TRAITOROUS PRO-EU MP'S WANT THE BEST OF TWO WORLDS.
We now hear from the political Editor of the Daily Mail
on September 1-2007 that
'Majority of MPs'
a vote on the
Former Europe minister Keith Vaz fuelled the campaign to
give the public a say on the revived
by calling on the premier to hold a poll on the same day
[We are surprised at Keith Vaz comments as from our
viewpoint the last thing that Gordon Brown intends to do is to permit a
How would he explain it to his new friend the German
Chancellor who has already indicated to her new bosom friend
'All you have to do is betray your
country and your future job as President of the
All this tipping around the mulberry bush has occurred
because the Eurosceptic organisations many with hundreds of
thousands of pounds in their piggy banks and over hundreds of
thousands of members possible into a few million over the years have
failed to realise that
'UNITED WE STAND-DIVIDED WE FALL'
Mr Brown did not need to be a genius to
understand that all he could hear from the
was TALK- MORE
TALK AND YET MORE TALK
and this in a year that they knew would see the end of our
of over 1,400 in the making unless they moved forward
together and united their resources and members on a gigantic
MARCH in LONDON.
We hear from Mr Vaz that he wants the
to ask the wider question:
'Do you support Britain's continuing membership of the EU
as set out in the
What the public should be asked is
'Do you want to accept the Treaty that
the French and Dutch rejected in 2005 which is identical to the
'NEW REFORM TREATY'
with the exception of 10 proposals out of 250 and those
10 were merely as NEW LABOUR would say a' tidying-up exercise' to make
the TREATY look more acceptable-
WHICH IT ISN'T!
For those who are ardent Pro-EU fans because of the
numerous examples of co-operation in EUROPE -many of their objects of
admiration can be obtained outside a corrupt totalitarian police state
naming itself the
UNITED STATES OF EUROPE.
We prefer to call it
THE GANGS OF EUROPE
-because as with much of the trouble in our society with
there is an analogy with the
MONSTROUS GANG OF EUROPE
What is the essence of gangs. A dictionary definition is:
'A band of roughs or criminals'
Well this certainly fits the
But many will say but all the member states are
NOT THE SAME
this is so in a gang of feral youths but everyone in the
gang must obey the LEADER'
WILL BE IN THE
UNITED STATES OF
There is one thing that pro-EU fanatics must remember and that is once
TREATY is RATIFIED
it will place them within a continuing revolving iron
curtain around the EU with no chance to get out but to accept
everything even if they find out later they have made a
Of course there is an opt out in the Treaty but even that
has its consequences. Far better that we do not enter the TRAP in the
FIRST PLACE and that is WHAT a REFERENDUM should DO
This late stage flurry of activity of conscience by the
MPs is a typical manoeuvre to ensure they can still expect the support
of their constituents should Gordon Brown call a snap
which we believe
HE WILL NOT
as his chances of a spectacular win are receding by the
day because what ever he says in the future unless he agrees to keep
and have a
TREATY is discussed in PARLIAMENT
NO ONE WILL AGAIN BELIEVE HIM
WHATEVER HE MAY SAY
Yet again we hear from Mr Vaz the legal eagle that has
been flying too high and his wings are beginning to melt so he has for
the moment come down to ground with a bump because he can not understand
the majority of the British people who take their at present
FREE NATION STATE
seriously and what ever he says they will not
'put up or shut up'
We have always stated that to have a REFERENDUM
to ask the people whether they wish to lose their
NATION STATE and in its place become a
PROVINCE of EUROPE
and particularly the
HOUSE OF COMMONS
belongs to the
and even they are not permitted to destroy what has
been the makings of over a thousand years and belongs to
If the Eurosceptic organisations had performed their duty
There would have not have been the need
WE state here and now as we have frequently done over the
years we would NOT
accept the result of a
if the people failed to protect their
and if millions of eurosceptics had
signed such a declaration years ago or had taken to the streets in their
millions we would not be in the situation today in September -2007 and
to be asked by our
HOUSE of COMMONS
-DO YOU WISH TO BE FREE?
