UNLESS THERE IS AN AWAKING - IN A FEW DAYS A DISCREDITED TONY
BLAIR - WILL RETURN TO No 10.
THE KING OF DUPLICITY
New Labour’s victory
eight years ago.
He argues that
Tony Blair has been
Corrupted by power
In a way
By any premier of modern
What does this say
A NATION SET TO RE-ELECT
HUXLEY’S Brave New World, written in 1932, is now an unfashionable
novel. But this election campaign puts
it into mind. In Huxley’s nightmare
universe of the future, human discontent is kept at bay by doses of the drug ‘soma’,
which lulls all cares.
robotically-conditioned characters talked of going on ‘soma
holidays’, narcotic escapes from reality.
Back in our own
times, much of the British electorate
seem astonishingly willing to continue their long political ‘soma holidays’
through next Thursday.
Content with material well-being, they appear unwilling to
think about anything save they are enjoying life, still some thousands off
their credit limits and the garden is looking nice for the time of the year,
thank you very much. They will thus re-elect Tony Blair.
This week’s revelations about Blair’s shameless
distortion of the legal advice about the war in Iraq completes a prosecution case
that was already devastating.
has performed actions as Britain’s prime minister, which if transferred to any
other sphere of life, would cost him a custodial sentence for FRAUD.
Those voters satisfied that the economy prospers, and
there is lots of money about, refuse to heed the fact that Labour’s leader has
been exposed as a serial deceiver.
this point to Mr Jones in Bristol or Sheffield and he might glance up from the
telly and shrug: ‘What do you expect?
All politicians are the same. It wouldn’t
be any different under Howard or Kennedy.’
Mr Jones believes that under the Tories or LibDems, petrol
prices would stay high, council tax would go up, Rover would go down, asylum
seekers would come in, serial offenders would be let out and -under Michael
Howard anyway-British troops would be committed to Texan adventurers abroad.
course, it is true that all the parties at all elections conduct auctions of
promises, most of which go unfulfilled.
But after eight years of any government, it is right to judge its
history, not its aspirations.
It was because the Tory record had become so tarnished
that the country ejected John Major in 1997.
was among those who thought that a just verdict. Tha Government’s refusal to address the plight of the public
services had become shameful. Civil war
on Europe paralysed.
was settlement day for years of failures and fiascos-the early Nineties
recession prominent among them. Tories had run out of steam and ideas.
Today, however, it is Tony Blair’s
turn to face a similar reckoning which invites an equally harsh verdict. This is the Blair who said at the
‘We in government have to be purer than pure.’
of us really did believe
that he was a man of
integrity as well as rhetoric, of honesty as well as moderation.
process of discovering otherwise has been long and painful.
The Prime Minister
offering himself for re-election next Thursday looks a different man from the
one who stood like John the Baptist on the doorstep of Downing Street the
morning after his 1997 poll triumph.
Today’s Tony Blair is the man who accepted cash for his
party for continuing to allow tobacco advertising on racing cars, whose
government has consistently deceived the public about NHS waiting lists, who
pardons and promotes his personal Iagos (Peter Mandelson and Alastair Campbell)
even when the stage is strewn with the flotsam of their deceits.
the Blair who promised more open government, yet goes to ever more ruthless
lengths to conceal its secrets; who has seized more power than any in history
for Whitehall, and for appointed advisers and quangos at the expense
has become less a democracy than an elected dictatorship
Here is a leader who claims
to respect our Armed Forces yet has cut their numbers and who exposes to
criminal prosecution the soldiers whom he sent to Iraq.
He has subverted public institutions-not least among
them the National Statistical Office-for partisan political purposes.
IDENTIFIES the interests of the State with those of his own party,
and demands that the Civil Service should do likewise. He claims to support
personal freedoms, yet he banned fox-hunting.
He professes to support commercial enterprise, yet has loaded it
with new taxation and regulation.
He has achieved some
improvement in health care at stupendous cost to the taxpayer, without
addressing structural reform.
Whatever promises Labour’s
manifesto makes for the future, the party has shrunk from any attempt to address
the vital issue of pensions.
have fallen, and no one is fooled by the cynical manipulation of
standards to make this seem otherwise.
Rail infrastructure has effectively been re-nationalised, to paper over
disastrous ministerial bungling.
