VIEWERS -TOP TOPICS-WKLY/ARCHIVE

*HOME-PT 2

PAGE ONE/ PAGE TWO/PAGE THREE/ & PAGE FOUR

A PEACEFUL ENGLISH REVOLUTION IS ON THE WAY-ALERT-1

 
     
 

 

Seven out of ten young criminals who are let off custody re-offend.

 

*

Daily Mail

Friday, June 9 -2006

 

 

By

 

Matthew Hickley

Home Affairs Correspondent

 

 

TEENAGE DRIFTERS COST 21BILLION

 

 

 

[21,000,000,000]

 

 

A GROWING ARMY of teenage drifters who refuse to take jobs or stay in education could cost the

Taxpayer 21 billion,

 

it was revealed yesterday.

 

More than one in ten 16 to 18-year-olds is dropping out and living on benefits, official figures show.

 

There are 220,000 of the drifters in England, up 20,000 since last year, according to figures from the Department for Education and Skills.

 

Known as NEETS-not in education, employment or training-they are estimated to cost the taxpayer an average of 97,000 each during their lifetime.

 

The cost of supporting them includes unemployment benefit, handouts to mothers, clearing up crime and their failure to pay taxes.

 

[THIS HAS HAPPENED DURING NINE YEARS OF BLAIRDOM WITH ITS ULTRA LIBERAL POLICES WHICH ARE NOW COMING HOME TO ROOST.]

 

LABOUR’S drive to target young criminals with ‘tough’ community punishments was described as a failure last night as figures revealed

 

7 out of 10

 

-commit more crimes within a year.

 

At the same time the re-offending tare for those let off with non-custodial sentences has risen, with

70%

 

-now caught offending again within 12 months.

 

The HOME OFFICE statistics are a severe blow to Labour’s strategy of using jail as a ‘last resort’ when trying to rehabilitate young offenders, and raise grave doubts over whether the range of new cheaper community sentences are working.

 

Probation officials warned last night that youngsters committing their first offences are largely ignored due to lack of resources and that serious efforts to turn them away from crime are only made when thy are already set in their ways.

 

In 1997 a total of 183, 671 young offenders aged ten to 17 were cautioned or convicted for crimes in England and Wales, while 7,083 - or just under four per cent-ere sentenced to custody.

 

By 2004 the number cautioned or convicted had risen to 201,198, but the number locked up fell to 6,325- 3.1 per cent, while thousands more were given community services.

 

The total number of juvenile re-offenders who are caught leapt from 6,693 in 2000 to 9,516 in 2004.

 

Figures published by the Home Office yesterday analyse the number of offenders given different punishments who are caught re-offending within 12 months. For those released from custody the figure was

 

78.2%

 

-Meaning only one in five kept out of trouble for a year- slightly worse than the figure for 2000.

 

For Community punishments the re-offending ate averaged

 

70%

-rising to

 

76%

-       for curfew orders, where offenders are tagged and forced to stay at home during certain hours.

 

For supervision orders, where young criminals are watched closely by probation staff and required to take part in activities such a repairing criminal damage,

 

73%

 

-almost three quarters-were caught committing more crimes within a year.

 

Of all those who re-offended after completing a community penalty.

 

70%

 

-were given another community penalty, while only 14.5 per cent were locked up.

 

For those originally convicted of a violent offence, the re-offending rate rose to

 

38%

 

-in 2004, up slightly from

 

37.5 %

 

-in 2000.

 

Critics point out that the rate are almost certainly a substantial under estimate, because police only detect 25% of all crimes and only young criminals who get caught show up in he figures.

 

The statistics reveal a depressing picture of he ‘revolving door’ of criminal justice. The more teenagers come into contact wit the court system, the more likely they re to offend again.

 

Those with seven previous convictions have an

 

80%

-chance of re-offending, rising to

 

90%

-for 12 or more convictions.

 

Community punishments for juveniles are far cheaper than custody. A one-year rehabilitation Order costs 3000, compared with 42,000 for a year in a Young Offenders’ Institution. But opposition critics claimed the cheaper punishment s appeared to be failing.

