|
|
|||||||||||||
*DON’T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY THE DEADLY SILENCE?
Once
again we are all made aware of our own thoughts which we are unable to express
because of the scourge of Political Correctness by the timely article in Saturday’s Daily Mail by Max
Hastings which
exposes the dangers which have taken place because of the unlimited immigration policy
of the present Government. * * ‘
Millions
of moderate Britons – deeply worried that limitless immigration is destroying
their Nation’s Identity – are cowed into silence by the Left who argue that any
discussion of this subject is racist. –What Nonsense!’ ‘I
think of myself as a one-nation Tory, a social liberal’, says Mr Max
Hastings. ‘ I applauded Margaret
Thatcher’s resurrection of the enterprise culture, deplored her indifference to
the poor, favour Europe but not today the Euro, mistrust the police, loath
capital punishment, want grammar schools restored and support university top-up
fees’. * * * In Modern Britain,
all these matters are contentious, but we can argue about them anywhere. There
is one issue, however, about which all public exchanges are muted, stifled. The
Left has driven debate on
Immigration underground. It
brandishes above the heads of every opponent of large-scale increases in the
population of this Island that most terrible of charges
– Racism. And that threat
works.
Even
the Conservative party, desperate to recover Power, holds back from assaulting
the Government on its deplorable record, for fear of unleashing the wrath of
the Liberal media. The worst legacy of Enoch Powell’s ravings in the Sixties
is that they made it
impossible ever since to hold a rational debate in Britain about
Immigration. Figures published this week show that the non-white population of London has topped two million, almost double the figure of a decade ago. Britain’s capital has become a Bable, as anyone who rides on a Tube or Bus perceives in a moment, among passengers drawn from dozens of Nationalities. Enthusiasts such as London Mayor –Ken Livingston applaud
the’ richness and diversity’ this creates. They speak of immigrants’ priceless
contribution to the ‘London buzz’, rivalling the melting pot of New York.
Livingston welcomes the inflow of immigrants, who account for almost a third of his city’s
population. ‘ Our poll shows that nearly eight out of ten
Londoners think that the city’s cultural diversity is one of its most
attractive features’, he says. This may be true, but Mr Livingston fail to add
that 80% of British poll respondents also wants more effective control of Immigration.
And
the truth is that the real number of Immigrants in London is higher than the
official figure, because so many illegal residents avoid censuses.
For
instance, the latest survey records 45,000 people from the whole South American
continent in London, yet the Columbian embassy believes Britain is hosting
150,000 of its citizens alone.
We know that more than 250,000 immigrants and asylum seekers are
arriving here each year creating a net population increase of more than two
million a decade.
The Home Secretary, ‘Billy’ Blunkett believes this does not matter.
Last month, he said on TV that he perceives no particular upper limit at which
the number of immigrants arriving in Britain would become un acceptable.
Some economists argue that immigration is not only essential to provide
a 21st century work force for Britain when its population is ageing
and the birth rate falling.
We shall return to the economic issue later, let us address first the
Social one.
Politics
is an ongoing debate about what kind of Britain we all wish to live in. It is a
wholly legitimate part of this debate to consider which outsiders should not be
admitted to the privilege of joining our society.
The Left argues that anyone opposed to large –scale immigration is,
ipso facto, a racist. This is nonsense.
No country in the modern world can close its doors to all comers, and
few sensible people wish to do so.
But
it is entirely reasonable for any citizen to believe, and to exercise a right
to declare publicly, that he or she wishes to live in a community dominated
by people who share our historic culture and values.
It
is plainly racist to object to the presence in Britain of any given individual
merely because of their colour or creed.
It
is not racist to argue that we must set limits upon how many people of alien
cultures or creeds can enter Britain within a given time span without imposing
intolerable strains on our society.
At
a time when housing the British people is a crisis issue for this overcrowded
Island, Sir Andrew Green’s Migration watch (the independent organisation set up
to monitor immigration policy) estimates that an additional 1.1 million new
homes will be
needed simply to provide roofs for immigrants
The Government’s arguments about Britain’s urgent need for immigrant
labour seem spurious. It
is indeed possible that, 20 years from now, we shall want workers. We do not need them now.
Young workers arriving in
2003 will already be ageing by the time even the most pessimistic labour
studies perceive a real need for their services.
Given
the desire of many British people to keep working past retirement age, even if
we shall no longer be capable of heaving bricks on building sites, the need for
immigrant labour a generation hence remains highly speculative.
