BRITISHNESS IS DEAD! NEW LABOUR KILLED IT!
AND NOW THEY WISH TO KILL ENGLISHNESS AND THEY HAVE ALMOST
It is often stated that
what occurs in the USA finally arrives in our country
whether for good or evil. At present in the land which was
once termed the land of the FREE there is a beginning of
another REVOLUTION and it is happening in TEXAS and no doubt
in many other states . There is an opinion about that
America will eventually split in to six parts but it is more
likely to be much greater.
What is causing this revolt against the
Federal Government -it is the usurpation of the 'Rights and
Liberties of Englishmen' which was the clarion cry of many
future Americans in the days before their Declaration of
Independence. The insurgents fighting for their freedom and
liberty realised that though the English had a
despotic King they were a free people as 'the three
centuries of struggle against executive despotism, the
ENGLISH PARLIAMENT was the only legislative body of the
European state system which was able to survive and develop.
Beginning with the issue of Magna Carta (1215), the Petition
of Rights (1628), the Habeas Corpus Act (1679), and
continuing by means of depositions and executions of kings
and a CIVIL WAR between the KING and PARLIAMENT. the English
freed themselves from executive despotism and sealed their
victory by the BILL OF RIGHTS of 1689 which established
PARLIAMENTARY SUPREMACY and a JUDICIARY free EXECUTIVE
The American Revolution of 1776, a revolt
from an executive according to the Declaration of
Independence, combined with the Glorious Revolution of 1688,
executive tyranny, made possible the free institutions of
the United States and the British Commonwealth of Nations,
and furnished an impressive example and methodology for the
rest of mankind. Truly these revolutions fired the
shot that was heard around the world. LIBERTY and DEMOCRACY
were on the march, and men in the process of becoming free
in their own name and able to determine their OWN DESTINY.
When we now fast-forward to the year 2009
well over 200 years later what does one find?
In England all those
Rights and Liberties of Englishmen'
which the American colonists insisting on being their RIGHTS
been usurped by the traitorous actions of THE QUEEN and the
traitorous majority in PARLIAMENT and an inactive JUDICIARY. Should
there be in the future any accountability for their heinous
TREASON they ought to remember that in England's past the
Lord Chief Justice [Lord Chief Justice Finch] fled the
country fearing the anger of the Long Parliament . Earlier
in 1629 he refused to read the REMONSTRANCE against tunnage
and poundage after the king's message for the adjournment of
Parliament had been delivered. A tumult occurred, during
which the Speaker [Finch] was held down in his chair. He was
known as "an unprincipled lawyer and time-serving minister".
Well we have a lot of those in the present Parliament over
the past decade and today in May 2009. It will not be enough for them to say they
were unable to prevent it happening. In Nazi Germany a
number of judges resigned rather than serve Hitler - some
even gave their lives. We have heard of no English
Judges resigning because of their TREASON to the Oaths taken
by THE QUEEN and HER MINISTERS by all
concerned to protect the CONSTITUTION. Of course they will
point to a secretive attachment to a Bill in 1998 when they
were covertly removed from their fear of TREASON but that
attachment to the TREATY is a TREASON itself because it is
THE PEOPLE by REFERENDUM who are to decide the fate of THEIR
FREEDOMS- CONSTITUTION and THEIR COUNTRY.
We had a
BRITAIN which Mr Trevor Phillips remembers but he
conveniently forgets that under NEW LABOUR there is now a
SCOTTISH PARLIAMENT with its wish for INDEPENDENCE and a
WALES ASSEMBLY which is not prepared to wait too long for
its NATIONAL INDEPENDENCE. So as you all can see we
are now no better but in fact in a worse situation than were
the American colonists in 1776 as shortly if the
LISBON TREATY is
ratified at the year's end there will not be an integral
ENGLAND and in fact the very name ENGLAND does not appear on
the EU map and much of its territory then
REGIONS will be
controlled by continental countries.
