VOTE UKIP!-ON MAY 7-2015

&

AT THE REFERENDUM

WHICH MUST BE HELD IN THE FOUR NATION STATES

VOTE TO LEAVE THE UNDEMOCRATIC

NAZI-PLANNED EU.

 

Est. 1994-

Policies-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links - Archive-Top Topics and Stats

 

HOME

*HOME-PT 2

PAGE ONE/ PAGE TWO/PAGE THREE/ & PAGE FOUR

A PEACEFUL ENGLISH REVOLUTION IS ON THE WAY-ALERT-1

FREEDOM CORNER

 UK voting system'ignores will of millions'

by Daniel Martin-Daily Mail -Chief Political Correspondent-JUNE 2-2015.

 

BRITAIN'S voting system is 'archaic' and divisive' and does not represent the will of millions, a pressure group has argued. The Electoral Reform Society, which has campaigned for proportional representation for 130 years, claimed last month's General election was the most disproportionate ever.  It said UKIP would have WON up to 80 seats using the type of PR used in many European nations, while the GREENS would have got 20.  UKIP and the GREENS received 5MILLION VOTES, but under the FIRST-PAST-THE-POST system ended up with ONE MP each.  An E R S-commissioned survey said under PR the TORIES would have seen their tally of MPs fall  by almost 100 while  LABOUR would have gone down 24...

 

[MONTHLY BULLETIN CHART UNTIL REFERENDUM ON EU -LATEST MAY 2017 -AT FOOT OF PAGE!    ASAP!  

SEE HERE!   ]

 
     
 

 

What PLANET are JUDGES living ON?

 

*

Daily Mail

Wednesday, May31-2006.

 

by

 

Melanie Phillips

 

ARE OUR senior judges simply living on a different planet from the rest of us lesser mortals? Our most senior judge, The Lord Chief Justice, Lord Phillips, has launched yet another judicial broadside against apparent evils of imprisonment.

In Lord Phillips’ UNIVERSE, it appears that PRISON is NOT the PLACE for CRIMINALS.

 

Instead, wherever possible judges should pass community sentences -which he admits will not be tolerated by the public unless they include ‘significant punishment’ -because ‘the sensible place for rehabilitation is the community.’

 

EXCUSE ME?

COMMUNITY SENTENCES FAIL TO REHABILITATE CRIMINALS. THEY RESULT IN AN EVEN HIGHER RATE OF RECIDIVISM THAN JAIL SENTENCES.

 

This is hardly surprising, since community sentences seem to be hardship-free zones.

According to a recent report by the

Chief Inspector of Probation

-burglars and robbers in London are being set to restore antique furniture or make costumes for the Notting Hill carnival.

[You couldn’t make it up if you tried]

 

And thousands of criminals sentenced to unpaid community service do nothing at all some days.

 

When they turn up, there are no probation staff to supervise them, so they are simply sent home. And those who don’t who don’t even bother to turn up are NOT taken back to COURT and re-sentenced.

 

It may amaze Lord Phillips to learn that ‘significant punishment’ means going

 

TO PRISON.

 

YES, overcrowding means prisons don’t function properly. But the remedy for that is

 

TO BUILD MORE PRISONS.

 

YET our senior judges harbour an obsessive animosity towards prison, doubtless because of the way Human Rights doctrine has so muddled the way we look at the very concepts of

CRIME AND PUNISHMENT.

 

Lord Phillips’ remarks, however were more bizarre still. One reason prison numbers are rising, he said, was that drug users were deliberately committing crimes to get into prison drug programmes. He had come across prisoners offered community sentences who preferred to go to prison so that they could get treatment.

 

Offenders

 

What on earth does the Lord Justice have under his wig? There is no proper evidence for this at all.

 

Indeed, an investigation by MPs said last year that fewer than half of all jails had drug treatment courses, that ONLY one in ten prisoners who use drugs got places on drug treatment programmes, and that half of those who did go on courses NEVER FINISHED THEM.

 

As for supposedly non-existent community drug treatment programmes, they do EXIST-

but are pretty useless in turning offenders away from crime.

