
	MAJOR ISSUES BULLETIN

The greatest threat to British liberty does not come from terrorism - said Lord Hoffmann.

TIMES

Simon Jenkins

Friday, April 15 - 2005

A sledgehammer for a nut

Blame the Government

the media and police chiefs

for the hysterical overreaction

to the ricin case

WE ARE GOING steadily mad. No there were no weapons of mass destruction. There was no 9/11-style threat, no ricin, no bombs or explosive, just some old Photostats and a psychotic individual with undoubtedly evil intent.

This is not Saddam Hussein just the latest monster on the political block. Kamel Bourgass. Yesterday he was formally anointed as Willie Horton of the British general election. He wants to murder us all. Vote for us, cry the politicians, or die.

There is not the faintest convergence between the Bourgass case as revealed in the Old Bailey this week and the crazed media and political coverage of it.

The BBC’s 6pm news on Wednesday night was a disgrace worse than anything during the Gilligan affair. But because it served [10] Downing Street’s purpose it will doubtless avoid censure. Nor was the Press any better. Mention the word terrorist and sanity, flies the coop.

Bourgass, an illegal immigrant, was found in possession of cherry stones, caster beans, nail polish remover and recipes for ricin and other poisons, copied from a 1980s Palo Alto website in California.

A detective as “garden-shed kitchen chemistry” described it. It had nothing to do with al- Qaeda and was translated into Arabic from American survival handbooks.

This was demonstrated by Duncan Campbell, the espionage expert, and accepted as such by Porton Down, the MOD’s chemical research establishment. The prosecution eventually admitted that no ricin was found in Bourgass’s flat, merely ingredients to make the stuff, but was clearly a hare-brained nut.

The Old Bailey was told that to make Bourgass’s ingredients into ricin or anything else would have taken a tremendous effort. As for claims this week that he could have” killed thousands”, this is absurd.

The poison has to be ingested to cause death and the intention appears to have been to contaminate shop products and smear it on Holloway door handles.

The judge concluded that the purpose was to cause “fear and disruption with the potential for injury and widespread panic.” As for al -Qaeda links, they were based on a claim extracted, possible under torture, from a compatriot of Bourgass’s Mohammed Meguerba, back in Algeria. Such “links” are the normal requirement from victims of the CIA’s outsourced torturers. To such material have British prosecutors descended.

This man was clearly dangerous. During his arrest in Manchester he grabbed a knife and stabbed a policeman to death. But the police and security services did a good job. They found their man, and would have done so without loss had normal handcuff procedure been followed, as admitted by Manchester police.

The system worked without Charles

Clarke’s emergency powers. A nasty

character is now in prison for life.

Tony Blair claimed at the time of

Bourgass’s arrest just before the Iraq war,

in flagrant contempt of court that he was intent on launching” weapons of mass destruction” with “huge potential”. This was evidently evidence of an Al -Qaeda plot, with Bourgass’s Wood End refrigerator a “factory in London and Manchester”.

Government spokesmen said material from the factory had “tested positive for ricin”. Peter Hain predicted a “ricin attack”, whatever that is, on the House of Commons. All this was garbage.

Bourgass’s hope, as both judge and jury concluded, was to use his kitchen concoction to spread panic. Here he was on firmer ground.

His co-conspirators were not Al- Qaeda but Mr Blair, David Blunkett, Mr Clarke, various newspaper editors and London police chiefs frantic to suggest that Britain faced a 9/11-style chemical attack- and from an organisation linked to Saddam.

Mr Clarke could still claim on Wednesday that Bourgass proves the need for ID cards, Mr Blunkett that he proves the need for more anti-terrorist laws and Michael Howard (more plausibly) that he proves the need for tougher immigration control.

This man appears to have been the miserable detritus of a North African dictatorship. He was fooled by anti -terrorist hysteria into imaging that he could win fame in Islamist circles by concocting a potion. He ends by killing a policeman.

