EU reminds French and Dutch voters that they cannot say NO to rejected Charter.

 

*

Eurofacts

28^th April-2006

Vol 11 No 14

 

*

The Charter of Fundamental Rights is being imposed illegally.

 

The Charter was an integral part of the draft Constitution rejected by French and Dutch voters last year, but it’s being imposed anyway – in flagrant contradiction of EU law.

 

The refusal of EU political leaders to accept the results of referendums is well known.

 

The Danes voted against the Maastricht Treaty in 1992 and were promptly told by the French President, Francois Mitterrand, and the British Foreign Secretary, Douglas Hurd [Yes! - the same Douglas Hurd who was overheard at the signing of the Maastricht Treaty saying having just signed it, that:

 

‘We’d better find out what we’ve just signed.

*

 

Also that All signatories of EU treaties had received payment from a Nazi-slush fund as an inducement to sign the Treaties.

 

 

Information received from International Currency Review

 

www.worldreports.org

 

E.mail: c/story@worldreports.org

 

(Full details on our web site)

 

To continue:

 

The Irish voted against the Nice treaty in 2001 and were told to vote again. They did.

 

In 2005, the French and Dutch voted against the draft EU Constitution, and were told, by former French President Valery Giscard d’Estaing amongst others, that they’d better vote again, and they’d better vote YES the next time.

 

Storm of Controversy

 

Imagine the storm of controversy in the UK if a losing Prime Minister refused to accept the result of a General Election and said that the British people had “really” meant to vote for him and would have to vote again until they got it “right”

 

 

Imagine the row in France if the losing candidate refused to accept the result of a Presidential Election.

 

YET! when it comes to “Europe” [EU], no-one seems particularly bothered, no doubt because the one-eyed MEDIA take the EUROCRATS contemptuous distain for the democratically-expressed will of the Electorates as par for the EU course.

 

So it wasn’t surprising that, following the French and Dutch [veto] votes against the [New European] Constitution last year, the EU “ELITE” decided they’d go ahead with the main bits of it anyway, without bothering what the French and Dutch electorates, or anyone else, said or thought about it.

 

DEMOCRACY is about far more than votes in Referendums or General Elections.

 

DEMOCRACY also means –or should mean, in the UK at least – that NO law or regulation can come into force without due process, including a majority vote, in a parliament composed of democratically –elected MPs.

 

The EU has now decided to ignore this PRINCIPLE, compounding its felony of ignoring the results of the referendums.  The EU position is:

 

To hell with due parliamentary process:

 

-even in its own poodle, the so-called “European Parliament”

 

Unlawful Behaviour

 

The unlawful behaviour of the EU is based on its illegal and improper misuse of an already pretty dodgy article in the Treaty of Rome

(technically known as the TEC:  the Treaty establishing the European Community)

 

This Article –Number 308 (formally Number 235) is a “catch all” or “sweep-up” Article.  This is what it says: -

 

Article 308

 

If action by the Community should prove necessary to attain, in the course of the operation of the Common Market [our emphasis], one of the objectives of the Community and the treaty has not provided the necessary powers, the Council shall, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission and after consulting the European Parliament, take the appropriate measures.

 

[This was warned about at the time but the LIERS were in abundance and wanted nothing to prevent their dream of a United States of Europe from taking place.  A number of British politicians are alive today who over thirty- four years ago peddled the cover story of NO THREAT to our SOVEREIGNTY.]

 

To continue:

 

Light of Day

 

Note that this Article is only supposed to be used “in the course of operation of the common market”.

 

Part II of the draft EU Constitution rejected by French and Dutch voters in 2005 consisted of the 54 articles of the

 

Charter of Fundamental Rights of the Union.

 

Readers may remember that the Charter first saw the light of day as a non-legally –binding annex to the TREATY of NICE, and was airily dismissed by poor Keith Vaz MP, then Minister for “Europe”, as of

 

“no more significance than the Beano”.

 

Since the Charter was an integral part of the now –moribund draft [New European] Constitution, most people would judge the Charter to be dead as well. BUT a little thing like mortality won’t stop the Eurocrats.

 

On the 6^th July 2005, Lord Triesman, for the British Government, confirmed in a written answer that the COMMISSION had adopted “…a proposal for a Council regulation establishing a European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, based on Article 308 of the TEC”

 

(which, as we saw above, is ONLY for matters to do with the Common Market). A further written question asked Lord Triesman to explain the misuse of

Article 308.

The Noble lord (a Foreign Office minister) in his written answer of 13^th December 2005, gave

 

NO EXPLANATION

 

All he could say was that Article 308 had already been used in 1997 to set up the Vienna-based “EU Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia”.

 

That body is now changing its name to become the “EU Agency for Fundamental Rights” and its job is to ensure that –notwithstanding the rejection of the draft [New European] Constitution –[of a United States of Europe] –all EU legislation complies with the provisions of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.

 

On the 11^th January 2006, Lord Triesman [He does seem to try it on too often for our liking-will nothing stop him?] confirmed the legal basis of the Fundamental Rights Agency

 

 “has not yet been agreed”.

 

On the 12^th January 2006, in response to a further written question Lord Triesman confirmed that Article 308 does indeed restrict the power to act to matters to do with the Common Market, but –in desperation –pulled another moth-eaten legal rabbit out of the FCO’s increasingly threadbare hat:

 

What one might call a variation on the Mandy Rice-Davis defence?

 

“…the European Court of justice has found that ensuring respect for fundamental rights is a condition for the lawfulness of Community Acts and that respect for fundamental rights thus forms an underlying or implied [our emphasis] objective of the Community.”

 

Note that even the ECJ hadn’t the gall to claim any connection with “ the operation of the common market”.

 

It is crystal clear therefore that the use of Article 308 to bring in the Charter by the back door is illegal.

 

Why does it matter?

It matters because the Charter is so widely –drawn that its implementation will have the effect of cementing-in, across all 25 members of the EU, including the UK, the EU “social model” which has so spectacularly failed in France, Germany and Italy.

 

That doesn’t seem to bother the British Government, but it should certainly bother the British people.

 

The House of Lords written Questions were asked by Lord Pearson of Rannoch and answered by Lord Triesman on the 6^th July 2005 (Hansard Col WA 109), 13^th December 2005 (Col WA 148), 11^th January 2006 (Col WA 58) and 12^th January 2006 (Col WA 83)

www.publications.parliament.uk

 

In the European Parliament, on 20^th March 2006, President Barroso, in a written answer (ref E-0429/06EN) to Daniel Hannan MEP, confirmed that the legal base for the setting up of the “European External Action Service” –the “European diplomatic service –is Article III-296 (3) of the draft EU Constitution.

 

SINCE THE CONSTITUTION IS NOT IN FORCE THE SETTING –UP OF THE EU DIPLOMATIC SERVICE IS ALSO ILLEGAL.

 

[So there Lord Triesman is Your Dilemma?]

 

*          *

 

 

Journalists also on EU gravy train

 

[The following article in Eurofacts of the same date is a warning that one can expect a great deal more of EU propaganda over the coming months.]

 

In order to compensate the extreme tedium of covering sessions of the European Parliament (see eurofacts for the 24^th march 2006) journalists are being offered an array of lavish sweeteners, a practice which dates from the 1980’s.

 

These include travel and entertainment subsidies to encourage them to follow when the EP shuttles once a month to Strasbourg from Brussels.

The funding for journalists can include payment of a first-class round trip train ticket, or an economy plane ticket from any of the 25 countries and a daily stipend of 100 EUROS to cover hotel, food and entertainment over two days.

 

Around 60 journalists are invited to Strasbourg each month under the [propaganda ministry] programme.  Media organs have benefited from the subsidies are RTVF of Belgium, RTE of Ireland, ERT of Greece and ORF of Austria, among dozens of others according to

 

The International Herald Tribune

 

-on the 5^th April 2006 in a lengthy account of the inducements currently being offered to journalists.

The [EU] Parliament also provided television broadcasters with unlimited use of free state –of –the art television studios, free sound and camera equipment and even two-person camera crews that can be borrowed for the day

 

[All this supplied by what must now be the leading corrupt institution in the world today-who’s annual accounts have not been passed for over eleven years –with a great deal of the cost at the enormous expense of the British taxpayer.]

 

One journalist told the IHT:

International Herald Tribune

 

“The Parliamentary sessions are stultifying dull, so the Parliament does whatever it can to make it easier for us to work here, including paying for our journeys and providing plush facilities. I would never get my Parliament reports on the air, if the Parliament was not paying for it.”

 

A broadcaster who requested anonymity said the perks had prompted journalists to refuse requests from editors to write stories on the controversial issue of members’ privileges and expenses.

