VOTE UKIP!-ON MAY 7-2015

&

AT THE REFERENDUM

WHICH MUST BE HELD IN THE FOUR NATION STATES

VOTE TO LEAVE THE UNDEMOCRATIC

NAZI-PLANNED EU.

 

Est. 1994-

Policies-Elections 1997 and EU election 1999-Speech -1000's of Links - Archive-Top Topics and Stats

 

HOME

*HOME-PT 2

PAGE ONE/ PAGE TWO/PAGE THREE/ & PAGE FOUR

FREEDOM CORNER

A PEACEFUL ENGLISH REVOLUTION IS ON THE WAY-ALERT-1

 

 UK voting system' ignores will of millions'

Daniel Martin for the Daily Mail -Chief Political Correspondent-JUNE 2-2015.

BRITAIN'S voting system is 'archaic' and divisive' and does not represent the will of millions, a pressure group has argued. The Electoral Reform Society, which has campaigned for proportional representation for 130 years, claimed last month's General election was the most disproportionate ever.  It said UKIP would have WON up to 80 seats using the type of PR used in many European nations, while the GREENS would have got 20.  UKIP and the GREENS received 5MILLION VOTES, but under the FIRST-PAST-THE-POST system ended up with ONE MP each.  An E R S-commissioned survey said under PR the TORIES would have seen their tally of MPs fall  by almost 100 while  LABOUR would have gone down 24...

 

[MONTHLY BULLETIN CHART UNTIL REFERENDUM ON EU -LATEST MAY 2017 -AT FOOT OF PAGE!    ASAP!  

SEE HERE!   ]

 
RON PAUL 9-11+(1) GLOBALWARMING SCAM USA IRAQ/AFGHAN LONDON BOMBINGS COMMON PURPOSE CONSPIRACY CENTRAL BANKS  +(1)
HOME ARCHIVE  MAIN BULLETINS E U  ENGLAND +(1) BILDERBERGERS+(1) ILLUMINATI +(1) NEW WORLD ORDER +(1)
1)U.S. Concentration Camps

2)DEC-2011- MADE-READY

3) PLANS

1)

FEMA

2)

Protocols

of

ZION

CITY

OF

LONDON

 

 A STATE WITHIN ENGLAND

+(2)

 Dr.

John

Coleman

WHO OWNS

THE FED

 

POWER

OF 1)HAARP FOR GOOD   2)EVIL

Mind Control Henry Makow 1)Chemtrails

2)CREATED

C3)

PRIVATE CENTRAL BANKS

War

is a Racket

 
A MEETING PLACE  - THERE ARE HUNDREDS  OF ALTERNATIVE WEBSITES ON OUR wEBSITE- SINCE 2003
realzionistnews. TruetorahJews CONSPIRACYPLANET

.COM/

Fagan-Sounded-Alarm-of -the ILLUMINATI-in-

1967

 
DAVID ICKE BRITISH CONSTITUTION GROUP

 

YOU CAN HANDLE THE TRUTH
BENJAMIN FULFORD.NET

 

THE WORLD OF TRUTH NEWWORLDORDER

INFO.COM

 

 

LANDDESTROYER.

BLOGSPOT

.COM

HENRY MAKOW  CORBETTREPORT) LIFE IN THE MIX 2

 

UK COLUMN.ORG. JEW WATCH

ACTIVISTPOST.

COM

TARPLEY.NET

 

 
 

 

CONSERVATIVES NEED SWING OF 7 PER CENT AND LEAD OF 11 PER CENT TO WIN NEXT ELECTION.

 

*

EUROFACTS

28th April -2006.

Vol 11 No 14

 

The Tories are the careless party.

 

Anthony Scholefield argues that the Tory leadership’s public distain for

 

UKIP

 

Is part of a political strategy that is deep ly flawed? Failure to secure its base and to find favourable electoral ground on which to fight means the party faces a near impossible task.