Downing Street has
abused patronage and sold favours in the fashion that makes Lloyd George’s
sale of honours seem amateurish.
The Prime Minister’s
political creatures control government information with a ruthlessness
that would command admiration in a Balkan dictatorship. It is sometimes suggested that the media
treat politicians too harshly. Tony
Blair, however, started his premiership with a honeymoon.
Many of us treated him with respect and even
admiration. We wanted him to
succeed. We thought he was different.
Blair has proved himself different all right, but not
remotely in the fashion
become enthralled with power, and corrupted by it in a fashion unmatched by any
prime minister of modern times.
Until the war, I continued to respect Labour’s management
of the economy, and to believe that this government had done some things that
need doing for Britain.
Yet over the past three years Blair’s glittering showcase
of sincerity has been stripped bare, to reveal a storehouse stocked with DUPLICITY.
hard to imagine
abuse of office than to take the nation to war on the basis of falsehoods.
MANY voters like me the progressive exposure of the TRUTH about IRAQ has been
decisive in convincing us that Blair is unfit to continue as prime minister.
Most of us try to rally round when Britain looks like going
to war. Yet through the summer of 2002,
my own doubts grew about what Blair was saying and doing, in thrall to an obviously
dangerous U.S. president.
Downing Street told Parliament and the British people that no decision had been
made about committing troops to Iraq.
wrote here in July 2002: ‘It is an extremely disturbing state of affairs
that the West appears to be advancing towards this campaign in a catatonic
stupor, without any real public debate about its objectives or their fulfilment.’
On September 24, just after the publication of Tony Blair’s
notorious dossier on Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD), I wrote from
Short says, or the United Nations or Uncle Tom Cobleigh and all, America was
going to invade Iraq and topple Saddam.
The Blair dossier is not evidence presented to a jury. The British Cabinet will have no influence
I thought the invasion was a ghastly mistake, because it
was hard to see a happy post-war scenario.
Yet I believed what Blair said about WMD. I simply could not imagine that
a British government would be so explicit about the threat unless it was sure.
I still accept Lord Hutton’s view that Blair did not explicitly
lie. He really believed that WMD
existed, as did the whole British defence establishment.
The charge against Blair, which Hutton absurdly
ignored but which seemed equally grave, is that the WMD case was only ever a pretext
to persuade the British people to a course of action which Blair and Bush were
secretly committed anyway.
When the nonsense of WMD was stripped bare after the fall of
Baghdad, when resigning Robin Cook was proved to have been right and the ruling
Prime Minister utterly wrong, Blair fell back on his defence for every mistake
he had made.
He said that he was sincere; that he believed in WMD at the
time; that he was an honest man.
Yet sincerity is a pitifully inadequate excuse for a
blinder as colossal as starting a war under false pretences.
HAVE DIED- Iraqis in thousands, British soldiers in scores-because
Blair cherished a messianic conviction that it was his moral duty to join Bush’s
crusade against Saddam.
Even when all this was
exposed, when it became clear that Alastair Campbell’s
presentation of the WMD case represented run-away inflation of the intelligence
provided to government, absolutely no one quit, or asked to do so.
in a sublime act of hubris, Tony Blair promoted John Scarlett, the intelligence officer
most grievously tarnished by collusion with Campbell, to become
director of Britain’s Secret Service.
Tony Blair forever forfeited the trust of the
British people by the false dealing over Iraq, the gravest of all his exercises
in public deceit. Yet today, he offers himself for re-election.
There might be some logic in supporting Labour next Thursday
if this hopelessly tarred prime minister had been supplanted by Gordon
Brown. Then, at least, labour could
claim to have cleansed the stables, purged Blair’s sins.
As it is, we are invited to support this government by the crudest nod and wink:
If we vote for tricky Tony next week, after a decent interval we will get
Labour is conducting this election campaign like a marathon
runner assisting round the course a man with a broken leg, or rather a
By an extraordinary twist of fate, the leader who was
Labour’s asset in 1997 has today become its overwhelming liability.
it is this liability who stands to re-enter Downing Street and retain power to
govern us all for a further five years, unless whim dispatches him on a
pilgrimage to Lourdes or to make himself Archbishop of Canterbury.
