Blair says he will strive for Peace in the Middle East-BUT HE is the BARRIER to that PEACE.
Promoter of Peace?
Don’t make me Laugh.
Thursday, September 28, 2006.
Much of the British media have fallen in love again with Tony Blair after his admittedly striking speech on Tuesday. Newspapers which berated his policy in Iraq forget their former misgivings and proclaim Tony Blair a political genius, the like of whom we will never see again.
Undoubtedly he is a genius, but not in the sense that is normally meant. He has carried fantasy and self-delusion to unparalleled heights in any leading politician of the modern age. He believes that he should stay in office until the summer – a view endorsed by acolytes such as Alan Johnson, Education Secretary – partly so that he can help broker a settlement between Israel and Palestine.
Anyone who knows anything about the Middle East understands that it is inconceivable that any settlement can be achieved soon. If a solution is eventually found, it certainly won’t be through the auspices of a man who is loathed, by the Palestinians. Mr Blair is almost the last man in the world who could achieve a resolution.
His remarks on Iraq were equally illuminating. He said that ‘if we retreat now, hand over Iraq to Al Qaeda…we won’t be safer.’ What he did not say was that until the Anglo-American invasion of Iraq neither Al Qaeda nor any other terrorist group had a presence in that country. He had inadvertently conceded that the war has made Iraq more dangerous to the West
THAT happens to be one terrifying conclusion of the
behind the so-called
National Intelligence Estimate
Parts of which were leaked over the weekend to the
New York Times.
The Bush administration has just released a portion of the document –
Less than 10 per cent of the total – in the hope of redressing the effects of the earlier report.
IN FACT, IT TENDS TO CONFIRM ITS WORST FEARS.
According to the
National Intelligence estimate,
‘the Iraq jihad [holy war] is shaping a new generation of terrorist leaders and operatives; perceived jihadist success there would inspire more fighters to continue the struggle elsewhere.
It adds that:
‘the Iraq conflict has become the cause celebre for jihadists breeding resentment of U.S. involvement in the Muslim world and cultivating supporters for the global jihadist movement.’
These are the conclusions of America’s intelligence agencies –
not of a bunch of anti –war protesters. The war in Iraq HAS increased the terrorist THREAT. It has encouraged the jihadists.
THE National Intelligence Estimate adds that:
‘the jihadists regard Europe as an important venue for attacking Western interests.’
This is, of course, the opposite of what the Blair-Bush ‘war on terror’ was supposed to achieve. We were told that the defeat of the Taliban in Afghanistan would undermine Al Qaeda. There was certainly no suggestion that the invasion of IRAQ would make us
MORE vulnerable to TERRORISM.
If we had known that this would be the outcome of the war, would a single person in the country have supported IT?
[Well if the so-called Her Majesty’s Opposition had NOT supported the illegal invasion of Iraq the Government with many dissenters on its side would NOT have gone to WAR.
Millions of people in the country were against the war for many reasons but what is indisputable is that authorities and reputable observers including many with long experience of the region warned Bush and Blair that it would be a disaster in fermenting growing terrorism in the Middle East and in the World beyond?]
Cast your mind back to the immediate aftermath of the bomb attacks in London on July 7 last year. Many people drew the obvious inference: that our involvement in Iraq had increased the likelihood of such an attack.
NOT SO – said Tony Blair and the then Foreign Secretary, Jack Straw. They repeatedly denied that the war had made us more vulnerable, pointing out that other Al Qaeda attacks, such as the destruction of the World Trade Centre
, had preceded the invasion of Iraq.
This was very slippery reasoning. No One doubted that Al Qaeda was already something of a threat. The argument was only that the war in Iraq, far from diminishing the danger, had exacerbated it.
WE WERE MORE AT RISK-NOT LESS
Iraq has become the cockpit of terrorism. The London bombings were, after all, the FIRST Al Qaeda-inspired attack on the British mainland.
