VOTE UKIP!-ON MAY 7-2015

MAJOR ISSUES BULLETIN

HOME

Est. 1994
-Elections 1997 - and EU election 1999- POLICIES -Speech -1000's of Links - Archive-
CHRISTIAN HERITAGE

Top Topics and Stats
IMMIGRATION

IMMIGRATION

[THERE ARE A GREAT MANY BULLETINS ON THIS SUBJECT GOING BACK TO 2004. WE ARE SHOWING JUST A FEW TO REMIND YOU THAT SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS-THE GANG OF THREE - CREATED THIS NATION DESTROYING AGENDA UNDER THE COVER OF POLITICAL CORRECTNESS. DON'T LET THEM GET AWAY WITH THIS MONSTROUS TYRANNY ON

MAY 7-2015]

THE VEIL-THE CROSS-A VITAL DEBATE over the HEART and SOUL of our NATION***

THE MAKING OF LONDONISTAN***

MULTICULTURALISM is. NO LONGER RIGHT for [ENGLAND]

ENGLAND is SECOND to HOLLAND as the MOST CROWDED country in EUROPE***

ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN PC BLAIRDOM

RACE RELATIONS CHIEF RECONFIRMS DISASTER OF MULTICULTURALISM AND OTHER RACE DOGMAS

IMMIGRATION WATCH uncovers CHAOS in IMMIGRATION and ASYLUM POLICY**

ZEALOTS in our Midst***

MULTICULTURALISM, NOT ONLY A FRAUD-BUT ALSO DANGEROUS***

How could a MULTICULTURAL [ENGLAND] BRITAIN WORK***

1.2 MILLION

IMMIGRANTS LET IN BY NEW LABOUR SINCE 1998 [2005] 3.5 MILLION +at least- the latest information***

MULTICULTURAL POLICES HAVE EFFECTIVELY DIVIDED THE POPULATION INTO ETHNIC AND FAITH COMMUNITIES***

MULTICULTURALISM, NOT ONLY A FRAUD-BUT ALSO DANGEROUS***

IMMIGRATION-The BETRAYAL of BRICK LANE by MULTICULTURALISM instead of INTEGRATION***

80% of MIGRANTS ARE a NET DRAIN on our ECONOMY***

QUIT [ENGLAND] BRITAIN IF YOU WANT SHARIA LAW-says TREVOR PHILLIPS***

THERE ARE RADICAL ELEMENTS OF ALL KINDS IN OUR SOCIETY AND RADICAL ISLAM IS ONE.***

ALLOW TOO MANY PEOPLE IN AND THE JOY OF BEING [ENGLISH] IS LESSONED FOR EVERYONE.***

SYSTEMATIC BRAINWASHING OF MUSLIMS BY THEIR LEADERS IS COMMON PLACE***

ENGLAND A MONOCULTURE-TOLERANT-NOT MULTICULTURAL***

WHY NO QUESTIONS IN THE HOUSE AFTER REAL RACISM REVEALED IN MOSQUES?***

FOR MORE THAN 20 YEARS MUSLIM EXTREMIST RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS TAUGHT BRITISH MUSLIMS TO WAGE WAR AGAINST THE WEST***

LETTING IN MIGRANTS TO WORK IS SELF-DEFEATING-SAYS MIGRATIONWATCH***

75% OF POLL SAYS TOO MANY MIGRANTS ARE COMING INTO OUR COUNTRY***

IMMIGRATION FLOOD 'FUELING MORE HOSTILITY***

HOW AN ASIAN IMMIGRANT BECAME [ENGLISH] BRITISH BECAUSE SHE CHOSE TO LIVE WHERE HER FRIENDS WERE WHITE - SO HAD TO LEARN ENGLISH.***'

A PLEA FOR INTEGRATION-Please Miss we don't like that sort of thing-we're [now] ENGLISH.***

WHY WE MUST BE FIRM WITH MUSLIM EXTREMISTS AND WHY CITIZENSHIP MEANS FULL INTEGRATION.***

MULTICULTURALISM ISN'T WORKING SAYS NOBEL PRIZE WRITER.***

IMMIGRATION FILE

*

GIVE THE POLITICALLY - CORRECT GANG OF THREE

THE FRIGHT OF A LIFETIME BY VOTING FOR UKIP TO GET US OUT OF NAZI-INSPIRED EU AND CLOSE THE FLOOD GATES AND ENCOURAGE THOSE WHO REFUSE TO INTEGRATE TO LEAVE.