If Labour achieves
the victory the polls predict, the British people will give a wretched signal
to the world: we do not care what lies
we have been told, what sins have been committed by this prime minister
CARE only that the sun shines, interest rates are low, and it will soon be
time to take the boat out. Think of the host of
ministers forced from office in recent years:
Mandelson for his personal
Byers for mismanaging
Blunkett over his lover’s
Estelle Morris for
finding education too much for her.
trivial their failures appear alongside those of their leader?
If a man expects to go to prison for issuing a fraudulent
prospective for a mere City company, what should be the judgement on one who
launched a nation on a fraudulent war?
From the dock, Blair cannot even claim personal penitence
in mitigation. He regrets NOTHING because
he is confident it is all-OK with God.
This is a sorry story, and its threatened outcome
reflects sorry truths about the British electorate.
The man who has made fools of 60 million people is
confident we shall re-elect him, without even needing to dose us with ‘ soma’.
unless there is a dramatic awakening in the next few days the British people
will return a wholly discredited prime minister to Downing Street.
* * *
altered-bolding & underlining used-comments in brackets]
The abolition of Britain
by The Reform Treaty
- Second Reading-Passed by majority of 138
Veteran parliamentarian TONY BENN speaks of the
absolute necessity of a
HEAR HIM ON
So You Want Out Of The EU
THEN WHY NOT SIGN THE
RENUNCIATION of EU CITIZENSHIP
Details from petition creator
With the signing of the Maastricht Treaty the
people of Britain were given
EUROPEAN and BRITISH
The extra tier of citizenship was thrust upon
the people without their consent -and in many cases knowledge.
The PEOPLE of GREAT BRITAIN should be allowed
the option of opting out of the EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP if they so wish. The
GOVERNMENT will then be able to provide those who have opted out with
-only such as British (not EU) passports,
driving licences and other national documents.
EU laws will also NOT APPLY to those who
HAVE OPTED OUT OF EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP
[PETITION OPEN UNTIL OCTOBER
A BLUNT REPLY TO THE
QUEEN'S SPEECH ON CHRISTMAS DAY-25th
LEGACY-AUSTRALIA-CANADA-NEW ZEALAND-WHY THEY
The Act of
Settlement of 1701-WHY IT SHOULD CONCERN
The Common Law of
ENGLAND is the LAW of
Commonwealth Realms V The Constitution for
AUSTRALIA-SUPPORT THE CROWN
THANK GOD WE
ELECTED A MONARCH
(by the Late -William
WHY WE MUST BE
ALERT AND WITH OUR COMMONWEALTH PATRIOTS
MAINTAIN CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHY
IF WE DESTROY OUR
RIGHT OF FREEDOM TO FIGHT A WAR ON
YOU CAN'T HAVE BOTH.
WILL THIS CHRISTMAS QUEEN'S SPEECH
LAST IN A
FREE INDEPENDENT ENGLAND -SCOTLAND AND WALES?
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ASSURE YOU THAT YOU
HAVE NOTHING TO FEAR FROM BECOMING A
PROVINCE OF EUROPE.
THE QUEEN MAKE IT PLAIN THAT OUR FREE
INDEPENDENT NATION STATE IS SACROSANCT BUT
THAT IF THE PEOPLE WISH TO BECOME SLAVES
-THEN A REFERENDUM THERE MUST BE.
THAT NO ENGLISHMAN SHOULD BE ASKED WHETHER
HE WISHES TO BE A SLAVE OR FREE!
CHRISTMAS WE WILL FIND OUT IF OUR PROTECTOR
'Rights and Liberties'
by HER SACRED OATH
MONARCHY be nothing more than a
PARK in the future
THE TIME FOR BLUNT SPEAKING AS THE VERY
EXISTENCE OF OUR UNIQUE NATION STATE IS IN
We are told on the BBC (Brussels
Broadcasting Service) at 11.30 pm on
Saturday the 23rd December, 2007, that the
QUEEN now has a website which has footage of
the Royal Family in the past and that the
QUEEN is NOT
'Stuck in the past'
far as many patriotic subjects are concerned
we need to remain in the PAST when it
concerns the protection of our
have had and will continue to have but it
must not threaten our very WAY-OF-LIFE our
Common Law of England and all which makes
our country the most unique parliamentary
democracy in the world.
