DON’T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY
THE DEADLY SILENCE?
again we are all made aware of our own thoughts which we are unable to express
because of the scourge of Political Correctness by the timely article in Saturday’s Daily Mail by Max
exposes the dangers which have taken place because of the unlimited immigration policy
of the present Government.
of moderate Britons – deeply worried that limitless immigration is destroying
their Nation’s Identity – are cowed into silence by the Left who argue that any
discussion of this subject is racist. –What Nonsense!’
think of myself as a one-nation Tory, a social liberal’, says Mr Max
Hastings. ‘ I applauded Margaret
Thatcher’s resurrection of the enterprise culture, deplored her indifference to
the poor, favour Europe but not today the Euro, mistrust the police, loath
capital punishment, want grammar schools restored and support university top-up
* * *
In Modern Britain,
all these matters are contentious, but we can argue about them anywhere. There
is one issue, however, about which all public exchanges are muted, stifled. The
Left has driven debate on
Immigration underground. It
brandishes above the heads of every opponent of large-scale increases in the
population of this Island that most terrible of charges
– Racism. And that threat
the Conservative party, desperate to recover Power, holds back from assaulting
the Government on its deplorable record, for fear of unleashing the wrath of
the Liberal media. The worst legacy of Enoch Powell’s ravings in the Sixties
is that they made it
impossible ever since to hold a rational debate in Britain about
Figures published this week show that the non-white
population of London has topped two million, almost double the figure of a
decade ago. Britain’s capital has become a Bable, as anyone who rides on a Tube or
Bus perceives in a moment, among passengers drawn from dozens of Nationalities.
Enthusiasts such as London Mayor –Ken Livingston applaud
the’ richness and diversity’ this creates. They speak of immigrants’ priceless
contribution to the ‘London buzz’, rivalling the melting pot of New York.
Livingston welcomes the inflow of immigrants, who account for almost a third of his city’s
‘ Our poll shows that nearly eight out of ten
Londoners think that the city’s cultural diversity is one of its most
attractive features’, he says. This may be true, but Mr Livingston fail to add
that 80% of British poll respondents also wants more effective control of Immigration.
the truth is that the real number of Immigrants in London is higher than the
official figure, because so many illegal residents avoid censuses.
instance, the latest survey records 45,000 people from the whole South American
continent in London, yet the Columbian embassy believes Britain is hosting
150,000 of its citizens alone.
We know that more than 250,000 immigrants and asylum seekers are
arriving here each year creating a net population increase of more than two
million a decade.
The Home Secretary, ‘Billy’ Blunkett believes this does not matter.
Last month, he said on TV that he perceives no particular upper limit at which
the number of immigrants arriving in Britain would become un acceptable.
Some economists argue that immigration is not only essential to provide
a 21st century work force for Britain when its population is ageing
and the birth rate falling.
We shall return to the economic issue later, let us address first the
is an ongoing debate about what kind of Britain we all wish to live in. It is a
wholly legitimate part of this debate to consider which outsiders should not be
admitted to the privilege of joining our society.
The Left argues that anyone opposed to large –scale immigration is,
ipso facto, a racist. This is nonsense.
No country in the modern world can close its doors to all comers, and
few sensible people wish to do so.
it is entirely reasonable for any citizen to believe, and to exercise a right
to declare publicly, that he or she wishes to live in a community dominated
by people who share our historic culture and values.
is plainly racist to object to the presence in Britain of any given individual
merely because of their colour or creed.
is not racist to argue that we must set limits upon how many people of alien
cultures or creeds can enter Britain within a given time span without imposing
intolerable strains on our society.
a time when housing the British people is a crisis issue for this overcrowded
Island, Sir Andrew Green’s Migration watch (the independent organisation set up
to monitor immigration policy) estimates that an additional 1.1 million new
homes will be
needed simply to provide roofs for immigrants
The Government’s arguments about Britain’s urgent need for immigrant
labour seem spurious.
is indeed possible that, 20 years from now, we shall want workers. We do not need them now.
