MAJOR ISSUES BULLETIN

HOME

 

 

 

 

 

VIEWERS -TOP TOPICS-WKLY/ARCHIVE

 

 

 

 

 

 

HOT SPOT

ON

FALSE FLAG ATTACKS

OR

RELATED INCIDENTS

 

PART 2

 

 

PART 1

First Great War of The 21st Century is Here! with Gerald Celente

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Alex Jones Channel
October 15, 2011

Renowned trends forecaster Gerald Celente about the false flag op and the move toward World War Three. Celente forecasted that there will be a major war as the economy crumbles.

Sponsored Link: Have you heard about a little-known way to own real silver bullion for around 3 bucks? Surprisingly, it’s an investment opportunity created by the U.S. government. And it has nothing to do with stocks, options, ETFs, or even uncirculated bullion coins.

Click here to learn more.


PrintPrint this page.

 

 

 

 

A STEP TO A WORLD GOVERNMENT

http://www.infowars.com/expect-a-false-flag-terror-attack-to-precede-invasion-of-iran/

SEPTEMBER-2011

 

 

 

THE ENEMY WITHIN!

 

FALSE FLAG ATTACKS!

 

http://www.helpfreetheearth.com/news183_false.html

 

 

 

 

 

 

WARS ARE THE BREAD OF BANKSTERS AND THE GRAVES AND FAMINE OF THE WORLD

 

When asked what kind of weapons would be used to fight World War III, the physicist Albert Einstein replied:[5]

 

“I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.”

 

THE ENEMY WITHIN

WHICH YOU CANNOT SEE BUT IT CAN GET TO YOU THROUGH BRICK WALLS OR WHEREVER YOU ARE-IT IS THE  SILENT TORTURE BUT IT CAN  MAKE YOU SERIOUSLY ILL OR KILL YOU   BUT IF YOU SURVIVE YOU  CANNOT GET MILLIONS  OF COMPENSATION LIKE THE GUANTANIMO BAY DETAINEES BECAUSE GOVERNMENTS DENY THAT THIS WEAPON IS BEING USED AGAINST ITS CITIZENS JUST AS OUR  GOVERNMENT  DENIED AT FIRST THAT THEY WERE ACCESSORIES TO TORTURE.

 

Hidden Evil Banner

 

No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degradiing treatment or punishment. In partcular , no one shall be subjected without his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation".-

Universal Declaration of Human Rights

 

DECEMBER -2010

!

 

Share

'Wikileaks founder Julian Assange has won an award from the “Economist” magazine, a financial publication controlled by the Rothschild banking family, and he has also featured on an “Economist” video clip, raising questions about conflicts of interest.  Assange predicted a bank run could be triggered by bank data leaks but he does not mention that this would result in the robbery of millions of people because of the way the fractional reserve banking system works, and profit the banks.

Is a false flag bank run hyped by the banker’s media and carried out by a Rothschild operative being planned to rob millions and to implement emergency laws?'

Read more: Wikileaks Founder Julian Assange has Close Links to the Economist, Controlled by the Rothschild Banking Family

 

DAVID IKE CHANNEL ;See below

 

A TRIBUTE TO A WARRIOR

http://consciousmedianetwork.blogspot.com/2010/08/david-icke-beleaguered-warrior.html#comment

LATEST!

http://www.prisonplanet.com/assange-set-up-by-cia-operative.html

Hear the TRUTH! -December 06, 2010

 

 

 

 

REMEMBER ! That at stake is the INDEPENDENCE and survival of the INTERNET and we as no doubt millions of DEFENDERS of FREEDOM are HOPING that THEIR TRUST in WIKILEAKS are not MISJUDGED.   BUT at STAKE is the very existence of a FREE INTERNET open to ALL! and NOT another WEAPON of the BANKSTER ELITE!

 

 

GLOBALIZATION

 

The long hard campaigner against Globalism John Pilger is supporting Julian Assange who  has all the signs of being a tool of the ARCH GLOBALISTS on the seemingly strong and indisputable evidence as indicated above.  It would be a cruel irony if this was  so but we have seen other apparently parliamentary white knights on white horses but behind the scenes attended by their NEW WORLD ORDER supporters. We have all seen what has happened to the TEA PARTY in the USA and its infiltration by the Corporate Elites-

Rothschilds & Rockefellers – Trillionaires Of The World

 - et al .

 

 "Manufacturing Dissent": the Anti-globalization Movement is Funded by the Corporate Elites, September 2010)

 

We well appreciated the terrible dilemma facing those who have given their support some financially such as John Pilger to Julian Assange's freedom of information stand but are baffled as to why they have not asked their idol with the many many questions raised above. Possibly they have and they have received sufficient answers but if so they should mention this to the WORLD at large where the hundreds of millions of INTERNET USERS  look on the  FREE INTERNET as a vital means of communication to ensure that THE TRUTH surfaces in order to prevent the take-over of the PLANET EARTH by the satanic BANKSTER TRIBE.

 

THERE MUST BE ANSWERS!

 

NOW!

 

http://www.businessinsider.com/blackboard/wikileaks

 

LATEST!

 

http://dissidentvoice.org/2010/12/front-for-intelligence-the-

case-against-wikileaks-part-iii/

Front for Intelligence: The Case Against Wikileaks (PART III)

In my previous articles I pointed out the most obvious problems I have with WikiLeaks — the fact that its leaks seem to leave larger Zionist imperial goals untouched; its antagonistic stance to 9-11 truth; it frantic validation and promotion by major media; the falsity of many of its claims of confidentiality for leakers; the implausibility of its achievements absent intelligence or government connections; the contradictions between its public advocacy of transparency and its own secrecy; and the authoritarian tendencies in the writing and personality of its co-founder, Julian Assange, tendencies that contradict the anarchist persona presented for public consumption.

