DEMOCRACY WILL WORK ONLY IF ENOUGH PEOPLE WANT IT TO WORK.
For an election to do what democracy requires of it,
there must be alternatives besides the officially sponsored ones
It is said elsewhere if the electoral system is to
ensure wide sensitivity, ANY group of electors must be free to propose its own
candidates if none of the others show any interest in it.
This implies freedom to associate, to sponsor
candidates and canvass on their behalf.
Again choice in unreal unless electors can find out all they need to
know about possible alternatives.
If the channels of publicity are reserved for the
official parties or for some particular group or interest, the elector is not
likely to get a very accurate impression of the choices open to him.
But legal rights to speak, publish, and criticize
freely are not
enough; the means of mass communication must NOT be effectively
monopolized by one group, interest or party, and the resources of ALL parties
must NOT be so unequal as to deprive ANY of a FAIR HEARING…
The majority is a shifting aggregate of interests
and its only claim to prevail is that it is more numerous, not that it is more
virtuous. [Well! we have all leant that since 1997 -have we not?]
We shall argue later that a selfish majority has no
better claim to have its way than a selfish minority, except that a
constitutional rule lays it down that it should.
There may be good reasons for that rule; but they
are quite different from the presumption that the majority will -is always
directed at the COMMON GOOD.
…It is sometimes assumed that the job of a
democratically elected government is to implement the electors’ WILL, by
enacting as quickly as it can the programme on which it was returned to office,
but this is quite untenable.
The electors’ will is limited to the single question
decided at the poll: WHO SHALL
GOVERN? Nothing can be inferred beyond
that. To say that a party programme has
been endorsed by the electorate- or even by a majority of electors is highly
misleading, for no one can say how many voted for the party despite any given item, or even despite the whole
The mandate theory is
capable of a negative application at best
[Unless specifically stated
as the main issue on which the election is being fought -it could be a case of
WAR or PEACE or as now in 2005 the very Freedom of a Nation-State]
No one can say of any given proposal of a victorious
party only that it was not so unpopular that it cost the party the election.
That is scarcely an electoral authorization to proceed.
But even if it were, there might be still grounds
for holding back, if it could be shown that the majority of electors demanded
action that would oppress a minority.
…For the natural right democrats, the right to vote
is rather a way of restraining the abuse of authority. Governments are never to be trusted; they must be watched and
For the Levellers [17th century
Independents -Civil War?], like Lilburne and
Rainborough, as later by Tom Paine, government was a necessary evil, to
be curbed by the people, and made to respond to its needs.
[On May 5-2005- the voters in this country will be watched
by the world at large to see if the once proud independence of the British
voter is still alive and kicking?]
…Where large homogeneous interests conflict with
smaller ones, democracy is always in danger of becoming a mere majority rule.
It can be
preserved only if there are traditions of tolerance and if competing groups
feel sufficient solidarity and concern about one another’s welfare to be ready
to compromise and respond to appeals for justice. This is another way of saying:
DEMOCRACY WILL WORK ONLY IF ENOUGH PEOPLE WANT IT TO
[As must be shown by the voters on May 5-
2005 or our Democracy will be DEAD.]
And are prepared to make the necessary adjustments
that the claims of others demand.
…This suggests two criteria for political
organisation: That there should
be adequate channels through which all interests can make their claims known; and that no interests should
be so powerful that a government can safely attend to them alone.
interest should be so weak that a government could afford to disregard any
convincing case it might put up. If one
of a government’s main concerns is to stay in power, it will be tempted to
placate powerful interests at the expense of weak and inarticulate one’s.
The problem then is so to distribute political
influence that no interest can be safely ignored [As with our future or
otherwise in Europe]
If the technique of representation works in this
sort of way, it is not important, in one sense, who wins an election and who
governs. [This has not been the case since 1997 -in Blairdom]
All parties would be sensitive to a wide range of
interests, and whoever governed would have to justify their policies by
appealing to widely accepted moral criteria [Ignored by Tony Blair]
Their decisions would not be influenced by any
particular sectional viewpoint, and whatever they did would adopt the same
policies; of course elections make a difference to what is actually done.
