VOTE UKIP!-ON MAY 7-2015

&

AT THE REFERENDUM

WHICH MUST BE HELD IN THE FOUR NATION STATES

VOTE TO LEAVE THE UNDEMOCRATIC

NAZI-PLANNED EU.

 

Est. 1994-

Policies-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links - Archive-Top Topics and Stats

 

HOME

*HOME-PT 2

PAGE ONE/ PAGE TWO/PAGE THREE/ & PAGE FOUR

THOUGHT OF THE DAY!

'WE DO NOT KNOW WHY EMPIRES FALL AND STATES DECAY;  BUT WE CAN AT ANY RATE CONJECTURE, WITH NO LITTLE JUSTICE,   THAT A DISTURBANCE OF THE RACIAL COMPOSITION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS ONE GREAT CAUSE OF ITS FALL.  RIGHT LAWS AND SOUND MORALS FORM THE STRONGEST SAFEGUARD OF EVERY NATIONAL STATE; BUT A SOUND RACIAL BASIS IS ALSO NECESSARY.   A NATION MAY BE ENRICHED BY THE  VARIED CONTRIBUTIONS OF FOREIGN  IMMIGRATION; BUT IF THE STREAM OF IMMIGRATION GROWS UNCHECKED INTO THE VOLUME OF A GREAT RIVER,  A NATION MAY LOSE THE INTEGRITY OF THE SOLID CORE WHICH IS THE BASIS OF ITS TRADITION  AND THE NATION WHICH LOSES ITS TRADITIONS HAS LOST ITS VERY SELF.'

[Earnest Barker-NATIONAL CHARACTER-1927]

[THE PROOF OF THIS STATEMENT IN 2015 IS SHOWN IN MANY TOWNS AND CITIES IN OUR ONCE FAMILIAR COUNTRY BEFORE THE EU AND MASS IMMIGRATION FROM FOREIGN CULTURES LEADING TO FOREIGN+ENCLAVES WILL UNLESS FIRM DECISIVE ACTION IS TAKEN NOW! TO A FOREIGN TAKEOVER OF OUR COUNTRY WITHIN A FEW GENERATIONS.]

ENGLAND

The present must be balanced on the wings of the past and the future, and that as you stretch out the one you stretch out the other to strength.'  Wordsworth

A PEACEFUL ENGLISH REVOLUTION IS ON THE WAY-ALERT-1

FREEDOM CORNER

 UK voting system'ignores will of millions'

byDaniel Martin for the Daily Mail -Chief Political Correspondent-JUNE 2-2015.

 

BRITAIN'S voting system is 'archaic' and divisive' and does not represent the will of millions, a pressure group has argued. The Electoral Reform Society, which has campaigned for proportional representation for 130 years, claimed last month's General election was the most disproportionate ever.  It said UKIP would have WON up to 80 seats using the type of PR used in many European nations, while the GREENS would have got 20.  UKIP and the GREENS received 5MILLION VOTES, but under the FIRST-PAST-THE-POST system ended up with ONE MP each.  An E R S-commissioned survey said under PR the TORIES would have seen their tally of MPs fall  by almost 100 while  LABOUR would have gone down 24...

 

[MONTHLY BULLETIN CHART UNTIL REFERENDUM ON EU -LATEST MAY 2017 -AT FOOT OF PAGE!    ASAP!  

SEE HERE!   ]

 

 

 
     
 

 

NON-AGRESSION PACT WITH LABOUR BY MR NICE-GUY- DAVE WILL LEAD TO A ONE PARTY STATE.

 

We have the Conservative member at the Despatch Box proudly proclaiming his Party policy of supporting the Government when they agree with their proposals.

 

What the speaker had failed to realise is that the purpose of

 

Her Majesty’s Opposition

 

- is there to oppose the Government EVEN WHEN the policy might appear non-contentious because only with rigorous opposition will the Government of the Day look more deeply into their polices in the light of such OPPOSITION.

 

The flood of legislation which has come into being over the past nine years would certainly have proved more effective or even shelved if Her Majesty’s Opposition had done its proper job of determined

 

OPPOSITION.

 

It should also be drawn to the attention of the Tory Front Bench that the majority of voters in the country wish to see the back of Mr Nice-Guy-Tony and it is their job when a good opportunity arrives as it did with the Education Bill for them to do so -not to consider it below their Nice-Guy image to apply the coup-de-grace

 

If the Tory Party continue with their fraternisation they will soon make it clear to the Public that there is no need of an Opposition Party at Westminster which will certainly please Gordon Brown considering the tens of millions of s a year which will be saved.