In brief, to the question what is WikiLeaks?

My answer is whatever it is, it has become a vehicle for disinformation.

Next, the companion question. Who is behind WikiLeaks?

Here, the answers are less clear.

According to several sources, WL is “run” by a non-profit called the Sunshine Press. Assange is reported to be director and co-founder. According to the WikiLeaks website, the Sunshine Press is an “international non-profit organization funded by human rights campaigners, investigative journalists, technologists, lawyers and the general public.”

This doesn’t make it clear if  Sunshine Press and WikiLeaks are the same thing or two separate outfits.  A little googling gives me three Sunshine presses. None of them is our guy.

At a site called World News that seems to be devoted to WikiLeaks news, I also find a video titled Sunshine Press announcement that refers to Sunshine realty management, a recipient of $250,0000 in grant money from Mayor Bloomberg. However, the URL for Sunshine Suites, sunshiney.com, doesn’t show any relationship to Wikileaks, so the appearance of the company next to WikiLeaks news and videos seems to be the result of mistaken identity.

The web site we want turns out to be Sunshine press.org (dot org, not dot com).

The Facebook page for Sunshine Press.org lists three URLs http://www.sunshinepress.org http://www.wikileaks.org and http://www.collateralmurder.com and clicking on the sunshine press.org link takes you back to WikiLeaks.

According to Sunshine Press’s Facebook page, the two organizations, WikiLeaks and Sunshine press, are the same. This seems to be borne out by the fact that the Sunshine Press Youtube channel consists of only WikiLeaks videos.

Some more googling about sunshinepress.org  yields several IP addresses; various domain names; its server, everydns.net; the location of the host in Sweden; the page rank (7); links (37); and other information.

http://www.robtex.com/dns/www.sunshinepress.org.html

www.sunshinepress.org (“http://www.sunshinepress.org/. Wikileaks. Sunshinepress”) has one IP number (88.80.2.32) , which is the same as for sunshinepress.org, but the reverse is host-88-80-2-32.cust.prq.se. Apple-memory.org, leaks.be, wikileaks.to, sunshinepress.org, apple-memory.de and at least three other hosts point to the same IP.

Sunshinepress.org is a domain controlled by four name servers at everydns.net.

All four of them are on different IP networks. The primary name server is ns1.everydns.net.

Incoming mail for sunshinepress.org is handled by one mail server at wikileaks.org.

We are missing the IP:s of one server: mail.wikileaks.org. www.sunshinepress.org is ranked #514197 world wide as sunshinepress.org and is hosted on a server in Sweden. It has 37 inlinks.

The Google Pagerank™ of sunshinepress.org is 7. backorder sunshinepress.org for 49.95 USD.

Trustworthiness, vendor reliability, privacy and child safety of this site is excellent. (more on reputation).

It is not listed in any blacklists.

I still couldn’t find a web page devoted to Sunshine Press itself, although, according to the WikiLeaks site, SP has been in existence since 1996.

Emails referencing WL at Cryptome goes back to October 2006. Sunshine Press (which doesn’t appear in the Cryptome emails) seems to have come into being at the same time and seems to be identical with WL. We can tentatively conclude that there is no separate Sunshine Press.

Nonetheless, the latest development is a new limited liability company formed on behalf of WikiLeaks called Sunshine Press Productions, which is registered in Iceland:

The brand new company registered on behalf of Wikileaks is called Sunshine Press Production – the same as the formal international name of Wikileaks, RUV reports. The chairman of the company is Wikileaks founder Julian Assange and he shares the board of directors with filmmaker Ingi Ragnar Ingason and journalist Kristinn Hrafnsson. The deputy board member is Gavin MacFadyen, a professor of journalism in London. The company is registered at the home address of one of the board members at Klapparhlid in Mosfellsbaer.

Researching the names mentioned in this paragraph give us some interesting tidbits.

Hrafnsson, an Icelandic investigative journalist formerly with national broadcaster RUV and a staff member of WL since April 2010, is now the public face of WL. Hrafnsson is also an outside advisor to the Icelandic Modern Media Initiative (IMMI), started by Birgitta Jonsdottir, an anarchist and member of the Icelandic parliament. IMMI seeks to make Iceland a kind of Switzerland for journalistic freedom. Investigative reporter, Wayne Madsen, has argued that IMMI is a stalking horse for currency speculator George Soros’ interests.

Jonsdottir’s inspiration for IMMI was reportedly a presentation by Assange and WL’s German staffer Daniel Domscheit-Berg in Iceland, just prior to WL’s outing of Iceland’s corrupt Kaupthing bank, which collapsed in August 2009. Other accounts describe IMMI as having been initiated by Soros spokesman, Mark Thompson, even earlier, in May 2009. (Domscheit-Berg has since fallen out with Assange and left to form his own company, OpenLeaks).

Birgitta Jonsdottir is also, and significantly, a member of International Network of Parliamentarians for Tibet, which “brings together 133 Parliamentarians from 30 Parliaments to advance the Tibet issue in governments worldwide.” according to the activist website Savetibet.org.

Now Tibetan autonomy, as championed by the Anglo-American elite, is reported to be a pretext for encroachment on Chinese sovereignty. Tibet, itself, is central to ecosystems and desertification in the region, as it provides water for several countries. Its grasslands also act as a carbon sink. Recall that a recent WL leak, trumpeted by the major media, was the reported assertion of the Dalai Lama that climate change trumps political issues in Tibet.

