BLAIR’S EUROPEAN OBSESSION PUTS ALL OUR LIVES AT RISK

 

Part 3

 

The Pre-Emptive strike-The Aftermath-what must happen now?

 

 

[We have an impotent and indifferent House of Commons which ignores the People on so many matters of great importance. It is the price we pay for tolerating a dictatorship. We are all to blame for not organizing ourselves better.

 

*

It is Sunday the 14^th November- the essay has just been completed as we hear the beginning of the Remembrance Service.

 

 

WE SAY -What were it all for? - That GREAT sacrifice? -In two World Wars- If we are still to lose our Country and Freedom if we don’t move ourselves.

 

We must fight those who threaten the safety and Freedom of our Country.

 

Why not send a ‘wish you were there’ Christmas Card to Geoff ‘NUTZ’ Hoon and the Chief of the‘NUTZ’ at No10.

 

-An invitation for them to join our troops south of Baghdad before Christmas and don’t forget to tell them to bring their own boots and flack-jacket and anything else they can carry as we are not sure what there is available.

 

Tell them not to rush back but to make friends as quickly as they can with those wonderful people they invited into Iraq who don’t seem to be pleased with their PRE-EMPTIVE invasion on a Muslim country.

 

* *

This is the phrase pre-emptive that the Home Secretary Mr Blunkett used in his television interview after the Remembrance Service this morning. A pre-emptive air-strike would certainly have been preferable to an Invasion if their had been WMD-even if illegal -AND FOR THE SAFETY OF OUR COUNTRY AND OUR OVERSEAS INTERESTS. But it is over the top to use that method to turn our Country into a Police State.

 

Mr Blunkett your dislike of ‘Individualism’ is plain to see and in order to answer your rebuke we will use the dictionary meanings as our aid:

 

Individual character: Well we don’t see a problem in this description. -Do you?

 

Independent action as opposed to co-operation: Well we can see your obvious dislike of the term. We have no intention to co-operate in the destruction of our Thousand Year Constitution- or will the Hunting fraternity who would have accepted a suitable Compromise -is not that THE USUAL English Way- So there?

 

That theory which opposes interference of the State in the affairs of Individuals: opposite to socialism or collectivism. Well in the main it answers the question-it is a matter of how much intervention should be suffered by the Subject (Master) from the ‘Servants of the People’.

 

‘The theory that looks to the rights of the Individual not the advantage of an abstraction such as a State.’ Well here again the answer is there for all to see.

 

‘The doctrine that the Individual things alone are real’- It speaks for itself.

 

‘The doctrine that nothing exists but for the Individual.’ This can be taken in so many different ways -but if the Individual is respected then a contribution is being made to the whole.

 

Our 19^th century philosopher J S Mill

(1806-1873) said:

 

‘The worth of the State, in the long run, is the worth of Individuals composing it’

 

 

A German humorist Jean Paul Richter (1763-1826) said:

 

‘Individuality is everywhere to be spared and respected as the root of every good’

An American clergyman and editor of the 19^th century said:

 

‘The great political controversy of the ages has reached its end in the recognition of the Individual. - The socialistic party would again sink the Individual in the government and make it possible for the government to perpetuate itself and become absolute’

 

Surely this certainly answers your remark -sounds very like New Labour today?

There are a dozen or more examples to hand but space is valuable so we leave you to cogitate on your difficulty in making everyone to conform to your ‘Big Brother’ dimension.

 

 

Mr Blunkett your action in trying to curb the ‘YOBS’ will be much appreciated though as you now know many of the offenders refuse to pay the fines or attend community service.

 

We are now informed that 50,000 children are truants from school -we ask they been imbued with love of country, their heritage and values or have they been infected by indiscipline and political correctness. One only has to see how many children act in public places to see that they are left to try and imitate adults.

 

The responsibility for this growing menace Mr Blunkett is your own party’s mixed message and its determination to destroy the Family. When you analyse the age group 12 to 25 - who students of psychology are agreed are the crucial years of life when the fundamentals of his character are likely to remain for the rest of his life are mainly responsible for crime and yobbery.

 

You will have to admit that it has been in New Labours seven-year reign that evil has been encouraged to come to fruition. We quote not from New Labour but from the New Testament:

 

“A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.”

