The CONservative Party -THEN the CONpassionate Party -WHAT NEXT-certainly NOT conservative values.

 

We hear from David Cameron of his genuine concern for MANKIND but nothing about supporting conservative values-OUR Constitution-OUR Conventions and Checks and Balances- OUR Rights and Liberties of over 1500 years in the making.

 

If he has time to dwell on the Parliamentary history of the House of Commons in the 18^th century and particularly in the 19^th century when a TRUE PATRIOT Conservative Prime Minister of ENGLAND (It wasn’t called Britain in Parliament then) the Great and Illustrious Benjamin Disraeli (1804-81)-later within a few years of his death after over forty years in the HOUSE to become the Earl of Beaconsfield.

His great predecessor of the Earldom of Beaconsfield in the 18^th century was the much respected and again a Great and Illustrious parliamentarian Edmund Burke (1729-75) who as history has shown-though an Irishman - was in many eyes (even his own) A TRUE ENGLISHMAN who with vigour did all he could be protect OUR Ancient Constitution and Institutions of OUR Great Country. [For further details refer Bulletin 312 and under Voluntary Association section]

 

 

With our troops in January 2006 now in Afghanistan on a dangerous fool’s errand of a poodle Government and Opposition led into an ‘unjust war’ by a sycophant First Minister by the name of Tony Bliar we will recount an important episode in the long career of Benjamin Disraeli of his natural character in his determination to act with INTEGRITY and JUSTICE in the cause of PEACE but to take what measures were necessary in the best interests of England and of the world at large.

 

The following extracts, which refer to the Afghan War of 1878, are taken from the 1622 pages of:

 

THE LIFE OF

 

BENJAMIN DISRAELI

 

(EARL OF BEACONSFIELD)

 

by

 

William Flavelle Monypenny

 

And

 

George Earle Buckle

(Contents -1860-1881)

Vol II (of 2 Vols)

 

JOHN MURRAY

ALBEMARLE STREET

LONDON

1929

 

*

[After his success at THE CONGRESS OF BERLIN, which brought some stability to the Balkans area after the Russian/Turkish conflict and securing the approaches to India in 1878, trouble ignited in Afghanistan and therefore Disraeli with his direct intervention with the Viceroy of Indian discussed the crisis and the following is from the above publication under the title]

 

THE AFGHAN WAR

 

On September 15 Beaconsfield has written to the Queen [Victoria], in reference to ‘Lord Palmerstone’ s

“ dangerous man,”

 

GLADSTONE.

 

The article in the North American Review disparaging his own country, the country of which he [Beaconsfield] was Chief Minister and acknowledging its decline and fall, fills Lord Beaconsfield with amazement.’

 

It was clearly this article that Lord [B] had in his mind in composing the fine peroration of his Guildhall speech; and subsequent history has vindicated his confidence in the imperial capacity of his countrymen.

 

Disraeli:

I know there are some who think that a great power of ENGLAND is on the wane. We have been informed lately that ours will be the lot of Genoa and Venice and Holland.

 

But, my Lord Mayor [London], there is a great difference between the condition of ENGLAND and these picturesque and interesting communities.

 

We have, during ages of prosperity, created a nation of 34.000,000 [1878]; a nation who are4 enjoying, and have long enjoyed, the two greatest blessings of civil life - JUSTICE and LIBERTY.

 

A NATION of that character is more calculated to create empires than to give them up; and I feel confident, if ENGLAND it true to herself, if the ENGLISH people prove themselves worthy of their ancestors, if they possess still the courage and determination of their forefathers, their honour will never be tarnished and their power will never diminish.

 

The fate of ENGLAND is in the hands of ENGLAND; and you must place no credit on those rumours, which would induce you to believe that you have neither the power nor the principle to assert that policy, which you believe, is a policy of

JUSTICE and TRUTH.

*

To Queen Victoria from Disraeli

10,Downing St., Nov.27,’78. -…Secret.

Tomorrow he understands your Majesty will give audience to Lord Salisbury on the occasion of Count Beust’s farewell.

 

Lord Beaconsfield is entirely satisfied with the conduct of Lord Salisbury; his personal loyalty to himself, his remarkable capacity for labor, and his fertile resource; but Lord Beaconsfield a little fears the cajoling influence of Count Schouvaloff over him. He would therefore, humbly entreats your Majesty to impress upon the Secretary of State, while appreciating his labours and ability, the absolute necessity and wisdom of the utmost firmness in our relations with Russia.

 

We may be, and ought to be, quite conciliatory in tone, but we must concede nothing. If we are firm and decided, Russia will surrender every point in dispute, present or future dispute. All is going right. Cyprus will be a marvellous success, and Hamley says that Famagusta will turn out a harbor, which will conveniently receive all your Majesty’s ironsides. The Sultan is certainly with us, since our announcement of our determination as to Bulgaria and E. Rumeli; and Austria, influenced much by the same cause, every day more inclined to act with us. All that is required is - that England should be conscience of her own strength….

 

Beaconsfield’s language at Guildhall confirmed the Liberal party in its resistance to his Afghan policy. The Ameer left the ultimatum unanswered, and on November 21 the British forces advanced through the passes.

 

The Opposition, once more under the de facto leadership of Gladstone (Liberal), immediately proclaimed that we had entered on an ‘unjust ‘war. They adopted eagerly the doctrines of the old Anglo-Indian school, whose spokesman was Lord Lawrence, and who deprecated any intermeddling whatever with the affairs of Afghanistan.

 

They failed to see that the Russian conquest of Turkestan and the imminent inclusion of Afghanistan within the Russian sphere of influence had entirely altered the problem; which, ever since Gladstone’s refusal of Sher Ali’s request for definite support and protection in 1873, had been urgently demanding a fresh solution.

 

This was fully recognised by many of the ablest Anglo-Indians, of whom Sir Bartle Frere and Sir James Fitzjames Stephen were the powerful voices.

 

But the Liberals [Gladstone] shut their eyes to the facts, insisted on regarding the Ameer, who was deep in Russian intrigue, as a would-be friend whom Lytton had treated ill, and vehemently protested that the forcible stoppage of a British Mission after the honorific reception of a Russian Mission was no sufficient ground for a punitive expedition.

 

Once more, as at the time of the Bulgarian atrocities, it was claimed that a great moral issue was involved; and so much were men’s minds inflamed that the chronicler of the Annual Register for 1878, whose duty it was to register facts and not to pass judgments, was moved solemnly to record the grave opinion that this was ‘a very wanton and a very wicked war,’ undertaken in pursuance of a ‘deliberately aggressive’ policy, and deserving therefore of ‘most emphatic condemnation.’

 

These expressions read very foolishly now side by side with the judgment of a man who was as alive as Gladstone to moral issues but who knew the facts. Lord Roberts, after gathering first-hand information on the spot, wrote at Cabul on November 22, 1879:

‘Our recent rupture with Shere Ali has, in fact, been the means of unmasking and checking a very serious conspiracy against the peace and security of our Indian Empire.’

 

A modern historian of good judgment, Dr. Holland Rose, in his [The Development of the European nations, 5th ed., p.393.] who recognises that the action of the British Government in the situation existing in 1878 was justifiable’ is yet inclined to maintain a situation would never have existed but for Beaconsfield’s anti-Russian policy.

 

He writes that

‘As far as can be judged from the evidence hitherto published (if we except some wild talk on the part of Muscovite Chauvinists), Russia would not have interfered in Afghanistan except in order to paralyse England’s action in Turkish affairs.’

 

Surely he forgets that it was in 1870, six years before the rejection of the Berlin Memorandum, That Russia’s intervention in Afghanistan began; when General Kaufmann, the Governor of Turkestan, opened communications with the Ameer, which steadily increased from year to year in frequency and intimacy.

The danger existed, and was ever growing, many years before the Eastern Question was reopened in Europe.

 

In spite of the Liberal outcry, the Afghan policy was successful both in the field and in Parliament.

