MAJOR ISSUES BULLETIN
 
 

VIEWERS -TOP TOPICS-WKLY/ARCHIVE

*HOME-PT 2

 

PREVIOUS:

PAGE ONE/ PAGE TWO/PAGE THREE/ PAGE FOUR/PAGE FIVE/

OCTOBER-PT2-2012/

NOVEMBER-PT2-2012

DECEMBER-PT2-2012

JANUARY-PT2-2013

 

FEBRUARY/MARCH-PT2-2013

 

 

A PEACEFUL ENGLISH REVOLUTION IS ON THE WAY-ALERT-1

 

 
RON PAUL_THE LIBERTY PARTY 9-11+(1) GLOBALWARMING SCAM USA IRAQ/AFGHAN LONDON BOMBINGS COMMON PURPOSE CONSPIRACY CENTRAL BANKS  +(1)GLOBALIZATION
IMMIGRATION ARCHIVE

HOME

 MAIN BULLETINS E U  ENGLAND +(1) BILDERBERGERS+(1) ILLUMINATI +(1)-(1)

+(1)

NEW WORLD ORDER

+(1) +(1)

 

1)U.S. Concentration Camps

2)DEC-2011- MADE-READY

3) PLANS

1)

FEMA

2)

1)Protocols

of

ZION

 

2)

ZIONISM

 

CITY

OF

LONDON

 

 A STATE WITHIN ENGLAND

+(2)

 Dr.

John

Coleman

WHO OWNS

THE FED

 

POWER

OF 1)HAARP FOR GOOD   2)EVIL

Mind Control Henry Makow 1)Chemtrails

2)CREATED

C3)

1)

PRIVATE CENTRAL BANKS

 

2)

(1)

War

is a Racket

 

(2)

A MEETING PLACE  - THERE ARE HUNDREDS  OF ALTERNATIVE WEBSITES ON OUR wEBSITE- SINCE 2003
realzionistnews. TruetorahJews CONSPIRACYPLANET

.COM/

JEWSNOT ZIONISTST DAVID ICKE BRITISH CONSTITUTION GROUP

 

YOU CAN HANDLE THE TRUTH
LANDDESTROYER.

BLOGSPOT

.COM

HENRY MAKOW  CORBETTREPORT) LIFE IN THE MIX 2

 

UK COLUMN.ORG. JEW WATCH

ACTIVISTPOST.

COM

TARPLEY.NET

 

 
 
 

PR-PROPORTIONAL

REPRESENTATION

 

[Now you know why we have been campaigning for years for PR Proportional Representation.

 Angela Merkel now feels the heat of the anger of the German taxpayers as they are now realising that they are in reality working hard to keep the NEW WORLD ORDER on track for a Global Government within the next five years. Millions of taxpayers in England are still not convinced that they are but "useful idiots"  used by the EU planners of those who still believed in 'supposed change in the E U' a special  characteristic of the Conservative Party for 38 years so vital to the plans of the Global Banksters.  With the German people now beginning to realise the FULL TRUTH of how they have been conned we shall hope to see more of what a proud Germanic  people are made of and hopeful they will turn the tide to bring back  REAL FREEDOM of the INDEPENDENT NATION STATE back to EUROPE.]

JUNE-2010

Of course we now hear from David Cameron that he is to permit a REFERENDUM on the question of PR  as a sop to the LibDems who advocate the AV system which for many  will not go far enough to bring real DEMOCRACY back to our outdated and loaded and in the main corrupt and undemocratic FPTP system which has resulted in DICTATORSHIPS as shown by the ARROGANCE and INAPTITUDE of NEW LABOUR and the next to useless so-called HM OPPOSITION which was no opposition at all.

Find out more on:-

WHAT IS PR?

 

JULY 3-2010

 

 

 
 
 

Startpage does NOT record your IP address !

  SPONSORED RESULTS See your ad here...
     
 
 
How Proportional Representation Elections Work ****
This system seems so "natural" that proportional representation (PR) elections may at first appear a bit strange to us. ... There are two broad types of list systems: closed list and open list.
www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/polit/damy/BeginnningReading/howprwor.htm - Proxy - Highlight - 2 more top results from this site


 
 
Proportional representation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia ***
Proportional representation (PR), sometimes referred to as full representation, is a category of electoral formula aimed at securing a close match between the percentage of votes that groups of candidates (grouped by a certain measure) obtain in ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proportional_representation - Proxy - Highlight


 
 
NSWEC | Proportional representation (PR) systems ****
Types of electoral systems. Majority systems. Proportional representation (PR) systems ... List proportional representation (List PR) Most PR systems use some ...
www.elections.nsw.gov.au/ electoral_education_and_resources/ types_of_electoral_systems/ proportional_representation_systems - Proxy - Highlight


