VIEWERS -TOP TOPICS-WKLY/ARCHIVE

*HOME-PT 2

 

A PEACEFUL ENGLISH REVOLUTION IS ON THE WAY-ALERT-1

 
RON PAUL 9-11+(1) GLOBALWARMING SCAM USA IRAQ/AFGHAN LONDON BOMBINGS COMMON PURPOSE CONSPIRACY CENTRAL BANKS  +(1)
HOME ARCHIVE  MAIN BULLETINS E U  ENGLAND +(1) BILDERBERGERS+(1) ILLUMINATI +(1) NEW WORLD ORDER +(1)
1)U.S. Concentration Camps

2)DEC-2011- MADE-READY

3) PLANS

1)

FEMA

2)

 

3)

1)Protocols

of

ZION

 

2)

ZIONISM

 

CITY

OF

LONDON

 

 A STATE WITHIN ENGLAND

+(2)

 Dr.

John

Coleman

WHO OWNS

THE FED

 

POWER

OF 1)HAARP FOR GOOD   2)EVIL

Mind Control

INTERNET

CENSORSHI

 
1)Chemtrails

2)CREATED

C3)

1)

PRIVATE CENTRAL BANKS

 

2)

(1)

War

is a Racket

 

(2)

 
A MEETING PLACE  - THERE ARE HUNDREDS  OF ALTERNATIVE WEBSITES ON OUR wEBSITE- SINCE 2003
realzionistnews. TruetorahJews CONSPIRACYPLANET

.COM/

Fagan-Sounded-Alarm-of -the ILLUMINATI-in-1967 DAVID ICKE BRITISH CONSTITUTION GROUP

 

YOU CAN HANDLE THE TRUTH
LANDDESTROYER.

BLOGSPOT

.COM

HENRY MAKOW  CORBETTREPORT) LIFE IN THE MIX 2

 

UK COLUMN.ORG. JEW WATCH

ACTIVISTPOST.

COM

TARPLEY.NET

 

 
 

EU

 

HITLER'S 1940 BLUEPRINT FOR A GERMAN DOMINATED EUROPEAN UNION  COLLECTIVE HAS ALMOST BEEN COMPLETED ****EUROPEAN UNION EXPOSED-A CRIMINALISED ORGANISATION/****  HOW HITLER'S ENABLING ACT OF 1933 WAS PASSED THROUGH YOUR WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENT BY 8 VOTES****   REVEALED AFTER HIS DEATH THAT EDWARD HEATH AN AGENT OF NAZI INTERNATIONAL AND TRAITOR TO HIS COUNTRY FOR 60 YEAR/ ****     THE TERM DVD STANDS FOR GERMAN DEFENCE AGENCY OR SECRET SERVICE/ ****      FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENT BY PAYOUTS/****     A TRAITOR FULL OF HONOURS FROM HIS COUNTRY-WHY?/  ****   WHAT WERE THE DARK ACTORS PLAYING GAMES WHICH THE PATRIOT DR DAVID KELLY REFERRED  -[WAS IT AN ILLUMINATI  PLAN TO USE BIOLOGICAL WEAPONS TO REDUCE THE POPULATION OF THE WORLD BY 95%?GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE ESTABLISHED IN MADRID IN 1943 BY HEINRICH HIMMLER****     A PLAGUE OF TREACHERY -CORRUPTION AND SKULDUGGERY HAS TAKEN OVER ONCE PROUD DEMOCRACIES?/****     THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE/ ****  WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON/ ****  GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE/GERMANY AS  STRONGMAN OF EUROPE- GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING/ ****  A WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND/****    50 YEARS OF SURRENDER/ **** BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENT SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL.****NAZI PENETRATION OF GERMANY'S POST WAR STRUCTURES****WILFUL BLINDNESS AND COWARDNESS OF POLITICIANS****AN INTERVIEW WITH FORMER SOVIET DISSIDENT VLADIMIR BUKOVSKY WARNS OF EU DICTATORSHIP.**** THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?****AN ABOLITION OF PARLIAMENT BILL? PART2****Former Nazi Bank Bank of International Settlements To Rule The Global Economy

 
     
 

 

A CALL TO ARMS  

 

 

[If our political system has been neutered it will be necessary for the loyal Britons to take direct action against the traitorous GOVERNMENT

The House of Commons and The House of Lords

must protect our Ancient Rights and Liberties but if this fails we have to be ready to do something other than talk.

OUR PARLIAMENT is under scrutiny of the PEOPLE and IF THEY FAIL then the People will rise as in the past in 1215 -Magna Carta and again in 1640 against a TYRANT KING

to protect the Ancient

'Rights and Liberties'

of

ENGLISHMEN.

*

 

Daily Mail

COMMENT

[Saturday, October 20, 2007]

No wonder voters are so disillusioned

SO ENDS a profoundly depressing week for trust in British politics

Without a shred of popular consent and in breach of his manifesto pledge on a REFERENDUM, the Prime Minister has signed away a raft of new powers to a

BRUSSELS-DOMINATED

IMPERIAL EUROPE

He may be a bigger and better man than

Tony Blair, but after the LISBON summit voters will have their faith in

British 

JUSTICE

tested as seldom before.

But then, When has ANY British leader reflected the public mood on matters

EUROPEAN?

From the beginning this issue has  driven a wedge between rulers and the ruled, brought new cynicism to

POLITICS

and persuaded millions that it isn't worth voting

AT ALL.

When Ted Heath took us into the then Common Market 35 years ago, it was at the price of losing

CONTROL OF [BRITISH] FISHING

Then came Harold Wilson's bogus

'RENEGOTIATION'

followed by the

1975 REFERENDUM

when Europhiles claimed were in a
 

FREE TRADE ORGANISATION

and our

SOVEREIGNTY

wouldn't be compromised.

