|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
VOTE
JUNE
4 -2009
FOR
www.LIBERTAS.eu
Who wish to
CHANGE the EU which will be impossible
because its foundation is the Nazi blueprint
from the Nazi
Geopolitical Centre in Madrid in 1943
when Himmler knew the war was lost and
prepared for the take-over of EUROPE in
peace time with the collaboration of the
European People's. But it will at
least prove to the hardened EU fanatics
the
'useful idiots'
who constantly utter the word change
THAT
THEY WERE MISTAKEN.
and
face the TRUTH at last and come on side and
join the majority who wish
TO
LEAVE
THE
EUROPEAN
UNION
TO RECLAIM
YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR
THE
TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER
BUT
www.LIBERTAS.eu
OR
SMALL
PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS
WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.
*
ONLY
PRO-PORTIONAL
REPRESENTATION
WILL
BRING
DEMOCRACY
BACK
TO
THE
ENGLISH
PEOPLE
IT
IS SAID ONLY AT ELECTION TIME ARE THE
ENGLISH PEOPLE FREE BUT IN THE PAST BECAUSE
OF THEIR INDIFFERENCE THEY ARE NOW FACED
WITH LOSING THEIR FREEDOM -CONSTITUTION AND
COUNTRY SHOULD THE LISBON TREATY BE RATIFIED
BY GERMANY AS THEY ARE BY AGREEMENT THE LAST
NATION STATE TO ENTER THE
DESPOTIC-UNACCOUNTABLE - SOVIETISED - SATANIC
UNITED STATES OF EUROPE. THOSE
MILLIONS OF THE ENGLISH WHO HAVE DIED IN
DEFENCE OF THEIR COUNTRY OVER 1500 YEARS
MUST BE TURNING IN THEIR GRAVES. WE ALL NOW
KNOW WHAT MAKES THE MAJORITY OF TRAITORS
CLING TO THEIR HIGHLY REMUNERATIVE
SALARY AND EXPENCES AND GOLD-PLATED PENSION.
BUT IT IS TIME THE ENGLISH PEOPLE SPAKE AND
TURNED THE GANG OF THREE OUT OF THE VERY
PARLIAMENT OF WHICH A MAJORITY THOUGHT SO
LITTLE AS TO HAVE SOLD YOUR COUNTRY
WITHOUT
YOUR REFERENDUM
TO A
FOREIGN
POWER.
*
www.LIBERTAS.eu
WE
WANT A CO-OPERATIVE NOT A CONCENTRATION CAMP
EUROPE
[Each
underlined word has a separate bulletin]
MAY-2009
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
MESSAGE TO GORDON
BROWN
IN
JUNE-2009
WHAT TREATMENT IS GOOD ENOUGH FOR
THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK IN THE USA
IS GOOD ENOUGH FOR THE BANK OF
ENGLAND
MONEY CONTROLS the WORLD. We have in the BANK of ENGLAND a CENTRAL
BANK which loves TO PRINT MONEY because it is a MONEY MAKING MACHINE for
those INTERNATIONAL BANKERS who for over hundreds of years have
CONTROLLED EVENTS such as WARS-ASSASSINATIONS-FINANCIAL SCANDALS and
DEPRESSIONS and TOPPLED REGIMES.
IN 1811 --- It
became clear to Thomas Jefferson,
John Adams, and other patriots that,
"The Bank of The United States", was
operated for the benefit of foreign
banking interests. So, when the
Bank's 20 year Charter came up for
renewal in 1811, it was refused by
Congress. The War of 1812 followed!
It was expected that America would
be impoverished by the war and
forced to come to the
Rothschild-controlled Bank of
England
for funds. The condition upon which
money would be supplied was renewal
of the Charter of the Bank of the
U.S. A subservient Congress granted
a renewal of the Charter in 1816.14
The second "Bank of the United
States" ...was largely controlled by
foreigners through "front men"; John
Jacob Aster, Stephen Girard, and
David Parish (who was the New York
agent for the Vienna branch of the
Rothschild banking dynasty during
the War of 1812).
*
VOICE FROM AMERICA
Texas Straight Talk
by
Senator Ron Paul
A
weekly column
Audit the Fed, Then End It!
I have been very pleased with
the progress of my legislation,
HR 1207, which calls for a
complete audit of the Federal
Reserve and removes many
significant barriers towards
transparency of our monetary
system. This bill now has
nearly 170 cosponsors, with
support from both Republicans
and Democrats. Senator Bernie
Sanders has introduced a
companion bill in the Senate S
604, which will hopefully begin
to gain momentum as well. I am
very encouraged to see so many
of my colleagues in Congress
stand with me for greater
transparency in government.
Some have begun to push back
against this bill, and I am very
happy to address their concerns.
The main argument seems to be
that Congressional oversight
over the Fed is government
interference in the free
market. This argument shows a
misunderstanding of what a free
market really is.
Fundamentally, you cannot defend
the Federal Reserve and the free
market at the same time. The
Fed negates the very foundation
of a free market by artificially
manipulating the price and
supply of money – the lifeblood
of the economy. In a free
market, interest rates, like the
price of any other consumer
good, are decentralized and set
by the market. The only
legitimate, Constitutional role
of government in monetary policy
is to protect the integrity of
the monetary unit and defend
against counterfeiters.
Instead, Congress has abdicated
this responsibility to a cabal
of elite, quasi-governmental
banks who, instead of
stabilizing the economy, have
destabilized it. It took less
than two decades for the Federal
Reserve to bring on the Great
Depression of the 1930’s. It
has also inflated away the value
of our currency by over 96
percent since its inception. It
has invisibly stolen from the
poor and given to the rich
through this controlled
inflation, and now openly stolen
through recent bank bailouts.
It has predictably exacerbated
the very problems it was meant
to solve.
Detractors have also argued that
the Fed must remain immune from
the political process, and that
that more congressional
oversight would distort their
very important decisions. On
the contrary, the Federal
Reserve is already heavily
entrenched in the political
process, as the Fed chairman is
a political appointee. High
level officials routinely make
the rounds between positions at
the Fed, member banks, Treasury
and back again, taking care of
friends and each other along the
way.
As far as the foolishness of
placing complex monetary policy
decisions in the hands of
politicians – I couldn’t agree
more. No politician or central
banker, no matter how brilliant,
is smart enough to know more
than the market itself. The
failure of central economic
planning has been witnessed over
and over. It is frankly beyond
me why we ever agreed to try it
again.
To understand how unwise it is
to have the Federal Reserve, one
must first understand the
magnitude of the privileges they
have. They have been given the
power to create money, by the
trillions, and to give it to
their friends, under any terms
they wish, with little or no
meaningful oversight or
accountability. Thus the
loudest arguments against
greater transparency are likely
to come from those friends, and
understandably so.
However, it is the
responsibility of every member
of Congress to represent the
interests of the people that
sent them to Washington and find
out what has been happening with
our money. As the branch of
government with the power of the
purse, we really have no other
reasonable choice when the
economy is in the shape it is
in.
[WE HEARTEDLY
AGREE WITH RON PAUL AND WE HOPE
HE WILL GIVE OUR BILDERBERGER
GOVERNOR OF THE BANK OF ENGLAND
MERVYN KING HIS GOOD ADVICE]
Posted by
Senator Ron Paul (05-18-2009,
12:42 PM) filed under
Monetary POLICY
*
www.house.gov/paul
*
[Font Altered-Bolding &
Underlining Used-Comments in
Brackets.]
www.JEWSNOTZIONISTS.ORG
*
-
Author: Christopher Story FRSA

In 1992, the Illuminati orchestrated the raising
of a targeted $27.5 trillion from 200+
international institutions, in the biggest
‘secretive’ ‘private placement’ financing
operation in world history. The ‘mainstream’
media unfortunately failed to report this
operation – so the general public is ignorant of
it. The aim was to provide finance for the
imposition of the New World Order, a.k.a., the
New Underworld Order, for its use throughout the
21st century. The euphemism for this programme
is the ‘global security environment’. The
consequent monumental ‘Global Security Fund’,
which is managed in Brussels, and is directed on
behalf of the global Illuminati’s controllers by
financial intelligence operatives, now disposes
of secret financial resources of approximately
$65 trillion for this purpose, probably far
more. Equipped with such limitless resources,
the directors of the
New Underworld
Order
have now amassed sufficient finance to bribe
every leader, ruler, policymaker, intelligence
operative and political figure worldwide, for
the rest of this century, in pursuit of their
aims.
More...

ILLUMINATI
masterplan 1
|
|
| EVERYONE IN THE WORLD MUST WATCH THIS
VIDEO. The Illuminati, a group of Super Rich that
control scientific research, banking system, all forms
of media,... |
| Don't forget to get this message to everyone on your
E-mail list.
NOW! |
| You can't rely on keeping your internet connection
open so form an LIBERTY ASSOCIATION in YOUR AREA so that
when your screen goes blank for good you have your
contact details to continue the FIGHT for REAL. It is
better to stand firm with friends rather than cower to
those who consider themselves YOUR MASTER. |
| |
|
JUNE-2009
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DAILY MAIL STATES NO
TIME FOR PR- WEAK GOVERNMENT
Daily Mail
Comment-Saturday,
May 30,2009.
As we have already
stated if we could go back four decades to a time when
politicians were not in politics just to fleece the
taxpayer but were there to SERVE THE PEOPLE and they
would certainly not then have sold OUR FREEDOM -OUR
CONSTITUTION-OUR COUNTRY to a FOREIGN POWER.
With regard to the
question of STRONG GOVERNMENT we have had enough of what
is called STRONG GOVERNMENT over the past 12 years which
has apart from our loss of LIBERTIES has virtually
destroyed OUR VALUES-OUR FREEDOMS and COUNTRY.
Tony Blair said he
wanted to implant his DEMOCRACY into IRAQ and they have
a PR system of government. At home we have the Scottish
Parliament and the Welsh Assembly. WHY is it acceptable
for PR in these cases but NOT in ENGLAND.
Of course whichever
text book one looks at over the past hundred years one
is left in no doubt that PR is not strong government but
they were other times and with different attitudes and
different values in society. What we have to face today
is that millions of people have had their full of what
is supposed to be effective strong democratic[?]
government and now realise that it is time to move on
and introduce PR in order that those millions of voters
and non-voters in their millions who had nowhere to go
to get their just complaints dealt with.
As we have said many
times if PR had been in existence there would have been
NO EEC in January 1973 because there would have been a
strong anti-EU party in existence with many Members in
YOUR HOUSE OF COMMONS.
The reasons that the
editorial of the Daily Mail puts before the English
people is tainted by past history and as part of the
Establishment in our country the supposed FREE PRESS are
in cahoots with those who have connived to entrap us all
in a nightmarish satanic, undemocratic
UNITED
STATES OF EUROPE
We can see that those
who speak in such derogatory terms about PR are
themselves part of the plot of the destruction of a once
world respected unique parliamentary democracy in a 1500
year nation state of England and its total eradication
from the map of Europe and the World.
We only have to look
what has happened across the seas to a once Land of the
Free with their written constitution which has been
virtually destroyed because the American Constitution is
now what the President says it is and not what Congress
should demand it is . They have so-called STRONG
GOVERNMENT in the USA and the PEOPLE loath it because it
has taken away almost all their rights in their once
world acclaimed
DECLARATION OF
INDEPENDENCE.
www.house.gov/paul
So the Daily Mail
needs urgently to take into account the history of the
past two centuries and particularly over the past decade
before being so adamant that their answer to the
treachery and thieves which now abound in our once
respected Westminster depends on STRONG GOVERNMENT when
it is that very premise which has landed us all in such
a gigantic political and financial swindle from the
political classes on the once free people in our Island
Home of ENGLAND.
*
MAY-2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ten EU truths we must tell the public
1. The leaderships of the Conservative, Labour and Lib Dem parties
have been taken over by pro-Europeans. These leaderships implement
the EU's policy, and ignore the wishes of their voters.
That's why your vote doesn't make a
difference.
2. The European Union has the
Constitution of a dictatorship, and the laws of a police state.
Dictatorships lead to oppression and poverty. The EU Constitution is
similar to the old Soviet Union's.
3. Once the Queen has signed the
sixth and final EU Treaty in June,2008
[SHE did against HER
CORONATION OATH] the very much alive EU
Constitution makes it clear the EU will abolish the nations of
Britain and England (and our Lib, Lab and Con
parties, Reform Treaty clause 8A-4).
4.
The EU is illegal under British
law. Four Prime Ministers and the Queen have committed five acts of
Treason by signing five EU treaties [6
in 2008 with the signing of the LISBON TREATY] which will abolish our nation
and replace it with the EU; they had to
secretly repeal two of the laws of
treason in the 1998 Crime and Disorder Act (s36.3) to escape
prosecution.
5. The police state growing around
you, and reported on by some national newspapers, is the EU police
state. We've been in the EU for 37 years, we
are harmonising our laws with the EU, the emerging police state is
the result.
6. Political correctness, the
undermining of parents, the family and teachers, the teaching of sex
and homosexuality to under tens, the promotion of single parent
families etc. is subversion by the EU or its
Common Purpose organisation over the
last 34 years, using the plans of the German Frankfurt School.
7. The EU will be an economic
disaster. We now lose £30 billion a year trading with Europe; before
we joined we broke even. The EU's 111,000 regulations cost us £100
billion a year (Better Regulation Commission Annual Report 2005);
they will
bring us a soviet style command economy and poverty.
Our politicians lied to us.
8. If you have voted Conservative,
Labour or Lib Dem over the last 37 years you
have voted for the EU police state, and for the abolition of your
own party.
9. German Chancellor Angela Merkel
ensured our government signed the “Reform Treaty;” which will
abolish the British Constitution and ENGLAND to enforce the EU’s
reforms from 1st
January 2009.
The EU treaties don’t allow for a British General
Election, which isn't due until 5th May 2010, so it is unlikely
another will be permitted. You will by then be imprisoned inside the
EU police state, where you will be ruled by
unelected EU dictators, who will control the nuclear weapons of what
used to be Britain and
France.
10. Britain is the fifth largest
economy amongst the world's 200 nations. Forget elections and
parties, whose leaderships are controlled by the EU. Fight the
direct anti EU campaigns on eutruth to get Britain back before its
too late. Start by visiting
your MP in his local surgery and warn him he will lose his £240,000
salary and expenses when the EU closes Westminster on 5th May 2010.
www.eutruth.org.uk
David Noakes. http://eutruth.org.uk
07974 437 097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Constitutional change? I
wouldn't trust this lot to
reform a parish council
By
Stephen
Glover
21st May 2009
Revolution! A new order!
Sweep it all away! These are
the sentiments emanating
from the mouths of MPs and
party leaders, and the pens
of diligent and enlightened
scribes.
And I must admit that I,
too, have been momentarily
seized by revolutionary
fervour over the past few
days. The evidence of the
corruption of MPs is so
stunning - and a few of them
were men I had revered -
that one feels tempted to
pull down the entire rotten
edifice and start all over
again.
But why? Why, when one
thinks about it, should the
fiddling or greed of a
significant minority of MPs
be allowed to turn into a
general call, amplified by
Gordon Brown, to reinvent
the whole system of
government?
Gordon Brown has
amplified calls to
reinvent the system of
Government in the wake
of the MPs' expenses
scandals
The
political class, or at any
rate some of them, have been
caught trousering money that
was not rightfully theirs.
Almost everyone seems to be
agreed that MPs must now be
subjected to a much tighter
and more transparent
expenses regime which is
independently monitored. In
so doing, they will join the
rest of the human race.
Yet
this vital reform is quickly
being subsumed into demands
for a written constitution
or proportional
representation, or any other
fashionable cause you may
care to mention. We've
almost left expenses behind
as we surge forward to a new
revolutionary dawn. The next
Speaker is spoken of as a
figure who must be able to
direct this process of
transformation.
What seems to have been
forgotten is that since 1997
this Government, far from
being wedded to the
constitutional arrangements
it inherited, has
relentlessly interfered with
them as it has gone along.
New Labour has a restless,
never-ending appetite for
change. We have been living
through a permanent
constitutional revolution
for the past 12 years. Why
on earth should we want
another one?
Look
what has happened to the
concept of Cabinet
government and collective
responsibility. Admittedly
it was already looking a bit
battered in 1997, but Tony
Blair dismantled the work of
centuries in a trice. The
minutes of one Cabinet
meeting early in the New
Labour era show John
Prescott, the Deputy Prime
Minister, pathetically
anticipating the wishes of
the absent Mr Blair about
the Millennium Dome.
More from
Stephen
Glover...
When he was Prime Minister,
Mr Blair persistently
relegated or ignored the
Cabinet, often preferring to
conduct great affairs of
state from his sofa in No
10, surrounded by a few
hand-picked, unelected
chums. The Cabinet seems
scarcely to have been
involved in the decision to
go to war against Iraq in
March 2003. Mr Blair had
already made up his mind.
The
security services had been
squared by Alastair
Campbell, who had leant on
his friend John Scarlett,
then head of the Joint
Intelligence Committee, to
come up with a dossier
representing Saddam Hussein
as a potentially lethal
threat to this country.
The
Blair Government also
politicised the Civil
Service, partly by greatly
increasing the scope and
power of political advisers
such as Jonathan Powell in
No 10, who was empowered to
give orders to civil
servants.
Mr
Campbell, who enjoyed the
same privileges, took over
and dominated the entire
government information
service, which had hitherto
been independent of
ministers, let alone No 10.
Spin doctors became an
accepted arm of government.
With
the help of its huge
majority, the Government
continually bullied its MPs,
many of whom were either dim
or ambitious - or both - and
pliable. Independent-minded
Labour MPs were too few in
number to make much impact,
though as time went on, and
Mr Blair's star began to
fade, they began to assert
themselves.
And whenever New Labour did
enact formal constitutional
reforms - rather than merely
abusing the system - it has
made a botch of things. They
deprived hundreds of
hereditary peers of the
right to sit in the House of
Lords for reasons that had
more to do with class envy
than principle, but ten
years later the second
chamber remains unreformed
and unelected, and
impossible to justify in its
present form.
Devolution, intended by New
Labour to kill off Scottish
nationalism, has had the
opposite effect. The
Government believed that the
system of proportional
representation would prevent
the Scots Nats from ever
taking power, but they were
wrong.
'New Labour has a
restless, never-ending
appetite for change. We
have been living through
a permanent
constitutional
revolution for the past
12 years...'
_______________________________________
Rather than deepening the
Union, as Labour said it
would, devolution has set
the English against the
Scots, as those south of the
border wonder why they
should not enjoy the same
lavish educational and
medical advantages as those
north of it.
And so
it goes on. No Government in
recent times has so
disregarded the
constitutional conventions
that had previously
commanded widespread
respect. Its attempts at
constitutional reform have
been laughable.
So
while others may welcome the
cry of revolution from
Labour thinkers and its
commentariat, I am afraid it
makes my blood run cold.
The
system that Labour inherited
in 1997 was of course very
far from perfect, but it was
a lot better than the one we
have now. That should be the
Conservatives' line. Not
revolution but restoration.
Depoliticise the Civil
Service. Give power back to
Parliament. Defend the
notion of collective Cabinet
responsibility against that
of presidential government.
The problem is not, as Mr
Brown asserts, that the
House of Commons is 'a
gentleman's club'. It was
always so. The problem is
that many MPs do not behave
like gentlemen - who are not
supposed to cheat and steal
what is not theirs.
As Prime Minister, Tony
Blair persistently
relegated or ignored the
Cabinet
The
Tory so-called gentlemen
claiming for their moats and
their swimming pools and
their horse manure are the
biggest disappointment of
all.
Incidentally, I can't help
wondering whether it was
very gentlemanly - or shall
we settle for fair-minded? -
of David Cameron to claim
over £20,000 a year from the
taxpayer towards the
mortgage on his Oxfordshire
country house.
He and
his wife appear to be quite
rich. Their house in the
country is big. Should the
public be helping to fund
it? All the colourful
stories about trouser
presses and flat-screen
televisions may have
diverted us from the deeper
issues.
My
argument is not that there
should never be any
constitutional reform. One
welcome measure would be to
reduce the number of MPs,
who easily outnumber the
number of people in the
United States Congress.
However, this may not be
high on the wish list of
most MPs, on the basis that
turkeys do not usually vote
for Christmas.
But
whatever reforms there are,
let them be few in number,
and well- considered. The
system that New Labour
inherited and has so abused
was the product of gradual
evolution over decades and
centuries. One can be
certain that a new
constitution brewed up by
politicians and academics in
a few weeks would be a
defective one.
Most
constitutional change
conceived in haste turns out
to be regretted. Besides,
this is a tired and
intellectually exhausted
government that can barely
get through a week without
some new mishap. I wouldn't
trust it to come up with a
workable constitution for a
parish council.
Teach MPs to be honest, and
not to rip off the public.
That is a big enough
challenge to be going on
with. Then let's have an
election, and only then
start the process of reform
by reinstating the
constitutional conventions
that this manic, abysmal
Government has destroyed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE RIGHT TO BE
CONSULTED-THE RIGHT TO ENCOURAGE-THE RIGHT
TO WARN
Yes! you have
guessed who we are talking about Her Majesty The Queen who
in 2008 traitorously signed the Lisbon Treaty ending over
1500 years of the rule of a MONARCH in England but for the
brief time when ENGLAND was governed by the great reformer
Oliver Cromwell who's fundamentals led to the Glorious
Revolution of 1689 and constitutional parliamentary
democracy.
Since that time we
have had many Monarchs on the throne but as far as we are
aware none who would have sold their people and country to
a foreign power as the present Queen who contrary to HER
OATH has done .
As a result of this
treasonable action by the Queen in 2008 in exchanging
English citizenship for European citizenship Her Majesty no
longer in reality is able to ask to be consulted by HER
equally traitorous PARLIAMENT who by a majority destroyed
the Constitution and therefore the immemorial
'Rights and
Liberties of Englishmen.
So prized by so many people the world over.
Once the members of PARLIAMENT knew that they
and its INSTITUTION would soon no longer exist what a golden
opportunity to make hay while the sun shines and fill their
pockets of taxpayer's money and for the greater majority it
was their own prize money for selling the people's
FREEDOM-CONSTITUTION and COUNTRY.
It appears there are
those who still believe the Ancient Constitution is in place
but the very Act of Parliament and signing by the Queen in
2008 of the EU TREATY with the connivance of the majority in
Parliament (unless the Lisbon Treaty is not ratified by
those nations who have yet to sign) our
CONSTITUTION is DEAD.
WHY this charade of conveying the impression
THAT THE QUEEN RULES
appears to be still maintained we are at a
loss to understand.
The following from the
respected
International Currency Review
has the following to say about the question
DOES THE QUEEN STILL
REIGN
and more specific
IS HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
SOVEREIGN?
Under Article 17 of the
collectivist Maastricht treaty , all residents of the
European Union are citizens of the EU Collective. It
follows that Presidents and Monarchs are 'citizens of the
EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE
as well
This provides the twisted
rationale for President Herzog's vituperative dismissal of
the relevance of the nation state, and for his insistence
that it has outlived its usefulness, even though he
continued to serve as President.
Dr Herzog's subversive
remarks have special resonance for Britain, where
QUEEN ELIZABETH II
is the
SOVEREIGN AND
CONSTITUTIONAL HEAD
of the
UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT
BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND.
She is the custodian, in
her person, of the sovereignty of the British people which
was passed to HER in February 1952 on the death of her
father, This was confirmed initially when the
QUEEN took the OATH of
ACCESSION
and was finally solemnised
at the QUEEN'S CORONATION in 1953 after HER MAJESTY had been
recognised and universally accepted as the undoubted and
rightful
SOVEREIGN of the BRITISH
PEOPLE
In November 2000 -after a
correspondent who had taken care to prepare his case
thoroughly, had written to the Prime Minister, Tony Blair;
to the then Leader of the Opposition William Hague; to the
Leader of the House of Lords, who was then Baroness jay; and
to the Lord Chief justice and other official office-holders
and dignitaries -asking:
Is Her Majesty the Queen
Sovereign?
HE
RECEIVED NO ANSWER AT ALL
or else a non-committal
weak, diversionary reply.
Mr Blair being unable to
answer the question himself, redirected the enquiry to the
Home office, which likewise prevaricated. Indeed, a hallmark
of the
BLAIR GOVERNMENT
has been its Ministers'
arrogant reluctance to answer letters and parliamentary
questions. Likewise, Mr Blair has reportedly made a point
on occasion, of'
' standing the Queen up'
by failing to turn up on
time., or at all, for his weekly scheduled audiences.
WHAT IF ALL EU LAWS PASSED BY PARLIAMENT
AND APPROVED BY HER MAJESTY ARE INVALID BECAUSE
AGAINST THE LAW OF THE LAND.
www.worldreports.org
By
the very signing in 2008 of the Lisbon treaty by Her
Majesty The Queen
She is no longer the
custodian, in her person, of the sovereignty of the British
people which was passed to HER in February 1952 on the death
of her father, This was confirmed initially when the
QUEEN took the OATH
of ACCESSION
and was finally solemnised at the QUEEN'S
CORONATION in 1953 after HER MAJESTY had been recognised and
universally accepted as the undoubted and rightful
SOVEREIGN
of the BRITISH PEOPLE
The
EU is ille gal
under British law. Four Prime Ministers and the Queen have
committed five acts of Treason by signing five EU treaties
which will abolish our nation and replace
it with the EU.
In
order to avoid the charge of HIGH TREASON against the
QUEEN and PARLIAMENT in 1998 Tony Blair
had
to secretly repeal two of the laws of
treason in the 1998 Crime and Disorder Act (s36.3) to escape
prosecution.
THE
Queen
has signed the sixth
and final EU Treaty in June,2008 the very much alive EU
Constitution makes it clear the EU will abolish the nations
of Britain and England
(and our Lib, Lab and Con parties, Reform Treaty clause
8A-4).
So with the above
information before our eyes we can but iterate our previous
conclusion which Simon Heffer so graphically described when
he stated that the MONARCHY would be a THEME PARK. We agreed
with him then and we would agree with him NOW! in
May-2009.
Our conclusion is that the once QUEEN does not REIGN but is
seeing before HER eyes the penalty of loss of HER COUNTRY
because SHE served other MASTERS who were interested in a
NEW WORLD ORDER and a WORLD GOVERNMENT. The Queen declined
to ACT to PROTECT HER PEOPLE and when the time came hid
behind the secrecy of the REPEAL of two LAWS of TREASON.
In
the words of our greatest poet William Shakespeare:
'The man was noble; but with his last attempt he wiped it
out; betrayed his country; and his name remains to the
ensuing age abhorred.'
ALL who signed the Lisbon Treaty are as far as any
Englishman is concerned are guilty of HIGH TREASON because
without consulting the ENGLISH PEOPLE to release THEM from
THEIR OATHS they still are and will always remain TRAITORS.
*
WHAT HISTORY TELLS US ABOUT OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE
CONTINENT?
*
WHY CAN'T WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH?
*
A MESSAGE from a PATRIOTIC HISTORIAN you can TRUST
EUROPEAN UNION
'worse
than its worst components'
*
MAY-2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
In 2005 William Rees
-Mog stated "Thank God we elected a Monarch."
How this can change in only 4
years.
[IT IS MAY
2009-LAST YEAR HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN SIGNED THE
LISBON TREATY WITHOUT PUTTING PRESSURE -'TO WARN'
THAT SHOULD THE PRIME MINISTER DENY THE PEOPLE A
REFERENDUM THEN SHE WOULD VETO THE TREATY. IT HAS
NOW ONLY RECENTLY COME TO OUR ATTENTION THAT THE
QUEEN IS ONE OF THE PROMINENT MASONIC FIGURES IN THE
NEW WORLD ORDER SO THAT THE PEOPLE HAVE BEEN CHEATED
FOR 47 YEARS THINKING THAT THEIR QUEEN WOULD STAND
BY HER SOLEMN OATH OF ALLEGIANCE TO HER PEOPLE AND
COUNTRY.]
*
Thank God we elected a Monarch
By
William Rees-Mogg
(Independent Peer)
Daily Mail
Sunday, April 3, 2005.
…I am glad to be an Independent peer;
I do not have a party and do not have a vote. Of
course, I always support my children wherever they
may be standing. None of the above criticisms
applies at this Election to the admirable
Conservative candidate for Aberavon. But she shall
remain anonymous.
It is not the least of the merits of a hereditary
Monarchy that the Queen, and the other senior
members of the Royal Family, are above the fray.
The Monarchy would not have lasted for well over a
thousand years if the Monarch had been involved in
the General Election every four years and been
forced to use stale and mendacious arguments to
discredit some alternative line.
In the 18th century, the House of Hanover
did have to defeat the House of Stuart on two
occasions, 1715 and 1745. Even those dates are 30
years apart. No Stuart rebellion has been attempted
since. That is just as well as they were a very
unfortunate family.
Constitutional Monarchy is one of the
great English discoveries. It separates the struggle
for power from the ultimate
authority.
The Monarch has no power, decides nothing except the
choice of her Ladies- in -Waiting, the membership of
the Garter and Order of Merit, the seating at State
banquets and which statesman to call to office if
the General Election produces a tie.
When I come to think of it, that
might be a good outcome, with 207 MP’s for Labour,
207 Conservatives, 207 Liberal Democrats, 25 others
and the Speaker. The Queen
would have some arithmetic to perform; that will not
happen, though it would correspond more closely to
voters’ real preferences than any result we are
likely to get. Arguably it might also produce a
better government.
It is sometimes said, particularly by Scottish
patriots that in English theory sovereignty belongs
to the Monarch, but in Scotland, as in the United
States, to the people.
I
do not know for sure about Scottish constitutional
theory. I do know that as recently as 1689 - the day
before yesterday by standards of our national
history -William and Mary
were crowned King and Queen of England at
Westminster before they had heard whether they were
also to be King and Queen of Scotland.
Until 1707 and the Act of Union, the
parliamentary process was separate and different for
both kingdoms.
Most of us think of England as having a purely
hereditary Monarchy, but
England does not. Our
constitutional Monarchy is itself elective and
therefore democratic. The
Queen sits on her throne by virtue of an Act of
Parliament, the Act of Settlement 1701.
That is her title deed to the Crown.
It was passed, like any other Act of Parliament, by
both Houses.
According to the historian Bishop Burnet, Sir John
Bowles ‘who was then disordered in his senses and
soon after quite lost them’, was put up to propose
Sophia, the Electress Dowager of Brunswick, and her
heirs as the line that would eventually follow Queen
Anne. That was carried in Committee of the House of
Commons; the Act went through the Lords with only
four dissenters and Sophia’s son eventually became
George I.
The history goes back much further than that. In
1399, King Richard II was forced to abdicate in
favour of his cousin, King Henry IV, who was John of
Gaunt’s eldest son. Parliament, sitting in
Westminster Hall, then elected Henry as King. He was
our first elected Monarch.
[Since
that of King Alfred -
Alfred the Great in 871. Many would say one of
the greatest Kings of the English.]
In 1571, Queen Elisabeth’s Parliament
resolved that it alone had the right to determine
the succession, and that it would be high treason
for anyone to question Parliament’s right.
In 1642, Parliament fought and won the Civil War to
determine the issue of ultimate power. In 1660,
Parliament invited King Charles II to return.
Britain does have a hereditary Monarchy but it is
established by parliamentary votes.
Parliaments have made the Monarchy
the keystone to our democratic constitution.
The Act of Settlement
itself could be amended, or on theory, repealed by a
further Act of Parliament. There is no head of steam
for republicanism, but amendment is now probable.
Even in this General Election, Michael Howard has
proposed that the Act’s bar on Roman Catholics
should be removed. It is, I
suspect, already unenforceable.
[Like
almost anything in what is left of our Constitution
- the Rock has been chipped away at for the past 32
years]
If Prince William wanted to marry a
Roman Catholic, which he does not, it would be
politically impossible to keep him from the throne
on those grounds. [We
expect the existence of Human
Rights Act will be
invoked.]
