MAJOR ISSUES BULLETIN
 
     
     
 

 

Scandal of British soldiers in Iraq robbed of their General Election vote -while they are explaining to Iraqi people the meaning of Democracy.

 

*

Daily Mail

Political Correspondent Graeme Wilson

Friday, April 15, 2005

 

Delays rob

Thousands

of a say

in the election

*

 

Tens of thousands of service personnel have been denied their right to vote in the General Election.

 

They have risked their lives in Iraq and Afghanistan, but were disenfranchised by a controversial new system for registering service voters.

 

Delays by the Ministry of Defence meant many received leaflets explaining the system only a day or two before the March 11 deadline to register to vote this year.

 

The impact is graphically illustrated by figures from the voting watchdog, the Electoral Commission. They reveal there were 140,000 service voters registered in England and Wales in 2002. A year later, however, the figure had slumped to 49,000.

 

Conservatives last night accused Labour of staggering complacency for brushing aside repeated warnings about the crisis.

 

They claimed ministers failed to act because members of the Armed Forces are likely to vote against Labour in protest at the spin, which took Britain to war in Iraq. There is deep resentment about the cull of famous regiments.

 

Conservative defence spokesman Andrew Robathan visited Iraq in January and was shocked to find four out of five troops he met had not registered to vote.

‘This is just another weapon for the Labour Party to deny the vote to Service voters, many of whom will probably be Conservative supporters,’ he said.

 

IN the past, soldiers simply registered as a Service voter when they joined up and remained on the register until they left.

 

Under the new system introduced in 2001, however, they have to re-register as a Service voter every year or lose their vote - a logistical nightmare when half the Army is currently serving overseas. They can also using the normal registration system for the rest of the population.

 

However, the Ministry of Defence failed to publicise the changes -meaning thousands of Service personnel were unaware they had to register this year if they wanted to vote.

 

There are currently just over 202,000 Service personnel of whom 195,000 are over 18 and eligible to vote. The rule changes have also caught out military personnel who appoint their parents or other close relatives to vote for them by proxy -an option which many prefer because of unpredictable foreign travel.

 

Forms appointing proxy voters now have to be filled out every year, but letters explaining the change were sent by local authorities to the last military base where the voter was known to live -even though such addresses could be years out of date.

 

Concerns about the system were raised last autumn but the MoD did not launch an ‘awareness campaign’ until January 28-2005.

 

At its core was a leaflet-produced by the Electoral Commission -which told servicemen and women how to register.

 

The Commission delivered 110,000 leaflets to the MoD on February 4. A spokesman said: ‘We understand that they would be turned round and sent out within a few days.

 

However, the MoD admitted yesterday it was another two weeks before all the leaflets had been despatched. -and it can take up to two weeks for mail to reach troops in Iraq and Afghanistan.

 

The Government tried to play down the importance of the leaflets yesterday, with the MoD insisting it was only ‘one part of a wider awareness campaign’, which included adverts on forces broadcasting.

 

However, the Electoral Commission disagreed.

 

‘The leaflet was one of the key elements of the campaign,’ said a spokesman.

 

Senior Tory backbencher Peter Viggers, the Electoral Commission’s official representative in the Commons, revealed yesterday that there were 4,700 Service voters registered in his Gosport constituency in 2000. By last year, the figure had plummeted to 470.

 

A similar fall was discovered by Tory MP for Chichester Andrew Tyrie, who found that the number of service voters in his constituency had fallen from 483 to 22 over the last five years.

 

Last night the mother of an RAF flight engineer serving in the Gulf told the Daily Mail how he had phoned her in anger at the poll shambles.

 

He said:

 

“Mum, I was ordered to go and fight an illegal war and put my life on the line on a daily basis, and now I can’t even vote against the Government that sent me.”

 

‘He would have voted Tory.’

 

And an Army sergeant just returned to Germany after a tour in Iraq said that he had no time to fill in his form when it arrived. ‘there were bombs and shootings going off. It was exhausting. When I got back here a few weeks ago it was too late. I would have voted Conservative. - certainly not Labour. That probably goes for most of the forces.’

 

The revelations come amid the growing scandal over postal vote fraud, which already has led to the conviction of a string of Labour councillors.

 

The Tories last night claimed Labour has a track record of trying to prevent likely Conservatives from voting. They pointed to the Government’s drive to cut the number of years a British citizen can live abroad and still register to vote from 20 to 15.

 

Conservatives claim the move discriminates against their supporters among more than two million expats.