 

One British division took Ali Musjid and occupied the Khyber Pass as far as Jellalabab; another, under General Roberts, operating by the Kurram Pass, routed the Afghans in a brilliant action at Peiwar Kotal; a third, starting from Quetta, occupied Pishin, and early in January reached Candahar.

 

Parliament met on December 5, while the news of these successes were coming in, and Northcote wrote next day to his wife:

 

‘[General] Roberts’s great victory has taken the wind not only out of the sails, but out of the bodies opponents….Poor Hartington [Liberal leader of the Opposition] is in lamentable case, and is reduced to asking my advise as to the best mode of attacking us, without hurting us.’

 

In both Houses Ministers, in spite of some initial anxiety, had large majorities. The Lords supported their action by 201 to 65; the Commons by 328 to 227.

 

The following were Beaconsfield’s reports to the Queen:

 

To Queen Victoria.

 

10,DOWNING ST., Dec.6,’78. - Lord Beaconsfield with his humble duty to your Majesty must offer his congratulations to his beloved Sovereign, on the signal triumph of your Majesty’s arms. The letter of the Ameer, which Lord Beaconsfield underlined some days ago, in a telegram which he forwarded to your majesty, has just been received by the secretary of State, and it is clear we may demand any terms we like. Of course, he offers to receive your Majesty’s Envoy at Cabul.

 

The check to Russia, to use a mild expression, is complete. Lord Beaconsfield has no doubt that expectations were held out by Russia of military aid to the Ameer.

 

Lord Beaconsfield has summoned the Cabinet to meet at three o’clock to-day, to consider the Ameer’s letter, and the situation generally. The debates proved last night that the Opposition is broken into pieces on the great question of the war.

They dare not face it, but take refuge in mere squabbling about sentences in despatches. Lord Beaconsfield closed the debate in the House of Lords to his satisfaction, and is not worse for what was a considerable tho’ not very prolonged physical exertion. He hopes your majesty is well on this bright morning, which is as bright as your majesty’s imperial fortunes.

 

*

To Queen Victoria

 

Dec. 7. - …The Cabinet decided that Major Cavagnari or some one of his standing should reply to the Ameer, that the terms of the ultimatum must be accepted, but that your Majesty’s Government were ready to conclude peace on just conditions.

 

The military operations, in the meanwhile, not to be suspended. He would, and meant to, have written this at length to your Majesty, but was summoned to the House of Lords from the cabinet, and on arriving at the Houses of Parliament, found everything in agitation and confusion.

 

The legitimate leaders of the Opposition, influenced, at the last moment, by the violent section of their supporters, had suddenly changed their front and had given notice of Votes of Censure on your Majesty’s Government, for Monday, in both Houses.

 

The Opposition are sanguine of success in the House of Lords, the members of which are not prepared to give up their shooting parties, and other pursuits popular at this season.

 

 

The Peers are independent, and cannot be acted upon like the members of the House of Commons [Sounds sometimes very like our own times in the early 21^st century] thro’ their constituencies. Lord Beaconsfield was detained until a late hour in the Lord Chancellor’s room, considering the situation, and writing incentive letters to apathetic Peers.

 

The House of lords will divide - perhaps even some days before the House of Commons, and the effect, it is feared, of an adverse, or feeble, vote in the Upper chamber, on the decision of the Lower, may be very injurious. All influences and efforts are necessary….

 

To Queen Victoria

 

Dec 9- Lord Beaconsfield … will not trouble your Majesty at the moment with business, for he knows your Majesty’s heart is disturbed [owing to Princess Alice’s illness]. there is no agitation like that of the affections, and he can truly say, that the thought of your Majesty’s suffering haunts him amid all his affairs.

 

He thought on the whole, however, that it might perhaps be a little relief to your Majesty’s Government in the impending struggle seem not unfavourable. He has very good accounts from the House of Commons, and his personal appeals to the House of Lords have brought some unexpectedly favourable results. With all duty and affection.

 

Dec 11. -…Your Majesty is, of course, aware of the division last night in the House of Lords: the greatest majority on record. Dukes of Sutherland and Lord Fitzwilliam, and several other Whigs, voted with your Majesty’s Government, and others stayed away. Lord Beaconsfield could not write to your Majesty before, as he did not retire last night, or rather this morning, until past four o’clock, having sate in the House of Lords for nearly 12 hours continuously.

 

He is rather shattered, but managed to speak at [half] past 2 o’clock this morning, an exhausted orator, he fears, to a jaded House. However, the deed is done, and the House of Lords has adjourned for a week, until next Tuesday. The division must have a considerable effect on that of the Commons. If good news could come from Darmstadt, he should feel content, but those thoughts prevent his writing more and perhaps he ought to ask your Majesty’s gracious pardon for saying so much…

 

*

 

The speech delivered in these unpromising circumstances was a successful effort, which extorted admiration even from hostile critics. Beaconsfield occupied the earlier part of it with an ingenious defence of his Guildhall indiscretion.

 

He repudiated the idea that rectification of frontier necessarily implied annexation or spoliation. It might be managed by an exchange of equivalents. Treaties for rectification of frontiers had been quite common in the recent history of European diplomacy. In any case he never said that the substitution of a scientific for a haphazard frontier was the object, but only a possible consequence, of the war.

 

When he spoke he had in mind the wild ideas then prevalent, that we were about to conquer Afghanistan and annex it to our Empire; whereas a scientific rectification would give us all the results we required, and enable us to garrison the frontier with a comparatively small number of men. He quoted Lord Napier of Magdala as a high military authority who confirmed his view.

 

The sudden appearance of Russia in the immediate vicinity of Afghanistan, said Beaconsfield had necessarily changed our policy. He held that Russia’s military and political preparations in Central Asia against India, at a time when war between Britain and Russia seemed to be impending, were perfectly justifiable.

 

But, now that the crisis was past, the Tsar was prepared to meet our wishes. He has given orders to his troops to retire; and his Ambassador would be merely considered as on a mission of courtesy, and would soon return.

 

Russia’s conduct was satisfactory; but after Russian armies had been within the walls of Cabul, our relations with the Ameer could not remain as they were, and we could not fancy our frontier to be secure.

 

It was said that we ought to have appealed to the Ameer and treated him with courtesy and kindness. That was what we have done.

 

Really the Ameer of Afghanistan has been treated like a spoiled child. He has had messages sent to him; he has messengers offered to him. He has sent messengers to us who have been courteously received. We have written him letters, some of which he has not answered, and others he has answered with unkindness. What more could we do? Yet the Government were reproached for not fighting Russia rather than the Ameer.

 

Beaconsfield impressed the HOUSE the magnitude and gravity of the issue it had to decide. ‘It is not a question of the Khyber Pass merely, and of some small cantonments at Dakka or Jellalabad. It is a question which concerns the character and the influence of ENGLAND in EUROPE.’

 

He [Disraeli-Lord Beaconsfield] developed this train of thought in his peroration:

 

[Speech to the House of Lords]

 

‘What I see in the amendment is not an assertion of great principles, which no man honours more than myself. What is at the bottom of it is rather that principle of peace at any price, which a certain party in this country upholds.

 

It is that dangerous dogma which I believe animates the ranks before me at this moment, although many of them may be unconscious of it. That deleterious doctrine haunts the people of this country in every form.

 

Sometimes it is a committee; sometimes a letter; sometimes it is an amendment to the Address; sometimes it is a proposition to stop supplies.

 

That doctrine has been more mischief than any I can well recall that has been afloat in this century.

It has occasioned more wars than the most ruthless conquerors.

It has disturbed and nearly destroyed that political equilibrium so necessary to the liberties of nations and the welfare of the world.

 

It has dimmed occasionally for a moment even the majesty of ENGLAND. And, my lords, tonight you have an opportunity, which I trust you will not lose, of branding these opinions, these deleterious dogmas, with the reprobation of the Peers of ENGLAND.

 

* *

[A Disraeli in our day would NOT have sanctioned the illegal war against IRAQ.

He would have guided Parliament in an Honourable and Just but firm Foreign policy which would have seen the links with the Arab and Muslim world held by RESPECT and not by fear of our motives in the past and today in 2006.]

