Are you SAFER in your Home -in the Street -?

with so many criminals denied jail by politically correct
Judges and Magistrates.

 

*

 

It’s no good just blaming the JUDGES.

 

*

Daily Mail

Tuesday, June 13-2006.

 

COMMENTARY

 

By

 

David Green

 

ON THE surface, it is a cause for celebration. The Attorney-General, Lord Goldsmith, as attacked a large number of senior judges for being too soft on sex offenders and other criminals who have committed grave offences, including rape and murder. He is particularly angered by the leniency often shown to paedophiles.

 

Only yesterday the problem was illustrated in the case of Craig Sweeney, 24, a convicted paedophile who abducted and sexually abused a tree-year-old and was told at Cardiff Crown Court, that he would have to serve a minimum of just five years and 108 days of his life sentence.

 

Such leniency is a disgrace and coincides with the release by Lord Goldsmith of a report, which criticises more than 200 judges and quotes 339 specific cases in which he challenged judge’s sentences in the Court of Appeal for being too soft. In more than three-quarters of these cases, he gained tougher sentences.

 

[BUT will they ALL ever be completed in full? - with the new Lord Chief Justice so fervent about reducing sentences-rather than press the Government to build more prisons which is the only REAL answer to ensure that those convicted of crime get the sentence they deserve and which the victims or their families expect -not the sentence guidelines the Lord Chief Justice lays down in order to keep the prison population from exploding because of a Government insistent in refusing to build more prisons for which £30,000,000 was earmarked two years ago and which are required because of its own actions or inactions of that Government over the past nine years.]

 

 

To return:

 

So yes, there is ample evidence that many judges have been too lenient in any number of cases- and it is an issue that needs redress.

 

Yet in lecturing, naming and shaming judges over their lenient sentences, Lord Goldsmith and HIS GOVERNMENT are culpable of the most monstrous, buck-passing hypocrisy. For this GOVERNMENT, with its liberal approach to criminal justice has created the very atmosphere in which judges are, in most cases, obliged to pass lenient sentences.

 

For Lord Goldsmith to pretend that the main problem with our judicial system is that ultra-liberal judges systematically flout the will of the Government, Parliament and the People is too simplistic.

 

The truth is that some judges-and a surprising proportion of magistrates-are actually angered by the fact that the system often makes it impossible for them to deal as severely with child molesters, rapists, sex traffickers and killers as they would wish.

 

Increasingly they are ‘guided’- and woe betide them if they ignore this guidance-by the Government’s Sentencing Guidelines Council, chaired by the GOVERNMENT’S Lord Chief Justice, Lord Phillips. This body tells them what sentences they must impose, and what circumstances they may not take into account when passing judgment.

 

[Over the past decade the words of a great and leaned Lord Chief Justice of England Sir Edward Coke (1552-1634):

 

‘For a man’s Home is his Castle’

 

and

 

‘Magna Carta is such a fellow, that he will have no Sovereign.’

 

(On the Lords’ Amendment to the Petition of Right -17^th May 1628)

 

 

- have been undermined by the actions of the present Lord Chief Justice who should have the welfare of the common man in full view and not the convenience of an untruthful and despotic manipulating Government.]

 

To Return:

 

A centralising GOVERNMENT, fixated on guidelines and procedures, is steadily undermining the freedom of the judiciary. And, surprise, surprise, the real effect of judicial guidelines is to make it more-not less difficult to sentence offenders to imprisonment. The guidelines also ensure that those jail sentences, which are imposed. are often shorter than judges themselves would wish.

 

Why would the GOVERNMENT and its Sentencing Guidelines Council want to discourage stiff prison sentences? Because our jails are disgracefully overcrowded, and civil servants genuinely fear what might happen if the prison population rises a few thousand from its present level of 80,000-plus.

 

[Well the answer in there for the asking -all the GOVERNMENT needs to do is to get hold of hundreds of Polish carpenters and of other trades and get them to put up temporary accommodation -post haste!]

 

To return:

 

The solution to this problem is not to impose unacceptably short sentences, or to leave criminals on the street who should be locked away. It is surely to build more prisons.

 

YET -Treasury mandarins remain resolutely set against such an option. It would admittedly, be costly, and the Treasury is not contrary to popular opinion-in the business of encouraging what it regards as profligacy by Whitehall Departments. [BUT they allowed Tony Blair to give up OUR hard fought for

EU REBATE of £7,000,000,000+

-without a whimper.]