[Font altered-bolding & underlining used-comments in brackets]

APRIL/05

* *

[Well! the only way to redress the wrong done to the Armed Forces abroad is for a newspaper to arrange for an Independent body to which the many voters who had not considered voting or have never voted to arrange for them to vote one for one for those cheated out of their vote abroad in Iraq, Afghanistan the Balkans and elsewhere.

 

A disenfranchised Serviceman abroad would give his preference to the Independent body appointed by the newspaper- with his political party choice and receive in turn a number and they would at the same take up details of those who have contacted them who now intend to vote in order to redress the balance of the injustice done to the troops abroad.

 

The person who has decided to vote would have to be on the register. It would be taken on trust that the particular individual had not previously intended to vote.

 

The details of the proxy voter -as such -would not be given out by the independent body appointed by the newspaper

 

It would simply be a question of a number to each coupling.

 

 

The disenfranchised voter would have the satisfaction that though he could not vote at least someone who had not considered voting would now do so to redress the wrong.

 

Possibly it could be made much simpler by the newspaper simply asking those who have not voted over the last few elections to for once consider the gross injustice done to our brave servicemen and women risking their lives abroad and ask the person concerned to simply give the constituency in which they will vote.

 

As there are election statistics available for each polling area it should be possible to see after the election whether indeed the promises were fulfilled.

 

The result of this exercise in justice will be that more citizens will become voters, which is good for democracy at the same time a great wrong will be rectified.

*

In the words of a President of the United States Theodore Roosevelt (1858-1919)

 

‘A man who is good enough to shed his blood for his country is good enough to be given a square deal afterwards. More than that no man is entitled to, and less than that no man shall have.’

 

(Speech at Springfield , Illinois, 4th June 1903.)

 

We ask Tony Blair to answer the charge against him by quoting a further saying of the President.

‘No man is justified in doing evil

on the

ground of expediency’

 

*

No serviceman or women should be deprived of their right to vote. Their pay book is their authority and the rest should be left to the unit commanders and the Ministry of Defence to ensure that our troops are not having to consider such matters when their prime responsibility is to defend our country.

 

* * *

APRIL/05

 

 

Daily Mail

COMMENT

 

So it comes to this: any Tom Dick or Harry in Britain can get hold of illicit postal votes by the bucketful, but our soldiers have been cynically dis enfranchised.

 

Forget that they are prepared to risk their lives in the cause of bringing democracy to Third World dictatorships. Forget that some have been wounded in Iraq, Afghanistan, the Balkans and other theatres of war and that many have seen their comrades killed.

 

The Government so blithely sends them into action at the drop of a hat - in one case on the basis of a pack of lies - is denying tens of thousands of them the chance to vote, because of the gross incompetence of a new registration system.

 

The smell of something rotten is overpowering. Was this shambles just the result of an official blunder? Or is it another squalid New Labour manoeuvre to rig the results on May 5 by ensuring that members of the military-many of whom have seen their regiments destroyed and might be presumed to be voting Conservative -don’t get near a ballot paper?

 

This Government doesn’t deserve the benefit of the doubt. It is frantically promoting a postal voting system elsewhere in Britain that it knows is wide open to fraud that it has been forced to announce major changes - but only when the election is safely out of the way.

 

In the meantime, it expects to benefit from a postal vote fiasco that in the words of Judge Richard Mawrey is reminiscent of a ‘banana republic’.

 

But then New Labour will do anything to hang on to power, even if it means leaving the door wide open to election crooks and dragging the integrity of our democratic process into the gutter.

 

*           *          *

APRIL/05

 

*

*

*

*

13th October,2007

 

So You Want Out Of The EU

 

THEN WHY NOT SIGN THE

RENUNCIATION of EU CITIZENSHIP

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/Optout

Details from petition creator

With the signing of the Maastricht Treaty the people of Britain were given

DUAL CITIZENSHIP

-both

EUROPEAN and BRITISH

The extra tier of citizenship was thrust upon the people without their consent -and in many cases knowledge.

The PEOPLE of GREAT BRITAIN should be allowed the option of opting out of the EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP if they so wish. The GOVERNMENT will then be able to provide those who have opted out with

BRITISH DOCUMENTATION

-only such as British  (not EU) passports, driving licences and other national documents.

