VOTE UKIP!-ON MAY 7-2015

 
 
 
MAJOR ISSUES BULLETIN
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

HOME

 
     
 
 

 

War sceptic Miliband offers chance of clean slate on Iraq

by

Julian Borger and Patrick Wintour

[THE Guardian -Friday 29th June-2007]

 

The appointment of David Miliband as the youngest

FOREIGN SECRETARY

in three decades offers a chance for Britain to turn as fresh face to the world that is less compromised by the war in Iraq.

[Before we continue with this statement we will make our position clear.

1) We look on the USA as our closest ally.

2) We accept that the USA has always looked to its own interest before any other nation on earth -even though they enjoy the fruit of its beginning of English common law and an 'Englishman's Rights and Liberties.

3) In two world wars  we have been well and truly well- blooded in lives and treasure before we have seen our cousins eventually come to our assistance -but their intervention was vital-as they knew it would be decisive.

4) But even with the above observations we still look on the USA as a Christian World Power - as our friend -for roots are the true meaning of

FRIENDSHIP.

 

5) But as a true friend to be open and honest about their relationship and rise above the occasional disagreement but stand firm on matters of Integrity and Honesty as in the end it is the very foundation of a nation that speaks to future generations.

6) As the history of England and Britain has disclosed we are the original nation state and later parliamentary democracy of which in their own way  the nations of the  world have taken for its own

7)  WE have no fear of any nation state as our long history has shown and we are a people who love

FREEDOM

-for our friends and even our enemies as our long history has portrayed at great cost to our ourselves.

*

8) As a independent nation state of long duration we must always be forthright in defending our own independence and the independence of other nation states and this will only be possible out of the

UNITED STATES OF EUROPE.

9) We ask David Miliband are you too a member of the BILDERBERGERS as  Tony Blair -David Cameron Kenneth Clarke and Paddy Ashdown and no doubt many others in positions of trust and power today in our country - who owe their loyalty not to the

BRITAIN

BUT

To

WORLD GOVERNMENT

10) A British Foreign Minister needs to heed the advice of a great ENGLISH Prime Minister Lord Palmerstone of over 159 years ago who 's grasp of FOREIGN AFFAIRS was important then and some would say even more important at this crucial crossroads in the history of the

ENGLISH NATION

Our neighbours in our shared island home have either a PARLIAMENT or an ASSEMBLY

-and we have a great suspicion that the Pro-EU David Miliband is a cosseted Bilderberger and has only

REGIONS

on offer for

ENGLAND

WE hope he will prove us wrong but the present signs do not look hopeful

A REFERENDUM WILL BE TAKEN WITH OR WITHOUT THE BROWN GOVERNMENT BUT IF THE PRIME MINISTER VALUES HIS LEGACY HE SHOULD CALL A REFERENDUM WITHOUT DELAY.

 

*

To continue

Responding to his appointment yesterday, Mr Miliband calls for

"a diplomacy which is patient as well as purposeful, which listens as well as leads."

 

[Well we remind Mr Miliband that in 2004 we asked for an immediate withdrawal of our forces from Iraq. Since then as at 27th June 2007 the first day as his  Prime Minister Gordon Brown took Office

 the casualty figures have reached

153 killed

-and the injured must now have reached over

5000

What alarms us is that the fate of our armed forces is still in the hands of a bumbling man who has neither the outward look of a man of confidence to do what is necessary to protect our soldiers lives and portrays a countenance of a man completely out of his depths and after the Iranian escapade he should have been put out to grass.

It is said that he is left in place because a withdrawal from Iraq was imminent -If this is so we need a man at the helm that the forces can have confidence in because a withdrawal is the most dangerous of manoeuvres in war.

To continue:

The remarks gave little away but sent a message abroad that he was prepared to cast a critical eye over a

FOREIGN POLICY

constrained by Britain's relationship with the USA. Mr Miliband, 41 is not publicly associated with the decision to invade Iraq and is said to have been privately sceptical about it.

*

 

[We are getting tired of hearing the same Pontius Pilot attitude -it is so easy to stand aside and let evil flourish and then later say -it had nothing to do with me.

As the great parliamentarian Edmund Burke said:

'When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.'

*

That may be one of the reasons Gordon Brown chose him for the job over Jack Straw, who played a leading role in justifying the invasion in 2003. Others will see his elevation as a reward for declining Blairite pleas, two months ago, to stand against Mr Brown for the leadership.

For the immediate future, the foreign secretary will not have a say over Iraq policy. A gradual British withdrawal has been set in motion, and most critical decisions will be taken in the White House, Downing Street and the *Ministry of Defence.[*Another telling reason why Des Brown should have been put out to pasture urgently.]

The same largely applies to Afghanistan. But it will be important psychologically that Mr Miliband will not be personally associated with the Iraq invasion by his foreign counterparts. He will travel abroad with much less baggage than Mr Straw or Margaret Beckett.

Diplomats also hope that Mr Miliband's appointment will mean that the

FOREIGN OFFICE

-will once again take the lead role over foreign policy and important decisions will not be confined to Mr Brown's bunker.