In England in October 1647 the extreme Republican party drafted a
Constitution known as the
Agreement of the People
That the Representatives have, and shall be understood to
have, the supreme trust in order to the preservation and government of
the whole; and their power extend without consent or concurrence of any
person or persons, to the erecting and abolishing of Courts of Justice
and public offices, and to the enacting, altering, repealing and
declaring of laws, and the highest and final judgment,
concerning things spiritual and evangelical. PROVIDED that,
even in things natural and civil these six particulars next following
are, and shall be understood to be EXCEPTED and RESERVED from our
There then follows
five points of detail which do not for the moment ,concern us. The SIXTH
is, in the present connexion, of first-rate importance;
Representative may in anywise render up or give or take away any of the
foundations of COMMON RIGHT, LIBERTY, or SAFETY contained in the
What is the
significance of the clause? It proposed that the powers of the
LEGISLATURE should be LIMITED; that certain questions of supreme
importance or difficulty should be reserved from its jurisdiction; that
in a word, its function should be LEGISLATIVE but not
Not even the extreme
DEMOCRATS of the COMMONWEALTH were willing to commit unlimited POWER to
a SINGLE legislative CHAMBER.
It may be objected
that The Agreement of the People was never accepted and never came in
force. that is true. But many of its PRINCIPLES reappear in the two
written CONSTITUTIONS of the COMMONWEALTH and PROTECTORATE.
But what is certainly
clear are the following:
Parliament strikes its roots so deep into the past that scarcely a
single feature of its proceedings can be made intelligible without
reference to history'.-Sir Courtenay Ilbert.
And there is in the
annals of Parliament the
Apology of 1604
by the House of
Commons to James the First of England.
' And contrarywise with all humble and due respect to your majesty our
sovereign lord and head, against those misinformation's we most truly
avouch, - first, that our privileges and liberties are our right and due
inheritance, no less than our lands and goods; secondly, that they
cannot be withheld from us, denied or impaired, but with apparent wrong
to the whole state of the realm; thirdly, and that our making of
request, in the entrance of Parliament, to enjoy our privilege, is an
act only of manners...! The Commons'
Apology of 1604.
This is our contention that the House of Commons cannot as clearly
stated above in the first clause:
first, that our
privileges and liberties are our right and due inheritance, no less than
our lands and goods...
our Great Charter of Magna Carta-articles 39,40
'No free man shall
be taken or imprisoned or disseised or outlawed or exiled or anyways
destroyed; nor will we go upon him, nor will we send upon , unless by
the lawful judgment of his peers, or by the law of the land.
To none will we
sell, to none will we deny or delay, right and justice.
Since the days of
Magna Carta and through the civil wars of the 17th century no Englishman
would have ever thought that his Commons of England would deliberately
over 35 years change the substance of our institutions and agree to sell
the very sacred
Though many have questioned the wisdom of not having a legal foundation
(a rigid constitution) which the legislature could not disturb they
trusted to the 'conventions and custom of the realm', and as the events of the last three decades
have shown our own Legislature has almost sold our country and its
unique parliamentary system -a model for the world for a
a home grown
despotic corrupt self-seeking political elite to be based in
UNITED STATES OF EUROPE.
friends of england
venue for the future
will be in the districts of the battles of the civil war because it was
at that time that the true liberties of the Englishman were discussed
and implemented. What is in the hearts of the people cannot be destroyed
by legislation-it is theirs to pass on to future generations. It
is a sacred trust which is in the hearts of the English wherever they
IT IS NOT FOR
SALE-AT ANY PRICE!
THE PEOPLE HAVE
SPOKEN-IS THE EU COMMISSION LISTENING?
Ditch the EU TREATY after IRISH
[Daily Mail-Wednesday, June
MORE THAN HALF of voters believe Britain should
drop the controversial European Treaty in the wake of its
rejection in last week's
The poll comes as the Tories launch a last-ditch
bid in the
HOUSE of LORDS
today to delay the
have signed a
within the past few days
, calling on the
NOT TO RATIFY THE BILL
[WHY DON'T YOU?]