 
 
Electoral Council of Australia - Electoral Systems- Proportional ***
Proportional Representation in Australia. Proportional representation electoral systems are used in Australia ... There are three main types of PR electoral systems: list systems; mixed ...
www.eca.gov.au/systems/proportional/proportion_rep.htm - Proxy - Highlight


 
 
Proportional Representation ***
What is Proportional Representation? Proportional Representation (PR) means using a type of election system in which representation is proportional to votes cast.
www.iserv.net/~dknight/pr/prfaq.html - Proxy - Highlight


 
 
Proportional Representation - PR - Definition of Proportional ***
The two main types of proportional representation electoral systems are: ... Proportional representation can also be achieved using mixed member proportional (MMP) electoral systems.
canadaonline.about.com/od/elections/g/proprep.htm - Proxy - Highlight


 
 
Proportional representation policy - PCS ***
Proportional representation. Proportional representation policy ... The main types of proportional representation. Most elections in UK are conducted by first
www.pcs.org.uk/en/resources/proportional-representation/ - Proxy - Highlight


 
 
Mixed member proportional representation **
Procedures|Use|Potential for...|Voter...Mixed member proportional representation, also termed mixed-member proportional voting and commonly abbreviated to MMP, is an 'additional member' voting system used to elect
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mixed_member_proportional_representation - Proxy - Highlight - 1 more top result from this site


 
 
Proportional Representation - Conservapedia *
Proportional Representation (PR) is a type of voting where the number of seats ... 1 Types of Proportional Representation. 1.1 Closed List. 1.2 Open List ...
www.conservapedia.com/Proportional_Representation - Proxy - Highlight


 
 
Why Not Proportional Representation? **
A presentation of arguments critical of geographical orientation electoral systems and suggesting pure proportional representation as viable alternative.
www.proportional-representation.org - Proxy - Highlight


 
  SPONSORED RESULTS See your ad here...
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
 

THE FOLLOWING ARE LETTERS FROM THE DAILY MAIL  SPECIAL LETTERS COLUMN ON AV ON MARCH 2ND 2011

We have chosen those which wish for a YES! vote or LET US HAVE A GO!

 

From:- P W, Heacham, Norfolk.

Let's try PR

I'M FED up with all the debate and delaying tactics over the issue of electoral reform and can't help feeling disenfranchised.

There are two issues here: if the constituency boundaries are altered (as I believe they were by Labour) to favour Labour strongholds, effectively making votes in some areas worth many votes in other areas, it's wrong.

It goes against the principle of one man one vote, and should be put right. Otherwise, it's  a criminal distortion of the so-called democratic process.

The second issue is the voting system. This is surely a matter for the electorate at large to express it's wishes.  It's not a political football to be kicked into touch because it does/doesn't suit any particular party.  I personally would like to see the system changed, but can't see why it must be to the Alternative Vote.

In earlier years, the talk was always about PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION, a system which seems much fairer than AV.  We imposed it in the Federal Republic of Germany after the war - if it's good enough for them (and it seems to have worked fairly well) why is it [PR] not good enough for us?

 

*

R G. Hatfield, Herts.

Long overdue

 THE FPTP system is a long way past its sell - by date.  The system has been the cause of much that has been wrong about overall governance since World War II.

Had it not been for all the reconstruction that was needed in the after math of World War II, it is inconceivable to think what might have happened here years ago, not just in recent years.

 Any country needs leadership from the 'top' but the lack of long-term thinking has been missing for years, entirely due to FPTP.  David Cameron says this system creates decisive and stable governments. Decisive yes, but stable no.

We've endured the switching from one extreme way of thinking to another for too long, purely because the Tories have come in and gone down one route unchecked in their objectives and Labour has come in and gone down another route unchecked in it's objectives.

  The Coalition has shown that people can work together for the good of the country, but that cannot happen when vested interests resulting from the FPTP system are in place. Rather than affording strong government it provides weak government because the excesses of one party changed by  the excesses of another party does not ensure that a steady course is followed, which ultimately causes damage to society and therefore a weak governance.

Had there been a system whereby the reins could have been held on  Margaret Thatcher's policies to explode the property market would the banks have been given the opportunity to act recklessly and irresponsibly?  The consequences of this will be felt for years to come.

Had there been a system whereby the reins could have been held on Tony Blair's policies over the Iraq war and other misguided adventures would we be suffering from the consequences of that!