Young workers arriving in
2003 will already be ageing by the time even the most pessimistic labour
studies perceive a real need for their services.
the desire of many British people to keep working past retirement age, even if
we shall no longer be capable of heaving bricks on building sites, the need for
immigrant labour a generation hence remains highly speculative.
why does the Government continue to admit legal immigrants in increasing
numbers and to make no serious effort to exclude illegal immigrants and
First, on the issue of asylum seekers, ministers
perceive themselves bowing to the inevitable. The physical difficulties of
keeping them out are enormous because Britain has abandoned effective frontier
The Government absolutely refuses to contemplate
abrogating the half-century Human Rights Conventions as a preliminary to
effective action. These are failures for which Ministers should be harshly
judged if or when a major terrorist atrocity takes place in Britain.
to the reckless abdication of responsibility, the authorities no longer possess
reliable knowledge of movements across our borders by terrorists, never mind
deep-rooted instinct in favour of
Immigration pervades the Labour benches of the House of Commons.
The liberal media almost daily highlight examples of
asylum seekers who have allegedly been victimised by the Immigration
authorities and threatened with expulsion to persecution in their home
The traditional socialist view is that
immigration is a good thing, which makes Britain a more diverse and vigorous
society, and that better any number of illegal immigrants than for us to
renounce our historic role as a sanctuary for the oppressed.
Unfortunately, the ranks of the allegedly oppressed
around the world today include millions of economic migrants who simply want a
The facility with which even the poorest people in the world can travel
renders the old liberal open-door vision utterly unrealistic.
is impossible for the rich democracies to accept all those who yearn to come
and live in them. It was a reckless act by Tony Blair for which he deserves
to face the political pillory to grant a right to work in Britain to 72
million citizens of the new European members of the EU.
I asked a Polish friend the other day about the mood in his country.
‘They are all just aching to leave,’ he answered laconically.
‘The moment they become EU members, the floodgates
It is not a reflection of paranoia to suggest a further
reason for: Labour’s inertia about Mass Immigration: it promises a political
It plays a significant part in fulfilling Tony Blair’s
long declared aspiration to change the face of Britain forever.
Very few newcomers to Britain are likely to vote Tory,
to embrace the old middle –class values which those cafetiere new- agers Blair
and Brown so despire.
For many years, immigrants will be instinctive Labour
supporters, just as new arrivals in the US almost always become Democrats.
I do not suggest that Tony Blair welcomes immigrants to
gain political advantage. I merely submit that his Government is not making any
serious attempt to exclude them, partly because their coming is good news for
his Party. A year or two ago, I was teasing an old friend, a former Cabinet
Minister of famously liberal convictions. What would his attitude be today, I
asked, if he had to address the issue of Immigration? His answer surprised me.
‘ I don’t feel comfortable about seeing large
numbers of People coming to live in this country that not only do not share our
values, but have not the slightest desire to do so.’ he said.
Here, in a nutshell, is the view of a great many of us.
I was amazed to hear it articulated by a legendary liberal, even if he would
have flinched from saying as much in public.
Here, I think is the heaviest charge against the Government and its
Far from encouraging immigrants to espouse our
Traditional Values, Labour has fostered the pernicious cause of multi-
It has encouraged the view that anybody who comes to
Britain can bring with them and establish in Hounslow or Reading or Coventry or
Newcastle their own bit of India or Pakistan, Africa or Caribbean. This is the
bit that sticks in the throats of millions of British People. Nobody expects
the new arrivals, straight off the boat, will tuck into bed with Jane Austen or
be able to recite within weeks a list of Marlborough’s battlefield triumphs
over the French.
Yet it seems a wholly proper indeed essential, message to give to
immigrants who come to Britain that they are welcome here if they come to share
our lives, but not if they want to make a corner of England forever Bombay or
It is monstrous that some English children have to learn Urdu in
It is repugnant that the Labour Party
Appears willing in the name of multi-culturalism, to extend a tolerance
to forced arranged marriages and the ritual slaughter of animals, which it
denies to foxhunting.
Multi-Culturism does a huge disservice to immigrants
themselves. Norman Tebbit’s suggested ‘cricket test’ was much derided and
indeed abused when he proposed it.
His choose of words was ugly. But he made a Fundamental
point that cannot be dismissed: the way to make immigration acceptable to the
huge majority of British people, whose country this is, is to encourage immigrants
to assimilate. National and social identities are precious possessions, which
need reinforcement, not suppression.