A BLUNT REPLY TO THE
QUEEN'S SPEECH ON CHRISTMAS DAY-25th
LEGACY-AUSTRALIA-CANADA-NEW ZEALAND-WHY THEY
The Act of
Settlement of 1701-WHY IT SHOULD CONCERN
The Common Law of
ENGLAND is the LAW of
Commonwealth Realms V The Constitution for
AUSTRALIA-SUPPORT THE CROWN
YOU CAN'T HAVE BOTH.
WILL THIS CHRISTMAS QUEEN'S SPEECH
LAST IN A
FREE INDEPENDENT ENGLAND -SCOTLAND AND WALES?
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ASSURE YOU THAT YOU
HAVE NOTHING TO FEAR FROM BECOMING A
PROVINCE OF EUROPE.
THE QUEEN MAKE IT PLAIN THAT OUR FREE
INDEPENDENT NATION STATE IS SACROSANCT BUT
THAT IF THE PEOPLE WISH TO BECOME SLAVES
-THEN A REFERENDUM THERE MUST BE.
THAT NO ENGLISHMAN SHOULD BE ASKED WHETHER
HE WISHES TO BE A SLAVE OR FREE!
CHRISTMAS WE WILL FIND OUT IF OUR PROTECTOR
'Rights and Liberties'
by HER SACRED OATH
MONARCHY be nothing more than a
PARK in the future
THE TIME FOR BLUNT SPEAKING AS THE VERY
EXISTENCE OF OUR UNIQUE NATION STATE IS IN
We are told on the BBC (Brussels
Broadcasting Service) at 11.30 pm on
Saturday the 23rd December, 2007, that the
QUEEN now has a website which has footage of
the Royal Family in the past and that the
QUEEN is NOT
'Stuck in the past'
far as many patriotic subjects are concerned
we need to remain in the PAST when it
concerns the protection of our
have had and will continue to have but it
must not threaten our very WAY-OF-LIFE our
Common Law of England and all which makes
our country the most unique parliamentary
democracy in the world.
BE NO SURRENDER!
Should the Monarch fail to protect our
inherited RIGHTS and Liberties then we shall
have to fight for a REPUBLIC as
happened in the 17th century because the
Monarch of the day ignored those very
'Rights and Liberties of Englishmen' which
will still survive in the English Speaking
World today in December 2007. How can the
MOTHER of PARLIAMENTS give away what is
already our and our children's
INHERITANCE which cannot be taken away by
PARLIAMENT or the QUEEN.
If the above publicity
exercise is to be used to soften the impact to
the population of the BETRAYAL of their
CONSTITUTION and COUNTRY then it would be
the greatest TREASON by a Monarch since
James II who sold our COUNTRY to the FRENCH
for MONEY and RELIGION.
WE ASK WHAT PRICE ARE OUR RIGHTS AND
THEY ARE PRICELESS!
Choice is Yours!-but time is running out
6 months to be EXACT!
WE are to
THEY are not
WE have more to LOSE
more to GAIN
WE have been clear of dictators from EUROPE
for most of our HISTORY
been cursed with that abomination for most
of their HISTORY and NOW!
Our Queen and the EU Constitution
The Spirit of England
THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE
HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH THE II
We now learn
from the Daily Mail COMMENT on Christmas Eve
that the Queen's Speech will cover the
catastrophic fall in Values and Moral
behaviour since the beginning of her 56
-year reign. This has been brought about by
the actions of HER MINISTERS and the greater
number of those in HER PARLIAMENT who have
placed THEIR CONCERNS before the INTERESTS
of THE PEOPLE and NATION STATE.