 

Shadow Home Secretary David Davis, said:

 

Those on community punishments should be less likely to offend since presumably they are less serious crimes. [Not true Mr Davis-as many on community punishment should have ended up in jail but for the lack of space and for no other reason] The fact they are continuing to re-offend represents a continuing failure by this Government.

‘Community punishments could have a serious role to play but only if they are properly enforced.’

 

Harry Fletcher of the National Association of Probation Officers called for more resources for earlier intervention when teenagers are first getting into trouble.

 

‘But there simply aren’t the resources to do that,’ he said.

 

‘We only get involved once they are in trouble.’

 

Mr Fletcher said most first time offenders let off with a police warning did not receive any follow-up intervention, even though that was the stage when support could make the most difference.

 

But he stressed that a 70 per cent re-offending rate could not be seen as a success given the nature of the offenders in question-some of the ‘most difficult teenagers in the country.’

 

The Home Office also claimed the

figures demonstrated success in tackling re-offending on the basis that the overall rate -including the minor first time offenders let off with a police warning -was *41.3per cent four years earlier.

 

A Home Office spokesman said:

‘The Government believes in custodial sentences for the most serious and persistent offenders. However. It should be a last resort.

 

* * *

 

[Our answer to the Home Office is that they are very efficient at something at least -their Statistics -but they should not try to convince the public that a failure rate of 70% -80%-90%

-is a success?

 

As the figures are those of the Home Office we have to conclude they are as close to perfection as they can be. BUT as everyone knows one can get Statistics to prove anything if you use the appropriate input.

 

*

[Well! what the Home Office calls a serious crime will in many victims’ eyes be any persistent yobbery being carried out in their community. When offenders are NOT attending their community punishments (unless they have been sent on a continental holiday curtsy of the Taxpayer) they are no doubt as confirmed above up to their old tricks. Any offender not turning up for community punishment without a valid reason should be immediately sent to a young offenders institution. If the Home Office is running out of space call on the Polish carpenters and other trades and get building -pronto!]

 

With such a furore taking place on the Sentencing guidelines which with the support of the Lord Chief Justice have resulted in inadequate sentences for many serious crimes we will no doubt hear a multitude of widespread comment on ways to correct the present diabolical system but what you will NOT HEAR is any suggestion that more PRISONS are needed.

 

If every persistent offender who had been given community punishment -many of whom never attend and if the sentencing for many crimes made more realistic as to be acceptable to the victim [hanging not an option at the moment though certain heinous crimes certainly deserve the death penalty] there would be a need to partake in a large Prison building programme. In the short term temporary buildings would suffice-, which could be built by the 500,000 missing illegals -Human Rights legislation permitting?

*

A snippet from the pen of Daily Mail reporter LITTLEJOHN on Friday, June 16-2006 on the English so-called ‘Justice System’ on Sentencing Guidelines so strenuously defended by the Lord Chief Justice and now in freefall in a Monopoly game ‘Go to jail’ realism or takes a card to win reprieve:

 

‘THE American legal system has its flaws. BUT anyone who has ever watched LAW & ORDER [Channel 5] will know there is a simple way to stop the sentencing shambles in the country.

 

Instead of starting with a sentence and working backwards until a killer given 18 years gets out in 6, we should do what they do in the USA and set a minimum term.

 

THEN EVERYONE will know the very least criminals will serve behind bars before they become eligible for parole.

 

Fifteen -to- live? That’ll do nicely.

 

*

[On another subject but having such an affect on so many people aware of the term

 

POLITICAL CORRECTNESS

 

-Is a term relatively new in our country. In consulting many dictionaries up to 1966 but no doubt followed the 1970,s Civil Rights campaign in America which in our country conjures up only one phrase -

 

Political Interference.

 

Our American cousins know a great deal about Political Correctness, which has plagued their society for many a year and they can have it.

 

In our island home it is a term inconsistent with

FREEDOM of SPEECH

-We have in English Law sufficient legislation to cope with excessive abuse and anyone pushing his luck unreasonably as to endanger our greatest legacy from the past should be dealt with most severely.

