ENGLISH DEMOCRATIC PARTY.ORG UK.

EDP

 

BULLETINS & VIEWERS FROM ACROSS THE WORLD

Established 1994-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links - Archive-Top Topics and Stats

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-1994-Official Website-2016-June-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

 

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

 

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

 

JULY 23 FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2016

 

EST.1944

-Elections 1997 - and EU election 1999-  POLICIES -Speech -1000's of Links - Archive-

CHRISTIAN HERITAGE

Top Topics and Stats

IMMIGRATION

PART-1-2-3-4-5-6-7-June-1994-EDP-Official Website-2016-June-PART-8-9-10-11-12 -13-14

BREXIT

BUT NOT OUT OF THE EU FOR 2/3 YEARS. IT IS A TRAVESTY OF JUSTICE. ALL EU TREATIES WERE OBTAINED BY

 BRIBERY AND TREASON

AND FRAUD WHICH UNDER THE 1969 VIENNA CONVENTION ON TREATIES MAKES THEM.

NULL AND VOID.

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-2016

JULY 23-FREEDOM NOW-PART 1-2016

JULY 23 FREEDOM NOW-PART 2-2016

JULY 30-2016

H.F.200A-FREEDOM NOW

 

 PART 2

(-ADDITIONAL UPDATED HOME PAGE-FEBRUARY-2017)

 

 -1994 -Official Website-2017 -

 

 

POLICIES!

 [END OF PAGE]

 

 
 

 

WHO WILL SPEAK FOR

 ENGLAND

 

 DAILY MAIL COMMENT

 

PART 1

 

TODAY the Mail asks a question of profound significance to our destiny as a sovereign nation and the fate of our children and grandchildren.

Who will speak for England?

It's a question inspired  by one of the most dramatic moments in the history of Parliamentary democracy.

The date was September 2, 1939, the day after Hitler invaded Poland. Tory PM Neville Chamberlain had just made an ambivalent statement to the House.

On his backbenches, anti-appeasement stalwart Leo Amery was incensed. As Labour's deputy leader Arthur Greenwood rose to reply for the Opposition, the Tory MP bellowed across the floor:

SPEAK FOR ENGLAND

And Greenwood did just that, voicing anger over the premier's reluctance to honour Britain's treaty obligations to Poland.  Bowing to the mood of the House, Chamberlain

DECLARED WAR ON HITLER THE NEXT DAY.

Nobody is suggesting there are any parallels whatever between the

NAZIS AND THE EU

Indeed, the Mail would argue that one of the Union's great achievements, along with NATO, has been to foster peace in Europe.

But as in 1939, we are at a crossroads in our island history. For oin perhaps as little as 20 weeks 'time, voters will be asked to decide nothing less than what sort of country we want to live in and bequeath to those who come after us.

Are we to be a self-governing nation to control our borders, strike trade agreements with whomever we choose and

DISMISS OUR RULERS AND LAWMAKERS IF THEY DISPLEASE US?

Or will our LIBERTY-SECURITY and PROSPERITY be better assured by submitting to a

STATIST-UNELECTED-BUREAUCRACY IN BRUSSELS

accepting the will of

UNACCOUNTABLE JUDGES

and linking

OUR DESTINY

with that of a sclerotic Europe that tries to achieve the impossible by uniting countries as diverse as

 GERMANY and GREECE.

For make no mistake. After the failure of Mr Cameron's renegotiations-and this week's draft deal shows there's no other word for it than

FAILURE,

since it changes

NOTHING

of any substance in our relationship with the EU

-this is the stark choice facing us in the coming REFERENDUM

For months, we have been bombarded with propaganda from one side: the side that speaks for

BRUSSELS.

In a brilliantly organised campaign,

BIG BUSINESS

UNIVERSITIES

'ELDER STATESMEN'

and the

CIVIL SERVICE

under the direction of its head,

Sir Cover-up' Jeremy Heywood-have been corralled into making the case that it would be a catastrophe if

BRITAIN left the EU.

Needless to say, their apocalyptic interventions have been zealously reported by the supposedly neutral BBC, that former champion of the disastrous EURO, which struggles for the

'OUT' camp

Meanwhile, the Conservative Party has thrown off all pretence of impartiality, proselytising for the EU in defiance of most of its rank-and-file members, who have grave doubts about Brussels.

More shamefully still, Eurosceptic ministers have been muzzled-banned from speaking on the most momentous issue of our time, even now that we know the [pathetic] terms Mr [Neville] Cameron is willing to accept'

As we report today, an edict has even gone out requiring all Cabinet ministers to filter their statements and quotes on Europe through Downing Street.

So we ask again: who will speak for England( and of course by

'England'

like Amery in 19389, we mean the whole of the United Kingdom)?

Full Article

 DAILY MAIL COMMENT

FOLLOW ON

PART 2

 

DAILY MAIL COMMENT: At last, we have voices to speak for

 ENGLAND

Earlier this month, the Mail asked on our front page:

 

 ENGLAND

WHO WILL SPEAK FOR

 

FEBRUARY 22-2016

 

*  *  *

DAILY MAIL COMMENT:

Don't treat us like fools over EU-rope

Friday April 8-2016

 
 

THE taxpayer-funded leaflet with which the Government hopes to persuade us to vote to remain in the EU raises many more questions than it answers.

The problem is that it presents as undoubted fact various assertions on which well-informed observers can arrive at precisely opposite conclusions.

TALKING of a REFORMED EU-ROPE

which  does not actually exist,

It says the UK has secured 'tough new restrictions on access to our welfare system for EU migrants

It  completely fails to mention that the EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT

has threatened to

VETO

 THIS

[INSIGNIFICANT]

CONCESSION

Nor does it mention that the disincentive to migrants these modest welfare restrictions would create is likely to be cancelled out by the

NEW LIVING WAGE.

David Cameron yesterday insisted that he makes no apology for spending 9.3 million of taxpayers' money on this leaflet campaign.

He added 'we are not neutral in this' -as if anyone imagined he was. But he needs to be careful.

Undecided voters realise there are

TWO SIDES to an ARGUMENT

 People can tell

 'one-sided propaganda'.

in

Michael Grove's words yesterday,

when they see it.

Some in the

LEAVE [THE EU] CAMP

say it is convenient for Mr Cameron this row has blown up at a moment his family's

TAX AFFAIRS HAVE COME UNDER SCRUTINY.

Although the formal 'purdah' period- when strict rules kick in on how much can be spent on

CAMPAIGNING

-is limited to the last 28 days before the

REFERENDUM

the

ELECTORAL COMMISSION

has advised that there should be no major intervention by GOVERNMENT after APRIL 15-ten weeks before.

EUROSCEPTICS BELIEVE THIS IS WHY THE LEAFLET IS BEING DISTRIBUTED

NOW!

The liberal Dutch have just held a referendum in which they voted, in what is seen as a deeply eurosceptic move, against an EU trade treaty with the Ukraine.

THE PM NEEDS TO REMEMBER THAT ACROSS EU-ROPE, THE PEOPLE DO NOT LIKE TO BE TREATED AS FOOLS BY AN EVER MORE ELITIST POLITICAL CLASS.

 

Full Article

H.F.743

 

    Daily Mail

     

     

     

     

    THE DOMINIC LAWSON

    COLUMN

     

     

     Cameron and the lie that's festered .for 45 years.

     

    HOW THE PEOPLE OF ENGLAND WERE BETRAYED IN 1972 AND 1975-AND THE

     CON PARTY

    ARE STILL LYING IN 2016

     

    As Mr  Lawson has stated so aptly: