The Nameless War
THE BRITISH REVOLUTION
"It was fated that England should be
the first of a series of Revolutions, which is not yet finished."
With these cryptic words Isaac Disraeli, father of Benjamin [1804-1881]-Prime
Minister- Earl of Beaconsfield, commenced his two volume life of Charles I
published in 1851. A work of astonishing detail and insight, much information
for which, he states, was obtained from the records of one Melchior de Salom,
French envoy in England during that period.
The scene opens with distant glimpses
of the British Kingdom based upon Christianity, and its own ancient traditions;
these sanctions binding Monarchy, Church, State, nobles and the people in one
solemn bond on the one hand; on the other hand, the ominous rumblings of
Calvin, who came to Geneva from
France, where his name was spelt Cauin, *possibly a French effort to
spell Cohen, organized great numbers of revolutionary orators, not a few of whom
were inflicted upon England and Scotland. Thus was laid the groundwork for
revolution under a cloak of religious fervour.
At a B'nai B'rith meeting in Paris reported in 'Catholic Gazette' in Feb
1936 he was claimed to be of Jewish extraction.
On both sides of the Tweed these
demagogues contracted all religion into rigid observance of the "Sabbath." To
use the words of Isaac Disraeli,
"The nation was artfully divided
into Sabbatarians and Sabbath breakers."
"Calvin deemed the Sabbath to have
been a Jewish ordinance, limited to the sacred people."
He goes on to say that when these
Calvinists held the country in their power,
"it seemed that religion chiefly
consisted of Sabbatarian rigours; and that a British senate had been
transformed into a company of Hebrew Rabbins":
"In 1650, after the execution of the
King, an Act was passed inflicting penalties for a breach of the Sabbath."
Buckingham, Strafford and Laud are
the three chief figures round the King in these early stages: Men on whose
loyalty to himself, the nation, and the ancient tradition Charles can rely.
Buckingham, the trusted friend of
King James I, and of those who had saved his life at the time of the Gowrie
Conspiracy (of ominous cabalistic associations) was assassinated in the early
years of King Charles' reign under mysterious circumstances.
who had been in his early days inclined to follow the opposite faction, later
left them; and became a staunch and devoted adherent of the King.
opposition faction became steadily more hostile to Charles and by the time that
they were led by Pym and decided to impeach Strafford. "The King," writes
Disraeli, "regarded this faction as his enemies"; and he states that the head of
this faction was the Earl of Bedford.
Walsh, the eminent Catholic historian, states
that a Jew wine merchant named Roussel was the founder of this family in Tudor
times. With the impeachment and execution of Strafford, the powers behind the
rising Calvinist, or Cohenist, Conspiracy began to reveal themselves, and their
focus, the City of London.
this time there suddenly began to appear from the City armed mobs of
"Operatives" (the medieval equivalent for "workers" no doubt). Let me quote
"They were said to amount to ten
with war-like weapons. It was a
militia for insurgency at all seasons, and might be depended upon for any
work of destruction at the cheapest rate ...
as these sallied forth with daggers
and bludgeons (from the city) the inference is obvious that this train of
explosion must have been long laid."
must indeed; and we must recollect here, that at this time Strafford was still
unexecuted, and civil war in the minds of none but of those behind the scenes,
who evidently had long since resolved upon and planned it.
armed mobs of "workers" intimidated all and sundry, including both Houses of
Parliament and the Palace at critical moments, exactly on the model employed
later by the "Sacred Bands" and the "Marseillais" in the French Revolution.
Disraeli draws again and again startling parallels between this and the French
Revolution; Notably in his passages on the Press, "no longer under restraint,"
and the deluge of revolutionary pamphlets and leaflets. He writes:
"From 1640 to 1660, about 30,000
appear to have started up."
"the collection of French
revolutionary pamphlets now stands by the side of the French tracts of the
age of Charles I, as abundant in number and as fierce in passion. . .
Whose hand behind the curtain played
the strings . . .
could post up a correct list of 59
commoners, branding them with the odious title of 'Straffordians or
betrayers of their country'."