[One point which has not seen clearly the light of day is that Britain has always had a reputation of centuries of giving a home to dissidents from the four corners of the world. World history is full of new regimes coming into being many on the continent of Europe by many who made our country their second home. It has always been understood that these refuges to use an underrated term were accommodated provided they did not commit terrorist outrages at home and abroad. Unfortunately in Tony Blair’s Human Right’s Britain and with our Intelligence Services taking their eye off the ball and Blair’s disastrous adventure in Iraq and now Afghanistan many dangerous insurgents were allowed to remain and a number of these though known to British Intelligence after training in Pakistan and training camps in our country found their way to America and the 9/11 World Trade Centre atrocity. Later as we all know a number of the homebred terrorists also escaped the intelligence net with the consequence of the July 7 bombings in London.
Al Qaeda before Iraq looked on Britain as useful neutral territory and even after 9/11 because of Tony Blair’s Human Right’s Act could still operate here –it was the war on Iraq that finally gave the impetus to Islamic Fundamentalist attack on our mainland.]
It is very difficult to imagine there will not be more.
President Bush is perhaps the chief villain of the piece. It was he who first declared the ‘War on Terror’. The invasion of Iraq was partly justified on wholly mendacious grounds that Al Qaeda or its affiliates had some presence there.
THEY DID NOT.
Iraq was country that posed very little, if any, danger to America or the West.
As a result of the war, it now presents a considerable threat – and we have the word of America’s entire intelligence community FOR IT.
Mr Bush is beyond our control. The American people will have to decide how to respond to being misled. BUT Blair is still our Prime Minister. Almost single-handedly he took us to a WAR in IRAQ, despite the reservations of many in the CABINET and his PARTY that was not in Britain’s interests by the wildest stretch of the imagination.
TWO DOSSIERS FULL OF LIES AND MISREPRESENTATIONS WERE PUBLISHED IN ORDER TO CONVINCE US OTHERWISE.
[What? we have to ask is WHY the IMPEACHMENT of TONY BLAIR has stalled in OUR HOUSE OF COMMONS? –Until that happens our ONCE GOOD REPUTATION cannot be RESTORED and in the meantime GREAT ISSUES NEEDING our ATTENTION are SHELVED until the BETRAYER of OUR COUNTRY is DISGRACED and PUNISHED for his GREAT CRIME?]
AND yet the same man, co-architect of a bloody and futile adventure that has made Britain a much more dangerous place, was cheered to the rafters on Tuesday –
So much so that many moist-eyed sentimentalists marvelled that the Labour Party should be getting rid of him. Newspapers which have recently put aside the habits of many years, and begun to criticise him, reverted to their former habits of blinkered adulation.
A few journalists – mostly in this paper – have rightly noted how Mr Bliar made a series of fantastical claims in his speech. But even if they were wild and excessive, I am prepared to admit that over the past nine years, some hospitals and a few schools have got better. The Government’s promotion of dept-relief probably has preserved some lives in Africa, though it has done nothing to save them in Darfur or Zimbabwe.
Mr Blair’s portrayal of himself as a friend of the military was pretty ludicrous, given the cutbacks and economies that have been applied while Britain has been taking on even greater responsibilities. All the same, I acknowledge that Mr Blair genuinely admires our Armed Forces, even if he has done little to help them.
[We can understand that Tony Blair should ADMIRE our Armed Forces –the dictionary meaning:
‘to have a high opinion of: to wonder at.’
What we have to ask is how it is possible for Tony Blair to mention the word knowing what destruction he has done to the proud traditions of the British Army and many of its historic regiments in order that his plans for his
EU. Fantasy Army can take shape by drawing off valuable resources needed desperately in Iraq and Afghanistan.
For a Prime Minister to say that he ADMIRES the Armed Forces is one thing but to ‘rub it in’ at such a time is an INSULT to the relatives and friends who have lost loved one’s because a Prime Minister embarked on an illegal war and to compound it TO NOT SEE that those forces had before leaving the UK the best equipment available to any troops in the world.
WE CAN’T ADMIRE BLAIR FOR LETTING DOWN OUR BRAVE TROOPS WHEREVER THEY ARE.]