Prince Charles, Prince William and Prince Harry now
come first in the line of succession; if they were
to fail, there would be a strong movement to put the
Princess Royal next in line rather than her younger
brothers. Parliament does not believe in gender
discrimination, nor does the Human Rights Act.
Fortunately this is a very remote possibility.
The Monarchy contributes six key
virtues to our Constitution. These are:
Impartiality,
Duty,
Personality,
Authority,
Unity
And
Permanence.
The idea of a national authority
which is personal humanises the inevitable
bureaucracy of the State.
Few of us would watch a Christmas broadcast by the
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
However high-minded they are, politicians can never
be genuinely impartial, as impartial journalists who
become politicians have repeatedly found.
There is a choice of loyalties to be
made.
No political leader has permanence however powerful
or imposing he may seem at the time - I doubt
whether Tony Blair, Michael Howard or Charles
Kennedy will be leading their parties into the
General Election after this one.
Politicians are mayflies, creatures for the day.
The Crown is for centuries.[?]
The Monarch exchanges power, which belongs to the
Prime Minister with a majority in the House of
Commons, for permanence and authority. Their two
functions are quite different. For my part, I feel
like saying:
‘God bless our politicians; thank God
for the Queen.’
[We would say most sincerely:
‘God help our politicians; thank God
for the Queen.
[How wrong we were to believe we
could count on a Queen with the illustrious name of
ELIZABETH of ENGLAND]
*
[Font altered-bolding &underlining
used-comments in brackets]
APRIL/05
* * *
[IT
IS MAY 2009-LAST YEAR HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN SIGNED
THE LISBON TREATY WITHOUT PUTTING PRESSURE
-TO WARN THAT
SHOULD THE PRIME MINISTER DENY HER PEOPLE A
REFERENDUM THEN SHE WOULD VETO THE TREATY. IT
HAS NOW ONLY RECENTLY COME TO OUR ATTENTION THAT THE
QUEEN IS ONE OF THE PROMINENT MASONIC FIGURES IN THE
NEW WORLD ORDER SO THAT THE PEOPLE HAVE BEEN CHEATED
FOR 47 YEARS THINKING THAT THEIR QUEEN WOULD STAND
BY HER SOLEMN OATH OF ALLEGIANCE TO HER PEOPLE AND
COUNTRY.]
[ADDED TO BULLETIN IN MAY-2009]
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
A TRAGEDY OF THE HISTORY OF OUR TIME
OUR
SERVICEMEN AND WOMEN ARE TOLD THEY ARE DYING FOR THEIR COUNTRY.
OUR
ECONOMY HAS BEEN TORPEDOED BY GREED AND UNACCOUNTABILITY.
OUR
POLITICAL SYSTEM AND MONARCHY LACK LOYALTY-MORALITY AND
PATRIOTISM.
OUR
PRESS AND MEDIA ARE CONCEALING THE TRUTH BECAUSE THEY ARE
CONTROLLED BY NEW WORLD ORDER ENTHUSIASTS.
OUR
FREEDOM ,CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY SOLD TO A FOREIGN POWER.
OUR
FUTURE WILL BE CONTROLLED BY THE MASONIC ILLUMINATI AND NEW
WORLD ORDER WHO ARE CLOSE TO ACHIEVING THEIR CENTURIES OLD
STRATEGY OF A NEW WORLD ORDER AND WORLD GOVERNMENT OF THE MOST
POWERFUL AND RICHEST CORPORATIONS IN A WORLD DICTATORSHIP.
WHAT CAN YOU DO?
WAKE UP!
BUT THEN MANY OF YOU
HAVE DECIDED NOT TO SEE THE TRUTH AND HAVE DECIDED THAT FREEDOM
MATTERS LITTLE SO LONG AS YOU RECEIVE YOUR BRIBES FROM THE STATE
BUT ONE DAY YOU WILL REGRET YOU DID NOT MAKE A STAND NOT SO MUCH
FOR YOURSELF BUT FOR THE CHILDREN OF THE FUTURE.
'There is a law above all human enactments,
written upon the heart by the finger of God; and while men
despise fraud, loath rapine, and abhor blood, they shall reject
with indignation the wild and guilty phantasy , that man can
hold property in man.'-
Lord Brougham (1778-1868)
*
'Whatever makes a man a slave takes half
his worth away.'
Alexander Pope (1688-1744)
*
Slavery is a system of the most complete
injustice.-
Plato. (427-347 B.C.)
*
To remind you what the situation was in the
USA in 1941 and the growing power of the Corporations across
America we include the following:
Whenever men of great
financial and political interests COMBINE then FREEDOM of
SPEECH is the FIRST CASUALTY.
Our greatest 18th century parliamentarian Edmund Burke spoke
of such things when he said:
"WHEN BAD MEN COMBINE, THE GOOD MUST
ASSOCIATE; ELSE THEY WILL FALL, ONE BY ONE, AN UNPITIED
SACRIFICE IN A CONTEMPTIBLE STRUGGLE.
Alex Jones is not the first to feel the anger of those bad
men. As he himself says the TRUTH MUST OUT if all stand
together and refuse to be daunted by the powerful elite who will
broke no resistance to it'S plans.
A speech by Senator Norris which was printed in
the Congressional Record of November
30, 1941, said:
"J. P. Morgan, with the
assistance and cooperation
of a few of the interlocking
corporations which reach all
over the United States in
their influence, controls
every railroad in the United
States. They control
practically every public
utility, they control
literally thousands of
corporations, they control
all of the large insurance
companies. Mr. President, we
are gradually reaching a
time, if we have not already
reached that point, when the
business of the country is
controlled by men who can be
named on the fingers of one
hand, because those men
control the money of the
Nation, and that control is
growing at a rapid rate."
[American President John F Kennedy publicly
stated that he was going to destroy the powerful
elite who could use their power against a
democratically elected President and put into
motion Bills to counter their influence. He also
issued an order for the troops to be WITHDRAWN
from VIETNAM. For these far-sighted and just
decisions HE WAS ASSASSINATED on the
instructions of that ELITE.
Over the past six decades this cancer has
grown into the BILDERBERGERS who meet each year
to DECIDE the FATE of the WORLD. It is TIME the
LITTLE MAN in the WHITE SUIT joined with HIS OWN
and THEMSELVES brought into being THEIR OWN
BANKS and which will counter the THREAT to
THEIR LIBERTY. The WEALTH of the LITTLE MAN
combined can COUNTER that of THOSE exponents of
a NEW WORLD ORDER and WORLD GOVERNMENT on THEIR
OWN TERMS.
If EVERY MAN in the WHITE SUIT put his money
in a PEOPLE'S BANK then the BANKERS who took us
for a ride and are still laughing and still
receiving their perks would soon lose THEIR
ARROGANCE and in TIME their WEALTH.
LET US SHOW THAT THE LITTLE MAN HAS THE
POWER BY WITHDRAWING EVERY POUND and DOLLAR
FROM THE BANKERS AND OVERNIGHT OUR PEOPLE'S BANK
WILL QUICKLY PUT THE OTHER CHEATS OUT OF
BUSINESS. As SENATOR RON PAUL maintains YOUR
MONEY is SAFER in GOLD or SILVER but even here
the supply can be greatly restricted by those
who do not want the LITTLE MAN in the WHITE SUIT
to be INDEPENDENT of THEIR RAPACIOUS CLUTCHES.
We all need to remember Edmund Burke's good
advice and take action NOW! as soon it will be
TOO LATE! to do ANYTHING! Possibly Alex Jones
could be OUR MAN in a WHITE SUIT but he will
need massive SUPPORT.
WILL YOU
DO IT! NOW!
www.JEWSNOTZIONISTS.ORG
[EXTRACT]
4) The Zionists claim that they are
the savers of Israel, but this is refuted by
twelve things.
FIRST - If one contemplates
the two thousand years of our exile, take any
hundred years even the hardest, one will not
find as much suffering, bloodshed, and
catastrophes for the People of Israel as in the
period of the Zionists. And it is known that
most of the suffering of this century was caused
by the Zionists as our Rabbis warned us would be
the case.
SECOND - It is openly stated
in the books written by the founders of Zionism
that the means by which they planned to
establish a state was by instigating
anti-Semitism, and undermining the security of
the Jews in all the lands of the world, until
they would be forced to flee to their state. And
thus they did. They intentionally infuriated the
German people and fanned the flames of Nazi
hatred, and then helped the Nazis, with trickery
and deceit, to take whole Jewish communities off
to the concentration camps, and the Zionists
themselves admit this. (See books Perfidy, Min
Ha Meitsor, etc.). The Zionists continue to
practice this strategy today, they incite
anti-Semitism and then they present themselves
as the "saviors". Here are two replies given by
leaders of the Zionists during World War II,
when they were asked for money to help ransom
Jews from the Nazis. Greenbaum said "One cow in
Palestine is worth more than all the Jews in
Poland." (G-d Forbid). Weitzman said, The most
important part of the Jewish people is already
in the land (of Israel) and those who are left,
are unimportant (May we be spared).
*
[We
ourselves have for some years been puzzled by
the contradictions of history as to the fate of
the Jewish People before we became aware of the
above account in May-2009 which clarified those
same contradictions. We were at a loss to
understand how the Jewish People could have
suffered so tragically over the past hundred
years when so much wealth and influence was
controlled by them and above we have the
answer.]
www.JEWSNOTZIONISTS.ORG
*
MAY-2009
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
THEY ARE
RETURNING THE MONEY THEY STOLE BUT WHAT ABOUT OUR FREEDOM-OUR CONSTITUTION AND
COUNTRY
MONEY is important but it is
NOTHING when
compared to the SELLING by those many TRAITORS in WESTMINSTER of one's
FREEDOM-CONSTITUTION and COUNTRY. The
majority of those who decided that the people had no right
to a Referendum because they knew best as the greatest
parliamentarian of the 18th century that
"Your representative
owes you, not his industry only, but his judgment: and he
betrays instead of serving you if he sacrifices it to your
opinion."
(Speech to the electors of Bristol, 3
Nov.1774.)
There can be little doubt
that Edmund Burke would NOT have considered that members of
the House of Commons would vote to sell their country to a
FOREIGN POWER. His many quotes on the subject confirm
this view. What we
have to ask in the present situation where it appears the
greater member of MPs are guilty of THEFT and FRAUD which
had it been a citizen outside of PARLIAMENT they would have
found themselves returning the money and spending a few
years inside.
When such an atrocious Act
of Parliament was passed last year which destroys a unique
parliamentary democracy of 1500 years in the making against
the Constitution and the Oaths taken particularly by Her
Majesty The Queen and in May 2009 we learn that many
of those who were required to give the matter their judgment
we have to ask the question
How can such a
decision now stand?
As we now know that the
very individuals who have traitorously sold of
FREEDOM-CONSTITUTION and COUNTRY to a FOREIGN POWER were
themselves not fit to be members of that Parliament and as a
consequence any involvement of those individuals should be
stricken from the record and such ACTS of PARLIAMENT should
be REPEALED and a NEW PARLIAMENT instituted with persons who
have the HONESTY-INTEGRITY and PATRIOTISM in order to make
the decisions that are the LIFE or DEATH of a MOTHER of
PARLIAMENTS and all that it implies to the freedom-loving
people of our ISLAND HOME.
A NEW GOVERNMENT should be instituted WITHOUT
DELAY of those who are prepared
TO SERVE THEIR COUNTRY
for HALF the present salary and sensible expenses. Those who
look on a place in the hallowed HOUSE OF COMMONS as a
mulched cow should find employment elsewhere if they are
able to get it-and
GOOD RIDDANCE TO THEM!
Edmund Burke stated" If you ask me what a free government
is, I answer, that for any practical purpose it is what the
People think it is."
This has nor been so
these last 12 years as a greater number of the population
want to leave the EU and now the UNITED STATES of EUROPE as
soon as possible.
WHERE IS OUR
REFERENDUM?
WHERE IS OUR CHOICE?
WHERE IS JUSTICE?
A NEW PARLIAMENT
WHICH LISTENS TO THE PEOPLE IS WHAT IS NEEDED AND WE HOPE
AND PRAY THAT ALL GOOD CITIZENS WILL MAKE THEIR CHOICE ON
JUNE 4 WITH THEIR FREEDOM-CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY IN THEIR
MIND AND WE HOPE TO GOD THAT AT THIS LATE HOUR THAT JUSTICE
WILL BE DONE.
You
Can't Separate Politics From Morals
*
For Over 36
years they have tried to GIVE AWAY YOUR COUNTRY. YOU pay them over £200,000 per
year-We call them MPs *
WHO CARES about MORALITY?
In
the Daily Mail on Wednesday the 1st December 2004 an article by
Simon Heffer comments: -
*
POLITICIANS ASKING FOR A SALARY
INCREASE OF 20 %
*
EU WHISTLEBLOWERS EXPOSE
BILLIONS OF
EURO FRAUD -
BUT
NOTHING IS DONE.
(The same EU which Tony Blair will
refund £5 billion of YOUR hard fought for rebate’.
[Could it be that at
the time the MPs knew that they were also fiddling that if they pursued the
matter too vigourously it might reveal that they also were at it!
*
Why The British People
Must Have THEIR Referendum on EUROPE.
Tuesday, May 31 -2005
*
*
MP’s demand parliamentary
inquiry into voting reform.
Friday 13 May-2005.
by
[WE
NEED IT NOW!
PRO-PORTIONAL
REPRESENTATION
TO SERVE ONE TERM
ONLY
[In the US in the
House of Representatives it is two years only -then
re-election]
MAY-2009 |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NEW LABOUR MINISTER DENIS MAC SHANE SCORES AN
OWN GOAL BY GIVING PROMINENCE TO BNP JUST BEFORE ELECTIONS.
His article in the Daily Telegraph on
Wednesday 13th May , 2009 in such a conspicuous spot under
the Letters section and opposite the excellent article by
Simon Heffer must have pleased the High Command of the BNP.
It would have cost them a packet to have bought such space.
If his object was to stop many floating
voters from voting for that party at the local and European
Elections he will soon hear that
HE FAILED!
What he failed to understand is that the greater number of
those voters going to the BNP are driven to them after 12
years of New Labour's disastrous rule with them ignoring the
worries of millions of voters on a number of issues but
particularly IMMIGRATION and EUROPE. It has been stated by a
number of MPs from both New Labour and Conservative parties
that it is no use complaining about the increased vote for
the
BNP
which is the result of the GANG of THREE in Westminster
ignoring their concerns. To state that anyone who joins the
BNP is a
racist no longer stands up to scrutiny as much publicity has
demonstrated over the past few years. They are a political
party and they are entitled to have their say in a
democracy. One of our greatest poets John Milton has much to
say about allowing everyone to have their say and that the
TRUTH will OUT by doing so.
Mr
Mac Shane must be completely out of touch with reality when
he covers up the fact that Hollywood and the majority of
Major corporations and Press and Media are owned and run by the Jewish
community. There is no secret here the evidence is clear
for all to see. Of course as is usual some have changed
their names in order to not attract undue attention. We can
see no problem with this fact because they are as a race an
industrious and cultured people. What we are concerned
about is their manipulation behind the scenes and their
express purpose some one call it a common purpose to create
a NEW WORLD ORDER and
WORLD GOVERNMENT
of an ELITE with no place for the INDEPENDENT NATION STATE
or INDIVIDUALISM. To have a WORD GOVERNMENT of INDEPENDENT
NATION STATES is a good idea as one day THE WORLD may be
attacked from outer space and UNITY would be the way that an
enemy could be defeated.
It
is an established fact that there are a number of
JEWS
who
are not part of the conspiracy of the
Zionist Movement
and
hold entirely different views and are critical of their
fellow citizens and there are a number of publications to
this effect
On
the political scene particularly in the USA the Jewish lobby
are all powerful in the GOVERNMENT and in the
CORPORATIONS/INDUSTRY and many say that they control the
PRESIDENT and not the other way round. For example as we
have shown on our website recently referring to the powerful
COUNCIL on
FOREIGN RELATIONS which directs American Foreign Policy
the greater number in the Committee are of Jewish
extraction. The PRESS and the major NETWORKS are also run
by the same elite. THIS IS NO SECRET so why Dennis Mac
Shane should be so ignorant of the matter beggars belief.
But then when one considers what NEW LABOUR and the majority
of their MPs have been up to it over the past 12 years it
only supports what many have said of NEW LABOUR all the GANG
OF THREE in PARLIAMENT. They are DISHONEST and TRAITORS to
their country in passing an ACT of PARLIAMENT which destroys
a unique parliamentary democracy of 1500 years in the making
in order to join an unaccountable -undemocratic - wasteful
-expensive - totalitarian satanic
UNITED STATES OF
EUROPE a plan a
NAZI
blueprint which
Himmler
arranged in 1943 when he realised that the WAR CANNOT BE
WON.
After the scandals of dishonesty in YOUR PARLIAMENT it has
shown the corruption underneath the surface which has no
doubt grown over the past 36 years when we were dishonestly
lied to by the then Prime Minister
Edward
Heath a Nazi
traitor for over 60 years when he died in 2005. his fellow
conspirators were Roy Jenkins and Geoffrey Rippon and Arthur
(Madron) Seligman, who were together at Balliol College
Oxford University. it is also stated that Harold Macmillan
like Edward Heath, had been exposed by intelligence sources
as a secret agent of the German Abwehr (Department of
Defence, or military apparat.]
At
the forthcoming Local and European elections voters and
those who have not voted in the past which are in many
millions having found that
ALL THE PARTIES ARE THE SAME.
on
matters which concern the greater population of our Island
Home. They NOW have a chance to put matters right by voting
in their millions for ANYONE but those in the GANG OF THREE
in WESTMINSTER who have shown that they have only in their
minds to make a buck or two and many are a disreputable and
dishonest band of TRAITORS who gladly SOLD YOUR FREEDOM
-YOUR CONSTITUTION and YOUR COUNTRY to a FOREIGN POWER.
Of
course there will be a few MPs who have not followed the
behaviour of the dishonest majority but they are equally to
blame because if one keeps silent when a great wrong is
happening then unfortunately for them they are as guilty as
those who filled their pockets to the full and still like
Oliver Twist asked for MORE! We have to ask why has this
dishonest practise continued for so long without an HONEST
WHISTLEBLOWER speaking out?
Mr
Mac Shane has offered the BNP a massive publicity by his
prominently placed article in the Daily Telegraph and we are
astonished that so close to Local and European elections
that Mr Mac Shane had decided to do the BNP such a wonderful
election broadcast on their behalf. What ever the Labour
Minister's intention was it has back- fired and has
certainly alerted many readers of the DT that the BNP are
looking for votes. We happened to discuss this article with
others and one response was 'I wonder if there is a BNP
candidate standing in our area and that individuals like so
many millions in our country can see that when the main
parties are worried about their election results they
automatically attack the BNP which has attracted many who
have given up on the dishonest-deceitful and traitorous GANG
OF THREE and want someone to hear their concerns about
IMMIGRATION and EUROPE which have been ignored for over a
decade.
But we hope they will all VOTE for the smaller parties as a
sign that they have had enough of the main parties and want
a breath of fresh air in the hallowed hall of Westminster
which has been polluted by the damaged goods which have been
rotting at the heart of PARLIAMENT for DECADES.
THE PEOPLE WILL
DECIDE NOT MACSHANE
In Milton's words we urge those who have not voted in the
past to as John Milton would say" AWAKE, arise, or be for
ever fallen"
MAY-2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HAVE YOU RECEIVED DAVID
CAMERON'S EU ELECTION MANIFESTO -ITS THE OLD TUNE WITH NO
DEFINITE DATE FOR AN EU REFERENDUM.
As they say we have heard
it all before and if voter's believe David Cameron's slip of
the tongue of a REFERENDUM they are living in cloud cuckoo
land.
It is over 36 years since a
Conservative
Prime Minister
Edward Heath told the people
that there would not be a
loss of
sovereignty by joining the EEC which in reality was the
road to the
UNITED STATES of EUROPE. Just before his death in 2005
he admitted that he had lied to the British people. This
same individual had been a
Nazi
spy for our
60 years
having been part of a ring of traitors which included Roy
Jenkins and Geoffrey Rippon.
The Conservative Foreign
Ministers since 1972 have signed every EU TREATY that has
been put in front of them. And if you thought that they knew
what they were signing you would be wrong as demonstrated
after the signing of the Maastricht Treaty
OPEN DOOR to the ultimate
United States of Europe.
when Douglas Hurd was
overheard saying to his colleague Francis Maud '
'We'd better find
out what we've just signed'
Even Kenneth Clark the most
ardent eurofanatic admitted he had not read the EU Treaty.
Both of the above MPs have
attended the annual event of the
BILDERBURGERS which as
you know is shrouded with secrecy. Even photographing its
membership will get you arrested.
For over three decades we
have been getting the same idiotic statement from
prospective Conservative MEPS that they will change the EU.
They haven't but they continue with the same mantra year
after year. It is always in the future as is the so-called
promise of a REFERENDUM.
If the electors fall for
the message from the Conservative party which has been
repeated over the last 36 years they will soon learn that
their
PROMISES mean
NOTHING.
Why
not ask David Cameron to name a specific date for a
REFERENDUM as it is better to have it BEFORE the
TREATY
has
been ratified by ALL EU member states and of course the
Germans will be the last to sign as it appears is their
right which they will gloat over when it occurs and be in
their eyes the surrender of the European powers plus of
course their enemies in TWO WORLD WARS - particularly
ENGLAND which embraced the UK at that time.
We are reminded of a
possible situation where a friend has stated that he
intended to CHANGE his life and year after year one hears
the same mantra but after 36 years it becomes intolerable to
have hear yet again the same message. This is exactly what
the Conservative MEPs have been saying for 36 years. There
is certainly need FOR CHANGE but David Cameron and the
Conservative Party are incapable because at rock bottom they
support the EU and the coming UNITED STATES of EUROPE which
YOU allowed to happen because you trusted promises instead
of demanding proof of their TRUE FAITH which they have been
unable to give.
The irony of the whole
situation is that it fits the purpose of the
NEW WORLD ORDER
enthusiasts to have the most unique parliamentary democracy
of over 700 years discredited before the world which suits
their purpose as within a short period of the final
ratification of the EU
TREATY
the emphasis will be on
REGIONS not of PARLIAMENT which will soon disappear out of
sight. Absolutely nothing happens in this world which the
advocates of the NEW WORLD ORDER has not already planned
and the expenses scandal could have been under most intense
scrutiny since 1998 but within months of a possible
ratification of the TREATY. What a wonderful way to destroy a
unique parliamentary democracy which has been destroyed from
WITHIN.
At the JUNE4 EU election
place your vote with the smaller parties and NOT with the
GANG of THREE at WESTMINSTER the majority of whom have been
fleecing the taxpayer for years and should the EU Treaty be
finally ratified later this year they can count on even
higher rewards at REGIONAL level of government from an EU
which has not had its accounts passed for 14 years.
[We notice that the Daily Telegraph are
making hay while the sun shines by its extensive explosive
revelations but one wonders if there is more to this
campaign than disclosing the flagrant abuse of expenses at
Westminster which cannot have been a recent discovery
because it must have been known and tolerated for years.
Possibly the Editor had a call from up high to make the
maximum damage possible at this important time in our
Island's History in order that the population will be more
likely to accept governance at REGIONAL level with any
national aspirations discouraged. Those under close scrutiny
who have broken the law must be dealt with in a Court of Law
as any other citizen of our country. What has surprised us
is that there are many members of the legal profession in
the House who should have know better and given a lead as to
what is reasonable and what is excessive. But when the
majority of one's representatives have traitorously deprived
a people of THEIR FREEDOM -THEIR COUNTRY and THEIR COUNTRY
without their right of a REFERENDUM it is no wonder that
many of them cannot understand what is RIGHT and what is
WRONG. We believe that there should be an immediate GENERAL
ELECTION so that the people's voice is heard so that JUSTICE
IS SEEN TO BE DONE. Unless this action is taken
history will not be so forgiving knowing what example the
Mother of Parliaments has portrayed to emerging nations in
the past. Dictators around the world will be giving our
Foreign Secretary David Milliband an earful and we shall be
the laughing stock of the whole world for some time to come.
Gordon Brown should be honourable and seek an immediate
General election so that the stain on the institution of
parliamentary democracy can be if not erased at least
minimised by the introduction of new honourable
members of the House of Commons who are there to SERVE THE
PEOPLE and NOT THEMSELVES. ]
*
So Why Don't We Leave the EU
Britain Can Leave EU Unilaterally
And Cease Payments Says Queen's Counsel.
*
CONSERVATIVE
MEPs IN 2009 - STILL HAVE THEIR INACCURATE, NAIVE AND
PERVERSE PERCEPTIONS OF CHANGE IN THE EU
*
WHY
NEW LABOUR
AND THE
CONSERVATIVE PARTY
NEED
EACH
OTHER
*
*
ON JUNE 4-2009
YOU CAN REGAIN CONTROL
OF YOUR PARLIAMENT IF YOU SEND AS MANY AS POSSIBLE OF THE
GANG OF THREE OUT OF WESTMINSTER.
*
MAY-2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hardened as I am
to the absurd
behaviour of the
semi-official
media, I have
seldom heard or
seen such an
amazing
collective
missing of a
major story -
and such a
collective
effort to
protect a public
figure and a
political party
from harm - as
has taken place
in the last
three days.On
Monday, and then
again on
Tuesday, a
former Chairman
of the
Conservative
Party urged
Conservative
voters to
withdraw their
votes from that
party at the
coming European
Parliament
elections.
Nor was this
some titular
figure of whom
nobody had
heard. It was
Lord Tebbit,
once known as
Norman Tebbit, a
much-celebrated
former Cabinet
Minister who -
if the IRA had
not severely
injured him and
even more
severely hurt
his wife during
their attempt to
massacre the
entire Cabinet
in Brighton -
might well have
become Prime
Minister. Many
of you will
remember the
moving (and
typical)
stoicism he
displayed as he
was rescued,
agonisingly,
from the ruins
on live TV.
Thanks to that
same stoicism,
few of you will
know how much
pain, physical
and emotional,
he has endured
since, not least
because it was
his wife who
suffered so much
more than he. So
I'll just
mention it here.
You may have
guessed that I
rather like him.
In fact I
would go so far
as to say that
Lord Tebbit is
probably the
single most
significant
survivor of the
Thatcher
government, and
the man who
speaks most
cogently for the
traditional
Conservative
voter, still
loyal, but
increasingly
dismayed and
puzzled by his
party's
direction.
His decision
(taken, I have
no doubt, after
much thought) to
urge Tories to
withhold their
votes from the
Tory Party is
news by
anybody's
measure. It is
somebody
important doing
something he is
a) not expected
to do and b) not
supposed to do.
I can confess
that I tried
very hard to
make him do
something of the
kind when I
interviewed him
for my Channel
Four programme
about David
Cameron. He
wouldn't oblige.
You can
criticise your
party from
within, but to
urge people not
to vote for it
tends to be an
unforgivable sin
and an expulsion
offence.
Nor is it the
result of a
secret briefing,
which can later
be denied. It
was done, more
than once, on
the record. The
Daily Mail
carried it on
Tuesday morning,
and the BBC
Radio Four Today
programme then
got him to
repeat it on air
in a recorded
interview -
though in a
bizarre mess-up
which has caused
the BBC some
embarrassment,
'Today' managed
to cut a crucial
section out of
its recording -
the section in
which Lord
Tebbit made it
clear that he
also strongly
(and rightly)
advised voters
to stay away
from the
repellent BNP
rabble.
Yes, of
course I
rejoiced over
this. For the
first time, a
genuine crack
has appeared in
the facade of
the Tory Party,
which all
insiders know to
be profoundly
split. It
appeared on the
same day that a
Populus Poll in
The Times showed
Tory and Labour
support
plummeting side
by side as a
result of the
expenses
revelations
engulfing both
parties.
There's been
a lot of silly
argument
(familiar to me)
about whether
Lord Tebbit was
secretly urging
people to vote
for UKIP. Why do
people find it
so hard to
believe that not
voting for your
former party is
itself a
powerful
political act,
highly effective
on its own, and
that no
alternative vote
is necessary?
Not voting can
be an extremely
potent form of
protest.
More
interesting is
his very narrow
condition - that
his advice
should apply
only to the
European vote,
not to local
elections or to
the next General
Election. Others
will have to
judge, or Lord
Tebbit will have
to say, whether
this is a
sustainable
position, and
whether disgust
can be contained
in so small an
area. In fact
it's quite
clever, since
the EU
elections, being
held under
proportional
representation
and in regions,
are much more
open to changes
in public
opinion than
first-past-the-post
polls. If the
Tories do
unexpectedly
badly, UKIP will
be the
beneficiaries
whether Tory
dissidents vote
for them or not,
and Lord Tebbit
will be able to
take credit for
it (and take the
blame and fury
from the
Cameroons). Lord
Tebbit cannot
fail to realise
that, however
narrow his
specific advice
is, a trickle of
this kind can
swiftly turn
into a torrent.
In current
conditions, when
the credit and
standing of all
established MPs
is exhausted,
who can say
where it might
end?
Why was this
enormous story
not at the very
least near the
top of every
bulletin and
every front page
yesterday? Why
was the bizarre
non-story, that
David Cameron
was
(understandably
but predictably)
trying to
minimise the
damage done by
the revelations
of his own
party's greed,
both pushed to
the front and
treated with
such reverence.
Why wouldn't he?
It would have
been news if he
hadn't. It
wasn't news that
he did. It's his
job and he is,
after all, a PR
man by
profession. But
this predictable
and obvious
action was
treated as if he
had
single-handedly
rescued a group
of menaced women
from the hands
of the Janjaweed
in Darfur, or
scaled
Kanchenjunga
without oxygen.
Even the
left-wing
'Independent'
carried a
leading article
on Wednesday
saying how
decisive etc Mr
Cameron had
been. Had he?
Had he sacked
anyone? No. Was
he himself
super-clean? No.
He had, in
effect, ordered
himself to pay
back money he
shouldn't have
claimed for
repairs to his
conservatory.
Conservatory?
Honestly, how
could anyone
have ever
thought it was
the taxpayer's
job to fix his
conservatory? I
shall return to
this at the
weekend, but it
simply isn't a
surprising or
unexpected story
that the leader
of a wounded
party seeks to
stem the damage
done to it by a
swirling
scandal. Gordon
Brown was
likewise seeking
to stem the
damage done to
his party, but
his efforts were
rightly
considered to be
of minor
importance and
not specially
impressive. Nor
were Mr
Cameron's. So
why the
difference in
coverage?
My new book
'The Broken
Compass',
explains how
political
journalism
operates in this
country, and I
do urge those
who are
interested to
get hold of a
copy. But in
brief, two
forces are
operating here.
One, the liberal
elite actively
wish for a Tory
government,
which they see
as the best hope
of safeguarding
the left-wing
policies of
Blairism and
two, many
ambitious
journalists have
invested a great
deal of time,
and many
lunches, in
making close
contacts with
the Tory
leadership. Now
they want their
pay-off, in the
form of a future
close
relationship
with a Tory
government.
The other
interesting
story about
Norman Tebbit
is: ‘Why didn't
David Cameron
move to expel or
at least suspend
him from the
Conservative
Party?’
This is not
explored because
the answer is:
‘He didn't
dare.’ And
journalists in
the liberal
elite don't want
to write such a
story, as it
reflects
discredit on
their chosen
hero. Remember
Michael Howard's
disgraceful
sacking of
Howard Flight,
or Mr Cameron's
equally wrong
dismissal of
Patrick Mercer
from his front
bench, (both
recently
defended to me,
very vigorously,
by a certain
Cameroon A-List
candidate)?
Norman Tebbit is
much bigger than
them, and
remains a canny
and
quick-thinking
political
operator. In any
fight between
them, Cameron
would end up
looking like a
callow teenager
who'd tried to
mug an elderly
war veteran and
been beaten off
with a few blows
of an umbrella.
