The Soul of England-Part 2
*
[ Before you read the
following we remind you that there are a few home-truths of the English race which
are explored by some of our own and others beyond our moat -many who gleefully
harangue us. Some are good and many not
so good but we have no reason to be unduly concerned unless you are Jessa Jowel
because in the main we are a practical rather than a logical people and have ‘an
understanding heart ,
rather than an understanding head’
Part 2
highlights many matters of which many of us are familiar no doubt
by recent attempts by the Blair Government to make us CONTINENTALS.
Part 3 - to follow includes
a statement by historian Elie Halevy that:
‘In Samuel Johnson -Englishmen
love and honour a perfect representative
of the national character with its sturdy independence, high-minded
rectitude and robust common sense.
Equally typical in their
different ways, are Wordworth, Tennyson. And Browning; e cannot imagine any of
these a Frenchman or a German, that Wordsworth is, or is to be, the true
national poet of
ENGLAND
* *
The
stoicism of the Englishman in pain and trouble has been noted by so many
observers, [1926], that we may admit it as a national trait. [Health and Safety
regulations in 2006 may certainly change this image in certain instances today
and in the future]
Mr Page, the American
Ambassador in London during the Great War, was greatly impressed by the dignity
and self-restraint shown by English mourners of both sexes, who repressed all
eternal signs of the grief, which they were feeling.
[Many Englishmen
alive today who lived though the 2nd World War can confirm that it was so then
-as an American Ambassador of that time would have also confirmed]
[Mr Page] also said (not in this case from personal
observation) that the English soldier dies silently in hospital “as if he had a
secret with his Maker,” whereas the continental soldier, equally gallant in
action, weeps when he is told that his wounds are mortal.
This stoicism is an
aristocratic quality, but it is found in all classes. All Englishmen feel that, especially in the presence of
foreigners, they must allow no signs of weakness to escape them,
The well-known story of The
Private of the Buffs, who was offered his life if he would kow- tow to
a Chinese mandarin, and preferred to die, though his Indian fellow-captives
made no difficulty about prostrating themselves according to the manner of the
country, is characteristic.
References to the gluttony
of the English are very common from the earliest time. Higden, who lived in
1350, say of them:
“They woneth to gluttony
more than other men, and are more costly in meat and drink [Reminder to Jessa Jowel in
2006] and
clothing.”
William of Malmesbury
mentions the heavy drinking of the English at the time of the Conquest. Sorbiere, a Frenchman, in the reign of
Charles II, reports that
“the English may
be easily brought to anything, provided you fill their bellies, let them have FREEDOM
of SPEECH, and do not bear too hard upon their lazy temper.”
Leo von Rozmital, a Bohemian Baron, visited ENGLAND in 1466,
and attended the banquet after the churching of Queen Elizabeth Woodville. He
reports that
“the women and maids who served
the Queen at table knelt as long as she ate
nigh three hours. (Sie ass bei
drein Stunden.)
The
northern races have always been heavy eaters, and the comparative prosperity
which our Island enjoyed from early times no doubt increased the temptation to
over-indulgence.
The richer
classes have always gorged themselves with flesh till within living memory, and
there is still [1926] much gluttony in the middle class, especially in the
north of ENGLAND.
The poor
were formerly unable to get much butcher’s meat, except at certain times of the
year; but the importation of frozen meat has made a great difference in their
diet. Flesh-eating twice or even three
times a day is no longer regarded as a luxury for the few.
In the
time of the TUDORS, [1485-1603] the baronial breakfast was a Gargantuan
meal. A Northumberland house-book of
1512 assigns to my lord and lady a daily provision at breakfast, of a quart of
beer and a quart of wine, and since it was Lent, salt fish, herrings, and
sprats. On flesh days half a chine of
mutton or a chine of boiled beef was provided.
This fare would have satisfied
Homer’s Achaeans.
Another
interesting foreign criticism is that of Muralt, a Swiss, whose Lettres sur les Anglais belong to the end of the seventeenth
century. He says that the ENGLISH are a
good-natured people, very rich, and so well nourished that they sometimes
die of obesity. They hate cruelty so much that it is ordained by Royal
Proclamation that the fish and ducks in the ponds shall be properly fed.
And yet
they allow the prisoners in their gaols to die of hunger. “The great cruelty of the English lies in permitting
evil rather than doing it.”
Our
country has unquestionably taken the lead in forbidding and reprobating cruelty
to animals, and it is interesting to find that this characteristic was already
observable more than two hundred years ago.
It is part
of modern ethics, a duty which has become more obvious since Darwin taught us
that lower animals, as we call them, are literally our distant cousins. The obligation is universally acknowledged
and usually observed in Protestant countries, though the popularity of field
sports has hitherto resisted protests which in principle seem to be justified;
in southern Europe public opinion on this subject is still pre-Darwinian. It is frequently even denied that the lower
animals have any rights.
Neglect of
prisoners, and harsh treatment of them, were a blot upon civilisation long
after the time Muralt wrote; But it is not certain that the condition of
prisons was worse in England than on the Continent. Professor Trevelyan, however, thinks that at one time we had a
bad pre -eminence in this respect.
It is well
known that the sober and undifferentiated dress of men is quite a modern
institution. It is nor really democratic, since an old or badly made suit of
clothes is a more humiliating sign of poverty that the earlier distinctive dress
of the ploughman, carter, or apprentice.
Modern
male dress has the further disadvantages of being ugly, expensive, and wasteful
of time.
In the
Middle Ages foreigners were struck by the ostentation, which Englishmen showed
in their dress, each class imitating the class above.
In England, it was
said,
“a yeoman arrayeth
himself as a squire, a squire as a knight, a knight as a duke, and a duke as a
king.’
Even the peasant
women, van Meteren says (1558-1612), wore gloves, as the ladies of the Court do
in Holland and Germany.
He adds
that they put on their best clothes for a journey, contrary to the practice in
other nations. This curious habit still prevails in the lower middle class.
Frederick,
Duke of Wurtemberg, in 1592 found the Londoners
“magnificently apparelled
and extremely proud and overbearing”
Male dress
was perhaps most becoming under the Plantagenets, most sumptuous under the
Tudors.
There was
not, however, much difference in this respect between France and England,
except that the middle-class Englishman could afford better clothes than the
corresponding class in France.
Shakespeare
speaks of the carelessness and strangeness of an Englishman’s apparel, as it
might have appeared to a cultivated Venetian; but I have not come upon any
contemporary foreign criticisms to the same effect.
In quite
modern times it is well known that the French accuse us, and especially our
women of lack of artistic sense in dress. In men’s dress, however, we set the
fashions.
The laziness
of our race was often noticed by foreigners and without much contradiction till
the industrial revolution altered the habits of the people.
In the
nineteenth century, it is true, French observers reported that the English “work
fiercely”, but the older habits have now reasserted themselves, and it cannot
be questioned that the average Englishman at present has no taste for the
untiring, laborious diligence of the Germans, or the parsimonious thrift of the
French (1926).
Economic
heresies may have something to do with the prevalent restriction of output; but
the American or German worker could not be induced to fritter away half his
working hours.