MARCH 21-2015

PAGE ONE/ PAGE TWO/PAGE THREE/ & PAGE FOUR

A PEACEFUL ENGLISH REVOLUTION IS ON THE WAY-ALERT-1

What about OUR Human Rights?

Daily Mail

Wednesday, July 27, 2005

For many years,

Sir ANDREW GREEN

says, Britain has allowed dangerous men to stay here as asylum seekers.

There is only one way to end this madness-to withdraw from the Convention of Human Rights.

THE NEWS that two of the men who tried to set off bombs in London last week came to Britain as dependents of asylum seekers turns the spotlight once more on this country’s asylum.

It has been known for some time that a number of those arrested on suspicion under the anti-terrorist laws have been asylum seekers. Others have used their status to spread messages of hate.

I know that Middle East governments have been warning us for ten years that many of those seeking asylum in Britain were far more dangerous than we realised. YET a feeble approach to asylum has been allowed to persist for a decade.

The case of Mahammed al Masari (the leader of the Saudi opposition movement who fled here in the mid Nineties) illustrates the point. Only last night [July 26-2005] he appeared on our television screens, singing the praises of suicide bombers while also publishing their hideous propaganda on his website.

Ingeniously, he called his Movement -the Committee for the Defence of Legitimate Rights’. It sounded like some kind of Human Rights organisation, but in truth was very far from it.

Complacent

As the head of the Middle East Command in the Foreign Office at the time, one of my tasks was to ensure Masari’s removal from Britain. For he was not just seeking sanctuary here but using this country as a base for his efforts to overthrow the Saudi government.

I FAILED completely, despite the support of the Prime Minister of the time, as the asylum system and its endless appeals lumbered into action.

The case of Masari was not alone. The governments of Egypt, Tunisia, Algeria and India warned us that we were giving shelter to very dangerous men.

However, we were thoroughly complacent, saying that these people wee free to do as they wished, although if they broke the law they would be prosecuted.

It can hardly be a surprise that seeing such prominent Islamist activists getting away with it, others should follow.

‘LONDONISTAN’ was born.

The answer now must be a fundamental review of the asylum system. Perhaps you hear the sound of stable doors slamming shut? But that is defeatism. The vicious attacks of 7/7 have transformed the whole scene.

OBVIOUSLY, no amount of asylum reform will tackle the homegrown bombers and fanatics who we now find in our midst. But we can address the ease with which foreign activists; even terrorists can exploit our asylum system and our Human Rights legislation.

The fundamental problem is the fact that the 1951 Geneva Convention on Refugees is hopelessly out of date.

Designed during the Cold War to allow a few dozen refugees to flee from behind the Iron Curtain, its authors would be absolutely astounded to learn that a generation later, hundreds of thousands of people were taking advantage of it every year.

‘Taking advantage’ is the right expression.

Last week, the National Audit Office, the Government’s watchdog, reported that up to 283,000 applicants whose cases had failed had NOT been removed from Britain.

Even this huge number omitted dependents -including those would bring the total to over a third of a million.

Chaos

But when, before the General Election, MigrationWatch published an estimate of a quarter of a million, the Government claimed [As is usual] we were exaggerating. YET AGAIN ministers were in denial.

The Government’s response to this chaos is the usual set of half-measures. The Nationality Asylum & Immigration Bill now going through parliament is the sixth in 12 years. Its contents are sensible enough, but it is just tinkering.

These days, most asylum seekers destroy their documents in order to make their removal more difficult. Such action has now been made a crime, but there have been few prosecutions, and it does not, as it should, disqualify offenders from asylum because the 1951 Convention does not permit it.

Similarly, people who have been in Britain illegally for years can claim asylum when they are eventually discovered. They can even claim asylum after they have been convicted of a criminal offence.

What’s more, our Courts offer layers of opportunities for asylum seekers to appeal (now at last being reduced) and which enable them and their lawyers to spin out cases for years. And if all that fails they can always go to ground [and join the estimated million plus within our country].

Meanwhile, the removals system cannot keep up. Over the past seven years [Of New Labour] anyone who has arrived in Britain and uttered the word ‘asylum’ has had an 85% chance of staying in Britain- more often than not illegally.

A recent Home Office report admitted that the illegal population was approaching half a million - probably an underestimate.

The truth is that we have a perfect right to withdraw from the 1951 Geneva Convention on Refugees and write OUR own Laws.

We would still continue to provide asylum in genuine cases, but we would close the loopholes and accelerate the whole process.

Of course, the asylum lobby will claim that this would undermine the International system for refugees and weaken the willingness of Third World countries to accept them.

NONSENSE, WE would be doing a service by setting up a viable system. Also, we would be helping to deal with those refugees fleeing across Third World borders by letting them remain in a more familiar environment and be more able and willing to return home when conditions improve.

For example, more than a million Afghans have now returned home from Pakistan. From Britain despite extensive inducements the number returning is nearer to 40 out of 40,000. Instead, we spend almost £2,000 million [£2 billion] a year putting asylum seekers in tower blocks and sitting them in front of televisions.

The second major reforms must be a move towards detention for all asylum seekers while their cases are being considered. This would have to be introduced gradually as the numbers of applicants came down and as detention facilities became available. There would be no need for barbed wire.

Deported

Once we were out of the 1951 Convention, we could ensure that anyone who left the location to which they were sent would automatically be refused asylum and deported IMMEDIATELY upon detection, with no right of appeal.

If they were genuine cases, they would have remained in place. If not, they would have deserved deportation.

The third step must be to rewrite our Human Rights legislation [After all - it was primarily our Legal Team which assisted the introduction of the 1951 Convention] to draw a necessary distinction between OUR own citizens and foreign citizens.

It is no longer sensible or practicable to accord the full panoply of Human Rights to everyone who sets foot on our soil.

For example we should state publicly that from a certain date, anyone convicted of terrorist offences would be liable to immediate deportation to their home state, without the right of appeal. That would be a serious disincentive to foreign terrorists thinking of basing themselves or operating here.

At present, they can be confident that the penalty might only be a slap on the wrist and a tag round the ankle. In future, they would have been warned and would have nobody else to blame.

To achieve this, we would have to withdraw, at least temporarily, from the European Convention of Human Rights, which now ties our hands. This country must write its OWN laws to meet its OWN needs. British people also have Human Rights, including the RIGHT to LIFE.

Expect the usual shock and horror from the asylum lobby. But they have had it all their own way for far too long. For years, they have been complicit in the failing system.

It is a system that is both failing genuine refugees who find themselves caught up in a maul of others shipped in by people smugglers and also failing the SECURITY requirements which stem from the very serious threats we now face.

The TIME for PLATITUDES is PAST.

Serious and Radical ACTION is Essential [NOW]

[Font altered-bolding and underlining used -comments in brackets]

* * *

SEP/05

CHRISTMAS SPECIAL!

A BLUNT REPLY TO THE QUEEN'S SPEECH ON CHRISTMAS DAY-25th DECEMBER ,2007.

*

TIME FOR DECISION

THE BRITISH LEGACY-AUSTRALIA-CANADA-NEW ZEALAND-WHY THEY MATTER.

*

The Act of Settlement of 1701-WHY IT SHOULD CONCERN -YOU!

*

The Common Law of ENGLAND is the LAW of

THE COMMONWEALTH and AMERICA

*
The Commonwealth Realms V The Constitution for Europe- 4-PARTS
*
MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA-SUPPORT THE CROWN
*
THANK GOD WE ELECTED A MONARCH
(by the Late -William Rees-Mogg-Independent Peer)
*
WHY WE MUST BE ALERT AND WITH OUR COMMONWEALTH PATRIOTS MAINTAIN CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHY
*
IF WE DESTROY OUR RIGHT OF FREEDOM TO FIGHT A WAR ON TERROR-WHO WINS?
(John Mortimer)

YOU CAN'T HAVE BOTH.

WILL THIS CHRISTMAS QUEEN'S SPEECH
BE THE LAST IN A FREE INDEPENDENT ENGLAND -SCOTLAND AND WALES?
Will HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ASSURE YOU THAT YOU HAVE NOTHING TO FEAR FROM BECOMING A PROVINCE OF EUROPE.
OR
WILL THE QUEEN MAKE IT PLAIN THAT OUR FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE IS SACROSANCT BUT THAT IF THE PEOPLE WISH TO BECOME SLAVES -THEN A REFERENDUM THERE MUST BE.
WE BELIEVE THAT NO ENGLISHMAN SHOULD BE ASKED WHETHER HE WISHES TO BE A SLAVE OR FREE!

THIS CHRISTMAS WE WILL FIND OUT IF OUR PROTECTOR OF THE
'Rights and Liberties'
of
Englishmen
Will keep by HER SACRED OATH
or the MONARCHY be nothing more than a THEME PARK in the future
THIS IS THE TIME FOR BLUNT SPEAKING AS THE VERY EXISTENCE OF OUR UNIQUE NATION STATE IS IN DIRE PERIL.
We are told on the BBC (Brussels Broadcasting Service) at 11.30 pm on Saturday the 23rd December, 2007, that the QUEEN now has a website which has footage of the Royal Family in the past and that the QUEEN is NOT
'Stuck in the past'
Well! as far as many patriotic subjects are concerned we need to remain in the PAST when it concerns the protection of our
FREEDOM and COUNTRY.

