||HE ARGUED THAT:
By its nature, the duty of allegiance is in law "unalienable and perpetual". This language, from Foster`s Crown Cases (1743-1761), was quoted with approval at the trial of Sir Roger Casement in 1917. Casement had been arrested near Tralee, County Kerry, in1916, having been landed from a German U-boat to foment Irish defection. Allegiance was similarly defined at the capital trial of the supercilious Nazi wartime broadcaster, William ' Lord Haw-Haw' Joyce (1906-1946)
For the purposes of allegiance, foreign states are deemed either to be "in actual hostility", as in the case of Argentina in 1982,or "in amity", as in the case at present of the other European Union states. However, the condition of hostility or amity in no way disposes of the essential exclusiveness of perpetual and unalienable allegiance. No man can serve two sovereigns. When, therefore the late Sir John Fiennes (1911-1996) cunningly drafted the European Communities Bill, in 1972, and when on 17 October 1972, his unamended Bill became an Act subordinating British law to European law, there was wrought nothing less than the greatest constitutional revolution in Parliament's seven and a half centuries of existence. It was furthermore done without even a schedule of consequential repeals.
The politicians of the day, many of them unwittingly, voted to launch the nation on a path of "ever closer[ European] union" which could only lead to the United Kingdom becoming a subordinate offshore province of the United States of
Europe. Those who engineered Britain`s adherence to the
Treaties of Rome and of Maastricht, probably never even had Section 3 of thee Treason Felony Act 1848 drawn to their attention. In it , condemnation is incurred:
"If any person whatsoever shall, within the United Kingdom or without, compass, imagine, invent, devise or intend to deprive or dispose our most gracious Lady the Queen. . . from the style, honour, or royal name of the imperial crown of the United Kingdom. . ."
Indicted and convicted offenders against this unrepealed law are subject to
imprisonment "for the term of his or her natural life". Yet not a finger was lifted even when, on 7 February 1992, two Privy Counsellors, Douglas Hurd and Francis Maude, signed the Maastricht Treaty which , at a stroke, brought our Monarch under suzerainty of the European Union.
The Queen was thereby rendered subject to past and future judgements of the Court of the European Communities in Luxembourg, from which there is no appeal and which was thereby confirmed in authority over her Courts in which she was previously arraignable.
Article 8 of the Treaty of Maastricht which imposed all-embracing compulsory European citizenship on the Queen and all her United Kingdom subjects, without their express consent, did so " subject to the duties imposed thereby".
These duties are undefined and are thus both unknown and unknowable. One of them is however perhaps discernable since the Maastricht Treaty left unamended Article 192 of the Treaty of Rome. This reads:
"Decisions of the Council or of the Commission which impose a pecuniary obligation on persons other than states shall be enforceable."
Since "pecuniary obligations" clearly includes taxation, and "perhaps other than states" must include the new recipients of compulsory European citizenship, we have here the legal authorization of a reserve power to levy new taxation from Brussels on each and every citizen of the 15 EU countries.
Of al the magical and mysterious processes involved in Britain`s political integration with Europe, initiated by Macmillan and engineered by Heath from 31 July 1961 to17 October 1972, none is more remarkable than the absence of a single measure repealing any part of any of the four great Constitutional Statutes - Magna Carta of Edward 1, the Petition of Right(1627), the Bill of Rights (1688 ) and the Act of Settlement (1700). Perhaps Sir John Fiennes relied upon the doctrine of implied repeal, but certainly the electorate would have regarded express repeal as offending against the principle that nothing but their own demerit can deprive natural born subjects of their peculiar privileges, called their birthright, as enshrined in these hitherto durable constitutional bulwarks.
In Vauxhall Estates v. Liverpool Corporation 1932, it was established in law that "no Parliament may bind its successors" However, Article Q of the timeless Maastricht Treaty said that the Treaty "is concluded for an unlimited period" and it conveyed no right or mechanism for secession. It is nonetheless arguable that what one Parliament has done , that same or some succeeding Parliament can undo. In Blackburn v.Attorney General 1983, Lord Justice Megarry, in his judgement declared:
"As a matter of law, the Courts of England recognize Parliament as being omnipotent in all save the power to destroy its omnipotence."
From the European Court of Luxembourg in 1972, the very year in which Parliament, at least temporarily, voted away its sovereignty in such large measure, came an unappealable judgement on the Treaty of Rome:
"The treaty entails a definitive limitation of the sovereign rights of member states against which no provisions of municipal law whatever their nature can be involved."
It was in reference to this Court that Sir Patrick Neill QC, former Warden of All Soul`s College, Oxford, coined the maxim; " A court with a mission is a menace; a supreme Court with a mission is a tyranny." The phrase was incorporated into the recent Euro-sceptic speech by the Home Secretary. (1996)
Those who see the erosion of British self -government (in defence of the 1,250,000 Britons died in the first half of this century) as emanating from the single Oxford college of Balliol, will be dubbed ' conspiracy theorists'. But the precise legal definition of a conspiracy is that it is an agreement between two or more people, unrelated in marriage, to behave in a manner that will automatically constitute an offence by at least one of them, though mens rea (guilty mind) is required by at least two co-conspirators. There is nothing theoretical about the way in which the Privy Counsellor's oath, which enjoined two Balliol educated Prime Ministers, Macmillan and Heath. And the first British President of the European Commission in Brussels (Lord Jenkins of Hillhead, also a Balliol man!):
"To bear faith bear faith and allegiance to the Crown and to defend its jurisdiction and powers against all foreign . . . persons . . . or states."
has been breached by these men.