 

None of us is unaware how volatile the question of one expressing our frank thoughts is in the world of today -but a search through past history will show it is not only a modern phenomenon.

 

The high sensitivity now engendered in our once ‘Let Live’ society has cowed many who have much of value to relate in the interests of curbing the few.

 

We have the title of Commission for Racial Equality a great insult to the greater majority of British citizens who do not press matters too far. We now learn that the objectionable name is to be changed -for many too late because as with the term MULTICULTURALISM

-has been found by the courageous stance by the chairman of the CRE Trevor Phillips to admit the responsibility for the Ghettoization of England and the failure of INTEGRATION.

 

We raised this matter many years ago and regret that the ultra-liberal left were left unhindered in their destructive politically correct agenda, which has been responsible for the enormous increase in CRIME and the undermining of traditional values in the community.

 

 

For many people in England the word political-correctness is like a red flag to a bull-dog.

 

 

 

*

Of course we would have to convert the Lord Chief Justice who disbelieves the need for custodial sentences for a majority of criminals and for those it is a short vocation with human rights oversight to make their stay shorter still

 

* * *

 

A RAT IN TWENTY IS A LEADER

 

One of the most closely guarded secrets of the Korean War was why there were no escapes of American prisoners. Chinese wanted to economize on manpower. So, instead of keeping all the prisoners under heavy guard, they watched them for a day or two, and picked out all the ‘leader’ figures: anyone who seemed to have imagination or enterprise, They were guarded heavily. The rest were left with almost no guard at all. And without leaders no one tried to escape.

 

The “dominant” types, the Chinese found, were always precisely five per cent of the total number of soldiers. The same figure applies to animals. In experiments concerned with the effect of overcrowding among rats, Dr John B. Calhoun of the U.S. National Institute of Mental Health discovered the “dominant” rats numbered five per cent.

 

The rats were put into four cages, all interconnected. There was enough room for all the rats to be fairly comfortable. But what happened was that two of the rats were very dominant indeed- “king rats”. Each of theses two took a cage for himself, and established himself in it with his harem. The rest had to crowd into the remaining two cages, creating a kind of slum.

 

And now the really interesting thing happened. The remainder of the dominant five per cent did not actively challenge the authority of the “king rats”. Instead, they formed themselves into “criminal” gangs and went around attacking other rates, stealing food, and generally creating a nuisance. Rats normally have an extremely elaborate courting ritual, which is never violated under normal conditions. The criminal gangs abandoned it and went in for rape. A percentage of them became homosexuals.

 

The point I am making should be ominously clear. Any society needs to provide an outlet for the dominant five per cent. A hundred years ago [written in 1970] a boy of this sort might run away to look for gold in Alaska. There are many outlets for the urge to adventure. [Regretfully in Blairdom we have the politically correct and compensation culture and much else to destroy a vigorous and healthy youth.]

 

G.K Chesterton once remarked that an adventure is only an inconvience rightly considered, and an inconvenience is an adventure wrongly considered. And It was A.H. Whitehead who pointed out that civilization cannot survive without adventure. [In the playground and out in the countryside.] Civilization may be defined as an attempt to do away with the inconvenience of living: so in a sense, civilization aims at the destruction of adventure. If Professor Whitehead is right, then civilization is aiming at its own destruction.

 

CONSIDER: in another hundred years’ time, (2070) the whole earth will be covered with one enormous New York. What will the dominant five per cent do with its urge to rise above the other 95 per cent?

 

The exploration of Space?

 

But the cost of transporting a single human being to Mars would be many millions of pounds; it could never be less than thousands. [A possibility in 2006 for the Government to consider for the hardcore YOBS and members of the feeble opposite Front Bench?] And by 2060 A.D. five per cent may amount to a billion human beings. No, the problem must be solved here [Shame!], on the EARTH.

 

The frustration of to many of the five per cent is the significance of the steadily rising crime rate, of the increasing figures for suicide and insanity. It is the reason behind the waves of violence that pass over normally law-abiding cities-Amsterdam, Belfast, Chicago- and for the periodic outbreaks of war in the world. [And when history has a Tony and George partnership] There is something in five per cent of men that doesn’t like peace, doesn’t want peace. It wants a sense of purpose, of doing something important, creative, and adventurous.