The point is rather that whatever was done could be
rationally defended. [Not in Blairdom]
However, though some policies are more prudent [Not
a virtue of Blairites] than others, there is
no reason to suppose that the one preferred by the electoral majority is
therefore the wisest.
do not settle such questions by counting heads.
Democratic techniques like elections prevent the
adoption of policies, which are morally indefensible; they do not ensure that
the kings will be philosophers.
But, then, no convincing technique has ever found
that would guarantee wise and virtuous rulers.
Even Plato himself warned against the dangers of being taken in by false
philosophers. [In our day we have an excellent example in our Tony Blair
and his countless advisers and cronies]
Democracy is only a safeguard against abuse of power, not a
guarantee that it will be wisely used. [Not in our day]
It encourages rulers to behave as if they were
virtuous, because it lays their decisions open to scrutiny of rivals as
competent as themselves, who have their own interest in drawing the voter’s
attention to partiality nor corruption.
[Well! In May 2005
There are plenty of examples of such partiality and
corruption to show that no democracy can survive in the hands of President
Blair and his numerous traitors who have almost destroyed a Democracy once a
beacon of hope for stability and justice
in the world.] MAY/05
* * *
The abolition of Britain
by The Reform Treaty
- Second Reading-Passed by majority of 138
Veteran parliamentarian TONY BENN speaks of the
absolute necessity of a
HEAR HIM ON
So You Want Out Of The EU
THEN WHY NOT SIGN THE
RENUNCIATION of EU CITIZENSHIP
Details from petition creator
With the signing of the Maastricht Treaty the
people of Britain were given
EUROPEAN and BRITISH
The extra tier of citizenship was thrust upon
the people without their consent -and in many cases knowledge.
The PEOPLE of GREAT BRITAIN should be allowed
the option of opting out of the EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP if they so wish. The
GOVERNMENT will then be able to provide those who have opted out with
-only such as British (not EU) passports,
driving licences and other national documents.
EU laws will also NOT APPLY to those who
HAVE OPTED OUT OF EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP
[PETITION OPEN UNTIL OCTOBER
A BLUNT REPLY TO THE
QUEEN'S SPEECH ON CHRISTMAS DAY-25th
LEGACY-AUSTRALIA-CANADA-NEW ZEALAND-WHY THEY
The Act of
Settlement of 1701-WHY IT SHOULD CONCERN
The Common Law of
ENGLAND is the LAW of
Commonwealth Realms V The Constitution for
AUSTRALIA-SUPPORT THE CROWN
THANK GOD WE
ELECTED A MONARCH
(by the Late -William
WHY WE MUST BE
ALERT AND WITH OUR COMMONWEALTH PATRIOTS
MAINTAIN CONSTITUTIONAL MONARCHY
IF WE DESTROY OUR
RIGHT OF FREEDOM TO FIGHT A WAR ON
YOU CAN'T HAVE BOTH.
WILL THIS CHRISTMAS QUEEN'S SPEECH
LAST IN A
FREE INDEPENDENT ENGLAND -SCOTLAND AND WALES?
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN ASSURE YOU THAT YOU
HAVE NOTHING TO FEAR FROM BECOMING A
PROVINCE OF EUROPE.
THE QUEEN MAKE IT PLAIN THAT OUR FREE
INDEPENDENT NATION STATE IS SACROSANCT BUT
THAT IF THE PEOPLE WISH TO BECOME SLAVES
-THEN A REFERENDUM THERE MUST BE.
THAT NO ENGLISHMAN SHOULD BE ASKED WHETHER
HE WISHES TO BE A SLAVE OR FREE!
CHRISTMAS WE WILL FIND OUT IF OUR PROTECTOR
'Rights and Liberties'
by HER SACRED OATH
MONARCHY be nothing more than a
PARK in the future
THE TIME FOR BLUNT SPEAKING AS THE VERY
EXISTENCE OF OUR UNIQUE NATION STATE IS IN
We are told on the BBC (Brussels
Broadcasting Service) at 11.30 pm on
Saturday the 23rd December, 2007, that the
QUEEN now has a website which has footage of
the Royal Family in the past and that the
QUEEN is NOT
'Stuck in the past'
far as many patriotic subjects are concerned
we need to remain in the PAST when it
concerns the protection of our
have had and will continue to have but it
must not threaten our very WAY-OF-LIFE our
Common Law of England and all which makes
our country the most unique parliamentary
democracy in the world.