Many diplomats complained that Mr Blair and his top advisers , the chief of staff, Jonathan Powell, and Sir Nigel Sheinwald, the foreign policy adviser dominated

FOREIGN POLICY

Most of Miliband's career to date has focused on domestic policy, but colleagues and foreign policy experts say he has been engaged behind the scenes in foreign policy debate, particularly over

EUROPE

-and has cultivated close ties with foreign policy thinkers abroad

Last night Jim Murphy was named

 as MINISTER FOR EUROPE

Mr Miliband's elevation is extraordinary, making him the youngest foreign secretary since the ill-fated David Owen. Unlike Lord Owen, he has never worked in the Foreign Office before. He has socialism in his blood: his father was a Marxist professor Ralph Miliband, author of

'The State in a Capitalist Society'

He will be present a stark contrast to his predecessor Mrs Beckett. He is energetic, modern, intellectual, non-tribal and instinctively pro-European.

[Well for millions of eurosceptics in Britain he is decidedly the wrong man in the job at the Foreign Office because what ever his ambitions there is no way that the majority of people will stomach the New European Constitution and if Mr Miliband is wise he will use his abundant talents in rejecting the  constitution and arranging a looser connection with Europe. Because he will come a great cropper if he thinks that his collectivist ideas will be accepted by the loyal and sane voters in our country. As for being non-tribal that is his concern but he should be reminded that there is a place called ENGLAND and millions of people identify themselves as being ENGLISH Mr Miliband though of course you will insist in being

A GOOD EUROPEAN

We're afraid that on first impressions you will be a great threat to millions of people who believe in a Nation State and not a UNITED STATES OF EUROPE]

*

"It's a really interesting appointment,"

said Mark Leonard, the executive director of the European Council on Foreign Relations.

[Well he would wouldn't he as he recognised another fellow Bilderberger.]

"Its the first time since Robin Cook you have someone coming into the post with ideas about what

[BRITISH] Foreign Policy should look like. He 's a natural internationalist".

 

[Well we were looking for a British Foreign Minister who would be concerned with maintaining the Integrity and Defence and interests of Britain.]

Mr Miliband was one of a group of European foreign policy intellectuals who formulated the Laeken declaration in 2001 calling for institutional reform in the EU.

[All window -dressing this is the same tall story you hear from Pro EU MEP's of all parties who have been voicing over 35 years their determination to change the despotic unaccountable police state

UNITED STATES OF EUROPE  

We hear constantly and no doubt from Mr Miliband shortly that the face of Europe will be changed. What a hope!-what a naive suggestion at the very moment when the majority of people in Britain want a REFERENDUM in order to give their answer

WE WANT OUT OF EUROPE.

*

The hottest political problem he will face will be finding a way to brush off Tory calls for a

REFERENDUM

-on the EUROPEAN TREATY

He is likely to have the confidence and grasp of detail to push this aside.

[What arrogance to think that Mr Miliband will have any choice but to accept the need for a REFERENDUM. If he does not do so others will and it will prove to the millions of voters in the country that

NO BRITISH GOVERNMENT CAN BE TRUSTED TO KEEP ITS WORD.

For millions of people the self-government and independence of our country is more important than anything that the Pro-EU sovietised Mr Miliband has to say.]

*

Charles Grant, the director of the Centre for European Reform, which Mr Miliband co-founded, said:

"Its an inspired choice I imagine Brown will delegate to him the job of building a network of friends and allies. Brown is not a natural networker."

 

[What we have to ask both Charles Grant and Mr Miliband can they give us one instance of the EU giving power back to national governments since their

Centre for European Reform

-was founded in 2001?

and we are not talking about their abandoning their attempt to meddle with our weights and measures on fruit and vegitables.

The EU Commissioners in Brussels must be laughing their heads off -they might even be members of this

Mission Impossible Club

because even they need some light relief from their dictatorial duties.

What better way to deflect from the monster of Europe than to give some hope that it may be slain some time in the future but of course we cannot tell you when and the gravy train continues with abundant rewards for all concerned.]

*

But in a field where personal relations matter, Mr Miliband will need time to build an international reputation. his in-tray at King Charles Street [Well this name will have to go for a start] is full of issues he has little direct experience in. Most important, there is no international consensus on Iran's nuclear aspirations, and it is clear the US has not dismissed the military option.

*

Bombs in London

 

 

[It is 10pm on Friday night the 29th June-2007 and  we have just heard on the BBC News that there have been two car bombs discovered by chance in London. We have already been informed that MI5 are watching 1500 suspect terrorists involved in possible 250 different plots.

What we have to ask the Security Services is WHY  after the arrival of a new Prime Minister that our communications are still being interrupted. We are patriots and no threat to our country at the moment though we cannot guarantee that this will remain so if Mr Miliband decides to ignore the millions of British people who will have their REFERENDUM with or without his consent.

*

To continue:

[We learn] Mr Miliband could have a key role in the search for a compromise that avoids disaster while preventing a nuclear arms race in the Middle East [Which his late captain lit the fuse by his illegal war in Iraq and his blundering Defence Minister 's ineptitude .] 

A crisis is also brewing over Kosovo , as Russia blocks [rightly so] plans for its qualified independence. [Or in other words the surrender of Serbian territory to Albanian Freedom Fighters who were encouraged by Germany]

 The Kosovo dilemma is part of the broader problem of how to deal with Vladimir Putin's newly assertive and powerful Russia.

Given his past , it seems likely that Mr Miliband will make building a common European position his priority.

[Well we as with many others hoped we were getting a British Foreign Minister and not a substitute European Foreign minister wishing to put the world to rights before looking in his own backyard to the concerns of millions of people HERE who wish to be free of the  monstrous collective police state in Brussels at the earliest possible moment.