NEXT came the Single European ACT

when Margaret Thatcher handed

more power to

BRUSSELS

(a decision she was to regret)

[We have always been an admirer of the IRON LADY and still remain so and  we hope one day the lady will give us the bottom line as to why she gave way instead of resigning on the issue of no further powers passed to the EU instead of waiting to be politically assassinated by the Europhiles. Her actions on the economic front were vital to our country but what she allowed to happen about EUROPE when she was wielding her handbag will also interest many in the years ahead. Was it as they say 'That Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely '-WILL WE EVER KNOW?]

- and John Major's opt-outs at

MAASTRICHT

-which proved  worthless.

Now it is the turn of Mr Brown, who has

PROMISED

that

EUROPE

will seek no

FUNDAMENTAL CHANGES

for ten years, once the

[new EU] TREATY

is

RATIFIED.

[There will be no need of further fundamental changes because the new treaty is quite capable in taking care of that.]

Oh , really? Why should we believe a word WHEN the Labour -dominated European Scrutiny Committee says  -the EU constitution and treaty are virtually identical and our 'red lines'

ARE WORTHLESS

It isn't that our politicians acted from dishonourably motives, They always believed Britain is best served by not being side-lined. But they underestimated the ruthlessness of the federalist project that simply won't allow public opinion to get in the way of a

GREATER EUROPE

[WE must interject here because we are of the opinion that a great number of MPs since 1972 have not and are not still acting from honourable motives. Since the letter to TED HEATH back in the 60's  from his Lord Chancellor-Lord Kilmuir which without equivocation showed the totalitarian direction and ambition of the European Union which was known to many prominent politicians at the time. And since then ALL governments have followed the Europhile LINE. As for being side -lined  this gives the impression that the British people but more particularly THE ENGLISH PEOPLE would be the losers by remaining an Independent Nation State with its own Foreign Minister and its OWN LAWS and the freedom to act independently on the WORLD STAGE. Politicians such as Tony Benn and Enoch Powell  and a small band at the time saw through the DECEIT. But for many others the temptation was too great as we find today in 2007. Over the past 35 years we have unnecessarily expended over  300 billion being in the corrupt insatiable monster . 40 years later we know that our future incarceration in the EU with a down graded ENTERPRISE POLICY its  own continental so-called justice system that has the individual Guilty before proven and Trial by Jury as a judicial nonsense ,and a foreign policy which would be  a matter  for the EU and our Armed Forces would be thrown into the fray on the first instant as many of the member states have no inclination to share the burden. Of course GERMANY with 300,000 strong Army will dominate with the French the direction of future conflict-it might be against a power who has been an ally of England in the past but not to the liking of the EU. We stand to lose more by being in the EU rather than being FREE  to take our own unimpeded direction as we had done before 1972 and over much of our long island history of over 1400 years.

The EU is

BAD for BRITAIN - BAD for ENGLAND

AND

BAD for EUROPE and the WORLD

*          *          *

Daily Mail COMMENT:

Britain isn't alone in being denied a vote. The great majority in France , Germany, Spain and Italy want a referendum too, but won't get one. Federalists were enraged when voters in France and Holland rejected the

EU CONSTITUTION

two years ago and won't risk another rebuff.

So now only national parliaments stand in the way of the European juggernaut. Most will simply rubber stamp the Lisbon deal. But is it really too much to hope that Westminster at least will show a spark of courage and independence?

Admittedly, the omens aren't good. MPs are - with some honourable exceptions -notably mainly for long holidays, gold-plated pensions, bloated expenses and a failure to hold Tony Blair to account.

BUT some brave Labour backbenchers are appalled that their manifesto promise has been broken. Meanwhile the Tories have found a new sense of purpose that should keep them united as they scrutinise the treaty word by word. And the Lords could throw a spanner in the works by demanding a referendum.

The odds may be against a Government defeat, but the battle isn't over yet. Parliament faces a huge challenge. How it responds will not only determine our future in EUROPE, but whether the PUBLIC can begin to TRUST politicians again.

*          *          *

 

[History is littered with numerous cases where politicians have deceived the people. The best way to consider politicians is to be surprised if you find one that has HONESTY-INTEGRITY and HONOUR and cherish THEM. Not as in our House of Commons where such men are held in ridicule and abused and drowned by dishonest charlatans when such courageous representatives try to have their say.

 

We now hear that David Cameron WILL NOT REPEAL THE NEW TREATY when he is BACK IN OFFICE though William Hague gave such an undertaking recently. We have constantly stated that we believe that MR NICE GUY DAVE was an EU plant in place to take over should the CONSERVATIVE PARTY return to OFFICE. Their tactics are to be strong about a REFERENDUM at this time so that the electorate might REMEMBER which is in line with the TWEEDLEDEE and TWEEDLEDUM basis of POLITICS at WESTMINSTER. We are all being taken as suckers who will do nothing better than TALK and MARCH. The ONLY WAY we will be able to protect our 'Rights and Liberties' will be to do great deal more otherwise

OUR JUST CAUSE IS LOST

*

 

To Follow also:      PRE 1688-Natural or Divine Law

How the Ancient safeguards were overruled which protected

FUNDAMENTAL VALUES

AND OR

FREEDOM

*

 

Parliamentary  Sovereignty

Pre-1688 - natural or divine law

 

The American system seeks to protect fundamental values by making their reform subject to a cumbersome law-making process requiring extremely high levels of popular consent. An analysis of early seventeenth century England cas law reveals several judgments in which the courts suggested that there were certain values that were so

 FUNDAMENTAL

to the

ENGLISH CONSTITUTION

that they could not be changed by any process at all.