So
why does the Government continue to admit legal immigrants in increasing
numbers and to make no serious effort to exclude illegal immigrants and
asylum seekers.
First, on the issue of asylum seekers, ministers
perceive themselves bowing to the inevitable. The physical difficulties of
keeping them out are enormous because Britain has abandoned effective frontier
controls. The Government absolutely refuses to contemplate
abrogating the half-century Human Rights Conventions as a preliminary to
effective action. These are failures for which Ministers should be harshly
judged if or when a major terrorist atrocity takes place in Britain. Thanks
to the reckless abdication of responsibility, the authorities no longer possess
reliable knowledge of movements across our borders by terrorists, never mind
immigrants.
Second, a
deep-rooted instinct in favour of
Immigration pervades the Labour benches of the House of Commons.
The liberal media almost daily highlight examples of
asylum seekers who have allegedly been victimised by the Immigration
authorities and threatened with expulsion to persecution in their home
countries.
The traditional socialist view is that
immigration is a good thing, which makes Britain a more diverse and vigorous
society, and that better any number of illegal immigrants than for us to
renounce our historic role as a sanctuary for the oppressed. Unfortunately, the ranks of the allegedly oppressed
around the world today include millions of economic migrants who simply want a
better life.
The facility with which even the poorest people in the world can travel
renders the old liberal open-door vision utterly unrealistic.
It
is impossible for the rich democracies to accept all those who yearn to come
and live in them. It was a reckless act by Tony Blair for which he deserves
to face the political pillory to grant a right to work in Britain to 72
million citizens of the new European members of the EU.
I asked a Polish friend the other day about the mood in his country.
‘They are all just aching to leave,’ he answered laconically.
‘The moment they become EU members, the floodgates
will open.’
It is not a reflection of paranoia to suggest a further
reason for: Labour’s inertia about Mass Immigration: it promises a political
windfall. It plays a significant part in fulfilling Tony Blair’s
long declared aspiration to change the face of Britain forever. Very few newcomers to Britain are likely to vote Tory,
to embrace the old middle –class values which those cafetiere new- agers Blair
and Brown so despire. For many years, immigrants will be instinctive Labour
supporters, just as new arrivals in the US almost always become Democrats. I do not suggest that Tony Blair welcomes immigrants to
gain political advantage. I merely submit that his Government is not making any
serious attempt to exclude them, partly because their coming is good news for
his Party. A year or two ago, I was teasing an old friend, a former Cabinet
Minister of famously liberal convictions. What would his attitude be today, I
asked, if he had to address the issue of Immigration? His answer surprised me. ‘ I don’t feel comfortable about seeing large
numbers of People coming to live in this country that not only do not share our
values, but have not the slightest desire to do so.’ he said. Here, in a nutshell, is the view of a great many of us.
I was amazed to hear it articulated by a legendary liberal, even if he would
have flinched from saying as much in public.
Here, I think is the heaviest charge against the Government and its
acolytes. Far from encouraging immigrants to espouse our
Traditional Values, Labour has fostered the pernicious cause of multi-
culturism.
It has encouraged the view that anybody who comes to
Britain can bring with them and establish in Hounslow or Reading or Coventry or
Newcastle their own bit of India or Pakistan, Africa or Caribbean. This is the
bit that sticks in the throats of millions of British People. Nobody expects
the new arrivals, straight off the boat, will tuck into bed with Jane Austen or
be able to recite within weeks a list of Marlborough’s battlefield triumphs
over the French.
Yet it seems a wholly proper indeed essential, message to give to
immigrants who come to Britain that they are welcome here if they come to share
our lives, but not if they want to make a corner of England forever Bombay or
Dhaka
It is monstrous that some English children have to learn Urdu in
schools.
It is repugnant that the Labour Party
Appears willing in the name of multi-culturalism, to extend a tolerance
to forced arranged marriages and the ritual slaughter of animals, which it
denies to foxhunting. Multi-Culturism does a huge disservice to immigrants
themselves. Norman Tebbit’s suggested ‘cricket test’ was much derided and
indeed abused when he proposed it. His choose of words was ugly. But he made a Fundamental
point that cannot be dismissed: the way to make immigration acceptable to the
huge majority of British people, whose country this is, is to encourage immigrants
to assimilate. National and social identities are precious possessions, which
need reinforcement, not suppression. If immigrants don’t want to celebrate Guy Fawkes’ Day
or read the Canterbury Tales in school, then they might care to think of living
somewhere else. Of course, schools, institutions and public services must recognise the cultural and language problems of new immigrants. They should, however, be pursuing policies directed towards social integration, not
Separation.
