating a DEBT BUBBLE-handing out excessive mortgages, cheep car
loans and credit cards with
ZERO INTEREST
rates fixed for months.
Meanwhile, the old racket of trading bundles of sub-prime debt
continues as if nothing untoward happened in 2007.
Now , as then, the banks have far too little capital in reserve
to weather a
STORM .
The difference is that in 2017, with
taxpayers milked dry, the Government will be unable to mount
anything like a similar bailout
[We prefer the word RESCUE. It is obvious that the banksters know
something that the rest of the population do not know. A history of
the City of London goes some way in explaining their unpatriotic and
selfish and arrogant behaviour. They are not ENGLAND they are a
financial DESPOT installed over 300 years ago by a SECRET SOCIETY -
the cause and curse of much suffering here and of people's the world
over. It is THE GREED CAPITAL of the WORLD -It is ALL for ITSELF
and NOTHING else MATTERS. IT IS A MAJOR DESTABILIZING BLOT ON THE
LIVES OF THE PEOPLE OF ENGLAND. THEY CONTRIBUTE TO OUR ECONOMY
AND AT THE SAME TIME THEY UNDERMINE IT AT GREAT COST TO THE PEOPLE
EVERYWHERE. THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD AMEND THEIR CHARTER
TO ENSURE THAT ONLY ETHICAL PRACTICES ARE PERMITTED. IT IS A
LOOSE CANNON WHICH MUST BE NEUTERED WITHOUT DELAY.]
]
The City must act now to shore up its defences. Otherwise, there
can be no telling how the next crisis will end.
Whatever
we may think about abortion,
shouldn’t everyone brought up in
our tradition of free expression
feel uneasy about this week’s
decision to ban pro-Life
campaigners from setting up shop
outside a clinic where
terminations are performed?
Indeed, it’s a measure of how
dominant and intolerant social
liberalism has become in modern
Britain that Mrs U has come to dread
being asked what she does for a
living.
It’s
not that she’s ashamed of her job
—on the contrary, she’s proud of it
and enjoys the fulfilment of working
for what she regards as a hugely
important cause.
It’s
just that in the metropolitan,
middle-class circles in which we
move, you will often hear a sharp
intake of breath around the dinner
table when she mentions she works
for SPUC.
Reaction
A
frisson of embarrassment tends to
grip the company, putting a dampener
on the whole evening, as if she had
confessed to working for the Ku Klux
Klan.
In
fact, of course, my wife’s views on
the moral value of human life, from
the moment of conception to the
grave, are shared by billions of
people around the globe.
They
are held by every mainstream world
religion and church — Catholic,
Protestant, Jewish, Muslim and more
— and have been espoused by
philosophers for millennia.
Yet
this cuts no ice at the parties we
attend, on the increasingly rare
occasions when we’re asked. Imagine
the reaction at a BBC staff meeting
if anyone were to admit to
supporting Brexit, and you’ll get
the idea.
I
should also declare that my wife
donates a modest monthly sum (or to
be more accurate, I give it at her
instigation, since my higher tax
rate makes the gift aid top-up worth
more) to a charity called the Good
Counsel Network (GCN).
This
is one of those affected by Tuesday
night’s Public Space Protection
Order, issued by Ealing Council in
West London to keep campaigners away
from the entrance to the local Marie
Stopes abortion clinic.
Now,
with my weakness for seeing both
sides of an argument, I can well
understand the thinking behind the
council’s order.
For
more than two decades, six days a
week, 52 weeks of the year, members
of the GCN have gathered on the
grass verge outside the clinic to
pray, sing hymns and try to persuade
pregnant women to seek alternatives
to abortion.
Indeed,
it’s a measure of how dominant
and intolerant social liberalism
has become in modern Britain
that Mrs U has come to dread
being asked what she does for a
living
As
anyone can imagine, this must be
irritating to local residents. Nor
is it hard to see that it could be
upsetting to women who’ve taken the
traumatic decision to terminate and
don’t want anyone to renew any
doubts or try to change their minds
at the last moment.
Let me
also put it on record that I do not
for one moment defend the bullying
tactics allegedly adopted by some
anti-abortion protesters outside
clinics.
