GREAT PASSION BUT
BAD JUDGMENT AND THE RESULT AN ILLEGAL WAR.
In
watching yesterday the unfolding More 4 drama/documentary of
‘WHY WE WENT TO WAR’
one was aware that Tony Blair had made his decision first
and then spent the rest of the time to see that events fitted in with his and
his dear friend George Bush’s plan.
This should not have
surprised us if it did some, as this is Blair philosophy at work. It is the same method within the
‘Rotten Core of the European
Union.’
Do what you want - THEN put
in place a scheme and fill in the gaps as you go along.
All those about their Prime
Minister with the exception of two outstanding parliamentarians of Courage
and Principle -Clare Short and Robin Cook - were so mesmerised by the
mindless vigour of their Leader that they followed him even though they knew he
was on a course of destruction with over a million marchers taking to the
streets of the Capital and many more around the country to protest at the
unjust war.
What the events showed was
the immense power there was in the hands of a British Prime Minister and the
necessity for Cabinet scrutiny and honesty, which was only showed by those who
chose to stand firm on Principle.
Regrettably the drama /documentary showed the docile way
those about him did nothing stronger than to warn him of the consequences of
his action.
The Foreign Secretary Jack Straw and others about the PM after
such scathing comments on the slide to war should have resigned and if others
had followed there would have been
NO WAR.
The
drama unfolding was so unreal when one considers the casualness in which the
decision was allowed to stand and they spent their time in trying to make the
plan work.
Looking in on the goings-on
was traumatic to say the least as one watched so many derogatory remarks of the
intended action but nevertheless the crazy show was still on the road.
We see the weak response of
the Attorney-General Goldsmith in refusing to take any responsibility in
the legal question but to land it on the lap of the Prime Minister who just
wrote his own interpretation and then delivered it to a packed House of Commons.
What a contrast there was in
the film a night before of the
‘Gathering Storm’
Which depicted a Prime
Minister of great PRINCIPLE- Stanley Baldwin in the late 30’s who
refused to take the country on the road to war as he knew so very well the
terror of total war from the Great War-The First World War. And it was
another man of PRINCIPLE Winston Churchill who alerted the country and
the House of Commons of the danger just in time for the country to rearm
to face the Nazi onslaught from the air and the expected Invasion.
We are told we live in a Democracy but what kind of
Democracy is it NOW that such events could happen before our eyes and be
helpless to bring the culprits to the Bar of the House of Commons as
accustomed in order they be heard and severely punished for their GREAT CRIMES
against the British People and the International Law which our country more
than most should have supported.
Many will say WHY did
so many people still vote Tony Blair back into the position of First
Minister of our once Free Country after we had witnessed such a gross
violation of that Great Office of State by the declaration of an unjust
war supported as we know now by Lies and Deceit.
Tony Blair defied PARLIAMENT and millions of people
marching the streets against the Iraq War and therefore he felt he was now
invincible and though he had lost so many of his supporters in an Election with
the lowest turnout for his Party for many a year he was able to resume Office
because of the antics of the Party on the other side of the HOUSE who handed
the Election to him on a plate.
Well! - The so-called Opposition
party, which calls itself the CONservative Party, had in the main supported
the illegal war rather than fall out with those in the White House. The vote on
the Iraq War in the House of Commons was held in the knowledge that the
decision had already been made to go to war. A classic example of doing what
you want and then explain later. This
can only be justified if and ONLY if the country is in REAL DANGER from
IMMINENT ATTACK.
THE LOSERS in this contest
are the sane voters of Britain who were in many cases glued to their Soaps or
other activities oblivious to the dangers of allowing a megalomaniac back as
leader of a once Great and Free Nation.
We have said on so many
occasions in the past
THE CHOOSE IS YOURS!
It appears many of you were
not interested and as a consequence we were led into an Illegal War and the
Prime Minister and ALL who supported him are in the main still with him to give
him further help if good old George wants to take on the remaining of HIS axis
of evil nations of IRAN and NORTH KOREA.
What the U.S.A and Britain
have done is to undo any credibility there may have been how ever small and
place themselves as aggressors in the early years of the 21st
century at a time when the world has become even more dangerous and when the
word Democracy has been devalued and in our Nation’s case almost destroyed by a
fanatic who has no interest in the PAST and therefore as we have proved he has
and will be a disaster in the FUTURE.
It is now confirmed that the three regions of Iraq
are now under the power of the local religious leaders and the American and British
troops are merely bystanders and the condition of Iraq is more deadly as a
result of the brainless action of Tony Blair and his many accomplices in
Parliament and the Country together with the gross stupidity of many Conservative
lapdogs and to the stark madness of the American President George Bush and his NeoConservative
followers.
The British sector in Iraq
will no doubt in the future become an integral part of Iran. The fools who
removed Saddam have now made Iraq much more dangerous but have placed Oil
reserves with a future enemy.
Both Tony Blair and George
Bush should both be IMPEACHED
by their respective Parliament
and Congress
* * *
January 10-2006
*
MoD - obtains
almost half the COST of the
Iraq War and
Afghanistan
selling Army land - barracks-hospitals.
July 2007
*
www.eutruth.org.uk
*
www.thewestminsternews.co.uk
*
www.speakout.co.uk
*
Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION
to the EU
www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs
*
VOTE
MAY -2007
TO
LEAVE
THE
EUROPEAN
UNION
WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE
TO SET YOU
FREE
THE
UK
INDEPENDENCE PARTY
www.ukip.org
TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE
FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER
BUT
SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS
WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.
*
ONLY
PRO-PORTIONAL
REPRESENTATION
WILL
BRING
DEMOCRACY
BACK
TO
THE
ENGLISH
PEOPLE
*
Home Rule for
Scotland
WHY NOT
HOME RULE for
ENGLAND
*
MAY/07
[All underlined words have a
separate bulletin
THE QUESTION THAT THE VOTER MUST ANSWER
‘DO YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY
THE CORRUPT ,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND ALIEN BUSYBODY BRUSSELS’
-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?