the fact that HER PEOPLE feel LOST that has
been the direct result of the actions of HER
SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS and the TRAITOROUS
POLITICIANS including PRIME MINISTERS who
have stealthily over the 56 years of HER
MAJESTY'S REIGN have almost achieved their
aim of ENSLAVING the PEOPLE to a FOREIGN
for the marked drop in the number viewing
THE QUEEN'S SPEECH is no doubt because the
mass of people have realised years ago that
the MONARCH is powerless to PROTECT their
WAY-OF-LIFE and events up to now have PROVED
There is a well know saying
'Nero fiddled while Rome burned'
Is it the case on
Christmas Day 2007 while the Monarch
talks our Rights and Liberties are
being taken from us under our very
Of course the QUEEN
under HER CONSTITUTIONAL ROLE can only
'Advise and Warn' HER MINISTERS but when
the matter concerns the very LIFE of an
INDEPENDENT STATE we expect that HER MAJESTY
consider the arrangement to be AT AN END as
it would make a MOCKERY of the PRIME
IMPORTANCE of the MONARCH to protect our
inherited Rights and Liberties which HER
MINISTERS are endeavouring TO GIVE
We as loyal
subjects of the MONARCH who is the living
embodiment of OUR RIGHTS and LIBERTIES
ask at this late stage with only months to
the eradication of a FREE NATION STATE some
veiled comments that HER MAJESTY will
PROTECT our RIGHTS and LIBERTIES.
As for the
MORAL tone of the NATION STATE at this most
crucial time in ENGLISH CONSTUTUTIONAL HISTORY this matter
should be left to CHURCH LEADERS who's
responsibility it is to CARE for their
FLOCKS particularly at this FESTIVAL of
MAJESTY'S SPEECH has not been pre-recorded
we ask HER MAJESTY to give those MILLIONS of
HER subjects some hope that their PROTECTOR
has NOT FORGOTTEN THEM.
APPEAL not be answered we can at last
confirm that the MONARCHY is after all
nothing more than a talking shop suitable
for YouTube and therefore nothing more than
Benn's comments about the despotic and
need for a
politician with INTEGRITY and love of
country who has for decades witnessed the
growth of the monstrous creature soon to be
STATES OF EUROPE.
[All words/word underlined have a
[THE QUESTION THAT THE
VOTER MUST ANSWER
YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE
CORRUPT ,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND CORRUPT ALIEN BUSYBODY BRUSSELS
-SIMPLE IS IT NOT? ]
WHAT A WAY TO WIN A WAR
THE ENEMY IS
Being in Europe 'COSTS' £114,000 a
[Daily Mail-Political Editor-Friday 31
paying £114,000 a minute to be a member of the EU, it is claimed today
That is £1,000
a year for every man, women and child in the country.
THE REPORT, by the right-wing Bruges Group think-tank, is
an attempt to conduct the cost-benefit analysis demanded by many MPs and
PEERS since we joined the then European Economic Community in 1973.
Successive governments have
refused such a study, arguing the benefits are self-evident. BUT the
research concludes Britain has contributed
-since we joined -and forecasts that by
2013 this will have risen to almost
It also assesses indirect costs of membership.
Over-regulation costs Britain at
£26 billion a year
Common Agricultural Policy at least
15.6 billion a year
This year, the REPORT says, costs to a
British family of four, an additional
£20 on their weekly food bill
about half of this is made up of higher
taxes in order to subsidise farmers, and half through higher food bills
compared to what we would pay for food on the world market.
Robert Oulds, director of the Bruges
'To put it into perspective just
£1 billion will pay for
222,000 hip replacements,
34,585 police officers.
THIS MONEY WOULD BE BETTER SPENT IN
BRITAIN FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE BRITISH PEOPLE.'
Bruges Group 020 7287
[We have 100's of Bulletins on our
website from INDEPENDENT sources detailing the COST of our being in the
EU going back over a number of years. particularly form
For a growing number of people in our
country the importance of our historic right to be governed by our own
elected representatives and the protection of our accustomed
'Rights and Liberties'
THE RIGHT TO RULE OURSELVES.