 

 

The lackadaisical attitude of the once known ‘Her Majesty’s Opposition Party’ to its DUTY in the House of Commons which their party owes in honour and memory of past members of that illustrious Chamber who would if they could arise from their resting places to occupy the seats in the venerable House they held dear in their historic fight to protect the

 

‘Rights and Liberties’

 

- of the

English People

 

 

With the present assistance of Mr Nice -Guy-Dave the Labour Party will be able very soon to pass legislation in order to bring in a Single Party State and then what will the Tory members at the Despatch Box have to say- possibly of cause as always we agree with the Government and anyway we have got so tired of continuing to agree WITH THEM that we have decided to GO!

 

WHAT THEN?

 

A ONE PARTY STATE!

 

WHAT A BRIGHT LAD NICE-GUY-DAVE IS?

 

* * *

THE NATURE OF BRITISH

PARLIAMENTARY GOVERNMENT

 

by

 

L.S Amery

(1951)

 

If by a written Constitution is meant a written document or series of documents embodying in statutory or declaratory form the principles and structure of our Government, then there is, in that sense no such thing as the British Constitution.

 

What we mean by the Constitution is not any deliberate attempt to control and confine our political growth on the basis of a preconceived intellectual plan, reflecting the political theories of a particular group of men or the prepossessions of a particular age, but a living structure continually shaped in the course of history by the interaction of individual purposes and collective instincts with the requirements of ever varying circumstances.

 

[The above words were written over fifty years ago and we are sure the writer would not be surprised at the almost demolition of our Constitution over the past thirty five years and most particularly over the last nine years.

 

Our political system has always been vulnerable to a despotic Executive for over seventy years when a Lord Justice of England warned of the consequences of which we see around us in the early years of the 21st century]

 

To continue:

 

Certain main elements of that structure, such as the Crown and its servants [Yes! that means Tony Blair -in 2006], the Houses of Parliament, the Judiciary and the national church, have continuously played their part in it, but in widely varying relationship and significance.

 

It includes some memorable documentary milestones like Magna Carta, the Declaration of Rights and the Statute of Westminster. But some of its most important features are no part of its formal and legal structure, and have little other sanction beyond use and precedent.

 

The whole, like the law of the land, of which it is a part, is a blend of formal law, precedent and tradition. It can only be understood in the light of our national history and indeed, of the national character, which it has both expressed and moulded.

 

IT IS THE POLITICAL ASPECT OF OUR WAY OF LIFE.

 

Our national character, like the English language, is the result of the impact, adjustment and blending, under the new political and social conditions created by the Conquest. of two entirely different elements: a compromise and balance between two antithetical temperaments. The ever initiating, constructive, domineering Norman had to come to terms with the slower Saxon, yielding in much, but tenacious of his rights and usages.

 

Much interpreting of each to the other was necessary before either the English language or the English mind found themselves. There was much parleying locally long before there were Parliaments. New demands were made and complied with: but always on terms.

 

The habit of compromise, of give and take after free discussion, of readiness to see something in the case of the other side, sank into the national character. Only once in our political history was there a complete breakdown in the national temper. That was when extreme theories of royal and parliamentary right, exacerbated by bitter religious controversy as well as economic issues, led to a civil war and dictatorship.

 

[In our time we have witnessed an illegal invasion of a sovereign country and the curbing of our rights and liberties with Habeas Corpus suspended and the country under a dictatorship for over nine years and with law and order in disarray with millions of illegal immigrants and thousands of foreign prisoners in jail and in the community after absconding from open prisons.]

 

To continue:

 

The Restoration of 1660 was a true restoration, not so much of the pre-rebellion constitution, as of the ancient good temper of the nation. Its most significant step was Charles II’s

Act of Indemnity and Oblivion

Commended to Parliament by Lord Chancellor Clarendon in words which no one believes in the continuance of free government in this country should ever allow himself to forget:

 

“The King is a suitor to you, makes it his suit very heartily, that you join him in restoring the whole nation, its primitive temper and integrity, to its old good nature - good nature, a virtue so peculiar to you, so appropriated by God Almighty to this nation, that it can be translated into no other language, hardly practised by any other people…”

 

Closely linked with this compromising and reasonable temper is the sense of responsibility, which is, indeed, the most characteristic feature of our national political character. Our system of government is usually described as

 

Parliamentary Responsible Government.

 

It would be difficult to find a better description. But it must be remembered, first of all, that Parliamentary Government means government, not by Parliament, but to use the old phrase-

Government

by the

King in Parliament’.

 

Secondly, that the responsibility is not merely one towards the majority in Parliament.

 

Ministers on taking office accept a first and dominant responsibility to the

CROWN

-as representing the unity and continuity of the life of the nation and of the Empire [1951], for defending the wider and national and imperial interest.