 

As for the Home office, it has long been a nest of the ‘progressive’ liberal left and top officials regard prison as crude, cruel and ineffective. [No doubt Holidays in the Sun is more in their line particularly if they themselves can accompany the so labelled misunderstood criminals on their so-called ordeal.]

 

Not, they feel, the sort of punishment civilised people, interested in ‘rehabilitating’ criminals, rather than punishing wrong-doers, or protecting society from their depredations, should be imposing on others.

 

SADLY however, there is little evidence that rehabilitation programmes are effective. Even so, the Home Office seems happiest when criminals receive non-custodial sentences, or brief terms of imprisonment, and are, in any case, released early. Many Ministers agree with this ‘progressive’ cant.

 

But it is not only the Home Office. Since 1997, the Labour Government has ensured that senior judicial appointments have gone to bien-pensant, progressives who instinctively dislike prison. The result, again, is that custodial sentences are sneered at.

 

Lord Goldsmith can berate the judges for their leniency -but this misbegotten state of affairs is the direct result of his

 

OWN GOVERNMENT’S POLICIES

 

-and as is so often in New Labour, these policies are a mass of contradictions.

 

[This is no accident as the same so-called procedure to avoid getting to the root of the problem has been developing in the Totalitarian European Union over the past five decades. Whatever the problem they go round it and look for another distraction in another area to create a smokescreen so that the previous problem is obscured from view. Always blame someone or something else is their motivation and DON’T let the TRUTH emerge whatever you do.]

 

 

The result is a Criminal Justice System that fails to serve its people as it should-that upsets and undermines the POLICE-and that hampers [INDEPENDENT] Judges and Magistrates from doing THEIR JOB.

 

* * *

 

 

Prison really DOES work

 

by

 

Dr David Green

 

 

Daily Mail

Tuesday, June 20-2006.

 

It saves the nation money, reduces crime and is better at reforming offenders.

 

 

A sense of deep crisis hangs over the prison system. While public concern mounts over short sentences for serious offenders, parts of our political elite and judiciary express anxiety about the size of the supposedly excessive use of custody.

 

 

The Chief Inspector of prisons Anne Owers, claims that our jails are now full to capacity, barely able to cope with current demands. The Lord Chief Justice, Lord Phillips, warns that too many criminals are being sent to prison in the first place.

And a phalanx of lobby groups, such as the Prison Reform Trust, argues that the jail system only encourages crime by dehumanising its inmates. It is, to use one of the campaigners favourite slogans

‘an expensive way of making bad people worse’.

 

But as the problem of overcrowding becomes more intense, neither the Government nor the judicial establishment seems willing to contemplate the obvious solution:

 

BUILD MORE PRISONS

 

This is partly because of the perceived costs, partly because of the Left-wing ideology, which holds that PRISONS in themselves are a bad idea. According to such thinking, a large prison population should be regarded as a badge of shame in a civilised society.

 

Wasted

 

But such an outlook is utterly misguided. For the truth is that prisons are not only the most effective method of protecting the public from criminal behaviour, they are also, in the long-term cheaper than the alternatives.

 

The entire cost of running our prisons is just

£2.2 Billion

-barely a fraction of the cost of the Welfare State.

 

To put it in perspective, that is smaller than the sum wasted every year on benefit fraud

 

And given that the COST of CRIME across the country is estimated at

 

-£60 Billion

[£60,000,000,000]

 

-a year, a prison system for £2.2 billion is surely a bargain.

 

It is absurd to argue that 21^st century Britain, one of the most affluent countries in the world, with public expenditure over £520 billion a year, cannot afford to build any more prisons and therefore has to treat convicted criminals more leniently.

 

Anti-prison campaigners are of course, fond of claiming that jail does not work [Well they would be out of a job], pointing to the high levels of re-offending among ex-convicts.

 

But this is to ignore the crucial point that when a criminal is locked up, it is physically impossible for him to commit any offences.

 

He may return to his life of crime once he is released, BUT at least when he is inside, the

 

PUBLIC IS SAFE FROM HIM

 

 

There are sobering statistics to show just how many crimes he might committed had he NOT been locked up. According to a Home Office survey in 2000, the average inmate committed:

 

140 crimes in the 12 months before his admission into custody.

 

On that basis, if we locked up

 

10,000 more offenders a year,

 

we could prevent

1.4 million offences,

 

-saving the PUBLIC PURSE a fortune as well as reducing aggravation for law-abiding citizens.

