VOTE UKIP!-ON MAY 7-2015

 
 
 
MAJOR ISSUES BULLETIN
 
     

VIEWERS -TOP TOPICS-WKLY/ARCHIVE

 

 

PAGE ONE/ PAGE TWO/PAGE THREE/ &  LATEST- PAGE FOUR

 

 

A PEACEFUL ENGLISH REVOLUTION IS ON THE WAY-ALERT-1

RON PAUL 9-11+(1) GLOBALWARMING SCAM USA IRAQ/AFGHAN LONDON BOMBINGS COMMON PURPOSE CONSPIRACY CENTRAL BANKS  +(1)
HOME ARCHIVE  MAIN BULLETINS E U  ENGLAND +(1) BILDERBERGERS+(1)

(+1)

ILLUMINATI +(1) NEW WORLD ORDER +(1)
1)U.S. Concentration Camps

2)DEC-2011- MADE-READY

3) PLANS

1)

FEMA

2)

Protocols

of

ZION

CITY

OF

LONDON

 

 A STATE WITHIN ENGLAND

+(2)

 Dr.

John

Coleman

WHO OWNS

THE FED

 

POWER

OF 1)HAARP FOR GOOD   2)EVIL

Mind Control Henry Makow 1)Chemtrails

2)CREATED

C3)

PRIVATE CENTRAL BANKS

(1)War

is a Racket

 

(2)

A MEETING PLACE  - THERE ARE HUNDREDS  OF ALTERNATIVE WEBSITES ON OUR wEBSITE- SINCE 2003
realzionistnews. TruetorahJews CONSPIRACYPLANET

.COM/

Fagan-Sounded-Alarm-of -the ILLUMINATI-in-196 DAVID ICKE BRITISH CONSTITUTION GROUP

 

YOU CAN HANDLE THE TRUTH
BENJAMIN FULFORD.NET

 

THE WORLD OF TRUTH NEWWORLDORDER

INFO.COM

 

 

LANDDESTROYER.

BLOGSPOT

.COM

HENRY MAKOW  CORBETTREPORT) LIFE IN THE MIX 2

 

UK COLUMN.ORG. JEW WATCH

ACTIVISTPOST.

COM

TARPLEY.NET

 

 
     
 

 

Prisons do not create criminals or make them worse; prisons are bricks and mortar.

 

Though the article which follows was written in 1998 a year into the New Labour era it has as much if not greater impact today in 2005 when so many are fearful of the growth in crime particularly because of the New Labour policies on drugs, gambling and now 24hr drinking.

 

In an article in the respected journal Freedom Today on Crime and Punishment (www.tfa.net) by a learned contributor David Fraser on the Supervision of offenders in the community has been a failure and its continuation exposes the Public to unnecessary risks. [As we learn in 2005]

*

Courts misled on failed policy

 

“the bleak fact is that not one of the considerable number of these research reports reviewed by the author has borne objective scrutiny,”…

 

 

There are 200,000 offenders subject to supervision in the community by the probation service.

 

For members of the public, as past and potential victims of crime, the over-riding question is:

 

Do these supervision programmes work; in terms of protecting us from further criminal victimisation?

 

An objective appraisal of the evidence makes it clear that the answer to the question is negative. Home Office statistics demonstrate that community supervision is a calamitous failure in terms of the number of reconvictions recorded against supervised offenders.

 

In 1995 the overall reconviction rates for those placed on probation was 53 per cent, the majority placed under supervision are males under 30; the reconviction rate for those under 21 years was 75 per cent, 21-24 years 62per cent and 25-29 years 56 per cent. Against a background of a 7 per cent detection rate, the reoffending rate will be horrific.

 

Reoffending refers to all crimes committed by a criminal; reconvictions refer to the small number of these crimes, which are successfully prosecuted through the courts.

 

These statistics are the only relevant yardstick against which to measure the effectiveness of these penal measures, which allow many persistent criminals their freedom, and which, as shown by the above figures, so obviously put public safety at risk. These results contradict the many claims made over recent years by a number of probation services, which have published so-called ‘successful’ results of programmes offering alternatives to imprisonment.

 

In addition, the Probation Service and other anti-prison organisations in this country have embraced uncritically the results of ‘what works’ research from both North America and the United Kingdom which purports to show that certain types of community supervision can be effective in reducing crime.

 

The bleak fact is that not one of a considerable number of these reports reviewed by the author has born objective scrutiny. As demonstrated by the following examples, when the ‘research babble’ [You could call it Spin!] has been decoded, what is found is that not only do the reported results not equate with the commonly accepted understanding of success in terms of protecting the public, but they threaten the public safety.

 

The first example is based on a programme run by the Hereford & Worcester Probation Service, which compared the reconviction rates of offenders on a supervision programme with those sentenced to a period of imprisonment. The researchers claimed that their programme was a ‘success’ because they had found “16 per cent fewer convictions within two years for the supervision group than for the custody group”

 

This is a meaningless claim as far as protecting the community is concerned.