No
matter how strongly they may feel
about the sanctity of human life, it
strikes me as cruel to shout
‘murderess’ at women arriving for
terminations, or to torment them by
calling them ‘mum’ and thrusting
teddy bears into their hands.
How
much this goes on, I just don’t
know. It is even possible that rogue
members of the GCN may have resorted
to such conduct, which is said to be
increasingly widespread among
anti-abortionists in the U.S.
All I
can say, because I have Mrs U’s word
for it, is that the people who run
the group disapprove strongly of
bullying and regard it as
counter-productive. They see it as
their mission to show kindness to
women who may be having doubts and
to offer them practical help with
alternatives — whether financial
support, within their limited
resources, or advice on putting
babies up for adoption.
Fanatics
In the
huge majority of cases, perhaps
needless to say, their efforts come
to nothing. But on those rare
occasions when they succeed in
persuading women to carry a
pregnancy through to childbirth, the
results are often profoundly moving.
They
say the mothers concerned almost
always bless them ever afterwards
for talking them out of abortion and
helping them through.
Yet
from the way groups such as the GCN
are portrayed in the liberal media,
you would think these kindly,
predominantly mild-mannered and
middle-aged Christians were
dangerous fanatics, spewing
religious hatred.
I
think of a Channel 4 Dispatches
programme — entitled Undercover:
Britain’s Abortion Extremists —
which claimed to have ‘infiltrated’
the network. Complete with wobbly
shots from a ‘hidden camera’ and
indistinct recordings with
subtitles, it was made to appear
almost as if the documentary makers
had risked their lives to unearth
the truth behind a sinister
terrorist organisation.
Yet
GCN has never made the slightest
secret of its mission, methods or
purpose, while the programme told us
nothing that we wouldn’t have
learned if the camera had been held
rock-steady and in full view, with a
decent quality sound recording.
This
kind of casual dishonesty is typical
of campaigners who call themselves
pro-Choice (by which naturally they
mean a woman’s choice of whether or
not to abort — never an expectant
father’s, let alone that of an
unborn life).
All
too often, they speak in euphemisms,
designed to strip the abortion issue
of any moral dimension, as if ending
a potential human life has no more
profound significance than having an
appendix removed.
Take
this week, when a councillor
interviewed on the news after
Tuesday’s vote said that Ealing had
struck a blow to protect women
seeking a ‘legally available
healthcare treatment’.
Honest
Well,
no one denies that abortion is
legally available. But a ‘healthcare
treatment’? Under the letter of the
1967 Abortion Act, that’s what it
ought to be, since terminations were
supposed to be permitted only when
two doctors certified independently
that continuing a pregnancy would
injure the physical or mental health
of the woman or existing children,
or if the baby was likely to be born
severely handicapped.
But
let’s be honest. While, yes, some
cases genuinely meet these criteria,
the great majority of the 190,406
abortions carried out in the UK in
2016 simply don’t. Only by
stretching the meaning of the words
‘injury to health’ to snapping point
does healthcare come into the
equation.
Or
take that oft-repeated platitude of
the pro-Choice lobby: ‘No woman
takes the decision to have an
abortion lightly.’ Again, this is
true of a great many women who will
testify that the decision was one of
the most agonising of their lives.
But
‘no woman’ decides lightly? How,
then, can it be explained that
nearly 40 per cent of those 190,406
operations performed in 2016 were
repeat terminations?
No,
the fact is that abortion is
increasingly seen as an accepted and
commonplace procedure, with doctors
and clinics ignoring the law and
simply rubber-stamping applications,
with no questions asked.
It has
come to the point where an encounter
with groups such as the Good Counsel
Network can be a pregnant woman’s
first contact with anyone prepared
to put the other side of the
argument, and reinforce instinctive
doubts that so many women feel.
Many
of us have met women who went
through with abortions and say
they’ve bitterly regretted it ever
since.
Isn’t
it a desperately sad reflection on
our society that this historic
Public Space Protection Order was
directed not against violent
demonstrators, yelling hatred of our
way of life, but against
well-meaning Christians, trying to
do good?
The current
leadership of the
Anglo-Saxon world is acting
in a manner that can only be
described as insane, by
issuing one obviously false,
incendiary claim after
another in a vain attempt to
start World War 3. They are
doing this because the
current leadership is
literally fighting to
survive as the wheels of
justice inevitably grind
closer.
This is why
recently we have seen that
UK Prime Minister Theresa
May’s hysterical claims that
Russia used poison gas
inside the UK are being
denied by her own
government’s experts. This
is also why U.S. President
Donald Trump was either
forced by blackmail or
fooled like an idiot into
falsely accusing the Syrian
government yet again of
attacking its own civilians
with chemical weapons.
In both
cases, the accusations
ultimately came from the
actual perpetrators of the
crimes. In the UK, it was
elements of its own
intelligence services who
manufactured the poison gas
incident, CIA and MI5
sources confirm. Russian UN
envoy Vasily Nebenzya called
the UK’s behavior a “theater
of the absurd.”
Russian
Foreign Minister Sergey
Lavrov, for his part, summed
up the of opinions many
countries about U.S. foreign
policy under the Trump
administration by noting it
to be “highly
controversial,” “lacking
clarity,” and being run by
people none of whom had more
than a year’s experience.
http://tass.com/politics/997996
The
general impression is that
the Trump administration is
going against all major
international agreements
reached in recent years
without actually offering an
alternative, multiple
sources agreed.
On top of
that, Trump U.S. Commerce
officials, working against
the advice of the Pentagon,
have declared a trade war
with China that they are
mathematically doomed to
lose. China’s government
has already promised to
“fight to the end at any
cost.”
So what is
really going on here? The
answer, of course, is that
the group of Western leaders
who brought us the fake war
on terror and the various
invasions that followed are
terrified of losing power
and consequently being
charged with multiple war
crimes. This is the real
reason why they are acting,
collectively, in an
irrational and hysterical
manner.
The
situation in the U.S.
remains the most intense, as
an undeclared but de
facto civil war is
raging there. The war pits
the fascist Khazarian mafia
faction that staged 9/11,
the Iraq War, and Fukushima
against patriots who want to
restore democracy and the
rule of law to the West.
Unlike the
open warfare of previous
civil wars, this one is
being fought over the
instruments of mass mind
control, including money,
propaganda, cyberwarfare,
targeted assassinations, and
unpublicized battles between
special forces.
The
ongoing attacks on Facebook,
Amazon, Google, Twitter, and
Microsoft, even as these
Internet giants strive to
censor the web, are just one
visible aspect of this new
type of war.
There is
also a space war and
esoteric dimension to this
that is visible to the
surface population in small
glimpses, much like people
on a boat watching a battle
between sea monsters that
takes place mostly
underwater.
The latest
such glimpse was the
crashing down to earth of
the Chinese space station
Tiangong-1. It was downed
by U.S. forces in
retaliation for recent
crashes of U.S. warships
apparently engineered by the
Chinese, CIA sources say.
Now three U.S. aircraft
carrier groups are headed to
the South China Sea to
confront a massive Chinese
battle group there, the CIA
sources say.
In fact,
though, the two groups may
actually be facing a common
enemy, say Pentagon
sources. Most of the action
is taking place underwater
and in secret, the sources
say.
According
to the CIA sources, “The
real reason for all the
sabre-rattling by the
Western military powers is
that…
The
remainder of this
article is only
available to members of
BenjaminFulford.net
Please
Log In
or
Registerto create
an account.
The Japanese
Khazarian mafia slave
government, desperate to
survive, is plotting the
removal of U.S. troops from
Japan as well as the end of
the regime of U.S. President
Donald Trump, according to
Japanese right-wing sources
close to the emperor. That
is why former U.S. President
Barack Obama and former Thai
Prime Minister Thaksin
Shinawatra were here last
week, the sources say. The
Japanese regime is working
with the Khazarian mafia
slave regimes of Theresa May
in the UK, Emmanuel Macron
of France, and Angela Merkel
of Germany in this effort
against the Trump regime,
the sources say. The French
branch of the Rothschild
family is deeply involved in
these moves, CIA sources in
Asia confirm.
The Japanese
regime has joined these
anti-Trump efforts because
it has become alarmed by a
series of recent public
rebukes by the Trump
military government. The
biggest is that Japan is
being kept totally out of
the loop about moves towards
peace in the Korean
Peninsula. Japan’s
government is also upset
that, unlike other U.S.
allies, it was not given an
exemption to U.S. tariffs on
steel and aluminum, the
sources say. That is why
the Japanese government is
making unprecedented (for a
usually servile,
boot-licking regime) public
rebukes of the U.S. moves.