BE NO SURRENDER!
Should the Monarch fail to protect our
inherited RIGHTS and Liberties then we shall
have to fight for a REPUBLIC as
happened in the 17th century because the
Monarch of the day ignored those very
'Rights and Liberties of Englishmen' which
will still survive in the English Speaking
World today in December 2007. How can the
MOTHER of PARLIAMENTS give away what is
already our and our children's
INHERITANCE which cannot be taken away by
PARLIAMENT or the QUEEN.
If the above publicity
exercise is to be used to soften the impact to
the population of the BETRAYAL of their
CONSTITUTION and COUNTRY then it would be
the greatest TREASON by a Monarch since
James II who sold our COUNTRY to the FRENCH
for MONEY and RELIGION.
WE ASK WHAT PRICE ARE OUR RIGHTS AND
THEY ARE PRICELESS!
Choice is Yours!-but time is running out
6 months to be EXACT!
WE are to
THEY are not
WE have more to LOSE
more to GAIN
WE have been clear of dictators from EUROPE
for most of our HISTORY
been cursed with that abomination for most
of their HISTORY and NOW!
Our Queen and the EU Constitution
The Spirit of England
THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE
HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH THE II
We now learn
from the Daily Mail COMMENT on Christmas Eve
that the Queen's Speech will cover the
catastrophic fall in Values and Moral
behaviour since the beginning of her 56
-year reign. This has been brought about by
the actions of HER MINISTERS and the greater
number of those in HER PARLIAMENT who have
placed THEIR CONCERNS before the INTERESTS
of THE PEOPLE and NATION STATE.
the fact that HER PEOPLE feel LOST that has
been the direct result of the actions of HER
SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS and the TRAITOROUS
POLITICIANS including PRIME MINISTERS who
have stealthily over the 56 years of HER
MAJESTY'S REIGN have almost achieved their
aim of ENSLAVING the PEOPLE to a FOREIGN
for the marked drop in the number viewing
THE QUEEN'S SPEECH is no doubt because the
mass of people have realised years ago that
the MONARCH is powerless to PROTECT their
WAY-OF-LIFE and events up to now have PROVED
There is a well know saying
'Nero fiddled while Rome burned'
Is it the case on
Christmas Day 2007 while the Monarch
talks our Rights and Liberties are
being taken from us under our very
Of course the QUEEN
under HER CONSTITUTIONAL ROLE can only
'Advise and Warn' HER MINISTERS but when
the matter concerns the very LIFE of an
INDEPENDENT STATE we expect that HER MAJESTY
consider the arrangement to be AT AN END as
it would make a MOCKERY of the PRIME
IMPORTANCE of the MONARCH to protect our
inherited Rights and Liberties which HER
MINISTERS are endeavouring TO GIVE
We as loyal
subjects of the MONARCH who is the living
embodiment of OUR RIGHTS and LIBERTIES
ask at this late stage with only months to
the eradication of a FREE NATION STATE some
veiled comments that HER MAJESTY will
PROTECT our RIGHTS and LIBERTIES.
As for the
MORAL tone of the NATION STATE at this most
crucial time in ENGLISH CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY this matter
should be left to CHURCH LEADERS who's
responsibility it is to CARE for their
FLOCKS particularly at this FESTIVAL of
MAJESTY'S SPEECH has not been pre-recorded
we ask HER MAJESTY to give those MILLIONS of
HER subjects some hope that their PROTECTOR
has NOT FORGOTTEN THEM.
APPEAL not be answered we can at last
confirm that the MONARCHY is after all
nothing more than a talking shop suitable
for YouTube and therefore nothing more than
Benn's comments about the despotic and
need for a
politician with INTEGRITY and love of
country who has for decades witnessed the
growth of the monstrous creature soon to be
STATES OF EUROPE.
Liberties of Parliament-
Birthright of Subjects of England.