What is relevant, however, is the number of crimes committed by the offenders on the scheme against innocent members of the public.

 

Based on the reported 68 per cent reconviction rate for the supervision group, and the 7 per cent detection rate, it is possible to estimate that the 53 offenders on the scheme are likely to have committed as many as 500 offences during the two-year period covering the period covering the programme and the follow-up period; none of these crimes would have been committed had a prison sentence been imposed.

 

Assuming only two victims per crime (a direct and a indirect victim) this means that 1000 people were affected. Quite apart from the significant financial loss likely to have been sustained by their victims, the potential personal costs to them in terms of for example,

 

Fear,

 

Lingering anxiety,

 

General loss of confidence,

 

A reduced sense of privacy,

 

And despair over the loss of irreplaceable family and personal items can be devastating.

[So when the Home Secretary and Police are discussing in February 2005 the question what the Householder can do to protect themselves when confronted by the intruder it is forgotten the lasting damage that such an intrusion has on the victim. In the political-correct world of Blair and his many adherents this does not appear to be discussed but then with them it is the destroyer of our society who must be understood otherwise what would he do with the thousands of interfering busybodies in our society today.

It is not stress councillors that are required but a stern front and action when it comes to dealing with the criminal and not whether he or she has a television in the cell or a swimming pool to use -of course the water must be of the correct temperature or the Human Rights legislation will be invoked.

 

It seems that Law & Order has become a hot potato so we now have Tony Blair trying to explain after almost eight years in office the out of control Immigration and Refugee flood which he has previously turned a blind eye. This negligence has changed our country so that the indigenous people now fear the future in their own once green and pleasant land.

 

Whatever New Labour or the so-called Conservative Party say it is their stance on Europe and their history of slowly turning their back on conservative values which has contributed to the present unrest in our society as evidenced in many areas in the community.]

 

To continue. - Thus when viewed through the eyes of the beleaguered public, the claims of success for the programme can be seen to be ill founded.

 

The second example draws on the research of Izzo & Ross (1990) who published so-called ‘positive’ results of a ‘cognitive’ skills programme for offenders, originally designed by Robert Ross and colleagues in Canada. Supporters of the ‘what works’ research have made much of Izzo & Ross’s findings that over a nine-month period, the reconviction rate of offenders on the cognitive skills programme was 18 per cent compared with 48 per cent and 70 per cent reconviction rates for two other types of community supervision programme.

 

When projected over the normal two-year follow-up period, however, the reconviction rates for those attending the cognitive skills programme, hailed by many as a ‘successful example of what works in reducing offending’, equates closely with the disastrous 53 per cent reconviction rate for all offenders on probation in the UK (Home Office Statistical Bulletin: 1995 figures).

 

Thus the failure in this example of the much heralded’ cognitive skills’ programme to protect the public from further offending and the even more disastrous reconviction rates of the other two supervision groups illustrates the high price paid by the general public for such experimentation.

 

Another tactic used by some contributors to the ‘what works’ research literature is to compare the reconviction rates of supervised offenders with their ‘predicted’ or expected reconviction rates.

 

While such comparisons may fascinate some academics, they are a red herring as far as the safety of the public is concerned; it is the actual level of crime in the community that matter to them.

 

This is illustrated in the example of the ‘Stop’ programme run by a South Wales Probation Service. The results were reported as showing that after 12 months, the reconviction rates of those attending the scheme were “16 per cent lower than their predicted reconviction rates” Further investigation of this classic example of statistical mummery showed that after only 12 months, the reconviction rate of those attending the scheme was already as high as 44 per cent. And due to the low detection rate, the actual re-offending rate will be significantly worse.

 

When [projected over the usual two year measurement period, the reconviction rate for offenders on the ‘Stop’ programme is likely to be closer to a catastrophic 80 per cent (which falls in line with the Home Office official reconviction rates of 74 per cent for supervised offenders under 21 years).

 

Only by a gross distortion of the English language could such results be described as ‘successful’. The researchers also reported as a ‘success’, the lower reconviction rates of those who finished the programme compared with those who dropped out, a consideration which irrelevant to the public, who are left to cope with the criminal behaviour of all the offenders on the scheme, not just the finishers.

 

Thus none of these research projects provides evidence to show that they stopped offenders referred to them from committing crime.

 

Indeed, when viewed objectively, their results show that, “far from offering protection from crime, these schemes have put the public at risk” This almost unbearable truth could not be more clearly illustrated than by the extrapolation that the Home Office figure of 53 per cent reconviction rate for the 200,000 offenders under supervision in the community equates to millions of offences committed by them during their period of supervision.

 

It is the innocent public that bears the brunt of this catastrophic failure in sentencing policy; the continued depredations of the persistent offender have had an effect on the quality of the lives of the victims and the public at large, probably unequalled by any other recent phenomenon.