[For as long as we can remember we have always considered this so what ever the courts might rule.]

These principles are perhaps analogous to the 'inalienable rights' of which Thomas Jefferson spoke in the

US Declaration of Independence

Some judges seemed ready to suggest that there was a system of

'Natural Law' or 'Divine Law'

which placed limits on what the various branches of government may do.

For example in Dr Bonham's case in 1610, Chief justice Coke had said:

'When an Act of Parliament is against common right or reason, or repugnant, or impossible to be performed, the common law will control it, in Day v Savadge, Chief Justice Hobart felt able to conclude that to make a man judge in his own case, is void in itself. Similarly in the 1653 case of R v Love, Keble J had pronounced that 'whatever is not consonant to the law of God, or to right reason which is maintained by scripture....be Acts of Parliament, customs, or any judicial acts of the Court, it is not law of England.

[The point we are making is that what the Government is doing is in direct denial of the people's wish to:

 

RULE THEMSELVES by THEIR OWN LAWS by THEIR OWN CUSTOMS.

and as  Ian Loveland professor of Law , Brunel University in his CONSTITUTIONAL LAW - Butterworths-1996 said further:

The facts of these cases need not detain us here. the point one would want to stress is that there was a time in [English Constitutional History] when it seems that it was widely believed that there were basic moral or political principles that it was not within the power of any number of people. through any type of law-making process, to change in any way at all.

[We can agree with the supreme authority of the HOUSE of COMMONS to do whatever it needs to do up to the limit of not endangering the very existence of that institution and the

'Rights and Liberties'

of Englishmen

TO RULE THEMSELVES

What has happened since that time in the 60's when Edward Heath asked a legal opinion from his Lord Chancellor -Lord Kilmuir should have been enough to make it clear that we could not be a part of such a destruction to our

 PARLIAMENT and  CONSTITUTION.

Back in 1640 the result of the then King Charles I attempts to endanger the constitution led to the civil war and later to King James II leaving the country in the 1688/9 invitation for William of Orange to be our king.

In 2007 and since 1972 powers have been given to the EU which should have been the sole guardian ship of our House of Commons-House of Lords-and the Monarch as stated in the Oath administered at the 1953 Coronation and the Oath of LOYALTY taken by every minister of the CROWN since then.

Rightly it is said that the Queen must follow her MINISTERS but when such a treaty is in effect the destruction of a NATION STATE then the Monarch should not sign it because it would be a great offence to the PEOPLE and an violation of Her Majesty's Coronation Oath. ONLY when the very existence of a nation -state is at risk would we ask for such a unconstitutional act.

It will be argued that even if Her Majesty the Queen refused to sign the treaty the government would bring in legislation to legalise an Act of Parliament on its own to pass the Bill.

But for the government to do that would bring strong pressure from the people here and around the world and would bring more adverse publicity than any British government could ignore.

 

The House of Commons has usurped the rights and liberties belonging to the people from under their very noses albeit with stealth and deceit. the time is now here for the

PEOPLE to take back those POWERS and hand them back to a

LOYAL HOUSE OF COMMONS.

 

The choice is with our representatives they can either go ahead with

THEIR TREASON

OR

They can realise their great error and not proceed with the new Treaty and obtain the return powers wrongly given to a foreign power-the EU. For many people it is simply a matter of

BETTER OUT OF THE EU.

*          *          *

LETTERS to the Daily Telegraph

[Monday ,October 22,2007]

 

 

SIR -

As you rightly say (leading article, October 20), in the context of Gordon Brown's plan to force the EU TREATY through Parliament without a REFERENDUM, "we entrust out LIBERTIES to our MPs and expect them in return to do what they have PROMISED TO DO when we elected THEM."

 In fact, the one right our MPs have not got is to give away those

 "LIBERTIES" WE ENTRUST TO THEM.

For three centuries, it has been central to our CONSTITUTION (under the Declaration of Right) that power ultimately BELONGS TO THE BRITISH PEOPLE. I is only entrusted to MPs for the duration of PARLIAMENT.

Under the LAW of the LAND MPs are not entitled to give away powers that do not belong to them.

Christopher Booker

Litton ,Somerset

*

Sir-

Why even bother to report (October 20) Gordon Brown's "high risk pledge to block any further extension of Europe's power for at least a decade", WHEN HE HAS JUST PROVED TO US THAT ANY PLEDGE WHICH HE MAKES IS

WORTHLESS?

*

 

[A BIG LIE IS A GREAT LIE and the greater the lie the greater the betrayal and as we know Hitler was a master at this art which misled his nation and it enabled him to lead his country to a devastating war and an infamy which will live with that nation for decades to come. Gordon Brown is but following in his footsteps.

In order to show the EU in a good light you will from time to time be reminded of what it has achieved so they are very careful to select cases which give them good publicity -which is exactly what the

NAZI REGIME

was all about.

 

A viewer from Anstruther, Fife has put the present impasse with Gordon Brown in context, he says:

SIR.

 Mr Marshall's suggestion (letters, October 20) regarding peaceful protest, though laudable loses sight of the fact that such a demonstration over something arguably more serious, the war in Iraq was singularly ineffective.

Perhaps public riots would be more effective.

[Our comment is that in a situation when the very life of a nation -state is threatened as in the 17th century civil war as it is today in 2007 then we agree with the writer that stronger measures are needed if the Government of the Day ignores the rights of the PEOPLE by refusing a REFERENDUM which was PROMISED on the question of the survival of that STATE.]