The Abe
government has been actively
preparing for war with China
using North Korea as a
pretext, and was totally
surprised by the move
towards peace, the sources
explain. While the
warmongering Abe regime
trembles, U.S., Chinese and
Russian Presidents “Donald
Trump, Xi Jinping, and
Vladimir Putin may win the
Nobel Peace Prize for a
Korean peace treaty and
denuclearization,” Pentagon
sources say.
By
contrast, members of the Abe
regime fear being charged
with war crimes over their
involvement in the March 11,
2011 tsunami and nuclear
terror attack on Japan.
This fear has arisen because
of the imminent arrest of
satan-worshipping Israeli
Prime Minister Benyamin
Netanyahu, who was one of
the chief architects of the
Fukushima terror operation,
they say. This attack was
orchestrated by the
Rothschild family in an
aborted attempt to evacuate
40 million Japanese to North
Korea, members of the
Rothschild family confirm.
The plan was to set up new
Rothschild Asian
headquarters in North Korea,
according to these sources.
Now this
is all unraveling, and a
peace deal in the Korean
Peninsula is likely to lead
to all of these murderous
plans being made public, say
CIA, Pentagon, and Japanese
right-wing sources. That is
why there is now great fear
and loathing amongst the
perpetrators of this mass
murder, they say.
A CIA
source in Thailand said
Thaksin Shinawatra was
called to Tokyo because
“Japanese Prime Minister
Shinzo Abe is looking for a
place to find refuge. Dubai
is at the top of his list.
Once the Japanese people
know what he has done to
them, he will have to run in
order to avoid being taken
out. His time is almost
up.” The source explained
that Shinawatra is exiled in
Dubai and thus Abe was
hoping his connections with
the government there would
get him shelter as well.
Also, last
week a member of the NSA
personally visited this
writer to warn him they had
intercepted communications
showing Japanese Finance
Minister Taro Aso is
actively trying to have me
murdered. Aso is upset at
being exposed as the top
Rothschild agent in Japan,
the NSA official explained.
Aso is also angry that his
regime’s construction of a
biological warfare factory
disguised as a veterinary
school has been exposed by
this writer, he said.
The other
fatal error made by the Abe
regime was to sell
substandard steel to the
U.S. military in a
deliberate act of sabotage,
Pentagon sources say. This
is something the Abe
government will pay a high
price for, the sources
promise.
Speaking
about steel, a U.S. military
intelligence source sent
this writer the following
information:
“The
Chinese are reacting to
Pentagon claims of
substandard steel with great
composure. Senior Chinese
officials point out that
this was a known problem in
2015 and wiped out by 2017,
the Chinese leadership
recognizing that their
reputation for quality was a
priceless national asset.
Interestingly, in the same
conversation it was
mentioned that China kept
many samples of the waste
from 9/11, and tested for…
The
remainder of this
article is only
available to members of
BenjaminFulford.net
Please
Log In or
Register to create
an account.
April 1st,
2018, CNN* — The Institute
for the Promotion of Cloning
(IPC), a
medical/pharmaceutical
lobbying group, has issued a
report calling for an
emergency response to a
crisis of what it calls “Age
Deficiency Syndrome” or
ADS. According to the IPC,
there are an estimated 1.9
billion ADS victims
worldwide. The IPC defines
ADS victims as anyone who is
5 or more years
developmentally or
chronologically retarded
compared to a 20-year-old
adult.
This crisis,
according to IPC
spokesperson H.V. Nomorkids,
has long been hidden with
euphemisms like “infancy” or
“childhood.” In fact, he
says, “An extreme ADS
sufferer can be 18 years
developmentally and mentally
retarded compared to a
20-year-old, and yet this
extreme suffering is brushed
off by labeling such a
victim as a ‘two-year-old,’”
he says.
Citing the
IPC study, he claims this
leads to incredible
suffering that has long been
ignored and dismissed with
misleading labels like
“growing pains.” “This
so-called two-year-old is
really the victim of an
18-year case of ADS who will
be forced to go through
years of suffering and
torment before the natural
immune system finally copes
with it through so-called
“natural growth.”