 

“How can I expose such perks when I myself am benefiting from them?” the journalist asked.

 

Other EU perks for journalists include free meals and unlimited phone calls during EU summit meetings and free television studios at the EU Commission.

 

At the beginning of every six-month EU presidency the presiding country invites journalists to a free junket to the capital.

 

In February 2006 Austria, the current holder of the EU presidency, invited 62 Brussels-based journalists to Vienna, paying for their lodgings at a Hilton Hotel and hosting a complementary dinner in an 18^th century baroque castle where a soprano sang Strauss operettas. Media organs had an option of paying for the trip. ONLY 8 DID SO.

[CORRUPTION ON SUCH A SCALE IS THE ONLY WAY THE EU CAN SURVIVE_AND REMEMBER A GREAT DEAL OF THE COST IS PAID FOR BY UK TAXPAYERS.]

 

*          *          *

[Font altered-bolding &underlining used –comments in brackets]

MAY/06

 

*          *

 

We already hear from the Daily Mail on April 27^th 2006 from the

Ephraim Hardcastle File 

 

of a clique of journalists pushing the hopeless cause of the so-called good effects of the war in Iraq:

 

‘Have you heard about the Euston Manifesto?

Sounding like a call-to-arms by disappointed train passengers it turns out to be a CABAL of journalists who supported the invasion of Iraq and –now there’s virtually civil war –have pledged to circulate arguments saying it remains a good cause.

 

THEY INCLUDE:

 

Nick Cohen

 

Christopher Hitchens

 

Francis Wheen

 

John Lloyd.

 

WHY EUSTON?

 

They plotted in a pub there. George Bush must be overjoyed.

 

[So beware of any fantasy stories which might arise from this clique of professional journalists who have forgotten the ethics of their trade which demand that the FULLTRUTH prevail. If by their misguided efforts our troops spend longer in Iraq then the deaths of those servicemen will lie with them. ]

 

*          *          *

MAY/06

 

*

Q&A: The Lisbon Treaty-2008 Leaders of the European Union's 27 member states meet in Portugal this week to sign what will now become known as the Lisbon Treaty.   * The abolition of Britain by The Reform Treaty - Second Reading-Passed by majority of 138 * Veteran parliamentarian TONY BENN speaks of the absolute necessity of a REFERENDUM HEAR HIM ON http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I-ZdvQz1o *

*

www.noliberties.com

[Latest Addition - June07]

*

www.eutruth.org.uk

*

www.thewestminsternews.co.uk

*

 

www.speakout.co.uk

*

 

Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU

www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs

 

*

 

 

VOTE

MAY -2007

 

TO LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION

WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE

TO SET YOU

 FREE

 

THE

UK INDEPENDENCE PARTY

www.ukip.org

 

TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER

BUT

SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.

*

 

ONLY

PRO-PORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

*

Home Rule for Scotland

WHY NOT

HOME RULE for ENGLAND

 

*

MAY/07

 

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin]

 