EU laws will also NOT APPLY to those who

HAVE OPTED OUT OF EUROPEAN CITIZENSHIP

*

*

 

Let the people speak!

www.makeitanissue.org.uk

 

 

*

www.noliberties.com

[Latest Addition - June07]

*

www.eutruth.org.uk

*

www.thewestminsternews.co.uk

*

 

www.speakout.co.uk

*

 

Daniel Hannan - Forming an OPPOSITION to the EU

www.telegraph.co.uk.blogs

 

*

GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY WON'T HE TRUST YOU?

HELL ON EARTH IN IRAQ

*

67% want powers back from EU-ICM poll-June 21-2007-95% of British people want a REFERENDUM

*

PETITION

FOR A

REFERENDUM

SIGN TODAY ON LINE

telegraph.co.uk/eureferendum

July 18-2007

ALSO

JOIN THE 10 DOWNING STREET PROTEST

Readers can add their support to the growing clamour for a REFERENDUM on the '"REFORM TREATY" by signing up to a 10 Downing Street 0n-line petition

http://petitions.pm.gov.uk/EU-treaty-NON/

 

The  Petition reads as follows:

"We the undersigned petition the Prime Minister to guarantee that the British people will be permitted a binding REFERENDUM on any and all attempts to resurrect the EU " CONSTITUTION" (and any or all of its content) regardless of nomenclature."

Deadline for the PETITION is 31st January,2008

Eurofacts 27th July 2007.

*

'The Spirit of England'

by

Winston Churchill

In London on St.George's Day -1953

*

 

 

VOTE

 -2007

 

TO LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION

WITH THE ONLY PARTY WITH A MANDATE

TO SET YOU

 FREE

 

THE

UK INDEPENDENCE PARTY

www.ukip.org

THE QUESTION THAT THE VOTER MUST ANSWER

 

DO YOU WISH TO BE GOVERNED BY YOUR OWN PEOPLE, LAW AND CUSTOM OR BY THE CORRUPT ,EXPENSIVE UNACCOUNTABLE AND CORRUPT ALIEN BUSYBODY BRUSSELS’

 

-SIMPLE IS IT NOT?

 

TO RECLAIM YOUR DEMOCRACY DON'T VOTE FOR THE TRIPARTITE PARTIES IN WESTMINSTER

BUT

SMALL PARTIES THAT SPEAK THEIR MINDS WITHOUT SPIN AND LIES.

*

 

ONLY

PRO-PORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

WILL BRING DEMOCRACY BACK TO THE ENGLISH PEOPLE

*

 

SCOTLAND -ITS PARLIAMENT -WALES-ITS ASSEMBLY-ENGLAND-STILL AWAITS ITS PARLIAMENT-WHY?

 

*

 

Home Rule for Scotland

WHY NOT

HOME RULE for ENGLAND

 

*

[All underlined words have a separate bulletin]

 

ADDED NOV 1-2015

 

 

 

 

BRITISH FORCES (OVERSEAS) BULLETINS

 

 

B F 1-BLAIR'SCRAPED THE BARREL' TO JUSTIFY INVASION OF IRAQ****B F 2-The Security Services and the Safety of YOUR REALM****B F 3-It's impossible to win a conflict without enough men on the ground.****B F 4-FIVE WARS BLAIR TO REDUCE OUR ILLUSTRIOUS FIGHTING REGIMENTS****B F5-The Lives and Reputation of our Ancient Island's Defenders of Freedom now at further RISK!**** B F 6-IRAQ NOT WORTH THE LIFE OF ANOTHER BRITISH SOLDIER****B F 7-Former Chief of Defence Intelligence supports Whistleblowers****B F 8-TONY BLAIR-THE MAN WHO NEVER DID-YET!****B F 9- The JUSTIFICATION for WAR offered by MR BLAIR may have been the  WRONG ONE, but it was a JUST WAR-says DAILY TELEGRAPH ****.  B F 10-A TROOPER and a TRAVESTY of JUSTICE****B F 11-House of Commons must REGAIN its RESPONSIBILITY****B F 12-Why wont Mr Ingram realise he CANNOT compare FUNDING of ARMY RECRUITMENT TRAINING with PRIVATE CORPORATIONS****B 490-TONY BLAIR WILL NOT ADMIT INVASION OF IRAQ MADE BRITAIN VULNERABLE TO TERRORIST ATTACK-ALMOST EVERYONE KNOWS-IT DID!****B484-ABANDONED HEROES FIGHTING AND DYING ON 2 AN HOUR-IRAQ-AFGHANISTAN-AND OTHER CONFLICTS-WHY?****B492-TELL THE TRUTH!-MR BLAIR-OF HOW LONG OUR TROOPS WILL REMAIN IN AFGHANISTAN****B 499-Three more British deaths take Afghan toll to 19 in 6 days.****B 501-SADDAM HAD NO LINK TO AL QAEDA-says THE SENATE of the USA***B 504-BLAIR CONFESSES HIS FAULTS BUT STILL CONTINUES WITH HIS DISASTROUS POLICIES.****