His assurances that he will change the monster will be of no avail as we have heard this fiction uttered so many times that it is now treated with the contempt it deserves. Of course we will hear much of the wonderful co-operation between EU members but then the Elite of these member states have much to lose if they allow their closed shop to be destroyed from within.

We will NEVER accept our ENSLAVEMENT in the

UNITED STATES OF EUROPE.

So Mr Miliband we await your first policy statement on the EU but

PLEASE DO NOT MISLEAD US.

You will be wasting your time if you think that after 35 years we will accept anything but a

WITHDRAWAL FROM THE EU

*

 

THE CASE FOR A REFERENDUM

*

 

Letters to the Daily Telegraph

Wednesday 27th June-2007

 

Stop the excuses and hold an EU referendum

SIR - In April 2004, we sent a PETITION of over

 1,000,000

signatures to the Queen requesting

NO ROYAL ASSENT

to any

BILL

-authorising the proposed

EU CONSTITUTION

-unless approved by at least two thirds of the

ELECTORATE

in a

REFERENDUM

Three weeks later, Tony Blair promised a referendum, on which

HE and GORDON BROWN

have since reneged as being unnecessary.

 

The revamped version of the

EU Constitution

-is virtually identical with its predecessor, and Mr Blair's attempts to hide this is a shameful

BETRAYAL OF THE COUNTRY.

THEREFORE

If our elected politicians refuse

TO HONOUR THEIR OATHS

I propose that an

INDEPENDENT REFERENDUM IS ARRANGED

-funded and conducted without further ado, preceded by a

FULL HONEST PRESENTATION OF THE FACTS.

This would at least provide a reliable un-spun indication of public opinion. We should also insist that there is

NO GOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH BRUSSELS.

until the outcome of the

REFERENDUM

IS KNOWN

The British people can then choose whether they wish to be subjugated by

AN ALIEN POWER

OR

SET FREE!

 

JOHN GOURIET

Dilton Marsh, Wiltshire

*

[ Mr John Gouriet needs no introduction as his eminent work  together with his once close colleague the late Chairman of the Freedom Association Norris McWhirter whose life was brought to an end by his patriotic and persistent hard work on behalf of his country - has been on our front page since its beginning.]

 

 

SIR - An Act of Parliament to ratify a

NEW EU TREATY

not only alters the external relationship between the British State and foreign states, but also the internal constitutional relationship between the

BRITISH STATE AND ITS CITIZENS

The Irish Republic has a

CODIFIED CONSTITUTION

-which can be amended

ONLY

BY

REFERENDUM

That is why the Irish Government has been

COMPELLED

 to hold

A REFERENDUM

ON EACH OF THE EU TREATIES.

At one time, Labour politicians were in favour of

REFERENDUMS

-to settle constitutional questions-for example on whether there should be

DEVOLVED GOVERNMENT

IN

SCOTLAND

But their enthusiasm for letting us have a say began to wane when voters in

NORTH EAST ENGLAND

threw out John Prescott's proposal for an elected

REGIONAL ASSEMBLY

None the less, every Labour MP was elected in 2005 on the

MANIFESTO PROMISE

of a

REFERENDUM

on the

NEW EU TREATY

-and they must not allow themselves to be bullied

INTO BREAKING THEIR WORD.

 

Dr D. R. Cooper

Maidenhead, Berkshire

 

[We know of Dr Cooper a regular contributor to Eurofacts  a fortnightly journal

www.junepress.com]

 

[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets]

June 27-2007

*

FROM

One Prime Minister in 1848 to

Gordon Brown in 2007

 

Over a Hundred and Fifty Seven years ago a great patriotic Prime Minister -Foreign Secretary -Lord Palmerstone (Henry John Temple) -beloved by his People defined the principle of nationality as follows:

 

Providence meant mankind to be divided into separate nations, and for this purpose countries have been bounded by natural barriers, and races of men have been distinguished by separate languages, habits, manners, dispositions, and characters…” (1848)

 

“…We have in the first place to say that the Business of an English Government, is to pursue that course of Foreign Policy which on the whole they may think right; and not to attempt the impossible task of at all times and upon all subjects doing that which is agreeable to all Foreign Governments. A man who in private life attempts to please everyone, invariably fails; and the Government of a great country would not be more successful in such an endeavour…

. It must at times be an advantage to a foreign Prince…in the present state of the continent to visit England and to see with his own eyes, how Liberty may be combined with Loyalty, Freedom with public order, and how the Respect which is shown by the Crown for the Rights of the Subject and for the enactment of the Law produces corresponding Feelings on the Part of the People and inspires them with similar Respect for the Rights of the Crown and for the Laws which secure the Liberties and the Property of all , from the highest to the lowest in the Land. ”

 

For a full statement of his Principles:

 

“I hold with respect to alliances that England is a Power sufficiently strong, sufficiently powerful to steer her own course, and not to tie herself as an unnecessary appendage to the policy of any other Government. I hold that the real policy of England-apart from questions which involve her own particular interests, political or commercial-is to be the champions of justice and right, pursuing that course with moderation and prudence, not becoming the Quixote of the world, but giving the weight of her moral sanction and support wherever she thinks that justice is, and wherever she thinks wrong has been done…

 

It is a narrow policy to suppose that this country or that is to be marked out as the eternal ally or the perpetual enemy of England. We have no eternal enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow.” [In 1848 Lord Palmerstone was Foreign Secretary at the age of sixty-three. He entered Parliament in 1807- Secretary at War in 1809; 1811-28 (most years) War Office; 1830- 1852 Foreign Office; 1852-55 -Home Office; 1855-65.