 

* * *

 

[The words of Benjamin Disraeli a great Prime Minister of our country will speak for us and if he were with us today he would soon rally the country to fight for our hard fought for Heritage of Institutions and OUR Mother of Parliaments and restore RESPECT-TRUTH-HONOUR to our land and in our dealings beyond our historic moat to the world at large.]

 

* * *

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used -comments in brackets.]

 

JAN 11/06

 

*

THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN-IS THE EU COMMISSION LISTENING? * Ditch the EU TREATY after IRISH REJECTION SAY VOTERS by Daniel Martin Political Reporter [Daily Mail-Wednesday, June 18,2008] MORE THAN HALF of voters believe Britain should drop the controversial European Treaty in the wake of its rejection in last week's IRISH REFERENDUM' The poll comes as the Tories launch a last-ditch bid in the HOUSE of LORDS today to delay the RATIFICATION OF THE TREATY. And 10,000 people have signed a PETITION on the DOWNING STREET- WEBSITE within the past few days JUNE16-2008 , calling on the GOVERNMENT NOT TO RATIFY THE BILL [WHY DON'T YOU?]   Downing Street website is http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Abandon-Lisbon/ * JUNE 18-2008

 

 

 

*

Q&A: The Lisbon Treaty-2008 Leaders of the European Union's 27 member states meet in Portugal this week to sign what will now become known as the Lisbon Treaty.   * The abolition of Britain by The Reform Treaty - Second Reading-Passed by majority of 138 * Veteran parliamentarian TONY BENN speaks of the absolute necessity of a REFERENDUM HEAR HIM ON http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I-ZdvQz1o *

*

13th October,2007

 

So You Want Out Of The EU

 

THEN WHY NOT SIGN THE

RENUNCIATION of EU CITIZENSHIP

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Optout

Details from petition creator

With the signing of the Maastricht Treaty the people of Britain were given

DUAL CITIZENSHIP

-both

EUROPEAN and BRITISH

The extra tier of citizenship was thrust upon the people without their consent -and in many cases knowledge.

The PEOPLE of GREAT BRITAIN should be allowed the option of opting out of the EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP if they so wish. The GOVERNMENT will then be able to provide those who have opted out with

BRITISH DOCUMENTATION

-only such as British  (not EU) passports, driving licences and other national documents.

EU laws will also NOT APPLY to those who

HAVE OPTED OUT OF EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP

 

[PETITION OPEN UNTIL OCTOBER 08]

