The Soul of England-Part 2

 

*

[ Before you read the following we remind you that there are a few home-truths of the English race which are explored by some of our own and others beyond our moat -many who gleefully harangue us. Some are good and many not so good but we have no reason to be unduly concerned unless you are Jessa Jowel because in the main we are a practical rather than a logical people and have ‘an understanding heart , rather than an understanding head’

 

Part 2

highlights many matters of which many of us are familiar no doubt by recent attempts by the Blair Government to make us CONTINENTALS.

Part 3 - to follow includes a statement by historian Elie Halevy that:

 

‘In Samuel Johnson -Englishmen love and honour a perfect representative of the national character with its sturdy independence, high-minded rectitude and robust common sense.

 

Equally typical in their different ways, are Wordworth, Tennyson. And Browning; We cannot imagine any of these a Frenchman or a German, that Wordsworth is, or is to be, the true national poet of

 

ENGLAND

 

* *

 

The stoicism of the Englishman in pain and trouble has been noted by so many observers, [1926], that we may admit it as a national trait. [Health and Safety regulations in 2006 may certainly change this image in certain instances today and in the future]

 

Mr Page, the American Ambassador in London during the Great War, was greatly impressed by the dignity and self-restraint shown by English mourners of both sexes, who repressed all eternal signs of the grief, which they were feeling.

[Many Englishmen alive today who lived though the 2nd World War can confirm that it was so then -as an American Ambassador of that time would have also confirmed]

 

[Mr Page] also said (not in this case from personal observation) that the English soldier dies silently in hospital “as if he had a secret with his Maker,” whereas the continental soldier, equally gallant in action, weeps when he is told that his wounds are mortal.

 

This stoicism is an aristocratic quality, but it is found in all classes. All Englishmen feel that, especially in the presence of foreigners, they must allow no signs of weakness to escape them,

 

The well-known story of The Private of the Buffs, who was offered his life if he would kow- tow to a Chinese mandarin, and preferred to die, though his Indian fellow-captives made no difficulty about prostrating themselves according to the manner of the country, is characteristic.

References to the gluttony of the English are very common from the earliest time. Higden, who lived in 1350, say of them:

 

“They woneth to gluttony more than other men, and are more costly in meat and drink [Reminder to Jessa Jowel in 2006] and clothing.”

 

William of Malmesbury mentions the heavy drinking of the English at the time of the Conquest. Sorbiere, a Frenchman, in the reign of Charles II, reports that

 

“the English may be easily brought to anything, provided you fill their bellies, let them have FREEDOM of SPEECH, and do not bear too hard upon their lazy temper.”

 

Leo von Rozmital, a Bohemian Baron, visited ENGLAND in 1466, and attended the banquet after the churching of Queen Elizabeth Woodville. He reports that

 

“the women and maids who served the Queen at table knelt as long as she ate nigh three hours. (Sie ass bei drein Stunden.)

 

The northern races have always been heavy eaters, and the comparative prosperity which our Island enjoyed from early times no doubt increased the temptation to over-indulgence.

 

The richer classes have always gorged themselves with flesh till within living memory, and there is still [1926] much gluttony in the middle class, especially in the north of ENGLAND.

 

The poor were formerly unable to get much butcher’s meat, except at certain times of the year; but the importation of frozen meat has made a great difference in their diet. Flesh-eating twice or even three times a day is no longer regarded as a luxury for the few.

 

In the time of the TUDORS, [1485-1603] the baronial breakfast was a Gargantuan meal. A Northumberland house-book of 1512 assigns to my lord and lady a daily provision at breakfast, of a quart of beer and a quart of wine, and since it was Lent, salt fish, herrings, and sprats. On flesh days half a chine of mutton or a chine of boiled beef was provided. This fare would have satisfied

Homer’s Achaeans.

 

Another interesting foreign criticism is that of Muralt, a Swiss, whose Lettres sur les Anglais belong to the end of the seventeenth century. He says that the ENGLISH are a good-natured people, very rich, and so well nourished that they sometimes die of obesity. They hate cruelty so much that it is ordained by Royal Proclamation that the fish and ducks in the ponds shall be properly fed.

 

And yet they allow the prisoners in their gaols to die of hunger. “The great cruelty of the English lies in permitting evil rather than doing it.”

 

Our country has unquestionably taken the lead in forbidding and reprobating cruelty to animals, and it is interesting to find that this characteristic was already observable more than two hundred years ago.

 

It is part of modern ethics, a duty which has become more obvious since Darwin taught us that lower animals, as we call them, are literally our distant cousins. The obligation is universally acknowledged and usually observed in Protestant countries, though the popularity of field sports has hitherto resisted protests which in principle seem to be justified; in southern Europe public opinion on this subject is still pre-Darwinian. It is frequently even denied that the lower animals have any rights.

 

Neglect of prisoners, and harsh treatment of them, were a blot upon civilisation long after the time Muralt wrote; But it is not certain that the condition of prisons was worse in England than on the Continent. Professor Trevelyan, however, thinks that at one time we had a bad pre -eminence in this respect.

 

It is well known that the sober and undifferentiated dress of men is quite a modern institution. It is nor really democratic, since an old or badly made suit of clothes is a more humiliating sign of poverty that the earlier distinctive dress of the ploughman, carter, or apprentice.

 

Modern male dress has the further disadvantages of being ugly, expensive, and wasteful of time.

 

In the Middle Ages foreigners were struck by the ostentation, which Englishmen showed in their dress, each class imitating the class above.

 

In England, it was said,

 

“a yeoman arrayeth himself as a squire, a squire as a knight, a knight as a duke, and a duke as a king.’

Even the peasant women, van Meteren says (1558-1612), wore gloves, as the ladies of the Court do in Holland and Germany.

 

He adds that they put on their best clothes for a journey, contrary to the practice in other nations. This curious habit still prevails in the lower middle class.

 

Frederick, Duke of Wurtemberg, in 1592 found the Londoners

 

“magnificently apparelled and extremely proud and overbearing”

 

Male dress was perhaps most becoming under the Plantagenets, most sumptuous under the Tudors.

 

There was not, however, much difference in this respect between France and England, except that the middle-class Englishman could afford better clothes than the corresponding class in France.

 

Shakespeare speaks of the carelessness and strangeness of an Englishman’s apparel, as it might have appeared to a cultivated Venetian; but I have not come upon any contemporary foreign criticisms to the same effect.

 

In quite modern times it is well known that the French accuse us, and especially our women of lack of artistic sense in dress. In men’s dress, however, we set the fashions.

The laziness of our race was often noticed by foreigners and without much contradiction till the industrial revolution altered the habits of the people.

 

In the nineteenth century, it is true, French observers reported that the English “work fiercely”, but the older habits have now reasserted themselves, and it cannot be questioned that the average Englishman at present has no taste for the untiring, laborious diligence of the Germans, or the parsimonious thrift of the French (1926).

 

Economic heresies may have something to do with the prevalent restriction of output; but the American or German worker could not be induced to fritter away half his working hours.

 

Laziness is a vice, which we share with natives of some hot countries, but with no other northern Europeans. It is, of course, by no means confined to the labouring class, nor does it apply by any means to all trades.

 

Some French visitors have complained of our rudeness and arrogance; others who have been led to expect these qualities have affirmed that we do not deserve the censure.

 

They have added very truly that

“the English do not trouble themselves much about us when they do not know us.”

 

There are good-mannered and bad-mannered people in every country. But there is no doubt that there was great brutality of manners in the north of England even a hundred years ago.

 

Novels like Wuthering Heights are evidence of this. Nor can it reasonably be denied that in the half-century after Waterloo, a sort of insular pride which had been noticeable in the eighteenth century took an offensive form.

 

Underbred Englishmen and Englishwomen gave us a bad name on the Continent, and even Punch, which is one of our most valued national possessions, sometimes echoed the insolence towards other nations which made Lord Palmerston popular at home and very odious abroad.