As for his eight supposed co-conspirators, the Old Bailey revealed them no more than a bunch of illegal immigrants and passport forgers, of whom thousands must be loose in Britain.

Despite two years of trying, the Crown never established them as terrorists, let alone Al-Qaeda. The trial, initiated in the run-up to the Iraq war, was heavily political.

The pursuit of domestic terrorism is a serious venture that deserves public support. I am sure there are dark forces hidden within society that would happily harm British citizens and I duly pay the police and M15 to protect me from them.

[When they are free from phone tapping innocent patriotic citizens who have seen their country maligned by Deceit, Lies and Treason - with possibly many members of the security services and other bodies taking their dirty-trick orders from Tony Blair - possibly the biggest liar in the twenty-first century.]

To continue:

This they have done in the Bourgass case. The venture was dangerous and these involved are entitled to some benefit of the doubt in judging the threat, but not to scaremongering. In the Bourgass case they deserve thanks and congratulations.

[Well! Of course we want our security services and our police services to do their job, which has been in the main exemplary until they encountered political interference from the likes of Tony Blair and his deceitful cronies. The results are there for us all to see?

For over eight years he has been and is still putting his own men in places of power in the main power base within our community so that should he need to get them to betray their country or do anything that is asked of them however unconstitutional or unethical then he knows he has chosen the right people.

A Prime Minister of Integrity and a Patriot is not to be feared in dispensing power, only when a person has illusions of grandeur and has no interest in protecting the inheritance of the country

are the people in great danger?

These same individuals will do anything whatsoever to justify the Iraq war and the recent passing of the recent Terrorism Bill, which has been, suspended Habeas Corpus for a year. A historic freedom of our almost 800 year Magna Carta and later reconfirmed by the Habeas Corpus Act

of 1679.]

To continue:

But the Government’s continued occupation of Iraq and its manic anti terrorist legislation have nothing to do with the case. They divert attention and resources from sensible policing while fuelling resentment among Muslims on which terrorism feeds. If there is any message from the Bourgass case, it is that Iraq is making Britain less safe, not more.

As for ID cards, what difference would they have made to this group of forgers, fugitives and kitchen poisoners?

Britain is in the grip of dumbed-down politics. This may be par for a general election, but has to be too important for that.

I return yet again to Lord Hoffmann’s judgment on the Belmarsh detainees.

“The greatest threat to British liberty”, he said.

“Does not come from Terrorism. It comes from the hysterical overreaction to it of the political community and the bad laws that follow.’

* * *

[Font altered-bolding &underlining-comments in brackets]

APRIL/05

Q&A: The Lisbon Treaty-2008

Leaders of the European Union's 27 member states meet in Portugal this week to sign what will now become known as the Lisbon Treaty.

*

The abolition of Britain
by The Reform Treaty
- Second Reading-Passed by majority of 138

*

Veteran parliamentarian TONY BENN speaks of the absolute necessity of a

REFERENDUM

HEAR HIM ON

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I-ZdvQz1o

13th October,2007

So You Want Out Of The EU

THEN WHY NOT SIGN THE

RENUNCIATION of EU CITIZENSHIP

WHY WE ASK YOUR SUPPORT

When we first saw the petition we reasoned that it had no chance of success from No 10 but we supported it in order to gauge the number of Britons who would publicly put their name to a list which stated that they wished to RENUNCIATE EU CITIZENSHIP and retain only BRITISH.-THAT IS WHAT THIS IS ABOUT. Some might say that to hide behind a negative premise is both cowardly and playing into the hands of the EU FEDERALISTS. DON'T LET THEM GET AWAY WITH IT- Place your vote so ALL can see that YOU CARE. about YOUR COUNTRY and YOUR FREEDOM.

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Optout

Details from petition creator

With the signing of the Maastricht Treaty the people of Britain were given

DUAL CITIZENSHIP

-both

EUROPEAN and BRITISH

The extra tier of citizenship was thrust upon the people without their consent -and in many cases knowledge.