The abolition of Britain by The Reform Treaty - Passed by majority of 138 The abolition of Britain by The Reform Treaty - Passed by majority of 138 MPs voted by 362 - 224 for the Reform Treaty in its Second Reading on Monday 21st January. This sixth and final treaty, now renamed the Lisbon Treaty, formally replaces Britain with the European Union on 1st January 2009. This is a year before the deadline set by the Chancellor of Germany, Angela Merkel. The Treaty will abolish the British Constitution, and therefore the nations of Britain and England, sweeping away our Westminster Parliament, and giving the EU the power to close it. The Treaty sets up an unelected three tier politburo executive in Brussels with absolute power, a dictatorship on the soviet model. The EU parliament has no power and is a sham. Read the Reform Treaty one page summary on the left. Gordon Brown was lying: the Treaty is worse than the constitution. This sixth treaty is the fastest moving and most secret the EU has drafted; opposition to and recognition of the EU as a police state is growing, and they know speed is vital. This Commons vote, one of the most important in our history, was largely unreported by our controlled press and media.   The Queen and Parliament to complete ratification this spring, 2008 Parliament has allocated 29 days to discuss this treaty in February (not much for its own abolition). They will probably have the final ratification vote in March. The Queen, the EU's most loyal supporter, plans to give her Royal Assent in June 2008. This means Westminster and the Queen will ratify it behind our backs, as they have the other five treaties.   No referendum German Chancellor Merkel chose this sixth Treaty instead of pushing it through as a constitution to avoid referendums in its member nations. She twice visited 10 Downing Street and forced Gordon Brown to cancel both his promised referendum, and his General Election. "Anti-EU" groups have encouraged us to call for a referendum precisely because the EU has already prohibited it. They know we are wasting our efforts: our four party leaderships take their orders from the EU, not from the voters.   How to fight The real course of action is to change the minds of 70 MP's and get a majority against. MP's have been selected on the Party list system over the last 20 years to ensure an obediant majority of pro-EU MPs. These MPs now need to understand the EU has the constitution (the six treaties) of a dictatorship, the laws of a police state, and when enforced, its 111,000 regulations will create a government command economy, soviet style: dictatorships cause poverty. They also need to realise that MPs are the people who put this dictatorship in power. If they put it in power, they are the greatest threat to take it out of power. All dictatorships in the past have eliminated that threat. Inside the EU, the lives of MPs will be even worse than our own; at best, they are likely to be institutionalised and held against their will. (This is the only good bit - these hated traitors will suffer severely.) Visit your MP in his surgery NOW and explain this. (Instructions top left)     The EU remains illegal Each of these six treaties are completely illegal under the British Constitution, our 1689 Bill of Rights, our treason laws, and under our common law. It is unforgivable that the Queen, her Ministers and our Parliament have committed the criminal act of treason by signing these treaties, and broken our laws to abolish our nation. The EU will always be illegal in Britain; but once the EU has complete power and control here, we can no more get rid of it than we could Germany, had their planned illegal occupation of Britain in 1940 been successful.   The Countdown to abolition Whereas the 465 page EU Constitution would have abolished the five treaties and replaced them with a single document conferring absolute power, the Reform Treaty adds to the existing five treaties, bringing them up to the powers of the EU Constitution. All six treaties with appendices add up to nearly 10,000 complex and unreadable pages. Tony Blair agreed to it on 23rd June 2007 as his final stab in Britain’s back. On the 23rd July there was an Intergovernmental Conference (IGC), when we should have seen a first draft of the Treaty. Foreign ministers agreed its terms on 7-8th September at the resort of Viana de Castelo, Portugal. There was a summit in Lisbon on the 18th and 19th October, where they hoped to sign the Treaty, but Gordon Brown signed it on December 13th 2007, commiting treason, the most criminal act on the statute book. The EU has decided to act now as if the Treaty were already in force; they are consolidating their power each day. On 1.1.2009 the Reform Treaty and the other five seize all remaining power from our Westminster Parliament, which becomes defunct on that day; it has no remaining powers whatsoever. (The Treaties do allow Brussels to return minor powers, but that is very unlikely.) On 11th June 2009 we have bogus elections to the sham Brussels Parliament, the only elections we will get in the future. Westminster's five year term expires on 5th May 2010 and a British General Election is due. The six treaties make no provision for an election to our Parliament. By that time the EU will have consolidated its absolute power, and it will almost certainly use it cancel that election and to close Westminster. The EU has always planned to rule what was Britain directly through its 12 nominated Regional capitals, by passing Westminster, from which every function will be removed. Its founders knew the EU dictatorship cannot be built while there is a strong and freedom loving Britain on its doorstep. They tried twice before in 1914 and 1939. Britian has to be utterly destroyed for the EU to succeed. The success of the EU's Frankfurt School subversion techniques on Britain (see left) has been astonishing; the abolition of Westminster is one of their final remaining goals.   You have 11 months left Treason is the most serious of all Britain’s crimes. You have just 11 months left to bring these vile British traitors to justice, and get us out of the EU dictatorship. Around 45 million British people are against the abolition of our nation, and with the little European voting that has been allowed, it seems clear over 200 million of its victims don’t want the EU. But we will never be given the choice. YOU have to decide to act yourself. There are ways to stop the EU - see "Your Campaigns" on the left. Then we will need a mass blockade of Westminster to stop our criminal MP's and Queen breaking our constitution and laws for the last time. Copy of the EU's Timetable at the BBC. Original 2009 article from German Parliament -.pdf for download Then check it at the German Parliament here         Campaigns: Print these .pdf's: One or two pages each.    Your Campaigns    Ten EU truths    Reform Treaty one page    50 reasons to leave    EUtruth flier    Common Purpose    Abolition of Councillors    Abolition of 48 Counties    Map: the 9 EU regions    Transnational regions    Reform Treaty full text    EU Constitution, one page pdf    EU Constitution: one page html    Signs of EU police state    The EU's degraded our lives    What will the EU be like?    List of British traitors    Beef up the British Constitution    Lib Lab Con: One Party State    The Queen    The EU's Hitler    The EU costs £200 billion pa    The dictatorship: Quotes    UK > EU handover of power.    EU subversion diagram.    Subversion: Common Purpose    Frankfurt subversion.    The terrorism deception    Abolition of our 48 counties    Abolition of Parliament.    Church flier    Some revolutionary lyrics    drjn.co.uk - copy of this site    The Westminster News    The Devonport Column    The Cornish Free Press    The British Free Press    Government disinformation    Mobilisation talk    Blueprint to get out    SS child snatching    Wood's rigged elections    Stood for the leadership       Where we are now: 1. Since 1972 The Queen has illegally signed five of the six EU Treaties. 2. The five treaties define and build the EU as an unelected dictatorship. 3. The EU's laws, passed by Westminster, give it the powers of a police state. 4. The sixth EU treaty will complete the abolition of Britain as a nation     - the Queen is due to sign it this year. A foreign power, the EU, will then rule us, and enforce the laws of a police state. Shouldn't we repeal the 1972 European Communities Act now before we are imprisoned permanently inside? We've only got till July 2008. Please fight the campaigns at the top of the menu on the left.   The leaderships of the Conservative, Labour and Lib Dem parties have been controlled by the European Union for two decades. It is the EU agenda they implement in Parliament, not your wishes, which is why your vote doesn't count. Our controlled press and media haven't reported it, but Britain would have been abolished in November 2006 if the French and Dutch hadn't voted down the EU Constitution. Instead a sixth and final Treaty will now be signed; after which EU Commissioners will have the power to impose the Constitution (and the Euro) on us, and enforce the laws of a police state.   5. Thirty three years inside the EU - have you noticed how our democracy is being withdrawn? The EU has already denied us that most basic of human rights - the right to vote against the EU and to keep our own nation. A majority of us don't want to be in the EU. We are being forced in against our will. Do you feel you've become powerless, unable to influence events, or your vote is worth less? The six treaties have been gradually removing our democracy; for thirty years our laws have been "harmonised" with the EU; 80% of the laws now passed by our Parliament are EU laws, not ours. Isn't the real reason people have lost interest in politics precisely because the EU has taken away our ability to change things? Common law, where the government was our servant, is now largely replaced by the EU's Corpus Juris, which puts the government above the law, and we don't participate. We have already lost most of our rights (including habeas corpus). The power of government grows unchecked, as does that of large corporations. Politicians continuously lie about the EU, pretending its not significant. 6. Massive EU corruption The EU's auditors have found the fraud is so widespread they've refused to sign off the EU's accounts for each of the last ten years. Whistleblowers like Marta Andreason, the EU Budget Director, who in 2005 found the EU couldn't account for 95% of its £66 billion budget, are simply fired for telling the truth. 