To lose one parent, Mr Worthington, may be regarded as a mistake, to lose both looks like carelessness. Lady Brackenbury in Oscar Wilde’s

 

The Importance of Being Earnest’

 

Since 1970 the Conservative Party has been careless about its core vote. It has allowed no fewer than four parties to take bites out of its core electoral strength.

 

These are the Ulster Unionists, the UKIP/Referendum Party, the BNP and Veritas.

 

Most of the damage was done in the Heath era, one that was characterised by the high tide of liberal managerial conservatism and distain for the core Conservative interests and ideals.

 

The breakaway new parties were grounded on formally traditional

Conservative

beliefs of democracy, patriotism and the protection of the interests of the British people, especially the working population.

 

Core Policies

 

Once a new party rises and establishes itself, it can prove remarkably resilient so long as its core policies are relevant and have a small but solid support.

 

It is quite clear that UKIP and the BNP plug into separate but vital core areas of politics and offer a distinctive policy from the three main parties. It is hard to see them going away.

 

Heath directly lost the 10/12 Unionist MP’s who were incorporated in the Conservative ranks up to 1970. Once a certain period of independence had passed, it was inconceivable that the Ulster Unionists would rejoin the Conservatives. The parties drifted further and further apart.

 

Heath’s enthusiasm for Europe did not do immediate damage to the Conservatives’ ability to win elections but the European issue eventually exploded in the 1990’s with the formation of the Referendum and UK Independence Parties.

 

Once again, what was a substantial opinion in the Conservative party was so estranged that it split off. Moreover, its policy stance was continually vindicated by the collapse of support for the EU by Conservative voters and the chronic evasiveness of Conservative politicians on the EU.

 

Finally, the ruling liberal conservative elite showed little interest in the impact of mass third-world immigration on British working class areas.

 

This enabled the BNP, despite the unsavoury past of some of its leadership, to gain a foothold. In fact, the impact of the BNP is probably underestimated since it presents a real obstacle to Conservative recovering in the metropolitan areas outside London where they now hold only

 

5 out of 124 seats

 

In most of the West Midlands and urban Yorkshire and Lancashire the Conservatives vote dropped in 2005 while the BNP saved deposits all over the regions.

 

In effect, the Tory working class vote cultivated by Conservative leaders in the nineteenth century has been ignored and has now collapsed in most of the Midlands and the North of England.

Electoral Bias

 

At the same time the Conservatives became careless about the state of the electoral system. The massive electoral bias in favour of Labour is, to a, large extent, the product of decisions about the electoral system taken when the Conservatives were in office.

 

In 1987, following a House of Commons’ Committee study of the electoral system, the decision was taken to retain the over-representation of Scotland and Wales.

 

The Tory leadership also failed to set principles for the Boundary Commission which would reduce bias in the electoral system, particularly to reduce the gap between the size of the average Labour seat and the average Conservative seat which in 1997 still amounted to 6,500 votes.

 

The more efficient distribution of the Conservative vote in the 1980’s masked the other biases in the system in Labour’s favour.

 

On the basis of the current bias in the Westminster electoral system the Conservatives would have only won one post –War election (1983), according to Kavanagh’s

 

‘The British General Election of 2001’.

In 2005 the result in England alone was 286 for Labour against 193 seats for the Conservatives despite the Conservatives being slightly ahead in the number of votes.

 

Anti-Democratic

 

Even now this staggeringly anti-democratic state of affairs is being treated as a second order issue by Conservative politicians who make no serious attempt to address it. It also has another effect. The poorest regions, which are massively over-represented, supply most of the governing party, which inevitably colours policy.

 

The next election

 

According to the Electoral Reform Society’s Report o the \General Election of 2005, the Conservative Party needs a swing of about 7 per cent and a lead of 11 per cent to win an absolute majority at the next election.

 

This allows for the Conservatives achieving a net gain of seven seats after the Boundary Commission Report. The changes are estimated to be

 

Tories +7, Labour –5

 

-and the Liberal Democrats +2.

 

In elections since 1945, such a swing was only attained once, by Tony Blair in 1997.

 

Given these self-inflicted handicaps, where are the Conservative votes to come from?

 

If we add up the votes for Labour, the Liberal democrats and the Scottish and Welsh nationalists we find that they totalled the following in the last nine elections.

 

1974-59.0% 1974-61.0% 1979-52.8%

 

1983-54.5% 1987-55.1% 1992-54.5%

 

1997-62.5% 2001-61.5% 2005-59.4%

 

The bedrock of this left Bloc is thus 55 per cent. In addition there is Northern Ireland, which is a further 2.5 per cent of the total electorate. So the Conservative ceiling would seem to be about 42.5 per cent of the vote.

 

The best Conservative performances were in 1979,1983, 1987 and 1992 when they won 42-43 per cent.

 

Their success in number of seats in 1979, 1983 and 1987 was due to the split in the left bloc with a great deal of the LibDem vote wasted. This is no longer the case.

 

But the crucial point is that up to 1992, the Conservatives did not face any political party attacking from the Right.

 

In the last three elections they did. In 1997 these parties attracted 2.9 per cent in 2001 1.7 per cent and in 2005

 

3 Per Cent

 

of the electorate.

 

Moreover, in England only, the parties of the Right attracted just under 4 per cent of the votes in 2005 –votes that, in the past, would normally have mainly gone to the Conservatives.

 

No wonder that the UKIP vote alone was in excess of the Labour’s winning margin of the vote in 25 constituencies and the BNP/UKIP vote combined exceeded that vote in a further 5 constituencies, despite the BNP concentrating on Labour heartlands and not standing in many marginals.

 

With the Cameron Policy of targeting left bloc parties, the Conservatives might cut back the vote for the Left bloc from about 60 per cent in the last three elections to, say, 55 per cent – the bedrock Left Bloc vote -and, from this process, they could gain 5 per cent of the national vote. Their possible electoral total might be:

 

Conservative vote 2005 32.4%

From left Bloc 5.0%

Total 37.4%

 

If we assume that 50 per cent of the votes came from Labour and 50 per cent from the LibDems, this would mean the labour vote would total 32.7 per cent, giving a Tory lead of 4.7 per cent.

This would produce a hung Parliament but the Tories would still have 25 seats behind Labour.

 

So, relying on taking votes only from the Left Bloc leaves the Conservatives with an inadequate result; a hung Parliament at best.

 

To actually win with this strategy the voting figure would have to look like this:

 

Conservative 42.6%

Labour 30.1%

LibDems 16.9%

Scots/Welsh 2.2%

 

This would give the Conservatives a lead over Labour of 12.5 per cent, just enough to form a government.

In this scenario the total of the Left Bloc is 49.2 per cent. In other words, the Tories would have to push the Left Bloc into a lower percentage of the vote than in 1979 when the Left Bloc totalled 52.8 per cent –lower than any election since the 1950s. Is this really a possibility?

 

To emphasise, there are two reasons for the scale of the challenge the Tories face.

 

The existence of the new Right parties compresses the total available vote for the Conservatives.

 

Second, the LibDem vote is more successful in turning votes into seats than it did in the 1980s.

 

Conservatives have ignored the two basic canons of electoral warfare.

They have failed to secure their base.

 

The left Bloc may shrink from 60 per cent to 55 per cent of the electorate if the Tories detach some of it with current strategy BUT, historically, it is unlikely to go lower.

 

Remember that Mrs Thatcher was neither handicapped by the bias in the electoral system nor by the existence of small but crucially important

 

Right Wing parties.

 

* * *

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used-comments in brackets]

 

[Well! until there is a more aggressive stance against the EU by the Tory leadership which can be believed –and that is the greatest difficulty they have -there is also the present suspicion that the trend of that party is to follow New Labour and hope they will hold their members until they can become a government-if ever.