BE NO SURRENDER!
Should the Monarch fail to protect our
inherited RIGHTS and Liberties then we shall
have to fight for a REPUBLIC as
happened in the 17th century because the
Monarch of the day ignored those very
'Rights and Liberties of Englishmen' which
will still survive in the English Speaking
World today in December 2007. How can the
MOTHER of PARLIAMENTS give away what is
already our and our children's
INHERITANCE which cannot be taken away by
PARLIAMENT or the QUEEN.
If the above publicity
exercise is to be used to soften the impact to
the population of the BETRAYAL of their
CONSTITUTION and COUNTRY then it would be
the greatest TREASON by a Monarch since
James II who sold our COUNTRY to the FRENCH
for MONEY and RELIGION.
WE ASK WHAT PRICE ARE OUR RIGHTS AND
THEY ARE PRICELESS!
Choice is Yours!-but time is running out
6 months to be EXACT!
WE are to
THEY are not
WE have more to LOSE
more to GAIN
WE have been clear of dictators from EUROPE
for most of our HISTORY
been cursed with that abomination for most
of their HISTORY and NOW!
Our Queen and the EU Constitution
The Spirit of England
THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE
HER MAJESTY QUEEN ELIZABETH THE II
We now learn
from the Daily Mail COMMENT on Christmas Eve
that the Queen's Speech will cover the
catastrophic fall in Values and Moral
behaviour since the beginning of her 56
-year reign. This has been brought about by
the actions of HER MINISTERS and the greater
number of those in HER PARLIAMENT who have
placed THEIR CONCERNS before the INTERESTS
of THE PEOPLE and NATION STATE.
the fact that HER PEOPLE feel LOST that has
been the direct result of the actions of HER
SUCCESSIVE GOVERNMENTS and the TRAITOROUS
POLITICIANS including PRIME MINISTERS who
have stealthily over the 56 years of HER
MAJESTY'S REIGN have almost achieved their
aim of ENSLAVING the PEOPLE to a FOREIGN
for the marked drop in the number viewing
THE QUEEN'S SPEECH is no doubt because the
mass of people have realised years ago that
the MONARCH is powerless to PROTECT their
WAY-OF-LIFE and events up to now have PROVED
There is a well know saying
'Nero fiddled while Rome burned'
Is it the case on
Christmas Day 2007 while the Monarch
talks our Rights and Liberties are
being taken from us under our very
Of course the QUEEN
under HER CONSTITUTIONAL ROLE can only
'Advise and Warn' HER MINISTERS but when
the matter concerns the very LIFE of an
INDEPENDENT STATE we expect that HER MAJESTY
consider the arrangement to be AT AN END as
it would make a MOCKERY of the PRIME
IMPORTANCE of the MONARCH to protect our
inherited Rights and Liberties which HER
MINISTERS are endeavouring TO GIVE
We as loyal
subjects of the MONARCH who is the living
embodiment of OUR RIGHTS and LIBERTIES
ask at this late stage with only months to
the eradication of a FREE NATION STATE some
veiled comments that HER MAJESTY will
PROTECT our RIGHTS and LIBERTIES.
As for the
MORAL tone of the NATION STATE at this most
crucial time in ENGLISH CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY this matter
should be left to CHURCH LEADERS who's
responsibility it is to CARE for their
FLOCKS particularly at this FESTIVAL of
MAJESTY'S SPEECH has not been pre-recorded
we ask HER MAJESTY to give those MILLIONS of
HER subjects some hope that their PROTECTOR
has NOT FORGOTTEN THEM.
APPEAL not be answered we can at last
confirm that the MONARCHY is after all
nothing more than a talking shop suitable
for YouTube and therefore nothing more than
Benn's comments about the despotic and
need for a
politician with INTEGRITY and love of
country who has for decades witnessed the
growth of the monstrous creature soon to be
STATES OF EUROPE.
