CABINET TYRANNY v CLARE SHORT MP
- the inevitable result of NEW LABOUR with charge of
ROYAL POWERS on TRUST since 1689.
Over 129 years ago it was warned of by a seasoned and well-versed observer of the British political scene of the dangers inherent in the English Constitution to unwarranted and unconstitutional interference with the sure old mixed with new in a growing super structure of our world admired parliamentary democracy.
As was stated at the time the Cabinet, which through a series of Constitutional fictions has succeeded to all the powers of the CROWN, has drawn to itself all, and more than all, of the ROYAL POWER over LEGISLATION.
It can dissolve Parliament, and, if it were to advise the CROWN to VETO a BILL which had been passed through both Houses, there is no certainty that the proceedings would be seriously objected to.
That it can arrest a measure at any stage of its progress through either House of Parliament, is conceded on all hands; and indeed the exercise of this power was exemplified on the hugest scale at the end of the Session of 1884 when age number of Bills of the highest importance were abandoned in deference to a CABINET decision.
The CABINET has further become the sole source of all important legislation, and therefore, by the necessity of the case, of ALL CONSTITUTIONAL legislation; and as a measure amending the CONSTITUTION passes through the House of Commons, the modification or maintenance of its depends on the fiat of the MINISTERS of the DAY.
Although the CABINET, as such, is quite unknown as such, (into the mid 1930’s) is quite unknown to the law, it is manifestly the ENGLISH INSTITUTION
-which is ever more and more growing in authority and influence; and already, besides wielding more than the legislative powers of the CROWN, it has taken to itself nearly all the legislative powers of PARLIAMENT,
-depriving IT in particular of the whole right of initiation.
The long familiarity of ENGLISHMEN with this INSTITUTION, and with the copies of it made in the European countries which possess Constitutions, has blinded them to its extreme singularity.
There is a fashion among historians of expressing wonder, not unmixed with dislike, at the secret bodies and councils which they occasionally find invested with authority in famous STATES.
In ancient history, the Spartan Ephors – in modern history, the Venetian Council of Ten – are criticised in this spirit. Many of these writers are ENGLISHMEN, yet they seem quite unconscious that their own country is governed by a secret Council.
No secret has been better kept than that of ENGLISH CABINET procedure. Apart from CABINET MINISTERS, past and present, there are probably not a dozen men in the country who knew accurately how CABINETS conduct their deliberation, and how they arrive at a conclusion. Some information may, however, be obtained from the published Diaries of the second Lord Ellenborough, from some printed, but unpublished, Memoirs left by Lord Broughton (Sir J.Cam Hobhouse), and in some degree from Lord Malmesbury’s recent Memoirs of an ex-Minister [Written in 1886]
There can be very little doubt that the secrecy of the CABINET is its strength. [Though as we all know 126 years later that Tony Blair and his note-free sofa-style Cabal kept their discussions even out of the 2003 CABINET.]
We have given the above narrative as the background to the CABINET
-of the day in 1884 as we intend to refer to this question of
and the almost destruction of our
We intend to compare the Constitution of the United States and its safeguards to its Constitutional usages which unfortunately were not put in place in the English Constitution after the Bloodless Revolution of 1689 and the later passing of the ROYAL POWER to the CABINET or in modern times the PRIME MINISTER.
As we have mentioned above and in the Daily Mail on Saturday, October 21st 2006 Clare Short has resigned as a Labour MP angry over Tony Blair’s ‘arrogant error-prone’ nine years as Prime Minister.
She claimed to be increasingly disillusioned with the bloodshed in Iraq and the way Mr Blair
PARLIAMENT OF ITS POWER
She accused Labour’s HIGH COMMAND of trying to stop her discussing Mr Blair’s ‘half truths’ and deceits’ over the
WAR in IRAQ.
Her decision came a month after her call for Labour voters to switch sides to force a hung Parliament at the next election.
Her departure is a further blow to Mr Blair’s dwindling authority and will increase pressure on him to say when he will quit.
^The former International Development Secretary will sit in the Commons as an Independent MP.
In a letter to the Chief Whip Jacqui Smith, she said:
‘I am sorry it has come to this, but after a lifetime of service to the Labour Party and 23 years in the House of Commons I think I am entitled to discuss what has gone wrong with the Government.
‘Our political system is in trouble and the exaggerated majorities in the Commons have led to an abject Parliament and a concentration of POWER in No10.’
Miss Short, 60, said she wanted to be free to argue for a
-so the COMMONS more accurately reflected public opinion and was more able to
HOLD THE GOVERNMENT TO ACCOUNT.
The MP for Birmingham Ladywood resigned as a CABINET MINISTER after the [illegal] IRAQ invasion….
(Daily Mail –Jane Merrick –Political Correspondent.)
Returning to 1884 – What is the reason of the advantage which historical Constitutions, Constitutions gradually developed through the accumulation of experience, appear as a fact to enjoy over a priori
Constitutions, *Constitutions founded on speculative assumptions remote from experience?
[As for example the fantasy of our own Tony Blair in 2006 –The United States of Europe.]