If immigrants don’t want to celebrate Guy Fawkes’ Day
or read the Canterbury Tales in school, then they might care to think of living
Of course, schools, institutions and public services
must recognise the cultural and language problems of new immigrants. They
should, however, be pursuing policies directed towards social integration,
current trends, within a few years, children from ethnic minorities will
outnumber whites in London’s schools.
flight’ will accelerate this development, as the middle classes leave boroughs
such as Southwark, Ealing, and Lambeth in search of lives for themselves and
their children among what they perceive as ‘their own kind’ in other parts of
Tony Blair’s Government is lying to the British People
by suggesting that 250’000 immigrants a year is an acceptable or remotely
desirable number if the stability and coherence of our society are to be
only consequence of an influx on such a scale must be to increase popular
resentment and hostility towards those who come.
Ken Livingston’s pollsters may tell him, millions of people remain determinedly
English, children of the culture of Dickens and Trollope, Wellington at
Waterloo and chocolate digestive biscuits.
London is – or was the City of Pepys and Pygmalion. The latest London
Population survey is bad news not because many of the city’s new immigrants are
bad people or unworthy citizens, but because their numbers have changed the
character of the Capital without its Historic inhabitants being consulted about
whether they wanted to live in an ‘exciting cultural melting pot’.
Immigration and its consequences should be at the
forefront of political argument because they are matters of deep concern to
millions of voters.
it is, however, when the LEFT is ready to attack even the excellent work of Sir
Andrew Green’s Migrationwatch as a reflection of racism, many people feel
obliged to vent their dismay and anger only behind closed doors.
sooner the newly revived Conservative Party works out a policy on Immigration
(and no more plans to invite mockery such as processing asylum seekers on
off-shore islands, please Mr Howard) then the better for the health of the body
We are not, thank goodness with ‘rivers of blood’ but we do face
profound changes in our society, which this Government has no mandate to
endorse. The British People care deeply about this, and are entitled to say so
* * *
WHAT Tony Blair is allowing to happen is the eventual destruction of a
our Peoples Culture and way of life by permitting the influx of unlimited
immigration of those of alien culture with the sole purpose of changing the
character and culture of the indigenous People of our Island.
During the Second World War the Nazi’s almost destroyed an entire race
whose origins where 3000 years in the past. The present means used by Mr Blair
have a similar purpose- the vanquishing of the way of life and culture of
Peoples who have existed in these Islands for over 1400 years by the flooding
in of millions of immigrants of an Alien Culture many of whom have no desire to
assimilate and who will in time wish to create many Foreign States within a
The Nazi’s were able to almost achieve their objective because other
Nations failed to speak out and act to prevent such a Holocaust, and only the
victory of the Allies in the Second World War, saved many who would have
We hope our kin and friends throughout the world will voice their
protest at the attempt to annihilate a People by our Government’s obsession
with Political Correctness and Multi-Culturalism.
As already stated above there will always be a home for other Peoples
of all nationalities and creeds but their numbers must be controlled for the
benefit of ALL the People in our Island.
This will ensure the future cohesion of our Nation in the difficult and
dangerous years ahead.
[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets
of London is governed by the Illuminati-Freemasons and they are governed
by their god Lucifer/Satan.
of England owns the Central Banks established around the world, and this
is the real power of the modern British Empire.
One example is
which is wholly owned by the Bank of England
and her subsidiaries. Thus the world has been enslaved by the
Illuminati-Free-Mason conspiracy which exacts her tribute through
interest on their various currencies.
"Historically all British military colonies with white populations such
as Australia, New Zealand, Canada and South Africa were under the
authority of the Queen and her Government. Whereas all other brown
'slave' colonies such as India, Egypt, Bermuda, Malta, Singapore, Hong
Kong, Gibraltar and the African nations were the private property of the
Crown, which is the separate board of the City of London. These colonies
were exploited for slave labor and trade, to make the cartels richer and
"The Crown" has nothing to do with the Queen. It is a private
corporation led by the Illuminati.
ZIONISM VERSUS BOLSHEVISM
-A struggle for the soul of the Jewish People by the Rt.Hon. Winston S.