What is further demoralizing is that no less than six subsequent Privy Counsellor's, following the precedent of Lord Jenkins in 1975, have each made a solemn declaration before the Luxembourg Court as European Commissioners:
"To perform my duties in complete independence in the general interest of the communities; in carrying out my duties".
This conflict of solemn undertaking can only mildly be described as duplicitous.
Unconstitutionality in the headlong dash to create the new European Superstate is hardly confined to Britain. The Dutch draftsmen of the Maastricht Treaty included a stipulation in Article R that each and every country must ratify it "according
to its own constitution requirements". Having got it ` wrong' the first time, Denmark`s second referendum raised several studiously unanswered constitutional questions . No case was , however, more stark than the case of Germany herself. She has a unique Federal Constitutional Court, the Bundesverfassungsgericht, with nine judges sitting in Karksruhe to guard their Constitution.
The creation of the European Union and Britain`s continued self-governance was dependent on the verdict of this Court for , on 11 October 1993 , Germany`s instrument of ratification was still undeposited in Rome. Without this
twelfth and last document (the other 11 EU countries having ratified the Maastricht Treaty) the EU could not come into being. It transpired however that the terms approved by this supreme German national Court to permit ratification, were miles wide of the terms of the Treaty already signed by the German Government and the eleven other nations.
For instance, the Court declared:
"Article F does not empower the (European) Union to procure the financial means or other means it deems necessary to fulfil its purposes."
Yet that is precisely what Article F does say in the following words:
" The Union shall provide itself with the resources necessary to attain its objectives and carry out its policies."
Following a question in the House of Lords, Baroness Chalker, Minister of State in the Foreign Office, confirmed that indeed the European Union "can obtain financial resources to attain the Union`s objectives."
In another area the Karksruhe Court calmly took for Germany an unnegotiated opt-out from the European Monetary Union (EMU) - something for which both Denmark and the United Kingdom had to negotiate by special protocol prior to signing. Both the Governors of the Bank of England and the Danish Central Bank have confirmed that there was and is no opt-out provision for Germany in the Treaty. The fact that the terms and conditions of the Maastricht Treaty, as approved by their Constitutional Court, simply do not exist. Hence Germany`s rapid ratification was in clear breach of Article R of the Treaty itself. Since its ratification was invalid, the Maastricht Treaty itself has no proper legal standing.
Though earlier this year (1996) our Foreign Office made a legal assessment of the Treaty, it has not publicly disclosed the obvious and only conclusion. Perhaps we are waiting either until the going gets rougher or some
wealthily corporation litigates to prove that some swingeing Brussels penalty is in fact unenforceable.
No sovereign state can survive without the concepts of allegiance and of breaches of allegiance being treasonable.
Can a European Superstate survive without such internal defences? The answer must assuredly be that where solidarity is more, rather than less, fragile and tenuous, the as yet unfamiliar concept of Euro-treason will eventually be vigorously advanced. There does not appear to be any ready instrument for enforcement at the moment (1996) it is not however hard to predict that the draconian powers of the Luxembourg Court will soon bring the concept of Euro-treason into focus. We are told that the Europol is intended for apprehending cross-border criminals within the Union. But the beef crisis, the United Kingdom was about to acquiesce
in its creation. Perhaps a fortuitous blow for freedom has been struck and magazine articles such as this will be safe from a Europol for a little longer.
Bully for beef.
From The Freedom Association www.tfa.net
It was reported in the
Sunday Telegraph on 20th July 2008 that the Irish
millionaire, Declan Ganley , has disclosed far reaching
plans to give voters THROUGHOUT THE EUROPEAN UNION a
REFERENDUM on the HANDOVER of POWER to BRUSSELS.
He is to field more than
400 candidates in next June's 
European Parliament elections in 26 countries including
GREAT BRITAIN, where voters have been side -tracked by
governments that have happily ratified the LISBON TREATY
without any democratic input from their voters.
Great Britain has 12
European Parliament constituencies and will certainly be a
novelty -and a huge relief -if formerly non-democratic
endorsement of the EU Treaties hits the buffers! The
vehicle for Mr Ganley's initiative will be his pressure
-he claims to be
well on his way to raising the £75 million to FUND HIS
As the long standing critic
of the way that the EU has concentrated power in Brussels,
AT THE EXPENSE OF DEMOCRACY
I and very many others will
say "GREAT, bring it on".
If Mr Ganley would welcome financial
contributions from the voters in the 26 countries then he
should place advertisements in their
His initiative will truly put the cat amongst
the pigeons for it has been all too easy for Europe's
political elite to ride roughshod over their peoples. His
initiative will also present UKIP with a conundrum for it no
doubt expected to do well in Europe, next June-2009, against
the [TRAITOROUS TRIPARTITE CABAL] the three main political
parties in our country.
[Well! as our bulletins have shown over the
past five years we have supported the UKIP solely because
they were the largest eurosceptic organisation with an
understood message of OUT OF THE EU. We are now of the
opinion that the UKIP have failed their supporters with
their TOO LITTLE! TOO LATE! approach failing to mobilise the
entire eurosceptic bodies under an INDEPENDENT LEADER of
RENOWN, possibly a military personage with the TRUE GRIT to
GET THE JOB DONE. UKIP has failed to do so and now all
their resources should be handed over to a MAN of DESTINY
who CAN SAVE the FREEDOM loving PEOPLE OF EUROPE. POWER
MUST RETURN TO THE PEOPLE and support for Mr Ganley and HIS
and OUR JUST CAUSE - WILL DO JUST THAT.