 

The indisputable fact is that, according to POLICE RECORDS

-and the authoritative British Crime Survey, crime levels have fallen when more offenders have been sent to PRISON.

 

YET the conjunction of a rising jail population and declining crime causes the anti-prison brigade to descend into tortuously illogical thinking and intellectual absurdities as they refuse to

FACE UP TO THE FACTS.

 

So John Denham, the normally well-balanced Labour MP who chairs the

HOME AFFAIRS SELECT COMMITTEE absurdly stated at the weekend that he could not see why we were jailing so many people at a time of falling CRIME.

 

Is he really so blinded by DOGMA that he CANNOT SEE that CRIME is on the way down precisely because MORE CRIMINALS are being kept OFF THE STREETS?

 

THE LESSON OF RECENT HISTORY IS THAT PRISON WORKS.

 

 

We should be celebrating that reality by building more jails, not wringing our hands about overcrowding.

 

It was the Tory politician Michael Howard who first challenged the progressive consensus. Until he became Home Secretary in 1993, the conventional wisdom was that RISING CRIME was inevitable and that the duty of the Government was to keep as many offenders as possible out of jail.

 

Mrs Thatcher was known as the Iron Lady, but there was nothing tough about her administration’ s penal policy.

 

Successive Home Secretaries such as Douglas Hurd [The one who having signed the Maastricht Treaty in 1992 -was heard to say

 

’We had better read it to find out what it said’,

 

or something along these lines] - and Kenneth Clarke swallowed the anti-prison line which predominated at the Home Office, allowing the widespread use of parole, cautions, executive early release and community sentences and massively extending

CRIMINAL’S RIGHTS

-through measures such as the

Police and Criminal Evidence Act.

 

AS A RESULT, THE CRIME RATE SOARED.

Bursting

 

Michael Howard showed far more courage than his predecessors. He wanted to tackle CRIME, not manage its rise, and he saw PRISON as a crucial weapon. For the first time since the Fifties, a Home Secretary presided OVER A DROP IN CRME.

 

Under LABOUR, the prison population continued to rise. This explains why surveys show crime figures have been falling gently.

 

Labour is far too complacent. Those convicted of offences continue to be treated too leniently; one recent study found that of defendants who had already been convicted of ten or more indictable-that is serious offences at Crown Court,

 

ONLY 37% were given custodial sentences

 

[In other words 63 criminals who should have gone to jail were back on the streets.]

 

The other two-thirds walked away with some sort of community punishment, which is NO REAL DETERRENT to SERIAL CRIMINALS.

 

ALL RESEARCH shows that reconviction rates for those serving community sentences are just as high as for those coming out of prison.

 

The crucial difference is that those supposedly under supervision in the community are STILL FREE TO COMMIT CRIMES as proven by a litany of resent crimes committed by people under the care of the

PROBATION SERVICE [?]

 

Also, it is a myth that Britain sends more people to prison than any other European country.

 

The claim is based entirely on a straightforward population head count. But a revealing indicator is a comparison of CRIME RATES.

 

Lenient

 

On that basis, we still have one of the most lenient regimes.

Britain has only 12 people in prison for every 1,000 recorded crimes, compared with 33 in Ireland and 48 in Spain.

 

Tellingly, both countries have far lower rates of recorded crime than we do.

 

But, say critics, prisons harden criminals rather than rehabilitate them.

 

NONSENSE!

 

Properly managed prisons are much more efficient at rehabilitating criminals than the community. Especially as community

rehabilitation schemes are often based on nothing more than a one-hour weekly meeting with a probation officer.

 

Rehabilitation can take place only over a long period in prison, where the inmate can receive intensive supervision, mentoring and counselling. Particularly beneficial is the way that a well-functioning humane prison regime can guide drug users away from their habits.

 

Moreover, prison can also ensure an inmate receives-perhaps for the first time in his life-a decent education.

 

Most offenders come from dysfunctional backgrounds- no fewer than 27 per cent have been in local authority care and 35 per cent have other family members who have been in prison- but the only way to break the cycle of offending is by taking them AWAY from that self-destructive environment and providing a

REAL ALTERNATIVE.

 

PRISON CAN DO THAT.

 

THE COMMUNITY CANNOT.

 

Ultimately, an efficient prison system is both HUMANE and REWARDING.

 

BUT our present overcrowded, under funded, derided, chaotic system is not able to function successfully.