7.The bribing of our Politicians by the EU Europe works by bribing politicians with huge salaries and expenses to vote for Europe, against the best interests of their own voters. As a result all three parties are in favour of the EU - Westminster acts like a one party state of politicians: the Lib-Lab-Con. The parties are run top down and implement the policy of their leaderships, not that of their members. (unfortunately UKIP is run in the same way). If you have voted for the Labs, Cons or Lib-Dems since 1969, you have voted for the EU dictatorship. 8. EU corruption is now exploding through our Civil Service, our local government, and our 7,000 quangos. A shadow EU government lives inside our bureaucracy, headquartered in the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM.) It includes many parts of government including the RDA and the Regional Assemblies. Common Purpose, an EU organisation, the UK branch also headquartered in the ODPM, has members across many government organisations including some city and county councils, the Land Registry, the police and the NHS, which it is destroying from within. Common Purpose is the glue that enables fraud to be committed across these government departments, most of it lining the pockets of politicians and bureaucrats. It often involves the sale of public assets such as land to friends of politicians or their businesses. (The RDA -The EU Regional Development Agency, is a major player in this type of fraud.) And the handing out of plum government non jobs with big salaries and expenses to members of Common Purpose, all of it involving the theft of our money as taxpayers. The Chief Executive Officer of Common Purpose is Julia Middleton of the ODPM. 9. Businesses closing under EU regulation The EU's 111,000 regulations, when fully enforced, will transform Britain from a free market economy into a Soviet style command economy, closing hundreds of thousands more businesses. They will also control our personal lives far more closely than were those of Soviet citizens. (In a Parliamentary answer to Lord Stoddart in January 2003, the government admitted there were 101,811 EU regulations, growing at 3,500 pa). The cost of Britain's 8,500 quangoes is £124 billion a year, and they raise an additional £40 billion from us in charges, according to the Cabinet Office. The Public Bodies Directory 2006 describes only 882 of them. Most exist to enforce EU regulations; nearly all should be closed. 10. The EU costs us £200 billion pa, 20% of our economy According to the government's Better Regulation Task Force Annual Report 2005 (Introduction written by Tony Blair,) complying with EU regulations now costs our economy over £100 billion a year. By far the largest treasury expense is now the £167 billion spent on the EU's 8,500 quangos, (Cabinet Office figures) most of which enforce EU regulation. This is patronage, bribery, putting thousands of officials and influential businessment on £100,000 - £300,000 a year salaries. That's why the Exchequer is so desperate for cash and can't pay for the navy, nurses, students etc. Economists say we lose £80 billion pa by associating with the EU's inferior economies. The EU took our fishing industry, which costs us £5 billion pa. EU damage to other industries (like forcing us to close the Rover Car Co) a further £20 billion. Our EU contribution is a relatively minor £10 billion, the only bit the Press discuss. Before we joined the EU we had an even balance of trade with them. Now EU regulations have fixed it so we lose £30 billion year trading with the EU on our balance of payments. We'd be enormously more wealthy if we left. The main use of taxes is now to finance government and its greedy whirlpool of waste; they've doubled in real terms in the 33 years we've been in the EU. There's less money in the economy left for wages, creating a growing underclass who can't make ends meet. 11. Our counties to be abolished The Queen signed the 1992 Maastricht Treaty, which adopts the EU Regionalisation Plan. This will abolish England's 48 counties and replace them with 9 European regions, each with their own Regional Capital, which reports directly to Brussels, not to Westminster. This effectively obliterates the country of England. For example the County of Cornwall is replaced by the South West Region, which stretches from Lands End and includes Gloucestershire and Wiltshire; its regional capital is Exeter. As this move is unpopular it is being kept low-key and will not be implemented until the sixth treaty is signed, when we lose our right to object. 12. The deliberate destruction of our standards and way of life, From Sunday trading, where large stores force staff to work Sundays for derisory pay - or they don't get a job, to the deliberate undermining of the family and teachers, to sex education for the under 13's, to children being given obscene homework, its all traceable via our compliant government back to the EU over the last 34 years, as it sucessfully implemented the subversion of the Frankfurt School. While inside atheist Europe, British Christianity has almost died out; safety on our streets and a great chunk of civilised life has left with it. 13. The EU has controlled our immigration since 1997 In January 2007 on the front page of The Westminster News we forecast 1.5 million immigrants for the year, and people laughed at us. On January 24th 2008 the Daily Express published government figures of 1.3 million Polish immigrants alone for 2007. With Romania and Hungary joining in that year the total was probaly double that. The Amsterdam Treaty handed control of our immigration to the EU. 30,000 a year used to arrive - the EU's increased it by 60 times That's why house prices have been screaming up, even though the population of original British people is falling. Politicians and huge corporations like immigration - with thousands of immigrants available on low pay, they can impose the minimum wage on millions. Politicians then lie that they can't get British workers to do dirty jobs. The truth is they won't offer a decent wage, and cynically use immigrants to drive wages down, adding to the huge underclass. The Government pretends there are a maximum of 145,000 immigants annually, and 1.5 million new houses will be needed to house them. But then Jack Straw admits that 2.6 million immigrants applied to stay here last year. Our infrastructure and services can't stand such huge numbers and is breaking down in some cities, where English people are becoming a 10% minority. But the EU controls it, not the Foreign secretary, and he has no power, no options but to do as EU policy dictates, and accept it. Michael Howard was lying on the 24th January 2005 when he said he'd fix immigration - as Prime Minister, he'd have had no control over it whatsoever. Immigration hurts our existing immigrants first - new immigrants move into their areas, decreasing the wages and increasing the pressure on housing. If the sixth Treaty is signed, we lose our right to withdraw and Britain ceases to be a nation. Like the other six, it only requires two signatures: the Prime Ministers, and the Queen's             Examples of how our lives have degraded since we've been in the EU: In the EU, (which means in Britain) government is above the law. The EU's corpus juris now pervades right through our legal system. A policeman was let off by magistrates this year (2005) for driving his private car at 159 mph in Ludlow, Shrops. Under Corpus Juris the government are above the law and cannot be prosecuted The judge ruled correctly under EU law. 45,000 police officers got off speed cameras in this way in 2004, although their speeding killed 44 innocent people. (Daily Mail 27.12.05.) EU "monitoring Officers" have the right to dismiss our Councillors. The Local Government Act of 2000 empowered the head of the EU government in England, the Office of the Deputy Prime Minster (ODPM) to appoint a monitoring officer to spy on every council. If an elected councillor disagrees with the EU or government line, the unelected "Standards Board for England" can suspend him for up to five years. An example is in Cambridgeshire, where the ODPM has threatened cllr Alex Riley with suspension if he attends any debate discussing the ODPM's plans to build a new town of 20,000 people called Nothstowe on his ward. The ODPM has the conflict of interest here; but its powers are becoming absolute. We have lost the right to freedom The EU arrest warrant (signed by the Queen on 18th November 2003) allows us to be arrested without charge and held indefinitely with no right to see a solicitor, make a phone call, or even a right to a trial. You can simply disappear. Under the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act (SOCPA) 2005, we can now be arrested and held in the cells by any police officer for any petty offence, like dropping litter. Before it had to be an offense that carried a 5 year jail term. This also applies to all of the EU's 107,000 regulations. Do you know them all? The Civil Contingences Act 2004 allows government to confiscate anything you possess permanently; you have no right to object. This includes your house. It also gives government the right to forceably move its population around to different locations; you can be left with no place to call your own and live like a refugee. The only check and balance here is a Minister just needs to utter the words "This is a national emergency." If a demonstration or strike government doesn't like is being organised, they can cut off all communications in a town - phones, mobiles, the internet, TV, and block all access to that town including closing roads and railways. It has all the powers and more of Hitler's Enabling Act of 1933. We have lost the right to free speech At the Labour Party conference the police held an 82 year old man, Walter Woolfgang, and denied him access to the conference under the EU's "anti terrorist" legislation because he had shouted the word "nonsense" at Jack Straw, who was speaking about Iraq. Terrified the true nature of the laws they have passed on behalf of the EU was escaping too early, the Labour Party stopped the police and begged the man to return to conference. On October 25th 2005 Miss Maya Evans was arrested under the Serious Organised Crime and Police Act 2005, for a lone protest at the Cenotaph by reading out the names of the 97 British soldiers killed in the Iraq war. She was arrested by no less than 14 police officers and found guilty at Bow Street Magistrates Court on the 8th December 2005. Would you hand over our nation, to be ruled by a foreign power, with oppressive laws like these, ? That's what's happening. We have lost the right to protest These laws make protest very difficult; if we did hold a General Strike and blockade Westminster it would now require some bravery: the powers the EU has demanded from our government enable it to respond in a way similar to the Chinese government's in Tiaanamen Square should it so wish. It is no coincidence that since 2004, all MP's offices in Westminster are guarded by police with machine guns, inside and out. The Governments "terrorism" deception All these new EU laws, including massive "anti terrorism" acts (recently 2000, 2001, 2005) were passed with the pretence they were only directed at terrorists, or in the case of Asbos, ruffians who terrorise the streets. In each case they are used far more often against ordinary law abiding people, particularly to suppress dissent. (91% of those detained under Terrorism Acts are innocent and have been improperly arrested. Most of the remainder are charged with offences that have nothing to do with terrorism, but cover up over zealous arrests). We have lost the right to life Under EU law the "Shoot to kill" policy did not need democratic authorisation. Just two senior police officers authorised the police to kill British people. A democratic vote by Parliament was not required, but even that would not have legalised the killing under British common law. A recent victim was an innocent Brazilian, Jean de Menezes, shot dead in Stockwell underground station, even though he was being held down by police officers at the time of the execution. The police used dum-dum bullets, outlawed under the Geneva Convention because they blow a man to pieces inside. The police can no longer be convicted for killing innocent people - Philip Prout shot at Lewannick in East Cornwall is just one of 30 people shot dead by police since 1992 when corpus juris crept in. At least one was shot in the back; most were no threat to anyone. Not once since 1992 has a policeman been convicted of any crime for these murders.   Have you noticed this growing police state? In addition to many more laws than those above, add the 107,000 regulations, and whole bureaucracies such as VOSA building up networks of cameras and databases to record our movements and criminalise us when we can't comply. Persecution is no longer confined to motorists; under EU Corpus Juris our courts have become extensions of government power instead of independent arbiters of justice. Westminster had passed sufficient of the EU's oppressive laws (the "harmonisation" in the Treaties) by the end of 2004 that we have been living in what is legally a police state since then. But at the moment, its only one per cent enforced. After the Queen signs the sixth Treaty, the EU has the absolute power to enforce 100% of its regulations and laws.     On the basis of the laws and treaties already signed by our Queen and Prime Ministers, What will life be like in the EU after the 6th Treaty is signed? Our Westminster Parliament immediately becomes pointess as its remaining powers are transferred to Europe. It is the formal end of Britain and England as nations. Britain's 153 embassies around the world will be closed as the ink from the Queen's signature dries. (As Tony Blair refused to admit this has been agreed to, Jose Zapatero, the Prime Minister of Spain, confirmed it in a February 2005 radio broadcast.) After the EU abolishes our 48 counties your address will change from 4 High St, Taunton, Somerset, Great Britain, to 4 High St, Taunton, Area K, European Union. (The glorious EU county "The South West Region" has had the postal address "Area K" assigned for over a decade.) The Official National Anthem of the EU, which you should have known since 1971 is based on the melody "Ode to Joy" by Beethoven, formally replaces God save the Queen. The EU flag replaces the Union Jack, the red, blue and white nautical ensigns etc. (The EU Commission has already ordered (24.11.2005) our Merchant Navy to fly the EU flag in place of the red Ensign.) The EU takes ownership and command of our Police, Army, Royal Navy, RAF, nuclear weapons, currency reserves, North Sea Oil. (See the EU Constitution below) Serving officers in our police, army, navy and air force already know they will have to take an oath to the EU instead of to the Queen. If they don't many have been told they will be dismissed. The EU will have complete military control of the UK. The UK Independence Party will be banned under the 1999 ruling of the European court of Justice case c274/99, where it was held that it is illegal to criticise the EU. The Conservative, Labour and Lib-dem parties will be abolished (only pan EU parties like the EPP or PES are allowed -see clause I.46.4 of the EU Constitution). It will then be blindingly obvious to even the dumbest politician there is no reason to keep Westmister open, and that the EU has the legal right to close it. Many people will be excluded from the jobs they know best, as the EU's demand that you must pay to be re-taught the job, and pay for a certificate before you can be employed, becomes universal. Hundreds of thousands more small businesses will close on the enforcement of the remaining 100,000 EU regulations our government has already passed. Several million will be permanently unemployed as a result. We will all be criminalised by the 107,000 regulations. Its impossible to know or understand 107,000 regulations, and the poor can't possibly afford to comply. We will all be subject to frequent fines and arrest as a result. Here are just 4 examples: Under EU regulations it is now illegal for you to repair your plumbing, electrics or your car (from 1st January 2006). If you buy a boat over six feet long, built after the EU Recreational Craft Directive of 1999, and don't pay the EU £4,000 to "measure" the boat, you get 6 months imprisonment. We will live under permanent threat of arrest and fear of the knock at the door that takes us away. Massive corporations will do well, but with huge immigration allowed from the EU, they'll be able to pay minimum wage everywhere, not just in the provinces as they do now. If you don't accept the minimum they'll employ a Pole or a Czekoslovakian. Big corporations will also have a near monopoly (with the government) on employment and will be able to dictate unfavourable terms to staff without fear of contradiction. Plum government jobs and corruption will ensure the wealth of politicians, bureaucrats, their businesses and associates at all levels of government, including local government and amongst our 7000+ quangos. Society will divide into two: the remaining 60% of us will be either unemployed or treated abysmally on minimum wage. Taxes will rise more steeply to pay for the even larger explosion in government growth and corruption There will be no redress through local democracy because there won't be any. The nine UK regional governments, which replace our 48 counties and councillors, will be unelected (see the European Regionisation plan). Our only vote is to the powerless EU parliament. We will be ruled by the 25 unelected Commisssioners, and have have no redress at any level; we will be as poor but have less freedom than Soviet Citizens. If we demonstrate or protest we can be be seized and relocated to another region. The EU Arrest Warrant and Civil Contingencies Act 2004, with 20 other oppressive Acts the Queen has signed between 1972 and 2005, give the government absolute power over us. They can shoot us if they wish with no legal comeback - the shootings of innocents Philip Prout and Jean de Menezes were entirely legal under EU law. The tendancy to pick on Muslims, as Germany used to pick on Jews, has already begun. Europe will be a very nasty place. How long will the EU last? Eventually, perhaps 15 years down the track, Europe will collapse under the weight of its own corruption, bureaucracy, and regulations. There will be so few productive businesses that even at 100% tax rates we will not be able to support the massive, corrupt and wasteful government. Many of us will be starving in the lead up to the collapse. After the collapse we may be able to leave the EU, if a dictator has not taken advantage of the complete absence of democratic checks and balances by seizing power. The Constitution of the EU is similar to the Soviet Union's. That dictator is free to choose between a Soviet or Nazi style government. Then it could take 70 years to break free.     Fifty years ago our greatest threat might have been violence or mugging. Now the greatest threat to our economic well being, our way of life, our freedom and the very existence of our nation, is our own government.     .      What do we want? After the repeal of the EU treaties we want a change to our British Constitution so politicians can never hijack our nation again. Every Parliamentary Bill, after its Second Reading, should come down to us, the people, to vote yes or no as to whether the Queen should give it Royal Assent. This will take power away from our destructive politicians and return it to the people, where it belongs. (They do this in Swtizerland - they, not us, are the most democratic nation on earth.) We can then return to being a peaceable, just, honest, prosperous and fully democratic society where everyone's rights, no matter how high or low are respected, and the disadvantaged properly looked after. And where neither governments, corporations nor individuals have obscene wealth and power.   David Noakes 07974 437 097 ; drjnoakes@yahoo.co.uk   Campaign to repeal the 1972 European Communities Act and get clean out.   What can you do to help? 1. Find out when your local MP holds their surgery and attend with a printout of this, and the one page summary of the EU constitution below. Ask that MP to cross the floor to be the leader of the first Anti EU Parliamentary Party (representing 65% of our nation). The publicity would be stunning, and might force an in/out vote. 2. Make appointments with your local journalists, give them the same two print outs and ask them to write about the truth about the EU. 3. Do you know anyone famous? Persuade them in the same way to join our cause and get the truth known. 4. Print little stickers: "We didn't vote for this - it has no mandate," and stick them on everything that represents the police state and rip off government. 5. Tell your Town, District and County councillors they are about to be abolished. See below. 6. Do anything you can to get the truth about the EU published. Or print and hand out this flier (a .pdf), or flier (as a word document). It can be photocopied double sided on to one page. .         