Mr Ganley will have our FULL SUPPORT in his
momentous EPIC making decision to SAVE the PEOPLE of EUROPE
and EUROPE ITSELF.
IT ONLY NEEDS FOR EVERY EUROSCEPTIC OF
WHATEVER PARTY TO PUT PARTY POLITICS ASIDE AND SUPPORT
in JUNE, 2009
[UNFORTUNATELY AT THE
ELECTION BROADCASTS MR GANLEY REVERTED TO TYPE -PRO EU]
The abolition of
by The Reform Treaty
- Passed by majority of 138
|The abolition of
by The Reform Treaty
- Passed by majority of 138
MPs voted by 362 - 224 for the Reform Treaty in its
Second Reading on Monday 21st January. This sixth and final
treaty, now renamed the Lisbon Treaty, formally replaces
Britain with the European Union on 1st January 2009. This is
a year before the deadline set by the Chancellor of Germany,
The Treaty will abolish the British Constitution, and
therefore the nations of Britain and England, sweeping away
our Westminster Parliament, and giving the EU the power to
The Treaty sets up an unelected three tier politburo
executive in Brussels with absolute power, a dictatorship on
the soviet model. The EU parliament has no power and is a
Read the Reform Treaty one page summary on the left.
Gordon Brown was lying: the Treaty is worse than the
This sixth treaty is the fastest moving and most secret
the EU has drafted; opposition to and recognition of the EU
as a police state is growing, and they know speed is vital.
This Commons vote, one of the most important in our
history, was largely unreported by our controlled press and
The Queen and Parliament to complete ratification this
Parliament has allocated 29 days to discuss this treaty in
February (not much for its own abolition). They will
probably have the final ratification vote in March. The
Queen, the EU's most loyal supporter, plans to give her
Royal Assent in June 2008. This means Westminster and the
Queen will ratify it behind our backs, as they have the
other five treaties.
German Chancellor Merkel chose this sixth Treaty instead of
pushing it through as a constitution to avoid referendums in
its member nations. She twice visited 10 Downing Street and
forced Gordon Brown to cancel both his promised referendum,
and his General Election.
"Anti-EU" groups have
encouraged us to call for a
referendum precisely because
the EU has already
prohibited it. They know we
are wasting our efforts: our
four party leaderships take
their orders from the EU,
not from the voters.
How to fight
The real course of action is to change the minds of 70
MP's and get a majority against. MP's have been selected on
the Party list system over the last 20 years to ensure an
obediant majority of pro-EU MPs.
These MPs now need to understand the EU has the
constitution (the six treaties) of a dictatorship, the laws
of a police state, and when enforced, its 111,000
regulations will create a government command economy, soviet
style: dictatorships cause poverty.
They also need to realise that MPs are the people who put
this dictatorship in power. If they put it in power, they
are the greatest threat to take it out of power. All
dictatorships in the past have eliminated that threat.
Inside the EU, the lives of MPs will be even worse than our
own; at best, they are likely to be institutionalised and
held against their will. (This is the only good bit - these
hated traitors will suffer severely.)
Visit your MP in his surgery NOW and explain this.
(Instructions top left)
The EU remains illegal
Each of these six treaties are completely illegal under the
British Constitution, our 1689 Bill of Rights, our treason
laws, and under our common law. It is unforgivable that the
Queen, her Ministers and our Parliament have committed the
criminal act of treason by signing these treaties, and
broken our laws to abolish our nation.
The EU will always be
illegal in Britain; but once
the EU has complete power
and control here, we can no
more get rid of it than we
could Germany, had their
planned illegal occupation
of Britain in 1940 been
The Countdown to abolition
Whereas the 465 page EU Constitution would have abolished
the five treaties and replaced them with a single document
conferring absolute power, the Reform Treaty adds to the
existing five treaties, bringing them up to the powers of
the EU Constitution. All six treaties with appendices add up
to nearly 10,000 complex and unreadable pages. Tony Blair
agreed to it on 23rd June 2007 as his final stab in
Britain’s back. On the 23rd July there was an
Intergovernmental Conference (IGC), when we should have seen
a first draft of the Treaty.
Foreign ministers agreed its terms on 7-8th September at
the resort of Viana de Castelo, Portugal. There was a summit
in Lisbon on the 18th and 19th October, where they hoped to
sign the Treaty, but Gordon Brown signed it on December 13th
2007, commiting treason, the most criminal act on the
The EU has decided to act now as if the Treaty were
already in force; they are consolidating their power each
day. On 1.1.2009 the Reform Treaty and the other five seize
all remaining power from our Westminster Parliament, which
becomes defunct on that day; it has no remaining powers
whatsoever. (The Treaties do allow Brussels to return minor
powers, but that is very unlikely.) On 11th June 2009 we
have bogus elections to the sham Brussels Parliament, the
only elections we will get in the future.
Westminster's five year term expires on 5th May 2010 and
a British General Election is due. The six treaties make no
provision for an election to our Parliament. By that time
the EU will have consolidated its absolute power, and it
will almost certainly use it cancel that election and to
close Westminster. The EU has always planned to rule what
was Britain directly through its 12 nominated Regional
capitals, by passing Westminster, from which every function
will be removed.