Churchill-written in 1920
AUGUST - 2010
LEGACY-AUSTRALIA-CANADA-NEW ZEALAND-WHY THEY
The Act of
Settlement of 1701-WHY IT SHOULD CONCERN
The Common Law of
ENGLAND is the LAW of
Commonwealth Realms V The Constitution for
AUSTRALIA-SUPPORT THE CROWN
YOU CAN'T HAVE BOTH.
WILL THIS CHRISTMAS QUEEN'S SPEECH
IN A FREE INDEPENDENT ENGLAND -SCOTLAND AND
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ASSURE YOU THAT YOU
HAVE NOTHING TO FEAR FROM BECOMING A
PROVINCE OF EUROPE.
THE QUEEN MAKE IT PLAIN THAT OUR FREE
INDEPENDENT NATION STATE IS SACROSANCT BUT
THAT IF THE PEOPLE WISH TO BECOME SLAVES
-THEN A REFERENDUM THERE MUST BE.
THAT NO ENGLISHMAN SHOULD BE ASKED WHETHER
HE WISHES TO BE A SLAVE OR FREE!
CHRISTMAS WE WILL FIND OUT IF OUR PROTECTOR
'Rights and Liberties'
by HER SACRED OATH
MONARCHY be nothing more than a
THEME PARK in
THE TIME FOR BLUNT SPEAKING AS THE VERY
EXISTENCE OF OUR UNIQUE NATION STATE IS IN
We are told on the BBC (Brussels
Broadcasting Service) at 11.30 pm on
Saturday the 23rd December, 2007, that the
QUEEN now has a website which has footage of
the Royal Family in the past and that the
QUEEN is NOT
'Stuck in the past'
far as many patriotic subjects are concerned
we need to remain in the PAST when it
concerns the protection of our
have had and will continue to have but it
must not threaten our very WAY-OF-LIFE our
Common Law of England and all which makes
our country the most unique parliamentary
democracy in the world.
BE NO SURRENDER!
Should the Monarch fail to protect our
inherited RIGHTS and Liberties then we shall
have to fight for a REPUBLIC as
happened in the 17th century because the
Monarch of the day ignored those very
'Rights and Liberties
of Englishmen' which will
still survive in the English Speaking World
today in December 2007. How can the MOTHER
of PARLIAMENTS give away what is already our
and our children's INHERITANCE which
cannot be taken away by
PARLIAMENT or the QUEEN.
If the above publicity
exercise is to be used to soften the impact
to the population of the BETRAYAL of their
CONSTITUTION and COUNTRY then it would be
the greatest TREASON by a Monarch since
James II who sold our COUNTRY to the FRENCH
for MONEY and RELIGION.
WE ASK WHAT PRICE ARE OUR RIGHTS AND
THEY ARE PRICELESS!
Choice is Yours!-but time is running out
months to be EXACT!
WE are to
THEY are not
WE have more to LOSE
more to GAIN
WE have been clear of dictators from EUROPE
for most of our HISTORY
been cursed with that abomination for most
of their HISTORY and NOW!
Our Queen and the EU Constitution
The Spirit of England
THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE
HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH THE II
We now learn
from the Daily Mail COMMENT on Christmas Eve
that the Queen's Speech will cover the
catastrophic fall in Values and Moral
behaviour since the beginning of her 56
-year reign. This has been brought about by
the actions of HER MINISTERS and the greater
number of those in HER PARLIAMENT who have
placed THEIR CONCERNS before the INTERESTS
of THE PEOPLE and NATION STATE.
As for the
fact that HER PEOPLE feel LOST that has been
the direct result of the actions of HER
SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS and the TRAITOROUS
POLITICIANS including PRIME MINISTERS who
have stealthily over the 56 years of HER
MAJESTY'S REIGN have almost achieved their
aim of ENSLAVING the PEOPLE to a FOREIGN
for the marked drop in the number viewing
THE QUEEN'S SPEECH is no doubt because the
mass of people have realised years ago that
the MONARCH is powerless to PROTECT their
WAY-OF-LIFE and events up to now have PROVED
There is a well know saying
'Nero fiddled while Rome burned'
Is it the case on
Christmas Day 2007 while the Monarch
talks our Rights and Liberties are
being taken from us under our very
Of course the QUEEN
under HER CONSTITUTIONAL ROLE can only
'Advise and Warn' HER MINISTERS but when
the matter concerns the very LIFE of an
INDEPENDENT STATE we expect that HER MAJESTY
consider the arrangement to be AT AN END as
it would make a MOCKERY of the PRIME
IMPORTANCE of the MONARCH to protect our
inherited Rights and Liberties which HER
MINISTERS are endeavouring TO GIVE
We as loyal
subjects of the MONARCH who is the living
embodiment of OUR RIGHTS and LIBERTIES
ask at this late stage with only months to
the eradication of a FREE NATION STATE some
veiled comments that HER MAJESTY will
PROTECT our RIGHTS and LIBERTIES.