Also the truth -
that Mr Cameron
has hijacked the
Tory Party for
the liberal
cause - would be
shockingly
evident. In my
view, Lord
Tebbit could
actually have
gone quite a lot
further and got
away with it. I
hope he does.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now, that's why I just
can't trust David
Cameron on the European
Union. Yesterday he gave
a speech meant to warn
the British that an
incoming Tory government
would make so many cuts
to spending that it
would preside over 'an
age of austerity.' This
apparently was all meant
to sound fierce and
determined about cutting
costs. Yet if the Tory
leader wants to start
cutting costs, the
obvious first place to
look is at the costs the
EU imposes on Britain.
You have to wonder why
he is happy to talk
about cutting
middle-class tax credits
and pensions and the
rest, but hesitates to
mention cutting EU
costs.
How much does
membership cost this
country? In the Lords
last month, Lord Pearson
of Rannock quoted
figures put together by
the TaxPayers' Alliance
from official
statistics. The figures
show that the cost per
year to each
UK
citizen is £2,000 --
that is, £300m a day for
the country as a whole,
or £120,000m a year.
Over at
the Open Europe
thinktank,
researchers have
calculated that EU
regulation alone between
1998 and 2008 cost the
British economy
£148.2bn: 'Of the
cumulative cost of
regulations introduced
over the past decade,
£106.6bn, or nearly 72%,
had its origin in EU
regulation.'
I'll believe Cameron
is serious about cutting
costs when he promises
to start untangling
Britain from this
utterly unnecessary
burden of euro-costs.
Meanwhile, William
Hague, [BILDERBERGER] the shadow
foreign secretary,
inspires no more trust
than does Cameron.
Yesterday, while his
leader was promising
cuts, Hague was
promising that a
Conservative government
would hold a referendum
on the Lisbon Treaty --
but only if the treaty
had not yet been
ratified by all 27
member states.
What a weasel
promise, and not least
because Hague knows that
the Irish and the others
who have not yet
completed the
ratification of the
treaty will be
bludgeoned into saying
'Yes' months before the
next election here.
What Hague is saying
is that the freedom of
the British people to
vote on what is in fact
a new Constitution must
depend on what the
Irish, and the Czechs,
and even the German
constitutional court,
finally decide on
Lisbon. If the Tories
had any spine they would
simply say the British
will be allowed a vote
to stay in the Lisbon
Treaty, or withdraw from
it, no matter what any
other country decides.
[THEY DON'T DESERVE YOUR VOTE ON
JUNE 4-2009]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WANT TO KNOW THE TRUTH
ABOUT THE EU FROM INDEPENDENT SOURCES
Publications
Joint publications with the
TaxPayers' Alliance
Click here to visit the
The TaxPayers' Alliance website
'What next for Britain and
Europe'
-
A conference
sponsored by Global Vision and The Daily
Telegraph
Full details
EU
Reform Treaty Documents
Perspectives
- Professional insights into
specific EU issues.
Pamphlets & Papers
Speeches
-
Ruth Lea's speeches from
Conservative Party Conference 2008 in
Birmingham
-
Ruth Lea, 'Can the City survive the
Financial Service Action Plan?', IEA/Cass
Business School panel debate, 18th June 2008
-
Ruth Lea, “Let the People Decide!”,
mass lobby, Houses of Parliament, 27
February 2008
-
Ruth Lea, 'Decision Time: reform,
renegotiate or withdrawal', Bruges Group
Conference, 17 November 2007
-
Ruth Lea, 'How does the EU get out
of this hole?', Debate at the London School
of Economics, 3 July 2007
Commentary
Other
|
|
Pamphlets & Papers
Speeches
-
Ruth Lea's speeches from
Conservative Party Conference 2008 in
Birmingham
-
Ruth Lea, 'Can the City survive the
Financial Service Action Plan?', IEA/Cass
Business School panel debate, 18th June 2008
-
Ruth Lea, “Let the People Decide!”,
mass lobby, Houses of Parliament, 27
February 2008
-
Ruth Lea, 'Decision Time: reform,
renegotiate or withdrawal', Bruges Group
Conference, 17 November 2007
-
Ruth Lea, 'How does the EU get out
of this hole?', Debate at the London School
of Economics, 3 July 2007
Commentary
Other
*
[We have included the above
information on the EU which will enable
everyone to look objectively at the question WHY
ARE WE IN THE EU the totalitarian police state
calling itself the UNITED STATES OF EUROPE? ]
*
EU QUANGOS
COSTING US ALL
£1,800.000.000
[Daily Mail,
Monday, February 23,2009]
DOZENS of
European Union QUANGOS costing taxpayers £1.8
billion a year are attacked today as 'not fit
for purpose'.
A report into
the growth of publicly funded EU AGENCIES said
many are duplicating work carried out at
NATIONAL LEVEL, and some were squeezing out
PRIVATE SECTOR rivals.
Until 1990,
there were only 2 EU QUANGOS. Then came 34 more
in 18 years, such as the COMMUNITY PLANT VARIETY
OFFICE.
Most expensive
is the EUROPEAN RESEARCH AGENCY with an annual
budget of
£460,000,000
The Essential Guide to EU QUANGOS
2009, by the Economic research Council
think-tank and research group
recommended
curbing their activities and even closing some.
It said the
QUANGOS were costing taxpayers £1.8billion a
year even though some-such as the EU's trademark
registration office-were self-financing. Ruth
Lee of GLOBAL VISION said the QUANGOS were
'symptomatic of an EU which fails to appreciate
that MEMBER STATES' economies can only RECOVER
and eventually PROSPER in a world which favours
INNOVATION over BUREAUCRACY and FLEXIBILITY over
CENTRALISED RIGIDITY'.
They are simply
not fit for purpose in the 21st century.'
*
[Font
Altered-Bolding & Underlining used-Comments in
Brackets]
FEBRUARY-2009
|
|
|
|
|
EU
wipes England
off the map - as
Gordon Brown flies the
flag of St George
over Downing Street
Brought
forward from 23 April 2008
[This
bulletin will remain in this space until
after the EU election on June 4, 2009
and until after the next GENERAL
ELECTION as a reminder that the best way
forward is to deny the main
parties and their EU enthusiasts a
reward for selling YOUR COUNTRY to a
FOREIGN POWER.
www.MailOnline.co.uk
The
Tories have issued a St George's Day
rallying cry against plans by Brussels
to "wipe England off the map" and create
a United Europe.
[What a cheek they have! It is
more than a little late for the
CONSERVATIVE
PARTY which has signed every EU TREATY
put before them and in particular the
MAASTRICHT TREATY the OPEN DOOR to the
UNITED STATES OF EUROPE and the
destruction of our Monarchy-Parliament
and Country of 1500 years in the making
ENGLAND.
After the signing the Treaty in 1992,
Foreign Secretary Douglas Hurd was
overheard saying to his fellow
conspirator in crime Francis Maud
'We'd
better find what we have just signed'
Conservative MEP's are obsessed with
changing the EU but have nothing
substantial to show after 36 years for it. In the eyes
of the EU they are the ''' useful idiots
'
who year after year promise change
without any success.]
As
Gordon Brown hoisted the English
national flag over 10 Downing Street to
celebrate St George's Day, it was
revealed that EU officials had revised a
map wiping out the country
[of ENGLAND]
and the
[ENGLISH]
Channel.The
change splits England into three and
lumps those parts together with chunks
of other countries to create
"transnational regions".
Flying the flag: The cross of St
George over No 10 Downing Street
today
It is claimed these zones - which have
been allocated their own budgets - are
intended to boost trade between EU
nations.
[The true
fact is that our trade with EU is less
than they with us. They could not
continue to pay the bills if we were not
in the EU. The trade deficit since
joining the EU in 1973 is £383.7
Billion. How many
hospitals-schools-higher pensions for
pensioners who receive a pittance
compared to those in GERMANY and FRANCE and many
other European Regions. We
are the second major contributor to the
EU funds. That is WHY if a GOVERNMENT
had the grit and guts of Margaret
Thatcher they could change the EU by
withholding their contribution until
those changes had taken place. The Iron
Lady in her day had a Bill of Parliament
printed ready to implement should they
turn down HER REQUEST for a reduction in
OUR CONTRIBUTION and SHE WON but that
war monger and nation destroyer and now
candidate for Presidency of the United
States of Europe Tony Blair gave much of
it away
FOR
NOTHING in RETURN. ]
But the Tories yesterday accused the
Government of trying "to create a
European super state via the back door".
['We've
heard it all before'
[Well!
the so-called Conservative Party has
been doing just this since
Edward
Heath -a
Nazi
traitor for over 60 years was
reported to MI5 by the MASTER of Balliol
College A .D. Lindsay just before the
Second World War. When Heath was Prime
Minister he lied to the people about the
true intentions of the EUROPEAN UNION
which included a UNITED STATES of EUROPE
based a a plan by Himmler at the Nazi
Geopoliticall
Centre in
Madrid
in 1943 when the Germans realised that
they would lose the war but they were
determined to conquer by stealth with
their new weapon of a UNITED EUROPE to
win their objective of a German
controlled Europe which had to include
their most feared enemy- as many would
say ENGLAND as it would be a threat to
its political and economic ambitions.
What two World Wars could not achieve
the majority of MPs of the GANG of THREE
and with the QUEEN against their OATHS
in JUNE 2008 destroyed OUR
CONSTITUTION-OUR FREEDOM- OUR COUNTRY
and now wish to be rewarded with YOUR
VOTE for THEIR TREACHERY]
Under the programme, known as INTER-REG,
counties along England's south coast
form the "Manche Region" along with
northern France.
Divide and rule: How the South-East
has been paired up with regions
across the Channel
The "Atlantic Region" takes in western
England, along with Ireland, Wales and
parts of Portugal, Spain, France and
Scotland.
Meanwhile eastern England is part of the
"North Sea Region", which covers areas
of Sweden, Denmark, Germany, Belgium,
Norway and the Netherlands.
Gordon Brown: Celebrating
Englishness
The UK Government is fully behind the
project, even though the words "England"
and "Britain" are left off official maps
of each area and the Manche Region
renames the English Channel "The Channel
Sea".
Each region, which will be given
taxpayers' money to promote trade links,
cultural ties, transport policies and
tourism, is to be run by a "managing
authority" of unelected officials
overseen by a director.
None will be based in the UK, with
Manche ruled by the French, Atlantic by
the Portuguese and North Sea by the
Danes.
The regions have legal status and Manche
has a budget of £261million between 2007
and 2013, Atlantic £127million and North
Sea £219million.
Every project funded by a region must
have a publicity campaign which ensures
"there is provision for flying the EU
flag at least one week every year".
Eric Pickles, the Conservatives'
communities spokesman, said: "We already
knew that Gordon Brown had hoisted the
white flag of surrender to the European
Constitution.
[What nonsense the
Conservative
spokesman speaks when their party has
been flying the white flag of surrender
to the EU for over 36 years.
St
George, played by historical
interpreter Alan Larson, does his
best at dispatching the Dragon at
Scarborough Castle
"Now the Labour Government has been
caught red-handed conspiring with
European bureaucrats to create a
European superstate via the back door.
"Gordon Brown literally wants to wipe
England off the map."
But a spokesman for the Department for
Communities and Local Government
insisted: "It has nothing to do with
altering names on maps.
"It is about support for business,
helping boost employment and turning
around deprived areas... helping firms
in Kent do business with people in
Northern France or promoting joint
tourism initiatives between different
countries."
[The fact
of the matter is that WALES and SCOTLAND
will retain their territorial integrity
but as already explained ENGLAND will
for the first time for over 1500 years
be divided up and given over to our past
enemies while as our Great War leader
Winston Churchill challenged the House
before the Second World War
' GERMANY
IS GROWING STRONGER
and
WE ARE
GROWING WEAKER'
WE have been BETRAYED
by the GANG of THREE in WESTMINSTER and
they should NOT be REWARDED for their
TREACHERY.
Winston Churchill
warned in a speech in the Mansion House
London in 1953 that we should be careful
of those who are always looking for
change, and history has as so often in
the past proved him correct .But
he would have been astonished to put it
mildly that his own party had ignored
his
WARNING.
A
St George's Day flag flies next to a
statue of Sir Winston Churchill in
London's Parliament Square today
The
move came as Gordon Brown ordered that
all UK Government buildings with two
flag poles should fly the cross of St
George alongside the union banner.
It
follows a review of flag flying
practices. Number 10 will in future fly
the Scottish and Welsh flags on their
patron saints' days.
Northern Ireland does not have an
official national flag, and so the same
practice will not apply on St Patrick's
Day.
"The
Prime Minister's view is that of course
we should celebrate our Britishness, but
celebrating our Britishness does not
mean we cannot also celebrate our
Englishness, Scottishness, Welshness or
Northern Irishness," said the spokesman.
The
English flag last flew over Downing
Street during the 2006 World Cup.
*
[The
Conservatives have their eye on
the forthcoming
2009 European
Elections and could even include
a General Election and their
pretence of being a patriotic
party was blown away over 36
years ago. Vote for the smaller
parties for a change and throw
the majority unpatriotic
expensive time wasters out on
the dole. A look at the Regions
/States of Germany will show
that the integrity of their
territory is intact.
It is said
what the Pan-Germans mean when
they say other Europeans can
tame the naturally aggressive
and acquisitive tendency to
augment the German race -in
translation is that the
Lebensraum' they seek is the
space vacated by abolishing
the sovereignty of all the other
regional nation states,
with the exception of
Germany hiding behind a 'mask of
federalism':
THIS: is the new
'Lebensraum'. The Germans
have got clean away with their
dastardly plan because of the
stupidity over 36 years of
British politicians who still in
2009
in the forthcoming European
Election will continue to be
'useful
idiots'
by claiming they can change the
EU for the better. They have no
chance whatsoever to do so and
they know so but they cannot
admit they have been fooled for
so long. We shall no doubt have
the same plea 'of change'
from the prospective
Conservative MEP for the West
Midlands Philip Bushill-Mathews.
He needs taken quietly to one
side and told that
Brussels rules Britannia
as he
appears to have some doubt about
it.
The Germans
have yet to ratify the Lisbon
Treaty because their
Constitutional Court has matters
yet to be dealt with before that
can take place. They seem
intent to ratify their treaty
ONLY after every other country
has done so. What a wonderful
propaganda victory and their
revenge for losing TWO WORLD
WARS as to accept the surrender
of all their previous foes but
particularly a country called
England which they have longed
to cut up to destruction.]
*
VOTE!
www.LIBERTAS.org.uk
Who will
either change the EU for the
better or finally show all EU
fanatics that in Margaret
Thatcher's phrase
[They're]
not for change.
We believe
that the FUNDAMENTALS cannot be
changed because the Nazi
blueprint does not allow for
such change. They will
tinker around the edges and give
concessions as they will offer
to IRELAND in order to get them
on side but the reality is that
whatever they offer CAN BE LATER
TAKEN AWAY.]
*
TREATY OF
TREASON
[Font
Altered-Bolding & Underlining
Used-Comments in Brackets]
FEBRUARY-2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LATEST!
MAY-2009
OUR MONTHLY
TOP TOPICS
CLICK
HERE
LISTS VIEWERS
TOP TOPICS BULLETINS OVER THE PAST YEAR AND BEYOND
*
[Each word underlined word /words has a separate
bulletin but where each LETTER of a word has a bulletin
it will be followed by the number of bulletins
within
red
SQUARE BRACKETS
as above and below
EU
COLLECTIVE [12]
.
OR
THE
EU
COLLECTIVE [15]
.
OR
THE
EUROPEAN
UNION
COLLECTIVE
[ 26 ] .
*
WITH EU
ELECTIONS ON JUNE 4-2009
THE GOVERNMENT HAS IT'S
EUROPE MINISTER-WHY HAVEN'T THE EUROSCEPTICS THEIR OWN SUPREMO?
*
TOTALITARIAN
POLICE STATE.
|
LIST OF BULLETINS FOR MAY-2009 |
|
|
|
What a fantastic speech which
encompasses virtually everything we have said about ENGLAND over the past 12
years. It is powerful and persuasive and it naturally is addressed to the
AMERICAN PEOPLE but almost all that is said is as true in England as it is in
America. We have hoped that such a speech could be delivered in England
with such strength of delivery and passion of a man who loves his CONSTITUTION
and COUNTRY.
www.house.gov/paul
[Hi! Bob and Phil in Emporia ,Kansas -Hope you are ALL well. We Don't know if it
is a case of us coming to rescue you or you coming to rescue us?-(A Bridge Too Far)
MAY -2009 |
U.S. NATIONAL
DEBT
CLOCK
The Outstanding Public Debt as of 11 May 2009 at
10:26:26 AM GMT is:
US Debt Clock
The estimated population of the
United States is 306,161,084
so each citizen's share of this debt is
$36,809.85.
The National Debt has
continued to increase an average of
$3.83 billion per day since September 28, 2007!
Concerned? Then
tell Congress and the White House!
Do you have any questions about the National
Debt or this Debt Clock?
Here are
some answers. The Treasury Department's
Bureau of Public Debt also has their own
Public Debt FAQ.
WHERE IS GORDON BROWN'S UK DEBT CLOCK OR
MORE SIGNIFICANTLY THE
ENGLISH DEBT CLOCK?
MAY-2009
|
|
12 YEARS IN NEW LABOUR'S HELL HOLE
BIG BROTHER FANTASY ISLAND.
|
Daily Mail
COMMENT
Saturday, February
21,2009 |
How
our liberties have been destroyed.
Since Labour was elected 12 years ago, a massive and frightening array of powers
have been introduced which curtail Britain's long-fought-for commitment to the
FREEDOM OF THE
INDIVIDUAL
There are
56 such
freedom-destroying powers ,
(brought forward to:)
May-2009
[F1531] |
|
BRITISHNESS IS
DEAD! NEW LABOUR KILLED IT! AND NOW THEY WISH TO KILL ENGLISHNESS AND THEY HAVE
ALMOST DONE SO
Under
cover of the term Britishness Gordon Brown used this term to destroy
Englishness and the very English Constitution and finally sell England to a
FOREIGN POWER which had already obliterated the name from the map of the
United States of Europe .WHY this TRAITOR has not been brought to book for his
TREASON against the country of which he is not a countryman will for
future generations be an indication of how little many of the ENGLISH felt about
THEIR FREEDOMS and COUNTRY for which millions have died for . Many of them are
sheep to the slaughter and many will regret that they didn't want to know when
it came to defending their unique Constitution and Country.
MAY-2009 |
Hard to believe, but youtube
suspended this guy's channel. Dave
had
thousands of A...
3 days ago
1,536 views
WakeUpBritain2009
[As Alex Jones knows so well there is no
better way to fight a CAUSE than to have your
marching feet squarely on the ground with millions
of others who share your view. The Internet is
a good tool for immediate contact and intelligence
but it can so easily become non-existent tool
overnight to those who use the service to maintain
contact with others of like minds. What must
happen , if it is not already happening ,which would
be impossible, is that everyone makes personal
contact with those of like minds in their locality.
It could for instance be something along the lines
of The Voluntary Association for DEFENCE of
LIBERTY - CONSTITUTION and STATE, which would act
immediately to assemble its members if a
blanket censorship was placed on all those who were
opposed to the NEW WORLD ORDER. One could use
the word FREEDOM on a global basis which could
read
FRIENDS
REVOLUTIONISTS ENGAGE EVIL DOMINATION OF MANKIND.
When the day comes when the forces of evil come to take away people at the
dead of night they would aim at one sector of the population as Hitler did as
history has shown that people don't take alarm until they are themselves are
targeted hoping their turn will not come. It is therefore
critical that who is targeted first must be supported by ALL which sends out the
message that what happens to one is the concern of ALL.
MAY-2009 |
*
The TEXANS are in a fighting mood and are on the streets in force but
the English consider their balloons and letters would save them and not a
million blocking the approaches to Westminster with the result the
Scottish prime minister Gordon Brown and his tartan clan behind him he
knew he was in the main dealing with mice and put up his two fingers to
the so compliant English people and the the majority simply slowly turned
over and went back to sleep.. The People fearlessly on the move in the STATES
against their spendthrift and war-mongering and domineering Federal
Government that has over many years got too big for its own good and has usurped
their Constitution which is now what the president says it is rather than what
it has always meant to the individual States and that of the American people who
want no interference from the major corporations and money
lenders who run the Federal Government.
MAY-2009 |
|
A SUCCESS STORY THAT NEW
LABOUR AND GORDON BROWN MUST BE PROUD OF - A DE-STABILISATION
PLAN OF THE KGB.
A look at the following
plan of the KGB for de-stabilising a once proud independent democratic
state which has all but been achieved by 12 years of New
Labour. They must be thoroughly pleased with their
success. If there was any justice the majority of their
comrades should find themselves on the dole queue on June
4-2009.
MAY-2009 |
by
Senator Ron Paul-Republican
-
known as DR NO in the Congress of the United States because of his NO VOTE i to
the implementation of the iniquitous PATRIOT ACT which was a danger to all FREE
AMERICANS by the withdrawal of their CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS.
A
weekly column
MAY-2009 |
|
GOOD ADVICE TO GORDON BROWN
Ron Paul:Stimulus Packages Will Turn Recession
|
|
AN APOLOGY
to visitors fr om around the
world that visited Warwick Castle
AND LATER
TOURED THE TOWN
on
St.
Ge ORGE'S
DAY
April 23rd - 2009
but there was
NO FLAG
of
ST.GEORGE flying from the
WARWICK COUNCIL
OFFICES.
SHIRE HALL
WARWICK
ENGLAND
MAY-2009 |
|
WHY WONT THE
EUROSCEPTICS UNITE- UNTIL THEY DO THEY ARE PLAYING INTO THE HANDS OF THE
EUROPHILES.
For a number
of years now we have been advocating that there should be an umbrella
organisation under which ALL eurosceptics can give THEIR VOTE! a Eurosceptic
Movement. But regrettably this measure has been constantly ignored so that at
the forthcoming European Election on June 4-2009 we will find that there will be
a number of smaller parties who will be showing their eurosceptic colours.
WHAT A WASTE!
MAY-2009 |
|
SERIOUS
ORGANISED CRIME AGENCY (SOCA) OR (SO OUTRAGEOUS CATACLYSMIC ACTION) IN TREATING
OUR FISHERMEN AS DRUG DEALERS.
French demonstrators
have shown more interest in the plight of two jailed UK fishermen than Britain's
mainstream political parties.
MAY-2009 |
|
DID YOU KNOW THAT BOTH
SIDES IN THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR WERE BACKED BY NEW WORLD
BANKERS IN ORDER TO MAXIMISE THEIR PROFITS
It is stated that without
this colossal investment in the Civil War
(1862-1865) it would not have lasted so long or have been so
costly in lives and expenditure.
[details
in PART 2 ]
Thomas Jefferson speaking
in 1801
for all believers in State rights as against national
rights, and for those who feared great corporations and a
money power-objected. He was a born popular leader, had
steadily gathered behind him the great mass of small
farmers, mechanics, shopkeepers, and other workers. They
meant to see that the nation had
a people's government, not
a government of special interests, and they asserted
themselves with tremendous power .As over 220 years later in
2009 the Texas Republican Ron Paul
-known as
Mr NO!
because he refused to vote for the inquisitive and intrusive
PATRIOT ACT which is used as is our TERRORISM ACT to curb
LIBERTY.
www.house.gov./paul
is gathering around him
millions of the American people who wish for less government and
the need to reclaim THEIR CONSTITUTION away from
SPECIAL INTERESTS(1)
WE ASK WHERE
IS OUR RON PAUL?
MAY-2009 |
|
Before we commence our journey of the life of 'a Man called Peter' we wish to
explain that it was a screening of the 1955 Fact-based drama
on JUNE 6-2008]
A MAN CALLED
PETER
which prompted
this mission into the life of a Man of God.
A SCOTSMAN WHO FILLED THE
CHAPLAINCY OF THE SENATE OF THE USA.
The
distinguished actor portraying Peter Marshal is Richard Todd of The Dambusters
and The Longest Day and many other fine films since the Second World . He was
himself fighting at Pegasus Bridge a vital objective on D Day June 6-1944.
[*Brought forward from
June 2008. Now showing again on Tuesday 5th May 2009 on CHANNEL4 .
WE wish the reclusive respected actor still amongst us our
sincere thanks for his many memorable portrayals of the values we still hold so
dear in our hearts and they are a constant reminder which still
gives us hope that all is still not lost, with faith in God and Country.]
MAY-2009 |
|
W HY
DO EUROSCEPTIC MPS AND MEPS REMAIN IN THEIR PARTY INSTEAD OF
FORMING A
TRUE CONSERVATIVE
ALTERNATIVE.
We have asked
this question many times over the past two decades and it is obvious that the
so-called Conservative party have tolerated their eurosceptics because it
enabled them to keep their party in power. In the forthcoming European
Election on June4-2009 the eurosceptic 'Conservative' prospective MEPs will
again support their party rather form their own 'Real' conservative party. It
has been so for over 36 years.
MAY-2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
LIST OF BULLETINS FOR APRIL-2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
HOW
TO POLICE OUR CRIME RIDDEN STREETS BY THE
'NONSENSE MAN' THE MAN OF 'STRAW' AND NO
SUBSTANCE
THE SO-CALLED JUSTICE MINISTER
JACK OF ALL TRADES MASTER OF NONE -JACK STRAW
WHO AFTER LEAVING THE STREETS TO THE
CRIMINALS
AFTER
TAKING AWAY THE LOCAL BOBBIE-ON-THE-BEAT HE
IS NOW ASKING THE VICTIMS OF CRIME TO POLICE
THE STREETS THEMSELVES BY LETTING THEM KNOW
WHERE THE THOUSANDS OF CRIMINALS
ARE. MR STRAW -NO DOUBT
MANY OF THEM IF JUSTICE HAD BEEN DONE THEY
WOULD BE IN PRISON FOR YEARS BUT THEN DUE TO
YOUR INCOMPETENCE AND SOFT JUSTICE THERE ARE
MORE CRIMINALS ON THE STREET NOW THAN THERE
HAS EVER BEEN FOR DECADES OR EVEN LONGER.
APRIL-2009 |
|
By
Richard Pendlebury
on 30th April 2009 |
ON
St George's Day 23 April
by
John Boyd
APRIL-2009 |
Opportunity of an epoch for tough
Toryism
byBy
APRIL-2009
|
|
Anthony Coughlan
APRIL-2009
|
APRIL-2009 |
|
Urgent: The Obama New
World Order Threat?
"The
Evidence Provided on Obama's Frightening
Involvement with the New World Agenda is Under a
threat of Being Taken Offline. You Must Act Now to
Receive it...FAST! !
APRIL-2009 |
|
THE GOVERNMENT HAS IT'S
EUROPE MINISTER-WHY HAVEN'T THE EUROSCEPTICS THEIR OWN SUPREMO?
APRIL-2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
ARE YOU HAVING A
RADIO MOBILE MAST IN YOUR VILLAGE RIGHT NOW?
AN
SOS.
APRIL-2009
|
|
INDIVIDUALISM
IS HATED BY TOTALITARIAN GOVERNMENTS -RACISM ENCOURAGED BY SUPPORTING GROUP
COLLECTIVISM .
The SINGLE VOICE
in CONGRESS against the PATRIOT ACT and stout defender of LIBERTY
and the CONSTITUTION and
much else .To curb the Presidential edict which is undermining the true
spirit of that CONSTITUTION and protect the RIGHTS of the STATES to decide those
matters which are not within the province of the FEDERAL GOVERNMENT -by Senator Ron Paul .
APRIL-2009 |
|
[DANGER]
TO
Is a Radio
mobile phone mast being installed in your village at
short notice?
APRIL-2009 |
|
By Declan J. Ganley
-The
leader of www.LIBERTAS.org.uk .Ireland's
'NO!'
to the EU unless they make the changes necessary for a more
DEMOCRATIC and ACCOUNTABLE EU.
www.LIBERTAS.org.uk
APRIL-2009 |
|
THE
BROTHERHOOD
AND THE MANIPULATION OF SOCIETY
[Editor's Note: A ten part series
Contains
written articles explaining the makeup and organization of the Illuminati
elites who are behind the New World Order/Globalization scheme.
[What kind of world would it be if every
living soul on the PLANET had to obey a WORLD GOVERNMENT which would destroy
INDIVIDUALITY and CHOICE. Those that advocate this system instead of
holding their meetings in SECRECY should throw OPEN THEIR DOORS and
OPINIONS for us ALL to HEAR and DISCUSS.]
APRIL-2009
|
|
DEMONSTRATING AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT
WATCH OUT-THE RATS ARE OUT TO GET
YOU!
by
Mind Control
The Ultimate Terror
APRIL-2009 |
|
A CONSPIRACY
YOU WILL WANT TO
IGNORE!
-OR
WILL
YOU?
*
The New
World Order
(NWO)
An Overview
APRIL-2009
|
|
BANKERS RULE THE WORLD.
WHY WE NEED A PEOPLE'S BANK
WHICH LENDS MONEY TO GOVERNMENT WITHOUT INTEREST
APRI L - 2009 |
|
By
Andrew
Alexander
8th April 2009
|
|
AMERICAN PRESIDENTS HAVE
BETRAYED THEIR WRITTEN CONSTITUTION TO OBTAIN TOTALITARIAN
RULE
Secret Organisations beyond the control of the President -FEMA
APRIL-2009
|
|
|
|
LIST OF BULLETINS FOR MARCH-2009 |
|
|
|
A NEW INTERNET POLITICAL
PARTY-OF THE PEOPLE -TO RECLAIM PARLIAMENT FOR THE PEOPLE. *
Tycoon's vision to smash party politics with
Independent MPs
[Daily Mail, Monday ,March
9, 2009]
A FORMER
Tory tycoon yesterday launched an X-Factor-style political party
which he claimed would restore the public's faith in Parliament.
MARCH-2009
|
|
A WARNING TO THE PEACE LOVING PEOPLE
OF AMERICA.
FOR MANY IN HIGH POSTS
IN WASHINGTON - WAR HAS BEEN WONDERFUL FOR THEIR BUSINESSES
*
Revolving door keeps the WAR CASH
rolling in
Andrew Alexander
COLUMN
[Daily Mail -Friday,March2, 2007]
|
|
NEW LABOUR SCRAPPED
EFFECTIVE HOUSE OF LORDS-THE RESULT- JOBS FOR LOANS.
*
[Brought forward 30th January 2008 from:
-Thursday March 23 -2009
|
|
GERMAN CONSTITUTIONAL COURT RULING ENABLES GERMANY TO
BE LAST TO SIGN EU TREATIES.
From
a historical perspective the EU treaties with Germany shown as the final
signatory, this is tantamount to Germany accepting the surrender of the member
states but particularly her victorious enemy ENGLAND with her sister nation
states of Wales and Scotland in TWO WORLD WARS.
MARCH-2009 |
MARCH-2009
|
|
UKIP LOST THE WAR TO FREE ENGLAND FROM
THE EU BUT THEY ARE STILL TALKING.
We have
for many years campaigned for ALL eurosceptic parties
/organisations [36] to unite under an unbrella label at
election time in order that EVERY NO VOTE is put into
ONE POT to recover our FREEDOM and COUNTRY.
The majority of the members of the GANG OF THREE
in PARLIAMENT should not receive YOUR VOTE as they
are a traitourous and deceitful and dishonest enemy of
the PEOPLE.
MARCH-2009 |
|
|
|
WHAT
IS THE POINT OF THE EUROPEAN UNION?
A
brief study of our relationship with ‘Brussels’ including
the case for the United Kingdom to leave the EU, and
the case to stay?
By
Lord Pearson
of Rannoch
|
|
WHAT
WE CAN LEARN AS WITH UNITED STATES OUR FOREIGN POLICY IS THREAT
TO LIBERTY AT HOME.
The
comparisons between our two countries are a mirror image at what
has happened to our society when foreign policy is decided by
the hawks and not the doves.
In the
173 pages of the 2008 edition of THE REVOLUTION-A MANIFESTO by
Ron Paul a best seller in the USA and as stated by the NEW YORK
TIMES -a BESTSELLER. And we know WHY?
MARCH-2009 |
|
THE REVOLUTION
A MANIFESTO
[2008]
by
Senator Ron Paul
-Republican of Texas-The People's Choice-Defender of the
American Constitution which has been undermined by Congress
and past Presidents since the days of Woodrow Wilson
who signed the Federal Reserve Bill which gave the world's
wealthiest bankers/corporation-a cartel a share of the bank
with unlimited plunder for years to come. Shortly
after he had signed the Federal Reserve Bill President
Woodrow Wilson realised the gravity of his action and
admitted later that on reflection he would NOT have done it
had he looked into the matter more closely. The American
taxpayer today is learning to its cost the effect of that
action from almost a century ago which placed THEIR BANK in
the hands of speculators and the enormous interest that has
been and still being paid by the American taxpayer on a debt
which will most likely never will be paid.
We now learn
that there are now Central Banks in Iraq and Afghanistan which will bring in
many more
billions in the years to come to those wealthy partners in the new adventures so
though one country was illegally invaded and another not left when the original
objective was obtained and the one country devastated with great loss of life
and displacement of population and infrastructure and the other now after
18years which we learn in April 2009 is almost controlled by the Taliban except
for a few areas around the capital. So in the midst of such barbaric
and illegal destruction some of those with a New World Order in mind are
investing in the future without delay
Federal Reserve Bank
[The purpose of showing
the work of Senator Ron Paul is that we applaud his mission
to Liberty and small government. Though the American
People have a written Constitution they have been for
decades witnessing the growth of BIG GOVERNMENT which
is threatening the true spirit of the original constitution.
The fight back by millions of Americans to stem or even
retard the intrusion of numerous government agencies is now
their biggest challenge. A message from Ron Paul on our
website gives his confident assurance that the tide of the
encroachment of Government can be turned around if all
who love LIBERTY join the FIGHT to regain control of our own
lives with the Government our SERVANTS and not as now in
America and England our MASTERS.]
*
Senator Ron
Paul identifies the problems on both sides
of the Atlantic;
'Ours is not
a fated existence, for nowhere is our
destiny etched in stone. In the final
analysis, the last line of defense in
support of FREEDOM and the CONSTITUTION
consists of THE PEOPLE themselves. IF THE
PEOPLE WANT TO BE FREE, if they want to lift
themselves out from underneath a STATE
apparatus that THREATENS THEIR LIBERTIES,
squanders their RESOURCES on
NEEDLESS WARS,
destroys the value of the DOLLAR, and spews
forth endless PROPAGANDA about how
indispensable it is and how lost we would be
without it, there is no force that can stop
them.
IF FREEDOM IS
WHAT YOU WANT, IT IS OURS FOR THE TAKING.
LET THE
REVOLUTION BEGIN.'
[last paragraphs of THE REVOLUTION-A
MANIFESTO by Ron Paul]
* www.gov.house/paul
MARCH-2009 |
|
WHAT YOU NEED
TO KNOW
DANGER
NOW!
*
Latest Info On The Microwave
Vertical Array
ELF Towers Being Erected Countrywide
ARE
THEY NEAR
YOU?
MARCH-2009 |
|
DEMONSTRATING AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT
WATCH OUT-THE RATS ARE OUT TO GET
YOU!
by
Mind Control
The Ultimate Terror
MARCH-2009 |
|
FOR THE SAME REASONS THAT MILLIONS OF CHRISTIANS WOULD
BE BARED FROM ISLAMIC STATES SO MUSLIMS SHOULD HAVE BEEN DENIED ENTRY TO
ENGLAND.
Because of the stupidity of New
Labour who had an OPEN DOOR for immigration from the Muslim world
we now have within our country what one can term an
ENEMY WITHIN.
March-2009
|
|
[WORK IN PROGRESS] |
|
|
|
|
|
LIST OF BULLETINS FOR FEBRUARY-2009 |
|
|
over Downing Street
|
|
WE AGREE WITH
FOREIGN SECRETARY DAVID MILIBAND THAT THE CASE OF
BINYAM MOHAMMED IS A MATTER OF NATIONAL SECURITY.
*
Jihadis
checking into rehab? I say NO!-NO!-NO!
by
LITTLEJOHN
[Daily Mail-Friday,
February 6, 2009.]
|
|
Boast that shows
the ignorance of Mandy Antoinette
by
Peter Oborne
[Daily Mail-February 2, 2009]
|
|
A WEEKLY VIEW OF THE EU
WHAT KIND OF EUROPEAN UNION IS IT?
FEBRUARY-2009 |
|
WORKERS OF
ENGLAND SCOTLAND AND WALES
YOU HAVE BEEN
BETRAYED!
FEBRUARY-2009 |
|
The EU plan
to ban our political parties and close down
PARLIAMENT?
FEBRUARY-2009 |
|
A WEEKLY VIEW OF THE EU
WHAT KIND OF EUROPEAN UNION IS IT?
EU FISHING POLICY
COSTS US BILLIONS
[Daily Mail-Monday, February 4-2009]
|
|
TIME IS NOW
RUNNING OUT TO SAVE YOUR FREEDOM AND COUNTRY
*
GENERAL ELECTION IN
2010- EUROPEAN ELECTION IN JUNE-2009 -THE LAST
CHANCE BATTLE OF A UNITED EUROSCEPTIC VOTE
*
The VOTE must be
for COUNTRY and NOT for PARTY
FEBRUARY-2009 |
|
APPEASEMENT
IN 1938 TO NAZI PLAN FOR EUROPE -WAR IN 1939.
APPEASEMENT TO NAZI PLAN FOR EUROPE IN 2009 -SLAVERY
IN EUROPE IN 2010.
TIME IS
RUNNING OUT!
DON'T LET THEM GET WHAT TWO WORLD
WARS FAILED TO ACHIEVE
FEBRUARY-2009 |
|
YOU HAVE NO CHOICE
EITHER YOU HAVE A TRUE CHRISTIAN COUNTRY OR YOU WILL
HAVE A DEMONIC COUNTRY
WE HAVE ALL SEEN THE RESULT OVER
THE PAST DECADE WHERE WRONG IS REWARDED AND RIGHT IS NO
LONGER RECOGNISED.
FEBRUARY-2009 |
|
Hitler's 1940 blueprint for a German
dominated EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE has
almost been completed.
FEBRUARY-2009 |
|
A MATTER OF FAITH
-NOT ABSOLUTE TRUTH.
*
Faith, hope and
what's become of the new religion.
by
Andrew Alexander
[Daily Mail, February 6, 2009]
|
|
The Law Lords have betrayed their
sacred trust to uphold the 'Rights and Liberties of
Englishmen'
FEBRUARY-2009 |
|
IF YOUR FAVOURITE
FOOTBALL TEAM WAS TO BE DISBANDED IN A YEAR YOU WOULD
LOOK FOR ANOTHER TEAM TO SUPPORT. THE
CONSERVATIVE-LABOUR OR LIBDEMS ARE TO BE DISBANDED BY
THE EU
FEBRUARY-2009 |
|
BAN THE BANK
PAYOUTS FOR BANK FAILURE
FEBRUARY-2009 |
|
THE TRADE UNIONS
-DID IT; THE EMPLOYERS-DID IT; THE PUBLIC SECTOR
-DID IT- SO WHY WONT THE EUROSCEPTICS DO IT.
IT IS NO SECRET IT
IS CALLED
UNITY.
FEBRUARY-2009
|
|
NEW
LABOUR WHEN UNDER PRESSURE BASH THE FAR -RIGHT BUT
THEIR FAR-LEFT IS AS MURDEROUS AS HISTORY HAS AND
STILL SHOWS.
FEBRUARY-2009 |
|
THE DAY OF
THE JACKALS!
How four
so-called top bankers brought the country to
its knees and wonder what the fuss is all about.
'Never has
so few in a dire economic conflict suffered so
little and repenteth so little for so much disaster
to so many.'
FEBRUARY-2009 |
|
LORD RATS SCAMPER
AWAY FREE FOR CHANGING THE LAW FOR A FEE-
WHY?
FEBRUARY-2009 |
|
GORDON BROWN'S CITY
CRONIES
*
Revealed: the roll
call of bankers rewarded by Brown and Blair.
by
James Chapman
Deputy
Political Editor
[Daily Mail,
Thursday, February 12, 2009]
|
www.dailymail.co.uk/debate
FEBRUARY-2009 |
|
MELANIE
PHILLIPS- WRITING
EXCLUSIVELY FOR MAIL ONLINE
10th February
2009
|
|
By
James Slack, Home Affairs
Editor
12th February 2009
|
FEBRUARY-2009 |
By
Archbishop of York -John Sentamu
13th February 2009
|
|
DAILY TELEGRAPH
LEADER MISLEADS THE PEOPLE SUGGESTING REGIONS CAN BE
DISSOLVED WHEN THEY ARE TO REPLACE PARLIAMENT UNDER
LISBON TREATY.
FEBRUARY-2009 |
|
FEBRUARY-2009 |
|
HOW WELL DOES THE
EU MANAGE YOUR MONEY?
eurofacts@junepress.com
VOL 14 NO 9
13th February ,2009.
|
|
A FORMER OF MI5 HAS
CONFIRMED WE LIVE IN A POLICE STATE- IF ANYONE
WOULD KNOW SHE WOULD.
THE GOVERNMENT IS SIMPLY PREPARING US FOR THE
ULTIMATE POLICE STATE THE UNITED STATES OF EUROPE.
Labour is
creating a police state, says former spy chief Dame
Stella
by
Kirsty Walker
Political reporter
[Daily
Mail-Tuesday, February 17,2009] ,
|
|
EUROPEAN UNION Q & A
|
|
THE THIRD
GREAT WONDER FROM THE NEW WORLD AFTER-MAN OF ALL
SEASONS -CROMWELL - NOW YOUNG QUEEN
VICTORIA-WHEN WILL MIRACLES CEASE?
*
Hollywood learns a
history lesson at LAST!
by
Andrew Roberts
[Daily
Telegraph-Wednesday, February 18, 2009]
|
|
Britain can be fixed-but not by a PM who wants to save the world.
by
Irwin Stelzer
[telegraph.co.uk/personal view]
[Daily Telegraph-Wednesday, February 18, 2009]
|
|
EUROPE, NATO AND THE 'FORMER'
REPUBLICS 'FALSE 'INDEPENDENCE'
FEBRUARY-2009 |
|
HOUSE OF LORDS COST US
£121 MILLION A YEAR -£18
MILLION ON
EXPENSES.
THEY GAVE AWAY OUR
CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY IN LEAGUE WITH THEIR
SOVEREIGN AND COMMONS -TRAITORS
ALL!
FEBRUARY-2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
[WORK IN PROGRESS] |
|
|
|
LIST OF BULLETINS FOR JANUARY-2009 |
|
|
|
HE IS PART
IRON AND PART CLAY- HE IS THE LEADER OF THE
OPPOSITION- HE IS AN OPPORTUNIST AND NOT TO BE
TRUSTED BY EUROSCEPTICS
*
Dave
talks tough on Europe.
eurofacts-
30th January,2009
|
|
The Queen,
Treason and the
Coronation oath
JANUARY-2009 |
|
THEY HAVE SOLD YOUR
CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY TO A FOREIGN POWER - LEFT
US IN A MIGHTY MESS-BUT THEY WON'T
DEPART.
|
|
No2
-SOUND reasons to
REJECT the EURO and the EU COLLECTIVE
JANUARY-2009 |
|
No 3
SOUND reasons to
REJECT the EURO and the EU COLLECTIVE
|
|
No 4
SOUND reasons to
REJECT the EURO and the EU COLLECTIVE
|
|
No 5
SOUND reasons to
REJECT the EURO and the EU COLLECTIVE
|
|
No 6
SOUND reasons to
REJECT the EURO and the EU COLLECTIVE
|
|
No 7
SOUND reasons to
REJECT the EURO and the EU COLLECTIVE
|
|
No 8
SOUND reasons to
REJECT the EURO and the EU COLLECTIVE
|
|
No 9
SOUND reasons to REJECT
the EURO and the EU COLLECTIVE
|
|
No 10
SOUND reasons to REJECT
the EURO and the EU COLLECTIVE
|
|
No 11
SOUND reasons to
REJECT the EURO and the EU COLLECTIVE
|
|
GREEDY BANKERS-AN
ARISTOCRACY OF CONFIDENCE TRICKSTERS.
*
Hanging bankers
from lamp-posts would do no one any good -but this
bonus gravy train is just an INSULT TO ALL OF US
by
MAX HASTINGS
[Daily
Mail-Tuesday, January 27,2009]
|
|
TINKER -TAILOR-
SPY?
*
The Bluebloods and
the Russians
Special REPORT
by
Ben Lawrence
JANUARY-2009 |
|
INSENSITIVE BASTARDS!
MOD TREAT BRITISH
WOUNDED BACK TO BACK WITH TALIBAN.
*
TROOPS ON SAME WARD
AS TALIBAN.
by
Matthew Hickley
Defence
Correspondent.
[Daily Mail
-Friday, January 23,2009]
|
|
A REAL JOB FOR OUR
EQUALITIES COMMISSION WHICH NEEDS THEIR HELP
NOW!
*
SPECIAL INVESTIGATION
from Andrew Malone
IN MUMBAI-INDIA.
JANUARY-2009
|
|
AN
APPEAL!
TO ALL
EUROSCEPTICS
AT HOME AND IN
EUROPE
THE
JUNE 2009 EU ELECTIONS
WILL SOON BE UPON US.
JANUARY-2009
|
|
OSTPOLITIK: DIALECTICAL GERMAN
ORIENTATION TO THE EAST.
As discussed in Part One,
Germany and the 'former' Soviet
Union are today bound together today
by bilateral treaties and secret
agreements concluded in 1990.
JANUARY-2009 |
|
HEAD OF
STATE OF THE FREE WORLD SITS OVER A CESSPOOL OF
CORRUPTION AND EVIL PURPOSE IT USES 'COMMON PURPOSE'
A TRAP TO SNARE THE RIGHTEOUSNESS
JANUARY-2009 |
|
MANY ARE DOING IT
-WHY NOT YOU?
*
RENUNCIATION
OF EU CITIZENSHIP
& EU CONSTITUTION
JANUARY-2009 |
|
MY LORDS-YOU ARE
COMMON CRIMINALS EVEN IF YOU DON'T THINK SO.
*
Nobles who are so
very obliging...
by
Peter McKay
[Daily Mail-Monday,
January 26,2009]
|
|
EUROPE, NATO AND THE 'FORMER'
REPUBLICS 'FALSE 'INDEPENDENCE'
As already discussed, the sudden
political rather than 'independence'
of the Soviet Republics 'declared'
one after the other in the course of
1991, conformed to the Leninist
model
JANUARY-2009 |
|
THE PUBLIC
PURSE IS BEING PLUNDERED BY PRIVATE BANKS -
POLITICIANS -PEERS -POLICE- PARTY DONORS- PUBLIC
PENSIONS and PRACTICALLY EVERYONE...
*
For quite a
few Coppers more
by
Peter McKay
[Daily
Mail-Monday, January 26,2009]
|
|
EUROPEAN BILATERAL TREATIES DRAFTED
BY THE GRU -SOVIET INTELLIGENCE.
When the author Christopher Story
interviewed Lady Thatcher in the
House of Commons in July 1991,
she had no knowledge of the
bilateral treaties which President
Gorbachev had been signing with key
targeted Western countries, and was
astonished at the
information
about these treaties shown to her
JANUARY-2009 |
|
cc. The
Home Secretary
Sir,
JANUARY-2009 |
|
THIS WAS OUR EIGHTH BULLETIN ON
INTRODUCING OUR BULLETIN FILE IN 2003 -WE ASK THE
SAME QUESTION TODAY IN JANUARY 2009.
PARLIAMENT IS OURS -A
LEGACY FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS
JANUARY-2009 |
|
The best summary of the six
EU treaties is the
Constitution
JANUARY-2009 |
|
THE
PRICIEST PEERS
TOP TEN
JANUARY-2009 |
|
30 YEAR SECRETS RULE
MAY BE REDUCED TO 15 -BUT WE NEED TIGHTER RULES TO
ENSURE ALL INFORMATION IS RETAINED.
Mr Paul Dacre
the Editor of the Daily Mail was a member of the Committee who where looking at
a reduction in the length of time before the release of sensitive
information. In the USA it is 5 years and we believe that that it the more
accountable time for the information to be made public. Our term of Parliament
is for a maximum of 5 years so why should we not know what dirty tricks they
have played with us then instead of 30 years later or even 15 years later?
JANUARY-2009 |
|
BLACK
OPERATIONS AND TRICKERY BIND UK TO EU.
*
INTERNATIONAL CURRENCY REVIEW
www.worldreports.org
JANUARY-2009 |
|
IS GERMANY AWAITING
THE SYMBOLIC TRIUMPH OF ACCEPTING THE UNCONDITIONAL
SURRENDER OF THE OTHER EU STATES BEFORE COMPLETING
HER OWN RATIFICATION?
As over the past
hundred years and in January 2009 what matters to
the Germans is that their plans for a German
dominated Europe as the inheritance of Bismarck
- Kaiser and Hitler and in the aftermath of the
Second World War the First post-war Chancellor of
German Dr Konrad Adenauer up to the present day
German Chancellor Angela Merkel.
JANUARY-2009 |
|
THE EQUALITIES BILL
MUST BE STOPPED -IT IS ALL ABOUT MIND CONTROL AND
PRESERVING A DISCREDITED BAND WAGON.
We now have Trevor
Philips once chairman of the RACE RELATIONS BOARD
and later critic of MULTICULTURALISM and now head of
the replacement EQUALITIES and HUMAN RIGHTS
COMMISSION.
THIS IS AN
ORGANISM THAT FEEDS ON ITSELF.
JANUARY-2009 |
|
A WARNING
FROM HISTORY WHICH CANNOT BE IGNORED
When Nick
Leeson bankrupted Barings Bank a few years
ago, he went to prison. yet the current
bunch of merchant bankers, who have brought
Britain to the verge of bankruptcy are
still in place
[WHY?]
and their
hoovering up waste salaries and nbonuses -at
TAXPAYER'S
EXPENCE.
JANUARY-2009 |
|
WHY KENNETH CLARKE
IS STILL THE ENEMY WITHIN WHO WOULD SELL OUR POUND
EVEN IF POLL SHOWS 71% ARE AGAINST.
This is not about
COUNTRY but about PARTY and that is how the
CONSERVATIVE
PARTY have been since 1972.
This
is a politician who made a point of stating that he
had never read the Maastricht Treaty, or as we have
often mentioned of Douglas Hurd (now Lord Hurd) who,
when he was Foreign Secretary was overheard after he
had signed the Maastricht Treaty -the OPEN DOOR to a
UNITED STATE OF EUROPE
'Well, we'd
better find out w hat we have just signed'
JANUARY-2009 |
|
A FOREIGN
CORRESPONDENT
In the
SOVIET
UNION
REPORTER SHOT
DEAD IN RUSSIA
INVESTIGATING
NEO-NAZISM
IN RUSSIA,
JANUARY-2009
|
|
DID YOU KNOW?
No
38
(Christopher Story of International
Currency Review)
EUROPE, NATO AND THE 'FORMER'
REPUBLICS 'FALSE 'INDEPENDENCE'
As
already discussed, the sudden
political rather than 'independence'
of the Soviet Republics 'declared'
one after the other in the course of
1991, conformed to the Leninist
model rather than to the
wishful-thinking of Western policy
makers.
www.worldreports.org
JANUARY-2009 |
|
HOUSE OF LORDS COST
US £121 MILLION A YEAR -£18 MILLION ON EXPENSES.
THEY GAVE AWAY OUR CONSTITUTION AND COUNTRY IN
LEAGUE WITH THEIR SOVEREIGN AND COMMONS -TRAITORS
ALL!
*
THE LORDS of
EXCESS
by
Michael Lea
JANUARY-2009
|
|
DID YOU
KNOW!
SOUND reasons to
REJECT the EURO and the EU COLLECTIVE
Come with us for a
short travel through the 123 pages of the 295
Reasons of Vernon Coleman's
ENGLAND OUR
ENGLAND
www.vernoncoleman.com
JANUARY-2009 |
|
Index | Bill
of Rights | Additional
Amendments
[Constitution for the United
States of America][1]
We the People of the United
States, in Order to form a more perfect Union,
establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility,
provide for the common defence, promote the general
Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to
ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish
this Constitution for the United States of America.
JANUARY-2009 |
|
OUR ONCE
COMFORTABLE PLEASANT LAND IS NOW A VAST CROWDED
CHICKEN PEN.
Why Britain
[ENGLAND] mustn't
get any more crowded.
January- 2009
|
|
AN APPEAL!
TO ALL
EUROSCEPTICS
AT HOME AND IN
EUROPE
THE
JUNE 2009 EU ELECTIONS
WILL SOON BE
UPON US. WHATEVER YOUR PRESENT PARTY OR ORGANISATION
YOUR VOTE IS NEEDED FOR UNITY AND SUCCESS. TOO
MANY TIMES IN THE PAST THE EUROSCEPTIC VOTE HAS BEEN
WASTED FOR PARTY ADVANTAGE INSTEAD OF UNDER ONE
BANNER.
BE UNITED WITH ONE
VOICE
VOTE!
www.LIBERTAS.eu
JANUARY-2009 |
|
JANUARY-2009
|
|
[WORK IN PROGRESS] |
|
[As we have done on many occasions we
have given a list of bulletins which are available at the click of the button.
We also, as you are aware, have a system of open bulletins which enables you to
scroll through as you pass down through the web-site -This we will continue to
do but in general those bulletins which are OPEN will be those which it is most
important for you to consider. As we have said on many occasions the
CHOICE IS
YOURS!.] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THE RIGHT TO BE
CONSULTED-THE RIGHT TO ENCOURAGE-THE RIGHT
TO WARN
Yes! you have
guessed who we are talking about Her Majesty The Queen who
in 2008 traitorously signed the Lisbon Treaty ending over
1500 years of the rule of a MONARCH in England but for the
brief time when ENGLAND was governed by the great reformer
Oliver Cromwell who's fundamentals led to the Glorious
Revolution of 1689 and constitutional parliamentary
democracy.
Since that time we
have had many Monarchs on the throne but as far as we are
aware none who would have sold their people and country to
a foreign power as the present Queen who contrary to HER
OATH has done .
As a result of this
treasonable action by the Queen in 2008 in exchanging
English citizenship for European citizenship Her Majesty no
longer in reality is able to ask to be consulted by HER
equally traitorous PARLIAMENT who by a majority destroyed
the Constitution and therefore the immemorial
'Rights and
Liberties of Englishmen.
So prized by so many people the world over.
Once the members of PARLIAMENT knew that they
and its INSTITUTION would soon no longer exist what a golden
opportunity to make hay while the sun shines and fill their
pockets of taxpayer's money and for the greater majority it
was their own prize money for selling the people's
FREEDOM-CONSTITUTION and COUNTRY.
It appears there are
those who still believe the Ancient Constitution is in place
but the very Act of Parliament and signing by the Queen in
2008 of the EU TREATY with the connivance of the majority in
Parliament (unless the Lisbon Treaty is not ratified by
those nations who have yet to sign) our
CONSTITUTION is DEAD.
WHY this charade of conveying the impression
THAT THE QUEEN RULES
appears to be still maintained we are at a
loss to understand.
The following from the
respected
International Currency Review
has the following to say about the question
DOES THE QUEEN STILL
REIGN
and more specific
IS HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
SOVEREIGN?
Under Article 17 of the
collectivist Maastricht treaty , all residents of the
European Union are citizens of the EU Collective. It
follows that Presidents and Monarchs are 'citizens of the
EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE
as well
This provides the twisted
rationale for President Herzog's vituperative dismissal of
the relevance of the nation state, and for his insistence
that it has outlived its usefulness, even though he
continued to serve as President.
Dr Herzog's subversive
remarks have special resonance for Britain, where
QUEEN ELIZABETH II
is the
SOVEREIGN AND
CONSTITUTIONAL HEAD
of the
UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT
BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND.
She is the custodian, in
her person, of the sovereignty of the British people which
was passed to HER in February 1952 on the death of her
father, This was confirmed initially when the
QUEEN took the OATH of
ACCESSION
and was finally solemnised
at the QUEEN'S CORONATION in 1953 after HER MAJESTY had been
recognised and universally accepted as the undoubted and
rightful
SOVEREIGN of the BRITISH
PEOPLE
In November 2000 -after a
correspondent who had taken care to prepare his case
thoroughly, had written to the Prime Minister, Tony Blair;
to the then Leader of the Opposition William Hague; to the
Leader of the House of Lords, who was then Baroness jay; and
to the Lord Chief justice and other official office-holders
and dignitaries -asking:
Is Her Majesty the Queen
Sovereign?
HE
RECEIVED NO ANSWER AT ALL
or else a non-committal
weak, diversionary reply.
Mr Blair being unable to
answer the question himself, redirected the enquiry to the
Home office, which likewise prevaricated. Indeed, a hallmark
of the
BLAIR GOVERNMENT
has been its Ministers'
arrogant reluctance to answer letters and parliamentary
questions. Likewise, Mr Blair has reportedly made a point
on occasion, of'
' standing the Queen up'
by failing to turn up on
time., or at all, for his weekly scheduled audiences.
WHAT IF ALL EU LAWS PASSED BY PARLIAMENT
AND APPROVED BY HER MAJESTY ARE INVALID BECAUSE
AGAINST THE LAW OF THE LAND.
www.worldreports.org
By
the very signing in 2008 of the Lisbon treaty by Her
Majesty The Queen
She is no longer the
custodian, in her person, of the sovereignty of the British
people which was passed to HER in February 1952 on the death
of her father, This was confirmed initially when the
QUEEN took the OATH
of ACCESSION
and was finally solemnised at the QUEEN'S
CORONATION in 1953 after HER MAJESTY had been recognised and
universally accepted as the undoubted and rightful
SOVEREIGN
of the BRITISH PEOPLE
The
EU is ille gal
under British law. Four Prime Ministers and the Queen have
committed five acts of Treason by signing five EU treaties
which will abolish our nation and replace
it with the EU.
In
order to avoid the charge of HIGH TREASON against the
QUEEN and PARLIAMENT in 1998 Tony Blair
had
to secretly repeal two of the laws of
treason in the 1998 Crime and Disorder Act (s36.3) to escape
prosecution.
THE
Queen
has signed the sixth
and final EU Treaty in June,2008 the very much alive EU
Constitution makes it clear the EU will abolish the nations
of Britain and England
(and our Lib, Lab and Con parties, Reform Treaty clause
8A-4).
So with the above
information before our eyes we can but iterate our previous
conclusion which Simon Heffer so graphically described when
he stated that the MONARCHY would be a THEME PARK. We agreed
with him then and we would agree with him NOW! in
May-2009.
Our conclusion is that the once QUEEN does not REIGN but is
seeing before HER eyes the penalty of loss of HER COUNTRY
because SHE served other MASTERS who were interested in a
NEW WORLD ORDER and a WORLD GOVERNMENT. The Queen declined
to ACT to PROTECT HER PEOPLE and when the time came hid
behind the secrecy of the REPEAL of two LAWS of TREASON.
In
the words of our greatest poet William Shakespeare:
'The man was noble; but with his last attempt he wiped it
out; betrayed his country; and his name remains to the
ensuing age abhorred.'
ALL who signed the Lisbon Treaty are as far as any
Englishman is concerned are guilty of HIGH TREASON because
without consulting the ENGLISH PEOPLE to release THEM from
THEIR OATHS they still are and will always remain TRAITORS.
*
WHAT HISTORY TELLS US ABOUT OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE
CONTINENT?
*
WHY CAN'T WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH?
*
A MESSAGE from a PATRIOTIC HISTORIAN you can TRUST
EUROPEAN UNION
'worse
than its worst components'
*
MAY-2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WANT TO KNOW THE TRUTH
ABOUT THE EU FROM INDEPENDENT SOURCES
Publications
www.globalvision.net
Joint publications with the
TaxPayers' Alliance
Click here to visit the
The TaxPayers' Alliance website
'What next for Britain and
Europe'
-
A conference
sponsored by Global Vision and The Daily
Telegraph
Full details
EU
Reform Treaty Documents
Perspectives
- Professional insights into
specific EU issues.
Pamphlets & Papers
Speeches
-
Ruth Lea's speeches from
Conservative Party Conference 2008 in
Birmingham
-
Ruth Lea, 'Can the City survive the
Financial Service Action Plan?', IEA/Cass
Business School panel debate, 18th June 2008
-
Ruth Lea, “Let the People Decide!”,
mass lobby, Houses of Parliament, 27
February 2008
-
Ruth Lea, 'Decision Time: reform,
renegotiate or withdrawal', Bruges Group
Conference, 17 November 2007
-
Ruth Lea, 'How does the EU get out
of this hole?', Debate at the London School
of Economics, 3 July 2007
Commentary
Other
|
|
Pamphlets & Papers
Speeches
-
Ruth Lea's speeches from
Conservative Party Conference 2008 in
Birmingham
-
Ruth Lea, 'Can the City survive the
Financial Service Action Plan?', IEA/Cass
Business School panel debate, 18th June 2008
-
Ruth Lea, “Let the People Decide!”,
mass lobby, Houses of Parliament, 27
February 2008
-
Ruth Lea, 'Decision Time: reform,
renegotiate or withdrawal', Bruges Group
Conference, 17 November 2007
-
Ruth Lea, 'How does the EU get out
of this hole?', Debate at the London School
of Economics, 3 July 2007
Commentary
Other
www.globalvision.net
*
[We have included the above
information on the EU which will enable
everyone to look objectively at the question WHY
ARE WE IN THE EU the totalitarian police state
calling itself the UNITED STATES OF EUROPE? ]
*
EU QUANGOS
COSTING US ALL
£1,800.000.000
[Daily Mail,
Monday, February 23,2009]
DOZENS of
European Union QUANGOS costing taxpayers £1.8
billion a year are attacked today as 'not fit
for purpose'.
A report into
the growth of publicly funded EU AGENCIES said
many are duplicating work carried out at
NATIONAL LEVEL, and some were squeezing out
PRIVATE SECTOR rivals.
Until 1990,
there were only 2 EU QUANGOS. Then came 34 more
in 18 years, such as the COMMUNITY PLANT VARIETY
OFFICE.
Most expensive
is the EUROPEAN RESEARCH AGENCY with an annual
budget of
£460,000,000
The Essential Guide to EU QUANGOS
2009, by the Economic research Council
think-tank and research group
www.globalvision.net
recommended
curbing their activities and even closing some.
It said the
QUANGOS were costing taxpayers £1.8billion a
year even though some-such as the EU's trademark
registration office-were self-financing. Ruth
Lee of GLOBAL VISION said the QUANGOS were
'symptomatic of an EU which fails to appreciate
that MEMBER STATES' economies can only RECOVER
and eventually PROSPER in a world which favours
INNOVATION over BUREAUCRACY and FLEXIBILITY over
CENTRALISED RIGIDITY'.
They are simply
not fit for purpose in the 21st century.'
*
[Font
Altered-Bolding & Underlining used-Comments in
Brackets]
FEBRUARY-2009
|
|
|
EU
wipes England
off the map - as
Gordon Brown flies the
flag of St George
over Downing Street
Brought
forward from 23 April 2008
[This
bulletin will remain in this space until
after the EU election on June 4, 2009
and until after the next GENERAL
ELECTION as a reminder that the best way
forward is to deny the main
parties and their EU enthusiasts a
reward for selling YOUR COUNTRY to a
FOREIGN POWER.
www.MailOnline.co.uk
The
Tories have issued a St George's Day
rallying cry against plans by Brussels
to "wipe England off the map" and create
a United Europe.
[What a cheek they have! It is
more than a little late for the
CONSERVATIVE
PARTY which has signed every EU TREATY
put before them and in particular the
MAASTRICHT TREATY the OPEN DOOR to the
UNITED STATES OF EUROPE and the
destruction of our Monarchy-Parliament
and Country of 1500 years in the making
ENGLAND.
After the signing the Treaty in 1992,
Foreign Secretary Douglas Hurd was
overheard saying to his fellow
conspirator in crime Francis Maud
'We'd
better find what we have just signed'
Conservative MEP's are obsessed with
changing the EU but have nothing
substantial to show after 36 years for it. In the eyes
of the EU they are the ''' useful idiots
'
who year after year promise change
without any success.]
As
Gordon Brown hoisted the English
national flag over 10 Downing Street to
celebrate St George's Day, it was
revealed that EU officials had revised a
map wiping out the country
[of ENGLAND]
and the
[ENGLISH]
Channel.The
change splits England into three and
lumps those parts together with chunks
of other countries to create
"transnational regions".
Flying the flag: The cross of St
George over No 10 Downing Street
today
It is claimed these zones - which have
been allocated their own budgets - are
intended to boost trade between EU
nations.
[The true
fact is that our trade with EU is less
than they with us. They could not
continue to pay the bills if we were not
in the EU. The trade deficit since
joining the EU in 1973 is £383.7
Billion. How many
hospitals-schools-higher pensions for
pensioners who receive a pittance
compared to those in GERMANY and FRANCE and many
other European Regions. We
are the second major contributor to the
EU funds. That is WHY if a GOVERNMENT
had the grit and guts of Margaret
Thatcher they could change the EU by
withholding their contribution until
those changes had taken place. The Iron
Lady in her day had a Bill of Parliament
printed ready to implement should they
turn down HER REQUEST for a reduction in
OUR CONTRIBUTION and SHE WON but that
war monger and nation destroyer and now
candidate for Presidency of the United
States of Europe Tony Blair gave much of
it away
FOR
NOTHING in RETURN. ]
But the Tories yesterday accused the
Government of trying "to create a
European super state via the back door".
['We've
heard it all before'
[Well!
the so-called Conservative Party has
been doing just this since
Edward
Heath -a
Nazi
traitor for over 60 years was
reported to MI5 by the MASTER of Balliol
College A .D. Lindsay just before the
Second World War. When Heath was Prime
Minister he lied to the people about the
true intentions of the EUROPEAN UNION
which included a UNITED STATES of EUROPE
based a a plan by Himmler at the Nazi
Geopoliticall
Centre in
Madrid
in 1943 when the Germans realised that
they would lose the war but they were
determined to conquer by stealth with
their new weapon of a UNITED EUROPE to
win their objective of a German
controlled Europe which had to include
their most feared enemy- as many would
say ENGLAND as it would be a threat to
its political and economic ambitions.
What two World Wars could not achieve
the majority of MPs of the GANG of THREE
and with the QUEEN against their OATHS
in JUNE 2008 destroyed OUR
CONSTITUTION-OUR FREEDOM- OUR COUNTRY
and now wish to be rewarded with YOUR
VOTE for THEIR TREACHERY]
Under the programme, known as INTER-REG,
counties along England's south coast
form the "Manche Region" along with
northern France.
Divide and rule: How the South-East
has been paired up with regions
across the Channel
The "Atlantic Region" takes in western
England, along with Ireland, Wales and
parts of Portugal, Spain, France and
Scotland.
Meanwhile eastern England is part of the
"North Sea Region", which covers areas
of Sweden, Denmark, Germany, Belgium,
Norway and the Netherlands.
Gordon Brown: Celebrating
Englishness
The UK Government is fully behind the
project, even though the words "England"
and "Britain" are left off official maps
of each area and the Manche Region
renames the English Channel "The Channel
Sea".
Each region, which will be given
taxpayers' money to promote trade links,
cultural ties, transport policies and
tourism, is to be run by a "managing
authority" of unelected officials
overseen by a director.
None will be based in the UK, with
Manche ruled by the French, Atlantic by
the Portuguese and North Sea by the
Danes.
The regions have legal status and Manche
has a budget of £261million between 2007
and 2013, Atlantic £127million and North
Sea £219million.
Every project funded by a region must
have a publicity campaign which ensures
"there is provision for flying the EU
flag at least one week every year".
Eric Pickles, the Conservatives'
communities spokesman, said: "We already
knew that Gordon Brown had hoisted the
white flag of surrender to the European
Constitution.
[What nonsense the
Conservative
spokesman speaks when their party has
been flying the white flag of surrender
to the EU for over 36 years.
St
George, played by historical
interpreter Alan Larson, does his
best at dispatching the Dragon at
Scarborough Castle
"Now the Labour Government has been
caught red-handed conspiring with
European bureaucrats to create a
European superstate via the back door.
"Gordon Brown literally wants to wipe
England off the map."
But a spokesman for the Department for
Communities and Local Government
insisted: "It has nothing to do with
altering names on maps.
"It is about support for business,
helping boost employment and turning
around deprived areas... helping firms
in Kent do business with people in
Northern France or promoting joint
tourism initiatives between different
countries."
[The fact
of the matter is that WALES and SCOTLAND
will retain their territorial integrity
but as already explained ENGLAND will
for the first time for over 1500 years
be divided up and given over to our past
enemies while as our Great War leader
Winston Churchill challenged the House
before the Second World War
' GERMANY
IS GROWING STRONGER
and
WE ARE
GROWING WEAKER'
WE have been BETRAYED
by the GANG of THREE in WESTMINSTER and
they should NOT be REWARDED for their
TREACHERY.
Winston Churchill
warned in a speech in the Mansion House
London in 1953 that we should be careful
of those who are always looking for
change, and history has as so often in
the past proved him correct .But
he would have been astonished to put it
mildly that his own party had ignored
his
WARNING.
A
St George's Day flag flies next to a
statue of Sir Winston Churchill in
London's Parliament Square today
The
move came as Gordon Brown ordered that
all UK Government buildings with two
flag poles should fly the cross of St
George alongside the union banner.
It
follows a review of flag flying
practices. Number 10 will in future fly
the Scottish and Welsh flags on their
patron saints' days.
Northern Ireland does not have an
official national flag, and so the same
practice will not apply on St Patrick's
Day.
"The
Prime Minister's view is that of course
we should celebrate our Britishness, but
celebrating our Britishness does not
mean we cannot also celebrate our
Englishness, Scottishness, Welshness or
Northern Irishness," said the spokesman.
The
English flag last flew over Downing
Street during the 2006 World Cup.
*
[The
Conservatives have their eye on
the forthcoming
2009 European
Elections and could even include
a General Election and their
pretence of being a patriotic
party was blown away over 36
years ago. Vote for the smaller
parties for a change and throw
the majority unpatriotic
expensive time wasters out on
the dole. A look at the Regions
/States of Germany will show
that the integrity of their
territory is intact.
It is said
what the Pan-Germans mean when
they say other Europeans can
tame the naturally aggressive
and acquisitive tendency to
augment the German race -in
translation is that the
Lebensraum' they seek is the
space vacated by abolishing
the sovereignty of all the other
regional nation states,
with the exception of
Germany hiding behind a 'mask of
federalism':
THIS: is the new
'Lebensraum'. The Germans
have got clean away with their
dastardly plan because of the
stupidity over 36 years of
British politicians who still in
2009
in the forthcoming European
Election will continue to be
'useful
idiots'
by claiming they can change the
EU for the better. They have no
chance whatsoever to do so and
they know so but they cannot
admit they have been fooled for
so long. We shall no doubt have
the same plea 'of change'
from the prospective
Conservative MEP for the West
Midlands Philip Bushill-Mathews.
He needs taken quietly to one
side and told that
Brussels rules Britannia
as he
appears to have some doubt about
it.
The Germans
have yet to ratify the Lisbon
Treaty because their
Constitutional Court has matters
yet to be dealt with before that
can take place. They seem
intent to ratify their treaty
ONLY after every other country
has done so. What a wonderful
propaganda victory and their
revenge for losing TWO WORLD
WARS as to accept the surrender
of all their previous foes but
particularly a country called
England which they have longed
to cut up to destruction.]
*
VOTE!
www.LIBERTAS.org.uk
Who will
either change the EU for the
better or finally show all EU
fanatics that in Margaret
Thatcher's phrase
[They're]
not for change.
We believe
that the FUNDAMENTALS cannot be
changed because the Nazi
blueprint does not allow for
such change. They will
tinker around the edges and give
concessions as they will offer
to IRELAND in order to get them
on side but the reality is that
whatever they offer CAN BE LATER
TAKEN AWAY.]
*
TREATY OF
TREASON
[Font
Altered-Bolding & Underlining
Used-Comments in Brackets]
FEBRUARY-2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEMONSTRATING AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT
WATCH OUT-THE RATS ARE OUT TO GET
YOU!
by
Mind Control
The Ultimate Terror
Write Down this Mirror web site
address of educate-yourself.org in Switzerland in case you
cannot access any page at this web site (our thanks to Stephanie
Meier for maintaining this mirror): http://mirrors.wordsforgood.org/educate-yourself.org/
[Editor's Note: May 31, 2006.
Somewhere between May 18 and May 30, 2006, this mind control index
page was surreptitiously erased from my web server and even from my
hard drive. Apparently, someone doesn't want this topic ventilated
before the public. I had to retrive an old copy of this Mind Control
index page from a disc which I had saved in November 2005, therefore
the more recent articles which I had posted on this page up to April
2006 will not appear in this version, but will be restored shortly
after I've had a chance to retrive this page from a mirror site
which was recently established in Europe. Thankfully, the
synchronistic offer to set up the mirror site in early May from a
very thoughtful person in Switzerland, came at just the right time.
I will publish the url of the mirror site as soon as I find the
e-mail sent to me by the person who set up the mirror site. .
For victims of electronic or psychic assault,
Be
sure to see section titled "Countermeasures to
Psychotronic and Demonic Attack.
We give
but two paragraphs of the article here:
The topic of mind control is
elaborate, multifaceted, and multi layered. For the casual
reader, it can quickly become numbing, overwhelming the senses
and creating a desire to exit the topic, but avoiding this
subject is the most foolish thing you could possibly do since
your only chance of surviving this hideous and insidious
enslavement agenda, which today threatens virtually all of
humanity, isto understand how it functions and
take steps to reduce your vulnerability.
The plans to create a mind
controlled workers society have been in place for a long time.
The current technology grew out of experiments that the Nazis
started before World War II and intensified during the time of
the Nazi concentration camps when an unlimited supply of
children and adults were available for experimentation. We've
heard about the inhumane medical experiments performed on
concentration camp prisoners, but no word was ever mentioned by
the media and the TV documentaries of the mind control
experiments. That was not to be divulged to the American public.
Mind control technologies can be broadly divided into two
subsets: trauma-based or
electronic-based.
Don't
complain in the future as you will about losing YOUR FREEDOM-YOUR
CONSTITUTION -YOUR COUNTRY and soon if you are still not AWAKE
YOUR MIND!
Please
Note: Should you at any time be unable to access www.educate-yourself
website articles on our pages then go to:
http://mirrors.wordsforgood.org/educate-yourself.org
.Ken]
By Ken Adachi <Editor@educate-yourself.org>
http://educate-yourself.org/mc/index.shtml
*
*
MARCH-2009
|
|
BANKERS RULE THE WORLD.
WHY WE NEED A PEOPLE'S BANK
WHICH LENDS MONEY TO GOVERNMENT WITHOUT INTEREST
Throughout history international bankers have
influenced the events of the day. We are particularly interested
with the period since 1775 when the Colonists in the New World were
forced to obtain their loans from the Bank of England at INTEREST
,whereas the Americans had introduced their own system which allowed
the Colonies to obtain money from their own resources for GOVERNMENT
spending WITHOUT INTEREST. It was a major cause of the eventual
split with the MOTHER COUNTRY.
Why should we be concerned by this today in
April,2009? Because Gordon Brown is on a great spending spree which
international bankers love to see as the more the Bank of England
and Reserve Bank of America prints their currency which is borrowed
by their GOVERNMENT at INTEREST there follows the extra interest
which must be added which accumulates over time so that the
outstanding DEBT never can be PAID but continue remorselessly out of
control.
And as the narrator on the
video below emphasises we are
ALL NOTHING more than SLAVES
The Act for Federal Reserve Bank of America was
passed in 1913, by President Woodrow Wilson while almost everyone
was enjoying Christmas. Years later he regretted his action as he
soon realised his great mistake as he saw that the real power broker
of his country was not CONGRESS but the international BANKERS.
IMAGINE if you could if we could next week
do what the early colonists did by having THEIR BANK which loaned
GOVERNMENT without INTEREST.
The saved billions could transform the lives of those in our Island
Home and if the system was world-wide would benefit everyone on our
PLANET.
SO in SUBSTANCE we already have a WORLD GOVERNMENT
of INTERNATIONAL BANKERS who CONTROL GOVERNMENTS the WORLD OVER.
The history of this sorry tale is explained by the
following video:
Federal Reserve Bank
Notice if you will that you are most unlikely to
hear this matter discussed in the financial papers of the day.
Remember NOTHING HAPPENS in this WORLD that is not in the 'INTEREST'
of those INTERNATIONAL BANKERS.
*
Federal Reserve Bank
*
APRIL-2009
|
|
Europe’s Constitutional Treaty: A
Threat to Democracy and How to Avoid It
By
Declan J. Ganley
Volume 4, Number 5
December 2003
Declan J. Ganley is
an Irish entrepreneur and founder of wireless broadband and cable TV
businesses in Western, Central, and Eastern Europe. In the early
1990s he built what became the largest private forestry company in
the former Soviet Union. He serves on the Futures Group of the Irish
Government’s Information Society Commission.
Many observers view former president of France
Valery Giscard d’Estaing as having labored tirelessly in the
interests of his nation and Europe over the course of his life of
public service. But Giscard d’Estaing now presides over the Brussels
convention charged with producing a draft constitution for the
future of Europe, the very concept of which is an attack on
democracy in Europe and a subversion of Europe’s citizenry.
“Democracy” derives from the ancient Greek word
for “the rule of the people.” Invented in Europe, its ideals have
spread to the far corners of the globe. It has become our way of
life in Europe and something we take for granted. It cannot be taken
from us or relegated to the role of symbolic chattel while Giscard
d’Estaing and his convention transfer its key functions to Brussels.
Throughout Europe’s history, those who attempt to take from the
people that which is theirs ultimately fail; one can only hope that
the convention’s usurpation of the European agenda seems similarly
destined to fail.
Benjamin Franklin famously said, “Any society that
would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will
deserve neither and lose both.” European citizens must pay attention
to and act on the draft constitution for the future of Europe that
the convention’s logrolling has produced. Unless they do, a serious
assault will have been carried out by the European elite represented
by the convention, which will further encroach on Europe’s
libertarian democratic society and its ability to hold those who
govern accountable for their actions. If the convention succeeds,
Europe’s future may be headed down a very dangerous path.
The draft constitution represents the political
bureaucracy’s attempt to consolidate its hold over the
decision-making process in the EU, which affects Europeans’ daily
lives in fundamental ways. Should it come to pass, the constitution
would call for a presidential head of Europe, in the role of the
president of the European Council, who will have global recognition
as president of the Union, in whose election the people will have no
say. Their vote and opinion are neither required nor desired.
A foreign affairs minister would oversee the tract
in the draft, that “member states shall actively and unreservedly
support the Union’s common foreign and security policy in a spirit
of loyalty and mutual solidarity. They shall refrain from action
contrary to the Union’s interests or likely to undermine its
effectiveness.” Of course, the (non-popularly elected) president and
his or her foreign minister would be unlikely to display what Chirac
earlier this year identified as the “bad behavior” and signs of
being “badly brought up” of the annoying, democratically elected
leaders of Central and Eastern European states.
The president and minister will be hand-picked by
the Brussels bureaucracy. The European minister for foreign affairs,
who will represent European interests to the world, will not have
been appointed by a president elected by Europeans. It is already
the case that Europeans did not elect those responsible for the
policy that underpins the Euro. The governor of the European Central
Bank is neither directly nor indirectly accountable to the
citizenry. This means that Western Europeans live in a far less
accountable society than they did only a decade or so ago. Sweden’s
rejection of the Euro in its recent referendum is a sign that
Europeans recognise this fact and require accountability from those
setting monetary and other policy. The many areas over which they
have ceded or will be ceding power to Brussels include employment
regulation, industry, transport, communications, justice, health,
agriculture, fisheries, and important aspects of defence. The
national veto is to be abolished in no fewer than 50 new areas,
including immigration and asylum. The draft constitution also
ratifies that EU law will have primacy over member states.
[As we have already pointed out it would be
impossible for the EU to make any major changes to its CONSTITUTION
because it is the exact copy of Himmler's PLAN for EUROPE which was
finally put into being in the Nazi
Geopolitical Centre in
Madrid in
1943 when it was accepted that the Nazis would lose the WAR. Our
support of
www.LIBERTAS.org.uk
is because that even those who agree about a
EUROPEAN UNION which WE DO NOT nevertheless it WILL PROVE to the EU
FANATICS that the FAULT is in their passionate adherence to a
TOTALITARIAN ideal which any Nazis still living will smile with
quiet satisfaction that what they could not complete in TWO WORLD
WARS they have DONE by the willing cooperation of ENGLAND'S
QUEEN and the majority of members of our once respected and
honourable Houses of PARLIAMENT.]
FOR FULL TRANSCRIPT
and
Bureaucracy vs. Democracy
*
www.LIBERTAS.org.uk
TREATY OF TREASON
*
[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining Used-Comments
in brackets]
APRIL-2009
|
|
INDIVIDUALISM IS HATED BY TOTALITARIAN
GOVERNMENTS -RACISM ENCOURAGED BY SUPPORTING GROUP COLLECTIVISM
.
*
Senator Ron Paul a
consistently lone voice in the Congress of the United States of
America becoming known as Dr NO in defending the Constitution
from violations because of overbearing Presidents, wrote the
following in his book
THE REVOLUTION-The Manifesto.
Our purpose is to show that whatever is
brought to light by the above defender of the People has a
connection with what has happened in our country over the past
few decades but particularly under New Labour.
The following section of which we are
wholeheartedly with him is from his work on THE CONSTITUTION:
No form of political organisation,-is immune
to cruel abuses like the Jim Crow laws, whereby government sets
out to legislate on how groups of human beings are allowed to
interact with one another. peaceful civil disobedience to
unjust laws, which I support with every fiber of my being, can
sometimes be necessary at any level of GOVERNMENT.
IT FALLS UPON THE PEOPLE IN THE LAST RESORT
TO STAND AGAINST INJUSTICE NO MATTER WHERE IT OCCURS.
In the long run, the only way racism can be
overcome is through the philosophy of
INDIVIDUALISM.
[In the run-up to the 1997 General Election
and as prospective candidate for the English Democratic Party in
the Warwick/Leamington constituency we were interviewed by a BBC
reporter who was intent by his questioning to reveal a racist
attitude and our answer was in substance not so different from
that of Senator Ron Paul as we laid great emphasis on the
INDIVIDUAL Englishman or Women of whatever background but united
as one PEOPLE.]
which I have promoted throughout my life. our
rights come to us not because we belong to some group, but our
rights come to us as
INDIVIDUALS.
And it is as individuals that we should judge
one another. Racism is a particularly odious form of
collectivism whereby individuals are treated not on their merits
but on the basis of
GROUP IDENTITY.
Nothing in my political philosophy, which is
the exact opposite of the racial totalitarianism of the
twentieth century, gives aid or comfort to such thing. To the
contrary, my philosophy of
INDIVIDUALISM
is the most radical intellectual challenge to
racism ever posed.
GOVERNMENTS exacerbates racial thinking and
undermines INDIVIDUALISM because its very existence encourages
people to organize along racial lines in order to lobby for
benefits for
THEIR GROUP.
That LOBBYING, in turn creates animosity and
suspicion among all groups, each of which believes that it is
getting LESS of its FAIR SHARE than the OTHERS.
INSTEAD, we should quit thinking in terms of
RACE - YES. in 2008 it is still necessary to say that we should
STOP THINKING in terms of RACE - and recognize that FREEDOM and
PROSPERITY benefit all Americans. As Thomas Sowell points out,
LOBBYISTS for various RACIAL GROUPS will spend all their time
trying to enact programs that specifically HELP THEIR GROUP,
even though that group would reap far more benefit from
advancing ECONOMIC FREEDOM in general.
[We have looked at every
statement in Ron Paul's 173 page Declaration of Common Sense and
we find that we are in complete agreement with him on ALL the
issues he has raised. His staggering success in the USA has
meant that he is constantly before the MEDIA as the principled
opponent of the YES! brigade who question little and ignore
THEIR CONSTITUTION as we find happens in ENGLAND in 2009 where
they have gone one step further and the GANG OF THREE in
PARLIAMENT have sold THEIR CONSTITUTION and THEIR COUNTRY to a
FOREIGN POWER. Apart from a few GOOD MEN and WOMEN the majority
should find themselves out on the street after the coming
elections. That is WHY we have said that those parasite's who
have betrayed us and robbed us, should be shown the door at the
next EUROPEAN and GENERAL ELECTIONS and give YOUR VOTE to the
smaller parties who WILL LISTEN to YOU!. ]
PART 2
*
http://www.house.
gov/paul
*
APRIL -2009
|
|
ARE YOU HAVING A MOBILE MAST IN YOUR VILLAGE RIGHT
NOW?
AN
SOS.
Well! with just a few week's notice give to our
village on the edge of the South Warwickshire countryside we have
been informed that they intend to decorate a tree standing on high
ground with a magnificent view of the un-spoilt English landscape with a
40foot mobile phone mast, there being NO other monstrosity evident
on the road encircling the unblemished village. They also state
that it must be painted black and not green which would at least
disguise the existence of its intrusive existence. Possibly as this
tactic has been used so many times they are embarrassed by the whole
affair.
We are told there is no proven case that the radio waves
DO HARM.
whereas there is a growing international research
which disputes this fact. A few clicks into GOOGLE will bring up a
great deal of pertinent information, there is even an instance of a
cancer cluster with one death in a Warwickshire village all ready and
no doubt there are many others throughout the country. In this
particular tragedy the mast WAS REMOVED. Only lower emissions can reduce the risk
as shown by the Switzerland study.
Our case is :
1] there is a children's play area within 20
metres approximately 60 feet.
2] the location of the antenna & boxes is on a
place where children are prone to play and in themselves pose a
hazard; the adjacent Severn Trent Water station acts as a place for
them to congregate being so close to the playing field, and there
appear to be no measures to protect against this corner which is busy and
unsighted to pedestrians/ children crossing at this place.
3] the antenna themselves when wet crackle and
would be
A NOISE NUISANCE.
4] The main mobile companies including O2, have
a mast sharing agreement; there is no evidence that any action has
been taken to
USE EXISTING MASTS.
The nature of 3g or g3 radio waves is currently a
matter of concern in particular & one of our group has a special
interest being already experiencing a danger to health in an area
already known to be a health risk which could be fatal should the
project be implemented.
From our brief search on the internet there does
not appear to be a nation-wide organisation which can be called upon
to coordinate action against the growing curse of mobile phone
masts.
A doctor in the local practice was one of the
first to raise concerns of the matter has contacted the relevant
authorities. We are expecting that we have only a few weeks to
mobilise our villagers to show
THAT THEY ALSO CARE.
A PETITION is being passed around the village and
has already shown that people do care about their community . Their
support can stop this diabolical mischief which is a danger to OUR
HEALTH and a blot on the landscape which should NOT be permitted in
our beautiful Warwickshire countryside.
What is also most alarming is that local
accountability is being undermined by what appears a change of
attitude of many councillors who seem to consider that they owe
their allegiance elsewhere and instead of with their fellow
citizens. We found it necessary to speak to the councillors and
explain that they cannot leave it to one lady to lead the fight back
and that they should take a lead and we have been told that we will
hear next Wednesday the 15th April with ONLY five days left . They
appeared to be shell shocked because no member of the parish council
had yet taken a decision to lead the important action which without
exaggeration was a matter of LIFE and DEATH as we had already
learned that in another Warwickshire village a cancer cluster had
appeared and one person had died and as a result the mast WAS
REMOVED.
Fortunately, there is now a swell of support
gaining ground within the community itself without their councillor's
active support, who are now aware of the danger to their community
and are fighting back. To show how arrogant the powers that be are
we went into the Ofcom- sitefinder of Radio masts in Warwickshire
which brought up the site being contested as already a notified site
in existence.
If there had been an emergency of another kind we
are sure that the matter would have been dealt with by the councillor's without delay but because one cannot SEE the danger
which with its emissions can be compared if we could see it to what
one would see in a dense smog which has resulted by an industrial
chimney stack which is sending into the atmosphere volumes of thick black acrid
smoke. To those who know about radiation it is called e-smog.
What is also a matter for concern is that this
attitude of not realising the greater danger has meant that a
connecting village which is pursuing another matter of dispute has
to some of the persons involved in its leadership not considered
that the greater enemy to their village is in the fact the matter of
LIFE and DEATH which involves the Radio mobile mast but they
are so fearful of distracting from their own objective that they do
not appear to be rising to the dangers to everyone in the village
which will affect them 24 hours a day throughout their lives. Should
the Radio mobile mast be erected they will soon learn to their cost
their partisan attitude had possibly contributed to the failure to
prevent the installation in the first place.
In a case mentioned in the website
www.computor-clear.com/radiation_and_health.pdf
In a Leicestershire village of Countesthorpe they
have been campaigning for three years to move a mobile phone mast
which they say is a health hazard.
More than 1,000 people have signed a petition
opposing the mast. At the meeting, residents hoped that they would
hear that removal was now possible option, but instead given the
news that 60 days must pass while a statutory consultation exercise
goes on .
It is far better to prevent the installation of
the health hazard from the beginning as the above case study has
revealed.
We have compared the dilatory way which is
happening over Radio mobile masts as similar to the early years of
the battle to find out the truth about the tobacco threat to health
which was obscured for years by the powerful and wealthy industry
which is still paying out claims of compensation which are now no
doubt being paid for by the profits from the considerable
number of new customers in the Third World.
In a decade or less the litigation of those proved
to have been affected by emissions will amount to millions at first
and later as with the cigarette industry to billions. The greatest
tragedy of the whole affair is that it will affect every living
being from the child in the womb and to an even even greater extent
to the young children who are now using mobile phones which have
become a common necessity and where their brains will be adversely
affected and their general health deteriorate to make them old
before their time.
The only beneficiaries will be the LEGAL
PROFESSION who as they did on smoking and asbestos and other
complaints must be already gearing up to make millions in processing
the number of claims that will soon be flooding into their offices.
With regard to our own battleground we shall keep you all posted as to the outcome
which we hope will be in our favour but the evidence already before
us is not at all comforting - but the fight goes on.
If there are any others which have been affected
by the same callous behaviour and have information which could be of
help in our CAUSE would you PLEASE sent the details to:
Pat Beal
6 , Friary Road, Hampton Magna, Budbrooke,
Warwick, Warwickshire England, CV 35 8TD
TEL 01926/498924.
*
There are many studies from across the world on
the effects of
RADIATION to HEALTH
The internet has many other studies to support the
study below.
www.computor-clear.com/radiation_and_health.pdf
*
www.educate-yourself.org
But GOOGLE will have many others for you to view.
In is only in the last few
weeks that we have displayed the dangers inherent in mobile phone
masts and the following articles below will remind YOU of the
DANGERS which exist under a totalitarian regime.
Should we be victims of
their evil satanic plans you will see our website being plagued with
viruses and we have already come under attack in the last few days
and if their mobile mast works as it should we shall not be getting
many comfortable nights in the future and our minds will have to fend
for themselves. But we must not be gloomy as for the people of our
island home are just beginning to awaken from their long sleep and
they will not like what they see happening around them and will we
hope question the actions of those who are turning our country into
a TOTALITARIAN STATE.
*
A visit to the ofcom website:
http://www.sitefinder.ofcom.org.uk/
will show that the post code CV35 8TD brings up
the map of the village as an already existing site.
*
APRIL -2009
|
|
www.hese-project.org/en/
h.e.s.e.-UK News
THE
Dangers
TO
Children in an
electromagnetic environment
It is an inescapable fact that the planet
today is a complete cacophony of man-made electromagnetic fields
and signals. It is as if a wild party is going on in what used
to be a quiet open space. Maybe it seems that many of us can
stand the noise and are resilient to the fields, and
particularly to the structures within modern digital
communications signals that lie within the range of frequencies
that our bodies use for normal healthy well-being.
All living things on Earth evolved over many
millions of years through a wildly changing environment,
surviving many changes, such as an oxygen-rich environment,
which once were competely toxic to most of life, but became
essential for our form of life. Slow adaptation over such
prolonged periods changed the nature of organisms; life itself
survived but few life forms did. We need therefore to be very
aware that the electromagnetic environment today is grossly out
or proportion to that we evolved within, filtered by natural
magnetic fields and our ionosphere.
If survival of the fittest is an acceptable
price for modern conveniences, we should be aware that the ‘less
fit’ includes our children, whose development in this changed
environment may affect their whole-life chances. In this
context, a home where everyone uses a mobile phone, uses DECT
phones and wireless routers and accepts everything wireless is
easier, better and without consequence, has become a blind spot
of natural precaution. At one very obvious end of the spectrum
is the hard sell of mobile phones to toddlers. Part of the sell
is that no-one is safe without one. Not true of course, but it
sounds persuasive. Perhaps, rather, no-one is safe with
one. Certainly, clamping a microwave transmitter of highly
structured signals onto your head is not a good idea, if you do
it very often, or for very long. And a very bad idea for a young
child. Some countries are becoming more precautionary at this
level, advising against it (even the UK, though it is not
government-endorsed action).
So what about wireless games? These too are an
addition to the electromagnetic burden in the home, and despite
the sell (again) that games improve the mind or the body, they
too are an unwise addition for a growing child. Music, books and
exercise with a ball will achieve the same healthy outcomes, but
of course make rather less money. The social context is another
aspect: children’s lives are more complex, more difficult, and
according to recent research reports, probably less happy
(though more entertained) than they used to be. We, the adult
world, the parents, are responsible for being duped by eternal
consumerism and pursuit of wealth and possessions, and it is we
who are imposing an increasingly dangerous electromagnetic
environment on this planet – and our children.
Do you think that the wealth of research
showing that life interacts with the environment
elctromagnetically, leaves us immune to the enormous changes we
have made? Like man-made climate change, we are not too small
and insignificant to alter the well-being of our planet and our
species. Can you recommend these developments?:
BioInitiative Report
A Rationale for a Biologically-based Public
Exposure Standard for Electromagnetic Fields (ELF and RF)
An international working group of scientists,
researchers and public health policy professionals (The
BioInitiative Working Group) has released its report on
electromagnetic fields (EMF) and health. They document serious
scientific concerns about current limits regulating how much EMF
is allowable from power lines, cell phones, and many other
sources of EMF exposure in daily life.
The report concludes the existing standards
for public safety are inadequate to protect public health.
Europe-wide survey of public perceptions about
mobile phone and mast radiation
Two in three believe radiation from phones
damaged their health according to a
European survey reported in the Independent on Sunday, 8
July 2007.
‘Two-thirds of Britons believe radiation from
mobile phones and their masts has affected their health, a
startling official survey shows. And huge majorities are
dissatisfied with government assurances about the potential
threat.’
The EU Eurobarometer survey polled more
than 27,000 people across the continent, 1,375 of them in
Britain. Chair of the Health Protection Agency, Sir William
Stewart appears not to have the support of the Agency’s
Radiation Protection Division. Whilst their statements remain
questionable and unconvincing (eg,
about
wi-fi, Sir William recently said on BBC Panorama, ‘I
believe that there is a need for a review of the Wi-Fi and other
areas ... I think it’s timely for it to be done
NOW!
I believe mobile phones /
masts have affected my health
| |
mobile phones
|
phone masts
|
| UK |
65% |
71% |
| Europe |
73% |
76% |
| EU, 2002 |
55% |
58% |
Source: EU Eurobarometer
*
[ FOR FULL TRANSCRIPT WHICH WILL NOT
DISAPPOINT YOU CLICK]
PART 2
|
|
THE TRUTH
CAMPAIGN
(http://www.truthcampaign.co.uk)
STRANGER THAN FICTION
AN
INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION OF 9-11 AND THE WAR ON TERRORISM
By: Dr. Albert D. Pastore Phd.
(Appeared in Truth Campaign issues 27 and
28 - then attributed to 'Anonymous')
|

Author hereby
grants full permission to reproduce
and mass distribute this paper for
non-commercial use.

“All truth passes through three
stages. First, it is ridiculed,
second it is violently opposed,
and third, it is accepted as
self-evident." - Arthur Schopenhauer
German philosopher, 1788-1860
"History is indeed little more
than the register of crimes,
follies, and misfortunes of mankind
- Edward Gibbon British historian,
1737-1794 From Decline and Fall of
Roman Empire
OPENING STATEMENT
The ancient Greek
philosopher Socrates taught his
students that the pursuit of truth
can only begin once they start to
question and analyze every belief
that they ever held dear. If a
certain belief passes the tests of
evidence, deduction, and logic, it
should be kept. If it doesn't, the
belief should not only be discarded,
but the thinker must also then
question why he was led to
believe the erroneous information in
the first place. Not surprisingly,
this type of teaching didn't sit
well with the ruling elite of
Greece. Many political leaders
throughout history have always
sought to mislead the thinking of
the masses. Socrates was tried for
"subversion" and for "corrupting the
youth". He was then forced to take
his own life by drinking poison.
It's never easy being an independent
thinker! Today, our ruling
government/media complex doesn't
kill people for pursuing the truth
about the world (at least not
yet!) They simply label them as
"extremists" or "paranoid",
destroying careers and reputations
in the process. For many, that's a
fate even worse than drinking poison
hemlock!
Every news story
you are about to review in this
research paper is true and easily
verifiable. This investigation
represents 10 months of careful
study, research, analysis, source
verification and logical deduction.
Every event and quote presented here
is 100% accurate. There are about
200 detailed footnotes which I
encourage, no, urge, readers
to explore and verify for
themselves. The Internet version of
this paper will allow users to
obtain instant verification
for each and every footnote by
clicking on the footnotes/links.
Others can obtain easy verification
by entering the key search words
(provided at the end of the paper)
into the Yahoo or Google.com
search engines. Due to the fact that
well organized efforts are under way
to suppress these facts, some of
these news links are mysteriously
disappearing even as we speak.
Fortunately, this information has
all been transcribed by many
websites and has therefore been
preserved from the censors. These
footnote searches will take you
directly to the news sites of many
well known established media
organizations throughout the world
as well as opening up doors to a
world of knowledge and information
that has been concealed from you.
With just a little common sense and
a few clicks of a mouse, Google and
Yahoo now enable anyone with an
ounce of curiosity to become a
Sherlock Holmes.
This is no opinion
piece. Rather it is a collection of
buried, but undeniable facts,
events, and quotes which, when
assembled in one place, will state
their own conclusions. In putting
together this research in a logical
and sequential format,
great care was taken to confirm,
double confirm, and triple confirm
every piece of information.
Any and all questionable data which
could not be independently verified
to this author’s satisfaction was
discarded.
Taken
individually, each story, quote and
event may not amount to a full case.
But when taken collectively, this
mountain of facts should hammer home
the truth to even the most skeptical
reader. There are of course those
who have fallen under the hypnotic
spell of the TV talking-heads and
"experts" whom they worship as
authority figures. Unaccustomed to
thinking for themselves, no amount
of truth can sway them from their
preconceived prejudices. They
will even deny that which they see
with their own eyes. They
are victims of a psychological
affliction known as "the lemming
effect". Lemmings are small rodents
who have been observed to follow
each other as they charge to their
deaths into raging rivers or even
off of cliffs. Lemminghood is an
innate psychological phenomenon,
present in most mammals and
observable in common people as well
the most sophisticated and educated
elites. Lemminghood is not an
intellectual phenomenon - it is
psychological. As such, no
socio-economic class is immune to
its strangulating effect. A grant-
seeking university scientist can be
a lemming just as much as a fashion
obsessed teen-age girl. One blindly
follows the latest trendy theory
while the other follows the latest
clothing style. What's the
difference? Neither can resist the
force of nature.
The power to fit
in with one's social peers can be
irresistible. To a human lemming,
the logic behind an opinion doesn't
count as much as the power and
popularity behind an opinion.
Man, like lemming, behaves
collectively. And it could be no
other way. Naturally, the individual
must be equipped with this trait.
Otherwise, the smallest steps toward
civilization could never have been
made. Lemminghood is a survival
trait, an inborn instinct in the
majority of people. However, as with
all natural phenomena, this tendency
can be manipulated and used for
harmful purposes. It is this lemming
effect which enables entire segments
of a society to lose their sense of
judgment all at the same time.
This research
paper will likely be wasted on many
lemmings. For lemmings, denial
is a basic psychological defense
mechanism used to not only shield
themselves from unpleasant
realities,
but also to reassure
themselves that they will still fit
within the acceptable range of
opinion held by their peer group.
Lemmings are absolutely terrified at
the thought of being labeled as an
"extremist" or a "conspiracy
theorist". At all costs, their
beliefs must always be on the
“right” side of the issue and
conform within the boundaries of
their lemming peers. Lemmings simply
cannot bear the burden of
responsibility, or the social
discomfort, which comes with
thinking independently. They will
resist any efforts to change their
misguided beliefs with all their
mental energy. We can try to open
their closed minds and free them
from their self-imposed blindness,
but it’s not easy fighting the force
of human nature. The chains of
ideological conformity have too
strong of a grip, and breaking them
is a difficult task. With the
limited resources at our disposal,
it is next to impossible to compete
with the media lemming-masters. The
lie of the emperor is always
believed before the truth of the
peasant. Nevertheless, some of us
must make the meager attempt, and
thus lay the foundation upon which
the truth might one day rise again.
There are those
few among us who do possess both the
courage and intellectual capacity to
break free of the shackles of
lemminghood and accept the truth
when it is presented in a clear and
logical sequence. To those open
minded and independent thinkers I
wish to state clearly and
unequivocally. I intend to set
forth in this paper an overwhelming
body of evidence which should
forever destroy the ridiculous
notion that some Saudi Arabian
caveman and his band of
half-trained, nerdy Arab flight
school attendees, orchestrated the
most sophisticated terror operation
in world history. The very
idea is utterly laughable. And yet,
due to the blithering barrage of
bullshit dished out by the
government/media complex, millions
of "patriotic" Americans have
accepted this fantastic fairy tale,
this moronic mendacity, this silly
superstition, this dangerous
delusion, with a religious
conviction bordering on insanity. As
an admittedly useless public service
to my helplessly misinformed
countrymen of today, and as a gift
to a posterity which will hopefully
be more enlightened than my
bewildered contemporaries, I have
published this research so as to
liberate as many people as I can
from the oppressive yoke of media
brainwashing and state sponsored
lies. Do you have what it takes to
break free from the lemming mob? If
so, read on!
SOCRATES TAKES
POISON CUP. ARE YOU A THINKER……. OR
A LEMMING?
THE DANCING
ISRAELIS
[while the TWIN
TOWERS were collapsing]
TO FOLLOW in PART 2
*
(http://www.truthcampaign.co.uk)
[MAKE SURE YOU ARE
SITTING COMFORTABLY FOR THE
'EXPLOSIVE' ACCOUNT OF 9/11 -YOU
WONT FORGET IT!]
*
[Font
Altered-Bolding & Underlining &
Bolding-Comments in Brackets]
*
APRIL-2009
|
|
|
Learning pride in national
identity
St
George's Day 23 April
by
John Boyd
[This
article has been brought forward from 1999 and we all know how
things have gone from bad to worse to the point that in 2008 our
country was sold to a FOREIGN POWER aginst the CORONATION OATH
of HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN and the Oaths of the majority of
TRAITOROUS members of YOUR PARLIAMENT. It is with great regret
that we have not a OLIVER CROMWELL in our day to clear the
dishonourable traitorous majority from the most HALLOWED piece
of ENGLAND to which ALL ENGLISHMEN looked for THEIR FREEDOM and
JUSTICE with the world's unique parliamentary democracy which
is today in April 2009 but a past memory, Soon there
will be but REGIONS which themselves will be short lived if the
NEW WORLD ORDER are able to complete their sinister plan of a
WORLD GOVERNMENT.
A PEOLE who are NOT VIGILANT about THEIR FREEDOMS are themselves
the unwitting supporters of the instigators of their OWN DESTRUCTION.
'The condition upon which God
hath given liberty to man is eternal vigilance'
John Philpot Curran
(1730-1817)
The
23rd April is taken to celebrate both St George’s day, patron
saint of England, and birthday of the great English bard,
William Shakespeare. In fact not much is known about either the
knight or the playwright. St George was probably not English and
hardly stepped on English soil and certainly did not kill a
dragon.
Without doubt it is now
commonly accepted in sports, athletic circles and events that
the English Cross represents England. The incorrect waving of
the Union Flag, or Jack, for England is fast disappearing.
Painting of faces with the English cross at recent world cup
events was an expression of national sentiment, English national
sentiment, by ordinary and working class people. The Scots,
Welsh and Irish have no qualms about who they are and what
nation they belong to and what flag they fly they certainly do
not consider themselves British except some Unionists in the six
counties of Northern Ireland. Although it is becoming clearer,
we the English, are still a little mixed up about whether we are
English or just "British". This is because England was the apex
of the British Empire which in fact was an English Empire where
fag ends persist today in Gibraltar, Northern Ireland, Falkland
Isles and several other spots around the world.
The
term "British" was highlighted in the days of imperialism to rub
out the idea of nations and nationalities. The apt and current
parallel form of imperialism is now being consolidated by
European Union. Wales and Scotland are to be merely regions and
not nations. England is divided into several regions like the
rest of the EU. Some Euro-regions straddle national boundaries.
According to the Treaty on European Union we are all supposed to
become "European Citizens" with duties and rights as yet
unspecified. Apart from one or two exceptions, according to
international law, you cannot be a citizen of two states at the
same time. This means we are intended to be citizens of a
superstate and lose our national identity as part of the process
of taking away the powers of nation states and national
governments, thereby national democracy and all forms of
democracy.
To
progress democracy into the economic and other fields requires
real socialism. The prerequisites of socialism are therefore
national independence and national democracy. Hence the thrust
to European Union is the antithesis of democracy, national
independence and socialism.
A nation state and
national government is strongest when the nation is the
strongest.
In the case of Britain
this entails several nations and peoples whatever class they
come from. A current example of the strength of a nation
irrespective of class is that of the Serb nation who have united
against the illegal and barbaric NATO bombing.
Socialism and
nationalism are not comparable just as flour and electricity are
not comparable. Socialism is an economic system where production
and appropriation proceed together in common but where personal
consumption is related to personal contribution. Nationalism or
patriotism does not define a system of society but can define a
sentiment, doctrine or movement. In the context of today’s
political situation, nationalism or patriotism has the aim of
securing national independence, an aim which is democratic but
not inherently socialist. Therefore it is the duty of all
socialists to be the best democrats and the best nationalists or
patriots.
The action of NATO in
the Balkans and intense rivalries between the imperialist powers
involved is to shred the UN Charter and international law,
especially the right to self determination of nation states. The
object of European Union with a single currency and single army
is to completely take away the right of EU member states to
their own self determination. European Union is being
consolidated as a capitalist corporatist superstate to suit
transnational capital. It is big capital which is opposed to
nationalism, nation states, national democracy and all forms of
democracy. The anti-thesis of transnational capital is therefore
the nation state, nationalism or patriotism and democracy.
Some of the factors
which bind a nation together include a common language, history,
geographical area, economic system, culture and democracy.
Democracy requires the minority to accept majority decisions and
can only happen within a nation state and not between nation
states. Britain is a multi-cultural, multi-racial, multi-nation
state comprises three predominant nations and part of the Irish
nation. This mini-Common Market is dominated by England. Britain
in turn is now subjugate over vast areas of economic, political
and military life to the European Union superstate. This is done
through common policies, laws, directives and regulations on
foreign policy and a European Army, a single currency even
though we have not joined the last stage of economic and
monetary union, agriculture, steel , shipbuilding, coal
production, fishing grounds, trans-European roads, judicial
system, taxation via VAT and so on.
A full understanding of
the importance of what is called the "National Question" is
required to broaden the anti-EU movement in Britain where all
classes take part, especially the working class and the
organisations of the labour movement who normally represent
them.
The Irish, Scots, Welsh
and ethnic minorities in Britain are mostly clear who they are
and proud of their nationality. It is the English who have to
learn further their nationality and that is why the English
cross and the English national day of St George are important.
There should b a national holiday on 23rd April in addition to
May Day and alongside St Andrew’s Day, St David’s Day and St
Patrick’s Day. The peasants in their 1381 revolt had no problem
in flying the English cross in their irregular army and we today
should not be afraid to do so either, whether this be an
expression of our utter disgust and opposition to Britain’s part
in NATO or in the struggle to extricate ourselves from the
prison of European Union.
[1999]
[THE
SPIRIT OF ENGLAND]
The words of Henry, Lord Brougham
in 1844 in his work on the Constitution had the following advice
to future generations:
...the chief advantage
of free institutions is their enabling men to obtain a wise and
an honest administration of their affairs; that the frame of
Government approaches to perfection in proportion as it helps
those who live under it to watch the conduct of their rulers,
aiding them when right, checking them when wrong; and above all,
that no
Constitution, however excellent, can supersede the necessity or
dispense with the duty of this constant vigilance.
WE HAVE ALL BEEN BETRAYED
*
First published in the
Morning Star on 23 April 1999 - a paper opposed to
Britain's membership of European Union, opposed the undeclared
war and NATO bombing in the Balkans and is a daily paper of the
left.
Partly based on a CAEF
discussion pamphlet by John Boyd - "European Union, National
Independence and Democracy"
Available for £1.27 (or 5x27p stamps) post free from CAEF, 57
Green Lane, Merseyside CH45 8JQ
----------
Democrat contents page
CAEF details page
Home page
*
[Font Altered-Bolding &
underlining Used-Comments in Brackets]
*
APRIL-2009
|
|
THE
TRUTH CAMPAIGN
(http://www.truthcampaign.co.uk)
STRANGER THAN
FICTION
AN
INDEPENDENT INVESTIGATION OF 9-11 AND
THE WAR ON TERRORISM
By: Dr. Albert D.
Pastore Phd.
(Appeared in Truth
Campaign issues 27 and 28 - then
attributed to 'Anonymous')
PART
1
THE DANCING ISRAELIS
Like most Americans, I was
gripped by senses of profound shock,
horror, revulsion, sadness, and rage
as I watched the horror of September
11, 2001 unfolding live on my
television screen. Watching the mass
murder of thousands of innocent
people live on television was the
most upsetting experience of my
life. How could any person of sound
moral character not be enraged at
witnessing this horrific act of
barbarism? To read about some
faraway, long-ago genocide in a
newspaper or a book is distressing
enough. But to actually witness
the mass murders of what was, at
first, believed to have been tens of
thousands of innocent people is
truly heart stopping and traumatic.
I barely slept for two nights
afterwards and suffered nightmares.
Polling data would later reveal that
65% of Americans actually shed tears
on 9-11.
(1)
But not all of the eye-witnesses
to the 9-11 slaughter were so
saddened. On September 11, five
Israeli army veterans were arrested
by the FBI after several witnesses
saw them “dancing“,
“high-fiving“, and “celebrating”
as they took pictures of the
World Trade Center disaster from
across the river in New Jersey.
Steven Gordon was the lawyer who
volunteered to represent the five
Israelis. He was asked by a Hebrew
newspaper why the five men were
being detained by the FBI. Here’s
what Gordon told Yediot America:
"On the day of the disaster,
three of the
five boys went up on
the roof of the building where the
company office is located," said
Gordon. "I'm not sure if they saw
the twin towers collapse, but, in
any event, they photographed the
ruins right afterwards. One of the
neighbors who saw them called the
police and claimed they were posing,
dancing and laughing, against the
background of the burning towers….
"Anyhow, the three left the roof,
took an Urban truck, and drove to a
parking lot, located about a
five-minute drive from the offices.
They parked, stood on the roof of
the truck to get a better view of
the destroyed towers and took
photographs. A woman who was in the
building above the lot testified
that she saw them smiling and
exchanging high-fives. She and
another neighbor called the police
and reported on Middle-Eastern
looking people dancing on the truck.
They copied and reported the license
plates.
(2)
The Ha’aretz new service of
Israel reported:
“The Foreign Ministry said it had
been informed by the consulate in
New York that the FBI had arrested
the five for "puzzling behavior."
They are said to have had been
caught videotaping the disaster and
shouting in what was
interpreted as cries of joy and
mockery.”
(2b)
(emphasis added)
Ha’aretz went on to describe how
the FBI field agents then subjected
the five Israelis to days of brutal
interrogation, torture, and solitary
confinement.
When their photos were developed,
it was revealed that the dancing
Israelis were smiling in the
foreground of the New York massacre.
(3)
According to ABC’s 20/20 attempted
whitewash of the incident, in
addition to their outrageous and
highly suspicious behavior, the five
also had in their possession the
following items; box-cutters,
European passports, and $4700 cash
hidden in a sock.
(4)
Why were these Israeli agents so
happy about the horrible massacre
that was unfolding right before
their very eyes? What evil spirit
could possess people who are
supposed to be America's "allies",
and who receive billions of dollars
in financial and military aid from
US taxpayers each year , to publicly
rejoice as innocent people
(including many American Jews)
were burning to death and jumping
out of 110 story buildings? Could it
be that these happy Israeli army
veterans were in some way linked to
this monstrous attack? That’s what
officials close to the investigation
initially told The Bergen Record
newspaper of New Jersey.
(5)
As incredible, as ridiculous,
and as "paranoid" as that belief may
appear to you at this point, the
fact is that certain elements within
the Israeli government, and
International Zionist movement in
general, have a long history of
attacking the USA and framing Arabs
in order to gain support from the
US. Before we begin to piece
together what really transpired on
9-11, it is absolutely critical that
we first review some historical
precedents regarding Israel's and
International Zionism's treacherous
history of manipulating America (and
other nations) for their own selfish
purposes. Without a basic
understanding of this history, it
would be impossible to understand
the truth as it is today. So put
aside your preconceived notions,
your psychological defense
mechanisms, and your prejudices, and
step into my time machine for a
journey down the memory hole.
SHOCK. RAGE.
GRIEF. HORRIFIED WITNESS REACT TO
9-11
*
FULL TRANSCRIPT in
PART 2
[SIT COMFORTABLY BECAUSE IT IS A LONG
READ WHICH WILL CHANGE YOUR LIFE- AND FORGET IT -YOU WILL NOT]
*
(http://www.truthcampaign.co.uk)
*
[Font Altered-Bolding &
Underlining Used-Comments in
Brackets]
*
APRIL-2009
|
|
THE GOVERNMENT HAS IT'S
EUROPE MINISTER-WHY HAVEN'T THE EUROSCEPTICS THEIR OWN SUPREMO?
Over the past years we have mentioned this on
countless occasions as it is obvious to anyone that the EUROSCEPTIC
strategy-if they ever had one-HAS FAILED.
All that was needed was a CONFERENCE to form a
CONGRESS of sorts where ALL EUROSCEPTICS across the political
spectrum to co-ordinate to select candidates for the umbrella
organisation under a unifying banner for example
FREEDOM IN EUROPE
or other suitable appendage bearing in mind the
multiplicity of views amongst the EUROSCEPTICS.
But as we have seen over the decades there have
been numerous contenders at the EU ELECTIONS each fighting their own
corner for the plum jobs in the EU PARLIAMENT.
What we have seen is each party pursuing its own
glory instead of fighting with others to FREE EUROPE from TYRANNY.
They have been building up their own EMPIRE by
putting PARTY before COUNTRY.
They should ALL UNITE under ONE BANNER in order
that ALL who wish to see change in the EU (which is impossible
because the fault is in its blueprint) which was planned in
Madrid in 1943 at the
Nazi
International
Geopolitical Centre
which Himmler realised that the
WAR CANNOT
BE WON.
That is why when the Czech President addressed the
EU PARLIAMENT and suggested CHANGE the majority of MEPS left the
HALL. They all know which side their bread was buttered and no way
are they going to relinquish such a wonderful job with such benefits
which has made them all millionaires before they are up for
election again. And they can never lose as the pensions will see
them secure for life.
Anyone who has taken the trouble to research the
evil-satanic monstrosity going by the name of the UNITED STATES OF
EUROPE knows that it is incapable of FUNDAMENTAL CHANGE. It will
however give way temporary on certain matters in order to complete
its plans of a concentration camp EUROPE which will as they had
hoped destroy the INDIVIDUAL FREEDOM and CONSCIENCE so that there is
no dissension or barrier to their final plans of NEW WORLD ORDER
leading to a WORLD GOVERNMENT.
WHY NOT ask your party why they have not decided
to UNITE with OTHERS for the GREATER GOOD and take a leaf out of the
INDEPENDENT LABOUR PARTY in the late 19th century and early 20th
century and the LABOUR MOVEMENT which in order to bring the mass of
workers under ONE BANNER felt the obvious need of a NATIONAL
CONGRESS to achieve their means for CHANGE.
Whether you are LEFT-RIGHT
or CENTRE or any other combination you must yourselves have no
trouble in seeing that only a UNITED MOVEMENT can achieve their
final VICTORY.
.
Might we suggest a slogan
'WE ARE ONE AND WE HAVE THE EU ON THE RUN.'
and
'AT PRESENT IT IS JUST A GAME BUT SOON WE WILL
BREAK THE CHAIN'
BUT WILL THEY DO IT !
www.worldreports.org.uk
*
[Each underlined word has a separate bulletin]
APRIL-2009
|
|
A VIEW FROM AMERICA
No
1
ON
Freedom From Government
President Obama signed an
executive order last week continuing the faith-based initiatives
program created by former President Bush. When the program was
created, I warned that giving taxpayer money to private religious
organizations would eventually lead to political control and
manipulation of them. This week has provided some evidence that
this was a justified concern.
The logic behind funding
faith-based initiatives seemed reasonable to some. Private
organizations are much more effective in charitable endeavors than
government programs and bureaucracies. Therefore, why not
“outsource” some of the government’s welfare-state activities to
these worthy organizations? This appealed to many conservatives,
especially after the follow-up executive order exempting recipients
from discriminatory hiring laws, which assured many that taking
federal funds would not jeopardize their control over their own
operations. But beware the government program started under an
administration you like, for it may look a lot different under the
one you don’t. Exemptions that Bush gave, Obama can take away.
But now, dependencies on
federal money have been set, operations have been expanded
accordingly, and many charities are waiting breathlessly for the
administration to tell them what new conditions they will have to
meet. With the stroke of a pen, religious charities might not be
able to take into consideration a job applicant’s faith, sexual
orientation or lifestyle if they wish to remain eligible for that
taxpayer money that was so enticing a few years ago. Similarly, if
FOCA (Freedom of Choice Act) is passed, will Catholic Church
hospitals be forced to offer abortion services to retain their
federal funding? Can they remain solvent without it?
This is the major problem with
basing a private business model on the receipt of government funds.
This money does not come without control, or the future possibility
of control. We are seeing parallel control grabs in industries that
have recently been the recipients of taxpayer largess. Government
officials are now discussing executive compensation on Wall Street,
banking, and in the auto industry. How much is too much to pay
someone? When is a bonus deserved? But because politicians have
bought their way into these industries, these are now political
decisions. It is easy to utilize class envy to whip up public
support for these interventions, but government always slides down
the slippery slope. Politicians are also discussing other aspects
of these businesses in which they are not expert, such as, what
should lending standards be? What sort of cars should we direct the
auto industry to make? Once government money infiltrates a balance
sheet, “taxpayers” meaning “politicians” have a say in how you
operate.
Money is the Trojan horse that
government uses to infiltrate and infect organizations. Funding
that, on the outset, is designed to strengthen and support, will
bureaucratize and regulate in the end. It is sad to see charities
now having reason to focus on lobbying, regulatory compliance and
paper pushing to get and retain money taken by force, rather than
beefing up private, voluntary fundraising activities.
Those tempted to join
Washington’s ongoing bailout bonanza should instead take the famed
advice of former First Lady Nancy Reagan on the acceptance of
harmful and addictive substances and
“Just Say No” to government money.
This
is the best protection from government control.
*
Posted
by Ron Paul-Republican
Http://house.gov/paul
(02-09-2009, 12:04 PM)
filed under
Civil Liberties
[It all sounds so
familiar here in England at the present time. Everything that is
destructive of society first comes from the LAND OF THE FREE[?]-not
any longer with their own so-called mischievous and freedom
destroying
PATRIOT ACT.]
*
[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining
Used-Comments in Brackets.]
*
APRIL-2009
|
|
A VIEW FROM AMERICA
No2
Texas Straight Talk
A weekly column
End the War on Drugs
[We
have always been of the opinion
that allowing an open market on
drugs would not work but as the
many replies to this article
have stated the matter should be
dealt with as with alcohol.
Further evidence has proved
conclusively that GOVERNMENTS
who themselves deal in drugs
through their security services
who use their profits for their
hidden agenda [www.worldreports.org]
In an open market the value of
the drugs will fall and those
who have used the restrictions
in order to capture the market
at great profit and with
increased power will see their
evil fortunes smashed and their
influence dissipate overnight]
*
We have recently heard many
shocking stories of brutal
killings and ruthless violence
related to drug cartels warring
with Mexican and US officials.
It is approaching the fever
pitch of a full blown crisis.
Unfortunately, the
administration is not likely to
waste this opportunity to
further expand government.
Hopefully, we can take a deep
breath and look at history for
the optimal way to deal with
this dangerous situation, which
is not unprecedented.
Alcohol prohibition in the
1920’s brought similar violence,
gangs, lawlessness, corruption
and brutality. The reason for
the violence was not that making
and selling alcohol was
inherently dangerous. The
violence came about because of
the creation of a brutal black
market which also drove profits
through the roof. These profits
enabled criminals like Al Capone
to become incredibly wealthy,
and militantly defensive of that
wealth. Al Capone saw the
repeal of Prohibition as a great
threat, and indeed smuggling
operations and gangland violence
fell apart after repeal. Today,
picking up a bottle of wine for
dinner is a relatively benign
transaction, and beer trucks
travel openly and peacefully
along their distribution routes.
Similarly today, the best way to
fight violent drug cartels would
be to pull the rug out from
under their profits by bringing
these transactions out into the
sunlight. People who, unwisely,
buy drugs would hardly opt for
the back alley criminal dealer
as a source, if a
coffeehouse-style dispensary was
an option. Moreover, a
law-abiding dispensary is likely
to check ID’s and refuse sale to
minors, as bars and ABC stores
tend to do very diligently.
Think of all the time and
resources law enforcement could
save if they could instead focus
on violent crimes, instead of
this impossible nanny-state
mandate of saving people from
themselves!
If these reasons don’t convince
the drug warriors, I would urge
them to go back to the
Constitution and consider where
there is any authority to
prohibit private personal
choices like this. All of our
freedoms – the freedom of
religion and assembly, the
freedom of speech, the right to
bear arms, the right to be free
from unnecessary government
searches and seizures – stem
from the precept that you own
yourself and are responsible for
your own choices. Prohibition
laws negate self-ownership and
are an absolute affront to the
principles of freedom. I
disagree vehemently with the
recreational use of drugs, but
at the same time, if people are
only free to make good
decisions, they are not truly
free. In any case, states
should decide for themselves how
to handle these issues and the
federal government should
respect their choices.
My great concern is that instead
of dealing deliberatively with
the actual problems, Congress
will be pressed again to act
quickly without much thought or
debate. I can’t think of a
single problem we haven’t made
worse that way. The panic
generated by the looming crisis
in Mexico should not be
redirected into curtailing more
rights, especially our second
amendment rights, as seems to be
in the works. Certainly, more
gun laws in response to this
violence will only serve to
disarm lawful citizens. This is
something to watch out for and
stand up against.
We
have escalated the drug war
enough to see it only escalates
the violence and profits
associated with drugs.
It is time to try freedom
instead.
Posted
by Ron Paul-Republican
Http://house.gov/paul
(02-09-2009, 12:04 PM)
filed under
Civil Liberties
*
[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining
Used-Comments in Brackets.]
*
APRIL-2009
|
|
The
Bilderbergers
A
NEW WORLD ORDER
AND
WORLD GOVERNMENT
In 1954, the most powerful men in the world
met for the first time under the auspices of the Dutch royal
crown and the Rockefeller family in the luxurious Hotel
Bilderberg of the small Dutch town of Oosterbeck. For an
entire weekend they debated the future of the world. When it
was over, they decided to meet once every year to exchange
ideas and analyze international affairs. They named
themselves the Bilderberg Club. Since then, they have
gathered yearly in a luxurious hotel somewhere in the world
arrogantly plotting the subversion and silent takeover of
constitutional governments everywhere. Their goal is a World
Government run exclusively by their hand-picked puppets.
Shrewd
and calculating, their hearts are filled with lust for power
and consumed by greed for money. Rich and aristocratic, they
despise Christians and they loathe the lowly working class.
They control the world's press and virtually all our banks
and financial institutions. They screen and choose who
America's leaders will be and even determine who will run on
the Democratic and Republican Party tickets. It was shortly
after attending the 1991 Bilderberger meeting, Governor Bill
Clinton was selected to be the next President of the United
States. Bill Clinton and White House advisor Vernon Jordan's
relationship goes back to it's Bilderberger connections.

Among the elitist membership or attendees at Bilderberg
meetings is David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, Lloyd
Bentsen, Helmut Kohl, Prince Charles, Prince Juan Carlos,
Katharine Graham, Alice Rivlin, Gerald Ford, Bill Clinton,
Hillary Clinton, Dan Quayle, Donald Rumsfeld, Colin L.
Powell, John Edwards, Bill Bradley, Bill Richardson,
Christopher Dodd, Dianne Feinstein, Kathleen Sebelius
(Kansas governor and Obama pick for HHS secretary),
Alexander Haig, Ralph E. Reed, George Stephanopoulos,
William J McDonough & Timothy F. Geithner (Presidents,
Federal Reserve Bank of New York), George Soros, Paul
Volcker & Alan Greenspan (former Chairman of the Federal
Reserve), H. J. Heinz II (CEO of H. J. Heinz Company), Peter
A. Thiel (Co-Founder, PayPal), Eric E. Schmidt (Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer, Google), Lloyd Blankfein (CEO of
Goldman Sachs), Rupert Murdoch, Donald E. Graham (Chairman
of the Board of The Washington Post Company), William F.
Buckley, Jr. (founder of National Review and former host of
Firing Line), Peter Jennings, George Will, Lesley Stahl,
Bill D. Moyers, and many others. The list includes prominent
persons in politics, the military, financial institutions,
major corporations, academia, and the media.
Leaders of the Bilderberg Club argue that
discretion is necessary to allow participants in the debates
to speak freely without being on the record or reported
publicly. Wikipedia recently deleted the Bilderberg
attendees list, citing it to be possibly defamatory towards
living persons.
Why are the Davos World Economic Forum and G8 meetings
carried in every newspaper, given front page coverage, with
thousands of journalists in attendance, while no one covers
Bilderberg Club meetings even though they are annually
attended by Presidents of the International Monetary Fund,
The World Bank, Federal Reserve, chairmen of 100 most
powerful corporations in the world such as DaimlerChrysler,
Coca Cola, British Petroleum, Chase Manhattan Bank, American
Express, Goldman Sachs, Microsoft, Vice Presidents of the
United States, Directors of the CIA and the FBI, General
Secretaries of NATO, American Senators and members of
Congress, European Prime Ministers and leaders of opposition
parties, top editors and CEOs of the leading newspapers in
the world.
"We
are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times,
Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors
have attended our meetings and respected their promises of
discretion for almost forty years. It would have been
impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we
had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those
years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared
to march towards a world government. The supranational
sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is
surely preferable to the national auto-determination
practiced in past centuries." -- David Rockefeller
Bilderbergers Planned Kosovo War in 1996
Rebuilding America's Defences: Strategies, Forces And
Resources For A New Century
A premeditated attack on Iraq to secure 'regime change' was
planned by George Bush and his cabinet long before
the
events of 9/11 and even before he took power in
January 2001. The blueprint for the creation of a 'global
Pax Americana' was drawn up for Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld,
Paul Wolfowitz, and others in September 2000 by the
neo-conservative think-tank Project for the New American
Century (PNAC).
Links to other sites exposing the New
World Order
Links to the Left promoting the New
World Order
OTHER
MARCH-2009
[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining
Used-Comments in Brackets]
MARCH-2009
|
|
DEMONSTRATING AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT
WATCH OUT-THE RATS ARE OUT TO GET
YOU!
by
Mind Control
The Ultimate Terror
Write Down this Mirror web site
address of educate-yourself.org in Switzerland in case you
cannot access any page at this web site (our thanks to Stephanie
Meier for maintaining this mirror): http://mirrors.wordsforgood.org/educate-yourself.org/
[Editor's Note: May 31, 2006.
Somewhere between May 18 and May 30, 2006, this mind control index
page was surreptitiously erased from my web server and even from my
hard drive. Apparently, someone doesn't want this topic ventilated
before the public. I had to retrive an old copy of this Mind Control
index page from a disc which I had saved in November 2005, therefore
the more recent articles which I had posted on this page up to April
2006 will not appear in this version, but will be restored shortly
after I've had a chance to retrive this page from a mirror site
which was recently established in Europe. Thankfully, the
synchronistic offer to set up the mirror site in early May from a
very thoughtful person in Switzerland, came at just the right time.
I will publish the url of the mirror site as soon as I find the
e-mail sent to me by the person who set up the mirror site. .
For victims of electronic or psychic assault,
Be
sure to see section titled "Countermeasures to
Psychotronic and Demonic Attack.
We give
but two paragraphs of the article here:
The topic of mind control is
elaborate, multifaceted, and multi layered. For the casual
reader, it can quickly become numbing, overwhelming the senses
and creating a desire to exit the topic, but avoiding this
subject is the most foolish thing you could possibly do since
your only chance of surviving this hideous and insidious
enslavement agenda, which today threatens virtually all of
humanity, isto understand how it functions and
take steps to reduce your vulnerability.
The plans to create a mind
controlled workers society have been in place for a long time.
The current technology grew out of experiments that the Nazis
started before World War II and intensified during the time of
the Nazi concentration camps when an unlimited supply of
children and adults were available for experimentation. We've
heard about the inhumane medical experiments performed on
concentration camp prisoners, but no word was ever mentioned by
the media and the TV documentaries of the mind control
experiments. That was not to be divulged to the American public.
Mind control technologies can be broadly divided into two
subsets: trauma-based or
electronic-based.
Don't
complain in the future as you will about losing YOUR FREEDOM-YOUR
CONSTITUTION -YOUR COUNTRY and soon if you are still not AWAKE
YOUR MIND!
Please
Note: Should you at any time be unable to access www.educate-yourself
website articles on our pages then go to:
http://mirrors.wordsforgood.org/educate-yourself.org
.Ken]
By Ken Adachi <Editor@educate-yourself.org>
http://educate-yourself.org/mc/index.shtml
*
*
MARCH-2009
|
|
Neocon & CSIS Agenda for World
Domination!
The CSIS Agenda to Control US Policy and the
World
WRITTEN BY: ANGELA VALKYRIE

[Above: CSIS logo]
SIS Contact Information:
Center for Strategic and International Studies
1800 K Street, NW
Washington, DC 20006
ph: 202-887-0200 | fax: 202-775-3199 | email: webmaster@csis.org
csis.org
For over forty years now, the Center for Strategic and
International Studies (CSIS) has been influencing the US
government and world leaders about foreign policy issues that
not only affect America, but the entire world.
The CSIS is composed of non-elected officials.
The fact that the CSIS is an organization led by un-elected
officials who consult our government on US foreign policy and
thus influence government decision making without our knowledge
is unconstitutional.
The governing system under which we live should be made up
solely of elected officials.
The
CSIS is a privately funded, nonpartisan tax-exempt organization
with its headquartered in Washington, D.C. No one is really sure
who pays these guys’ salaries. Many suspect their salaries
inadvertently come from America’s tax-payers. Because CSIS is so
influential within the confines of the US Department of Defense
it is more than likely that they are a beneficiary of taxpayer
dollars. Although this has yet to be proven, we definitely need
to have someone trace the money.
The US government takes its direction from these CSIS
un-elected individuals. There is little if any mention of these
people in the media.
Since the post WWII era, many organizations just like the
CSIS have been manipulating the US government to their own power
hungry advantage and to their own agenda, without our knowledge.
It is time we recognize who these people are and their strategic
effects on the US government. It is time to put a stop to their
control over America, now! To do this, we need to inform the
American people of each organization one by one, alerting
Americans to the organizations involved in affecting changes in
our country that are illegal and unconstitutional.
Although I will illustrate how other various Neoconservative
groups are working together with the CSIS to affect our US
government, this article will focus first and mostly on the
Center for Strategic and International Studies.
The CSIS is made up of Neoconservatives.
Neoconservatives are
the bad guys.
The CSIS consists mostly of un-elected Neoconservative
individuals who affect
US GOVERNMENT POLICY.
The CSIS Advisory Board is composed of both public- and
private- sector policymakers, including several members of
Congress.
The CSIS Washington Roundtable meets three to four times a year
with members of Congress, executive branch officials, and other
Washington experts to discuss pressing policy issues of the day.
Neoconservative views dominate the media.
CSIS Neoconservatives are mostly former leftists/liberals
who converted to conservatism during the ’70’s and 80’s when
Ronald Reagan became President.
“Neoconservatives are followers of Leo Strauss and are
commonly known as Straussians. Leo Strauss, a Jew from Nazi
German arrived in the US in 1938 and taught at the New School
for Social Research. Later he taught at the University of
Chicago where he managed to gather about a 100 Ph.D. students
who later became disciples of Straussian philosophy and took up
important posts in various institutions.”
– Paul Webster, “What it is and how it came about…”
In domestic policies Neocons tend to be “liberal” while being
extremely militant about foreign affairs. They cross party lines
and tend to be either “Compassionate Conservative” Republican
Christian Conservatives & Jewish Neoconservatives: Two
sides of the same coin.
Regardless of their domestic “liberal” leanings, their major
concern is always foreign policy specifically US relations with
Israel in the Middle East. They strongly favor US military
global interventions which would lead to America becoming the
leader in a “New World Order.”
US Vice-President Dick Cheney, James Woolsey, Henry
Kissinger, James Schlesinger are all current CSIS members.
Mark Neuman, a longtime Jewish Republican activist and White
House official during the Reagan administration, in reference to
his support of George W. Bush, was quoted as saying this about
George W. Bush, “He will surprise people with how diverse his
administration will actually be.”
Diverse meaning the coalition between Jewish Neoconservative
Democrats, Christian Compassionate Conservative Republicans,
Jewish Republicans, Black Republicans and Black
Neoconservatives. All of these movements divide party lines
because they all have the same political agenda, which is, in a
nutshell, US global domination with Israel by its side. These
guys are always blaming the “evil terrorists” for everything
that is wrong in the world and assert America as the
“good-guy-super-power-super-hero” of the world.
Now, that all sounds nice and dandy but it’s just not true.
We’d all love America to be the “good-guy-super-hero” of the
world. But, sadly, it’s not real, it’s not the truth, it’s just
a pretty picture painted with propaganda and lies, framed by
your television set. What is real? What they do not show us on
TV. The blood, the oil, the money, the power, the greed, land
grabbing, hatred and Zionism.
“There are no necessary evils in government.” –
Andrew Jackson ( July
10, 1832)
Neoconservatives
believe that there are necessary evils in the name of “defense”
that need undertaking. These “defense” strategies are almost
always offensive pre-emptive strikes.
“Happily the Government of the United States, which gives to
bigotry no sanction, to persecution no assistance.” -
President George
Washington (1790)
The US Government has
been giving military and monetary aid to Israel in their
persecution of Palestinians and in the occupation of Palestinian
land.
Palestinians have the
right to return to their homeland. Because they are not being
allowed to return to their native land, this angers many Arabs,
many who’ve become “terrorists” in retaliation for Israeli
occupation. These Arab revolutionaries or “terrorists” know that
the United States of America is aiding Israel in the oppression
of their people. This makes them very angry at the United
States. They want the US to mind its own damn business. Under
the US constitution that would be the right thing for us to do.
“Tis our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances, with
any portion of the foreign world.” - President George Washington
(September 17,
1796)
Our alliance with
Israel is immoral, corrupt and unconstitutional.
CSIS Neocons are
notorious for avoiding all explanations for terrorists’ hatred
towards America, because that would bring questions about US
globalization and imperialism. So they “explain” terrorists as
“freedom haters” or “anti-Semitics” (ignoring the obvious fact
that Arabs can’t be anti-Semitic since they are Semitic) who are
insane suicide bombers that enjoy killing people and themselves
just because they oppose freedom and American values. The reason
for terrorist activity is vastly more complicated than this
Neocon explanation. Alternative media sources are trying to get
the real news out but in these paranoid “Patriot Act” times, it
can be very difficult.
“In spite of constant
reassurances about the term ‘democracy’ one is rarely allowed to
criticize the country of Israel without suffering some punishing
consequence for it. If you are a Jew you may survive the
accusations of anti-Semitism but if you consistently express
yourself online in any dissidence about Israel’s current
politick, you will probably not be immune to cyber attack.”
- Mary La Rosa, The Chomskybot Code: Conduct in the Time of
Terror
In the Middle East, CSIS Neocons support the most extremist
elements in Israel such as the Likud Party. The Likud party is
made-up of Jewish Zionists.
“The war in Iraq was
conceived by 25 Neoconservative intellectuals, most of them
Jewish, who are pushing President Bush to change the course of
history.”
[Written in 2004]
NEO-CONSERVATIVES BAD! @
http://www.geocities.com/neoconsbad/
*
PART 2
[Font Altered-Bolding
& Underlining Used-Comments in Brackets
MARCH-2009
|
|
Ten principles of democracy
The Nation, State Sovereignty
and the European Union
by
Anthony Coughlan
[We are pleased to be able to offer to those
who are still undecided about the need for a EUROPEAN UNION the
well known work of Anthony Coughlan whose research is impeccable
and succinct in his work which has and will inform the many who
still are unable to understand the dangers which are resulting
in the destruction of the once FREE NATION STATES in EUROPE and
most of all our own NATION STATE of 1500 years in the making.
Our
BULLETIN FILE and
EU FILE have over 1000 bulletins on
the subject of the EU from independent sources such as Anthony
Coughlan.
We have recently asked the question how can
the FREE PEOPLE throughout the world be sure that the INTERNET
is not taken over by the NEW WORLD ORDER elite who have as their
aim the destruction of FREE NATION STATES to be replaced by an
elitist run WORLD GOVERNMENT and we know already that they go by
the name of the
The Bilderberg Group
who meet in secret every year
since 1952. Details of their membership listed in PART 2 and no
doubt many who's names are yet to surface. We have a prominent
member of that conspiracy visiting our shores at the present
time and as to why the QUEEN would not consider it a break of
decorum and custom with that helpful arm is because they
are all part of the same team which goes by the name of the
Illuminati
At the present time we hear that two of the
INTERNET PROVIDERS have forbidden certain information which hits
close to home while GOOGLE is at present doing its rightful duty
in not censoring CONSPIRACY information which is not to the
taste of those WHO WISH TO ENSLAVE US. How long this will last
will no doubt depend on how close the NEW WORLD ORDER is to
reaching its sinister objective.
Should ALL INTERNET PROVIDERS close ranks in
order to be obedient to the DESTROYERS of FREE INDEPENDENT
NATION STATES and FREE EXPRESSION then PLANS need to be put in
place to PROTECT that FREEDOM which the INTERNET has a DUTY to
FREE PEOPLE everywhere on our shrinking PLANET to HONOUR before
MAMMON. ]
*
Nations and Nation
States make up the international community.
The trends constituting "globalisation,"
or the supranationalism of the European Union, affect
the environment of Nation States, but do not make them
out-of-date. Shared nationhood is the normal basis of
democratic States in the modern world, as is shown by
the advent of many new Nation States since 1989, and the
likely advent of many more in coming decades. These ten
democratic principles are proposed as fruitful ways of
approaching questions of nationhood, State sovereignty
and the European Union.
1.
INTERNATIONALISM, NOT NATIONALISM,
IS THE PRIMARY CATEGORY
We are internationalists on the basis
of our solidarity as members of the human race. As
internationalists we seek the emancipation of mankind.
The human race is divided into nations. Therefore we
stand for the self-determination of nations. The right
of nations to self-determination was the basis of the
American Revolution. It was formally proclaimed in 1789
in the Declaration of the Rights of Man of the French
Revolution.
It is now a
basic principle of international law, enshrined in the
United Nations Charter.
[See our statement above between
President Roosevelt of the USA and Winston Churchill in
the UN in 1941 emphasing the right of SELF
-DETERMINATION of NATION STATES something the NEW WORLD
ORDER lunatics wish to
DESTROY.]
As democrats and internationalists we
assert the right of those nations that wish it to have
their independence, sovereignty and a Nation State of
their own, so that they may relate to one another
internationally on the basis of equal rights with other
nations.
The democratic principle of
internationalism does not mean that we are called upon
to urge people of other nations to assert their right to
self-determination; but that we respect their wishes and
show solidarity with them if they decide to do that. It
is as true of the life of nations as of individuals that
separation, mutual recognition of boundaries, and mutual
respect - i.e. political equality, neither dominance nor
submission - are the pre-requisite of free and friendly
cooperation, of internationalism in other words. Good
fences make good neighbours.
2.
NATIONS AND NATIONALITY COME
BEFORE NATIONALISMS AND NATION STATES
Nations exist as communities before
nationalisms and Nation States. To analyse nations and
the national question in terms of "nationalisms" is
philosophical idealism, looking at the mental reflection
rather than the thing it reflects. Nations evolve
historically as stable, long-lasting communities of
people, sharing a common language and territory and the
common culture and history that arise from that.
On this basis develop the
solidarities, mutual identification and mutual interests
that distinguish a people from its neighbours. Some
nations are ancient, some young, some in process of
being formed. Like all human groups - for example the
family, clan, tribe - they are fuzzy at the edges. No
neat definition will encompass all cases. The empirical
test is to ask people themselves. If they have passed
beyond the stage of kinship society, where the political
unit is the clan or tribe, people will invariably know
what nation they belong to. That is the political and
democratic test too.
If enough people in a nation wish to
establish their own independent State, they should have
it. For democracy can exist normally only at the level
of the national community and the Nation State. The
reason is that it is within the national community alone
that there exists sufficient solidarity, mutual
identification and mutuality of interest among people as
to induce minorities freely to consent to majority rule
and obey a common government based upon that.
Such solidarity is the basis of shared
citizenship. It underpins a people's allegiance to a
government as "their" government, and their willingness
to finance that government's tax and income-transfer
system, thereby tying the richer and poorer regions and
social classes of particular Nation States together.
The solidarities that exist within
nations do not exist between them, although other
solidarities may exist, international solidarity, which
becomes more important with time, as modern
communications, trade, capital movements and common
environmental problems link all nations together in
international inter-dependence as part of today's
"global village."
3.
MANKIND IS STILL AT THE RELATIVELY EARLY STAGE
OF THE FORMATION OF NATION STATES,
AS THE DEMOCRATIC PRINCIPLE OF THE FRENCH REVOLUTION
- THE RIGHT OF NATIONS TO SELF-DETERMINATION -
WORKS ITSELF OUT IN HISTORY
Fewer than a dozen contemporary Nation
States are more than a few centuries old. The number of
States in the United Nations has gone from fewer than 60
in 1946 to nearly 200 today. The number of European
States has gone from 30 to 50 since 1989. This process
is not ended even in Western Europe, where people have
been at the business of Nation State formation for
centuries. It is still ongoing in Eastern Europe. It has
scarcely begun in Africa and Asia, where the bulk of
mankind lives, where most people still form part of
clan-tribal society, and where State boundaries were
drawn by the colonial powers after World War 2, with
little consideration for the wishes of indigenous
peoples.
There are some 6000 distinct languages
in the world. At their present rate of disappearance
there should still be 600 or so left in a century's
time. These will survive because in each case they are
spoken by several million people. There clearly are many
embryonic nations. There are also long-established
nations without Nation States, which have a national
identity but no political independence.
A nation can
keep its identity in servitude as well as freedom. Many
new Nation States, probably a couple of hundred or more,
are likely to come into being during the twenty-first
century. They will thereby acquire those two classical
pillars of independent statehood, the sword and the
currency - the monopoly of legal force over a territory
and the monopoly of the issue of legal tender for that
territory. A world of several hundred Nation States will
also be a world of several hundred currencies.
10.
PEOPLE ON THE POLITICAL RIGHT AND LEFT
HAVE AN OBJECTIVE COMMON INTEREST IN
THE ESTABLISHMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF STATE SOVEREIGNTY
AND
IN UPHOLDING NATIONAL DEMOCRACY
The political Right wish the State to
legislate right-wing measures, the political Left
left-wing ones; but neither can get their wishes unless
they are citizens of an independent State with the
relevant power and competence in the first place.
Likewise within each State different social interests
align themselves for and against the maintenance of
State sovereignty, seeking either to uphold or to
undermine national democracy.
This is the central theme of the
politics of our time. That is why democrats in every
country today, whether on the political Right or Left,
form part of an international movement in defence of the
Nation State and national democracy.
PART 2
[ For Sections 4-9- Don't miss it]
And FULL TRANSCRIPT
by Anthony Coughlan
[Return
to Democrat index]
[To
subscribe to Democrat] (members receive
each issue free through the post)
[Membership
form]
[Order
form for material]
[Details
about our Campaign against Euro-federalism]
[Home
page] [top]
*
[Font Altered-Bolding & Underlining
Used-Comments in Brackets]
MARCH-2009
|
|
|
Urgent: The
Obama New World Order Threat?
"The
Evidence Provided Below on Obama's Frightening
Involvement with the New World Agenda is Under a threat
of Being Taken Offline. You Must Act Now to Receive
it...Fast" |
|

WARNING: This Report is under threat of being
taken offline due to its content. It is important that
you read below to know how to access the rest of the
information before the Report is taken offline.
Click here for a Sneak
Preview
PART 2
|
|
According to Henry Kissinger, the Nobel Peace
Prize winner and former secretary of state under
President Nixon,
"conflicts across the globe and an international
respect for Barack Obama have created the
perfect setting for establishment of “a New
World Order.”
Remark
in a 2008 interview with CNBC’s “Squawk on the
Street” hosts Mark Haines and Erin Burnett at
the New York Stock Exchange |
|
|
Obama New World Order?
Download Antichrist Identity
About Us
Frequently Asked Questions
Terms and Conditions
©2008 Prime Republic Ltd All Rights Reserved
Email:admin@primerepublic.com |
|
|
Hatred and
Discrimination of Christians
AS IN THE USA SO
ALSO IN THE UK
"Then you will be
handed over to be persecuted and put to death, and you will
be hated by all nations because of me. At that time many
will turn away from the faith and will betray and hate each
other, and many false prophets will appear and deceive many
people. Because of the increase of wickedness, the love of
most will grow cold, but he who stands firm to the end will
be saved."
[Matthew 24:9-13]
Reaping What We've Sown
Because we have allowed the censorship
of our public officials, our teachers, our elected
representatives and our judges of expressing their faith in
public, the predictable is happening: a generation of young
people growing up with very little understanding of the
spiritual principles on which our country was founded.
Our culture has taught them that right and wrong are
abribrary - subjective - changing.
Many people today have willfully and
philosophically turned away from the covenantal vision and
biblical principles of our Founders and have been
promoting as 'constitutional' those things which God
condemns (Matt. 24:10). Our society now openly endorses the
killing of babies,
homosexuality as an acceptable life-style, and
encourages the
pagan worship of Mother Earth.
The Scriptures state that "Blessed is
the nation whose God is the Lord." (Psalm 33:12). The nation
who honors the one true Jehovah God will experience His
blessings of protection, provision, peace, and stability.
But, as Pastor Jeremiah Wright said, "America has failed."
This nation has forsaken God and as a result we can see in
our families, our schools, the inner-cities, our government,
our national security, our Constitutional rights, indeed in
all areas of our lives, the removal of Gods blessing.
The demise of morality, the
loss of our freedom, the crime in our streets,
increased drug use, the poverty in the inner-cities, the
war zones in our homes and the
violence of our children is a result of our disobedience
to the Word of God and will not improve until we take
responsibility for our actions. Contrary to liberal
propaganda, we don't have an economic problem, we have a
problem of our spirit. We have willfully and systematically
rejected God and as a result, we are now experiencing the
fruit of that sin.
The Battle for the Hearts and Minds of Christians
Across our country today and indeed
around the world, there is a battle being waged by those who
hate Christ and the truth contained in the Bible (Mat.
24:9). The scheme is a propaganda campaign that
depersonalizes and minimizes Christians. Depersonalization
makes it easier for people to accept negative stereotypes,
pigeonholed, and, in the extreme, tolerate abuse and
persecution of the people who have been depersonalized.
Historical precedent for this can be found in Nero's
treatment of Christians, racism in all forms, and Hitler's
treatment of the Jews.
Secularists appear to have agreed upon three specific
mechanisms to complete the task of immobilizing and
silencing Christians. You can find
evidence of these strategies in your own communities and
schools.
1. Deny
our Judeo-Christian roots and rewrite our historical record.
Children in public schools never hear the expressions of
faith made by the founders of our country. They celebrate
the pilgrim's first Thanksgiving but are not told to whom
those early settlers were thankful. Christ and His church
has been banned and any mention of Christianity is
forbidden.
2.
Convince the American people that Christians are in
violation of the Constitution.
Liberal activists would have us believe our founding fathers
were terrified at the prospect of Christians participating
in the political process. This led them, we're told, to
establish a
wall of separation between church and state. But no such
provision appears in the Constitution or any of the
foundational documents. The principle of separation of
church and state is found only in one of Jefferson's
letters, and referred, not to the exclusion of religious
people from government, but to the protection of religion
from governmental interference.
"[The religious right] are demanding
their rightful seat at the table, and that is what the
American people fear the most." [Rep. Vic Fazio, D-CA,
"God as a Wedge Issue," Norfold Virginian-Pilot, June
24, 1994]
Liberals in Congress formed a so-called
"Radical Right Task Force" in 1994, paid for with American
tax dollars. This "Task Force" meets in the U.S. Capitol to
plan how to intimidate Christians from going to the polls
and to deny churches tax-exempt status if they distribute
Christian voter education literature. They have focused on
"non-profit groups vs. Advocacy groups" and "when do
non-profits cross the line and become advocacy groups?" The
law provides tax exemptions for non-profit groups but not
for advocacy groups.
"People of traditional faith have
become effective, and this makes the left quake." [Sen.
Dan Coats]
3.
Embarrass, insult, shout down and mischaracterize
Christians, hoping to intimidate them into silence.

Those who reject Jesus will also shun
Christians, for faithful believers carry the presence of the
Holy Spirit who brings conviction of sin as well as God's
love. Any mention of sin grates against today's relativistic
values and the kind of "freedom" where anything goes. That's
why Christians, who are "the aroma of Christ" to believers,
are also "the smell of death to those who are perishing."
They hate the true Jesus.
George Gardner of College Hill United
Methodist Church in Wichita, Kansas said, "The evangelical
Christian right does not represent the religion of America.
We have to deal with the Christian evangelical religious
right that would take the love of God and turn it into the
wrath of God ... that would take the equality of men, women
and children and would turn it into a male-dominated
hierarchy that would subjugate women and intimidate
children." [The Wichita Eagle, January 22, 1994]
Leading political and cultural groups
have mounted a campaign to misrepresent and discredit the
religious right in hopes of undermining the growing
political influence of religious conservatives. President
Bill Clinton called religious conservatives
"obstructionist right-wing fanatics"
who embrace a message of
"hate and fear."
Hillary Clinton claimed that those who were
bringing charges against her husband for his extra-marital
sexual adventures are part of a
"Vast Right-Wing Conspiracy"
or simply are
prejudiced against anyone from
Arkansas. Texas
governor Ann Richards labeled them
"mongers of hate" who
"preach their anger" and
"have turned the party of Lincoln into the party of
Operation Rescue." Also, Congressman, Vic Fazio, chairman of
the Democratic Congresional Campaign Committee, said the
"intolerant,"
religious right wants
"to carry views that are distinctly
religious over into government and try to impose them as
law" using "stealth candidates" and
"subterranean tactics" to advance its ruthless agenda. U.S.
Surgeon General Joycelyn Elders spoke of the
"unchristian religious right"
as "those people who are
selling our children out in the name of religion."
Writing on the op-ed page of the New York
Times, Robert H. Meneilly writes,
"The religious right confronts
us with a threat far greater then the old threat of
Communism."
The Christian Right has oftentimes been compared with Nazism
and they point out that Nazi's were Christian. But, were
they?
Martin Borman was a very high Nazi official in Hitler's
government and he wrote,
"National
Socialism and Christian concepts are irreconcilable. The
Christian churches build upon man's ignorance and are
endeavoring to keep the greatest number of people in a
state of ignorance....Our National Socialist concept of
the world is on a far higher plane than are the ideas of
Christianity, whose essential points have been taken
from the Jews. For that reason too, we have no need of
Christianity....." (The NAZI YEARS, Joachim Remak, pp.
103-104, Prentice-Hall, 1969)
Ludwig Von Mises described socialism
under the Nazi's [increasingly similar in America].
"There are,
however, no longer entrepreneurs but only shop managers
(Betriebsfuhrer). These shop managers do the buying and
selling, pay the workers, contract debts, and pay
interest and amortization. There is no labor market;
wages and salaries are fixed by the government [Labor
unions, minimum wage]. The government tells the shop
managers what and how to produce [FDA, OSHA], at
what prices and from whom to buy, at what prices and to
whom to sell. The government decrees to whom and under
what terms the capitalists must entrust their funds and
where and at what wages laborers must work. Market
exchange is only a sham. All the prices, wages, and
interest rates are fixed by the central authority
[Federal Reserve]. They are prices, wages, and
interest rates in appearance only; in reality they are
merely determinations of quantity relations in the
government's orders. The government, not the consumers,
directs production. This is socialism in the outward
guise of capitalism. Some labels of capitalistic market
economy are retained but they mean something entirely
different from what they mean in a genuine market
economy." (Omnipotent Government,
Ludwig Von Mises, p. 56)
[emphasis added
by author]
Any Christian who has stood his ground
on Biblical faith has grown uncomfortably accustomed to
being called all sorts of names:
 |
Judgmental
or Biggot: People say, "You criticize our way
- you don't think we're good enough for God!"
(Romans 3:23-24) |
 |
Arrogant:
"You think you're better than us - that you have
found the only way to eternal life!" (John 14:6)
|
 |
Narrow-minded:
"You think you have the only handle on truth. If you
practiced the love you preach, you would see all
people as worthy of salvation" (1 Timothy 4:1)
|
 |
Ignorant:
"You don't know there are other paths to
enlightenment" (2 Timothy 4:3-4) |
 |
Old-Fashioned:
"You cling to obsolete myths" (Hebrews 13:8)
|
The names "radical right," "far right,"
"extreme right"and "Christian right" are also
part of the effort to marginalize and demoralize those with
traditional views. When was the last time you heard
homosexual activists or abortionists referred to as the
"Radical Left?
The Media Assault on Christianity
When Reggie White, an ordained minister
and All-Pro defensive end for the Green Bay Packers, stated
in a speech his Christian beliefs regarding homosexuality,
CBS almost immediately cancelled his pending sportscasting
contract. During his speech, White declared that he is
"offended" by the comparison of struggles of homosexual
groups to those of blacks. "Homosexuality is a decision.
It's not a race," he said. At about the same time, CBS
announced plans to air the Howard Stern Show, featuring
raunchy language, nudity and graphic sexual content. Nike
agreed to retain Reggie as a spokesman, but Nike Chairman
Phil Knight denounced Reggie as "crazy." Campbell Soup
Company declines to renew Reggie's endorsement contract,
saying that his "comments are not consistent with the
principles of the Campbell Soup Company."
Supported by the Justice Department, the news media
characterizes Christians who choose to believe in the Bible
as cultists. Numerous examples of this bigotry is evidenced
by the endless reports of people who believe the "end of the
age" is near is responsible for all sorts of terrorists
acts. Some of the more apparent examples includes the
burning of the Davidian compound in Waco Texas and the
murder of the family at Ruby Ridge.
Following the tragedy in Oklahoma City,
Americans watched in disbelief as liberal pundits attempted
to portray the maniac bombers with conservative and
religious Americans - especially those who fight for the
unborn child.
Writing in The Washington Post, Michael Lind made
that connection between the bombers and pro-lifers. He
wrote,
"The story of Oklahoma City and the
militias should not make us forget that the main form of
political terrorism in the United States is perpetuated
by right wing opponents of abortion."
Washington Post
columnist Carl Rowan wrote one of the most unbelievable
columns stating:
"I am absolutely certain the harsh
rhetoric of the Gingriches and Doles … creates a climate
of violence in America."
Bruce Morton of CNN attempted to link the
bombers with religious Americans:
"What do you suppose the odds are
that when they finally know who did it, they will say,
"Well, I was following God's will?"
Eleanor Clift, the loud voice of the left
on PBS's The McGlaughlin Report, predicted the bombers were
from...
"a loose cabal of gun extremists,
religious extremists."
In the wake of the murder of Nicole
Simpson, Wall Street Journal columnist Al Hunt attributed
part of the blame for domestic violence against women on Pat
Robertson's teaching on the headship of the husband over the
wife.
A government report blamed Christianity for causing teenage
suicides. Published in 1989 by the U.S. Department of Health
and Human Services, it accused Catholics, Baptists, and
other Christian groups of depicting homosexuality as morally
wrong, thus creating "unresolvable internal conflicts for
youth who adhere to their faith but believe they will not
change their sexual orientation." The recommendation:
churches must change their beliefs.
"Religion needs to reassess
homosexuality in a positive context..."
["Government Tells Churches What to
Teach," AFA Journal (October 1989).]
In 1989, the U.S. government released a
report by a committee of the National Research Council which
called the Christian perspective of homosexuality a
"deep-rooted social pathology" and further blamed Christians
for "stigmatizing" homosexuals and thus contributing to the
spread of AIDS.
Dan Rather, CBS News anchor, blamed Christians for attacks
on homosexuals in an April 11 editorial for the magazine
Nation. He wrote,
"Gays and lesbians are beaten to
death in the streets with increasing frequency - in part
due to irrational fear of AIDS but also because
hatemongers, from comedians to the worst of the
Christian Right, sent the message that homosexuals have
no value in our society."
You can't overlook the
massive public and media response generated following Rev.
Jeremiah Wright’s reference concerning the scientific and
political imposition of HIV/AIDS as a genocidal plague
created by the Anglo-American ruling elite. Scientific
support for Rev. Wright's concerns was published in 1998 by
Dr. Leonard Horowitz, a Harvard degree expert in public
health who spent three years investigating links between the
first cases of AIDS and the first hepatitis B vaccines given
to gay men in New York and central Africans between 1972 and
1974.
Indeed, name calling has become the
defacto standard for liberals when describing their
opponents. But, their derogatory terms, "biggot," "racist,"
"sexist," and "homophobic" must be loosing their
effectiveness because recently they have begun a new
campaign: calling their opponents "crazy."