Then there is the immense burden being foisted on the public for carrying the liability of the ever-increasing costs that go with funding of public  sector employee pension schemes, the responsibility for which seems to be stretching for decades into the distance without an end in sight.

Would this burden be upon us if there had been a system of governance that applied the reins of the instigators of this policy?

I look forward to hearing what measures the Government will put in place to right the wrongs of so many bad decisions implemented because FPTP failed to prevent extreme policies from being adopted.

*

 

[10/10]

[There is not a word we would change in this article which for its common sense and justice few would disagree with.]

 

 

[To be continued-other comments to follow shortly]

 

 

MARCH-2011

 

 

 

 
     
 
   
   
  OUR UNREPRESENTATIVE VOTING SYSTEM=BREEDS TREASON-BETRAYAL OF COUNTRY.

MAY-2007

 
   

Modern dilemma in POLITICS is that Tweedledee and Tweeedledum fail to represent millions of voters

OCTOBER-2006

 
  DAVID CAMERON is the EU REPLACEMENT for TONY BLAIR

- HIS CENTRE of POLITICS is but an AMALGAM of  ACCEPTABLE EU POLICIES,

OCTOBER-2006
   

ENGLAND is where the MAJORITY VIEWS are IGNORED and MINORITIES RULE at THEIR EXPENSE in POLLITICALLY-CORRECT BLAIRDOM

DECEMBER-2005

 
   

THE POLITICS OF TWEEDLEDEE AND TWEEDLEDUM MUST NOW  END WITH PR-PROPORTIONAL REPRESENTATION

 

SEPTEMBER-2005

   

Why Parliamentary Reform will give a voice to the people.

 JUNE-2005
  REFERENDUM: HOW THE GOVERNMENT RIGGED THE QUESTION-WITHOUT BEING NOTICED!

MARCH-2005

  OUR UNREPRESENTATIVE VOTING SYSTEM=BREEDS TREASON-BETRAYAL OF COUNTRY.

MAY-2007

 
  DANGERS OF A SUPREME PARLIAMENT 
   
 
 
Elections in the British One Party State

If you vote Conservative, Labour, Lib-Dem, UKIP or the BNP, you'll be voting for the EU dictatorship. All five party leaderships are EU controlled. That's why your vote doesn't make a difference - all these five parties have the same policies: the EU's policies.

The 17 most senior politicians in the Conservative, Lib Dem and Labour parties, including Ken Clarke, Francis Maude, Cameron, William Hague, George Osborne, Nick Clegg, Brown, David and Ed Milliband, Ed Balls, Peter Mandleson are Bilderbergers, the 140 strong band of ultra senior Freemasons who are bribed by the EU to build the EU dictatorship.

No Bilderberger, Freemason or Common Purpose graduate should ever be allowed to hold public office.

UKIP and the BNP are honey traps to neutralise activists: UKIP is riddled with Freemasons and Common Purpose like a cancer, and the BNP controlled by the Edgar Griffin (father) and son Nick Freemasonry family. The 350,000 freemasons and the 40,000 strong Common Purpose Organisation are the (mostly unknowing) foot soldiers of the EU in Britain. (Which makes the BNP the easiest party to clean up - get rid of the Griffins, and put in a real anti-EU leadership.)

 

 

EU control structures UK - EU Truth

 

FIND OUT HOW THE CONSERVATIVE PARTY FOUNDED COMMON PURPOSE IN 1970 AND CREATED THE UKIP in 1992

See:

www.bilderberg.org/masons.htm

 

Adam Weishaupt, founder of the Illuminati in John Robison's Proofs of a Conspiracy, 1793

 

 

For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

 

IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF

UKIP

 OR

 INTEND TO JOIN THEM TAKE NOTE OF THE MESSAGE ABOVE

 

 