Meanwhile, while Westerners consider the Dalai Lama a benign spiritual guru, not everyone else finds him so warm and fuzzy.  Many in Asia  consider him an ethnic grievance-monger, who wants to segregate Tibetans from Han Chinese. His political positions also fit nicely with Anglo-American imperial ambitions in that region, for which human rights and climate-change are cover for surveillance and control.

Tibet, after all, is a highly strategic and sensitive area.  The Dalai Lama is reported to be financially supported by the National Endowment for Democracy and NED, itself, receives CIA funding.

Jonsdottir is not the only interesting figure in this group.

Gavin MacFadyen, with whom Julian Assange is now staying, is also someone with strong connections to the financial elites. MacFadyan is a senior producer-director at corporate mainstream outlets,  BBC and PBS, and a director of the NY conference of financial and business journalists at the Columbia Journalism School. He is also the director of the Center for Investigative Journalism, where Assange is listed as a teacher, along with such well-known names as leftist author-activists,  Mike Davis, John Pilger, and Vandana Shiva. Sponsors of the CIJ are George Soros’ Open Society Institute (which, notably, sponsors a number of pro-Tibet projects),  the David and Elaine Potter Foundation, the Ford Foundation (another foundation with ties to the CIA), Park Foundation, City University London and several smaller private trusts.

There’s a third connection to the Anglo-American elites. Assange is staying at the 600 acre Suffolk manor of Vaughan Smith, a former British army captain, who owns a popular journalists’ club in Paddington in London, called The Frontline Club (along with the related Frontline TV News).

Frontline, it is reported, has sponsored a documentary that “casts doubt on allegations of a massacre at Jenin on the West Bank by the Israel Defense Forces in 2002″ and has received funding from George Soros’ Open Society Institute.

On a side note, notice the company Assange keeps. If Assange is a “libertarian,” then, he travels a lot in very government-friendly circles. He is most certainly not the anarchist he’s often portrayed to be and which hackers and computer geeks often really are.

To return to the question of WL’s origins, the first part of this series pointed out that many of WL’s earliest staffers were Chinese dissidents and pro-Tibet activists.

To sum up, the Soros connection turns up in six separate WL relationships:

·  Its Chinese and pro-Tibetan volunteers/advisors, some of whom worked at Soros connected Radio Free Asia and National Endowment for Democracy

·  Its connection through Hrafnsson to IMMI, considered by many to be a stalking horse for Soros in Iceland

·  Its connection to Jonsdottir and her Tibetan advocacy, which parallels objectives of Radio Free Asia and OSI

·  Assange’s and MacFadyen’s sponsorship by the Open Society Institute, with its pro-Tibetan positions

·  Frontline Club’s funding by the Open Society Institute

·  Direct requests by WL in 2007 for funding from the National Endowment for Democracy and Freedom House, both CIA connected. (Note: Open Society Foundation denies funding WikiLeaks).

In this regard, it’s relevant that the Open Society Institute had no critical comment about Wikileaks until recently, when it suddenly joined the chorus of voices suggesting that WL’s actions could have jeopardized the lives of Afghan informants (WSJ, August 9, 2010).

This happened about a week after border security detained WL’s Jacob Applebaum for several hours. (Applebaum is a security researcher and hacker who works for the Tor privacy protection project as well as for WL).

Next question. Who specifically set up WikiLeaks?

A little research into the first appearance of WikiLeaks on the web shows that Assange is not the only name associated with it from its inception. On the Internet archive (the Wayback machine) the earliest archived pages for WikiLeaks go back to January 14, 2007. There are 60 pages in 2007 for the outfit, 19 for 2008, 0 for 2009, and 87 for 2010.

A click on January 14, 2007, gives us mostly dead links, but the contact page produces two web addresses: w i k i l e a k s @ w i k i l e a k s . o r g & p r e s s @ w i k i l e a k s . o r g, a phone number (a cell number) in Washington DC, +1 (202) 657-6222, and a skype address, wikileaks.

The DC cell number turns out to be registered in Adelphi, Virginia, and it traces back 20 miles to Reston Virginia, which seems a bit odd, considering that WL’s professed interests originally were in Asia and Africa and its volunteers were supposedly mostly from the Pacific and Europe.

Reston is a center for outfits working on US cybersecurity, information technology, and defense, as indeed is the whole DC-MD-Va metropolitan area. Among many similar companies HQ’d there, one finds NCI, whose website announces that it is “an industry leader and provider of full-spectrum IO (Information Operations) enabling technologies and services to promote and protect our US federal government customers’ information and information systems.”

IO, electronic warfare (EW) and Cyberwar are its specialties.

Wondering why I hadn’t come across the Reston cell phone in articles about Wikileaks, I did another search and found that, in fact, in March, 2007 a Columbia Journalism Review intern, Dan Goldberg, had published something about it, only the piece had been removed from the web.

This is one angle for further research.

Next, double-checking the domain information, I did a whois search for WikiLeaks.org which pulled up the following information:

Domain ID: D130035267-LROR
Domain Name: WIKILEAKS.ORG
Created On: 04-Oct-2006 05:54:19 UTC
Last Updated On: 17-Dec-2010 01:57:59
UTC Expiration Date: 04-Oct-2018 05:54:19
UTC Sponsoring Registrar: Dynadot, LLC (R1266-LROR)
Status: CLIENT TRANSFER PROHIBITED
Registrant ID: CP-13000
Registrant Name: John Shipton c/o Dynadot Privacy
Registrant Street1: PO Box 701
Registrant City: San Mateo
Registrant State/Province: CA
Registrant Postal Code: 94401
Registrant Country: US
Registrant Phone: +1.6505854708

The address of the registrar, Dynadot, as it appears at page insider is PO Box 1072, Belmont, CA 94002, the email is privacy@dynadot.com and the phone number is 1-866-652-2039.

