Burglary law U-turn after Blair says he is on the side
of Victim not the Offender.
the Daily Mail
on Thursday the 13th January, 2005 an article by their Deputy
Political Editor Paul Eastham outlines the case as ‘Labour drops pledge to give
house owners more rights of self -defence’
yesterday went back on his promise to give homeowners extra protection when
Only a month ago, the Prime minister hinted at new laws
allowing people to fight back without fear of prosecution.
in his first big decision as Home Secretary, Charles Clarke ruled out tougher
laws against intruders.
announced a review had concluded that the law, which allows people to use ‘reasonable
force’ against housebreakers, is ‘sound’ as it stands.
Mr Clarke said, there will be a publicity campaign to ensure house owners
understand that they can protect themselves.
the decision ‘flew in the face of public opinion’ [So does being
conned into the new European Constitution with millions of people wanting to
leave the EU- NOW. What are the Tories going to do about that before the General
Election -May 2005?]
the ‘review’ was a sham! To get Mr Blair out of a tight
political corner before Christmas.
controversy started in December when Metropolitan police Commissioner Sir John
Stephens backed Tory leader Michael Howard’s demands for a tougher law.
John said: ‘My view is that people
should be allowed to use what force is necessary.’
[It is impossible for any householder to know how they
would react to a burglar in their home. They certainly would not in many cases
have the time or inclination to consult the Home Office guidelines but only
wish to eject the intruder as soon as possible and with as much force as
possible -rather than risk injury or death to themselves and their family. If
burglars knew that there were no holds bared then they would have to think only
once that it would not be worth the risk.
The burglar should have the worry not the householder Mr Clarke.]
should be presumed to have acted legally, even if a burglar dies, unless
there is contrary evidence, the Commissioner added.
not to be outflanked by the Conservatives, Mr Blair told the Commons, ‘I
share the general view’ of the Commissioner.
He announced a review consulting Chief Police Officers, the
Crown Prosecution Service and the Attorney General. ‘If we get the right response from these people, we will. Of
course, support a change in the law,’ promised the Premier.
He claimed it would ‘send a very clear signal to people, that we are on
the side of the victim, not the offender.’
Mr Howard had demanded a change so only those using ‘grossly disproportionate
force’ would risk being prosecuted. [Well! Mr Howard- this is a red herring as who is to
know what fear may do-particularly to the elderly or disabled or for that
matter to all who are faced by a stranger in the home. What might look like
disproportionate force on the surface is but the reaction to the terror of
facing an intruder in your home not knowing whether he is armed or not and
having seconds and not minutes to protect your family. No -the
only way is to make it clear to the intended intruder that he may face injury
or even death by pursuing his insidious profession.]
the law, people are entitled to use ‘reasonable force’ to defend themselves and
their homes. It is up to judges and
juries to decide what level of force is ‘reasonable’ [says Mr
Howard-spoken as a lawyer not as a confronted householder]
Mr Clarke’s announcement yesterday came just before the first reading in Parliament
of Tory MP Patrick Mercer’s Private Member’s Bill for changing the law.
Home Secretary said: I have concluded that the current law is sound but
needs to be better
explained to all concerned, especially for householders. [Well we have
already given our opinion of this unsatisfactory explanation]
He said the review had included consultations with the
Association of Chief Police Officers, the Crown Prosecution Service and the
Director of Public Prosecutions.
Mr Clarke said the prosecution service had recently issued
guidance on when people should be charged and the Association of Chief Police
Officers was ensuring police officers understood the current law. [Does this mean that previously the current law was
not understood and therefore police officers were not upholding the law?]
An advertising campaign would be launched so people were
clear ‘that the current law ensures that
appropriate steps to protect themselves and their family and their property
will always be justified.’ [Well! that’s all right then-but it would be a better solution if the Government
did better to protect the householder in the home by the return of the Bobby on
the beat; by getting a grip on street crime and the growing knife and gun
culture which is now out of control and being fuelled by their lack policies
regarding drugs; drinking; gambling together with their Political Correctness regime which has destroyed
any hope they have of bringing many Criminals to Justice and if they should
make the mistake of apprehending the culprit they have no space for him in Gaol
Continue: Mr Mercer said he was ‘extremely disappointed’ by the
news. But he said he would continue to try to get his
Bill passed, especially as several police officers had supported the move.
He said Mr Clarke’s
decision ‘flew in the face of public opinion’.
A survey for Virgin Money Insurance that 87 per cent think current legislation on the
issue is weighted in favour of Criminals.
Police Officers backed the Government’s retreat. ACPO president Chris Fox admitted there was ‘real public
concern’ over break-ins.
added: A clarification of the law
rather than a change will help to reassure the public and improve their
confidence in the criminal justice system.
we all know what we think of that.
altered-bolding used-underlining-comments in brackets]
THE PEOPLE HAVE
SPOKEN-IS THE EU COMMISSION LISTENING?