 

Given the incontrovertible evidence of their failure to stop further crime, the question must be asked: why the courts continue to use community sentences for persistent offenders unmotivated to change? Over the last three decades, the misleading dogma of the of the anti-prison lobby has had a powerful influence on both policy makers and courts. As a result, sentencers, prey to their own uncertainties, have been vulnerable to the ides of these anti-prison organisations, which threaten them with ‘ball and chain’ tag for sending a greater percentage of offenders to prison compared with other courts.

 

Relentless mitigation

 

Sentencers have also been exposed to the influence of probation reports offering relentless and undisguised mitigation for offenders, invariably presenting alternatives to custodial sentences, regardless of the risk to the public. In some probation areas the slavish adherence to this ideological dogma is reinforced by official instructions from senior managers to their staff not to recommend prison or even use the word ’custody’ in their court reports concerning offenders.

 

Official records of sentences passed by both judges and magistrates illustrate the effect of such intimidation; they show unarguably how, over the past decade, courts have favoured the freedom of the persistent offender rather than the protection of the public; they have sentenced increasing numbers of offenders unmotivated to reform in the community programmes of the sort described above, thus giving them a licence to go on offending and victimising yet more members of the public.

 

[It is no wonder why crime is out of control in 2005-It is the scourge of political -correctness over the past years which has encouraged the increased crime wave]

 

For the courts to allow such offenders to stay in the community is to abdicate their primary responsibility to protect the public, particularly as in every case, the offenders frightening history of previous criminality is made known to the court before sentence is passed.

 

No one has the right to risk the safety of the public with such’programme experimentation’, which, in the vast majority of cases, is so predictably doomed to failure. Courts should more properly exercise the conscience and forbearance of the community by reserving community sentences for those offenders who demonstrate genuine regret over their actions and who show some degree of motivation to change.

 

Persistent offenders unmotivated to reform should be sent to prison, affording the public maximum protection from them for the duration of the sentences.

 

We should resist being bullied by fallacious ideological argument to think negatively about prisons. Recent Home Office statistics show that the reconviction rate for those released from prison are marginally better for than for those offenders placed on community supervision [If they bother to turn up?]

 

In any event, the reconviction rates of those released from prison are a distraction and unrelated to the success or otherwise of supervision in the community. If in addition to protecting the public, prison deters or reforms, that is a bonus. If on discharge, ex-prisoners re-offend, it confirms that a custodial sentence was right in the FIRST PLACE.

 

Cannot be responsible

 

Prisons do not create criminals or make worse criminals; prisons are mere bricks and mortar; they cannot be held responsible for further offending. The decision is solely the responsibility of the individual who chooses to continue a life of crime. Persistent offenders should get longer sentences, which could eventually be a deterrent; otherwise, at least, the sentences would protect the public for longer and longer periods.

 

* *

The author -David Fraser, who read social administration at the London School of Economics in the 1960’s, was a Senior Probation Officer for most of the 26 years he spent working with the Probation Service in inner London and in Bristol. He is now a criminal intelligence analyst with the National Criminal Intelligence Service.

 

[Fonts altered-bolding &underling used-comments in brackets]

 

It is no wonder that both the Conservative and New Labour are now pleased that the main headline in the second week of February 2005 has changed to Immigration and Refugee concerns where here again political-correctness and the Human Rights legislation in 1998 is giving both parties more severe headaches.

 

With regard to the above article -Courts misled on failed policy it should be made a rule that the judge or magistrate who gives a community sentence instead of a prison sentence in the case of the persistent offender that it be a rule that all offenders should have to make contact every six months with the person who gave the community sentence to remind the sentencer that the offender is still a great pain to many members of the public. This will make it clear to the soft-touch legal eagles that they are not finished with the case until either the persistent offender is in goal or miraculously in a few cases they have relented of their misdeeds.

 

We ask as we are sure many of those who have experienced the crime wave when will the do-gooders find other jobs and let real Justice take its place-the Public are still waiting.]

 

* * *

FEB/05

 

To obtain other enlightened articles contact Freedom Association:  www.itf.org.uk

 

*          *          *

 

*

 

THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN-IS THE EU COMMISSION LISTENING?

*

Ditch the EU TREATY after IRISH REJECTION

SAY VOTERS

by

Daniel Martin

Political Reporter

[Daily Mail-Wednesday, June 18,2008]

MORE THAN HALF of voters believe Britain should drop the controversial European Treaty in the wake of its rejection in last week's

IRISH REFERENDUM'

The poll comes as the Tories launch a last-ditch bid in the

HOUSE of LORDS

today to delay the

RATIFICATION OF THE TREATY.

And

10,000 people

have signed a

PETITION

on the

DOWNING STREET- WEBSITE

within the past few days

JUNE16-2008

, calling on the

GOVERNMENT

NOT TO RATIFY THE BILL

[WHY DON'T YOU?]