 

A PROPER JAIL-BUILDING PROGRAMMEE IS THE ONLY WAY
FORWARD

 

David Green is Director of think-tank CIVITAS

 

 

* * *

[Font altered-Bolding & Underlining used-comments in brackets]

 

*

 

THE SCALES OF JUSTICE ARE LOWERED BY

NEW LABOUR

IN THE FAVOUR OF THE CRIMINAL

 

THEY LIED TO YOU THAT THEY ARE STRONG ON

‘LAW AND ORDER’

 

LOOK AROUND YOUR-LANE- ROAD- STREET-IS IT SAFER SINCE 1997?

 

HOW MANY

BOBBIE’S ON THE BEAT HAVE YOU SEEN RECENTLY

(EXCEPT LONDON?]

 

* * *

 

David Green is Director of the Think-Tank CIVITAS.

 

* * *

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used-comments in brackets]

JUNE/06

 

*

 

LATEST!

 

Andrew Alexander

*

Daily Mail

Friday, July 7-2006

 

Prison works…

It’s letting people

out that doesn’t

 

 

ONCE upon a time, when I was much younger, I used to think how grim it must be to live in a country, a dictatorship for example, where the forces of law and order were regarded with hatred, ridicule and contempt.

 

Now alas, I know.

 

We have become a nation where the police outrage ordinary citizens through daily stories of blundering, inactivity and their inability to distinguish between criminals and victims. At times they seem determined to bring stupidity into disrepute.

 

As for the judges- drawn from a curiously unworldly class once miscalled Hampstead liberals - the public must constantly also wonder whose side they are on. The lightness of their sentencing stems not just from a shortage of prison places, but a belief that imprisonment does not work.

 

They can prove it, you see. Criminals emerge from prison and commit more crimes. The punishment does not work.

The fools! To use the Latin which lawyers enjoy, they accept post hoc ergo propter hoc- what happens after an event is caused by it.

 

To the ordinary law-abiding citizens, cause and effect are clearer. Of course prison does not work if the sentences are too short or conditions too easy.

 

Softness incentivises the criminal. He reckons that conviction is unlikely anyway given the low detection rate and that a subsequent soft sentence makes crime worth the risk.

 

*

 

I ONCE asked a judge why the COURTS

-did not make use of heavy fines. ‘

 

‘But they would not pay them’-came the feeble reply.

 

IN FACT -COURTS can either imprison non-payers or, significantly send in the bailiffs to seize the offenders goods-his beloved car, all his electronic gear.

AND ANYTHING ELSE.

 

ALL THE COURTS NEED IS

DETERMINATION.

 

The Home Office acknowledges that shortage of prison space [they are sitting on £30,000,000 for over two years -earmarked for a prison building programme -a site had already been designated -but nothing done] -is making difficulties. Yet it has scarcely touched its building budget for a couple of years.

 

But in any case, why not use some inhabitable islands around our coast for prison camps? Well, you see, then it would be hard for the prisoners to see their families.

 

THAT WOULD BE NO BAD THING.

Less contact with criminal fathers would be a benefit for children -NOT A LOSS.

 

We should not, unfortunately look to new Home Secretary John Reid in the hope of sensible measures about CRIME.

He promises to match his hapless predecessors.

 

The incompetence of the Home Office has been revealed in various instances because individuals in the department have leaked documents. They show, in Reid’s words, that the department is ‘not fit for purpose’- an odd and pompous phrase, incidentally.

 

WHY NOT INCOMPETENT?

 

So what does he do? He reaches for a law- not one which will improve Home Office efficiency but one which will keep it secret by imposing new penalties on

WHISTLE BLOWERS.

 

HE WANTS TO SHOOT THE MESSENGERS.

 

* * *

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used -comments in brackets]

JULY/06

 

*

Q&A: The Lisbon Treaty-2008 Leaders of the European Union's 27 member states meet in Portugal this week to sign what will now become known as the Lisbon Treaty.   * The abolition of Britain by The Reform Treaty - Second Reading-Passed by majority of 138 * Veteran parliamentarian TONY BENN speaks of the absolute necessity of a REFERENDUM HEAR HIM ON http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I-ZdvQz1o *