DEFENDERS OF THE REALM
THE NEW BATTLE FOR BRITAIN -A
FROM: John Gouriet
TEL: 44(0) 1984
44(0) 7832 -342909
RENUNCIATION OF EU CITIZENSHIP & EU CONSTITUTION
you know 80% of our laws now come from Brussels without proper scrutiny
by Parliament, forced on us by foreign bureaucrats whom we dont elect
and cant sack?
Do you know Euro law is accepted as
superior to UK law by our politicians and judges?
Do you realise the new EU constitution will
enforce EU citizenship, spell the END of our self-government,
the monarchy and our independence, if as expected it is
imposed later this year?
Do you realise British taxpayers pay £31
million per day every day to the EU and that almost all our net
contribution to the EU is lost in fraud, now more than £6 billion a
Do you realise that the EU has virtually
destroyed our fishing and agriculture, forced us to cut back on our
armed forces and their equipment, caused massive under-funding in
schools and hospitals, contributed to immigration pressures and taken
possession of our cash, oil and gas reserves? Our contributions to
the EU would fund a hundred hospitals a year!
Successive British governments have
actively betrayed our sovereignty by helping to bring about destruction
of our nationhood, not in our interests, but in pursuit of political
Do you realise we have been disfranchised
and have no choice because all the main parties favour integration
within the EU, whatever the cost, however bad for Britain? Do you
subscribe to the Conservative, Labour or LibDem Parties and believe we
would be better off out of the EU? Why not withhold your subscription
until your MP or candidate pledges in writing to uphold the primacy
of our Constitution and rule of law over Euro law and to support
withdrawal and re-negotiation of trade if reform proves impossible?
Let me know the result.
DO YOU REALISE THAT EURO LAW, ESPECIALLY
THE EU CONSTITUTION, IS CONTRARY TO THE BRITISH CONSTITUTION AND RULE OF
LAW AND NO GOVERNMENT MAY LEGALLY IMPOSE ALIEN LAW ON US?
I dont know about you, but I am NOT
prepared to surrender my sovereignty to Brussels! TOGETHER WE CAN
STOP IT! Will you join us? Become a Defender of the Realm by
completing and returning to me as soon as possible the ATTACHED
LETTER RENOUNCING EU CITIZENSHIP, but do remember to have your
signature witnessed. Please include if possible a
cheque/PO payable to CONSTITUTION to help towards campaign costs. We
will send the completed letters in bulk to the Foreign Secretary,
demanding a reply.
We have just delivered a Petition to the
Queen signed by 900,000 patriots urging Her not to assent to any Bill
accepting the EU constitution unless it has the consent of a majority of
the whole electorate in an impartial referendum. You can still order
Petition forms, also car stickers and videos. Get as many people to
sign as possible, because we are hoping for at least another million by
6 June (60th anniversary of D Day) for a second delivery.
BUT WE WANT MILLIONS OF RENUNCIATION
LETTERS SIGNED! Its our right and duty to
renounce the EU if we want to save our country for our children and
future generations. So copy this and send it to all your friends.
Together we will save the Realm!
With best wishes JOHN
Council & Trustees: Lord
Pearson of Rannoch Norris McWhirter CBE Frederick Forsyth CBE, Edward
David Hempleman-Adams Capt.
John Hutchinson FRAeS FRIN David Shepherd OBE
Chairman: John Gouriet
Editor: Roy Faiers Treasurer: C.J.K. Arkell
FTCA Legal Adviser: John Bingley
WHAT YOU CAN DO!