 

It was an old complaint, for Froissart says that

“Englishmen are so proud that they set store by no nation except their own”; and even Defoe says that the English are

“ the most churlish people alive to foreigners, so that all men think an Englishman the devil.”

 

Goldsmith’s lines:

“Pride in their port, defiance in their eye, we see the lords of human kindness pass by,” have often been quoted against us.

 

It would be easy to find examples of boastful language in earlier times, as when Milton calmly asserts that if God has some unusually difficult task on hand, He gives it to an Englishman to carry out.

 

Our pride has always been mixed with pious gratitude. “The English,” said Mark Twain, “are mentioned in the Bible:

 

“The meek-spirited shall possess the earth.”

[J.R.] Seely speaks of the “kind of Deuteronomic people.” Which we made for ourselves in the nineteenth century; as a reward for pour moral superiority our trade went up and our National Debt diminished.

 

But the most amusing piece of brag is the utterance of Sir R Wingfield in the reign of Henry VIII.

“As the English nation has always surpassed the French in valour and good faith, so it cannot be judged inferior to it in antiquity or dignity, or in size of its territory (!) or in learning and capacity.”

 

Shakespeare too is not afraid of some full-blooded boasting, but in such passages he usually observes dramatic propriety. Patriotic poetry must be judged leniently, except when it stimulates hatred against national rivals.

 

These examples of arrogance seem to living Englishmen to belong to a past age, and we resent having them brought up against us as if they are characteristic of England of our day.

 

We are conscience of having been in a chastened temper since the Boer War, which revealed to us the insecurity of our position and the jealousy of foreign powers.

 

We have indeed been struggling against paralysing attacks of pessimism, which we half put aside rather by an effort of will than from intellectual conviction.

 

Pride and arrogance are the last faults, which we think could be rightly charged against us at present. And yet we find that these same old charges are still heard, and from Americans, of whom the Continental press justly remarked at the time of the Venezuela crisis: [In 2006 -the America foreign policy is again in a similar crisis]

 

“America can now give the English a lesson in arrogance and brutality.”

 

The American notion that the English are arrogant may be chiefly an inherited prejudice dating back to the days of [Lord] Palmerston or even earlier; but it is probably in part due to the fact that we are not accustomed to be accosted by strangers without an introduction, and instinctively repel such a liberty by stiffness of manner.

 

In any case, the accusation is no longer true, and we need not trouble ourselves about it. All that remains of our former pride is a wholesome indifference to the opinions of foreign nations, which we find to be generally ill-informed and frequently biased.

 

There are several other legends about our national character, which are not worth discussing at length.

 

It is an old joke, after Froissart. That we take our pleasures sadly; this could hardly be affirmed of the masses today. On the other hand “merry England” probably only meant that England is a pleasant country to live in, though it may possibly be taken from Henry of Huntingdon, De Praerogativis Angliae:

 

Anglia plena locis, gens libera, digna iocari.

 

English humour has been a national characteristic from Chaucer to Dickens. It is a good-natured appreciation of the little absurdities and incongruities of life, which cause no amusement to a sour or over anxious temper.

 

The French have been fond of dwelling on the proneness of Englishmen to commit suicide. A French writer, Pierre Jean Grosley (about 1770), informs his countrymen that great precautions are taken to block up the approaches to the Thames, lest the sight of water tempt passers-by to drown themselves.

 

“Yet what precautions can prevent those who are resolved to die from carrying their resolve into effect?

That it is impossible to prevent this mischief I am convinced by the shocking sight of twenty skulls found in the bed of the Thames, where the foundations of a new bridge were being dug.”

 

Even Englishmen shared this delusion. Young, in his famous Night Thoughts wrote:

 

O Britain, infamous for suicide!

In ambient waves plunge thy polluted head

Wash the dire stain. Nor shock the Continent.

 

Vital statistics have finally destroyed this legend.

 

It is indeed true that barbarous peoples seldom commit suicide; it is a habit of civilized races and classes. But our country has no bad pre-eminence in this dubious result of culture.

 

Our suicide rate, while higher than that of Ireland, is much lower tha that of the militarised nations of the Continent [1929]. The number of suicides culminates, I believe in Saxony. The practice of carrying arms increases the number of suicides, as well as the number of homicides.

 

Our enemies have constantly accused us of “perfidy” and “hypocrisy.” We might fairly ask on what occasions we have been perfidious, for our accusers seldom condescend to be explicit.

 

Our diplomacy has generally been straightforward, [Not in Blairland 1997-2006] if judged by the low standard, which prevails in international relations.

 

No deep-laid Machiavellian plots can justly be laid to our charge. [Until Tony Blair ruled in England]

 

Indeed our frequent changes of GOVERNMENT would make any consistent foreign policy, and above all a secret and crafty foreign policy difficult.

 

[That is WHY -Tony Blair needed to return to OFFICE. Not once -Not twice - but on a third occasion in order to achieve his Machiavellian objectives? This is WHY the EDP have campaigned for PR-Proportional Representation and in forbidding any MP from sitting in the Commons for more than one TERM at a time and may be considered by the electorate for return after the next TERM to allow fresh blood into Parliament so that no clique can make the Commons their OWN]

 

*

 

We have been fortunate [Again we must remind the viewer that we are talking about 1926 not 2006], and our simple methods have sometimes succeeded in thwarting the much more subtle calculations of our rivals.

 

Other nations have ascribed this success to superior cunning, disguised under a clock of innocence, and so the think they have a ground of hypocrisy.

 

The expressionless face of an Englishman, and his apparent want of interest in serious subjects, undoubtedly encouraged the Central European Powers to underrate our intellect and energy. Some of them have complained that we deceived them about ourselves, to their own undoing.

 

[Is not this happening today in 2006 and for the past 35 years about the EEC -but really a

 

United States of Europe.

 

Our politicians tricked the people in 1972 about their future and it is no wonder the former founders of the EU can’t understand WHY even in 2006 there is still great opposition in England to their SLAVERY in Europe. They didn’t understand the English mind they only took notice of the TRAITORS who wished to SELL OUR Country.]

 

Mr Wicham Steed, who has an almost unrivalled knowledge of Continental peoples, says very truly:

 

“There are few people in the world whose acts are more constantly sincere than those of Englishmen.’

 

[No wonder the politicians in Europe are confused when they deal with TRAITORS to their country like Tony Blair and his cronies in Parliament and in the population at large. The damage that Blair -Straw and his many idiots have done to the prestige and diplomacy in good faith of our nation will be a stain we will have to bear for some time in the future.]

 

To continue:

 

[Mr Wickham Steed]

 

But he proceeds to say, Englishmen act from instinct [good-feeling] and not from logic; and in this way they often appear inconsistent. The English have, he says, an understanding heart rather than an undrstanding head. Perhaps, however, the distinction is not so much between instinct and intellect, or between heart and head, as between the logical and the practical reason.

 

A nation which has been “in business” for centuries believes in a “deal” with concessions on both sides, as usually the best way of composing a quarrel; and we think we have observed that the only irreparable mistakes are those which are made by consistant intellectuals or strict logicians. Debelius, in his admirable book on

 

England

 

-sees the truth.

 

“ The man of power who breaks down in the attempt to make possible the impossible does not occur in English history.” (p.497).

“Non-English nations are apt to see nothing but Machiavellian cunning harnessing the world’s idealism to England’s triumphal car. Such judgments over looks the fact that purely idealistic movements, rare in the world we live in, are only too constantly forced to make terms, and very unexhilerating terms at that, with the world’s political, economic, and egotistic forces” (p.106)

 

With so much more to follow we shall draw to a close with a few home truths.

 

“The English,” said Mr Bonar Law, ‘are a generous race. I can say that, for I am not an Englishman. They have a magnanimity which goes always with consciousness of strength.”