Elections in the British One Party State If you vote Conservative, Labour, Lib-Dem, UKIP or the BNP, you'll be voting for the EU dictatorship. All five party leaderships are EU controlled. That's why your vote doesn't make a difference - all these five parties have the same policies: the EU's policies. The 17 most senior politicians in the Conservative, Lib Dem and Labour parties, including Ken Clarke, Francis Maude, Cameron, William Hague, George Osborne, Nick Clegg, Brown, David and Ed Milliband, Ed Balls, Peter Mandleson are Bilderbergers, the 140 strong band of ultra senior Freemasons who are bribed by the EU to build the EU dictatorship. No Bilderberger, Freemason or Common Purpose graduate should ever be allowed to hold public office. UKIP and the BNP are honey traps to neutralise activists: UKIP is riddled with Freemasons and Common Purpose like a cancer, and the BNP controlled by the Edgar Griffin (father) and son Nick Freemasonry family. The 350,000 freemasons and the 40,000 strong Common Purpose Organisation are the (mostly unknowing) foot soldiers of the EU in Britain. (Which makes the BNP the easiest party to clean up - get rid of the Griffins, and put in a real anti-EU leadership.)  For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF UKIP  OR  INTEND TO JOIN THEM TAKE NOTE OF THE MESSAGE ABOVE     THE EDP HAS BEEN CRITICAL OF THE MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP OF THE UKIP FOR SOME TIME NOW AS IS SHOWN IN A NUMBER OF BULLETINS  OVER THE PAST FEW YEARS WHERE WE HAVE CRITICISED THEIR LACK LUSTRE PERFORMANCE AS THEY FAILED TO MOTIVATE THEIR MEMBERSHIP TO A MORE DETERMINED CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE CAMPAIGN WHICH WOULD HAVE MADE THE GOVERNMENTS TREMBLE BUT THEY HAD NO WORRY BECAUSE THEY HAD THEIR OWN PERSONS IN CHARGE AT THE TOP OF THE ORGANISATION.  THIS FIGHTING SPIRIT HAS BEEN LACKING AND WE CAN CONFIRM THIS OURSELVES BECAUSE WE HAVE BEEN OUTSIDE PARLIAMENT WHEN A MARCH WAS CANCELLED - AND WATCH THE FARCE WHEN CANDLES WERE HELD AND THOUSANDS OF LETTERS SENT TO MPS WHO KNEW WHERE TO DISPOSES OF THEM -AND ALL TO NO AVAIL.  IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF UKIP YOU HAVE BEEN BETRAYED BY YOUR OWN LEADERSHIP SOME APPEAR ON THE ALEX JONES SHOW WHICH HAS BEEN UNDER CLOSE SPOTLIGHT RECENTLY AS BEING CLOSE TO AN ISRAELI SECURITY FIRM DETAILS ON OUR WEBSITE .    IRONICALLY IT WAS A CHANCE LOOK ON THE INTERNET A FEW YEARS AGO  TO COME UPON THAT SITE WHICH OPENED OUR MIND TO THE ILLUMINATI.   THOUGH WE HAVE SOME DETAILS OF THE BILDERBERGERS ON OUR SITE  A NUMBER OF YEARS AGO WE FAILED TO DO MORE RESEARCH- WE ALL HAVE TO LEARN.  THE FAILURE OF UKIP WE HAVE SUSPECTED  FOR MANY YEARS   THAT MANY AT THE TOP OF THEIR ORGANISATION MIGHT BE UNDERCOVER MEMBERS OF THE ILLUMINATI.  IT IS A FAVOURITE TRICK OF THEIRS TO SUPPORT ANY PARTY OR ORGANISATION AT THE OUTSET WHATEVER ITS POLICY AS IT ALLOWS THEM TO PUT THEIR OWN PEOPLE IN TO CONTROL ITS POLICES AS THEY BEHIND THE SCENES SUPPLY THE VITAL FINANCIAL SUPPORT.   Our intention is not to benefit from this disaster as since the 1999 European Election we have NOT! accepted a DONATION! from ANYONE! and we closed membership also because we did not wish to split the vote for UKIP but have stated in the past that we would contest another election if it was ever necessary to enter into the affray again and with the reputation of UKIP under scrutiny we will keep our options OPEN!   As we mentioned some time ago we have been almost two decades on the campaign trail to free our once FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE of ENGLAND from the SATANIC EU and those who have for centuries have planned for an EVIL ONE-WORLD CORPORATION/GOVERNMENT and EXTERMINATE! at least 5 BILLION of the WORLD'S POPULATION and therefore if we are right about those mentioned above they are not only TRAITORS to their COUNTRY but also a THREAT to WORLD PEACE.   However, of late, matters have NOT! been going well for the ILLUMINATI as you will observe BELOW.   WHAT A WAY TO WIN A WAR     BENJAMIN FULFORD   More! [WORKS] * SEEKTHETRUTHANDWISDOM   * Bank Of England « The Banking Swindle   More!   More!   PATRIOT or TRAITOR to HIS COUNTRY +More!    More!   +(More!     THIS YOU MUST SEE IT CONCERNS  YOUR PLANET! AND  YOU!     NO NEED TO PANIC!   'Others shall sing the song, Others shall right the wrong,- Finish what I begin, All all I fail of win. Hail to the coming singers! Hail to the brave light-bringers! Forward I reach and above All that they sing and dare.   The airs of heaven blow o'er me; A glory shines before me Of what mankind shall be'- Pure, generous, brave and free, I feel the earth move sunward, I join the great march onward, And  take, by faith, while living, My freehold of thanksgiving.-   WHITTIER   MAY-2012   TOP OF PAGE       ADDED - MAY-2012