Washington Post columnist Richard Cohen says that Charlton
Heston is nuts because his views on the culture war
contradict today's notion of political correctness.
Jesse Jackson says that Mayor Rudy Giuliani "sounds like a
mentally disturbed person" because the Mayor had defended
police action in New York City respecting the shooting of
unarmed suspects.
Mind you, these people are not saying
that their opponents' ideas are crazy. That is perfectly
legitimate. They are rather labeling the proponents of ideas
they oppose as crazy. Their intent of course is to convince
the American public that since these people are crazy, as
opposed to the idea being crazy, then they do not deserve to
be listened to at all. [Paul Weyrich, "Liberals resort to
calling names," Christian Crusade, June 2000]
The defenders of all that is fine and
decent indict Bible-believing activists as "hate mongers,"
"fire-breathing radicals," "unchristian," "merchants of
hate" who would establish "a Christian version of the
Ayatollah Khomeini's Iran" and "fanatics" with a message of
"hate and fear." By stigmatizing the values movement, the
Left hopes to avoid the issues in debate. Its subliminal
message is: "Don't listen to what these extremists are
saying. Don't take them seriously." They're militants
and bigots - and that's all you need to know about them."
[Don Feder, "The Religious Right? That's You," Christian
American, September 1994.]
The frustrating
thing is that those who are attacking religion claim
they are doing it in the name of tolerance, freedom, and
open-mindedness. Question: Isn't the real truth that
they are intolerant of religion? They refuse to tolerate
its importance in our lives. -
Ronald Reagan
*
MARCH-20009
|
|
PROTECTION OF WHITE ENGLISH
RACE
Over the last decade we have been seen a
proliferation of people's in our country from around the world who
now form themselves into associations in order to fight for what
they term
THEIR
RIGHTS.
These bodies must run into thousands and growing
by the day. But we have to ask ourselves if we are white whether we
too should have our associations to protect our interests in a
country who's GOVERNMENT appears to have forgotten that the majority
of citizens in
ENGLAND are WHITE.
Those that call for diversity cannot complain if
the white English who are discriminated against but have no rallying
League to fight their corner should decide to take a leaf out of the
numerous other races in our small island and fight our corner as the
others have done with Government Assistance.
As we ourselves said many years ago we look on
anyone who joins us in our island home and observes our customs and
culture and loyalty to England is English by their own actions. But
over the last decade particularly the White English are considered
the least and have been castigated and ridiculed and made them feel
that they were no longer living in their own country.
Even a decade ago we would not have believed in
putting up this agenda which is the direct result of what we now
find around us where every interest is taken care of by the NEW
LABOUR GOVERNMENT except that of the majority of WHITE indigenous
people who are made to feel unwelcome in
THEIR OWN COUNTRY
It is said
the 'fault is in our stars' whereas in reality it is because the
white indigenous population has itself been tolerant of the
'Gathering Storm' of FOREIGN origin which knows how to fight its
corner whereas the white English have not realised that they also have
RIGHTS.
We hope
our article will result in a serious DEBATE which will reveal the
true ENEMY WITHIN and what we must do to reclaim OUR COUNTRY.
There
needs to be a concerted fight back by the white English because they
are looked on as fair game in the liberty stakes.
*
Of course
we will hear the usual exaggerated claims that the white English are
racist. If that was the case many of those freely critising would not be
here. Our history disputes this accusation.
[Possibly someone could produce the
listing of all political and other needs by those who fight for
their so-called RIGHTS under their own racial banner?]
*
MARCH-2009
|
|
A CONSPIRACY
YOU WILL WANT TO
IGNORE!
-OR WILL
YOU?
*
The New
World Order
(NWO)
An Overview
By Ken Adachi Editor@educate-yourself.org
http://educate-yourself.org/nwo/
Translated versions:
Introduction
There is a
worldwide conspiracy being orchestrated by an
extremely powerful and influential group of
genetically-related individuals (at least at the
highest echelons) which include many of the world's
wealthiest people, top political leaders, and corporate
elite, as well as members of the so-called Black
Nobility of Europe
(dominated by the British
Crown)
whose goal is to create a One World
(fascist) Government, stripped of nationalistic
and regional boundaries, that is obedient to their
agenda. Their intention is to effect complete and
total control over every human being on the planet
and
to dramatically reduce the world's population by 5.5
Billion people. While the name New World Order
is a term frequently used today when referring to this
group, it's more useful to identify the principal
organizations, institutions, and individuals who make up
this vast interlocking spiderweb of elite conspirators.
The
Illuminati is the oldest term commonly used
to refer to the 13 bloodline families (and
their offshoots) that make up a major portion of this
controlling elite. Most members of the Illuminati are
also members in the highest ranks of numerous secretive
and occult societies which in many cases extend straight
back into the ancient world. The upper levels of the
tightly compartmentalized (need-to-know-basis)
Illuminati structural pyramid include planning
committees and organizations that the public has little
or no knowledge of. The upper levels of the Illuminati
pyramid include secretive committees with names such as:
the Council of 3, the Council of 5, the
Council of 7, the Council of 9, the
Council of 13, the Council of 33, the
Grand Druid Council, the Committee of 300
(also called the "Olympians") and the Committee of
500 among others.
In 1992,
Dr John Coleman published Conspirators'
Hierarchy:
The Story of the Committee of 300. With
laudable scholarship and meticulous research,
Dr Coleman
identifies the players and carefully details the Illuminati agenda of worldwide domination and control.
On page 161 of the Conspirators Hierarchy, Dr
Coleman accurately
summarizes the intent and purpose of the Committee of
300 as follows:
"A One World Government and one-unit monetary
system, under permanent non-elected hereditary
oligarchists who self-select from among their numbers in
the form of a feudal system as it was in the Middle
Ages. In this One World entity, population will be
limited by restrictions on the number of children per
family, diseases, wars, famines, until 1 billion people
who are useful to the ruling class, in areas which will
be strictly and clearly defined, remain as the total
world population.
There will be no middle class, only rulers and
the servants. All laws will be uniform under a legal
system of world courts practicing the same unified code
of laws, backed up by a One World Government police
force and a One World unified military to enforce laws
in all former countries where no national boundaries
shall exist. The system will be on the basis of a
welfare state; those who are obedient and subservient to
the One World Government will be rewarded with the means
to live; those who are rebellious will simple be starved
to death or be declared outlaws, thus a target for
anyone who wishes to kill them. Privately owned firearms
or weapons of any kind will be prohibited."
The sheer magnitude and complex web of deceit
surrounding the individuals and organizations involved
in this conspiracy is mind boggling, even for the most
astute among us. Most people react with disbelief and
skepticism towards the topic, unaware that they have
been conditioned (brainwashed) to react with
skepticism by institutional and media influences that
were created by the Mother of All mind control
organizations:
The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations in
London. Author and de-programmer
Fritz Springmeier (The Top 13 Illuminati
Bloodlines ) says that most people have built in
"slides" that short circuit the mind's critical
examination process when it comes to certain sensitive
topics. "Slides", Springmeier reports, is a CIA term for
a conditioned type of response which
dead ends a person's thinking and terminates debate or
examination of the topic at hand. For example, the
mention of the word "conspiracy" often solicits a slide
response with many people. (Springmeier has co-authored
three books on trauma-based programming which detail how
the Illuminati employs highly tuned and extrememly
sophisticated
Mind Control (MC) training programs that begin the
programming process while the intended victim is still
within the womb.
Mind Control is a much greater
problem than most people realize. According to
Cisco Wheeler,
a former Illuminati mind control
programmer, there are 10 million people
who have been programmed as mind controlled slaves using
trauma-based MC programs with names
like Monarch and MK Ultra.
The newer, non-trauma, electronic means of MC
programming that grew out of the Montauk Project,
may include millions more.
Al Bielek,
who played a principle role in the development of the
Montauk Project, said that there likely 10 million
victims of Montauk style mind control programming
worldwide, the majority located in the USA. He also said
that there are covert Montauk Programming 'Centers' in
every major city in the U.S. )
What most Americans believe to be "Public Opinion" is
in reality carefully crafted and scripted propaganda
designed to elicit a desired behavioral response
from the public. Public opinion polls are
really taken with the intent of gauging the public's
acceptance of the Illuminati's planned programs.
A strong showing in the polls tells the Illuminati that
the programing is "taking", while a poor showing tells
the NWO manipulators that they have to recast or "tweak"
the programming until the desired response is achieved.
While the thrust and content of the propaganda is
decided at Tavistock, implementation of the propaganda
is executed in the United States by well over 200
'think tanks' such as the Rand Corporation and
the Brookings Institute which are overseen and
directed by the top NWO mind control organization in
the United States, the Stanford Research
Institute (SRI) in Menlo Park, California.
The NWO global conspirators manifest their agenda
through the skillful
manipulation of human emotions, especially
fear. In the past centuries, they have
repeatedly utilized a contrivance that NWO researcher
and author
David Icke
has characterized in his latest book,
The Biggest Secret, as
Problem,
Reaction, and Solution.
The technique is as follows: Illuminati strategists
create the Problem- by funding , assembling, and
training an "opposition" group to stimulate turmoil in
an established political power (sovereign country,
region, continent, etc.) that they wish to impinge upon
and thus create opposing factions in a conflict that
the Illuminati themselves maneuvered into existence.
In recent decades, so called "opposition" groups are
usually identified in the media as 'freedom fighters' or
'liberators' (recently the KLA-Kosovo
Liberation Army).
At the same time, the leader of the established
political power where the conflict is being orchestrated
is demonized and, on cue, referred to as 'another
Hitler' (take your pick: Saddam Hussein, Milosevic,
Kadaffi, etc.). The 'freedom fighters' are not
infrequently assembled from a local criminal element
(i.e. KLA, drug traffickers). In the spirit of true
Machiavellian deceit, the same NWO strategists are
equally involved in covertly arming and
advising the leader of the established power as well
(the Illuminati always profits from any armed conflict
by loaning money, arming, and supplying all
parties involved in a war).
The conflict is drawn to the world stage by the
controlled media outlets with a barrage of photos and
video tape reports of horrific and bloody atrocities
suffered by innocent civilians. The cry goes up
"Something has to be done!" And That is the
desired Reaction
(note: the same
technique is presently being used to bring about
gun control
in the United States).
The NWO puppeteers then provide the Solution
by sending in UN 'Peace Keepers' (Bosnia) or a UN
'Coalition Force' (Gulf War) or NATO Bombers and then
ground troops (Kosovo).
Once installed, the 'peace
keepers'
never leave
(Bosnia, Kosovo). The idea is to have NWO controlled ground troops in all major countries or
strategic areas where significant resistance to the New
World Order takeover is likely to be encountered.
[Senator Ron
Paul Republican has identified over 700 locations world
-wide which have American troops stationed over 50,000
in Germany in March,2009-makes one think!]
East Timor, Indosnesia.
(9/14/99) Virtually , the same strategy used to
occupy Kosovo with UN/NATO troops was applied by the NWO
manipulators to take military control of East Timor.
Once again, the same morality play is trotted out for
public consumption: the local evil and demonic
Indonesian Army trained militias responsible for
the slaughter of innocent civilians following the August
30 vote for Independence (from Indonesian control),
must be stopped at all costs. This time,
Australia (to keep up the appearance of an
'international' humanitarian effort) will lead the charge
with 'peacekeeping' troops. Of course, it didn't take
long for Madeline Albright to announce that US 'support
assets' will be part of the "UN Peacekeeping Team". In
a front page story in the LA Times (9/13/99), Mike
Jendrzejczyk of Human Rights Watch (an
Illuminati front group) in Washington DC said
that it's "crucial" that "peacekeepers have the
authority to disarm militia forces and any Indonesian
soldiers actively working with them". ]
The local, sovereign military force is either
defeated (i.e. Yugoslavia) or, as in the case of
the United States itself, replaced by
foreign UN "Partnership For Peace" (PFP) troops
who take over the jobs of US soldiers who have
been sent overseas on 'peacekeeping' missions. In
addition to being killed in ground conflicts on foreign
soil, US military forces will likely be reduced in the
next few years through disease induced attrition
(i.e. from mandatory Anthrax Vaccinations
required of all US military personnel). These
vaccinations will, in all probability, eventually
produce the symptoms of the so-called Gulf War
Illness, which was acquired by a certain percentage
of Gulf War soldiers who were given a "special" anthrax
vaccine (intended by the Illuminati/CIA as a test run
to ascertain how quickly (and fatally) the disease would
progress with a substantial population of healthy young
men and women).
The corporate portion of the NWO pyramid seems to be
dominated by
international bankers and the big
pharmaceutical cartels, as well as other major
multinational corporations. The Royal Family of
England, namely Queen Elizabeth II and the
House of Windsor, (who are, in
fact, descendants of the German arm of
European Royalty -the Saxe-Coburg-Gotha
family-changed the name to Windsor in 1914 ), are high
level players, along with the
British oligarchy
which controls the upper strata of
the Illuminati. The decision making Illuminati nerve
centers of this effort are in the London
(especially the City of London), Basel
Switzerland, and Brussels (NATO headquarters).
The United Nations, along with all the
agencies working under the UN umbrella, such as the
World Health Organization (WHO), are full time
players in this scheme. Similarly, NATO is a
military tool of the NWO.
The leaders of all major industrial
countries like the United States, England,
Germany, Italy, Australia, New
Zealand, etc. (E.g. members of the "G7/G8" ) are
active and fully cooperative participants in this
conspiracy.
In this century, the degree of
control exerted by the Illuminati has advanced to the
point that only certain hand-picked individuals,
who are groomed and selected by the Illuminati
are even eligible to become the prime minister or
president of countries like England, Germany, or The
United States. It didn't matter whether Bill Clinton or
Bob Dole won the Presidency in 1996, the results would
have been the same (except maybe for Zipper Gate ). Both
men are playing on the same team for the same ball club.
Anyone who isn't a team player is taken out: i.e.President Kennedy, Ali Bhutto (Pakistan)
and Aldo Moro (Italy). More recently,
Admiral Borda and William Colby were also killed
because they were either unwilling to go along with the
conspiracy to destroy America, weren't cooperating in
some capacity, or were attempting to expose/ thwart the
Takeover agenda.
Most of the major wars, political upheavals,
and economic depression/recessions of the past
100 years (and earlier) were carefully
planned and instigated by the machinations of these
elites. They include The Spanish-American War
(1898), World War I and World War II;
The Great Depression; the Bolshevik Revolution of
1917; the Rise of Nazi Germany; the Korean
War; the Vietnam War; the 1989-91"fall"
of Soviet Communism, the 1991 Gulf War;
and the recent War in Kosovo. Even the
French Revolution was an orchestrated into
existence by the Barvaian Illuminati and the House of
Rothchild.
FEMA
In America, the
Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA)
was created in 1979 under Presidential Memorandum 32
authored for President Carter by Prof. Samuel P.
Huntington, a Harvard professor and former FEMA
Advisory Board chairman. Huntington wrote the
Seminal Peace for the Trilateral Commission in
the mid 70's, in which he criticized democracy and
economic development as outdated ideas. As co-author of
the book, Crisis in Democracy, Huntington
wrote:
"We have come to recognize that there are
potential desirable limits to economic growth. There
are also potentially desirable limits to the
indefinite extension of political democracy. A
government which lacks authority will have little
ability short of cataclysmic crisis to impose on its
people the sacrifices which may be necessary."
Huntington's ideas were rewritten into National
Security Decision Directive #47 (NSDD47), which was
enacted in July 1982 by President Reagan. Treated as a
passing footnote by the media, this law identified
legitimate areas to be upgraded to maintain national
defense, but it also laid the groundwork for
Emergency Mobilization Preparedness, a plan under
which existing socio/economic regulations or other legal
constraints would be waived in the event of a
national emergency. This plan was further
strengthened in Public Law 101-647, signed by
President Bush in November 1990.What it boils down to is
this: in the event that the President declares a
national emergency, for any reason (from
major earthquakes to increased international tensions or
economic /financial crisis of any stripe), FEMA can
then, at their discretion, implement Executive
Orders 10995 through 11005.
These Executive Orders
permit a takeover by FEMA of local, state, and national
governments and the suspension of constitutional
guarantees. FEMA will have the authority to
exert any sort of control that it deems necessary upon
the American public. A trained National
Police Force, formally referred to by the name of
Multi Jurisdictional Task Force (MJTF), wearing
black uniforms and composed of:
1. specially selected US military personnel
2. foreign military units carrying United Nations ID
cards, and
3. specially trained existing police groups from
larger metropolitan American cities.
These members of the MJTF will implement and enforce
martial law under the direction and controlof FEMA.
The President and Congress are out of the loop.
FEMA is the Trojan Horse by
which the New World Order will implement overt,
police-state control over the American populace.
War on Drugs
The "War on Drugs" is a cruel
joke. The US government,
specifically the CIA, is the biggest 'drug lord' on
the planet. Drug money is used to pay for innumerable
'black projects', including the
construction of huge underground cities housing both
humans and aliens working with the secret US government.
The instigation of a trumped-up war as a cover for
amassing fortunes can be dated back to at least the
12th Century when only a core group of nine
members of an Illuminati group called the Knights
Templar, the military arm of an Illuminati secret
society known as the Priory of Sion, kicked off
the The Crusades that lasted for over a century
and a half. A rift later developed between the Templars
and the Priory of Sion when Jerusalem was lost to
Saracen Turks in 1187. In 1307, the king of France,
Philippe the Fair (a Merovingian Illuminati),
coveted the wealth and was jealous of the Templars'
power. The French king, being a puppet of the Priory of
Sion, set out to arrest all the Templars in France on
October 13. While many Templars were seized and
tortured, including their Grand Master, Jacques de Molay,
many other Templars (who had been tipped off) escaped.
They eventually resurfaced in Portugal, in Malta (as the Knights of Malta) and later in Scotland as The
Scottish Rites of Free Masonry.
The acquisition and consolidation of ever greater
wealth, natural resources, total political
power, and control over others are the
motivating forces which drives the decisions of the
Illuminati. The toll in human suffering and the loss
of innocent lives are non issues for these individuals,
who are aligned with very dark and malevolent 4th
dimensional aliens. The dominant group of 4th
dimentional malevolent aliens controlling and
manipulating the human Iluminati are known as
Draconians or Drakos Reptilians. Not all
alien reptilians are of a negative spiritual
orientation.
Mind Control
Recent revelations from deprogrammed Illuminati
(government) mind controlled individuals such as
Arizona Wilder (The
Biggest
Secret),
Cisco Wheeler (
The Illuminati Formula to Create an Undetectable
Total Mind Control Slave), Cathy O'Brien
(Trance
Formation of America), and Brice Taylor (Thanks
for the Memories) leave NO DOUBT that the upper
levels of the Illuminati engage in Satanic rituals
which usually include the killing of young children,
the drinking of human blood and the consuming of flesh
and human organs.
The details of the Illuminati conspiracy are
brilliantly laid out in the books of David Icke (Tales
from the Time Loop,
Children of the
Matrix,
Alice in Wonderland and the World Trace Center Disaster,
The Biggest Secret,
The Truth Shall
Set You Free, and
I am Me, I am Free;
and in three books by Dr. John Coleman (Conspirators'
Hierarchy: The Story of The Committee of 300; One
World Order: Socialist Dictatorship; and
Diplomacy by Deception
To be Continued & Expanded...
This Page Last Updated: September 02, 2008
*
At the forthcoming elections if you vote for either
Gordon Brown or David Cameron remember they are both
members of the
BILDERBERGERS
the front for the
NEW WORLD
ORDER
planned and instigated by the machinations of these
elites
*
worldwide conspiracy
*
'Can you imagine an all powerful group that knows no
national boundaries, that has set itself above the laws
of all countries, one that controls every aspect of
politics, religion, commerce and industry, banking,
insurance, mining, the drug trade, the petroleum
industry, a group answerable to no one but its members?'
Dr John Coleman
*
The
Supreme World Council.
This
council is already set up as a prototype of the one
that will rule when the NWO comes into being. It
meets on a regular basis to discuss finances,
direction, policy, etc. and to problem-solve
difficulties that come up. Once again, these leaders
are heads in the financial world, OLD banking money.
The Rothschild family in England, and in France,
have ruling seats. A descendant of the Hapsburg
dynasty has a generational seat. A descendant of the
ruling families of England and France have a
generational s
| |
August 1st, 2009 at 5:38 am
All you need to do is read the interview Bin Laden gave to UMMAT on Sept 28, 2001:
UMMAT: You have been accused of involvement in the attacks in New York and Washington. What do you want to say about this? If you are not involved, who might be?
USAMA BIN LADEN: In the name of Allah (God), the most beneficent, the most merciful. Praise be to Allah, Who is the creator of the whole universe and Who made the Earth as an abode for peace, for the whole humankind. Allah is the Sustainer, who sent Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) for our guidance. I am thankful to the Ummat Group of Publications, which gave me the opportunity to convey my viewpoint to the people, particularly the valiant and momin (true Muslim) people of Pakistan who refused to believe the lies of the demon (Pakistani military dictator General Pervez Musharraf).
I have already said that I am not involved in the 11 September attacks in the United States. As a Muslim, I try my best to avoid telling a lie. I had no knowledge of these attacks, nor do I consider the killing of innocent women, children and other humans as an appreciable act. Islam strictly forbids causing harm to innocent women, children and other people. Such a practice is forbidden even in the course of a battle. It is the United States, which is perpetrating every maltreatment on women, children and common people of other faiths, particularly the followers of Islam. All that is going on in Palestine for the last 11 months is sufficient to call the wrath of God upon the United States and Israel. There is also a warning for those Muslim countries, which witnessed all these as a silent spectator. What had earlier been done to the innocent people of Iraq, Chechnya and Bosnia? Only one conclusion could be derived from the indifference of the United States and the West to these acts of terror and the patronage of the tyrants by these powers that America is an anti-Islamic power and it is patronizing the anti-Islamic forces. Its friendship with the Muslim countries is just a show, rather deceit. By enticing or intimidating these countries, the United States is forcing them to play a role of its choice. Put a glance all around and you will see that the slaves of the United States are either rulers or enemies of Muslims.
The U.S. has no friends, nor does it want to keep any because the prerequisite of friendship is to come to the level of the friend or consider him at par with you. America does not want to see anyone equal to it. It expects slavery from others. Therefore, other countries are either its slaves or subordinates. However, our case is different. We have pledged slavery to God Almighty alone and after this pledge there is no possibility to become the slave of someone else. If we do that it will be disregardful to both our Sustainer and his fellow beings. Most of the world nations upholding their freedom are the religious ones, which are the enemies of the United States, or the U.S. itself considers them as its enemies.
The countries which do not agree to become the U.S. slaves are China, Iran, Libya, Cuba, Syria [Afghanistan, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Iraq, Sudan, Indonesia, Malaysia] and Russia. Whoever committed the act of 11 September are not the friends of the American people. I have already said that we are against the American system, not against its people, whereas in these attacks, the common American people have been killed. According to my information, the death toll is much higher than what the U.S. Government has stated. But the Bush Administration does not want the panic to spread. The United States should try to trace the perpetrators of these attacks within itself; the people who are a part of the U.S. system, but are dissenting against it. Or those who are working for some other system; persons who want to make the present century as a century of conflict between Islam and Christianity so that their own civilization, nation, country, or ideology could survive. They can be anyone, from Russia to Israel and from India to Serbia. In the U.S. itself, there are dozens of well-organized and well-equipped groups, which are capable of causing a large-scale destruction. Then you cannot forget the American-Jews, who are annoyed with President Bush ever since the elections in Florida and want to avenge him.
Then there are intelligence agencies in the U.S., which require billions of dollars worth of funds from the Congress and the government every year. This [funding issue] was not a big problem till the existence of the former Soviet Union but after that the budget of these agencies has been in danger. They needed an enemy. So, they first started propaganda against Usama and Taleban and then this incident happened. You see, the Bush Administration approved a budget of 40 billion dollars. Where will this huge amount go? It will be provided to the same agencies, which need huge funds and want to exert their importance. Now they will spend the money for their expansion and for increasing their importance. I will give you an example. Drug smugglers from all over the world are in contact with the U.S. secret agencies. These agencies do not want to eradicate narcotics cultivation and trafficking because their importance will be diminished. The people in the U.S. Drug Enforcement Department are encouraging drug trade so that they could show performance and get millions of dollars worth of budget. General Noriega was made a drug baron by the CIA and, in need, he was made a scapegoat. In the same way, whether it is President Bush or any other U.S. President, they cannot bring Israel to justice for its human rights abuses or to hold it accountable for such crimes. What is this? Is it not that there exists a government within the government in the United Sates? That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks.
UMMAT: A number of world countries have joined the call of the United States for launching attacks on Afghanistan. These also include a number of Muslim countries. Will Al-Qa’idah declare a jihad against these Islamic countries as well?
USAMA BIN LADEN: I must say that my duty is just to awaken the Muslims; to tell them as to what is good for them and what is not. What does Islam say and what do the enemies of Islam want. Al-Qa’idah was set up to wage a jihad against infidelity, particularly to counter the onslaught of the infidel countries against the Islamic states. Jihad is the sixth undeclared pillar of Islam. [The first five being the basic holy words of Islam ("There is no god but God and Muhammad is the messenger of God"), prayers, fasting (in Ramadan), pilgrimage to Mecca and giving alms (zakat).] Every anti-Islamic person is afraid of jihad. Al-Qa’idah wants to keep jihad alive and active and make it a part of the daily life of the Muslims. It wants to give it the status of worship. We are not against any Islamic country. We do not consider a war against an Islamic country as jihad. We are in favour of armed jihad only against those infidel governments, which are killing innocent Muslim men, women and children just because they are Muslims. Supporting the U.S. act is the need of some Muslim countries and the compulsion of others. However, they should think as to what will remain of their religious and moral position if they support the attack of the Christians and the Jews on a Muslim country like Afghanistan. The orders of Islamic Shariah [jurisprudence] for such individuals, organizations and countries are clear and all the scholars of the Muslim brotherhood are unanimous on them. We will do the same, which is being ordered by the Ameer-ul-Momeneen [the commander of the faithful] Muhammad Omar [leader of the Taleban] and the Islamic scholars. The hearts of the people of Muslim countries are beating with the call of jihad. We are grateful to them.
UMMAT: The losses caused in the attacks in New York and Washington have proved that giving an economic blow to the U.S. is not too difficult. U.S. experts admit that a few more such attacks can bring down the American economy. Why is Al-Qa’idah not targeting their economic pillars?
USAMA BIN LADEN: I have already said that we are not hostile to the United States. We are against the [U.S. Government] system, which makes other nations slaves of the United States, or forces them to mortgage their political and economic freedom. This system is totally in the control of the American Jews, whose first priority is Israel, not the United States. It is clear that the American people are themselves the slaves of the Jews and are forced to live according to the principles and laws laid down by them. So the punishment should reach Israel. In fact, it is Israel, which is giving a blood bath to innocent Muslims and the U.S. is not uttering a single word.
UMMAT: Why is harm not caused to the enemies of Islam through other means, apart from the armed struggle? For instance, urging the Muslims to boycott Western products, banks, shipping lines and TV channels.
USAMA BIN LADEN: The first thing is that Western products could only be boycotted when the Muslim fraternity is fully awakened and organized. Secondly, the Muslim companies should become self-sufficient in producing goods equal to the products of Western companies. Economic boycott of the West is not possible unless economic self-sufficiency is attained and substitute products are brought out. You see that wealth is scattered all across the Muslim World but not a single TV channel has been acquired which can preach Islamic injunctions according to modern requirements and attain an international influence. Muslim traders and philanthropists should make it a point that if the weapon of public opinion is to be used, it is to be kept in the hand. Today’s world is of public opinion and the fates of nations are determined through its pressure. Once the tools for building public opinion are obtained, everything that you asked for can be done.
UMMAT: The entire propaganda about your struggle has so far been made by the Western media. But no information is being received from your sources about the network of Al-Qa’idah and its jihadi successes. Would you comment?
USAMA BIN LADEN: In fact, the Western media is left with nothing else. It has no other theme to survive for a long time. Then we have many other things to do. The struggle for jihad and the successes are for the sake of Allah and not to annoy His bondsmen. Our silence is our real propaganda. Rejections, explanations, or corrigendum only waste your time and through them, the enemy wants you to engage in things which are not of use to you. These things are pulling you away from your cause. The Western media is unleashing such a baseless propaganda, which makes us surprise but it reflects on what is in their hearts and gradually they themselves become captive of this propaganda. They become afraid of it and begin to cause harm to themselves. Terror is the most dreaded weapon in modern age and the Western media is mercilessly using it against its own people. It can add fear and helplessness in the psyche of the people of Europe and the United States. It means that what the enemies of the United States cannot do, its media is doing that. You can understand as to what will be the performance of the nation in a war, which suffers from fear and helplessness.
UMMAT: What will be the impact of the freeze of Al-Qa’idah accounts by the U.S.?
USAMA BIN LADEN: God opens up ways for those who work for Him. Freezing of accounts will not make any difference for Al-Qa’idah or other jihad groups. With the grace of Allah, Al-Qa’idah has more than three alternative financial systems, which are all separate and totally independent from each other. This system is operating under the patronage of those who love jihad. What to say of the United States, even the combined world cannot budge these people from their path. These people are not in hundreds but in thousands and millions. Al-Qa’idah comprises of such modern educated youths who are aware of the cracks inside the Western financial system as they are aware of the lines in their hands. These are the very flaws of the Western fiscal system, which are becoming a noose for it and this system could not recuperate in spite of the passage of so many days.
UMMAT: Are there other safe areas other than Afghanistan, where you can continue jihad?
USAMA BIN LADEN: There are areas in all parts of the world where strong jihadi forces are present, from Indonesia to Algeria, from Kabul to Chechnya, from Bosnia to Sudan, and from Burma to Kashmir. Then it is not the problem of my person. I am a helpless fellowman of God, constantly in the fear of my accountability before God. It is not the question of Usama but of Islam and, in Islam too, of jihad. Thanks to God, those waging a jihad can walk today with their heads raised. Jihad was still present when there was no Usama and it will remain as such even when Usama is no longer there. Allah opens up ways and creates loves in the hearts of people for those who walk on the path of Allah with their lives, property and children. Believe it, through jihad, a man gets everything he desires. And the biggest desire of a Muslim is the life after death. Martyrdom is the shortest way of attaining an eternal life.
UMMAT: What do you say about the Pakistan Government policy on Afghanistan attack?
USAMA BIN LADEN: We are thankful to the Momin and valiant people of Pakistan who erected a blockade in front of the evil forces and stood in the first file of battle. Pakistan is a great hope for the Islamic brotherhood. Its people are awakened, organized and rich in the spirit of faith. They backed Afghanistan in its war against the Soviet Union and extended every help to the mojahedeen (freedom fighters) and the Afghan people. Then these are very Pakistanis who are standing shoulder by shoulder with the Taleban. If such people emerge in just two countries, the domination of the West will diminish in a matter of days. Our hearts beat with Pakistan and, God forbid, if a difficult time comes we will protect it with our blood. Pakistan is sacred for us like a place of worship. We are the people of jihad and fighting for the defense of Pakistan is the best of all jihads to us. It does not matter for us as to who reforms Pakistan. The important thing is that the spirit of jihad is alive and stronger in the hearts of the Pakistani people.
Source: Ummat, Urdu-language daily newspaper based in Karachi, Pakistan -
Friday, 28 September 2001 – pages 1, 7.
Source: BBC Monitoring Service.
Source: http://www.khilafah.com/
Reply
Sui Juris Reply:
August 1st, 2009 at 5:39 am
Here is the most important part of that interview:
In the same way, whether it is President Bush or any other U.S. President, they cannot bring Israel to justice for its human rights abuses or to hold it accountable for such crimes. What is this? Is it not that there exists a government within the government in the United Sates? That secret government must be asked as to who carried out the attacks.
-Bin Laden Sept 28, 2001