 

We all rightly deplore the conflict in Vietnam [As we do in 2006 of the illegal war in Iraq in 2003-still raging now as a civil war and our precarious and dangerous presence in Afghanistan.] and its loss of life. But we might, for a moment, take a scientific attitude. While these small-localized conflicts are going on, there is little chance of a major war. -[Not so sure in 2006 with the Iran factor -a nuclear power?] The smaller conflicts may act as a safety valve. It is like two bullies swearing at each other across a fence; the prospect of actual blows is remote.

 

What then, am I suggesting? First of all, that we should face this biological fact about the dominant five per cent and stop generalizing about “mankind” as if it consisted of only one sort of person.

 

Once this is faced, we can become practical about it. We need thorough investigation by a team of scientists drawn from all over the world of ways in which creative or aggressive impulses can be used. The first great step would e recognition that it is a problem in which all society must co-operate.

 

In a small town with no facilities for the young, the boys hang around in groups. If someone has the sense to organize clubs and dances, all the explosiveness goes out of the situation. It is “socialized”. Most social violence today comes from people who do not feel “socialized”, who have a sharp sense of “apartness” from society.

 

Colin Wilson (1970)

 

* * *

 

[Font altered0bolding & underlining used-comments in brackets]

JUNE/06

*

 

*

The abolition of Britain
by The Reform Treaty
- Second Reading-Passed by majority of 138

*

Veteran parliamentarian TONY BENN speaks of the absolute necessity of a

REFERENDUM

HEAR HIM ON

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I-ZdvQz1o

*

 

 

 

 

*

www.noliberties.com

[Latest Addition - June07]

*

www.eutruth.org.uk

*

www.thewestminsternews.co.uk

*

 

www.speakout.co.uk

*

 

Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU

www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs

 

*

 

 

VOTE

MAY -2007

 

TO LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION

WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE

TO SET YOU

 FREE

 

THE

UK INDEPENDENCE PARTY

www.ukip.org

 

TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER

BUT

SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.

*

 

ONLY

PRO-PORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

*

Home Rule for Scotland

WHY NOT

HOME RULE for ENGLAND

 

*

MAY/07

 

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin]

 
Elections in the British One Party State

If you vote Conservative, Labour, Lib-Dem, UKIP or the BNP, you'll be voting for the EU dictatorship. All five party leaderships are EU controlled. That's why your vote doesn't make a difference - all these five parties have the same policies: the EU's policies.

The 17 most senior politicians in the Conservative, Lib Dem and Labour parties, including Ken Clarke, Francis Maude, Cameron, William Hague, George Osborne, Nick Clegg, Brown, David and Ed Milliband, Ed Balls, Peter Mandleson are Bilderbergers, the 140 strong band of ultra senior Freemasons who are bribed by the EU to build the EU dictatorship.

No Bilderberger, Freemason or Common Purpose graduate should ever be allowed to hold public office.

UKIP and the BNP are honey traps to neutralise activists: UKIP is riddled with Freemasons and Common Purpose like a cancer, and the BNP controlled by the Edgar Griffin (father) and son Nick Freemasonry family. The 350,000 freemasons and the 40,000 strong Common Purpose Organisation are the (mostly unknowing) foot soldiers of the EU in Britain. (Which makes the BNP the easiest party to clean up - get rid of the Griffins, and put in a real anti-EU leadership.)