Laziness
is a vice, which we share with natives of some hot countries, but with no other
northern Europeans. It is, of course,
by no means confined to the labouring class, nor does it apply by any means to
all trades.
Some
French visitors have complained of our rudeness and arrogance; others who have
been led to expect these qualities have affirmed that we do not deserve the censure.
They have
added very truly that
“the
English do not trouble themselves much about us when they do not know us.”
There are
good-mannered and bad-mannered people in every country. But there is no doubt
that there was great brutality of manners in the north of England even a
hundred years ago.
Novels
like Wuthering
Heights are evidence of this. Nor can it reasonably be denied that
in the half-century after Waterloo, a sort of insular pride which had been
noticeable in the eighteenth century took an offensive form.
Underbred
Englishmen and Englishwomen gave us a bad name on the Continent, and even Punch, which is
one of our most valued national possessions, sometimes echoed the insolence
towards other nations which made Lord Palmerston popular at home and very
odious abroad.
It was an
old complaint, for Froissart says that
“Englishmen
are so proud that they set store by no nation except their own”; and even Defoe
says that the English are
“ the most
churlish people alive to foreigners, so that all men think an Englishman the
devil.”
Goldsmith’s
lines:
“Pride in
their port, defiance in their eye, we see the lords of human kindness pass by,”
have often been quoted against us.
It would
be easy to find examples of boastful language in earlier times, as when Milton
calmly asserts that if God has some unusually difficult task on hand, He gives
it to an Englishman to carry out.
Our pride
has always been mixed with pious gratitude.
“The English,” said Mark Twain, “are mentioned in the Bible:
“The meek-spirited
shall possess the earth.”
[J.R.] Seely
speaks of the “kind of Deuteronomic people.”
Which we made for ourselves in the nineteenth century; as a reward for
pour moral superiority our trade went up and our National Debt diminished.
But the
most amusing piece of brag is the utterance of Sir R Wingfield in the reign of
Henry VIII.
“As the
English nation has always surpassed the French in valour and good faith, so it
cannot be judged inferior to it in antiquity or dignity, or in size of its
territory (!) or in learning and capacity.”
Shakespeare
too is not afraid of some full-blooded boasting, but in such passages he
usually observes dramatic propriety.
Patriotic poetry must be judged leniently, except when it stimulates
hatred against national rivals.
These
examples of arrogance seem to living Englishmen to belong to a past age, and we
resent having them brought up against us as if they are characteristic of
England of our day.
We are
conscience of having been in a chastened temper since the Boer War, which
revealed to us the insecurity of our position and the jealousy of foreign
powers.
We have
indeed been struggling against paralysing attacks of pessimism, which we half
put aside rather by an effort of will than from intellectual conviction.
Pride and
arrogance are the last faults, which we think could be rightly charged against
us at present. And yet we find that these same old charges are still heard, and
from Americans, of whom the Continental press justly remarked at the time of
the Venezuela crisis: [In 2006 -the America foreign
policy is again in a similar crisis]
“America can now give the
English a lesson in arrogance and brutality.”
The
American notion that the English are arrogant may be chiefly an inherited
prejudice dating back to the days of [Lord] Palmerston or even earlier; but it
is probably in part due to the fact that we are not accustomed to be accosted
by strangers without an introduction, and instinctively repel such a liberty by
stiffness of manner.
In any
case, the accusation is no longer true, and we need not trouble ourselves about
it. All that remains of our former
pride is a wholesome indifference to the opinions of foreign nations, which we
find to be generally ill-informed and frequently biased.
There are
several other legends about our national character, which are not worth
discussing at length.
It is an
old joke, after Froissart. That we take our pleasures sadly; this could hardly
be affirmed of the masses today. On the
other hand “merry England” probably only meant that England is a pleasant
country to live in, though it may possibly be taken from Henry of Huntingdon, De Praerogativis Angliae:
Anglia
plena locis, gens libera, digna iocari.
English
humour has been a national characteristic from Chaucer to Dickens. It is a good-natured appreciation of the
little absurdities and incongruities of life, which cause no amusement to a
sour or over anxious temper.
The French
have been fond of dwelling on the proneness of Englishmen to commit suicide. A French writer, Pierre Jean Grosley (about
1770), informs his countrymen that great precautions are taken to block up the
approaches to the Thames, lest the sight of water tempt passers-by to drown themselves.
“Yet what
precautions can prevent those who are resolved to die from carrying their
resolve into effect?
That it is
impossible to prevent this mischief I am convinced by the shocking sight of
twenty skulls found in the bed of the Thames, where the foundations of a new
bridge were being dug.”
Even
Englishmen shared this delusion. Young, in his famous Night Thoughts wrote:
O Britain,
infamous for suicide!
In ambient
waves plunge thy polluted head
Wash the
dire stain. Nor shock the Continent.
Vital
statistics have finally destroyed this legend.
It is
indeed true that barbarous peoples seldom commit suicide; it is a habit of
civilized races and classes. But our country has no bad pre-eminence in this
dubious result of culture.
Our
suicide rate, while higher than that of Ireland, is much lower tha that of the militarised
nations of the Continent [1929]. The number of suicides culminates, I believe
in Saxony. The practice of carrying
arms increases the number of suicides, as well as the number of homicides.
Our enemies
have constantly accused us of “perfidy” and “hypocrisy.” We might fairly ask on
what occasions we have been perfidious, for our accusers seldom condescend to
be explicit.
Our
diplomacy has generally been straightforward, [Not in Blairland 1997-2006] if
judged by the low standard, which prevails in international relations.
No deep-laid Machiavellian plots can justly be laid
to our charge. [Until Tony Blair ruled in England]
Indeed our
frequent changes of GOVERNMENT would make any consistent foreign policy, and above
all a secret and crafty foreign
policy difficult.
[That is WHY -Tony Blair needed to return to
OFFICE. Not once -Not twice - but on a
third occasion in order to achieve his Machiavellian objectives? This is WHY the EDP have campaigned for PR-Proportional
Representation and in forbidding any MP from sitting in the Commons for more
than one TERM at a time and may be considered by the electorate for return after
the next TERM to allow fresh blood into Parliament so that no clique can
make the Commons their OWN]
*
We have
been fortunate [Again we must remind the viewer that we are talking about
1926 not 2006], and our simple methods have sometimes succeeded in
thwarting the much more subtle calculations of our rivals.
Other
nations have ascribed this success to superior cunning, disguised under a clock
of innocence, and so the think they have a ground of hypocrisy.
The expressionless
face of an Englishman, and his apparent want of interest in serious subjects,
undoubtedly encouraged the Central European Powers to underrate our intellect
and energy. Some of them have complained that we deceived them about
ourselves, to their own undoing.
[Is not this happening today in 2006 and for
the past 35 years about the EEC -but really a
United States of Europe.
Our
politicians tricked the people in 1972 about their future and it is no wonder
the former founders of the EU can’t understand WHY even in 2006 there is still great
opposition in England to their SLAVERY in Europe. They didn’t understand the
English mind they only took notice of the TRAITORS who wished to SELL OUR
Country.]
Mr Wicham
Steed, who has an almost unrivalled knowledge of Continental peoples, says very
truly:
“There are few
people in the world whose acts are more constantly sincere than those of Englishmen.’