 

Downing Street website is

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Abandon-Lisbon/

*

JUNE 18-2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

*

 

*

The abolition of Britain
by The Reform Treaty
- Second Reading-Passed by majority of 138

*

Veteran parliamentarian TONY BENN speaks of the absolute necessity of a

REFERENDUM

HEAR HIM ON

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I-ZdvQz1o

*

*

*

*

13th October,2007

 

So You Want Out Of The EU

 

THEN WHY NOT SIGN THE

RENUNCIATION of EU CITIZENSHIP

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Optout

Details from petition creator

With the signing of the Maastricht Treaty the people of Britain were given

DUAL CITIZENSHIP

-both

EUROPEAN and BRITISH

The extra tier of citizenship was thrust upon the people without their consent -and in many cases knowledge.

The PEOPLE of GREAT BRITAIN should be allowed the option of opting out of the EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP if they so wish. The GOVERNMENT will then be able to provide those who have opted out with

BRITISH DOCUMENTATION

-only such as British  (not EU) passports, driving licences and other national documents.

EU laws will also NOT APPLY to those who

HAVE OPTED OUT OF EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP

 

[PETITION OPEN UNTIL OCTOBER 08]

 

*

       
   

CHRISTMAS SPECIAL!

 

A BLUNT REPLY TO THE QUEEN'S SPEECH ON CHRISTMAS DAY-25th DECEMBER ,2007.

*

 

 

TIME FOR DECISION

 

THE BRITISH LEGACY-AUSTRALIA-CANADA-NEW ZEALAND-WHY THEY MATTER.

*

The Act of Settlement of 1701-WHY IT SHOULD CONCERN -YOU!

*

The Common Law of ENGLAND is the LAW of

THE COMMONWEALTH and AMERICA

*

The Commonwealth Realms V The Constitution for Europe- 4-PARTS

*

MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA-SUPPORT THE CROWN

*

WHY WE MUST BE ALERT AND WITH OUR COMMONWEALTH PATRIOTS MAINTAIN CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHY

*

IF WE DESTROY OUR RIGHT OF FREEDOM TO FIGHT A WAR ON TERROR-WHO WINS?

(John Mortimer)

 

 

YOU CAN'T HAVE BOTH.

 

WILL THIS CHRISTMAS  QUEEN'S SPEECH

BE THE LAST IN A FREE INDEPENDENT ENGLAND -SCOTLAND AND WALES?

Will HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ASSURE YOU THAT YOU HAVE NOTHING TO FEAR FROM BECOMING A PROVINCE OF EUROPE.

OR

WILL THE QUEEN MAKE IT PLAIN THAT OUR FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE IS SACROSANCT BUT THAT IF THE PEOPLE WISH TO BECOME SLAVES -THEN A REFERENDUM THERE MUST BE.

WE BELIEVE THAT NO ENGLISHMAN SHOULD BE ASKED WHETHER HE WISHES TO BE A SLAVE OR FREE!

 

THIS CHRISTMAS WE WILL FIND OUT IF OUR PROTECTOR OF THE

'Rights and Liberties'

of

Englishmen

Will keep by HER SACRED OATH

or the MONARCHY be nothing more than a  THEME PARK in the future

THIS IS THE TIME FOR BLUNT SPEAKING AS THE VERY EXISTENCE OF OUR UNIQUE NATION STATE IS IN DIRE PERIL.

We are told on the BBC  (Brussels Broadcasting Service) at 11.30 pm on Saturday the 23rd December, 2007, that the QUEEN now has a website which has footage of the Royal Family in the past and that the QUEEN is NOT

'Stuck in the past'

Well! as far as many patriotic subjects are concerned we need to remain in the PAST when it concerns the protection of  our

FREEDOM and COUNTRY.

 

Change we have had and will continue to have but it must not threaten our very WAY-OF-LIFE our Common Law of England and all which makes our country the most unique parliamentary democracy in the world.

THERE CAN BE NO SURRENDER!

 

Should the Monarch fail to protect our inherited RIGHTS and Liberties then we shall have to fight for a REPUBLIC  as happened in the 17th century because the Monarch of the day ignored those very 'Rights and Liberties of Englishmen' which will still survive in the English Speaking World today in December 2007. How can the MOTHER of PARLIAMENTS give away what is already our and our children's  INHERITANCE which cannot be taken away by

PARLIAMENT or the QUEEN.

 

If the above publicity exercise is to be used to soften the impact to the population of the BETRAYAL of their CONSTITUTION and COUNTRY then it would be the greatest TREASON by a Monarch since James II who sold our COUNTRY to the FRENCH for MONEY and RELIGION.

WE ASK WHAT PRICE ARE OUR RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES WORTH?

THEY ARE PRICELESS!

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION –CONSPIRATORS NAMED

*

 

The Choice is Yours!-but time is running out FAST!

6 months to be EXACT!

*

 

THE EU

 

WE-AND THEM!

 

WE are to join THEM

THEY are not joining US

WE have more to LOSE

THEY have more to GAIN

WE have been clear of dictators from EUROPE for most of our HISTORY

THEY have been cursed with that abomination for most of their HISTORY and NOW!

