Home Secretary Charles Clarke’s policy puts repeat KILLERS
on the street to save on PRISON SPACE.
*
Daily Mail
Wednesday, March 1-2006
by
James Slack
Home Affairs Editor
*
KILLER ON THE LOOSE (1)
*
HOME SECRETARY
Charles Clarke
takes the blame for blunders
in banker murder case.
A DEVASTATING ‘collective
failure’ by the Probation Service left two criminals free to kill banker John
Monckton an Inquiry found yesterday.
The damning verdict from the Chief Inspector of Probation
cast grave doubts over Home Secretary Charles Clarke’s plans to free thousands
more convicts to live in the community.
As four probation workers
were suspended from their posts last night, Mr Clarke said he accepted
responsibility for the catalogue of blunders in the Monckton case and promised
urgent steps to sort out the chaos in the London Probation Service.
But opponents questioned
whether he could now have any hope of persuading the public that tough
monitoring of criminals in the community was a suitable alternative to keeping
them behind bars, as proposed in his five-year Law and Order strategy published
last month.
Damien Hanson, whose
nicknames included Devil’s child, Omen and 666, had been freed halfway through
a 12-year sentence for attempted murder when he killed Mr Monckton during a
burglary at the 49-year-old financier’s Chelsea home in 2004.
His accomplice Elliot White
was on bail for drugs charges, despite having repeatedly broken the terms of
two community penalties. Mr Monckton was stabbed eight times and his wife
Homeyra twice, though she survived.
Yesterday’s report, by
Probation Watchdog Andrew bridges, found ‘serious deficiencies amounting to
a collective failure’ in both the cases of Hanson and White.
It revealed that the Parole
Board decision to free Hanson then 24 was based on a report by a probation
officer who HAD NOT MET HIM FOR 14 MONTHS.
A RISK ASSESSMENT CARRIED
OUT ON HIM WHILE HE WAS IN PRISON IN May 2004 gave him a 91 per cent
probability of sexual or violent re-offending. But this was not made available
to the parole panel, nor was it acted upon by probation staff.
Conditions attached to his
release by the Parole Board were not enforced. He was supposed to live in a
hostel outside London, where the original attempted murder took place in 1998. But,
when no place was found, he was allowed to return to the Capital.
Incredibly, an exclusion
zone drawn to keep him out of contact with his first victim was ignored when he
was actually ordered to meet his probation officer inside the cordon.
Mr Bridges described this as
‘utterly extraordinary’
The London
Probation Service responded to yesterday’s report by announcing the
suspension from duty of four unnamed officers involved in the cases. A total of
seven members of staff had dealings with the two men.
In a joint statement, the
Director of the National Probation Service Roger Hill, and the Chief Officer of
London Probation, David Scott, said they accepted ‘entirely’ the findings of
the Report.
But the Conservatives said
there must now be huge doubts over Mr Clarke’s strategy to prevent offending.
Shadow Home Secretary David
Davis said:
‘This problem starts with a policy that has created a lack of
prison places -the direct consequence of which is that people who should be in
prison are not in prison.
‘The public will properly
demand that the Government is more serious about maintaining their safety.’
Hanson was jailed for 36
years last December for Mr Monckton’s murder and the attempted murder of his
wife.
* * *
LATEST NEWS
Daily Mail
COMMENT
Wednesday, March15-2006
The vicious thugs set free to
murder.
YOUSEF BOUHADDOU is a
violent maniac with a long criminal record, a crack cocaine addict who
habitually steals to pay for his £300-a-day habit.
He always returns to
burglary at the first opportunity say police who know him (and there are plenty
of them).
Yet this is the vicious thug who was
let out of jail early to
commit murder.
-freed after serving
just 30 months of a five
and a half year sentence
by
the Parole Board that didn’t even
meet him.
-but took just
20 minutes
to review the paperwork.
NOW a fine man, Robert Symons, is dead as his family
tries to cope with unsupportable grief, all of them betrayed by a
PENAL SYSTEM
-that no longer makes even a
pretence of
PROTECTING THE PUBLIC.
There was nothing out of character in Bouhaddou’s
appalling crime. That didn’t stop
PROBATION and PRISON OFFICIALS considering him eligible for
EARLY
RELEASE.
Nor did it give pause to the
PAROLE BOARD.
NO, through INCOMPETANCE,
FOLLY or simply the desire to relieve overcrowding they unleashed this
menace on society anyway- just as they had agreed early release for the thug
who murdered London financier
JOHN MONCKTON
AND WILL LESSONS
BE LEARNT THIS TIME?
DREAM ON.
It seems the
probation officers suspended after the Monckton case is to be reinstated. No
doubt those who so crassly freed Bouhaddou will be treated with kid gloves also.
NOBODY PAYS.
NOBODY IS PUNISHED.
Certainly NOT the CRIMINALS, who under the 2003 Criminal
Justice Act are automatically released halfway through their sentences, as
Bouhaddou would have been, had he not been paroled earlier.
That is how this Government
compensates for its failure to build more prisons.
NO LONGER DO CRIMINALS SERVE
THEIR TIME
INSTEAD
Public Safety depends on
probation and parole officials who seem to be bereft of any common sense.