That the advantage exists will hardly be denied by any educated Englishman. With Conservatives  this is of course an axiom, but there are a few really eminent men on the opposite side who do not from time to time betray the same opinion, especially in presence of a catastrophe suffered by some Constitution of the last-mentioned type.* [As in 2006 the Blair/Bush-Iraq debacle and the mission impossible in Afghanistan.]
Not many persons in the last century [18th] could have divined from the previous opinions of
[one of the greatest parliamentarians of the time]
-the real substructure of his political creed, or did in fact suspect it till it was uncovered by the early and comparatively slight miscarriage of French revolutionary institutions. A great disillusion has always seemed to me to separate the:
“Thoughts on the Present Discontents in 1770”
“Speech on American Taxation in 1774”
-from the magnificent panegyric on the British Constitution in 1790.
‘Our political system is placed in a just correspondence and symmetry with the order of the world and with the mode of existence decreed to a permanent body composed of transitory parts; wherein, by the disposition of a stupendous wisdom, moulding together the great mysterious incorporation of the human race, the whole, at one time, is never old, or middle-aged, or young, but in a condition of unchangeable constancy moves on through the varied tenour of perpetual decay, fall, renovation, and progression. Thus, in preserving that method of nature in the conduct of the State, in what we improve we are never wholly new; in what we retain, we are never wholly obsolete.
[Try telling Tony Blair and his destructive Scottish Cabal and allied English traitors to keep their hands off centuries of achievement in the political landscape of ENGLAND which they have almost destroyed while the greater number of our Members of Parliament have and still stand by and watch without a murmur. Clare Short MP has in October 2006 as previously on Iraq sided with Justice and Integrity and as guardian of an ENGLISH Constitution which for many centuries has been the envy of the world.]
One of our greatest historians of the 19th century Lord Macaulay
Who closed his account of the [Bloodless] revolution of 1688 just when a new French experiment in a priori Constitution –building had spread confusion through the Continent of Europe and his pictures of events which gave birth to the party that had a monopoly of his admiration would almost rob them of their historical name of “Revolution Whigs,”
-which he nevertheless claimed for them.
‘As our Revolution was a vindication of ancient rights, so it was conducted with strict attention to ancient formalities. In almost every word and act may be discerned a profound reverence for the Past. The Estates of the Realm deliberated in the old halls and according to the old rules… The speeches present an almost ludicrous contrast to the revolutionary oratory of every other country.
Both the English parties agreed in treating with solemn respect the ancient constitutional traditions of the State.
The only question was, in what sense these traditions were to be understood. The asserters of liberty said nothing about natural equality of men and the inalienable sovereignty of the people, about Harmodius or Timoleon , Brutus the elder or Brutus the younger. When they were told that, by the English law. The Crown, at the moment of a demise, must descend to the next heir, they answered that, by the English law, a living man could have no heir.
When they were told that there was no precedent for declaring the throne vacant, they produced from among the records in the Tower a roll of parchment, near three hundred year old, on which, in quaint characters and barbarous Latin, it was recorded that the Estates of the Realm had declared vacant the throne of a perfidious and tyrannical Plantagenet [In 2006 we hope Tony Blair a sworn traitor and known ardent destroyer of our English Constitution]
When at length the dispute had been accommodated, the new sovereigns were proclaimed with the old pageantry. All the fantastic pomp of heraldry was there, ,Clarencieux and Norry, Portcullis and Rouge Dragon, the trumpets, the banners, the grotesque coats embroided with lions and lilies. The title of King
Of France, assumed by the conqueror of Cressy, was not omitted in the royal style. To us, who have lived in the year 1848, it may seem almost an abuse of terms to call a proceedings, conducted with so much deliberation, with so much sobriety, and with such minute attention to prescriptive etiquette, by the terrible name of Revolution.
[Macaulay. History of England, chap.x Works,ii. 395,]
We ask the constituents of Clare Short to support their honourable Member of Parliament in her new role as their Independent Member as it is so rare in these days to witness an INDEPENDENT attitude from the numerous party clones who put their parliamentary career before matters of JUSTICE and INTEGRITY and the questions of LIFE and DEATH of our FIGHTING SERVICES
* * *
Let the people speak!
[Latest Addition - June07]
Daniel Hannan - Forming an
OPPOSITION to the EU
GORDON BROWN WANTS
TRUST-BUT WHY WON'T HE TRUST YOU?
HELL ON EARTH IN IRAQ
want powers back from EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95%
of British people want
SIGN TODAY ON LINE
WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE
TO SET YOU
THE QUESTION THAT THE
VOTER MUST ANSWER
YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE
CORRUPT ,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND CORRUPT ALIEN BUSYBODY
-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?
TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T
VOTE FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER
SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR
MINDS WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.
SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS
AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?
Elections in the British One
If you vote Conservative, Labour, Lib-Dem, UKIP or the
BNP, you'll be voting for the EU dictatorship. All five party
leaderships are EU controlled. That's why your vote doesn't make a
difference - all these five parties have the same policies: the EU's
The 17 most senior politicians in the
Conservative, Lib Dem and Labour parties, including Ken Clarke, Francis
Maude, Cameron, William Hague, George Osborne, Nick Clegg, Brown, David
and Ed Milliband, Ed Balls, Peter Mandleson are Bilderbergers, the 140
strong band of ultra senior Freemasons who are bribed by the EU to build
the EU dictatorship.