The PEOPLE of GREAT BRITAIN should be allowed the option of opting out of the EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP if they so wish. The GOVERNMENT will then be able to provide those who have opted out with

BRITISH DOCUMENTATION

-only such as British (not EU) passports, driving licences and other national documents.

EU laws will also NOT APPLY to those who

HAVE OPTED OUT OF EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP

[PETITION OPEN UNTIL OCTOBER 08]

CHRISTMAS SPECIAL!

A BLUNT REPLY TO THE QUEEN'S SPEECH ON CHRISTMAS DAY-25th DECEMBER ,2007.

*

TIME FOR DECISION

THE BRITISH LEGACY-AUSTRALIA-CANADA-NEW ZEALAND-WHY THEY MATTER.

*

The Act of Settlement of 1701-WHY IT SHOULD CONCERN -YOU!

*

The Common Law of ENGLAND is the LAW of

THE COMMONWEALTH and AMERICA

*
The Commonwealth Realms V The Constitution for Europe- 4-PARTS
*
MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA-SUPPORT THE CROWN
*
WHY WE MUST BE ALERT AND WITH OUR COMMONWEALTH PATRIOTS MAINTAIN CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHY
*
IF WE DESTROY OUR RIGHT OF FREEDOM TO FIGHT A WAR ON TERROR-WHO WINS?
(John Mortimer)

YOU CAN'T HAVE BOTH.

WILL THIS CHRISTMAS QUEEN'S SPEECH
BE THE LAST IN A FREE INDEPENDENT ENGLAND -SCOTLAND AND WALES?
Will HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ASSURE YOU THAT YOU HAVE NOTHING TO FEAR FROM BECOMING A PROVINCE OF EUROPE.
OR
WILL THE QUEEN MAKE IT PLAIN THAT OUR FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE IS SACROSANCT BUT THAT IF THE PEOPLE WISH TO BECOME SLAVES -THEN A REFERENDUM THERE MUST BE.
WE BELIEVE THAT NO ENGLISHMAN SHOULD BE ASKED WHETHER HE WISHES TO BE A SLAVE OR FREE!

THIS CHRISTMAS WE WILL FIND OUT IF OUR PROTECTOR OF THE
'Rights and Liberties'
of
Englishmen
Will keep by HER SACRED OATH
or the MONARCHY be nothing more than a THEME PARK in the future
THIS IS THE TIME FOR BLUNT SPEAKING AS THE VERY EXISTENCE OF OUR UNIQUE NATION STATE IS IN DIRE PERIL.
We are told on the BBC (Brussels Broadcasting Service) at 11.30 pm on Saturday the 23rd December, 2007, that the QUEEN now has a website which has footage of the Royal Family in the past and that the QUEEN is NOT
'Stuck in the past'
Well! as far as many patriotic subjects are concerned we need to remain in the PAST when it concerns the protection of our
FREEDOM and COUNTRY.

Change we have had and will continue to have but it must not threaten our very WAY-OF-LIFE our Common Law of England and all which makes our country the most unique parliamentary democracy in the world.
THERE CAN BE NO SURRENDER!

Should the Monarch fail to protect our inherited RIGHTS and Liberties then we shall have to fight for a REPUBLIC as happened in the 17th century because the Monarch of the day ignored those very 'Rights and Liberties of Englishmen' which will still survive in the English Speaking World today in December 2007. How can the MOTHER of PARLIAMENTS give away what is already our and our children's INHERITANCE which cannot be taken away by
PARLIAMENT or the QUEEN.

If the above publicity exercise is to be used to soften the impact to the population of the BETRAYAL of their CONSTITUTION and COUNTRY then it would be the greatest TREASON by a Monarch since James II who sold our COUNTRY to the FRENCH for MONEY and RELIGION.

WE ASK WHAT PRICE ARE OUR RIGHTS AND LIBERTIES WORTH?

THEY ARE PRICELESS!

*

A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION –CONSPIRATORS NAMED

*

The Choice is Yours!-but time is running out FAST!
6 months to be EXACT!
*

THE EU

WE-AND THEM!