THE EDP HAS BEEN CRITICAL OF THE MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP OF THE UKIP FOR SOME TIME NOW AS IS SHOWN IN A NUMBER OF BULLETINS  OVER THE PAST FEW YEARS WHERE WE HAVE CRITICISED THEIR LACK LUSTRE PERFORMANCE AS THEY FAILED TO MOTIVATE THEIR MEMBERSHIP TO A MORE DETERMINED CIVIL DISOBEDIENCE CAMPAIGN WHICH WOULD HAVE MADE THE GOVERNMENTS TREMBLE BUT THEY HAD NO WORRY BECAUSE THEY HAD THEIR OWN PERSONS IN CHARGE AT THE TOP OF THE ORGANISATION.  THIS FIGHTING SPIRIT HAS BEEN LACKING AND WE CAN CONFIRM THIS OURSELVES BECAUSE WE HAVE BEEN OUTSIDE PARLIAMENT WHEN A MARCH WAS CANCELLED - AND WATCH THE FARCE WHEN CANDLES WERE HELD AND THOUSANDS OF LETTERS SENT TO MPS WHO KNEW WHERE TO DISPOSES OF THEM -AND ALL TO NO AVAIL.  IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF UKIP YOU HAVE BEEN BETRAYED BY YOUR OWN LEADERSHIP SOME APPEAR ON THE ALEX JONES SHOW WHICH HAS BEEN UNDER CLOSE SPOTLIGHT RECENTLY AS BEING CLOSE TO AN ISRAELI SECURITY FIRM DETAILS ON OUR WEBSITE .    IRONICALLY IT WAS A CHANCE LOOK ON THE INTERNET A FEW YEARS AGO  TO COME UPON THAT SITE WHICH OPENED OUR MIND TO THE ILLUMINATI.   THOUGH WE HAVE SOME DETAILS OF THE BILDERBERGERS ON OUR SITE  A NUMBER OF YEARS AGO WE FAILED TO DO MORE RESEARCH- WE ALL HAVE TO LEARN.  THE FAILURE OF UKIP WE HAVE SUSPECTED  FOR MANY YEARS   THAT MANY AT THE TOP OF THEIR ORGANISATION MIGHT BE UNDERCOVER MEMBERS OF THE ILLUMINATI.  IT IS A FAVOURITE TRICK OF THEIRS TO SUPPORT ANY PARTY OR ORGANISATION AT THE OUTSET WHATEVER ITS POLICY AS IT ALLOWS THEM TO PUT THEIR OWN PEOPLE IN TO CONTROL ITS POLICES AS THEY BEHIND THE SCENES SUPPLY THE VITAL FINANCIAL SUPPORT.

 

Our intention is not to benefit from this disaster as since the 1999 European Election we have NOT! accepted a DONATION! from ANYONE! and we closed membership also because we did not wish to split the vote for UKIP but have stated in the past that we would contest another election if it was ever necessary to enter into the affray again and with the reputation of UKIP under scrutiny we will keep our options OPEN!   As we mentioned some time ago we have been almost two decades on the campaign trail to free our once FREE INDEPENDENT NATION STATE of ENGLAND from the SATANIC EU and those who have for centuries have planned for an EVIL ONE-WORLD CORPORATION/GOVERNMENT and EXTERMINATE! at least 5 BILLION of the WORLD'S POPULATION and therefore if we are right about those mentioned above they are not only TRAITORS to their COUNTRY but also a THREAT to WORLD PEACE.   However, of late, matters have NOT! been going well for the ILLUMINATI as you will observe BELOW.

The Queen, Treason and the Coronation oath

Together with Churchill, King George VI saved our nation; he was a Monarch to be proud of. But his daughter the Queen is the only monarch to have broken all her coronation oaths, by signing these six treaties that abolish our common law, the British Constitution, the British and English nations, and our sovereignty. She has also committed treason, together with co-signatories Ted Heath, Margaret Thatcher, John Major, Tony Blair and Gordon Brown.

Realising that under the five Treason Acts they should already be hanging by the neck until dead, Tony Blair and the Queen signed the Crime and Disorder Act, 1998, which secretly abolished much of the crime of treason (s36.3) and reduced the penalty to life imprisonment - they didn't tell the MP's what they had just voted for.

1.4 million British Servicemen gave their lives for our independence. The Queen has thrown their sacrifices away and made them worthless.

At no physical risk to herself, she could have fulfilled her oath and duty as a constitutional check and balance, by refusing to sign the six treaties until an in/out referendum had been held. In the unlikely event the vote went against her, she was even more unlikely to lose her crown (not her life or a limb), and would keep her £9 billion plus palaces either way. Those servicemen's lives would still have meant something.

But she was always keen to sign; and said in advance she would sign the last treaty. Princes Charles, William or Harry can now never be King. You can't have a King without a Kingdom: they can only be princes of a region (principality) within Europe.

King Edward 8th was forced to abdicate because he was too overt as a German Nazi supporter. Mrs Simpson's divorce was merely the excuse. The Royal Family is a German Family - real surname Saxe-Coburg Gotha. Windsor is an adopted surname. All four of Prince Phillip's sisters married high ranking German Nazis. After they lost the war the EU was switched from a Nazi basis to a communist basis.

Between the ages of 12 and 22 Queen Elisabeth's political and constitutional tutor was Sir Henry Martin, a Fabian Communist. It seems clear she was well trained for her subversion and treason.

Because she waves and smiles at us most are fooled into thinking she's lovely; in fact the Queen is a member of the Illuminati, a Bilderberger, head of Freemasonry, is wholly pro the (German) EU, and has abolished this nation with ruthless determination. It is so obvious she cares nothing for Britain or the British.

The Queen's aspirations are not ours; she clearly serves a much darker master; the faith she defends cannot be the one we think it is. King George VI, the one recent monarch not indoctrinated with Nazi or Communist philosophy, must be turning over in his grave.

I ask that the law be enforced, and the Queen be tried for treason before 12 honest people, and not by our corrupt judges. And that the illegal section 36.3 Crime and Disorder Act be declared null and void, so that she can hang by the neck till dead.

The new EU Hitler doesn't have to get elected
Its worth noting that Adolf Hitler first had to get elected, if on a 35% minority vote, and then get his Enabling Act passed. An EU dictator has no such problems. Our EU rulers do not submit themselves for election now. And the Queen has already signed the Enabling Act (Civil Contingencies Act 2004).

The EU's Hitler will have a much easier rise to power, and will have the formerly British and French nuclear weapons from day one. Adolf Hitler killed 54 million people. The EU's dictator could kill a billion at the touch of a button, with no democratic checks and balances to answer to. How could any aspiring dictator resist the EU opportunity?

 

 For more details go to :http://eutruth.org.uk

 

www.bilderbergmeetings.org/participants2012.l

 

A+MONARCH+THAT+BREAKS+A+CORONATION+OATH+

CANNOT+CLAIM+IMMUNITY+FROM+HIGH+TREASON+

BECAUSE+A+FIRST+MINISTER+SECRETLY

+CHANGED+THE+LAW

IN+1998.

THE+SACRET+OATH+IS+TO+THE+PEOPLE+

TO+PROTECT+THEIR+ACCUSTOMED+LIBERTIES+

AND+THOSE+OF+FUTURE+GENERATIONS+TO+COME

+IS +SACROSANCT.

 

 

HOME

DID YOU KNOW?

No 8

(Christopher Story of International Currency Review)

 

IS HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN SOVEREIGN?

Under Article 17 of the collectivist Maastricht treaty , all residents of the European Union are citizens of the EU Collective.  It follows that Presidents and Monarchs are 'citizens of the

EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE

as well

This provides the twisted rationale for President Herzog's vituperative dismissal of the relevance of the nation state, and for his insistence that it has outlived its usefulness, even though he continued to serve as President.

Dr Herzog's subversive remarks have special resonance for Britain, where

QUEEN ELIZABETH II

 is the

 SOVEREIGN AND CONSTITUTIONAL HEAD

of the

UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND.

She is the custodian, in her person, of the sovereignty of the British people which was passed to HER in February 1952 on the death of her father,  This was confirmed initially when the

QUEEN took the OATH of ACCESSION

and was finally solemnized at the QUEEN'S CORONATION in 1953 after HER MAJESTY had been recognized and universally accepted as the undoubted and rightful

 SOVEREIGN of the BRITISH PEOPLE

In November 2000 -after a correspondent who had taken care to prepare his case thoroughly, had written to the Prime Minister, Tony Blair; to the then Leader of the Opposition William Hague; to the Leader of the House of Lords, who was then Baroness Jay; and to the Lord Chief justice and other official office-holders and dignatories -asking:

Is Her Majesty the Queen Sovereign?

HE RECEIVED NO ANSWER AT ALL

or else a non-committal weak, diversionary reply.

Mr Blair being unable to answer the question himself, redirected the enquiry  to the Home office, which likewise prevaricated. Indeed, a hallmark of the

BLAIR GOVERNMENT

has been its Ministers' arrogant reluctance to answer letters and parliamentary questions.  Likewise, Mr Blair has reportedly made a point on occasion, of'

' standing the Queen up'

by failing to turn up on time., or at all, for his weekly scheduled audiences.

[Further details to follow]

*

[More background information will be available in the near future but why wait - order your copy - contact the under-mentioned website]

 

[This is a new series of single statements from

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

www.edwardharle.com

www.worldreports.org

*

AUGUST-2008

*

 

WHAT IF ALL EU LAWS PASSED BY PARLIAMENT AND APPROVED BY HER MAJESTY ARE INVALID BECAUSE AGAINST THE LAW OF THE LAND.

 

The position under English law, of course, is that Her Majesty remains Sovereign until the moment of her death, when sovereignty will pass automatically to the next rightful heir to the British Throne.  However, the Prime Minister's problem appears to be that since, under Article 17 of the Maastricht treaty, the Queen is a 'citizen' of the European Union, Her Sovereignty has been usurped.  Those UK Ministers and officials who permitted this scandalous state of affairs to develop are accordingly prima facie

TRAITORS

and ought to be indicted for

TREASON.