FRIENDS of ENGLAND

*

 

Daily Telegraph

COMMENT

[Monday October 22, 2007]

 

We must have a say

[THE NEW EU TREATY]

As the tear into Labour over its refusal to hold the promised referendum on the EU, the Conservatives should take a moment to make sure their own position is secure.

David Cameron has accused the Prime Minister of

TREATING US LIKE FOOLS

Fair enough.

Gordon Brown's pretence that the new draft is different from the old is so flagrantly false that it insults our intelligence. As we report today, even his claim that the EU Charter would not be legally binding in Britain - the most important of his fatuous

"red lines"

-is being demolished.

Tactically, the Tories are right to make the issue one of

TRUST

rather than one of Europe.

This newspaper strongly opposes the

CONSTITUTION

 (let's call it by its proper name)

because it shifts power from elected representatives in Westminster to unelected functionaries in

BRUSSELS.

But even those who couldn't give a bent banana about the EU will be receptive to the

CHARGE

THAT LABOUR ARE LYING.

Having taken their

STAND ON

HONESTY

though, the Conservatives need to be on their guard against anything that smacks of playing games of their own with the voters.

A month ago, Mr Cameron wrote:

" Today, I will give this cast-iron guarantee:

If I become PM, a Conservative Government will hold a referendum on any EU TREATY that emerges from these negotiations."

THAT SOUNDS PRETTY UNEQUIVOCAL.

Now , though, Mr Hague seems tiptoeing away from that promise, refusing to confirm that an incoming Tory administration would hold a retrospective poll if Labour had already pushed the constitution through.

WHY?

No Parliament can bind its successor and the Tories have been prepared on the issue of ID cards, to commit themselves to giving the people a say whenever they take power. Anything else, to borrow Mr Cameron's phrase would be to

TREAT PEOPLE LIKE FOOLS.

*

[Well from the accession of David Cameron to the leader of the Tories we have been firmly convinced that he was always an understudy of Tony Blair kept originally in the background and brought out of suspension to protect the EU connection whatever happened. Everything we have seen since has confirmed this charge.  However, can one explain the happenings in his party at this crucial crossroads in the life and death of a once Independent Nation -State of over 1400 years in the making?]

*          *          *

OCTOBER-2007

 

*

 

THE PEOPLE HAVE SPOKEN-IS THE EU COMMISSION LISTENING?

*

Ditch the EU TREATY after IRISH REJECTION

SAY VOTERS

by

Daniel Martin

Political Reporter

[Daily Mail-Wednesday, June 18,2008]

MORE THAN HALF of voters believe Britain should drop the controversial European Treaty in the wake of its rejection in last week's

IRISH REFERENDUM'

The poll comes as the Tories launch a last-ditch bid in the

HOUSE of LORDS

today to delay the

RATIFICATION OF THE TREATY.

And

10,000 people

have signed a

PETITION

on the

DOWNING STREET- WEBSITE

within the past few days

JUNE16-2008

, calling on the

GOVERNMENT

NOT TO RATIFY THE BILL

[WHY DON'T YOU?]

 

Downing Street website is

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Abandon-Lisbon/

*

JUNE 18-2008

 

 

 
 
Elections in the British One Party State

If you vote Conservative, Labour, Lib-Dem, UKIP or the BNP, you'll be voting for the EU dictatorship. All five party leaderships are EU controlled. That's why your vote doesn't make a difference - all these five parties have the same policies: the EU's policies.

The 17 most senior politicians in the Conservative, Lib Dem and Labour parties, including Ken Clarke, Francis Maude, Cameron, William Hague, George Osborne, Nick Clegg, Brown, David and Ed Milliband, Ed Balls, Peter Mandleson are Bilderbergers, the 140 strong band of ultra senior Freemasons who are bribed by the EU to build the EU dictatorship.

No Bilderberger, Freemason or Common Purpose graduate should ever be allowed to hold public office.

UKIP and the BNP are honey traps to neutralise activists: UKIP is riddled with Freemasons and Common Purpose like a cancer, and the BNP controlled by the Edgar Griffin (father) and son Nick Freemasonry family. The 350,000 freemasons and the 40,000 strong Common Purpose Organisation are the (mostly unknowing) foot soldiers of the EU in Britain. (Which makes the BNP the easiest party to clean up - get rid of the Griffins, and put in a real anti-EU leadership.)

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF

UKIP

 OR

 INTEND TO JOIN THEM TAKE NOTE OF THE MESSAGE ABOVE

 

 