 

But assuming that the rank and file of the Tory party are being led along with the belief that there is a possibility of government while behind the scenes the leadership is merely interested in ensuring that the Pro-Europe faction from ALL main parties achieve their ambition of our entry into a

 

United States of Europe.

 

This is all speculation but when one looks at the reluctance of the Tory party to take a stronger stance on withdrawal from the EU or at the least a positive programme of clawing back our Sovereignty it leads many with the unmistakable impression that a vote for the Tories is a vote for New Labour or LibDem as their policy on Europe and in fact on many other major issues of concern crosses party lines.

 

As we have stated for some years now we believe that ONLY

 

PR-PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

 

-can ensure that the voices of millions of voters who have no intention of being European citizens in a Collective Totalitarian State have the opportunity to protect their accustomed

 

Rights and Liberties.

 

The battle lines need to be drawn by the fringe parties in the following months of 2006 by making PR the most important issue for discussion as a first step to returning True Democracy to England.

 

If Scotland and Wales have their Devolution- why not England?

 

DO IT NOW –MAKE IT HAPPEN!

 

* * *

MAY/06

 

*

 

*

The abolition of Britain
by The Reform Treaty
- Second Reading-Passed by majority of 138

*

Veteran parliamentarian TONY BENN speaks of the absolute necessity of a

REFERENDUM

HEAR HIM ON

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=o0I-ZdvQz1o

*

 

 

 

*

www.noliberties.com

[Latest Addition - June07]

*

www.eutruth.org.uk

*

www.thewestminsternews.co.uk

*

 

www.speakout.co.uk

*

 

Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU

www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs

 

*

 

 

VOTE

MAY -2007

 

TO LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION

WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE

TO SET YOU

 FREE

 

THE

UK INDEPENDENCE PARTY

www.ukip.org

 

TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER

BUT

SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.

*

 

ONLY

PRO-PORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

*

Home Rule for Scotland

WHY NOT

HOME RULE for ENGLAND

 

*

MAY/07

 

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin]

 

 
Elections in the British One Party State

If you vote Conservative, Labour, Lib-Dem, UKIP or the BNP, you'll be voting for the EU dictatorship. All five party leaderships are EU controlled. That's why your vote doesn't make a difference - all these five parties have the same policies: the EU's policies.

The 17 most senior politicians in the Conservative, Lib Dem and Labour parties, including Ken Clarke, Francis Maude, Cameron, William Hague, George Osborne, Nick Clegg, Brown, David and Ed Milliband, Ed Balls, Peter Mandleson are Bilderbergers, the 140 strong band of ultra senior Freemasons who are bribed by the EU to build the EU dictatorship.

No Bilderberger, Freemason or Common Purpose graduate should ever be allowed to hold public office.

UKIP and the BNP are honey traps to neutralise activists: UKIP is riddled with Freemasons and Common Purpose like a cancer, and the BNP controlled by the Edgar Griffin (father) and son Nick Freemasonry family. The 350,000 freemasons and the 40,000 strong Common Purpose Organisation are the (mostly unknowing) foot soldiers of the EU in Britain. (Which makes the BNP the easiest party to clean up - get rid of the Griffins, and put in a real anti-EU leadership.)

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF

UKIP

 OR

 INTEND TO JOIN THEM TAKE NOTE OF THE MESSAGE ABOVE

 

 