What was utterly unendurable, though, was his pretence that he is a promoter of peace in the Middle East. Partly out of a misguided subservience to President |Bush, and partly he is gripped by some wild, messianic imperative to‘re-order’ (his phrase) the WORLD.
He has squandered this country’s name by engaging in a stupid and immoral [and devastating] war which, in the considered view of America’s Intelligence Community, has made us
MORE VULNERABLE TO ISLAMIC TERRORISM.
Certain sections of the Labour Party may want him to stay on, and in the wave of emotion some journalists are happy to forget what they were writing only a few weeks ago.
PERSONALLY I CAN’T WAIT FOR THIS DESTRUCTIVE AND DANGEROUS [MACHAVELLIAN AND DEVILISH]
MAN - TO BE GONE.
[MANY PEOPLE IN OUR COUNTRY TODAY AGREE –AND QUICKLY.]
[But before he goes he and his cronies must be punished for their international and national crime of illegal war and the almost destruction of our Ancient Constitution – A FULL INQUIRY should be held IMPEACHMENT if possible before the House of Commons and in the Words of our own Thomas Paine of “Common Sense” fame:]
‘It is error only, and not truth, that shrinks from inquiry’
Mindful of the need to see that justice is done we quote the words of an American statesman – orator Daniel Webster on Jurisprudence which fits our desire for JUSTICE against those who embarked on an illegal war and also in the almost destruction of our
‘Whenever a jury [or Parliament] through whimsical or ill-founded scuples suffer the guilty [Tony Blair and his Scottish cabal and English traitors], to escape, they become responsible for the augmented danger of the innocent [the casualties of an illegal war and the suppression of Freedom of Speech and Expression].’
‘Justice is as strictly due between neighbour nations, as between neighbour citizens. A highwayman is as much a robber when plunders in a gang, as when single; and a nation that makes an unjust war is only a great gang of robbers.’
Benjamin Franklin (1706-90) Am. Statesman, inventor and author.
* * *
[Font altered-bolding & underlining used-comments in brackets]
Let the people speak!
[Latest Addition - June07]
Daniel Hannan - Forming an
OPPOSITION to the EU
GORDON BROWN WANTS
TRUST-BUT WHY WON'T HE TRUST YOU?
HELL ON EARTH IN IRAQ
want powers back from EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95%
of British people want
SIGN TODAY ON LINE
WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE
TO SET YOU
THE QUESTION THAT THE
VOTER MUST ANSWER
YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE
CORRUPT ,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND CORRUPT ALIEN BUSYBODY
-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?
TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T
VOTE FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER
SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR
MINDS WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.
SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS
AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?
[All underlined words have a
Elections in the British One
If you vote Conservative, Labour, Lib-Dem, UKIP or the
BNP, you'll be voting for the EU dictatorship. All five party
leaderships are EU controlled. That's why your vote doesn't make a
difference - all these five parties have the same policies: the EU's
The 17 most senior politicians in the
Conservative, Lib Dem and Labour parties, including Ken Clarke, Francis
Maude, Cameron, William Hague, George Osborne, Nick Clegg, Brown, David
and Ed Milliband, Ed Balls, Peter Mandleson are Bilderbergers, the 140
strong band of ultra senior Freemasons who are bribed by the EU to build
the EU dictatorship.
Bilderberger, Freemason or Common Purpose graduate should ever be
allowed to hold public office.
UKIP and the BNP are honey traps to neutralise activists: UKIP is
riddled with Freemasons and Common Purpose like a cancer, and the BNP
controlled by the Edgar Griffin (father) and son Nick Freemasonry
family. The 350,000 freemasons and the 40,000 strong Common Purpose
Organisation are the (mostly unknowing) foot soldiers of the EU in
Britain. (Which makes the BNP the easiest party to clean up - get rid of
the Griffins, and put in a real anti-EU leadership.)
details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk
IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF
INTEND TO JOIN THEM TAKE NOTE OF THE MESSAGE ABOVE
THE EDP HAS BEEN
CRITICAL OF THE MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP OF THE
UKIP FOR SOME TIME NOW AS IS SHOWN IN A NUMBER OF
BULLETINS OVER THE PAST FEW YEARS WHERE WE HAVE
CRITICISED THEIR LACK LUSTRE PERFORMANCE AS THEY
FAILED TO MOTIVATE THEIR MEMBERSHIP TO A MORE
DETERMINED CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE CAMPAIGN WHICH WOULD
HAVE MADE THE GOVERNMENTS TREMBLE BUT THEY HAD NO
WORRY BECAUSE THEY HAD THEIR OWN PERSONS IN CHARGE
AT THE TOP OF THE ORGANISATION. THIS FIGHTING
SPIRIT HAS BEEN LACKING AND WE CAN CONFIRM THIS
OURSELVES BECAUSE WE HAVE BEEN OUTSIDE PARLIAMENT
WHEN A MARCH WAS CANCELLED - AND WATCH THE FARCE
WHEN CANDLES WERE HELD AND THOUSANDS OF LETTERS SENT
TO MPS WHO KNEW WHERE TO DISPOSES OF THEM -AND ALL
TO NO AVAIL. IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF UKIP YOU HAVE
BEEN BETRAYED BY YOUR OWN LEADERSHIP SOME APPEAR ON
THE ALEX JONES SHOW WHICH HAS BEEN UNDER CLOSE
SPOTLIGHT RECENTLY AS BEING CLOSE TO AN ISRAELI
SECURITY FIRM DETAILS ON OUR WEBSITE . IRONICALLY
IT WAS A CHANCE LOOK ON THE INTERNET A FEW YEARS
AGO TO COME UPON THAT SITE WHICH OPENED OUR MIND TO
THE ILLUMINATI. THOUGH WE HAVE SOME DETAILS OF THE
BILDERBERGERS ON OUR SITE A NUMBER OF YEARS AGO WE
FAILED TO DO MORE RESEARCH- WE ALL HAVE TO LEARN.
THE FAILURE OF UKIP WE HAVE SUSPECTED FOR MANY
YEARS THAT MANY AT THE TOP OF THEIR ORGANISATION
MIGHT BE UNDERCOVER MEMBERS OF THE ILLUMINATI. IT
IS A FAVOURITE TRICK OF THEIRS TO SUPPORT ANY PARTY
OR ORGANISATION AT THE OUTSET WHATEVER ITS POLICY AS
IT ALLOWS THEM TO PUT THEIR OWN PEOPLE IN TO CONTROL
ITS POLICES AS THEY BEHIND THE SCENES SUPPLY THE
VITAL FINANCIAL SUPPORT.
Our intention is
not to benefit from this disaster as since the 1999
European Election we have NOT! accepted a DONATION!
from ANYONE! and we closed membership also because
we did not wish to split the vote for UKIP but have
stated in the past that we would contest another
election if it was ever necessary to enter into the
affray again and with the reputation of UKIP under
scrutiny we will keep our options OPEN! As we
mentioned some time ago we have been almost two
decades on the campaign trail to free our once FREE
INDEPENDENT NATION STATE of ENGLAND from the SATANIC
EU and those who have for centuries have planned for
an EVIL ONE-WORLD CORPORATION/GOVERNMENT and
EXTERMINATE! at least 5 BILLION of the WORLD'S
POPULATION and therefore if we are right about those
mentioned above they are not only TRAITORS to their
COUNTRY but also a THREAT to WORLD PEACE. However,
of late, matters have NOT! been going well for the
ILLUMINATI as you will observe BELOW.
WHAT A WAY TO WIN A WAR
PATRIOT or TRAITOR to HIS
THIS YOU MUST SEE IT
NO NEED TO PANIC!
'Others shall sing
Others shall right
Finish what I begin,
All all I fail of
Hail to the coming
Hail to the brave
Forward I reach and
All that they sing
The airs of heaven
blow o'er me;
A glory shines
Of what mankind
brave and free,
I feel the earth
I join the great
And take, by faith,
My freehold of
ADDED - MAY-2012