 

An Englishman is simply unable to comprehend the brooding hatred of the

Irishman, which has no better ground than that Cromwell exercised the laws of war somewhat severely against the Irish rebels, and that William III won the battle of the Boyne. The detestable crime of political assassination has been conspicuously rare in England…

 

The words “fair play” and “playing the game,” are often in an Englishman’s mouth. There are rules to be observed in all rivalry, and limits beyond which even animosity must not be carried out.

[Tony Blair and his cronies have been playing their own game over the last nine years so there may be some adjustment needed in 2006 to the above statement.]

END of PART 2

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used-comments in brackets]

APRIL/06

 

 

*

FROM

A Prime Minister in 1848

to another

Gordon Brown in June 2007

Over a Hundred and Fifty Seven years ago a great patriotic Prime Minister -Foreign Secretary -Lord Palmerstone (Henry John Temple) -beloved by his People defined the principle of nationality as follows:

 

“ Providence meant mankind to be divided into separate nations, and for this purpose countries have been bounded by natural barriers, and races of men have been distinguished by separate languages, habits, manners, dispositions, and characters…” (1848)

 

“…We have in the first place to say that the Business of an English Government, is to pursue that course of Foreign Policy which on the whole they may think right; and not to attempt the impossible task of at all times and upon all subjects doing that which is agreeable to all Foreign Governments. A man who in private life attempts to please everyone, invariably fails; and the Government of a great country would not be more successful in such an endeavour…

. It must at times be an advantage to a foreign Prince…in the present state of the continent to visit England and to see with his own eyes, how Liberty may be combined with Loyalty, Freedom with public order, and how the Respect which is shown by the Crown for the Rights of the Subject and for the enactment of the Law produces corresponding Feelings on the Part of the People and inspires them with similar Respect for the Rights of the Crown and for the Laws which secure the Liberties and the Property of all , from the highest to the lowest in the Land. ”

 

For a full statement of his Principles:

 

“I hold with respect to alliances that England is a Power sufficiently strong, sufficiently powerful to steer her own course, and not to tie herself as an unnecessary appendage to the policy of any other Government. I hold that the real policy of England-apart from questions which involve her own particular interests, political or commercial-is to be the champions of justice and right, pursuing that course with moderation and prudence, not becoming the Quixote of the world, but giving the weight of her moral sanction and support wherever she thinks that justice is, and wherever she thinks wrong has been done…

 

It is a narrow policy to suppose that this country or that is to be marked out as the eternal ally or the perpetual enemy of England. We have no eternal enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow.” [In 1848 Lord Palmerstone was Foreign Secretary at the age of sixty-three. He entered Parliament in 1807- Secretary at War in 1809; 1811-28 (most years) War Office; 1830- 1852 Foreign Office; 1852-55 -Home Office; 1855-65.

 

‘ Born 1784 in Park Street Westminster. Family home ‘Broadlands’ Hampshire. Died on the morning of October 18, 1865. And the last candle [last of his contempories] of the Eighteenth century was out.’

 

* *

 

[It is significant that the word ‘England’ was not a word despised in our House of Commons during the time of this great patriot of England and only closer to our own times has the word Britain taken its place though we do detect a slight revival now in existence. ]

 

* *

*

 FINALLY REMEMBER!!!

 

*DID YOU KNOW? The City of London is governed by the Illuminati-Freemasons and they are governed by their god Lucifer/Satan. The Bank of England owns the Central Banks established around the world, and this is the real power of the modern British Empire. One example is the United States Federal Reserve Bank , which is wholly owned by the Bank of England and her subsidiaries. Thus the world has been enslaved by the Illuminati-Free-Mason conspiracy which exacts her tribute through interest on their various currencies. "Historically all British military colonies with white populations such as Australia, New Zealand, Canada and South Africa were under the authority of the Queen and her Government. Whereas all other brown 'slave' colonies such as India, Egypt, Bermuda, Malta, Singapore, Hong Kong, Gibraltar and the African nations were the private property of the Crown, which is the separate board of the City of London. These colonies were exploited for slave labor and trade, to make the cartels richer and more powerful." "The Crown" has nothing to do with the Queen. It is a private corporation led by the Illuminati. (See: +(1)+(1)+(1) ZIONISM VERSUS BOLSHEVISM -A struggle for the soul of the Jewish People by the Rt.Hon. Winston S. Churchill-written in 1920   AUGUST - 2010

 

 

 

Q&A: The Lisbon Treaty-2008 Leaders of the European Union's 27 member states meet in Portugal this week to sign what will now become known as the Lisbon Treaty.   * The abolition of Britain by The Reform Treaty - Second Reading-Passed by majority of 138 * Veteran parliamentarian TONY BENN speaks of the absolute necessity of a REFERENDUM HEAR HIM ON http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I-ZdvQz1o *

 

 

 

*

The abolition of Britain
by The Reform Treaty
- Passed by majority of 138

The abolition of Britain by The Reform Treaty - Passed by majority of 138 MPs voted by 362 - 224 for the Reform Treaty in its Second Reading on Monday 21st January. This sixth and final treaty, now renamed the Lisbon Treaty, formally replaces Britain with the European Union on 1st January 2009. This is a year before the deadline set by the Chancellor of Germany, Angela Merkel. The Treaty will abolish the British Constitution, and therefore the nations of Britain and England, sweeping away our Westminster Parliament, and giving the EU the power to close it. The Treaty sets up an unelected three tier politburo executive in Brussels with absolute power, a dictatorship on the soviet model. The EU parliament has no power and is a sham. Read the Reform Treaty one page summary on the left. Gordon Brown was lying: the Treaty is worse than the constitution. This sixth treaty is the fastest moving and most secret the EU has drafted; opposition to and recognition of the EU as a police state is growing, and they know speed is vital. This Commons vote, one of the most important in our history, was largely unreported by our controlled press and media.   The Queen and Parliament to complete ratification this spring, 2008 Parliament has allocated 29 days to discuss this treaty in February (not much for its own abolition). They will probably have the final ratification vote in March. The Queen, the EU's most loyal supporter, plans to give her Royal Assent in June 2008. This means Westminster and the Queen will ratify it behind our backs, as they have the other five treaties.   No referendum German Chancellor Merkel chose this sixth Treaty instead of pushing it through as a constitution to avoid referendums in its member nations. She twice visited 10 Downing Street and forced Gordon Brown to cancel both his promised referendum, and his General Election. "Anti-EU" groups have encouraged us to call for a referendum precisely because the EU has already prohibited it. They know we are wasting our efforts: our four party leaderships take their orders from the EU, not from the voters.   How to fight The real course of action is to change the minds of 70 MP's and get a majority against. MP's have been selected on the Party list system over the last 20 years to ensure an obediant majority of pro-EU MPs. These MPs now need to understand the EU has the constitution (the six treaties) of a dictatorship, the laws of a police state, and when enforced, its 111,000 regulations will create a government command economy, soviet style: dictatorships cause poverty. They also need to realise that MPs are the people who put this dictatorship in power. If they put it in power, they are the greatest threat to take it out of power. All dictatorships in the past have eliminated that threat. Inside the EU, the lives of MPs will be even worse than our own; at best, they are likely to be institutionalised and held against their will. (This is the only good bit - these hated traitors will suffer severely.) Visit your MP in his surgery NOW and explain this. (Instructions top left)     The EU remains illegal Each of these six treaties are completely illegal under the British Constitution, our 1689 Bill of Rights, our treason laws, and under our common law. It is unforgivable that the Queen, her Ministers and our Parliament have committed the criminal act of treason by signing these treaties, and broken our laws to abolish our nation. The EU will always be illegal in Britain; but once the EU has complete power and control here, we can no more get rid of it than we could Germany, had their planned illegal occupation of Britain in 1940 been successful.   The Countdown to abolition Whereas the 465 page EU Constitution would have abolished the five treaties and replaced them with a single document conferring absolute power, the Reform Treaty adds to the existing five treaties, bringing them up to the powers of the EU Constitution. All six treaties with appendices add up to nearly 10,000 complex and unreadable pages. Tony Blair agreed to it on 23rd June 2007 as his final stab in Britain’s back. On the 23rd July there was an Intergovernmental Conference (IGC), when we should have seen a first draft of the Treaty. Foreign ministers agreed its terms on 7-8th September at the resort of Viana de Castelo, Portugal. There was a summit in Lisbon on the 18th and 19th October, where they hoped to sign the Treaty, but Gordon Brown signed it on December 13th 2007, commiting treason, the most criminal act on the statute book. The EU has decided to act now as if the Treaty were already in force; they are consolidating their power each day. On 1.1.2009 the Reform Treaty and the other five seize all remaining power from our Westminster Parliament, which becomes defunct on that day; it has no remaining powers whatsoever. (The Treaties do allow Brussels to return minor powers, but that is very unlikely.) On 11th June 2009 we have bogus elections to the sham Brussels Parliament, the only elections we will get in the future. Westminster's five year term expires on 5th May 2010 and a British General Election is due. The six treaties make no provision for an election to our Parliament. By that time the EU will have consolidated its absolute power, and it will almost certainly use it cancel that election and to close Westminster. The EU has always planned to rule what was Britain directly through its 12 nominated Regional capitals, by passing Westminster, from which every function will be removed. Its founders knew the EU dictatorship cannot be built while there is a strong and freedom loving Britain on its doorstep. They tried twice before in 1914 and 1939. Britian has to be utterly destroyed for the EU to succeed. The success of the EU's Frankfurt School subversion techniques on Britain (see left) has been astonishing; the abolition of Westminster is one of their final remaining goals.   You have 11 months left Treason is the most serious of all Britain’s crimes. You have just 11 months left to bring these vile British traitors to justice, and get us out of the EU dictatorship. Around 45 million British people are against the abolition of our nation, and with the little European voting that has been allowed, it seems clear over 200 million of its victims don’t want the EU. But we will never be given the choice. YOU have to decide to act yourself. There are ways to stop the EU - see "Your Campaigns" on the left. Then we will need a mass blockade of Westminster to stop our criminal MP's and Queen breaking our constitution and laws for the last time. Copy of the EU's Timetable at the BBC. Original 2009 article from German Parliament -.pdf for download Then check it at the German Parliament here