 

‘ Born 1784 in Park Street Westminster. Family home ‘Broadlands’ Hampshire. Died on the morning of October 18, 1865. And the last candle [last of his contempories] of the Eighteenth century was out.’

 

* *

 

[It is significant that the word ‘England’ was not a word despised in our House of Commons during the time of this great patriot of England and only closer to our own times has the word Britain taken its place though we do detect a slight revival now in existence. ]

 

* *

JUNE/07

*

*

 

THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN-IS THE EU COMMISSION LISTENING?

*

Ditch the EU TREATY after IRISH REJECTION

SAY VOTERS

by

Daniel Martin

Political Reporter

[Daily Mail-Wednesday, June 18,2008]

MORE THAN HALF of voters believe Britain should drop the controversial European Treaty in the wake of its rejection in last week's

IRISH REFERENDUM'

The poll comes as the Tories launch a last-ditch bid in the

HOUSE of LORDS

today to delay the

RATIFICATION OF THE TREATY.

And

10,000 people

have signed a

PETITION

on the

DOWNING STREET- WEBSITE

within the past few days

JUNE16-2008

, calling on the

GOVERNMENT

NOT TO RATIFY THE BILL

[WHY DON'T YOU?]

 

Downing Street website is

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Abandon-Lisbon/

*

JUNE 18-2008

 

*

13th October,2007

 

So You Want Out Of The EU

 

THEN WHY NOT SIGN THE

RENUNCIATION of EU CITIZENSHIP

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Optout

Details from petition creator

With the signing of the Maastricht Treaty the people of Britain were given

DUAL CITIZENSHIP

-both

EUROPEAN and BRITISH

The extra tier of citizenship was thrust upon the people without their consent -and in many cases knowledge.

The PEOPLE of GREAT BRITAIN should be allowed the option of opting out of the EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP if they so wish. The GOVERNMENT will then be able to provide those who have opted out with

BRITISH DOCUMENTATION

-only such as British  (not EU) passports, driving licences and other national documents.

EU laws will also NOT APPLY to those who

HAVE OPTED OUT OF EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP

 

[PETITION OPEN UNTIL OCTOBER 08]

 

*

 

Let the people speak!

www.makeitanissue.org.uk

 

 

*

www.noliberties.com

[Latest Addition - June07]

*

www.eutruth.org.uk

*

www.thewestminsternews.co.uk

*

 

www.speakout.co.uk

*

 

Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU

www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs

 

*

GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY WON'T HE TRUST YOU?

HELL ON EARTH IN IRAQ

*

67% want powers back from EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95% of British people want a REFERENDUM

*

PETITION

FOR A

REFERENDUM

SIGN TODAY ON LINE

telegraph.co.uk/eureferendum

July 18-2007

 

 

VOTE

 -2007

 

TO LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION

WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE

TO SET YOU

 FREE

 

THE

UK INDEPENDENCE PARTY

www.ukip.org

THE QUESTION THAT THE VOTER MUST ANSWER

 

DO YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE CORRUPT ,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND CORRUPT ALIEN BUSYBODY BRUSSELS’

 

-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?

 

TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER

BUT

SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.

*

 

ONLY

PRO-PORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

*

 

SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?

 

*

 

Home Rule for Scotland

WHY NOT

HOME RULE for ENGLAND

 

*

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin]

 

 
 
Elections in the British One Party State

If you vote Conservative, Labour, Lib-Dem, UKIP or the BNP, you'll be voting for the EU dictatorship. All five party leaderships are EU controlled. That's why your vote doesn't make a difference - all these five parties have the same policies: the EU's policies.

The 17 most senior politicians in the Conservative, Lib Dem and Labour parties, including Ken Clarke, Francis Maude, Cameron, William Hague, George Osborne, Nick Clegg, Brown, David and Ed Milliband, Ed Balls, Peter Mandleson are Bilderbergers, the 140 strong band of ultra senior Freemasons who are bribed by the EU to build the EU dictatorship.

No Bilderberger, Freemason or Common Purpose graduate should ever be allowed to hold public office.

UKIP and the BNP are honey traps to neutralise activists: UKIP is riddled with Freemasons and Common Purpose like a cancer, and the BNP controlled by the Edgar Griffin (father) and son Nick Freemasonry family. The 350,000 freemasons and the 40,000 strong Common Purpose Organisation are the (mostly unknowing) foot soldiers of the EU in Britain. (Which makes the BNP the easiest party to clean up - get rid of the Griffins, and put in a real anti-EU leadership.)

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF

UKIP

 OR

 INTEND TO JOIN THEM TAKE NOTE OF THE MESSAGE ABOVE

 

 

THE EDP HAS BEEN CRITICAL OF THE MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP OF THE UKIP FOR SOME TIME NOW AS IS SHOWN IN A NUMBER OF BULLETINS  OVER THE PAST FEW YEARS WHERE WE HAVE CRITICISED THEIR LACK LUSTRE PERFORMANCE AS THEY FAILED TO MOTIVATE THEIR MEMBERSHIP TO A MORE DETERMINED CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE CAMPAIGN WHICH WOULD HAVE MADE THE GOVERNMENTS TREMBLE BUT THEY HAD NO WORRY BECAUSE THEY HAD THEIR OWN PERSONS IN CHARGE AT THE TOP OF THE ORGANISATION.  THIS FIGHTING SPIRIT HAS BEEN LACKING AND WE CAN CONFIRM THIS OURSELVES BECAUSE WE HAVE BEEN OUTSIDE PARLIAMENT WHEN A MARCH WAS CANCELLED - AND WATCH THE FARCE WHEN CANDLES WERE HELD AND THOUSANDS OF LETTERS SENT TO MPS WHO KNEW WHERE TO DISPOSES OF THEM -AND ALL TO NO AVAIL.  IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF UKIP YOU HAVE BEEN BETRAYED BY YOUR OWN LEADERSHIP SOME APPEAR ON THE ALEX JONES SHOW WHICH HAS BEEN UNDER CLOSE SPOTLIGHT RECENTLY AS BEING CLOSE TO AN ISRAELI SECURITY FIRM DETAILS ON OUR WEBSITE .    IRONICALLY IT WAS A CHANCE LOOK ON THE INTERNET A FEW YEARS AGO  TO COME UPON THAT SITE WHICH OPENED OUR MIND TO THE ILLUMINATI.   THOUGH WE HAVE SOME DETAILS OF THE BILDERBERGERS ON OUR SITE  A NUMBER OF YEARS AGO WE FAILED TO DO MORE RESEARCH- WE ALL HAVE TO LEARN.  THE FAILURE OF UKIP WE HAVE SUSPECTED  FOR MANY YEARS   THAT MANY AT THE TOP OF THEIR ORGANISATION MIGHT BE UNDERCOVER MEMBERS OF THE ILLUMINATI.  IT IS A FAVOURITE TRICK OF THEIRS TO SUPPORT ANY PARTY OR ORGANISATION AT THE OUTSET WHATEVER ITS POLICY AS IT ALLOWS THEM TO PUT THEIR OWN PEOPLE IN TO CONTROL ITS POLICES AS THEY BEHIND THE SCENES SUPPLY THE VITAL FINANCIAL SUPPORT.

  Our intention is not to benefit from this disaster as since the 1999 European Election we have NOT! accepted a DONATION! from ANYONE! and we closed membership also because we did not wish to split the vote for UKIP but have stated in the past that we would contest another election if it was ever necessary to enter into the affray again and with the reputation of UKIP under scrutiny we will keep our options OPEN!   As we mentioned some time ago we have been almost two decades on the campaign trail to free our once FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE of ENGLAND from the SATANIC EU and those who have for centuries have planned for an EVIL ONE-WORLD CORPORATION/GOVERNMENT and EXTERMINATE! at least 5 BILLION of the WORLD'S POPULATION and therefore if we are right about those mentioned above they are not only TRAITORS to their COUNTRY but also a THREAT to WORLD PEACE.   However, of late, matters have NOT! been going well for the ILLUMINATI as you will observe BELOW.

The Queen, Treason and the Coronation oath

Together with Churchill, King George VI saved our nation; he was a Monarch to be proud of. But his daughter the Queen is the only monarch to have broken all her coronation oaths, by signing these six treaties that abolish our common law, the British Constitution, the British and English nations, and our sovereignty. She has also committed treason, together with co-signatories Ted Heath, Margaret Thatcher, John Major, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown.

Realising that under the five Treason Acts they should already be hanging by the neck until dead, Tony Blair and the Queen signed the Crime and Disorder Act, 1998, which secretly abolished much of the crime of treason (s36.3) and reduced the penalty to life imprisonment - they didn't tell the MP's what they had just voted for.

1.4 million British Servicemen gave their lives for our independence. The Queen has thrown their sacrifices away and made them worthless.

At no physical risk to herself, she could have fulfilled her oath and duty as a constitutional check and balance, by refusing to sign the six treaties until an in/out referendum had been held. In the unlikely event the vote went against her, she was even more unlikely to lose her crown (not her life or a limb), and would keep her £9 billion plus palaces either way. Those servicemen's lives would still have meant something.

But she was always keen to sign; and said in advance she would sign the last treaty. Princes Charles, William or Harry can now never be King. You can't have a King without a Kingdom: they can only be princes of a region (principality) within Europe.

King Edward 8th was forced to abdicate because he was too overt as a German Nazi supporter. Mrs Simpson's divorce was merely the excuse. The Royal Family is a German Family - real surname Saxe-Coburg Gotha. Windsor is an adopted surname. All four of Prince Phillip's sisters married high ranking German Nazis. After they lost the war the EU was switched from a Nazi basis to a communist basis.

Between the ages of 12 and 22 Queen Elisabeth's political and constitutional tutor was Sir Henry Martin, a Fabian Communist. It seems clear she was well trained for her subversion and treason.

Because she waves and smiles at us most are fooled into thinking she's lovely; in fact the Queen is a member of the Illuminati, a Bilderberger, head of Freemasonry, is wholly pro the (German) EU, and has abolished this nation with ruthless determination. It is so obvious she cares nothing for Britain or the British.

The Queen's aspirations are not ours; she clearly serves a much darker master; the faith she defends cannot be the one we think it is. King George VI, the one recent monarch not indoctrinated with Nazi or Communist philosophy, must be turning over in his grave.