WE are to join THEM
THEY are not joining US
WE have more to LOSE
THEY have more to GAIN
WE have been clear of dictators from EUROPE for most of our HISTORY
THEY have been cursed with that abomination for most of their HISTORY and NOW!
*
Our Queen and the EU Constitution
*
The Spirit of England
by
Winston Churchill
*
THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE
*
MESSAGE TO HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH THE II
*
We now learn from the Daily Mail COMMENT on Christmas Eve that the Queen's Speech will cover the catastrophic fall in Values and Moral behaviour since the beginning of her 56 -year reign. This has been brought about by the actions of HER MINISTERS and the greater number of those in HER PARLIAMENT who have placed THEIR CONCERNS before the INTERESTS of THE PEOPLE and NATION STATE.

As for the fact that HER PEOPLE feel LOST that has been the direct result of the actions of HER SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS and the TRAITOROUS POLITICIANS including PRIME MINISTERS who have stealthily over the 56 years of HER MAJESTY'S REIGN have almost achieved their aim of ENSLAVING the PEOPLE to a FOREIGN POWER.
The reason for the marked drop in the number viewing THE QUEEN'S SPEECH is no doubt because the mass of people have realised years ago that the MONARCH is powerless to PROTECT their WAY-OF-LIFE and events up to now have PROVED THEM CORRECT.
There is a well know saying 'Nero fiddled while Rome burned'
Is it the case on Christmas Day 2007 while the Monarch talks our Rights and Liberties are being taken from us under our very noses?
Of course the QUEEN under HER CONSTITUTIONAL ROLE can only 'Advise and Warn' HER MINISTERS but when the matter concerns the very LIFE of an INDEPENDENT STATE we expect that HER MAJESTY consider the arrangement to be AT AN END as it would make a MOCKERY of the PRIME IMPORTANCE of the MONARCH to protect our inherited Rights and Liberties which HER MINISTERS are endeavouring TO GIVE AWAY.
We as loyal subjects of the MONARCH who is the living embodiment of OUR RIGHTS and LIBERTIES ask at this late stage with only months to the eradication of a FREE NATION STATE some veiled comments that HER MAJESTY will PROTECT our RIGHTS and LIBERTIES.
As for the MORAL tone of the NATION STATE at this most crucial time in ENGLISH CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY this matter should be left to CHURCH LEADERS who's responsibility it is to CARE for their FLOCKS particularly at this FESTIVAL of CHRISTMAS.
IF HER MAJESTY'S SPEECH has not been pre-recorded we ask HER MAJESTY to give those MILLIONS of HER subjects some hope that their PROTECTOR has NOT FORGOTTEN THEM.
Should this APPEAL not be answered we can at last confirm that the MONARCHY is after all nothing more than a talking shop suitable for YouTube and therefore nothing more than a
THEME PARK
*
Hear Tony Benn's comments about the despotic and corrupt EUROPEAN UNION
and the need for a
REFERENDUM
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I-ZdvQz1o
From a politician with INTEGRITY and love of country who has for decades witnessed the growth of the monstrous creature soon to be a
UNITED STATES OF EUROPE.
*

Liberties of Parliament- Birthright of Subjects of England.

*

[All words/word underlined have a separate bulletin]



A CHRISTMAS MESSAGE

TO

ALL OUR VIEWERS.

WE WISH YOU ALL A

HAPPY CHRISTMAS AND A HAPPY NEW YEAR

IN

2008

[Since our Xmas message to you all last year we find that our sentiments remain the same with the added emphasise on the coming danger to YOUR COUNTRY from those many traitors in YOUR HOUSE of COMMONS who intend to sell YOUR COUNTRY to a FOREIGN POWER]

We Remember The Year 2006

The Spirit of England-Winston Churchill-1953

[We were warned in 1953 to beware of wreckers of our Constitution and Way-of- Life but it had taken Tony Blair just 10 years to do just THAT while everyone had their minds they thought on more important matters. Well! in 2007 his predessessor Gordon Brown is leading you to SLAVERY and only awaits the final signature of the present holder of the House of Wessex the over 1000 year PROTECTOR of our inherited