Liberties of Parliament-
Birthright of Subjects of England.
[All words/word underlined have a
WE WISH YOU ALL A
CHRISTMAS AND A HAPPY
Xmas message to you all last year we find
that our sentiments remain the same with the
added emphasise on the coming danger to YOUR
COUNTRY from those many traitors in YOUR
HOUSE of COMMONS who intend to sell YOUR
COUNTRY to a FOREIGN POWER]
We Remember The
Spirit of England-Winston Churchill-1953
were warned in 1953 to beware of wreckers of
our Constitution and Way-of- Life but it had
taken Tony Blair just 10 years to do just
THAT while everyone had their minds they
thought on more important matters. Well! in
2007 his predessessor Gordon Brown is
leading you to SLAVERY and only awaits the
final signature of the present holder of the House of Wessex the over 1000 year
PROTECTOR of our inherited
RIGHTS and LIBERTIES of ENGLISHMEN
Of the House
of Wessex since King Alfred 'the Shepherd
and Darling of England' in the annals of 893
leave it to the work of
Alfred the Great
England was saved to become the first
individual nation -state which over 1100
years later a member of that same House of
Wessex has already signed away much of those
ancient Rights and Liberties and
fundamentals of justice and Rule of Law and
only awaits a final signature to enslave her
people into a despotic undemocratic godless
police state to call itself a
within the power of Her Majesty the Queen to
refuse to ratify the New EU TREATY because
whatever lies her ministers have given her
over her long reign the TRUTH is now clear
for ALL TO SEE.
Netherlands a number of years ago their
MONARCH resigned for a day rather than sign
the Bill put before him. The New EU TREATY
is the death of a NATION STATE of over 1200
years in the making. It is the treasonable
actions of HER MINISTERS which has placed
THE QUEEN in the forefront in the protection
of the Rights and Liberties of HER SUBJECTS
as on no one else can HER PEOPLE DEPEND.
WILL THIS CHRISTMAS QUEEN'S SPEECH
BE THE LAST IN A
FREE INDEPENDENT ENGLAND -SCOTLAND AND WALES?
WARNING MESSAGE TO THE FREEDOM LOVING PEOPLE OF ENGLAND
[Author of Germany's Four Reich's]
'There'll always Be an ENGLAND'
-NOT any MORE
OVER THE NEXT FEW MONTHS WILL PORTRAY ITSELF
AS THE BEST THING SINCE SLICED BREAD
'Don't tell the voters-or you
will ruin everything '
"...we have to make sure
that there are no discussions taking place
in the open air"
Burghardt, a former EU ambassador to the US,
warning that details of the new EU
diplomatic service (officially to be known
as the External Action Service) should not
be discussed in public before the
ratified the NEW EU TREATY
and Ireland has held
its TREATY REFERENDUM early next summer
(source: EU Observer on 27th
The EU has also stated
that none of its institutions should rock
the boat until the English have ratified
Over the next few months
you will hear more than ever the wonderful
benefits of the EU. Whether it is Global
warming or whatever they feel shows them in
a good light and when you have swallowed the
bait you will not know what has hit you.
They intend to show how reasonable they are
and that they are there to make you happy.
If you all fall for this con-trick then you
will deserve the SLAVERY that is in store
Referendum: how Labour
could still smell of roses.
'Money to spare'
when we leave the EU in
Open Europe says:
Build 40 brand new
general hospitals each year 2007-13
- Cut council tax
by nearly 50 per cent
- Cut the
basic rate of income tax by 3p
duty by 75 per cent
total bill for the London Olympics
in less than a year
on the European Communities
(Finance) Bill on Monday 19th
A TIME FOR EUROSCEPTICS TO LEARN
FROM THE PAST-ONLY A TWO-PRONGED ATTACK CAN BRING
VICTORY AND SAVE YOUR FREEDOM -CONSTITUTION AND
[Latest Addition - June07]
Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION
to the EU
WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE
TO SET YOU
TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE
FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER
SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS
WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.
[All underlined words have a