Change we have had and will continue to have but it must not threaten our very WAY-OF-LIFE our Common Law of England and all which makes our country the most unique parliamentary democracy in the world.
THERE CAN BE NO SURRENDER!

Should the Monarch fail to protect our inherited RIGHTS and Liberties then we shall have to fight for a REPUBLIC as happened in the 17th century because the Monarch of the day ignored those very 'Rights and Liberties of Englishmen' which will still survive in the English Speaking World today in December 2007. How can the MOTHER of PARLIAMENTS give away what is already our and our children's INHERITANCE which cannot be taken away by
PARLIAMENT or the QUEEN.

If the above publicity exercise is to be used to soften the impact to the population of the BETRAYAL of their CONSTITUTION and COUNTRY then it would be the greatest TREASON by a Monarch since James II who sold our COUNTRY to the FRENCH for MONEY and RELIGION.

WE ASK WHAT PRICE ARE OUR RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES WORTH?

THEY ARE PRICELESS!

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION –CONSPIRATORS NAMED

*

The Choice is Yours!-but time is running out FAST!
6 months to be EXACT!
*

THE EU

WE-AND THEM!

WE are to join THEM
THEY are not joining US
WE have more to LOSE
THEY have more to GAIN
WE have been clear of dictators from EUROPE for most of our HISTORY
THEY have been cursed with that abomination for most of their HISTORY and NOW!
*
Our Queen and the EU Constitution
*
The Spirit of England
by
Winston Churchill
*
THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE
*
MESSAGE TO HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH THE II
*
We now learn from the Daily Mail COMMENT on Christmas Eve that the Queen's Speech will cover the catastrophic fall in Values and Moral behaviour since the beginning of her 56 -year reign. This has been brought about by the actions of HER MINISTERS and the greater number of those in HER PARLIAMENT who have placed THEIR CONCERNS before the INTERESTS of THE PEOPLE and NATION STATE.

As for the fact that HER PEOPLE feel LOST that has been the direct result of the actions of HER SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS and the TRAITOROUS POLITICIANS including PRIME MINISTERS who have stealthily over the 56 years of HER MAJESTY'S REIGN have almost achieved their aim of ENSLAVING the PEOPLE to a FOREIGN POWER.
The reason for the marked drop in the number viewing THE QUEEN'S SPEECH is no doubt because the mass of people have realised years ago that the MONARCH is powerless to PROTECT their WAY-OF-LIFE and events up to now have PROVED THEM CORRECT.
There is a well know saying 'Nero fiddled while Rome burned'
Is it the case on Christmas Day 2007 while the Monarch talks our Rights and Liberties are being taken from us under our very noses?
Of course the QUEEN under HER CONSTITUTIONAL ROLE can only 'Advise and Warn' HER MINISTERS but when the matter concerns the very LIFE of an INDEPENDENT STATE we expect that HER MAJESTY consider the arrangement to be AT AN END as it would make a MOCKERY of the PRIME IMPORTANCE of the MONARCH to protect our inherited Rights and Liberties which HER MINISTERS are endeavouring TO GIVE AWAY.
We as loyal subjects of the MONARCH who is the living embodiment of OUR RIGHTS and LIBERTIES ask at this late stage with only months to the eradication of a FREE NATION STATE some veiled comments that HER MAJESTY will PROTECT our RIGHTS and LIBERTIES.
As for the MORAL tone of the NATION STATE at this most crucial time in ENGLISH CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY this matter should be left to CHURCH LEADERS who's responsibility it is to CARE for their FLOCKS particularly at this FESTIVAL of CHRISTMAS.
IF HER MAJESTY'S SPEECH has not been pre-recorded we ask HER MAJESTY to give those MILLIONS of HER subjects some hope that their PROTECTOR has NOT FORGOTTEN THEM.
Should this APPEAL not be answered we can at last confirm that the MONARCHY is after all nothing more than a talking shop suitable for YouTube and therefore nothing more than a
THEME PARK
*
Hear Tony Benn's comments about the despotic and corrupt EUROPEAN UNION
and the need for a
REFERENDUM
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I-ZdvQz1o
From a politician with INTEGRITY and love of country who has for decades witnessed the growth of the monstrous creature soon to be a
UNITED STATES OF EUROPE.
*

Liberties of Parliament- Birthright of Subjects of England.

*

[All words/word underlined have a separate bulletin]

A CHRISTMAS MESSAGE

TO

ALL OUR VIEWERS.

WE WISH YOU ALL A

HAPPY CHRISTMAS AND A HAPPY NEW YEAR

IN

2008

[Since our Xmas message to you all last year we find that our sentiments remain the same with the added emphasise on the coming danger to YOUR COUNTRY from those many traitors in YOUR HOUSE of COMMONS who intend to sell YOUR COUNTRY to a FOREIGN POWER]

We Remember The Year 2006

The Spirit of England-Winston Churchill-1953

[We were warned in 1953 to beware of wreckers of our Constitution and Way-of- Life but it had taken Tony Blair just 10 years to do just THAT while everyone had their minds they thought on more important matters. Well! in 2007 his predessessor Gordon Brown is leading you to SLAVERY and only awaits the final signature of the present holder of the House of Wessex the over 1000 year PROTECTOR of our inherited

RIGHTS and LIBERTIES of ENGLISHMEN

HER MAJESTY-THE QUEEN

Of the House of Wessex since King Alfred 'the Shepherd and Darling of England' in the annals of 893 -897

'We still leave it to the work of

Alfred the Great

that England was saved to become the first individual nation -state which over 1100 years later a member of that same House of Wessex has already signed away much of those ancient Rights and Liberties and fundamentals of justice and Rule of Law and only awaits a final signature to enslave her people into a despotic undemocratic godless police state to call itself a

UNITED STATES OF EUROPE

It is within the power of Her Majesty the Queen to refuse to ratify the New EU TREATY because whatever lies her ministers have given her over her long reign the TRUTH is now clear for ALL TO SEE.
In the Netherlands a number of years ago their MONARCH resigned for a day rather than sign the Bill put before him. The New EU TREATY is the death of a NATION STATE of over 1200 years in the making. It is the treasonable actions of HER MINISTERS which has placed THE QUEEN in the forefront in the protection of the Rights and Liberties of HER SUBJECTS as on no one else can HER PEOPLE DEPEND.
GOD SAVE THE QUEEN
*
WILL THIS CHRISTMAS QUEEN'S SPEECH
BE THE LAST IN A FREE INDEPENDENT ENGLAND -SCOTLAND AND WALES?
*

A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND

by

Harry Beckhough

[Author of Germany's Four Reich's]

2004

*

'There'll always Be an ENGLAND'

-NOT any MORE

*

THE EU OVER THE NEXT FEW MONTHS WILL PORTRAY ITSELF AS THE BEST THING SINCE SLICED BREAD

'Don't tell the voters-or you will ruin everything '

"...we have to make sure that there are no discussions taking place in the open air"

Guenter Burghardt, a former EU ambassador to the US, warning that details of the new EU diplomatic service (officially to be known as the External Action Service) should not be discussed in public before the

UK PARLIAMENT

had ratified the NEW EU TREATY

and Ireland has held its TREATY REFERENDUM early next summer (source: EU Observer on 27th November ,2007

The EU has also stated that none of its institutions should rock the boat until the English have ratified their TREATY.

Over the next few months you will hear more than ever the wonderful benefits of the EU. Whether it is Global warming or whatever they feel shows them in a good light and when you have swallowed the bait you will not know what has hit you. They intend to show how reasonable they are and that they are there to make you happy. If you all fall for this con-trick then you will deserve the SLAVERY that is in store for

YOU!

Referendum: how Labour could still smell of roses.

and

'Money to spare'

when we leave the EU in 2008?

Open Europe says:

Build 40 brand new general hospitals each year 2007-13

or

Cut council tax by nearly 50 per cent

or

Cut the basic rate of income tax by 3p

or

Cut petrol duty by 75 per cent

or

Pay the total bill for the London Olympics in less than a year

AND MUCH MORE

Commons debate on the European Communities (Finance) Bill on Monday 19th November,2007.

REFERENDUM DAY

will be

RECOMPENCE DAY?

*

A TIME FOR EUROSCEPTICS TO LEARN FROM THE PAST-ONLY A TWO-PRONGED ATTACK CAN BRING VICTORY AND SAVE YOUR FREEDOM -CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY.

www.eutruth.org.uk

www.thewestminsternews.co.uk

www.speakout.co.uk

Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU

www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs

PETITION

FOR A

REFERENDUM

SIGN TODAY ON LINE

telegraph.co.uk/eureferendum

* July 18-2007

VOTE