MAJOR ISSUES BULLETIN
 
     
     
 

 

GREAT PASSION BUT BAD JUDGMENT AND THE RESULT AN ILLEGAL WAR.

 

In watching yesterday the unfolding More 4 drama/documentary of

 

‘WHY WE WENT TO WAR’

 

one was aware that Tony Blair had made his decision first and then spent the rest of the time to see that events fitted in with his and his dear friend George Bush’s plan.

 

This should not have surprised us if it did some, as this is Blair philosophy at work. It is the same method within the

 

‘Rotten Core of the European Union.’

 

Do what you want - THEN put in place a scheme and fill in the gaps as you go along.

 

All those about their Prime Minister with the exception of two outstanding parliamentarians of Courage and Principle -Clare Short and Robin Cook - were so mesmerised by the mindless vigour of their Leader that they followed him even though they knew he was on a course of destruction with over a million marchers taking to the streets of the Capital and many more around the country to protest at the unjust war.

 

What the events showed was the immense power there was in the hands of a British Prime Minister and the necessity for Cabinet scrutiny and honesty, which was only showed by those who chose to stand firm on Principle.

Regrettably the drama /documentary showed the docile way those about him did nothing stronger than to warn him of the consequences of his action.

 

The Foreign Secretary Jack Straw and others about the PM after such scathing comments on the slide to war should have resigned and if others had followed there would have been

 

NO WAR.

 

The drama unfolding was so unreal when one considers the casualness in which the decision was allowed to stand and they spent their time in trying to make the plan work.

 

Looking in on the goings-on was traumatic to say the least as one watched so many derogatory remarks of the intended action but nevertheless the crazy show was still on the road.

 

We see the weak response of the Attorney-General Goldsmith in refusing to take any responsibility in the legal question but to land it on the lap of the Prime Minister who just wrote his own interpretation and then delivered it to a packed House of Commons.

What a contrast there was in the film a night before of the

 

‘Gathering Storm’

 

Which depicted a Prime Minister of great PRINCIPLE- Stanley Baldwin in the late 30’s who refused to take the country on the road to war as he knew so very well the terror of total war from the Great War-The First World War. And it was another man of PRINCIPLE Winston Churchill who alerted the country and the House of Commons of the danger just in time for the country to rearm to face the Nazi onslaught from the air and the expected Invasion.

 

We are told we live in a Democracy but what kind of Democracy is it NOW that such events could happen before our eyes and be helpless to bring the culprits to the Bar of the House of Commons as accustomed in order they be heard and severely punished for their GREAT CRIMES against the British People and the International Law which our country more than most should have supported.

 

Many will say WHY did so many people still vote Tony Blair back into the position of First Minister of our once Free Country after we had witnessed such a gross violation of that Great Office of State by the declaration of an unjust war supported as we know now by Lies and Deceit.

 

Tony Blair defied PARLIAMENT and millions of people marching the streets against the Iraq War and therefore he felt he was now invincible and though he had lost so many of his supporters in an Election with the lowest turnout for his Party for many a year he was able to resume Office because of the antics of the Party on the other side of the HOUSE who handed the Election to him on a plate.

 

 

Well! - The so-called Opposition party, which calls itself the CONservative Party, had in the main supported the illegal war rather than fall out with those in the White House. The vote on the Iraq War in the House of Commons was held in the knowledge that the decision had already been made to go to war. A classic example of doing what you want and then explain later. This can only be justified if and ONLY if the country is in REAL DANGER from IMMINENT ATTACK.

 

THE LOSERS in this contest are the sane voters of Britain who were in many cases glued to their Soaps or other activities oblivious to the dangers of allowing a megalomaniac back as leader of a once Great and Free Nation.

 

We have said on so many occasions in the past

 

THE CHOOSE IS YOURS!

 

 

It appears many of you were not interested and as a consequence we were led into an Illegal War and the Prime Minister and ALL who supported him are in the main still with him to give him further help if good old George wants to take on the remaining of HIS axis of evil nations of IRAN and NORTH KOREA.

 

What the U.S.A and Britain have done is to undo any credibility there may have been how ever small and place themselves as aggressors in the early years of the 21st century at a time when the world has become even more dangerous and when the word Democracy has been devalued and in our Nation’s case almost destroyed by a fanatic who has no interest in the PAST and therefore as we have proved he has and will be a disaster in the FUTURE.

 

It is now confirmed that the three regions of Iraq are now under the power of the local religious leaders and the American and British troops are merely bystanders and the condition of Iraq is more deadly as a result of the brainless action of Tony Blair and his many accomplices in Parliament and the Country together with the gross stupidity of many Conservative lapdogs and to the stark madness of the American President George Bush and his NeoConservative followers.

 

The British sector in Iraq will no doubt in the future become an integral part of Iran. The fools who removed Saddam have now made Iraq much more dangerous but have placed Oil reserves with a future enemy.

 

Both Tony Blair and George Bush should both be IMPEACHED

by their respective Parliament and Congress

 

 

* * *

January 10-2006

 

*

MoD - obtains almost half the COST of the Iraq War and Afghanistan  selling Army land - barracks-hospitals. July 2007

 

 

*

www.eutruth.org.uk

*

www.thewestminsternews.co.uk

*

 

www.speakout.co.uk

*

 

Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU

www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs

 

*

 

 

VOTE

MAY -2007

 

TO LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION

WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE

TO SET YOU

 FREE

 

THE

UK INDEPENDENCE PARTY

www.ukip.org

 

TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER

BUT

SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.

*

 

ONLY

PRO-PORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

*

Home Rule for Scotland

WHY NOT

HOME RULE for ENGLAND

 

*

MAY/07

 

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin

THE QUESTION THAT THE VOTER MUST ANSWER

 

DO YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE CORRUPT ,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND ALIEN BUSYBODY BRUSSELS’

 

-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?