I ask that the law be enforced, and the Queen be tried for treason before 12 honest people, and not by our corrupt judges. And that the illegal section 36.3 Crime and Disorder Act be declared null and void, so that she can hang by the neck till dead.

The new EU Hitler doesn't have to get elected
Its worth noting that Adolf Hitler first had to get elected, if on a 35% minority vote, and then get his Enabling Act passed. An EU dictator has no such problems. Our EU rulers do not submit themselves for election now. And the Queen has already signed the Enabling Act (Civil Contingencies Act 2004).

The EU's Hitler will have a much easier rise to power, and will have the formerly British and French nuclear weapons from day one. Adolf Hitler killed 54 million people. The EU's dictator could kill a billion at the touch of a button, with no democratic checks and balances to answer to. How could any aspiring dictator resist the EU opportunity?

 

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

 

www.bilderbergmeetings.org/participants2012.l

 

A+MONARCH+THAT+BREAKS+A+CORONATION+OATH+

CANNOT+CLAIM+IMMUNITY+FROM+HIGH+TREASON+

BECAUSE+A+FIRST+MINISTER+SECRETLY

+CHANGED+THE+LAW

IN+1998.

THE+SACRET+OATH+IS+TO+THE+PEOPLE+

TO+PROTECT+THEIR+ACCUSTOMED+LIBERTIES+

AND+THOSE+OF+FUTURE+GENERATIONS+TO+COME

+IS +SACROSANCT.

 

 

HOME

DID YOU KNOW?

No 8

(Christopher Story of International Currency Review)

 

IS HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN SOVEREIGN?

Under Article 17 of the collectivist Maastricht treaty , all residents of the European Union are citizens of the EU Collective.  It follows that Presidents and Monarchs are 'citizens of the

EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE

as well

This provides the twisted rationale for President Herzog's vituperative dismissal of the relevance of the nation state, and for his insistence that it has outlived its usefulness, even though he continued to serve as President.

Dr Herzog's subversive remarks have special resonance for Britain, where

QUEEN ELIZABETH II

 is the

 SOVEREIGN AND CONSTITUTIONAL HEAD

of the

UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND.

She is the custodian, in her person, of the sovereignty of the British people which was passed to HER in February 1952 on the death of her father,  This was confirmed initially when the

QUEEN took the OATH of ACCESSION

and was finally solemnized at the QUEEN'S CORONATION in 1953 after HER MAJESTY had been recognized and universally accepted as the undoubted and rightful

 SOVEREIGN of the BRITISH PEOPLE

In November 2000 -after a correspondent who had taken care to prepare his case thoroughly, had written to the Prime Minister, Tony Blair; to the then Leader of the Opposition William Hague; to the Leader of the House of Lords, who was then Baroness Jay; and to the Lord Chief justice and other official office-holders and dignatories -asking:

Is Her Majesty the Queen Sovereign?

HE RECEIVED NO ANSWER AT ALL

or else a non-committal weak, diversionary reply.

Mr Blair being unable to answer the question himself, redirected the enquiry  to the Home office, which likewise prevaricated. Indeed, a hallmark of the

BLAIR GOVERNMENT

has been its Ministers' arrogant reluctance to answer letters and parliamentary questions.  Likewise, Mr Blair has reportedly made a point on occasion, of'

' standing the Queen up'

by failing to turn up on time., or at all, for his weekly scheduled audiences.

[Further details to follow]

*

[More background information will be available in the near future but why wait - order your copy - contact the under-mentioned website]

 

[This is a new series of single statements from

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

www.edwardharle.com

www.worldreports.org

*

AUGUST-2008

*

 

WHAT IF ALL EU LAWS PASSED BY PARLIAMENT AND APPROVED BY HER MAJESTY ARE INVALID BECAUSE AGAINST THE LAW OF THE LAND.

 

The position under English law, of course, is that Her Majesty remains Sovereign until the moment of her death, when sovereignty will pass automatically to the next rightful heir to the British Throne.  However, the Prime Minister's problem appears to be that since, under Article 17 of the Maastricht treaty, the Queen is a 'citizen' of the European Union, Her Sovereignty has been usurped.  Those UK Ministers and officials who permitted this scandalous state of affairs to develop are accordingly prima facie

TRAITORS

and ought to be indicted for

TREASON.

But so far as President Herzog of Germany has been concerned, his status as a 'citizen' of the

EU COLLECTIVE

appears to be entirely acceptable, because the EU is just a 'mask' for emerging

'GREATER GERMANY'.

When, following the correspondent's letters to selected leaders, an attempt was made by Christopher Gill MP in January 2001 to put down a question asking the Prime Minister whether

Her Majesty is Sovereign

the Table Office at the House of Commons replied in the following astonishing language:

'Last night you sought to table a question to the Prime Minister concerning the effect of the UK's membership of the

EUROPEAN UNION

on the constitutional position of

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN.

You will recall that I explained I would need to check the admissibility of the question with other colleagues before it could be tabled.  It has been pointed out to me that the question as drafted in effect seeks the Prime Minister's view in the interpretation of the law, in this case the

Treaties of the European Communities and associated European Treaties and UK legislation.

IT IS NOT POSSIBLE

to table questions to Ministers seeking interpretation of the , as this is a matter for the appropriate courts , not Ministers.'.

It would accordingly appear unclear whether

Her Majesty the Queen is Sovereign

-and by extension, whether any legislation passed by Westminster Parliament since  Britain made the mistake of joining the

EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

in

1972

is

VALID.