Its founders knew the EU dictatorship cannot be built
while there is a strong and freedom loving Britain on its
doorstep. They tried twice before in 1914 and 1939. Britian
has to be utterly destroyed for the EU to succeed. The
success of the EU's Frankfurt School subversion techniques
on Britain (see left) has been astonishing; the abolition of
Westminster is one of their final remaining goals.
You have 11 months left
Treason is the most serious of all Britain’s crimes. You
have just 11 months left to bring these vile British
traitors to justice, and get us out of the EU dictatorship.
Around 45 million British
people are against the
abolition of our nation, and
with the little European
voting that has been
allowed, it seems clear over
200 million of its victims
don’t want the EU. But we
will never be given the
choice. YOU have to decide
to act yourself.
There are ways to stop the EU - see "Your Campaigns" on
the left. Then we will need a mass blockade of Westminster
to stop our criminal MP's and Queen breaking our
constitution and laws for the last time.
Copy of the EU's Timetable at the BBC.
Original 2009 article from German Parliament -.pdf for
Then check it at the German Parliament
Campaigns: Print these .pdf's: One or two pages
Ten EU truths
Treaty one page
50 reasons to
Abolition of 48
Map: the 9 EU
Treaty full text
one page pdf
one page html
Signs of EU
The EU's degraded our lives
What will the EU be like?
List of British
Beef up the British Constitution
Lib Lab Con: One Party State
The EU's Hitler
The EU costs £200
UK > EU
handover of power.
Abolition of our
drjn.co.uk - copy of this site
The Westminster News
The Cornish Free
The British Free
Stood for the
Where we are now:
1. Since 1972 The Queen has illegally signed five
of the six EU Treaties.
2. The five treaties define and build the EU as
an unelected dictatorship.
3. The EU's laws, passed by Westminster, give it
the powers of a police state.
4. The sixth EU treaty will complete the
abolition of Britain as a nation
- the Queen is due to sign it this year.
A foreign power, the EU, will then rule us, and
enforce the laws of a police state.
Shouldn't we repeal the 1972 European
Communities Act now
before we are imprisoned permanently inside? We've
only got till July 2008.
Please fight the campaigns at
the top of the menu on the left.
leaderships of the Conservative, Labour and Lib Dem
parties have been controlled by the European Union
for two decades. It is the EU agenda they implement
in Parliament, not your wishes, which is why your
vote doesn't count.
Our controlled press and media haven't reported
it, but Britain would have been abolished in
November 2006 if the French and Dutch hadn't
voted down the EU Constitution.
Instead a sixth and final Treaty will now be
signed; after which EU Commissioners will have the
power to impose the Constitution (and the Euro) on
us, and enforce the laws of a police state.
5. Thirty three years inside the EU - have you
noticed how our democracy is being withdrawn?
The EU has already denied us that most basic of
human rights - the right to vote against the EU and
to keep our own nation. A majority of us don't want
to be in the EU. We are being forced in against our
Do you feel you've become powerless, unable to
influence events, or your vote is worth less? The
six treaties have been gradually removing our
democracy; for thirty years our laws have been
"harmonised" with the EU; 80% of the laws now passed
by our Parliament are EU laws, not ours. Isn't the
real reason people have lost interest in politics
precisely because the EU has taken away our ability
to change things?
Common law, where the government was our servant,
is now largely replaced by the EU's Corpus Juris,
which puts the government above the law, and we
don't participate. We have already lost most of our
rights (including habeas corpus). The power of
government grows unchecked, as does that of large
corporations. Politicians continuously lie about the
EU, pretending its not significant.
6. Massive EU corruption
The EU's auditors have found the fraud is so
widespread they've refused to sign off the EU's
accounts for each of the last ten years.
Whistleblowers like Marta Andreason, the EU Budget
Director, who in 2005 found the EU couldn't account
for 95% of its £66 billion budget, are simply
fired for telling the truth.
7.The bribing of our Politicians by the EU
Europe works by bribing politicians with huge
salaries and expenses to vote for Europe, against
the best interests of their own voters.
As a result all three parties are in favour of
the EU - Westminster acts like a one party state of
politicians: the Lib-Lab-Con. The parties are run
top down and implement the policy of their
leaderships, not that of their members.
(unfortunately UKIP is run in the same way). If you
have voted for the Labs, Cons or Lib-Dems since
1969, you have voted for the EU
8. EU corruption is now exploding through our
Civil Service, our local government, and our 7,000
A shadow EU government lives inside our bureaucracy,
headquartered in the Office of the Deputy Prime
Minister (ODPM.) It includes many parts of
government including the RDA and the Regional
Assemblies. Common Purpose, an EU
organisation, the UK branch also headquartered in
the ODPM, has members across many government
organisations including some city and county
councils, the Land Registry, the police and the NHS,
which it is destroying from within.
Common Purpose is the glue that enables
fraud to be committed across these government
departments, most of it lining the pockets of
politicians and bureaucrats. It often involves the
sale of public assets such as land to friends of
politicians or their businesses. (The RDA -The EU
Regional Development Agency, is a major player in
this type of fraud.) And the handing out of plum
government non jobs with big salaries and expenses
to members of Common Purpose, all of it involving
the theft of our money as taxpayers. The Chief
Executive Officer of Common Purpose is Julia
Middleton of the ODPM.