 

They each accept a corresponding individual responsibility towards the particular services over which they have been called to preside. As members of Parliament themselves they are responsible to Parliament as a whole and to the nation for the effective working of Parliament

 

[Which means an Opposition Party needful of its responsibility to Parliament and the nation in vigorously examining ALL proposals submitted by the Government of the Day]

 

-as the centre of our national life, for the maintenance of FULL and FREE discussion of every aspect of government policy, and for support of the Speaker in upholding the dignity and impartiality of debate.

[Do you understand your responsibilities Mr Nice-Guy-Dave in 2006]?

It is only subject to these wider responsibilities that, as Party leaders, they owe a responsibility to their own Party for promoting its particular views and forwarding its interests.

 

The word ‘responsibility’ has, however, two senses. It connotes not only accountability to man outside or final authority. It also connotes a state of mind, which weighs the consequences of action and then acts, irrespective; it may be, of the concurrence or approval of others.

 

It is the strength of our constitutional system that it encourages and fosters responsibility in the higher sense. A British Government is not merely responsible to those who appointed it or keep it in office in the sense in which an agent is responsible to his principal. It is an independent body, which on taking office assumes the responsibility of leading and directing Parliament and the nation in accordance with its own judgment and convictions.

 

Members of Parliament are no mere delegates of their constituents, but, as Burke pointed out, representatives of the nation, responsible, in the last resort, to their own conscience.

 

[So how was it that so many members of Parliament voted in 2003 for an illegal war-was it to keep their jobs and perks worth around

 

284,000 +a year

 

-with pensions up to 150,000 a year.]

 

Nor is the responsibility of the Opposition [Her Majesty’s Opposition] in these various respects any less than that of the Government and of its supporters. [Do you get it Nice-Guy-Dave -you are leader of the Opposition]

 

On the Opposition rests the main responsibility for what was once the critical function of Parliament as a whole, while at the same time it directs its criticisms [Do you understand Mr Nice-Guy-Dave] with a view to convincing public opinion of its own fitness for office. It is with the importance of this responsibility in mind that Lowell in his

Government of England said that:

 

“The expression ‘Her Majesty’s Opposition’… embodies the greatest contribution of the nineteenth century to the art of government, that of a party out of power which is recognised as perfectly loyal to the institutions of the State and ready to come into office without a shock to the political traditions of the nation”

 

The same point was made by Lord Simon:

 

“Our parliamentary system will work as long as the responsible people in different parties accept the view that it is better that the other side win than that the constitution should be broken.”

 

[Well! an ineffective Opposition Party does no favours for

OUR CONSTITUTION]

 

The combination of responsible leadership by Government with responsible criticism in Parliament is the essence of our Constitution. Our aim must be to preserve it though the inevitable changes which the needs and demands of each generation bring about in its outward structure and in the adjustment of parts.

 

[Not the almost destruction of our Ancient Constitution in 2006]

 

* * *

 

[Font altered-bolding & understanding used -comments in brackets]

MAY/06

 

 

*

 

*

The abolition of Britain
by The Reform Treaty
- Second Reading-Passed by majority of 138

*

Veteran parliamentarian TONY BENN speaks of the absolute necessity of a

REFERENDUM

HEAR HIM ON

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I-ZdvQz1o

*

 

 

 

*

www.noliberties.com

[Latest Addition - June07]

*

www.eutruth.org.uk

*

www.thewestminsternews.co.uk

*

 

www.speakout.co.uk

*

 

Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU

www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs

 

*

 

 

VOTE

MAY -2007

 

TO LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION

WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE

TO SET YOU

 FREE

 

THE

UK INDEPENDENCE PARTY

www.ukip.org

 

TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER

BUT

SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.

*

 

ONLY

PRO-PORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

*

Home Rule for Scotland

WHY NOT

HOME RULE for ENGLAND

 

*

MAY/07

 

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin]

Elections in the British One Party State

If you vote Conservative, Labour, Lib-Dem, UKIP or the BNP, you'll be voting for the EU dictatorship. All five party leaderships are EU controlled. That's why your vote doesn't make a difference - all these five parties have the same policies: the EU's policies.

The 17 most senior politicians in the Conservative, Lib Dem and Labour parties, including Ken Clarke, Francis Maude, Cameron, William Hague, George Osborne, Nick Clegg, Brown, David and Ed Milliband, Ed Balls, Peter Mandleson are Bilderbergers, the 140 strong band of ultra senior Freemasons who are bribed by the EU to build the EU dictatorship.

No Bilderberger, Freemason or Common Purpose graduate should ever be allowed to hold public office.

UKIP and the BNP are honey traps to neutralise activists: UKIP is riddled with Freemasons and Common Purpose like a cancer, and the BNP controlled by the Edgar Griffin (father) and son Nick Freemasonry family. The 350,000 freemasons and the 40,000 strong Common Purpose Organisation are the (mostly unknowing) foot soldiers of the EU in Britain. (Which makes the BNP the easiest party to clean up - get rid of the Griffins, and put in a real anti-EU leadership.)