Our Councillors abolished Our 20,000 Councillors will be permanently abolished after the EU Regionalisation Plan has established the nine EU Regions. Point out they were elected to serve the public, not the government, and the public has not agreed to their abolition. Try to persuade them to stand up for the people who voted for them, (which is only doing their duty) by holding a yes/no local ballot on whether the public agree with the abolition of our counties, councillors and nation. If the public vote no, they should declare, for their Town or county, UDI from Europe and the illegal actions of our government since 1971, particularly the abolition of our British Constiution, common law, our nation and counties. The press coverage this would generate would force the truth into the open nationally, leading to a national in/out ballot on the EU. Just one council could achieve this fabulous result alone. Download: A summary of the loss of our 48 counties (a WP file) Download: A map of the nine EU regions (.pdf) The Devonport Column, exposing Common Purpose nationally, and corruption in Plymouth. The six treaties are: 1. The European Communities Act 1972. 2. The Single European Act, 1986. 3. The Maastricht Treaty, 1992. 4. The Amsterdam Treaty, 1997. 5. The Nice Treaty 2001.   The sixth will be called something equally innocuous, like the Treaty of Lille. Then the loss of our nation, way of life and freedom will be complete.   The best summary of the six treaties is the Constitution It reveals the true nature of the EU. Some British politicians were horrified when they saw the EU's absolute power revealed in its new constitution, and falsely accused the EU of much more than a tidying up exercise. It wasn't, it was a re-statement of the 6 treaties in almost readable English. Our politicians simply hadn't read the six treaties before they voted for them. The French and Dutch "No" votes are being ignored as usual; the EU Constitution is 2/3rds implemented and still being implemented. Dan Hannan of the Brussels EU Constitutional Committee, confirms it will be fully implemended in two years. Brussels can enforce it fully after the Queen signs the sixth EU treaty. Here's a one page summary with Article numbers: One page summary of the Constitution - pdf for download UKIP is way understating the costs of the EU. Even the British and EU governments admit to four times the UKIP figure. The EU is costing us 200 billion pa, 20% of our economy Quotes from our leaders revealing they know they built the EU as a dictatorship. EU treaties and publications abolishing our 48 counties   The Conservative Con trick Many people have been fooled by the Conservative Party into believing the party is anti EU. It was the Conservatives, under Ted Heath, who took us in to the EU, and then he lied that his 1972 EU Treaty wouldn't affect our sovereignty. Three out of the four Prime Ministers who signed the 6 EU treaties were Conservatives, every one af them legally a traitor under the British laws of their time. Do you see a pattern here? In 2005 Party Leader Michael Howard could have won the election for the Conservatives by making one simple statement: "We will repeal the 1972 EU Communities Act and leave Europe". Millions of Conservative voters would have rejoined the fold. A million Lib-Dems and Labour voters would have joined him. But he didn't. Because the Conservative leadership would rather be in Europe than be in power. Instead Howard continued betraying Conservative voters, so he lost. (And to be fair, why should Conservative leaders miss out on the EU corruption gravy train?) The Conservative leadership is completely dedicated to joining Europe, none more so than David Cameron, who is using the language and methods of Common Purpose against the Conservative Party. Conservative policy is to reform the EU from the inside (renegotiation). We've been in it 34 years and failed to refom this dictatorship one jot. Their policy is to continue this complete failure, and they know this pretence is wholly dishonest. You either submit to 100% of the EU or don't join it at all; that is the only choice open to us. Half a cheer for the Lib-Dems They realise we're now living in what is legally a police state, and speak out against it. We've been forced to harmonise our laws with the EU during the 34 years we've been inside, and the police state we're living in is the EU's. The Lib-Dems tell us with stunning naivity its Labour's police state, don't seem to realise the EU is behind it, and are still madly in favour of the EU. Its no comfort that they will suffer for their stupidity. Lately some Lib-Dem MP's have been talking about the Tories pathetic "reform the EU" idea. Will they never learn? With the Labour and Lib-Dem parties openly for Europe, and the Conservative leadership secretly for it, its clear the three parties will never give us a vote to leave the EU and keep our nation. Massive civil disobedience, a permanent General Strike, or a blockade of Westminster until MP's resign might be effective.   The abolition of the Labour, Conservative and Lib-Dem parties. So sloppy have our politicians been in their reading of the EU treaties, most haven't noticed that the EU will abolish our Labour, Conservative and Lib-Dem parties. It was clear in the Madrid 1999 party financing document, and it was re-stated in the Constitution, clause I-46-4. Only pan European parties like the EPP will be allowed. Some politicians, like Heseltine and Ken Clarke, can't wait for this to happen. A date for the abolition of Westminster has tactfully not been given Once the 6th treaty is signed, Westminster's remaining powers are transferred to Brussels, and Westminster is left with the powers of a county council. Except it won't have a county, because they will be abolished under the Regionalisation plan. The 9 EU regions report direct to Brussels, so Westminster will be a county council without a county. Anyone with half a brain can see Brussels will abolish Westminster, as it's only potential use would be as a rallying point to challenge the power of Brussels.     The Queen, Treason and the Coronation oath  Together with Churchill, King George VI saved our nation; he was a Monarch to be proud of. But his daughter the Queen is the only monarch to have broken her coronation oath, by signing these five treaties that abolish our common law, the British Constitution, the British and English nations, and our sovereignty. She has also committed treason, together with co-signatories Ted Heath, Margaret Thatcher, John Major and Tony Blair. Realising they stood a good chance of spending the rest of their lives behind bars, Tony Blair and the Queen signed the Crime and Disorder Act, 1998 (s36.3), which secretly abolished much of the crime of treason - they didn't tell the MP's what they had just voted for. 1.4 million British Servicemen gave their lives for our independence. The Queen has thrown their sacrifices away and made them worthless. At no physical risk to herself, she could have fulfilled her duty as a constitutional check and balance, by refusing to sign the five treaties until an in/out referendum had been held. In the unlikely event the vote went against her she might have lost her crown (not her life or a limb), and kept her £9 billion plus palaces. Those servicemen's lives would still have meant something. But she's dead keen to sign; she's already said she'll sign the last treaty. Princes Charles, William or Harry can then never be King. You can't have a King without a Kingdom: they can only be princes of a region (principality) within Europe. The Queen's aspirations are not ours; she clearly serves a higher and darker master; the faith she defends cannot be the one we think it is. King George VI must be turning over in his grave.     The new EU Hitler doesn't have to get elected Its worth noting that Adolf Hitler first had to get elected, if on a 35% minority vote, and then get his Enabling Act passed. An EU dictator has no such problems. Our EU rulers do not submit themselves for election now. And the Queen has already signed the Enabling Act (Civil Contingencies Act 2004). The EU's Hitler will have a much easier rise to power, and will have the formerly British and French nuclear weapons from day one. Adolf Hitler killed 54 million people. The EU's dictator could kill a billion at the touch of a button, with no democratic checks and balances to answer to. How could any aspiring dictator resist the EU opportunity?                         . Some revolutionary lyrics - We're being fooled again A diagram of the parallel EU Government in the UK. The wiring of the EU in Britain EU subversion of our Government. A link to ukip-plymouth.org.uk Our other site: drjn.co.uk Common Purpose, training 18,000 of our new EU rulers at all levels of our government now. As a word doc. The Legislative and Regulatory Reform Bill 2006 - government doesn't need Parliament. Cromwell had something similar in the 1680's. Is there anyone out there who doesn't realise all the treaties and laws of a dictatorship, and more, are now enacted? And that all it takes is for a foreign power, the EU, to enforce them? Do we want to be in Europe? Do we want to lose democratic government, the nations of Britain and England, and all our counties? Do we want to put ourselves in the EU, where we will be at the mercy of any dictator who chooses to control us? Isn't the answer obviously "No" ? We can live again outside Europe Outside the EU we can be a free and properly democratic nation. Free from Europe we could stop half our government spending being wasted, could save the £200 billion a year it costs us to be in Europe, repeal all its 107,000 regulations, and stop losing the £22 billion a year to Europe on our balance of payments. With those vast savings we could easily pay all our people a good living wage. According to the OECD we are the 4th strongest economy amongst the world's 205 independent nations, and we will make it handsomely. We could leave the EU in 14 hours The fastest an Act of Parliament has been drafted, passed by Parliament and signed by the Monarch was the abdication of King Edward 8th. It was done in 13.5 hours. We could repeal the 1972 European Communities Act and be out of Europe in just fourteen hours, if our traiterous MP's, Prime Minister and Queen so wished. So far they've illegally denied us the choice. We need to change that, but we may only have two years left before the final 6th treaty is signed. Thank you. Please choose one of the six actions above and complete it.   Questions? Call David Noakes: 07974 437 097 drjnoakesdel@yahoo.co.uk but delete the three letters "del" -this is to stop automated spam. The Westminster News   Please donate to help us spread the word:         Paypal accepts credit cards.     The EU dictatorship: Poverty under a brutal police state.   This is: http://eutruth.org.uk Questions for Bush. This site is © Copyright David Noakes 1997-2007, All Rights Reserved, but permission to copy and republish is granted. 07974 437 097.