9. Businesses closing under EU regulation
The EU's 111,000 regulations, when fully enforced,
will transform Britain from a free market economy
into a Soviet style command economy, closing
hundreds of thousands more businesses. They will
also control our personal lives far more closely
than were those of Soviet citizens. (In a
Parliamentary answer to Lord Stoddart in January
2003, the government admitted there were 101,811 EU
regulations, growing at 3,500 pa).
The cost of Britain's 8,500 quangoes is £124
billion a year, and they raise an additional £40
billion from us in charges, according to the Cabinet
Office. The Public Bodies Directory 2006 describes
only 882 of them. Most exist to enforce EU
regulations; nearly all should be closed.
10. The EU costs us £200 billion pa, 20% of
According to the government's Better Regulation Task
Force Annual Report 2005 (Introduction written by
Tony Blair,) complying with EU regulations now costs
our economy over £100 billion a year.
By far the largest treasury expense is now the
£167 billion spent on the EU's 8,500 quangos,
(Cabinet Office figures) most of which enforce EU
regulation. This is patronage, bribery, putting
thousands of officials and influential businessment
on £100,000 - £300,000 a year salaries. That's why
the Exchequer is so desperate for cash and can't pay
for the navy, nurses, students etc.
Economists say we lose £80 billion pa by
associating with the EU's inferior economies. The EU
took our fishing industry, which costs us £5 billion
pa. EU damage to other industries (like forcing us
to close the Rover Car Co) a further £20 billion.
Our EU contribution is a relatively minor £10
billion, the only bit the Press discuss.
Before we joined the EU we had an even balance of
trade with them. Now EU regulations have fixed it so
we lose £30 billion year trading with the EU on our
balance of payments. We'd be enormously more wealthy
if we left.
The main use of taxes is now to finance
government and its greedy whirlpool of waste;
they've doubled in real terms in the 33 years we've
been in the EU. There's less money in the economy
left for wages, creating a growing underclass who
can't make ends meet.
11. Our counties to be abolished
The Queen signed the 1992 Maastricht Treaty, which
adopts the EU Regionalisation Plan. This will
abolish England's 48 counties and replace them with
9 European regions, each with their own Regional
Capital, which reports directly to Brussels, not to
Westminster. This effectively obliterates the
country of England. For example the County of
Cornwall is replaced by the South West Region, which
stretches from Lands End and includes
Gloucestershire and Wiltshire; its regional capital
is Exeter. As this move is unpopular it is being
kept low-key and will not be implemented until the
sixth treaty is signed, when we lose our right to
12. The deliberate destruction of our
standards and way of life,
From Sunday trading, where large stores force staff
to work Sundays for derisory pay - or they don't get
a job, to the deliberate undermining of the family
and teachers, to sex education for the under 13's,
to children being given obscene homework, its all
traceable via our compliant government back to the
EU over the last 34 years, as it sucessfully
implemented the subversion of the Frankfurt School.
While inside atheist Europe, British Christianity
has almost died out; safety on our streets and a
great chunk of civilised life has left with it.
13. The EU has controlled our immigration
In January 2007 on the front page of The Westminster
News we forecast 1.5 million immigrants for the
year, and people laughed at us. On January 24th 2008
the Daily Express published government figures of
1.3 million Polish immigrants alone for 2007. With
Romania and Hungary joining in that year the total
was probaly double that. The Amsterdam Treaty handed
control of our immigration to the EU. 30,000 a year
used to arrive - the EU's increased it by 60
times That's why house prices have been
screaming up, even though the population of original
British people is falling.
Politicians and huge corporations like
immigration - with thousands of immigrants available
on low pay, they can impose the minimum wage on
millions. Politicians then lie that they can't get
British workers to do dirty jobs. The truth is they
won't offer a decent wage, and cynically use
immigrants to drive wages down, adding to the huge
The Government pretends there are a maximum of
145,000 immigants annually, and 1.5 million new
houses will be needed to house them. But then Jack
Straw admits that 2.6 million immigrants applied to
stay here last year.
Our infrastructure and services can't stand such
huge numbers and is breaking down in some cities,
where English people are becoming a 10% minority.
But the EU controls it, not the Foreign secretary,
and he has no power, no options but to do as EU
policy dictates, and accept it.
Michael Howard was lying on the 24th January 2005
when he said he'd fix immigration - as Prime
Minister, he'd have had no control over it
whatsoever. Immigration hurts our existing
immigrants first - new immigrants move into their
areas, decreasing the wages and increasing the
pressure on housing.
If the sixth Treaty is signed, we lose our
right to withdraw and Britain ceases to be a nation.
Like the other six, it only requires two signatures:
the Prime Ministers, and the Queen's
|Examples of how
our lives have degraded since we've been in
In the EU, (which means in Britain)
government is above the law.
The EU's corpus juris now pervades right
through our legal system. A policeman was
let off by magistrates this year (2005) for
driving his private car at 159 mph in
Ludlow, Shrops. Under Corpus Juris the
government are above the law and cannot be
prosecuted The judge ruled correctly under
EU law. 45,000 police officers got off speed
cameras in this way in 2004, although their
speeding killed 44 innocent people. (Daily
EU "monitoring Officers" have the
right to dismiss our Councillors.