*

Our Queen and the EU Constitution

*

The Spirit of England

by

Winston Churchill

*

THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE

*

MESSAGE TO HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH THE II

*

We now learn from the Daily Mail COMMENT on Christmas Eve that the Queen's Speech will cover the catastrophic fall in Values and Moral behaviour since the beginning of her 56 -year reign. This has been brought about by the actions of HER MINISTERS and the greater number of those in HER PARLIAMENT who have placed THEIR CONCERNS before the INTERESTS of THE PEOPLE and NATION STATE.

 

 As for the fact that HER PEOPLE feel LOST that has been the direct result of the actions of HER SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS and the TRAITOROUS POLITICIANS including PRIME MINISTERS who have stealthily over the 56 years of HER MAJESTY'S REIGN have almost achieved their aim of ENSLAVING the PEOPLE to a FOREIGN POWER. 

The reason for the marked drop in the number viewing THE QUEEN'S SPEECH is no doubt because the mass of people have realised years ago that the MONARCH is powerless to PROTECT their WAY-OF-LIFE and events up to now have PROVED THEM CORRECT.

There is a well know saying 'Nero fiddled while Rome burned'

Is it the case on Christmas Day 2007 while the  Monarch talks  our Rights and Liberties are being taken from us under our very  noses?

Of course the QUEEN under HER CONSTITUTIONAL ROLE can only 'Advise and Warn' HER MINISTERS but when the matter concerns the very LIFE of an INDEPENDENT STATE we expect that HER MAJESTY consider the arrangement to be AT AN END as it would make a MOCKERY of the PRIME IMPORTANCE of the MONARCH to protect our inherited Rights and Liberties which HER MINISTERS  are endeavouring TO GIVE AWAY.

We as loyal subjects of the MONARCH who is the living embodiment of OUR RIGHTS and LIBERTIES  ask at this late stage with only months to the eradication of a FREE NATION STATE some veiled comments that HER MAJESTY will PROTECT our RIGHTS and LIBERTIES.

As for the MORAL tone of the NATION STATE at this most crucial time in ENGLISH CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY this matter should be left to CHURCH LEADERS who's responsibility it is to CARE for their FLOCKS particularly at this FESTIVAL of CHRISTMAS.

IF HER MAJESTY'S SPEECH has not been pre-recorded  we ask HER MAJESTY to give those MILLIONS of HER subjects some hope that their PROTECTOR has NOT FORGOTTEN THEM.

Should this APPEAL not be answered we can at last confirm that the MONARCHY is after all nothing more than a talking shop suitable for YouTube and therefore nothing more than a

THEME PARK

*

Hear Tony Benn's comments about the despotic and corrupt EUROPEAN UNION

and the need for a

REFERENDUM

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I-ZdvQz1o

From a politician with INTEGRITY and love of country who has for decades witnessed the growth of the monstrous creature soon to be a

UNITED STATES OF EUROPE.

*

 

Liberties of Parliament- Birthright of Subjects of England.

*

 

[All words/word underlined  have a separate bulletin]

 

 
     

 

 

 

                                                                                                

A CHRISTMAS MESSAGE

TO

ALL OUR VIEWERS.

 

WE WISH YOU ALL A

HAPPY CHRISTMAS AND A HAPPY NEW YEAR

IN

2008

[Since our Xmas message to you all last year we find that our sentiments remain the same with the added emphasise on the coming danger to YOUR COUNTRY from those many traitors in YOUR HOUSE of COMMONS who intend to sell YOUR COUNTRY to a FOREIGN POWER]

We Remember The Year 2006
 

The Spirit of England-Winston Churchill-1953

[We were warned in 1953 to beware of wreckers of our Constitution and Way-of- Life but it had taken Tony Blair just 10 years to do just THAT while everyone had their minds they thought on more important matters. Well! in 2007 his predessessor Gordon Brown is leading you to SLAVERY and only awaits the final signature of the present holder of the House of Wessex the over 1000 year  PROTECTOR of our inherited

RIGHTS and LIBERTIES of ENGLISHMEN

HER MAJESTY-THE QUEEN

Of the House of Wessex since King Alfred 'the Shepherd and Darling of England' in the annals of 893 -897

'We still leave it to the work of

Alfred the Great

 that England was saved to become the first individual nation -state which over 1100 years later a member of that same House of Wessex has already signed away much of those ancient Rights and Liberties and fundamentals of justice and Rule of Law and only awaits a final signature to enslave her people into a despotic undemocratic godless police state to call itself a

UNITED STATES OF EUROPE

It is within the power of Her Majesty the Queen to refuse to ratify the New EU TREATY because whatever lies her ministers have given her over her long reign the TRUTH is now clear for ALL TO SEE.

In the Netherlands a number of years ago their MONARCH resigned for a day rather than sign the Bill put before him. The New EU TREATY is the death of a NATION STATE of over 1200 years in the making. It is the treasonable actions of HER MINISTERS which has placed THE QUEEN in the forefront in the protection of the Rights and Liberties of HER SUBJECTS as on no one else can HER PEOPLE DEPEND.