THE EDP HAS BEEN CRITICAL OF THE MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP OF THE UKIP FOR SOME TIME NOW AS IS SHOWN IN A NUMBER OF BULLETINS  OVER THE PAST FEW YEARS WHERE WE HAVE CRITICISED THEIR LACK LUSTRE PERFORMANCE AS THEY FAILED TO MOTIVATE THEIR MEMBERSHIP TO A MORE DETERMINED CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE CAMPAIGN WHICH WOULD HAVE MADE THE GOVERNMENTS TREMBLE BUT THEY HAD NO WORRY BECAUSE THEY HAD THEIR OWN PERSONS IN CHARGE AT THE TOP OF THE ORGANISATION.  THIS FIGHTING SPIRIT HAS BEEN LACKING AND WE CAN CONFIRM THIS OURSELVES BECAUSE WE HAVE BEEN OUTSIDE PARLIAMENT WHEN A MARCH WAS CANCELLED - AND WATCH THE FARCE WHEN CANDLES WERE HELD AND THOUSANDS OF LETTERS SENT TO MPS WHO KNEW WHERE TO DISPOSES OF THEM -AND ALL TO NO AVAIL.  IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF UKIP YOU HAVE BEEN BETRAYED BY YOUR OWN LEADERSHIP SOME APPEAR ON THE ALEX JONES SHOW WHICH HAS BEEN UNDER CLOSE SPOTLIGHT RECENTLY AS BEING CLOSE TO AN ISRAELI SECURITY FIRM DETAILS ON OUR WEBSITE .    IRONICALLY IT WAS A CHANCE LOOK ON THE INTERNET A FEW YEARS AGO  TO COME UPON THAT SITE WHICH OPENED OUR MIND TO THE ILLUMINATI.   THOUGH WE HAVE SOME DETAILS OF THE BILDERBERGERS ON OUR SITE  A NUMBER OF YEARS AGO WE FAILED TO DO MORE RESEARCH- WE ALL HAVE TO LEARN.  THE FAILURE OF UKIP WE HAVE SUSPECTED  FOR MANY YEARS   THAT MANY AT THE TOP OF THEIR ORGANISATION MIGHT BE UNDERCOVER MEMBERS OF THE ILLUMINATI.  IT IS A FAVOURITE TRICK OF THEIRS TO SUPPORT ANY PARTY OR ORGANISATION AT THE OUTSET WHATEVER ITS POLICY AS IT ALLOWS THEM TO PUT THEIR OWN PEOPLE IN TO CONTROL ITS POLICES AS THEY BEHIND THE SCENES SUPPLY THE VITAL FINANCIAL SUPPORT.

  Our intention is not to benefit from this disaster as since the 1999 European Election we have NOT! accepted a DONATION! from ANYONE! and we closed membership also because we did not wish to split the vote for UKIP but have stated in the past that we would contest another election if it was ever necessary to enter into the affray again and with the reputation of UKIP under scrutiny we will keep our options OPEN!   As we mentioned some time ago we have been almost two decades on the campaign trail to free our once FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE of ENGLAND from the SATANIC EU and those who have for centuries have planned for an EVIL ONE-WORLD CORPORATION/GOVERNMENT and EXTERMINATE! at least 5 BILLION of the WORLD'S POPULATION and therefore if we are right about those mentioned above they are not only TRAITORS to their COUNTRY but also a THREAT to WORLD PEACE.   However, of late, matters have NOT! been going well for the ILLUMINATI as you will observe BELOW.

The Queen, Treason and the Coronation oath

Together with Churchill, King George VI saved our nation; he was a Monarch to be proud of. But his daughter the Queen is the only monarch to have broken all her coronation oaths, by signing these six treaties that abolish our common law, the British Constitution, the British and English nations, and our sovereignty. She has also committed treason, together with co-signatories Ted Heath, Margaret Thatcher, John Major, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown.

Realising that under the five Treason Acts they should already be hanging by the neck until dead, Tony Blair and the Queen signed the Crime and Disorder Act, 1998, which secretly abolished much of the crime of treason (s36.3) and reduced the penalty to life imprisonment - they didn't tell the MP's what they had just voted for.

1.4 million British Servicemen gave their lives for our independence. The Queen has thrown their sacrifices away and made them worthless.

At no physical risk to herself, she could have fulfilled her oath and duty as a constitutional check and balance, by refusing to sign the six treaties until an in/out referendum had been held. In the unlikely event the vote went against her, she was even more unlikely to lose her crown (not her life or a limb), and would keep her 9 billion plus palaces either way. Those servicemen's lives would still have meant something.

But she was always keen to sign; and said in advance she would sign the last treaty. Princes Charles, William or Harry can now never be King. You can't have a King without a Kingdom: they can only be princes of a region (principality) within Europe.

King Edward 8th was forced to abdicate because he was too overt as a German Nazi supporter. Mrs Simpson's divorce was merely the excuse. The Royal Family is a German Family - real surname Saxe-Coburg Gotha. Windsor is an adopted surname. All four of Prince Phillip's sisters married high ranking German Nazis. After they lost the war the EU was switched from a Nazi basis to a communist basis.

Between the ages of 12 and 22 Queen Elisabeth's political and constitutional tutor was Sir Henry Martin, a Fabian Communist. It seems clear she was well trained for her subversion and treason.

Because she waves and smiles at us most are fooled into thinking she's lovely; in fact the Queen is a member of the Illuminati, a Bilderberger, head of Freemasonry, is wholly pro the (German) EU, and has abolished this nation with ruthless determination. It is so obvious she cares nothing for Britain or the British.

The Queen's aspirations are not ours; she clearly serves a much darker master; the faith she defends cannot be the one we think it is. King George VI, the one recent monarch not indoctrinated with Nazi or Communist philosophy, must be turning over in his grave.

I ask that the law be enforced, and the Queen be tried for treason before 12 honest people, and not by our corrupt judges. And that the illegal section 36.3 Crime and Disorder Act be declared null and void, so that she can hang by the neck till dead.

The new EU Hitler doesn't have to get elected
Its worth noting that Adolf Hitler first had to get elected, if on a 35% minority vote, and then get his Enabling Act passed. An EU dictator has no such problems. Our EU rulers do not submit themselves for election now. And the Queen has already signed the Enabling Act (Civil Contingencies Act 2004).

The EU's Hitler will have a much easier rise to power, and will have the formerly British and French nuclear weapons from day one. Adolf Hitler killed 54 million people. The EU's dictator could kill a billion at the touch of a button, with no democratic checks and balances to answer to. How could any aspiring dictator resist the EU opportunity?

 

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

 

www.bilderbergmeetings.org/participants2012.l

 

A+MONARCH+THAT+BREAKS+A+CORONATION+OATH+

CANNOT+CLAIM+IMMUNITY+FROM+HIGH+TREASON+

BECAUSE+A+FIRST+MINISTER+SECRETLY

+CHANGED+THE+LAW

IN+1998.