*

	CHRISTMAS SPECIAL!   A BLUNT REPLY TO THE QUEEN'S SPEECH ON CHRISTMAS DAY-25th DECEMBER ,2007. *     TIME FOR DECISION   THE BRITISH LEGACY-AUSTRALIA-CANADA-NEW ZEALAND-WHY THEY MATTER. * The Act of Settlement of 1701-WHY IT SHOULD CONCERN -YOU! * The Common Law of ENGLAND is the LAW of THE COMMONWEALTH and AMERICA * The Commonwealth Realms V The Constitution for Europe- 4-PARTS * MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA-SUPPORT THE CROWN * THANK GOD WE ELECTED A MONARCH (by the Late -William Rees-Mogg-Independent Peer) * Previous Speaker of the House of Commons (1976-83) says: 'WE MUST NOT SURRENDER OUR SOVEREIGNTY INTO FOREIGN HANDS.'   * WHY WE MUST BE ALERT AND WITH OUR COMMONWEALTH PATRIOTS MAINTAIN CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHY * IF WE DESTROY OUR RIGHT OF FREEDOM TO FIGHT A WAR ON TERROR-WHO WINS? (John Mortimer)     YOU CAN'T HAVE BOTH.   WILL THIS CHRISTMAS  QUEEN'S SPEECH BE THE LAST IN A FREE INDEPENDENT ENGLAND -SCOTLAND AND WALES? Will HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ASSURE YOU THAT YOU HAVE NOTHING TO FEAR FROM BECOMING A PROVINCE OF EUROPE. OR WILL THE QUEEN MAKE IT PLAIN THAT OUR FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE IS SACROSANCT BUT THAT IF THE PEOPLE WISH TO BECOME SLAVES -THEN A REFERENDUM THERE MUST BE. WE BELIEVE THAT NO ENGLISHMAN SHOULD BE ASKED WHETHER HE WISHES TO BE A SLAVE OR FREE!   THIS CHRISTMAS WE WILL FIND OUT IF OUR PROTECTOR OF THE 'Rights and Liberties' of Englishmen Will keep by HER SACRED OATH or the MONARCHY be nothing more than a  THEME PARK in the future THIS IS THE TIME FOR BLUNT SPEAKING AS THE VERY EXISTENCE OF OUR UNIQUE NATION STATE IS IN DIRE PERIL. We are told on the BBC  (Brussels Broadcasting Service) at 11.30 pm on Saturday the 23rd December, 2007, that the QUEEN now has a website which has footage of the Royal Family in the past and that the QUEEN is NOT 'Stuck in the past' Well! as far as many patriotic subjects are concerned we need to remain in the PAST when it concerns the protection of  our FREEDOM and COUNTRY.   Change we have had and will continue to have but it must not threaten our very WAY-OF-LIFE our Common Law of England and all which makes our country the most unique parliamentary democracy in the world. THERE CAN BE NO SURRENDER!   Should the Monarch fail to protect our inherited RIGHTS and Liberties then we shall have to fight for a REPUBLIC  as happened in the 17th century because the Monarch of the day ignored those very 'Rights and Liberties of Englishmen' which will still survive in the English Speaking World today in December 2007. How can the MOTHER of PARLIAMENTS give away what is already our and our children's  INHERITANCE which cannot be taken away by PARLIAMENT or the QUEEN.   If the above publicity exercise is to be used to soften the impact to the population of the BETRAYAL of their CONSTITUTION and COUNTRY then it would be the greatest TREASON by a Monarch since James II who wished to sell our COUNTRY to the FRENCH for MONEY and RELIGION. WE ASK WHAT PRICE ARE OUR RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES WORTH? THEY ARE PRICELESS! * A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION –CONSPIRATORS NAMED *   The Choice is Yours!-but time is running out FAST! 6 months to be EXACT! *   THE EU   WE-AND THEM!   