For evidently  until the matter is decided by the 'appropriate courts', the question of whether

HER MAJESTY IS SOVEREIGN

and thus able to act as

HEAD OF STATE

and hence give the

ROYAL ASSENT

to

LEGISLATION

passed by the

WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENT

remains in the air.

This Kafkaesque situation reflects the fact that, as noted under the

COLLECTIVE TREATY

all residents of the

EUROPEAN UNION

 are its citizens; and the

QUEEN

is a resident of the

EUROPEAN UNION

THEREFORE

if

EU law

 

has precedence over

BRITISH LAW

the

QUEEN

 being an

EU citizen

is

NOT

SOVEREIGN.

 

*

 

It may be asked: Why does no British Government ever take steps to have this matter clarified?

There are two possible answers to this question:

(1)    If the matter were to be resolved and it were to transpire that, indeed, The Queen is not Sovereign, then all legislation to which Her Majesty has given the Royal Assent since Britain acceded to the EEC is

NULL and VOID
 

because she had no power to give the Royal Assent, Alternatively:

(2)    Successive UK Governments since the beginning of the collapse in 1970 have preferred this issue to remain unresolved because if it were to be concluded by 'the appropriate courts' that The Queen is Sovereign, then correspondingly all EU legislation in the UK

is

NULL and VOID

because it is presupposed that EU law has precedence over UK law.

which cannot be the case if The Queen is Sovereign.

By contrast, if it does transpire the

The Queen is not Sovereign, then, certainly all legislation passed since Britain joined the EEC is indeed called into question.

Either way -whether The Queen is or is not Sovereign -the logic of the above leads to the conclusion that all EU law may be invalid in the United Kingdom.

Thus the the real reason this key issue has never been clarified is that the British Government's deceitful EU 'coup d' etat by installments'  policy would be exposed as illegal if the issue were ever to be addressed in the COURTS.  Furthermore, as reveiwed on page 209, the Treaty of Rome was reportedly

NOT SIGNED

-so the basis of all EU law throughout the

EU COLLECTIVE

may be open to

LEGAL CHALLENGE

on that ground alone.

It is concluded that EU law may have no standing in the United Kingdom and that successive conniving UK Governments have been

SHIRKING THIS CENTRAL ISSUE.

 

In an article published in The Times of London on 27th April,1996, Karl Lamers, whio was then foreign affairs spokesman for the Christian Democrats in the Bundestag, condescended to recognise that 'British doubts are deeply rooted.

The British concern is about the destruction of the national identity and the nation state, which is seen by the British as the only legitimate expression of the popular will.   Germans, by contrast, say that there has long been a supranational reality created by our European civilisation.  Common problems spawn common interests; our vital interests are identical

Whereupon Herr Lamers delivered a further broadside in Germany's psychological warfare offensive designed to help the stupid British to abandon their love of national sovereignty, which it is the central purpose of the European Union to

COLLECTIVISE:

'The  Euro-optimists take as their starting point the objective external reality.... The Eurosceptics (in Britain) deal with the inner, subjective reality of the consciousness of the British people.  It is if you like , the forces of Logic pitied against the forces of Psycho-logic.  It must be the task of democratic politics to help narrow this gap.  Otherwise politics will cease to be effective.  A community makes sense if it can begin to solve its existential problems.

If the nation state can no longer do that by itself, its failure undermines its political legitimacy'.

In other words, Britain had no right to continue existing as a nation state, and it must be 'brought to reason' so that it comes to full acceptance of German prescriptions and intentions without further. tedious prevarication

Note that, for Herr Lamers, the Pan-German position was 'logical', whereas the perceived British tendency to 'cling' to the nation state was 'psychological'. Once again here, the truth was turned upside-down.

The essence of Germany's continuing, updated strategy to realise the Germans, has never been in doubt - not least, since the German legislature adopted several amendments to the Basic Law (constitution) on 22nd December, 1992, in order to legalise' ratification of the Maastricht Treaty.  A new Article 23 was incorporated, the previous one having been repealed by the Unification T of 31st August 1990. The revised Article known as the 'ARTICLE on EUROPEAN UNION'. contains the following:

 

With a view to establishing a Unite Europe, the Federal republic of Germany shall participate in the development of the European Union, which is committed to democratic[?], rule of law, social and federative principles as well as to the principle of subsidiarity, and ensures protection of basic rights comparable in substance to that accorded to the Basic law

To this end the (German) Federation may transfer sovereign powers by law with the consent of the Bundesrat. The establishment of the European Union , as well as amendments to its statutory foundations and comparable foundations which amend or supplement the content of this Basic Law or make such amendments and supplements possible shall be subject to the provisions of paragraph (2) and (30 of Article 79.........