THE+SACRET+OATH+IS+TO+THE+PEOPLE+

TO+PROTECT+THEIR+ACCUSTOMED+LIBERTIES+

AND+THOSE+OF+FUTURE+GENERATIONS+TO+COME

+IS +SACROSANCT.

 

 

HOME

DID YOU KNOW?

No 8

(Christopher Story of International Currency Review)

 

IS HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN SOVEREIGN?

Under Article 17 of the collectivist Maastricht treaty , all residents of the European Union are citizens of the EU Collective.  It follows that Presidents and Monarchs are 'citizens of the

EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE

as well

This provides the twisted rationale for President Herzog's vituperative dismissal of the relevance of the nation state, and for his insistence that it has outlived its usefulness, even though he continued to serve as President.

Dr Herzog's subversive remarks have special resonance for Britain, where

QUEEN ELIZABETH II

 is the

 SOVEREIGN AND CONSTITUTIONAL HEAD

of the

UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND.

She is the custodian, in her person, of the sovereignty of the British people which was passed to HER in February 1952 on the death of her father,  This was confirmed initially when the

QUEEN took the OATH of ACCESSION

and was finally solemnized at the QUEEN'S CORONATION in 1953 after HER MAJESTY had been recognized and universally accepted as the undoubted and rightful

 SOVEREIGN of the BRITISH PEOPLE

In November 2000 -after a correspondent who had taken care to prepare his case thoroughly, had written to the Prime Minister, Tony Blair; to the then Leader of the Opposition William Hague; to the Leader of the House of Lords, who was then Baroness Jay; and to the Lord Chief justice and other official office-holders and dignatories -asking:

Is Her Majesty the Queen Sovereign?

HE RECEIVED NO ANSWER AT ALL

or else a non-committal weak, diversionary reply.

Mr Blair being unable to answer the question himself, redirected the enquiry  to the Home office, which likewise prevaricated. Indeed, a hallmark of the

BLAIR GOVERNMENT

has been its Ministers' arrogant reluctance to answer letters and parliamentary questions.  Likewise, Mr Blair has reportedly made a point on occasion, of'

' standing the Queen up'

by failing to turn up on time., or at all, for his weekly scheduled audiences.

[Further details to follow]

*

[More background information will be available in the near future but why wait - order your copy - contact the under-mentioned website]

 

[This is a new series of single statements from

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

www.edwardharle.com

www.worldreports.org

*

AUGUST-2008

*

 

WHAT IF ALL EU LAWS PASSED BY PARLIAMENT AND APPROVED BY HER MAJESTY ARE INVALID BECAUSE AGAINST THE LAW OF THE LAND.

 

The position under English law, of course, is that Her Majesty remains Sovereign until the moment of her death, when sovereignty will pass automatically to the next rightful heir to the British Throne.  However, the Prime Minister's problem appears to be that since, under Article 17 of the Maastricht treaty, the Queen is a 'citizen' of the European Union, Her Sovereignty has been usurped.  Those UK Ministers and officials who permitted this scandalous state of affairs to develop are accordingly prima facie

TRAITORS

and ought to be indicted for

TREASON.

But so far as President Herzog of Germany has been concerned, his status as a 'citizen' of the

EU COLLECTIVE

appears to be entirely acceptable, because the EU is just a 'mask' for emerging

'GREATER GERMANY'.

When, following the correspondent's letters to selected leaders, an attempt was made by Christopher Gill MP in January 2001 to put down a question asking the Prime Minister whether

Her Majesty is Sovereign

the Table Office at the House of Commons replied in the following astonishing language:

'Last night you sought to table a question to the Prime Minister concerning the effect of the UK's membership of the

EUROPEAN UNION

on the constitutional position of

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN.

You will recall that I explained I would need to check the admissibility of the question with other colleagues before it could be tabled.  It has been pointed out to me that the question as drafted in effect seeks the Prime Minister's view in the interpretation of the law, in this case the

Treaties of the European Communities and associated European Treaties and UK legislation.

IT IS NOT POSSIBLE

to table questions to Ministers seeking interpretation of the , as this is a matter for the appropriate courts , not Ministers.'.

It would accordingly appear unclear whether

Her Majesty the Queen is Sovereign

-and by extension, whether any legislation passed by Westminster Parliament since  Britain made the mistake of joining the

EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

in

1972

is

VALID.

For evidently  until the matter is decided by the 'appropriate courts', the question of whether

HER MAJESTY IS SOVEREIGN

and thus able to act as

HEAD OF STATE

and hence give the

ROYAL ASSENT

to

LEGISLATION

passed by the

WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENT

remains in the air.

This Kafkaesque situation reflects the fact that, as noted under the

COLLECTIVE TREATY

all residents of the

EUROPEAN UNION

 are its citizens; and the

QUEEN

is a resident of the

EUROPEAN UNION

THEREFORE

if

EU law

 

has precedence over

BRITISH LAW

the

QUEEN

 being an

EU citizen

is

NOT

SOVEREIGN.

 

*

 

It may be asked: Why does no British Government ever take steps to have this matter clarified?

There are two possible answers to this question:

(1)    If the matter were to be resolved and it were to transpire that, indeed, The Queen is not Sovereign, then all legislation to which Her Majesty has given the Royal Assent since Britain acceded to the EEC is

NULL and VOID
 

because she had no power to give the Royal Assent, Alternatively:

(2)    Successive UK Governments since the beginning of the collapse in 1970 have preferred this issue to remain unresolved because if it were to be concluded by 'the appropriate courts' that The Queen is Sovereign, then correspondingly all EU legislation in the UK

is

NULL and VOID

because it is presupposed that EU law has precedence over UK law.

which cannot be the case if The Queen is Sovereign.