 

In a recent report, the Commons Public Accounts Committee observed that drug treatment orders were ‘more like a

GET OUT OF JAIL FREE CARD’

than a rehabilitation programme.

 

 

Only 25 per cent of those who accepted them ever completed them.

 

It is deeply worrying not only that a senior judge should make such odd and ill-informed remarks, BUT that the JUDICIARY should assume it knows better what policies should be pursued.

 

Yesterday, the former Lord Chief Justice, Lord Woolf [The burglars’ friend] expanded upon such arrogance.

Apparently making a coded attack on the Prime Minister for his criticisms of a judge over the immigration ruling, Lord Woolf condemned politicians for ‘knocking’ individual judges, because it was ‘very damaging’.

 

So lets get this right. Judges may make comments, which are not only wildly inappropriate because they are intensely political, but also reveal themselves to be woefully OUT OF TOUCH.

 

Yet then they loftily inform us that we should not criticise them for doing so, because they apparently reside on some celestial plane above public debate.

 

Of course, in principle politicians and judges should have a Chinese wall between them. And it was once clearly understood that politicians and judges stood on either side of the wall.

 

But the problem is that the judges have torn up that understanding and are now getting involved in matters of POLICY such as the role of imprisonment or drug treatment, which ARE properly the territory of POLITICIANS.

 

The judges have simply grown too big for their wigs.

 

One of the main reasons is the Human Rights law. Lord Woolf robustly defended this yesterday and said that any resulting tension between GOVERNMENT and JUDICIARY was healthy in a democracy.

 

Weakness

But the fact is that Human Rights law has given the judges a weapon to undermine democracy, by setting up themselves rather than politicians as the people who should decide how the country should be ruled.

 

This first surfaced back in the 1980s, when senior judges decided that the long years of Tory government and the weakness of the opposition posed such a threat to democracy that the judiciary should take upon itself the mantle of opposition instead.

 

In the days before the passage of the Human Rights Act [1998], this took the form of challenges to immigration law through judicial review. Such attempts to change the direction of government policy through court rulings became known as judicial activism.

 

When Tony Bair came to power, instead of putting the judges back behind the Chinese wall he attached a turbo-charge to their already burgeoning judicial activism by introducing the Human Rights Act.

 

This change in the behaviour of judges was by no means restricted to Britain. Judicial activism had become a phenomenon throughout the

WESTERN WORLD.

 

In America, Australia, the countries of the EU and elsewhere, the judges -

Acting as a kind of judicial fifth column around the world - are arrogating to themselves power, which belong to the world of politics.

 

Earlier this year, in a little noticed address in London to the Law Commission, a prominent Australian judge, Michael Kirby - a key proponent of judicial activism- spelt out the judge’s agenda with unabashed frankness.

 

The institutions of government in both Britain and Australia, he said, had become unbalanced. Governments had become too powerful, civil servants and MPs had lost influence to political advisers and ministerial accountability was a thing of the past.

 

Amen to that.

 

BUT he went on to say that as a result ‘the very notion of “sovereignty” of parliament has become a somewhat inapposite concept’

 

There should be instead a new type of government led by judges and based on HUMAN RIGHTS LAW - which was already developing in BRITAIN.

 

So the remedy for politicians who were abusing their powers was to replace them by JUDICIAL POWER.

 

This was nothing less than an all-out attack on parliamentary democracy.

 

[Whatever is left of it after nine years of Tony Blair]

 

Yet Justice Kirby was given a platform by our principle legal reform body -the Law Commission - and before an appreciative audience, which included Lord Phillips, Lord Woolf and the Lord Chancellor.

 

Despised

 

English judges express similar alarming distain for democracy. Last year Lord Bingham, the Senior Law Lord, said that the Human Rights Convention existed to protect vulnerable minorities. Which were sometimes disliked, resented or despised.

 

It should therefore come as no surprise, he went on, that decisions vindicating their rights ‘should provoke howls of criticism by politicians and the mass media. They generally reflect majority opinion.’