The Local Government Act of 2000 empowered
the head of the EU government in England,
the Office of the Deputy Prime Minster
(ODPM) to appoint a monitoring officer to
spy on every council. If an elected
councillor disagrees with the EU or
government line, the unelected "Standards
Board for England" can suspend him for up to
five years. An example is in Cambridgeshire,
where the ODPM has threatened cllr Alex
Riley with suspension if he attends any
debate discussing the ODPM's plans to build
a new town of 20,000 people called Nothstowe
on his ward. The ODPM has the conflict of
interest here; but its powers are becoming
We have lost the right to freedom
The EU arrest warrant (signed by the Queen
on 18th November 2003) allows us to be
arrested without charge and held
indefinitely with no right to see a
solicitor, make a phone call, or even a
right to a trial. You can simply disappear.
Under the Serious Organised Crime and
Police Act (SOCPA) 2005, we can now be
arrested and held in the cells by any police
officer for any petty offence, like dropping
litter. Before it had to be an offense that
carried a 5 year jail term. This also
applies to all of the EU's 107,000
regulations. Do you know them all?
The Civil Contingences Act 2004 allows
government to confiscate anything you
possess permanently; you have no right to
object. This includes your house. It also
gives government the right to forceably move
its population around to different
locations; you can be left with no place to
call your own and live like a refugee. The
only check and balance here is a Minister
just needs to utter the words "This is a
national emergency." If a demonstration or
strike government doesn't like is being
organised, they can cut off all
communications in a town - phones, mobiles,
the internet, TV, and block all access to
that town including closing roads and
railways. It has all the powers and more of
Hitler's Enabling Act of 1933.
We have lost the right to free speech
At the Labour Party conference the police
held an 82 year old man, Walter Woolfgang,
and denied him access to the conference
under the EU's "anti terrorist" legislation
because he had shouted the word "nonsense"
at Jack Straw, who was speaking about Iraq.
Terrified the true nature of the laws they
have passed on behalf of the EU was escaping
too early, the Labour Party stopped the
police and begged the man to return to
On October 25th 2005 Miss Maya Evans was
arrested under the Serious Organised Crime
and Police Act 2005, for a lone protest at
the Cenotaph by reading out the names of the
97 British soldiers killed in the Iraq war.
She was arrested by no less than 14 police
officers and found guilty at Bow Street
Magistrates Court on the 8th December 2005.
Would you hand over our nation, to be
ruled by a foreign power, with oppressive
laws like these, ? That's what's happening.
We have lost the right to protest
These laws make protest very difficult; if
we did hold a General Strike and blockade
Westminster it would now require some
bravery: the powers the EU has demanded from
our government enable it to respond in a way
similar to the Chinese government's in
Tiaanamen Square should it so wish.
It is no coincidence that since 2004, all
MP's offices in Westminster are guarded by
police with machine guns, inside and out.
The Governments "terrorism" deception
All these new EU laws, including massive
"anti terrorism" acts (recently 2000, 2001,
2005) were passed with the pretence they
were only directed at
terrorists, or in the case of Asbos,
ruffians who terrorise the streets. In each
case they are used far more often against
ordinary law abiding people, particularly to
suppress dissent. (91% of those detained
under Terrorism Acts are innocent and have
been improperly arrested. Most of the
remainder are charged with offences that
have nothing to do with terrorism, but cover
up over zealous arrests).
We have lost the right to life
Under EU law the "Shoot to kill" policy did
not need democratic authorisation. Just two
senior police officers authorised the police
to kill British people. A democratic vote by
Parliament was not required, but even that
would not have legalised the killing under
British common law. A recent victim was an
innocent Brazilian, Jean de Menezes, shot
dead in Stockwell underground station, even
though he was being held down by police
officers at the time of the execution. The
police used dum-dum bullets, outlawed under
the Geneva Convention because they blow a
man to pieces inside.
The police can no longer be convicted for
killing innocent people - Philip Prout shot
at Lewannick in East Cornwall is just one of
30 people shot dead by police since 1992
when corpus juris crept in. At least one was
shot in the back; most were no threat to
anyone. Not once since 1992 has a policeman
been convicted of any crime for these
Have you noticed this growing police
In addition to many more laws than those
above, add the 107,000 regulations, and
whole bureaucracies such as VOSA building up
networks of cameras and databases to record
our movements and criminalise us when we
can't comply. Persecution is no longer
confined to motorists; under EU Corpus Juris
our courts have become extensions of
government power instead of independent
arbiters of justice.
Westminster had passed sufficient of the
EU's oppressive laws (the "harmonisation" in
the Treaties) by the end of 2004 that we
have been living in what is legally a police
state since then. But at the moment, its
only one per cent enforced. After the Queen
signs the sixth Treaty, the EU has the
absolute power to enforce 100% of its
regulations and laws.
|On the basis of the laws and
treaties already signed by our Queen and
life be like in the EU after
the 6th Treaty is signed?
Our Westminster Parliament immediately
becomes pointess as its remaining powers are
transferred to Europe.
It is the formal end of Britain and
England as nations.
Britain's 153 embassies around the world
will be closed as the ink from the Queen's
signature dries. (As Tony Blair refused to
admit this has been agreed to, Jose
Zapatero, the Prime Minister of Spain,
confirmed it in a February 2005 radio
After the EU abolishes our 48 counties
your address will change from 4 High St,
Taunton, Somerset, Great Britain, to 4 High
St, Taunton, Area K, European Union. (The
glorious EU county "The South West Region"
has had the postal address "Area K" assigned
for over a decade.)