*

www.noliberties.com

[Latest Addition - June07]

*

www.eutruth.org.uk

*

www.thewestminsternews.co.uk

*

 

www.speakout.co.uk

*

 

Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU

www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs

 

*

PETITION

FOR A

REFERENDUM

SIGN TODAY ON LINE

telegraph.co.uk/eureferendum

*  July 18-2007

 

 

VOTE

 -2007

 

TO LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION

WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE

TO SET YOU

 FREE

 

THE

UK INDEPENDENCE PARTY

www.ukip.org

 

TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER

BUT

SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.

*

 

ONLY

PRO-PORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

*

Home Rule for Scotland

WHY NOT

HOME RULE for ENGLAND

 

*

MAY/07

 

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin

 

Elections in the British One Party State If you vote Conservative, Labour, Lib-Dem, UKIP or the BNP, you'll be voting for the EU dictatorship. All five party leaderships are EU controlled. That's why your vote doesn't make a difference - all these five parties have the same policies: the EU's policies. The 17 most senior politicians in the Conservative, Lib Dem and Labour parties, including Ken Clarke, Francis Maude, Cameron, William Hague, George Osborne, Nick Clegg, Brown, David and Ed Milliband, Ed Balls, Peter Mandleson are Bilderbergers, the 140 strong band of ultra senior Freemasons who are bribed by the EU to build the EU dictatorship. No Bilderberger, Freemason or Common Purpose graduate should ever be allowed to hold public office. UKIP and the BNP are honey traps to neutralise activists: UKIP is riddled with Freemasons and Common Purpose like a cancer, and the BNP controlled by the Edgar Griffin (father) and son Nick Freemasonry family. The 350,000 freemasons and the 40,000 strong Common Purpose Organisation are the (mostly unknowing) foot soldiers of the EU in Britain. (Which makes the BNP the easiest party to clean up - get rid of the Griffins, and put in a real anti-EU leadership.)  For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF UKIP  OR  INTEND TO JOIN THEM TAKE NOTE OF THE MESSAGE ABOVE     THE EDP HAS BEEN CRITICAL OF THE MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP OF THE UKIP FOR SOME TIME NOW AS IS SHOWN IN A NUMBER OF BULLETINS  OVER THE PAST FEW YEARS WHERE WE HAVE CRITICISED THEIR LACK LUSTRE PERFORMANCE AS THEY FAILED TO MOTIVATE THEIR MEMBERSHIP TO A MORE DETERMINED CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE CAMPAIGN WHICH WOULD HAVE MADE THE GOVERNMENTS TREMBLE BUT THEY HAD NO WORRY BECAUSE THEY HAD THEIR OWN PERSONS IN CHARGE AT THE TOP OF THE ORGANISATION.  THIS FIGHTING SPIRIT HAS BEEN LACKING AND WE CAN CONFIRM THIS OURSELVES BECAUSE WE HAVE BEEN OUTSIDE PARLIAMENT WHEN A MARCH WAS CANCELLED - AND WATCH THE FARCE WHEN CANDLES WERE HELD AND THOUSANDS OF LETTERS SENT TO MPS WHO KNEW WHERE TO DISPOSES OF THEM -AND ALL TO NO AVAIL.  IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF UKIP YOU HAVE BEEN BETRAYED BY YOUR OWN LEADERSHIP SOME APPEAR ON THE ALEX JONES SHOW WHICH HAS BEEN UNDER CLOSE SPOTLIGHT RECENTLY AS BEING CLOSE TO AN ISRAELI SECURITY FIRM DETAILS ON OUR WEBSITE .    IRONICALLY IT WAS A CHANCE LOOK ON THE INTERNET A FEW YEARS AGO  TO COME UPON THAT SITE WHICH OPENED OUR MIND TO THE ILLUMINATI.   THOUGH WE HAVE SOME DETAILS OF THE BILDERBERGERS ON OUR SITE  A NUMBER OF YEARS AGO WE FAILED TO DO MORE RESEARCH- WE ALL HAVE TO LEARN.  THE FAILURE OF UKIP WE HAVE SUSPECTED  FOR MANY YEARS   THAT MANY AT THE TOP OF THEIR ORGANISATION MIGHT BE UNDERCOVER MEMBERS OF THE ILLUMINATI.  IT IS A FAVOURITE TRICK OF THEIRS TO SUPPORT ANY PARTY OR ORGANISATION AT THE OUTSET WHATEVER ITS POLICY AS IT ALLOWS THEM TO PUT THEIR OWN PEOPLE IN TO CONTROL ITS POLICES AS THEY BEHIND THE SCENES SUPPLY THE VITAL FINANCIAL SUPPORT.   Our intention is not to benefit from this disaster as since the 1999 European Election we have NOT! accepted a DONATION! from ANYONE! and we closed membership also because we did not wish to split the vote for UKIP but have stated in the past that we would contest another election if it was ever necessary to enter into the affray again and with the reputation of UKIP under scrutiny we will keep our options OPEN!   As we mentioned some time ago we have been almost two decades on the campaign trail to free our once FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE of ENGLAND from the SATANIC EU and those who have for centuries have planned for an EVIL ONE-WORLD CORPORATION/GOVERNMENT and EXTERMINATE! at least 5 BILLION of the WORLD'S POPULATION and therefore if we are right about those mentioned above they are not only TRAITORS to their COUNTRY but also a THREAT to WORLD PEACE.   However, of late, matters have NOT! been going well for the ILLUMINATI as you will observe BELOW.   The Queen, Treason and the Coronation oath Together with Churchill, King George VI saved our nation; he was a Monarch to be proud of. But his daughter the Queen is the only monarch to have broken all her coronation oaths, by signing these six treaties that abolish our common law, the British Constitution, the British and English nations, and our sovereignty. She has also committed treason, together with co-signatories Ted Heath, Margaret Thatcher, John Major, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown.   Realising that under the five Treason Acts they should already be hanging by the neck until dead, Tony Blair and the Queen signed the Crime and Disorder Act, 1998, which secretly abolished much of the crime of treason (s36.3) and reduced the penalty to life imprisonment - they didn't tell the MP's what they had just voted for.   1.4 million British Servicemen gave their lives for our independence. The Queen has thrown their sacrifices away and made them worthless. At no physical risk to herself, she could have fulfilled her oath and duty as a constitutional check and balance, by refusing to sign the six treaties until an in/out referendum had been held. In the unlikely event the vote went against her, she was even more unlikely to lose her crown (not her life or a limb), and would keep her £9 billion plus palaces either way. Those servicemen's lives would still have meant something.   But she was always keen to sign; and said in advance she would sign the last treaty. Princes Charles, William or Harry can now never be King. You can't have a King without a Kingdom: they can only be princes of a region (principality) within Europe. King Edward 8th was forced to abdicate because he was too overt as a German Nazi supporter. Mrs Simpson's divorce was merely the excuse. The Royal Family is a German Family - real surname Saxe-Coburg Gotha. Windsor is an adopted surname. All four of Prince Phillip's sisters married high ranking German Nazis. After they lost the war the EU was switched from a Nazi basis to a communist basis. Between the ages of 12 and 22 Queen Elisabeth's political and constitutional tutor was Sir Henry Martin, a Fabian Communist. It seems clear she was well trained for her subversion and treason.   Because she waves and smiles at us most are fooled into thinking she's lovely; in fact the Queen is a member of the Illuminati, a Bilderberger, head of Freemasonry, is wholly pro the (German) EU, and has abolished this nation with ruthless determination. It is so obvious she cares nothing for Britain or the British. The Queen's aspirations are not ours; she clearly serves a much darker master; the faith she defends cannot be the one we think it is. King George VI, the one recent monarch not indoctrinated with Nazi or Communist philosophy, must be turning over in his grave.   I ask that the law be enforced, and the Queen be tried for treason before 12 honest people, and not by our corrupt judges. And that the illegal section 36.3 Crime and Disorder Act be declared null and void, so that she can hang by the neck till dead. The new EU Hitler doesn't have to get elected   Its worth noting that Adolf Hitler first had to get elected, if on a 35% minority vote, and then get his Enabling Act passed. An EU dictator has no such problems. Our EU rulers do not submit themselves for election now. And the Queen has already signed the Enabling Act (Civil Contingencies Act 2004).   The EU's Hitler will have a much easier rise to power, and will have the formerly British and French nuclear weapons from day one. Adolf Hitler killed 54 million people. The EU's dictator could kill a billion at the touch of a button, with no democratic checks and balances to answer to. How could any aspiring dictator resist the EU opportunity?    For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk   www.bilderbergmeetings.org/participants2012.   A+MONARCH+THAT+BREAKS+A+CORONATION+OATH+ CANNOT+CLAIM+IMMUNITY+FROM+HIGH+TREASON+ BECAUSE+A+FIRST+MINISTER+SECRETLY +CHANGED+THE+LAW IN+1998. THE+SACRET+OATH+IS+TO+THE+PEOPLE+ TO+PROTECT+THEIR+ACCUSTOMED+LIBERTIES+ AND+THOSE+OF+FUTURE+GENERATIONS+TO+COME +IS +SACROSANCT.               WHAT A WAY TO WIN A WAR       BENJAMIN FULFORD   More! [WORKS] * SEEKTHETRUTHANDWISDOM   * Bank Of England « The Banking Swindle   More!   More!   PATRIOT or TRAITOR to HIS COUNTRY +More!    More!   +(More!     THIS YOU MUST SEE IT CONCERNS  YOUR PLANET! AND  YOU!     NO NEED TO PANIC!   'Others shall sing the song, Others shall right the wrong,- Finish what I begin, All all I fail of win. Hail to the coming singers! Hail to the brave light-bringers! Forward I reach and above All that they sing and dare.   The airs of heaven blow o'er me; A glory shines before me Of what mankind shall be'- Pure, generous, brave and free, I feel the earth move sunward, I join the great march onward, And  take, by faith, while living, My freehold of thanksgiving.-   WHITTIER   MAY-2012   TOP OF PAGE   The Soul of England pt I **** The Soul of England pt 2 **** Why are we English made to feel guilty? **** Don't let them destroy our Identity **** Nor shall my sword **** Why can't we have a right to be English ?- pt I **** Why can't we have a right to be English ? -pt 2 **** England is where the majority views are ignored and minorities rule at their expense in politically-correct Browndom **** Alfred - Christian King of the English-pt I **** Alfred - Christian King of the English -pt 2 **** Englishmen as others see us beyond our once oak wall **** England arise!-Today we can claim our right of self-determination. **** Kiss good bye to your sovereignty and country **** St George's Day-England's Day **** The Spirit of England by Winston Churchill.       ADDED - MAY-2012