WE are to join THEM THEY are not joining US WE have more to LOSE THEY have more to GAIN WE have been clear of dictators from EUROPE for most of our HISTORY THEY have been cursed with that abomination for most of their HISTORY and NOW! * Our Queen and the EU Constitution * The Spirit of England by Winston Churchill * THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE * MESSAGE TO HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH THE II * We now learn from the Daily Mail COMMENT on Christmas Eve that the Queen's Speech will cover the catastrophic fall in Values and Moral behaviour since the beginning of her 56 -year reign. This has been brought about by the actions of HER MINISTERS and the greater number of those in HER PARLIAMENT who have placed THEIR CONCERNS before the INTERESTS of THE PEOPLE and NATION STATE.    As for the fact that HER PEOPLE feel LOST that has been the direct result of the actions of HER SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS and the TRAITOROUS POLITICIANS including PRIME MINISTERS who have stealthily over the 56 years of HER MAJESTY'S REIGN have almost achieved their aim of ENSLAVING the PEOPLE to a FOREIGN POWER.  The reason for the marked drop in the number viewing THE QUEEN'S SPEECH is no doubt because the mass of people have realised years ago that the MONARCH is powerless to PROTECT their WAY-OF-LIFE and events up to now have PROVED THEM CORRECT. There is a well know saying 'Nero fiddled while Rome burned' Is it the case on Christmas Day 2007 while the  Monarch talks  our Rights and Liberties are being taken from us under our very  noses? Of course the QUEEN under HER CONSTITUTIONAL ROLE can only 'Advise and Warn' HER MINISTERS but when the matter concerns the very LIFE of an INDEPENDENT STATE we expect that HER MAJESTY consider the arrangement to be AT AN END as it would make a MOCKERY of the PRIME IMPORTANCE of the MONARCH to protect our inherited Rights and Liberties which HER MINISTERS  are endeavouring TO GIVE AWAY. We as loyal subjects of the MONARCH who is the living embodiment of OUR RIGHTS and LIBERTIES  ask at this late stage with only months to the eradication of a FREE NATION STATE some veiled comments that HER MAJESTY will PROTECT our RIGHTS and LIBERTIES. As for the MORAL tone of the NATION STATE at this most crucial time in ENGLISH CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY this matter should be left to CHURCH LEADERS who's responsibility it is to CARE for their FLOCKS particularly at this FESTIVAL of CHRISTMAS. IF HER MAJESTY'S SPEECH has not been pre-recorded  we ask HER MAJESTY to give those MILLIONS of HER subjects some hope that their PROTECTOR has NOT FORGOTTEN THEM. Should this APPEAL not be answered we can at last confirm that the MONARCHY is after all nothing more than a talking shop suitable for YouTube and therefore nothing more than a THEME PARK * Hear Tony Benn's comments about the despotic and corrupt EUROPEAN UNION and the need for a REFERENDUM http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I-ZdvQz1o From a politician with INTEGRITY and love of country who has for decades witnessed the growth of the monstrous creature soon to be a UNITED STATES OF EUROPE. *   Liberties of Parliament- Birthright of Subjects of England. *   [All words/word underlined  have a separate bulletin]