Bilderberger, Freemason or Common Purpose graduate should ever be
allowed to hold public office.
UKIP and the BNP are honey traps to neutralise activists: UKIP is
riddled with Freemasons and Common Purpose like a cancer, and the BNP
controlled by the Edgar Griffin (father) and son Nick Freemasonry
family. The 350,000 freemasons and the 40,000 strong Common Purpose
Organisation are the (mostly unknowing) foot soldiers of the EU in
Britain. (Which makes the BNP the easiest party to clean up - get rid of
the Griffins, and put in a real anti-EU leadership.)
details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk
IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF
INTEND TO JOIN THEM TAKE NOTE OF THE MESSAGE ABOVE
THE EDP HAS BEEN
CRITICAL OF THE MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP OF THE
UKIP FOR SOME TIME NOW AS IS SHOWN IN A NUMBER OF
BULLETINS OVER THE PAST FEW YEARS WHERE WE HAVE
CRITICISED THEIR LACK LUSTRE PERFORMANCE AS THEY
FAILED TO MOTIVATE THEIR MEMBERSHIP TO A MORE
DETERMINED CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE CAMPAIGN WHICH WOULD
HAVE MADE THE GOVERNMENTS TREMBLE BUT THEY HAD NO
WORRY BECAUSE THEY HAD THEIR OWN PERSONS IN CHARGE
AT THE TOP OF THE ORGANISATION. THIS FIGHTING
SPIRIT HAS BEEN LACKING AND WE CAN CONFIRM THIS
OURSELVES BECAUSE WE HAVE BEEN OUTSIDE PARLIAMENT
WHEN A MARCH WAS CANCELLED - AND WATCH THE FARCE
WHEN CANDLES WERE HELD AND THOUSANDS OF LETTERS SENT
TO MPS WHO KNEW WHERE TO DISPOSES OF THEM -AND ALL
TO NO AVAIL. IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF UKIP YOU HAVE
BEEN BETRAYED BY YOUR OWN LEADERSHIP SOME APPEAR ON
THE ALEX JONES SHOW WHICH HAS BEEN UNDER CLOSE
SPOTLIGHT RECENTLY AS BEING CLOSE TO AN ISRAELI
SECURITY FIRM DETAILS ON OUR WEBSITE . IRONICALLY
IT WAS A CHANCE LOOK ON THE INTERNET A FEW YEARS
AGO TO COME UPON THAT SITE WHICH OPENED OUR MIND TO
THE ILLUMINATI. THOUGH WE HAVE SOME DETAILS OF THE
BILDERBERGERS ON OUR SITE A NUMBER OF YEARS AGO WE
FAILED TO DO MORE RESEARCH- WE ALL HAVE TO LEARN.
THE FAILURE OF UKIP WE HAVE SUSPECTED FOR MANY
YEARS THAT MANY AT THE TOP OF THEIR ORGANISATION
MIGHT BE UNDERCOVER MEMBERS OF THE ILLUMINATI. IT
IS A FAVOURITE TRICK OF THEIRS TO SUPPORT ANY PARTY
OR ORGANISATION AT THE OUTSET WHATEVER ITS POLICY AS
IT ALLOWS THEM TO PUT THEIR OWN PEOPLE IN TO CONTROL
ITS POLICES AS THEY BEHIND THE SCENES SUPPLY THE
VITAL FINANCIAL SUPPORT.
Our intention is
not to benefit from this disaster as since the 1999
European Election we have NOT! accepted a DONATION!
from ANYONE! and we closed membership also because
we did not wish to split the vote for UKIP but have
stated in the past that we would contest another
election if it was ever necessary to enter into the
affray again and with the reputation of UKIP under
scrutiny we will keep our options OPEN! As we
mentioned some time ago we have been almost two
decades on the campaign trail to free our once FREE
INDEPENDENT NATION STATE of ENGLAND from the SATANIC
EU and those who have for centuries have planned for
an EVIL ONE-WORLD CORPORATION/GOVERNMENT and
EXTERMINATE! at least 5 BILLION of the WORLD'S
POPULATION and therefore if we are right about those
mentioned above they are not only TRAITORS to their
COUNTRY but also a THREAT to WORLD PEACE. However,
of late, matters have NOT! been going well for the
ILLUMINATI as you will observe BELOW.
WHAT A WAY TO WIN A WAR
PATRIOT or TRAITOR to HIS
THIS YOU MUST SEE IT
NO NEED TO PANIC!
'Others shall sing
Others shall right
Finish what I begin,
All all I fail of
Hail to the coming
Hail to the brave
Forward I reach and
All that they sing
The airs of heaven
blow o'er me;
A glory shines
Of what mankind
brave and free,
I feel the earth
I join the great
And take, by faith,
My freehold of
ADDED - MAY-2012
[All underlined words have a