THIS MEANS that Germany can extend its sovereignty into Moravia and Bohemia, as provided for under the secret accord reached between President Gorbachev and Chancellor Kohl in Geneva , in 1990

As for Dr Professor Herzog, he faced both ways at the 1997 Konigswinter Conference, held in Berlin. In a welcoming speech, he suggested that 'Britons and Germans can build on common values, convictions and interests.  the debate on Europe can only reach a fruitful conclusion - that is to say, a conclusion acceptable to the German strategy elite- if we help gain acceptance for one idea, namely that the 'Europe of-Fatherlands' is possible.  The European nations can be Fatherlands and still integrate' 

 

 

[TO BE CONTINUED]

*

 

 

[More background information will be available in the near future but why wait - order your copy -

THE EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE

 -contact the under-mentioned website]

 

[This is a new series of single statements from

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

www.edwardharle.com

www.worldreports.org

*

 

 

SEPTEMBER-2008

*

 

TO ASSIST YOUR SEARCH WE HAVE INCLUDED THE LINKS BELOW

 

EUROPEAN UNION Q & A

1 EUROFACTS -   THE REALITY BEHIND THE EU

2]   WHAT IS THE POINT OF THE EU

3]   THE TRUTH OF A FEDERAL EUROPE-PARTS1-4

4]   THE 1701 ACT OF SETTLEMENT-WHY IT SHOULD  CONCERN YOU!

5[    THE BRITISH LEGACY -CANADA-AUSTRALIA-NEW ZEALAND

6]    COMMONWEALTH REALMS VERSUS THE NEW CONSTITUTION  OF EUROPE

7]   OUR BASIC LIBERTIES AND FREEDOMS SURRENDERED TO A FOREIGN POWER

8]   MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA-SUPPORT THE CROWN

9]   OUR QUEEN AND EU CONSTITUTION

10] VALERY GISCARD'ESTAING -WHY HE IS CALLED X

11]  THE ROTTEN HEART OF EUROPE by BERNARD CONNOLLY

12]   'I SAY WE MUST NOT JOIN EUROPE'-FIELD MARSHALL MONTGOMERY-(1962)

13]  PREVIOUS SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS SAYS WE MUST RETAIN OUR ANCIENT CONSTITUTION

14] THE COMMON LAW OF ENGLAND IS THE  LAW OF ENGLISH SPEAKING PEOPLES.

15]  A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION - CONSPIRATORS NAMED (1993)

16]   WHAT HISTORY TELLS US ABOUT OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CONTINENT

17]    COST of EU to UK-£4.8billion = 40 DISTRICT HOSPITALS-EQUIPPED -_STAFFED-AND FUNDED.

18]   WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON ABOUT THE EURO.

19]     200 MORE REASONS TO WHY TO REJECT THE EURO AND THE EU

20]     100 REASONS TO LEAVE THE EU

21]    THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE

22]    UK CONTRIBUTION TO BRUSSELS: BIG INCREASE IN 2005

23]   EU WHISTLEBLOWERS EXPOSE BILLIONS OF EURO FRAUD BUT NOTHING IS DONE

24]    BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENTS SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL

25]    FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENTS BY PAYOUTS

26]    SIGNS OF AN EU POLICE STATE

27]    NINETY-NINE COUNTRIES HAVE FREE TRADE WITH THE EU-WITHOUT PAYING A CENT TO BRUSSELS.

28]    IT IS TIME TO CONSIDER OURSELVES-IN A COMMONWEALTH FREE TRADE AREA

29]   BRITAIN MUST LEAVE THE EU AS UN SHOW BEST AREA FOR EXPANSION WILL BE USA/ANGLO-SAXON SPHERE

30]    WAVE GOODBYE TO THE EU AND MAKE EUROPE A BETTER PLACE   

31]    LORD STODDART PINS DOWN BLAIR GOVERNMENT ON COST OF EU -JUNE 2007.

32]    BRITISH VOTERS MUST GET A SAY ON NEW EU TREATY-[JUNE-2007]

33]    BLAIR'S LAST TREACHEROUS ACT. THE 60,000 DOLLAR QUESTION IS WHAT WILL MR BROWN DO?-JUNE-2007]

34]   GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY WON'T HE TRUST YOU?

35]  HITLER'S PRECEDENT PROVIDED THE MODEL FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION-1930-2007

36]  SAVE YOUR ENGLAND! - SAY NO! TO REGIONS
 

37]   NAZI INTERNATIONAL IN 2007-CLOSER TO YOUR HOME THAN YOU THINK  

38]    A WARNING FROM JAN-2005-TO PRESERVE THE NATION-STATES OF EUROPE-VOTE 'NO' TO THE NEW EU CONSTITUTION (D.T.)

49]    SO WHY DON'T WE LEAVE THE EU. (D.M.)

 

[For hundreds of bulletins about the EU]

HOME

 

 

WHAT A WAY TO WIN A WAR

*

IS SENATOR RON PAUL- ILLUMINATI?

 

BENJAMIN FULFORD

 

More!

[WORKS]

*

SEEKTHETRUTHANDWISDOM

 

*

Bank Of England « The Banking Swindle

 

More!

 

More!

 

PATRIOT or TRAITOR to HIS COUNTRY

+More!

 

 More!

 

+(More!

 

 

THIS YOU MUST SEE IT CONCERNS

 YOUR

PLANET!

AND

 YOU!

 

 

NO NEED TO PANIC!

 

'Others shall sing the song,

Others shall right the wrong,-

Finish what I begin,

All all I fail of win.

Hail to the coming singers!

Hail to the brave light-bringers!

Forward I reach and above

All that they sing and dare.

 

The airs of heaven blow o'er me;

A glory shines before me

Of what mankind shall be'-

Pure, generous, brave and free,

I feel the earth move sunward,

I join the great march onward,

And  take, by faith, while living,

My freehold of thanksgiving.-

 

WHITTIER

 

MAY-2012

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

 

 

MAY-2012

 
 

HOME