GOD SAVE THE QUEEN

*

WILL THIS CHRISTMAS  QUEEN'S SPEECH

BE THE LAST IN A FREE INDEPENDENT ENGLAND -SCOTLAND AND WALES?

*

 

A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND

by

Harry Beckhough

[Author of Germany's Four Reich's]

2004

*

'There'll always Be an ENGLAND'

-NOT any MORE

 

 

     
 

  

    

 

   

THE EU OVER THE NEXT FEW MONTHS WILL PORTRAY ITSELF AS THE BEST THING SINCE SLICED BREAD

'Don't tell the voters-or you will ruin everything '

 

"...we have to make sure that there are no discussions taking place in the open air"

Guenter Burghardt, a former EU ambassador to the US, warning that details of the new EU diplomatic service (officially to be known as the External Action Service) should not be discussed in public before the

UK PARLIAMENT

had ratified the NEW EU TREATY

 and Ireland has held its TREATY REFERENDUM early next summer (source: EU Observer on 27th November ,2007

The EU has also stated that none of its institutions should rock the boat until the English have ratified their TREATY.

Over the next few months you will hear more than ever the wonderful benefits of the EU. Whether it is Global warming or whatever they feel shows them in a good light and when you have swallowed the bait you will not know what has hit you. They intend to show how reasonable they are and that they are there to make you happy. If you all fall for this con-trick then you will deserve the SLAVERY that is in store for

YOU!

Referendum: how Labour could still smell of roses.

and

'Money to spare'

when we leave the EU in 2008?

Open Europe says:

 

  • Build 40 brand new general hospitals each year 2007-13

or

  • Cut council tax by nearly 50 per cent

or

  • Cut the basic rate of income tax by 3p

or

Cut petrol duty by 75 per cent

or

Pay the total bill for the London Olympics in less than a year

AND MUCH MORE

Commons debate on the European Communities (Finance) Bill on Monday 19th November,2007.

REFERENDUM DAY

will be

RECOMPENCE DAY?

*

A TIME FOR EUROSCEPTICS TO LEARN FROM THE PAST-ONLY A TWO-PRONGED ATTACK CAN BRING VICTORY AND SAVE YOUR FREEDOM -CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY.

 

 

 

 
       

*

 

Let the people speak!

www.makeitanissue.org.uk

 

 

*

www.noliberties.com

[Latest Addition - June07]

*

www.eutruth.org.uk

*

www.thewestminsternews.co.uk

*

 

www.speakout.co.uk

*

 

Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU

www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs

 

*

GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY WON'T HE TRUST YOU?

HELL ON EARTH IN IRAQ

*

67% want powers back from EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95% of British people want a REFERENDUM

*

PETITION

FOR A

REFERENDUM

SIGN TODAY ON LINE

telegraph.co.uk/eureferendum

July 18-2007

ALSO

JOIN THE 10 DOWNING STREET PROTEST

Readers can add their support to the growing clamour for a REFERENDUM on the '"REFORM TREATY" by signing up to a 10 Downing Street 0n-line petition

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/EU-treaty-NON/

 

The  Petition reads as follows:

"We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to guarantee that the British people will be permitted a binding REFERENDUM on any and all attempts to resurrect the EU " CONSTITUTION" (and any or all of its content) regardless of nomenclature."

Deadline for the PETITION is 31st January,2008

Eurofacts 27th July 2007.

*

'The Spirit of England'

by

Winston Churchill

In London on St.George's Day -1953

*

 

 

VOTE

 -2007

 

TO LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION

WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE

TO SET YOU

 FREE

 

THE

UK INDEPENDENCE PARTY

www.ukip.org

THE QUESTION THAT THE VOTER MUST ANSWER

 

DO YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE CORRUPT ,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND CORRUPT ALIEN BUSYBODY BRUSSELS’

 

-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?

 

TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER

BUT

SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.

*

 

ONLY

PRO-PORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

*

 

SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?

 

*

 

Home Rule for Scotland

WHY NOT

HOME RULE for ENGLAND

 

*

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin]

 

 
 
Elections in the British One Party State

If you vote Conservative, Labour, Lib-Dem, UKIP or the BNP, you'll be voting for the EU dictatorship. All five party leaderships are EU controlled. That's why your vote doesn't make a difference - all these five parties have the same policies: the EU's policies.

The 17 most senior politicians in the Conservative, Lib Dem and Labour parties, including Ken Clarke, Francis Maude, Cameron, William Hague, George Osborne, Nick Clegg, Brown, David and Ed Milliband, Ed Balls, Peter Mandleson are Bilderbergers, the 140 strong band of ultra senior Freemasons who are bribed by the EU to build the EU dictatorship.

No Bilderberger, Freemason or Common Purpose graduate should ever be allowed to hold public office.

UKIP and the BNP are honey traps to neutralise activists: UKIP is riddled with Freemasons and Common Purpose like a cancer, and the BNP controlled by the Edgar Griffin (father) and son Nick Freemasonry family. The 350,000 freemasons and the 40,000 strong Common Purpose Organisation are the (mostly unknowing) foot soldiers of the EU in Britain. (Which makes the BNP the easiest party to clean up - get rid of the Griffins, and put in a real anti-EU leadership.)