 

Many politicians wish to satisfy every fad, which raises its head and put no limits to what is encouraged in order to be sure of their particular vote at the next election.

 

‘No Standards-No Safety’

 

 

It is no wonder that so many youngsters are so baffled by the never-ending political correctness to know what they are meant to do. To many of them they are now so confused that they no longer believe there is any such thing as ‘Right or Wrong’ and as for their attitude to the Elderly- well the increased almost daily attacks in the home and out in the street speaks for itself.

 

*

 

You still need to justify the draconic measures you are taking in what was once a Free Country, and in the meantime it would help if your colleagues Mr Geoff ‘NUTZ’ Hoon and the head of MI6 -John Scarlett were to hand in their resignations which will go some way to give some credence to the sincerity of the Government in its attempt to justify the People beginning to believe what they hear.

 

Better still as we have requested before that there should be an Independent Commons Supreme Committee to oversee the Intelligence Services to prevent any other so-called illegal pre- emptive strikes in the future. 11/04

 

Finally, Mr Blunkett may wish to be reminded of the words of a great parliamentarian of the 18^th century Edmund Burke: -

 

“ The State is a partnership in all science, a partnership in all art, a partnership in every virtue and in all perfection. As the ends of such a partnership cannot be obtained in many generations, it becomes a partnership not only between those who are living, but also between those who are living and those who are dead, and those who are to be born. Each contract of each particular State is but a clause in the great primeval contract of eternal society, linking the lower with the higher natures, linking the visible and the invisible world, according to a fixed compact sanctioned by the inviolable oath which holds all physical and all moral nature, each in their appointed place.”

*

And in the words of a great liberal historian and philosopher and Regius Professor of Cambridge J.E.E.D. Acton in [Later Lord Acton] 1834-1902.

 

‘Authority is essentially an ethical term, but when separated from liberty is nothing but force.’

 

‘The will of a whole people cannot make just that which is unjust.’

 

‘The short triumph of Athenian liberty, and its quick decline, belong to an age which possessed no fixed standard of right or wrong.’

‘ State absolutism is the modern danger against which representative government nor democracy can defend us.’

 

‘Natural law is the law of reason and of God.’ 11/04

 

Lord Acton was ahead of his time in his astute reasoning on many subjects and he reached the conclusion that a world of (True) Federal Democracies was the answer to the world’s stability and NOT a Multi-National (world) State. So it is still time for a little while for many Liberals to change their minds and concentrate on the forming of (True) Federal Democracies and not the EU model a concealed Slave State, which is doomed to extinction.

 

The True Federal Democracy will be:

 

Those Independent Peoples’ with the same Customs, Tradition and Values forms True Federal Democracies.

 

[The EDP has the objective of a Federation of the Independent Nation States of England, Scotland ,Wales and Northern Ireland with a still greater Union with the English Speaking Nations of the Commonwealth and other Independent Nation States sharing in the main our Cultural Values and Way-of -Life.

 

Federations should be formed with those Independent Nation States with the same ideology and cultural background and ties which as shown with the beginnings of the USA was achieved from the root aspirations of the People and NOT as with the EU from a dictatorial elite in Brussels.

 

A Combination of smaller loose Independent Nation States within Federations- with their own distinct Identity of history and religious and cultural background, would achieve more to protect the Individual and maintain World Peace. 11/04

 

*

 

www.eutruth.org.uk

*

www.thewestminsternews.co.uk

*

 

www.speakout.co.uk

*

 

Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU

www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs

 

*

 

 

VOTE

MAY -2007

 

TO LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION

WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE

TO SET YOU

 FREE

 

THE

UK INDEPENDENCE PARTY

www.ukip.org

 

TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER

BUT

SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.

*

 

ONLY

PRO-PORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

*

Home Rule for Scotland

WHY NOT

HOME RULE for ENGLAND

[EACH WORD HAS A DIFFERENT BULLETIN]

 

*

MAY/07

 

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin

THE QUESTION THAT THE VOTER MUST ANSWER

 

‘DO YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE CORRUPT ,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND ALIEN BUSYBODY BRUSSELS’

 

-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?