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF

UKIP

 OR

 INTEND TO JOIN THEM TAKE NOTE OF THE MESSAGE ABOVE

 

 

THE EDP HAS BEEN CRITICAL OF THE MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP OF THE UKIP FOR SOME TIME NOW AS IS SHOWN IN A NUMBER OF BULLETINS  OVER THE PAST FEW YEARS WHERE WE HAVE CRITICISED THEIR LACK LUSTRE PERFORMANCE AS THEY FAILED TO MOTIVATE THEIR MEMBERSHIP TO A MORE DETERMINED CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE CAMPAIGN WHICH WOULD HAVE MADE THE GOVERNMENTS TREMBLE BUT THEY HAD NO WORRY BECAUSE THEY HAD THEIR OWN PERSONS IN CHARGE AT THE TOP OF THE ORGANISATION.  THIS FIGHTING SPIRIT HAS BEEN LACKING AND WE CAN CONFIRM THIS OURSELVES BECAUSE WE HAVE BEEN OUTSIDE PARLIAMENT WHEN A MARCH WAS CANCELLED - AND WATCH THE FARCE WHEN CANDLES WERE HELD AND THOUSANDS OF LETTERS SENT TO MPS WHO KNEW WHERE TO DISPOSES OF THEM -AND ALL TO NO AVAIL.  IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF UKIP YOU HAVE BEEN BETRAYED BY YOUR OWN LEADERSHIP SOME APPEAR ON THE ALEX JONES SHOW WHICH HAS BEEN UNDER CLOSE SPOTLIGHT RECENTLY AS BEING CLOSE TO AN ISRAELI SECURITY FIRM DETAILS ON OUR WEBSITE .    IRONICALLY IT WAS A CHANCE LOOK ON THE INTERNET A FEW YEARS AGO  TO COME UPON THAT SITE WHICH OPENED OUR MIND TO THE ILLUMINATI.   THOUGH WE HAVE SOME DETAILS OF THE BILDERBERGERS ON OUR SITE  A NUMBER OF YEARS AGO WE FAILED TO DO MORE RESEARCH- WE ALL HAVE TO LEARN.  THE FAILURE OF UKIP WE HAVE SUSPECTED  FOR MANY YEARS   THAT MANY AT THE TOP OF THEIR ORGANISATION MIGHT BE UNDERCOVER MEMBERS OF THE ILLUMINATI.  IT IS A FAVOURITE TRICK OF THEIRS TO SUPPORT ANY PARTY OR ORGANISATION AT THE OUTSET WHATEVER ITS POLICY AS IT ALLOWS THEM TO PUT THEIR OWN PEOPLE IN TO CONTROL ITS POLICES AS THEY BEHIND THE SCENES SUPPLY THE VITAL FINANCIAL SUPPORT.

  Our intention is not to benefit from this disaster as since the 1999 European Election we have NOT! accepted a DONATION! from ANYONE! and we closed membership also because we did not wish to split the vote for UKIP but have stated in the past that we would contest another election if it was ever necessary to enter into the affray again and with the reputation of UKIP under scrutiny we will keep our options OPEN!   As we mentioned some time ago we have been almost two decades on the campaign trail to free our once FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE of ENGLAND from the SATANIC EU and those who have for centuries have planned for an EVIL ONE-WORLD CORPORATION/GOVERNMENT and EXTERMINATE! at least 5 BILLION of the WORLD'S POPULATION and therefore if we are right about those mentioned above they are not only TRAITORS to their COUNTRY but also a THREAT to WORLD PEACE.   However, of late, matters have NOT! been going well for the ILLUMINATI as you will observe BELOW.

 

WHAT A WAY TO WIN A WAR

 

 

BENJAMIN FULFORD

 

More!

[WORKS]

*

SEEKTHETRUTHANDWISDOM

 

*

Bank Of England The Banking Swindle

 

More!

 

More!

 

PATRIOT or TRAITOR to HIS COUNTRY

+More!

 

 More!

 

+(More!

 

 

THIS YOU MUST SEE IT CONCERNS

 YOUR

PLANET!

AND

 YOU!

 

 

NO NEED TO PANIC!

 

'Others shall sing the song,

Others shall right the wrong,-

Finish what I begin,

All all I fail of win.

Hail to the coming singers!

Hail to the brave light-bringers!

Forward I reach and above

All that they sing and dare.

 

The airs of heaven blow o'er me;

A glory shines before me

Of what mankind shall be'-

Pure, generous, brave and free,

I feel the earth move sunward,

I join the great march onward,

And  take, by faith, while living,

My freehold of thanksgiving.-

 

WHITTIER

 

MAY-2012

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

 

 

ADDED - MAY-2012