DOES ANYBODY BELIEVE
ROBERT SYMONS
WILL
BE THE LAST VICTIM OF THIS MADNESS?
*
[When the DEATH PENALTY was
abolished in the 60’s it was understood that there would be a need for more
PRISON SPACE and over the past nine years with New Labour’s stupidity in using
any method in order NOT TO BUILD PRISONS even going so far as to down grade certain
CRIMES which should be punishable by a Prison Sentence rather than to protect
the PUBLIC and VICTIM.]
Labour’s love [IS] lost
*
Daily Mail
Wednesday, March 15,2006
By
Allison Pearson
This selfish lust for speed
must be stopped in its tracks.
[Make the penalty fit the
CRIME]
THERE was a huge response to
my story about the obscenely inadequate sentence given to the driver who killed
three-year-old Levi Bleasdale.
Police officers e-mailed
their frustrations with a system which calls reckless behaviour an
‘ACCIDENT’
Bereaved parents sent stories
almost too sad to write down.
So let us now praise
Judge James Stewart.
This wise man stopped a case at Leeds Crown Court last
week because the defendant, who ran down 20-year-old Christopher Benson, was ONLY
charged with driving without due care and attention.
The Judge demanded that the
Crown Prosecution Service reconsider.
Inkthab Alam, a Tory Councillor was doing 70 in a 40mph
zone when he killed Christopher.
He drove off and torched his
car, then denied any involvement until four months later when police proved he
did it.
Astonishingly, the CPS came back and insisted it could
not make a case for death by dangerous driving.
‘This is a matter of some
amazement to me, ’said the Judge, ‘This undercharging
is happening in the4 Courts
and its getting out of hand.’
Millions will surely agree with him. We urgently need a
CRIME called Vehicular Manslaughter, which they already have in the USA.
I wish those in high places
with any lingering doubt could read the words of one reader, Sally, who told me
what happened to
her family.
Sally’s
two boys were holding hands and crossing the road outside school when they were
knocked over by a motors cyclist travelling at 70 mph.
The seven -year-old was
killed instantly, his elder brother sustained head injuries, but survived. The Boy Racer, who had run into a policeman
on a previous occasion, was fined £250 and walked free.
Over the next ten years, Sally and her husband fought for
JUSTICE for their boys. Finally despairing, her husband committed suicide. Two
years later, their surviving son took his life.
‘All this is a direct result
of one lad’s selfish lust for speed,’ writes Sally.
‘There is no one, I repeat
no one, in this world who is so important that five minutes added on to their
travelling time will change the Universe.
BUT
A human life cannot be
replaced.
‘Families like mine can
never come to terms with the needless loss of our loved one. We go to hell, and
only some of us manage to come back.’
How many Levis and Christopher’s
will it take to change the LAW?
How many mothers like Sally?
* * *
[The Punishment must fit the
Crime
otherwise it will be a
return to an Eye for an eye. The State
has a DUTY to protect its citizens and its failure must be a return to a family Blood Feud.]
Home Secretary Charles Clarke
-it is down to you -which way do you intend to go?
PROPER & FIRM
STATE JUSTICE
Or
FAMILY FEUD.
*
Are you on the side of the CRIMINAL
or the VICTIM?
*
The People are awaiting your
answer.
* * *
[Font altered-bolding &
underlining used -comments in brackets]
MAR/06
*
*
13th October,2007
So You Want Out Of The EU
THEN WHY NOT SIGN THE
RENUNCIATION of EU CITIZENSHIP
http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Optout
Details from petition creator
With the signing of the Maastricht Treaty the
people of Britain were given
DUAL CITIZENSHIP
-both
EUROPEAN and BRITISH
The extra tier of citizenship was thrust upon
the people without their consent -and in many cases knowledge.
The PEOPLE of GREAT BRITAIN should be allowed
the option of opting out of the EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP if they so wish. The
GOVERNMENT will then be able to provide those who have opted out with
BRITISH DOCUMENTATION
-only such as British (not EU) passports,
driving licences and other national documents.
EU laws will also NOT APPLY to those who
HAVE OPTED OUT OF EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP
[PETITION OPEN UNTIL OCTOBER
08]
*
www.noliberties.com
[Latest Addition - June07]
*
www.eutruth.org.uk
*
www.thewestminsternews.co.uk
*
www.speakout.co.uk
*
Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION
to the EU
www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs
*
PETITION
FOR A
REFERENDUM
SIGN TODAY ON LINE
telegraph.co.uk/eureferendum
*
July 18-2007
VOTE
-2007
TO
LEAVE
THE
EUROPEAN
UNION
WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE
TO SET YOU
FREE
THE
UK
INDEPENDENCE PARTY
www.ukip.org
TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE
FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER
BUT
SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS
WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.
*
ONLY
PRO-PORTIONAL
REPRESENTATION
WILL
BRING
DEMOCRACY
BACK
TO
THE
ENGLISH
PEOPLE
*
Home
Rule for
Scotland
WHY NOT
HOME
RULE
for
ENGLAND
*
MAY/07
[All underlined words have a
separate bulletin]