 

So majority opinion, on this account, was essentially illegitimate, and the role of the JUDICIARY was to use HUMAN RIGHTS LAW to do it down.

 

This unashamed justification of judicial supremacism is as anti m-democratic as it is arrogant. We are living through a kind of creeping judicial coup d’etat driven by a profound contempt for the

PUBLIC OPINION

-to which politicians are answerable.

 

It is parliamentary weakness that is to blame. Only if Parliament reasserts itself will the

 

RULE OF LAW

 

-     be rescued from

 

RULE OF LAWYERS

 

-who have so high-handedly hijacked it?

 

* * *

[Font altered -bolding & underlining used -comments in brackets]

*

 

[Well it must occur to many in this country that the present sorry predicament of

 

OUR PARLIAMENT

 

- only benefits those in the Judiciary and of course the growing army of lawyers many of whom have grown rich on their human rights harvest which Tony Blair and his flatmate Lord Falconer have no doubt been sowing with hindsight for years. What better way to destroy an immemorial institution of over 700 in the making than to undermine it from within while professing that their attempts to govern are undermined by the JUDICIARY?

 

WHO CAN WE POSSIBLY TRUST?

 

THERE MUST SURELY BE A SEQUAL TO FOLLOW?

 

 

* * *

MAY/06

*

 

*

The abolition of Britain
by The Reform Treaty
- Second Reading-Passed by majority of 138

*

Veteran parliamentarian TONY BENN speaks of the absolute necessity of a

REFERENDUM

HEAR HIM ON

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I-ZdvQz1o

*

 

 

 

*

www.noliberties.com

[Latest Addition - June07]

*

www.eutruth.org.uk

*

www.thewestminsternews.co.uk

*

 

www.speakout.co.uk

*

 

Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU

www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs

 

*

 

 

VOTE

MAY -2007

 

TO LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION

WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE

TO SET YOU

 FREE

 

THE

UK INDEPENDENCE PARTY

www.ukip.org

 

TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER

BUT

SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.

*

 

ONLY

PRO-PORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

*

Home Rule for Scotland

WHY NOT

HOME RULE for ENGLAND

 

*

MAY/07

 

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin]

*

*
Elections in the British One Party State

If you vote Conservative, Labour, Lib-Dem, UKIP or the BNP, you'll be voting for the EU dictatorship. All five party leaderships are EU controlled. That's why your vote doesn't make a difference - all these five parties have the same policies: the EU's policies.

The 17 most senior politicians in the Conservative, Lib Dem and Labour parties, including Ken Clarke, Francis Maude, Cameron, William Hague, George Osborne, Nick Clegg, Brown, David and Ed Milliband, Ed Balls, Peter Mandleson are Bilderbergers, the 140 strong band of ultra senior Freemasons who are bribed by the EU to build the EU dictatorship.

No Bilderberger, Freemason or Common Purpose graduate should ever be allowed to hold public office.

UKIP and the BNP are honey traps to neutralise activists: UKIP is riddled with Freemasons and Common Purpose like a cancer, and the BNP controlled by the Edgar Griffin (father) and son Nick Freemasonry family. The 350,000 freemasons and the 40,000 strong Common Purpose Organisation are the (mostly unknowing) foot soldiers of the EU in Britain. (Which makes the BNP the easiest party to clean up - get rid of the Griffins, and put in a real anti-EU leadership.)

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF

UKIP

 OR

 INTEND TO JOIN THEM TAKE NOTE OF THE MESSAGE ABOVE

 

 

THE EDP HAS BEEN CRITICAL OF THE MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP OF THE UKIP FOR SOME TIME NOW AS IS SHOWN IN A NUMBER OF BULLETINS  OVER THE PAST FEW YEARS WHERE WE HAVE CRITICISED THEIR LACK LUSTRE PERFORMANCE AS THEY FAILED TO MOTIVATE THEIR MEMBERSHIP TO A MORE DETERMINED CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE CAMPAIGN WHICH WOULD HAVE MADE THE GOVERNMENTS TREMBLE BUT THEY HAD NO WORRY BECAUSE THEY HAD THEIR OWN PERSONS IN CHARGE AT THE TOP OF THE ORGANISATION.  THIS FIGHTING SPIRIT HAS BEEN LACKING AND WE CAN CONFIRM THIS OURSELVES BECAUSE WE HAVE BEEN OUTSIDE PARLIAMENT WHEN A MARCH WAS CANCELLED - AND WATCH THE FARCE WHEN CANDLES WERE HELD AND THOUSANDS OF LETTERS SENT TO MPS WHO KNEW WHERE TO DISPOSES OF THEM -AND ALL TO NO AVAIL.  IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF UKIP YOU HAVE BEEN BETRAYED BY YOUR OWN LEADERSHIP SOME APPEAR ON THE ALEX JONES SHOW WHICH HAS BEEN UNDER CLOSE SPOTLIGHT RECENTLY AS BEING CLOSE TO AN ISRAELI SECURITY FIRM DETAILS ON OUR WEBSITE .    IRONICALLY IT WAS A CHANCE LOOK ON THE INTERNET A FEW YEARS AGO  TO COME UPON THAT SITE WHICH OPENED OUR MIND TO THE ILLUMINATI.   THOUGH WE HAVE SOME DETAILS OF THE BILDERBERGERS ON OUR SITE  A NUMBER OF YEARS AGO WE FAILED TO DO MORE RESEARCH- WE ALL HAVE TO LEARN.  THE FAILURE OF UKIP WE HAVE SUSPECTED  FOR MANY YEARS   THAT MANY AT THE TOP OF THEIR ORGANISATION MIGHT BE UNDERCOVER MEMBERS OF THE ILLUMINATI.  IT IS A FAVOURITE TRICK OF THEIRS TO SUPPORT ANY PARTY OR ORGANISATION AT THE OUTSET WHATEVER ITS POLICY AS IT ALLOWS THEM TO PUT THEIR OWN PEOPLE IN TO CONTROL ITS POLICES AS THEY BEHIND THE SCENES SUPPLY THE VITAL FINANCIAL SUPPORT.

  Our intention is not to benefit from this disaster as since the 1999 European Election we have NOT! accepted a DONATION! from ANYONE! and we closed membership also because we did not wish to split the vote for UKIP but have stated in the past that we would contest another election if it was ever necessary to enter into the affray again and with the reputation of UKIP under scrutiny we will keep our options OPEN!   As we mentioned some time ago we have been almost two decades on the campaign trail to free our once FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE of ENGLAND from the SATANIC EU and those who have for centuries have planned for an EVIL ONE-WORLD CORPORATION/GOVERNMENT and EXTERMINATE! at least 5 BILLION of the WORLD'S POPULATION and therefore if we are right about those mentioned above they are not only TRAITORS to their COUNTRY but also a THREAT to WORLD PEACE.   However, of late, matters have NOT! been going well for the ILLUMINATI as you will observe BELOW.

 

WHAT A WAY TO WIN A WAR

 

 

BENJAMIN FULFORD

 

More!

[WORKS]

*

SEEKTHETRUTHANDWISDOM

 

*

Bank Of England The Banking Swindle

 

More!

 

More!

 

PATRIOT or TRAITOR to HIS COUNTRY

+More!

 

 More!

 

+(More!

 

 

THIS YOU MUST SEE IT CONCERNS

 YOUR

PLANET!

AND

 YOU!

 

 

NO NEED TO PANIC!

 

'Others shall sing the song,

Others shall right the wrong,-

Finish what I begin,

All all I fail of win.

Hail to the coming singers!

Hail to the brave light-bringers!

Forward I reach and above

All that they sing and dare.

 

The airs of heaven blow o'er me;

A glory shines before me

Of what mankind shall be'-

Pure, generous, brave and free,

I feel the earth move sunward,

I join the great march onward,

And  take, by faith, while living,

My freehold of thanksgiving.-

 

WHITTIER

 

MAY-2012

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

 

 

ADDED - MAY-2012

 

 

 FOR RETURN TO

IMMIGRATION FILE

*