But so far as President Herzog of Germany has been concerned, his status as a 'citizen' of the

EU COLLECTIVE

appears to be entirely acceptable, because the EU is just a 'mask' for emerging

'GREATER GERMANY'.

When, following the correspondent's letters to selected leaders, an attempt was made by Christopher Gill MP in January 2001 to put down a question asking the Prime Minister whether

Her Majesty is Sovereign

the Table Office at the House of Commons replied in the following astonishing language:

'Last night you sought to table a question to the Prime Minister concerning the effect of the UK's membership of the

EUROPEAN UNION

on the constitutional position of

HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN.

You will recall that I explained I would need to check the admissibility of the question with other colleagues before it could be tabled.  It has been pointed out to me that the question as drafted in effect seeks the Prime Minister's view in the interpretation of the law, in this case the

Treaties of the European Communities and associated European Treaties and UK legislation.

IT IS NOT POSSIBLE

to table questions to Ministers seeking interpretation of the , as this is a matter for the appropriate courts , not Ministers.'.

It would accordingly appear unclear whether

Her Majesty the Queen is Sovereign

-and by extension, whether any legislation passed by Westminster Parliament since  Britain made the mistake of joining the

EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES

in

1972

is

VALID.

For evidently  until the matter is decided by the 'appropriate courts', the question of whether

HER MAJESTY IS SOVEREIGN

and thus able to act as

HEAD OF STATE

and hence give the

ROYAL ASSENT

to

LEGISLATION

passed by the

WESTMINSTER PARLIAMENT

remains in the air.

This Kafkaesque situation reflects the fact that, as noted under the

COLLECTIVE TREATY

all residents of the

EUROPEAN UNION

 are its citizens; and the

QUEEN

is a resident of the

EUROPEAN UNION

THEREFORE

if

EU law

 

has precedence over

BRITISH LAW

the

QUEEN

 being an

EU citizen

is

NOT

SOVEREIGN.

 

*

 

It may be asked: Why does no British Government ever take steps to have this matter clarified?

There are two possible answers to this question:

(1)    If the matter were to be resolved and it were to transpire that, indeed, The Queen is not Sovereign, then all legislation to which Her Majesty has given the Royal Assent since Britain acceded to the EEC is

NULL and VOID
 

because she had no power to give the Royal Assent, Alternatively:

(2)    Successive UK Governments since the beginning of the collapse in 1970 have preferred this issue to remain unresolved because if it were to be concluded by 'the appropriate courts' that The Queen is Sovereign, then correspondingly all EU legislation in the UK

is

NULL and VOID

because it is presupposed that EU law has precedence over UK law.

which cannot be the case if The Queen is Sovereign.

By contrast, if it does transpire the

The Queen is not Sovereign, then, certainly all legislation passed since Britain joined the EEC is indeed called into question.

Either way -whether The Queen is or is not Sovereign -the logic of the above leads to the conclusion that all EU law may be invalid in the United Kingdom.

Thus the the real reason this key issue has never been clarified is that the British Government's deceitful EU 'coup d' etat by installments'  policy would be exposed as illegal if the issue were ever to be addressed in the COURTS.  Furthermore, as reveiwed on page 209, the Treaty of Rome was reportedly

NOT SIGNED

-so the basis of all EU law throughout the

EU COLLECTIVE

may be open to

LEGAL CHALLENGE

on that ground alone.

It is concluded that EU law may have no standing in the United Kingdom and that successive conniving UK Governments have been

SHIRKING THIS CENTRAL ISSUE.

 

In an article published in The Times of London on 27th April,1996, Karl Lamers, whio was then foreign affairs spokesman for the Christian Democrats in the Bundestag, condescended to recognise that 'British doubts are deeply rooted.

The British concern is about the destruction of the national identity and the nation state, which is seen by the British as the only legitimate expression of the popular will.   Germans, by contrast, say that there has long been a supranational reality created by our European civilisation.  Common problems spawn common interests; our vital interests are identical

Whereupon Herr Lamers delivered a further broadside in Germany's psychological warfare offensive designed to help the stupid British to abandon their love of national sovereignty, which it is the central purpose of the European Union to

COLLECTIVISE:

'The  Euro-optimists take as their starting point the objective external reality.... The Eurosceptics (in Britain) deal with the inner, subjective reality of the consciousness of the British people.  It is if you like , the forces of Logic pitied against the forces of Psycho-logic.  It must be the task of democratic politics to help narrow this gap.  Otherwise politics will cease to be effective.  A community makes sense if it can begin to solve its existential problems.