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF

UKIP

 OR

 INTEND TO JOIN THEM TAKE NOTE OF THE MESSAGE ABOVE

 

 

THE EDP HAS BEEN CRITICAL OF THE MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP OF THE UKIP FOR SOME TIME NOW AS IS SHOWN IN A NUMBER OF BULLETINS  OVER THE PAST FEW YEARS WHERE WE HAVE CRITICISED THEIR LACK LUSTRE PERFORMANCE AS THEY FAILED TO MOTIVATE THEIR MEMBERSHIP TO A MORE DETERMINED CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE CAMPAIGN WHICH WOULD HAVE MADE THE GOVERNMENTS TREMBLE BUT THEY HAD NO WORRY BECAUSE THEY HAD THEIR OWN PERSONS IN CHARGE AT THE TOP OF THE ORGANISATION.  THIS FIGHTING SPIRIT HAS BEEN LACKING AND WE CAN CONFIRM THIS OURSELVES BECAUSE WE HAVE BEEN OUTSIDE PARLIAMENT WHEN A MARCH WAS CANCELLED - AND WATCH THE FARCE WHEN CANDLES WERE HELD AND THOUSANDS OF LETTERS SENT TO MPS WHO KNEW WHERE TO DISPOSES OF THEM -AND ALL TO NO AVAIL.  IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF UKIP YOU HAVE BEEN BETRAYED BY YOUR OWN LEADERSHIP SOME APPEAR ON THE ALEX JONES SHOW WHICH HAS BEEN UNDER CLOSE SPOTLIGHT RECENTLY AS BEING CLOSE TO AN ISRAELI SECURITY FIRM DETAILS ON OUR WEBSITE .    IRONICALLY IT WAS A CHANCE LOOK ON THE INTERNET A FEW YEARS AGO  TO COME UPON THAT SITE WHICH OPENED OUR MIND TO THE ILLUMINATI.   THOUGH WE HAVE SOME DETAILS OF THE BILDERBERGERS ON OUR SITE  A NUMBER OF YEARS AGO WE FAILED TO DO MORE RESEARCH- WE ALL HAVE TO LEARN.  THE FAILURE OF UKIP WE HAVE SUSPECTED  FOR MANY YEARS   THAT MANY AT THE TOP OF THEIR ORGANISATION MIGHT BE UNDERCOVER MEMBERS OF THE ILLUMINATI.  IT IS A FAVOURITE TRICK OF THEIRS TO SUPPORT ANY PARTY OR ORGANISATION AT THE OUTSET WHATEVER ITS POLICY AS IT ALLOWS THEM TO PUT THEIR OWN PEOPLE IN TO CONTROL ITS POLICES AS THEY BEHIND THE SCENES SUPPLY THE VITAL FINANCIAL SUPPORT.

  Our intention is not to benefit from this disaster as since the 1999 European Election we have NOT! accepted a DONATION! from ANYONE! and we closed membership also because we did not wish to split the vote for UKIP but have stated in the past that we would contest another election if it was ever necessary to enter into the affray again and with the reputation of UKIP under scrutiny we will keep our options OPEN!   As we mentioned some time ago we have been almost two decades on the campaign trail to free our once FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE of ENGLAND from the SATANIC EU and those who have for centuries have planned for an EVIL ONE-WORLD CORPORATION/GOVERNMENT and EXTERMINATE! at least 5 BILLION of the WORLD'S POPULATION and therefore if we are right about those mentioned above they are not only TRAITORS to their COUNTRY but also a THREAT to WORLD PEACE.   However, of late, matters have NOT! been going well for the ILLUMINATI as you will observe BELOW.

 

WHAT A WAY TO WIN A WAR

 

 

BENJAMIN FULFORD

 

More!

[WORKS]

*

SEEKTHETRUTHANDWISDOM

 

*

Bank Of England The Banking Swindle

 

More!

 

More!

 

PATRIOT or TRAITOR to HIS COUNTRY

+More!

 

 More!

 

+(More!

 

 

THIS YOU MUST SEE IT CONCERNS

 YOUR

PLANET!

AND

 YOU!

 

 

NO NEED TO PANIC!

 

'Others shall sing the song,

Others shall right the wrong,-

Finish what I begin,

All all I fail of win.

Hail to the coming singers!

Hail to the brave light-bringers!

Forward I reach and above

All that they sing and dare.

 

The airs of heaven blow o'er me;

A glory shines before me

Of what mankind shall be'-

Pure, generous, brave and free,

I feel the earth move sunward,

I join the great march onward,

And  take, by faith, while living,

My freehold of thanksgiving.-

 

WHITTIER

 

MAY-2012

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

 

 

ADDED - MAY-2012