 

 

A CHRISTMAS MESSAGE TO ALL OUR VIEWERS.   WE WISH YOU ALL A HAPPY CHRISTMAS AND A HAPPY NEW YEAR IN 2008 [Since our Xmas message to you all last year we find that our sentiments remain the same with the added emphasise on the coming danger to YOUR COUNTRY from those many traitors in YOUR HOUSE of COMMONS who intend to sell YOUR COUNTRY to a FOREIGN POWER] We Remember The Year 2006   The Spirit of England-Winston Churchill-1953 [We were warned in 1953 to beware of wreckers of our Constitution and Way-of- Life but it had taken Tony Blair just 10 years to do just THAT while everyone had their minds they thought on more important matters. Well! in 2007 his predessessor Gordon Brown is leading you to SLAVERY and only awaits the final signature of the present holder of the House of Wessex the over 1000 year  PROTECTOR of our inherited RIGHTS and LIBERTIES of ENGLISHMEN HER MAJESTY-THE QUEEN Of the House of Wessex since King Alfred 'the Shepherd and Darling of England' in the annals of 893 -897 'We still leave it to the work of Alfred the Great  that England was saved to become the first individual nation -state which over 1100 years later a member of that same House of Wessex has already signed away much of those ancient Rights and Liberties and fundamentals of justice and Rule of Law and only awaits a final signature to enslave her people into a despotic undemocratic godless police state to call itself a UNITED STATES OF EUROPE It is within the power of Her Majesty the Queen to refuse to ratify the New EU TREATY because whatever lies her ministers have given her over her long reign the TRUTH is now clear for ALL TO SEE. In the Netherlands a number of years ago their MONARCH resigned for a day rather than sign the Bill put before him. The New EU TREATY is the death of a NATION STATE of over 1200 years in the making. It is the treasonable actions of HER MINISTERS which has placed THE QUEEN in the forefront in the protection of the Rights and Liberties of HER SUBJECTS as on no one else can HER PEOPLE DEPEND. GOD SAVE THE QUEEN * WILL THIS CHRISTMAS  QUEEN'S SPEECH BE THE LAST IN A FREE INDEPENDENT ENGLAND -SCOTLAND AND WALES? *   A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND by Harry Beckhough [Author of Germany's Four Reich's] 2004 * 'There'll always Be an ENGLAND' -NOT any MORE   * THE EU OVER THE NEXT FEW MONTHS WILL PORTRAY ITSELF AS THE BEST THING SINCE SLICED BREAD 'Don't tell the voters-or you will ruin everything '   "...we have to make sure that there are no discussions taking place in the open air" Guenter Burghardt, a former EU ambassador to the US, warning that details of the new EU diplomatic service (officially to be known as the External Action Service) should not be discussed in public before the UK PARLIAMENT had ratified the NEW EU TREATY  and Ireland has held its TREATY REFERENDUM early next summer (source: EU Observer on 27th November ,2007 The EU has also stated that none of its institutions should rock the boat until the English have ratified their TREATY. Over the next few months you will hear more than ever the wonderful benefits of the EU. Whether it is Global warming or whatever they feel shows them in a good light and when you have swallowed the bait you will not know what has hit you. They intend to show how reasonable they are and that they are there to make you happy. If you all fall for this con-trick then you will deserve the SLAVERY that is in store for YOU! Referendum: how Labour could still smell of roses. and 'Money to spare' when we leave the EU in 2008? Open Europe says:   Build 40 brand new general hospitals each year 2007-13 or Cut council tax by nearly 50 per cent or Cut the basic rate of income tax by 3p or Cut petrol duty by 75 per cent or Pay the total bill for the London Olympics in less than a year AND MUCH MORE Commons debate on the European Communities (Finance) Bill on Monday 19th November,2007. REFERENDUM DAY will be RECOMPENCE DAY? * A TIME FOR EUROSCEPTICS TO LEARN FROM THE PAST-ONLY A TWO-PRONGED ATTACK CAN BRING VICTORY AND SAVE YOUR FREEDOM -CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY. *