If the nation state can no longer do that by itself, its failure undermines its political legitimacy'.

In other words, Britain had no right to continue existing as a nation state, and it must be 'brought to reason' so that it comes to full acceptance of German prescriptions and intentions without further. tedious prevarication

Note that, for Herr Lamers, the Pan-German position was 'logical', whereas the perceived British tendency to 'cling' to the nation state was 'psychological'. Once again here, the truth was turned upside-down.

The essence of Germany's continuing, updated strategy to realise the Germans, has never been in doubt - not least, since the German legislature adopted several amendments to the Basic Law (constitution) on 22nd December, 1992, in order to legalise' ratification of the Maastricht Treaty.  A new Article 23 was incorporated, the previous one having been repealed by the Unification T of 31st August 1990. The revised Article known as the 'ARTICLE on EUROPEAN UNION'. contains the following:

 

With a view to establishing a Unite Europe, the Federal republic of Germany shall participate in the development of the European Union, which is committed to democratic[?], rule of law, social and federative principles as well as to the principle of subsidiarity, and ensures protection of basic rights comparable in substance to that accorded to the Basic law

To this end the (German) Federation may transfer sovereign powers by law with the consent of the Bundesrat. The establishment of the European Union , as well as amendments to its statutory foundations and comparable foundations which amend or supplement the content of this Basic Law or make such amendments and supplements possible shall be subject to the provisions of paragraph (2) and (30 of Article 79.........

THIS MEANS that Germany can extend its sovereignty into Moravia and Bohemia, as provided for under the secret accord reached between President Gorbachev and Chancellor Kohl in Geneva , in 1990

As for Dr Professor Herzog, he faced both ways at the 1997 Konigswinter Conference, held in Berlin. In a welcoming speech, he suggested that 'Britons and Germans can build on common values, convictions and interests.  the debate on Europe can only reach a fruitful conclusion - that is to say, a conclusion acceptable to the German strategy elite- if we help gain acceptance for one idea, namely that the 'Europe of-Fatherlands' is possible.  The European nations can be Fatherlands and still integrate' 

 

 

[TO BE CONTINUED]

*

 

 

[More background information will be available in the near future but why wait - order your copy -

THE EUROPEAN UNION COLLECTIVE

 -contact the under-mentioned website]

 

[This is a new series of single statements from

THE EUROPEAN UNION

COLLECTIVE

IS THE

Enemy of its Member State

www.edwardharle.com

www.worldreports.org

*

 

 

SEPTEMBER-2008

*

 

TO ASSIST YOUR SEARCH WE HAVE INCLUDED THE LINKS BELOW

 

EUROPEAN UNION Q & A

1 EUROFACTS -   THE REALITY BEHIND THE EU

2]   WHAT IS THE POINT OF THE EU

3]   THE TRUTH OF A FEDERAL EUROPE-PARTS1-4

4]   THE 1701 ACT OF SETTLEMENT-WHY IT SHOULD  CONCERN YOU!

5[    THE BRITISH LEGACY -CANADA-AUSTRALIA-NEW ZEALAND

6]    COMMONWEALTH REALMS VERSUS THE NEW CONSTITUTION  OF EUROPE

7]   OUR BASIC LIBERTIES AND FREEDOMS SURRENDERED TO A FOREIGN POWER

8]   MESSAGE FROM AUSTRALIA-SUPPORT THE CROWN

9]   OUR QUEEN AND EU CONSTITUTION

10] VALERY GISCARD'ESTAING -WHY HE IS CALLED X

11]  THE ROTTEN HEART OF EUROPE by BERNARD CONNOLLY

12]   'I SAY WE MUST NOT JOIN EUROPE'-FIELD MARSHALL MONTGOMERY-(1962)

13]  PREVIOUS SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS SAYS WE MUST RETAIN OUR ANCIENT CONSTITUTION

14] THE COMMON LAW OF ENGLAND IS THE  LAW OF ENGLISH SPEAKING PEOPLES.

15]  A BETRAYAL OF OUR NATION - CONSPIRATORS NAMED (1993)

16]   WHAT HISTORY TELLS US ABOUT OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CONTINENT

17]    COST of EU to UK-£4.8billion = 40 DISTRICT HOSPITALS-EQUIPPED -_STAFFED-AND FUNDED.

18]   WARNING FROM OUR MAN IN WASHINGTON ABOUT THE EURO.