 

Campaigns: Print these .pdf's: One or two pages each.

   Your Campaigns

   Ten EU truths

   Reform Treaty one page

   50 reasons to leave

   EUtruth flier

   Common Purpose

   Abolition of Councillors

   Abolition of 48 Counties

   Map: the 9 EU regions

   Transnational regions


   Reform Treaty full text

   EU Constitution, one page pdf
   EU Constitution: one page html

   Signs of EU police state

   The EU's degraded our lives

   What will the EU be like?

   List of British traitors

   Beef up the British Constitution

   Lib Lab Con: One Party State

   The Queen

   The EU's Hitler

   The EU costs £200 billion pa

   The dictatorship: Quotes

   UK > EU handover of power.

   EU subversion diagram.

   Subversion: Common Purpose

   Frankfurt subversion.

   The terrorism deception

   Abolition of our 48 counties

   Abolition of Parliament.

   Church flier

   Some revolutionary lyrics

   drjn.co.uk - copy of this site

   The Westminster News

   The Devonport Column

   The Cornish Free Press

   The British Free Press

   Government disinformation


   Mobilisation talk

   Blueprint to get out

   SS child snatching

   Wood's rigged elections

   Stood for the leadership

Where we are now: 1. Since 1972 The Queen has illegally signed five of the six EU Treaties. 2. The five treaties define and build the EU as an unelected dictatorship. 3. The EU's laws, passed by Westminster, give it the powers of a police state. 4. The sixth EU treaty will complete the abolition of Britain as a nation     - the Queen is due to sign it this year. A foreign power, the EU, will then rule us, and enforce the laws of a police state. Shouldn't we repeal the 1972 European Communities Act now before we are imprisoned permanently inside? We've only got till July 2008. Please fight the campaigns at the top of the menu on the left.   The leaderships of the Conservative, Labour and Lib Dem parties have been controlled by the European Union for two decades. It is the EU agenda they implement in Parliament, not your wishes, which is why your vote doesn't count. Our controlled press and media haven't reported it, but Britain would have been abolished in November 2006 if the French and Dutch hadn't voted down the EU Constitution. Instead a sixth and final Treaty will now be signed; after which EU Commissioners will have the power to impose the Constitution (and the Euro) on us, and enforce the laws of a police state.   5. Thirty three years inside the EU - have you noticed how our democracy is being withdrawn? The EU has already denied us that most basic of human rights - the right to vote against the EU and to keep our own nation. A majority of us don't want to be in the EU. We are being forced in against our will. Do you feel you've become powerless, unable to influence events, or your vote is worth less? The six treaties have been gradually removing our democracy; for thirty years our laws have been "harmonised" with the EU; 80% of the laws now passed by our Parliament are EU laws, not ours. Isn't the real reason people have lost interest in politics precisely because the EU has taken away our ability to change things? Common law, where the government was our servant, is now largely replaced by the EU's Corpus Juris, which puts the government above the law, and we don't participate. We have already lost most of our rights (including habeas corpus). The power of government grows unchecked, as does that of large corporations. Politicians continuously lie about the EU, pretending its not significant. 6. Massive EU corruption The EU's auditors have found the fraud is so widespread they've refused to sign off the EU's accounts for each of the last ten years. Whistleblowers like Marta Andreason, the EU Budget Director, who in 2005 found the EU couldn't account for 95% of its £66 billion budget, are simply fired for telling the truth. 7.The bribing of our Politicians by the EU Europe works by bribing politicians with huge salaries and expenses to vote for Europe, against the best interests of their own voters. As a result all three parties are in favour of the EU - Westminster acts like a one party state of politicians: the Lib-Lab-Con. The parties are run top down and implement the policy of their leaderships, not that of their members. (unfortunately UKIP is run in the same way). If you have voted for the Labs, Cons or Lib-Dems since 1969, you have voted for the EU dictatorship. 8. EU corruption is now exploding through our Civil Service, our local government, and our 7,000 quangos. A shadow EU government lives inside our bureaucracy, headquartered in the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM.) It includes many parts of government including the RDA and the Regional Assemblies. Common Purpose, an EU organisation, the UK branch also headquartered in the ODPM, has members across many government organisations including some city and county councils, the Land Registry, the police and the NHS, which it is destroying from within. Common Purpose is the glue that enables fraud to be committed across these government departments, most of it lining the pockets of politicians and bureaucrats. It often involves the sale of public assets such as land to friends of politicians or their businesses. (The RDA -The EU Regional Development Agency, is a major player in this type of fraud.) And the handing out of plum government non jobs with big salaries and expenses to members of Common Purpose, all of it involving the theft of our money as taxpayers. The Chief Executive Officer of Common Purpose is Julia Middleton of the ODPM. 9. Businesses closing under EU regulation The EU's 111,000 regulations, when fully enforced, will transform Britain from a free market economy into a Soviet style command economy, closing hundreds of thousands more businesses. They will also control our personal lives far more closely than were those of Soviet citizens. (In a Parliamentary answer to Lord Stoddart in January 2003, the government admitted there were 101,811 EU regulations, growing at 3,500 pa). The cost of Britain's 8,500 quangoes is £124 billion a year, and they raise an additional £40 billion from us in charges, according to the Cabinet Office. The Public Bodies Directory 2006 describes only 882 of them. Most exist to enforce EU regulations; nearly all should be closed. 10. The EU costs us £200 billion pa, 20% of our economy According to the government's Better Regulation Task Force Annual Report 2005 (Introduction written by Tony Blair,) complying with EU regulations now costs our economy over £100 billion a year. By far the largest treasury expense is now the £167 billion spent on the EU's 8,500 quangos, (Cabinet Office figures) most of which enforce EU regulation. This is patronage, bribery, putting thousands of officials and influential businessment on £100,000 - £300,000 a year salaries. That's why the Exchequer is so desperate for cash and can't pay for the navy, nurses, students etc. Economists say we lose £80 billion pa by associating with the EU's inferior economies. The EU took our fishing industry, which costs us £5 billion pa. EU damage to other industries (like forcing us to close the Rover Car Co) a further £20 billion. Our EU contribution is a relatively minor £10 billion, the only bit the Press discuss. Before we joined the EU we had an even balance of trade with them. Now EU regulations have fixed it so we lose £30 billion year trading with the EU on our balance of payments. We'd be enormously more wealthy if we left. The main use of taxes is now to finance government and its greedy whirlpool of waste; they've doubled in real terms in the 33 years we've been in the EU. There's less money in the economy left for wages, creating a growing underclass who can't make ends meet. 11. Our counties to be abolished The Queen signed the 1992 Maastricht Treaty, which adopts the EU Regionalisation Plan. This will abolish England's 48 counties and replace them with 9 European regions, each with their own Regional Capital, which reports directly to Brussels, not to Westminster. This effectively obliterates the country of England. For example the County of Cornwall is replaced by the South West Region, which stretches from Lands End and includes Gloucestershire and Wiltshire; its regional capital is Exeter. As this move is unpopular it is being kept low-key and will not be implemented until the sixth treaty is signed, when we lose our right to object. 12. The deliberate destruction of our standards and way of life, From Sunday trading, where large stores force staff to work Sundays for derisory pay - or they don't get a job, to the deliberate undermining of the family and teachers, to sex education for the under 13's, to children being given obscene homework, its all traceable via our compliant government back to the EU over the last 34 years, as it sucessfully implemented the subversion of the Frankfurt School. While inside atheist Europe, British Christianity has almost died out; safety on our streets and a great chunk of civilised life has left with it. 13. The EU has controlled our immigration since 1997 In January 2007 on the front page of The Westminster News we forecast 1.5 million immigrants for the year, and people laughed at us. On January 24th 2008 the Daily Express published government figures of 1.3 million Polish immigrants alone for 2007. With Romania and Hungary joining in that year the total was probaly double that. The Amsterdam Treaty handed control of our immigration to the EU. 30,000 a year used to arrive - the EU's increased it by 60 times That's why house prices have been screaming up, even though the population of original British people is falling. Politicians and huge corporations like immigration - with thousands of immigrants available on low pay, they can impose the minimum wage on millions. Politicians then lie that they can't get British workers to do dirty jobs. The truth is they won't offer a decent wage, and cynically use immigrants to drive wages down, adding to the huge underclass. The Government pretends there are a maximum of 145,000 immigants annually, and 1.5 million new houses will be needed to house them. But then Jack Straw admits that 2.6 million immigrants applied to stay here last year. Our infrastructure and services can't stand such huge numbers and is breaking down in some cities, where English people are becoming a 10% minority. But the EU controls it, not the Foreign secretary, and he has no power, no options but to do as EU policy dictates, and accept it. Michael Howard was lying on the 24th January 2005 when he said he'd fix immigration - as Prime Minister, he'd have had no control over it whatsoever. Immigration hurts our existing immigrants first - new immigrants move into their areas, decreasing the wages and increasing the pressure on housing. If the sixth Treaty is signed, we lose our right to withdraw and Britain ceases to be a nation. Like the other six, it only requires two signatures: the Prime Ministers, and the Queen's