On
current trends, within a few years, children from ethnic minorities will
outnumber whites in London’s schools.
‘White
flight’ will accelerate this development, as the middle classes leave boroughs
such as Southwark, Ealing, and Lambeth in search of lives for themselves and
their children among what they perceive as ‘their own kind’ in other parts of
the countryside. Tony Blair’s Government is lying to the British People
by suggesting that 250’000 immigrants a year is an acceptable or remotely
desirable number if the stability and coherence of our society are to be
maintained.
The
only consequence of an influx on such a scale must be to increase popular
resentment and hostility towards those who come.
Whatever
Ken Livingston’s pollsters may tell him, millions of people remain determinedly
English, children of the culture of Dickens and Trollope, Wellington at
Waterloo and chocolate digestive biscuits.
Our
London is – or was the City of Pepys and Pygmalion. The latest London
Population survey is bad news not because many of the city’s new immigrants are
bad people or unworthy citizens, but because their numbers have changed the
character of the Capital without its Historic inhabitants being consulted about
whether they wanted to live in an ‘exciting cultural melting pot’. Immigration and its consequences should be at the
forefront of political argument because they are matters of deep concern to
millions of voters.
AS
it is, however, when the LEFT is ready to attack even the excellent work of Sir
Andrew Green’s Migrationwatch as a reflection of racism, many people feel
obliged to vent their dismay and anger only behind closed doors. The
sooner the newly revived Conservative Party works out a policy on Immigration
(and no more plans to invite mockery such as processing asylum seekers on
off-shore islands, please Mr Howard) then the better for the health of the body
politic.
We are not, thank goodness with ‘rivers of blood’ but we do face
profound changes in our society, which this Government has no mandate to
endorse. The British People care deeply about this, and are entitled to say so
without embarrassment.’
(End)
* * *
WHAT Tony Blair is allowing to happen is the eventual destruction of a
our Peoples Culture and way of life by permitting the influx of unlimited
immigration of those of alien culture with the sole purpose of changing the
character and culture of the indigenous People of our Island. During the Second World War the Nazi’s almost destroyed an entire race
whose origins where 3000 years in the past. The present means used by Mr Blair
have a similar purpose- the vanquishing of the way of life and culture of
Peoples who have existed in these Islands for over 1400 years by the flooding
in of millions of immigrants of an Alien Culture many of whom have no desire to
assimilate and who will in time wish to create many Foreign States within a
State.
The Nazi’s were able to almost achieve their objective because other
Nations failed to speak out and act to prevent such a Holocaust, and only the
victory of the Allies in the Second World War, saved many who would have
perished.
We hope our kin and friends throughout the world will voice their
protest at the attempt to annihilate a People by our Government’s obsession
with Political Correctness and Multi-Culturalism.
As already stated above there will always be a home for other Peoples
of all nationalities and creeds but their numbers must be controlled for the
benefit of ALL the People in our Island.
This will ensure the future cohesion of our Nation in the difficult and
dangerous years ahead.
* * *
[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets
* FINALLY REMEMBER!!!
*
*
* [Latest Addition - June07] * * *
*
Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU
* GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY WON'T HE TRUST YOU? * 67% want powers back from EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95% of British people want a REFERENDUM * FOR A REFERENDUM SIGN TODAY ON LINE * July 18-2007
VOTE -2007
WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE TO SET YOU FREE
THE UK INDEPENDENCE PARTY THE QUESTION THAT THE VOTER MUST ANSWER
‘DO YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE CORRUPT ,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND CORRUPT ALIEN BUSYBODY BRUSSELS’
-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?
TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER BUT SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES. *
ONLY WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE *
SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?
*
* [All underlined words have a separate bulletin]
|
|||||||||||||
|
The Soul of England pt I **** The Soul of England pt 2 **** Why are we English made to feel guilty? **** Don't let them destroy our Identity **** Nor shall my sword **** Why can't we have a right to be English ?- pt I **** Why can't we have a right to be English ? -pt 2 **** England is where the majority views are ignored and minorities rule at their expense in politically-correct Browndom **** Alfred - Christian King of the English-pt I **** Alfred - Christian King of the English -pt 2 **** Englishmen as others see us beyond our once oak wall **** England arise!-Today we can claim our right of self-determination. **** Kiss good bye to your sovereignty and country **** St George's Day-England's Day **** The Spirit of England by Winston Churchill. *
ALSO
FOR
RETURN TO *
|