THE EDP HAS BEEN CRITICAL OF THE MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP OF THE UKIP FOR SOME TIME NOW AS IS SHOWN IN A NUMBER OF BULLETINS  OVER THE PAST FEW YEARS WHERE WE HAVE CRITICISED THEIR LACK LUSTRE PERFORMANCE AS THEY FAILED TO MOTIVATE THEIR MEMBERSHIP TO A MORE DETERMINED CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE CAMPAIGN WHICH WOULD HAVE MADE THE GOVERNMENTS TREMBLE BUT THEY HAD NO WORRY BECAUSE THEY HAD THEIR OWN PERSONS IN CHARGE AT THE TOP OF THE ORGANISATION.  THIS FIGHTING SPIRIT HAS BEEN LACKING AND WE CAN CONFIRM THIS OURSELVES BECAUSE WE HAVE BEEN OUTSIDE PARLIAMENT WHEN A MARCH WAS CANCELLED - AND WATCH THE FARCE WHEN CANDLES WERE HELD AND THOUSANDS OF LETTERS SENT TO MPS WHO KNEW WHERE TO DISPOSES OF THEM -AND ALL TO NO AVAIL.  IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF UKIP YOU HAVE BEEN BETRAYED BY YOUR OWN LEADERSHIP SOME APPEAR ON THE ALEX JONES SHOW WHICH HAS BEEN UNDER CLOSE SPOTLIGHT RECENTLY AS BEING CLOSE TO AN ISRAELI SECURITY FIRM DETAILS ON OUR WEBSITE .    IRONICALLY IT WAS A CHANCE LOOK ON THE INTERNET A FEW YEARS AGO  TO COME UPON THAT SITE WHICH OPENED OUR MIND TO THE ILLUMINATI.   THOUGH WE HAVE SOME DETAILS OF THE BILDERBERGERS ON OUR SITE  A NUMBER OF YEARS AGO WE FAILED TO DO MORE RESEARCH- WE ALL HAVE TO LEARN.  THE FAILURE OF UKIP WE HAVE SUSPECTED  FOR MANY YEARS   THAT MANY AT THE TOP OF THEIR ORGANISATION MIGHT BE UNDERCOVER MEMBERS OF THE ILLUMINATI.  IT IS A FAVOURITE TRICK OF THEIRS TO SUPPORT ANY PARTY OR ORGANISATION AT THE OUTSET WHATEVER ITS POLICY AS IT ALLOWS THEM TO PUT THEIR OWN PEOPLE IN TO CONTROL ITS POLICES AS THEY BEHIND THE SCENES SUPPLY THE VITAL FINANCIAL SUPPORT.

  Our intention is not to benefit from this disaster as since the 1999 European Election we have NOT! accepted a DONATION! from ANYONE! and we closed membership also because we did not wish to split the vote for UKIP but have stated in the past that we would contest another election if it was ever necessary to enter into the affray again and with the reputation of UKIP under scrutiny we will keep our options OPEN!   As we mentioned some time ago we have been almost two decades on the campaign trail to free our once FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE of ENGLAND from the SATANIC EU and those who have for centuries have planned for an EVIL ONE-WORLD CORPORATION/GOVERNMENT and EXTERMINATE! at least 5 BILLION of the WORLD'S POPULATION and therefore if we are right about those mentioned above they are not only TRAITORS to their COUNTRY but also a THREAT to WORLD PEACE.   However, of late, matters have NOT! been going well for the ILLUMINATI as you will observe BELOW.

 

WHAT A WAY TO WIN A WAR

 

 

BENJAMIN FULFORD

 

More!

[WORKS]

*

SEEKTHETRUTHANDWISDOM

 

*

Bank Of England The Banking Swindle

 

More!

 

More!

 

PATRIOT or TRAITOR to HIS COUNTRY

+More!

 

 More!

 

+(More!

 

 

THIS YOU MUST SEE IT CONCERNS

 YOUR

PLANET!

AND

 YOU!

 

 

NO NEED TO PANIC!

 

'Others shall sing the song,

Others shall right the wrong,-

Finish what I begin,

All all I fail of win.

Hail to the coming singers!

Hail to the brave light-bringers!

Forward I reach and above

All that they sing and dare.

 

The airs of heaven blow o'er me;

A glory shines before me

Of what mankind shall be'-

Pure, generous, brave and free,

I feel the earth move sunward,

I join the great march onward,

And  take, by faith, while living,

My freehold of thanksgiving.-

 

WHITTIER

 

MAY-2012

 

TOP OF PAGE

 

 

 

ADDED - MAY-2012

 

 

 

 
 

HOME