Examples of how our lives have degraded since we've been in the EU: In the EU, (which means in Britain) government is above the law. The EU's corpus juris now pervades right through our legal system. A policeman was let off by magistrates this year (2005) for driving his private car at 159 mph in Ludlow, Shrops. Under Corpus Juris the government are above the law and cannot be prosecuted The judge ruled correctly under EU law. 45,000 police officers got off speed cameras in this way in 2004, although their speeding killed 44 innocent people. (Daily Mail 27.12.05.) EU "monitoring Officers" have the right to dismiss our Councillors. The Local Government Act of 2000 empowered the head of the EU government in England, the Office of the Deputy Prime Minster (ODPM) to appoint a monitoring officer to spy on every council. If an elected councillor disagrees with the EU or government line, the unelected "Standards Board for England" can suspend him for up to five years. An example is in Cambridgeshire, where the ODPM has threatened cllr Alex Riley with suspension if he attends any debate discussing the ODPM's plans to build a new town of 20,000 people called Nothstowe on his ward. The ODPM has the conflict of interest here; but its powers are becoming absolute. We have lost the right to freedom The EU arrest warrant (signed by the Queen on 18th November 2003) allows us to be arrested without charge and held indefinitely with no right to see a solicitor, make a phone call, or even a right to a trial. You can simply disappear. Under the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act (SOCPA) 2005, we can now be arrested and held in the cells by any police officer for any petty offence, like dropping litter. Before it had to be an offense that carried a 5 year jail term. This also applies to all of the EU's 107,000 regulations. Do you know them all? The Civil Contingences Act 2004 allows government to confiscate anything you possess permanently; you have no right to object. This includes your house. It also gives government the right to forceably move its population around to different locations; you can be left with no place to call your own and live like a refugee. The only check and balance here is a Minister just needs to utter the words "This is a national emergency." If a demonstration or strike government doesn't like is being organised, they can cut off all communications in a town - phones, mobiles, the internet, TV, and block all access to that town including closing roads and railways. It has all the powers and more of Hitler's Enabling Act of 1933. We have lost the right to free speech At the Labour Party conference the police held an 82 year old man, Walter Woolfgang, and denied him access to the conference under the EU's "anti terrorist" legislation because he had shouted the word "nonsense" at Jack Straw, who was speaking about Iraq. Terrified the true nature of the laws they have passed on behalf of the EU was escaping too early, the Labour Party stopped the police and begged the man to return to conference. On October 25th 2005 Miss Maya Evans was arrested under the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005, for a lone protest at the Cenotaph by reading out the names of the 97 British soldiers killed in the Iraq war. She was arrested by no less than 14 police officers and found guilty at Bow Street Magistrates Court on the 8th December 2005. Would you hand over our nation, to be ruled by a foreign power, with oppressive laws like these, ? That's what's happening. We have lost the right to protest These laws make protest very difficult; if we did hold a General Strike and blockade Westminster it would now require some bravery: the powers the EU has demanded from our government enable it to respond in a way similar to the Chinese government's in Tiaanamen Square should it so wish. It is no coincidence that since 2004, all MP's offices in Westminster are guarded by police with machine guns, inside and out. The Governments "terrorism" deception All these new EU laws, including massive "anti terrorism" acts (recently 2000, 2001, 2005) were passed with the pretence they were only directed at terrorists, or in the case of Asbos, ruffians who terrorise the streets. In each case they are used far more often against ordinary law abiding people, particularly to suppress dissent. (91% of those detained under Terrorism Acts are innocent and have been improperly arrested. Most of the remainder are charged with offences that have nothing to do with terrorism, but cover up over zealous arrests). We have lost the right to life Under EU law the "Shoot to kill" policy did not need democratic authorisation. Just two senior police officers authorised the police to kill British people. A democratic vote by Parliament was not required, but even that would not have legalised the killing under British common law. A recent victim was an innocent Brazilian, Jean de Menezes, shot dead in Stockwell underground station, even though he was being held down by police officers at the time of the execution. The police used dum-dum bullets, outlawed under the Geneva Convention because they blow a man to pieces inside. The police can no longer be convicted for killing innocent people - Philip Prout shot at Lewannick in East Cornwall is just one of 30 people shot dead by police since 1992 when corpus juris crept in. At least one was shot in the back; most were no threat to anyone. Not once since 1992 has a policeman been convicted of any crime for these murders.   Have you noticed this growing police state? In addition to many more laws than those above, add the 107,000 regulations, and whole bureaucracies such as VOSA building up networks of cameras and databases to record our movements and criminalise us when we can't comply. Persecution is no longer confined to motorists; under EU Corpus Juris our courts have become extensions of government power instead of independent arbiters of justice. Westminster had passed sufficient of the EU's oppressive laws (the "harmonisation" in the Treaties) by the end of 2004 that we have been living in what is legally a police state since then. But at the moment, its only one per cent enforced. After the Queen signs the sixth Treaty, the EU has the absolute power to enforce 100% of its regulations and laws.