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF

UKIP

 OR

 INTEND TO JOIN THEM TAKE NOTE OF THE MESSAGE ABOVE

 

 

THE EDP HAS BEEN CRITICAL OF THE MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP OF THE UKIP FOR SOME TIME NOW AS IS SHOWN IN A NUMBER OF BULLETINS  OVER THE PAST FEW YEARS WHERE WE HAVE CRITICISED THEIR LACK LUSTRE PERFORMANCE AS THEY FAILED TO MOTIVATE THEIR MEMBERSHIP TO A MORE DETERMINED CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE CAMPAIGN WHICH WOULD HAVE MADE THE GOVERNMENTS TREMBLE BUT THEY HAD NO WORRY BECAUSE THEY HAD THEIR OWN PERSONS IN CHARGE AT THE TOP OF THE ORGANISATION.  THIS FIGHTING SPIRIT HAS BEEN LACKING AND WE CAN CONFIRM THIS OURSELVES BECAUSE WE HAVE BEEN OUTSIDE PARLIAMENT WHEN A MARCH WAS CANCELLED - AND WATCH THE FARCE WHEN CANDLES WERE HELD AND THOUSANDS OF LETTERS SENT TO MPS WHO KNEW WHERE TO DISPOSES OF THEM -AND ALL TO NO AVAIL.  IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF UKIP YOU HAVE BEEN BETRAYED BY YOUR OWN LEADERSHIP SOME APPEAR ON THE ALEX JONES SHOW WHICH HAS BEEN UNDER CLOSE SPOTLIGHT RECENTLY AS BEING CLOSE TO AN ISRAELI SECURITY FIRM DETAILS ON OUR WEBSITE .    IRONICALLY IT WAS A CHANCE LOOK ON THE INTERNET A FEW YEARS AGO  TO COME UPON THAT SITE WHICH OPENED OUR MIND TO THE ILLUMINATI.   THOUGH WE HAVE SOME DETAILS OF THE BILDERBERGERS ON OUR SITE  A NUMBER OF YEARS AGO WE FAILED TO DO MORE RESEARCH- WE ALL HAVE TO LEARN.  THE FAILURE OF UKIP WE HAVE SUSPECTED  FOR MANY YEARS   THAT MANY AT THE TOP OF THEIR ORGANISATION MIGHT BE UNDERCOVER MEMBERS OF THE ILLUMINATI.  IT IS A FAVOURITE TRICK OF THEIRS TO SUPPORT ANY PARTY OR ORGANISATION AT THE OUTSET WHATEVER ITS POLICY AS IT ALLOWS THEM TO PUT THEIR OWN PEOPLE IN TO CONTROL ITS POLICES AS THEY BEHIND THE SCENES SUPPLY THE VITAL FINANCIAL SUPPORT.

  Our intention is not to benefit from this disaster as since the 1999 European Election we have NOT! accepted a DONATION! from ANYONE! and we closed membership also because we did not wish to split the vote for UKIP but have stated in the past that we would contest another election if it was ever necessary to enter into the affray again and with the reputation of UKIP under scrutiny we will keep our options OPEN!   As we mentioned some time ago we have been almost two decades on the campaign trail to free our once FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE of ENGLAND from the SATANIC EU and those who have for centuries have planned for an EVIL ONE-WORLD CORPORATION/GOVERNMENT and EXTERMINATE! at least 5 BILLION of the WORLD'S POPULATION and therefore if we are right about those mentioned above they are not only TRAITORS to their COUNTRY but also a THREAT to WORLD PEACE.   However, of late, matters have NOT! been going well for the ILLUMINATI as you will observe BELOW.

 

The Queen, Treason and the Coronation oath

Together with Churchill, King George VI saved our nation; he was a Monarch to be proud of. But his daughter the Queen is the only monarch to have broken all her coronation oaths, by signing these six treaties that abolish our common law, the British Constitution, the British and English nations, and our sovereignty. She has also committed treason, together with co-signatories Ted Heath, Margaret Thatcher, John Major, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown.

Realising that under the five Treason Acts they should already be hanging by the neck until dead, Tony Blair and the Queen signed the Crime and Disorder Act, 1998, which secretly abolished much of the crime of treason (s36.3) and reduced the penalty to life imprisonment - they didn't tell the MP's what they had just voted for.

1.4 million British Servicemen gave their lives for our independence. The Queen has thrown their sacrifices away and made them worthless.

At no physical risk to herself, she could have fulfilled her oath and duty as a constitutional check and balance, by refusing to sign the six treaties until an in/out referendum had been held. In the unlikely event the vote went against her, she was even more unlikely to lose her crown (not her life or a limb), and would keep her 9 billion plus palaces either way. Those servicemen's lives would still have meant something.

