David Cameron has informed his members that they should TRUST him as he is to be known as being
-in the political spectrum.
A glance at the dictionary definition on the word has:
‘The middle point of ANYTHING.’
-Men of MODERATE political opinions.’
WE now have a firm guide line to work to when we ask David Cameron what is the CENTRE ground in regard to the European Union and particularly the
UNITED STATES OF EUROPE.
To be centre ground surely means the mean of the topic under review in this case and we ask the pied piper (as he seems to be leading his members blindly into deep water) of the so-called Conservative Party does this not mean that he is NOT for a United States of Europe or for leaving the EU. If he agrees with this definition then we can establish his middle ground policy as clawing back from the EU any powers handed to Brussels which are in line with the New EU Constitution objectives and to go further to pursue a trading union only as most people who voted YES in 1975 were promised.
If what we have said is his intention we are moderately pleased but as we and with possibly more than half the population - hearing the TRUTH about the EU would no doubt wish to leave tomorrow.
We have to ask Mr Cameron what is his Centre ground
on the EU question because we and millions of people in our country would like to hear him say so.
At the Conservative Conference he refused to even discuss the
-what KIND of CENTRE GROUND is THAT?
The Man of the Glaciers has yet to start melting so that he can speak and tell his adoring fans what are the Centre ground polices he is so fond of and which he cannot bring into the open until an election is just around the corner.
IF he means to be TRUE to his WORD by HIS so called CENTRE POLICIES then there is NO difficulty in looking at the question of
LAW and ORDER
-in fact any question whatever under discussion.
Using Dave’s incantation of CENTRE GROUND on LAW and ORDER for instance will mean that all criminals will not be locked away for life or that all criminals will escape from punishment. The middle ground is that all criminals should be punished as the majority of victims decide (and not the Chief Justice with his idiotic Sentencing Committee) but there is no chance of this happening as there are not enough prisons to accommodate them and those who are in prison are having their sentences drastically reduced and in a growing number of cases are out after only a few days in the nick. Prison in Blairland is a revolving door –the criminal enters –gets his certificate of admission and discharge and leaves by the same door.
WE now hear that the Home Office is considering changing the law to enable assaults against the police constable not in future to be an automatic jailing offence. This is another move to fit in with the continental system and at the same time to stem the flow into already crowded prisons.
You don’t need to be a genius to see that the CENTRE ground is another word for COMPROMISE: –
‘Anything of intermediate or mixed kind –
Neither one thing or the other’.
Compromise of course is an excellent attribute but there are times when the middle ground is NOT ENOUGH. When someone brutally kills another with little or no mitigation the sentence is (or should) fit the crime. In Blairland as we all know this is rarely the case.
Returning to the question as regards the European Union one can see quite clearly that the Middle Ground or the Centre Ground is NOT the policy of any of the three political parties at Westminster. They are ALL committed to eventually joining a future
UNITED STATES OF EUROPE
-as we all know Tony Blair has already signed the TREATY in Rome last year –twenty-five times –where we ask was the Centre ground then. Our man from the snow flows and ice of the Artic has not shown us his Middle Ground or Centre Ground – in fact he does not want to speak about it at all. Where is his COMPROMISE NOW!
At the Conservative Conference in October 2006. And where was the Compromise or Centre or Middle Ground in 1975 and at every subsequent signing of the EU Treaties particularly the Maastricht Treaty in 1992 which opened the door to the monstrous idea of a Mammoth Police State calling itself the United States of Europe.
David Cameron has been kept in reserve by his masters in Brussels and he will not disappoint them. As far as we are aware he has no intention whatsoever to discuss the EU as with so many thousands of politicians over the last 35 years. Should he change his mind he will give away a few crumbs which he has managed to obtain from Brussels in order to show his so-called Centre Ground policy – BUT DON’T COUNT ON IT!
It was and still is so easy for them to refuse to give the PUBLIC the full facts of the Benefits or Disadvantages of the EU which Switzerland has recently done without the SPIN –Details on our Eurofacts and General bulletin board.
We shall be watching Mr Nice Guy Dave over the forthcoming months-we wont say years because as soon as the members of his PARTY (And it is only a ‘party’ – ‘a game-a . body of persons associated together in an occupation [?] or amusement.) see what they already suspect that he has no real substance but
just ‘a very nice man’ –
THEY WILL REPLACE HIM.
As the polls are suggesting with his recent 4 per cent rise now down to level pegging.
BUT STILL HE WILL NOT SAY
YOU MUST TRUST ME
WAIT FOR A FEW MORE YEARS CLOSER TO AN ELECTION AND I MAY LET YOU KNOW?
In our final answer to Mr Nice Guy we quote the words of
(1809-1865) 16th President of the U.S.
‘Well you can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.’
Mind you when one sees what the original Mr Nice Guy has up to now got away with:
Almost destroying our valued and cherished CONSTITUTION.
Human Rights Legislation –a lawyer’s paradise
Illegal invasion of IRAQ
Mission impossible in AFGHANISTAN
Chaos in our PUBLIC SERVICES
Local accountability DESTROYED.
An impotent and slavish
HOUSE of COMMONS
Too much LAW and Too much Disorder.
Political correctness and Health and Safety madness destroying our once free and friendly and once ‘give and take ‘society.
Peerages for CASH Inquiry is now in No 10 –but will the real culprit
WE could of course go on –and on –and on, but time is drawing to an end.
With the Conservative Conference now in session we decided to see what Mr Nice Guy Dave had to say about his polices ? to
Jon Snow on Channel 4.
It was the usual waffle and evasion but what he did say in his last few words almost as a throw-away remark to which there was no more time to be further interviewed–that he had supported Tony Blair on a particular issue and was proud to have done so because he was in favour of the bill.
We have been here before about the responsibility of the so-called
HER MAJESTY’S OPPOSITION PARTY.
-to contest ALL issues by the GOVERNMENT in POWER
particularly in one which has shown such blatant disregard for the
Checks and Balances
WITHOUT the SUPPORT
and a large number of his MP’s
ILLEGAL INVASION of IRAQ could NEVER have TAKEN PLACE.
So when we hear Mr Cameron proudly declaring what a democrat he is he should ponder about the 119 British troops who have died in Iraq and the 40 lives lost in Afghanistan and the 5,000 -7,000 wounded (the figures could be much higher) –the MoD will not tell us the TRUTH about the number of casualties – some disabled for life –
Finally we read in the D.Mail on Tuesday October 3-20006 that a
British soldier airlifted to Selly Oak Hospital in Birmingham after being badly wounded in a Sud missile attack on the first day of the Iraq war in 2003 was asked by hospital staff’
‘Can you take your uniform off in case you offend somebody.’
What have we come to as a NATION,
when we treat our troops like this?
AND ALL FOR £2 AN HOUR.
IT could ONLY HAPPEN in BLAIRDOM.
* * *.
PLEA to bring back MILITARY WARDS after WOUNDED are ABUSED.
By Michael Seamark.
Thursday, October 5, 2006
MILITARY-ONLY wards are necessary to protect injured troops being treated in British hospitals, veterans and MPs said yesterday.
There are mounting concerns that servicemen are not safe on open wards
It has emerged that a badly-injured soldier from the Parachute Regiment was confronted by a Muslim man at Selly Oak Hospital Birmingham.
The soldier, in combat uniform after evacuation from the front line and unable to defend himself was told:
‘You have been killing my Muslim brothers in Afghanistan.’
The Ministry of Defence is trying to arrange a ‘military managed ward within the NHS hospital –the main casualty reception centre for injured soldiers.
But servicemen and politicians have demanded more segregation and protection.
Service personnel are routinely treated on civilian wards open to the public. Most of Britain’s military hospitals were closed down in the 1990’s
Scott Garthley, 38, who was seriously wounded on the first day of the 2003 Iraq war, was evacuated to Selly Oak. There he was told to take off his uniform in case he offended any body.
‘This is a ludicrous situation and I am appalled at what happened. Three-and-a-half years on it has actually escalated to personal confrontation.’
Denzil Connick, who lost a leg during 3 Para’s assault on Mount Longdon during the Falklands War, said: ‘It’s a disgrace but I knew this sort of thing would happen from the moment they started closing down military hospitals in the UK.
‘I hope the people who 15 years ago or 20 years ago made the decision to close our military hospitals are eating their words.’
MP Robert Key whose Salisbury constituency is home to many service personnel, said:
‘There should be proper security for these people and there should be no question of people dropping in off the street and abusing them.’
Tory security spokesman Patrick Mercer said:
‘In times of war and military conflict we have got to have wards which are dedicated to soldiers ,sailors and airmen and women with military staff giving medical treatment.
‘Security is obviously an issue and we have got to serve our servicemen as they serve us.
More than 600 soldiers have been flown to Britain after being injured in operations abroad since 2003. The majority were treated at Selly Oak, Birmingham.
Unlike American military hospitals, Selly Oak has no armed guards or strict entry systems.
[No doubt another example of the MoD policy of its ‘Softly-softly’ approach in matters to do with the safety and protection of our brave troops]
The MoD said:
‘We continue to monitor security to ensure it’s kept at an appropriate level. The safety of our people is paramount.’
[You will notice that they did not mention our brave servicemen –BUT our people –possibly themselves more likely. We don’t want them to monitor security –we want
them to make the areas secure for our troops which should have been carried out years ago. – as we have mentioned before another case of
NOT FIT FOR PURPOSE
-thanks awfully Dr Reid for that most apt phrase which fits all Government Departments throughout Blairdom]
But the MoD was criticised by former Chief of Defence Staff Lord Bramall following claims that thousands of injured British troops were on NHS waiting lists.
A reported 5,000 were having to wait for treatment. But the one remaining military hospital, the Royal Hospital Haslar in Gosport, is UNDER USED..
The MoD said the troops were convalescing – not waiting for treatment – and many of them had sports injuries or other illnesses. But Lord Bramall said he had ‘great concern’
about the medical care for soldiers brought to the UK for treatment.
‘When you hear all the stories about poor aftercare for wounded soldiers, including the Territorial Army, the long waiting lists, the stretched medical facilities and some patients almost lost in the system, I am convinced that the Government has not done enough, particularly with funding to correct the appalling situation that existed some years ago.
‘The MoD will say it has made a lot of improvements and it has made some, but I don’t think it has made enough.
[The attitude of the Government is to asset strip as much as it can because it has been losing Billions over the past nine years. Look around you at the hospitals –schools-playgrounds –you name if it is there it WILL be SOLD as soon as possible in order to try and keep their heads above water.
They do not concern themselves over what they term details as shown in the case of Military Hospitals. We have a Government which has illegally invaded a Muslim country and yet it appears oblivious that by placing our troops in a general ward of an NHS hospital that there would not be repercussions of sorts.
To place our brave injured soldiers in such circumstances and in mixed wards to boot is the height of
of those at Selly Oak Hospital that have tried –most unsuccessfully to defend their disgraceful behaviour
WE DEMAND THAT OUR INJURED TROOPS ARE TREATED IN MILITARY HOSPITALS
AS TONY BLAIR’S POLICIES MAKE MORE WARS CERTAIN NOW!.
* * *
[Font altered-bolding & underlining used –comments in brackets]