The Official National Anthem of the EU,
which you should have known since 1971 is
based on the melody "Ode to Joy" by
Beethoven, formally replaces God save the
Queen. The EU flag replaces the Union Jack,
the red, blue and white nautical ensigns
etc. (The EU Commission has already ordered
(24.11.2005) our Merchant Navy to fly the EU
flag in place of the red Ensign.)
The EU takes ownership and command of our
Police, Army, Royal Navy, RAF, nuclear
weapons, currency reserves, North Sea Oil.
(See the EU Constitution below)
Serving officers in our police, army,
navy and air force already know they will
have to take an oath to the EU instead of to
the Queen. If they don't many have been told
they will be dismissed. The EU will have
complete military control of the UK.
The UK Independence Party will be banned
under the 1999 ruling of the European court
of Justice case c274/99, where it was held
that it is illegal to criticise the EU.
The Conservative, Labour and Lib-dem
parties will be abolished (only pan EU
parties like the EPP or PES are allowed -see
clause I.46.4 of the EU Constitution). It
will then be blindingly obvious to even the
dumbest politician there is no reason to
keep Westmister open, and that the EU has
the legal right to close it.
Many people will be excluded from the
jobs they know best, as the EU's demand that
you must pay to be re-taught the job, and
pay for a certificate before you can be
employed, becomes universal.
Hundreds of thousands more small
businesses will close on the enforcement of
the remaining 100,000 EU regulations our
government has already passed. Several
million will be permanently unemployed as a
We will all be criminalised by the
107,000 regulations. Its impossible to know
or understand 107,000 regulations, and the
poor can't possibly afford to comply. We
will all be subject to frequent fines and
arrest as a result. Here are just 4
Under EU regulations it is now illegal
for you to repair your plumbing, electrics
or your car (from 1st January 2006). If you
buy a boat over six feet long, built after
the EU Recreational Craft Directive of 1999,
and don't pay the EU £4,000 to "measure" the
boat, you get 6 months imprisonment. We will
live under permanent threat of arrest and
fear of the knock at the door that takes us
Massive corporations will do well, but
with huge immigration allowed from the EU,
they'll be able to pay minimum wage
everywhere, not just in the provinces as
they do now. If you don't accept the minimum
they'll employ a Pole or a Czekoslovakian.
Big corporations will also have a near
monopoly (with the government) on employment
and will be able to dictate unfavourable
terms to staff without fear of
Plum government jobs and corruption will
ensure the wealth of politicians,
bureaucrats, their businesses and associates
at all levels of government, including local
government and amongst our 7000+ quangos.
Society will divide into two: the
remaining 60% of us will be either
unemployed or treated abysmally on minimum
Taxes will rise more steeply to pay for
the even larger explosion in government
growth and corruption
There will be no redress through local
democracy because there won't be any. The
nine UK regional governments, which replace
our 48 counties and councillors, will be
unelected (see the European Regionisation
plan). Our only vote is to the powerless EU
parliament. We will be ruled by the 25
unelected Commisssioners, and have have no
redress at any level; we will be as poor but
have less freedom than Soviet Citizens.
If we demonstrate or protest we can be be
seized and relocated to another region. The
EU Arrest Warrant and Civil Contingencies
Act 2004, with 20 other oppressive Acts the
Queen has signed between 1972 and 2005, give
the government absolute power over us. They
can shoot us if they wish with no legal
comeback - the shootings of innocents Philip
Prout and Jean de Menezes were entirely
legal under EU law.
The tendancy to pick on Muslims, as
Germany used to pick on Jews, has already
begun. Europe will be a very nasty place.
How long will the EU last?
Eventually, perhaps 15 years down the track,
Europe will collapse under the weight of its
own corruption, bureaucracy, and
regulations. There will be so few productive
businesses that even at 100% tax rates we
will not be able to support the massive,
corrupt and wasteful government. Many of us
will be starving in the lead up to the
collapse. After the collapse we may be able
to leave the EU, if a dictator has not taken
advantage of the complete absence of
democratic checks and balances by seizing
power. The Constitution of the EU is similar
to the Soviet Union's. That dictator is free
to choose between a Soviet or Nazi style
government. Then it could take 70 years to
Fifty years ago our greatest threat might
have been violence or mugging. Now the
greatest threat to our economic well being,
our way of life, our freedom and the very
existence of our nation, is our own
to the Daily Telegraph
Wednesday 27th June-2007
Stop the excuses and hold an EU
SIR - In April 2004, we sent a PETITION
signatures to the Queen requesting
NO ROYAL ASSENT
-authorising the proposed
-unless approved by at least two thirds
Three weeks later, Tony Blair promised
a referendum, on which
HE and GORDON BROWN
have since reneged as being
The revamped version of the
-is virtually identical with its
predecessor, and Mr Blair's attempts to hide this is a shameful
BETRAYAL OF THE COUNTRY.
If our elected politicians refuse
TO HONOUR THEIR OATHS
I propose that an
INDEPENDENT REFERENDUM IS ARRANGED
-funded and conducted without further
ado, preceded by a
FULL HONEST PRESENTATION OF THE FACTS.