But she was always keen to sign; and said in advance she would sign the last treaty. Princes Charles, William or Harry can now never be King. You can't have a King without a Kingdom: they can only be princes of a region (principality) within Europe.

King Edward 8th was forced to abdicate because he was too overt as a German Nazi supporter. Mrs Simpson's divorce was merely the excuse. The Royal Family is a German Family - real surname Saxe-Coburg Gotha. Windsor is an adopted surname. All four of Prince Phillip's sisters married high ranking German Nazis. After they lost the war the EU was switched from a Nazi basis to a communist basis.

Between the ages of 12 and 22 Queen Elisabeth's political and constitutional tutor was Sir Henry Martin, a Fabian Communist. It seems clear she was well trained for her subversion and treason.

Because she waves and smiles at us most are fooled into thinking she's lovely; in fact the Queen is a member of the Illuminati, a Bilderberger, head of Freemasonry, is wholly pro the (German) EU, and has abolished this nation with ruthless determination. It is so obvious she cares nothing for Britain or the British.

The Queen's aspirations are not ours; she clearly serves a much darker master; the faith she defends cannot be the one we think it is. King George VI, the one recent monarch not indoctrinated with Nazi or Communist philosophy, must be turning over in his grave.

I ask that the law be enforced, and the Queen be tried for treason before 12 honest people, and not by our corrupt judges. And that the illegal section 36.3 Crime and Disorder Act be declared null and void, so that she can hang by the neck till dead.

The new EU Hitler doesn't have to get elected
Its worth noting that Adolf Hitler first had to get elected, if on a 35% minority vote, and then get his Enabling Act passed. An EU dictator has no such problems. Our EU rulers do not submit themselves for election now. And the Queen has already signed the Enabling Act (Civil Contingencies Act 2004).

The EU's Hitler will have a much easier rise to power, and will have the formerly British and French nuclear weapons from day one. Adolf Hitler killed 54 million people. The EU's dictator could kill a billion at the touch of a button, with no democratic checks and balances to answer to. How could any aspiring dictator resist the EU opportunity?

 

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

www.bilderbergmeetings.org/participants2012.

 

 

 

 

 KNOWN GOOD GUYS UNDER SUSPICION OF BEING PROVOCATEURS ON BEHALF OF THE ILLUMINATI.

As we have explained elsewhere it is this typical situation which we must fear the most and expect this insidious practice of the satanic ILLUMINATI who wish to ensure where possible that it is THEIR STOOGE in CONTROL! within their ENEMIES camp.  We suspect that there are many more within UKIP [-possibly even MEP's-one talking about a deal with the Conservative party ] and  BNP and other declared advocates across the political spectrum pursuing  FREEDOM! and NATION STATE! who will soon share the space below.

There are always great difficulty in these matters and one can only go on the actions and contacts of the individuals involved.

There can be no greater or more heinous crime imaginable than for one to betray the TRUST of a COMRADE fighting for a JUST! and GOOD CAUSE!

'It is said: 'No man can justly censure or condemn another, because indeed no man truly knows another'

But what we are considering is at a time when those who intend to destroy the majority of mankind and make serfs of the majority allowed to live and  It is a WAR we are FIGHTING for SURVIVAL! and in such circumstances a persons ACTIONS or lack of ACTION! are the ONLY basis on which one can JUDGE! another.

Finally it is up to the membership of UKIP and BNP to purge THEIR PARTY of the TRAITORS within and look for those who have the fire in their belly to carry the party forward to VICTORY!

 

MAY-2012

 

 

WHAT A WAY TO WIN A WAR

*

IS SENATOR RON PAUL- ILLUMINATI?

 

BENJAMIN FULFORD

 

More!

[WORKS]

*

SEEKTHETRUTHANDWISDOM

 

*

Bank Of England The Banking Swindle

 

More!

 

More!

 

PATRIOT or TRAITOR to HIS COUNTRY

+More!

 

 More!

 

+(More!

 

 

THIS YOU MUST SEE IT CONCERNS

 YOUR

PLANET!

AND

 YOU!

 

 

NO NEED TO PANIC!

 

'Others shall sing the song,

Others shall right the wrong,-

Finish what I begin,

All all I fail of win.

Hail to the coming singers!

Hail to the brave light-bringers!

Forward I reach and above

All that they sing and dare.

 

The airs of heaven blow o'er me;

A glory shines before me

Of what mankind shall be'-

Pure, generous, brave and free,

I feel the earth move sunward,

I join the great march onward,

And  take, by faith, while living,

My freehold of thanksgiving.-

 

WHITTIER

 

MAY-2012

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/ ****  THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/ ****    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/****  DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/ ****   NOR SHALL MY SWORD/****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/ ****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/****   ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY -CORRECT BROWNDOM/****    ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1- /****   ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/****    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./****    ENGLAND ARISE! - TODAY WE CLAIM OUR RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION/ ****  KISS GOOD BYE TO YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY / ****    ST GEORGE'S DAY-ENGLAND'S DAY/****    EU WIPES ENGLAND OFF THE MAP**** THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

MAY-2012