[No wonder the politicians in Europe are confused
when they deal with TRAITORS to their country like Tony Blair and his cronies
in Parliament and in the population at large. The damage that Blair -Straw and
his many idiots have done to the prestige and diplomacy in good faith of our
nation will be a stain we will have to bear for some time in the future.]
To
continue:
[Mr
Wickham Steed]
But he
proceeds to say, Englishmen act from instinct [good-feeling] and not from logic;
and in this way they often appear inconsistent. The English have, he says, an understanding heart rather
than an undrstanding head. Perhaps,
however, the distinction is not so much between instinct and intellect, or
between heart and head, as between the logical and the practical reason.
A nation
which has been “in business” for
centuries believes in a “deal” with concessions on both sides, as usually the
best way of composing a quarrel; and we think we have observed that the only
irreparable mistakes are those which are made by consistant intellectuals or
strict logicians. Debelius, in his admirable book on
England
-sees the
truth.
“ The man
of power who breaks down in the attempt to make possible the impossible does
not occur in English history.” (p.497).
“Non-English nations are apt to see nothing but Machiavellian
cunning harnessing the world’s idealism to England’s triumphal car. Such judgments over looks the fact that
purely idealistic movements, rare in the world we live in, are only too
constantly forced to make terms, and very unexhilerating terms at that, with
the world’s political, economic, and egotistic forces” (p.106)
With so
much more to follow we shall draw to a close with a few home truths.
“The English,” said Mr Bonar Law, ‘are a generous race. I
can say that, for I am not an Englishman. They have a magnanimity which goes always
with consciousness of strength.”
An
Englishman is simply unable to comprehend the brooding hatred of the
Irishman,
which has no better ground than that Cromwell exercised the laws of war
somewhat severely against the Irish rebels, and that William III won the battle
of the Boyne. The detestable crime of political assassination has been
conspicuously rare in England…
The words “fair
play” and “playing the game,” are often in an Englishman’s mouth. There are
rules to be observed in all rivalry, and limits beyond which even animosity
must not be carried out.
[Tony Blair and his cronies have been
playing their own game over the last nine years so there may be some adjustment
needed in 2006 to the above statement.]
END
of PART 2
[Font
altered-bolding & underlining used-comments in brackets]
APRIL/06
*
FROM
A Prime Minister in 1848
to another
Gordon Brown in June 2007
Over a Hundred and Fifty
Seven years ago a great patriotic Prime Minister -Foreign Secretary -Lord
Palmerstone (Henry John Temple) -beloved by his People defined the principle of
nationality as follows:
“ Providence meant
mankind to be divided into separate nations, and for this purpose countries have
been bounded by natural barriers, and races of men have been distinguished by
separate languages, habits, manners, dispositions, and characters…” (1848)
“…We have in the
first place to say that the Business of an English Government, is to pursue that
course of Foreign Policy which on the whole they may think right; and not to
attempt the impossible task of at all times and upon all subjects doing that
which is agreeable to all Foreign Governments. A man who in private life
attempts to please everyone,
invariably fails; and the Government of a great country would not be more
successful in such an endeavour…
. It must at times
be an advantage to a foreign Prince…in the present state of the continent to
visit England and to see with his own eyes, how Liberty may be combined with
Loyalty, Freedom with public order, and how the Respect which is shown by
the Crown for the Rights of the Subject and for the enactment of the Law
produces corresponding Feelings on the Part of the People and inspires them with
similar Respect for the Rights of the Crown and for the Laws which secure the
Liberties and the Property of all , from the highest to the lowest in the Land.
”
For a full statement of his Principles:
“I hold with respect
to alliances that England is a Power sufficiently strong, sufficiently powerful
to steer her own course, and not to tie herself as an unnecessary appendage to
the policy of any other Government. I hold that the real policy of England-apart
from questions which involve her own particular interests, political or
commercial-is to be the champions of justice and right, pursuing that course
with moderation and prudence, not becoming the Quixote of the world, but giving
the weight of her moral sanction and support wherever she thinks that justice
is, and wherever she thinks wrong has been done…
It is a narrow policy
to suppose that this country or that is to be marked out as the eternal ally or
the perpetual enemy of England. We have no eternal enemies. Our interests are
eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow.”
[In 1848 Lord Palmerstone was Foreign Secretary at the age of sixty-three.
He entered Parliament in 1807- Secretary at War in 1809; 1811-28 (most years)
War Office; 1830- 1852 Foreign Office; 1852-55 -Home Office; 1855-65.
‘ Born 1784 in Park
Street Westminster. Family home ‘Broadlands’ Hampshire. Died on the morning of
October 18, 1865. And the last candle [last of his contempories] of the
Eighteenth century was out.’
* *
[It is significant that
the word ‘England’
was not a word despised in our House of Commons during the time of this great
patriot of England and only closer to our own times has the word Britain taken
its place though we do detect a slight revival now in existence. ]
* *
*
*
The abolition of Britain
by The Reform Treaty
- Passed by majority of 138
The abolition of Britain
by The Reform Treaty
- Passed by majority of 138
MPs voted by 362 - 224 for the Reform Treaty in its Second Reading on
Monday 21st January. This sixth and final treaty, now renamed the Lisbon
Treaty, formally replaces Britain with the European Union on 1st January
2009. This is a year before the deadline set by the Chancellor of
Germany, Angela Merkel.
The Treaty will abolish the British Constitution, and therefore the
nations of Britain and England, sweeping away our Westminster
Parliament, and giving the EU the power to close it.
The Treaty sets up an unelected three tier politburo executive in
Brussels with absolute power, a dictatorship on the soviet model. The EU
parliament has no power and is a sham.
Read the Reform Treaty one page summary on the left. Gordon Brown was
lying: the Treaty is worse than the constitution.
This sixth treaty is the fastest moving and most secret the EU has
drafted; opposition to and recognition of the EU as a police state is
growing, and they know speed is vital.
This Commons vote, one of the most important in our history, was
largely unreported by our controlled press and media.
The Queen and Parliament to complete ratification this spring, 2008
Parliament has allocated 29 days to discuss this treaty in February (not
much for its own abolition). They will probably have the final
ratification vote in March. The Queen, the EU's most loyal supporter,
plans to give her Royal Assent in June 2008. This means Westminster and
the Queen will ratify it behind our backs, as they have the other five
treaties.
No referendum
German Chancellor Merkel chose this sixth Treaty instead of pushing it
through as a constitution to avoid referendums in its member nations.
She twice visited 10 Downing Street and forced Gordon Brown to cancel
both his promised referendum, and his General Election.
"Anti-EU" groups have
encouraged us to call for a
referendum precisely because
the EU has already
prohibited it. They know we
are wasting our efforts: our
four party leaderships take
their orders from the EU,
not from the voters.
How to fight
The real course of action is to change the minds of 70 MP's and get
a majority against. MP's have been selected on the Party list system
over the last 20 years to ensure an obediant majority of pro-EU MPs.
These MPs now need to understand the EU has the constitution (the six
treaties) of a dictatorship, the laws of a police state, and when
enforced, its 111,000 regulations will create a government command
economy, soviet style: dictatorships cause poverty.