Whose hand indeed? But [Benjamin]
Disraeli [Prime Minister during this period (1804 - 1881)] who knew so
much, now discreetly draws a veil over that iron curtain; and it is left to us
to complete the revelation.
To do so we must turn to such other
works as the Jewish Encyclopedia, Sombart's work, The Jews and Modern
Capitalism, and others. From these we learn that Cromwell, the chief figure of
the revolution, was in close contact with the powerful Jew financiers in
Holland; and was in fact paid large sums of money by Manasseh Ben Israel; whilst
Fernandez Carvajal, "The Great Jew" as he was called, was the chief contractor
of the New Model Army.
In The Jews in England we read:
"1643 brought a large contingent of Jews to England, their rallying point
was the house of the Portuguese Ambassador De Souza, a Marano (secret Jew).
Prominent among them was Fernandez Carvajal, a great financier and army
January of the previous year, the attempted arrest of the five members had set
in violent motion the armed gangs of "Operatives" already mentioned, from the
city. Revolutionary pamphlets were broadcasted on this occasion, as Disraeli
"Bearing the ominous insurrectionary
cry of 'To your tents, O Israel'."
Shortly after this the King and the
Royal Family left the Palace of Whitehall.
The five members with armed mobs
and banners accompanying them, were given a triumphal return to Westminster. The
stage was now set for the advent of Carvajal and his Jews and the rise of their
The scene now changes. The Civil
War has taken its course. The year is 1647: Naseby has been won and lost. The
King is virtually a prisoner, while treated as an honoured guest at Holmby
According to a letter published in
Plain English (a weekly review published by the North
British Publishing Co. and edited by the late Lord Alfred Douglas.) on 3rd
Learned Elders have been in existence for a much longer period than they
have perhaps suspected.
friend, Mr. L. D. van Valckert, of Amsterdam, has recently sent me a letter
containing two extracts from the Synagogue at Mulheim. The volume in which
they are contained was lost at some period during the Napoleonic Wars, and
has recently come into Mr. van Valckert's possession.
It is written in German, and
contains extracts of letters sent and received by the authorities of the
Mulheim Synagogue. The first entry he sends me is of a letter received:
16th June, 1647
From O.C. (i.e. Oliver
Cromwell), by Ebenezer Pratt.
In return for financial
support will advocate admission of Jews to England: This however
impossible while Charles living.
Charles cannot be executed
without trial, adequate grounds for which do not at present exist.
Therefore advise that Charles be assassinated, but will have nothing to
do with arrangements for procuring an assassin, though willing to help
in his escape.
reply was dispatched the following:
12th July, 1647
To O.C. by E. Pratt.
grant financial aid as soon as Charles removed and Jews admitted.
Assassination too dangerous. Charles shall be given opportunity to
escape: His recapture will make trial and execution possible. The
support will be liberal, but useless to discuss terms until trial
With this information now at our
disposal, the subsequent moves on the part of the regicides stand out with a new
clearness. On 4th June, 1647, Cornet Joyce, acting on secret orders from
Cromwell himself, and, according to Disraeli, unknown even to General-in-Chief
Fairfax, descended upon Holmby House with 500 picked revolutionary troopers, and
seized the King. According to Disraeli,
"The plan was arranged on May 30th
at a secret meeting held at Cromwell's house, though later Cromwell
pretending that it was without his concurrence."
This move coincided with a sudden
development in the army; the rise of the 'Levelers" and "Rationalists." Their
doctrines were those of the French revolutionaries; in fact, what we know today
as Communism. These were the regicides, who four times "purged" Parliament, till
there was left finally 50 members, Communist-like themselves, known later as the
return to the letter from Mulheim Synagogue of the 12th June, 1647, and its
cunning suggestion that attempted escape should be used as a pretext for
execution. Just such an event took place, on 12th November of that year. Hollis
and Ludlow consider the flight as a stratagem of Cromwell's. Isaac Disraeli
"Contemporary historians have
decided that the King from the day of his deportation from Holmby to his
escape to the Isle of Wight was throughout the dupe of Cromwell."
more remains to be said. Cromwell had carried out the orders from the Synagogue,
and now it only remained to stage the mock trial.