By contrast, if it does transpire the

The Queen is not Sovereign, then, certainly all legislation passed since Britain joined the EEC is indeed called into question.

Either way -whether The Queen is or is not Sovereign -the logic of the above leads to the conclusion that all EU law may be invalid in the United Kingdom.

Thus the the real reason this key issue has never been clarified is that the British Government's deceitful EU 'coup d' etat by installments'  policy would be exposed as illegal if the issue were ever to be addressed in the COURTS.  Furthermore, as reveiwed on page 209, the Treaty of Rome was reportedly

NOT SIGNED

-so the basis of all EU law throughout the

EU COLLECTIVE

may be open to

LEGAL CHALLENGE

on that ground alone.

It is concluded that EU law may have no standing in the United Kingdom and that successive conniving UK Governments have been

SHIRKING THIS CENTRAL ISSUE.

 

In an article published in The Times of London on 27th April,1996, Karl Lamers, whio was then foreign affairs spokesman for the Christian Democrats in the Bundestag, condescended to recognise that 'British doubts are deeply rooted.

The British concern is about the destruction of the national identity and the nation state, which is seen by the British as the only legitimate expression of the popular will.   Germans, by contrast, say that there has long been a supranational reality created by our European civilisation.  Common problems spawn common interests; our vital interests are identical

Whereupon Herr Lamers delivered a further broadside in Germany's psychological warfare offensive designed to help the stupid British to abandon their love of national sovereignty, which it is the central purpose of the European Union to

COLLECTIVISE:

'The  Euro-optimists take as their starting point the objective external reality.... The Eurosceptics (in Britain) deal with the inner, subjective reality of the consciousness of the British people.  It is if you like , the forces of Logic pitied against the forces of Psycho-logic.  It must be the task of democratic politics to help narrow this gap.  Otherwise politics will cease to be effective.  A community makes sense if it can begin to solve its existential problems.

If the nation state can no longer do that by itself, its failure undermines its political legitimacy'.

In other words, Britain had no right to continue existing as a nation state, and it must be 'brought to reason' so that it comes to full acceptance of German prescriptions and intentions without further. tedious prevarication

Note that, for Herr Lamers, the Pan-German position was 'logical', whereas the perceived British tendency to 'cling' to the nation state was 'psychological'. Once again here, the truth was turned upside-down.

The essence of Germany's continuing, updated strategy to realise the Germans, has never been in doubt - not least, since the German legislature adopted several amendments to the Basic Law (constitution) on 22nd December, 1992, in order to legalise' ratification of the Maastricht Treaty.  A new Article 23 was incorporated, the previous one having been repealed by the Unification T of 31st August 1990. The revised Article known as the 'ARTICLE on EUROPEAN UNION'. contains the following:

 

With a view to establishing a Unite Europe, the Federal republic of Germany shall participate in the development of the European Union, which is committed to democratic[?], rule of law, social and federative principles as well as to the principle of subsidiarity, and ensures protection of basic rights comparable in substance to that accorded to the Basic law

To this end the (German) Federation may transfer sovereign powers by law with the consent of the Bundesrat. The establishment of the European Union , as well as amendments to its statutory foundations and comparable foundations which amend or supplement the content of this Basic Law or make such amendments and supplements possible shall be subject to the provisions of paragraph (2) and (30 of Article 79.........

THIS MEANS that Germany can extend its sovereignty into Moravia and Bohemia, as provided for under the secret accord reached between President Gorbachev and Chancellor Kohl in Geneva , in 1990

As for Dr Professor Herzog, he faced both ways at the 1997 Konigswinter Conference, held in Berlin. In a welcoming speech, he suggested that 'Britons and Germans can build on common values, convictions and interests.  the debate on Europe can only reach a fruitful conclusion - that is to say, a conclusion acceptable to the German strategy elite- if we help gain acceptance for one idea, namely that the 'Europe of-Fatherlands' is possible.  The European nations can be Fatherlands and still integrate' 

 

 

[TO BE CONTINUED]

*

 

 

[More background information will be available in the near future but why wait - order your copy -

THE EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE

 -contact the under-mentioned website]

 

[This is a new series of single statements from

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

www.edwardharle.com

www.worldreports.org

*

 

 

SEPTEMBER-2008

*

 

TO ASSIST YOUR SEARCH WE HAVE INCLUDED THE LINKS BELOW

 

EUROPEAN UNION Q & A

1 EUROFACTS -   THE REALITY BEHIND THE EU

2]   WHAT IS THE POINT OF THE EU

3]   THE TRUTH OF A FEDERAL EUROPE-PARTS1-4

4]   THE 1701 ACT OF SETTLEMENT-WHY IT SHOULD  CONCERN YOU!

5[    THE BRITISH LEGACY -CANADA-AUSTRALIA-NEW ZEALAND

6]    COMMONWEALTH REALMS VERSUS THE NEW CONSTITUTION  OF EUROPE

7]   OUR BASIC LIBERTIES AND FREEDOMS SURRENDERED TO A FOREIGN POWER

8]   MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA-SUPPORT THE CROWN

9]   OUR QUEEN AND EU CONSTITUTION

10] VALERY GISCARD'ESTAING -WHY HE IS CALLED X

11]  THE ROTTEN HEART OF EUROPE by BERNARD CONNOLLY

12]   'I SAY WE MUST NOT JOIN EUROPE'-FIELD MARSHALL MONTGOMERY-(1962)

13]  PREVIOUS SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS SAYS WE MUST RETAIN OUR ANCIENT CONSTITUTION

14] THE COMMON LAW OF ENGLAND IS THE  LAW OF ENGLISH SPEAKING PEOPLES.