On the basis of the laws and treaties already signed by our Queen and Prime Ministers, What will life be like in the EU after the 6th Treaty is signed? Our Westminster Parliament immediately becomes pointess as its remaining powers are transferred to Europe. It is the formal end of Britain and England as nations. Britain's 153 embassies around the world will be closed as the ink from the Queen's signature dries. (As Tony Blair refused to admit this has been agreed to, Jose Zapatero, the Prime Minister of Spain, confirmed it in a February 2005 radio broadcast.) After the EU abolishes our 48 counties your address will change from 4 High St, Taunton, Somerset, Great Britain, to 4 High St, Taunton, Area K, European Union. (The glorious EU county "The South West Region" has had the postal address "Area K" assigned for over a decade.) The Official National Anthem of the EU, which you should have known since 1971 is based on the melody "Ode to Joy" by Beethoven, formally replaces God save the Queen. The EU flag replaces the Union Jack, the red, blue and white nautical ensigns etc. (The EU Commission has already ordered (24.11.2005) our Merchant Navy to fly the EU flag in place of the red Ensign.) The EU takes ownership and command of our Police, Army, Royal Navy, RAF, nuclear weapons, currency reserves, North Sea Oil. (See the EU Constitution below) Serving officers in our police, army, navy and air force already know they will have to take an oath to the EU instead of to the Queen. If they don't many have been told they will be dismissed. The EU will have complete military control of the UK. The UK Independence Party will be banned under the 1999 ruling of the European court of Justice case c274/99, where it was held that it is illegal to criticise the EU. The Conservative, Labour and Lib-dem parties will be abolished (only pan EU parties like the EPP or PES are allowed -see clause I.46.4 of the EU Constitution). It will then be blindingly obvious to even the dumbest politician there is no reason to keep Westmister open, and that the EU has the legal right to close it. Many people will be excluded from the jobs they know best, as the EU's demand that you must pay to be re-taught the job, and pay for a certificate before you can be employed, becomes universal. Hundreds of thousands more small businesses will close on the enforcement of the remaining 100,000 EU regulations our government has already passed. Several million will be permanently unemployed as a result. We will all be criminalised by the 107,000 regulations. Its impossible to know or understand 107,000 regulations, and the poor can't possibly afford to comply. We will all be subject to frequent fines and arrest as a result. Here are just 4 examples: Under EU regulations it is now illegal for you to repair your plumbing, electrics or your car (from 1st January 2006). If you buy a boat over six feet long, built after the EU Recreational Craft Directive of 1999, and don't pay the EU £4,000 to "measure" the boat, you get 6 months imprisonment. We will live under permanent threat of arrest and fear of the knock at the door that takes us away. Massive corporations will do well, but with huge immigration allowed from the EU, they'll be able to pay minimum wage everywhere, not just in the provinces as they do now. If you don't accept the minimum they'll employ a Pole or a Czekoslovakian. Big corporations will also have a near monopoly (with the government) on employment and will be able to dictate unfavourable terms to staff without fear of contradiction. Plum government jobs and corruption will ensure the wealth of politicians, bureaucrats, their businesses and associates at all levels of government, including local government and amongst our 7000+ quangos. Society will divide into two: the remaining 60% of us will be either unemployed or treated abysmally on minimum wage. Taxes will rise more steeply to pay for the even larger explosion in government growth and corruption There will be no redress through local democracy because there won't be any. The nine UK regional governments, which replace our 48 counties and councillors, will be unelected (see the European Regionisation plan). Our only vote is to the powerless EU parliament. We will be ruled by the 25 unelected Commisssioners, and have have no redress at any level; we will be as poor but have less freedom than Soviet Citizens. If we demonstrate or protest we can be be seized and relocated to another region. The EU Arrest Warrant and Civil Contingencies Act 2004, with 20 other oppressive Acts the Queen has signed between 1972 and 2005, give the government absolute power over us. They can shoot us if they wish with no legal comeback - the shootings of innocents Philip Prout and Jean de Menezes were entirely legal under EU law. The tendancy to pick on Muslims, as Germany used to pick on Jews, has already begun. Europe will be a very nasty place. How long will the EU last? Eventually, perhaps 15 years down the track, Europe will collapse under the weight of its own corruption, bureaucracy, and regulations. There will be so few productive businesses that even at 100% tax rates we will not be able to support the massive, corrupt and wasteful government. Many of us will be starving in the lead up to the collapse. After the collapse we may be able to leave the EU, if a dictator has not taken advantage of the complete absence of democratic checks and balances by seizing power. The Constitution of the EU is similar to the Soviet Union's. That dictator is free to choose between a Soviet or Nazi style government. Then it could take 70 years to break free.

. Fifty years ago our greatest threat might have been violence or mugging. Now the greatest threat to our economic well being, our way of life, our freedom and the very existence of our nation, is our own government.