Maneuvering for position continued
for some time. And it became apparent that the House of Commons, even in their
partially "purged" condition, were in favour of coming to an agreement with the
King. On 5th December, 1648, the House sat all night; and finally carried the
question, "That the King's concessions were satisfactory to a settlement."
Should such agreement have been
reached, of course, Cromwell would not have received the large sums of money
which he was hoping to get from the Jews. He struck again. On the night of
December 6th, Colonel Pryde, on his instructions, carried out the last and most
famous "purge" of the House of Commons, known as "Pryde's Purge."
On 4th January, the Communist
remnant of 50 members, the Rump, invested themselves with "the supreme
On 9th January "a High Court of
Justice" to try the King was proclaimed. Two-thirds of its members were Levelers
from the Army. Algernon Sidney warned Cromwell:
"First, the King can be tried by no
court. Second, no man can be tried by this court."
So writes Hugh Ross Williamson in his
Charles and Cromwell; and he adds a finishing touch to the effect
"no English lawyer could be found to
draw up the charge, which was eventually entrusted to an accommodating
alien, Isaac Dorislaus."
to say, Isaac Dorislaus was exactly the same sort of alien as Carvajal and
Manasseh Ben Israel and the other financiers who paid the "Protector" his blood
were once again permitted to land freely in England in spite of strong protests
by the sub-committee of the Council of State, which declared that they would be
a grave menace to the State and the Christian religion.
it is due to their protests that the actual act of banishment has never to this
day been repealed.
"The English Revolution under
Charles I was unlike any preceding one ...
From that time and event we
contemplate in our history the phases of revolution." Isaac Disraeli
were many more to follow on similar lines, notably in France.
1897 a further important clue to these mysterious happenings fell into Gentile
hands in the shape of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. In that document we
read this remarkable sentence:
"Remember the French Revolution, the
secrets of its preparation are well known to us for it was entirely the work
of our hands."[Protocol
Elders might have made the passage even fuller, and written,
"Remember the British and French
revolutions, the secrets of which are well known to us for they were
entirely the work of our hands."
The difficult problem of the
subjugation of both Kingdoms was still however unsolved. Scotland was Royalist
before everything else; and she had proclaimed Charles II King. Cromwell's
armies marched round Scotland, aided by their Geneva sympathizers, dispensing
Judaic barbarity; but Scotland still called Charles II King. He moreover
accepted the Presbyterian form of Christianity for Scotland; and slowly but
steadily the feeling in England began to come round to the Scottish point of
Finally upon the death of Cromwell,
all Britain welcomed the King's restoration to the throne of England.
1660 Charles II returned; but there was an important difference between the
Kingdom he had fled from as a boy, and the one to which he returned as King. The
enemies of Kingship were entrenched within his kingdom now, and as soon as the
stage should be set for renewing the propaganda against the papacy and so,
dividing once more persons, all of whom considered themselves as part of
Christ's Church, the next attack would develop.
The next attack would aim at
placing the control of the finances of both Kingdoms in the hands of the Jews,
who were now firmly ensconced within.
Charles evidently had no
consciousness of the Jewish problem or plans, or the menace they held for his
peoples. The wisdom and experience of Edward I had become lost in the centuries
of segregation from the Jewish virus. A consciousness of the danger to the Crown
in placing his enemies in possession of the weapon of a "Popish Plot" cry he did
With James II's accession, the
crisis could not be long delayed. The most unscrupulous pamphleteering and
propaganda was soon in full swing against him, and it is no surprise to find
that many of the vilest pamphlets were actually printed in Holland. This country
was now quite openly the focus for all disaffected persons; and considerable
comings and goings took place during these years.
were brought to the King that his own brother-in-law had joined those who
plotted against him; but he utterly refused to credit them, or take any action
till news came that the expedition against himself was actually under way.
chief figure amongst those who deserted James at that crucial juncture was John
Churchill, first Duke of Marlborough. It is interesting to read in the Jewish
Encyclopedia that this Duke for many years received not less than 6,000 pounds a
year from the Dutch Jew Solomon Medina.
objective of the "Glorious Revolution" was achieved a few years later in 1694,
when the Royal consent was given for the setting up of the "Bank of England" and
the institution of the National Debt.
This charter handed over to an
anonymous committee the Royal prerogative of minting money; converted the
basis of wealth to gold; and enabled the international money lenders to
secure their loans on the taxes of the country, instead of the doubtful
undertaking of some ruler or potentate which was all the security they could
that time economic machinery was set in motion which ultimately reduced all
wealth to the fictitious terms of gold which the Jews control; and
drained away the life blood of the land, the real wealth which was the
birthright of the British peoples.
[Note: Germany's most successful
economic system was NOT backed by gold. He eluded the blood-sucking grip of the
Zionist Jew Money Masters, therefore "Germany must be destroyed!" and Adolf
Hitler vilified down through ages so the uninformed will DEMAND their government
return to the gold standard. -- jackie]
The political and economic union of
England and Scotland was shortly afterwards forced upon Scotland with wholesale
corruption, and in defiance of formal protests from every county and borough.
The main objects of the Union were to suppress the Royal Mint in Scotland, and
to force upon her, too, responsibility for the "National Debt."
grip of the moneylender was now complete throughout Britain. The danger was that
the members of the new joint Parliament would sooner or later, in the spirit of
their ancestors, challenge this state of affairs. To provide against this,
therefore, the party system was now brought into being, frustrating true
national reaction and enabling the wire-pullers to divide and rule; using their
newly-established financial power to ensure that their own men and their own
policies should secure the limelight, and sufficient support from their
newspapers, pamphlets, and banking accounts to carry the day.
was soon to become the basis of loans, ten times the size of the amount
deposited. In other words, 100 pounds in gold would be legal security for 1,000
pounds of loan; at 3% therefore 100 pounds in gold could earn 30 pounds interest
annually with no more trouble to the lender than the keeping of a few ledger
The owner of 100 pounds of land,
however, still must work every hour of daylight in order to make perhaps 4%. The
end of the process must only be a matter of time. The moneylenders must become
millionaires; those who own and work the land, the Englishman and the Scotsman,
must be ruined. The process has continued inexorably till now, when it is nearly
has been hypocritically camouflaged by clever propaganda as helping the poor by
mulcting the rich. It has been in reality nothing of the kind. It has been in
the main the deliberate ruination of the landed classes, the leaders among the
Gentiles, and their supplanting by the Jew financiers and their hangers-on.
- Chapter 2
[EDP] HAD BEEN TAKEN IN BY THE TRADITIONAL VIEW OF THE
HISTORY OF THE PAST REACHING BACK TO OLIVER CROMWELL
AND HIS CLIMB TO POWER AS PROTECTOR WITH THE HELP OF THE
MONEY LENDERS AND MUCH ELSE SINCE AND IT WAS
ONLY A FEW YEARS AGO WITH AN INITIAL CHANCE VIEW
ON THE INTERNET THAT WE FOUND OUT THE TRUTH ON THIS AND
SO MANY OTHER IMPORTANT MATTERS - WE ADMIT WE WERE BLIND
TO THE TRUTH ON SO MANY MATTERS AND IT WAS SOLELY DUE TO
THE INTERNET THAT THE FULL LIGHT OF TRUTH EMERGED.
BENJAMIN DISRAELI [1804-1881- born
A Jew but became a CHRISTIAN]
WHO WAS PRIME MINISTER ON TWO OCCASIONS IN HIS LIFETIME MADE THE FOLLOWING
' I was told that the Privileged and the
People formed Two Nations'
don't we know it!
[COMMENTS IN BRACKETS-HEADING AND
HIGHLIGHTING-CAPS ARE OURS]