RIGHTS and LIBERTIES of ENGLISHMEN

HER MAJESTY-THE QUEEN

Of the House of Wessex since King Alfred 'the Shepherd and Darling of England' in the annals of 893 -897

'We still leave it to the work of

Alfred the Great

that England was saved to become the first individual nation -state which over 1100 years later a member of that same House of Wessex has already signed away much of those ancient Rights and Liberties and fundamentals of justice and Rule of Law and only awaits a final signature to enslave her people into a despotic undemocratic godless police state to call itself a

UNITED STATES OF EUROPE

It is within the power of Her Majesty the Queen to refuse to ratify the New EU TREATY because whatever lies her ministers have given her over her long reign the TRUTH is now clear for ALL TO SEE.
In the Netherlands a number of years ago their MONARCH resigned for a day rather than sign the Bill put before him. The New EU TREATY is the death of a NATION STATE of over 1200 years in the making. It is the treasonable actions of HER MINISTERS which has placed THE QUEEN in the forefront in the protection of the Rights and Liberties of HER SUBJECTS as on no one else can HER PEOPLE DEPEND.
GOD SAVE THE QUEEN
*
WILL THIS CHRISTMAS QUEEN'S SPEECH
BE THE LAST IN A FREE INDEPENDENT ENGLAND -SCOTLAND AND WALES?
*

A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND

by

Harry Beckhough

[Author of Germany's Four Reich's]

2004

*

'There'll always Be an ENGLAND'

-NOT any MORE




THE EU OVER THE NEXT FEW MONTHS WILL PORTRAY ITSELF AS THE BEST THING SINCE SLICED BREAD

'Don't tell the voters-or you will ruin everything '

"...we have to make sure that there are no discussions taking place in the open air"

Guenter Burghardt, a former EU ambassador to the US, warning that details of the new EU diplomatic service (officially to be known as the External Action Service) should not be discussed in public before the

UK PARLIAMENT

had ratified the NEW EU TREATY

and Ireland has held its TREATY REFERENDUM early next summer (source: EU Observer on 27th November ,2007

The EU has also stated that none of its institutions should rock the boat until the English have ratified their TREATY.

Over the next few months you will hear more than ever the wonderful benefits of the EU. Whether it is Global warming or whatever they feel shows them in a good light and when you have swallowed the bait you will not know what has hit you. They intend to show how reasonable they are and that they are there to make you happy. If you all fall for this con-trick then you will deserve the SLAVERY that is in store for

YOU!

Referendum: how Labour could still smell of roses.

and

'Money to spare'

when we leave the EU in 2008?

Open Europe says:

Build 40 brand new general hospitals each year 2007-13

or

Cut council tax by nearly 50 per cent

or

Cut the basic rate of income tax by 3p

or

Cut petrol duty by 75 per cent

or

Pay the total bill for the London Olympics in less than a year

AND MUCH MORE

Commons debate on the European Communities (Finance) Bill on Monday 19th November,2007.

REFERENDUM DAY

will be

RECOMPENCE DAY?

*

A TIME FOR EUROSCEPTICS TO LEARN FROM THE PAST-ONLY A TWO-PRONGED ATTACK CAN BRING VICTORY AND SAVE YOUR FREEDOM -CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY.



www.noliberties.com

[Latest Addition - June07]

*

www.eutruth.org.uk

*

www.thewestminsternews.co.uk

*

www.speakout.co.uk

*

Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU

www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs

*

VOTE

MAY -2007

TO LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION

WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE

TO SET YOU

FREE

THE

UK INDEPENDENCE PARTY

www.ukip.org

TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER

BUT

SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.

*

ONLY

PRO-PORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

*

Home Rule for Scotland

WHY NOT

HOME RULE for ENGLAND

*

JUNE/07

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin