Blair PRISON PLEDGE Exposed As A SHAM After £30m Is Left
Monday, June 26, 2006.
Home Affairs Editor.
TONY Blair’s promise to build more jails was exposed as a
‘total sham’ yesterday.
It has emerged that the Home Office Minister said the
Government has had permission to build a prison in his constituency for several
‘but not a brick’ has been laid.’
director-general of the Prison Service, has been forced to give interviews
denying the Government plans were in ‘crisis’.
But critics say the result of Labour’s inaction has been
An increase in lenient
sentences and early release of dangerous offenders.
Shadow Home Secretary David
‘This is yet another example
of the Government’s total failure to address the lack of capacity in our
[Or in plain language the
PRISONS are FULL.]
‘Mr Blair’s drive this week
to provide more prison places now looks
A TOTAL SHAM.’
The Prime Minister unveiled plans to create
4,000 new prison places on Friday, in a speech promising to ‘rebalance’ the
skewed criminal justice system.
BUT officials yesterday
confirmed they had been given
-two years ago to find new
sites and had not spent it.
The Home Office has
also under spent on other projects by
-over the same period. The
combined total would pay for:
ALL 4000 PRISON SPACES.
Labour’s former Home Office
Minister George Howarth said there was a site in his Merseyside constituency of
Knowsley North and Sefton East which had gained planning permission for a
-but no construction work
had been done.
He added: ‘So far I don’t think the Prison Service has
got to grips with the need for more prison places. In my constituency, they have planning permission for a 600-place
prison and they have had that for several years, YET there is NO SIGN of a
BRICK being LAID or ANYTHING happening AT ALL.’
Her Majesty’s Inspector of
Prisons, Anne Owers, has said that jails will soon be putting up signs to say
THEY ARE FULL’
The total prison population
in England and Wales stands at 77,711-only 1,717 short of the maximum
operational capacity of
A Home Office spokesman said the
-had not been handed back to
the Treasury and could theoretically,
STILL BE SPENT.
[After sitting on the
money for two years]
* * *
By James Slack
Home Affairs Editor
LABOUR is preparing
to make a huge U-turn by ditching plans to change the  Human Rights Act.
Instead of facing up to the chaos caused
by the law, MINISTERS will blame the POLICE, Parole Board and laws pre-dating
their time in power.
But the ACT was passed in 1998; a year AFTER Labour was
The strategy is to protect Tony Blair from
the embarrassment after he blamed the Act for the release of killers and the
Government’s failure to kick out FOREIGN TERROR SUSPECTS.
Last night, the Premier signalled his
intent by attacking the JUDGES. And in a speech today, he will insist Labour is
determined to ‘rebalance’ the JUSTICE SYSTEM in favour of VICTIMS.
Although Labour introduced
the Human Rights Act, Mr Blair blamed the COURTS for giving to much weight to
offenders’ human rights.
He said: ‘The absolute human right of the defendant is
taken into consideration too much.
‘We need to look at the balance
of human rights of the victims, defendants and the community.
‘We need to stop the process
taking up to a year and stop witnesses feeli9ng intimidated.’
In his speech today he was
expected to stick to the line that the [Human Rights] Act will be reviewed.
BUT Home Secretary John Reid
is preparing to absolve the legislation from blame. He claims many scandals are the FAULT of the POLICE and other
officials for not understanding the Act properly.
Failing to remove foreign
convicts is being blamed on the 12 -year legislation passed by the
Conservatives and a 1996 judgment by the European Court of Human Rights.
Mr Reid was sent a letter by
Tony Blair last month suggesting the Act be changed.
In a separate letter to Lord
falconer, the Constitutional Affairs Secretary, Mr Blair asked for a strategy
that improves the public’s confidence in the ACT.
But Mr Reid said yesterday:
‘There can be
interpretations of the law which are ill-informed. It is not the Human Rights
Act at all. Sometimes parole boards make decisions believing they are required
to do certain things by the Human Rights Act -which they are not.
‘Police will not put up
posters because they believe they are prohibited when they are not.
People say we cannot keep
documentation on Ian Huntley because it is contrary to the Data Protection Act.
It is not.
His comments represent a
huge change from MR Blair’s suggestion to amend the ACT.
[Well Tony Blair we are told
is a LAWYER -whereas Dr Reid is NOT. As much as we have never trusted Tony
Blair with OUR CONSTITUTION we would consider his views on the Human Rights Act
to those of Mr Reid]
In May, Mr Blair branded a case in which
High Court Judge - Mr Justice Sullivan allowed nine Afghan hijackers to stay in
Britain ‘an abuse of common sense.’
But Mr Reid said: ‘If we look at the level of scrutiny we have
got to give to every case before deportation, which is long tedious and
difficult, it is from an Act passed in 1994, I think by Michael Howard.’
‘The scrutiny demanded is
about three times as much as the Human Rights Act would require.’
He also blamed the Chahal
judgment by the European Court of Human Rights in 1996, which prevents the risk
of harm to British citizens being considered in deportation hearings.
Instead, only the human rights
of the suspected terrorist can be taken into account.
Mr Reid said: ‘That decision
was before we had a Human Rights Act.’
Rather than change the Act,
MINISTERS are likely to repeal the 1994 legislation and challenge the European Court’s
Shadow Home Secretary David
‘After nine years, three
huge majorities and over 50 pieces of Criminal Justice legislation there is
only one Prime Minister to blame for the utter chaos in our Criminal Justice System.
‘It is astonishing mixture
of complacency and self-righteousness that the Government will blame anyone but
themselves for the disasters at the Home Office.’
[Well Mr Davis cannot throw
up his hands and deny any blame in the present chaos in our once world renowned
It was a Conservative Prime
Minister Edward Heath a known Nazi Agent for the past 60 years with
his colleague Geoffrey Rippon and the third member of the Balliol
College Nazi Ring Roy Jenkins. It was the College Master [Lindsay]
who alerted MI5 at the time.
Mr Heath who died last year from a
coronary which afflicted him when he was in Salzburg in 2003 for a music
festival but in reality to be advised by his Nazi controllers that British
Intelligence knew of his long spy career and on receiving the stunning news
immediately suffered a seizure.
He received a Pomp and Ceremony
burial service in Salisbury Cathedral in 2005 (details on our Bulletin Board) who
over 35 years ago was instrumental in getting us into the present mess by his blatant
LIES of a supposed TRADING ONLY
which was known by its
exponents then that it would eventually lead a
United States of Europe
The passing of the
Masstricht Treaty in 1992
-destroyed the ability of a
return to being governed by our OWN LAWS, which could be repealed or amended as
conditions demanded and not as now in servitude to European Human Rights Act
and other EU institutions. Many citizens of Europe in 1951 had had no
experience of Human Rights which Britain’s lawyers showed the way in the
1951 Convention on Human
We had no need then and even
now to be a party to such a Convention as our own
Petition of Right
and other Acts of
legislation on our Statute Book and a FREE people are our security against TYRANNY
at HOME and ABROAD if OUR PARLIAMENT so DESIRED.
Mr Davis is concerned about what is happening to our country he should reflect
that it is the inability of his Party to abide by behaviour suggested by his
party’s name that has been responsible for our present difficulties throughout
the span of our Society.
say to Mr Davis either change your Party NAME or give what your Party has
always valued -it’s conservativism-its protection of OUR CONSTITUTION and its COMMON
LAW and VALUES.
Mr Davis don’t waste our time by blaming others when your party has done enough
damage to ensure we hope it never gets elected again in this century.
Representation might lead to a less strong government but we would not have
almost lost all our inherited ‘Rights and Liberties’
* * *
altered-bolding & underlining used-comments in brackets]
ONLY Traffic Lights will STOP Hazel Blears and other
MINISTERS hogging the LIMELIGHT.
A RIGHT OF REPLY!
Only recently we observed
Hazel Blears on screen being interviewed by Jeremy Paxman and she made it
possible by her unchallenged tactic to talk her opponent OUT of a REPLY.
This practice has been
observed for some time and we are astonished that in a supposed democratic
country that a chance of REPLY is inherent otherwise the exercise is a farce.
Everyone knows TIME is
PRECIOUS and we ourselves were severely restricted in our address in the 1999
European Election broadcast held at the -Black Museum in the West Midlands
which the candidate’ s were first given 20 seconds to address the public which
was later changed to 13 seconds just before the broadcast went on air.
Even in these circumstances one
candidate spent part of those valuable seconds with an unprovoked attack on the
views of a fellow candidate who had no opportunity to defend his Party that was
entitled under the rules to be there and judged by THEIR address and NOT on the
comments of a fellow candidate who instead wasted a number VALUABLE SECONDS
which could have been used on their own parties Electoral Address.
The MEDIA should have firm
rules that each candidate must observe a traffic light sequence and if a person
interviewed went over time the sound would cease and that would make the
law-breaker look ridiculous particularly as the other speaker would be able to
use all their available time constructively.
The above practice would prevent
any favouritism by interviewers, which is a common practice at the moment, and
it would lead to persons being interviewed to search for limited BUT potent
material, in which to REPLY, which will be more interesting to the VIEWER.
We have in the past
commentated on much gobbledegook by the Clan from beyond our northern border
and have noted that it has now become a rare event. We hope the suggestion of the traffic lights might bring fairness
and interest to both sides of a political DEBATE in the FUTURE.
* * *
If TIME be of all things the most precious, wasting
TIME must be the greatest prodigality, since lost TIME is never found again;
and what we call TIME enough always proves little enough. Let us then up and doing, and doing to the
purpose; so by diligence shall we do more with less perplexity. - Franklin
Statesman. Inventor and author.
‘To choose TIME is to save
Bacon (1561-1626) Eng. Jur., sci., auth. And
TIME! The corrector where
our judgments err; the test of truth, and love; the sole philosopher, for all
beside are sophists. - Byron (1788-1824) Eng. Poet.
Know the true value of TIME;
snatch, seize, and enjoy every moment of it. -No idleness; no laziness; no
procrastination; -never put off till tomorrow what you can do today. - Chesterfield. (1694-1773) Eng. Courtier, orator and
‘There is a TIME to be born, and a TIME to die, says
Solomon, and it is the memento of a truly wise man; but there is an interval
between these two lines of infinite importance.’- Richmond (1772-1827) Eng.
‘TIME, with all its
celerity, moves slowly on to him whose whole employment is to watch its flight’.
Auth., lexicographer and conversationalist.
‘The end crowns all; and
that old common arbitrator, TIME, will one day end it’.
I wasted TIME, and now doth TIME waste me. -
Shakespeare (1564-1616) Eng. Poet and dramatist.
* * *
[Latest Addition - June07]
Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION
to the EU
WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE
TO SET YOU
TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE
FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER
SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS
WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.
Home Rule for
[All underlined words have a separate
Elections in the British One
If you vote Conservative, Labour, Lib-Dem, UKIP or the
BNP, you'll be voting for the EU dictatorship. All five party
leaderships are EU controlled. That's why your vote doesn't make a
difference - all these five parties have the same policies: the EU's
The 17 most senior politicians in the
Conservative, Lib Dem and Labour parties, including Ken Clarke, Francis
Maude, Cameron, William Hague, George Osborne, Nick Clegg, Brown, David
and Ed Milliband, Ed Balls, Peter Mandleson are Bilderbergers, the 140
strong band of ultra senior Freemasons who are bribed by the EU to build
the EU dictatorship.
Bilderberger, Freemason or Common Purpose graduate should ever be
allowed to hold public office.
UKIP and the BNP are honey traps to neutralise activists: UKIP is
riddled with Freemasons and Common Purpose like a cancer, and the BNP
controlled by the Edgar Griffin (father) and son Nick Freemasonry
family. The 350,000 freemasons and the 40,000 strong Common Purpose
Organisation are the (mostly unknowing) foot soldiers of the EU in
Britain. (Which makes the BNP the easiest party to clean up - get rid of
the Griffins, and put in a real anti-EU leadership.)
details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk
IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF
INTEND TO JOIN THEM TAKE NOTE OF THE MESSAGE ABOVE
THE EDP HAS BEEN
CRITICAL OF THE MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP OF THE
UKIP FOR SOME TIME NOW AS IS SHOWN IN A NUMBER OF
BULLETINS OVER THE PAST FEW YEARS WHERE WE HAVE
CRITICISED THEIR LACK LUSTRE PERFORMANCE AS THEY
FAILED TO MOTIVATE THEIR MEMBERSHIP TO A MORE
DETERMINED CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE CAMPAIGN WHICH WOULD
HAVE MADE THE GOVERNMENTS TREMBLE BUT THEY HAD NO
WORRY BECAUSE THEY HAD THEIR OWN PERSONS IN CHARGE
AT THE TOP OF THE ORGANISATION. THIS FIGHTING
SPIRIT HAS BEEN LACKING AND WE CAN CONFIRM THIS
OURSELVES BECAUSE WE HAVE BEEN OUTSIDE PARLIAMENT
WHEN A MARCH WAS CANCELLED - AND WATCH THE FARCE
WHEN CANDLES WERE HELD AND THOUSANDS OF LETTERS SENT
TO MPS WHO KNEW WHERE TO DISPOSES OF THEM -AND ALL
TO NO AVAIL. IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF UKIP YOU HAVE
BEEN BETRAYED BY YOUR OWN LEADERSHIP SOME APPEAR ON
THE ALEX JONES SHOW WHICH HAS BEEN UNDER CLOSE
SPOTLIGHT RECENTLY AS BEING CLOSE TO AN ISRAELI
SECURITY FIRM DETAILS ON OUR WEBSITE . IRONICALLY
IT WAS A CHANCE LOOK ON THE INTERNET A FEW YEARS
AGO TO COME UPON THAT SITE WHICH OPENED OUR MIND TO
THE ILLUMINATI. THOUGH WE HAVE SOME DETAILS OF THE
BILDERBERGERS ON OUR SITE A NUMBER OF YEARS AGO WE
FAILED TO DO MORE RESEARCH- WE ALL HAVE TO LEARN.
THE FAILURE OF UKIP WE HAVE SUSPECTED FOR MANY
YEARS THAT MANY AT THE TOP OF THEIR ORGANISATION
MIGHT BE UNDERCOVER MEMBERS OF THE ILLUMINATI. IT
IS A FAVOURITE TRICK OF THEIRS TO SUPPORT ANY PARTY
OR ORGANISATION AT THE OUTSET WHATEVER ITS POLICY AS
IT ALLOWS THEM TO PUT THEIR OWN PEOPLE IN TO CONTROL
ITS POLICES AS THEY BEHIND THE SCENES SUPPLY THE
VITAL FINANCIAL SUPPORT.
Our intention is
not to benefit from this disaster as since the 1999
European Election we have NOT! accepted a DONATION!
from ANYONE! and we closed membership also because
we did not wish to split the vote for UKIP but have
stated in the past that we would contest another
election if it was ever necessary to enter into the
affray again and with the reputation of UKIP under
scrutiny we will keep our options OPEN! As we
mentioned some time ago we have been almost two
decades on the campaign trail to free our once FREE
INDEPENDENT NATION STATE of ENGLAND from the SATANIC
EU and those who have for centuries have planned for
an EVIL ONE-WORLD CORPORATION/GOVERNMENT and
EXTERMINATE! at least 5 BILLION of the WORLD'S
POPULATION and therefore if we are right about those
mentioned above they are not only TRAITORS to their
COUNTRY but also a THREAT to WORLD PEACE. However,
of late, matters have NOT! been going well for the
ILLUMINATI as you will observe BELOW.
WHAT A WAY TO WIN A WAR
PATRIOT or TRAITOR to HIS
THIS YOU MUST SEE IT
NO NEED TO PANIC!
'Others shall sing
Others shall right
Finish what I begin,
All all I fail of
Hail to the coming
Hail to the brave
Forward I reach and
All that they sing
The airs of heaven
blow o'er me;
A glory shines
Of what mankind
brave and free,
I feel the earth
I join the great
And take, by faith,
My freehold of
ADDED - MAY-2012