I called, and Dynadot confirmed that it is the current registrar for Wikileaks.

A Cnet blog article and documents from the Julius Baer court case also confirm that the registrar in 2008 was California LLC, Dynadot, and that the registrant/owner was John Shipton, an Australian citizen resident in Nairobi. This is also confirmed by the Notice of Intent to Appear filed by Shipton and his California law firm, Chadwick, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton. Shipton has a Nairobi address in the notice and Dynadot has its usual San Mateo CA address. 1-650-585-1961.

Now who is John Shipton? Does he exist in his own right or is he simply a nom-de-plume of Julian Assange? Most likely the second, since it would be grotesquely coincidental to have two Australian nationals resident in Kenya, both involved in human rights activism at the same outfit. Again, more research is in order.

The original whois information for WikiLeaks appears at Cryptome.org, where the registrant’s name is given as John Young, the owner of Cryptome and a co-founder of Wikileaks. The Cryptome site carries the email correspondence between Young and Wikileaks from a restricted mailing list housed at the collective, rise-up.net, in 2006-07.

The letters show Young to be first enthusiastic about WL and then increasingly frustrated and annoyed by its methods. He calls the claim of over a million documents exaggerated and the repeated assertions of superior ethics and confidentiality deeply suspect, in the absence of a track-record.

The final straw comes when WL says it needs $5 million in funding by the summer of 2007 to stay alive. Young erupts with accusations that WL is a CIA “hustle.”

On the plus side for WL, the Young correspondence suggests how WL might have got hold of names of activists. Members seem to have been regular readers of Counterpunch, Z Mag, and Mother Jones. I’d written several pieces for Counterpunch in 2005-06, and it’s possible that’s how they got hold of names that way.

So that is an explanation that does not undermine WL.

However, the Cryptome emails note another problem that the review site, Wikileak.com (no S) describes in great detail:

Wikileaks.org (with an S) makes extraordinary claims about confidentiality and anonymity that are just that — claims. They’re not justified by an examination of the actual procedures involved in uploading documents to the site. These procedures are often shoddy, incompetent, uncoordinated, or even deliberately misleading, as Wikileak.com (no S) notes pointedly.

Anyway, taking all this into account, WL seems to have been founded and registered in 2006 by Julian Paul Assange/John Shipton and John Young OR by a group of activists who, for whatever reason, let Assange and Young wear the public face of the company.

Who were these activists?

The original web entry on the subject (since changed) said WL was the creation of Chinese dissidents and other activists. This is also the claim of an article by Cass Sunstein, Obama’s Information Czar, in The Washington Post in February 2007, “A Brave New Wikiworld.”

John Young says that the Sunstein article was the first public introduction of WikiLeaks and that WikiLeaks might well be the cointelpro operation to infiltrate conspiracy groups that Sunstein seemed to be arguing for in a later (2008) white paper.

But this isn’t accurate. WikiLeaks had already been introduced to the public by a Time Magazine story, “A Wiki for whistle-blowers” a month earlier than the Sunstein piece, in January 2007. Time, Washington Post – this is pretty high-profile coverage for an outfit that had just begun three months earlier. What’s even more interesting is that the Time piece, like the Post piece, both point out the concurrent start of Intellipedia, the intelligence-sharing project started by US intelligence in October 2006, the month when WikiLeaks began.

Both articles also explicitly mention rumors about WikiLeaks possibly being a CIA front. This is quite curious. Were these papers simply reporting all the information available to them? Were they going on Young’s statement at the time, or did they have other sources for this suspicion? If the suspicions were credible, if WL was plausibly an intel operation, why the full-court press? If the suspicions were not credible, why mention them so pointedly?

Again, it’s impossible to say for sure without first-hand information.

One explanation of how activists created WL, comes, once more, from John Young.

In his latest Cryptome posts on the subject, Young talks about Assange as a craven spokesman for WL, seduced by money and the promise of fame to betray the original ideals of the outfit. Those ideals, says Young, grew out of a cypherpunk mailing list going back to 1992 that debated issues around cryptography and privacy. Wikipedia has the list with individual descriptions.

It’s a distinguished group.

Besides Assange, who is described as WL’s founder, the inventor of deniable cyptography and the co-author of “Underground,” there are three Bell lab researchers; two elite university professors; the Chief Technical Officer of PGP corporation; the creators of Bit Torrent and other software/technologies; the founders of Anonymizer.Inc., Interhack Corp., HavenCo., C2Net and of Cypherpunk itself; a researcher at Lawrence Livermore labs; the founder and lawyer of the Electronic Frontier Foundation; a former Chief Scientist from Intel; authors of several books – “Assassination Politics,” “A Cypher Punk’s Manifesto,” “God Wants You Dead,” and “A Crypto-Anarchist Manifesto”; Sun Microsystems employees; and a noted blogger and author on computer security issues.

These are accomplished activists, no question. And if they were at some point involved with the creation of WikiLeaks, or were aware of it, or promoted it, then it’s no wonder that the project quickly got such a high level of media attention. On the other hand, the involvement of the high-profile cypherpunks lends weight to the notion that intelligence played a hand in the creation of WikiLeaks. It is well-known by now that important American businesses have often been co-opted by the intelligence community.