15]  A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION - CONSPIRATORS NAMED (1993)

16]   WHAT HISTORY TELLS US ABOUT OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CONTINENT

17]    COST of EU to UK-4.8billion = 40 DISTRICT HOSPITALS-EQUIPPED -_STAFFED-AND FUNDED.

18]   WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON ABOUT THE EURO.

19]     200 MORE REASONS TO WHY TO REJECT THE EURO AND THE EU

20]     100 REASONS TO LEAVE THE EU

21]    THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE

22]    UK CONTRIBUTION TO BRUSSELS: BIG INCREASE IN 2005

23]   EU WHISTLEBLOWERS EXPOSE BILLIONS OF EURO FRAUD BUT NOTHING IS DONE

24]    BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENTS SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL

25]    FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENTS BY PAYOUTS

26]    SIGNS OF AN EU POLICE STATE

27]    NINETY-NINE COUNTRIES HAVE FREE TRADE WITH THE EU-WITHOUT PAYING A CENT TO BRUSSELS.

28]    IT IS TIME TO CONSIDER OURSELVES-IN A COMMONWEALTH FREE TRADE AREA

29]   BRITAIN MUST LEAVE THE EU AS UN SHOW BEST AREA FOR EXPANSION WILL BE USA/ANGLO-SAXON SPHERE

30]    WAVE GOODBYE TO THE EU AND MAKE EUROPE A BETTER PLACE   

31]    LORD STODDART PINS DOWN BLAIR GOVERNMENT ON COST OF EU -JUNE 2007.

32]    BRITISH VOTERS MUST GET A SAY ON NEW EU TREATY-[JUNE-2007]

33]    BLAIR'S LAST TREACHEROUS ACT. THE 60,000 DOLLAR QUESTION IS WHAT WILL MR BROWN DO?-JUNE-2007]

34]   GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY WON'T HE TRUST YOU?

35]  HITLER'S PRECEDENT PROVIDED THE MODEL FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION-1930-2007

36]  SAVE YOUR ENGLAND! - SAY NO! TO REGIONS
 

37]   NAZI INTERNATIONAL IN 2007-CLOSER TO YOUR HOME THAN YOU THINK  

38]    A WARNING FROM JAN-2005-TO PRESERVE THE NATION-STATES OF EUROPE-VOTE 'NO' TO THE NEW EU CONSTITUTION (D.T.)

49]    SO WHY DON'T WE LEAVE THE EU. (D.M.)

 

[For hundreds of bulletins about the EU]

HOME

 

 

WHAT A WAY TO WIN A WAR

*

IS SENATOR RON PAUL- ILLUMINATI?

 

BENJAMIN FULFORD

 

More!

[WORKS]

*

SEEKTHETRUTHANDWISDOM

 

*

Bank Of England The Banking Swindle

 

More!

 

More!

 

PATRIOT or TRAITOR to HIS COUNTRY

+More!

 

 More!

 

+(More!

 

 

THIS YOU MUST SEE IT CONCERNS

 YOUR

PLANET!

AND

 YOU!

 

 

NO NEED TO PANIC!

 

'Others shall sing the song,

Others shall right the wrong,-

Finish what I begin,

All all I fail of win.

Hail to the coming singers!

Hail to the brave light-bringers!

Forward I reach and above

All that they sing and dare.

 

The airs of heaven blow o'er me;

A glory shines before me

Of what mankind shall be'-

Pure, generous, brave and free,

I feel the earth move sunward,

I join the great march onward,

And  take, by faith, while living,

My freehold of thanksgiving.-

 

WHITTIER

 

MAY-2012

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

 

 

MAY-2012

 
 
 

ENGLAND

 

 

 

Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND?**** BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH****NEW LABOUR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND****UNLESS WE TAKE CONTROL OF OUR LIVES WE WILL LOSE OUR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY****.OUR PAST IS EMBEDDED IN OUR NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS -IT ASKS WERE WE CAME FROM AND WHO WE ARE .****.THE ENGLISH WITH OTHER GERMANIC TRIBES CAME TO BRITAIN OVER YEARS AGO - THE STREAM OF TEUTONIC INFLUENCE  HAS DECIDED THE FUTURE OF EUROPE****THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/ ****  THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/ ****    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/****  DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/ ****   NOR SHALL MY SWORD/****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/ ****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/****   ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY -CORRECT BROWNDOM/****    ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1- /****   ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/****    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./****   WHY OUR ENGLISH SELF-GOVERNMENT IS UNIQUE IN EUROPE AND THE WORLD****.ENGLAND ARISE! - TODAY WE CLAIM OUR RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION/ ****  KISS GOOD BYE TO YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY****  THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED? **** ST GEORGE'S DAY-ENGLAND'S DAY/**** ST GEORGE'S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ONSHAKESPEARE'S' BIRTHDAY****NAZI SPY RING REVEALED BY THE MASTER OF BALLIOL COLLEGE IN 1938 . IT INCLUDED THE LATE EX PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH AND MINISTERS GEOFFREY RIPPON AND ROY JENKINS.* * * *AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED****   EU WIPES ENGLAND OFF THE MAP**** THE ENGLISH DID NOT MOVE THEMSELVES SO ARE NOW SLAVES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE****"...What kind of people do they think we are?" by WINSTON CHURCHILL****THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 
 

*HOME-PT 2

 

HOME