They also need to realise that MPs are the people who put this
dictatorship in power. If they put it in power, they are the greatest
threat to take it out of power. All dictatorships in the past have
eliminated that threat. Inside the EU, the lives of MPs will be even
worse than our own; at best, they are likely to be institutionalised and
held against their will. (This is the only good bit - these hated
traitors will suffer severely.)
Visit your MP in his surgery NOW and explain this. (Instructions top
left)
The EU remains illegal
Each of these six treaties are completely illegal under the British
Constitution, our 1689 Bill of Rights, our treason laws, and under our
common law. It is unforgivable that the Queen, her Ministers and our
Parliament have committed the criminal act of treason by signing these
treaties, and broken our laws to abolish our nation.
The EU will always be
illegal in Britain; but once
the EU has complete power
and control here, we can no
more get rid of it than we
could Germany, had their
planned illegal occupation
of Britain in 1940 been
successful.
The Countdown to abolition
Whereas the 465 page EU Constitution would have abolished the five
treaties and replaced them with a single document conferring absolute
power, the Reform Treaty adds to the existing five treaties, bringing
them up to the powers of the EU Constitution. All six treaties with
appendices add up to nearly 10,000 complex and unreadable pages. Tony
Blair agreed to it on 23rd June 2007 as his final stab in Britain’s
back. On the 23rd July there was an Intergovernmental Conference (IGC),
when we should have seen a first draft of the Treaty.
Foreign ministers agreed its terms on 7-8th September at the resort
of Viana de Castelo, Portugal. There was a summit in Lisbon on the 18th
and 19th October, where they hoped to sign the Treaty, but Gordon Brown
signed it on December 13th 2007, commiting treason, the most criminal
act on the statute book.
The EU has decided to act now as if the Treaty were already in force;
they are consolidating their power each day. On 1.1.2009 the Reform
Treaty and the other five seize all remaining power from our Westminster
Parliament, which becomes defunct on that day; it has no remaining
powers whatsoever. (The Treaties do allow Brussels to return minor
powers, but that is very unlikely.) On 11th June 2009 we have bogus
elections to the sham Brussels Parliament, the only elections we will
get in the future.
Westminster's five year term expires on 5th May 2010 and a British
General Election is due. The six treaties make no provision for an
election to our Parliament. By that time the EU will have consolidated
its absolute power, and it will almost certainly use it cancel that
election and to close Westminster. The EU has always planned to rule
what was Britain directly through its 12 nominated Regional capitals, by
passing Westminster, from which every function will be removed.
Its founders knew the EU dictatorship cannot be built while there is
a strong and freedom loving Britain on its doorstep. They tried twice
before in 1914 and 1939. Britian has to be utterly destroyed for the EU
to succeed. The success of the EU's Frankfurt School subversion
techniques on Britain (see left) has been astonishing; the abolition of
Westminster is one of their final remaining goals.
You have 11 months left
Treason is the most serious of all Britain’s crimes. You have just 11
months left to bring these vile British traitors to justice, and get us
out of the EU dictatorship.
Around 45 million British
people are against the
abolition of our nation, and
with the little European
voting that has been
allowed, it seems clear over
200 million of its victims
don’t want the EU. But we
will never be given the
choice. YOU have to decide
to act yourself.
There are ways to stop the EU - see "Your Campaigns" on the left.
Then we will need a mass blockade of Westminster to stop our criminal
MP's and Queen breaking our constitution and laws for the last time.
Copy of the EU's Timetable at the BBC.
Original 2009
article from German Parliament -.pdf for download
Then check it at the German Parliament
here
|
Campaigns: Print these .pdf's: One or two pages each.
Your Campaigns
Ten EU truths
Reform Treaty one
page
50 reasons to leave
EUtruth flier
Common Purpose
Abolition of Councillors
Abolition of 48 Counties
Map: the 9 EU regions
Transnational regions
Reform Treaty full text
EU Constitution, one page pdf
EU Constitution: one page
html
Signs of EU police
state
The EU's degraded our lives
What will the EU be like?
List of British traitors
Beef up the British Constitution
Lib Lab Con: One Party State
The Queen
The EU's Hitler
The EU costs £200 billion pa
The dictatorship: Quotes
UK > EU handover of power.
EU subversion diagram.
Subversion: Common Purpose
Frankfurt subversion.
The terrorism deception
Abolition of our 48 counties
Abolition of Parliament.
Church flier
Some revolutionary lyrics
drjn.co.uk - copy of this site
The Westminster News
The Devonport Column
The Cornish Free Press
The British Free Press
Government disinformation
Mobilisation talk
Blueprint to get out
SS child snatching
Wood's rigged elections
Stood for the leadership
| Where we are now:
1. Since 1972 The Queen has
illegally signed five of the six EU
Treaties.
2. The five treaties define and build the EU as an unelected
dictatorship.
3. The EU's laws, passed by Westminster, give it the powers
of a police state.
4. The sixth EU treaty will complete the abolition of Britain
as a nation
- the Queen is due to sign it this year.
A foreign power, the EU, will then rule us, and enforce the
laws of a police state.
Shouldn't we repeal the 1972 European Communities Act
now
before we are imprisoned permanently inside? We've only got till
July 2008.
Please fight the campaigns at the top of
the menu on the left.
The leaderships of the
Conservative, Labour and Lib Dem parties have been controlled by
the European Union for two decades. It is the EU agenda they
implement in Parliament, not your wishes, which is why your vote
doesn't count.
Our controlled press and media haven't reported it, but
Britain would have been abolished in November 2006 if the
French and Dutch hadn't voted down the EU Constitution.
Instead a sixth and final Treaty will now be signed; after
which EU Commissioners will have the power to impose the
Constitution (and the Euro) on us, and enforce the laws of a
police state.
5. Thirty three years inside the EU - have you noticed how
our democracy is being withdrawn?
The EU has already denied us that most basic of human rights -
the right to vote against the EU and to keep our own nation. A
majority of us don't want to be in the EU. We are being forced
in against our will.
Do you feel you've become powerless, unable to influence
events, or your vote is worth less? The six treaties have been
gradually removing our democracy; for thirty years our laws have
been "harmonised" with the EU; 80% of the laws now passed by our
Parliament are EU laws, not ours. Isn't the real reason people
have lost interest in politics precisely because the EU has
taken away our ability to change things?
Common law, where the government was our servant, is now
largely replaced by the EU's Corpus Juris, which puts the
government above the law, and we don't participate. We have
already lost most of our rights (including habeas corpus). The
power of government grows unchecked, as does that of large
corporations. Politicians continuously lie about the EU,
pretending its not significant.
6. Massive EU corruption
The EU's auditors have found the fraud is so widespread they've
refused to sign off the EU's accounts for each of the last
ten years. Whistleblowers like Marta Andreason, the EU
Budget Director, who in 2005 found the EU couldn't account for
95% of its £66 billion budget, are simply fired for
telling the truth.
7.The bribing of our Politicians by the EU
Europe works by bribing politicians with huge salaries and
expenses to vote for Europe, against the best interests of their
own voters.
As a result all three parties are in favour of the EU -
Westminster acts like a one party state of politicians: the
Lib-Lab-Con. The parties are run top down and implement the
policy of their leaderships, not that of their members.
(unfortunately UKIP is run in the same way). If you have voted
for the Labs, Cons or Lib-Dems since 1969, you have voted
for the EU dictatorship.
8. EU corruption is now exploding through our Civil
Service, our local government, and our 7,000 quangos.
A shadow EU government lives inside our bureaucracy,
headquartered in the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM.)
It includes many parts of government including the RDA and the
Regional Assemblies. Common Purpose, an EU organisation,
the UK branch also headquartered in the ODPM, has members across
many government organisations including some city and county
councils, the Land Registry, the police and the NHS, which it is
destroying from within.
Common Purpose is the glue that enables fraud to be
committed across these government departments, most of it lining
the pockets of politicians and bureaucrats. It often involves
the sale of public assets such as land to friends of politicians
or their businesses. (The RDA -The EU Regional Development
Agency, is a major player in this type of fraud.) And the
handing out of plum government non jobs with big salaries and
expenses to members of Common Purpose, all of it involving the
theft of our money as taxpayers. The Chief Executive Officer of
Common Purpose is Julia Middleton of the ODPM.
9. Businesses closing under EU regulation
The EU's 111,000 regulations, when fully enforced, will
transform Britain from a free market economy into a Soviet style
command economy, closing hundreds of thousands more businesses.
They will also control our personal lives far more closely than
were those of Soviet citizens. (In a Parliamentary answer to
Lord Stoddart in January 2003, the government admitted there
were 101,811 EU regulations, growing at 3,500 pa).
The cost of Britain's 8,500 quangoes is £124 billion a year,
and they raise an additional £40 billion from us in charges,
according to the Cabinet Office. The Public Bodies Directory
2006 describes only 882 of them. Most exist to enforce EU
regulations; nearly all should be closed.
10. The EU costs us £200 billion pa, 20% of our economy
According to the government's Better Regulation Task Force
Annual Report 2005 (Introduction written by Tony Blair,)
complying with EU regulations now costs our economy over £100
billion a year.
By far the largest treasury expense is now the £167 billion
spent on the EU's 8,500 quangos, (Cabinet Office figures) most
of which enforce EU regulation. This is patronage, bribery,
putting thousands of officials and influential businessment on
£100,000 - £300,000 a year salaries. That's why the Exchequer is
so desperate for cash and can't pay for the navy, nurses,
students etc.
Economists say we lose £80 billion pa by associating with the
EU's inferior economies. The EU took our fishing industry, which
costs us £5 billion pa. EU damage to other industries (like
forcing us to close the Rover Car Co) a further £20 billion. Our
EU contribution is a relatively minor £10 billion, the only bit
the Press discuss.
Before we joined the EU we had an even balance of trade with
them. Now EU regulations have fixed it so we lose £30 billion
year trading with the EU on our balance of payments. We'd be
enormously more wealthy if we left.
The main use of taxes is now to finance government and its
greedy whirlpool of waste; they've doubled in real terms in the
33 years we've been in the EU. There's less money in the economy
left for wages, creating a growing underclass who can't make
ends meet.
11. Our counties to be abolished
The Queen signed the 1992 Maastricht Treaty, which adopts the EU
Regionalisation Plan. This will abolish England's 48 counties
and replace them with 9 European regions, each with their own
Regional Capital, which reports directly to Brussels, not to
Westminster. This effectively obliterates the country of
England. For example the County of Cornwall is replaced by the
South West Region, which stretches from Lands End and includes
Gloucestershire and Wiltshire; its regional capital is Exeter.
As this move is unpopular it is being kept low-key and will not
be implemented until the sixth treaty is signed, when we lose
our right to object.
12. The deliberate destruction of our standards and way of
life,
From Sunday trading, where large stores force staff to work
Sundays for derisory pay - or they don't get a job, to the
deliberate undermining of the family and teachers, to sex
education for the under 13's, to children being given obscene
homework, its all traceable via our compliant government back to
the EU over the last 34 years, as it sucessfully implemented the
subversion of the Frankfurt School. While inside atheist Europe,
British Christianity has almost died out; safety on our streets
and a great chunk of civilised life has left with it.
13. The EU has controlled our immigration since 1997
In January 2007 on the front page of The Westminster News we
forecast 1.5 million immigrants for the year, and people laughed
at us. On January 24th 2008 the Daily Express published
government figures of 1.3 million Polish immigrants alone for
2007. With Romania and Hungary joining in that year the total
was probaly double that. The Amsterdam Treaty handed control of
our immigration to the EU. 30,000 a year used to arrive - the
EU's increased it by 60 times That's why house prices
have been screaming up, even though the population of original
British people is falling.
Politicians and huge corporations like immigration - with
thousands of immigrants available on low pay, they can impose
the minimum wage on millions. Politicians then lie that they
can't get British workers to do dirty jobs. The truth is they
won't offer a decent wage, and cynically use immigrants to drive
wages down, adding to the huge underclass.
The Government pretends there are a maximum of 145,000
immigants annually, and 1.5 million new houses will be needed to
house them. But then Jack Straw admits that 2.6 million
immigrants applied to stay here last year.
Our infrastructure and services can't stand such huge numbers
and is breaking down in some cities, where English people are
becoming a 10% minority. But the EU controls it, not the Foreign
secretary, and he has no power, no options but to do as EU
policy dictates, and accept it.
Michael Howard was lying on the 24th January 2005 when he
said he'd fix immigration - as Prime Minister, he'd have had no
control over it whatsoever. Immigration hurts our existing
immigrants first - new immigrants move into their areas,
decreasing the wages and increasing the pressure on housing.
If the sixth Treaty is signed, we lose our right to
withdraw and Britain ceases to be a nation. Like the other six,
it only requires two signatures: the Prime Ministers, and the
Queen's |
|
| Examples of how our lives
have degraded since we've been in the EU:
In the EU, (which means in Britain) government is
above the law.
The EU's corpus juris now pervades right through our
legal system. A policeman was let off by magistrates
this year (2005) for driving his private car at 159 mph
in Ludlow, Shrops. Under Corpus Juris the government are
above the law and cannot be prosecuted The judge ruled
correctly under EU law. 45,000 police officers got off
speed cameras in this way in 2004, although their
speeding killed 44 innocent people. (Daily Mail
27.12.05.)
EU "monitoring Officers" have the right to dismiss
our Councillors.
The Local Government Act of 2000 empowered the head of
the EU government in England, the Office of the Deputy
Prime Minster (ODPM) to appoint a monitoring officer to
spy on every council. If an elected councillor disagrees
with the EU or government line, the unelected "Standards
Board for England" can suspend him for up to five years.
An example is in Cambridgeshire, where the ODPM has
threatened cllr Alex Riley with suspension if he attends
any debate discussing the ODPM's plans to build a new
town of 20,000 people called Nothstowe on his ward. The
ODPM has the conflict of interest here; but its powers
are becoming absolute.
We have lost the right to freedom
The EU arrest warrant (signed by the Queen on 18th
November 2003) allows us to be arrested without charge
and held indefinitely with no right to see a solicitor,
make a phone call, or even a right to a trial. You can
simply disappear.
Under the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act
(SOCPA) 2005, we can now be arrested and held in the
cells by any police officer for any petty offence, like
dropping litter. Before it had to be an offense that
carried a 5 year jail term. This also applies to all of
the EU's 107,000 regulations. Do you know them all?
The Civil Contingences Act 2004 allows government to
confiscate anything you possess permanently; you have no
right to object. This includes your house. It also gives
government the right to forceably move its population
around to different locations; you can be left with no
place to call your own and live like a refugee. The only
check and balance here is a Minister just needs to utter
the words "This is a national emergency." If a
demonstration or strike government doesn't like is being
organised, they can cut off all communications in a town
- phones, mobiles, the internet, TV, and block all
access to that town including closing roads and
railways. It has all the powers and more of Hitler's
Enabling Act of 1933.
We have lost the right to free speech
At the Labour Party conference the police held an 82
year old man, Walter Woolfgang, and denied him access to
the conference under the EU's "anti terrorist"
legislation because he had shouted the word "nonsense"
at Jack Straw, who was speaking about Iraq. Terrified
the true nature of the laws they have passed on behalf
of the EU was escaping too early, the Labour Party
stopped the police and begged the man to return to
conference.
On October 25th 2005 Miss Maya Evans was arrested
under the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005,
for a lone protest at the Cenotaph by reading out the
names of the 97 British soldiers killed in the Iraq war.
She was arrested by no less than 14 police officers and
found guilty at Bow Street Magistrates Court on the 8th
December 2005.
Would you hand over our nation, to be ruled by a
foreign power, with oppressive laws like these, ? That's
what's happening.
We have lost the right to protest
These laws make protest very difficult; if we did hold a
General Strike and blockade Westminster it would now
require some bravery: the powers the EU has demanded
from our government enable it to respond in a way
similar to the Chinese government's in Tiaanamen Square
should it so wish.
It is no coincidence that since 2004, all MP's
offices in Westminster are guarded by police with
machine guns, inside and out.
The Governments "terrorism" deception
All these new EU laws, including massive "anti
terrorism" acts (recently 2000, 2001, 2005) were passed
with the pretence they were only directed at
terrorists, or in the case of Asbos, ruffians who
terrorise the streets. In each case they are used far
more often against ordinary law abiding people,
particularly to suppress dissent. (91% of those detained
under Terrorism Acts are innocent and have been
improperly arrested. Most of the remainder are charged
with offences that have nothing to do with terrorism,
but cover up over zealous arrests).
We have lost the right to life
Under EU law the "Shoot to kill" policy did not need
democratic authorisation. Just two senior police
officers authorised the police to kill British people. A
democratic vote by Parliament was not required, but even
that would not have legalised the killing under British
common law. A recent victim was an innocent Brazilian,
Jean de Menezes, shot dead in Stockwell underground
station, even though he was being held down by police
officers at the time of the execution. The police used
dum-dum bullets, outlawed under the Geneva Convention
because they blow a man to pieces inside.
The police can no longer be convicted for killing
innocent people - Philip Prout shot at Lewannick in East
Cornwall is just one of 30 people shot dead by police
since 1992 when corpus juris crept in. At least one was
shot in the back; most were no threat to anyone. Not
once since 1992 has a policeman been convicted of any
crime for these murders.
Have you noticed this growing police state?
In addition to many more laws than those above, add the
107,000 regulations, and whole bureaucracies such as
VOSA building up networks of cameras and databases to
record our movements and criminalise us when we can't
comply. Persecution is no longer confined to motorists;
under EU Corpus Juris our courts have become extensions
of government power instead of independent arbiters of
justice.
Westminster had passed sufficient of the EU's
oppressive laws (the "harmonisation" in the Treaties) by
the end of 2004 that we have been living in what is
legally a police state since then. But at the moment,
its only one per cent enforced. After the Queen signs
the sixth Treaty, the EU has the absolute power to
enforce 100% of its regulations and laws.
|
|
|
| On the basis of the laws and treaties
already signed by our Queen and Prime Ministers,
What will
life be like in the EU after
the 6th Treaty is signed?
Our Westminster Parliament immediately becomes pointess
as its remaining powers are transferred to Europe.
It is the formal end of Britain and England as
nations.
Britain's 153 embassies around the world will be
closed as the ink from the Queen's signature dries. (As
Tony Blair refused to admit this has been agreed to,
Jose Zapatero, the Prime Minister of Spain, confirmed it
in a February 2005 radio broadcast.)
After the EU abolishes our 48 counties your address
will change from 4 High St, Taunton, Somerset, Great
Britain, to 4 High St, Taunton, Area K, European Union.
(The glorious EU county "The South West Region" has had
the postal address "Area K" assigned for over a decade.)
The Official National Anthem of the EU, which you
should have known since 1971 is based on the melody "Ode
to Joy" by Beethoven, formally replaces God save the
Queen. The EU flag replaces the Union Jack, the red,
blue and white nautical ensigns etc. (The EU Commission
has already ordered (24.11.2005) our Merchant Navy to
fly the EU flag in place of the red Ensign.)
The EU takes ownership and command of our Police,
Army, Royal Navy, RAF, nuclear weapons, currency
reserves, North Sea Oil. (See the EU Constitution below)
Serving officers in our police, army, navy and air
force already know they will have to take an oath to the
EU instead of to the Queen. If they don't many have been
told they will be dismissed. The EU will have complete
military control of the UK.
The UK Independence Party will be banned under the
1999 ruling of the European court of Justice case
c274/99, where it was held that it is illegal to
criticise the EU.
The Conservative, Labour and Lib-dem parties will be
abolished (only pan EU parties like the EPP or PES are
allowed -see clause I.46.4 of the EU Constitution). It
will then be blindingly obvious to even the dumbest
politician there is no reason to keep Westmister open,
and that the EU has the legal right to close it.
Many people will be excluded from the jobs they know
best, as the EU's demand that you must pay to be
re-taught the job, and pay for a certificate before you
can be employed, becomes universal.
Hundreds of thousands more small businesses will
close on the enforcement of the remaining 100,000 EU
regulations our government has already passed. Several
million will be permanently unemployed as a result.
We will all be criminalised by the 107,000
regulations. Its impossible to know or understand
107,000 regulations, and the poor can't possibly afford
to comply. We will all be subject to frequent fines and
arrest as a result. Here are just 4 examples:
Under EU regulations it is now illegal for you to
repair your plumbing, electrics or your car (from 1st
January 2006). If you buy a boat over six feet long,
built after the EU Recreational Craft Directive of 1999,
and don't pay the EU £4,000 to "measure" the boat, you
get 6 months imprisonment. We will live under permanent
threat of arrest and fear of the knock at the door that
takes us away.
Massive corporations will do well, but with huge
immigration allowed from the EU, they'll be able to pay
minimum wage everywhere, not just in the provinces as
they do now. If you don't accept the minimum they'll
employ a Pole or a Czekoslovakian.
Big corporations will also have a near monopoly (with
the government) on employment and will be able to
dictate unfavourable terms to staff without fear of
contradiction.
Plum government jobs and corruption will ensure the
wealth of politicians, bureaucrats, their businesses and
associates at all levels of government, including local
government and amongst our 7000+ quangos.
Society will divide into two: the remaining 60% of us
will be either unemployed or treated abysmally on
minimum wage.
Taxes will rise more steeply to pay for the even
larger explosion in government growth and corruption
There will be no redress through local democracy
because there won't be any. The nine UK regional
governments, which replace our 48 counties and
councillors, will be unelected (see the European
Regionisation plan). Our only vote is to the powerless
EU parliament. We will be ruled by the 25 unelected
Commisssioners, and have have no redress at any level;
we will be as poor but have less freedom than Soviet
Citizens.
If we demonstrate or protest we can be be seized and
relocated to another region. The EU Arrest Warrant and
Civil Contingencies Act 2004, with 20 other oppressive
Acts the Queen has signed between 1972 and 2005, give
the government absolute power over us. They can shoot us
if they wish with no legal comeback - the shootings of
innocents Philip Prout and Jean de Menezes were entirely
legal under EU law.
The tendancy to pick on Muslims, as Germany used to
pick on Jews, has already begun. Europe will be a very
nasty place.
How long will the EU last?
Eventually, perhaps 15 years down the track, Europe will
collapse under the weight of its own corruption,
bureaucracy, and regulations. There will be so few
productive businesses that even at 100% tax rates we
will not be able to support the massive, corrupt and
wasteful government. Many of us will be starving in the
lead up to the collapse. After the collapse we may be
able to leave the EU, if a dictator has not taken
advantage of the complete absence of democratic checks
and balances by seizing power. The Constitution of the
EU is similar to the Soviet Union's. That dictator is
free to choose between a Soviet or Nazi style
government. Then it could take 70 years to break free.
|
|
|
| .
Fifty years ago
our greatest threat might have been violence or mugging. Now the
greatest threat to our economic well being, our way of life, our
freedom and the very existence of our nation, is our own
government. |
|
| What do we want?
After the repeal of the EU treaties we want a change
to our British Constitution so politicians can never
hijack our nation again. Every Parliamentary Bill, after
its Second Reading, should come down to us, the people,
to vote yes or no as to whether the Queen should give it
Royal Assent. This will take power away from our
destructive politicians and return it to the people,
where it belongs. (They do this in Swtizerland - they,
not us, are the most democratic nation on earth.) We can
then return to being a peaceable, just, honest,
prosperous and fully democratic society where everyone's
rights, no matter how high or low are respected, and the
disadvantaged properly looked after. And where neither
governments, corporations nor individuals have obscene
wealth and power.
David Noakes 07974 437 097 ; drjnoakes@yahoo.co.uk
Campaign to repeal the 1972 European Communities
Act and get clean out.
What can you do to help?
1. Find out when your local MP holds their surgery and
attend with a printout of this, and the one page summary
of the EU constitution below. Ask that MP to cross the
floor to be the leader of the first Anti EU
Parliamentary Party (representing 65% of our nation).
The publicity would be stunning, and might force an
in/out vote.
2. Make appointments with your local journalists, give
them the same two print outs and ask them to write about
the truth about the EU.
3. Do you know anyone famous? Persuade them in the same
way to join our cause and get the truth known.
4. Print little stickers: "We didn't vote for this - it
has no mandate," and stick them on everything that
represents the police state and rip off government.
5. Tell your Town, District and County councillors they
are about to be abolished. See below.
6. Do anything you can to get the truth about the EU
published.
Or print and hand out this
flier (a .pdf),
or flier
(as a word document). It can be photocopied
double sided on to one page.
.
|
Our Councillors abolished
Our 20,000 Councillors will be permanently abolished after the
EU Regionalisation Plan has established the nine EU Regions.
Point out they were elected to serve the public, not the
government, and the public has not agreed to their abolition.
Try to persuade them to stand up for the people who voted for
them, (which is only doing their duty) by holding a yes/no local
ballot on whether the public agree with the abolition of our
counties, councillors and nation.
If the public vote no, they should declare, for their Town or
county, UDI from Europe and the illegal actions of our
government since 1971, particularly the abolition of our British
Constiution, common law, our nation and counties. The press
coverage this would generate would force the truth into the open
nationally, leading to a national in/out ballot on the EU. Just
one council could achieve this fabulous result alone.
Download: A
summary of the loss of our 48 counties (a WP file)
Download: A
map of the nine EU regions (.pdf)
The
Devonport Column, exposing Common Purpose nationally, and
corruption in Plymouth.
The six treaties are:
1. The European Communities Act 1972.
2. The Single European Act, 1986.
3. The Maastricht Treaty, 1992.
4. The Amsterdam Treaty, 1997.
5. The Nice Treaty 2001.
The sixth will be called something equally innocuous, like
the Treaty of Lille. Then the loss of our nation, way of life
and freedom will be complete.
The best summary of the six treaties is
the Constitution
It reveals the true nature of the EU. Some
British politicians were horrified when they saw the EU's
absolute power revealed in its new constitution, and falsely
accused the EU of much more than a tidying up exercise. It
wasn't, it was a re-statement of the 6 treaties in almost
readable English. Our politicians simply hadn't read the six
treaties before they voted for them. The French and Dutch "No"
votes are being ignored as usual; the EU Constitution is 2/3rds
implemented and still being implemented. Dan Hannan of the
Brussels EU Constitutional Committee, confirms it will be fully
implemended in two years. Brussels can enforce it fully after
the Queen signs the sixth EU treaty. Here's a one page summary
with Article numbers:
One page summary of the Constitution
- pdf for download
UKIP is way understating the costs of the EU. Even the
British and EU governments admit to four times the UKIP figure.
The EU is
costing us 200 billion pa, 20% of our economy
Quotes from
our leaders revealing they know they built the EU as a
dictatorship.
EU treaties
and publications abolishing our 48 counties
The Conservative Con trick
Many people have been fooled by the Conservative Party into
believing the party is anti EU. It was the Conservatives, under
Ted Heath, who took us in to the EU, and then he lied that his
1972 EU Treaty wouldn't affect our sovereignty. Three out of the
four Prime Ministers who signed the 6 EU treaties were
Conservatives, every one af them legally a traitor under the
British laws of their time. Do you see a pattern here?
In 2005 Party Leader Michael Howard could have won the
election for the Conservatives by making one simple statement:
"We will repeal the 1972 EU Communities Act and leave Europe".
Millions of Conservative voters would have rejoined the fold. A
million Lib-Dems and Labour voters would have joined him. But he
didn't.
Because the Conservative leadership would rather be in
Europe than be in power.
Instead Howard continued betraying Conservative voters, so he
lost. (And to be fair, why should Conservative leaders miss out
on the EU corruption gravy train?)
The Conservative leadership is completely dedicated to
joining Europe, none more so than David Cameron, who is using
the language and methods of Common Purpose against the
Conservative Party.
Conservative policy is to reform the EU from the inside
(renegotiation). We've been in it 34 years and failed to refom
this dictatorship one jot. Their policy is to continue this
complete failure, and they know this pretence is wholly
dishonest. You either submit to 100% of the EU or don't join it
at all; that is the only choice open to us.
Half a cheer for the Lib-Dems
They realise we're now living in what is legally a police state,
and speak out against it. We've been forced to harmonise our
laws with the EU during the 34 years we've been inside, and the
police state we're living in is the EU's. The Lib-Dems tell us
with stunning naivity its Labour's police state, don't seem to
realise the EU is behind it, and are still madly in favour of
the EU. Its no comfort that they will suffer for their
stupidity. Lately some Lib-Dem MP's have been talking about the
Tories pathetic "reform the EU" idea. Will they never learn?
With the Labour and Lib-Dem parties openly for Europe, and
the Conservative leadership secretly for it, its clear the three
parties will never give us a vote to leave the EU and keep our
nation. Massive civil disobedience, a permanent General Strike,
or a blockade of Westminster until MP's resign might be
effective.
The abolition of the Labour, Conservative and Lib-Dem
parties.
So sloppy have our politicians been in their reading of the EU
treaties, most haven't noticed that the EU will abolish our
Labour, Conservative and Lib-Dem parties. It was clear in the
Madrid 1999 party financing document, and it was re-stated in
the Constitution, clause I-46-4. Only pan European parties like
the EPP will be allowed. Some politicians, like Heseltine and
Ken Clarke, can't wait for this to happen.
A date for the abolition of Westminster has tactfully not
been given
Once the 6th treaty is signed, Westminster's remaining powers
are transferred to Brussels, and Westminster is left with the
powers of a county council. Except it won't have a county,
because they will be abolished under the Regionalisation plan.
The 9 EU regions report direct to Brussels, so Westminster will
be a county council without a county. Anyone with half a brain
can see Brussels will abolish Westminster, as it's only
potential use would be as a rallying point to challenge the
power of Brussels.
The Queen, Treason and the Coronation oath
Together with Churchill, King George VI saved our nation; he was
a Monarch to be proud of. But his daughter the Queen is the only
monarch to have broken her coronation oath, by signing these
five treaties that abolish our common law, the British
Constitution, the British and English nations, and our
sovereignty. She has also committed treason, together with
co-signatories Ted Heath, Margaret Thatcher, John Major and Tony
Blair.
Realising they stood a good chance of spending the rest of
their lives behind bars, Tony Blair and the Queen signed the
Crime and Disorder Act, 1998 (s36.3), which secretly abolished
much of the crime of treason - they didn't tell the MP's what
they had just voted for.
1.4 million British Servicemen gave their lives for our
independence. The Queen has thrown their sacrifices away and
made them worthless.
At no physical risk to herself, she could have fulfilled her
duty as a constitutional check and balance, by refusing to sign
the five treaties until an in/out referendum had been held. In
the unlikely event the vote went against her she might have lost
her crown (not her life or a limb), and kept her £9 billion plus
palaces. Those servicemen's lives would still have meant
something.
But she's dead keen to sign; she's already said she'll sign
the last treaty. Princes Charles, William or Harry can then
never be King. You can't have a King without a Kingdom: they can
only be princes of a region (principality) within Europe.
The Queen's aspirations are not ours; she clearly serves a
higher and darker master; the faith she defends cannot be the
one we think it is. King George VI must be turning over in his
grave.
The new EU Hitler doesn't have to get elected
Its worth noting that Adolf Hitler first had to get elected, if
on a 35% minority vote, and then get his Enabling Act passed. An
EU dictator has no such problems. Our EU rulers do not submit
themselves for election now. And the Queen has already signed
the Enabling Act (Civil Contingencies Act 2004).
The EU's Hitler will have a much easier rise to power, and
will have the formerly British and French nuclear weapons from
day one. Adolf Hitler killed 54 million people. The EU's
dictator could kill a billion at the touch of a button, with no
democratic checks and balances to answer to. How could any
aspiring dictator resist the EU opportunity?
.
Some revolutionary lyrics -
We're being fooled
again
A diagram of the parallel
EU Government
in the UK.
The wiring of the EU in Britain
EU subversion
of our Government.
A link to
ukip-plymouth.org.uk
Our other site: drjn.co.uk
Common Purpose,
training 18,000 of our new EU rulers at all levels of our
government now.
As a word doc.
The Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill 2006 -
government
doesn't need Parliament.
Cromwell had something similar in the 1680's. Is there anyone
out there who doesn't realise all the treaties and laws of a
dictatorship, and more, are now enacted? And that all it takes
is for a foreign power, the EU, to enforce them?
Do we want to be in Europe? Do we want to lose democratic
government, the nations of Britain and England, and all our
counties? Do we want to put ourselves in the EU, where we will
be at the mercy of any dictator who chooses to control us? Isn't
the answer obviously "No" ?
We can live again outside Europe
Outside the EU we can be a free and properly democratic nation.
Free from Europe we could stop half our government spending
being wasted, could save the £200 billion a year it costs us to
be in Europe, repeal all its 107,000 regulations, and stop
losing the £22 billion a year to Europe on our balance of
payments. With those vast savings we could easily pay all our
people a good living wage. According to the OECD we are the 4th
strongest economy amongst the world's 205 independent nations,
and we will make it handsomely.
We could leave the EU in 14 hours
The fastest an Act of Parliament has been drafted, passed by
Parliament and signed by the Monarch was the abdication of King
Edward 8th. It was done in 13.5 hours. We could repeal the 1972
European Communities Act and be out of Europe in just fourteen
hours, if our traiterous MP's, Prime Minister and Queen so
wished. So far they've illegally denied us the choice. We need
to change that, but we may only have two years left before the
final 6th treaty is signed.
Thank you. Please choose one of the six actions above and
complete it.
Questions? Call David Noakes: 07974 437 097
drjnoakesdel@yahoo.co.uk
but delete the three letters "del" -this is to stop automated
spam.
The Westminster News
Please donate to help us spread the word:
Paypal accepts credit cards.
The EU dictatorship: Poverty under a brutal police
state.
This is: http://eutruth.org.uk
Questions for
Bush.
This site is © Copyright David Noakes
1997-2007, All Rights Reserved, but permission to copy and
republish is granted. 07974 437 097.
|
|
*
www.noliberties.com
[Latest Addition - June07]
*
www.eutruth.org.uk
*
www.thewestminsternews.co.uk
*
www.speakout.co.uk
*
Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU
www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs
*
67%
want powers back from EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95%
of British people want a REFERENDUM
*
PETITION
FOR A
REFERENDUM
SIGN TODAY ON LINE
telegraph.co.uk/eureferendum
*
July 18-2007
VOTE
-2007
TO
LEAVE
THE
EUROPEAN
UNION
WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE
TO SET YOU
FREE
THE
UK
INDEPENDENCE PARTY
www.ukip.org
THE QUESTION THAT THE VOTER MUST
ANSWER
‘DO
YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE CORRUPT
,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND CORRUPT ALIEN BUSYBODY BRUSSELS’
-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?
*
TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE
TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER
BUT
SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS
WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.
*
ONLY
PRO-PORTIONAL
REPRESENTATION
WILL
BRING
DEMOCRACY
BACK
TO
THE
ENGLISH
PEOPLE
*
Home Rule for
Scotland
WHY
NOT
HOME
RULE
for
ENGLAND
*
[All underlined words have a separate
bulletin]
MAY/07