 

 

[OVER THE PAST 12 YEARS  WE HAVE SHOWN A GREAT NUMBER OF BULLETINS WITH REGARD TO OUR ARMED SERVICES WHO WERE NOT ALWAYS GIVEN THE APPROPRIATE TOOLS TO DO THE JOB- MR HOON-COMES TO MIND-SHORTAGE OF BODY ARMOUR AND SUITABLE AND SAFE TRANSPORT. THE ABOVE ARTICLES ARE BUT A FEW OF THE MANY BUT WE WILL ADD TO THE LIST OVER THE FOLLOWING WEEKS. A VISIT TO IRAQ FILE & BULLETIN FILE WILL REVEAL MUCH INFORMATION.]

 

 

FOR FURTHER INFO GO TO:

PT 2/ PT3/PT4/PT5/PT6

 

 

 

 

*

The Queen, Treason and the Coronation oath

Together with Churchill, King George VI saved our nation; he was a Monarch to be proud of. But his daughter the Queen is the only monarch to have broken all her coronation oaths, by signing these six treaties that abolish our common law, the British Constitution, the British and English nations, and our sovereignty. She has also committed treason, together with co-signatories Ted Heath, Margaret Thatcher, John Major, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown.

Realising that under the five Treason Acts they should already be hanging by the neck until dead, Tony Blair and the Queen signed the Crime and Disorder Act, 1998, which secretly abolished much of the crime of treason (s36.3) and reduced the penalty to life imprisonment - they didn't tell the MP's what they had just voted for.

1.4 million British Servicemen gave their lives for our independence. The Queen has thrown their sacrifices away and made them worthless.

At no physical risk to herself, she could have fulfilled her oath and duty as a constitutional check and balance, by refusing to sign the six treaties until an in/out referendum had been held. In the unlikely event the vote went against her, she was even more unlikely to lose her crown (not her life or a limb), and would keep her 9 billion plus palaces either way. Those servicemen's lives would still have meant something.

But she was always keen to sign; and said in advance she would sign the last treaty. Princes Charles, William or Harry can now never be King. You can't have a King without a Kingdom: they can only be princes of a region (principality) within Europe.

King Edward 8th was forced to abdicate because he was too overt as a German Nazi supporter. Mrs Simpson's divorce was merely the excuse. The Royal Family is a German Family - real surname Saxe-Coburg Gotha. Windsor is an adopted surname. All four of Prince Phillip's sisters married high ranking German Nazis. After they lost the war the EU was switched from a Nazi basis to a communist basis.

Between the ages of 12 and 22 Queen Elisabeth's political and constitutional tutor was Sir Henry Martin, a Fabian Communist. It seems clear she was well trained for her subversion and treason.

Because she waves and smiles at us most are fooled into thinking she's lovely; in fact the Queen is a member of the Illuminati, a Bilderberger, head of Freemasonry, is wholly pro the (German) EU, and has abolished this nation with ruthless determination. It is so obvious she cares nothing for Britain or the British.

The Queen's aspirations are not ours; she clearly serves a much darker master; the faith she defends cannot be the one we think it is. King George VI, the one recent monarch not indoctrinated with Nazi or Communist philosophy, must be turning over in his grave.

I ask that the law be enforced, and the Queen be tried for treason before 12 honest people, and not by our corrupt judges. And that the illegal section 36.3 Crime and Disorder Act be declared null and void, so that she can hang by the neck till dead.

The new EU Hitler doesn't have to get elected
Its worth noting that Adolf Hitler first had to get elected, if on a 35% minority vote, and then get his Enabling Act passed. An EU dictator has no such problems. Our EU rulers do not submit themselves for election now. And the Queen has already signed the Enabling Act (Civil Contingencies Act 2004).

The EU's Hitler will have a much easier rise to power, and will have the formerly British and French nuclear weapons from day one. Adolf Hitler killed 54 million people. The EU's dictator could kill a billion at the touch of a button, with no democratic checks and balances to answer to. How could any aspiring dictator resist the EU opportunity?

 

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

 

 http://www.bilderbergmeetings.org/participants2012.html

 

*

 

 

 KNOWN GOOD GUYS UNDER SUSPICION OF BEING PROVOCATEURS ON BEHALF OF THE ILLUMINATI.