19]     200 MORE REASONS TO WHY TO REJECT THE EURO AND THE EU

20]     100 REASONS TO LEAVE THE EU

21]    THE ENEMY IS EVERYWHERE

22]    UK CONTRIBUTION TO BRUSSELS: BIG INCREASE IN 2005

23]   EU WHISTLEBLOWERS EXPOSE BILLIONS OF EURO FRAUD BUT NOTHING IS DONE

24]    BRITAIN CAN LEAVE THE EU UNILATERALLY AND CEASE PAYMENTS SAYS QUEEN'S COUNSEL

25]    FOREIGN POWERS DIRECT OUR GOVERNMENTS BY PAYOUTS

26]    SIGNS OF AN EU POLICE STATE

27]    NINETY-NINE COUNTRIES HAVE FREE TRADE WITH THE EU-WITHOUT PAYING A CENT TO BRUSSELS.

28]    IT IS TIME TO CONSIDER OURSELVES-IN A COMMONWEALTH FREE TRADE AREA

29]   BRITAIN MUST LEAVE THE EU AS UN SHOW BEST AREA FOR EXPANSION WILL BE USA/ANGLO-SAXON SPHERE

30]    WAVE GOODBYE TO THE EU AND MAKE EUROPE A BETTER PLACE   

31]    LORD STODDART PINS DOWN BLAIR GOVERNMENT ON COST OF EU -JUNE 2007.

32]    BRITISH VOTERS MUST GET A SAY ON NEW EU TREATY-[JUNE-2007]

33]    BLAIR'S LAST TREACHEROUS ACT. THE 60,000 DOLLAR QUESTION IS WHAT WILL MR BROWN DO?-JUNE-2007]

34]   GORDON BROWN WANTS TRUST-BUT WHY WON'T HE TRUST YOU?

35]  HITLER'S PRECEDENT PROVIDED THE MODEL FOR THE EUROPEAN UNION-1930-2007

36]  SAVE YOUR ENGLAND! - SAY NO! TO REGIONS
 

37]   NAZI INTERNATIONAL IN 2007-CLOSER TO YOUR HOME THAN YOU THINK  

38]    A WARNING FROM JAN-2005-TO PRESERVE THE NATION-STATES OF EUROPE-VOTE 'NO' TO THE NEW EU CONSTITUTION (D.T.)

49]    SO WHY DON'T WE LEAVE THE EU. (D.M.)

 

[For hundreds of bulletins about the EU]

HOME

 

 

WHAT A WAY TO WIN A WAR

*

IS SENATOR RON PAUL- ILLUMINATI?

 

BENJAMIN FULFORD

 

More!

[WORKS]

*

SEEKTHETRUTHANDWISDOM

 

*

Bank Of England « The Banking Swindle

 

More!

 

More!

 

PATRIOT or TRAITOR to HIS COUNTRY

+More!

 

 More!

 

+(More!

 

 

THIS YOU MUST SEE IT CONCERNS

 YOUR

PLANET!

AND

 YOU!

 

 

NO NEED TO PANIC!

 

'Others shall sing the song,

Others shall right the wrong,-

Finish what I begin,

All all I fail of win.

Hail to the coming singers!

Hail to the brave light-bringers!

Forward I reach and above

All that they sing and dare.

 

The airs of heaven blow o'er me;

A glory shines before me

Of what mankind shall be'-

Pure, generous, brave and free,

I feel the earth move sunward,

I join the great march onward,

And  take, by faith, while living,

My freehold of thanksgiving.-

 

WHITTIER

 

MAY-2012

 

 

 

 

MAY-2012

 
 
RON PAUL 9-11+(1) GLOBALWARMING SCAM USA IRAQ/AFGHAN LONDON BOMBINGS COMMON PURPOSE CENTRAL BANKS  +(1)
   

GLOBALIZATION 

WHAT IS PR?  IS WORLD WAR III AGAINST IRAN IMMANENT NHS DATABASE OPT-OUT LETTER TOXIC FLUORIDE IN YOUR TAP WATER BUSH & OBAMA IN GIGANTIC WORLD FINANCIAL SCAM
HOME ARCHIVE  MAIN BULLETINS E U  ENGLAND +(1) BILDERBERGERS+(1) ILLUMINATI +(1)+(1) NEW WORLD ORDER +(1)+(1)+(1)+(1)+(1)
 
 
 

PREVIOUS:

PAGE ONE/ PAGE TWO/PAGE THREE/ PAGE FOUR/PAGE FIVE/

OCTOBER-PT2-2012/

NOVEMBER-PT2-2012

DECEMBER-PT2-2012

JANUARY-PT2-2013

 

FEBRUARY/MARCH-PT2-2013

 

 

TOP OF PAGE