| The
TRUTH about the EU and GLOBAL WARMING deliberately HIDDEN from VIEW by
POLITICIANS.
On both issues there has been LIES-LIES
and even MORE LIES as it appears that as with one myth of 35 years in
the making is now almost in view the other on a global issue has been
around for almost three decades.
With the EU or as it was in 1972 the
'Common Market' there is abundant literature detailing the myth of a
trading block which as almost everyone now knows in 2007 was a
Nazi-politically inspired plan which was conceived during the Second
World War when they realised that they were going to be beaten. On this
subject there is sufficient evidence from many government and other
sources and of course the Arch-traitor Edward Heath admitted before his
death that he had in fact lied about the real intent of the EEC or
Common Market which as most people now realise was a step to a United
States of Europe.
We are now informed by a number of
eminent scientists from the four corners of the world that the basis of
the Global Warming lobby that the rising world temperature is down to
the amount of C02 in the
atmosphere whereas the eminent scientists on the rejected view claim
that it is in fact the SUNSPOTS that affects our climate and a research
project which involves going back through 600,000,000 years has shown a
correlation between Sunspots and world temperature over that period. In
other words Vice president Gore's floorshow has the right information
but it has been misinterpreted. But he and others on their political
bandwagon are now too deep in the CRUSADE to accept the facts and face
the correct solution that As temperatures rise so will later C02
As the informative programme on More 4
revealed about the
Global Warming Swindle
It was back in the 80's of Margaret
Thatcher's premiership that the global warming bandwagon got all the
support it wanted and it has mushroomed with massive support from other
vigilantes who joined in after the fall of the Berlin Wall and others
who had other agendas which neatly fitted their purpose.
Today in March 2007 we have Mr Iceman
himself now taking the faulty premise of Global Warming by the increase
of Co2 forward and what a wonderful opportunity he has had to show the
PEOPLE he CARES.
As we have also seen in the last few
days any frank speaking from his shadow ministers will result in a text
message to get on their way - instead of looking at the matter with more
judgment.
We had Nigel Lawson now Lord Lawson of
Blaby who when part of an Inquiry about the issue said:
THE FACTS DID NOT ADD UP
The most disturbing matter to be
mentioned apart from the whole disputed essence of the pro-Co2 lobby was
that the POOR THIRD WORLD
will be expected to lose the
opportunity to share the same growth in Industry and whatever and will
have to PAY like YOU and YOUR FAMILY for a CRUSADE which is MARCHING IN
THE WRONG DIRECTION.
The same manic drive which has and
still is driving the discredited move to a United States of Europe
Led by Brussels which has now the
chance to get on the bandwagon and show they also CARE and at a time
when they are desperate to get some good news before they get the 27
member-states to sign on the dotted line shortly after they have
been able to proudly proclaim that all light bulbs will have to be
changed in Europe a measure which the individual householder is already
doing, but in an excellent article by Christopher Booker in the Daily
Mail on March 13-2007 gives damning evidence that householders will have
to keep the CFLs on much longer to run efficiently and the actual
amount of energy saved by these bulbs has been vastly exaggerated.
He also says: 'So what are
the disadvantages of CFLs over the traditional we will no longer be
allowed to buy? Quite apart from the fact that the CFLs are larger, much
heavier and mostly much uglier than familiar bulbs -and up to 20 times
more expensive - the vast majority of then give off a harsher -less
pleasant light.
Also because they do NOT produce light
in a steady stream like an incandescent bulb, but flicker 50 times a
second, some who use them for reading eventually find their eyes
beginning to swim - and they can make fast -moving machine parts look
stationary, posing a
SERIOUS SAFETY PROBLEM.
Mr Booker further states that
Fluorescent CFLs cannot be used with dimmer switches or
electronically-triggered security lights, so these will become a thing
of the past. They cannot be used in microwaves, ovens of freezers,
because these are either too hot or too cold for them to function (at any
temperature above 600C degrees or lower than-20C
THEY DON'T WORK).
Further , more seriously because CFLs
need more ventilation than a standard bulb they cannot be used in any
enclosed light fitting which is not open at both bottom and top - the
implications for householders is horrendous.
And astonishingly, according to a
report on 'energy scenarios in domestic lighting sector', carried out by
Defra by its Market Transformation Programme, 'less than 50 per cent of
the fittings installed in UK homes can currently take CFLs'. In other
words, on the Government's own figures, the owners of Britain's 24
million homes will have to replace hundreds of millions of light
fittings at a
COST of upwards of £3 BILLION
In addition to this, low energy bulbs
are much more complex to make than standard bulbs, requiring
UP TO 10 TIMES MORE ENERGY TO
MANUFACTURE.
Unlike standard bulbs they use toxic
materials, including mercury vapour, which the EU itself banned from
landfill sites -which means that recycling the bulbs will create an
ENORMOUSLY EXPENSIVE PROBLEM.
Perhaps most significantly of
all, however, to run CFLs economically they
MUST BE KEPT ON MORE OR LESS
CONTINUOUSLY
-the more they are turned on and off,
the shorter becomes their life, creating a fundamental paradox, as is
explained by an Australian electrical expert Rod Elliot (whose Elliot
Sound Products website provides as good a technical analysis of the
disadvantages of CFLs as any on the internet).
If people continue switching
their lights on and off when
needed, as Mr Elliot puts it, they will find that
THEIR GREEN BULBS HAVE A SHORTER LIFE
-than promised, thus triggering a
consumer backlash from those
WHO THINK THEY HAVE BEEN FOOLED.