 

 

*

www.noliberties.com

[Latest Addition - June07]

*

www.eutruth.org.uk

*

www.thewestminsternews.co.uk

*

 

www.speakout.co.uk

*

 

Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU

www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs

 

*

 

 

VOTE

MAY -2007

 

TO LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION

WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE

TO SET YOU

 FREE

 

THE

UK INDEPENDENCE PARTY

www.ukip.org

 

TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER

BUT

SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.

*

 

ONLY

PRO-PORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

*

Home Rule for Scotland

WHY NOT

HOME RULE for ENGLAND

 

*

MAY/07

 

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin]

 

Elections in the British One Party State If you vote Conservative, Labour, Lib-Dem, UKIP or the BNP, you'll be voting for the EU dictatorship. All five party leaderships are EU controlled. That's why your vote doesn't make a difference - all these five parties have the same policies: the EU's policies. The 17 most senior politicians in the Conservative, Lib Dem and Labour parties, including Ken Clarke, Francis Maude, Cameron, William Hague, George Osborne, Nick Clegg, Brown, David and Ed Milliband, Ed Balls, Peter Mandleson are Bilderbergers, the 140 strong band of ultra senior Freemasons who are bribed by the EU to build the EU dictatorship. No Bilderberger, Freemason or Common Purpose graduate should ever be allowed to hold public office. UKIP and the BNP are honey traps to neutralise activists: UKIP is riddled with Freemasons and Common Purpose like a cancer, and the BNP controlled by the Edgar Griffin (father) and son Nick Freemasonry family. The 350,000 freemasons and the 40,000 strong Common Purpose Organisation are the (mostly unknowing) foot soldiers of the EU in Britain. (Which makes the BNP the easiest party to clean up - get rid of the Griffins, and put in a real anti-EU leadership.)  For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF UKIP  OR  INTEND TO JOIN THEM TAKE NOTE OF THE MESSAGE ABOVE     THE EDP HAS BEEN CRITICAL OF THE MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP OF THE UKIP FOR SOME TIME NOW AS IS SHOWN IN A NUMBER OF BULLETINS  OVER THE PAST FEW YEARS WHERE WE HAVE CRITICISED THEIR LACK LUSTRE PERFORMANCE AS THEY FAILED TO MOTIVATE THEIR MEMBERSHIP TO A MORE DETERMINED CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE CAMPAIGN WHICH WOULD HAVE MADE THE GOVERNMENTS TREMBLE BUT THEY HAD NO WORRY BECAUSE THEY HAD THEIR OWN PERSONS IN CHARGE AT THE TOP OF THE ORGANISATION.  THIS FIGHTING SPIRIT HAS BEEN LACKING AND WE CAN CONFIRM THIS OURSELVES BECAUSE WE HAVE BEEN OUTSIDE PARLIAMENT WHEN A MARCH WAS CANCELLED - AND WATCH THE FARCE WHEN CANDLES WERE HELD AND THOUSANDS OF LETTERS SENT TO MPS WHO KNEW WHERE TO DISPOSES OF THEM -AND ALL TO NO AVAIL.  IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF UKIP YOU HAVE BEEN BETRAYED BY YOUR OWN LEADERSHIP SOME APPEAR ON THE ALEX JONES SHOW WHICH HAS BEEN UNDER CLOSE SPOTLIGHT RECENTLY AS BEING CLOSE TO AN ISRAELI SECURITY FIRM DETAILS ON OUR WEBSITE .    IRONICALLY IT WAS A CHANCE LOOK ON THE INTERNET A FEW YEARS AGO  TO COME UPON THAT SITE WHICH OPENED OUR MIND TO THE ILLUMINATI.   THOUGH WE HAVE SOME DETAILS OF THE BILDERBERGERS ON OUR SITE  A NUMBER OF YEARS AGO WE FAILED TO DO MORE RESEARCH- WE ALL HAVE TO LEARN.  THE FAILURE OF UKIP WE HAVE SUSPECTED  FOR MANY YEARS   THAT MANY AT THE TOP OF THEIR ORGANISATION MIGHT BE UNDERCOVER MEMBERS OF THE ILLUMINATI.  IT IS A FAVOURITE TRICK OF THEIRS TO SUPPORT ANY PARTY OR ORGANISATION AT THE OUTSET WHATEVER ITS POLICY AS IT ALLOWS THEM TO PUT THEIR OWN PEOPLE IN TO CONTROL ITS POLICES AS THEY BEHIND THE SCENES SUPPLY THE VITAL FINANCIAL SUPPORT.   Our intention is not to benefit from this disaster as since the 1999 European Election we have NOT! accepted a DONATION! from ANYONE! and we closed membership also because we did not wish to split the vote for UKIP but have stated in the past that we would contest another election if it was ever necessary to enter into the affray again and with the reputation of UKIP under scrutiny we will keep our options OPEN!   As we mentioned some time ago we have been almost two decades on the campaign trail to free our once FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE of ENGLAND from the SATANIC EU and those who have for centuries have planned for an EVIL ONE-WORLD CORPORATION/GOVERNMENT and EXTERMINATE! at least 5 BILLION of the WORLD'S POPULATION and therefore if we are right about those mentioned above they are not only TRAITORS to their COUNTRY but also a THREAT to WORLD PEACE.   However, of late, matters have NOT! been going well for the ILLUMINATI as you will observe BELOW.   WHAT A WAY TO WIN A WAR     BENJAMIN FULFORD   More! [WORKS] * SEEKTHETRUTHANDWISDOM   * Bank Of England « The Banking Swindle   More!   More!   PATRIOT or TRAITOR to HIS COUNTRY +More!    More!   +(More!     THIS YOU MUST SEE IT CONCERNS  YOUR PLANET! AND  YOU!     NO NEED TO PANIC!   'Others shall sing the song, Others shall right the wrong,- Finish what I begin, All all I fail of win. Hail to the coming singers! Hail to the brave light-bringers! Forward I reach and above All that they sing and dare.   The airs of heaven blow o'er me; A glory shines before me Of what mankind shall be'- Pure, generous, brave and free, I feel the earth move sunward, I join the great march onward, And  take, by faith, while living, My freehold of thanksgiving.-   WHITTIER   MAY-2012   TOP OF PAGE       The Soul of England pt I **** The Soul of England pt 2 **** Why are we English made to feel guilty? **** Don't let them destroy our Identity **** Nor shall my sword **** Why can't we have a right to be English ?- pt I **** Why can't we have a right to be English ? -pt 2 **** England is where the majority views are ignored and minorities rule at their expense in politically-correct Browndom **** Alfred - Christian King of the English-pt I **** Alfred - Christian King of the English -pt 2 **** Englishmen as others see us beyond our once oak wall **** England arise!-Today we can claim our right of self-determination. **** Kiss good bye to your sovereignty and country **** St George's Day-England's Day **** The Spirit of England by Winston Churchill.         ADDED - MAY-2012