To the Foreign Secretary
cc. The Home Secretary
RENUNCIATION OF CITIZENSHIP OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
.. am a subject of the Crown to which I owe allegiance as a British
Citizen, Passport Number:
This is my birthright to which I am
entitled and no government may legally remove this without just cause.
understand that every citizen of the member states of the EU is now classed as
an EU citizen (Maastricht Treaty of Union Article 8), but that EU citizenship
is additional and will not replace my existing British citizenship. I further
understand that EU citizens shall enjoy the rights of the EU and be subject to
any duties imposed, although these do not exist at present. However there
appears to be no guarantee that duties, perhaps contrary to my national or
personal interests, will not be imposed in the future. I am not persuaded that
rights, privileges and benefits claimed as advantageous to EU citizens are
beneficial when they have so far proved largely illusory and often positively
harmful and vexatious. Yet British taxpayers are expected to contribute
billions per year to the EU and endure the constraints of a continuing flow of
EU directives, some 40,000 since 1973. These adversely affect nearly every
facet of our lives and I refuse to continue to accept imposition of direct or
indirect EU taxes that affect me as a British citizen.
as an EU citizen, I understand I may in future be required to owe allegiance
primarily or wholly to the European Union instead of to the Crown. I can only
be a citizen of one state. I owe allegiance to the British Crown and
Constitution. I cannot be a citizen of the EU because it is not yet a state,
nor can I owe allegiance to two sovereign entities.
have therefore decided to renounce my so-called EU citizenship and exercise my
right and choice to retain my British citizenship and passport, together with
my freedom to associate or not to associate as adjudged by the European Court
of Human Rights in 1981. (Young, James & Webster v. United Kingdom ECHR
am not prepared to have EU citizenship foisted upon me against my will, without
public consultation or consent, nor do I accept primacy of EU law or the
imposition of an EU constitution over the British Constitution and rule of law.
I refuse to accept the transfer of the United Kingdoms sovereignty, the
sovereignty of the people, to EU rule.
I therefore herewith
formally renounce EU citizenship, its rights and duties, as set out by the
Maastricht Treaty and/or by any other treaty or act purporting to impose EU
citizenship upon me. I await your response.
IF YOU CAN SAY
'WE WANT OUT-WITHOUT
[Only an ultimatum by millions of
subjects that the new EU TREATY can never be accepted such as signing
RENUNCIATION of EU CITIZENSHIP
Details from petition creator
With the signing of the Maastricht
Treaty the people of Britain were given
EUROPEAN and BRITISH
The extra tier of citizenship was
thrust upon the people without their consent -and in many cases
The PEOPLE of GREAT BRITAIN should be
allowed the option of opting out of the EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP if they so
wish. The GOVERNMENT will then be able to provide those who have opted
-only such as British (not EU)
passports, driving licences and other national documents.
EU laws will also NOT APPLY to those who
HAVE OPTED OUT OF EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP
"ASK US FIRST"
MARTYRS WIN VICTORY OVER EU
SOFT TALK FROM EU ON EVE OF OUR
BATTLE AGAINST NEW TREATY-THEY
NOW BACK DOWN TO ALLOW IMPERIAL
MEASURES TO REMAIN FOR EVER
[Daily Mail - Tuesday, September 11,2007]
PROOF OF WHAT WE SAY-ONLY DIRECT
ACTION CAN GET RESULTS
to West Midlands MEP -who couldn't understand what imperial measures
meant 'to the people'.
In one word 'IDENTITY' now do
Let the people speak!
[Latest Addition - June07]
Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION
to the EU
GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY WON'T
HE TRUST YOU?
HELL ON EARTH IN IRAQ
67% want powers back from
EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95%
of British people want a
SIGN TODAY ON LINE
JOIN THE 10 DOWNING
Readers can add
their support to the growing clamour for a
REFERENDUM on the '"REFORM TREATY" by signing up to
a 10 Downing Street 0n-line petition
reads as follows:
undersigned petition the Prime Minister to guarantee
that the British people will be permitted a binding
REFERENDUM on any and all attempts to resurrect the
EU " CONSTITUTION" (and any or all of its content)
regardless of nomenclature."
Deadline for the
PETITION is 31st January,2008
'The Spirit of England'
In London on
St.George's Day -1953
WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE
TO SET YOU
THE QUESTION THAT THE
VOTER MUST ANSWER
YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE
CORRUPT ,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND CORRUPT ALIEN BUSYBODY BRUSSELS
-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?
TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE
FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER
SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS
WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.
-ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS
AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?
[All underlined words have a