Trevor Phillips keeps going on about
BRITISHNESS because in his chats with Gordon Brown who is
continuingly harping on about it needs a cover for the
demolition of ENGLAND - its ENGLISH CONSTITUTION and the LAND
of ENGLAND which will not exist neither will there exist the
ENGLISH CHANNEL in name. At least the
 concurs with
encouraging Englishness. If Trevor Phillips was around
ENGLAND before and over the war years of 1939-46 he would
hardly if ever hear the word BRITAIN or BRITISHNESS and at a
time when we were ALL united the word used by FRIENDS and
FOE was ENGLAND. Hitler used it! The
America President Roosevelt used it! and almost everyone
amongst the millions of visitors to our shores then and now
still use it!. It has been stated by a number of
journalists that a number of Scottish newspaper proprietors
shortly before the war and after had a habit of changing the word ENGLISH for BRITISH. Of course we had the BATTLE OF BRITAIN
the greater loss of property and lives lost was
the word England embraced the nation states of the then United Kingdom of Great
We ourselves in the
AIMS of the PARTY mention a
GREATER BRITAIN but of a FAMILY of INDEPENDENT NATION
STATES. This as we all know since 1998 has now been obliterated
by Tony Blair and Gordon Brown.
Returning to the situation today in 2009
in America but particularly in the STATE of TEXAS a silent
REVOLUTION is taking place with a PATRIOT as determined as
his forebears were in 1776 and who is campaigning for a return
to the letter and spirit of the AMERICAN CONSTITUTION which has been usurped by the PATRIOT
ACT a name which Americans everywhere consider synonymous
with SLAVERY. It has decimated their RIGHTS under the
CONSTITUTION to a point that they the PEOPLE are treated by
the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT as the ENGLISH are treated by their
TRAITOROUS GOVERNMENT as SERFS.
In 17th century ENGLAND Sir John Elliot
who was the recognised leader of the constitutional party .
In 1627 Elliot was one of those who with Hampton and
Wentworth refused to contribute towards the forced loan
levied by the CROWN, and was imprisoned in the Gate House.
In the Parliament of 1628 he was again foremost in the
attack on ROYAL GOVERNMENT, and bore a chief share in
drawing up the REMONSTRANCE and PETITION of RIGHT. On
the dissolution of the PARLIAMENT he was imprisoned in the
TOWER (March 1629) In spite of his application for a
habeas corpus, HE WAS NOT RELEASED. He was kept in
confinement, and his health was broken by the harsh
treatment he received, and ,on NOv,27, 1632, HE DIED. During
his imprisonment he wrote a treatise called Monarchy of
Men, which embodied his views on the theory of
constitutional monarchy. Elliot was one of the
ablest as well as the most estimable of the popular leaders
of CHARLES I.s reign. "Great as his intellectual
powers were," says Mr Gardiner, "it was not by mere
force of intellect that he won his way to distinction.
It was the moral nature of the man, his utter
self-forgetfulness, which made him what he was."
We have given these details above as what
follows is taken from his work and is in the pages of
Presidential Government in the United States -The
Unwritten Constitution by PROFESSOR C. PERRY PATTERSON
(1947). AS the book is a learned work we use every
opportunity to take its learned work to develop our thesis
on the present dire constitutional situation in the USA and
in ENGLAND in 2009.
'THERE IS an
ETERNAL STRUGGLE between LIBERTY and AUTHORITY. MAN loves
BOTH. THE STATE is the personification of AUTHORITY.
LIBERTY is always at a DISADVANTAGE in this STRUGGLE because
those EXERCISING AUTHORITY have the POWER of the STATE to
SUPPORT THEM. LIBERTY is INDIVIDUALISTIC in its nature
and DEPENDS on the RESOURCES of the INDIVIDUAL for its
PRESERVATION in the normal course of events while AUTHORITY
is a COLLECTIVISTIC FORCE representing SOCIETY as a WHOLE.