Ditch the EU TREATY after IRISH REJECTION
[Daily Mail-Wednesday, June 18,2008]
MORE THAN HALF of voters believe Britain should drop the
controversial European Treaty in the wake of its rejection in last
The poll comes as the Tories launch a last-ditch bid in
HOUSE of LORDS
today to delay the
RATIFICATION OF THE
have signed a
DOWNING STREET- WEBSITE
within the past few days
, calling on the
NOT TO RATIFY THE BILL
[WHY DON'T YOU?]
Downing Street website is
The abolition of Britain
by The Reform Treaty
- Second Reading-Passed by majority of 138
Veteran parliamentarian TONY BENN speaks of the
absolute necessity of a
HEAR HIM ON
So You Want Out Of The EU
THEN WHY NOT SIGN THE
RENUNCIATION of EU CITIZENSHIP
Details from petition creator
With the signing of the Maastricht Treaty the
people of Britain were given
EUROPEAN and BRITISH
The extra tier of citizenship was thrust upon
the people without their consent -and in many cases knowledge.
The PEOPLE of GREAT BRITAIN should be allowed
the option of opting out of the EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP if they so wish. The
GOVERNMENT will then be able to provide those who have opted out with
-only such as British (not EU) passports,
driving licences and other national documents.
EU laws will also NOT APPLY to those who
HAVE OPTED OUT OF EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP
A BLUNT REPLY TO THE
QUEEN'S SPEECH ON CHRISTMAS DAY-25th
LEGACY-AUSTRALIA-CANADA-NEW ZEALAND-WHY THEY
The Act of
Settlement of 1701-WHY IT SHOULD CONCERN
The Common Law of
ENGLAND is the LAW of
Commonwealth Realms V The Constitution for
AUSTRALIA-SUPPORT THE CROWN
YOU CAN'T HAVE BOTH.
WILL THIS CHRISTMAS QUEEN'S SPEECH
LAST IN A
FREE INDEPENDENT ENGLAND -SCOTLAND AND WALES?
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ASSURE YOU THAT YOU
HAVE NOTHING TO FEAR FROM BECOMING A
PROVINCE OF EUROPE.
THE QUEEN MAKE IT PLAIN THAT OUR FREE
INDEPENDENT NATION STATE IS SACROSANCT BUT
THAT IF THE PEOPLE WISH TO BECOME SLAVES
-THEN A REFERENDUM THERE MUST BE.
THAT NO ENGLISHMAN SHOULD BE ASKED WHETHER
HE WISHES TO BE A SLAVE OR FREE!
CHRISTMAS WE WILL FIND OUT IF OUR PROTECTOR
'Rights and Liberties'
by HER SACRED OATH
MONARCHY be nothing more than a
PARK in the future
THE TIME FOR BLUNT SPEAKING AS THE VERY
EXISTENCE OF OUR UNIQUE NATION STATE IS IN
We are told on the BBC (Brussels
Broadcasting Service) at 11.30 pm on
Saturday the 23rd December, 2007, that the
QUEEN now has a website which has footage of
the Royal Family in the past and that the
QUEEN is NOT
'Stuck in the past'
far as many patriotic subjects are concerned
we need to remain in the PAST when it
concerns the protection of our
have had and will continue to have but it
must not threaten our very WAY-OF-LIFE our
Common Law of England and all which makes
our country the most unique parliamentary
democracy in the world.
BE NO SURRENDER!
Should the Monarch fail to protect our
inherited RIGHTS and Liberties then we shall
have to fight for a REPUBLIC as
happened in the 17th century because the
Monarch of the day ignored those very
'Rights and Liberties of Englishmen' which
will still survive in the English Speaking
World today in December 2007. How can the
MOTHER of PARLIAMENTS give away what is
already our and our children's
INHERITANCE which cannot be taken away by
PARLIAMENT or the QUEEN.
If the above publicity
exercise is to be used to soften the impact to
the population of the BETRAYAL of their
CONSTITUTION and COUNTRY then it would be
the greatest TREASON by a Monarch since
James II who sold our COUNTRY to the FRENCH
for MONEY and RELIGION.
WE ASK WHAT PRICE ARE OUR RIGHTS AND
THEY ARE PRICELESS!
Choice is Yours!-but time is running out
6 months to be EXACT!
WE are to
THEY are not
WE have more to LOSE
more to GAIN
WE have been clear of dictators from EUROPE
for most of our HISTORY
been cursed with that abomination for most
of their HISTORY and NOW!
Our Queen and the EU Constitution
The Spirit of England
THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE
HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH THE II
We now learn
from the Daily Mail COMMENT on Christmas Eve
that the Queen's Speech will cover the
catastrophic fall in Values and Moral
behaviour since the beginning of her 56
-year reign. This has been brought about by
the actions of HER MINISTERS and the greater
number of those in HER PARLIAMENT who have
placed THEIR CONCERNS before the INTERESTS
of THE PEOPLE and NATION STATE.