What do we want? After the repeal of the EU treaties we want a change to our British Constitution so politicians can never hijack our nation again. Every Parliamentary Bill, after its Second Reading, should come down to us, the people, to vote yes or no as to whether the Queen should give it Royal Assent. This will take power away from our destructive politicians and return it to the people, where it belongs. (They do this in Swtizerland - they, not us, are the most democratic nation on earth.) We can then return to being a peaceable, just, honest, prosperous and fully democratic society where everyone's rights, no matter how high or low are respected, and the disadvantaged properly looked after. And where neither governments, corporations nor individuals have obscene wealth and power.   David Noakes 07974 437 097 ; drjnoakes@yahoo.co.uk   Campaign to repeal the 1972 European Communities Act and get clean out.   What can you do to help? 1. Find out when your local MP holds their surgery and attend with a printout of this, and the one page summary of the EU constitution below. Ask that MP to cross the floor to be the leader of the first Anti EU Parliamentary Party (representing 65% of our nation). The publicity would be stunning, and might force an in/out vote. 2. Make appointments with your local journalists, give them the same two print outs and ask them to write about the truth about the EU. 3. Do you know anyone famous? Persuade them in the same way to join our cause and get the truth known. 4. Print little stickers: "We didn't vote for this - it has no mandate," and stick them on everything that represents the police state and rip off government. 5. Tell your Town, District and County councillors they are about to be abolished. See below. 6. Do anything you can to get the truth about the EU published. Or print and hand out this flier (a .pdf), or flier (as a word document). It can be photocopied double sided on to one page. .   Our Councillors abolished Our 20,000 Councillors will be permanently abolished after the EU Regionalisation Plan has established the nine EU Regions. Point out they were elected to serve the public, not the government, and the public has not agreed to their abolition. Try to persuade them to stand up for the people who voted for them, (which is only doing their duty) by holding a yes/no local ballot on whether the public agree with the abolition of our counties, councillors and nation. If the public vote no, they should declare, for their Town or county, UDI from Europe and the illegal actions of our government since 1971, particularly the abolition of our British Constiution, common law, our nation and counties. The press coverage this would generate would force the truth into the open nationally, leading to a national in/out ballot on the EU. Just one council could achieve this fabulous result alone. Download: A summary of the loss of our 48 counties (a WP file) Download: A map of the nine EU regions (.pdf) The Devonport Column, exposing Common Purpose nationally, and corruption in Plymouth. The six treaties are: 1. The European Communities Act 1972. 2. The Single European Act, 1986. 3. The Maastricht Treaty, 1992. 4. The Amsterdam Treaty, 1997. 5. The Nice Treaty 2001.   The sixth will be called something equally innocuous, like the Treaty of Lille. Then the loss of our nation, way of life and freedom will be complete.   The best summary of the six treaties is the Constitution It reveals the true nature of the EU. Some British politicians were horrified when they saw the EU's absolute power revealed in its new constitution, and falsely accused the EU of much more than a tidying up exercise. It wasn't, it was a re-statement of the 6 treaties in almost readable English. Our politicians simply hadn't read the six treaties before they voted for them. The French and Dutch "No" votes are being ignored as usual; the EU Constitution is 2/3rds implemented and still being implemented. Dan Hannan of the Brussels EU Constitutional Committee, confirms it will be fully implemended in two years. Brussels can enforce it fully after the Queen signs the sixth EU treaty. Here's a one page summary with Article numbers: One page summary of the Constitution - pdf for download UKIP is way understating the costs of the EU. Even the British and EU governments admit to four times the UKIP figure. The EU is costing us 200 billion pa, 20% of our economy Quotes from our leaders revealing they know they built the EU as a dictatorship. EU treaties and publications abolishing our 48 counties   The Conservative Con trick Many people have been fooled by the Conservative Party into believing the party is anti EU. It was the Conservatives, under Ted Heath, who took us in to the EU, and then he lied that his 1972 EU Treaty wouldn't affect our sovereignty. Three out of the four Prime Ministers who signed the 6 EU treaties were Conservatives, every one af them legally a traitor under the British laws of their time. Do you see a pattern here? In 2005 Party Leader Michael Howard could have won the election for the Conservatives by making one simple statement: "We will repeal the 1972 EU Communities Act and leave Europe". Millions of Conservative voters would have rejoined the fold. A million Lib-Dems and Labour voters would have joined him. But he didn't. Because the Conservative leadership would rather be in Europe than be in power. Instead Howard continued betraying Conservative voters, so he lost. (And to be fair, why should Conservative leaders miss out on the EU corruption gravy train?) The Conservative leadership is completely dedicated to joining Europe, none more so than David Cameron, who is using the language and methods of Common Purpose against the Conservative Party. Conservative policy is to reform the EU from the inside (renegotiation). We've been in it 34 years and failed to refom this dictatorship one jot. Their policy is to continue this complete failure, and they know this pretence is wholly dishonest. You either submit to 100% of the EU or don't join it at all; that is the only choice open to us. Half a cheer for the Lib-Dems They realise we're now living in what is legally a police state, and speak out against it. We've been forced to harmonise our laws with the EU during the 34 years we've been inside, and the police state we're living in is the EU's. The Lib-Dems tell us with stunning naivity its Labour's police state, don't seem to realise the EU is behind it, and are still madly in favour of the EU. Its no comfort that they will suffer for their stupidity. Lately some Lib-Dem MP's have been talking about the Tories pathetic "reform the EU" idea. Will they never learn? With the Labour and Lib-Dem parties openly for Europe, and the Conservative leadership secretly for it, its clear the three parties will never give us a vote to leave the EU and keep our nation. Massive civil disobedience, a permanent General Strike, or a blockade of Westminster until MP's resign might be effective.   The abolition of the Labour, Conservative and Lib-Dem parties. So sloppy have our politicians been in their reading of the EU treaties, most haven't noticed that the EU will abolish our Labour, Conservative and Lib-Dem parties. It was clear in the Madrid 1999 party financing document, and it was re-stated in the Constitution, clause I-46-4. Only pan European parties like the EPP will be allowed. Some politicians, like Heseltine and Ken Clarke, can't wait for this to happen. A date for the abolition of Westminster has tactfully not been given Once the 6th treaty is signed, Westminster's remaining powers are transferred to Brussels, and Westminster is left with the powers of a county council. Except it won't have a county, because they will be abolished under the Regionalisation plan. The 9 EU regions report direct to Brussels, so Westminster will be a county council without a county. Anyone with half a brain can see Brussels will abolish Westminster, as it's only potential use would be as a rallying point to challenge the power of Brussels.     The Queen, Treason and the Coronation oath Together with Churchill, King George VI saved our nation; he was a Monarch to be proud of. But his daughter the Queen is the only monarch to have broken her coronation oath, by signing these five treaties that abolish our common law, the British Constitution, the British and English nations, and our sovereignty. She has also committed treason, together with co-signatories Ted Heath, Margaret Thatcher, John Major and Tony Blair. Realising they stood a good chance of spending the rest of their lives behind bars, Tony Blair and the Queen signed the Crime and Disorder Act, 1998 (s36.3), which secretly abolished much of the crime of treason - they didn't tell the MP's what they had just voted for. 1.4 million British Servicemen gave their lives for our independence. The Queen has thrown their sacrifices away and made them worthless. At no physical risk to herself, she could have fulfilled her duty as a constitutional check and balance, by refusing to sign the five treaties until an in/out referendum had been held. In the unlikely event the vote went against her she might have lost her crown (not her life or a limb), and kept her £9 billion plus palaces. Those servicemen's lives would still have meant something. But she's dead keen to sign; she's already said she'll sign the last treaty. Princes Charles, William or Harry can then never be King. You can't have a King without a Kingdom: they can only be princes of a region (principality) within Europe. The Queen's aspirations are not ours; she clearly serves a higher and darker master; the faith she defends cannot be the one we think it is. King George VI must be turning over in his grave.     The new EU Hitler doesn't have to get elected Its worth noting that Adolf Hitler first had to get elected, if on a 35% minority vote, and then get his Enabling Act passed. An EU dictator has no such problems. Our EU rulers do not submit themselves for election now. And the Queen has already signed the Enabling Act (Civil Contingencies Act 2004). The EU's Hitler will have a much easier rise to power, and will have the formerly British and French nuclear weapons from day one. Adolf Hitler killed 54 million people. The EU's dictator could kill a billion at the touch of a button, with no democratic checks and balances to answer to. How could any aspiring dictator resist the EU opportunity?   . Some revolutionary lyrics - We're being fooled again A diagram of the parallel EU Government in the UK. The wiring of the EU in Britain EU subversion of our Government. A link to ukip-plymouth.org.uk Our other site: drjn.co.uk Common Purpose, training 18,000 of our new EU rulers at all levels of our government now. As a word doc. The Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill 2006 - government doesn't need Parliament. Cromwell had something similar in the 1680's. Is there anyone out there who doesn't realise all the treaties and laws of a dictatorship, and more, are now enacted? And that all it takes is for a foreign power, the EU, to enforce them? Do we want to be in Europe? Do we want to lose democratic government, the nations of Britain and England, and all our counties? Do we want to put ourselves in the EU, where we will be at the mercy of any dictator who chooses to control us? Isn't the answer obviously "No" ? We can live again outside Europe Outside the EU we can be a free and properly democratic nation. Free from Europe we could stop half our government spending being wasted, could save the £200 billion a year it costs us to be in Europe, repeal all its 107,000 regulations, and stop losing the £22 billion a year to Europe on our balance of payments. With those vast savings we could easily pay all our people a good living wage. According to the OECD we are the 4th strongest economy amongst the world's 205 independent nations, and we will make it handsomely. We could leave the EU in 14 hours The fastest an Act of Parliament has been drafted, passed by Parliament and signed by the Monarch was the abdication of King Edward 8th. It was done in 13.5 hours. We could repeal the 1972 European Communities Act and be out of Europe in just fourteen hours, if our traiterous MP's, Prime Minister and Queen so wished. So far they've illegally denied us the choice. We need to change that, but we may only have two years left before the final 6th treaty is signed. Thank you. Please choose one of the six actions above and complete it.   Questions? Call David Noakes: 07974 437 097 drjnoakesdel@yahoo.co.uk but delete the three letters "del" -this is to stop automated spam. The Westminster News   Please donate to help us spread the word:         Paypal accepts credit cards.     The EU dictatorship: Poverty under a brutal police state.   This is: http://eutruth.org.uk Questions for Bush. This site is © Copyright David Noakes 1997-2007, All Rights Reserved, but permission to copy and republish is granted. 07974 437 097.

 

 

*

www.noliberties.com

[Latest Addition - June07]

*

www.eutruth.org.uk

*

www.thewestminsternews.co.uk

*

 

www.speakout.co.uk

*

 

Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU

www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs

 

*

67% want powers back from EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95% of British people want a REFERENDUM

*

 

PETITION

FOR A

REFERENDUM

SIGN TODAY ON LINE

telegraph.co.uk/eureferendum

*  July 18-2007

 

 

VOTE

-2007

 

TO LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION

WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE

TO SET YOU

 FREE

 

THE

UK INDEPENDENCE PARTY

www.ukip.org

THE QUESTION THAT THE VOTER MUST ANSWER

 

‘DO YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE CORRUPT ,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND CORRUPT ALIEN BUSYBODY BRUSSELS’

 

-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?

*

 

TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER

BUT

SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.

*

 

ONLY

PRO-PORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

*

Home Rule for Scotland

WHY NOT

HOME RULE for ENGLAND

 

*

 

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin]

 

 

MAY/07

 

The Soul of England pt I **** The Soul of England pt 2 **** Why are we English made to feel guilty? **** Don't let them destroy our Identity **** Nor shall my sword **** Why can't we have a right to be English ?- pt I **** Why can't we have a right to be English ? -pt 2 **** England is where the majority views are ignored and minorities rule at their expense in politically-correct Browndom **** Alfred - Christian King of the English-pt I **** Alfred - Christian King of the English -pt 2 **** Englishmen as others see us beyond our once oak wall **** England arise!-Today we can claim our right of self-determination. **** Kiss good bye to your sovereignty and country **** St George's Day-England's Day **** The Spirit of England by Winston Churchill.

 

 

Elections in the British One Party State If you vote Conservative, Labour, Lib-Dem, UKIP or the BNP, you'll be voting for the EU dictatorship. All five party leaderships are EU controlled. That's why your vote doesn't make a difference - all these five parties have the same policies: the EU's policies. The 17 most senior politicians in the Conservative, Lib Dem and Labour parties, including Ken Clarke, Francis Maude, Cameron, William Hague, George Osborne, Nick Clegg, Brown, David and Ed Milliband, Ed Balls, Peter Mandleson are Bilderbergers, the 140 strong band of ultra senior Freemasons who are bribed by the EU to build the EU dictatorship. No Bilderberger, Freemason or Common Purpose graduate should ever be allowed to hold public office. UKIP and the BNP are honey traps to neutralise activists: UKIP is riddled with Freemasons and Common Purpose like a cancer, and the BNP controlled by the Edgar Griffin (father) and son Nick Freemasonry family. The 350,000 freemasons and the 40,000 strong Common Purpose Organisation are the (mostly unknowing) foot soldiers of the EU in Britain. (Which makes the BNP the easiest party to clean up - get rid of the Griffins, and put in a real anti-EU leadership.)  For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF UKIP  OR  INTEND TO JOIN THEM TAKE NOTE OF THE MESSAGE ABOVE     THE EDP HAS BEEN CRITICAL OF THE MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP OF THE UKIP FOR SOME TIME NOW AS IS SHOWN IN A NUMBER OF BULLETINS  OVER THE PAST FEW YEARS WHERE WE HAVE CRITICISED THEIR LACK LUSTRE PERFORMANCE AS THEY FAILED TO MOTIVATE THEIR MEMBERSHIP TO A MORE DETERMINED CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE CAMPAIGN WHICH WOULD HAVE MADE THE GOVERNMENTS TREMBLE BUT THEY HAD NO WORRY BECAUSE THEY HAD THEIR OWN PERSONS IN CHARGE AT THE TOP OF THE ORGANISATION.  THIS FIGHTING SPIRIT HAS BEEN LACKING AND WE CAN CONFIRM THIS OURSELVES BECAUSE WE HAVE BEEN OUTSIDE PARLIAMENT WHEN A MARCH WAS CANCELLED - AND WATCH THE FARCE WHEN CANDLES WERE HELD AND THOUSANDS OF LETTERS SENT TO MPS WHO KNEW WHERE TO DISPOSES OF THEM -AND ALL TO NO AVAIL.  IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF UKIP YOU HAVE BEEN BETRAYED BY YOUR OWN LEADERSHIP SOME APPEAR ON THE ALEX JONES SHOW WHICH HAS BEEN UNDER CLOSE SPOTLIGHT RECENTLY AS BEING CLOSE TO AN ISRAELI SECURITY FIRM DETAILS ON OUR WEBSITE .    IRONICALLY IT WAS A CHANCE LOOK ON THE INTERNET A FEW YEARS AGO  TO COME UPON THAT SITE WHICH OPENED OUR MIND TO THE ILLUMINATI.   THOUGH WE HAVE SOME DETAILS OF THE BILDERBERGERS ON OUR SITE  A NUMBER OF YEARS AGO WE FAILED TO DO MORE RESEARCH- WE ALL HAVE TO LEARN.  THE FAILURE OF UKIP WE HAVE SUSPECTED  FOR MANY YEARS   THAT MANY AT THE TOP OF THEIR ORGANISATION MIGHT BE UNDERCOVER MEMBERS OF THE ILLUMINATI.  IT IS A FAVOURITE TRICK OF THEIRS TO SUPPORT ANY PARTY OR ORGANISATION AT THE OUTSET WHATEVER ITS POLICY AS IT ALLOWS THEM TO PUT THEIR OWN PEOPLE IN TO CONTROL ITS POLICES AS THEY BEHIND THE SCENES SUPPLY THE VITAL FINANCIAL SUPPORT.   Our intention is not to benefit from this disaster as since the 1999 European Election we have NOT! accepted a DONATION! from ANYONE! and we closed membership also because we did not wish to split the vote for UKIP but have stated in the past that we would contest another election if it was ever necessary to enter into the affray again and with the reputation of UKIP under scrutiny we will keep our options OPEN!   As we mentioned some time ago we have been almost two decades on the campaign trail to free our once FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE of ENGLAND from the SATANIC EU and those who have for centuries have planned for an EVIL ONE-WORLD CORPORATION/GOVERNMENT and EXTERMINATE! at least 5 BILLION of the WORLD'S POPULATION and therefore if we are right about those mentioned above they are not only TRAITORS to their COUNTRY but also a THREAT to WORLD PEACE.   However, of late, matters have NOT! been going well for the ILLUMINATI as you will observe BELOW.   WHAT A WAY TO WIN A WAR     BENJAMIN FULFORD   More! [WORKS] * SEEKTHETRUTHANDWISDOM   * Bank Of England « The Banking Swindle   More!   More!   PATRIOT or TRAITOR to HIS COUNTRY +More!    More!   +(More!     THIS YOU MUST SEE IT CONCERNS  YOUR PLANET! AND  YOU!     NO NEED TO PANIC!   'Others shall sing the song, Others shall right the wrong,- Finish what I begin, All all I fail of win. Hail to the coming singers! Hail to the brave light-bringers! Forward I reach and above All that they sing and dare.   The airs of heaven blow o'er me; A glory shines before me Of what mankind shall be'- Pure, generous, brave and free, I feel the earth move sunward, I join the great march onward, And  take, by faith, while living, My freehold of thanksgiving.-   WHITTIER   MAY-2012   TOP OF PAGE       ADDED - MAY-2012