A QUESTION OF INSURANCE

We all need it and with the service providers spending millions to get your business it is no doubt a competitive business

BUT:   WHAT ABOUT THE SERVICE

Has your vehicle been involved in an accident in the following circumstances?

You were proceeding along the HIGHWAY when your vehicle was struck by a vehicle coming from  a side road on the left.

HOW LONG DID YOUR INSURANCE COMPANY TAKE TO COMPLETE ITS CASE?

ONE MONTH?

TWO MONTH'S

THREE

FOUR

FIVE

SIX

SEVEN

EIGHT

NINE

TEN ELEVEN

We will let you know -When we know

IN

 MARCH-2009

IT HAS REACHED - 27 MONTHS

The HIGHWAY Code (Section 146) states the following:

'not assume, when waiting at a junction, that a vehicle coming from the right and signaling left will actually turn,

WAIT AND MAKE SURE'.

We are aware of a case where the accident occurred in November 2006 and IS STILL NOT SETTLED in March, 2009

What is most surprising about the circumstances is that there had been months of SILENCE and then in August 2007 a firm of solicitors said they had been instructed to take the matter to COURT as the other party contested the claim but NO WORD from the INSURANCE COMPANY. The damage to the vehicle on the HIGHWAY was consistent with the vehicle being struck at right-angles from the left  and the final positioning of the damaged vehicle  was approximately 50 feet away on the HIGHWAY in QUESTION.

WHAT WE QUESTION IS WHY THE EXCESSIVE TIME in order to complete on the evidence a straightforward case

 The party concerned has written to his insurance company to ask WHY!

The complainant has asked us to address the

 hopping 'red telephone'

to the urgency of the matter and take off its  red hat and ring through to the CUSTOMER and explain WHY the MATTER has STILL NOT BEEN RESOLVED.

The person concerned feels there may be some dark forces at work here?

Should there be interference with the legal process by anyone for their own purpose we remind them that there is such a law of

CONSPIRACY

Conspiracy is both a TORT and a CRIME

Criminal conspiracy has been authoritatively defined as:

"the agreement of two or more persons to do an unlawful act, or to do a lawful act by unlawful means"

Knowing the underhand methods of

GOVERNMENT

to their opponents we would not be at all surprised if their dirty tricks department is working overtime at this crucial hour in the life of our NATION STATE.

We will keep you all in the picture as the events unfold.

We hope you are having better luck with

YOUR INSURER

As the above case should have been handled

A GOOD DEAL BETTER

*

[This could be scoop for Ephraim Hardcastle  COLUMN of the Daily Mail or a misunderstanding that has taken up at least ten months and will no doubt reach over twelve months AT LEAST.

*

SEPTEMBER 8-2007

*

Unreserved Apology received September, 28 , 2007

As in a any well conducted company the reputation of that company depends on the people it employs. And the above case exemplifies what damage can be done if those responsible for supervising its work fail to do so. The person concerned with the above case  because of the trauma of the accident was unable to read the letter from the company but a close friend was able to read the contents and assure him that the company had investigated the case and had found that their normal high standard  of working practice had been in the above mentioned case had been undermined and therefore they had sent their

UNQUALIFIED APOLOGY.

*

LATEST!

MARCH-2009

It is only days since we have brought to the attention of our many viewers the dirty tricks of those who aspire to a

NEW WORLD ORDER

and a

WORLD GOVERNMENT

of an ELITE.

So we were not surprised when we heard of the following developments which confirmed beyond doubt that they in a colloquial way Don'T Like It Up Them!

Since receiving the apology on September 28th 2007 the party concerned had been in contact with Irwin Mitchell-Solicitors who we believe have links with Cherie Blair's Matric Chambers as confirmed on the ephraim.hardcastle@dailymail.co.uk column  not so long ago.

Also other correspondence has also been transacted with other associated companies over the past twelve months and we were of the opinion that the rejection of the acceptance of a 50% liability had been noted.

It is  now Thursday 26th March 2009 and a phone call from a solicitor at 10.30 am acting for Direct Line has asked yet again whether the particular individual would accept 50% liability and the complainant again  made it perfectly clear that he had from the very beginning decided it was not acceptable.  The person contacted remembered the voice of the contact and asked had he dealt with the case during the time when the case was not dealt with in Direct Lines usual efficient manner and he replied that he was in fact  the person concerned. Thereupon he asked why the case was still  at the same stage as when Direct Line sent an apology in September 28th, 2007.  He replied that he wished to close the file and his request for a 50%/50% settlement would enable him to do so.  You can guess the answer that he received from the unfortunate customer of DIRECT LINE.

We are aware that DIRECT LINE in a recent poll as to service did not do so well and it is no wonder if the case above is  typical of their idea of service.

As far as we are concerned it is a politically inspired motive involved in this case and the very fact that after months of silence and within days of opening the can of worms about the NEW WORLD ORDER that a call should be received by the individual concerned on a matter which should have been resolved within a few months of its occurrence in OCTOBER 2006..

WE WILL KEEP YOU POSTED!

*

THE CASE FROM 2006 HAS IN 2011 NOW REACHED A 70% LIABILITY ON THE OTHER DRIVER -RAISED FROM 50% AND THE MATTER IS STILL WITH THE OMBUDSMAN.

*          *          *

MARCH-2009