the fact that HER PEOPLE feel LOST that has
been the direct result of the actions of HER
SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS and the TRAITOROUS
POLITICIANS including PRIME MINISTERS who
have stealthily over the 56 years of HER
MAJESTY'S REIGN have almost achieved their
aim of ENSLAVING the PEOPLE to a FOREIGN
for the marked drop in the number viewing
THE QUEEN'S SPEECH is no doubt because the
mass of people have realised years ago that
the MONARCH is powerless to PROTECT their
WAY-OF-LIFE and events up to now have PROVED
There is a well know saying
'Nero fiddled while Rome burned'
Is it the case on
Christmas Day 2007 while the Monarch
talks our Rights and Liberties are
being taken from us under our very
Of course the QUEEN
under HER CONSTITUTIONAL ROLE can only
'Advise and Warn' HER MINISTERS but when
the matter concerns the very LIFE of an
INDEPENDENT STATE we expect that HER MAJESTY
consider the arrangement to be AT AN END as
it would make a MOCKERY of the PRIME
IMPORTANCE of the MONARCH to protect our
inherited Rights and Liberties which HER
MINISTERS are endeavouring TO GIVE
We as loyal
subjects of the MONARCH who is the living
embodiment of OUR RIGHTS and LIBERTIES
ask at this late stage with only months to
the eradication of a FREE NATION STATE some
veiled comments that HER MAJESTY will
PROTECT our RIGHTS and LIBERTIES.
As for the
MORAL tone of the NATION STATE at this most
crucial time in ENGLISH CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY this matter
should be left to CHURCH LEADERS who's
responsibility it is to CARE for their
FLOCKS particularly at this FESTIVAL of
MAJESTY'S SPEECH has not been pre-recorded
we ask HER MAJESTY to give those MILLIONS of
HER subjects some hope that their PROTECTOR
has NOT FORGOTTEN THEM.
APPEAL not be answered we can at last
confirm that the MONARCHY is after all
nothing more than a talking shop suitable
for YouTube and therefore nothing more than
Benn's comments about the despotic and
need for a
politician with INTEGRITY and love of
country who has for decades witnessed the
growth of the monstrous creature soon to be
STATES OF EUROPE.
Liberties of Parliament-
Birthright of Subjects of England.
[All words/word underlined have a
WE WISH YOU ALL A
CHRISTMAS AND A HAPPY
Xmas message to you all last year we find
that our sentiments remain the same with the
added emphasise on the coming danger to YOUR
COUNTRY from those many traitors in YOUR
HOUSE of COMMONS who intend to sell YOUR
COUNTRY to a FOREIGN POWER]
We Remember The
Spirit of England-Winston Churchill-1953
were warned in 1953 to beware of wreckers of
our Constitution and Way-of- Life but it had
taken Tony Blair just 10 years to do just
THAT while everyone had their minds they
thought on more important matters. Well! in
2007 his predessessor Gordon Brown is
leading you to SLAVERY and only awaits the
final signature of the present holder of the House of Wessex the over 1000 year
PROTECTOR of our inherited
RIGHTS and LIBERTIES of ENGLISHMEN
Of the House
of Wessex since King Alfred 'the Shepherd
and Darling of England' in the annals of 893
leave it to the work of
Alfred the Great
England was saved to become the first
individual nation -state which over 1100
years later a member of that same House of
Wessex has already signed away much of those
ancient Rights and Liberties and
fundamentals of justice and Rule of Law and
only awaits a final signature to enslave her
people into a despotic undemocratic godless
police state to call itself a
within the power of Her Majesty the Queen to
refuse to ratify the New EU TREATY because
whatever lies her ministers have given her
over her long reign the TRUTH is now clear
for ALL TO SEE.
Netherlands a number of years ago their
MONARCH resigned for a day rather than sign
the Bill put before him. The New EU TREATY
is the death of a NATION STATE of over 1200
years in the making. It is the treasonable
actions of HER MINISTERS which has placed
THE QUEEN in the forefront in the protection
of the Rights and Liberties of HER SUBJECTS
as on no one else can HER PEOPLE DEPEND.
WILL THIS CHRISTMAS QUEEN'S SPEECH
BE THE LAST IN A
FREE INDEPENDENT ENGLAND -SCOTLAND AND WALES?
WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND
[Author of Germany's Four Reich's]
'There'll always Be an ENGLAND'
-NOT any MORE
Let the people speak!
[Latest Addition - June07]
Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU
GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY
WON'T HE TRUST YOU?
HELL ON EARTH
want powers back from EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95%
of British people want a REFERENDUM
SIGN TODAY ON LINE
JOIN THE 10 DOWNING STREET PROTEST
Readers can add their support to the growing
clamour for a REFERENDUM on the '"REFORM TREATY" by signing up to a 10 Downing
Street 0n-line petition
The Petition reads as follows:
"We the undersigned petition the Prime
Minister to guarantee that the British people will be permitted a binding
REFERENDUM on any and all attempts to resurrect the EU " CONSTITUTION" (and any
or all of its content) regardless of nomenclature."
Deadline for the PETITION is 31st January,2008
Eurofacts 27th July 2007.
'The Spirit of
In London on St.George's Day -1953
WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE
TO SET YOU
THE QUESTION THAT THE VOTER MUST
YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE CORRUPT
,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND CORRUPT ALIEN BUSYBODY BRUSSELS’
-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?
TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE
TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER
SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS
WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.
AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?
[All underlined words have a separate