But if they keep their lights on all
the time to maximise their life, CFLs can end up using almost as much
electricity from power stations (creating CO2 emissions) as incandescent
bulbs -
THUS CANCELING OUT THEIR ONE SUPPOSED
ADVANTAGE.
In other words, in every possible way
this looks like a classic example of knee-jerk politics, imposed on us by
our elected Parliament [not for much longer BRUSSEL'S hopes)
AFTER FULL CONSULTATION AND DEBATE.
[Of course we are joking!]
BUT
-on the whim of 27 politicians sitting
around a table in Brussels, not one of whom could have made an informed
speech about the pluses (if there are any) and minuses (plenty)
OF WHAT THEY ARE PROPOSING.
[Has anyone informed Green MEP Caroline
Lucas who claimed that banning old-fashioned light bulbs across the EU
would cut carbon emissions by around 20 million tonnes per year and save
between 5 million and 8 million euros per year in domestic fuel bills.
We shall be looking to see her adjusted figures shortly?]
Even IF it does have the effect of
reducing CO2 emissions, those reductions will be utterly insignificant
when compared with CO2 emissions from CHINA, for example which is
growing so fast it is using
HALF of the world's cement,
30 per cent of the world's coal,
one quarter of copper production
and 35 per cent of steel.
There was not a hint of democracy in
this crackpot decision, which will have a major impact on all our
lives, costing thousands of pounds and our economy billions - all to
achieve little useful purpose , while making our homes considerably less
pleasant to live in.
Such is the price we are now beginning
to pay for the 'eco-madness' which is sweeping through our political
class like a psychic epidemic.
THE GREAT EURO-BULB BLUNDER
is arguably the starkest symbol to date
of the crazy new world into which this is leading us.'
We thank Mr Christopher Booker for his
contribution.
*
But for the European Union with a
signature to be shortly obtained from 27 member -states it makes excellent news when they are struggling to justify
their attempt to get respectability for their corrupt unaccountable
-police state of a
United States of Europe.
As we have previously mentioned
ENERGY CONSERVATION-YES!
But to tax the people in order they
hope to reduce Co2 is a lost cause or should we say more simply a wrong
cause.
The answer is simple and that is to
accept the scientific connection between Sunspots and the later rise of
Co2 as a natural occurrence on our planet and spend all the available
resources on
ENERGY CONSERVATION.
We hope all fair-minded people will
accept at the least that the minority view should be publicly aired and
that no decisions be taken on the way to deal with the question of
global warming until instead of now completely ignored as not
conveniently suited to the politics of the day should be brought out
into the open so that a dreadful mistake and waste of scarce resources
are NOT invested in the wrong direction.
The recent showings of the Global
Warming programme has at least got the issue into the public domain. We
hope the PRESS will follow up this chance to review the whole subject in
the light of the evidence which had been rejected as not to the likening
of those who prefer to stay aboard the bandwagon even if it is going in
the wrong direction.
WE HOPE THIS WILL HAPPEN.
*
* *
MARCH/07
*
|
THE PEOPLE HAVE
SPOKEN-IS THE EU COMMISSION LISTENING?
*
Ditch the EU
TREATY after IRISH REJECTION
SAY VOTERS
by
Daniel
Martin
Political
Reporter
[Daily Mail-Wednesday, June
18,2008]
MORE THAN HALF of voters believe Britain should
drop the controversial European Treaty in the wake of its
rejection in last week's
IRISH REFERENDUM'
The poll comes as the Tories launch a last-ditch
bid in the
HOUSE of LORDS
today to delay the
RATIFICATION OF
THE TREATY.
And
10,000 people
have signed a
PETITION
on the
DOWNING STREET-
WEBSITE
within the past few days
JUNE16-2008
, calling on the
GOVERNMENT
NOT TO RATIFY THE BILL
[WHY DON'T YOU?]
Downing Street
website is
http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Abandon-Lisbon/
*
JUNE 18-2008
|
*
*
The abolition of Britain
by The Reform Treaty
- Second Reading-Passed by majority of 138
on
21st January, 2008
*
*
Let the people speak!
www.makeitanissue.org.uk
*
www.noliberties.com
[Latest Addition - June07]
*
www.eutruth.org.uk
*
www.thewestminsternews.co.uk
*
www.speakout.co.uk
*
Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION
to the EU
www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs
*
GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY WON'T
HE TRUST YOU?
HELL ON EARTH IN IRAQ
*
67% want powers back from
EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95%
of British people want a
REFERENDUM
*
PETITION
FOR A
REFERENDUM
SIGN TODAY ON LINE
telegraph.co.uk/eureferendum
*
July 18-2007
VOTE
-2007
TO
LEAVE
THE
EUROPEAN
UNION
WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE
TO SET YOU
FREE
THE
UK
INDEPENDENCE PARTY
www.ukip.org
THE QUESTION THAT THE
VOTER MUST ANSWER
‘DO
YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE
CORRUPT ,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND CORRUPT ALIEN BUSYBODY BRUSSELS’
-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?
TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE
FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER
BUT
SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS
WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.
*
ONLY
PRO-PORTIONAL
REPRESENTATION
WILL
BRING
DEMOCRACY
BACK
TO
THE
ENGLISH
PEOPLE
*
SCOTLAND
-ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS
ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL
AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?
*
Home
Rule
for
Scotland
WHY
NOT
HOME
RULE
for
ENGLAND
*
[All underlined words have a
separate bulletin]
|