As for the
MORAL tone of the NATION STATE at this most
crucial time in ENGLISH CONSTITUTIONAL
HISTORY this matter should be left to CHURCH
LEADERS who's responsibility it is to CARE
for their FLOCKS particularly at this
FESTIVAL of CHRISTMAS.
MAJESTY'S SPEECH has not been pre-recorded
we ask HER MAJESTY to give those MILLIONS of
HER subjects some hope that their PROTECTOR
has NOT FORGOTTEN THEM.
APPEAL not be answered we can at last
confirm that the MONARCHY is after all
nothing more than a talking shop suitable
for YouTube and therefore nothing more than
Benn's comments about the despotic and
need for a
politician with INTEGRITY and love of
country who has for decades witnessed the
growth of the monstrous creature soon to be
STATES OF EUROPE.
Liberties of Parliament- Birthright of
Subjects of England.
[All words/word underlined have a
WE WISH YOU ALL A
CHRISTMAS AND A HAPPY
Xmas message to you all last year we find
that our sentiments remain the same with the
added emphasise on the coming danger to YOUR
COUNTRY from those many traitors in YOUR
HOUSE of COMMONS who intend to sell YOUR
COUNTRY to a FOREIGN POWER]
We Remember The
Spirit of England-Winston Churchill-1953
were warned in 1953 to beware of wreckers of
our Constitution and Way-of- Life but it had
taken Tony Blair just 10 years to do just
THAT while everyone had their minds they
thought on more important matters. Well! in
2007 his predessessor Gordon Brown is
leading you to SLAVERY and only awaits the
final signature of the present holder of the House of Wessex the over 1000 year
PROTECTOR of our inherited
RIGHTS and LIBERTIES of ENGLISHMEN
Of the House
of Wessex since King Alfred 'the Shepherd
and Darling of England' in the annals of 893
leave it to the work of
Alfred the Great
England was saved to become the first
individual nation -state which over 1100
years later a member of that same House of
Wessex has already signed away much of those
ancient Rights and Liberties and
fundamentals of justice and Rule of Law and
only awaits a final signature to enslave her
people into a despotic undemocratic godless
police state to call itself a
within the power of Her Majesty the Queen to
refuse to ratify the New EU TREATY because
whatever lies her ministers have given her
over her long reign the TRUTH is now clear
for ALL TO SEE.
Netherlands a number of years ago their
MONARCH resigned for a day rather than sign
the Bill put before him. The New EU TREATY
is the death of a NATION STATE of over 1200
years in the making. It is the treasonable
actions of HER MINISTERS which has placed
THE QUEEN in the forefront in the protection
of the Rights and Liberties of HER SUBJECTS
as on no one else can HER PEOPLE DEPEND.
WILL THIS CHRISTMAS QUEEN'S SPEECH
BE THE LAST IN A
FREE INDEPENDENT ENGLAND -SCOTLAND AND WALES?
WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND
[Author of Germany's Four Reich's]
'There'll always Be an ENGLAND'
-NOT any MORE
Let the people speak!
[Latest Addition - June07]
Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU
GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY
WON'T HE TRUST YOU?
HELL ON EARTH
want powers back from EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95%
of British people want a REFERENDUM
SIGN TODAY ON LINE
WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE
TO SET YOU
THE QUESTION THAT THE VOTER MUST
YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE CORRUPT
,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND CORRUPT ALIEN BUSYBODY BRUSSELS’
-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?
TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE
TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER
SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS
WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.
AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?
[All underlined words have a separate