Dr. Rex
Clonem of the IPC claims his
Institute has come up with a
system to cure ADS
worldwide. “Our plan is to
take skin grafts from all
ADS sufferers and use them
to create fully adult
clones,” he says. “Once the
adult replacement clones are
awakened, the ADS sufferers
can be put out of their
misery through medical
euthanasia,” he says. In
addition, he says the
worldwide shortage of
transplant organs could be
alleviated overnight by
harvesting the organs of the
euthanized ADS victims.
There
would be many social
advantages to this system,
according to the IPC
report. “For one thing,
traditional child-rearing
practices result in the
inefficient transmission of
archaic cultural traditions
like ‘religion,’ ‘morals,’
and ‘individual
personality,’” the report
claims. “Adult clones can
be created free of these
flaws and fully
indoctrinated with the
ruling secret government
ideology of technocratic
materialism,” the report
continues.
The report
also says that mild ADS
sufferers,
“16-19-year-olds,” could be
treated with age-enhancing
drugs to relieve the
residual symptoms.
“This is
the most outrageous thing I
have ever heard,” says I.M.
Mature of the Peter Pan
Institute for Eternal
Youth. “These people just
want to make money building
cloning facilities and
selling aging drugs by
labeling “childhood” as a
disease, when in reality it
is a time of carefree
innocence,” he says.
Reverend
R. Epent of the
Pan-Theological Institute
for the Promotion of
Religious Guilt, for his
part, claims that “The
Creator makes us suffer
through childhood and
infancy as punishment for
the sins of our past and
future lives, and so it
would be an abomination for
humanity to try to end this
suffering.”
“This is a
typical Western medical
approach to a problem that
is best dealt with through
natural cures like strong
doses of opiates or
naturally sourced arsenic,”
says Dr. P. Oysonem of the
Institute for Dealing with
Youth in Asia.
In any
case, the IPC admits it will
probably take years of
lobbying before their
recommendations will be put
into action.
The start
today (March 26, 2018) of
oil futures trading in
gold-backed Chinese yuan is
being widely seen as a
Chinese victory in the
ongoing financial war for
control of the planet
Earth. It is also a good
time to remind China that
the world will NEVER swap
Khazarian mafia control for
Chinese mafia control.
The West will
be eternally grateful for
the help provided by Asian
secret societies in its
battle to free itself from
the control of the satan-worshipping
Khazarian mafia. As we will
point out, this battle is
about to end in victory for
humanity.
However,
the Khazarians, who should
never be underestimated, are
appealing to the ego of
certain Chinese leaders by
promising them the role of
Babylonian god-king of the
planet Earth. In exchange
for Chinese support, many
Chinese leaders are falling
for this and dreaming of a
Chinese dictatorship over
the entire planet.
China thus
needs to be reminded of a
few things. The first is
that the West still has the
power to entirely wipe China
out of existence. The White
Dragon Society (WDS) and its
allies fought hard to defeat
a faction in the West that
wanted to do exactly that.
Thus, instead of
obliterating China, the West
deliberately transferred its
industrial and technical
expertise in order to help
China modernize and
develop. That’s because it
was the right thing to do,
and because the West wants
Asian help in a campaign to
end poverty and stop
environmental destruction.
Also, China and other Asian
countries were helped in
their modernization because
a deal between East and West
for world peace is necessary
to end the quarantine the
planet earth is now under.
In other words, certain
Chinese radical factions
need to be reminded that the
end goal is to achieve a
win-win solution for
everybody.
With that
in mind, let us now look at
the latest news in the
ongoing battle for the
planet Earth. On this
front, there is very serious
brinkmanship going on
between the U.S. and China
in the run-up to the start
of the Chinese Gold/Oil/Yuan
(GOY) trading that is
rightly being seen as a
threat to the petrodollar
and U.S. hegemony.
The U.S.
reaction was to impose
tariffs on $60 billion worth
of Chinese imports and hire
warmongering radical neocon
John Bolton as National
Security Adviser to U.S.