It is not DIFFICULT to see why EXECUTIVES who as HEADS of
STATE are in a STRATEGIC POSITION to us FORCE to SUPPORT
their AUTHORITY constitute a difficult PROBLEM in the
CONSTRUCTION of POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS. The VERDICT of
HISTORY lays the WRECKAGE of POLITICAL INSTITUTIONS at THEIR
DOOR. OUR forefathers were keenly SENSITIVE to
the DANGERS of EXECUTIVE POWER. James Wilson of
PENNSYLVANIA, a DELEGATE to the FEDERAL CONVENTION, a MEMBER
of the RATIFYING CONVENTION in PENNSYLVANIA, and later a
MEMBER of the SUPREME COURT of the UNITED STATES, in
speaking of the CONSTRUCTION of the PRESIDENCY, called it "THE
MOST DIFFICULT PART OF IT.
In the year 1836 there was a TEXAS
Revolution and there is the beginnings of one again in 2009.
They have a leader with millions joining his banner who has
been able to put his message of the protection of THEIR
CONSTITUTION which had been almost disabled by George Bush
with his treasonable PATRIOT ACT and we will have to
see if President Obama will join Senator Ron Paul in the
fight to reclaim the compliance to the letter and
spirit of the Constitution of the United States of America
which has been undermined by many presidents since Woodrow
Wilson who after signing the FEDERAL RESERVE ACT in 1913
which gave International Bankers -a cartel and interest in
the bank later realised the enormous power placed with those
bankers regretted his action and history has proved him
right as events of the past two years have witnessed..
Will President Obama join with
Senator Ron Paul in order to reclaim their Constitution
which has been overruled by the President -the Congress and
most importantly the SUPREME COURT of the UNITED STATES OF
AMERICA. The president has the power to decide who
will become a member of the Supreme Court and is therefore
able to ensure that his policies are followed and as his
predecessors have made sure that they will comply he knows
the POWER is in HIS HANDS. The signs do not look
hopeful as it is surmised that President Obama is but a
figurehead on behalf of the NEW WORLD ORDER and the
ILLUMINATI who now control the USA of which there is an
abundance of information and video's on our website for you
all to view.
In 1791 our greatest parliamentarian of
the 18th century Edmund Burke in 1791 said that the
Americans in the revolution against England had stood "in
the same relation to England, as England did to King James
the Second in 1688."
In 2009 there is still a similarity
between the people's revolution in the USA against their
CONGRESS - SUPREME COURT and PRESIDENT for usurping their
CONSTITUTION and in ENGLAND against the traitorous
QUEEN -PRIME MINISTER and PARLIAMENT and the JUDICIARY
usurping the ENGLISH CONSTITUTION. Both are attacks on
the RIGHTS and LIBERTIES of THE PEOPLE and destroying THEIR
What we find so alarming is that a
great number of influential people particularly
prominent journalists are ignoring what is happening to the
'Rights and Liberties of Englishmen' and appear to be aiding
and abetting the treason of QUEEN and PARLIAMENT.
We can only conclude that they are more interested in
keeping their well-paid jobs and care not a wit for the
PEOPLE'S RIGHTS. Those in earlier
days who gave warning of what was to happen are now silent.
At least in the USA there is a FREEDOM MOVEMENT gathering
momentum but in ENGLAND only a sole voice or two are heard.
The 'FREE PRESS' is a misnomer
and though we now see some articles which were no doubt
VERBOTEN in the past they know that by the year's end the
LISBON TREATY will be ratified and ENGLISH LIBERTIES and the
very name ENGLAND will be lost because of the inaction and
cowardly behaviour of many who consider themselves ENGLISH
but who are too timid and forgetful about those countless
millions who have given their lives in defence of ENGLAND
since its conception over 1500 years ago. We have to
say that we are greatly disappointed at the lack of UNITY by
those who have expressed their wish to SAVE THEIR COUNTRY
but their so-called leaders have only their minds on the
power game and will not UNIFY and take positive action and
less talking which is the only way to SAVE OUR CONSTITUTION
WE WANT A REVOLUTION WILL YOU JOIN US?
Well! if past experience has anything
to go by there will not be any response whatsoever.
But it can never be said that there was no Englishman who
would not put his head above the parapet and fight on for a
CLAIM OF RIGHT for the forfeiture of the Crown of
England against the traitorous Monarch and the majority of
members of PARLIAMENT.
[ TO BE CONTINUED]
word underlined has a separate bulletin]