[All words/word underlined have a
WE WISH YOU ALL A
CHRISTMAS AND A HAPPY
Xmas message to you all last year we find
that our sentiments remain the same with the
added emphasise on the coming danger to YOUR
COUNTRY from those many traitors in YOUR
HOUSE of COMMONS who intend to sell YOUR
COUNTRY to a FOREIGN POWER]
We Remember The
Spirit of England-Winston Churchill-1953
were warned in 1953 to beware of wreckers of
our Constitution and Way-of- Life but it had
taken Tony Blair just 10 years to do just
THAT while everyone had their minds they
thought on more important matters. Well! in
2007 his predessessor Gordon Brown is
leading you to SLAVERY and only awaits the
final signature of the present holder of the House of Wessex the over 1000 year
PROTECTOR of our inherited
RIGHTS and LIBERTIES of ENGLISHMEN
Of the House
of Wessex since King Alfred 'the Shepherd
and Darling of England' in the annals of 893
leave it to the work of
Alfred the Great
England was saved to become the first
individual nation -state which over 1100
years later a member of that same House of
Wessex has already signed away much of those
ancient Rights and Liberties and
fundamentals of justice and Rule of Law and
only awaits a final signature to enslave her
people into a despotic undemocratic godless
police state to call itself a
within the power of Her Majesty the Queen to
refuse to ratify the New EU TREATY because
whatever lies her ministers have given her
over her long reign the TRUTH is now clear
for ALL TO SEE.
Netherlands a number of years ago their
MONARCH resigned for a day rather than sign
the Bill put before him. The New EU TREATY
is the death of a NATION STATE of over 1200
years in the making. It is the treasonable
actions of HER MINISTERS which has placed
THE QUEEN in the forefront in the protection
of the Rights and Liberties of HER SUBJECTS
as on no one else can HER PEOPLE DEPEND.
WILL THIS CHRISTMAS QUEEN'S SPEECH
BE THE LAST IN A
FREE INDEPENDENT ENGLAND -SCOTLAND AND WALES?
WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND
[Author of Germany's Four Reich's]
'There'll always Be an ENGLAND'
-NOT any MORE
OVER THE NEXT FEW MONTHS WILL PORTRAY ITSELF
AS THE BEST THING SINCE SLICED BREAD
'Don't tell the voters-or you
will ruin everything '
"...we have to make sure
that there are no discussions taking place
in the open air"
Burghardt, a former EU ambassador to the US,
warning that details of the new EU
diplomatic service (officially to be known
as the External Action Service) should not
be discussed in public before the
ratified the NEW EU TREATY
and Ireland has held
its TREATY REFERENDUM early next summer
(source: EU Observer on 27th
The EU has also stated
that none of its institutions should rock
the boat until the English have ratified
Over the next few months
you will hear more than ever the wonderful
benefits of the EU. Whether it is Global
warming or whatever they feel shows them in
a good light and when you have swallowed the
bait you will not know what has hit you.
They intend to show how reasonable they are
and that they are there to make you happy.
If you all fall for this con-trick then you
will deserve the SLAVERY that is in store
Referendum: how Labour
could still smell of roses.
'Money to spare'
when we leave the EU in
Open Europe says:
Build 40 brand new
general hospitals each year 2007-13
- Cut council tax
by nearly 50 per cent
- Cut the
basic rate of income tax by 3p
duty by 75 per cent
total bill for the London Olympics
in less than a year
on the European Communities
(Finance) Bill on Monday 19th
A TIME FOR EUROSCEPTICS TO LEARN
FROM THE PAST-ONLY A TWO-PRONGED ATTACK CAN BRING
VICTORY AND SAVE YOUR FREEDOM -CONSTITUTION AND
Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU
GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY
WON'T HE TRUST YOU?
HELL ON EARTH
want powers back from EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95%
of British people want a REFERENDUM
SIGN TODAY ON LINE
JOIN THE 10 DOWNING STREET PROTEST
Readers can add their support to the growing clamour for a
REFERENDUM on the '"REFORM TREATY" by signing up to a 10 Downing Street 0n-line
The Petition reads as follows:
the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to guarantee that the British people
will be permitted a binding REFERENDUM on any and all attempts to resurrect the
EU " CONSTITUTION" (and any or all of its content) regardless of nomenclature."
Deadline for the PETITION is 31st January,2008
Eurofacts 27th July 2007.
'The Spirit of
In London on St.George's Day -1953
WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE
TO SET YOU
THE QUESTION THAT THE VOTER MUST
YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE CORRUPT
,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND CORRUPT ALIEN BUSYBODY BRUSSELS’
-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?
TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE
TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER
SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS
WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.
AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?