President Donald Trump. The
U.S. message to China was
clearly, “We will stop
buying your stuff, cut off
your Middle-East oil supply,
and use North Korea as an
excuse to start war.” The
Chinese reaction, in
contrast, was to seek
compromise and peaceful
negotiation while reminding
the U.S. side that it was
fully prepared for any
eventuality.
Despite
the U.S. bluster, a quick
look at the cards each side
is holding makes it obvious
China is likely to emerge as
a pyrrhic victor in any
trade war. This can be seen
by taking things to an
extreme and imagining the
U.S. stopping all trade with
China, and China dumping all
of its U.S. Treasury
holdings. Americans would
see an immediate plunge in
their living standards as
they would lose access to
cheap Chinese goods, while a
plunging dollar would make
imports from the rest of the
world more expensive. Also,
it would take many years for
the Americans to build
factories to replace the
goods it is used to getting
from China, and the end
result would be far more
expensive.
China, for
its part, would lose access
to U.S. soybeans and grains,
but would be able to replace
these with supplies from
sources like Russia and
Brazil. The loss of U.S.
dollars earned through its
trade surplus with America
would also deprive China of
a lot of the hard currency
it has been using to enhance
its power around the world.
However, it is likely that
China has set up the GOY
trading in part to have a
ready substitute for the
petrodollars it would lose
in a trade war with the U.S.
On the surface, thus it
appears the Rothschilds and
their Khazarian brethren
were right to side with
China against the U.S.
However, if you analyze
things on a deeper level, a
very different picture
emerges. In this one, the
Rothschilds and their fellow
Khazarian mafiosi face a
catastrophic defeat.
In
reality, Pentagon sources
say the trade war with China
“provides a cover for the
U.S. military so that they
can crash the stock market
and …
The
remainder of this
article is only
available to members of
BenjaminFulford.net
Please
Log In
or
Register
to create an account.
One of your
subscribers noticed the
linked video of Bandar’s
supposed suicide. This was
actually an event that took
place at Atlanta
International Airport on
Feb. 28, 2018 as reported by
local media:
The man
who fell off the railing is
clearly African-American and
was reportedly drunk, so it
appears this is not Bandar.
While this does not
invalidate Bandar’s suicide
outright, the linked video
is definitely false
evidence. Of course, there
is the possibility that
Baaghi is a disinformation
campaign.
If this
was done on purpose, then
please disregard this
message.
–N.
EU
‘would be a very, very bad outcome for
Britain’ was seen as an attack on his
Brexiteer colleagues in the Cabinet (and,
indeed, on the Prime Minister).
But yesterday
he appeared as joint author of a newspaper
article with the most adamantine Brexiteer
in the Cabinet, the International Trade
Secretary Dr Liam Fox. The two supposed foes
declared that in March 2019, Britain would
not just be leaving the EU but also ‘we will
leave the Customs Union and be free to
negotiate the best trade deals around the
world as an independent, open, trading
nation’.
Although the
Cabinet Brexiteers were content with
Hammond’s proposal that there should be a
transition period after March 2019, pending
a final settlement of the country’s
arrangements with the EU, the Chancellor had
given the impression he was bending to the
demands of the CBI that Britain remain
within the Customs Union during that
unspecified period.
Blunder
This they
regarded as a fatal blunder — and not just
because they suspected the CBI (which had
campaigned for Britain to give up sterling
for the euro) of seeking to keep the UK in
the EU ‘by the back door’.
As Shanker
Singham, chairman of the special trade
commission of the Legatum Institute (a group
consulted regularly by the Government),
warned last week: ‘The UK must be able to
provide the clarity of being outside the
Customs Union on Day 1 of
If such clarity does not exist, then other
countries will not think the UK is serious
about executing an independent trade policy
and they will quickly lose patience and move
on.’...
This clearly
disappointed the most voluble critic of the
Brexiteers on the Tory parliamentary
benches, Anna Soubry. In her own newspaper
article yesterday, she lamented ‘a sense of
resignation among most people who voted
Remain that we have to “man up” and make the
most of what we know will be a rotten Brexit’...
It¿s bridle and groom at
jump star¿s wedding:
Medal-winning...
200,000 people a year
are being hit by scam
text messages...
Oxfam chiefs are hauled
in to explain the
prostitute scandal...
ROBERT HARDMAN:
Tempers boiling at
this tawdry shrine
to... 