This would at least provide a reliable
unspun indication of public opinion. We should also insist that there is
NO GOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT WITH
until the outcome of the
The British people can then choose
whether they wish to be subjugated by
AN ALIEN POWER
Dilton Marsh, Wiltshire
[ Mr John Gouriet needs no introduction
as his eminent work together with his once close colleague the late
Chairman of the Freedom Association Norris McWhirter whose life was
brought to an end by his persisted hard work on behalf of his country - has been on
our front page since its beginning.]
SIR - An Act of Parliament to ratify a
NEW EU TREATY
not only alters the external
relationship between the British State and foreign states, but also the
internal constitutional relationship between the
BRITISH STATE AND ITS CITIZENS
The Irish Republic has a
-which can be amended
That is why the Irish Government has
ON EACH OF THE EU TREATIES.
At one time, Labour politicians were in
-to settle constitutional questions-for
example on whether there should be
But their enthusiasm for letting us
have a say began to wane when voters in
NORTH EAST ENGLAND
threw out John Prescott's proposal for
None the less, every Labour MP was
elected in 2005 on the
NEW EU TREATY
-and they must not allow themselves to
INTO BREAKING THEIR WORD.
Dr D. R. Cooper
[We know of Dr Cooper a a regular
contributor to Eurofacts a fortnightly journal
[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining
Used-Comments in Brackets]
||* * *
A Prime Minister in 1848
Gordon brown in 2007
Hundred and Fifty Seven years ago a great patriotic Prime Minister
-Foreign Secretary -Lord Palmerstone (Henry John Temple) -beloved by
his People defined the principle of nationality as follows:
Providence meant mankind to be divided into separate nations, and
for this purpose countries have been bounded by natural barriers,
and races of men have been distinguished by separate languages,
habits, manners, dispositions, and characters…” (1848)
have in the first place to say that the Business of an English
Government, is to pursue that course of Foreign Policy which on the
whole they may think right; and not to attempt the impossible task
of at all times and upon all subjects doing that which is agreeable
to all Foreign Governments. A man who in private life attempts to
invariably fails; and the Government of a great country would not
be more successful in such an endeavour…
must at times be an advantage to a foreign Prince…in the present
state of the continent to visit England and to see with his own
eyes, how Liberty may be combined with Loyalty, Freedom with public
order, and how the Respect which is shown by the Crown for the
Rights of the Subject and for the enactment of the Law produces
corresponding Feelings on the Part of the People and inspires them
with similar Respect for the Rights of the Crown and for the Laws
which secure the Liberties and the Property of all , from the
highest to the lowest in the Land. ”
For a full statement of his Principles:
with respect to alliances that England is a Power sufficiently
strong, sufficiently powerful to steer her own course, and not to
tie herself as an unnecessary appendage to the policy of any other
Government. I hold that the real policy of England-apart from
questions which involve her own particular interests, political or
commercial-is to be the champions of justice and right, pursuing
that course with moderation and prudence, not becoming the Quixote
of the world, but giving the weight of her moral sanction and
support wherever she thinks that justice is, and wherever she thinks
wrong has been done…
It is a
narrow policy to suppose that this country or that is to be marked
out as the eternal ally or the perpetual enemy of England. We have
no eternal enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and
those interests it is our duty to follow.”
[In 1848 Lord Palmerstone was Foreign Secretary at the age of
sixty-three. He entered Parliament in 1807- Secretary at War in
1809; 1811-28 (most years) War Office; 1830- 1852 Foreign Office;
1852-55 -Home Office; 1855-65.
‘ Born 1784
in Park Street Westminster. Family home ‘Broadlands’ Hampshire. Died
on the morning of October 18, 1865. And the last candle [last of his
contempories] of the Eighteenth century was out.’
significant that the word
‘England’ was not a word
despised in our House of Commons during the time of this great
patriot of England and only closer to our own times has the word
Britain taken its place though we do detect a slight revival now in
of a great Prime Minister, William Ewart Gladstone, are much to the point:
‘’The finance of any country is ultimately associated with the liberties of the
country. It is a powerful leverage by which English liberty has been gradually
acquired. If the House of Commons by any possibility loses the control of the
grants of public money, depend upon it, your very liberty will be worth very
little in comparison. That powerful leverage has been what is commonly known as
the power of the purse – the control of the House of Commons over public expenditure’’ (1891)
Let the people speak!
[Latest Addition - June07]
Daniel Hannan - Forming an
OPPOSITION to the EU
GORDON BROWN WANTS
TRUST-BUT WHY WON'T HE TRUST YOU?
HELL ON EARTH IN IRAQ
want powers back from EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95%
of British people want
SIGN TODAY ON LINE
JOIN THE 10 DOWNING STREET PROTEST
Readers can add their support to
the growing clamour for a REFERENDUM on the '"REFORM TREATY" by
signing up to a 10 Downing Street 0n-line petition
The Petition reads as follows:
"We the undersigned petition the
Prime Minister to guarantee that the British people will be
permitted a binding REFERENDUM on any and all attempts to resurrect
the EU " CONSTITUTION" (and any or all of its content) regardless of
Deadline for the PETITION is 31st
Eurofacts 27th July 2007.
Spirit of England'
In London on St.George's Day -1953
WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE
TO SET YOU
THE QUESTION THAT THE
VOTER MUST ANSWER
YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE
CORRUPT ,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND CORRUPT ALIEN BUSYBODY
-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?
TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T
VOTE FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER
SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR
MINDS WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.
SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS
AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?
[All underlined words have a