As we have explained elsewhere it is this typical situation which we must fear the most and expect this insidious practice of the satanic ILLUMINATI who wish to ensure where possible that it is THEIR STOOGE in CONTROL! within their ENEMIES camp.  We suspect that there are many more within UKIP [-possibly even MEP's-one talking about a deal with the Conservative party ] and  BNP and other declared advocates across the political spectrum pursuing  FREEDOM! and NATION STATE! who will soon share the space below.

There are always great difficulty in these matters and one can only go on the actions and contacts of the individuals involved.

There can be no greater or more heinous crime imaginable than for one to betray the TRUST of a COMRADE fighting for a JUST! and GOOD CAUSE!

'It is said: 'No man can justly censure or condemn another, because indeed no man truly knows another'

But what we are considering is at a time when those who intend to destroy the majority of mankind and make serfs of the majority allowed to live and  It is a WAR we are FIGHTING for SURVIVAL! and in such circumstances a persons ACTIONS or lack of ACTION! are the ONLY basis on which one can JUDGE! another.

Finally it is up to the membership of UKIP and BNP to purge THEIR PARTY of the TRAITORS within and look for those who have the fire in their belly to carry the party forward to VICTORY!

 

MAY-2012

*

 

 

ENGLAND

 

 Home Rule for Scotland WHY NOTHOME RULE for ENGLAND?**** BOTH SIDES OF THE BORDER BACK SCOTS INDEPENDENCE****A DISUNITED KINGDOM****NEW LABOUR HAS DESTROYED THE UNION- SO USE THE WORDS ENGLAND AND ENGLISH-NOT BRITISH****NEW LABOUR'S LEGACY-THE GHETTOSIZATION OF ENGLAND****UNLESS WE TAKE CONTROL OF OUR LIVES WE WILL LOSE OUR FREEDOM AND IDENTITY****.OUR PAST IS EMBEDDED IN OUR NATIONAL CONSCIOUSNESS -IT ASKS WERE WE CAME FROM AND WHO WE ARE .****.THE ENGLISH WITH OTHER GERMANIC TRIBES CAME TO BRITAIN OVER YEARS AGO - THE STREAM OF TEUTONIC INFLUENCE  HAS DECIDED THE FUTURE OF EUROPE****THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 1/ ****  THE SOUL OF ENGLAND PT 2/ ****    WHY ARE WE ENGLISH MADE TO FEEL GUILTY/****  DON'T LET THEM DESTROY OUR IDENTITY/ ****   NOR SHALL MY SWORD/****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT1-/ ****  WHY CAN'T WE HAVE A RIGHT TO BE ENGLISH-PT2/****   ENGLAND IS WHERE THE MAJORITY VIEWS ARE IGNORED AND MINORITIES RULE AT THEIR EXPENSE IN POLITICALLY -CORRECT BROWNDOM/****    ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT1- /****   ALFRED - CHRISTIAN KING OF THE ENGLISH-PT2/****    ENGLISHMEN AS OTHERS SEE US BEYOND OUR ONCE OAK WALL./****   WHY OUR ENGLISH SELF-GOVERNMENT IS UNIQUE IN EUROPE AND THE WORLD****.ENGLAND ARISE! - TODAY WE CLAIM OUR RIGHT OF SELF-DETERMINATION/ ****  KISS GOOD BYE TO YOUR SOVEREIGNTY AND COUNTRY****  THE DAY A NATION STATE WAS DOOMED? **** ST GEORGE'S DAY-ENGLAND'S DAY/**** ST GEORGE'S DAY - 23APRIL - RAISE A FLAG ONSHAKESPEARE'S' BIRTHDAY****NAZI SPY RING REVEALED BY THE MASTER OF BALLIOL COLLEGE IN 1938 . IT INCLUDED THE LATE EX PRIME MINISTER EDWARD HEATH AND MINISTERS GEOFFREY RIPPON AND ROY JENKINS.* * * *AN OBITUARY TO YOUR COUNTRY WHICH NEED NOT HAVE HAPPENED****   EU WIPES ENGLAND OFF THE MAP**** THE ENGLISH DID NOT MOVE THEMSELVES SO ARE NOW SLAVES IN A CONCENTRATION CAMP EUROPE****"...What kind of people do they think we are?" by WINSTON CHURCHILL****THE SPIRIT OF ENGLAND BY WINSTON CHURCHILL.

 

 

*