Given that, it’s impossible that companies in the vanguard of technological development in encryption, security, privacy, and espionage, especially as it relates to nuclear energy (Lawrence Livermore labs), could have operated without some monitoring or input from the CIA. Ergo, if WikiLeaks were, in fact, the creation of the cypherpunks, I believe intelligence would have been aware of it and involved in it, as private contractors are deeply involved in Homeland security at every level.

Of course, it’s not only US intelligence that is involved in Homeland Security. Many have seen the hand of the Israeli intelligence and security business in it too.

Whether WikiLeaks grew out of the cypherpunk list or not, it’s not in dispute that Assange was quickly WL’s public face. In fact, he’s repeatedly and abrasively insisted that he was the “the heart and soul” of the outfit, angering colleagues and eventually leading to public fall-outs with some of them (Young, Domscheit-Berg).

Besides the cypherpunk list, another group of activists have been treated as the creators of WL — the Chinese dissidents originally named on WL’s website.

Who were these activists?

Here are the ones mentioned on the web page originally: “Chinese dissidents, journalists, mathematicians and startup company technologists, from the U.S., Taiwan, Europe, Australia and South Africa

But there is another list mentioned in an email dated December 9, 2006 from Cryptome.org’s exchanges with Wikileaks which refers to WL’ activists by their work (I have guessed at three of them in brackets).

1) Retired New York architect and notorious intelligence leak facilitator (John Young of Cryptome.org?)
2) Euro cryptographer/programmer
3) Pacific physicist and illustrator
4) A pacific author and economic policy lecturer
5) Euro, Ex-Cambridge mathematician/cryptographer/programmer
6) Euro businessman and security specialist/activist
7) Author of software than runs 40% of the world’s web sites (Phil Zimmerman?)
8) US pure mathematician with criminal law background
9) An infamous US ex-hacker
10) Pacific cryptographer/physicist and activist (Julian Assange?)
11) US/euro cryptographer and activist/programmer
12) Pacific programmer
13) Pacific architect / foreign policy wonk

This doesn’t sound quite like “Chinese dissidents, journalists etc.,” but both lists do refer to technologists. That fact makes it plausible that some, or all, of the original WL material came from hacking, and not whistle-blowing, a theory that fits with a WL letter to John Young on January 7, 2007 suggesting that hackers were involved with some of the material, and that WL was gathering so much material it didn’t know where 90% of the material came from or what was in it:

We are going to fuck them all. Chinese mostly, but not entirely a feint. Invention abounds. Lies, twists and distorts everywhere needed for protection. Hackers monitor Chinese and other intel as they burrow into their targets, when they pull, so do we. Inexhaustible supply of material. Near 100,000 documents/emails a day. We’re going to crack the world open and let it flower into something new. If fleecing the CIA will assist us, then fleece we will. We have pullbacks from NED, CFR, Freedom House and other CIA teats. We have all of pre 2005 Afghanistan. Almost all of India fed. Half a dozen foreign ministries. Dozens of political parties and consulates, world bank, apec, UN sections, trade groups, tibet and fulan dafa associations and… russian phishing mafia who pull data everywhere. We’re drowning. We don’t even know a tenth of what we have or who it belongs to. We stopped storing it at 1Tb.”

However you interpret this, one thing is clear, right from the start, Wikileaks was a conduit for a lot of material that the WL staff themselves could not identify or source. If an intelligence agency wanted to plant its own slanted “disclosures” in the welter of documents being dumped on the site, it would be only too easy to do.

Lila Rajiva is a freelance journalist and the author of The Language of Empire: Abu Ghraib and the US Media (Monthly Review Press, 2005) and Mobs, Messiahs and Markets (with Bill Bonner-Wiley, September 2007). She has also contributed chapters to One of the Guys (Ed., Tara McKelvey and Barbara Ehrenreich, Seal Press, 2007), an anthology of writing on women as torturers, and to The Third World: Opposing Viewpoints (Ed., David Haugen, Greenhaven, 2006). She can be reached at lrajiva@hotmail.com. Read other articles by Lila, or visit Lila's website.

9 comments on this article so far ...

Comments RSS feed

1.  MichaelKenny said on December 27th, 2010 at 9:03am #

Very interesting! Our friend Soros pops up again! More importantly, this very detailed analysis shows just how easy it is to engage in false flagging on the internet and how hard it is to unmask such people. It is perfectly possible that the whole Wikileaks thing was a stunt to reinforce the myth of the “free” and “independent” internet, giving a voice to the “little people” and revealing the “inside story”, thereby protecting the net as a useful disinformation machine. The weakness of the net in that regard is that, without the need to pay, readers can visit sites whose ideology they oppose. In print days, people tended to subscribe to publications that more or less agreed with their own ideology. They didn’t see what the “enemy” was saying. Now, people can see the same ” bottom line” being peddled by supposedly opposing ideologies, the only difference being the ideological jargon used and whether we are asked to cheer or to lament. It certainly seems odd that Wikileaks could get its hands on such a vast number of documents without high-level connivance and it also seems odd that, if the documents are taken at face value, they all seem to support well-established “bottom lines” of US propaganda of both right and left. Thus, if Wikileaks was a false flag operation, it seems to be blowing up in its originators’ faces!

Report this comment

 

Comments RSS feed


 

[THERE LEAVES LITTLE DOUBT THAT WIKILEAKS IS A CIA FALSE FLAG OPERATION AND WE SOON GOT THE SMELL OF IT ALMOST IMMEDIATELY BY THE SLANTED NATURE OF THE MATERIAL BEING RELEASED. THE ABOVE COMMENT STRUCK US AS AN ACCURATE ASSESSMENT . WE HAD HOPED WE WOULD BE WRONG BUT WITH THE ISSUE OF A FREE INTERNET AT STAKE IT ALL FELL INTO PLACE.]

DECEMBER 31-2010

 

 

http://www.prisonplanet.com/exclusive-internet-was-never-free-or-open-and-never-will-be-media-studies-prof-says.html

 

 

 

 

DECEMBER-2010

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ISRAEL ATTACKS US SHIP

 

 

 

 

USS Liberty Cover-Up (Full Movie) The Loss

Of Liberty US Navy Army Marines Military

 

 

 

SURVIVERS STILL FIGHTING FOR JUSTICE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

*

Police Intelligence Analyst Fired For Blowing Whistle On False Flag Terror

  •  

Print

The Alex Jones Channel

Alex Jones Show podcast

Prison Planet TV

Infowars.com Twitter

Alex Jones' Facebook

Infowars store

 

Strategic Threat Assessment Matrix concluded that 7/7 was an inside job

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Wednesday, July 13, 2011

Police Intelligence Analyst Fired For Blowing Whistle On False Flag Terror busPA2601 228x495
 

A British police intelligence analyst who was asked to create a strategic assessment concerning terror threats was fired when he told his superiors

that the threat of an “internal tyranny” was far greater than that of Islamic terrorism, after discovering that both 7/7 and 9/11 were false flag attacks.

Tony Farrell, who has a university degree in statistics, was employed for 12 years as a ‘Police Intelligence Analyst’ with South Yorkshire Police. His job was to provide a yearly ‘Strategic Threat Assessment Matrix’ to enable police to prioritize resources and activities. Fully expecting Farrell to regurgitate the contention that Muslim extremists posed the biggest threat, his bosses were stunned when Farrell instead reported that the 2005 London bombings were staged by British intelligence and that the official story was a “monstrous lie”.

During an hour-long interview with

Richard D. Hall

which was broadcast nationwide on UK television last week, Farrell revealed how one week before the 5th anniversary of 7/7 in 2010, he began researching information suggesting that the official story behind 9/11 was a total fabrication. Farrell cites the Alex Jones Show as being instrumental in his awakening to this knowledge.

After sharing his concerns with the resident police church minister, it was suggested to Farrell that he also investigate the July 2005 London bombings.

“Something he had not suspected ‘in his wildest dreams’ then started to unfold,” writes Nick Kollerstrom. “After reading much of the available but publicly-unreported witness statements and other evidence relating to 7/7, Tony found that he could only conclude that the official 7/7 narrative was ‘a monstrous lie.’ Instead of the official ‘suicide bombers’ narrative, which he and all of his colleagues had believed without question, he realized that the weight of evidence strongly points far more towards 7/7 being an event stage-managed by British intelligence than anything else.”

With the deadline fast approaching for Farrell to present his report to the Intelligence Strategic Management Board, he struggled with his conscience, well aware that if he divulged his contention that internal tyranny and not domestic or Islamic terrorism was the primary threat, he could easily lose his job and with it a 12-year career.

Speaking with the Director of Intelligence at South Yorkshire Police on July 6th, Farrell cautioned that his discovery of 7/7 being “deliberately engineered” by the state threatened to cause a “total breakdown in trust between the government and the masses.”

After stating that the threat from internal tyranny “far exceeded” that posed by Islamic terrorism, Farrell’s Director of Intelligence responded by saying, “Tony, you and I will never get them to tell the truth….we are mere foot-soldiers of the government.”

Farrell’s superiors then ordered him to visit Occupational Health, a development Farrell took as an implication that his colleagues thought he was having a mental breakdown.

“On July 7th 2010, his first line manager, a Detective Chief Inspector spent a good part of the day with him trying to steer him into keeping to the original plan and to avoid rocking the boat. Could they not achieve some sort of compromise – then he could take his three weeks’ leave?” writes Kollerstrom. “To comply with that, he would have had turn a blind eye to his own assessment and deliberately hand over misleading analysis. His ‘strategic’ models were looking promising according to his line manager – yet he could not set aside his new views about ‘internal tyranny.’”

Farrell’s Christian beliefs and his adherence to the 9th commandment,

 “Thou shalt not bear false witness,”

 eventually compelled him to file a Strategic Assessment Matrix which included his firm belief that

 the threat from Islamic terrorism was “insignificant” in comparison to the danger posed by state-sponsored terrorism.

Farrell was told that his conclusion did not match with the ‘National Intelligence Model’ and that his beliefs were “incompatible” with his position. Despite being praised for his excellent service and told by the police’s Director of Finance that his conclusion “may be right,” Farrell was dismissed on September 2nd 2010.

His case is now on appeal with an Employment Tribunal and is set to be heard in Sheffield in early September 2011.

Farrell’s story reminds us that awareness of false flag terror is so prevalent that people on the inside are now coming to the realization that the entire war on terror is a fable built on myths about non-existent Al-Qaeda plots.

As we have exhaustively documented,

 every single major terror plot in the UK or the US has been engineered, provocateured or outright staged by elements within government.

This knowledge is now so widespread that good people within the system are discovering the truth and blowing the whistle, despite the best efforts of the establishment media to demonize any skepticism towards the official story of any major event as tantamount to mental illness.

The story also serves as a reminder of the

overwhelming number of sober, respected, educated and credible professionals who have gone public to denounce the official fables behind both 9/11 and 7/7.

Tony Farrell should be commended for his courage in sacrificing his entire career for the truth, and stands as a shining example to everyone else working within the establishment who is considering blowing the whistle on misdeeds, corruption and outright tyranny within government.

Watch the full interview with Tony Farrell below courtesy of

 RichPlanet.net.

 

 

 

Farrell will also be appearing on the

Alex Jones Show

soon.

 

 

**

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

http://conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?ChannelID=69- Gladio Conspiracy:

 Staged NATO-CIA TERRORISM.

 

 

 

 

 

 

http://dissidentvoice.org/2010/12/front-for-intelligence-the-

case-against-wikileaks-part-iii/

Front for Intelligence: The Case Against Wikileaks (PART III)

In my previous articles I pointed out the most obvious problems I have with WikiLeaks — the fact that its leaks seem to leave larger Zionist imperial goals untouched; its antagonistic stance to 9-11 truth; it frantic validation and promotion by major media; the falsity of many of its claims of confidentiality for leakers; the implausibility of its achievements absent intelligence or government connections; the contradictions between its public advocacy of transparency and its own secrecy; and the authoritarian tendencies in the writing and personality of its co-founder, Julian Assange, tendencies that contradict the anarchist persona presented for public consumption.

In brief, to the question what is WikiLeaks?

My answer is whatever it is, it has become a vehicle for disinformation.

Next, the companion question. Who is behind WikiLeaks?

 

 

DECEMBER-2010

 

 

 

 

 

http://www.prisonplanet.com/

fake-bomb-aboard-german-passenger-jet-was-made-by-u-s-firm-to-test-airport-security.html

 

 

 

NOVEMBER - 2010

 

 

 

 

 

http://www.prisonplanet.com/

when-will-u-s-leaders-confess-to-the-american-people-that-america-carries-out-false-flag-attacks-as-part-of-its-foreign-policy.html

 

 

NOVEMBER-2010

 

 

 

 

 

THE HOT SPOT

 

 

[THIS BOX  TO WARN YOU OF THE DECEIT OF GOVERNMENTS IN

FALSE FLAG ATTACKS AND ASSOCIATED INCIDENTS]

 

NOW ON SATURDAY NOVEMBER 6 THEY HAVE THEIR

FRONT PAGE!

THEY HAVE TRIED SO HARD TO PUT THEIR STORY!

 

Al-Qaeda plane bomb 17 minutes from going off

·                                  

The Alex Jones Channel

Alex Jones Show podcast

Prison Planet TV

Infowars.com Twitter

Alex Jones' Facebook

Infowars store

Comment: A device originally confirmed not to contain any explosive material has now morphed into a deadly bomb that was just about to explode. Are you scared yet?

Duncan Gardham
London Telegraph
Nov 4, 2010

*

PREVIOUS

 

No U.S. Commercial or Private Plane left Yemen to the U.S. over last 48 hours; Yemeni Official

 

A Yemeni official told Yemen Post that no U.S. cargo aircraft of any American company flew out of Yemen over the last 48 hours.

 

Suspicious Package to U.S. not from Yemen; Yemenia Air Cargo Director

 

Mohammed al-Shaibah, Air Cargo Director for Yemenia Airways said to Yemen Post, “No UPS cargo plane left Yemeni lands over the land 48 hours. These accusations are false and baseless.”

 

UAE rejects US claims on Flight 201

 

The United Arab Emirates’ Civil Aviation Authority has rejected claims that a US-bound Emirates’ flight from Dubai contained “suspicious” parcels from Yemen.

 

Pat-Downs May Soon Become Norm At Airports

 

Friday’s UPS scare is prompting increased security measures at the nation’s airports. That could include newly introduced pat-down procedures.

 

Obama ‘Fake Terror’ Alert Story Hits #1 on Google

 

Efforts to warn the population that the Obama Administration, like the Bush Administration before it, has engaged in issuing fake terror alerts has gone viral, with the search term “fake terror” reaching #1 on Google Trends. It is yet another success in the Infowar, initiated on the Alex Jones Show.

 

Obama Issues Fake Terror Alert On Eve Of Elections

 

As we predicted on four separate occasions would happen, the Obama White House has deliberately contrived a fake terror scare on the eve of the mid-term elections in an effort to subdue the rampaging political appetite for anti-big government candidates that threatens to sweep aside establishment incumbents next week.


[ We ourselves from the onset suspected as no doubt  the majority of people that the  pretended cry  Wolf! wolf! on the prowl would be most unfortunate because in the long run a true threat will never be believed.   The first spot on ITV NEWS at 10pm on Sunday 31st October shows how important it is to the NEW WORLD ORDER enthusiasts for the supposed bomb threat to be given as much prominence as possible . No doubt the PRESS will also do their part and  give equal prominence to this more than possible BIG LIE!    Regrettably ,there will be many people who have no computer to research the news coverage and will be unable to learn the TRUTH.  ]

 

LATEST!

 

 

FEATURED STORIES ARCHIVE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

WHAT IF ALL EU LAWS PASSED BY PARLIAMENT AND APPROVED BY HER MAJESTY ARE INVALID BECAUSE AGAINST THE LAW OF THE LAND.

Christopher Story of International Currency Review

www.worldreports.org

 

THE IDEA OF A SINISTER GLOBAL ELITE CONTROLLING EVENTS HAS LONG BEEN THE STUFF OF CONSPIRACY THEORIES-[AND WITH MUCH JUSTIFICATION].

*

DEATH OF PATRIOTISM

by

Leo McKinstry

 

THE NAZI INTERNATIONAL  PLAN IS BROUGHT INTO THE OPEN.

No 3

(Christopher Story of International Currency Review)

www.worldreports.org

 

DO YOU KNOW?

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

www.edwardharle.com

 

WHY CAN'T WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH

WHY NO TREATY LIMITATIONS CAN EVER RELIED ON

67% WANT POWERS RETURNED FROM THE EU

THE SOUL OF ENGLAND

How many people work for the European Union?

The ANSWER is NOT as stated in the EU pamphlet and blazed about by the Government minister Denis MacShane and the Independent which SHOULD KNOW BETTER.]

 

Hurrah for Libertas!

 

eurofacts:-5th September,2008

DAVID OWEN

DEVON

eurofacts

No:89

5th September, 2008

Review by Ian Milne

of 'The Triumph of the Political Class'

by

Peter Oborne.

 

DID YOU KNOW?

No 8

(Christopher Story of International Currency Review)

IS HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN SOVEREIGN?

Under Article 17 of the collectivist Maastricht treaty , all residents of the European Union are citizens of the EU Collective.  It follows that Presidents and Monarchs are 'citizens of the

EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE

www.worldreports.org

WHY THE QUEEN MUST STAND UP TO BLAIR & BROWN

I SAY WE MUST NOT JOIN EUROPE-MONTGOMERY

WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY?

LAST DAYS OF BRITAIN

GERMAN-NAZI-GEOPOLITICAL CENTRE

ESTABLISHED

IN MADRID IN 1943

By

HEINRICH HIMMLER

 

 

PETITIONS TO NO10

DEMANDING A REFERENDUM ON EU

It is time the EUROSCEPTIC factions created a WAR COMMITTEE united under one LEADER.

As we have stated on many occasions in the past the Eurosceptic organisations are without a War Committee led by a General such as Sir Michael Rose -ex SAS command who would be the pivot point of the entire Eurosceptic opinion in the country.

 

POLITICAL COURAGE IS NOT AMONG THE QUEEN'S MANY VIRTUES.

PART of EXTRACT

from

WHO KILLED BRITAIN

by

A. N. Wilson

 

SLY OLD FOX-ARCHITECT OF EU CONSTITUTION - SUGGESTS SPECIAL TERMS FOR BRITAIN.

'I fear the Frenchman even  though he offer gifts'.

THEY never give up.  THEY they can't afford to because without Britain the cost to the German engine driver and French fireman of the EU Collective Express would topple the EU.

 

THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND by WINSTON CHURCHILL

THOUGHTS ON ST GEORGE'S DAY WHO ARE THE ENGLISH

OUR QUEEN & EU CONSTITUTION

THREE PARTIES HAVE MORE IN COMMON WITH EACH OTHER

THE END OF TRUTH - HOW WE CAME TO LOSE OUR CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY

 

THE EXECUTIVE IS TOO STRONG-THE LEGISLATURE TOO WEAK.

*

The views of the majority of the people of our country are ignored

 

Why our English Self-Government is unique in Europe and the World.

As one of many who attended the Collegiate Church of Saint Mary in Warwick for the Funeral Service of The Rt. Hon. J. Enoch Powell (1912-1998) it was a great honour to be present with many to hear of the life of one of our nations great Patriots.

 

THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED?

*

Gordon Brown states before a packed Parliament that it has now signed six

EU TREATIES

so

A REFERENDUM is NOT NECESSARY

WELL! -HE IS WRONG! 

SIGNS OF THE EU POLICE STATE

BRITAIN & EUROPE-THE GREAT CONSPIRACY

A GERMANISED EMPIRE IN THE MAKING

NAZI INTERNATIONAL IN 2007

THE WAY WE ARE?

Over our long history we have rarely made a mistake of colossal magnitude such as our foreign affairs with the American colonies in the 18th century and the question of Ireland which is still not completely settled after over 400 years.

BUT IN JUNE 2008 THE ENGLISH PEOPLE WERE BETRAYED BY QUEEN-COMMONS and LORDS.

THE EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE AS 'THE NEW EUROPEAN SOVIET

Christopher Story of International Currency Review

wwww.worldreports.org

 

The CORONATION OATH ACT of 1688

declares

OATH TAKEN for the PURPOSE of MAINTAINING our SPIRITUAL and CIVIL RIGHTS.

Can the QUEEN veto the New EU Treaty?

'YES!'

 

AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED

HOW a  supposed FREE PRESS failed to FIGHT FOR YOUR FREEDOM.

But are they finally gradually moving towards greater disclosure of the iniquities of the EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE?

OUR VERDICT IS THEY HAVE AS YET ONLY PUT THE TIP OF THEIR TOE INTO THE REVOLTING CREATURE.

BRITAIN & EUROPE -THE CULTURE OF DECEIT by CHRISTOPHER BOOKER

GERMANY AS STRONGMAN OF EUROPE

50 YEARS of SURRENDER by CHRISTOPHER BOOKER

ALMOST 70% OF BRITONS WOULD EITHER LEAVE THE EU OR LOOSER RELATIONSHIP

Latest!

AUGUST-08

TOP TOPICS

PAST TOP TOPICS

[2003-2007]

BULLETIN FILE

'ODESSA FILE'

Author supports Mr Ganley

Irish Millionaire's

'NO VOTE'

Letter to eurofacts -17th October, 2008

 

THE END OF THE ENGLISH

INTRODUCTION

HOW IT ALL BEGAN 

HOW IT ALL FITS TOGETHER

THE RESULTANT LUNACIES

HOW WE ARE CONTROLLED

WHERE FREEDOM IS VANISHING

ENGLAND

is where the MAJORITY VIEWS are IGNORED and MINORITIES RULE at THEIR EXPENSE in POLITICALLY-CORRECT BLAIRDOM.

IT IS TIME TO FIGHT BACK

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HOME